ReportWire

Tag: US & Canada

  • Trump target of classified docs probe, prosecutors tell lawyers

    Trump target of classified docs probe, prosecutors tell lawyers

    [ad_1]

    US media reports suggest investigation is moving closer to charging former president over materials found at his Florida home.

    Prosecutors in the United States have told Donald Trump’s lawyers that he is the target of an investigation into his handling of classified documents after leaving the presidency, according to reports in multiple US media outlets.

    The notice came from the office of special counsel Jack Smith, ABC, The New York Times, CNN and other news outlets have said.

    The justice department typically notifies people when they become targets of an investigation to give them an opportunity to present their own evidence before a grand jury. The notification does not necessarily mean they will be charged.

    Trump, the frontrunner in the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, pleaded not guilty in April to charges of falsifying business records relating to hush money paid to an adult film star before the 2016 presidential race. He also faces a criminal investigation into alleged efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.

    Trump claims the multiple investigations are politically motivated.

    A redacted FBI photograph of documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container stored in Trump’s Florida estate [File: US Department of Justice/Handout via Reuters]

    The investigation into the classified documents began in 2021, amid suspicions among federal officials that the former president had not returned all the documents he was supposed to.

    In August last year, the FBI found some 13,000 documents, 100 of which were marked classified, in a search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, even though one of Trump’s lawyers had previously said that all records with classified markings had been returned.

    Trump has defended his retention of the documents, suggesting that he declassified them while he was president. However, Trump has provided no evidence for the claim and the court filings show his lawyers have also not made that argument.

    Trump is the first current or former US president to face criminal charges, and his legal woes are growing.

    In May, a jury in a civil court in Manhattan ordered Trump to pay $5m in damages for sexually abusing former Elle magazine columnist E Jean Carroll and then defaming her by branding her a liar.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Q&A: Canada’s anti-Islamophobia representative vows to fight hate

    Q&A: Canada’s anti-Islamophobia representative vows to fight hate

    [ad_1]

    Montreal, Canada – It was a Sunday evening two years ago when an act “rooted in unspeakable hatred” changed one family forever and shook Muslim communities across Canada in the process.

    The Afzaals were taking a walk in the city of London, Ontario on June 6, 2021, when a man ran them over with his truck in what authorities said was an intentional attack. Four members of the family were killed, and a young boy was seriously injured.

    The deadly assault sent shock waves throughout the country, where Muslims were still reeling from a series of fatal attacks at mosques and a rise of Islamophobic rhetoric.

    It also fuelled calls for action and pushed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government to first establish a summit on Islamophobia and then earlier this year to name a special representative to tackle the problem.

    The appointment of Amira Elghawaby in January as Canada’s first special representative on combatting Islamophobia was welcomed by Muslim community advocates. But it faced fierce criticism in the province of Quebec, where politicians called for her removal for past criticism of a law banning religious garb in the public sector that has drawn widespread accusations of racism.

    Here, Al Jazeera speaks to Elghawaby about the two-year anniversary of the London attack, the state of Islamophobia in Canada today, and what her job entails.

    Al Jazeera: What impact did the London attack have on Muslims in Canada?

    Amira Elghawaby: I think it’s really important to note that London’s Muslim communities are still carrying the weight of what happened two years ago. It’s still quite heavy on people’s minds.

    [I have been] meeting with some of the young people, in particular, who have been organising for the past two years, trying to ensure that not only the city of London, but Canadians, don’t forget what happened to this beautiful, intergenerational family that was targeted for no other reason than their Muslim faith.

    There is still a lot of pain and anxiety and fear that hate is still in our communities. Especially women who are visibly Muslim, who wear the hijab [headscarf], are sometimes a little more worried about being singled out. And so I think that those sentiments are held in other communities, as well.

    In the first 100 days of my office, I’ve had an opportunity to have community engagements in the top provinces where Muslims reside, so Ontario, Quebec and Alberta. While I consistently hear that Canadian Muslims are proud to be in Canada and contributing … at the same time, there are concerns about Islamophobia.

    And there is hope that the Afzaal attack hopefully really galvanised people to understand that this is a type of hatred that we have to work collectively to address.

    Al Jazeera: There was strong criticism of your appointment, notably from politicians from Quebec. Do you feel that you can speak out against Islamophobia in that province specifically?

    Elghawaby: I have been quite clear in speaking out against Islamophobia right across Canada as a phenomenon that all of us have to come together to address.

    Muslims living in different provinces experience discrimination and Islamophobia in different ways, and so I think what’s critical is for this office to continue to engage, to continue to listen, to the lived experiences of Muslims in every single part of this country.

    The role is to bring those experiences forward to fellow Canadians, to the federal government, in helping to support legislation and policies that are helping to ensure the inclusion of all people in this country.

    Al Jazeera: What is the state of Islamophobia in Canada right now?

    Elghawaby: I think it’s very important to emphasise that many, many fellow Canadians are very committed to inclusive, warm, welcoming societies. Overall, we have values in this country, we have a democratic tradition, [and] we have a sense of pluralism and inclusion that really is part of our identity as Canadians.

    But the reality is as well that, for instance, Islam is the most negatively viewed religion in Canada, according to a recent poll (PDF) by Angus Reid. Or another poll by Leger a few months ago showed that while 46 percent of Canadians do see themselves as allies to Muslim communities, there’s still a significant number who don’t.

    Unfortunately for 2020 to 2021 – the most recent statistics – we’ve seen a 71-percent increase in anti-Muslim hate crimes, according to Statistics Canada. That only tells a partial story though, too, because a majority of people don’t report the hate that they experience.

    We’re able to sort of piece together these statistics and these lived experiences to know that again, we certainly do have our work cut out for us.

    Al Jazeera: What can be done to address and end Islamophobia in the country?

    Elghawaby: I think acknowledging that this phenomenon is real and impacts peoples’ lives has been a very important and hard-fought step. It did take the Quebec City mosque massacre and then the attack on the Afzaal family for there to be this wide consensus across Canada that this is clearly a phenomenon.

    The good news is that various levels of government have taken concrete action. Here in London, there is an action plan to disrupt Islamophobia … They have hired a Muslim liaison officer to work with communities and to look for ways to address this, to raise awareness and education.

    We have this office that I now sit in … that communities asked for. So we are taking positive steps forward. There is acknowledgement that this is a phenomenon that we need to address – as we need to address any form of racism in our country. What’s so critical I think for all Canadians to understand of course is that hate against one community is really hatred against all of us.

    Al Jazeera: What would you say is your mission as Canada’s special representative? What are you focusing on?

    Elghawaby: Number one is to provide the policy advice to the government: to provide guidance, as outlined in the mandate, around how policies and legislation are impacting on Muslim communities, as well as to provide guidance and support to national security agencies on training.

    Number two is about raising awareness about Islamophobia and its impacts, and working with community partners to look for ways to address the various issues that not only impact on Canadian Muslims, but impact on other minorities. For example, I touched upon issues of online safety, the rise of hate in Canada.

    Then the third level of work is really around that community engagement, to constantly be meeting and hearing from Canada’s Muslim communities on the experiences that people are having, not just with regards to hate but even discrimination, whether in the workplace, whether in other aspects of life – and to bring forward community-informed solutions.

    Al Jazeera: What would you want people to know about why there needs to be a special representative for combatting Islamophobia in Canada?

    Elghawaby: I think it’s extremely important that Canada has taken this step to appoint a special representative on combatting Islamophobia because it signals the importance of addressing a phenomenon that has led to deadly violence in this country.

    And we know that along the continuum of hate, deadly violence is sort of the very pinnacle and the worst of what hate can lead to. And so we have reached that pinnacle several times in this country – more than any other G7 [Group of Seven] country.

    But beyond even that, the day-to-day discrimination and Islamophobia and the systemic forms of Islamophobia that do exist are also impacting on people’s lives. And so the federal government has signalled that this is an issue that needs to be addressed.

    And it sends a reassurance to communities that this is being taken seriously. I’m very committed to working with all government partners, as well as civil society, as well as all minority communities, to address hate and of course specifically to address Islamophobia.

    Al Jazeera: How important is it to be able to freely speak out against policies that Muslim community members say are affecting them negatively – especially amid fears that these policies can lead to violence?

    Elghawaby: I think that policymakers, as [those] having to be responsive to the needs of the community that they serve, will only be able to do that job if their basis for decision-making is reliant on the actual impact of those policies on people’s lives.

    It’s not just an intention of what a law is meant to do, but it’s the impacts of policies and laws that are important to understand. So that if there are negative impacts of policies or legislation anywhere, there can be a course correction to ensure that everyone living in Canada is treated with dignity and respect, in their full rights as members of the society.

    This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Middle East: Goodbye America, hello China?

    The Middle East: Goodbye America, hello China?

