ReportWire

Tag: University of Virginia

  • ‘Sadly, It’s a Club’: What Michigan State Leaders Learned Responding to a Mass Shooting

    ‘Sadly, It’s a Club’: What Michigan State Leaders Learned Responding to a Mass Shooting

    [ad_1]

    After a shooting spree at Michigan State University last week left three students dead and five critically injured, campus leaders had some major responsibilities: help their community process grief and regain a sense of safety on campus, facilitate a return to the classroom, communicate new developments to the public, and examine what could be done to improve campus security. It’s a set of duties that has become familiar to the leaders of other institutions that have experienced tragedies on and around their campuses, especially in an era when mass shootings take place almost every day.

    On Sunday, Michigan State’s interim president, interim provost, and chief of police answered questions from The Chronicle about how they see their roles in the midst of this tragedy and the kinds of support they have received from other college leaders. They also discussed the return to the classroom and measures they’re taking to improve campus safety. The interim president, Teresa K. Woodruff, and interim provost, Thomas D. Jeitschko, ascended to those posts last fall after the president at the time, Samuel L. Stanley, resigned amid a dispute with the Board of Trustees. Woodruff was the provost at the time, and Jeitschko was the senior associate provost.

    The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

    As you know, a portion of our audience is other leaders. If the unthinkable happens, as it did in this case, what should they expect? How can they learn from Michigan State’s experience?

    Teresa K. Woodruff, interim president: Well, I wish no leader or no person ever has to stand in front of that bank of microphones, ever. It’s a circumstance that one never wishes to be there. And I hope no one is. As I think about the last however many hours we’ve been going through this, I believe we’ve tried to link arms, to make sure that everybody is staying closer. Sometimes the instinct is to pull apart. But I think leadership asks us to link arms to come together.

    For many students, one of the worst parts about this tragedy is that Michigan State’s campus used to be a sanctuary, a place that they felt safe. And some students have told me that it no longer feels that way. How do you restore students, staff, and faculty’s sense of comfort on campus?

    Woodruff: Today we had … about 20,000 people across campus. And as you went around this beautiful campus, people were coming back into the community, and one of our graduate students organized a grass-roots effort to bring people into the heart of the campus. Basically, it was a moment to say, “We’re taking our campus back. This is our campus. This is who we are.”

    It is natural that we all have a sense of unsettledness. The unsettledness, I think, can be warded off by being together. So it is that linking arms again, that bringing together, that coming together. I don’t think it happens all at once, but I think it happens by steps and by measures of being together. And in that way, I think we’ll take back our campus.

    I want to talk a little bit about the “No Media” signs. Students and others have complained about journalists’ invading their privacy. How are you dealing as a campus with the intense media scrutiny?

    Woodruff: I’ve talked directly to some of the media, and in fact with our students. Our student-body president asked me about the invasiveness of the media. Emily Guerrant [vice president and university spokesperson] immediately launched into action, and we have buttons for students to be able to wear. I directly talked with some of our media folks who were being very invasive, and students yesterday talked with me about how their privacy and their moments of grief were really being interrupted.

    And we’ve thanked the media. I thanked the media directly for their work, particularly as they were the ones that released the image of the individual involved in this case [the gunman]. And very quickly, we were able to identify and complete, and that ending took place. And there is a role for our media. But I think what we need is care and compassion from everyone to know that these are students who are regaining their lives. These are faculty who are beginning to think about how to teach in this context. And these are employees. I think the emotions of grief that sometimes are repeated over and over on the media — that’s not the message. We’re trying to help all of our community by having that symbol that says, “Maybe I respect the media, but media is not for me today.”

    How have the leaders of other colleges provided their support? Do you have any examples?

    The academy comes together to grieve, but also to support.

    Woodruff: Sadly, it’s a club. The mayor of Highland Park [the Illinois town where a mass shooting last year killed seven people and injured dozens] was the first to reach out to me, Nancy Rotering … When she was going through the issues in Highland Park, she is part of a group of mayors who have developed a number of resources that have also been adopted in higher ed. Nancy is one that I really appreciated in those early moments when she was giving me advice … she was seeing into my future, and that was helpful.

    The presidents of the University of Virginia and Virginia Tech have been very helpful, as have been many of the folks on their staffs, with senior executives across Michigan State. They’ve been very generous reaching out, but I would say we’ve had — I think it’s not hyperbole to say — hundreds, if not a thousand, leaders from literally across the AAU [Association of American Universities], of course the Big Ten, but across all of higher education reach out, not just here but around the globe. The academy comes together to grieve, but also to support.

    What advice did the mayor of Highland Park give you?

    Woodruff: The first piece of advice she said is that anger comes later. When you first step to the podium, compassion, followed by anger. Anger will come, but make it about compassion first.

    Did you take into account what other universities that have experienced violence on campus did in terms of resuming classes? What informed this decision?

    Thomas D. Jeitschko, interim provost: We talked to some mental-health experts in these areas. We actually invited someone who was an expert in how to teach the day after any type of traumatic event, who provided tremendous resources. We’ve collected a lot of other resources as well, to support faculty and others to try to figure out how to manage this. I got outreach from the University of Virginia provost, and he connected me with other people, so we were able to make connections across the academic side with counterparts, and they provided a write-up of things we should consider. I spoke extensively also to the provost at the University of Idaho.

    Both of them actually said that many students — and that’s also the experience we have here — really were feeling strongly that they want to come back, they want to be in this community. There are others that have strong trepidation around that and are worried about it — partly, I think, because they think this would just be a resumption of normal, and pushing aside everything, and trying to force the issue of moving forward, which I think is a perception, and I hope that that will have been cleared up.

    That’s what I heard when I wrote a story about this issue. And some of the learning researchers I talked to said that there’s a concern that being alone could foster some worse mental-health impacts. Is that part of the thinking?

    Jeitschko: I think that’s generally true, and I think it’s in our almost immediate post-Covid aftermath especially true. One of our associate provosts, the associate provost for undergraduate education, has shared that there have been some parents that had reached out who said, “Earlier this week, our students were in lockdown for four hours, and that was very traumatic. You cannot put them in lockdown for the next weeks. They have to come back.”

    That’s an interesting comparison. What do you tell students or faculty members who say they’re traumatized to come back to the classroom?

    Jeitschko: I’ve had conversations and email exchanges with individual students, and have been able to allay their fears, and they are more comfortable now. I have a faculty member who has just reached out that I will respond to them. One thing that we said is we understand that everybody is in their own individual pace around this, and if there are extenuating circumstances, we will work with them individually, what their needs are. In a community this large with a shooting this dramatic and brutal, there will be some for whom coming back might not be an option for a while, and we will work around that. And there might be some faculty members who are also affected in this manner.

