ReportWire

Tag: United States House of Representatives

  • Trump enters GOP convention with bandage covering ear

    Trump enters GOP convention with bandage covering ear

    MILWAUKEE (AP) — Former President Donald Trump, two days after surviving an attempted assassination, appeared triumphantly at the Republican National Convention’s opening night with a bandage over his right ear.

    Delegates cheered wildly as Trump appeared onscreen backstage and then emerged, visibly emotional, as Lee Greenwood sang “God Bless the USA.” Trump did not address the convention.

    Trump’s appearance came hours after jubilant and emboldened delegates nominated the former president to lead their ticket for a third time and welcomed Ohio Sen. JD Vance as his running mate.

    “We must unite as a party, and we must unite as a nation,” said Republican Party Chairman Michael Whatley, Trump’s handpicked party leader, as he opened Monday’s primetime national convention session. “We must show the same strength and resilience as President Trump and lead this nation to a greater future.”

    But Whatley and other Republican leaders made clear that their calls for harmony did not extend to President Joe Biden and Democrats.

    “Their policies are a clear and present danger to America, to our institutions, our values and our people,” said Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, welcoming the party to his battleground state, which Trump won in 2016 but lost to Biden four years ago.

    Saturday’s shooting at a Pennsylvania rally, where Trump was injured and one man died, was not far from delegates’ minds as they celebrated — a stark contrast to the anger and anxiety that had marked the previous few days. Some delegates chanted “fight, fight, fight” — the same words that Trump was seen shouting to the crowd as the Secret Service ushered him off the stage, his fist raised and face bloodied.

    “We should all be thankful right now that we are able to cast our votes for President Donald J. Trump after what took place on Saturday,” said New Jersey state Sen. Michael Testa as he announced all of his state’s 12 delegates for Trump.

    The scene upon Trump’s formal nomination reflected the depths of his popularity among Republican activists. When he cleared the necessary number of delegates, video screens in the arena read “OVER THE TOP” while the song “Celebration” played and delegates danced and waved Trump signs. Throughout the voting, delegates flanked by “Make America Great Again” signs applauded as state after state voted their support for a second Trump term.

    Multiple speakers invoked religious imagery to discuss Trump and the assassination attempt.

    “The devil came to Pennsylvania holding a rifle,” said Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina. “But an American lion got back up on his feet!”

    Wyoming delegate Sheryl Foland was among those who adopted the “fight” chant after seeing Trump survive Saturday in what she called “monumental photos and video.”

    “We knew then we were going to adopt that as our chant,” added Foland, a child trauma mental health counselor. “Not just because we wanted him to fight, and that God was fighting for him. We thought, isn’t it our job to accept that challenge and fight for our country?”

    “It’s bigger than Trump,” Foland said. “It’s a mantra for our country.”

    Another well-timed development boosted the mood on the convention floor Monday: The federal judge presiding over Trump’s classified documents case dismissed the prosecution because of concerns over the appointment of the prosecutor who brought the case, handing the former president a major court victory.

    The convention is designed to reach people outside the GOP base

    Trump’s campaign chiefs designed the convention to feature a softer and more optimistic message, focusing on themes that would help a divisive leader expand his appeal among moderate voters and people of color.

    On a night devoted to the economy, delegates and a national TV audience heard from speakers the Trump campaign pitched as “everyday Americans” — a single mother talking about inflation, a union member who identified himself as a lifelong Democrat now backing Trump, among others.

    Featured speakers also included Black Republicans who have been at the forefront of the Trump campaign’s effort to win more votes from a core Democratic constituency.

    U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Texas said rising grocery and energy prices were hurting Americans’ wallets and quoted Ronald Reagan in calling inflation “the cruelest tax on the poor.” Hunt argued Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris didn’t seem to understand the problem.

    “We can fix this disaster,” Hunt said, by electing Trump and “send him right back to where he belongs, the White House.”

    U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Texas said rising grocery and energy prices were hurting Americans’ wallets and quoted Ronald Reagan in calling inflation “the cruelest tax on the poor.” Hunt argued Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris didn’t seem to understand the problem.

    “We can fix this disaster,” Hunt said, by electing Trump and “send him right back to where he belongs, the White House.”

    Scott, perhaps the party’s most well-known Black lawmaker, declared: “America is not a racist country.”

    Republicans hailed Vance’s selection as a key step toward a winning coalition in November.

    Trump announced his choice of his running mate as delegates were voting on the former president’s nomination Monday. The young Ohio senator first rose to national attention with his best-selling memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” which told of his Appalachian upbringing and was hailed as a window into the parts of working-class America that helped propel Trump.

    North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, who had been considered a potential vice presidential pick, said in a post on X that Vance’s “small town roots and service to country make him a powerful voice for the America First Agenda.”

    Yet despite calls for harmony, two of the opening speakers at Monday’s evening session — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and North Carolina gubernatorial nominee Mark Robinson — are known as some of the party’s most incendiary figures.

    Robinson, speaking recently during a church service in North Carolina, discussed “evil” people who he said threatened American Christianity. “Some folks need killing,” he said then, though he steered clear of such rhetoric at the convention stage.

    Trump’s nomination came on the same day that Biden sat for another national TV interview the 81-year-old president sought to demonstrate his capacity to serve another four years despite continued worries within his own party.

    Biden told ABC News that he made a mistake recently when he told Democratic donors the party must stop questioning his fitness for office and instead put Trump in a “bullseye.” Republicans have circulated the comment aggressively since Saturday’s assassination attempt, with some openly blaming Biden for inciting the attack on Trump’s life.

    The president’s admission was in line with his call Sunday from the Oval Office for all Americans to ratchet down political rhetoric. But Biden maintained Monday that drawing contrasts with Trump, who employs harsh and accusatory language, is a legitimate part of a presidential contest.

    Inside the arena in Milwaukee, Republicans did not dial back their attacks on Biden, at one point playing a video that mocked the president’s physical stamina and mental acuity.

    They alluded often to the “Biden-Harris administration” and found ways to take digs at Vice President Kamala Harris — a not-so-subtle allusion to the possibility that Biden could step aside in favor of Harris.

    Source link

  • Elected officials condemn Trump attack, call for calm

    Elected officials condemn Trump attack, call for calm

    Massachusetts and New Hampshire officials are condemning political violence and calling for calm after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally.

