ReportWire

Tag: Vaccines

  • Maryland to protect access to vaccines with flu season approaching – WTOP News

    In the midst of states thinking about removing vaccine mandates, Maryland will protect access to vaccines for all of its residents with flu season approaching.

    With some states thinking about removing vaccine mandates, Maryland will protect access to vaccines for all of its residents with flu season approaching.

    Maryland residents can go to their providers and pharmacies to get their vaccinations, and get advice on what types of vaccines to get to protect themselves from viruses and illnesses.

    The CDC recommends to those 6 years and older to get the flu shot.

    This comes in the midst of the Food and Drug Administration approving updated COVID-19 shots from Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax, which is limited for some kids and adults with one high-risk health condition.

    “The federal government’s rapid changes and unnecessary swirl around vaccine policy is harmful for Marylanders and all Americans, and could result in disastrous public health outcomes,” Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said in a release.

    Moore added that the state is prepared to deal with the challenges of federal vaccine guidance with U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. trying to advance anti-vaccine policies.

    He signed a law in 2024 that would allow pharmacists to give those 3 years and over COVID-19 and flu vaccine without a prescription, a release said.

    “The health, safety and well-being of Marylanders and their loved ones are our North Star, and we will do everything in our power to ensure they have access to life-saving medicines like vaccines,” Moore said.

    Massachusetts is following Maryland’s playbook in protecting vaccine access for its residents, despite Florida being on the verge of being the first state to to get rid of school vaccine mandates.

    About 8 in 10 U.S. adults said kids should be vaccinated to go to school, according to a Harvard/SSRS poll.

    “Vaccines continue to be one of the most powerful public health tools for safeguarding our people and communities against disease,” Maryland Department of Health Secretary Dr. Meena Seshamani said.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Tadiwos Abedje

    Source link

  • New West Coast COVID Vaccine Guidelines Announced – KXL


    SACRAMENTO, CA – California is aiming to set its own healthcare and vaccine standards especially as the Food and Drug Administration approves its new COVID-19 vaccines. Under FDA guidelines, COVID vaccine access is now limited. Only people at higher risk for severe illness can receive them. That’s adults 65 and older, and those ages 5 to 64 with certain health conditions.

    With a rise in cases, California health officials are looking into vaccine supplies, and as of now, there is a pause on vaccination appointments.

    California, along with Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii are collaborating to create their own science-based COVID-19 vaccination guidelines. They have created the West Coast Alliance in response to what they call the Trump Administration’s “destruction” of the Centers for Disease Control.

    More about:


    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. draws bipartisan pushback at Senate hearing over moves to limit vaccines

    A rare display of bipartisan consensus was seen Thursday at a remarkably contentious Senate hearing with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    Kennedy appeared before the Senate Finance Committee after an extraordinarily tumultuous week and a half in which he announced limited access to Covid vaccines and fired the newly confirmed director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Susan Monarez, leading to an exodus of senior officials at the agency.

    Over roughly three hours of questioning, Kennedy was more vocal in his anti-vaccine views than at previous Senate hearings and seemed to return to embracing fringe positions that experts have warned could seriously damage public health.

    He told Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., that he believes vaccines developed with mRNA — the technology used for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid shots — cause serious harm, including death. He later doubled down on the remark during an exchange with Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.

    During a U.S. Senate Finance Committee hearing, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated that he “doesn’t know” how many people died during the COVID-19 pandemic. His comment came after the CDC issued guidance requiring pharmacists to obtain a prescription before administering the COVID vaccine.

    It was Kennedy’s criticism of vaccines that drew bipartisan condemnation.

    Several Republicans sought to highlight a divide between Kennedy and what they said was one of President Trump’s biggest accomplishments of his first term: Operation Warp Speed, the public-private program to quickly develop and distribute the first Covid shots.

    Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., asked whether Trump deserved a Nobel Prize for the initiative, to which Kennedy said: “Absolutely, senator.”

    “As lead attorney for the Children’s Health Defense, you engaged in multiple lawsuits attempting to restrict access to the Covid vaccine,” Cassidy responded. “Again, it surprises me that you think so highly of Operation Warp Speed, when, as an attorney, you attempted to restrict access.”

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the U.S. Senate Finance Committee that he fired Susan Monarez as CDC director because she said she was not “a trustworthy person.” Monarez says she was fired for refusing to endorse vaccine recommendations not supported by science.

    Cassidy’s line of questioning was eagerly anticipated. The senator was a key vote in Kennedy’s confirmation but has since been critical of some of his decisions. Earlier this week, Cassidy would not say whether he regretted his vote to confirm the secretary.

    He also read aloud a post on X from conservative talk show host Erick Erickson, whose wife has Stage 4 lung cancer and — according to Erickson — was unable to get a Covid vaccine “thanks to the current mess at HHS.”

    “I would say, effectively, we’re denying people vaccine,” Cassidy said.

    Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., highlighted the turmoil at the CDC and questioned Kennedy’s response to the measles outbreak in western Texas. During the outbreak, Kennedy downplayed the benefits of vaccination and pushed unproven treatments.

    “Secretary Kennedy, in your confirmation hearings, you promised to uphold the highest standards for vaccines,” Barrasso said. “Since then, I’ve grown deeply concerned.”

    Barrasso’s ardent defense of vaccines (he is also a medical doctor) and line of questioning was notable given his leadership position in the Senate, where he serves as majority whip.

    Sen. Tillis pointed to several examples of what he said were contradictions between Kennedy’s words and actions, including Kennedy promising not to impose his beliefs on others, then firing the CDC director, canceling $500 million in mRNA research contracts and ousting longtime members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory board.

    “You said you’re going to empower the scientists at HHS to do their job. I’d just like to see evidence where you’ve done that,” Tillis said.

    Chaos at the CDC

    The chaos at the CDC, including the firing of Monarez, was a flashpoint for both Democrats and Republicans. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published shortly before the hearing, Monarez said she was fired after being told to preapprove recommendations made by a vaccine advisory panel whose members have expressed skepticism about vaccines.

    “Mr. Secretary, did you in fact do what Director Monarez said you did, which is tell her to just go along with vaccine recommendations, even if she didn’t think such recommendations aligned with scientific evidence?” asked Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the ranking member of the Finance Committee. (Earlier Thursday, Wyden, along with other Democratic senators, called on Kennedy to resign.)

    “No, I did not,” Kennedy said.

    “So she’s lying today to the American people in The Wall Street Journal?” Wyden said.

    Kennedy responded: “Yes, sir.”

    In a fiery exchange, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., also pressed Kennedy on why he dismissed Monarez. Kennedy said he told Monarez to resign because he asked her whether she was a “trustworthy person” and, he claims, she said no. “If you had an employee who told you they weren’t trustworthy, would you ask them to resign, senator?” Kennedy asked.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt, pushed to clarify his remark.

    “Are you telling us that the former head of CDC went to you, you asked her, ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ And she said, ‘No, I am not a trustworthy person’?” Sanders asked.

    “She didn’t say, ‘No, I’m not a trustworthy person.’ She said, ‘No,’” Kennedy said.

    The dispute over the vaccine recommendations, which Monarez said in her op-ed she had been asked to preapprove, stems from Kennedy’s decision earlier this summer to fire every member of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee and replace them with vaccine skeptics. Kennedy has said he did this to eliminate conflicts of interest.

    According to Cassidy, Kennedy had promised that he wouldn’t make changes to the influential panel.

    During the hearing, Cassidy pointed out that conflicts of interest on the previous panel were low — under 7% — and that Kennedy had appointed new members who served as expert witnesses for plaintiffs suing vaccine makers.

    “If we put people who are paid witnesses for people suing vaccines, that actually seems like a conflict of interest. Real quickly: Do you agree with that?” Cassidy said.

    “No, I don’t,” Kennedy responded. “It may be a bias, and that bias, if disclosed, is OK.”

    At multiple points, Kennedy accused senators of lying when confronted with difficult questions about actions he’s taken at the agency and his views on vaccines.

    “You’re making things up to scare people, and it’s a lie,” he told Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., in response to her claim that Kennedy did not offer a transparent explanation for the Food and Drug Administration’s limited approval of Covid vaccines.

    The FDA last week narrowed its Covid vaccine approval to a smaller, high-risk group: people 65 and up and those with at least one medical condition that puts them at risk of severe illness. The CDC in May also stopped recommending the vaccine for pregnant people and healthy children.

    Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, the former director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases who resigned last week, told NBC News on Aug. 28 that he learned about the changes to Covid vaccine recommendations on social media. Daskalakis said he asked to see the data that supported the decision and “was told no.”

    Berkeley Lovelace Jr. and Aria Bendix | NBC News

    Source link

  • Anti-Vaxxers Rejoice at Florida’s Scheme to End Vaccine Mandates for Kids and Everyone Else

    On Wednesday afternoon, Florida surgeon general Joseph Ladapo announced that he would advocate for ending all vaccine mandates in the state. This would include, among other things, the end of vaccine requirements for children in school. Within minutes of Ladapo’s announcement, members of a private anti-vaccine Facebook group called The Vaccine Free Child were rejoicing.