    There’s been some conversation about students not feeling safe on such an open or public campus. Are there moves to close it off at all? What is the thinking around those issues?

    Marlon C. Lynch, chief of police: We are a large public university — 400-plus buildings, 5,200 acres. And we don’t have gates and walls and fences. That’s just not who we are. We’re a destination for not just our Spartan community, but the neighboring communities and the state of Michigan. And so we’re welcoming in that sense. I don’t foresee us closing off campus. What I think we will do — what I know that we will do because we’ve already begun the process of establishing communication with our community — [is] to step through what we want to do together. How do we want our culture and who we are to be impacted, knowing that we have to do something differently?

    We initiated in the fall centralizing our security systems that will allow police and public safety to monitor all the security systems on campus from one location and operations center. That will then allow us to have real-time monitoring of those systems as well. That’s one component to that. The other piece to it is that we’re actually completing an RFP [request for proposals] process for new platforms for access-control management as well as video-management systems. That will be done in March. That will give us some additional capabilities with building-access options and how you manage it. We have several different types of buildings on campus: residence halls, a union, classroom buildings, research facilities. So there’s not one approach for every single building.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Hidalgo Bellows

    Source link

  • After 3 mass shootings in 2 weeks, Biden pushes for stricter gun legislation

    After 3 mass shootings in 2 weeks, Biden pushes for stricter gun legislation

    [ad_1]

    After 3 mass shootings in 2 weeks, Biden pushes for stricter gun legislation – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In the wake of three mass shootings in the United States in the span of two weeks, President Biden is renewing calls for stricter gun legislation and an assault weapons ban. CBS News chief White House correspondent Nancy Cordes joined Omar Villafranca to discuss the president’s statement and the administration’s involvement in ongoing negotiations between railway companies and unions.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jefferson Council Appoints Bacon as Executive Director

    Jefferson Council Appoints Bacon as Executive Director

    [ad_1]

    Alumni group gears up campaign to promote Jeffersonian tradition, free speech, intellectual diversity at the University of Virginia.

    Press Release


    Nov 21, 2022 08:00 EST

    The Jefferson Council, an alumni association devoted to upholding the Jeffersonian legacy at the University of Virginia, has appointed James A. Bacon Jr. as executive director.

    “The hiring of a full-time director manager is a milestone in the evolution of the Jefferson Council from an all-volunteer group to a professionally staffed organization,” said President Bert Ellis. “The appointment will position the Council to ramp up its activities in support of the longstanding Jeffersonian traditions of civility, honor, free speech and the open exchange of ideas.”

    Bacon is the perfect individual to manage the day-to-day operations of the Council, Ellis said. “As a university alumnus, a life-long Virginia journalist, including 16 years as editor and publisher of Virginia Business magazine and then founder of the Bacon’s Rebellion public policy blog, Bacon has a depth of knowledge of UVa’s challenges that few can match.”

    Founded two years ago, the Jefferson Council is one of the first alumni associations in the United States to organize in response to the rise of ideological intolerance and suppression of free speech on college campuses. It is one of five founding members of the Alumni Free Speech Alliance, and a leader in the alumni rebellion sweeping the United States. 

    “We want UVa to be open and welcoming to everyone, but we believe that demographic diversity should be accompanied by free speech, free expression and intellectual diversity,” Bacon said. “We share Thomas Jefferson’s vision of UVa as an institution based upon ‘the illimitable freedom of the human mind’ where ‘we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.’”

    “We envision UVa as a place where ideas collide and diverse viewpoints contend,” Bacon said. “Building upon our rich history, our Honor Code, and world-heritage architecture, we aspire to make UVa the most intellectually vibrant university in the United States, if not the world.” 

    Bacon’s priorities as executive director will be (1) to locate a Charlottesville office and flesh out the Council organization, (2) build a coalition of groups that share the desire for political and ideological pluralism on the grounds, and (3) create an alternative source of news and commentary about governance and culture at the university.

    Source: The Jefferson Council

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • University of Virginia running back wounded in Sunday’s bus shooting was trying to warn others when he was shot, his mother says | CNN

    University of Virginia running back wounded in Sunday’s bus shooting was trying to warn others when he was shot, his mother says | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    The mother of University of Virginia running back Mike Hollins, who was hospitalized in a shooting that killed three football players Sunday, says her son was trying to warn others before being struck by gunfire.

    Hollins, a native of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, is one of two people wounded when a fellow student opened fire on a bus returning from a class field trip in Charlottesville, killing football players Devin Chandler, Lavel Davis Jr. and D’Sean Perry.

    As Mike Hollins remains hospitalized, the athlete’s mother, Brenda Hollins, spoke to CNN’s John Berman Friday night and described the harrowing moments her son ran off the bus, yelling at two of his classmates to flee.

    But when he noticed nobody else was exiting, he started to go into the bus and yell for them to leave, she said.

    “He tried to take that first step back onto the bus and he met the shooter,” Hollins said.

    “I’m thankful that he’s able to tell the story,” she added.

    Brenda Hollins also gave an update on his condition, saying Friday was a rough day for her son and he still faces a long road to recovery ahead of him.

    “My son, he has feeling, so hurting is good. And so I’m trying to look at it in that aspect because … I saw him yesterday … he was up, he was walking. He was laughing, and I mean we had a good time, and then today he’s hurting,” the mother told CNN. “He’s back in bed, and I know it’s going to be up and down, and I’m grateful for that because with the pain, here’s here, he’s with me.”

    She added, “I’m thankful though, thankful because I could be one of the other boys’ parents and they’re making preparations to receive their sons’ bodies. I couldn’t imagine. I couldn’t imagine.”

    Hollins said her son, from his hospital bed, was waiting to find out what happened to D’Sean Perry and the others who died. Perry was Mike’s best friend, said his mother.

    “As soon as they took him off of the ventilator, he asked ‘where’s D’Sean.’ And no one said anything, and my daughter, she shook her head and she told him he didn’t make it. And he just broke down, he broke down,” Hollins said.

    The mother described feeling helpless trying to comfort her wounded son, who’s also grappling with losing his friends in the shooting.

    “Anytime your child cries, you want to comfort them and this was a time that I couldn’t comfort him,” she said. “Kids always run to their mother, always, and he wasn’t able to run to me, and I wasn’t able to embrace him,” she added.

    The suspect in the shooting, former UVA football player Christopher Darnell Jones Jr., faces three charges of second-degree murder and three counts of using a handgun in the commission of a felony, UVA Police Chief Timothy Longo Sr. said. He also faces two counts of malicious wounding, each accompanied by a firearm charge.

    Jones had his first court appearance on Wednesday and the court ordered that he be held without bond. He remains in custody in Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail, online records show.