    Trump was rushed off the stage Saturday after a bullet grazed his ear in what authorities described as an apparent assassination attempt. One spectator was killed and two others critically injured in the incident, authorities said.

    Federal authorities named Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, as the suspect. He was shot and killed by authorities. A motive is not yet known.

    But the attack stoked fears about increasing violence in the nation’s toxic political system ahead of an already divisive presidential election, with Trump locked in a neck-and-neck race for the White House against incumbent Democratic President Joe Biden.

    Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey condemned the attack, praised law enforcement for its “swift response,” and said she was “relieved” the former president is safe.

    “Political violence has no place in this country, and all Americans must condemn it,” the Democrat said in a statement.

    Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, and Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr, R-Gloucester, issued a joint statement, saying they “grieve for the families affected by Saturday’s tragedy and condemn those who would seek to use violence to further their political goals.”

    “While we may disagree on many things, we are deeply committed to this country’s ideals of settling those disagreements through public participation, debate, and respect for our colleagues regardless of their affiliation,” they said.

    Members of Massachusetts’s all-Democratic congressional delegation also denounced the violence and appealed for calm.

    “It doesn’t matter how much we might disagree in politics, violence is never acceptable,” Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Salem, said in a statement. “This is a polarized time, but we’re stronger when we’re united, not divided.”

    New Hampshire’s political leaders also voiced their outrage and appealed for calm in the November elections.

    “Political violence of any kind is never acceptable,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said in a statement. “I’m appreciative of the quick efforts of law enforcement and hope the former President and anyone else injured today recovers fully.”

    Republican Gov. Chris Sununu echoed those sentiments on social media, saying in a statement that “violence of any form has no place in America” and wishing Trump a “speedy recovery” from his injuries.

    The assassination attempt on Trump was the first instance of a president or presidential candidate being targeted with violence since President Ronald Reagan survived a shooting in 1981.

    Biden used a rare White House address Sunday to condemn violence and pleaded with Americans to cool the political rhetoric ahead of the November elections, citing the attempt on Trump and other recent incidents involving elected officials.

    “A former president was shot. An American citizen was killed while simply exercising his freedom to support the candidate of his choosing. We cannot, we must not go down this road in America,” the Democrat said. “We’ve traveled it before throughout history. Violence has never been the answer.”

    Trump arrived Sunday in Milwaukee for the Republican National Convention, where he is expected to accept his party’s formal nomination in a speech later this week.

    Delegates from the state’s Republican Party, who are expected to attend the four-day convention, issued a statement wishing Trump a speedy recovery, condemning the violence and calling on Americans “to unify as a nation to condemn this horrible incident.”

    “Like every American, we are outraged, horrified and deeply concerned,” MassGOP Chairwoman Amy Carnevale and other party officials said. “Whether Democrat or Republican, despite our differences, we all desire peace and prosperity for our nation.”

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Food benefit fund runs out of money

    Food benefit fund runs out of money

    BOSTON — After state officials quietly restored state-funded food benefits for legally present immigrants last winter, advocates and lawmakers celebrated the decision, but the money set aside for benefits quickly ran out.

    In December, the Legislature and Gov. Maura Healey agreed on a policy tucked into a large spending bill to expand Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits to all legal immigrants who met the program’s income requirements.

    Advocates said the $6 million injection would last seven months — ending right around the start of the new fiscal year when they hoped lawmakers and Healey would make the program permanent by putting it into the annual state budget.

    But the program ran out of money by the end of April, only two months after it got up and running. Now, Rep. Antonio Cabral is looking to revive the benefit.

    “It was like a tease,” said Lina Tabar, director of organizing and policy at La Colaborativa. “To not have the opportunity to provide decent food for your family, then having the opportunity for two months, then guess what? You don’t have it any more. It’s a bit cruel.”

    La Colaborativa runs a twice-weekly food pantry under the Tobin Bridge, which sees about 10,000 people every week who line up for food. Advocates say that number has increased significantly in the past year, as the number of new immigrants in Massachusetts has grown.

    “We have never experienced running out of food so quickly as we do now,” Tabar said.

    Slipping through a patchwork

    The SNAP benefit expansion was intended to capture certain people who slip through the patchwork of immigration laws.

    About 95 percent of the new arrivals coming into Massachusetts are from Haiti, said Massachusetts Law Reform Institute senior policy advocate Pat Baker. Haitians granted humanitarian parole or who have a pending application for asylum are eligible for federal benefits under a longstanding federal law.

    These are also largely the immigrants who are seeking or using the state’s Emergency Assistance family shelter system, which has grown rapidly since 2022, hit a “capacity limit” set by the governor and has a long and growing list of families hoping to get in.

    These families whose immigration status grants them access to federal benefits and the state’s emergency assistance shelters are largely not the same group who the expanded SNAP benefits were intended to target, Baker said.

    Those who received state-funded SNAP do not get money from the federal government to pay for food, and are usually living with host families or doubled up in living spaces. Many of them have work authorizations but due to language barriers they work in extremely low-wage jobs, where their American coworkers are eligible for SNAP.

    “I feel like there’s a misunderstanding between the immigrants who have been here for a long time and never received government support, and the recent migrant crisis. They think they’re helping the same population, but it’s not,” Tabar said. “We’re talking about workers that have been putting long hours in to support our economy and that are filing taxes, and they have a social security number. But they still don’t have access to these benefits.”

    Benefits resurrected

    Massachusetts used to be one of six states that offered state SNAP benefits to all legal immigrants who met the program’s income requirements, before the state halted the program after five years in 2002.

    By signing a supplemental budget in December, Healey resurrected those benefits.

    The program was funded at $6 million on Dec. 4, after which the Department of Transitional Assistance took about two months to make system changes and identify who was legally present but ineligible for federal dollars.

    It rolled out in mid-February, delivering SNAP dollars to eligible households retroactive to early December. But by April, Baker said, the state realized it didn’t have enough to continue funding the program and terminated it on April 30.

    Baker shared cases of people who quickly gained and lost the extra money to help supplement their food purchases:

    • A Salvadoran immigrant, legally present with a work authorization and working a low wage job, who has been in the U.S. for over 30 years;

    • A family of four from Venezuela with humanitarian parole, approved for state benefits, who didn’t qualify for federal SNAP;

    • An individual from Uganda with a pending asylum case and in treatment for cancer, which impacted their earnings and they could no longer afford food on top of rent;

    • A parent of two children pending asylum and awaiting work authorization documents, who cannot yet legally work in the U.S. to support their family and qualified for, then lost, about $400 per month in SNAP to pay for the family’s food.

