ReportWire

Tag: United States House of Representatives

  • Senate passes 45-day funding bill to avert government shutdown

    Senate passes 45-day funding bill to avert government shutdown

    About three hours before a midnight deadline, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan bill Saturday evening to keep the government funded for 45 days, on a vote of 88 to 9, just before a government shutdown was to go into effect. 

    The bill, which funds the government through Nov. 17, now goes to President Biden’s desk for his signature. 

    “Tonight, bipartisan majorities in the House and Senate voted to keep the government open, preventing an unnecessary crisis that would have inflicted needless pain on millions of hardworking Americans,” Mr. Biden said in a statement after the passage. “This bill ensures that active-duty troops will continue to get paid, travelers will be spared airport delays, millions of women and children will continue to have access to vital nutrition assistance, and so much more. This is good news for the American people.”

    No Democratic senators voted against the measure, with all nine no votes from Republicans. 

    “It’s been a day full of twists and turns, but the American people can breath a sigh of relief,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor after the vote. “There will be no government shutdown.”

    The House passed the bill by a 335-91 margin Saturday afternoon, after House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced in the morning that he would try to push the short-term funding bill through the House with Democratic help — a move that could keep the government open but would put his speakership at risk.

    The bill ultimately won support from more Democrats than Republicans in the House, with 90 Republicans voting no. Just one Democrat voted against the measure.  

    Noticeably absent from the bill however, is funding for Ukraine that was sought by Democrats but opposed by many Republicans but does include spending for disaster relief.

    McCarthy was forced to rely on Democrats for passage because the speaker’s hard-right flank said it would oppose any short-term measure. The speaker set up a process for voting requiring a two-thirds supermajority, about 290 votes in the 435-member House for passage. Republicans hold a 221-212 majority, with two vacancies.

    Before the vote, McCarthy indicated that the cost of a shutdown to Americans, particularly those in uniform, was too high. “I am asking Republicans and Democrats alike, put your partisanship away, focus on the American public,” he said. “How can you in good conscience — think of the men and women who volunteer to risk their lives to defend us — to say they can’t be paid, be while we work out our differences — that is unfair. I cannot do that to our men and women in uniform.” 

    Ukraine funding not included in short-term spending bill

    In his statement, Mr. Biden addressed the absence of Ukraine funding in the bill, saying that “we cannot under any circumstances allow American support for Ukraine to be interrupted. I fully expect the Speaker will keep his commitment to the people of Ukraine and secure passage of the support needed to help Ukraine at this critical moment.”  

    Prior to the Senate vote, Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, a Democrat, had put a hold on the continuing resolution over the Ukraine funding issue, according to two congressional sources.

    The White House earlier welcomed passage of the House bill, noting that it “keeps the government open at a higher funding levels” than a version the Senate had earlier been considering, “and includes disaster relief and FAA authorization,” a White House official said. 

    Two Senate GOP aides told CBS News that last Sunday, national security adviser Jake Sullivan and Secretary of State Antony Blinken told McConnell that the Biden administration had exhausted nearly all available security assistance funding for Ukraine and could not make it through a 45-day period based alone on existing drawdown authorities, the mechanism used to transfer military equipment to Ukraine. Based on that guidance and despite the knowledge that it would draw House opposition, McConnell agreed to support the Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s continuing resolution, which contained $6 billion in support for Ukraine for 45 days.  

    A House lawmaker with knowledge of the Ukraine funding issue confirmed to CBS News that the Biden administration had given House lawmakers a similar message and said something would have to be done relatively quickly to move on a supplemental Ukraine aid bill before the 45 days are up. But Republican House leaders are confident that there’s bipartisan support for this. 

    Republican Sen. Mike Rounds, of South Dakota, said Ukrainians “should not take anything negative” from the vote Saturday and added, “we can do border security and a supplemental on Ukraine in a connected type of approach somewhere in a very short time period, whether that’s over the next two days, three days, 10 days.”

    The Senate had been working on advancing its own bill that was initially supported by Democrats and Republicans and would fund the government through Nov. 17.

    But once the House plan emerged, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell urged his members to vote no on advancing the Senate version to see whether the House could get its temporary funding measure passed. 

    Funding bill may keep government open but risks McCarthy’s speakership

    McCarthy announced Saturday morning he would try to push the 45-day funding bill through the House with Democratic help — a move that could keep government open but would put his speakership at risk.

    “The House is going to act so government will not shut down,” McCarthy said, after an early-morning meeting with the Republican conference Saturday. He told reporters that it would give lawmakers more time to finish work on individual appropriations bills. 

    Relying on Democratic votes and leaving his right-flank behind is something that the hard-right lawmakers have warned would risk McCarthy’s job as speaker. They are almost certain to quickly file a motion to try to remove McCarthy from that office, though it is not at all certain there would be enough votes to topple the speaker.

    “If somebody wants to remove because I want to be the adult in the room, go ahead and try,” McCarthy said of the threat to oust him. “But I think this country is too important.”

    The quick pivot to Saturday’s bill came after the collapse Friday of McCarthy’s earlier plan to pass a Republican-only bill including severe border security provisions and steep spending cuts up to 30% to most government agencies that the White House and Democrats rejected as too extreme. It failed because of opposition from a faction of 21 hard-right holdouts.

    Catering to his hard-right flank, McCarthy had returned to the spending limits the conservatives demanded back in January as part of the deal-making to help him become the House speaker.

    Some of the Republican holdouts, including Gaetz, are allies of former President Donald Trump, who is Biden’s chief rival in the 2024 race. Trump has been encouraging the Republicans to fight hard for their priorities and even to “shut it down.”

    What a shutdown would have meant

    Without short-term funding before midnight, federal workers would have faced furloughs, more than 2 million active-duty and reserve military troops would have worked without pay, and programs and services that Americans rely on from coast to coast would have faced shutdown disruptions.

    A shutdown would pose grave uncertainty for federal workers in states all across America and the people who depend on them — from troops to border control agents to office workers, scientists and others.

    Families that rely on Head Start for children, food benefits and countless other programs large and small would be confronting potential interruptions or outright closures. At the airports, Transportation Security Administration officers and air traffic controllers would be expected to work without pay, but travelers could face delays in updating their U.S. passports or other travel documents.