    [ad_1]

    In an attempt to salvage his country’s waning influence in the Middle East, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is embarking on a three-day visit to Saudi Arabia this week. But advancing “strategic cooperation” with his Saudi and Gulf counterparts may well prove an uphill battle.

    In July last year, President Joe Biden attended the Gulf Cooperation Council summit in the kingdom and vowed that the United States “will not walk away and leave a vacuum to be filled by China, Russia, or Iran”. But that is precisely what has been happening.

    Despite US objections, the past year has seen its regional allies go hybrid: they have improved relations with Beijing and Tehran and maintained strong ties with Moscow.

    Although the Biden administration has publicly downplayed the importance of the recent Chinese-brokered Saudi-Iranian agreement to re-establish diplomatic relations, it seems frantic about the growing Chinese influence in the oil-rich Gulf region and the greater Middle East.

    Over the past two decades, the US has ramped up oil and gas production, becoming virtually energy independent. It may no longer need Gulf oil as much, but it insists on being in charge in the region so it is able to cut China off of vital energy supplies in the event of a conflict, and secure them for its allies.

    As Blinken warned last month, “China represents the most consequential geopolitical challenge we face today: a country with the intent and, increasingly, the capability to challenge our vision for a free, open, secure, and prosperous international order.”

    But Beijing’s autocracy may actually be an easier and better fit for the region’s autocrats than Washington’s democracy.

    Russia’s sway in the Middle East and beyond has also made the US nervous.

    Fed up with their ambiguity, even complicity with Russia, the Biden administration has been ramping up pressure on certain Middle Eastern states, making clear that its patience is running out. It has been warning countries in the region against helping Russia evade sanctions and demanding they pick sides – or else face the wrath of the US and G7 nations.

    But to no avail.

    Saudi Arabia has thus far refused the US request to substantially increase oil production to lower its market price and offset the effect of Western sanctions on Russia. It has maintained good relations with Moscow and dragged its feet on supporting Ukraine. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s “middle finger to Washington” has reportedly made him extremely popular in the region.

    Last year, in response to Biden’s threats to punish Riyadh for its presumed insolence, the kingdom went on to host the Chinese president, Xi Jinping for bilateral talks and the China-GCC and China-Arab summits. Saudi Arabia then normalised relations with Iran under Chinese auspices, just as the West was tightening sanctions against Tehran, and in a clear snub to the US, went on to repair ties with Syria.

    But this new attitude towards relations with the US is not only evident in Riyadh; it is a regional phenomenon. The United Arab Emirates, another US ally, has also cultivated closer ties with China, improved strategic relations with France, and worked on engaging Iran, Russia and India. This, at times, has been at the expense of its relations with the US.

    The region as a whole has been diversifying its global engagement. This is quite apparent in its commercial relations. Between 2000 and 2021, trade between the Middle East and China has grown from $15.2bn to $284.3bn; in the same period, trade with the US has increased only modestly from $63.4bn to $98.4bn.

    Six Middle Eastern countries – among them Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt – have recently requested to join the Chinese-led BRICS group, which also includes Russia, India, Brazil and South Africa. This is despite the West’s ever-widening sanctions regime imposed on Russia.

    Of course, America has been the dominant strategic power in the Middle East the past three decades and remains so today. But will it be in the next three decades?

    In a region where autocratic regimes and the general public do not agree on much if anything at all, saying no to America is a very popular stance because the majority believes it is a hypocritical imperial power that pays only lip service to human rights and democracy.

    This is particularly apparent in US foreign policy on Palestine, which staunchly and unconditionally supports the Palestinians’ coloniser and occupier – Israel.

    On his visit to Riyadh, Secretary Blinken will likely put pressure on Saudi Arabia to normalise relations with Tel Aviv, hoping to lower its asking price, which reportedly includes a nuclear civilian programme and major security assurances.

    The UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan have already normalised relations with Israel at the expense of the Palestinians in return for American concessions, such as the sale of US-made F-35s to Abu Dhabi, US recognition of Moroccan claims over Western Sahara, and the lifting of US sanctions on Khartoum. All so that the Israeli government does not have to make any “concessions” of its own and end its decades-long occupation of Palestine.

    But the Palestinian cause, which is quite close to the heart of ordinary Arabs, is not the only issue that has convinced the Arab public that America is a duplicitous power that should be kept at a distance.

    Thanks to satellite television and social media platforms, people of the region saw with their own eyes US crimes in Iraq and its humiliation in Afghanistan, and do not think of it as a guardian of civilisation, let alone an invincible power. The balance sheet of US interventions in the Middle East over the past 20 years since the 9/11 attacks is firmly not in its favour.

    No wonder that in a 2022 poll conducted by the Doha-based Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies in 14 Arab countries, 78 percent of respondents believed that the biggest source of threat and instability in the region was the US. By contrast, only 57 percent thought of Iran and Russia in these terms, both of which have had their own share of dirty work in the region – from Syria to Iraq and Yemen.

    In his aptly titled book, Grand Delusion: The Rise and Fall of American Ambition in the Middle East, former US official Steven Simon estimates the US has wasted some $5-7 trillion on wars that have resulted in the death of millions of Arabs and Muslims, and the devastation of their communities. In addition, these conflicts have killed thousands of US soldiers, injured tens of thousands and led to some 30,000 suicides of US veterans.

    It is no coincidence then, that more Middle Easterners (and Americans) agree that the region’s decoupling from America and at least some American disengagement from the region is as desirable as it is inevitable.

    Such a turn of events would also be terribly consequential with messy long-term implications for both sides and it would be determined by whether and how America chooses to change its foreign policy.

    But that’s another discussion for another day.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden signs debt ceiling bill, pulling US from brink of default

    Biden signs debt ceiling bill, pulling US from brink of default

    [ad_1]

    With just two days to spare, President Joe Biden has signed legislation that lifts the nation’s debt ceiling, averting an economically disastrous default on the federal government’s debt.

    The White House announced the signing on Saturday, done in private at the White House, in an emailed statement in which Biden thanked congressional leaders for their partnership.

    The Department of the Treasury had warned the country would start running short of cash to pay all of its bills on Monday, which would have sent shockwaves through the US and global economies.

    Republicans had refused to raise the country’s borrowing limit unless Democrats agreed to cut spending, leading to a standoff that was not resolved until weeks of intense negotiations between the White House and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

    The final agreement, passed by the House on Wednesday and the Senate on Thursday, suspends the debt limit until 2025 – after the next presidential election – and restricts government spending. It gives lawmakers budget targets for the next two years in hopes of assuring fiscal stability as the political season heats up.

    Raising the nation’s debt limit, now at $31.4 trillion, will ensure the government can borrow to pay debts already incurred.

    “Passing this budget agreement was critical. The stakes could not have been higher,” Biden said from the Oval Office on Friday evening. “Nothing would have been more catastrophic,” than defaulting on the country’s debt, he said.

    “No one got everything they wanted but the American people got what they needed,” Biden said, highlighting the “compromise and consensus” in the deal. “We averted an economic crisis and an economic collapse.”

    Biden used the opportunity to itemise the achievements of his first term as he runs for re-election, including support for high-tech manufacturing, infrastructure investments and financial incentives for fighting climate change. He also highlighted ways he blunted Republican efforts to roll back his agenda and achieve deeper cuts.

    “We’re cutting spending and bringing deficits down at the same time,” Biden said. “We’re protecting important priorities from Social Security to Medicare to Medicaid to veterans to our transformational investments in infrastructure and clean energy.”

    Even as he pledged to continue working with Republicans, Biden also drew contrasts with the opposing party, particularly when it comes to raising taxes on the wealthy, something the Democratic president has sought.

    It is something he suggested may need to wait until a second term. “I’m going to be coming back,” he said. “With your help, I’m going to win.”

    ‘Good of the country’

    Biden’s remarks were the most detailed comments from the Democratic president on the compromise he and his staff negotiated. He largely remained quiet publicly during the high-stakes talks, a decision that frustrated some members of his party but was intended to give space for both sides to reach a deal and for lawmakers to vote it to his desk.

    Biden praised McCarthy and his negotiators for operating in good faith, and all congressional leaders for ensuring swift passage of the legislation. “They acted responsibly, and put the good of the country ahead of politics,” he said.

    Overall, the 99-page bill restricts spending for the next two years and changes some policies, including imposing new work requirements for older Americans receiving food aid and greenlighting an Appalachian natural gas pipeline that many Democrats oppose. Some environmental rules were modified to help streamline approvals for infrastructure and energy projects – a move long sought by moderates in Congress.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimated that it could actually expand total eligibility for federal food assistance with the elimination of work requirements for veterans, homeless people and young people leaving foster care.

    The legislation also bolstered funds for defence and veterans, cut back some new money for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and rejected Biden’s call to roll back Trump-era tax breaks on corporations and the wealthy to help cover the nation’s deficits.

