ReportWire

Tag: University of Utah

  • Telescope Array detects second highest-energy cosmic ray ever

    Telescope Array detects second highest-energy cosmic ray ever

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — In 1991, the University of Utah Fly’s Eye experiment detected the highest-energy cosmic ray ever observed. Later dubbed the Oh-My-God particle, the cosmic ray’s energy shocked astrophysicists. Nothing in our galaxy had the power to produce it, and the particle had more energy than was theoretically possible for cosmic rays traveling to Earth from other galaxies. Simply put, the particle should not exist.

    The Telescope Array has since observed more than 30 ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, though none approaching the Oh-My-God-level energy. No observations have yet revealed their origin or how they are able to travel to the Earth.

    On May 27, 2021, the Telescope Array experiment detected the second-highest extreme-energy cosmic ray. At 2.4 x 1020eV, the energy of this single subatomic particle is equivalent to dropping a brick on your toe from waist height. Led by the University of Utah (the U) and the University of Tokyo, the Telescope Array consists of 507 surface detector stations arranged in a square grid that covers 700 km2 (~270 miles2) outside of Delta, Utah in the state’s West Desert. The event triggered 23 detectors at the north-west region of the Telescope Array, splashing across 48 km2 (18.5 mi2). Its arrival direction appeared to be from the Local Void, an empty area of space bordering the Milky Way galaxy.

    “The particles are so high energy, they shouldn’t be affected by galactic and extra-galactic magnetic fields. You should be able to point to where they come from in the sky,” said John Matthews, Telescope Array co-spokesperson at the U and co-author of the study. “But in the case of the Oh-My-God particle and this new particle, you trace its trajectory to its source and there’s nothing high energy enough to have produced it. That’s the mystery of this—what the heck is going on?” 

    In their observation that published on Nov. 24, 2023, in the journal Science, an international collaboration of researchers describe the ultra-high-energy cosmic ray, evaluate its characteristics, and conclude that the rare phenomena might follow particle physics unknown to science. The researchers named it the Amaterasu particle after the sun goddess in Japanese mythology. The Oh-My-God and the Amaterasu particles were detected using different observation techniques, confirming that while rare, these ultra-high energy events are real.

    “These events seem like they’re coming from completely different places in the sky. It’s not like there’s one mysterious source,” said John Belz, professor at the U and co-author of the study. “It could be defects in the structure of spacetime, colliding cosmic strings. I mean, I’m just spit-balling crazy ideas that people are coming up with because there’s not a conventional explanation.”

    Natural particle accelerators

    Cosmic rays are echoes of violent celestial events that have stripped matter to its subatomic structures and hurled it through universe at nearly the speed of light. Essentially cosmic rays are charged particles with a wide range of energies consisting of positive protons, negative electrons, or entire atomic nuclei that travel through space and rain down onto Earth nearly constantly.

    Cosmic rays hit Earth’s upper atmosphere and blasts apart the nucleus of oxygen and nitrogen gas, generating many secondary particles. These travel a short distance in the atmosphere and repeat the process, building a shower of billions of secondary particles that scatter to the surface. The footprint of this secondary shower is massive and requires that detectors cover an area as large as the Telescope Array. The surface detectors utilize a suite of instrumentation that gives researchers information about each cosmic ray; the timing of the signal shows its trajectory and the amount of charged particles hitting each detector reveals the primary particle’s energy.

    Because particles have a charge, their flight path resembles a ball in a pinball machine as they zigzag against the electromagnetic fields through the cosmic microwave background. It’s nearly impossible to trace the trajectory of most cosmic rays, which lie on the low- to middle-end of the energy spectrum. Even high-energy cosmic rays are distorted by the microwave background. Particles with Oh-My-God and Amaterasu energy blast through intergalactic space relatively unbent. Only the most powerful of celestial events can produce them.   

    “Things that people think of as energetic, like supernova, are nowhere near energetic enough for this. You need huge amounts of energy, really high magnetic fields to confine the particle while it gets accelerated,” said Matthews.

    Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays must exceed 5 x 1019 eV. This means that a single subatomic particle carries the same kinetic energy as a major league pitcher’s fast ball and has tens of millions of times more energy than any human-made particle accelerator can achieve. Astrophysicists calculated this theoretical limit, known as the Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin (GZK) cutoff, as the maximum energy a proton can hold traveling over long distances before the effect of interactions of the microwave background radiation take their energy. Known source candidates, such as active galactic nuclei or black holes with accretion disks emitting particle jets, tend to be more than 160 million light years away from Earth. The new particle’s 2.4 x 1020 eV and the Oh-My-God particle’s 3.2 x 1020 eV easily surpass the cutoff.

    Researchers also analyze cosmic ray composition for clues of its origins. A heavier particle, like iron nuclei, are heavier, have more charge and are more susceptible to bending in a magnetic field than a lighter particle made of protons from a hydrogen atom. The new particle is likely a proton. Particle physics dictates that a cosmic ray with energy beyond the GZK cutoff is too powerful for the microwave background to distort its path, but back tracing its trajectory points towards empty space.

    “Maybe magnetic fields are stronger than we thought, but that disagrees with other observations that show they’re not strong enough to produce significant curvature at these ten-to-the-twentieth electron volt energies,” said Belz. “It’s a real mystery.” 

    Expanding the footprint 

    The Telescope Array is uniquely positioned to detect ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. It sits at about 1,200 m (4,000 ft), the elevation sweet-spot that allows secondary particles maximum development, but before they start to decay. Its location in Utah’s West Desert provides ideal atmospheric conditions in two ways: the dry air is crucial because humidity will absorb the ultraviolet light necessary for detection; and the region’s dark skies are essential, as light pollution will create too much noise and obscure the cosmic rays.

    Astrophysicists are still baffled by the mysterious phenomena. The Telescope Array is in the middle of an expansion that that they hope will help crack the case. Once completed, 500 new scintillator detectors will expand the Telescope Array will sample cosmic ray-induced particle showers across 2,900 km2  (1,100 mi2 ), an area nearly the size of Rhode Island. The larger footprint will hopefully capture more events that will shed light on what’s going on.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Logo Brands Captures 35th Strategic Partnership With The University of Utah

    Logo Brands Captures 35th Strategic Partnership With The University of Utah

    [ad_1]

    Logo Brands Will Now Exclusively Produce an Array of Licensed Tailgate and Inflatables Products for the Utah Utes

    Logo Brands, Inc. has announced The University of Utah as the company’s 35th strategic partnership. Beginning Jan. 1, 2024, Logo Brands and Utah will enter into a 10-year exclusive agreement in the tailgate and inflatables categories.

    This new agreement grants Logo Brands exclusive rights to manufacture, produce, and distribute officially licensed Utah Utes tents, chairs, stadium seating, soft-sided coolers, tables, and non-leather inflatable sports balls for the university. Logo Brands will continue to offer a vast selection of hard goods products for the university including various types of drinkware, blankets and throws, inflatable mascots, and totes. 

    “Utah boasts a remarkable collegiate program,” stated Maggie McHugh, Vice President of Strategic Partnerships at Logo Brands. “We eagerly anticipate expanding this program by providing a vast array of products catering to Utah students, fans, and alumni for years to come.”

