ReportWire

Tag: United States Senate

  • Biden signs bill avoiding a rail strike during holidays

    Biden signs bill avoiding a rail strike during holidays

    [ad_1]

    Washington — President Biden on Friday morning signed a measure that will impose a labor agreement for rail workers that his administration brokered in September, averting a nationwide disruption of rail service ahead of the holiday season. 

    “The bill I’m about to sign ends a difficult rail dispute and helps our nation avoid what without a doubt would have been an economic catastrophe at a very bad time in the calendar,” Mr. Biden said before signing the legislation. 

    The bill passed the Senate Thursday with bipartisan support, 80 to 15, with GOP Sen. Rand Paul voting “present.” The measure passed the House earlier this week, after the president urged Congress to intervene. 

    An amendment that would have added seven days of paid sick leave to the rail contract failed in a 52 to 43 vote. The Senate also voted down a GOP amendment for a 60-day cooling off period for union and rail negotiations. 

    “I know this was a tough vote for members of both parties,” Mr. Biden said Friday. “It was tough for me. But it was the right thing to do at the moment to save jobs and to protect millions of families from harm or disruption and to keep supply chain stable around the holidays, and to continue the progress we’ve made.” 

    Biden Rail Strike
    President Joe Biden signs H.J.Res.100, a bill that aims to avert a freight rail strike, in the Roosevelt Room at the White House, Friday, Dec. 2, 2022, in Washington. Biden is joined by from left, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Transportation, Secretary Pete Buttigieg and and Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh.

    Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP


    Mr. Biden asked Congress to intervene after four of the 12 rail unions rejected the agreement between rail workers and operators. The Biden administration has been urging swift action, as workers threatened to strike if they failed to reach a labor agreement by Dec. 9. While some lawmakers, particularly Democrats who are typically pro-labor, have expressed hesitation about intervening, congressional leaders agreed on the need to avoid a rail strike that could deal a blow to the economy. 

    Mr. Biden hosted the four House and Senate leaders at the White House on Tuesday, and they discussed the role for Congress in preventing a rail shutdown.

    “I negotiated a contract no one else could negotiate,” Mr. Biden said during a joint press conference Thursday with French President Emmanuel Macron. “The only thing that was left out was whether there was paid leave.”

    The president added that the U.S. is a rare wealthy nation without guaranteed paid leave, and he wants to provide paid sick leave “not just for rail workers, but for all workers.” 

    The compromise agreement negotiated with the help of the Biden administration provides 24% pay increases and $5,000 in bonuses retroactive to 2020, as well as the one additional day of paid leave. Under the proposal, workers’ premiums would be capped at 15% of the cost of the insurance plan.

    Railroad unions criticized Mr. Biden’s call for Congress to wade into the contract dispute, claiming it undermines his repeated characterizations of himself as “the most pro-union president.”

    But the president said this week that not acting could have devastating impacts on the economy.

    “It’s going to immediately cost 750,000 jobs and cause a recession,” Mr. Biden said Thursday of a strike. “What was negotiated was so much better than anything they ever had, and they all signed on to it.” 

    The president stressed that he would continue to “fight for paid leave for not only rail workers, but for all American workers.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senate approves bill to avoid rail strike during holiday season

    Senate approves bill to avoid rail strike during holiday season

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Senate on Thursday approved a measure that will impose a labor agreement for rail workers that was brokered by the Biden administration in September, averting a nationwide disruption of rail service ahead of the holiday season. The bill passed with bipartisan support, 80 to 15, with one senator voting “present.” 

    The measure, which passed the House this week, now heads to the desk of President Biden, who urged Congress to intervene. 

    An amendment that would have added seven days of paid sick leave to the rail contract failed in a 52 to 43 vote. The Senate also voted down a GOP amendment for a 60-day cooling off period for union and rail negotiations. 

    Mr. Biden asked Congress to intervene after four of the 12 rail unions rejected the agreement between rail workers and operators. The Biden administration has been urging swift action, as workers threatened to strike if they failed to reach a labor agreement by Dec. 9. While some lawmakers, particularly Democrats who are typically pro-labor, have expressed hesitation about intervening, congressional leaders agreed on the need to avoid a rail strike that could deal a blow to the economy. 

    Mr. Biden hosted the four House and Senate leaders at the White House on Tuesday, and they discussed the role for Congress in preventing a rail shutdown.

    “I negotiated a contract no one else could negotiate,” Mr. Biden said during a joint press conference Thursday with French President Emmanuel Macron. “The only thing that was left out was whether there was paid leave.”

    The president added that the U.S. is a rare wealthy nation without guaranteed paid leave, and he wants to provide paid sick leave “not just for rail workers, but for all workers.” 

    The compromise agreement negotiated with the help of the Biden administration provides 24% pay increases and $5,000 in bonuses retroactive to 2020, as well as the one additional day of paid leave. Under the proposal, workers’ premiums would be capped at 15% of the cost of the insurance plan.

    Railroad unions criticized Mr. Biden’s call for Congress to wade into the contract dispute, claiming it undermines his repeated characterizations of himself as “the most pro-union president.”

    But the president said this week that not acting could have devastating impacts on the economy.

    “It’s going to immediately cost 750,000 jobs and cause a recession,” Mr. Biden said Thursday of a strike. “What was negotiated was so much better than anything they ever had, and they all signed on to it.” 

    The president stressed that he would continue to “fight for paid leave for not only rail workers, but for all American workers.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Railroad labor bill that could avert strike in Senate’s hands with deadline approaching

    Railroad labor bill that could avert strike in Senate’s hands with deadline approaching

    [ad_1]

    Railroad labor bill that could avert strike in Senate’s hands with deadline approaching – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A bill that could avert a national rail strike is now in the hands of the U.S. Senate. The House passed legislation on Wednesday to ratify an agreement that the Biden administration helped broker in September, but some unions rejected that deal over paid sick leave. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane explained what’s at stake.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House votes on bill to prevent rail workers strike

    House votes on bill to prevent rail workers strike

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Congress is moving swiftly to prevent a looming U.S. rail workers strike, reluctantly intervening in a labor dispute to stop what would surely be a devastating blow to the nation’s economy if the transportation of fuel, food and other critical goods were disrupted.

    The House is voting on Wednesday after President Biden asked Congress to step in. The bill lawmakers are considering would impose a compromise labor agreement brokered by his administration that was ultimately voted down by four of the 12 unions representing more than 100,000 employees at large freight rail carriers. The unions have threatened to strike if an agreement can’t be reached before a Dec. 9 deadline. They are also considering a separate measure to provide workers with paid sick days. 

    Lawmakers from both parties expressed reservations, but the intervention was particularly difficult for some Democratic lawmakers who have traditionally sought to align themselves with the politically powerful labor unions.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with Democrats, announced that he would object to fast-tracking the president’s proposal until he can get a roll-call vote on the amendment that would guarantee seven paid sick days for rail workers. Some of the more liberal lawmakers in the House such as Reps. Jamaal Bowman of New York and Cori Bush of Missouri tweeted that they couldn’t support the measure.

    And a handful of Senate Republicans have expressed their opposition to Congress intervening. 

    “I’m not going to vote to impose this on them against their will with the force of law,” said Sen. Josh Hawley on Wednesday. 

    Still, the bill is expected to receive a significant bipartisan vote. That show of support began when the Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate met with Mr. Biden on Tuesday at the White House.

    “We all agreed that we should try to avoid this rail shutdown as soon as possible,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday as he returned to the Capitol.

    A letter from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Democratic colleagues promised two votes, reflecting the consternation she was hearing from members. The first vote will be on adopting the tentative labor agreement. The second will be on a measure to add seven days of paid sick leave for railroaders to the agreement.

    “It is with great reluctance that we must now move to bypass the standard ratification process for the Tentative Agreement,” Pelosi wrote. “However, we must act to prevent a catastrophic strike that would touch the lives of nearly every family: erasing hundreds of thousands of jobs, including union jobs; keeping food and medicine off the shelves; and stopping small businesses from getting their goods to market.”