    The University of Virginia is holding a public memorial service at 3:30 p.m. ET Saturday at its basketball stadium, John Paul Jones Arena, to honor the lives lost during the shooting. It will be live streamed for those who can’t attend in person.

    When the Virginia men’s basketball team arrived at the court for a game in Las Vegas Friday, players wore sweatshirts honoring the three football players killed in the shooting.

    The sweatshirts featured the words “UVA Strong” on the front and the names Chandler, Davis Jr. and Perry on the backs.

    “I want Coach (Tony) Elliott and all those players and most importantly those families to know that we love them and certainly we are praying for them,” Cavaliers men’s basketball head coach Tony Bennett said on the ESPN2 television broadcast Friday.

    Multiple university football teams across the state of Virginia are honoring the football players with helmet decals in upcoming games. The Virginia Tech Hokies, Old Dominion Monarchs, Liberty Flames and James Madison Dukes all announced players will wear helmet decals on Saturday.

    The NFL’s Washington Commanders also announced that the team will be wearing three helmet decals with the jersey numbers of the three football players.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Should All Genetics Research on Intelligence Be Off Limits?

    Should All Genetics Research on Intelligence Be Off Limits?

    [ad_1]

    Research on human intelligence tends to be a magnet for controversy, with papers leading to protests and speakers drawing scorn. A few years back, a couple of academics attempted to catalog that history and found 111 incidents since 1956. Discussion of genetics and intelligence is particularly fraught because of how it’s been twisted by racists to justify oppression and violence. Simply typing the words “genes” and “intelligence” in the same sentence can be enough to raise eyebrows.

    But should any genetics research touching on intelligence be considered out of bounds? Including research that has nothing to do with group differences? More specifically, is that the policy of the National Institutes of Health?

    In a recent op-ed for City Journal, published by the Manhattan Institute, a right-leaning think tank, James Lee, a behavioral geneticist at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, argued that the NIH is restricting access to the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes, a massive repository of studies on the relationships between genes and traits. Lee wrote that the NIH has been turning down applications, and even withdrawing approval for studies, because they might be “stigmatizing.”

    Though how exactly it’s stigmatizing isn’t entirely clear. Lee, who declined to comment for this article, insisted in his op-ed that the research in question had nothing to do with race or with sex. He called the rejections a “drastic form of censorship” that “stymies progress on the problems these studies were funded to address.” He put the blame on “anonymous bureaucrats with ideological motivations.”

    Lee is not alone in his frustration. Another researcher, Stuart Ritchie, a senior lecturer at King’s College London and author of Intelligence: All That Matters, wrote in his Substack newsletter that he had encountered more or less the same thing. He had wanted to study how intelligence test scores might be correlated with Alzheimer’s disease, but when he looked at the website for the NIH’s genetics of Alzheimer’s database, he noticed a prohibition against using the data for “research into the genetics of intelligence.”

    So he emailed the NIH and was told that the organization did, in fact, endorse that policy because “the association of genetic data with any of these parameters can be stigmatizing to the individuals or groups of individuals in a particular study. Any type of stigmatization that could be associated with genetic data is contrary to NIH policy.” How finding associations between intelligence scores and Alzheimer’s diagnoses might be stigmatizing to a particular person or group isn’t spelled out. (It’s worth noting that The Chronicle recently covered the story of a researcher who cited the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes in a paper on cognitive ability and ancestry, which led to accusations from other researchers that NIH policy may have been violated.)

    What was the NIH’s rationale? Is all such research banned? Is it case by case? Is there a more detailed set of criteria somewhere that details when a legitimate scientific question, such as the one Ritchie was asking, is too harmful to entertain? The emailed response I received from the NIH about the policy offered general information about the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes, including that more than 14,000 requests for data have been approved since January 2021 and that about 75 percent of requests receive the green light. Which is interesting enough but doesn’t address the concerns raised by Lee and Ritchie.

    This is all part of this wave of being very sensitive to what potential findings show, how they might be interpreted in a negative way, and therefore you shouldn’t allow the research.

    These are tough issues, and not just for the NIH. In 2020, Richard Haier, editor of the journal Intelligence, wrote an editorial that acknowledged criticisms of the journal over the years for publishing studies that had been cited by racists. That had led to a perception, Haier wrote, that the journal was, if not racist itself, then perhaps apathetic toward the consequences of the research it published. On the contrary, Haier wrote that while academic freedom was the journal’s guiding principle, the editors were “not naive or indifferent about our social responsibilities.”

    In a recent interview, Haier said he thought that Lee was brave for going public about the database rejections. “This is all part of this wave of being very sensitive to what potential findings show, how they might be interpreted in a negative way, and therefore you shouldn’t allow the research,” Haier said. “I think that’s a losing proposition, and I think it hurts science.”

    As evidence of such a wave, Haier points to an editorial published in Nature Human Behaviour in August asserting that while “academic freedom is fundamental, it is not unbounded.” The editors wrote that they would modify or reject “content that undermines — or could reasonably be perceived to undermine — the rights and dignities of an individual or human group.” In a follow-up last month, the editors clarified that the policy isn’t intended to censor controversial results but rather to make sure they are handled with care.

    Like the original Nature Human Behaviour editorial, the NIH’s current stance on database access isn’t easy to parse. What does it mean to undermine dignity? What qualifies as stigmatizing? With intelligence research, even if the study doesn’t delve into group differences, the perception can be that something nefarious is afoot. “The thinking goes that if you show that there’s a genetic component to intelligence, then automatically people will conclude that there is a genetic component to race differences and therefore it’s best not to support genetic research on intelligence,” Haier said.

    It is true that racists have pointed to intelligence research as justification for their hateful views and violent actions. The gunman accused of killing 10 Black people in a Buffalo, N.Y., supermarket this year published a deranged manifesto that contained references to intelligence research, apparently copy-pasted from online forums, along with vile conspiracy theories. That massacre is a grim example of why it’s important to proceed with caution when pursuing research that could feed distorted narratives, according to Eric Turkheimer, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia. Turkheimer’s research has explored how both a person’s environment and their genes contribute to various outcomes, and he has emphasized how difficult it can be to untangle the two. “Some work is dangerous, and that’s easy to see if somebody is modifying viruses and releasing them into the wild, right?” he said. “But these things can also be socially and psychologically dangerous too.”

    That said, Turkheimer doesn’t believe that forbidding genetics research that has to do with intelligence is the right approach. “I respect that they have to come up with a policy,” he told me. “But if that’s their decision, I disagree with it.”