    “Amen, stop the application of poison given to our precious children,” one member wrote, with another adding: “F yah! About time. Let the revolution begin.”

    “I shouldn’t have to inject my kids with poison because you’ve been brainwashed to live in fear,” another member wrote, adding: “Hopefully more will follow Florida’s lead.”

    Soon, group members from other parts of the country expressed their desire to have similar measures in their own states. “I am so jealous! I hope GA is next,” one member wrote, with another adding: “Ugh I wish Mississippi would do this but I don’t see it happening.” Another added: “Hopefully VA follows suit.”

    While many members were celebrating, others were seeking medical help. That same day in the group, one member was seeking advice for treating whooping cough in their child. Responses included various vitamin supplements and “onion socks.” (Some people believe, without evidence, that sliced onions held close to the body absorb viruses and toxins.) Elsewhere in the group, members recommended an hourly administration of chlorine dioxide—a toxic bleach solution—to treat a baby’s possible case of meningitis. The groups don’t just boost anti-vaccine content; they also spread unproven and often dangerous medical advice.

    The outpouring of joy in The Vaccine Free Child group echoed a celebratory mood online among the anti-vaccine community.

    “This is how you make America healthy again. Will other states follow Florida’s lead?” Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., posted to its X account. Moments later, the group hosted a live X Space with Dr. Memhet Oz, who heads up the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Kennedy’s wife, actress Cheryl Hines. (Oz didn’t discuss the announcement from Florida.)

    While the anti-vaccine community celebrated, public health experts slammed Florida’s decision, saying it will possibly endanger the lives of children who will be left unprotected from diseases like measles, mumps, chickenpox, polio, and hepatitis—all of which can be prevented by safe, affordable vaccines.

    “There is short-term damage as this announcement alone will further undermine trust in vaccines around the world,” says Alex Morozov, an oncologist who has overseen hundreds of drug trials at multiple companies including Pfizer.

    For Natalia Solenkova, a Miami-based critical care physician who has been fighting anti-vaccine disinformation for years, Ladapo’s announcement and the ensuing celebrations came as no surprise—and she believes the outcome will be just as predictable.

    “Florida has been moving in this direction for several years,” says Solenkova. “We know from history that before vaccines, children died from measles, polio, whooping cough, and other vaccine-preventable diseases. Without vaccines, children will die again.”

    With vaccination rates across the US already dropping in recent years, the impact of Florida’s proposed vaccine mandate ban could be devastating. “Long-term, we don’t know the impact. There is very little data on what happens when mandates are lifted. That is the danger of doing this so abruptly,” says Morozov. “Maybe vaccination rates will drop by 10 percent? Or maybe by 50 percent? Nobody knows. Higher drops could lead to devastating epidemics.”

    David Gilbert

    Source link

  • West Coast States to Offer Their Own Vaccine Guidance

    California, Oregon, and Washington announced on Wednesday that they are creating a health alliance that will share “credible information” about vaccine safety and efficacy, at a time when the federal health agency tasked with releasing vaccine guidance has been thrown into chaos.

    In a joint statement, the Democratic governors of the three West Coast states said the alliance was meant “to ensure residents remain protected by science, not politics.” The governors slammed the Trump Administration’s “dismantling” of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    “President Donald Trump’s mass firing of CDC doctors and scientists—and his blatant politicization of the agency—is a direct assault on the health and safety of the American people,” the governors said. “The CDC has become a political tool that increasingly peddles ideology instead of science, ideology that will lead to severe health consequences. California, Oregon, and Washington will not allow the people of our states to be put at risk.”

    The alliance, they said, will ensure that public health policies in the three states are based on information from “trusted scientists, clinicians, and other public health leaders.” While each state may embark on independent strategies depending on its own laws, geographies, and residents, the governors said the joint alliance will “start coordinating health guidelines by aligning immunization recommendations informed by respected national medical organizations.” 

    “This will allow residents to receive consistent, science-based recommendations they can rely on—regardless of shifting federal actions,” the governors said.

    Read More: What to Know About Getting the COVID-19 Vaccine Right Now

    The announcement comes amid ongoing turmoil at the CDC. Last week, the White House said that it had fired then-CDC Director Susan Monarez, though she refused to step down from her position. Monarez had only been in the role for about a month. At least four other top officials resigned from the agency after Monarez’s firing. The Trump Administration tapped Jim O’Neill, a former Silicon Valley executive with no formal medical or scientific training and the deputy to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to become the new acting leader of the CDC.

    Attorneys representing Monarez said that she was “targeted” after she “refused to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.”

    Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic, has led a number of changes to the country’s immunization policy since he was confirmed to be the country’s health secretary earlier this year. Last week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said when authorizing updated COVID-19 vaccines that the shots were only approved for people ages 65 and older, or people who have an increased risk of developing severe cases of the virus—a dramatic shift from previous guidance. In May, Kennedy said the CDC would stop recommending COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children. Respected medical associations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have offered their own recommendations, diverging from federal guidance.

    In June, Kennedy removed all 17 members of a committee that provides immunization recommendations to the CDC. The governors of California, Oregon, and Washington condemned the move at the time.

    Hundreds of public health workers have criticized Kennedy, signing a letter last month that urged him to “stop spreading inaccurate health information” and protect staffers, in the aftermath of a shooting at the CDC headquarters a few weeks earlier. The public health workers said the shooting “came amid growing mistrust in public institutions, driven by politicized rhetoric that has turned public health professionals from trusted experts into targets of villainization—and now, violence.”

    Chantelle Lee

    Source link

  • Florida Aims to End All Vaccine Mandates

    Florida’s Surgeon General, Joseph Ladapo, announced on Wednesday that the state would end all vaccine mandates, likening them to slavery.

    Lifting the mandates would mean children would not be required to be vaccinated in order to attend school in Florida. It would be the first state to withdraw from the practice, which has been credited with increasing vaccination rates and lowering the risk of infectious diseases like measles spreading.

    “Who am I to tell you what your child should put in their body?” Ladapo said.

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis endorsed the move and acknowledged that although the state can eliminate some vaccine mandates, it would need “changes from the legislature” to eradicate them all. 

    Ladapo is a known vaccine critic and has opposed mainstream scientific research and guidance. In the past, Ladapo has downplayed the importance of COVID-19 vaccines, which public health experts have credited with saving millions of lives during the pandemic, calling them “nothing special.” He also promoted unproven treatments for COVID-19, including hydroxychloroquine, which the World Health Organization has warned is not an effective treatment for the virus. During a measles outbreak in 2024 at an elementary school in Florida, Ladapo said guardians should have the right to decide whether their unvaccinated children are kept home, contrary to federal guidance that children be excluded from schools in such cases.

    Ladapo did not provide specifics on the plans to eliminate all vaccine mandates in the state, although he repeatedly said that “every last one of them” would be eradicated, “is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.”

    Florida’s move to end mandates in the states comes as the national Department of Health and Human Services—led by another well-known vaccine skeptic, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—has made a number of controversial changes to the country’s vaccine policies. 

    The governors of Oregon, California and Washington formed a health alliance on Wednesday to provide health guidance for the residents of their states, including on vaccine safety, in a rebuke against the Trump Administration. The alliance comes in response to what the three governors described as “the blatant politicization” of the CDC following the firing of its former director, Susan Monarez last week.

    Meanwhile, anti-vaccine sentiments have been on the rise among the American public. Vaccination exemptions have been increasing in states across the country. During the 2024-25 school year, vaccine exemptions for kindergarteners rose from 3.3% to 3.6%, while 36 states reported overall rising exemptions, according to CDC data. Seventeen states reported exemptions exceeding 5%. Childhood vaccination rates, meanwhile, have been declining: The agency recorded a decrease in vaccine coverage for kindergarteners for all reported vaccines in the 2024-2025 school year.

    About 4 million deaths worldwide are prevented by childhood vaccines every year, according to the CDC. The World Health Organization estimated roughly 154 million lives have been saved over the last 50 years from global immunization efforts.

    Connor Greene

    Source link

  • Trump demands definitive answer amid ongoing debate over COVID-19 vaccines

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump is now demanding a definitive answer on the controversy surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.

    “It is very important that the Drug Companies justify the success of their various Covid Drugs. Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree! With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW,” he declared in a Monday Truth Social post

    CVS, WALGREENS PULL BACK COVID VACCINES IN MORE THAN A DOZEN STATES FOLLOWING NEW GUIDELINES

    President Donald Trump speaks during the Operation Warp Speed Vaccine Summit in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House in Washington, D.C. on Dec. 8, 2020 (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

    “I have been shown information from Pfizer, and others, that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public. Why not??? They go off to the next ‘hunt’ and let everyone rip themselves apart, including Bobby Kennedy Jr. and CDC, trying to figure out the success or failure of the Drug Companies Covid work. They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don’t seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!” he continued.

    After COVID-19 pandemic erupted during Trump’s first term in office, he presided over Operation Warp Speed, an effort to help accelerate the development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines.

    “I hope OPERATION WARP SPEED was as ‘BRILLIANT’ as many say it was. If not, we all want to know about it, and why???” he wrote in the post on Monday. “Thank you for your attention to this very important matter!”