    Congressional White House Meeting
    Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer address the media after a meeting about avoiding a railroad worker strike with President Biden at the White House on Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2022.

    Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images


    The compromise agreement that was supported by the railroads and a majority of the unions provides for 24% raises and $5,000 in bonuses retroactive to 2020 along with one additional paid leave day. The raises would be the biggest rail workers have received in more than four decades. Workers would have to pay a larger share of their health insurance costs, but their premiums would be capped at 15% of the total cost of the insurance plan. But the agreement didn’t resolve workers’ concerns about demanding schedules that make it hard to take a day off and the lack of paid sick time.

    Lawmakers from both parties grumbled about stepping into the dispute, but they also said they had little choice.

    “The bottom line is we are now forced with this kind of terrible situation where we have to choose between an imperfect deal that has already been negotiated or an economic catastrophe,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts.

    “This is about whether we shut down the railroads of America, which will have extreme negative effects on our economy,” said Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House. “We should have a bipartisan vote.”

    Republicans needled the Biden administration and Democrats for Congress being asked to step in now to avert an economic crisis. But many indicated they were ready to do so.

    “This has got to be tough for Democrats in that they generally kowtow to unions,” said GOP Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana.

    “At this late hour, it’s clear that there is little we can do other than to support the measure,” said Republican Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma.

    Business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Farm Bureau Federation said earlier this week in a letter to congressional leaders they must be prepared to intervene and that a stoppage of rail service for any duration would represent a $2 billion per day hit to the economy.

    On several past occasions, Congress has intervened in labor disputes by enacting legislation to delay or prohibit railway and airline strikes.

    Railroad unions on Tuesday decried Mr. Biden’s call for Congress to intervene in their contract dispute, saying it undercuts their efforts to address workers’ quality-of-life concerns.

    Conductor Gabe Christenson, who is co-chairman of the Railroad Workers United coalition that includes workers from all the rail unions, said Mr. Biden and the Democrats are siding with the railroads over workers.

    “The ‘most labor-friendly president in history’ has proven that he and the Democratic Party are not the friends of labor they have touted themselves to be,” Christenson said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Virginia Rep. McEachin dies at 61 after cancer battle

    Virginia Rep. McEachin dies at 61 after cancer battle

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. A. Donald McEachin, D-Va., died Monday after a battle with colorectal cancer, his office said. He was 61.

    Tara Rountree, McEachin’s chief of staff, said in a statement late Monday: “Valiantly, for years now, we have watched him fight and triumph over the secondary effects of his colorectal cancer from 2013. Tonight, he lost that battle.”

    McEachin represented Virginia’s 4th Congressional District, which includes part of Richmond and extends south to the North Carolina border. He was reelected to a fourth term earlier this month.

    Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., released a statement saying: “Up until the very end, Don was a fighter. Even though he battled cancer and faced other trials in recent years, he never lost his focus on social and environmental justice. Tonight, Virginia has lost a great leader and I have lost a great friend.”

    Rep. Gerry Connelly, D-Va., called McEachin an “environmentalist, civil rights advocate, faithful public servant, and a man of consequence. There was no better ally to have.”

    Richmond TV station WTVR said McEachin is survived by his wife, Richmond Commonwealth’s Attorney Colette McEachin, and their three adult children.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senator Mitch McConnell wins reelection for Senate minority leader

    Senator Mitch McConnell wins reelection for Senate minority leader

    [ad_1]

    Senator Mitch McConnell wins reelection for Senate minority leader – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Senator Mitch McConnell has won reelection for Senate minority leader over challenger Rick Scott. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane joins “Red and Blue” to discuss what McConnell is saying about the midterm elections and more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats clinch Senate control following projected Nevada win

    Democrats clinch Senate control following projected Nevada win

    [ad_1]

    CBS News projects that the Democrats have clinched control of the Senate following the 2022 midterms. This comes after CBS News projected Saturday night that incumbent Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez has been reelected in Nevada following a tight race with Republican challenger Adam Laxalt.

    The win gives the Democrats a projected 50 seats and control of the Senate, regardless of the outcome of the Georgia runoff election in December between Sen. Raphael Warnock and Republican challenger Herschel Walker. 

    “The election is a great win for the American people,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a briefing late Saturday night. “With the races now called in Arizona and Nevada, Democrats will have a majority in the Senate, and I will once again be majority leader.”   

    The man charged with helping Republicans win control of the Senate, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Rick Scott is unhappy with the GOP’s performance in the midterms.

    “Election Day, our voters didn’t show up. We didn’t get enough voters,” he said on Fox News Friday night.

    Alaska, where three candidates were on the ballot in a ranked-choice voting system, has also not yet been called, but with the top two finishers both Republicans, CBS News projects it will stay in Republican hands.

    On Friday evening, CBS News projected Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly will win reelection over Republican challenger Blake Masters.

    In other battleground states, CBS News projected the races in Wisconsin, Florida, Ohio and North Carolina will go to Republicans, while Democrats will win in Colorado, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania. 

    In each of the Senate battlegrounds where CBS News has conducted exit polls, voters said control of the Senate was important to their vote. CBS News conducted statewide surveys in 11 key battleground states: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin.

    In each of these states, voters had negative views of the nation’s economy. 

    In most of the Senate battleground states, the issue of inflation is outpacing abortion in terms of the importance of the issue to voters. But in Pennsylvania’s closely-watched race, where Democrat John Fetterman came out ahead of Dr. Mehmet Oz, early exit polling showed abortion outpaced inflation as a concern for voters.

    Nearly three in four voters said they were dissatisfied about the country as they headed to the polls Tuesday, according to early exit polling. That includes almost a third who said they were angry. Almost three-quarters said the economy is bad, and nearly half of voters said their family’s finances are worse than they were two years ago.

    Thirty-five Senate seats were up for grabs in total in the 2022 midterm elections, but under a third were expected to be close. 

    Musadiq Bidar and Jack Turman contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Amy Klobuchar says Democrats

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar says Democrats

    [ad_1]

    Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota said she was surprised by a “number of things” in the midterm elections, including how well Democrats fared. 

    Democrats did better than expected and appeared to have staved off a “red wave,” although control of the House and several Senate races were still up in the air Wednesday morning. 

    “We have literally defied the tides of history,” Klobuchar said of the House election. “No matter what happens, we know it’s going to be incredibly close in the House.”

    She said many Republicans were “out there predicting this red tide,” but “those predictions did not age well,” adding that a number of governor races across the country were won by Democrats.

    The senator said, however, that she had her concerns going into Tuesday’s elections.

    “Everyone was concerned because of all the money that had been spent against our candidates, the angry, angry types of ads that we saw on TV,” she said. 

    She urged for campaign finance reform to prevent “the angry, ugly ads coming from untold sources of money that no one can figure out, shadow contributions.”

    “That’s got to end,” she said. “It’s really bad for our democracy.”

    She also said voters were “amazing” for showing up in big numbers. 

    “The voters understood that democracy was on the ballot,” and prioritized issues including reproductive rights and inflation, she said.

    “I think the people of this country understood more than the pollsters or the pundits thought that Democrats have been doing a whole lot to help, and that in fact, the Republicans didn’t really have a plan and they were playing politics with it, with the problem that’s a worldwide inflation problem,” she said. 

    Klobuchar said she thinks Democrats can gain more voter trust on issues like crime and the economy by “putting forward plans to go after crime.” 

    “That includes funding the police,” she said. “…I think that’s going to be really important going forward, that we continue to make that clear and that we actually hope to solve this problem. There’s many solutions including mental health, including recruiting police officers, fentanyl, many things that we have to deal with.”

    The senator said she is also continuing work on inflation. 

    “To me that means continuing this work on workforce training, on the supply chain disruptions, on bringing the shipping costs down, on doing more when it comes to pharmaceutical costs and housing and childcare,” she said. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Live Updates: Senate control in the balance as Democrats and Republicans fight for battleground states

    Live Updates: Senate control in the balance as Democrats and Republicans fight for battleground states

    [ad_1]

    Polls have closed in 25 states and the District of Columbia, including the battleground Senate states of Georgia, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire.