    “These are families who will get back on their feet if given the tools to do so,” Baker said. “For people whose relationship to their own governments, in their own countries, may already be fractured, to then work with a community partner to get what they need to feed their families — to have that suddenly end is really confusing, and it does worsen trust in communities to get what they need.”

    Seeking opportunities

    Cabral and Sen. Sal DiDomenico filed amendments to include those benefits in fiscal year 2025 annual budgets, but neither the House nor the Senate agreed to to revive the program.

    At the time of the House budget debate, tax collections were coming in below expectations and budget writers were hesitant about adding spending to their bottom line, Cabral said.

    The New Bedford Democrat, who championed the original SNAP benefit expansion policy in the 1990s, said he is looking for new opportunities to get the funding.

    He’s eyeing an amendment, he said, that would re-establish the program for children in these immigrant families with the long-term hope of expanding it to adults eventually.

    “The amount of dollars we need, if it was just for kids, I think would be a number that probably could get support. So we’re trying to figure it out,” Cabral said. “I know the speaker and chairman of Ways and Means have been very supportive of this in the past … Sometimes it’s a matter of dollars and cents.”

    Support, opposition voiced

    When the expansion was approved in December, Senate President Karen Spilka voiced her support for the program.

    “Massachusetts is better off when the most vulnerable in our communities are cared for,” Spilka said. “Access to food is a priority, no matter where you come from or what part of the Commonwealth you live in, and I was happy to see aid for that purpose included in the supplemental budget.”

    Paul Craney of the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance warned that the funding was “unsustainable.”

    “It’s not a long-term solution to have an open southern border, broken immigration system, and very generous welfare SNAP program funded by Massachusetts taxpayers for newly arriving immigrants,” he said. “This latest taxpayer benefit will attract more immigrants, and Massachusetts will continue to be a magnet. It may sound noble to some but it’s unsustainable for the taxpayers.”

    By Sam Drysdale | State House News Service

    Source link

  • House OKs $6.5B housing bill, drops transfer fee

    House OKs $6.5B housing bill, drops transfer fee

    BOSTON — The state House of Representatives on Wednesday approved a $6.5 billion housing bill aimed at spurring the production of new homes, but dropped a controversial tax on real estate transactions to pay for housing development.

    The proposal, which passed 145-13, calls for a mix of tax breaks, changes to state laws, and bond authorization to increase the construction of much-needed market rate and affordable homes throughout the state.

    “The rents are high, the availability of stock is decreasing, there’s very few homes on the market,” House Speaker Ron Mariano, a Quincy Democrat, told reporters ahead of a final vote on the bill. “When you talk to folks and they say they don’t want to locate here because they can’t find homes for their staff or their employees, it’s a real problem.”

    The House bill adds more than $2.4 billion to Gov. Maura Healey’s $4.1 billion Affordable Homes Act plan, filed in October, which also included a range of tax breaks, policy changes and borrowing.

    It also didn’t include Healey’s controversial proposal to give communities the authority to add transfer fees from 2% to 5% onto property tax bills to pay for affordable housing projects.

    The proposal faced significant opposition from real estate brokers and other critics who argued it would drive up the costs of housing.

    The bill includes $1 billion to allow the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s water system to expand to the Ipswich River Basin, which includes Beverly, Danvers, Ipswich, Middleton, Peabody, Salem and other communities north of Boston.

    Lawmakers argue that the spending will help expand access to water resources in the region to offset the impact from building new homes and housing complexes.

    The proposal also includes a new $150 million program to help municipalities convert commercial properties for multiunit residential or mixed use. Developers would be eligible for a tax credit of up to 10% of the development costs.

    The bill also includes a new tax credit to incentivize production of home ownership units targeting households with incomes of up to 120% of the area median income, according to House Democrats.

    At least $2 billion would be devoted to the rehabilitation of more than 43,000 public housing units in the state, with 25% of the money dedicated to preserving housing for those with low incomes.

    The plan also makes permanent the state’s Community Investment Tax Credit Program, which funds community development corporations that build affordable housing, and raises the cap on donations from $12 million to $15 million.

    The policy initiatives in the bill include a proposal to authorize accessory dwelling units equal to or less than 900 square feet to be built by-right in single-family zoning districts in all communities.

    House lawmakers slogged through more than 200 amendments to the bill and approved dozens of them in bundles that passed on voice votes. The changes added another $300 million in borrowing to the final version of the bill.

    The legislation must be approved by the state Senate before it returns to Gov. Maura Healey’s desk for consideration.

    Beacon Hill leaders are trying to incentivize more home building amid a shrinking inventory they say is edging first-time buyers out of the market.

    The prolonged housing crunch is hurting the state’s economic growth, they say, making it much harder to attract new families and companies to invest in the state.

    Massachusetts has some of the highest housing costs and rents in the country. The median price of a single-family home hit a record $560,000 in March, according to real estate industry reports. Meanwhile, single-family home sales were down 7.4% in March versus the same month last year.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Small biz feels left out of legislative blitz

    Small biz feels left out of legislative blitz

    BOSTON — A top lobbyist for small businesses said that he does not see lawmakers giving a “primary focus” to that sector, with hefty bills on economic development and health care missing an opportunity to lift up Main Street businesses.

    “I think they need to be a top discussion item,” said Jon Hurst of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, adding that there was “not enough” targeted legislation for small businesses moving through the State House.

    RAM joined with the Mass. Restaurant Association and the National Federation of Independent Business at a lobbying event inside the capitol on Wednesday, timed about two and a half months away from the end of large-scale lawmaking for this term.

    “This is an election year. This is the year in which we do an economic development bill. Yet, what level of discussion has there been on helping our main streets, helping our small businesses? They are the backbone, they are the majority of our jobs,” Hurst told the News Service.

    He added that he saw “a general taking-for-granted of small businesses out there.”

    Rep. Paul McMurtry, co-chair of the Joint Committee on Community Development and Small Businesses, told the News Service he agreed that “sometimes in policymaking, we take small businesses for granted.”

    “And a lot of us in the small business community focus on running and managing and operating that business day-to-day, don’t have time to focus on the policies and legislative issues,” added the Dedham Democrat, who owns and operates Dedham Community Theatre.