    The NIH situation strikes Robert Plomin, a psychologist and geneticist and the author of the 2018 book Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are, as odd. “I really don’t understand what they mean by stigmatizing,” he told me. “Who decides what’s stigmatizing?” Plomin is known for his widely cited studies on twins and, lately, for attempting to explain the value of genetics to those who regard it as irrelevant or threatening. Plomin told me that when he encounters people with a negative opinion of genetics, he usually finds that their impression isn’t grounded in a deep understanding of the field. “It’s ‘genetics bad, environment good,’ and they want that to be the end of the story,” he said. “I find you can often talk them around — or at least make them realize we’re not all devils who do this work.”

    [ad_2]

    Tom Bartlett

    Source link

  • University of Virginia shooting survivor doesn’t know his friends are dead, mother says

    University of Virginia shooting survivor doesn’t know his friends are dead, mother says

    [ad_1]

    Mike Hollins, one of the University of Virginia students who survived Sunday night’s shooting, does not yet know three of his friends and teammates were killed, his mother said. 

    In her first television interview since the shooting, Brenda Hollins told CBS News that her son, a running back for the school’s football team, is using pen and paper to ask about his friends. 

    “He can’t talk, but he has written D’Sean’s name,” she said. “He has written Devin’s name. And then I believe it was an L — I don’t know what he was writing at the bottom, but he was taking the marker and beating on it because he wants to know.” 

    Devin Chandler, Lavel Davis Jr. and D’Sean Perry were killed in the shooting on a bus as it pulled into a campus garage. They were returning from a field trip. 

    An eyewitness said the alleged shooter, former UVA football player Christopher Darnell Jones Jr., was on board. 

    “What I’m hearing is Mike made it off the bus, but went back to help his friends and was shot,” Brenda Hollins said of the information that came to her second hand. “So, that’s my baby. I could absolutely see him doing that.”

    She said her son was shot in the back and the bullet exited through his stomach. He is in critical but stable condition after two surgeries, she said. 

    “It’s the call that you never want to get,” she said. “You hear other people receiving [those calls], and you hope and pray that you never get it. But when you do, your world stops.” 

    She also said she had a feeling the night before the shooting that something was wrong. 

    “I was having a hard time sleeping, falling asleep, I just felt uneasy,” she said, saying it was about her “connection” with her son. “I felt something.” 

    Brenda Hollins said her son is “so kindhearted.” 

    “When he loves you, he loves you,” she said. “He works hard and he sets his goals high. He strives. He is a fighter.” 

    The 22-year-old suspect is being held in a Virginia jail. Brenda Hollins said she is praying for him and his family. 

    “It’s hard to not be angry,” she said. “But I’m working through that. … I pray for them. … His family, they’re victims also. I pray for them and I’m working through forgiveness. Because we have to, we have to forgive.” 

    The suspect could be arraigned as early as Wednesday. In addition to second-degree murder charges, he could face federal charges if he brought weapons into Washington, D.C., on the field trip. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mother of UVA shooting survivor speaks out

    Mother of UVA shooting survivor speaks out

    [ad_1]

    Mother of UVA shooting survivor speaks out – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The mother of Mike Hollins, a University of Virginia student injured in Sunday’s shooting, says her son is in critical but stable condition. She opens up to Catherine Herridge about her son’s strength and the challenge of forgiveness.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • When a Student Seems Violent, Colleges Turn to Threat-Assessment Teams. What Are They?

    When a Student Seems Violent, Colleges Turn to Threat-Assessment Teams. What Are They?

    [ad_1]

    After three students died in a shooting at the University of Virginia, officials updated the shaken campus community during a Monday news conference. They announced that the suspected gunman, also a student, had been arrested after an overnight search. They identified the deceased students, all members of the football team: D’Sean Perry, Devin Chandler, Lavel Davis Jr.

    The university’s police chief also mentioned that the suspect, Christopher Darnell Jones, had recently come to the attention of the university’s threat-assessment team — a group of officials who evaluate possible threats to campus safety.

    In September, the threat-assessment team received word that Jones had made a comment to someone about owning a gun, though that person never saw the gun, said Timothy Longo, the police chief, who is part of the team. The comment about the gun, Longo said, was not accompanied by any threats.

    “The office of student affairs followed up with the reporting person and made efforts to contact Mr. Jones,” Longo said. “In fact, they followed up with Mr. Jones’s roommate, who did not report seeing the presence of a weapon.”

    It wasn’t the first time Jones had crossed paths with the threat-assessment team. He was involved in a hazing investigation focused on the football team; Jones was on the roster in 2018 but did not play in any games. The inquiry was closed after witnesses refused to cooperate. During that investigation, the university learned that Jones had been connected to a previous “criminal incident” outside Charlottesville, which involved a concealed-weapons violation.

    Longo’s comments confirmed that Jones was on the university’s radar months before he was announced as the sole suspect in the murders of Perry, Chandler, and Davis. That revelation brought fresh attention to the role of threat-assessment teams in colleges’ security protocols.

    The teams have existed for 15 years, but outside of student-affairs and campus-safety offices, their role isn’t widely understood. The Chronicle spoke to several higher-education experts about what threat-assessment teams do and potential concerns with how they operate. Here’s what you need to know.

    What are threat-assessment teams?

    Threat-assessment teams, sometimes referred to as behavioral-intervention teams, are groups of college administrators who meet to evaluate students — and, in many cases, faculty, staff, and outsiders — who have been flagged as possible threats to themselves or others.

    In these meetings, which may occur monthly, weekly, or somewhere in between, officials share details on the dangers posed by the students, determine the seriousness of the threats, and decide on a course of action. Often, they’ll use a numerical rubric to make judgments.

    People get so focused on students who might act out, but it could be a disgruntled employee.

    The goal is to intervene before violence occurs by responding to warning signs, such as mental-health challenges or basic needs not being met.

    Experts said there are two schools of thought when it comes to the teams. In one model, the teams focus on students who pose real threats to their own safety or campus safety as a whole. In the other, more common, framework, the focus is on helping students who are at any risk level, including those at risk of academic failure.

    This broader approach recognizes that, in many cases, the students who are at risk of committing violence are also the ones struggling psychologically, socially, and academically, said Victor Schwartz, a psychiatrist and former official with the Jed Foundation, a suicide-prevention group. He now serves as senior associate dean for wellness and student life at the City University of New York School of Medicine, and advises colleges on mental health.

    “Over time, threat assessment became one narrow lane within a much wider effort to provide early identification and early intervention for students struggling in any way,” Schwartz said.

    How did the teams get their start?

    Threat-assessment teams proliferated in higher education following the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting, where a student gunman killed 32 people before turning the gun on himself. Some on campus had known about the gunman’s mental-health troubles and violent intentions, but no one had connected the dots.

    “There was no central hub of any wheel that was getting information and sharing information,” said Jeffrey J. Nolan, a lawyer who works with colleges. “Instead, there was a care team in the middle that got bits and pieces. There was lots of information about the offender that never made it to a centralized place.”