    But the White House said the IRS’s plans to step up enforcement of tax laws for high-income earners and corporations would continue.

    The agreement imposed an automatic overall 1 percent cut to spending programmes if Congress failed to approve its annual spending bills – a measure designed to pressure lawmakers of both parties to reach consensus before the end of the fiscal year in September.

    In both chambers, more Democrats backed the legislation than Republicans, but both parties were critical to its passage.

    In the Senate, the tally was 63-36 including 46 Democrats and independents and 17 Republicans in favour, 31 Republicans along with four Democrats and one independent who caucuses with the Democrats opposed.

    The vote in the House was 314-117.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 465

    Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 465

    [ad_1]

    As the war enters its 465th day, here’s a look at the main developments.

    This is the situation as it stands on Saturday, June 3, 2023.

    Fighting

    • The head of the Russian mercenary force Wagner, Yevgeny Prigozhin, said that nearly all of his fighters have pulled out of the captured eastern Ukrainian city of Bakhmut. Prigozhin said that 99 percent of his units have left the city.
    • Russia’s Ministry of Defence announced that the Akhmat group of Chechen special forces are waging an offensive near the town of Marinka in eastern Ukraine’s Donetsk region.
    • The Freedom of Russia Legion, a pro-Ukrainian force, said it was fighting Russian troops on the outskirts of a village in Russia’s Belgorod region just over the border with Ukraine. “We have active fighting on the outskirts of the village of Novaya Tavolzhanka [in the Belgorod region]. Unfortunately, there are wounded legionnaires, but freedom is won through blood,” the legion said in a statement.
    • Ukrainian forces in Kyiv said they shot down 36 Russian missiles and drones in and around the capital overnight, with two people injured by falling debris before authorities lifted air raid alerts across most of the country. Russia has launched about 20 missiles and drone attacks on Kyiv since the beginning of May.
    • Two people were killed and six others were injured in the Russian border region of Belgorod after heavy shelling from the Ukrainian side, according to Russian officials. Two children were among the injured.
    • A Russian-installed official in Donetsk said at least three people were killed and four wounded, including a three-year-old girl, due to Ukrainian shelling of the city of Makiivka. Russian forces bombed the Kharkiv region, killing two people and injuring four, according to The Kyiv Independent.
    • A Russian-installed official in Zaporizhia said Ukrainian forces shelled the Russian-controlled port city of Berdyansk and at least nine people were injured. Ukraine’s governor for the Zaporizhia region said that at least two people died and four were wounded due to a Russian attack on a village while a Russian-installed official said Ukrainian forces hit a “hospital camp” in the occupied part of Zaporizhia region. He did not provide details.
    • Ukraine’s President Volodymr Zelenskyy complained about problems with Kyiv’s air raid shelters after residents reported shortages of bunkers, locked bunkers and restricted access to them. “This level of negligence in the city cannot be justified,” Zelenskyy said, instructing his government to handle the issue.

    Diplomacy

    • United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said the US will not support peace talks for the war in Ukraine until Kyiv holds the upper hand, possibly after a Ukrainian counteroffensive. Blinken said heeding calls from Russia and others, including China, for a ceasefire and negotiations to end the war now would result in a “Potemkin peace” that would not secure Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity or enhance European security.
    • Zelenskyy said he knows it would be “impossible” for Ukraine to join the NATO military alliance while in the middle of a war. He said Ukraine joining the alliance was still the best security guarantee. “And that’s why we understand that we won’t be a member of NATO while this war is ongoing. Not because we don’t want to. Because it’s impossible”.
    • Russian President Vladimir Putin said “ill-wishers” are increasing efforts to destabilise Russia, and he urged members of his cabinet not to allow this “under any circumstances”. Putin said Russia’s security council would discuss ensuring security between the country’s 190 ethnic groups.
    • China’s envoy to Ukraine appealed to governments to “stop sending weapons to the battlefield” and hold peace talks. “China believes that if we really want to put an end to war, to save lives and realise peace, it is important for us to stop sending weapons to the battlefield, or else the tensions will only spiral up,” Li Hui said.

    Aid

    • The Swiss parliament rejected an exemption for the transfer of arms to Ukraine after most members of parliament voted against a proposal that would have allowed other states to supply Swiss-made weapons to Ukraine. The laws of neutral Switzerland prohibit support for countries involved in acts of war.
    • US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley said the training of Ukrainian forces in the use of Abrams tanks has begun.

    Politics

    • Polish President Andrzej Duda has backtracked on a new law creating a body to probe “Russian influence” after critics, including the European Union and the US, voiced concern.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US investigators end probe into former VP Pence classified docs

    US investigators end probe into former VP Pence classified docs

    [ad_1]

    The lack of charges in the probe removes one headache for Pence before his anticipated presidential campaign launch.

    The United States Department of Justice has ended a probe into the handling of classified documents found at the home of former Vice President Mike Pence, without filing any charges.

    The move, reported by US media on Friday, removed at least one legal woe for Pence before the expected announcement next week that he will run for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election.

    Pence’s entrance into the race would see the staunchly religious conservative take on his former boss and current frontrunner Donald Trump, as well as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.

    In a tweet on Friday, Noah Bookbinder, president of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, called the Department of Justice’s decision not to charge Pence “appropriate” given that only a few documents were recovered.

    “He apparently didn’t know about them, and he has fully cooperated with the investigation — all of which is in marked contrast with Donald Trump,” he said.

    Classified documents also at Trump, Biden homes

    In January, Pence’s lawyer Greg Jacob notified federal authorities that the former vice president had discovered classified documents at his home. Pence, Jacob said, was “unaware” of their existence and promised to cooperate fully with the subsequent investigation.

    But Pence is not the only major political figure to undergo scrutiny for classified documents in recent months.

    In November, lawyers for US President Joe Biden informed authorities that classified documents had been found at his Delaware residence, as well as at his office at the Penn Biden Center think tank in Washington, DC. The Department of Justice has pursued an investigation into that incident, as well.

    Prior to that, the department had launched a probe into a tranche of classified documents recovered at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, including about 33 containers with 11,000 documents, at least 184 of which carried classified markings.

    On Thursday, CNN reported that federal prosecutors had obtained a 2021 audio recording of the former president acknowledging he kept a classified Pentagon document about a possible attack on Iran after leaving the White House.

    The report undercuts Trump’s claim that he had declassified the documents before taking them.

    An expected campaign launch

    US media on Wednesday reported that Pence is expected to announce his presidential bid on June 7.

    While the investigation’s end removes one possible stumbling block, analysts said Pence’s bid is a long shot. A former Indiana governor, he has polled far behind rivals Trump and DeSantis, averaging just 4 percent of support within the Republican party.

    When Pence was tapped to be Trump’s running mate in their successful 2016 campaign, he was framed as a traditional conservative who would “balance” the ticket with his evangelical bona fides and wealth of political experience.

    Though he served as a loyal deputy to Trump throughout the presidency, Pence ultimately broke ranks by resisting a pressure campaign to stop the certification of Biden’s 2020 election victory.

    The move has made Pence a top target of Trump’s vocal base. When Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, some were heard chanting, “Hang Mike Pence.”

    In April, Pence was ordered to testify before a federal grand jury probing Trump and his allies’ attempts to overturn the election results.

    Pence has said, “History will hold Donald Trump accountable.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Bullying’ campaign after US graduate speech criticises Israel

    ‘Bullying’ campaign after US graduate speech criticises Israel

    [ad_1]

    Washington, DC – It is not often that Republicans and Democrats in the United States find common ground, but this week, officials from both major parties pursued a shared cause – bashing a New York law school graduate for a speech criticising Israel.

    Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres called The City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law graduate “crazed”; former Republican candidate for governor Lee Zeldin described the speech as “raging antisemitism”; Mayor Eric Adams characterised it as “words of negativity and divisiveness”.

    Even Republican Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas, joined the pile-on of condemnations against the Yemeni-American graduate speaker, Fatima Mohammed. CUNY itself dubbed the speech a “public expression of hate toward people and communities based on their religion, race or political affiliation” in a statement attributed to its chancellor.

    The New York Post tabloid newspaper put Mohammed on its front page on Tuesday.

    But many Palestinian rights advocates appeared bewildered by the accusations, stressing that Mohammed said nothing hateful or bigoted.

    Advocates say the vilification of Mohammed fits into a broader pattern of publicly attacking Israel’s critics in an effort to deter further criticism of the country’s policies.

    Adam Shapiro, director of advocacy for Israel-Palestine at Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), a US-based rights group, said pro-Israel organisations and politicians are hoping that such attacks would dissuade Palestine solidarity activists from speaking out.

    “But I think it’s actually having the opposite effect. I think this actually emboldens more people to speak out,” Shapiro told Al Jazeera.

    He highlighted successful legal and political advocacy to push back against “smear campaigns” in recent years.