    Utah product will continue to be produced and distributed by Logo Brands through top retailers in the United States including Costco, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Scheels, Amazon, and Fanatics, in addition to Utah’s on-campus bookstore, Utah University Bookstore, and the Logo Brands e-commerce site.

    The University of Utah is known for both its prestigious academics and its high-level sports. The Utah Utes have demonstrated that they are an athletics power as they have produced 29 team national championships, 115 individual national champions, 503 All-Americans, and 67 Olympians. The move to Pac-12 in 2011 has fueled their highly successful seasons across their varsity sports teams with high-place finishes in both Pac-12 Conference Championships and NCAA Championships.   

    “The University of Utah is thrilled to have a dynamic partnership with Logo Brands, a leading name in high-quality collegiate tailgating products,” says Richard Fairchild, Associate Director of Trademarks & Licensing. “This collaboration marks an exciting step forward in our ongoing efforts to enhance the fan experience and extend the reach of our university brand.”

    About Logo Brands

    Logo Brands is a leading manufacturer of officially licensed products for more than 800 colleges and leagues including NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, MLS, and NASCAR. The company’s assortment spans the categories of outdoor lifestyle, indoor living and on-the-go with more than 900 different product lines in the company’s history. Logo Brands began as a family business in 2000 by shipping tailgate chairs from a garage just outside of Memphis, Tennessee. Its headquarters are now in Franklin, Tennessee. 

    MEDIA CONTACT: 
    Natalie Hill
    615-716-4901
    natalie@logobrands.com

    Follow on Instagram: @logobrandsinc

    Source: Logo Brands

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New study shows algorithms promote bias–and that consumers cooperate

    New study shows algorithms promote bias–and that consumers cooperate

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Just watched a rom-com on Netflix? Well, now there are “top picks” just like it in your queue, thanks to the streaming service’s matching system.

    Every time you engage with Amazon, Facebook, Instagram, Netflix and other online sites, algorithms are busy behind the scenes chronicling your activities and queuing up recommendations tailored to what they know about you. The invisible work of algorithms and recommendation systems spares people from a deluge of information and ensures they receive relevant responses to searches.

    But Sachin Banker says a new study shows that subtle gender biases shape the information served up to consumers. The Journal of Consumer Psychology published the study, which was co-authored by Shelly Rathee, Arul Mishra and Himanshu Mishra.

    “Everything you’re consuming online is filtered through some kind of recommendation system,” said Banker, an assistant professor of marketing in the David Eccles School of Business, “and what we’re interested in understanding is whether there are subtle biases in the types of information that are presented to different people and how this affects behavior.”

    Banker, who researches how people interact with technology, said gender bias is relatively easy to study because Facebook provides information about that social characteristic. And it is not necessarily surprising that algorithms, which make word associations based by all the texts on the internet, pick up biases since they exist in human language. The bigger questions are to what extent is this happening and what are the consequences.

    In their multi-step study, the  researchers first demonstrated that gender biases embedded in language are incorporated in algorithms—associating women with negative psychographic attributes such as  impulsivity, financially irresponsibility and irrationality.

    The team then tweaked a single word in an ad—“responsible” versus “irresponsible”—to see who subsequently received it; they found ads with negative psychographic attributes were more likely to be delivered to women even though there was no basis for such differentiation.

    It’s a self-perpetuating loop, the researchers found, because undiscerning consumers reinforce the algorithmic gender bias by often clicking on the ads and accepting the recommendations they receive.

    “There are actual consequences of this bias in the marketplace,” Banker said. “We’ve shown that people are split into different kinds of consumption bubbles and that influences your thoughts and behaviors and reinforces historical biases.”

    For online technology companies, the study indicates a greater need for proactive work to minimize gender bias in algorithms used to serve up consumer ads and recommendations, Banker said. People advertising products may want to test an ad before launch to detect any subtle bias that might affect delivery. And consumers should be aware of the biases at play as they scroll through their feeds and visit online sites and engage in healthy skeptism about ads and recommendations.

    Most people, he said, don’t totally understand how these things work because the online giants don’t disclose much about their algorithms, though Amazon appears to be providing more information to consumers about the recommendations they receive.

    And while this study focused on gender bias, Banker said biases likely exist for other social characteristics, such as age, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, etc.

     

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Gadusol: Nature’s sunscreen

    Gadusol: Nature’s sunscreen

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — As outside activities become more popular with the changing seasons, people are looking to protect themselves from sunburns and melanomas, primarily using commercial sunscreens.

    However, humans aren’t the only species that have to worry about damage from exposure to the sun’s ultraviolet rays. Many creatures use sunscreen, just not the white lotions that humans are familiar with. Their sunblock is encoded in their DNA.

    For years, U biologist James Gagnon’s lab has studied gadusol, a chemical compound in fish, resulting in a new paper demonstrating how females excrete the compound on their eggs. The gadusol molecule was discovered in fish more than 40 years ago, and was originally thought to come from dietary sources. It has since been proven that gadusol is produced from metabolic pathways within the fish.

    With help from colleagues in the School of Biological Sciences and Department of Human Genetics,  doctoral student Marlen Rice is the lead author of the paper published this week. Gagnon, an assistant professor of biology who holds a prestigious Mario Cappecchi Endowed Chair, is listed as the senior author.

    Rice grew up on a farm an hour south of Salt Lake City and earned a degree in molecular biology at Utah State University.

    “The fun thing to me about biology is just the fact that [living] things are dynamic and they interact [with] their environment,” Rice said. “I like thinking about animals in relation to ecology.”

    He aspires to bridge the gap between the ecological and molecular fields. Rice’s lifelong passion for animals and his industry background inspired him to use laboratory tools to investigate ecological factors, starting with sunlight, which sustains all life, but also presents a danger.

    Ultraviolet exposure

    Nearly all life on Earth depends on the sun, whether it’s tapping its energy to produce food, or consuming other organisms. But exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) comes at a cost. Wavelengths in UVB rays are especially dangerous, causing damage at a molecular level and leading to mutations in DNA. Excessive levels of UVR exposure can even kill cells, a process known as apoptosis, resulting in what we know as a sunburn. Even in the water, organisms are not safe because biologically harmful levels of UVB can penetrate more than 10 meters deep.

    Protection lies in sunscreens which absorb UV photons before they penetrate vulnerable cells and dissipate this absorbed energy as less harmful heat, according to Rice and Gagnon’s paper. They act as physical shields over precious genetic material in cells, preventing damage and mutations.

    Organisms across many habitats have developed adaptations, including nocturnal lifestyles and DNA repair mechanisms, to avoid and fix the harm associated with UV exposure. But some have evolved an ability to create their own chemical sunscreens.

    “Since sunlit habitats can have significantly nutritive advantages over dark environments and because no repair pathway is completely efficient, many organisms employ sunscreens to avoid UVR damage from occurring in the first place,” the paper said.

    Mutant zebrafish

    Initially, Rice considered melanin as the primary sunscreen in aquatic life.  Melanin is produced in melanophores that migrate to cover parts of the brain and body as fish embryos mature.