    It’s not clear how many colleges have threat-assessment teams, but 633 institutions are members of the National Association for Behavioral Intervention and Threat Assessment, known as Nabita. Some states, including Virginia, now require public colleges to have such teams.

    Who serves on the teams?

    Membership varies from college to college, but experts said that they often include officials from the departments of public safety, residence life, and student conduct, as well as representatives from the dean of students’ office, the Title IX office, and the counseling center.

    UVA’s team has representation from at least 12 offices, including the campus-safety department, the general counsel’s office, and the student-affairs office.

    “Usually you want the people who are likely to interact with students when they’re in distress of some kind,” Schwartz said.

    A focus on students can come at the expense of awareness of faculty threats, said Jody Shipper, a co-founder and managing director of the higher-ed consulting firm Grand River Solutions. For larger teams, it can be good to have representatives who can speak to issues involving faculty and staff, such as human-resources officials.

    “That doesn’t always happen,” Shipper said, “because people get so focused on students who might act out, but it could be a disgruntled employee.”

    What do teams do once they determine that a student or someone else is a threat?

    If a threat-assessment team determines that a student is in imminent danger of hurting themselves or others, the team will get law enforcement involved right away. If the risk is less immediate, like if a student is struggling in class, the team will create a management plan.

    “You want the most benign intervention to go first,” Schwartz said. “And then you go to deeper interventions depending on the seriousness and acuity of the situation.”

    Shipper said it’s important to remember that the team is not a substitute for law enforcement. Rather, it’s a tool for sharing information, identifying threats, and determining what other information is needed in order to respond appropriately.

    At times, Shipper said, it may be necessary to have outside experts weigh in. Officials may also need to contact people, such as family members, who are close to the person of concern, to gather more information about their state of mind.

    Are there concerns about how the teams operate?

    One of the major concerns surrounding threat-assessment teams is student privacy.

    Students typically don’t know they’re the focus of a threat-assessment investigation, and may be alarmed if they get a call from an official they don’t know asking about their well-being.

    “You don’t want this campus to begin to feel that the slightest thing leads to overreactions, because then people won’t report stuff,” Schwartz said. “So there needs to be a really careful titrating of responses — not to underrespond and not to overrespond.”

    For example, Schwartz said, a police response may not be appropriate for a student experiencing mental-health distress or substance-use issues.

    Plus, Nolan said, in many cases, the student hasn’t done anything to break the law. “A lot of the information gathering is not a law-enforcement function,” he said.

    What are some best practices for threat-assessment teams?

    Shipper said that threat-assessment teams should be narrowly tailored. Administrators in certain roles, she said, should be “identified and required” to be part of the groups.

    “This isn’t an all-volunteer thing, as in you put out an all-campus request” saying “‘Who wants to serve?’” she said.

    The team also has to figure out how it will receive reports, Shipper said — directly, through a triage process, or from the campus-safety department.

    Good teams, she said, also practice how they would respond to reports.

    Despite this week’s tragedies at UVA and the University of Idaho, Schwartz said it was important to remember that colleges are relatively safe places to be and that in general, support systems for at-risk students work well.

    “We don’t hear about all of the tragedies that are averted,” he said. “We only hear about the ones that go badly.”

    [ad_2]

    Kate Hidalgo Bellows

    Source link

  • Virginia students were prepared for shooting, not aftermath

    Virginia students were prepared for shooting, not aftermath

    [ad_1]

    CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (AP) — Students huddled inside laboratory closets and darkened dorm rooms across the University of Virginia while others moved far away from library windows and barricaded the doors of its stately academic buildings after an ominous warning flashed on their screens: “RUN. HIDE. FIGHT.”

    Responding to the immediate threat of an on-campus shooting was a moment they had prepared for since their first years of elementary school. But dealing with the emotional trauma of an attack that killed three members of the school’s football team late Sunday left students shaken and grasping to understand.

    “This will probably affect our campus for a very, very long time,” said Shannon Lake, a third-year student from Crozet, Virginia.

    More on the U.Va. shootings

    For 12 hours, she hid with friends and other students, much of that time in a storage closet, while authorities searched into Monday morning for the suspect before he was taken into custody.

    When Lake and the others heard someone might be right outside the business school building, they all decided to go into the closet, turn off the lights and barricade the door.

    “That was probably the most terrifying moment because it became more real to us, and reminded us of those practice school lockdowns as children. And it was just kind of a surreal moment where, you know, I don’t think any of us were really processing what was going on,” she said.

    Police charged 22-year-old student Christopher Darnell Jones Jr. with three counts of second-degree murder, saying the three victims were killed just after 10:15 p.m. as a charter bus full of students returned from seeing a play in Washington. Two other students were wounded.

    University President Jim Ryan said authorities did not have a “full understanding” of the motive or circumstances surrounding the shooting.

    Police conducted a building-by-building search of the campus while students sheltered in place before the lockdown order was lifted late Monday morning.

    Charlotte Goeb, a student who lives in an apartment about a half-mile (800 meters) away from the shooting scene, immediately checked her doors and shut off the lights after getting an alert from the school.

    “I’m having a hard time coming to terms that this was happening,” she said. “Even though you spend all of your upbringing knowing this can happen.”

    Ellie Wilkie, a fourth-year student, was about to leave her room on the university’s prestigious, historic Lawn at the center of campus when her group texts with friends began exploding with word of the shooting. But she didn’t barricade herself in right away.

    “I think our generation has been so habituated to these being drills and this being commonplace that I didn’t even think it was all that serious until I got an email that said, ‘Run. Hide. Fight,’ all caps,” she said.

    Wilkie moved a large trunk she uses for storage in front of the door and put her mattress on top of that. She turned off the lights, unplugged anything that might make noise, put her phone on do-not-disturb mode, got under the covers of her top bunk and texted her mom, who called back, terrified.

    She picked up but told her mom: “I have to get off the phone now. I can’t be making noise in here.”

    University Police Chief Timothy Longo Sr. said the suspect had once been on the football team, but he had not been part of the team for at least a year. The UVA football website listed Jones as a team member during the 2018 season and said he did not play in any games.

    It was not immediately clear whether Jones had an attorney or when he would make his first court appearance.

    Hours after Jones was arrested, first-year head football coach Tony Elliott sat alone outside the athletic building used by the team, at times with his head in his hands. He said the victims “were all good kids.”

    Elizabeth Paul was working at a desktop computer in the Clemons library when she got a call from her mom about the shooting. She thought it was probably something minor until the computer she was using lit up with a warning about an active shooter.

    She spent about 12 hours huddled with several others underneath windows in the library, hoping that if gunfire did erupt, they would be out of sight. She spent most of the night on the phone with her mom.

    “Not even talking to her the whole time necessarily, but she wanted the line to be on so that if I needed something she was there,” Paul said.