    — Margaret Brennan, Jack Turman, Keshia Butts, Ellis Kim, Willie James Inman and Alan He contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • House passes 45-day funding bill, sends it to Senate for final approval

    House passes 45-day funding bill, sends it to Senate for final approval

    House passes 45-day funding bill, sends it to Senate for final approval – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The House on Saturday passed a last-minute stopgap measure that would fund the government for 45-days and likely avoid a government shutdown. The bill now heads to the Senate, where it will need to be passed before 11:59 p.m. Saturday to avoid a shutdown.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House passes 45-day funding bill to avert government shutdown

    House passes 45-day funding bill to avert government shutdown

    The House passed a bill 335-91 Saturday afternoon to fund the government for 45 days, hours before a government shutdown was to go into effect. 

    The bill House Speaker Kevin McCarthy put to a vote ultimately won support from more Democrats than Republicans. Ninety Republicans voted no, and just a single Democrat voted against the short-term funding measure.  

    McCarthy was forced to rely on Democrats for passage because the speaker’s hard-right flank said it would oppose any short-term measure. The speaker set up a process for voting requiring a two-thirds supermajority, about 290 votes in the 435-member House for passage. Republicans hold a 221-212 majority, with two vacancies.

    The bill will now go to the Senate for a vote.

    McCarthy announced Saturday morning he would try to push the short-term funding bill through the House with Democratic help — a move that could keep government open but would put his speakership at risk.

    “The House is going to act so government will not shut down,” McCarthy said, after an early-morning meeting with the Republican conference Saturday. “We will put a clean funding, stopgap on the floor to keep government open for 45 days for the House and Senate to get their work done.” 

    He told reporters that it would give lawmakers more time to finish work on individual appropriations bills. The measure does not contain funding for Ukraine that was sought by Democrats but opposed by many Republicans. It does, however, include spending for disaster relief.

    “Knowing what transpired through the summer — the disasters in Florida, the horrendous fire in Hawaii and also disasters in California and Vermont — we will put the supplemental portion that the president asks for in disaster there, too,” McCarthy said.

    The White House welcomed passage of the House bill, noting that it “keeps the government open at a higher funding levels than the Senate bill and includes disaster relief and FAA authorization,” a White House official said. The official, noting McCarthy’s support for Ukraine funding, said the White House expects he “will bring a separate bill to the floor shortly.”

    Republican Sen. Mike Rounds, of South Dakota, also said Ukrainians “should not take anything negative” from the vote Saturday, and added, “we can do border security and a supplemental on Ukraine in a connected type of approach somewhere in a very short time period, whether that’s over the next two days, three days, 10 days.”

    Before the House vote, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, initially said Democrats needed more time to review the bill and criticized Republicans for “rushing it at the 11th hour, when in fact, just yesterday, extreme MAGA Republicans voted on a bill that would slash spending by 30%.”

    To give Democrats more time to read the bill, Jeffries spoke for nearly an hour on the House floor, using his “magic minute” — a privilege that allows House leaders to speak for a virtually unlimited time.

    The Senate had been working on advancing its own bill that was initially supported by Democrats and Republicans and would fund the government through Nov. 17.

    But once the House plan emerged, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell urged his members to vote no on advancing the Senate version to see whether the House could get its temporary funding measure passed. 

    “It looks like there may be a bipartisan agreement coming from the House,” McConnell said. “So, I’m fairly confident that most of my members, our members are going to vote against cloture — not necessarily because they’re opposed to the underlying bill, but see what the House can do on a bipartisan basis and then bring it over to us. So, under these circumstances, I’m recommending a no vote, even though I very much want to avoid a government shutdown.”

    The sudden House action would fund government at current 2023 levels for 45 days and provide money for U.S. disaster relief.

    With no deal in place before Sunday, federal workers face furloughs, more than 2 million active-duty and reserve military troops will work without pay and programs and services that Americans rely on from coast to coast will begin to face shutdown disruptions.

    Relying on Democratic votes and leaving his right-flank behind is something that the hard-right lawmakers have warned would risk McCarthy’s job as speaker. They are almost certain to quickly file a motion to try to remove McCarthy from that office, though it is not at all certain there would be enough votes to topple the speaker.

    “If somebody wants to remove because I want to be the adult in the room, go ahead and try,” McCarthy said of the threat to oust him. “But I think this country is too important.”

    The quick pivot to Saturday’s bill came after the collapse Friday of McCarthy’s earlier plan to pass a Republican-only bill with steep spending cuts up to 30% to most government agencies that the White House and Democrats rejected as too extreme.

    The federal government has been heading straight into a shutdown that poses grave uncertainty for federal workers in states all across America and the people who depend on them — from troops to border control agents to office workers, scientists and others.

    Families that rely on Head Start for children, food benefits and countless other programs large and small would be confronting potential interruptions or outright closures. At the airports, Transportation Security Administration officers and air traffic controllers would be expected to work without pay, but travelers could face delays in updating their U.S. passports or other travel documents.

    An earlier McCarthy plan to keep the government open collapsed Friday due to opposition from a faction of 21 hard-right holdouts despite steep spending cuts of nearly 30% to many agencies and severe border security provisions.

    Catering to his hard-right flank, McCarthy had returned to the spending limits the conservatives demanded back in January as part of the deal-making to help him become the House speaker.

    Some of the Republican holdouts, including Gaetz, are allies of former President Donald Trump, who is Biden’s chief rival in the 2024 race. Trump has been encouraging the Republicans to fight hard for their priorities and even to “shut it down.”

    Keshia Butts, Ellis Kim and Alan He contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • House Republicans cancel planned recess as government shutdown appears more likely

    House Republicans cancel planned recess as government shutdown appears more likely

    WASHINGTON — House Republican leaders Friday canceled a planned two-week recess as a government shutdown appeared more likely after they failed to pass a short-term spending bill with fewer than two days left to avoid the shutdown.

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif, informed the GOP caucus of the canceled break at a closed-door meeting after more than 20 Republicans embarrassed him by voting with Democrats to defeat the bill.

    Republicans who joined Democrats voting against the measure included several of McCarthy’s most outspoken antagonists, Rep. Matt Gaetz, of Florida; Reps. Andy Biggs and Eli Crane, of Arizona, and other hardline conservatives.

    Even if the bill had passed, it was doomed to failure in the Senate, where Democrats hold majority control.

    The government is scheduled to shut down at 12:01 a.m. ET Sunday if a funding bill is not approved by both chambers of Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden.

    The Senate already advanced a bipartisan bill by a wide margin that would fund the government through Nov. 17.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Friday blasted McCarthy for trying to placate conservatives in his caucus, rather than working with Democrats and moderates on a bill that could pass the Senate.

    “Coddling the hard right is as futile as trying to nail jello to a wall, and the harder the speaker tries, the bigger mess he makes,” Schumer said. “And that mess is going to hurt the American people the most.”