    The speech

    Mohammed’s speech was given to the law school’s graduating class of 2023 earlier this month but started making headlines after it was noticed online by some media outlets last week. From there, it gained exponential national and international attention as more pro-Israel publications and politicians continued to condemn it.

    In her 12-minute address, Mohammed touched on a variety of social justice causes, highlighting the student body’s activism.

    “I want to celebrate CUNY law as one of the few if not the only law school to make a public statement defending the right of its students to organise and speak out against Israeli settler colonialism,” she said.

    The hijab-wearing speaker’s remarks were interrupted repeatedly by applause from fellow graduates in the audience.

    Mohammed went on to say: “Israel continues to indiscriminately rain bullets and bombs on worshippers, murdering the old, the young, attacking even funerals and graveyards as it encourages lynch mobs to target Palestinian homes and businesses.”

    Her accusations seem to correspond with recent Israeli conduct, including attacks on worshippers inside Al-Aqsa Mosque during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan and a police assault on slain Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh’s funeral last year.

    Earlier this year, a mob of Israeli settlers also ransacked the Israeli-occupied West Bank town of Huwara, and an Israeli government minister said the Palestinian community should be “wiped out”.

    “It ultimately was a review of what’s been happening in real life on the ground in Palestine,” Shapiro said of the speech.

    CUNY did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment seeking clarification on what part of Mohammed’s address constituted “hate speech”.

    Mohammed also touched on other issues, including the university’s cooperation with law enforcement, calling the New York Police Department “fascist”.

    While the speech was decidedly politically charged, Mohammed’s supporters noted that CUNY Law’s mission statement explicitly states that the programme is social justice-oriented.

    “CUNY Law is built on a tradition of radical lawyering: movements for social change are built with leadership and collaboration from the people and communities who have experienced injustice,” it says.

    Advocates defend Mohammed

    Activists say the campaign against Mohammed is the latest episode in attacks against pro-Palestine advocates. Palestinian rights supporters in the US often face accusations of anti-Semitism and campaigns to cancel their events and protests.

    Professors critical of Israel have lost their jobs as the result of pressure campaigns. Political nominees to human rights and diplomatic positions in the government have been withdrawn over past criticism of Israel in recent years.

    But this week, as pro-Israel groups and politicians put Mohammed in their crosshairs, many Arab, Muslim and Palestinian rights advocates came to her defence.

    Ahmad Abuznaid, executive director of the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USPCR), lauded Mohammed’s address as “impassioned and liberatory” against white supremacy, state surveillance and Israeli colonialism.

    “Of course the politicians upholding these oppressive institutions are quick to smear her for calling out their violent complicity,” Abuznaid told Al Jazeera in an email.

    “We applaud Fatima for her principled speech and look forward to following her pursuit of justice and liberation for all people in her legal career.”

    The New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-NY) denounced what it called the “silencing of voices” seeking to underscore human rights abuses.

    “CAIR-NY stands in solidarity with the student commencement speaker who bravely sought to elevate the plight of Palestinians and the human rights abuses they face. We affirm their right to express their views freely and without interference,” Afaf Nasher, the group’s executive director, said in a statement.

    The New York City chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace, an anti-occupation group, also praised Mohammed and slammed her critics, accusing them of using Islamophobic tropes to “punch down” and smear the young woman.

    “We decry the false characterization of her speech as anti-Semitic simply because she accurately describes the conditions Palestinians live under every day. We couldn’t agree with her more that ‘Palestine can no longer be the exception to our pursuit of justice’,” the group said.

    Mohammed’s defenders were particularly incensed at Congressman Torres, a staunchly pro-Israel Democrat.

    “Imagine being so crazed by hatred for Israel as a Jewish State that you make it the subject of your commencement speech at a law school graduation,” Torres wrote on Twitter on Sunday. “Anti-Israel derangement syndrome at work.”

    Palestinian-American analyst Yousef Munayyer hit out at Torres.

    “The idea that Muslims are irrationally and uncontrollably possessed by hatred of Jews is an racist and Islamophobic trope you are engaging in. Imagine being so cowardly to be a congressman punching down at a student for speaking up against Apartheid,” Munayyer said in a tweet.

    Torres’s office did not immediately respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

    For his part, Shapiro – of DAWN – said Torres was coming after a young Muslim, hijab-wearing woman with far less power to shore up his pro-Israel credentials.

    “This is a classic case of bullying,” Shapiro said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Wagner boss blasts Russia’s elite following Moscow drone attack

    Wagner boss blasts Russia’s elite following Moscow drone attack

    [ad_1]

    The head of Russia’s Wagner mercenary force has again criticised the Russian military and political elite following the drone attack on Moscow that injured two people, damaged property and left some furious the Kremlin had not better protected the capital city.

    In an expletive-drenched statement posted on Telegram by his press service on Tuesday, Yevgeny Prigozhin – whose mercenary fighters have played a key role in the war in Ukraine – blamed the drone attack on out-of-touch officials living in Moscow’s affluent suburb of Rublyovka.

    “You, the Defence Ministry, have done nothing to launch an offensive,” Prigozhin said in the statement.

    “How dare you allow the drones to reach Moscow?”

    “And what do ordinary people do when drones with explosives crash into their windows?”

    Focusing his ire on powerful residents of the upmarket Rublyovka area in Moscow’s western suburbs, Prigozhin spoke of the “scum” and “swine” who sat quietly while Moscow was attacked.

    In a post on Telegram after the attack on Tuesday, Alexander Khinshtein, a prominent member of Russia’s parliament from the ruling United Russia bloc, said three of the eight drones had been downed over three Rublyovka villages, one of which is located just 10 minutes drive from Russian President Vladimir Putin’s residence at Novo-Ogaryovo.

    Rublyovka, a patchwork of elite gated communities in the forests west of Moscow, which once boasted some of the world’s highest real-estate prices, is home to much of Russia’s political, business and cultural elite. Former President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin have been reported to own homes in Rublyovka, alongside many of Russia’s richest business figures.

    Wagner boss Prigozhin, known for his blunt and often foul language, has repeatedly cast Rublyovka’s residents as an out-of-touch elite insufficiently committed to the war in Ukraine and has blamed the top brass for Russian failures on the battlefield.

    Russian military blogger Igor Girkin – whom a Dutch court found guilty of the murder of 298 people who were killed when flight MH17 was shot down over Russian-controlled eastern Ukraine in 2014 – also criticised Rublyovka residents on Tuesday who, he said, had “never thought about the country”.

    He also chided Putin for continuing to state the war in Ukraine was a “special military operation”, despite drone attacks on the Russian capital, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) wrote on Wednesday.

    Following the drone attacks, Ramzan Kadyrov, the strongman leader of the Russian province of Chechnya, urged the Kremlin to declare martial law nationwide and use all its resources in Ukraine “to sweep away that terrorist gang”.

    The ISW, a Washington, DC-based think tank, said that Kadyrov also warned European countries over supplying Ukraine with weapons, stating that “if they continue to supply Ukraine with weapons, they will not have the weapons needed to defend themselves when Russia ‘knocks on their doors’”.

    Some Kremlin watchers noted that Putin’s calm reaction to the drone attack contrasted starkly with angry statements from Russian hawks and appears to reflect his belief that the Russian public will not be unsettled by the attack.

    Putin said it was clear that Moscow’s air defences need to be improved against what he described as Ukrainian “terrorism”.

    Legitimate defence

    Russia’s envoy to the United States said on Wednesday that Washington was encouraging Kyiv to carry out such attacks by not speaking out against the drone raid on Moscow.

    The White House said it did not support attacks inside of Russia and that it was still gathering information on the incident.

    “What are these attempts to hide behind the phrase that they are ‘gathering information’?” Russian ambassador to Washington Anatoly Antonov said in remarks published on the Telegram messaging channel.

    “This is an encouragement for Ukrainian terrorists,” he said.

    Though not commenting specifically on the Moscow drone attacks, the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said on Tuesday that Ukraine had the right to attack targets on Russian territory for the purpose of self-defence.

    “Ukraine does have the legitimate right to defend itself,” Cleverly said during a press conference with his Estonian counterpart Margus Tsahkna in Estonia’s capital Tallinn.

    “It has the legitimate right to do so within its own borders, of course, but it does also have the right to project force beyond its borders to undermine Russia’s ability to project force into Ukraine itself,” he said. “So legitimate military targets beyond its own border are part of Ukraine’s self-defence. And we should recognise that,” he added.

    Ukrainian forces shelled a Russian town close to the border for the third time in a week on Wednesday, damaging buildings and setting vehicles on fire, the governor of the region said on Wednesday.

    At least one person was injured during the artillery strike on Shebekino, Belgorod Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said.

    A Ukrainian drone also sparked a fire at the Afipsky oil refinery in southern Russia on Wednesday, the governor of Russia’s Krasnodar region said.