    To test this hypothesis, Rice altered the genotype in zebrafish to knock out the gene for melanin production.  He found that zebrafish embryos died from UVR exposure at the same rate, regardless of whether or not their genotype was altered. There must be something else protecting the embryos.

    Through CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, Gagnon’s lab created gadusol-deficient mutant zebrafish to test whether gadusol provide UV protection. Zebrafish were chosen for these experiments because they inhabit sunlit waters, produce gadusol and are amenable to genetic manipulation.

    He determined that gadusol is provided for zebrafish embryos by the mother, is the most effective sunscreen over other methods of protection and is lost evolutionarily in fish species when their embryos are not exposed to sunlight.

    “Transparency as camouflage”

    To demonstrate gadusol’s importance to the survival of larval fish, Rice delivered precise doses of UVB to both the mutant and unaltered zebrafish embryos and measured the effect on swim bladder inflation. When exposed to the same dose, the gadusol-deficient mutant fish were all unable to inflate their swim bladders, indicating that the UV exposure had caused significant developmental defects.

    A Boston-based beauty company is now looking to synthesize gadusol to create sunscreens that would be safer for both humans and marine environments. For fish, gadusol offers advantages over other sunscreens due to its invisibility. “Transparency as camouflage,” the study said, “is a common trait in aquatic animals, especially in the open ocean where there is nothing to hide behind.”

    Melanin’s main drawback is it absorbs most wavelengths in the visible light spectrum as well as the UVB spectrum, so it is detectable by predators. Sunlight, meanwhile, is just one of many challenges that aquatic ecosystems pose to their inhabitants.

    “The environment that they evolved in, which is filled with sunlight and viruses and predators and temperature switches and all this crazy stuff that doesn’t happen in our fish facility,” Gagnon said, “and so if you can bring a little bit of that into our laboratory, now we can apply what’s cool to more questions.”

    These environmental factors will guide the lab’s research with zebrafish moving forward. Rice is also curious about the evolutionary history of gadusol itself.

    “I’d really like to fill out on the tree of life how widespread gadusol is,” Rice said. “At some point, land vertebrates stopped using gadusol. I think evolutionarily it’d be really interesting to think about that. At what point did they move away?”

    The answers to these mysteries lie within—within DNA to be specific.

    “I really do love the idea of DNA. I think it’s a really beautiful thing,” Rice said, “the fact that it’s an unbroken chain of DNA replication and now lives inside of you.”

    The paper, titled “Gadusol is a maternally provided sunscreen that protects fish embryos from DNA damage,”  was published June 26 in Current Biology. It was funded with a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Other authors include Jordan Little and Julane Muchado, School of Biological Sciences, and Nathan Clark and Jordan Little with the U’s Department of Human Genetics.

     

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Baodong Liu and his role in landmark voting rights case

    Baodong Liu and his role in landmark voting rights case

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — University of Utah political scientist Baodong Liu served as an expert witness in a consequential voting rights case decided on June 8 by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision in  Allen v. Milligan rejected Alabama’s congressional redistricting map because it disenfranchises African-American voters.

    In a surprise 5-4 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court agreed with Liu’s premise that the new voting districts, redrawn after the 2020 Census, packed a large portion of Alabama’s Black voters into a single district, thus diluting their voice in the six other districts.

    Roberts was joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the court’s three liberal justices in upholding a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

    Central to the case was Alabama’s history of “racially polarized voting,” according to Liu, a professor of political science, as well as of ethnic studies in the U’s School for Social and Cultural Transformation. His analysis found the state’s Black voters tend to overwhelmingly favor Democratic candidates, while White voters lean heavily Republican.

    While Alabama’s voting population is nearly 27% Black, just one of its seven congressional seats is held by an African-American, Democrat Terri Sewell. The other six are held by White Republicans.

    This is largely the result of a voting-district map that packs many of the state’s Black residents into Sewell’s Birmingham district, while the others are spread out among the other districts in a way that virtually ensures their preferred candidate won’t stand much chance of winning election, according to Liu, who teaches political science in the College of Social and Behavioral Science.

    Similar legal challenges are targeting congressional district maps in other Southern states. This week, the Supreme Court affirmed a federal court’s decision that Louisiana’s six-district congressional map is racially gerrymandered to favor White voters.

    An immigrant from China, Liu is a U.S. citizen and a Utah voter. What follows is a Q&A with Liu conducted by U science writer Brian Maffly, edited for length and clarity.

    What is at stake in the Alabama case?

    As a state in the South, Alabama is growing in terms of population. We have the requirement every 10 years to do the census, which gives us the overall look at the balance of power in Congress in terms of which states get more seats, and which states get fewer seats. Southern states tend to get more seats, but if they have more seats, will they get more representation for only the White majority and not minorities.

    This case is about the Voting Rights Act, arguably, the most significant and successful civil rights law in U.S. history. It was such a significant law that had never taken place in human history, where the minorities of a nation can have access to not only representation at the highest level, but also state and local governments, all due to the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    It’s a huge accomplishment in our history. All of us should be very proud of it. However, more recently the political atmosphere has changed. The division has gone deep and the nation has revisited all kinds of laws, the Voting Rights Act being one of those. It’s up to the court to tell us how we should interpret the Voting Rights Act, and more importantly, how should we implement it. This Alabama case put everything at the center. Should we explain the Voting Rights Act in a way that fits our fundamental desire for not only majority rule, but also equality under law for all? This case has everything at stake in terms of not only politically, who gets elected and who represents who, but also how the democracy itself should represent in the future.

    The idea of “racially polarized voting” is central to this case. What is it and why does it matter?

    The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Voting Rights Act concerning Section 2 is what we call the Gingles precondition. The Supreme Court’s 1986 Gingles decision made it clear in order to make a Section 2 claim, which is the vote dilution of a state entity against certain minorities, it is based on the tests that the Supreme Court set up. The centerpiece of the Gingles tests is called “racial polarized voting.” What does that mean? On the surface it is very intuitive, meaning different racial groups are polarized in their choices of voting. It’s American voters’ right to choose whoever they want to vote for. However, if racial groups do not agree with each other consistently then it has a profound impact on election outcomes.

    If this racially polarized voting takes place again and again and again, one has to ask, who will be elected? Intuitively it’s White voters’ choice that will prevail because they are the super majority of the state and they can form a formidable bloc to defeat any minority candidate, which leads to a scenario  where White voters dictate the election outcome, a phenomenon of tyranny of majority that our Constitution tries to correct.

    How did you become involved in the Alabama case?

    I am an immigrant myself. Back in China, I never had a chance to vote for anything. There was no election in China in a substantive way. As a graduate student coming to the U.S. studying American voting, it was always my desire to learn the mysteries surrounding it, but also for the incredible achievement of American democracy. That is, everybody has a right to vote, and collectively they decide based on their individual choices, who should represent them, but also for the most powerful position in human history, that is the U.S. president.