    NFIB’s Christopher Carlozzi told the crowd in a State House meeting room that Gov. Maura Healey’s so-called Municipal Empowerment Act “should be on a lot of your radar screens.”

    The governor’s bill would open the door for increases in local-option meals and occupancy taxes, and Carlozzi said he saw “quite a few mayors and town officials” at the bill’s committee hearing who were ready to embrace the new revenue tools.

    “If you’re a restaurant, if you’re in hospitality, we don’t want consumers to find a reason to go to New Hampshire, or go to Maine, or go to another state and vacation. We want them spending their dollars in Massachusetts,” Carlozzi said.

    While Healey’s bill is still pending, top Democrats haven’t advanced it and have shown little interest in the local option taxes, apart from a potential new tax on high-dollar real estate transactions to fund affordable housing investments.

    Sen. Bruce Tarr listed off other “challenges” that face small businesses, including the cost of workers’ compensation and Paid Family and Medical Leave contributions.

    “There are so many issues when every day you’re running a small business and it’s Thursday night, and you’re thinking about making payroll for Friday,” Tarr said, “and you’re wondering, ‘How am I going to get through that next day, or that next week, with all of these different things that are coming at me?’”

    Public policy affects both the “very flat to down sales” numbers as well as the “very high costs” that local shops must deal with, Hurst said.

    “And particularly for small businesses, some of the costs out there are just choking them,” Hurst added. “It’s one thing, if you’re big companies or you’re very profitable margin type of companies, whether it be biotech, health care, technology, banking and so forth. They’re doing OK, but their customers are not. The small businesses are not. So we have to start focusing on, what can we do to help them?”

    While that could be a “major thrust” of the economic development bill, he said he sees legislators’ eyes attracted to areas like biotech and climate technology.

    “I mean they’re perfectly important for our economy, but there should be an equal thrust on helping our small businesses survive and thrive,” he said.

    Tarr, a Gloucester Republican, said lawmakers were faced in the near-term with “a number of vehicles” that could carry small business priorities, including the Senate budget bill scheduled for debate next week. Senators have filed 1,100 amendments to the bill, including around 110 from Tarr, some dealing with the sales tax or health insurance purchasing cooperatives.

    The Retailers Association passed out a list of four priority bills at the event, though one of them — related to insurance purchasing cooperatives — has already been effectively relegated to the dustbin by a joint committee.

    Sen. Michael Moore’s bill (S 687) would allow insurers to “provide members of small business group purchasing cooperatives with year-end incentives based on administrative efficiencies resulting from the group purchase of coverage,” according to a summary.

    The Joint Committee on Financial Services sent it to study in February. It remained one of the focuses of the lobby day, though, and Moore told the crowd he would potentially file the language as an amendment to the pending economic development bill.

    The Millbury Democrat said he expected action on the eco-dev bill “over the next month and a half or two months,” a timeline that could have Democrats scrambling like they did two years ago when they couldn’t agree to a bill at the July 31 deadline.

    “There’s a big health care bill [in the House] this week,” RAM’s Hurst told the News Service. “How much of that is focused on lowering the cost of health insurance for small businesses? Not seeing much on that, right?”

    Other priorities on the Retailers Association list included bills dealing with credit card surcharging (Rep. James Murphy, H 1101), workers’ compensation premium payment schedules (Sen. Susan Moran, S 695), and a proposed “vendors’ collection allowance” to compensate businesses for collecting and remitting taxes (Sen. John Velis, S 1957).

    The credit card surcharge bill is in House Rules, the workers’ comp bill was sent to Senate Ways and Means in March, and the vendors’ allowance bill is still before the Joint Committee on Revenue.

    Ahead of their lobbying stops around the building, Jessica Muradian of the Mass. Restaurant Association also prepped attendees on opposition to the tipped wage ballot question. The head of the Restaurant Association is among the plaintiffs in a pending Supreme Judicial Court challenge to the question’s certification to appear before voters.

    Muradian said that “we will find out by the end of June if we won that case or not. If we win it, then there’s no more ballot question. If we don’t win it, we fight on and we win it at the ballot in November with your help.”

    Moore has conducted his own unscientific poll of restaurant workers, he told the business owners.

    “I have, on occasion, been out and asked and tried to survey some of them. and when you actually explain what the law will do, they do understand this is going to hurt them, that their wage is going to go down,” he said, adding that policymakers should focus on the tipped wage issue “because I don’t think a lot of people really understand what the effects are going to be, and also the employees who are benefiting from the current system.”

    For McMurtry’s part, he sees a number of small businesses, including his own, still affected by negative implications of COVID-19. He said the Legislature should “put some focus on the small business community” as local outfits continue to emerge from the pandemic.

    McMurtry told the News Service that business at his 97-year-old cinema is “still challenging” post-COVID, but he’s staying the course.

    “We get the right movie, we do well,” the Dedham Democrat said.

    By Sam Doran | State House News Service

    Source link

  • House to vote on second funding package as lawmakers race to avoid shutdown

    House to vote on second funding package as lawmakers race to avoid shutdown

    Washington — The House is set to vote on a massive spending package on Friday to fully fund the government through September as the clock runs out to avert a partial government shutdown. 

    The $1.2 trillion package, which was unveiled less than 48 hours before the shutdown deadline, wraps six spending bills into one to fund about three-quarters of the government until the end of the fiscal year. Another package funding the rest of the government cleared Congress two weeks ago. 

    Passage in the House would move Congress one step closer to ending a fight over spending that has persisted six months into the fiscal year, one that has forced lawmakers to repeatedly rely on short-term funding extensions to keep the government operating since October. 

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, waived a self-imposed 72-hour rule that gives lawmakers time to read legislation before a vote in order to get it across the finish line and send it to the Senate, giving the upper chamber just hours before the clock strikes midnight. 

    Senate rules that allow a single lawmaker to object to expediting a bill’s passage could push a vote into Saturday. Republicans are also likely to demand votes on amendments in exchange for speeding up the process, as they did with the last funding bill. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, predicted the upper chamber could hold amendment votes as soon as Friday afternoon. 

    A brief lapse in funding over the weekend may not cause disruptions. When President Biden signed the first funding package hours after a similar shutdown deadline earlier this month, the Office of Management and Budget said agencies would not shut down and could continue their normal operations, since it was clear that a resolution was imminent.

    After delays caused by disputes over funding for the Department of Homeland Security, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees released the second package in the early morning hours of Thursday. 