    “I hope the speaker snaps out of the vice grip he’s put himself in and stops succumbing to the 30 or so extremists who are running the show in the House,” Schumer said. “Mr. Speaker, time has almost run out.”

    House Republican leaders advised members that there would be votes Saturday.

    It was unclear what they would be voting on.

    But on Friday evening, McCarthy suggested that his conference might be willing to back a bipartisan bill to fund the government, as long as it did not contain additional emergency funding for Ukraine — a key White House demand with broad support in the Senate.

    “I think if we had a clean [funding bill] without Ukraine on it, we could probably be able to move that through,” McCarthy told reporters as he left the closed door conference meeting.

    Several hours later, McCarthy walked back his apparent willingness to move the Senate bill.

    “After meeting with House Republicans this evening, it’s clear the misguided Senate bill has no path forward and is dead on arrival,” he said around 9:30 p.m. ET. “The House will continue to work around the clock to keep government open and prioritize the needs of the American people.”

    Nonetheless, the notice to members to be ready for Saturday votes had raised hopes among both moderate Republicans and Democrats that McCarthy might agree to hold a vote on a version of the Senate bill to fund the government. Such a bill which would almost certainly pass with broad support from moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans.

    As the clock neared midnight Friday, with just 24 hours remaining before a shutdown, it was difficult to envision what McCarthy could do that would both fund the government and satisfy the conservative critics in his restive caucus,

    The White House condemned House Republicans for engaging in fiscal brinksmanship.

    “We’re doing everything we can to plead, beg, shame House Republicans to do the right thing,” Shalanda Young, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, told reporters.

    She scoffed at McCarthy’s suggestion that he would refuse his own paycheck during a shutdown.

    “That is theater,” Young said.

    “The guy who picks up the trash in my office won’t get a paycheck. That’s real.”

    The White House said Biden would stay “in dialogue with Congress” over the coming days, but insisted the core elements of any spending bill had been agreed to as part of the debt ceiling deal earlier this year.

    Across Washington on Friday, government agencies prepared their employees and the public for the effects of a shutdown.

    The Smithsonian Institution said it would use existing funds from last year to keep its museums and the National Zoo open for at least the next week.

    Source link

  • House GOP holds first Biden impeachment proceeding

    House GOP holds first Biden impeachment proceeding

    House GOP holds first Biden impeachment proceeding – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    House Republicans on Thursday held their first impeachment proceeding, seeking to tie President Biden to his son Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings. Nikole Killion has details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House Speaker McCarthy scrambling to avoid shutdown

    House Speaker McCarthy scrambling to avoid shutdown

    House Speaker McCarthy scrambling to avoid shutdown – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is trying to bolster support for spending bills to fund the government. But the bills House Republicans are pushing have almost no chance of passing the Senate, which would likely lead to a government shutdown. Nikole Killion has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Why House Republicans are divided over short-term funding deal

    Why House Republicans are divided over short-term funding deal

    Why House Republicans are divided over short-term funding deal – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A group of House Republicans over the weekend reached a deal for a one-month government funding bill to prevent a shutdown, but a number of Republicans in the House say they won’t vote for the proposed measure. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane explains why not all Republicans are on board with the latest proposal from their colleagues.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Romney cites a dysfunctional House as one reason for retirement

    Romney cites a dysfunctional House as one reason for retirement

    Romney cites a dysfunctional House as one reason for retirement – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Utah Sen. Mitt Romney announced Wednesday he will not run for reelection in 2024. Romney is not on board with the latest talk of presidential impeachment, saying he sees no evidence that the proceedings launched by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy meet the standard. CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion has the latest from Capitol Hill.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Examining the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan 2 years later

    Examining the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan 2 years later

    Examining the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan 2 years later – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    It has now been two years since the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. The Biden administration defends the move while Republicans say it was chaotic and a failure. Texas Republican Rep. Michael McCaul, House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, joins “America Decides” to give an update on the investigation into what happened leading up to the deadly bombing that killed 13 U.S. service members.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House Republicans move closer to impeachment inquiry

    House Republicans move closer to impeachment inquiry

    House Republicans are moving closer to opening an impeachment inquiry after the transcribed interviews and public testimony earlier this summer by two IRS whistleblowers regarding the government’s handling of its investigation into President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden. 

    The whistleblower testimony about the probe was a “game changer” according to a senior GOP aide, who told CBS News that with what House Republicans believe is significant new evidence uncovered by their committee investigators, the “momentum is going toward opening an impeachment inquiry.” 

    The aide said September would be a pivotal month, with the anticipated testimony of Attorney General Merrick Garland before the House Judiciary Committee. Garland is expected to be pressed by Republicans about apparent discrepancies in statements about the authority held by then-U.S. Attorney David Weiss to bring charges in the five-year investigation of Hunter Biden.  

    White House spokesperson Ian Sams said, “This baseless impeachment exercise would be a disaster for congressional Republicans, and don’t take our word for it: just listen to the chorus of their fellow Republicans who admit there is no evidence for their false allegations and that pursuing such a partisan stunt will ‘backfire.’”

    Garland and the two IRS whistleblowers — supervisory agent Gary Shapley and case agent Joseph Ziegler — disagree over whether then-U.S. Attorney David Weiss had the ultimate authority to bring charges in the five-year probe.   

    In June, Garland had said that Weiss would be able “to make a decision to prosecute any way in which he wanted to and in any district in which he wanted to.”

    But in August, Garland said Weiss had informed him that his investigation had reached a stage where he believed his work should continue as special counsel, and he then asked for the designation. Garland said he concluded it was “in the public interest” to appoint Weiss special counsel, giving him expanded powers to continue the probe, in light of the “extraordinary circumstances” of the case.

    Since the whistleblowers’ testimony in July, the House GOP-led Ways and Means Committee has also subpoenaed two senior IRS officials with direct knowledge of the October 2022 meeting during which IRS whistleblower Shapley alleged Weiss had said he did not have the ultimate authority to bring charges and had been denied special counsel status. 

    The Republican chairman of the committee, Rep. Jason Smith, sent letters to Michael Batdorf, identified as an IRS director of field operations, and Darrell Waldon, an IRS special agent in charge, asking them to appear for transcribed interviews in early September.

    Smith said in the letter that the committee wanted to speak with them because of their “direct knowledge of a key meeting on October 7, 2022, in which updates about the Hunter Biden investigation were discussed.” He went on to note that the IRS officials had so far “refused to voluntarily cooperate” with the request for a transcribed interview, so they were therefore being subpoenaed. According to a transcript of Shapley’s May interview before the House Ways and Means Committee, he testified that the Oct. 7, 2022, session had been his “red-line” meeting.