    When I was a graduate student in New Orleans, the question was at the mayor level. Was it possible for White voters to cast their vote across racial lines for Black candidates? I wrote a dissertation about the conditions under which White voters were willing to vote for black candidates [for mayor]. For that, I won the American Political Science Association dissertation award. And within just a few years beyond my Ph.D., the whole nation was faced with the choice of Barack Obama [the first African American elected president]. After I became an assistant professor, I was asked by voting groups to help analyze data. So starting from Obama’s election all the way to this current case in Alabama, I’ve been practicing as an expert witness for more than two decades.

    What did you document about Alabama’s new congressional districts during your investigation?

    What I have done in this case was to collect data in real elections. There are two parts to it. One is what we call “endogenous” elections. Those are the elections that deal directly with the elected offices under dispute in this case, congressional seats. I analyzed those elections from 2008 all the way to 2020. I analyzed seven congressional districts. That’s too few, so I analyzed a second group of elections called “exogenous” elections, which concern statewide offices, such as lieutenant governor and state auditor, to supplement the endogenous elections. In both groups of elections, I found racially polarized voting.

    I also compared the enacted plan, passed by the state Legislature and signed by the governor of Alabama, with the plan proposed by the plaintiffs in this case, the Legal Defense Fund and other organizations that provided competing maps. I evaluate which plans would give more equal access to minorities based on empirical data. I’m an empirical scientist, so everything I do is based on data and statistical analysis.

    Your take on Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion?

    In my view, this is one of the best written opinions ever because it shows at the Jurisprudence level, how the court’s majority opinion evaluated not only the claim of Alabama but also the plaintiffs who challenged Alabama’s plan based on court’s interpretation of our Constitution.

    It’s not in favor of either the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party. It’s written in a very objective tone. It has no accusation against any party. It is fully based on the facts that both sides presented and explains why the court has gone through vigorous tests in the facts itself. And most importantly the case sends a strong message of why the Voting Rights Act still holds true today in our great democracy. All that is not based on whether the chief justice is a conservative or not. It’s based on his read of our great constitution. For that I am forever grateful as an American.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Baodong Liu and his role in landmark voting rights case

    Baodong Liu and his role in landmark voting rights case

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — University of Utah political scientist Baodong Liu served as an expert witness in a consequential voting rights case decided on June 8 by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision in  Allen v. Milligan rejected Alabama’s congressional redistricting map because it disenfranchises African-American voters.

    In a surprise 5-4 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court agreed with Liu’s premise that the new voting districts, redrawn after the 2020 Census, packed a large portion of Alabama’s Black voters into a single district, thus diluting their voice in the six other districts.

    Roberts was joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the court’s three liberal justices in upholding a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

    Central to the case was Alabama’s history of “racially polarized voting,” according to Liu, a professor of political science, as well as of ethnic studies in the U’s School for Social and Cultural Transformation. His analysis found the state’s Black voters tend to overwhelmingly favor candidates from their own racial group, while White voters vote as a bloc for White candidates.

    While Alabama’s voting population is nearly 27% Black, just one of its seven congressional seats is held by an African-American, Democrat Terri Sewell. The other six are held by White Republicans.

    This is largely the result of a voting-district map that packs many of the state’s Black residents into Sewell’s Birmingham district, while the others are spread out among the other districts in a way that virtually ensures their preferred candidate won’t stand much chance of winning election, according to Liu, who teaches political science in the College of Social and Behavioral Science.

    Similar legal challenges are targeting congressional district maps in other Southern states. This week, the Supreme Court affirmed a federal court’s decision that Louisiana’s six-district congressional map is racially gerrymandered to favor White voters.

    An immigrant from China, Liu is a U.S. citizen and a Utah voter. What follows is a Q&A with Liu conducted by U science writer Brian Maffly, edited for length and clarity.

    What is at stake in the Alabama case?

    As a state in the South, Alabama is growing in terms of population. We have the requirement every 10 years to do the census, which gives us the overall look at the balance of power in Congress in terms of which states get more seats, and which states get fewer seats. Southern states tend to get more seats, but if they have more seats, will they get more representation for only the White majority and not minorities.

    This case is about the Voting Rights Act, arguably, the most significant and successful civil rights law in U.S. history. It was such a significant law that had never taken place in human history, where the minorities of a nation can have access to not only representation at the highest level, but also state and local governments, all due to the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    It’s a huge accomplishment in our history. All of us should be very proud of it. However, more recently the political atmosphere has changed. The division has gone deep and the nation has revisited all kinds of laws, the Voting Rights Act being one of those. It’s up to the court to tell us how we should interpret the Voting Rights Act, and more importantly, how should we implement it. This Alabama case put everything at the center. Should we explain the Voting Rights Act in a way that fits our fundamental desire for not only majority rule, but also equality under law for all? This case has everything at stake in terms of not only politically, who gets elected and who represents who, but also how the democracy itself should represent in the future.

    The idea of “racially polarized voting” is central to this case. What is it and why does it matter?

    The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Voting Rights Act concerning Section 2 is what we call the Gingles precondition. The Supreme Court’s 1986 Gingles decision made it clear in order to make a Section 2 claim, which is the vote dilution of a state entity against certain minorities, it is based on the tests that the Supreme Court set up. The centerpiece of the Gingles tests is called “racial polarized voting.” What does that mean? On the surface it is very intuitive, meaning different racial groups are polarized in their choices of voting. It’s American voters’ right to choose whoever they want to vote for. However, if racial groups do not agree with each other consistently then it has a profound impact on election outcomes.

    If this racially polarized voting takes place again and again and again, one has to ask, who will be elected? Intuitively it’s White voters’ choice that will prevail because they are the super majority of the state and they can form a formidable bloc to defeat any minority candidate, which leads to a scenario  where White voters dictate the election outcome, a phenomenon of tyranny of majority that our Constitution tries to correct.

    How did you become involved in the Alabama case?

    I am an immigrant myself. Back in China, I never had a chance to vote for anything. There was no election in China in a substantive way. As a graduate student coming to the U.S. studying American voting, it was always my desire to learn the mysteries surrounding it, but also for the incredible achievement of American democracy. That is, everybody has a right to vote, and collectively they decide based on their individual choices, who should represent them, but also for the most powerful position in human history, that is the U.S. president.

    When I was a graduate student in New Orleans, the question was at the mayor level. Was it possible for White voters to cast their vote across racial lines for Black candidates? I wrote a dissertation about the conditions under which White voters were willing to vote for black candidates [for mayor]. For that, I won the American Political Science Association dissertation award. And within just a few years beyond my Ph.D., the whole nation was faced with the choice of Barack Obama [the first African American elected president]. After I became an assistant professor, I was asked by voting groups to help analyze data. So starting from Obama’s election all the way to this current case in Alabama, I’ve been practicing as an expert witness for more than two decades.

    What did you document about Alabama’s new congressional districts during your investigation?

    What I have done in this case was to collect data in real elections. There are two parts to it. One is what we call “endogenous” elections. Those are the elections that deal directly with the elected offices under dispute in this case, congressional seats. I analyzed those elections from 2008 all the way to 2020. I analyzed seven congressional districts. That’s too few, so I analyzed a second group of elections called “exogenous” elections, which concern statewide offices, such as lieutenant governor and state auditor, to supplement the endogenous elections. In both groups of elections, I found racially polarized voting.