    Republicans and Democrats both claimed victories in the package that funds the departments of Homeland Security, Defense, State, Labor and Health and Human Services, as well as foreign operations, financial services and the legislative branch. 

    Democrats touted funding for child care and education programs, medical research, mental health care and an extension of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, an initiative known as PEPFAR that is credited with saving 25 million lives worldwide. 

    “We had to work within difficult fiscal constraints — but this bipartisan compromise will keep our country moving forward,” Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democratic appropriator in the Senate, said in a statement. 

    Republicans highlighted funding for Border Patrol agents and more detention beds, as well as a ban on funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, the main humanitarian agency operating in Gaza, through March 2025.

    The bill also includes several conservative policy wins. It prevents the federal government from banning gas stoves, puts restrictions on which flags can be flown over U.S. diplomatic facilities and maintains a provision banning federal funds from covering abortion services.

    “House Republicans have achieved significant conservative policy wins, rejected extreme Democrat proposals, and imposed substantial cuts to wasteful agencies and programs while strengthening border security and national defense,” Johnson said in a statement.

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, told reporters on Thursday that an “overwhelming majority” of conservative policy riders did not make it into the bill. 

    Alan He contributed reporting.

    Source link

  • 3/13: CBS Evening News

    3/13: CBS Evening News

    3/13: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    House passes bill that could lead to U.S. TikTok ban; Texas teacher donates kidney to save life of toddler she did not know

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Is TikTok a threat to national security?

    Is TikTok a threat to national security?

    Is TikTok a threat to national security? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    As U.S. lawmakers move forward with legislation that could potentially ban TikTok, China is warning of repercussions. Elizabeth Palmer, CBS News senior foreign correspondent, and Chris Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, joins to unpack the larger national security threat TikTok could pose to the U.S.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House to vote on TikTok ban

    House to vote on TikTok ban

    WashingtonLegislation that could ban TikTok in the U.S. if Beijing-based ByteDance doesn’t sell its stake in the social media platform is moving quickly in the House, with lawmakers expected to hold a vote Wednesday morning.  

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, was confident the bill would pass. 

    TikTok has repeatedly been targeted by lawmakers seeking to restrict the app over concerns that the Chinese government could force ByteDance to hand over the data of its 170 million American users. Lawmakers say the concern is warranted because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. TikTok has long denied it could be used by the Chinese government to spy on Americans. 

    The House fast-tracked the bill, known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, skipping the Rules Committee and bringing it up under a procedure that requires two-thirds support for passage, an indication that it has broad bipartisan support.

    President Biden has vowed to sign the legislation, which would require ByteDance to sell TikTok within six months or be banned from U.S. app stores and web-hosting services.

    “Americans need to ask themselves whether they want to give the Chinese government the ability to control access to their data, whether they want to give the Chinese government the ability to control the information they get through the recommendation algorithm,” FBI Director Christopher Wray told House Intelligence Committee members on Tuesday, adding that the Chinese government could compromise Americans’ devices through the software. 

    China’s Ministry of Commerce said last year it would “firmly oppose” the forced sale of TikTok. ByteDance did not return a request for comment. 

    Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington accused the U.S. of running a disinformation campaign “for the purpose of bringing down the company.” 

    The U.S. “has not been able to give hard evidence to prove the so-called threats from TikTok to U.S. national security,” Liu said in a statement, calling on the U.S. to “provide an open, fair, equal and non-discriminatory business environment to companies of all countries operating in the U.S.” 

    But it’s unclear whether its passage in the House would mark the beginning of the end for TikTok in the U.S. Efforts to widely ban it have stalled amid disagreements about how to regulate the platform, free speech concerns and legal challenges. 

    In recent days, TikTok wielded its massive user base against lawmakers, inundating them with calls from constituents worried that they could lose access to the widely popular platform. A recent Pew Research Center survey found declining support among U.S. adults for a TikTok ban, even among those who were aware of ByteDance’s connection to China. 

    Former President Donald Trump’s opposition to the bill could also sway some Republicans to drop their support for it, just as it helped sink a bipartisan immigration deal earlier this year. Trump reversed his support for a TikTok ban, arguing that doing so would benefit Facebook, though at the same time, he also called TikTok a national security risk. Trump signed an executive order in 2020 that would have effectively barred it from operating in the U.S., but it faced a legal challenge from the company and was ultimately rescinded by the Biden administration. 

    The House bill is likely to face obstacles in the Senate, where a bipartisan effort last year to restrict TikTok petered out. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, has not yet committed to putting it on the floor and some senators are hesitant to focus on just one social media platform. 

    “I still have concerns about naming a specific company in legislation, but it feels like this House bill has momentum,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters Monday. 

    Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said he is “not sure that this is the answer.” Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, opposes the bill, calling it “inconsistent” with the First Amendment. 

    Rubio, however, said it was “a good sign” that the bill is quickly moving through the House.

    On Thursday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously advanced it after officials from the Justice Department and FBI gave members a classified briefing on TikTok. House members received another briefing on Tuesday from national security officials. 

    The Justice Department advised lawmakers that the legislation would be on more stable legal ground if it gave the government the authority to force ByteDance to divest from TikTok, rather than to impose an outright ban on the app if ByteDance doesn’t sell, according to a memo obtained by CBS News. The White House has also suggested it may not yet withstand legal scrutiny. 

    Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who introduced the bill, said Tuesday that he thinks the legislation could withstand a legal challenge because “there’s no authority to go after any American company, and there’s no authority to go after content.” 

    “This is regulating conduct, not content,” Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican, said after Tuesday’s classified briefing in defense of the bill. 

    Rep. Robert Garcia, a California Democrat, said the briefing failed to convince him that TikTok is an immediate national security threat. Appearing alongside TikTok creators outside the Capitol on Tuesday, Garcia said a ban would harm the economy and take away a platform that minority communities have used to connect. 

    Other House Democrats who opposed the bill criticized the lower chamber for rushing the bill to a floor vote, saying it lacked the necessary hearings. 

    Garcia said they would pressure their Senate colleagues to “ensure the Senate does not rush on this.” 

    “I’m more hopeful in the Senate doing the right thing right now than us in the House,” he said. 

    Gallagher, who leads the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said an overwhelming vote in favor would send a message to the Senate. 

    “I just want a big vote on Wednesday so that the Senate is forced to take it up,” he said. 

    Jaala Brown, Cristina Corujo, Alan He and Robert Legare contributed reporting. 