    PREVIOUS CDC DIRECTORS ACCUSE RFK JR. OF ENDANGERING ALL AMERICANS IN NY TIMES ESSAY

    In a post on X, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. thanked the president for his “commitment to Gold Standard Science.”

    Sen. Bernie Sanders responded to Trump’s comments by suggesting that Operation Warp Speed was a success.

    CDC OFFICIAL INCLUDES ‘PREGNANT PEOPLE’ TERMINOLOGY AND PRONOUNS IN RESIGNATION LETTER

    Sen. Bernie Sanders

    Senator Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont and ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, arrives for a confirmation hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, July 16, 2025. (Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    “Mr. Trump: You were right about the success of Operation Warp Speed & the COVID vaccine when you said that it saved ‘tens of millions of lives.’ Vaccines have also helped eliminate polio, measles & smallpox. Don’t backtrack. Stick with the scientists, not conspiracy theorists,” Sanders wrote on X.

    Source link

  • Previous CDC directors accuse RFK Jr. of endangering all Americans in NY Times essay

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Several former directors and former acting directors at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) condemned Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in a joint New York Times guest essay on Monday.

    In the essay, the nine officials across Democratic and Republican administrations accused the Trump appointee of weakening the nation’s public health system.

    “What Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has done to the CDC and to our nation’s public health system over the past several months—culminating in his decision to fire Dr. Susan Monarez as CDC director days ago—is unlike anything we have ever seen at the agency, and unlike anything our country has ever experienced,” they wrote. 

    CDC DIRECTOR SUSAN MONAREZ REFUSES TO BE FIRED AS OTHER OFFICIALS CALL IT QUITS

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    Monarez was removed as the head of the agency last week, less than a month after her confirmation. She reportedly refused Kennedy’s directives to adopt new limitations on the availability of some vaccines, including approvals for COVID-19 shots.

    Four other senior CDC officials resigned, pointing to Monarez’s removal, as well as Kennedy’s vaccine policies, as the reasons for their exit. Additionally, hundreds of workers at the agency also walked out of the CDC’s headquarters in Atlanta last month in support of their former colleagues.

    The Times guest essay’s authors – William Foege, William Roper, David Satcher, Jeffrey Koplan, Richard Besser, Tom Frieden, Anne Schuchat, Rochelle P. Walensky and Mandy K. Cohen – slammed Kennedy, stating he “has fired thousands of federal health workers and severely weakened programs designed to protect Americans from cancer, heart attacks, strokes, lead poisoning, injury, violence and more.”

    ABOUT 600 CDC WORKERS TERMINATED AFTER COURT CLEARS PART OF TRUMP ADMIN RESTRUCTURING PLAN

    Former CDC Director Susan Monarez testifying during her confirmation hearing

    Susan Monarez testifies during her June confirmation hearing in front of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on June 25, 2025. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

    “Amid the largest measles outbreak in the United States in a generation, he’s focused on unproven ‘treatments’ while downplaying vaccines,” they wrote. “He canceled investments in promising medical research that will leave us ill-prepared for future health emergencies. He replaced experts on federal health advisory committees with unqualified individuals who share his dangerous and unscientific views.”

    They also blasted the secretary for ending U.S. support of global vaccination programs and justifying the move with “flawed research” and “inaccurate statements.” Additionally, they said he supported federal legislation that would cause “millions of people with health insurance through Medicaid to lose their coverage.”

    The collection of former directors said that, because of these actions, rural Americans and people with disabilities will have less access to health care, lower-income Americans will have less access to treatment, and children could lose access to “lifesaving vaccines.”

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    People walk outside the CDC campus in Atlanta

    The campus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta on June 25, 2025. (Mike Stewart/AP Photo)

    In his own New York Times guest essay published on Saturday, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called for Kennedy to resign after Monarez’s exit. 

    “Despite the overwhelming opposition of the medical community, Secretary Kennedy has continued his longstanding crusade against vaccines and his advocacy of conspiracy theories that have been rejected repeatedly by scientific experts,” Sanders wrote.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    HHS did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

    Source link

  • Senior CDC officials resign after Susan Monarez’s ouster, citing concerns over scientific independence

    Four senior officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced their resignations in recent days, citing what they described as growing political interference in the agency’s scientific work, particularly regarding vaccines.

    Two of them — Debra Houry, the CDC’s chief science and medical officer, and Demetre Daskalakis, who led the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases — stepped down on Wednesday, hours after the White House announced the firing of CDC Director Susan Monarez.


    Monarez, confirmed by the Senate in late July, was removed less than a month into her tenure. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Monarez “was not aligned with the President’s agenda of Making America Healthy Again.” Monarez’s attorneys argue the dismissal is unlawful, asserting that only the president can remove a Senate-confirmed director.

    On Thursday, Jim O’Neill, the deputy secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, was chosen to serve as acting CDC director, several White House officials confirmed to CBS News and KFF Health News. And in an internal email sent to CDC staffers that evening, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. confirmed O’Neill as the acting CDC director without addressing Monarez’s departure.

    “I am committed to working with you to restore trust, transparency, and credibility to the CDC,” Kennedy told CDC employees, later writing that “President Trump and I are aligned on the commonsense vision for the CDC: Strengthen the public health infrastructure by returning to its core mission of protecting Americans from communicable diseases by investing in innovation to prevent, detect and respond to future threats.”

    Houry and Daskalakis said they had become increasingly uneasy about how vaccine policy was being handled. Both pointed to preparations for the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting, which recommends vaccine schedules.

    Houry said they feared “some decisions had been made before there was even the data or the science to support those. We are scientists, and that was concerning to us.”

    Daskalakis added that he was “very concerned that there’s going to be an attempt to relitigate vaccines that have already had clear recommendations with science that has been vetted,” which he warned could undermine public trust. “If you can’t attack access, then why not attack trust? And that’s what I think the playbook is,” he said.

    Both officials cited instances in which evidence reviews were altered or withdrawn. A CDC analysis of thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, was briefly posted before being taken down at the HHS’ direction. “If there’s something that doesn’t line up with the recommendations, then that information will be taken down, and it’s not there for the public to see for openness and transparency,” Houry said.

    The two also criticized what they described as a lack of direct communication between CDC scientists and HHS leadership. Daskalakis said his team was never invited to brief Kennedy on topics ranging from measles to COVID-19.

    When asked about Kennedy’s calls for “radical transparency,” Houry and Daskalakis described learning about changes to the COVID vaccine schedule for children not through internal channels but via social media.

    “The radical transparency manifested itself by a Twitter post, which is how Dr. Houry and I learned that the secretary had mandated the change in the children’s vaccine schedule for COVID,” Daskalakis recalled. “What is the background that led to that decision? And we were denied access to that information. So, I don’t think that that’s radically transparent,” Daskalakis said.

    CBS News and KFF Health News reached out to HHS for comment on some of the allegations made by Houry and Daskalakis but did not immediately hear back.

    Both officials said they had no jobs lined up when they resigned. Houry described the decision as an effort to raise the alarm about the direction of the agency.

    “For us, this was really sending out a bat signal,” Houry said. “We were the very senior scientists and career leaders at CDC. We thought this was the time to stand together and try to do what we could to raise the alarm around public health in our country.”

    Daskalakis said remaining at the CDC under current conditions would have made them complicit in what he called the “weaponization” of public health.

    “The safety has already been compromised. … We are flying blind in the U.S. already. If we continued … we would be complicit and would be facilitating the ability to go from flying blind to actively harming people,” he said.

    Houry emphasized the severity of the moment by noting that she left without a backup plan.

    “My leaving without a job was really just showing how dire the circumstances had become,” Houry said.

    Daskalakis said his decision was also shaped by his medical oath.

    “As a physician, I take the Hippocratic oath: First, do no harm. I am seeing ideology permeating science in a way that is going to harm children and adults. … I think we are seeing things that are happening that are making our country less prepared to be able to respond to the everyday pathogens … but also … to the next big thing.”

    Both also expressed concerns about their personal safety in the current climate.

    “The environment we live in … stoked by misinformation, especially from people considered by some to be health authorities, makes me worried for all of us in public health,” Daskalakis said. “I am concerned, but that’s part of our job … to be brave and continue to speak the truth even when we are outside of the CDC.”

    The resignations came weeks after a shooting outside the CDC’s Atlanta headquarters, which law enforcement linked to COVID misinformation.

    Houry said the White House response to the shooting was muted. Kennedy toured the site but later gave an interview expressing distrust of experts. “That was after the attack. It was based on COVID misinformation. So this is when we were trying to build trust,” she said.

    Daskalakis added that while Kennedy later described mass shootings as a public health crisis, he believed the secretary should address misinformation as a root cause. “The misinformation about the COVID vaccine — that has been documented by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation” as the reason for the CDC shooting. “I would really recommend that the secretary actually do take his own advice and actually address the core problem that led to that shooting as well,” he said.

    He also noted that the CDC’s gun violence prevention programs had been sharply reduced. “We talk about violence as a public health problem. It is, and there’s things we can do to prevent it. Unfortunately, the majority of that program, the staff are terminated,” he said.