    CBS News characterizes the races in Georgia, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire as toss-ups. Polls have also closed in Ohio and North Carolina, races that CBS News has characterized as lean Republican. 

    In Florida, CBS News projects Sen. Marco Rubio wins reelection over challenger Val Demings. 

    Control of the Senate remains a toss-up. 

    Voters have Senate control on their minds — in each of the Senate battlegrounds where CBS News has conducted exit polls, voters said control of the Senate is important to their vote. CBS News conducted statewide surveys in 11 key battleground states: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wisconsin.

    In each of these states, voters have negative views of the nation’s economy. 

    Right now, in most of the Senate battleground states, the issue of inflation is outpacing abortion in terms of the importance of the issue to voters. But in Pennsylvania’s closely-watched race, early exit polling shows abortion outpaces inflation as a concern for voters.

    Nearly three in four voters were dissatisfied about the country as they headed to the polls Tuesday, according to early exit polling. That includes almost a third who said they were angry. Almost three-quarters said the economy is bad, and nearly half of voters said their family’s finances are worse than they were two years ago.

    The top issue overall that’s driving voters to the polls is inflation. This is particularly true among those who are voting Republican. Abortion comes in second, especially among those voting Democratic.

    In Georgia’s Senate race, where Democrat Raphael Warnock is defending his seat against a challenge from Republican Herschel Walker, voters said the qualities voters are looking for are honesty and integrity, as well as a candidate who shares their values. 

    In Pennsylvania, the electorate is divided on whether Democrat John Fetterman is healthy enough to serve effectively as a U.S. senator. Right now, there is also a bit more concern that Republican Mehmet Oz has not lived in the state long enough to serve effectively.

    Thirty-five Senate seats are up for grabs in total in the 2022 midterm elections, but under a third are expected to be close. Control of the chamber will come down to the races in those battleground states, including Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.  

    Historically, a president’s party tends to lose seats during midterm elections. Former President George W. Bush was the last president to see his party gain seats during a midterm election. That was in 2002, shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Obama, on the Pennsylvania campaign trail, tells Democrats

    Obama, on the Pennsylvania campaign trail, tells Democrats

    [ad_1]

    The Democratic Party’s most powerful voices warned Saturday that abortion, Social Security and democracy itself are at risk as they labored to overcome fierce political headwinds — and an ill-timed misstep from President Biden — over the final weekend of the high-stakes midterm elections.

    “Sulking and moping is not an option,” former President Barack Obama told several hundred voters on a blustery day in Pittsburgh.

    “On Tuesday, let’s make sure our country doesn’t get set back 50 years,” Obama said. “The only way to save democracy is if we, together, fight for it.”

    Obama was the first president, but not last, to rally voters Saturday in Pennsylvania, a pivotal state as voters decide control of Congress and key statehouses. Polls across America will close on Tuesday, but more than 36 million people have already voted.

    By day’s end, voters in the Keystone State also were to have heard directly from Mr. Biden as well as former President Donald Trump. And former President Bill Clinton was campaigning in New York.

    Each was appearing with local candidates, but their words echoed across the country as the parties sent out their best to deliver a critical closing argument.

    Not everyone, it seemed, was on message, however.

    Even before arriving in Pennsylvania, Mr. Biden was dealing with a fresh political mess after upsetting some in his party for promoting plans to shut down fossil fuel plants in favor of green energy. While he made the comments in California the day before, the fossil fuel industry is a major employer in Pennsylvania.

    Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said the president owed coal workers across the country an apology.

    “Being cavalier about the loss of coal jobs for men and women in West Virginia and across the country who literally put their lives on the line to help build and power this country is offensive and disgusting,” Manchin said.

    The White House said Mr. Biden’s words were “twisted to suggest a meaning that was not intended; he regrets it if anyone hearing these remarks took offense” and that he was “commenting on a fact of economics and technology.”

    Democrats are deeply concerned about their narrow majorities in the House and Senate as voters sour on Mr. Biden’s leadership amid surging inflation, crime concerns and widespread pessimism about the direction of the country. History suggests that Democrats, as the party in power, will suffer significant losses in the midterms.

    Clinton, 76, addressed increasing fears about rising crime as he stumped for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, whose reelection is at risk even in deep-blue New York. He blamed Republicans for focusing on the issue to score political points.

    “But what are the Republicans really saying? ‘I want you to be scared and I want you to be mad. And the last thing I want you to do is think,’” Clinton said.

    In Pittsburgh, Obama accompanied Senate candidate John Fetterman, the lieutenant governor who represents his party’s best chance to flip a Republican-held seat. Later Saturday, they appeared in Philadelphia with Mr. Biden and Josh Shapiro, the nominee for governor.

    Trump will finish the day courting voters in a working-class region in the southwestern corner of the state with Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Senate nominee, and Doug Mastriano, who is running for governor.

    Former President Trump Holds Rally In Robstown, Texas
    Former U.S President Donald Trump speaks at a ‘Save America’ rally on October 22, 2022 in Robstown, Texas. The former president, alongside other Republican nominees and leaders held a rally where they energized supporters and voters ahead of the midterm election.

    BRANDON BELL / Getty Images


    The attention on Pennsylvania underscores the stakes in 2022 and beyond for the tightly contested state. The Oz-Fetterman race could decide the Senate majority — and with it, Mr. Biden’s agenda and judicial appointments for the next two years. The governor’s contest will determine the direction of state policy and control of the state’s election infrastructure heading into the 2024 presidential contest.

    Shapiro, the state attorney general, leads in polls over Mastriano, a state senator and retired Army colonel who some Republicans believe is too extreme to win a general election in a state Mr. Biden narrowly carried two years ago.

    Polls show a closer contest to replace retiring Republican Sen. Pat Toomey as Fetterman recovers from a stroke he suffered in May. He jumbled words and struggled to complete sentences in his lone debate against Oz last month, although medical experts say he’s recovering well from the health scare.

    Obama addressed Fetterman’s stroke directly when appearing with him in Pittsburgh.

    “John’s stroke did not change who he is. It didn’t change what he cares about,” he said.

    Fetterman railed against Oz and castigated the former New Jersey resident as an ultrawealthy carpetbagger who will say or do anything to get elected.

    “I’ll be the 51st vote to eliminate the filibuster, to raise the minimum wage,” Fetterman said. “Please send Dr. Oz back to New Jersey.”

    Oz has worked to craft a moderate image in the general election and focused his attacks on Fetterman’s progressive positions on criminal justice and drug decriminalization. Still, Oz has struggled to connect with some voters, including Republicans who think he’s too close to Trump, too liberal or inauthentic.

    Obama acknowledged that voters are anxious after suffering through “some tough times” in recent years, citing the pandemic, rising crime and surging inflation.

    “The Republicans like to talk about it, but what’s their answer, what’s their economic policy?” Obama asked. “They want to gut Social Security. They want to gut Medicare. They want to give rich folks and big corporations more tax cuts.”

    Obama and Fetterman hugged on stage after the speeches were over.

    Saturday marked Obama’s first time campaigning in Pennsylvania this year, though he has been the party’s top surrogate in the final sprint to Election Day. He campaigned in recent days in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada and Arizona, while Mr. Biden has spent more time in Democratic-leaning states where he’s more welcome.

    Mr. Biden opened his day in Illinois campaigning with Rep. Lauren Underwood, a two-term suburban Chicago lawmaker in a close race.

    The president ticked through his administration’s achievements, including the Inflation Reduction Action, passed in August by the Democratic-led Congress. It includes several health care provisions popular among older adults and the less well-off, including a $2,000 cap on out-of-pocket medical expenses and a $35 monthly cap per prescription on insulin. The new law also requires companies that raise prices faster than overall inflation to pay Medicare a rebate.

    “I wish I could say Republicans in Congress helped make it happen,” Mr. Biden said of the legislation that passed along party lines. He also vowed that Democrats would protect Social Security.

    Yet his comments from the day before about the energy industry — and Manchin’s fierce response — may have been getting more attention.