    Shapley said Weiss and “senior-level managers” from the IRS, FBI and the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office participated, among others. At the meeting, Shapley alleged that Weiss “surprised us by telling us on the (Hunter Biden) charges, quote: ‘I’m not the deciding official on whether charges are filed,’ unquote. He then shocked us with the earth-shattering news that the Biden-appointed D.C. U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves would not allow him to charge in Washington, D.C., where Hunter Biden lived during some of the years under investigation. To add to the surprise, U.S. Attorney Weiss stated that he subsequently asked for special counsel authority from Main DOJ at that time and was denied that authority.”

    Shapley’s testimony included internal IRS communications. “Exhibit 10” is an email exchange between Waldon and Batdorf and Shapley on Oct. 11, 2022. Asked if Shapley’s summary of the Oct. 7, 2022 meeting — including allegations that Weiss said he didn’t have the authority to charge Hunter Biden — was accurate, Waldon responded, “You covered it all.”

    The IRS did not immediately respond to CBS News’ request for comment. A spokesperson for Weiss in Delaware and the Justice Department declined to comment.  However, in court documents, Weiss has indicated the investigation is ongoing.   

    When the subpoenas were issued last week, the spokesperson for the committee’s Democrats accused the majority of “cherry-picking to build a politically-expedient narrative.” 

    “The Committee has a duty to seek the whole truth related to these allegations, and when more than 59 individuals have relevant information, sending two subpoenas is premature,” the spokesperson added.

    When the House returns in September, the GOP aide said conference members will come together to discuss a potential impeachment inquiry, which is among the top issues they’ll be discussing. Also high on that list is government spending. Funding for the government expires at the end of September, and if Congress fails to pass a stopgap bill, there would be a government shutdown.

    If that were to occur, any government work that is not deemed essential would come to a halt. But congressional committee work to try to get appropriations bills through Congress would continue because that would fall into the category of essential work. But investigations in the House and Senate would come to a halt while the government is shut down.

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” that if the government shuts down, then so would GOP-led investigations. The assessment may incentivize some House Republicans keen on moving forward with any impeachment inquiry to support short-term funding to keep the government running.

    John Nolen and Kathryn Watson contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Flood-ravaged Vermont waits for action from a gridlocked Congress

    Flood-ravaged Vermont waits for action from a gridlocked Congress

    In the small town of Johnson, Vermont, a few dozen miles south of the Canadian border, a family still lives in a tent outside their damaged mobile home.  

    The only food market within miles is gutted. The flooded U.S. Post Office shifted its service to a small van with an awning in a parking lot.

    A town official told CBS News the town wastewater treatment plant and its pump station will need to be moved to prevent another failure and to continue serving the community’s 3,000 residents. It’s estimated to cost $25 million.

    Nearly 20 miles away, the wastewater treatment plant was also submerged in the community of Hardwick. The city manager told CBS News that most of Hardwick’s roads — 80 miles — must be repaired, or they will be rendered impassable in the winter. City leaders are also worried about how many home owners lost their furnaces, just a couple of months before the unforgiving Vermont chill returns.

    image001-1.jpg
    The U.S. Post Office in Johnson, Vermont, is now operating out of a van.

    CBS News


    In the capital, Montpelier, a children’s clothing store was inundated and needs assistance to reopen.

    Six weeks ago, a torrent of rain and a catastrophic flood ravaged Vermont, with an estimated two months worth of rain falling in two days. More than 100 people were rescued. 

    The emergency and rescues have ended. But the damage, rebuilding and recovery efforts persist. In some cases, it’s been sluggish in a state with smaller towns, smaller roads, fewer contractors and supply chain disruptions. 

    What has been the federal response? 

    Perhaps no surprise, it’s the Congressional delegation from Vermont raising warning flags that the federal government is running short on emergency disaster funds and risks a temporary, but potentially lengthy, interruption in the federal response to the flood.

    In a letter to the White House this month, the two U.S. senators from Vermont urged President Biden to request emergency funding from Congress to help the expensive and painstaking rebuilding. The letter said, “To help New England farmers, small businesses, and communities recover from the July 2023 floods, we ask that you include assistance for New England in your supplemental appropriations request.”  

    The White House has since requested $12 billion in emergency disaster relief funding from Congress to help fund the federal recovery programs and assist the growing number of states and communities that have suffered natural disasters this year. But the outlook for the funding is precarious, in a Congress that is polarized, gridlocked and unpredictable in its ability to formally approve new spending.

    “The fear all of us have is that we will get caught in the buzzsaw of shutdown politics,” said Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont. “That’s very, very dangerous for all of us who have constituents hammered by a weather event.”

    Congress is already approaching a Sept. 30 deadline to approve new spending to fund the entirety of the federal government and avert a government shutdown. And Congress might face an even tighter deadline to approve the emergency disaster relief funds requested by the president. With Republicans’ narrow majority in the House and Democrats’ narrow majority in the Senate — and in the wake of an ugly debate to avert a debt ceiling crisis earlier this year — the prospect of an impasse is growing. 

    Can FEMA cover the cost? 

    Federal Emergency Management Agency administrator Deanna Criswell told CBS News the agency’s disaster relief fund is projected to run short on funding in September, as the fiscal year ends. A failure by Congress to approve new spending to replenish the funds raises the risk that FEMA will have to halt some of its longer-term rebuilding and recovery programs nationwide, including in Vermont.

    Former FEMA official Elizabeth Zimmerman said that if money runs low, FEMA will spend its remaining funds on the most urgent and time-sensitive needs. Zimmerman told CBS News that “recovery projects from recently-declared disasters, such as Vermont’s severe storms, could be put on hold until supplemental funds are made available.”

    What are Congress’ next steps? 

    Congress remains on its summer recess until after Labor Day. A spokesperson for Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin said the timetable for consideration of an emergency disaster funding bill would become clearer after Senators return to Washington in September. The House majority leader’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment from CBS News about the timing of a debate on the proposal.

    The members of Congress from Vermont have begun lobbying their colleagues to support the emergency funding. 

    “Our job is to appeal to our colleagues,” Democratic Rep. Becca Balint told CBS News. “This time it’s my district. Next time it’s going to be your district. Climate change is coming for you. And your constituents are not going to escape from it.”

    Welch said he is having conversations with Senators from both parties about the need to approve funding.