    Source link

  • Biden electrifies Democrats, spars with Republicans in fiery State of the Union address

    Biden electrifies Democrats, spars with Republicans in fiery State of the Union address

    A spirited President Joe Biden delivered a fiery, partisan State of the Union address on Thursday, fit for an election year with enormously high stakes in a divided nation.

    “Not since President Lincoln and the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault here at home as they are today,” Biden said early in the speech.

    “What makes our moment rare is that freedom and democracy are under attack, both at home and overseas, at the very same time,” he said.

    “Overseas, [President Vladimir] Putin of Russia is on the march, invading Ukraine and sowing chaos throughout Europe and beyond. If anybody in this room thinks Putin will stop at Ukraine, I assure you, he will not,” the president said to cheers from Democrats and applause from a smattering of Republicans.

    “My message to President Putin is simple. We will not walk away. We will not bow down. I will not bow down,” Biden said.

    The president also celebrated Sweden’s ascension into NATO earlier in the day, as Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson sat to the left of First Lady Jill Biden in her guest box.

    U.S. first lady Jill Biden sits alongside Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson during U.S. President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, March 7, 2024.

    Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images

    On domestic policy, Biden was even more confrontational than he was on foreign affairs, repeatedly calling out Republicans and sparring live on TV with some of the loudest voices in the GOP caucus.

    As a coterie of conservative Supreme Court justices sat just feet away from him, Biden excoriated them for overturning the reproductive rights enshrined in Roe vs. Wade.

    “In its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court majority wrote that, ‘women are not without … electoral or political power,’” Biden said.

    Then he paused and said to them, “You’re about to realize just how much.” With that, Democrats in the chamber jumped to their feet and clapped and cheered.

    Biden also went toe to toe with Republicans over a border security bill.

    “In November, my team began serious negotiations with a bipartisan group of senators. The result was a bipartisan bill with the toughest set of border security reforms we’ve ever seen in this country,” said Biden.

    U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., yells at U.S. President Joe Biden as he delivers the State of the Union address at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, March 7, 2024.

    Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

    As Republicans booed the bill that they agreed to in the Senate, but then sunk in the House, Biden turned to his left, where Republican members were seated.

    “Oh, you don’t think so? You don’t like that bill, huh? Darn, that’s amazing,” he said.

    “Because that bipartisan deal would hire 1,500 more border security agents and officers, 100 more immigration judges to help tackle a backload of 2 million cases.”

    Again and again, Biden met Republican interruptions and boos in real time with quips and jabs that appeared to disarm them.

    Overall, the speech was a clear, and effective, effort to convey to the public and to his party that he is a candidate ready for a fight in November.

    Source link

  • Democrat Tom Suozzi sworn back into Congress after winning special election for NY-3

    Democrat Tom Suozzi sworn back into Congress after winning special election for NY-3

    Democrat Tom Suozzi sworn back into Congress


    Democrat Tom Suozzi sworn back into Congress

    11:13

    WASHINGTON — Democrat Tom Suozzi was sworn in as a congressman again Wednesday, representing Long Island and Queens’ 3rd congressional district.

    Suozzi brought his own local cheering section to Congress. About 100 people from Long Island were shouting his name as he called for a new era of harmony and working across the aisle.

    It was the second time Suozzi took the Oath of Office to become congressman, but probably the first time he bluntly confronted members of Congress to cast aside the dysfunction and, as he said, “Wake up.”

    Watch Suozzi being sworn in


    L.I. Democrat Tom Suozzi sworn in after winning special election

    00:45

    Suozzi was warmly embraced by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is no doubt hoping that Suozzi is not the last New York Democrat to flip a seat from red to blue.

    Suozzi’s victory in the recent special election cuts into House Republicans’ already slim majority.

    Democrats now have 16 seats in New York, with Republicans holding 10. However, with the newly drawn congressional maps, Democratic officials believe the maps will yield 18 safe seats for their party, six for the Republicans and two toss-ups.

    Suozzi’s message was pointed.

    “While I might be the only one being sworn in today, what if we all see this as a fresh start? What if we all took this chance to break some of our bad habits? What if today we remembered why we ran for office in the first place? Let’s get back into the solutions business,” he said.

    As Suozzi posed for formal pictures with House Speaker Mike Johnson, there was no mention of the bitter special election with Mazi Pillip and certainly no mention of the man he replaced, former Congressman George Santos.

    But he did talk about the concerns of his constituents and all Americans.

    “People are worried about the cost of living. They’re worried about the chaos at the border. They’re worried about Israel, Gaza and Ukraine. They look to Congress, and what do they see? The extremists get all the attention. We’re letting ourselves be bullied by our base. We aren’t getting anything done,” Suozzi said.

    Watch: Tom Suozzi on The Point with Marcia Kramer


    Democrat Tom Suozzi aims to buck red wave in Long Island’s special election

    10:08

    With the migrant crisis not only in New York but around the country, Suozzi called for both sides to put aside politics and solve the problem.

    “I know compromise is hard in this town, Mr. Speaker, but bring a bipartisan compromise to the floor and I guarantee it will pass,” he said.

    Suozzi will have to run again in November, but he’s gonna have a far easier time. That’s because a redistricting bill passed in Albany means Suozzi’s district will skew more Democratic, though not dramatically. He is set to lose Republican-leaning Massapequa, Huntington Station, Cold Spring Harbor and Lloyd Harbor.

    Suozzi represented New York’s 3rd congressional district for three terms before surrendering his seat to run for governor in 2022.

    Source link

  • GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies

    GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies

    GOP lays out next steps in impeachment probe after Hunter Biden testifies – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Hunter Biden testified Wednesday before two House committees leading the impeachment inquiry into his father. CBS News investigative reporter Erica Brown has the latest on where things stand.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • McConnell’s end as leader marks seismic shift for Republican Party

    McConnell’s end as leader marks seismic shift for Republican Party

    McConnell’s end as leader marks seismic shift for Republican Party – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell surprised Capitol Hill on Thursday by announcing he will step down from leadership in November. CBS News chief election and campaign correspondent Robert Costa examines what the move means for the Republican Party.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • Schumer, McConnell suggest progress being made to avoid shutdown

    Schumer, McConnell suggest progress being made to avoid shutdown

    Schumer, McConnell suggest progress being made to avoid shutdown – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    President Biden and congressional leaders met Tuesday to work on a solution toward averting a government shutdown. CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion has the latest on where negotiations stand.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House Republicans voice opposition to Senate immigration plan

    House Republicans voice opposition to Senate immigration plan


    House Republicans voice opposition to Senate immigration plan – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    House Republicans are rallying against a bipartisan Senate plan on immigration reform that is still being finalized. The bill would allow the president to deport most migrants seeking asylum whenever illegal border crossings surge. Nancy Cordes reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




    Source link

  • Rep. Tony Gonzales on potential border deal passing the House:

    Rep. Tony Gonzales on potential border deal passing the House:

    Washington — Rep. Tony Gonzales, a Texas Republican whose district includes over 800 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border, said Sunday it’s going to be a “battle” getting any deal involving Ukraine aid and border security funding through the House. 