    “It’s also now cheaper to generate electricity from wind and solar than it is from coal and oil,” Mr. Biden said Friday in Southern California. “We’re going to be shutting these plants down all across America and having wind and solar.”

    Pennsylvania has largely transitioned away from coal, but fossil fuel companies remain a major employer in the state.

    As for Trump, his late rally in Latrobe is part of a late blitz that will also take him to Florida and Ohio. He’s hoping a strong GOP showing will generate momentum for the 2024 run that he’s expected to launch in the days or weeks after polls close.

    Trump has been increasingly explicit about his plans.

    At a rally Thursday night in Iowa, traditionally home of the first contest on the presidential nominating calendar, Trump repeatedly referenced his 2024 White House ambitions.

    After talking up his first two presidential runs, he told the crowd: “Now, in order to make our country successful and safe and glorious, I will very, very, very probably do it again, OK? Very, very, very probably. Very, very, very probably.”

    “Get ready, that’s all I’m telling you. Very soon,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Could permanent daylight saving time help

    Could permanent daylight saving time help

    [ad_1]

    Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are getting behind a bill that would impact every resident in the U.S.:  A permanent switch to daylight saving time beginning in November 2023. Aside from avoiding the nuisance — and sleep deprivation — of changing clocks twice a year, the effort could give the economy a boost, lawmakers say. 

    The Sunshine Protection Act should boost consumer spending and shift energy consumption by giving Americans an extra hour of sunlight at the end of the workday, the lawmakers said in a release about the bill. Passage of the bill could “jump-start” the economy and effectively act as a “stimulus package all on its own,” wrote Sam Lyman, policy director of the Orrin G. Hatch Foundation, in an op-ed in The Hill. 

    But the economic benefits of year-round DST may be murkier than its supporters suggest, according to PNC economist Kurt Rankin, who looked into studies about time shifts and their impact on the economy. First off, there’s not much available research on the issue, at least when compared with other aspects of the economy such as wages or inflation. And the existing research is limited in scope, raising questions about what the national economic impact would be. 

    “From an economist perspective, I think the benefits will be minimal,” Rankin told CBS MoneyWatch. “It’s not something that is going to cure the woes that are facing the U.S. economy over the next year or two — the inflation concerns, rising interest rates, the supply chain shortages.”

    One finding often cited as evidence of the economic benefits of the switch comes from the JP Morgan Chase Institute, which in 2016 found that consumer spending dropped 3.5% after the end of daylight saving time in November. That suggests some consumers pare their spending when there’s one less hour of daylight at the end of the day for them to shop or do errands. 

    But the Chase Institute study focused on spending in Los Angeles, a relatively limited scope. And the researchers noted that other policy changes, such as a sales tax holiday, could provide a larger boost to consumer spending. 

    A boost for restaurants?

    Some business groups say they are studying the issue. The National Retail Federation in an email said it has “historically supported daylight saving time, but that position does not reflect the current debate over creating permanent daylight saving time, which was passed by the Senate this week.” 

    It added, “We are examining the implications of this change and consulting with our members.”

    That being said, Rankin believed the switch to permanent DST could benefit one sector of the economy: Hospitality businesses like restaurants and hotels. More daylight toward the end of the day could boost demand for those services, which would help those businesses as well as gig economy workers like DoorDash drivers. 

    “That is the sector that is still having the most difficulty bouncing back from the pandemic, so giving some security to workers in that sector will be helpful,” he said. 

    Rankin added that he himself likes the idea of a permanent switch, even if he doesn’t see much of an economic case for the bill. “I’m in favor of getting rid of changing the clocks because it throws off your schedule,” he said days after clocks were spun forward one hour on March 13. “I’ve been eating dinner an hour and a half late the last week, as I try to adjust.”

    Energy savings argument is “questionable”

    The research findings on energy savings — one of the primary reasons supporters suggest making daylight saving time permanent — is mixed. A 2008 Department of Energy study found that there was a savings of 0.5% in electricity per day in the four weeks after the nation extended daylight saving time in 2005.

    Yale University researchers in a 2011 paper found that daylight saving time actually increased energy consumption in Indiana because higher heating and cooling costs outpaced lower demand for electrical lighting. The researchers wrote, “We find that the long-standing rationale for DST is questionable.” 

    But that paper is based on energy consumption in one state — once again, a small section of the U.S. — and might not be applicable more broadly.

    Unanimous approval in Senate

    The bill, which was approved unanimously by the Senate on Tuesday, must now be approved by the House and signed by the president to become law. 

    At a House Energy Subcommittee on Consumer Protection hearing on March 9, experts urged lawmakers to make the change, citing issues such as safety and an increase in traffic accidents when commuters are traveling during darkness.

    “Simply put, darkness kills. And darkness in the evening is far deadlier than darkness in the morning,” University of Washington professor Steve P. Calandrillo told the committee.

    Americans themselves are divided on the issue, according to polls. About 3 in 10 people said they would like to have daylight saving time all year round, while an equal number said they’d prefer to keep the current system of falling back an hour in November and springing forward an hour in March, an AP-NORC poll found in 2019. The remaining 4 in 10 people said they wanted to switch to standard time all year.

    In the end, the rationale for switching to permanent daylight savings time may come down to personal preference, not economics. As JPMorgan Chase put it: Americans “may simply enjoy having the additional daylight.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP uses crime in closing message against Democrats in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania Senate races

    GOP uses crime in closing message against Democrats in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania Senate races

    [ad_1]

    Around the corner from the Milwaukee Public Market, Eden Haynes recalled seeing a DoorDash worker’s car stolen — while her children were in the car.

    The carjacker shot an off-duty detective in the abdomen before fleeing the scene, according to CBS58.

    “It’s been a crazy year,” Haynes, a Democratic voter, told CBS News. “Luckily she was safe. I think he ended up dropping off the car with the [kids] in it. It’s just insane. It freaks me out a little bit because he could have come in here and done something.”

    In Wisconsin’s Senate race between Republican Sen. Ron Johnson and Democratic Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, crime and public safety is among the top concerns for voters. In an October CBS News poll, crime ranked third, behind the economy and inflation, when it came to “very important issues” for likely voters. And 42% of registered voters said Johnson’s policies would make them “more safe from crime.”

    The issue itself is divided along partisan lines, but 59% of voters who identify as “moderate” said it was “very important.” By comparison, 45% of moderates rank the issue of abortion, which Barnes and Wisconsin Democrats have centered their campaigns around, as “very important.”

    Crime in Milwaukee began rising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Homicides and non-fatal shootings increased by 18% from 2020 to October 2022, according to data from Milwaukee’s Police Department. In 2020, there were 3,228 incidents of motor vehicle theft. As of Oct. 28, there were 6,913 motor vehicle thefts, an increase of 114%.

    Throughout the campaign and now, in the closing days of the race, Republicans across the country have been hammering Democrats as “soft on crime.”

    The issue has been especially prevalent in GOP attack ads against Barnes. Since Aug. 30, 70% of the Republican ads that air in Wisconsin’s Senate race mention crime, and the pace of these ads airing has remained high since October 18, according to an analysis of data by ad tracking firm AdImpact.

    In the Pennsylvania Senate race between Democratic Lt. Gov. John Fetterman and Republican Mehmet Oz, 53% of Republican ads since August 30 have mentioned crime. Since August 30, Republicans have spent $12.3 million on ads about crime, more than the $11.8 million spent on ads about any other topic. 

    The Republican ads against Barnes in Wisconsin hit him on his past comments, one on how police budgets should be reallocated and another in which he showed support for reducing the prison population in half. 

    Barnes has been trying to refute the ads on several fronts. He’s been running one ad since Aug. 30 in which he says, “Look, we knew the other side would make up lies about me to scare you. Now they’re claiming I want to defund the police and abolish ICE. That’s a lie.” He’s spent over $3.1 million on this ad, according to AdImpact.

    Republican Sen. Ron Johnson has sought to tie himself to Wisconsin’s law enforcement community and argued that even though the federal government doesn’t have much of a say in local funding for police departments, unequivocal support for law enforcement is needed. 