    Members of the powerful New York Congressional delegation are helping champion the legislation too. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York told reporters last week, “I am fully supportive of that and will do everything I can to get it passed in the Senate. Whether it’s a hurricane in the south or east, the flood in the Midwest, the wildfire in the West, Americans can’t fail to answer the call when our fellow Americans are suffering from disaster. That’s always been the case in this country year after year, decade after decade. And I believe it should continue and hope it will continue.”

    “Some people have just lost everything”  

    As Congress resumes the debate over spending, the slog of repair work continues in upstate Vermont. Local officials acknowledge it will be a grind.

    “We have people who are living in homes that are gutted,” Town of Johnson board member Beth Foy told CBS News. “But they’re still living in those homes. We have people without electricity. We have people who are living with friends, not necessarily in town. We have people who are using money provided by the Red Cross and FEMA and other entities to live in hotels.” 

    A few Good Samaritans managed to rescue the books from the Johnson town library as the flood waters rose during the catastrophe and the building was gutted.

    Local Vermont officials acknowledge the rebuilding will be lengthy and will likely require ongoing federal support.

    “Some people have just lost everything,” said Hardwick city manager David Upson.

    Source link

  • Ban on gender-affirming care for minors takes effect in North Carolina after veto override

    Ban on gender-affirming care for minors takes effect in North Carolina after veto override

    Transgender youth in North Carolina on Wednesday lost access to the gender-affirming treatments many credit as live-saving after the Republican-controlled General Assembly overrode the Democratic governor’s veto of that legislation and others touching on gender in sports and classroom instruction.

    GOP supermajorities in the House and Senate enacted —over Gov. Roy Cooper’s opposition— a bill barring medical professionals from providing hormone therapy, puberty-blocking drugs and surgical gender-transition procedures to anyone under 18, with limited medical exceptions.

    The policy takes effect immediately, but minors who had begun treatment before Aug. 1 may continue receiving that care if their doctors deem it medically necessary and their parents consent.

    North Carolina becomes the 22nd state to enact legislation restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for trans minors. But most of those laws face legal challenges, and local LGBTQ+ right advocates have vowed to challenge the ban in court.

    The Senate voted 27-18 to complete the veto override after an earlier House vote, 73-46.

    US-NEWS-NC-ABORTION-RA
    North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper.

    Raleigh News & Observer


    Democratic Sen. Lisa Grafstein, North Carolina’s only out LGBTQ+ state senator, said the gender-affirming care bill “may be the most heartbreaking bill in a truly heartbreaking session.”

    Some LGBTQ+ rights advocates in the Senate gallery began yelling after Republican Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, who was presiding, cut off Grafstein to let another lawmaker speak. Several people were then escorted from the chamber by capitol police.

    Sen. Joyce Krawiec, a Forsyth County Republican and chief sponsor of the bill restricting gender-affirming care, said the state has a responsibility to protect children from receiving potentially irreversible procedures before they are old enough to make their own informed medical decisions.

    Earlier, the Senate and House voted minutes apart to override another Cooper veto of a bill limiting LGBTQ+ instruction in the early grades, also making that law.

    That law requires public school teachers in most circumstances to alert parents before they call a student by a different name or pronoun. And the law also bans instruction about gender identity and sexuality in K-4 classrooms, which critics have previously likened to a Florida law opponents call “Don’t Say Gay.”

    Both chambers also voted Wednesday to override Cooper’s veto of another bill banning transgender girls from playing on girls’ sports teams from middle and high school through college. It, too, immediately became law.

    A day of divisive deliberations saw anger and emotion at times in the assembly.

    Democratic state Rep. John Autry of Mecklenburg County, who has a transgender grandchild, choked up while debating the gender-affirming care bill on the House floor. “Just stop it,” he begged his Republican colleagues shortly before they voted to enact the law.

    And Cooper blasted the decisions of the Republican-controlled chambers in a blistering statement, calling them “wrong priorities” even before lawmakers had completed all their votes.

    “The legislature finally comes back to pass legislation that discriminates,” he said, adding it would have several negative impacts for North Carolina. “Yet they still won’t pass a budget when teachers, school bus drivers and Medicaid Expansion for thousands of working people getting kicked off their health plans every week are desperately needed.”

    Parents of transgender and nonbinary children, like Elizabeth Waugh of Orange County, said hours before the voting started that they have been considering whether to move their families out of North Carolina so their children will have unrestricted access to gender-affirming care.

    Waugh’s nonbinary child did not begin receiving treatment before Aug. 1 and would need to travel elsewhere if they decide they want to start taking hormones.

    “I have felt like I had a lump in my throat for months,” Waugh said. “Just talking to other families who are dealing with this, I mean, the pain that they are feeling, the suffering, the fear for their children —it’s devastating.”

    Gender-affirming care is considered safe and medically necessary by the leading professional health associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association and the Endocrine Society. While trans minors very rarely receive surgical interventions, they are commonly prescribed drugs to delay puberty and sometimes begin taking hormones before they reach adulthood.

    The House kicked off the day’s rush of votes with a 74-45 vote to override Cooper’s veto of a bill that would prohibit transgender girls from playing on girls’ middle school, high school and college sports teams. The Senate completed the override soon after.

    A former Olympic swimmer, Rep. Marcia Morey, had spoken in House floor debate before the vote about possible repercussions for young athletes.

    “This bill affects 10-, 11-, 12-year-olds who are just starting to learn about athletics, about competition, about sportsmanship,” Morey, a Durham County Democrat, said. “To some of these kids, it could be their lifeline to self-confidence.”

    Critics have said limits on transgender girls’ participation in sports are discriminatory and have called it a measure disguised as a safety precaution that would unfairly pick on a small number of students.

    But such supporters of the bill as Payton McNabb, a recent high school graduate from Murphy, argued that legislation is needed to protect the safety and well-being of young female athletes and to preserve scholarship opportunities for them.

    “The veto of this bill was not only a veto on women’s rights, but a slap in the face to every female in the state,” said McNabb, who says she suffered a concussion and neck injury last year after a transgender athlete hit her in the head with a volleyball during a school match.

    Source link

  • Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing

    Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing

    Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Is there life beyond our little blue planet? And how much does the government know about it? Those were the questions a House Oversight Subcommittee attempted to answer Wednesday as they heard testimony from a former Air Force intelligence officer and two Navy veterans. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane reported on what came from the hearing on Capitol Hill.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • UFO hearing key takeaways: What a whistleblower told Congress about UAP

    UFO hearing key takeaways: What a whistleblower told Congress about UAP

    Washington — A former military intelligence officer-turned-whistleblower told House lawmakers that Congress is being kept in the dark about unidentified anomalous phenomena, known as UAP or UFOs, alleging at a hearing that executive branch agencies have withheld information about the mysterious objects for years.