    The fire was soon extinguished and there were no casualties, Governor Veniamin Kondratyev said on the Telegram messaging app. The Afipsky refinery is not far from the Black Sea port of Novorossiisk, near another refinery that has been attacked several times this month.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nine injured in shooting at Florida beach in US

    Nine injured in shooting at Florida beach in US

    [ad_1]

    Four minors – aged between one and 17 – were injured, along with five adults, police say.

    Nine people were injured when gunfire erupted along a beachside promenade in Hollywood, Florida, sending people frantically running for cover along the crowded beach during the Memorial Day holiday in the United States.

    Several of those wounded on Monday evening were taken to a children’s hospital, police spokesperson Deanna Bettineschi said.

    Bettineschi said four minors – aged between one and 17 – were hit, along with five adults between 25 and 65. One was in surgery late on Monday night while the others were stable, she said.

    The shooting happened shortly before 7pm (23:00 GMT) when a fight broke out and at least one gun was pulled and shots were fired, Bettineschi said. At least one person was in custody, but police were looking for more suspects.

    Police chief Chris O’Brien said thousands of people were in the area and dozens of police officers responded, including some who were nearby.

    “It’s unfortunate we have law-abiding citizens who come to our beaches and that gets interrupted by a group of criminals,” he said.

    Videos posted on Twitter showed emergency medical crews responding and providing aid to injured people.

    Police said there would be a heavy presence of officers as the investigation continues. Officials also set up an area for family members to reunite.

    “Thank you to the good samaritans, paramedics, police and emergency room doctors and nurses for their immediate response to aid the victims of today’s shooting,” Hollywood Mayor Josh Levy said in a statement.

    The South Florida Sun Sentinel newspaper quoted the mayor as saying: “Our beach has millions of beachgoers a year. It’s a very popular and beautiful destination. Ordinarily, it’s a peaceful beach.”

    A popular beach destination, Hollywood was expecting to see more visitors than usual because of the Memorial Day holiday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As per your politics, debt ceiling plan is good or a ‘disaster’

    As per your politics, debt ceiling plan is good or a ‘disaster’

    [ad_1]

    The reviews are starting to come in as details emerge about the debt ceiling agreement reached by United States President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

    Even before seeing those details, some politicians were criticising the deal as not doing enough to tackle the nation’s debt, while others worried it is too austere and will harm many low-income Americans.

    The legislation will probably need support from a significant number of politicians of both parties to clear the closely divided House of Representatives and gain the 60 votes necessary to advance in the Senate.

    Many legislators said they were withholding judgement until they see the final details, many of which did not come out until Sunday evening. That’s when the 99-page bill that resulted from the Biden-McCarthy negotiations was made public.

    Here’s a look at how the agreement is going over so far:

    Early concerns

    Some of the earliest objections are coming from the most conservative members of Congress, particularly members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus that often clashes with GOP leadership.

    “I think it’s a disaster!” tweeted Matt Rosendale, a Republican from Montana.

    “Fake conservatives agree to fake spending cuts,” tweeted Senator Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky.

    “This ‘deal’ is insanity,” tweeted Representative Ralph Norman, a Republican from South Carolina. “A $4T debt ceiling increase with virtually no cuts is not what we agreed to. Not gonna vote to bankrupt our country. The American people deserve better.”

    GOP leaders knew all along that they would lose some members’ support in any compromise with a Democratic-led White House and Senate. The question has always been whether the deal would pick up enough Democratic support to offset those defections.

    Democrats weigh in

    As much as some Democrats dislike what is roughly a spending freeze on non-defence programmes next year and chafe at work requirements being extended to more food-stamp recipients, initial reaction has been circumspect as they await more details.

    Representative Annie Kuster, a Democrat from New Hampshire and chair of a centre-left group known as the New Dems, which has roughly 100 members, said the group is “confident” that White House negotiators delivered a “viable, bipartisan solution to end this crisis”.

    Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said he believed it was the best deal that could be reached given the demands coming from House Republicans.

    “To my colleagues who have serious misgivings about this deal, I say this is far better than defaulting,” Coons said.

    The likeliest opposition will come from the more liberal members of the caucus. Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat from Washington state, has been voicing opposition to additional work requirements for some of those getting food and cash assistance. She called the debt ceiling agreement a “terrible policy” Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union programme.

    But she said she is also waiting for legislative text to determine the level of exemptions to the work requirements that Biden was able to win for veterans, homeless people and people coming out of foster care.

    “And so what do the numbers look like at the end of the day, I’m not sure,” said Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. “However, it is bad policy. I told the president that directly, when he called me last week on Wednesday, that this is saying to poor people and people who are in need that we don’t trust them.”

    Asked if the Democrats at the White House and in the congressional leadership have to worry about whether the progressive caucus will support the bill, Jayapal said: “Yes, they have to worry.”

    A provision that expedites the approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a natural gas pipeline in West Virginia and Virginia, also adds to the consternation many Democrats will have about the bill. They had succeeded in keeping it out of prior bills, but Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, and other members of the West Virginia delegation prevailed in getting it included in the debt limit bill. Environmental groups were harshly criticising its inclusion Sunday evening.

    Business group backing

    With the nation roughly a week away from the risk of a default that could roil the US and global economy, major business groups have been urging Washington to act quickly on a debt-ceiling increase.

    The Business Roundtable, a group of more than 200 chief executive officers, called on Congress to pass the bill as soon as possible.

    “In addition to raising the debt ceiling, this agreement takes steps towards putting the US on a more sustainable fiscal trajectory,” said the group’s CEO, Joshua Bolten. “This deal also makes a down payment on permitting reform, helping to clear the path for new energy infrastructure projects.”

    The US Chamber of Commerce also urged a “yes” vote and noted that the vote will be included when the group rates or “scorecards” members of Congress based on how they vote on business priorities.

    Economists have been clear that the economy would be roiled with even a short-term breach in the nation’s ability to fully pay its bills as interest rates would rise and financial markets swoon.

    “The gravity of this moment cannot be overstated,” said Suzanne Clark, the US Chamber of Commerce president and CEO.

    Watchdog groups approve

    Some advocacy groups have long warned of the propensity of Congress to enact policy priorities without fully paying for them. Their concerns generally go unheeded. But some see the agreement as a step in the right direction.

    The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted that if the legislation passes, it would be the first major deficit-reducing budget agreement in almost a dozen years.

    “The process was tense, risky and ugly, but in the end, we have a plan to enact savings and lift the debt ceiling, and that is what is needed,” said Maya MacGuineas, the group’s president.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Celine Dion cancels 2023-24 shows over health condition

    Celine Dion cancels 2023-24 shows over health condition

    [ad_1]

    Singer posted a video in December 2022 to say she had recently been diagnosed with Stiff-Person Syndrome.

    Pop icon Celine Dion has cancelled all her remaining shows scheduled for 2023-24, saying she was not strong enough to tour as she battles a rare neurological disorder.

    Last year, the 55-year-old Canadian revealed that her condition – Stiff-Person Syndrome – was affecting her singing.

    “I’m so sorry to disappoint all of you once again… and even though it breaks my heart, it’s best that we cancel everything until I’m really ready to be back on stage,” Dion tweeted.

    “I’m not giving up… and I can’t wait to see you again!” she added.

    A statement released by her tour said, “With a sense of tremendous disappointment, Celine Dion’s Courage World Tour today announced the cancellation of all remaining dates currently on sale for 2023 and 2024.”

    Dion, one of the top women singers with an octave-busting voice, is the author of hits like, Because You Loved Me, My Heart Will Go On, and, Think Twice.

    In December 2022, she posted a tearful video on Instagram to say she had recently been diagnosed with Stiff-Person Syndrome and would not be ready to start her European tour in February as planned.

    She said the disorder was causing muscle spasms and was “not allowing me to use my vocal cords to sing the way I’m used to”.

    Sufferers commonly experience stiff muscles in the torso, arms and legs, with noise or emotional distress known to trigger spasms.

    The cancellations will affect her 16-country tour in Europe which was due to start in Amsterdam in August and conclude with two dates at the O2 arena in London in April next year.

    Her “Courage World Tour” began in 2019, and Dion completed 52 shows before the coronavirus pandemic put the remainder on hold. She later cancelled the North American section of the tour due to her health problems.

    Fans online reacted with disappointment, but wished Dion well.

    “Not surprising, but no less sad. Courage to you Celine, we are with you,” wrote one fan information account @LesRedHeads.

    “You don’t have to apologize queen! Take care of yourself. Your health should take number one priority,” wrote @notaerz.

    The youngest of 14 children, Dion was born in Quebec, Canada and got her start at 12, when her mother sent a recording of her to Angelil, who mortgaged his own home to finance her first album. She began singing in French, but started bellowing out hits in English after taking English lessons in the 1980s.