    “If you don’t feel safe on your streets, in your neighborhood, in your own home, that’s going to animate what your votes are going to be,” Johnson told CBS News after an October event where he touted his endorsement from the Wisconsin Fraternal Order of Police. “It’s primarily an issue of the disdain that some politicians have shown for law enforcement for far too many years.” 

    Ryan Windroff, the president of the Wisconsin Fraternal Order of Police, blamed the high level of crime on Democratic district attorneys for bail bonds that are too low and for failing to dole out punishments severe enough to prevent recidivism. 

    “Any officer working the street can tell you they are dealing with a small percentage of the population, a majority of the time. It’s the same people doing the same things over and over,” he said.

    In an interview with CBS News, Barnes said defunding police budgets “is not my position at all” and pointed to his support for state budgets that increase law enforcement funding. He argued the root issues of crime, of economic opportunity and education, play a bigger role in the rise of crime than how politicians talk about the issue.

    “When you talk about rises in crime, nobody goes out and says,’ Oh, well, what are Democrats thinking?’ They don’t even go, ‘What are Republicans thinking?’ That’s not what makes a person go out and commit a crime. It is the desperation that people are experiencing. It is the lack of opportunity,” he said. 

    Barnes has called Johnson a hypocrite on his support for law enforcement over comments he’s made saying that the Jan. 6 attacks were not an “armed insurrection” —  it’s “inaccurate” to call them that, Johnson said in early October — and his ties to an attempt to deliver a false slate of 2020 presidential electors to former Vice President Mike Pence. 

    Johnson told CBS News he condemned the violence on Jan. 6 but reiterated his previous remarks. “There weren’t thousands of armed insurrectionists,” Johnson said. “That’s a false narrative.” 

    Several Democratic voters in Milwaukee told CBS News they feel that Republicans are exploiting the issue of crime, and think the ads hitting Barnes, a Black native of Milwaukee, are racist.

    “What worries me is that we don’t ever try to address the root causes because it takes time and energy and subtle, nuanced debate, instead of just saying, “Let’s throw them under the bus because crime is up,” said Suzie Holstein.

    “They are equating Mandela — to the fact that he’s Black, so therefore his pals are all crooks. And that is the most obscene and divisive ad that’s out there,” said Nancy Link of Waukesha, a Milwaukee. 

    She was referencing one ad from the National Republican Senatorial Committee that ties Barnes’ support for ending cash bail to Darrell Brooks, who was found guilty of intentional homicide after driving his SUV into a Waukesha Christmas parade, killing six people.

    In a statement, NRSC communications director Chris Hartline said overall accusations from Democrats that the ads are racist are “not surprising, considering this is what Democrats and their allies in the media do when they’re losing.”

    “We’re using their own words and their own records. If they don’t like it, they should invent a time machine, go back in time and not embrace dumbass ideas that voters are rejecting,” he added. 

    In Pennsylvania, Oz and outside GOP groups have been slamming Fetterman on the airwaves and campaign trail over crime and safety — claiming he wants to release a third of prisoners and legalize drugs. They have also been attacking his votes as chair of the state board of pardons, part of his role as lieutenant governor. 

    The Senate Leadership Fund, which is spending more than $40 million on this race alone, started running a number of ads with a focus on crime starting in August, according to tracking by AdImpact. The Oz campaign and NRSC also began running ads mentioning crime around the same time. The focus on crime has increased on the airwaves as Election Day nears.

    “It’s at the forefront for a lot of voters, particularly suburban women outside of Philly and Pittsburgh as well,” said Jess Szymanski, senior adviser at the Republican consulting firm Axiom Strategies. “The Oz campaign and other campaigns in Pennsylvania being able to focus and hone in on that issue is really resonating with people. I think that’s why you see the polls tighten in Pennsylvania specifically.”

    The latest CBS News Battleground Tracker shows Fetterman with a 2-point lead over Oz, within the margin of error. That’s down from a five-point lead Fetterman held in mid-September. 

    Fetterman has pushed back on the attacks — accusing Republicans of lies. On the stump he has been talking about how he ran as mayor of Braddock to stop gun violence and by working with communities and funding police, killings stopped for five and a half years. 

    “I am a Democrat that is running on my record on crime,” Fetterman said on the campaign trail in response to attacks. “What does Dr. Oz know about crime? What has he ever done?”

    In response to the barrage of attack ads, he has also released his own TV ads featuring state law enforcement officials and declaring his support for police funding.

    It’s undeniable that crime has surged in Philadelphia in recent years, with homicides skyrocketing in 2020 from 2019 and continuing to climb in 2021. There have been 437 homicides so far this year, only a slight dip from this time last year. 

    The latest CBS News Battleground Tracker showed 91% of registered voters in the state said it was important for candidates to talk about crime and police at the debate, making it the second most important issue behind the economy and inflation policies. 

    The day before the first and only debate, Oz released his plan to fight crime. Afterward, he hit the campaign trail for an event at the State Troopers Association in Harrisburg and talked about keeping people safe.

    “Most of my life I was doing that by talking about health issues. But it turns out that not being safe creates a lot of health issues as well,” Oz said. 

    Voters are split on who’s best equipped to address the issue.

    “Crime is an issue, but the Republicans won’t do anything about guns, so to me that is a big thing that has to do with the crime,” said Anita Altman, a registered Democrat. She said Democrats are better on gun laws.

    Rev. Dr. Wayne Weathers, who worked for President Biden’s 2020 campaign, said of the constant crime ads, “I call it the 21st century Willie Horton.”

    Caitlin Huey-Burns contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A World Without Chuck Grassley in the Senate?

    A World Without Chuck Grassley in the Senate?

    [ad_1]

    The long-serving Senator Chuck Grassley is, for lack of a comparison closer to home, Iowa’s Queen Elizabeth II. This is partly a matter of sheer longevity. At 89, the senator is older than John Deere’s first self-propelled combine, which appeared in 1947. He was 26 when Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and the Big Bopper died in a plane crash in 1959. The year Kevin Costner filmed Field of Dreams in Dyersville, 1988, Grassley was 55.

    Age aside, Grassley is simply a part of Iowa’s political furniture—many voters in the state have never known a time without him. When I was born, in 1993, he’d been the state’s senior senator for 12 years; he has held elected office—first in the state House, then in the U.S. House and Senate—since my father was 4 years old. For many Iowans, the day when Grassley would not be their senator has been scarcely imaginable.

    Until now, maybe. Every six years, Iowa Democrats have inched closer to unseating the seven-term Republican senator. This time, they seem closer than ever: A recent poll showed Grassley leading 64-year-old Mike Franken only narrowly, suggesting that this will be Grassley’s toughest reelection fight in four decades.

    Twelve years ago, he defeated Roxanne Conlin by 31 points. In 2016, he beat Patty Judge by 24. This year’s race against Franken didn’t seem particularly newsworthy until earlier this month, when Selzer & Company, Iowa’s most respected polling firm, released results from a survey showing that Grassley was leading Franken by a mere three percentage points. “It says to me that Franken is running a competent campaign and has a shot to defeat the seemingly invincible Chuck Grassley—previously perceived to be invincible,” J. Ann Selzer, the president of Selzer & Company, told the Des Moines Register.

    The poll is only a snapshot in time, and it could certainly prove wrong. But it’s reasonable to assume, given other polling since then, that Franken is closer to unseating Grassley than any challenger before him. The most obvious reason for this is that Iowans may finally be noticing how old their senator is—a veritable crinoid in the creek bed of Iowa politics. Although Grassley seems healthy—he runs several miles each morning and kicks off campaign events by doing push-ups onstage—more than 60 percent of the Selzer poll’s respondents said his age was a real concern. “There are a lot of voters between 75 and 85 who think, I wouldn’t want to be in the United States Senate right now. I wouldn’t want to have that life; why does he?” Jeff Link, an Iowa Democratic strategist, told me.