    A bipartisan group of senators has been negotiating a landmark deal to limit asylum and expand detention and deportation efforts. This border agreement would be paired with aid for Ukraine and Israel

    Gonzales said “it’s a good start,” but “the devil’s in the details.” 

    “The Senate is much different than the House. The Senate is going to have its battle getting to 60 votes. The House is going to have its battle getting to 218,” Gonzales told “Face the Nation.” “We can do that. But we have to sweeten the deal.” 

    Gonzales said that includes designating cartels as terrorist organizations and holding smugglers accountable. He said those could help get a bill across the finish line. 

    1702837462331.png
    Rep. Tony Gonzales on “Face the Nation,” Dec. 17, 2023

    CBS News


    “The deal between the Senate and the White House is going to be much different than the House and the overall package,” he said. 

    The GOP-led House passed an immigration bill earlier this year that would make it much more difficult for migrants to claim asylum in the U.S., among other strict provisions. Republican senators have recently said it’s not realistic to expect the Senate to pass a similar bill when it did not have a single Democratic vote in the House when it passed in May. 

    Without a deal, House lawmakers left Thursday for their holiday break, while senators have remained in Washington to see if they can strike a deal before the end of the year. 

    Gonzales said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana has not given a timeline for getting a bill through the House if the Senate reaches a deal. 

    “We can’t just wait,” Gonzales said. “We have to find 218 votes, however we can, and push things over the finish line.” 

    Oksana Markarova, the Ukrainian ambassador to the U.S., told “Face the Nation” that “time is important” in getting additional aid through Congress. The White House recently warned that the U.S. will run out of funding by the end of the year to assist Ukraine in its war against Russia. 

    “All the eyes are on Congress now, and we really hope that there’s progress that we hear about and they will be able to find a solution,” Markarova said Sunday. 

    Source link

  • N.Y. Court of Appeals sides with Democrats, orders redrawing of congressional maps

    N.Y. Court of Appeals sides with Democrats, orders redrawing of congressional maps

    New York’s highest court throws out state’s congressional map


    New York’s highest court throws out state’s congressional map

    02:33

    NEW YORK — The state Court of Appeals has ordered an independent redistricting commission to redraw New York’s congressional districts.

    It’s a move that has national implications and could affect which party controls the House of Representatives.

    New York has a law that says you can’t gerrymander, or make congressional maps essentially for political gain. The Constitution calls for a bipartisan commission to draw the maps, but then Democrats controlling the statehouse get final approval and only slight changes in current maps could likely end with lines favorable to Democrats.

    The decision, which came down Tuesday afternoon, throws a monkey wrench into the 2024 congressional races in New York, where the six freshman Republicans who won last time could have to run in new district lines that are less favorable, and it could give Democrats a leg up in taking back control of the House, where only a handful of votes separate the two parties.

    The New York Congressional Delegation currently has 15 Democrats and 11 Republicans. If all six freshmen lose and everything else stays the same next November, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries could become speaker.

    Depending on how the independent redistricting commission redraws the maps, the most vulnerable New York congressmen could be Mike Lawler of Rockland County, Anthony D’Esposito of Long Island, and Marc Molinaro of Dutchess County.

    Former congressman Tom Suozzi, a Democrat running to replace the expelled George Santos, could also see his district redrawn to add more likely Democrat voters.

    Watch Marcia Kramer’s report


    N.Y. Court of Appeals sides with Democrats, orders redrawing of congressional maps

    01:30

    Needless to say, the Republicans are furious and the Democrats are thrilled.

    “I think it’s corruption at its finest. We had a ruling last year that overturned the Democrats’ attempts to gerrymander New York’s maps and violate the Constitution. And because they didn’t like the outcome, they decided that they would do it once more,” Lawler said.

    The high court ruled last year that Democrats had “unconstitutionally gerrymandered districts.” A neutral court-appointed special master drew new lines that helped Republicans flip four seats last November, but judges Tuesday said those maps were only supposed to be temporary and in a 4-3 vote, the Court of Appeals upheld a challenge and tossed out the current maps.

    “This is what the court should have said last year. If they thought the process was incomplete, they should have just ordered the commission to finish the job, not take it completely away and draw the lines themselves through a special master from another state. That was just an absurd outcome to begin with. I’m glad now that things are being made right,” said state Sen. Michael Gianaris, a Democrat representing Queens.

    Republicans hold a razor-thin three-seat majority in Congress, and this could potentially help flip anywhere from two to six seats.

    “This is an enormous ruling not only because it can swing so many suburban New York area congressional districts, but the entire balance of power in Congress could hinge just on Upstate New York and Long Island — Hudson Valley, Syracuse area, Nassau and Suffolk County,” said CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane.

    New York GOP Chair Ed Cox and House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik from upstate New York have hinted at more court action, saying they “will not give up the fight against gerrymandering.”

    The 4-3 ruling was written by the new Chief Justice Rowan Wilson.

    The commission has until Feb. 28 to finish its work, then it goes to the Democratic-controlled legislature for approval. Lawler says there could be many lawsuits filed.

    Source link

  • In Congress and in class: Rep. Don Beyer works toward master's degree in AI

    In Congress and in class: Rep. Don Beyer works toward master's degree in AI

    Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va.

    Bill Clark | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    WASHINGTON — Don Beyer isn’t the average student at George Mason University. He’s 73 years old. He prefers a notebook and pen to a laptop for note-taking. And he’s a top lawmaker on AI policy in Congress.

    The Virginia Democrat found AI fascinating, but the breakthrough came when he realized he could enroll in computer science classes at George Mason University. So he enrolled, starting with the prerequisite classes that will ultimately lead him to a master’s degree in machine learning. 