    David Grusch, who served for 14 years as an intelligence officer in the Air Force and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, appeared before the House Oversight Committee’s national security subcommittee alongside two former fighter pilots who had firsthand experience with UAP.

    Grusch served as a representative on two Pentagon task forces investigating UAP until earlier this year. He told lawmakers that he was informed of “a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program” during the course of his work examining classified programs. He said he was denied access to those programs when he requested it, and accused the military of misappropriating funds to shield these operations from congressional oversight. He later said he had interviewed officials who had direct knowledge of aircraft with “nonhuman” origins.

    Members of both parties questioned how Congress should go about investigating the remarkable allegations, a reflection of the increasing willingness by lawmakers to demand the executive branch be more forthcoming about the phenomena.

    “We’re going to uncover the cover-up, and I hope this is just the beginning of many more hearings and many more people coming forward about this,” said Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Grusch’s claims, but the department has denied his assertions in the past.

    The UAP issue has gained widespread attention from Congress and the public in recent years with the release of several video recordings of the encounters, which typically show seemingly nondescript objects moving through the air at very high speeds with no apparent method of propulsion.

    The Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which Congress established last year to investigate the incidents, has investigated roughly 800 reports of UAP as of May. While military officials have said most cases have innocuous origins, many others remain unexplained. Lawmakers say the military knows more about the objects than it has disclosed to Congress.

    What the witnesses said at the UAP/UFO hearing

    From left to right, Ryan Graves, David Grusch and David Fravor are sworn in to testify during a House subcommittee hearing on UAP on Capitol Hill on July 26, 2023.
    From left to right, Ryan Graves, David Grusch and David Fravor are sworn in to testify during a House subcommittee hearing on UAP on Capitol Hill on July 26, 2023.

    BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images


    In addition to Grusch, the panel heard testimony from Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot who has spoken out about encountering UAP on training missions, and David Fravor, who shot the now-famous “Tic Tac” video of a large object during a flight off the coast of California in 2004. 

    All three witnesses said current reporting systems are inadequate to investigate UAP encounters, and said a stigma still exists for pilots and officials who press for more transparency about their experiences.

    Graves was an F-18 pilot stationed in Virginia Beach in 2014 when his squadron first began detecting unknown objects. He described them as “dark grey or black cubes … inside of a clear sphere, where the apex or tips of the cubes were touching the inside of that sphere.” 

    He said a fellow pilot told him about one incident about 10 miles off the coast, in which an object between 5 and 15 feet in diameter flew between two F-18s and came within 50 feet of the aircraft. He said there was no acknowledgement of the incident or way to report the encounter at the time. 

    UAP encounters, he said, were “not rare or isolated.”

    “If everyone could see the sensor and video data I witnessed, our national conversation would change,” Graves said. “I urge us to put aside stigma and address the security and safety issue this topic represents. If UAP are foreign drones, it is an urgent national security problem. If it is something else, it is an issue for science. In either case, unidentified objects are a concern for flight safety. The American people deserve to know what is happening in our skies. It is long overdue.”

    Grusch served as the National Reconnaissance Office’s representative to the AARO and its predecessor task force. While he said he couldn’t answer many questions about what he knew about classified programs in Wednesday’s open hearing, he said he was “hopeful that my actions will ultimately lead to a positive outcome of increased transparency.”

    Fravor recounted his 2004 encounter with an object off the California coast. He told the subcommittee that the smooth, seamless oval-shaped object was spotted hovering over the water before rapidly climbing about 12,000 feet in the air. It then accelerated and disappeared. It was detected roughly 60 miles away less than a minute later.

    “I think what we experienced was, like I said, well beyond the material science and the capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently or that we’re going to have in the next 10 to 20 years,” Fravor said.

    screen-shot-2020-04-27-at-10-13-16-am.png
    An unidentified object seen in footage captured by the Navy in 2004.

    Department of Defense


    Congress pushes for UAP/UFO transparency

    Wednesday’s hearing took place amid a growing willingness by lawmakers to demand the military and intelligence agencies release more about what they know regarding the mysterious incidents, with many members of Congress citing the potential national security threat posed by unknown objects in or near U.S. airspace. 

    A bipartisan group of senators led by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment to the annual defense spending bill currently making its way through Congress. The measure, modeled off legislation aimed at revealing government records about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, would require executive branch agencies to hand over UAP records to a review board with “the presumption of immediate disclosure.” Agencies would have to justify requests to keep records classified.

    A different House panel heard testimony from Pentagon officials at the first open hearing about the issue in more than 50 years last summer. 

    At Wednesday’s hearing, lawmakers of both parties expressed anger about their inability to get information about UAP from the military and intelligence agencies, describing a system of overclassification that shields reports of incident from public view. 

    “We should have disclosure today. We should have disclosure tomorrow. The time has come,” said Democratic Rep. Jared Moskowitz of Florida.

    “Several of us are going to look forward to getting some answers in a more confidential setting. I assume some legislation will come out of this,” said GOP Rep. Glenn Grothman, the subcommittee’s chairman.

    Source link

  • Congress working to pass NDAA, DOJ pushing back on House Republicans’ Hunter Biden probe

    Congress working to pass NDAA, DOJ pushing back on House Republicans’ Hunter Biden probe

    Congress working to pass NDAA, DOJ pushing back on House Republicans’ Hunter Biden probe – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Congressional lawmakers are preparing to break for their monthlong August recess Thursday night, but the Senate is still hammering out details on the bill that will set Pentagon policy. CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion has more on that and other top stories from Capitol Hill.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies at House censorship hearing, denies antisemitic comments

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies at House censorship hearing, denies antisemitic comments

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. worked to defend himself Thursday against accusations that he traffics in racist and hateful online conspiracy theories, testifying at a House hearing on government censorship despite requests from outside groups to disinvite the Democratic presidential candidate after his recent antisemitic remarks.

    The Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is amplifying GOP claims that conservatives and others are being unfairly targeted by technology companies that routinely work with the government to try to stem the spread of disinformation online. Democrats argued that free speech comes with responsibilities not to spread misinformation, particularly when it fans violence.

    In opening remarks, Kennedy invoked his famous family’s legacy in decrying the complaints of racism and antisemitism against him.