    Em Gunter, a second-year anthropology student, heard three gunshots and then three more while she was studying genetics in her dorm room.

    She told everyone on her floor to go in their rooms, shut their blinds and turn off the lights. Students know from active shooter drills how to respond, she said.

    “But how do we deal with it afterwards?” she asked. “What’s it going to be like in a week, in a month?”

    ___

    Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Ben Finley in Norfolk, Va.; Denise Lavoie in Richmond, Va.; Sarah Brumfield in Silver Spring, Md.; Hank Kurz in Charlottesville, Va.; Holly Ramer in Concord, New Hampshire; and news researcher Rhonda Shafner; as well as videojournalist Nathan Ellegren and photographer Steve Helber in Charlottesville.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Virginia students were prepared for shooting, not aftermath

    Virginia students were prepared for shooting, not aftermath

    [ad_1]

    CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — Students huddled inside laboratory closets and darkened dorm rooms across the University of Virginia while others moved far away from library windows and barricaded the doors of its stately academic buildings after an ominous warning flashed on their screens: “RUN. HIDE. FIGHT.”

    Responding to the immediate threat of an on-campus shooting was a moment they had prepared for since their first years of elementary school. But dealing with the emotional trauma of an attack that killed three members of the school’s team late Sunday left students shaken and grasping to understand.

    “This will probably affect our campus for a very, very long time,” said Shannon Lake, a third-year student from Crozet, Virginia.

    For 12 hours, she hid with friends and other students, much of that time in a storage closet, while authorities searched into Monday morning for the suspect before he was taken into custody.

    When Lake and the others heard someone might be right outside the business school building, they all decided to go into the closet, turn off the lights and barricade the door.

    “That was probably the most terrifying moment because it became more real to us, and reminded us of those practice school lockdowns as children. And it was just kind of a surreal moment where, you know, I don’t think any of us were really processing what was going on,” she said.

    Police charged 22-year-old student Christopher Darnell Jones Jr. with three counts of second-degree murder, saying the three victims were killed just after 10:15 p.m. as a charter bus full of students returned from seeing a play in Washington. Two other students were wounded.

    University President Jim Ryan said authorities did not have a “full understanding” of the motive or circumstances surrounding the shooting.

    Police conducted a building-by-building search of the campus while students sheltered in place before the lockdown order was lifted late Monday morning.

    Charlotte Goeb, a student who lives in an apartment about a half-mile (800 meters) away from where the shooting scene, immediately checked her doors and shut off the lights after getting an alert from the school.

    “I’m having a hard time coming to terms that this was happening,” she said. “Even though you spend all of your upbringing knowing this can happen.”

    Ellie Wilkie, a fourth-year student, was about to leave her room on the university’s prestigious, historic Lawn at the center of campus when her group texts with friends began exploding with word of the shooting. But she didn’t barricade herself in right away.

    “I think our generation has been so habituated to these being drills and this being commonplace that I didn’t even think it was all that serious until I got an email that said, ‘Run. Hide. Fight,’ all caps,” she said.

    Wilkie moved a large trunk she uses for storage in front of the door and put her mattress on top of that. She turned off the lights, unplugged anything that might make noise, put her phone on do-not-disturb mode, got under the covers of her top bunk and texted her mom, who called back, terrified.

    She picked up but told her mom: “I have to get off the phone now. I can’t be making noise in here.”

    University Police Chief Timothy Longo Sr. said the suspect had once been on the team, but he had not been part of the team for at least a year. The UVA football website listed Jones as a team member during the 2018 season and said he did not play in any games.

    It was not immediately clear whether Jones had an attorney or when he would make his first court appearance.

    Hours after Jones was arrested, first-year head football coach Tony Elliott sat alone outside the athletic building used by the team, at times with his head in his hands. He said the victims “were all good kids.”

    Elizabeth Paul was working at a desktop computer in the Clemons library when she got a call from her mom about the shooting. She thought it was probably something minor until the computer she was using lit up with a warning about an active shooter.

    She spent about 12 hours huddled with several others underneath windows in the library, hoping that if gunfire did erupt, they would be out of sight. She spent most of the night on the phone with her mom.

    “Not even talking to her the whole time necessarily, but she wanted the line to be on so that if I needed something she was there,” Paul said.

    Em Gunter, a second-year anthropology student, heard three gunshots and then three more while she was studying genetics in her dorm room.

    She told everyone on her floor to go in their rooms, shut their blinds and turn off the lights. Students know from active shooter drills how to respond, she said.

    “But how do we deal with it afterwards?” she asked. “What’s it going to be like in a week, in a month?”

    ———

    Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio. Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Ben Finley in Norfolk, Va.; Denise Lavoie in Richmond, Va.; Sarah Brumfield in Silver Spring, Md.; Hank Kurz in Charlottesville, Va.; Holly Ramer in Concord, New Hampshire; and news researcher Rhonda Shafner; as well as videojournalist Nathan Ellegren and photographer Steve Helber in Charlottesville.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suspected Gunman At Large After 3 Dead, 2 Wounded In University Of Virginia Shooting

    Suspected Gunman At Large After 3 Dead, 2 Wounded In University Of Virginia Shooting

    [ad_1]

    Topline

    Three people were killed and two wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia late Sunday night, officials announced, with police urging people at the university’s Charlottesville campus to shelter in place as they search for the suspect.

    Key Facts

    Police and university officials urged people to shelter in place after the shooting at the university’s main campus in Charlottesville late Sunday night.

    Police warned the suspect, identified as school student Christopher Darnell Jones Jr., is at large and is believed to be “armed and dangerous.”

    Jones was described as wearing a burgundy jacket, blue jeans and red shoes and police said he may be driving a black SUV.

    The UVA police department said multiple police agencies are working to apprehend Jones, including Virginia State police, who have deployed helicopters.

    University president Jim Ryan said he is “heartbroken” to report the shooting had resulted in three fatalities and said the university is working closely to support the families of the victims.

    What We Don’t Know

    Two victims were injured in the shooting and are receiving medical care, Ryan said in a statement. He said the university will share additional details “as soon as we are able,” adding that the institution will “keep our community apprised of developments as the situation evolves.”

    Crucial Quote

    “This is a message any leader hopes never to have to send,” Ryan wrote in a statement on the shooting. “I am devastated that this violence has visited the University of Virginia.”

    [ad_2]

    Robert Hart, Forbes Staff

    Source link

  • UVA shooting: 3 killed, 2 wounded and community told to shelter in place with suspect still at large

    UVA shooting: 3 killed, 2 wounded and community told to shelter in place with suspect still at large

    [ad_1]

    Charlottesville, Virginia — The University of Virginia was locked down and classes were cancelled on Monday morning as police searched for a student in connection with a fatal shooting the previous night. The university’s president confirmed in a letter to the community that three people were killed and two others wounded in the shooting on Sunday evening.  