    The firings and resignations have sparked calls for oversight. Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont called for a bipartisan investigation, Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington urged Kennedy’s removal, and Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana — who voted to confirm Kennedy’s appointment as HHS secretary — said the developments would “require oversight.”

    The events come as the FDA narrowed eligibility for updated COVID vaccines to older adults and people with risk factors for severe COVID.


    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF. Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Céline Gounder, KFF Health News

    Source link

  • CVS, Walgreens now require prescriptions for COVID vaccines in Colorado

    People who want to get an updated COVID-19 vaccine at CVS or Walgreens pharmacies in Colorado this fall will need to present a prescription.

    State law allows pharmacists to administer vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group that counsels the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about who will benefit from which shots.

    In previous years, the committee recommended updated COVID-19 vaccines within days of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approving them. This year, the committee doesn’t have any meetings scheduled until late September, and may not recommend the shot when it does meet, since Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appointed multiple members with anti-vaccine views after removing all prior appointees in June.

    The lack of a recommendation also means that insurance companies aren’t legally required to pay for the COVID-19 vaccine without out-of-pocket costs. Most private insurers will cover the updated shots this year, though that could change in 2026, according to Reuters.

    Initially, CVS said it couldn’t give the COVID-19 vaccine to anyone in Colorado or 15 other states, because of their ACIP-approval requirement. As of Friday morning, its pharmacies can offer the shots to eligible people who have a prescription, spokeswoman Amy Thibault said.

    As of about 10 a.m. Friday, CVS’s website wouldn’t allow visitors to schedule COVID-19 shots in Colorado.

    Walgreens didn’t respond to questions about its COVID-19 vaccine policy, but its website said patients need a prescription in Colorado. A New York Times reporter found the same in 15 other states.

    The FDA this week recommended the updated shots only for people who are over 65 or have a health condition that puts them at risk for severe disease.

    The listed conditions include:

    • Asthma and other lung diseases
    • Cancer
    • History of stroke or disease in the brain’s blood vessels
    • Chronic kidney disease
    • Liver disease
    • Cystic fibrosis
    • Diabetes (all types)
    • Developmental disabilities, such as Down syndrome
    • Heart problems
    • Mental health conditions, including depression and schizophrenia
    • Dementia
    • Parkinson’s disease
    • Obesity
    • Physical inactivity
    • Current or recent pregnancy
    • Diseases or medications that impair the immune system
    • Smoking

    Meg Wingerter

    Source link

  • White House Stands With RFK Jr. In Firing of CDC Director

    President Trump backs Health and Human Services Director Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to fire the head of the health agency in charge of preventing disease outbreaks in the U.S., White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday.

    The show of support came a day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was plunged into chaos, as director Susan Monarez, a Trump appointee and longstanding government scientist, was fired along with other officials. Monarez, who the Senate confirmed as the CDC’s new leader in July, claims through her attorneys she was fired after a disagreement about the scientific rigor of orders Kennedy was handing down. Her departure was announced abruptly on the Health and Human Services’ X account Wednesday night.

    Mark Zaid and Abbe Lowell, lawyers for Monarez, said in a statement she was targeted after she refused to “rubberstamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.” The lawyers said her dismissal is symptomatic of a larger effort to undermine scientific institutions in the country for political reasons. “It is about the systematic dismantling of public health institutions, the silencing of experts, and the dangerous politicization of science,” they wrote.

    Leavitt told reporters that President Trump fired Monarez after she refused Kennedy’s demand that she resign. “Her lawyers’ statement made it abundantly clear themselves that she was not aligned with the President’s vision to make America healthy again,” Leavitt said. “The President has the authority to fire those who are not aligned with his mission.”

    CDC’s chief medical officer, Deb Houry, and other senior CDC leaders resigned Wednesday as well. Firing Monarez is a “dangerous” decision, said Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who called for an investigation into Monarez’s firing and urged Senator Bill Cassidy, the top Republican on the Senate’s health committee, to hold a hearing about her departure.

    C.D.C. leaders have increasingly found themselves in the middle of a tug-of-war with Kennedy over his vision of health policy, particularly around vaccines. A key panel at the CDC that makes vaccine recommendations is scheduled to meet in mid-September and may vote on recommendation criteria for vaccines to protect against COVID-19, Hepatitis B, MMRV and RSV, according to a preliminary agenda. On Thursday, Cassidy urgently called for the vaccine panel’s next meeting to be postponed, saying “serious allegations” have been made about the scientific process being followed going into the meeting. “These decisions directly impact children’s health and the meeting should not occur until significant oversight has been conducted,” said Cassidy in a statement.

    Read more: Trump Draws False Link Between Vaccines and Autism in TIME Interview

    Leavitt said that Trump and Kennedy “are committed to restoring trust and credibility to the CDC by ensuring their leadership and their decisions are more public facing, more accountable, protecting our public health systems and restoring it to its core mission of protecting Americans from communicable diseases, investing in innovation, prevent and respond to future threats.”

    Trump himself regularly touts his own efforts during his first term to accelerate production of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic through a program called Operation Warp Speed. But he’s so far stood by as Kennedy has worked to pare back federal vaccine guidelines and undermine well-established scientific consensus about the benefits of not only the Covid-19 vaccines, but for polio, measles and other diseases.

    Kennedy Jr. raised concerns about further disruptions at the CDC on Thursday, telling Fox News the agency is “in trouble and we need to fix it.” Some people at CDC “should not be working there any more,” he said.

    Kennedy turned on Monarez less than 30 days after she formally took her post. During Monarez’s swearing in ceremony on July 31, Kennedy had praised her “unimpeachable scientific credentials” and said he had “full confidence in her ability to restore the CDC’s role as the most trusted authority in public health.” His confidence in her and her scientific expertise did not survive a month.

    Brian Bennett

    Source link

  • Top CDC Officials Resign After Director Is Pushed Out

    Susan Monarez is no longer the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to a post by the official Department of Health and Human Services X account. She had been in the position for just a month. In the wake of her apparent ouster, several other CDC leaders have resigned.

    Named acting CDC director in January, Monarez was officially confirmed to the position by the Senate on July 29 and sworn in two days later. During her brief tenure, the CDC’s main campus in Atlanta was attacked by a gunman who blamed the Covid-19 vaccine for making him sick and depressed. A local police officer, David Rose, was killed by the suspect when responding to the shooting.

    In a statement Wednesday evening Mark Zaid and Abbe David Lowell, Monarez’s lawyers, alleged that she had been “targeted” for refusing “to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.” The statement further says that Monarez has not resigned and does not plan to, and claims that she has not received notification that she’s been fired.

    According to emails obtained by WIRED, at least three other senior CDC officials resigned Wednesday evening: Demetre Daskalakis, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Debra Houry, chief medical officer and deputy director for program and science; and Daniel Jernigan, director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases.

    More resignations are expected to become public soon, say CDC with knowledge of the departures.

    “I worry that political appointees will not make decisions on the science, but instead focus on supporting the administration’s agenda,” says one CDC employee, who was granted anonymity out of concerns over retribution. “I worry that the next directors will not support and protect staff.”

    President Donald Trump’s original pick to lead the CDC was David Weldon, a physician and previous Republican congressman from Florida who had a history of making statements questioning the safety of vaccines. But hours before his Senate confirmation hearing in March, the White House withdrew Weldon’s nomination. The administration then nominated Monarez.

    The CDC leadership exits come amid recent vaccine policy upheaval by HHS secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who in May removed the Covid-19 vaccine from the list CDC’s recommended vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women. The following month, he fired all 17 sitting members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group of independent experts that makes science-based recommendations on vaccines.

    In their place, he installed eight new members, including several longtime vaccine critics. “A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,” Kennedy said in a statement at the time.

    Earlier this month under Kennedy’s leadership, HHS canceled a half billion dollars in funding for research on mRNA vaccines. This month HHS also announced the reinstatement of the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines, a federal advisory panel created by Congress in 1986 to improve vaccine safety and oversight for children in the US. The panel was disbanded in 1998, when it issued its final report. Public health experts worry that the panel is a move to further undermine established vaccine science.

    Emily Mullin

    Source link

  • Can RFK Jr. ban COVID-19 vaccines?

    A single-source news report that said Trump administration officials plan to take COVID-19 vaccines off the market prompted fresh questions about Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s power over vaccines. 

    The Daily Beast reported Aug. 25 that “a decision to remove the (COVID-19) vaccine from the U.S. market pending further research will come ‘within months,’” citing British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra. Malhotra is chief medical adviser at Make America Healthy Again Action — an advocacy group run by longtime Kennedy allies. In July, the group launched an advertising campaign supporting Kennedy and President Donald Trump’s MAHA goals.

    Malhotra is not listed among Trump administration officials. But some of his anti-COVID-19 vaccine statements align with past statements by administration officials, including Kennedy.

    Kennedy has long opposed vaccines and once called the COVID-19 vaccine “the deadliest vaccine ever made,” contradicting scientific evidence. Kennedy said in November 2024 that he didn’t plan to ban vaccines: “If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away.” 

    But if he changed his mind, could Kennedy ban COVID-19 vaccines?