    I also compared the enacted plan, passed by the state Legislature and signed by the governor of Alabama, with the plan proposed by the plaintiffs in this case, the Legal Defense Fund and other organizations that provided competing maps. I evaluate which plans would give more equal access to minorities based on empirical data. I’m an empirical scientist, so everything I do is based on data and statistical analysis.

    Your take on Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion?

    In my view, this is one of the best written opinions ever because it shows at the Jurisprudence level, how the court’s majority opinion evaluated not only the claim of Alabama but also the plaintiffs who challenged Alabama’s plan based on court’s interpretation of our Constitution.

    It’s not in favor of either the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party. It’s written in a very objective tone. It has no accusation against any party. It is fully based on the facts that both sides presented and explains why the court has gone through vigorous tests in the facts itself. And most importantly the case sends a strong message of why the Voting Rights Act still holds true today in our great democracy. All that is not based on whether the chief justice is a conservative or not. It’s based on his read of our great constitution. For that I am forever grateful as an American.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • U law expert available to comment on Supreme Court decision on affirmative action

    U law expert available to comment on Supreme Court decision on affirmative action

    [ad_1]

    In a widely anticipated decision, the Supreme Court on Thursday issued a decision finding that race-conscious admissions policies were unconstitutional. Students for Fair Admissions filed the original case against Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The decision, however, has far wider repercussions for higher education institutions. Erika George, a law professor at the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah, is available to comment on the decision and its implications.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Ramón Barthelemy wins 2023 LGBTQ+ Educator of the Year

    Ramón Barthelemy wins 2023 LGBTQ+ Educator of the Year

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — The LGBTQ+ Educator of the Year award recognizes an educator who has significantly impacted STEM students through teaching, counseling, advocacy, and role modeling. Dr. Barthelemy is an assistant professor in the Department of Physics & Astronomy at the University of Utah. Before joining the faculty at the U, Dr. Barthelemy was a Fulbright Fellow at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland, and an AAAS Science Policy Fellow. As a Fulbright Fellow, Dr. Barthelemy researched university physics education in Finland. As an AAAS Fellow, he focused on STEM education policies and helped support equity in STEM education. His current position focuses on physics education research, with a broad range of interests from student learning in the classroom to policies that govern the physics community and impact physics careers. Last year, Barthelemy and collaborators published  a pioneering study that revealed the barriers that LGBTQ+ physicists face in the field. His current research focuses on understanding the social network development of Ph.D. physicists who identify as women and/or as part of the LGBTQ+ community. This unique project focuses on Ph.D. scientists beyond academia and includes the government and private sectors. This work aims to better understand how these groups build their professional networks and navigate them to find their definition of career-related success.

    When asked how his life experiences have shaped his perspective as an educator, Dr. Barthelemy said, “…being queer has impacted how I think about binaries. I do not see the world as a place where there is one incorrect and one correct answer. Rather I see a very complex world in which multiple kinds of explanations and models can be used to understand our lives and the world around us. As a scientist, this dips into ideas of philosophy of science and how we are not necessarily claiming to have a T truth, but instead are working to develop and refine models that help us explain and predict the natural world.”

    His nominators noted, “…he combines stellar graduate work in physics education research with some of the deepest and most significant work on gender and LGBTQ+ issues in Physics that has so far been written.” When asked what advice he would give his younger self and scientists just beginning their adventures in physics, Barthelemy “…would tell a younger version of me to trust myself and to build a community of people who support one another and want to see each other succeed.”

    Out to Innovate awarded LGBTQ+ Engineer of the Year to Dr. David Jansing, Ph.D., a remote sensing scientist at Johns Hopkins University, and LGBTQ+ Scientist of the year to Dr. Victoria Orphan, Ph.D., the James Irvine Professor of Environmental Science and Geobiology at Caltech.

    Adapted from a release by Out to Innovate.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • University of Utah law professor and Navajo Nation member available to comment on SCOTUS decision on Indian Child Welfare Act

    University of Utah law professor and Navajo Nation member available to comment on SCOTUS decision on Indian Child Welfare Act

    [ad_1]

    Implications of the SCOTUS decision on the Indian Child Welfare Act

    Defying expectations, the Supreme Court on Thursday rejected challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act, which gives preference to Native American families in adopting Native American children. The act is aimed at preserving Native American children’s ties to their tribes, traditions and cultures.

    Heather Tanana, a member of the Navajo Nation and law professor at the S.J Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah, is available to comment on the decision and its implications.

    Faculty page

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Ivory Innovations celebrates 2023 Ivory Prize winners at Pacific Coast Builders Conference

    Ivory Innovations celebrates 2023 Ivory Prize winners at Pacific Coast Builders Conference

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: Jenna Louie

    Newswise — Ivory Innovations, a leading organization dedicated to addressing the housing affordability crisis, proudly announces the winners of the highly anticipated 2023 Ivory Prize for Housing Affordability. 

    The announcement was met with excitement and applause at the renowned Pacific Coast Builders Conference held in Anaheim, California. These four exceptional organizations have emerged as champions of innovation, demonstrating outstanding ambition, feasibility, and scalability in their efforts to tackle the urgent issue of housing affordability. Ivory Innovations will distribute a total of $300,000 in prize money to support the transformative initiatives of these deserving winners.

    The winners of the 2023 Ivory Prize for Housing Affordability actively address the challenge of affordable housing through interconnected approaches. The Dearfield Fund for Black Wealth empowers Black homebuyers by providing down-payment assistance, enabling the creation of generational wealth. Diamond Age uses cutting-edge industrial-scale robotics, revolutionizing new home construction and addressing the labor shortage while increasing affordability. The National Zoning Atlas brings transparency to zoning laws, illuminating their impact on housing availability. PermitFlow streamlines construction permitting processes, expediting housing development in ways that can lower costs and increase affordability. These winners embody innovation, equity, transparency, and efficiency, collectively driving solutions for housing affordability.

    “These remarkable winners of the 2023 Ivory Prize for Housing Affordability exemplify the spirit of innovation and the transformative impact it can have on addressing the pressing housing affordability crisis,” said Clark Ivory, CEO of Ivory Homes and founder of Ivory Innovations.

    “Their visionary approaches, from harnessing industrial-scale robotics to empowering marginalized communities, streamlining processes, and bringing transparency to zoning laws, inspire us to push boundaries and create a more accessible and equitable housing future for all,”

    Additional details about the four winners are included below and at https://ivoryinnovations.org/ivory-prize-2023-winner-announcement.

    1. Dearfield Fund for Black Wealth (Denver, Colorado) – committed to closing the racial wealth gap and promoting Black homeownership by providing crucial down-payment assistance to first-time Black and African American homebuyers. 

    “Many Black and African American families are considered ‘mortgage-ready,’ but lack the capital needed for a down payment due to historic housing discrimination that has prevented Black people from building wealth. Moreover, the rising cost of housing in many U.S. cities leaves families vulnerable to displacement due to rising rents. To address this centuries-old issue and advance housing stability, we’ve created a new financing tool that invests in and alongside Black homeowners in the form of returnable down-payment assistance,” said Aisha T. Weeks, managing director of the Dearfield Fund for Black Wealth. “The Ivory Prize is meaningful to us because it recognizes the program for our place-based impact and elevates the Dearfield Fund as a scalable and replicable solution that can be used nationally to address housing affordability and to build generational wealth.”