    The suspect, identified as university student Christopher Darnell Jones Jr. by UVA President Jim Ryan, remained at large.

    The warning for students and staff to shelter in place came late Sunday night following after a report of shots being fired on the campus. The university’s emergency management issued an alert on Twitter at 10:42 p.m. of an “active attacker firearm.” 

    “There has been a shooting on Culbreth Road and the suspect is at large and considered armed and dangerous,” Ryan said in a tweet, asking the university community to “please shelter in place.” 

    Ryan later sent out the letter with the message to the university community, saying he was “heartbroken to report that the shooting has resulted in three fatalities,” with two others being hospitalized and treated for unspecified wounds.
     
    The UVA Police Department also posted a notice online saying multiple police agencies were searching for a suspect who was considered “armed and dangerous.”

    Ryan said in his Monday morning letter that only designated essential staff should come to work.
     
    A UVA student who was in her dormitory room near Culbreth Road said she heard six shots fired, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Shots fired at University of Virginia, police seek suspect

    Shots fired at University of Virginia, police seek suspect

    [ad_1]

    CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — The University of Virginia issued a warning to students to shelter in place late Sunday night following a report of shots fired on the campus.

    The university’s emergency management issued an alert on Twitter at 10:42 p.m. of an “active attacker firearm.”

    Authorities did not immediately release additional information about possible casualties, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.

    “There has been a shooting on Culbreth Road and the suspect is at large and considered armed and dangerous,” UVA President Jim Ryan said in a tweet, asking the university community to “please shelter in place.”

    The UVA Police Department posted a notice online saying multiple police agencies were searching for a suspect who was considered “armed and dangerous.”

    A UVA student who was in her dormitory room near Culbreth Road said she heard six shots fired, the Times-Dispatch reported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warning Signs About the First Post-pandemic Winter

    Warning Signs About the First Post-pandemic Winter

    [ad_1]

    This fall, unlike the one before it, and the one before that, America looks almost like its old self. Schools and universities are in session; malls, airports, and gyms are bustling with the pre-holiday rush; handwashing is passé, handshakes are back, and strangers are packed together on public transport, nary a mask to be seen. On its surface, the country seems ready to enjoy what some might say is our first post-pandemic winter.

    Americans are certainly acting as if the crisis has abated, and so in that way, at least, you could argue that it has. “If you notice, no one’s wearing masks,” President Joe Biden told 60 Minutes in September, after proclaiming the pandemic “over.” Almost no emergency protections against the virus are left standing; we’re dismantling the few that are. At the same time, COVID is undeniably, as Biden says, “a problem.” Each passing day still brings hundreds of deaths and thousands of hospitalizations; untold numbers of people continue to deal with long COVID, as more join them. In several parts of the country, health-care systems are struggling to stay afloat. Local public-health departments, underfunded and understaffed, are hanging by a thread. And a double surge of COVID and flu may finally be brewing.

    So we can call this winter “post-pandemic” if we want. But given the policy failures and institutional dysfunctions that have accumulated over the past three years, it won’t be anything like a pre-pandemic winter, either. The more we resist that reality, the worse it will become. If we treat this winter as normal, it will be anything but.


    By now, we’ve grown acquainted with the variables that dictate how a season with SARS-CoV-2 will go. In our first COVID winter, the vaccines had only just begun their trickle out into the public, while most Americans hadn’t yet been infected by the virus. In our second COVID winter, the country’s collective immunity was higher, but Omicron sneaked past some of those defenses. On the cusp of our third COVID winter, it may seem that SARS-CoV-2 has few plot twists left to toss us.

    But the way in which we respond to COVID could still sprinkle in some chaos. During those first two winters, at least a few virus-mitigating policies and precautions remained in place—nearly all of which have since come down, lowering the hurdles the virus must clear, at a time when America’s health infrastructure is facing new and serious threats.

    The nation is still fighting to contain a months-long monkeypox outbreak; polio continues to plague unvaccinated sectors of New York. A riot of respiratory viruses, too, may spread as temperatures cool and people flock indoors. Rates of RSV are rising; flu returned early in the season from a nearly three-year sabbatical to clobber Australia, boding poorly for us in the north. Should flu show up here ahead of schedule, Americans, too, could be pummeled as we were around the start of 2018, “one of the worst seasons in the recent past,” says Srinivasan Venkatramanan, an infectious-disease modeler at the University of Virginia and a member of the COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub.

    The consequences of this infectious churn are already starting to play out. In Jackson, Mississippi, health workers are watching SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses tear through children “like nothing we’ve ever seen before,” says Charlotte Hobbs, a pediatric-infectious-disease specialist at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Flu season has yet to go into full swing, and Hobbs is already experiencing one of the roughest stretches she’s had in her nearly two decades of practicing. Some kids are being slammed with one virus after the other, their sicknesses separated by just a couple of weeks—an especially dangerous prospect for the very youngest among them, few of whom have received COVID shots.

    The toll of doctor visits missed during the pandemic has ballooned as well. Left untreated, many people’s chronic conditions have worsened, and some specialists’ schedules remain booked out for months. Add to this the cases of long COVID that pile on with each passing surge of infections, and there are “more sick people than there used to be, period,” says Emily Landon, an infectious-disease physician at the University of Chicago. That’s with COVID case counts at a relative low, amid a massive undercount. Even if a new, antibody-dodging variant doesn’t come banging on the nation’s door, “the models predict an increase in infections,” Venkatramanan told me. (In parts of Europe, hospitalizations are already making a foreboding climb.)

    And where the demand for care increases, supply does not always follow suit. Health workers continue to evacuate their posts. Some have taken early retirement, worried that COVID could exacerbate their chronic conditions, or vice versa; others have sought employment with better hours and pay, or left the profession entirely to salvage their mental health. A wave of illness this winter will pare down forces further, especially as the CDC backs off its recommendations for health-care workers to mask. At UAB Hospital, in Birmingham, Alabama, “we’ve struggled to have enough people to work,” says Sarah Nafziger, an emergency physician and the medical director for employee health. “And once we get them here, we have a hard time getting them to stay.”

    Clinical-laboratory staff at Deaconess Hospital, in Indiana, who are responsible for testing patient samples, are feeling similar strain, says April Abbott, the institution’s microbiology director. Abbott’s team has spent most of the past month below usual minimum-staffing levels, and has had to cut some duties and services to compensate, even after calling in reinforcements from other, already shorthanded parts of the lab. “We’re already at this threshold of barely making it,” Abbott told me. Symptoms of burnout have surged as well, while health workers continue to clock long hours, sometimes amid verbal abuse, physical attacks, and death threats. Infrastructure is especially fragile in America’s rural regions, which have suffered hospital closures and an especially large exodus of health workers. In Madison County, Montana, where real-estate values have risen, “the average nurse cannot afford a house,” says Margaret Bortko, a nurse practitioner and the region’s health officer and medical director. When help and facilities aren’t available, the outcome is straightforward, says Janice Probst, a rural-health researcher at the University of South Carolina: “You will have more deaths.”