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    Not unilaterally, vaccine law experts say. Although there are ways the administration can make COVID-19 vaccines harder for Americans to get, there’s a process for taking approved vaccines off the market, and attempts to take vaccines off the market could face legal challenges. 

    “The Administration is relying on gold standard science and is committed to radical transparency to make decisions that affect all Americans,” White House spokesman Kush Desai told PolitiFact when asked about The Daily Beast’s report that the administration was considering a COVID-19 vaccine ban. “Unless announced by the Administration, however, any discussion about HHS policy should be dismissed as baseless speculation.”

    An HHS spokesperson said the agency doesn’t comment on potential policy decisions. 

    Can HHS remove approved vaccines from the market? 

    To take an approved vaccine off the market, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would have to revoke the manufacturers’ license for that vaccine.

    The FDA has licensed and approved three COVID-19 vaccines for at least some segments of the population. Those include two mRNA vaccines — one made by Moderna and another made by Pfizer-BioNTech — and Novavax’s protein-based vaccine. 

    The FDA’s approval of the COVID-19 vaccines — in some cases, during Trump’s current term — could make it more difficult to completely remove them from the market. 

    The FDA could try to remove a vaccine if the agency had significant safety concerns or “concerns about manufacturing practices,” reported KFF, a nonprofit health policy research, polling and news organization. 

    For years, Kennedy has said that vaccines are inadequately tested and unsafe.

    But federal regulations specify how the FDA would revoke a license, said Dorit Reiss, a vaccine law and policy expert at University of California Law San Francisco.

    “You need to meet procedural requirements and show that the removal was not arbitrary and capricious,” Reiss told PolitiFact in November.

    It can be done, though: The FDA recently announced it suspended a French drugmaker’s license for a live-attenuated vaccine that protects against chikungunya, a virus spread by mosquitoes. 

    Kenendy has also already made moves that reduce Americans’ access to the COVID-19 vaccines. 

    In May, Kennedy announced he’d removed COVID-19 vaccines from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women — a move that could limit vaccine access by reducing insurance companies’ coverage of the shot. The FDA also announced that vaccine makers seeking approval for future COVID-19 vaccines, or boosters, would need to conduct new randomized clinical trials of healthy populations. Such moves are expected to limit COVID-19 vaccine access

    Steps toward revoking an approved vaccine 

    Under federal rules, the FDA commissioner — not the HHS secretary — can try to revoke a vaccine license. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is a pancreatic surgeon and a proponent of the “Make America Healthy Again” movement; he said he has a good relationship with Kennedy.

    Makary could seek to revoke a vaccine’s license if, as the law outlines, he found it “fails to conform to the applicable standards” that ensure the product’s “continued safety, purity, and potency” or if he determined “the licensed product is not safe and effective” for its intended uses.

    The FDA commissioner typically must notify the vaccine manufacturer of the agency’s plans to revoke the license, provide the agency’s grounds for the revocation and give the manufacturer an opportunity for a hearing. An FDA official known as an administrative adjudicator — an executive branch official — would preside over the hearing, Reiss said. 

    “It should be a chance to provide safety data and lay out their case,” she said. After the hearing, the FDA would decide whether to revoke the license and the company could then challenge a revocation, Reiss said. 

    Initiating the procedure to remove an approved vaccine “without new information and sufficient evidence of harms or other concerns” would likely trigger legal challenges, KFF said

    “Most vaccines that were removed from the market were removed voluntarily, so there’s not really a lot of experience,” Reiss said. “Companies do not always sue FDA; it might not be cost-effective to do so. But they can, and I would be surprised if none of them do.”

    Wendy Parmet, director of Northeastern University law school’s Center for Health Policy and Law, said that if the vaccine manufacturers contested a license revocation, she expected they would have a strong case, given the reams of vaccine safety data and post-market studies of COVID-19 vaccine use around the world. 

    But some companies have been unwilling to fight the Trump administration, she said. 

    “They’ve already lost contracts from mRNA research,” Parmet said, referring to Kennedy’s decision to cut mRNA vaccine development funding. And the companies have broad portfolios with numerous business interests that could be affected by the Trump administration’s policies more widely.

    “Are they going to be afraid that they’ll be hit with retaliatory tariffs?” Parmet said. “We’ve seen companies being afraid of asserting their rights because they’re being pressured in other ways.” 

    If vaccine manufacturers don’t challenge the government, physicians groups or patients groups could file legal challenges, Parmet said. 

    “I think there’ll be litigation. I would expect a court to try to give temporary relief,” she said. “But we’ve seen the Trump administration have greater success the higher up the judicial ladder we go. So I don’t know what’s going to happen.”

    RELATED: Ask PolitiFact: If Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is confirmed as HHS secretary, could he ban vaccines?

    RELATED: RFK Jr. ended COVID vaccine recommendation for kids, pregnant women. What do facts show about risk?

    RELATED: RFK Jr. fired everyone on a key vaccine panel. Here’s who he replaced them with.

    Source link

  • 5 parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby

    (CNN) — Parenting is not for the faint of heart. It can take new parents a beat or two to fully tune in to what their baby’s cries could mean. So many small but consequential decisions need to be made on a daily, if not hourly, basis. There are also questions. Many questions.

    At a time when misinformation abounds, pediatrician Dr. David Hill is the calm voice of reassurance and reason, grounded in science. He encourages new parents to ask their baby’s pediatrician questions, including about any advice they find on the internet.

    “People come to me with stuff all the time,” Hill said, noting the importance of forging a solid parent-pediatrician relationship. That trust, he said, is what’s “going to steer us through this swamp of misinformation and disinformation that’s out there right now.”

    Hill is a father of five in a blended family who has been in practice for more than 25 years. He has been the associate medical editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ book “Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, 8th edition,” and is slated to be the editor-in-chief for the next edition. He also cohosts the academy’s podcast “Pediatrics On Call.”

    “The question I get the most often from new parents, and even those who have been at it for a while is, is this normal?” Hill told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life.

    “As somebody who’s seen probably over 10,000 children … it is a joy for me to almost always be able to reassure, and be like, ‘Yeah. That’s fine. They do that. Kids do a lot of weird things, and they do a lot of things at their own pace,” Hill said. “Normal can be all over the map.”

    You can listen to the podcast’s full episode here.

    Hill said he strongly urges parents to seek out trusted, reliable sources for guidance. “Sources of information that have been validated, that use real data,” he said. “And honestly, talk to your child’s doctor — develop that relationship, because that’s what we’ve dedicated our lives to doing.”

    Hill works closely with the AAP on the organization’s parent-facing information. “I do that because I know, over decades of experience, how dedicated everybody in that group is to making sure we get this right, including being willing to get egg on our faces and say, ‘You know what? We were wrong,’ when we were wrong,” Hill said. “And that’s really critical. Anybody who’s never wrong, I don’t trust, because none of us is perfect.”

    During the decades Hill has been in practice, he has witnessed some of the babies he saw at the start of his career become parents themselves. During that time, he has also watched the science of child health evolve.

    “What I tell these new parents is sometimes the complete opposite of what I said when they were babies!” he said via email.

    Here are the five biggest changes Hill has seen over his career.

    Safe sleep practices

    Sleep guidelines literally flipped in 1994, when Hill finished medical school. That year, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the first “Back to Sleep” campaign urging parents to put their baby to sleep on their back. Before then, parents had been told to put an infant to sleep on the belly to avoid aspiration.

    But that’s not all. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission banned drop-side cribs from the marketplace in 2011 and warned against inclined sleepers in 2019, Hill said. And the Safe Sleep for Babies Act, signed into federal law in 2022, outright banned the sale of drop-side cribs and crib bumpers that could potentially suffocate infants.

    He noted that in 1990, there were 154 sudden unexpected infant deaths per 100,000 babies, a number that fell 44% to a low of 86 in 2011. (It has since gone up to 100 deaths per 100,000 in 2022).

    “While some of those deaths are from mysterious or unavoidable causes,” he said, “many could still be prevented by following all the safe sleep guidelines, including not only placing infants on their backs to sleep, but never co-sleeping (and) avoiding soft bedding.”

    Advice to prevent food allergies

    Complete avoidance is out, and small exposures are in.

    “I still remember in 2015 searching all the drawers in our practice for outdated infant feeding handouts that, if parents followed them, could put their babies at increased risk of developing life-threatening food allergies,” Hill said. “These handouts told parents to avoid giving their infants and toddlers anything containing peanuts or eggs until they turned at least 2 years old, even 3 if they had eczema or a family history of allergies.”

    But, Hill said, in 2015, the results of the LEAP trial confirmed what some earlier studies had suggested: “That it wasn’t early peanut exposure that had caused a doubling of peanut allergies in the preceding decade. It was the advice in these handouts!” he said.

    Now parents and guardians are advised to introduce peanut-containing products and eggs along with other solid foods in the first year of life, as soon as babies are safely taking solids, usually around 6 months of age.

    Preventing babies from having any exposure to potential allergens apparently left their immune systems oversensitive when they finally did encounter them later on.

    Umbilical cord care

    Umbilical cords used to be treated with a messy (for doctors) purple “triple” dye — an antiseptic to keep bacterial infections at bay. Now, the recommendation in well-resourced countries and communities is to let the cord dry on its own — and to keep a close eye on it.