    1. Diamond Age (Phoenix, Arizona) – an automation platform that makes people more efficient and productive to drive affordability in single-family home construction.

    “Winning the Ivory Prize is a milestone event in the short history of Diamond Age — it’s a tribute to our team’s dedication to create affordability in single-family housing,” said Jack Oslan, CEO of Diamond Age. “The current state of innovation in construction technology, though robust, is primarily focused on incremental improvements vs. systemic change. Diamond Age is focused on changing the way homes are built — converting physically demanding manual labor into technology-focused jobs that will attract a new generation of workers into the industry. Although capital intensive, our first principles approach to replace not all, but the majority of onsite manual labor with automation, enables a practical, affordable, and scalable solution with a clear roadmap to profitability.”

    1. National Zoning Atlas (Ithaca, New York) – an extraordinary collaboration of researchers dedicated to digitizing, demystifying, and democratizing approximately 30,000 U.S. zoning codes. 

    “For the first time, the National Zoning Atlas is democratizing, demystifying, and digitizing our nation’s 30,000 or more zoning codes,” said Sara Bronin, founder of the National Zoning Atlas. “By analyzing a hundred different regulatory characteristics on every inch of zonable land, we’re informing state and local policy decisions about housing, transportation, climate change, and public infrastructure. We are so grateful to be recognized by the Ivory Prize for this work, and we hope with this recognition that more people will use our data to catalyze reform — or even join or start an atlas team.”

    1. PermitFlow (San Jose, California) – accelerating the construction permitting process to reduce risk and costs, creating new avenues to build housing more affordably and efficiently.

    “We are grateful for the Ivory Prize recognition and it will help us further our work of improving the construction permitting process,” said Francis Thumpasery, CEO of PermitFlow. “Permitting processes and timelines can vary greatly for each project, and this lack of standardization makes it hard for builders to develop new units in a timely and cost-effective manner. We are excited to scale our solution across the industry and look forward to continued technology adoption to lower costs, increase efficiency, and improve housing affordability.”

    These visionary winners embody the spirit of innovation and demonstrate the power of transformative ideas in solving the housing affordability crisis. Each organization’s unique approach showcases the potential to revolutionize the housing industry, from leveraging advanced robotics to promoting generational wealth and addressing regulatory barriers.

    Abby Ivory, managing director of Ivory Innovations, echoed the excitement, stating, “This year’s winners represent the very best in innovation and their solutions offer a glimpse into what the future of housing can be. We are honored to showcase their groundbreaking work and remain dedicated to supporting and amplifying their impact in making housing more affordable for everyone.”

    The Ivory Prize for Housing Affordability is a testament to the transformative power of innovation in creating a more equitable and accessible housing landscape. Ivory Innovations remains committed to championing innovators, inspiring change, and fostering collaborations that drive tangible solutions to the housing affordability crisis.

    About Ivory Innovations: Ivory Innovations is dedicated to catalyzing innovative solutions in housing affordability. Utilizing its network and resources, Ivory Innovations promotes the most compelling ideas in housing affordability, working across sectors and providing monetary awards with the Ivory Prize for Housing Affordability. Additionally, in partnership with the David Eccles School of Business at the University of Utah, Ivory Innovations places students at the center of its efforts, through Hack-A-House — an annual entrepreneurial competition — as well as scholarships, a course on housing innovation, and internships that place students at the core of the Ivory Prize search. For more information about the Ivory Prize and Ivory Innovations, visit www.ivoryinnovations.org.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Coffee plantations limit birds’ diets

    Coffee plantations limit birds’ diets

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: Paul Gabrielsen

    Newswise — Cast your mind back to the spring of 2020, when grocery store shelves sat bare of essential items and ingredients. For birds who live in the forests of Central America, replacement of forest land with coffee plantations essentially “clears out the shelves” of their preferred foods, causing them to shift their diets and habitats to survive.

    A new study led by researchers at the University of Utah explores a record of birds’ diets preserved in their feathers and radio tracking of their movements to find that birds eat far fewer invertebrates in coffee plantations than in forests, suggesting that the disturbance of their ecosystem significantly impacts the birds’ dietary options.

    “Growing human ecological impact on the planet, especially via habitat loss and degradation and climate change, often impacts bird diets negatively as well,” said Çağan H. Şekercioğlu, the study’s lead author and an ecology and ornithology professor in the U’s School of Biological Sciences. “These negative changes, including declines in key dietary resources like insects and other invertebrates can lead to reduced survival, especially of rapidly growing young, often leading to population declines and losses of these undernourished birds.”

    The study is published in Frontiers of Ecology and Evolution. Find the full study here.

    The forests of Costa Rica

    PHOTO CREDIT: ÇAĞAN H. ŞEKERCIOĞLU

    An Ochre-bellied Flycatcher.

     DOWNLOAD FULL-RES IMAGE

    All over the world, forests are being reduced from once-verdant havens of life to much smaller remnants, scattered amongst the agricultural land that has replaced them. Only about one percent of bird species prefer the types of habitats dominated by humans and human activity, but the rapid disappearance of natural forest habitat means that about a third of bird species now find themselves working to survive in human-dominated environments.

    In Costa Rica, the land around the Las Cruces Biological Station near the Panama border, has gone from fully forested to now 50% coffee plantations, 20% cattle pastures and 10% other human environments—only 20% of the land is still forested. The agricultural areas are drenched in pesticides, fertilizers and fungicides, drastically impacting the communities of invertebrates on which local birds feed.

    Those local birds include four species that the researchers focused on in the study: orange-billed nightingale-thrush, silver-throated tanager, white-throated thrush and ochre-bellied flycatcher. All four species can be found in both the forests and the open countryside where they feed on both fruits and invertebrates. But the invertebrates (including insects) are an important part of their diet, since they provide key nutrients including protein and nitrogen.

    Şekercioğlu and his colleagues, including researchers from the United States, Costa Rica, and Singapore, wanted to understand how the bird species they studied were obtaining their nutrients between the agricultural and forest environments, specifically during the crucial breeding season when proper nutrition is key to sustaining the species.

    An isotopic food diary

    PHOTO CREDIT: ÇAĞAN H. ŞEKERCIOĞLU

    An Orange-billed Nightingale-thrush.

     DOWNLOAD FULL-RES IMAGE

    To learn more about the birds’ diet, the researchers analyzed isotopes in their feathers. We are what we eat, and the chemical signatures of the foods we eat, in the form of isotope ratios, are incorporated into our tissues.

    Isotopes are different versions of the same element that differ only in the amount of neutrons in their nucleus – an infinitesimal difference in mass between a carbon atom with, say, six neutrons and a carbon atom with seven. But biological and physical processes can prefer either light or heavy isotopes, changing the resulting ratio in a way that can be measured and can provide valuable information.

    In humans, for example, a record of our diets is preserved in the isotopes in our hair. In a previous study, co-author Thure Cerling, a distinguished professor in the U’s Department of Geology and Geophysics, and colleagues analyzed hair clippings from barbershops and salons around the Salt Lake Valley and learned about the relative ratios of corn-fed meat and plant-based protein in the diets of local residents.