    In health departments, too, the workforce is threadbare. As local leaders tackle multiple infectious diseases at once, “it’s becoming a zero-sum game,” says Maria Sundaram, an epidemiologist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute. “With limited resources, do they go to monkeypox? To polio? To COVID-19? To influenza? We have to choose.” Mati Hlatshwayo Davis, the director of health in St. Louis, told me that her department has shrunk to a quarter of the size it was five years ago. “I have staff doing the jobs of three to five people,” she said. “We are in absolute crisis.” Staff have left to take positions as Amazon drivers, who “make so much more per hour.” Looking across her state, Hlatshwayo Davis keeps watching health directors “resign, resign, resign.” Despite all that she has poured into her job, or perhaps because of it, “I can’t guarantee I won’t be one of those losses too.”


    This winter is unlikely to be an encore of the pandemic’s worst days. Thanks to the growing roster of tools we now have to combat the coronavirus—among them, effective vaccines and antivirals—infected people are less often getting seriously sick; even long COVID seems to be at least a bit scarcer among people who are up-to-date on their shots. But considering how well our shots and treatments work, the plateau of suffering at which we’ve arrived is bizarrely, unacceptably high. More than a year has passed since the daily COVID death toll was around 200; nearly twice that number—roughly three times the daily toll during a moderate flu season—now seems to be a norm.

    Part of the problem remains the nation’s failed approach to vaccines, says Avnika Amin, a vaccine epidemiologist at Emory University: The government has repeatedly championed shots as a “be-all and end-all” strategy, while failing to rally sufficient uptake. Boosting is one of the few anti-COVID measures still promoted, yet the U.S. remains among the least-vaccinated high-income countries; interest in every dose that’s followed the primary series has been paltry at best. Even with the allure of the newly reformulated COVID shot, “I’m not really getting a good sense that people are busting down the doors,” says Michael Dulitz, a health worker in Grand Forks, North Dakota. Nor can vaccines hold the line against the virus alone. Even if everyone got every shot they were eligible for, Amin told me, “it wouldn’t make COVID go away.”

    The ongoing dry-up of emergency funds has also made the many tools of disease prevention and monitoring more difficult to access. Free at-home tests are no longer being shipped out en masse; asymptomatic testing is becoming less available; and vaccines and treatments are shifting to the private sector, putting them out of reach for many who live in poor regions or who are uninsured and can least afford to fall ill.

    It doesn’t help, either, that the country’s level of preparedness lays out as a patchwork. People who vaccinate and mask tend to cluster, Amin told me, which means that not all American experiences of winter will be the same. Less prominent, less privileged parts of the country will quietly bear the brunt of outbreaks. “The biggest worry is the burden becoming unnoticed,” Venkatramanan told me. Without data, policies can’t change; the nation can’t react. “It’s like flying without altitude or speed sensors. You’re looking out the window and trying to guess.”


    There’s an alternative winter the country might envision—one unencumbered by the policy backslides the U.S. has made in recent months, and one in which Americans acknowledge that COVID remains not just “a problem” but a crisis worth responding to.

    In that version of reality, far more people would be up-to-date on their vaccines. The most vulnerable in society would be the most protected. Ventilation systems would hum in buildings across the country. Workers would have access to ample sick leave. Health-care systems would have excesses of protective gear, and local health departments wouldn’t want for funds. Masks would come out in times of high transmission, especially in schools, pharmacies, government buildings, and essential businesses; free tests, boosters, and treatments would be available to all. No one would be asked to return to work while sick—not just with COVID but with any transmissible disease. SARS-CoV-2 infections would not disappear, but they would remain at more manageable levels; cases of flu and other cold-weather sicknesses that travel through the air would follow suit. Surveillance systems would whir in every state and territory, ready to detect the next threat. Leaders might even set policies that choreograph, rather than simply capitulate to, how Americans behave.

    We won’t be getting that winter this year, or likely any year soon. Many policies have already reverted to their 2019 status quo; by other metrics, the nation’s well-being even seems to have regressed. Life expectancy in the U.S. has fallen, especially among Native Americans and Alaskan Natives. Institutions of health are beleaguered; community-outreach efforts have been pruned.

    The pandemic has also prompted a deterioration of trust in several mainstays of public health. In many parts of the country, there’s worry that the vaccine hesitancy around COVID has “spread its tentacles into other diseases,” Hobbs told me, keeping parents from bringing their kids in for flu shots and other routine vaccines. Mississippi, once known for its stellar rate of immunizing children, now consistently ranks among those with the fewest young people vaccinated against COVID. “The one thing we do well is vaccinate children,” Hobbs said. That the coronavirus has reversed the trend “has astounded me.” In Montana, sweeping political changes, including legislation that bans employers from requiring vaccines of any kind, have made health-care settings less safe. Fewer than half of Madison County’s residents have received even their primary series of COVID shots, and “now a nurse can turn down the Hepatitis B series,” Bortko told me. Health workers, too, feel more imperiled than before. Since the start of the pandemic, Bortko’s own patients of 30 years, “who trusted me with their lives,” have pivoted to “yelling at us about vaccination concerns and mask mandates and quarantining and their freedoms,” she told me. “We have become public enemy No. 1.”

    At the same time, many people with chronic and debilitating conditions are more vulnerable than they were before the pandemic began. The policies that protected them during the pandemic’s height are gone—and yet SARS-CoV-2 is still here, adding to the dangers they face. The losses have been written off, Bortko told me: Cases of long COVID in Madison County have been dismissed as products of “risk factors” that don’t apply to others; deaths, too, have been met with a shrug of “Oh, they were old; they were unhealthy.” If, this winter, COVID sickens or kills more people who are older, more people who are immunocompromised, more people of color, more essential and low-income workers, more people in rural communities, “there will be no press coverage,” Hlatshwayo Davis said. Americans already expect that members of these groups will die.

    It’s not too late to change course. The winter’s path has not been set: Many Americans are still signing up for fall flu and COVID shots; we may luck out on the viral evolution front, too, and still be dealing largely with members of the Omicron clan for the next few months. But neither immunity nor a slowdown in variant emergence is a guarantee. What we can count on is the malleability of human behavior—what will help set the trajectory of this winter, and others to come. The U.S. botched the pandemic’s beginning, and its middle. That doesn’t mean we have to bungle its end, whenever that truly, finally arrives.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link