    “The purpose of the dye was to prevent potentially dangerous infections of the umbilical cord and surrounding tissues (omphalitis),” Hill said. “Then, a few brave souls, perhaps fed up with their dry-cleaning bills, decided to see what would happen if we used alcohol instead of the dye. It turned out … nothing.”

    Hill said the next step was to just let the cord dry on its own, taking care not to trap it in a wet or soiled diaper for extended periods and to avoid soaking it at bathtime. That practice is where the guidance stands today.

    Some known risk factors for omphalitis, Hill said, include low birth weight, prolonged rupture of membranes or prolonged labor, maternal infection, nonsterile delivery or home birth, and improper cord care.

    “If you see the skin around the belly button turning red or notice an unusually foul discharge, get your baby seen,” he advised.

    What about bathing? Should new parents avoid baths until the cord falls off? “Advice on this one varies, but it’s not clear there’s any more danger from a brief immersion than from a sponge bath,” he said.

    New and better vaccines

    The vaccination schedule for infants and children has been updated throughout the years as new shots become available, offering better protection against childhood scourges.

    “My dad is also a pediatrician, and I grew up hearing horror stories of babies suffering from meningitis and sepsis. It seems my dad was always dashing off to the hospital to perform spinal taps,” Hill recalled. “This started to change, however, in 1985, when a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza B, one of the most dreaded infections of childhood, came out.

    “In training and early in my career, I saw awful infections from another bacteria, pneumococcal pneumonia. These infections became much rarer in 2000, when the first pneumococcal vaccine for children came out,” he said. “Since then, that vaccine has expanded from covering seven subtypes of pneumococcus to covering as many as 23.”

    Just in the past year, Hill said he witnessed another infantile infection he dreaded, RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, plummet in frequency and severity thanks to both vaccines for expectant mothers and antibody injections for babies.

    Considering the big picture

    Another change involves a paradigm shift in the way pediatricians think about health and well-being, Hill said.

    “In pediatrics, one of those tectonic shifts hit in 1998, the year I started practice and the year the ACEs Study came out,” he said, referring to a study that looked at adverse childhood experiences. Those potentially traumatic events include physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse; the death of a parent; mental illness; or violence or substance abuse in the household, any of which can create toxic stress in a child, leading to changes in brain development and affecting future mental, physical and emotional health.

    “Many people had noticed that traumatic events in childhood … seemed to impact later health,” Hill said. “The ACEs Study measured and quantified the extent and duration of these effects, and the results were more dramatic and longer-lasting than anyone had guessed.”

    An explosion of research followed, Hill said, which led to a new approach in pediatrics.

    “Every child faces stressful events, some severe enough to impact their health. But the safe, stable, nurturing relationships that children build with the adults around them can protect them,” he explained. “Understanding these interactions inspires trauma-informed care, an effort to work with families to address the stresses in their lives and to build those emotional connections that can help their children thrive.”

    Under this approach, Hill said, pediatricians pivoted from asking “What’s wrong with you?” to asking “What happened to you, and how can we help?”

    “A key concept here is the ‘good enough parent,’” he said. “No parent is perfect, but perfection is not required to be safe, stable, and nurturing.”

    As a parent himself, Hill said that thought “brings me a sigh of relief.”

    Andrea Kane and CNN

    Source link

  • What About Elderberry, Echinacea, and Cranberries for Colds and the Flu?  | NutritionFacts.org

    How effective are flu shots, elderberries, echinacea, and cranberries?

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that everyone over the age of six months get a routine flu shot every year, unless you have some sort of contraindication, such as an allergy to any of the vaccine’s components. CDC recommends getting vaccinated by the end of October, but it may even be beneficial when received in December or later. How effective are flu vaccines? It depends on the year, but, as you can see below and at 0:33 in my video Friday Favorites: Elderberry Benefits and Side Effects: Does It Help with Colds and the Flu?, the flu vaccine typically reduces the risk of getting the flu by about 40 to 50 percent.

    So, in healthy adults, we can say with moderate certainty that we can decrease our risk of influenza from about 2 percent each year down to just under 1 percent. Older adults may get a similar relative risk reduction, but the baseline risk is higher and the consequences greater, so the absolute benefits are greater, too. In kids, flu vaccines shine; there’s a high certainty of evidence of a substantial drop in risk. But even in this kind of best-case scenario, there’s still a risk with vaccination, so what else can we do?

    In the United States alone, each year, Americans experience millions of cases of influenza and hundreds of millions of colds. What about elderberry supplements? In a test tube, elderberry extracts can inhibit pathogens, including the flu virus. In a petri dish, it can rev up the production of flu-fighting molecules from human immune system cells, like tumor necrosis factor, as much as nearly 45-fold. Elderberry juice can help mice fight off the flu. But what about actual people?

    The first clinical trial was published back in the 1990s: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to treat flu-like symptoms. Researchers found that the odds for improvement before the fifth day in those in the treated group were more than 20 times the odds of the participants in the control group (p < 0.001). Two subsequent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials showed similar accelerated healing in the elderberry groups, as you can see here and at 1:54 in my video

    I was excited to see this study—“Elderberry Supplementation Reduces Cold Duration and Symptoms in Air-Travelers”—given a 200-city book tour I was embarking on. It was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 312 economy class passengers. While taking elderberry didn’t seem to prevent people from coming down with cold symptoms, the duration and severity of symptoms in those who did get a cold seemed to have been lessened, and they suffered an average of about five days instead of seven.

    A similar study using the herb echinacea found a lessening of symptom scores, but it was of only borderline statistical significance. Nevertheless, even though most of the individual trials didn’t find statistically significant improvements, when all such studies were compiled, it seems there may be about a 20 percent decrease incidence of colds, as seen below and at 2:50 in my video.

    Note, though, that there is a concern about publication bias and selective reporting. A number of findings and some entire studies seem to be MIA, suggesting that negative studies may have been quietly shelved. So, we aren’t really sure about echinacea, but all the elderberry studies seem to have positive results, suggesting elderberry supplementation “provides an effective treatment option when advanced or more invasive care [more serious treatment] is not warranted.” This conclusion came from someone with apparent conflicts of interest, though. In fact, each of the four elderberry studies was funded by the elderberry product companies themselves.

    Any other berries that might be helpful? A randomized, placebo-controlled, interventional study—funded, predictably, by Ocean Spray—found that the gamma-delta-T-cells of those drinking a low-calorie cranberry juice beverage for ten weeks appeared to be proliferating at nearly fivefold the rate. These immune cells “serve as a first line of defense.” Though the study participants didn’t get fewer colds, they did seem to suffer less, but not enough to prevent days missed from work or an impairment of their activities, as shown here and at 3:56 in my video

    At least cranberries have never been reported to cause pancreatitis. A man taking an elderberry extract not only suffered an attack of acute pancreatitis, a sudden painful inflammation of the pancreas, but it went away when he stopped it, then reappeared again years later when he tried taking it again, which suggests cause-and-effect. Why take elderberry extracts when you can just eat the elderberries themselves? Well, cooked are fine, but “consuming uncooked blue or black elderberries can cause nausea and vomiting.”

    I found out the hard way, as I explained in an answer to the question, “What was the worst day of your life?” in my London Real interview on my How Not to Die book tour. It turns out elderberry fruits form cyanide, such that eight people had to be medevacked out after someone brought freshly squeezed elderberry juice to a gathering.

    Doctor’s Note:

    Here’s the London Real interview I mentioned.

    What else can we do for the common cold? See the related posts below.

    And, speaking of cranberries, Can Cranberry Juice Treat Bladder Infections?. Watch the video to find out. 

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • What Donald Trump’s Win Could Mean for Vaccines

    President-elect Donald Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris means U.S. health policy may soon be shaped, at least in part, by one of the country’s most notorious vaccine skeptics: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    At this point, no one knows exactly what Trump’s second term will mean for vaccine policy or health policy more broadly. But Kennedy, who is infamous for peddling debunked views of vaccines and science, is poised to play a major role in defining Trump’s health legacy. “I’m going to let him go wild on health. I’m going to let him go wild on the food. I’m going to let him go wild on the medicines,” Trump said of Kennedy at an October campaign rally in New York City.

    Though it’s unclear whether Kennedy would serve in an official role within the Trump Administration, he is reportedly involved in discussions about who should head federal health agencies, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who during the pandemic discouraged healthy children from getting COVID-19 vaccines, is reportedly in consideration to run the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, further stoking fears about an anti-vaccine agenda under Trump.

    “I see an America whose health will suffer greatly in the next four years,” says Lawrence Gostin, director of Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. “And I see an American whose trust in science and public health will be severely damaged in the next four years.”

    Trump’s first administration oversaw Operation Warp Speed, the cross-governmental effort that led to the historically fast creation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. But Kennedy’s influence has some experts worried that, the second time around, Trump’s administration may attempt to discourage people from receiving vaccines or even curtail access to them. Kennedy has said that he is not against vaccination, but he has for years spread misinformation about immunizations, questioning their well-proven safety and efficacy and promoting the debunked claim that they are linked to autism.

    Read More: Did the Pandemic Break Our Brains?