    For the first time in the history of this particular poll, more Iowan respondents disapprove of Grassley’s job performance than approve of it. Pair that dissatisfaction with the fact that Franken is a strong candidate. A retired Navy vice admiral from deep-red northwest Iowa, the Democrat could provide a nonthreatening alternative for the independents and Republicans who are reluctant to give Grassley another term. Franken “is energetic, very smart—almost loquacious—but he knows what he’s talking about,” David Oman, a state Republican strategist and a former co-chair of the Iowa GOP, told me. Despite that positive assessment, the recent emergence of an assault allegation from a former campaign manager might cool Democrats’ enthusiasm. (Franken has denied the allegation, and police have closed the case, calling it “unfounded.”)

    Undergirding all of these factors is the plain reality that Iowa, like the rest of the country, is becoming more partisan and more polarized. For 30 years, Iowans sent both Grassley and a Democrat, Tom Harkin, who retired in 2014, to the Senate at every chance, no matter which party was in the White House or who was occupying the governor’s mansion. The consensus among Iowans was that such a balance was ideal. But the days of winning big by being part of that balance are over.

    Grassley has changed, too. Back then, he was viewed as a kind of farmers-first independent, interested chiefly in restraining federal spending, whistleblower protections, and promoting free trade. Democrats liked him—and often voted for him. In 1991, Grassley was one of just two Republicans to vote against the Gulf War. “That made him seem above partisanship,” David Yepsen, a former reporter for the Des Moines Register, told me. Grassley’s image, among Iowans, was of a man who operated above the partisan fray.

    That gloss began to wear off in 2009. At first, Grassley seemed a willing negotiating partner on President Barack Obama’s plans for health-care reform; he worked for months on a bipartisan bill. But he hadn’t bargained for how unpopular the Affordable Care Act would be with his party’s base. During a tour of central Iowa that summer, Grassley was mobbed by Republicans and Tea Partiers who rejected the plan. He buckled under the pressure, abandoned the talks, and ultimately voted against the final bill. “He’d never been treated that way by his own party. It changed him,” Yepsen said. “It made him mindful that there’s a new kind of conservative out there, a new generation coming on—the populists.” And he responded accordingly.

    In the ensuing years, Grassley came to recognize that there were fewer and fewer points to be earned by working across the aisle. In 2016, as the chair of the Judiciary Committee, he was party to the Senate’s refusal to give Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland a hearing, and along with Republican leadership, he held open more than 100 seats on the federal bench during the final months of the Obama administration for Donald Trump to fill. “You can’t underestimate Democrats in Iowa watching his leadership in the Judiciary Committee putting all these conservatives on the Court, and seeing them now do their thing on the Dobbs decision,” Yepsen said. “Conservatives love it. But it makes him much more of a partisan.”

    Whether Grassley would support the candidacy of Donald Trump was initially an open question. The womanizing, scandal-plagued Republican presidential nominee seemed, after all, to be the Iowa senator’s bizarro opposite. Yet Grassley, like most others in the GOP, fell in line. He has stuck by Trump through vulgar comments and allegations. In 2019, Grassley—an actual author of the 1989 Whistleblower Protection Act—defended Trump’s firing of the whistleblower and impeachment witness Alexander Vindman. Lately, Grassley has broken from his party only a handful of times, including to gently push back on some of Trump’s “America First” protectionist trade policies and to support the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure bill. The senator seems altogether untroubled by Trump’s effort to discredit the 2020 election, and continues to appear alongside him at rallies.

    “The way that [Grassley] didn’t stand up for much of anything is emblematic of the Republican Party in the years of Trump,” Bill Kristol, the editor at large of The Bulwark, told me. “People you thought would be independent just ended up going along.”

    Nowadays, the way Iowans view Grassley simply reflects their politics, not some old-timey desire for balance and comity. Democrats see him as an utter disappointment—a caricature of the man they may once have disagreed with but at least respected. Some Republicans are pleased with the careful line he’s walked, embracing Trump while hanging on to moderates. For other Republicans, Grassley is not nearly MAGA enough. This year, for the first time in his Senate career, Grassley faced a primary challenger. Jim Carlin, a state senator who has criticized Grassley for voting to certify the results of the 2020 election, earned 26 percent of the primary vote.

    Given this transformation in how Iowans regard Grassley, defeat at the hands of a Democrat is more plausible than it’s ever been. More plausible, but still not likely. The Selzer poll may have given Franken a jolt of momentum, including a burst of Hail Mary fundraising, but the state is reddening and the gap in party registration is wide and growing: The Iowa GOP has roughly 88,000 more registered voters this year than the Iowa Democratic Party, according to the Iowa secretary of state’s office. In 2020, that advantage was only about 20,000. This gap, combined with the historical precedent of higher Republican turnout in off-year elections, seems likely to add up to a Grassley victory. The numbers are “hugely problematic,” Jeff Link, the Democratic strategist, said—even for a three-star admiral.

    A world without Chuck Grassley in power is one in which most Iowans have never actually lived. That may be why “Faith in adversity” has recently become the unofficial motto of the state’s Democrats. This year, they even decided to put it on a sign. Orange placards dapple grassy lawns throughout Iowa, each bearing a message of hopeful conviction—We believe Michael Franken will defeat Chuck Grassley, the signs say—as though they can speak such a mammoth upset into existence.

    [ad_2]

    Elaine Godfrey

    Source link

  • Wife of former U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander dies at age 77

    Wife of former U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander dies at age 77

    [ad_1]

    MARYVILLE, Tenn. — Leslee Kathryn Buhler Alexander, the wife of former Tennessee governor and U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander and a longtime family and children’s health advocate, has died at age 77, her family said Sunday.

    Known as “Honey,” Alexander was surrounded by her family when she died Saturday at her home outside of the Tennessee city of Maryville, her family said in a statement.

    She was married for 53 years to Lamar Alexander, a Republican who served as Tennessee’s governor from 1979 to 1987, and campaigned for him throughout his political career. He also served as U.S. education secretary under President George H.W. Bush, ran for president and spent three terms in the U.S. Senate before retiring in 2020.

    While her husband was governor, Alexander led the statewide Healthy Children Initiative, which sought to provide prenatal health care for children. She was a member of the 1985-1986 Southern Regional Task Force on Infant Mortality, the governor’s task forces on day care and youth alcohol and drug abuse, and the U.S. Health Secretary’s Council on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, her family’s statement said.

    She also co-founded Leadership Nashville in 1976 and served on many boards, including the Junior League of Nashville and the Hermitage. She also had been vice-chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and a board member of Family Service America and the National Archives Foundation, the statement said.

    The Honey Alexander Center, located at the Nashville nonprofit Family and Children’s Service, opened in 2019.

    “Our dear ‘Honey’ was funny, loving, always caring, unselfish and courageous,” her family said in the statement. “We are so fortunate to have spent our lives with her. We will miss her every day.”

    Honey Alexander was born Oct. 12, 1945, in Los Angeles. She was working for U.S. Sen. John Tower of Texas when she met her future husband, who was a staffer for U.S. Sen. Howard Baker Jr. of Tennessee, during a softball game between the two staffs in 1967, her family said. They married in 1969.

    Honey Alexander liked to jog, plant flowers and read historical novels, her family said. She also loved to spend time with her children and grandchildren, her family said.

    In a statement, U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said Honey Alexander “modeled grace, charity, and public service.” Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee said on Twitter that she “devoted her life to serving others & made a profound impact through her work to support children & families.”

    Honey Alexander will be remembered at a private graveside service for family members and at a memorial service to be held later at Christ Church Cathedral in Nashville, the family said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez under federal criminal investigation

    New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez under federal criminal investigation

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Senator Bob Menendez
    FILE: U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) at a Senate hearing on Capitol Hill, Sept. 15, 2022.

    Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images


    Washington — New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez is under federal criminal investigation in New York, sources and a political adviser to the senator confirmed to CBS News. 

    Michael Soliman, a longtime political adviser to the New Jersey Democrat, told CBS News, “Senator Menendez is aware of an investigation that was reported today. However, he does not know the scope of the investigation. As always, should any official inquiries be made, the senator is available to provide any assistance that is requested of him or his office.”

    The news site Semafor first reported the investigation into Menendez.