    “This is an attempt to censor a censorship hearing,” said Kennedy, the son of Robert F. Kennedy and the nephew of President John F. Kennedy.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is sworn-in during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing on Thursday, July 20, 2023.
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is sworn-in during a House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing on Thursday, July 20, 2023.

    Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    Growing animated at times, Kennedy defended his statements, which have delved into race, vaccine safety and other issues, as neither “racist or antisemitic.” He said his family has long believed in the First Amendment right to free speech.

    “The First Amendment was not written for easy speech,” Kennedy said. “It was written for the speech that nobody likes you for.”

    Republicans are eager to elevate Kennedy after he announced in April he was mounting a long-shot Democratic primary challenge to President Biden. Kennedy’s presidential campaign chairman, Dennis Kucinich, the former congressman and past presidential contender, sat in the front row behind him during the more-than-three-hours hearing.

    The Big Tech companies have adamantly denied the GOP assertions and say they enforce their rules impartially for everyone regardless of ideology or political affiliation. And researchers have not found widespread evidence that social media companies are biased against conservative news, posts or materials.

    The top Democrat on the House panel, Del. Stacey Plaskett of the Virgin Islands, said the Republican majority was giving a platform to Kennedy and others to promote conspiracy theories and a rallying cry for “bigotry and hate.”

    “This is not the kind of free speech I know,” Plaskett said.

    Plaskett warned against misinformation from Russia and other U.S. adversaries who have interfered in American elections and are expected to meddle again in the 2024 election.

    Often emotional and heated, Thursday’s hearing came as subcommittee chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican of Ohio, portrayed what he claimed were examples of censorship, including a White House request to Twitter to remove a race-based post from Kennedy about COVID-19 vaccines.

    “It’s why Mr. Kennedy is running for president — it’s to stop, to help us expose and stop what’s going on,” Jordan said.

    A watchdog group asked Jordan to drop the invitation to Kennedy after he suggested COVID-19 could have been “ethnically targeted” to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.

    In those filmed remarks first published by The New York Post, Kennedy said “there is an argument” that COVID-19 “is ethnically targeted” and that it “attacks certain races disproportionately.”

    After the video was made public, Kennedy posted on Twitter that his words were twisted and denied ever suggesting that COVID-19 was deliberately engineered to spare Jewish people. He called for the Post’s article to be retracted.

    A clip from the video was aired at the hearing.

    Kennedy has a history of comparing vaccines — widely credited with saving millions of lives — with the genocide of the Holocaust during Nazi Germany, comments for which he has sometimes apologized.

    In heated exchanges, Democrats implored Kennedy and Republicans to consider the fallout from their words and actions — and noted that one of the posts Republicans had singled out at the hearing was not removed by any censors.

    “Hate speech has consequences,” said Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia, who made reference to the mass shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue, among others. He called the hearing Orwellian.

    Democratic Rep. Sylvia Garcia of Texas said she received a death threat after the last hearing of the Weaponization panel.

    When Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat of Florida, read aloud Kennedy’s postings and questioned his intent, Kennedy interjected that she was “slandering me” and claimed what the congresswoman was saying was a lie.

    An organization that Kennedy founded, Children’s Health Defense, currently has a lawsuit pending against a number of news organizations, among them The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines.

    Ahead of the hearing, Jordan said that while he disagreed with Kennedy’s remarks, he was not about to drop him from the panel. Speaker Kevin McCarthy took a similar view, saying he did not want to censor Kennedy.

    The panel wants to probe the way the federal government works with technology companies to flag postings that contain false information or downright lies. Hanging over the debate is part of federal communications law, Section 230, which shields technology companies like Twitter and Facebook from liability over what’s said on their platforms.

    Lawmakers on the panel were also hearing testimony from Emma-Jo Morris, a journalist at Breitbart News, who has reported extensively on Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter Biden; and D. John Sauer, a former solicitor general in Missouri who is now a special assistant attorney general at the Louisiana Department of Justice involved in the lawsuit against the Biden administration.

    Morris tweeted part of her opening remarks in which she described an “elaborate censorship conspiracy” that she claimed sought to halt her reporting of Hunter Biden.

    A witness called by Democrats, Maya Wiley, the president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, implored the lawmakers to consider the platforms where Americans share views — but also “how deeply vital that they be based in fact, not fiction.”

    The U.S. has been hesitant to regulate the social media giants, even as outside groups warn of the rise of hate speech and misinformation that can be erosive to civil society.

    Source link

  • Don Bacon discusses Trump target letter, defense spending bill and more

    Don Bacon discusses Trump target letter, defense spending bill and more

    Don Bacon discusses Trump target letter, defense spending bill and more – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Reaction from Capitol Hill is pouring in following former President Donald Trump’s social media post saying he’s been informed by special counsel Jack Smith that he is a target of the investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska joined “America Decides” to discuss the target letter and the fight over controversial amendments in the defense spending bill.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House escalates an already heated battle over federal government diversity initiatives

    House escalates an already heated battle over federal government diversity initiatives

    The House of Representatives is poised this week to resume — and potentially escalate  — a blistering debate over the use of taxpayer money for federal government programs and initiatives that seek to promote diversity and equity.  

    On Monday, the House Rules Committee considered Republican amendments to remove funding for diversity and inclusion programs at the Federal Aviation Administration. The amendments were offered on a bill under House debate this week to authorize FAA programs, standards and initiatives.  

    Just last week, in a near party-line vote, the House approved legislation to strip funding for inclusion and diversity programs at the Pentagon. The debate over the amendments, both on and off the House floor, grew contentious, with the House Democratic leader accusing Republicans of being “sympathetic to white supremacy” as Republicans accused Democrats of building a “woke” and “weak” military.

    The debate hit a boiling point during a floor speech Thursday, when Rep. Eli Crane used the term “colored people” while discussing one such amendment. Crane later issued a statement that he “misspoke” and said “every one of us is made in the image of God and created equal.”   

    The response from some Democrats was sharp and emphatic. Rep. Joyce Beatty, Democrat of Ohio, asked that Crane’s words be “taken down” from the record. Rep. Jamal Bowman, Democrat of New York, in an interview with CBS News, said of the statement and the debate, “They want to take us back to Jim Crow.” 

    The amendments to the FAA bill, authored by Rep. Mary Miller, Republican of Illinois, and Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, Republican of Georgia, would limit or ban the use of taxpayer funding for diversity programs in the FAA. The amendment from Greene calls on Congress to “Prohibit funds from being used on diversity, equity, and inclusion within the FAA.”  