    She gained worldwide fame in 1997 with, My Heart Will Go On, the theme to James Cameron’s extremely popular film, Titanic.

    She parlayed that success into a regular gig at Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas, playing for audiences night after night for 16 years, with only a few breaks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Top US court curbs government regulations to protect wetlands

    Top US court curbs government regulations to protect wetlands

    [ad_1]

    The United States Supreme Court has made it harder for the federal government to police water pollution, issuing a decision that strips protections from wetlands that are isolated from larger bodies of water.

    The ruling on Thursday is the second decision in as many years narrowing the reach of federal environmental regulations. The court’s conservative majority boosted property rights over concerns about clean water.

    The justices found in favour of a couple who sought to build a house near Priest Lake in Idaho’s panhandle. Chantell and Michael Sackett objected when federal officials identified a soggy portion of the property as a wetlands and required them to get a permit before building.

    By a 5-4 vote, the court said wetlands may only be regulated if they have a “continuous surface connection” to larger, regulated bodies of water.

    The court dropped the 17-year-old opinion by their former colleague Anthony Kennedy that allowed regulation of wetlands that have a “significant nexus” to larger waterways.

    Kennedy’s opinion had been the standard for evaluating whether wetlands were covered under the 1972 Clean Water Act (CWA). Opponents had objected that the standard was vague and unworkable.

    In the majority opinion issued with Thursday’s ruling, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was exceeding the powers granted under the CWA when regulating all wetlands.

    While praising the CWA as a “great success” that led to the cleanup of severely polluted rivers and lakes, the conservative justice said its vague mandate has been an “unfortunate footnote”.

    “The Act applies to ‘the waters of the United States’, but what does that phrase mean? Does the term encompass any backyard that is soggy enough for some minimum period of time?” Alito asked.

    Environmental advocates predicted that narrowing the reach of that law would strip protections from more than half the wetlands in the country.

    Reacting to the decision, Manish Bapna, the chief executive of the Natural Resources Defense Counsel, called on the US Congress to amend the CWA to restore wetlands protections and on states to strengthen their own laws.

    “The Supreme Court ripped the heart out of the law we depend on to protect American waters and wetlands,” Bapna said in a statement. “The majority chose to protect polluters at the expense of healthy wetlands and waterways. This decision will cause incalculable harm. Communities across the country will pay the price.”

    At the White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the decision “aims to take our country backwards. It will jeopardise the sources of clean drinking water for farmers, businesses and millions of Americans.”

    Jean-Pierre said President Joe Biden will “use every legal authority available to him” to ensure Americans have clean drinking water.

    The outcome almost certainly will affect ongoing court battles over new wetlands regulations that the Biden administration put in place in December. Two federal judges have temporarily blocked those rules from being enforced in 26 states.

    Scientists say protecting wetlands, which naturally capture planet-warming emissions, is key to combating climate change.

    But in Thursday’s ruling, all nine justices agreed that the wetlands on the Sacketts’ property are not covered by the act. Yet only five justices joined in the majority opinion, imposing a new test for evaluating when wetlands are covered by the CWA.

    Conservative Brett Kavanaugh and the court’s three liberal justices charged that their colleagues had rewritten the law with their opinion.

    “The Court’s erroneous test not only will create real-world consequences for the waters of the United States, but also is sufficiently novel and vague (at least as a single standalone test) that it may create regulatory uncertainty for the Federal Government, the States, and regulated parties,” Kavanaugh wrote.

    Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the majority’s rewriting of the act was “an effort to cabin the anti-pollution actions Congress thought appropriate”. Kagan referenced last year’s decision limiting the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the CWA.

    In both cases, she noted, the court had appointed “itself as the national decision-maker on environmental policy”. Kagan was joined in her opinion by her liberal colleagues Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

    Thursday’s decision is part of an ongoing trend. Since former President Donald Trump appointed the last of his three Supreme Court justices in 2020, the high court has had a solid conservative majority, allowing for the rollback of regulations and the advancement of right-wing priorities.

    Those priorities included overturning the constitutional right to abortion, which the court ordered last year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US bombs unlikely to reach underground Iran nuclear site: Report

    US bombs unlikely to reach underground Iran nuclear site: Report

    [ad_1]

    Near a peak of the Zagros Mountains in central Iran, workers are building a nuclear facility so deep in the earth that it is likely beyond the range of a last-ditch United States weapon designed to destroy such sites, according to experts and satellite imagery analysed by The Associated Press news agency.

    The photos and videos from Planet Labs PBC show Iran has been digging tunnels in the mountain near the Natanz nuclear site, which has come under repeated sabotage attacks amid Tehran’s standoff with the West over its atomic programme.

    With the country now producing uranium close to weapons-grade levels after the collapse of its nuclear deal with world powers, the installation complicates the West’s efforts to halt Tehran from potentially developing an atomic bomb, which Iran denies seeking.

    The report on Monday comes amid a spike in Iran-US tensions and stalled diplomacy between the two countries.

    Completion of such a facility “would be a nightmare scenario that risks igniting a new escalatory spiral,” warned Kelsey Davenport, the director of nonproliferation policy at the Washington-based Arms Control Association.

    “Given how close Iran is to a bomb, it has very little room to ratchet up its programme without tripping US and Israeli red lines. So at this point, any further escalation increases the risk of conflict,” Davenport told AP.

     

    This month marked five years since former President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from a multilateral nuclear deal that saw Iran scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for a lifting of international sanctions against its economy.

    The administration of US President Joe Biden has continued to impose and enforce a strict sanctions regime against Iran and its oil and petrochemicals industries. Meanwhile, Tehran has been advancing its nuclear programme.

    Biden, who was vice president to Barack Obama when the 2015 agreement was signed, had promised to revive the pact, but numerous rounds of indirect talks over the past two years have failed to restore it.

    Since the demise of the nuclear accord, Iran has said it is enriching uranium up to 60 percent – up from the 3.67 percent limit it observed under the deal. Inspectors also recently discovered the country had produced uranium particles that were 83.7 percent pure, just a short step from reaching the 90 percent threshold of weapons-grade uranium.

    As of February, international inspectors estimated Iran’s stockpile was more than 10 times what it was under the Obama-era deal, with enough enriched uranium to allow Tehran to make “several” nuclear bombs, according to the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

    The US and Israel – which is widely believed to have its own covert nuclear arsenal – have said they won’t allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon. “We believe diplomacy is the best way to achieve that goal, but the president has also been clear that we have not removed any option from the table,” the White House said in a statement to the AP.

    Iran’s mission to the United Nations, in response to questions from the AP regarding the construction, said that “Iran’s peaceful nuclear activities are transparent and under the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards.”

    Iran says the new construction will replace an above-ground centrifuge manufacturing centre at Natanz struck by an explosion and fire in July 2020. Tehran labelled the attack at that time as “nuclear terrorism” and blamed it on Israel.

    Tehran has not acknowledged any other plans for the facility, though it would have to declare the site to the IAEA if authorities planned to introduce uranium into it. The Vienna-based IAEA did not respond to questions about the new underground facility.

    The new project is being constructed next to Natanz, about 225km (140 miles) south of Tehran. Natanz has been a point of international concern since its existence became known two decades ago.

    Protected by anti-aircraft batteries, fencing and Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, the facility sprawls across 2.7sq km (1sq mile) in the country’s arid central plateau.

    Satellite photos taken in April by Planet Labs PBC and analysed by the AP show Iran burrowing into the Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La, or “Pickaxe Mountain”, which is just beyond Natanz’s southern fencing.

    A different set of images analysed by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies reveals that four entrances have been dug into the mountainside, two to the east and another two to the west. Each is 6m (20 ft) wide and 8m (26 ft) tall.

    The scale of the work can be measured in large dirt mounds, two to the west and one to the east. Based on the size of the spoil piles and other satellite data, experts at the centre told AP that Iran is likely building a facility at a depth of between 80m (260 ft) and 100m (328 ft). The centre’s analysis, which it provided exclusively to AP, is the first to estimate the tunnel system’s depth based on satellite imagery.

    “So the depth of the facility is a concern because it would be much harder for us. It would be much harder to destroy using conventional weapons, such as… a typical bunker buster bomb,” said Steven De La Fuente, a research associate at the centre who led the analysis of the tunnel work.

    The new Natanz facility is likely to be even deeper underground than Iran’s Fordow facility, another enrichment site that was exposed in 2009 by the US and others. That facility sparked fears in the West that Iran was hardening its programme from air attacks

    Such underground facilities led the US to create the GBU-57 bomb, which can plow through at least 60m (200 ft) of earth before detonating, according to the US military.

    US officials reportedly have discussed using two such bombs in succession to ensure a site is destroyed, according to AP. It is not clear that such a one-two punch would damage a facility as deep as the one at Natanz.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What is the G20?

    What is the G20?