    Federal prosecutors first investigated Menendez in 2015 when he was indicted — but never convicted — in an alleged bribery scheme in which prosecutors said an eye doctor provided flights on a private jet and other perks in exchange for his help securing contracts. The subsequent 2017 trial on the charges in New Jersey ended in a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a verdict. 

    It is unclear if this latest investigation involves similar allegations.

    Menendez is also a senior member of the Senate Banking and Finance committees and, according to his Senate website, he is the first Latino to chair the Foreign Relations Committee. He was first elected to Congress in 1993 to represent New Jersey’s 13th Congressional District and ran for the Senate over a decade later. 

    The Justice Department declined to comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tuberville: US has too many ‘takers’ who don’t want to work

    Tuberville: US has too many ‘takers’ who don’t want to work

    [ad_1]

    MONTGOMERY, Ala — U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said this week that the country has too many “takers” instead of workers and suggested that many in younger generations — including people in their 40s — don’t understand they need to work.

    Tuberville, 68, made the remarks while discussing the national worker shortage during a speech to business groups in south Alabama.

    “What’s happening in our country right now, we’re getting too many takers in our country,” Tuberville said Tuesday, according to Al.com. Later, he added, “They don’t want to go to work. We’ve got to get Generation X and these Millennials to understand that you have to tote your own load.”

    A spokeswoman for Tuberville, responding to a question from The Associated Press on Wednesday, said the state’s junior senator misspoke and meant to say Generation Z, which includes people born after 1997, instead of Generation X, which includes people in their 50s. Millennials are generally defined as people born between 1981 and 1996. The oldest millennials are entering their 40s.

    Tuberville made the remarks in Mobile on Tuesday. He was the featured speaker at a Forum Alabama breakfast presented by the Mobile Chamber and attended by local business leaders. He also spoke to news outlets during an appearance at Austal USA after touring the shipyard. The remarks about generational work ethic came two weeks after Tuberville was widely criticized for comments about race and crime.

    Fox10 reported that Tuberville blamed government benefits.

    “We’re getting too many takers in our country,” the former college football coach said. “They’d rather take a (government) check.”

    While the federal government initially sent out trillions in pandemic relief funds, the COVID-19-related extended unemployment benefits and stimulus checks have ended. The last pandemic stimulus check was given out last year.

    Businesses nationwide have struggled to fill positions amid a dire worker shortage, prompting some companies to raise wages or offer perks such as college tuition reimbursement to try to lure workers. Economists have pointed to complex reasons for the worker shortage in the wake of the pandemic, including a rise in early retirements, a shortage of affordable child care and other factors that have contributed to a workforce reshuffling.

    Tuberville’s comments came two weeks after he drew widespread criticism for saying at an election rally that Democrats support reparations for the descendants of enslaved people because “they think the people that do the crime are owed that.”

    In an interview with FOX10 afterward, Tuberville maintained his comments were about crime, not race. “It had nothing to do with race. You know crime has no color,” he said.

    Tuberville rejected calls to apologize. “I would apologize if I meant anything about race, but it wasn’t. Like I said, race has no color. Reparation would have no color,” Tuberville said.

    Al.com reported that Tuberville deflected a question about the controversy.

    “We don’t have enough people right now paying the price for a lot of the crimes that are being made,” he said. “They don’t need to be rewarded for it. They need to understand that we can’t run a country — it’s like a football team. If you’ve got people going in different directions breaking all the rules, you’re not going to win.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alaska asylum seekers are Indigenous Siberians from Russia

    Alaska asylum seekers are Indigenous Siberians from Russia

    [ad_1]

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Two Russian Indigenous Siberians were so scared of having to fight the war in Ukraine, they chanced everything to take a small boat across the treacherous Bering Sea to reach American soil, Alaska’s senior U.S. senator said after talking with the two.

    The two, identified as males by a resident, landed earlier this month near Gambell, on Alaska’s St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Strait, where they asked for asylum.

    “They feared for their lives because of Russia, who is targeting minority populations, for conscription into service in Ukraine,” Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said Saturday during a candidate forum at the Alaska Federation of Natives conference in Anchorage.

    “It is very clear to me that these individuals were in fear, so much in fear of their own government that they risked their lives and took a 15-foot skiff across those open waters,” Murkowski said when answering a question about Arctic policy.

    “It is clear that (Russian President Vladimir) Putin is focused on a military conquest at the expense of his own people,” Murkowski said. “He’s got one hand on Ukraine and he’s got the other on the Arctic, so we have to be eyes wide open on the Arctic.”

    Murkowski said she met with the two Siberians recently but didn’t provide more details about exactly when or where the meeting took place or where their asylum process stood. She was not available after the forum for follow-up questions.

    Murkowski’s office on Oct. 6 announced their request for asylum, saying the men reportedly fled one of the coastal communities on Russia’s east coast.

    A village elder in Gambell, 87-year-old Bruce Boolowon, is believed to be the last living Alaska National Guard member who helped rescue 11 U.S. Navy men who were in a plane that was shot down by Russian MIGs over the Bering Sea in 1955. The plane crash-landed on St. Lawrence Island.

    Gambell, an Alaska Native community of about 600 people, is about 36 miles (58 kilometers) from Russia’s Chukotka Peninsula in Siberia.

    Even though one of the Russians spoke English pretty well, two Russian-born women from Gambell were brought in to translate. Both women married local men and became naturalized U.S. citizens, said Boolowon, who is Siberian Yupik.

    Russians landing in Gambell during the Cold War was commonplace, but the visits were not nefarious, Boolowon said. Since St. Lawrence Island is so close to Russia, people routinely traveled back and forth to visit relatives.

    But these two men seeking asylum were unknown to the people of Gambell.

    “They were foreigners and didn’t have any passports, so they put them in jail,” he told The Associated Press last week.

    The two men spent the night in the jailhouse, but townspeople in Gambell brought them food, both Alaska Native dishes and items bought at a grocery store.

    “They were pretty full; they ate a lot,” Boolowon said.

    “The next day, a Coast Guard C-130 with some officials came and picked them up,” he said, adding that was the last he heard about the Russians.

    Since then, officials have been tight-lipped.

    “The individuals were transported to Anchorage for inspection, which includes a screening and vetting process, and then subsequently processed in accordance with applicable U.S. immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act,” was all a Department of Homeland Security spokesman said in an email this past week when asked for an update on the asylum process and if and where the men were being held.

    Margaret Stock, an immigration attorney in Anchorage, said it’s very unlikely information about the Russians will ever be released.

    “The U.S. government is supposed to keep all of this confidential, so I don’t know why they would be telling anybody anything,” she told the AP.

    Instead, it would be up to the two Russians to publicize their situation, which could put their families in Russia at risk. “I don’t know why they would want to do that,” Stock said.

    Thousands of Russian men fled the country after Putin in September announced a mobilization to call up about 300,000 men with past military experience to bolster forces in Ukraine.

    Messages sent last week and again on Saturday to the Russian consular office in San Francisco were not returned.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alaska asylum seekers are Indigenous Siberians from Russia

    Alaska asylum seekers are Indigenous Siberians from Russia

    [ad_1]

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Two Russian Indigenous Siberians were so scared of having to fight the war in Ukraine, they chanced everything to take a small boat across the treacherous Bering Sea to reach American soil, Alaska’s senior U.S. senator said after talking with the two.

    The two, identified as males by a resident, landed earlier this month near Gambell, on Alaska’s St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Strait, where they asked for asylum.

    “They feared for their lives because of Russia, who is targeting minority populations, for conscription into service in Ukraine,” Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said Saturday during a candidate forum at the Alaska Federation of Natives conference in Anchorage.

    “It is very clear to me that these individuals were in fear, so much in fear of their own government that they risked their lives and took a 15-foot skiff across those open waters,” Murkowski said when answering a question about Arctic policy.

    “It is clear that (Russian President Vladimir) Putin is focused on a military conquest at the expense of his own people,” Murkowski said. “He’s got one hand on Ukraine and he’s got the other on the Arctic, so we have to be eyes wide open on the Arctic.”