    Speaking with CBS News, Greene declared, “We’re all equal. It’s time for us to start acting like it.” She said the FAA’s mandated mission is to ensure safe airspace. “It doesn’t talk about skin color,” she added. 

    Miller criticized diversity programs in the FAA, telling CBS News, “Implementing these policies has led to chaos within the FAA.”

    Rep. August Pfluger, Republican of Texas, told CBS News, “The Federal Aviation Administration should be laser focused on strengthening a safe, reliable, and robust airline industry—not advancing a woke, divisive agenda.”

    When asked Monday about the latest series of amendments targeting diversity, equity and inclusion programs, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, said he was unfamiliar with the specific proposals, but added, “Amendments offered on floor so people can debate them. I look forward to seeing them.”

    Greene, Miller and House Freedom Caucus members have taken aim at a range of diversity, equity and inclusion programs in Washington. Greene said, “They’re in every branch of our government.” And she indicated she would pursue efforts to defund the initiatives at other federal agencies, too.

    Rep. Rosa DeLauro, Democrat of Connecticut, criticized Republicans last week for also including language in a separate appropriations bill funding the Environmental Protection Agency and Interior Department that would “prohibit funding for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility in the federal workforce.” DeLauro decried the “absurd recissions” of funds. 

    Rep. Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California, told CBS News, “Common-sense bills that have decades of bipartisan support should not become the next frontier of the GOP’s imaginary culture wars.”

    The fate of the amendments and House-passed legislation to defund military diversity programs is unclear.   The Senate takes up its own version of a military authorization bill Tuesday.  Such amendments are highly unlikely to be approved in a chamber controlled by a Democratic majority.  

    At a news conference Friday, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York, issued a scorching criticism of the House Republicans effort, accusing them of being “sympathetic to white supremacy.”

    After hearing of Jeffries criticism, Rep. Chip Roy told CBS News, “What we’re trying to do is stop the extent to which the Department of Defense and its democratic administration have been injecting that kind of divisive social engineering into the Department of Defense.”

    Source link

  • House Democrats plan to force vote on censuring Rep. George Santos

    House Democrats plan to force vote on censuring Rep. George Santos

    Washington — House Democrats plan to force a vote on censuring Republican Rep. George Santos of New York for repeatedly lying about his background, two months after a previous Democratic-led effort to expel him from Congress failed.

    Rep. Ritchie Torres, a New York Democrat, plans to introduce the resolution as “privileged,” a designation under House rules that require a floor vote within two legislative days. 

    “I have a message to House Republicans who, for too long, have been protecting Mr. Santos, who has disgraced the United States Congress,” Torres said in a tweet. “Stop treating Mr. Santos as untouchable. The time has come for Congress to hold him accountable.” 

    Censure is essentially a formal public reprimand by the House to punish misconduct that falls short of warranting expulsion. The censured member typically must stand on the House floor as the resolution detailing his or her offenses is read aloud.

    A three-page draft of the resolution obtained by CBS News lists a number of falsehoods Santos has told about his education, career and family. Among the falsehoods listed in the resolution are that his grandparents survived the Holocaust, his mother died in the 9/11 terror attacks and that he helped produce the Broadway musical “Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark.” 

    Democrats tried to expel Santos in May after he was charged in a 13-count federal indictment accusing him of fraud, money laundering and other crimes. Republicans blocked the effort by voting to refer the matter to the House Ethics Committee, which opened a formal probe into Santos in March, giving vulnerable GOP members cover from being forced to go on the record with their position on whether the indicted congressman should keep his seat. 

    Santos has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and has announced he will run for reelection next year.

    Unlike expulsion, which needs two-thirds support, a censure vote requires a simple majority. 

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said he wanted the Ethics Committee to move quickly in determining whether Santos should be disciplined, but Democrats have grown impatient, especially after Republicans voted to censure Rep. Adam Schiff last month. 

    Republicans sought to punish Schiff, a California Democrat, for his role in the congressional investigations of former President Donald Trump. He was the 25th House lawmaker in U.S. history to be censured. 

    On Monday, McCarthy criticized Democrats for not allowing the Ethics Committee process to play out. 

    “They have brought this up numerous times. This is their entire agenda,” he told reporters. “We don’t get involved within the Ethics Committee. These are individuals who will do their job and get their work done and follow through on whatever they need to find.” 

    Nikole Killion contributed reporting. 

    Source link

  • GOP Rep. Michael McCaul says he thinks the NDAA will ultimately be a

    GOP Rep. Michael McCaul says he thinks the NDAA will ultimately be a

    McCaul: NDAA will be “bipartisan bill”


    GOP Rep. Michael McCaul says he thinks the NDAA will ultimately be a “bipartisan bill”

    06:50

    Washington — Republican Rep. Michael McCaul is optimistic the final version of the annual defense policy bill will pass with bipartisan support, even if it includes a controversial amendment on abortion that cost the bill Democratic support when it was approved in the House last week

    “Traditionally, the more partisan amendments get stripped out,” McCaul told “Face the Nation” on Sunday, referring to the eventual House-Senate conference committee that would negotiate a compromise bill. “At the end of the day, this always ends up as a bipartisan bill.”

    The National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes funding and sets the policy for the Defense Department, has passed every year since 1961 with wide bipartisan support. But the House passed the bill Friday in a near-party-line vote, with four Republicans voting against the bill and four Democrats voting for it. 

    Even if other controversial amendments are stripped from the final bill, McCaul said he expects the amendment that bans the Pentagon from covering travel expenses for service members seeking abortions out of state is “one that will survive.” 

    “It will be a bipartisan bill,” he reiterated. “I think there’s nothing more important than our national defense and our military.” 

    1689522398474.png
    Rep. Michael McCaul on “Face the Nation,” July 16, 2023

    CBS News


    Other conservative policy amendments that passed included the denial of healthcare coverage for sex reassignment surgeries and hormone treatments for transgender service members, and the elimination of the Pentagon’s offices of diversity, equity and inclusion, and their personnel. 

    Such provisions are dead-on-arrival in the Democratic-controlled Senate, which is expected to start debate on the package this week. 

    The House rejected by wide margins proposals involving the U.S. assistance to Ukraine, including one from Republican Rep. Marjorie Tayler Greene to stop the U.S. from giving cluster munitions to Ukraine and another from Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz to prohibit security assistance to the country during its war with Russia. 

    “It’s very dangerous to have these amendments when Ukraine is in the crossfire trying to push the aggression of Russia back in the counteroffensive,” McCaul said. “It failed, and I think that’s good news.” 

    Source link