    [ad_1]

    The forum of the world’s biggest economies is focused on economic matters. Its latest meeting is in Indian-administered Kashmir.

    India is the chair this year of the Group of 20 (G20), one of the most important international forums, and plans more than 100 G20 meetings across the country.

    The G20 is primarily concerned with economic matters. It is made up of the world’s 20 largest economies – the European Union and 19 countries.

    The bloc generates 85 percent of the global gross domestic product and accounts for two-thirds of the world’s population.

    (Al Jazeera)

    The G20 was formed in 1999 in the wake of a number of economic crises, including the 1997 Asian financial crisis. It includes longtime industrialised and developing countries. It describes itself as the “premier forum for international economic cooperation”.

    The G20 members are:

    • Argentina
    • Australia
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • European Union
    • France
    • Germany
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Mexico
    • Russia
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • South Korea
    • Turkey
    • United Kingdom
    • United States

    India as 2023 host

    The latest G20 gathering is a tourism meeting in Indian-administered Kashmir, taking place under tight security and with criticism from China and Pakistan.

    New Delhi is seeking to promote the disputed region’s tourism potential. The aim of the meeting is to accelerate the tourism sector’s move towards sustainable development goals by 2030, the Indian government says.

    More than 60 delegates are attending the three-day event, which started on Monday.

    However, China is not attending. It opposes the meeting being held in the disputed Himalayan territory.

    Pakistan, which along with India claims the territory in full, has also condemned New Delhi’s decision to hold the event there.

    INDIA-KASHMIR-G20
    A convoy of cars carrying delegates makes its way to the G20 tourism meeting in Srinagar on May 22, 2023. [Tauseef Musfafa/AFP]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What will the next race to the White House look like?

    What will the next race to the White House look like?

    [ad_1]

    Leading campaign managers from both parties weigh in on their presumptive candidates’ chances in 2024.

    Both Joe Biden and Donald Trump claim they are fighting for the soul of the United States. And, as president, both were equally unpopular by their second year in office, hovering at about 40 percent approval ratings.

    On The Bottom Line, host Steve Clemons asks Democratic and Republican campaign managers to weigh in on their candidates’ chances in the race for the White House next year.

    Jason Miller, senior adviser to the Trump campaign, says his candidate’s anti-establishment message connects with millions of Americans – not only Republicans. Faiz Shakir, former campaign manager for Senator Bernie Sanders, says Trump’s candidacy ironically fuels support for the presumptive Democratic candidate, President Biden.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian cruise missile attack targets Kyiv, one killed in Odesa

    Russian cruise missile attack targets Kyiv, one killed in Odesa

    [ad_1]

    Attack on Kyiv marks the ninth time this month that Russian air raids have targeted the Ukrainian capital.

    Russian missile attacks have again rocked Ukraine with one person reported killed in the southern city of Odesa and falling debris from destroyed missiles causing fires in two districts of the capital, Kyiv.

    Two more people were also wounded in the Odesa attack, Ukraine’s military administration spokesman Serhiy Bratchuk wrote on Telegram on Thursday.

    Ukraine’s army reported several explosions in Kyiv’s Desnianskyi district and said a fire had broken out at a business in the city’s Darnytskyi neighbourhood as a result of falling debris from the shooting down of missiles.

    The military also reported “cruise missile” attacks in the central Vinnytsia region, and local media reported explosions in Khmelnytskyi, about 100km (62 miles) further west.

    Kyiv’s anti-aircraft defences had engaged the air attack and there were no reports of injuries, according to Serhii Popko, head of the city’s civil and military administration, who urged people to stay in bomb shelters.

    “A series of air attacks on Kyiv, unprecedented in their power, intensity and variety, continues,” Popko said.

    The city had been attacked by cruise missiles and all of them were downed by air defences, he said.

    Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko, writing on Telegram, said one fire had broken out in a garage facility in the city’s Darnitsya region and debris had also fallen in another part of the city. He said there were no casualties from either of the incidents.

    The attack on Kyiv marks the ninth time this month that Russian air raids have targeted the capital, a clear escalation after weeks of a lull and ahead of a much-anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive using newly supplied advanced Western weapons.

    On Tuesday, Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine’s Armed Forces Valerii Zaluzhnyi said that Ukraine had shot down 18 Russian missiles of various types that were launched in a concentrated attack on Kyiv.

    Russia had launched six Kinzhal ballistic missiles, nine Kalibr cruise missiles, and three Iskander land-based cruise missiles, Zaluzhnyi said on Telegram. Ukraine’s Air Force also shot down six Iranian-made Shahed drones and three reconnaissance drones.

    US-made Patriot missile systems have proved key in helping to shield Kyiv against relentless missile attacks targeting civilians and infrastructure.

    One of only two Patriot systems confirmed to be in Ukraine was damaged by an unspecified projectile landing nearby, US officials confirmed on Wednesday, though they said the missile system was easily repaired and functioning.

    The Russian defence ministry said on Tuesday that its forces had destroyed a Patriot system in Kyiv with a Kinzhal hypersonic missile.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US Supreme Court agrees to hear case on alleged voting map biases

    US Supreme Court agrees to hear case on alleged voting map biases

    [ad_1]

    Case centres on allegation that Republican lawmakers in South Carolina drew district maps to dilute share of Black votes.

    The US Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a bid by South Carolina officials to revive a Republican-crafted voting map that a lower court said had unconstitutionally “exiled” 30,000 Black voters from a closely contested congressional district.

    The justices took up an appeal by South Carolina officials of a federal judicial panel’s ruling that found the Republican-drawn map had deliberately split up Black neighbourhoods in Charleston County in a “stark racial gerrymander” and ordered the district to be redrawn.

    Gerrymandering is a practice involving the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to marginalise a certain set of voters and increase the influence of others. In this case, the Republican legislators were accused of racial gerrymandering to reduce the influence of Black voters.

    Legislative districts across the United States are redrawn to reflect population changes documented in the nationwide census conducted by the federal government every decade. South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature adopted a new voting map last year following the 2020 US census.

    In a major blow to election reformers, the Supreme Court in 2019 rejected efforts to rein in gerrymandering done for partisan advantage, finding that federal judges do not have the authority to curb the practice. Alleged race-based gerrymandering can be challenged in federal courts but the Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority, has rolled back protections over the past decade.

    In the South Carolina case, the map at issue set new boundaries for the state’s 1st Congressional District, which for almost four decades had consistently elected a Republican to the House until 2018, when a Democrat secured what was widely seen as an upset victory. In 2020, Republican Nancy Mace won the district by just over one percentage point.

    In redrawing the district last year, Republicans moved more than 30,000 Black residents in Charleston County to the neighbouring majority-Black 6th Congressional District, which for more than 30 years has been represented in the House by Representative James Clyburn, a Black Democratic legislator.

    The Republican map resulted in a 1st District with a larger percentage of white, Republican-leaning voters. Mace, who is white, won re-election by 14 percentage points last November under the district’s new configuration.

    The state conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) civil rights group sued in 2022, arguing that several House districts created under the map were designed at least in part with “a racially discriminatory intent to discriminate against Black voters in violation of the US Constitution”.

    Is gerrymandering destroying US democracy?

    A federal three-judge panel in January ruled that the way the 1st District was drawn violated the rights of Black voters under the Constitution’s 14th and 15th Amendments, which guarantee equal protection under the law and prohibit race-based voting discrimination.

    The strategies employed in drawing the district boundaries, the panel wrote, “ultimately exiled over 30,000 African American citizens from their previous district and created a stark racial gerrymander of Charleston County and the City of Charleston”.

    The judges – all three appointed by Democratic presidents – ruled that no elections could take place in the 1st District until it has been redrawn, prompting the South Carolina Republican officials to appeal to the Supreme Court.

    The South Carolina chapter of the NAACP and Taiwan Scott, a Black voter who lives in South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District, on Monday urged the justices to uphold the lower court’s ruling.

    “South Carolina’s congressional map is the latest instance in our state’s long, painful history of racial discrimination that must be remedied,” they said in a statement. “As the case moves to oral argument, we implore the court to uphold the panel’s decision and protect Black South Carolina voters from this egregious form of discrimination.”

    The case will be heard during the Supreme Court’s next term, which begins in October.

    Redistricting in most states is carried out by the party in power, though some states assign the task to independent commissions to ensure fairness. Gerrymandering typically involves packing voters who tend to favour a particular party into a small number of districts to diminish their statewide voting power while dispersing others in districts in numbers too small to be a majority.

    In another case involving redistricting and race, the Supreme Court is weighing Alabama’s appeal of a lower court’s ruling that a Republican-drawn electoral map setting the boundaries of the state’s seven US House districts unlawfully diluted the influence of Black voters. A decision in the case is expected by late June.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump jokes about sexual assault verdict, repeats election lies

    Trump jokes about sexual assault verdict, repeats election lies

    [ad_1]

    Former US president Donald Trump downplayed the January 6, 2021, violence in Washington, DC, during a town hall meeting.