    In Costa Rica, the researchers hoped to do the same, but with the stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in the birds’ feathers. They collected 170 feathers from the four bird species to analyze diet, and tracked 49 birds’ movements using radio tracking to see where they spent their time.

    “It’s definitely not the first time feather isotopic analysis has been used to study bird diets,” said co-author Seth Newsome of the University of New Mexico, “but it might be the first time, especially in the tropics, it has been used in conjunction with radio telemetry to examine diet composition and relative use of agricultural versus natural habitats.”

    The results showed that the birds’ habitat of choice had a significant effect on their diet. The isotopic data suggested that three of the four species studied ate significantly fewer invertebrates in coffee plantations than in forests. For silver-throated tanagers and the white-throated thrushes, the data suggested that they were eating twice as much invertebrate biomass in forests than in coffee plantations.

    “Our results suggest that coffee plantations are deficient in invertebrates preferred by forest generalist birds that forage in both native forest remnants and coffee plantations,” Şekercioğlu said.

    Consequences of habitat shifts

    PHOTO CREDIT: ÇAĞAN H. ŞEKERCIOĞLU

    A Silver-throated Tanager.

     DOWNLOAD FULL-RES IMAGE

    The coffee plantations were planted decades ago, and the researchers don’t have the data to know how the birds behaved when the forest was intact. But from what we know about the birds’ behaviors now, we can infer what the results mean for the birds’ lifestyles.

    To consume enough invertebrates, Şekercioğlu said, the birds need to forage frequently in the small forest fragments of around 7-12 acres (about the size of the parking lot at the U’s Rice-Eccles Stadium) and narrow corridors of forests alongside rivers, only around 30-60 ft wide.

    “We think that the more mobile birds like silver-throated tanager and white-throated thrush move constantly to get enough food, especially protein-rich invertebrates,” Şekercioğlu said, a hypothesis supported by a 2007 radio tracking study. “Less mobile species like orange-billed nightingale thrush that can have lifelong home range sizes as small as an acre (half a hectare) either have to adapt to coffee plantations and eat fewer invertebrates or they disappear.” The orange-billed nightingale thrush isn’t alone—a 2019 study showed that more bird species were in decline in the region than were stable.

    So for the birds of Costa Rica, and for birds in other, similar tropical regions, forest reserves can provide critical resources for birds that have shifted their habitats to the remaining forest and travel through coffee plantations to reach other forest fragments.

    “These birds’ shifting their feeding to other places may result in new ecological interactions that can themselves have negative consequences,” Şekercioğlu said. “For example, increased competition with birds in these new places or overpredation on a prey species that was formerly not consumed as much.”

    How you can help

    PHOTO CREDIT: ÇAĞAN H. ŞEKERCIOĞLU

    A White-throated Thrush.

     DOWNLOAD FULL-RES IMAGE

    If you’re a coffee drinker, you can help by choosing to buy bird-friendly coffee. According to Şekercioğlu, bird-friendly coffee is grown in plantations with more tree cover and forest remnants, which are beneficial for native birds. He recommends buying shade-grown coffee, coffee certified as Bird Friendly by the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, or coffee from Ethiopia which, he said, is among the bird-friendliest.

    And local governments in tropical regions can help by prioritizing the conservation of intact forest, secondary growth forests and strips of forest alongside rivers to increase the connectivity of forest remnants.

    “It is urgent,” Şekercioğlu said, “to prioritize the conservation and regeneration of forest remnants in increasingly human-dominated agricultural areas that continue to replace the world’s most biodiverse tropical forests.”

    Find the full study here.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Shock to the system

    Shock to the system

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: Vincent Horiuchi, Public Relations Specialist, University of Utah John and Marcia Price College of Engineering

    Newswise — Feb. 22, 2022 — In this high-tech era, wearable devices such as smartwatches have proven to be invaluable companions for the health conscious. But a new study from the University of Utah shows that for a small group of people, some of these electronic fitness gadgets could possibly be risky to their health — even potentially deadly.

    University of Utah electrical and computer engineering assistant professor Benjamin Sanchez Terrones and U associate professor of medicine Benjamin Steinberg have published a new study that shows wearable devices such as the Samsung Galaxy watch 4, Fitbit smart scales, or Moodmetric smart rings, among others, have sensing technology that could interfere with cardiac implantable electronic  devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices.

    “This study raises a red flag,” says Sanchez Terrones. “We have done this work in simulations and benchtop testing following Food and Drug Administration accepted guidelines, and these gadgets interfere with the correct functioning of the CIEDs we tested. These results call for future clinical studies evaluating the translation of our findings to patients wearing CIEDs and using these wearable devices.”

    Their study was published in the newest edition of the scientific journal, Heart Rhythm. The paper, authored by U electrical and computer engineering graduate student Gia-Bao Ha, Sanchez Terrones, Steinberg, U internal medicine professor Roger Freedman, and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona cardiology professor Antoni Bayés-Genís, can be read here.

    At issue are specific wearable smartwatches, at-home smart scales, and smart rings that utilize bioimpedance, a type of sensing technology that emits a very small, imperceptible current of electricity (measured in microamps) into the body. For smartwatches like the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 or the Fitbit Aria 2 smart scale, the electrical current flows through the body and the response is measured by the sensor to determine the person’s body composition such as skeletal muscle mass or fat mass. For smart rings like the Moodmetric smart ring, bioimpedance sensing technology is used to measure a person’s level of stress.

    But after conducting comprehensive testing of bioimpedance on three cardiac CRT devices from manufacturers Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott, Sanchez Terrones’ team learned the slight electrical currents from these wearable gadgets can interfere and sometimes confuse cardiac implantable devices into operating incorrectly.

    In the case of a pacemaker, which sends small electrical impulses to the heart when it is beating too slowly, the bioimpedance’s tiny electrical current could trick the heart into thinking it is beating fast enough, preventing the pacemaker from doing its job when it is supposed to.

    “We have patients who depend on pacemakers to live,” Steinberg, a cardiac electrophysiologist, says. “If the pacemaker gets confused by interference, it could stop working during the duration that it is confused. If that interference is for a prolonged time, the patient could pass out or worse.”

    For other types of medical devices such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, which not only act as a pacemaker but can also shock the heart to restore a regular heart rhythm, a wearable device with bioimpedance could trick the defibrillator into delivering the patient an unneeded electric shock, which can be painful.

    Nearly all if not all implantable cardiac devices already warn patients about the potential for interference with a variety of electronics due to magnetic fields, such as carrying a mobile phone in your breast pocket near a pacemaker. But Sanchez-Terrones says this is the first time a study has discovered problems associated with a gadget’s bioimpedance sensing technology.

    “The scientific community doesn’t know about this,” he says. “No one has looked at whether this is a real concern or not.”

    Sanchez Terrones and Steinberg emphasize that the research does not convey an immediate or clear risk to patients who use these kinds of wearable devices, but they believe it’s a first step for further study.

    “We need to test across a broader cohort of devices and possibly in patients with these devices,” Steinberg said.