    Murkowski said she met with the two Siberians recently but didn’t provide more details about exactly when or where the meeting took place or where their asylum process stood. She was not available after the forum for follow-up questions.

    Murkowski’s office on Oct. 6 announced their request for asylum, saying the men reportedly fled one of the coastal communities on Russia’s east coast.

    A village elder in Gambell, 87-year-old Bruce Boolowon, is believed to be the last living Alaska National Guard member who helped rescue 11 U.S. Navy men who were in a plane that was shot down by Russian MIGs over the Bering Sea in 1955. The plane crash-landed on St. Lawrence Island.

    Gambell, an Alaska Native community of about 600 people, is about 36 miles (58 kilometers) from Russia’s Chukotka Peninsula in Siberia.

    Even though one of the Russians spoke English pretty well, two Russian-born women from Gambell were brought in to translate. Both women married local men and became naturalized U.S. citizens, said Boolowon, who is Siberian Yupik.

    Russians landing in Gambell during the Cold War was commonplace, but the visits were not nefarious, Boolowon said. Since St. Lawrence Island is so close to Russia, people routinely traveled back and forth to visit relatives.

    But these two men seeking asylum were unknown to the people of Gambell.

    “They were foreigners and didn’t have any passports, so they put them in jail,” he told The Associated Press last week.

    The two men spent the night in the jailhouse, but townspeople in Gambell brought them food, both Alaska Native dishes and items bought at a grocery store.

    “They were pretty full; they ate a lot,” Boolowon said.

    “The next day, a Coast Guard C-130 with some officials came and picked them up,” he said, adding that was the last he heard about the Russians.

    Since then, officials have been tight-lipped.

    “The individuals were transported to Anchorage for inspection, which includes a screening and vetting process, and then subsequently processed in accordance with applicable U.S. immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act,” was all a Department of Homeland Security spokesman said in an email this past week when asked for an update on the asylum process and if and where the men were being held.

    Margaret Stock, an immigration attorney in Anchorage, said it’s very unlikely information about the Russians will ever be released.

    “The U.S. government is supposed to keep all of this confidential, so I don’t know why they would be telling anybody anything,” she told the AP.

    Instead, it would be up to the two Russians to publicize their situation, which could put their families in Russia at risk. “I don’t know why they would want to do that,” Stock said.

    Thousands of Russian men fled the country after Putin in September announced a mobilization to call up about 300,000 men with past military experience to bolster forces in Ukraine.

    Messages sent last week and again on Saturday to the Russian consular office in San Francisco were not returned.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senators say North Dakota farmer detained in Ukraine is home

    Senators say North Dakota farmer detained in Ukraine is home

    [ad_1]

    BISMARCK, N.D. — A North Dakota farmer who had been detained in Ukraine since November 2021 on accusations he planned to kill his business partner is back home, the state’s two U.S. senators announced Friday.

    Kurt Groszhans, from Ashley, North Dakota, has ancestors from Ukraine and went there to farm in 2017. The relationship with his partner, law professor Roman Leshchenko, crumbled after Groszhans alleged that Leshchenko embezzled money from him.

    Groszhans and his assistant were arrested on charges of plotting to assassinate Leshchenko, who was then Ukraine’s agriculture minister. Groszhans said in a statement Friday that the Ukrainian officials made up the charges in an “effort to shut me up” after he discovered corruption “at the highest levels” of the government.

    “I am grateful to be home after this horrible ordeal,” Groszhans said in a statement. “My family and supporters worked tirelessly over a long period of time to make this happen and it was nice to be able to celebrate my birthday on North Dakota soil.

    “The fact they refused to classify me as a wrongful detainee was an unfortunate and politically cowardly act that cost me almost a year of my life,” he said.

    Groszhans is among a handful of Americans jailed in Ukraine or Russia whose departures have been complicated by the war.

    A statement Friday from Groszhans’ family said the charges would have been dismissed in a U.S. court for lack of evidence. “Kurt was eventually able to legally depart Ukraine when his bail restrictions allowed,” the statement said.

    Republican U.S. Sens. Kevin Cramer and John Hoeven said they are grateful for Groszhans’ safe return home but did not offer further information.

    “Out of respect for the family’s wishes, we aren’t able to provide additional details at this time,” said Kami Capener, Hoeven’s spokeswoman.

    Cramer did not immediately return an email message seeking further comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Appeals court rules Lindsey Graham must testify in Georgia election probe

    Appeals court rules Lindsey Graham must testify in Georgia election probe

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham must testify before a special grand jury investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in Georgia, a federal appeals court said Thursday.

    The ruling by a three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals paves the way for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to bring Graham in for questioning. She wants to ask the South Carolina Republican about phone calls he made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in the weeks after the election.

    Raffensperger said Graham asked whether he had the power to reject certain absentee ballots, something Raffensperger took as a suggestion to toss out legally cast votes. Graham has dismissed that interpretation as “ridiculous.”

    Graham could appeal the ruling to the full appellate court. An attorney for Graham deferred comment Thursday to a spokesperson for the senator’s office, which did not immediately comment on the ruling.

    Graham had challenged his subpoena, saying his position as a U.S. senator protected him from having to testify in the state investigation. He has also denied wrongdoing. In a six-page order, the judges wrote that Graham “has failed to demonstrate that this approach will violate his rights under the Speech and Debate Clause.”

    Willis opened the investigation early last year, shortly after a recording of a January 2021 phone call between Trump and Raffensperger was made public. In that call, Trump suggested Raffensperger could “find” the votes needed to overturn his narrow loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

    Willis requested a special grand jury, saying the panel’s subpoena power would allow the questioning of people who otherwise wouldn’t cooperate with the investigation. She has since filed several rounds of paperwork with the court seeking to compel the testimony of close Trump advisers and associates.

    Some of those associates include former White House counsel Pat Cipollone, who has testified before the special grand jury, according to a person familiar with Cipollone’s testimony who spoke to The Associated Press on Thursday on condition of anonymity to discuss a private appearance. Cipollone’s appearance was first reported by CNN.

    Cipollone vigorously resisted efforts to undo the election and has said he did not believe there was sufficient fraud to have affected the outcome of the race won by Biden.

    Graham was in the first group of people close to Trump whose testimony Willis sought to compel in a batch of petitions filed with the court in early July. He challenged his subpoena in federal court, but U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May refused to toss out his subpoena. Graham then appealed to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Graham’s lawyers argued that the U.S. Constitution’s speech or debate clause, which protects members of Congress from having to answer questions about legislative activity, shields him from having to testify. He contends that the call he made to Raffensperger fare was protected because he was asking questions to inform his decisions on voting to certify the 2020 election and future legislation.

    Lawyers on Willis’ team argued that comments Graham made in news interviews at the time, as well as statements by Raffensperger, show that the senator was motivated by politics rather than by legislative factfinding.

    They also argued that the scope of the special grand jury’s investigation includes a variety of other topics that have nothing to do with the Raffensperger call. They also want to ask Graham about his briefings by the Trump campaign, including whether he was briefed on the Trump-Raffensperger call, and whether he communicated or coordinated with Trump and his campaign about efforts to overturn the election results in Georgia and elsewhere.

    Graham’s lawyers also argued that the principle of “sovereign immunity” protects a U.S. senator from being summoned by a state prosecutor.

    Even if the speech or debate clause or sovereign immunity didn’t apply, Graham’s lawyers argued, his status as a “high-ranking official” protects him from having to testify. That’s because Willis has failed to show that his testimony is essential and that the information he would provide cannot be obtained from someone else, they argued.

    In their ruling Thursday, the appellate judges ruled that Willis “can ask about non-investigatory conduct that falls within the subpoena’s scope” but “may not ask about any investigatory conduct,” noting that Graham could note any issues over specific areas at the time of his questioning.

    Others have already made their appearances before the special grand jury. Former New York mayor and Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, who’s been told he could face criminal charges in the probe, testified in August. Attorneys John Eastman and Kenneth Chesebro have also appeared before the panel.

    Paperwork has been filed seeking testimony from others, including former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

    Associated Press writers Kate Brumback in Atlanta and Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link