    In his first televised town hall meeting of the 2024 United States presidential election, Donald Trump dug in on his lies about the rigging of the 2020 presidential election, downplayed the violence on January 6, 2021, in Washington, DC, and repeatedly insulted a woman in response to a civil jury’s finding this week that he was liable of sexually assaulting her.

    In a contentious 70-minute CNN town hall broadcast on Wednesday, Trump drew laughter from a New Hampshire audience when he mocked writer E Jean Carroll’s account of him having sexually abused her.

    He also repeated falsehoods about his 2020 election loss, said he would pardon many of his supporters convicted of taking part in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, and called his CNN moderator Kaitlan Collins a “nasty person”.

    During the contentious back-and-forth in early-voting New Hampshire – where moderator Collins sometimes struggled to fact-check his misstatements in real-time – Trump continued to insist the 2020 presidential election had been “rigged”, even though state and federal election officials, his own campaign and White House aides, and numerous courts have rejected his allegations.

    Trump also repeatedly minimised the violence caused by a mob of his supporters who stormed the Capitol in 2021. Instead, he said he was inclined to pardon “a large portion” of January 6 defendants if he wins re-election.

    “They thought the election was rigged. They were there with love in their heart. That was unbelievable, and it was a beautiful day,” he said of the January 6 attack.

    He also rejected a suggestion that he apologise to his former vice president, Mike Pence, who was targeted by the mob.

    “I don’t feel he was in any danger,” he said. In fact, Trump said, Pence was the one who “did something wrong”.

    Throughout, the audience of Republican and unaffiliated voters cheered him on, laughing and applauding.

    Trump and Collins frequently spoke over each other with Collins challenging a number of the former president’s false claims.

    The audience of Republicans and independent voters who plan to vote in the Republican primary were generally very supportive of Trump, giving him a standing ovation when he took the stage.

    New Hampshire is an early nominating state that could prove critical in his bid to return to the White House.

    Responding to Trump’s remarks on Wednesday, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) said the former president “lied about the 2020 election” for 20 minutes and criticised his characterising of January 6, 2021, as “a beautiful day”.

    “This would be disgusting if it wasn’t so dangerous,” DNC spokesperson Ammar Moussa said in a statement.

    On Tuesday, a federal jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a department store dressing room in Manhattan in the 1990s then harmed her reputation by describing her claims as “a hoax” and “a lie”.

    “What kind of a woman meets somebody and brings them up and within minutes, you’re playing hanky panky in a dressing room?” Trump said, one of many disparaging comments about Carroll that elicited applause and laughter at the town hall.

    After Tuesday’s verdict, Carroll issued a statement saying: “Today, the world finally knows the truth … This victory is not just for me but for every woman who has suffered because she was not believed.”

    Trump also stood by his remarks in a 2005 “Access Hollywood” tape in which he bragged about grabbing women by their genitals.

    “And you would like me to take that back. I can’t take it back because it happens to be true. I said it’s been true for one million years, approximately a million years, perhaps a little bit longer than that,” Trump said.

    “I’m not referring to myself – I’m saying people that are famous, people that are stars.”

    Trump, who was absent throughout the two-week trial in New York, was asked by an audience member what he had to say to voters who say it disqualifies him from being president.

    “Well, there aren’t too many of them because my poll numbers just came out. They went up,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US ‘cautiously optimistic’ about Sudan ceasefire talks

    US ‘cautiously optimistic’ about Sudan ceasefire talks

    [ad_1]

    As its negotiators participate in Sudan ceasefire talks in Saudi Arabia, the United States is “cautiously optimistic” about securing a truce to deliver humanitarian aid to the country, a Department of State official has said.

    Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland told senators during a briefing on Wednesday that she had spoken with US officials attending the negotiations in the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah.

    The talks, which started Saturday, involve members of two rival groups: the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

    “Our goal for these talks has been very narrowly focused: First, securing agreement on a declaration of humanitarian principles and then, getting a ceasefire that is long enough to facilitate the steady delivery of badly needed services,” Nuland said.

    “If this stage is successful — and I talked to our negotiators this morning who are cautiously optimistic — it would then enable expanded talks with additional local, regional and international stakeholders towards a permanent cessation of hostilities, and then a return to civilian-led rule as the Sudanese people have demanded for years.”

    The violence in Sudan broke out on April 15, as two top generals and their forces clashed for power and control over Sudan’s resources.

    The fighting between the SAF, led by Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the RSF, which is loyal to General Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo, has killed hundreds and displaced hundreds of thousands more so far.

    Clashes and air raids intensified in the capital Khartoum and surrounding areas on Wednesday despite the talks in Jeddah, residents reported.

    “There’s been heavy air strikes and RPG fire since 6:30am,” Ahmed, a resident of the Khartoum North neighbourhood of Shambat, told the Reuters news agency.

    “We’re lying on the ground, and there are people living near us who ran to the Nile to protect themselves there under the embankment.”

    Witnesses have also reported seeing bodies in the streets, as most hospitals have been put out of service amid deteriorating security.

    “Our only hope is that the negotiations in Jeddah succeed to end this hell and return to normal life, and to stop the war, the looting, the robbery and the chaos,” said Ahmed Ali, a 25-year-old resident of Khartoum.

    Rights groups have cautioned of a humanitarian catastrophe if the violence continues.

    The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) warned on Wednesday that as many as 2.5 million more people could slip into hunger in Sudan as a result of the conflict.

    “This would take acute food insecurity in Sudan to record levels, with more than 19 million people affected, two fifths of the population,” WFP said in a statement.

    The warring sides have agreed to previous US-brokered ceasefires, but the deals rarely held with residents reporting continuing fighting.

    The administration of US President Joe Biden has said it is looking to play an active role in Sudan with the immediate stated goal of reducing the violence.

    On Monday, the State Department said Secretary of State Antony Blinken discussed “recent developments” in Sudan with his Israeli counterpart Eli Cohen.

    After years of animosity, ties between Khartoum and Washington had been warming since the Sudanese military removed longtime President Omar al-Bashir from power in 2019, following months of anti-government protests.

    The two countries re-established diplomatic ties in 2020. Sudan also agreed to normalise relations with Israel and was removed from the US’s list of “state sponsors of terrorism”.

    The Sudanese military staged a coup against the civilian government of Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok in October 2021, leading to his resignation early in 2022.

    In April, before the violence erupted, Sudan’s leaders were set to sign a deal to return the country to its democratic transition, but the accord was delayed because of outstanding disagreements.

    Washington has previously said it supports the Sudanese people’s aspirations for peace and stability as well as their demands to return to “civilian authority”.

    On Wednesday, Nuland said the US is looking at appropriate targets for sanctions if the fighting rivals do not agree to a ceasefire and delivery of aid.

    “We have the sanctions tool now that allow us to continue to pressure them,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Australian lawmakers press US envoy for Julian Assange release

    Australian lawmakers press US envoy for Julian Assange release

    [ad_1]

    Assange’s supporters say he is an anti-establishment hero who has been victimised because he exposed the US wrongdoings.

    Australian lawmakers have met United States Ambassador Caroline Kennedy, urging her to help drop the pending extradition case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and allow him to return to Australia.

    The “Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group” said on Tuesday it informed Kennedy of “the widespread concern in Australia” about the continued detention of Assange, an Australian citizen.

    The meeting comes before US President Joe Biden’s scheduled visit to Australia this month for the Quad leaders’ summit.

    “There are a range of views about Assange in the Australian community and the members of the Parliamentary Group reflect that diversity of views. But what is not in dispute in the Group is that Mr Assange is being treated unjustly,” the legislators said in a statement after meeting Kennedy in the capital, Canberra.

    Assange is battling extradition from the United Kingdom to the US where he is wanted on criminal charges over the release of confidential military records and diplomatic cables in 2010. Washington says the release of the documents had put lives in danger.

    Assange’s supporters say he is an anti-establishment hero who has been victimised because he exposed US wrongdoings, including in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    The US embassy in Australia confirmed the meeting in a tweet but did not share further details.

    ‘Millions of Australians’

    Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, said he felt the meeting was an “important acknowledgement” by the US government that “Julian’s freedom is important to millions of Australians”.

    “After [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese] expressed frustration with the Biden administration, this is now a test for Ambassador Kennedy to see if she can move Washington on this issue,” said Shipton.

    Albanese, who has been advocating for the release of Assange, last week aired his frustration for not yet finding a diplomatic fix over the issue.

    Support for Assange among US policymakers remains low. Only a few members of Congress have come forward in support of the demand to drop charges against him.

    If extradited, Assange faces a sentence of up to 175 years in a maximum-security prison.

    [ad_2]

    Source link