    “Ultimately, more studies are needed to evaluate the clinical translation of our findings and ensure the health of our patients,” Sanchez Terrones added.

     

    This news release and photos may be downloaded from attheu.utah.edu/category/news-releases.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Utah’s Consumer Sentiment rises in December

    Utah’s Consumer Sentiment rises in December

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — January 6, 2023 (Salt Lake City) – Utah’s consumer sentiment increased from 64.1 in November to 68.7 in December, according to the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute’s Survey of Utah Consumers. A similar survey by the University of Michigan also found sentiment rose from November (56.8) to December (59.7) among Americans as a whole. The Gardner Institute has now measured Utah Consumer Sentiment for 27 consecutive months. The December 2022 Index for both Utah and the US increased over the prior month, suggesting a slightly better outlook.

    “Current economic challenges from an overheated economy include high inflation, rising interest rates, and slowdowns in construction and real estate.  Consumer sentiment has reflected these challenges,” said Phil Dean, Chief Economist at the Gardner Institute.  “Yet, there are many often under-appreciated economic buffers.  Extremely low employment coupled with improving supply chains and strong overall household, business, and state and local government financial reserves provide a hedge against these challenges in the new year.” 

    The full results and methodology are now available online.

    ### 

    ABOUT THE GARDNER POLICY INSTITUTE

    The Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute serves Utah by preparing economic, demographic, and public policy research that helps the state prosper. We are Utah’s demographic experts, leaders on the Utah economy, and specialists on public policy and survey research. We are an honest broker of INFORMED RESEARCH, which guides INFORMED DISCUSSIONS, and leads to INFORMED DECISIONS™. For more information, please visit gardner.utah.edu or call 801-587-3717. 

    ABOUT THE DAVID ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

    The Eccles School is synonymous with ‘doing.’ The Eccles experience provides a world-class business education with a unique, entrepreneurial focus on real-world scenarios where students put what they learn into practice long before graduation. Founded in 1917 and educating more than 6,000 students annually, the University of Utah David Eccles School of Business offers nine undergraduate majors, four MBAs, eight other graduate programs, a Ph.D. in seven areas and executive education curricula. The School is also home to 12 institutes, centers, and initiatives, which deliver academic research and support an ecosystem of entrepreneurship and innovation. For more information, visit Eccles.Utah.edu or call 801-581-7676.

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link

  • Sorenson Impact Center Launches Video Course Series to Change the Status Quo in Entrepreneurship and Investing

    Sorenson Impact Center Launches Video Course Series to Change the Status Quo in Entrepreneurship and Investing

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — SALT LAKE CITY – The Sorenson Impact Center today announced the launch of Project DEEP (Developing Equitable Economies Program)  – a multi-pronged initiative including a new series of free video courses designed to accelerate the growth of underrepresented entrepreneurs. Course facilitators include an impressive array of world-class experts, including Beta Boom Managing Partner Kimmy Paluch, national economic development expert Dell Gines, and Womenpreneurs Co-founder and investor Rose Maizner.

    Three courses focus on tactical topics for entrepreneurs, and three focus on shifts for stakeholders who can influence entrepreneurs’ success, including investors, economic developers, and entrepreneur support organizations. Course facilitators were chosen for not only their extensive professional expertise but also their lived personal experience overcoming the systemic barriers Project DEEP seeks to eliminate.

    “Too many resources focus on “fixing” entrepreneurs without recognizing it’s the system that needs to change – our aim with Project DEEP is to both directly support overlooked entrepreneurs and more broadly shift the burden of change to the ecosystem decision makers who can influence entrepreneur success,” said Megan Brewster, Senior Manager at Sorenson Impact Center and co-director of the series. “Too much in our current entrepreneurial ecosystem isn’t working for the increasingly diverse modern entrepreneur, and there is a significant opportunity cost in not remedying this.”

    In the U.S.’s current entrepreneurial ecosystem, inequities persist across investment, lending, network access, technical assistance, and more. Take funding, for example: On the debt side, the average loan amount in 2020 was 33% lower for women-owned businesses, while on the equity side, less than 2% of venture capital goes to female-founded firms and less than 3% goes to Black or Latinx founders.

    The slow change in these systemic barriers contrasts with the opportunity inherent in supporting women and entrepreneurs of color. According to the American Express Women-Owned Businesses report, women of color are starting businesses at more than 4x the rate of all businesses and generate $422.5 billion in revenue. Women are starting more than 1,800 businesses per day on average, and women-owned firms are increasing employment at more than 4x the rate of all businesses.  

    “Research shows that entrepreneurs of color have a net worth 10-12x greater than their non-entrepreneurial peers – entrepreneurship is key to building lasting wealth and creating a sense of place in communities” said Dell Gines, entrepreneurial ecosystem expert and course facilitator for the initiative. “Project DEEP will help provide the resource and knowledge sharing to generate more of that in communities that have been left behind for too long.”

    Project DEEP is funded by the Economic Development Administration, JPMorgan Chase Foundation, and the Sorenson Impact Foundation. The project also included additional components, such as a community partnerships program funding Utah-based entrepreneur support organizations Women’s Business Center of Utah and New Pattern and an impact measurement component.

    The initiative builds on the Center’s prior work around equitable entrepreneurship locally and nationally, including its 2018 landscape analysis report that reviewed challenges and opportunities for small businesses owned by women and people of color in Utah. This pioneering report provided concrete recommendations for better supporting historically marginalized entrepreneurs.

    About the Sorenson Impact Center

    The Sorenson Impact Center helps organizations achieve their impact vision by connecting capital to social and environmental solutions, helping organizations measure, report, and improve impact, and integrating data science and people-centered storytelling into all that we do. Along with our clients and partners, we share a vision of an equitable and thriving world where everyone is valued, communities prosper, and the measured impact of our actions guides decision-making. As part of our mission to train future impact leaders, the Center integrates academic programming and experiential learning into each of its practice areas. The Center is proudly housed at the University of Utah David Eccles School of Business. Learn more at http://www.sorensonimpactcenter.com

     

    About the Economic Development Administration

    As the only federal government agency focused exclusively on economic development, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA) plays a critical role in fostering regional economic development efforts in communities across the nation. Through strategic investments that foster job creation and attract private investment, EDA supports development in economically distressed areas of the United States. Learn more at https://www.eda.gov/

     

    About JPMorgan Chase

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) is a leading financial services firm based in the United States of America (“U.S.”), with operations worldwide. JPMorgan Chase had $3.7 trillion in assets and $294.1 billion in stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2021. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands, the Firm serves millions of customers in the U.S. and many of the world’s most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients globally. Information about JPMorgan Chase & Co. is available at www.jpmorganchase.com.

     

    About the Sorenson Impact Foundation

    The Sorenson Impact Foundation invests in innovative social entrepreneurs who look to solve the world’s most pressing needs. We invest around the world in companies that have developed scalable, innovative and potentially disruptive solutions to the world’s most pressing needs including access to quality healthcare and education, workforce development, sanitation, water, and clean energy. Learn more at https://sorensonimpactfoundation.org/

     

     

    -30-

     

    [ad_2]

    University of Utah

    Source link