    Howard Lutnick, co-chair of Trump’s transition team, told CNN in October that Kennedy wants additional data on vaccines, despite the fact that troves of information about vaccine safety and efficacy are already widely available. “He says, ‘If you give me the data, all I want is the data and I’ll take on the data and show that it’s not safe. And then if you pull the product liability, the companies will yank these vaccines right off of the market.’ So that’s his point,” Lutnick told CNN.

    Kennedy, however, said in post-election interviews that he and the Trump Administration do not plan to take vaccines off the market, despite widespread speculation to that effect. “I’m not going to take away anybody’s vaccines. I’ve never been anti-vaccine. If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away,” he told NBC on Nov. 6. “People ought to have [a] choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information.” (In the same interview, Kennedy cast doubt on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, which are credited with saving millions of lives.)

    Even if the Trump Administration did attack vaccine access, it’s not clear how much they could actually do, Gostin says. The federal government has a hand in aspects of vaccine distribution, including funding the Vaccines for Children program, which provides free shots to kids whose parents could otherwise not afford them. But ultimately, states craft their own policies around vaccination, including which shots are required for children entering school. At least under current standards of governance, the president “would have no power to force the states to do anything,” Gostin says.

    That’s not to say anti-vaccine sentiment in the White House would have no effect, says Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia who has served on CDC and FDA vaccine advisory committees. One aim of Project 2025—a conservative policy plan from which Trump tried to distance himself during his campaign, but which many political experts view as a blueprint for his second term—is restructuring the CDC such that it can no longer provide recommendations about vaccinations. Many states lean on CDC guidance to create their local mandates, Offit says, and the agency’s recommendations also inform insurance coverage.

    Read More: How to Break 8 Toxic Communication Habits

    If states ease vaccine requirements—or if people emboldened by a vaccine-hesitant White House seek exemptions from those requirements, a trend that’s already on the rise—the U.S. may see a resurgence of vaccine-preventable illnesses such as measles, chickenpox, and mumps. “Viruses don’t recognize state lines,” Offit says. “We don’t see ourselves as part of a whole. But we are, especially when it comes to contagious diseases.”

    What will happen within the FDA, which approves vaccines and drugs, is another question mark. The Trump Administration could nominate an FDA commissioner who, if confirmed by the Senate, could theoretically try to revoke approvals for vaccines. But, Gostin says, such a move would likely be challenged in court. “If the FDA were to have a record of approving a vaccine for many decades and then all of a sudden withdrew that approval, the courts would demand scientific justification for it,” he says.

    Even with a conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court in place, Gostin says he’s confident the judiciary wouldn’t overlook decades of solid safety and efficacy data on vaccines.

    In June, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-abortion activists seeking to overturn the FDA’s long-standing approval of mifepristone, one of two drugs used to complete a medication abortion, had no legal basis to do so. Their decision signals some willingness to respect the FDA’s scientific review process, since ruling in favor of the anti-abortion groups could have set a precedent that made it easier for other groups to challenge the agency’s decisions.

    It’s too soon to say what legal or legislative curveballs a second Trump term will bring. But Gostin says he’s confident legal guardrails will hold, even though they can’t stop the influence of anti-vaccine sentiment entirely.

    The best thing concerned people can do now, Gostin says, is “get yourself and your children up to date on all their vaccinations. Be very active in your local school boards, and fight for vaccination and public health.”

    Jamie Ducharme

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. Wants to Reshape US Health Policy. Good Luck With That

    RFK Jr. Wants to Reshape US Health Policy. Good Luck With That

    Kennedy’s past makes him an unlikely candidate for agriculture secretary, according to Daniel Glickman, who served in the role during Bill Clinton’s presidency. “It’s hard for me to imagine, given Trump’s traditional base in the heartlands, that he would pick somebody who was an advocate for breaking up large farms and breaking consolidated agriculture,” says Glickman.

    Like top posts at HHS, the USDA secretary position would need to be confirmed by a Senate vote. “I don’t think [Kennedy] is a slam dunk,” says Glickman.

    Trump’s pick for USDA chief during his first term was Sonny Perdue, a former governor of Georgia and founder of an agricultural trading company. Most agriculture secretaries either have a background in the industry or politics—two crucial constituencies for the person who will be in charge of a department that employs nearly 100,000 and is made up of 29 agencies, including forestry, conservation, and nutrition programs. “The difference between Sonny Perdue and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is like night and day,” says Glickman.

    If Kennedy were to be confirmed as agriculture secretary, he might struggle to enact the most radical parts of his program. He is an outspoken critic of pesticides, but the USDA is generally not in charge of regulating those, says Dan Blaustein-Rejto, director of agriculture policy and research at the Breakthrough Institute. Rather, the EPA regulates pesticides with public health uses.

    Although he may not be able to directly influence pesticide regulations, Kennedy has said he would try to “weaponize” other agencies against “chemical agriculture” by commissioning scientific research into the effects of pesticides. The USDA Agricultural Research Service has a nearly $2 billion discretionary budget for research into crops, livestocks, nutrition, food safety, and natural resources conservation.

    There are other levers that an agriculture secretary could pull, says Blaustein-Rejto. The USDA is investing $3 billion through the partnership for climate-smart commodities—a scheme that’s supposed to make US agriculture more climate-friendly. A USDA chief might be able to put their thumb on their scale by influencing the selection criteria for these kinds of programs. The USDA also oversees the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), which has a $5 billion fund that it uses to support farm incomes and conservation programs, and to assist farmers hit by natural disasters. It’s possible that a USDA chief could influence how these CCC funds are distributed by the agency.

    Kennedy has also argued that corporate interests have captured the US’s dietary guidelines, and he pledged to remove conflicts of interest from USDA groups that come up with dietary guidelines. US dietary guidelines are developed jointly by the USDA and HHS and are updated every five years, giving the agriculture secretary limited opportunities to influence any recommendations.

    “If RFK is in a high-level policy role, I expect to see a lot more talk about ultra-processed foods, but I’m not sure what that would actually entail when it comes to the dietary guidelines,” says Blaustein-Rejto.

    The experts WIRED spoke with largely think Kennedy’s more extreme positions will likely be constrained by bureaucracy. But the message that elevating a vocal vaccine skeptic and conspiracy theorist would send remains a serious concern ahead of a potential second Trump administration.

    Emily Mullin, Matt Reynolds

    Source link

  • Stay ahead this flu season: California health experts urge timely vaccinations

    Stay ahead this flu season: California health experts urge timely vaccinations

    Stay ahead this flu season: California health experts urge timely vaccinations

    The ideal time for the flu vaccine is before the end of October.

    EXPERTS ON WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW. CIRCULATING EVERY YEAR. A NASTY VIRUS FOR SOME AND DEADLY FOR OTHERS. INFLUENZA BEGINNING TO MAKE ITS ROUNDS. TYPICALLY, THE FLU STARTS IN THE FALL AND CAN ABSOLUTELY GO ALL THROUGH THE WINTER INTO THE SPRING AND SOMETIMES WE’VE SEEN INFLUENZA LAST ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO MAY. SPEAKING TO DOCTOR VANESSA WALKER, SHE SAYS RIGHT NOW WE’RE STILL BEATING THE CURVE. WE’RE NOT REALLY SEEING MUCH FLU AT ALL YET IN THE HOSPITALS OR OUT IN THE COMMUNITY. IT’S STILL AT VERY LOW LEVELS RIGHT NOW, WHICH LEADS TO THE FACT THAT WE ARE IN THE PERFECT WINDOW OF TIME TO GET THE VACCINE. I USUALLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU IF YOU’RE GOING TO GET THE FLU VACCINE, THAT YOU SHOULD PROBABLY GET IT BEFORE THE END OF OCTOBER. THAT’S WHEN YOU’RE GOING TO GET IT. IT TAKES A COUPLE WEEKS FOR IT TO REALLY GET TO FULL EFFICACY FOR YOUR BODY TO MAKE ALL THOSE FLU ANTIBODIES, TO REALLY PROTECT YOU. GETTING THE VACCINE NOW ENSURES YOU’RE COVERED THROUGH PEAK FLU SEASON, WHICH TYPICALLY LANDS NEAR THE HOLIDAYS. GETTING IT TOWARDS THE END OF OCTOBER SHOULD START COVERING YOU WHEN WE START TO SEE MORE FLU CASES IN THE FALL, AND THEN WE’LL DEFINITELY BE IN FULL SWING TO PROTECT YOU WHEN WE SEE AN EXPECTED SPIKE IN DECEMBER OR JANUARY. ACCORDING TO THE CDC, 148 MILLION DOSES OF THE FLU VACCINE ARE IN SUPPLY. THIS SEASON, WITH MANY THAT ARE STEERING AWAY FROM FORMULAS THAT CONTAIN PRESERVATIVES. THE CDC, REMINDING THE PUBLIC CO-INFECTIONS, MEANING GETTING SEVERAL ILLNESSES ALL AT ONCE, IS NOT AN IMPOSSIBILITY, AND THE AID OF A VACCINATION HELPS ALLEVIATE HOW ILL THAT PERSON COULD BECOME. INFLUENZA VACCINE SAVE SO MANY LIVES THEY DECREASE THE RATE OF HOSPITALIZATIONS AND THEY DECREASE THE SEVERITY OF THE INFLUENZA VIRUS. LASTLY, A QUICK EXPLANATION AS TO WHY YOU CAN FEEL ACHY OR ILL AFTER GETTING THE SHOT. ANYTIME WE GET EITHER A VACCINE OR A VIRUS, OUR BODY IS GOING TO RESPOND VERY SIMILARLY TO TO TRY TO GET RID OF WHATEVER IS COMING IN THE BODY. SO THAT MAKES US HAVE MUSCLE ACHES. SOMETIMES YOU MIGHT GET A FEVER, YOU JUST MIGHT FEEL GENERALLY TIRED. THAT IS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM ACTIVATING AND DOING ITS JOB. BOTTOM LINE, DOCTORS SAY IT’S NEVER TOO LATE FOR THE FLU VACCINE, BUT FOR NEAR PERFECT TIMING FOR PEAK SEASON. NOW, IS YOUR SHOT IN SACRAMENTO ERIN HEFT KCRA THREE NEWS. AND WITH INSURANCE, THE VACCINE WILL LIKELY BE FREE OF CHARGE AND EVEN WITHOUT INSURANCE, THER

    Stay ahead this flu season: California health experts urge timely vaccinations

    The ideal time for the flu vaccine is before the end of October.

    As the cold weather sets in, flu season is expected to ramp up across the country.Experts, including Dr. Vanessa Walker, emphasize the importance of taking precautions now. “We’re not really seeing much flu at all yet in the hospitals or out in the community, it’s still at very low levels right now,” she explained. The ideal time for the flu vaccine is before the end of October, allowing it to reach full efficacy before the holiday season, when influenza cases typically peak.The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has ensured an ample supply of 148 million flu vaccine doses this year, many of which don’t include preservatives. Although its never too late to get vaccinated for influenza, if the virus is circulating, acting promptly maximizes protection.Dr. Walker provides insight into post-vaccination symptoms like muscle aches and fatigue, highlighting them as normal immune responses. Watch in the video player aboveSee more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter

    As the cold weather sets in, flu season is expected to ramp up across the country.

    Experts, including Dr. Vanessa Walker, emphasize the importance of taking precautions now.

    “We’re not really seeing much flu at all yet in the hospitals or out in the community, it’s still at very low levels right now,” she explained.

    The ideal time for the flu vaccine is before the end of October, allowing it to reach full efficacy before the holiday season, when influenza cases typically peak.

    The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has ensured an ample supply of 148 million flu vaccine doses this year, many of which don’t include preservatives.

    Although its never too late to get vaccinated for influenza, if the virus is circulating, acting promptly maximizes protection.

    Dr. Walker provides insight into post-vaccination symptoms like muscle aches and fatigue, highlighting them as normal immune responses. Watch in the video player above

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter

    Source link

  • What Vaccine Side Effects Really Mean

    What Vaccine Side Effects Really Mean

    Vaccine side effects like soreness, fever, and fatigue scare some people out of getting their shots. Ask a doctor, though, and they’ll tell you these unpleasant symptoms have a silver lining: they’re a signal that your immune system is firing up in response to the shot, doing exactly what it’s supposed to do.

    “If you feel bad after the vaccine, at least feel good about feeling bad,” says Dr. Kevin Dieckhaus, chief of infectious diseases at UConn Health and co-author of a 2023 study on COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

    But is it a bad sign if you don’t get side effects after a shot? Does a pain-free next day mean the vaccine didn’t work? 

    Probably not. Here’s why.

    Why do vaccines cause side effects?

    Vaccines work by mimicking an infection. They introduce your body to a weakened or broken-down form of a particular pathogen so it can practice defending itself against the real thing. This involves creating antibodies, proteins that attack foreign invaders.

    When the immune system fires up in response to the shot, it results in inflammation that can leave you feeling lousy the next day. A flu shot won’t give you the flu—you’re not actually getting infected—but you may temporarily experience some of the same symptoms.

    However, side effects vary. Some shots produce more than others. And even two people who get the exact same vaccine may have totally different reactions, for a range of reasons including age, sex, health and immunization history, and other factors that scientists don’t fully understand. “The human body is an amazingly varied machine,” Dieckhaus says.

    Do stronger side effects mean stronger immune protection?

    Multiple studies on COVID-19 shots have found at least a modest link between the number and severity of side effects someone experiences after vaccination and the strength or durability of their immune response. A 2022 study pointed to a similar effect for flu shots.

    Read More: 9 Things You Should Do for Your Brain Health Every Day, According to Neurologists

    But not all studies have reached that conclusion. “The literature is pretty mixed,” says Florian Krammer, a professor of vaccinology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “It’s highly variable.”

    Even some studies that have found a correlation have concluded that, when it comes to protection, the difference between people who get side effects and those who don’t is so minimal as to barely matter, Krammer adds.

    So is it bad not to get side effects after a shot?

    Don’t worry if you feel fine the day after an immunization. While side effects can be a sign of the immune system working, they are not necessary, Krammer says. In fact, vaccine developers usually strive to create a product that works as well as possible while triggering as few side effects as possible.

    Almost “everybody gets an immune response” after being vaccinated, Dieckhaus agrees. “If you have symptoms, we just know that your immune response is probably a little bit more robust.” Side effects may be the cherry on top of the sundae, but you still have the sundae no matter what.

    In the original clinical trials for Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine, for example, less than half of study participants reported side effects, but the shot worked well for the vast majority of people. People who don’t respond well to vaccines typically have a medical reason, such as taking an immune-suppressing drug. “If you’re a somewhat healthy adult and you don’t have side effects, good,” Krammer says.

    Read More: Why Vinegar Is So Good for You

    Plus, trends reported in studies don’t always translate to individual experiences, says Dr. Ethan Dutcher, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, San Francisco, and co-author of a recent study on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Overall, his team found that people who experienced lots of side effects after their initial COVID-19 vaccines tended to mount stronger antibody responses. But as with any trend, there were plenty of exceptions. “We had a lot of people who didn’t experience tiredness who had higher antibody levels than people who did experience tiredness,” Dutcher says.

    And, Dieckhaus says, the immune system is complex. His team’s study, which also found an association between side effects and durability of immune response, measured only one aspect of it: how long it took antibodies to wane after COVID-19 shots. But that’s “just one piece of the puzzle,” he says. There are lots of other variables that influence whether someone gets infected and how sick they’ll be if they do.

    The bottom line: make sure you get your vaccines, and don’t worry too much about how you feel afterward. If you have side effects, “you can feel your immune system working,” Krammer says. “But if you don’t feel that, that’s fine too. It’s probably still working.”

    Jamie Ducharme

    Source link

  • The US Is Loading Up on Bird Flu Vaccine

    The US Is Loading Up on Bird Flu Vaccine

    Amid a US outbreak of avian influenza in poultry flocks and dairy cattle, the federal government on Friday announced $72 million in funding to three vaccine manufacturers to expand the production of bird flu vaccines for humans, in the event that they are needed.

    The H5N1 virus has affected millions of wild and commercial birds nationwide, and in March it made the jump to dairy cows for the first time. As the number of affected animals grows, so does the concern for spread to people. In the past, H5N1 has had a high mortality rate in humans, and scientists are monitoring the virus closely to determine whether it poses a pandemic risk. The US government has a stockpile of approved H5N1 vaccines, but today’s awards, which will go to CSL Seqirus, GSK, and Sanofi, will double that number.

    “We do expect that we will have a total of just over 10 million doses filled and finished by the end of the first quarter of calendar year 2025,” said David Boucher, director of infectious disease preparedness and response at the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, in a press briefing on Friday.

    Moderna, Pfizer, and GSK are also working on mRNA vaccines for bird flu, but those need to go through human testing and be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration before they could be used.

    This year, 16 people in the US have been infected with bird flu. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the latest two cases, both in California, Thursday evening. The individuals are farm workers who had contact with infected dairy cows at two facilities in the Central Valley, the epicenter of the state’s cattle outbreak. Both had mild symptoms, including eye redness, and are being treated with antiviral medication. Neither reported respiratory symptoms or were hospitalized.

    Nirav Shah, the CDC’s principal deputy director, said the new cases do not change the agency’s risk assessment for the general public, which continues to be low. “Finding these two cases was not unexpected,” he said during Friday’s briefing. “As there are more herds that test positive, there are more workers who are exposed, and where there are more workers who are exposed, the chances of human infection increase.”

    Both California cases are thought to be instances of animal-to-human spread, with no known link or contact between the two. California health officials are following up with close contacts of the workers, including household members that are also dairy workers.

    In the coming days, the CDC says it will do additional testing on the virus samples, including genetic sequencing to monitor for any changes in the virus. Scientists are particularly interested in whether the virus is developing new mutations that could make human-to-human transmission more likely. The agency says there is no evidence that the virus can spread from person to person at this time.

    Of the 16 confirmed human cases, six have been linked to exposure to sick or infected dairy cows, while nine had exposure to infected poultry. The source of infection for a case in Missouri has not been determined.

    Emily Mullin

    Source link