    Beyer can only take about one class a semester, as he balances voting on the floor, working on legislation and fundraising with getting his coding homework done. But the classes are already providing benefits. 

    “With every additional course I take, I think I have a better understanding of how the actual coding works,” he recently told CNBC. “What it means to have big datasets, what it means to look for these linkages and also, perhaps, what it means to have unintended consequences.”

    Beyer is part of almost every group of House lawmakers working on AI. He’s vice chair for both the bipartisan Congressional Artificial Intelligence Caucus and a newer AI working group started by The New Democrat Coalition, the largest groups of centrist Democrats in the House.

    He was also a member of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s working group on AI, which could be resurrected under Speaker Mike Johnson. On the legislative side, he’s a leader on a bill to expand access to high-powered computational tools needed to develop AI.

    Crash course

    As members of Congress raced to get themselves up to speed on AI this fall with hearings, forums and a dinner with Open AI CEO Sam Altman, Beyer said his classroom time has given him a perspective on what goes on under the hood.

    He’s also learning how easy it can be for a small mistake to have a major impact on code. Beyer said one of his daughters, who is also a coder, sent him a big book about debugging programs that was “very, very long.”

    “You make big mistakes, then you make stupid little mistakes that take you hours to find. And you realize how imperfect any technology is,” he said. “That’s going to drive a lot of trying to defend against the downside risks of AI.”

    Congress is grappling with how to move forward on AI.

    In the House, Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., who served on McCarthy’s AI working group with Beyer, told CNBC he’s spoken briefly with Johnson, R-La, and the speaker is interested in getting the AI group started again soon, after more pressing battles such as government funding are over.

    Obernolte said there were a few different directions the House could head in on AI, including enacting digital privacy protections for consumers or deciding whether a new federal agency should oversee AI, or whether each currency agency should handle the issue.

    Obernolte, who has a masters degree in artificial intelligence, said there’s no shortage of smart lawmakers on AI, including Beyer. 

     “Don is wonderful, very knowledgeable, you know, really has a passion for this particular issue,” he said. 

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    ‘Time is of the essence’

    Another issue Congress has its eye on is the ease of spreading videos and photos that look real but are generated by AI — particularly ones showing events that never happened, or real people saying things they never actually said, which could ultimately impact elections.

    Rep. Derek Kilmer, D-Wash., who chairs the New Democrats’ AI working group, said the 2024 election lends fresh urgency to figuring out how to minimize the impact of misleading or false media. 

    “The implications for the spread of misinformation for the integrity of our public discourse or democracy is significant,” Kilmer told CNBC. “And that is driving this push.”

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., recently said “time is of the essence” when it comes to dealing with AI-generated videos and photos. “It may be the thing we have to do first, when it comes to legislation and creating guardrails in AI.”

    Still, Beyer is worried Congress won’t move quickly enough to keep up with the rapid pace of new AI models.

    “What we’re trying to do is not replicate our failures on social media, where for 20-plus years we’ve not regulated at all,” said Beyer. “Social media has had wonderful positive effects, but also some pretty scary downsides to misinformation, disinformation.”

    Beyer acknowledged that due to fights over spending and the House speaker’s gavel, it wasn’t likely Congress would be able to pass AI legislation this year. But he’s hopeful something can move next year, ahead of the 2024 election.

    Source link

  • George Santos says he expects he’ll be expelled from Congress

    George Santos says he expects he’ll be expelled from Congress

    Washington — Embattled Rep. George Santos said he expects to be expelled from Congress in the coming days and will “wear it like a badge of honor.” 

    “I know I’m going to get expelled when this expulsion resolution goes to the floor,” the New York Republican said Friday on an X Space hosted by conservative media personality Monica Matthews.  

    “I have done the math over and over,” he said, laughing, “and it doesn’t look really good.” 

    The Ethics Committee released a 56-page report earlier this month that said there was “substantial evidence” that Santos violated federal law. The report alleged Santos funneled large sums of money through his campaign and businesses to pay for his personal expenses, including on cosmetic procedures such as Botox, at luxury stores Hermès and Ferragamo, on smaller purchases at OnlyFans, a website containing adult content, meals, parking, travel and rent. 

    House Republicans Gather For Their Conference Meeting On Capitol Hill
    Rep. George Santos (R-NY) arrives for the weekly House Republican conference meeting in the basement of the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 7, 2023.

    / Getty Images


    After the report’s release, Rep. Michael Guest, the chairman of the Ethics Committee, introduced a resolution to expel Santos. Guest, a Mississippi Republican, said the findings were “more than sufficient to warrant punishment and the most appropriate punishment is expulsion.” 

    Calling his colleague an obscenity, Santos dared Guest to introduce his resolution as “privileged,” meaning the House would be required to consider the measure within two legislative days. 

    “He thought that he was going to bully me out of Congress,” Santos said, adding that he would not resign and calling the report “a political opposition hit piece at best.” 

    “I want to see them set this precedent,” he said. “Because this precedent sets a new era of due process, which means you are guilty until proven innocent, we will take your accusations and use it to smear, to mangle, to destroy you and remove you from society. That is what they are doing with this.” 

    Santos declined to address the specific allegations in the report, claiming they were “slanderous.” He said defending himself against the allegations could be used against him in the federal case. Santos has pleaded not guilty to 23 federal charges

    Santos also lashed out at his colleagues, accusing them of adultery, voting hungover and handing out their voting cards like “candy for someone else to vote for them.” 

    “There’s felons galore,” he said. “There’s people with all sorts of sheisty backgrounds. And all of a sudden, George Santos is the Mary Magdalene of United States Congress.” 

    During the hourslong discussion, Rep. Robert Garcia, a Democrat from California, logged onto the X Space and pressed Santos on why he wouldn’t resign. 

    “Why not just do the right thing and resign?” Garcia said. “We’re going to vote to expel you, George.” 

    Santos said he hasn’t been found guilty of anything. 

    “George, we’re going to expel you,” Garcia repeated. 

    “And that’s fine,” Santos said. “You’re saying it like I’m scared of it, Robert. I’m not scared of it. … I resign, I admit everything that’s in that report, which most of it is some of the craziest s—t I’ve ever read in my life.” 

    Source link

  • House Republicans subpoena prosecutor in Hunter Biden investigation

    House Republicans subpoena prosecutor in Hunter Biden investigation

    Washington — House Republicans issued a subpoena Tuesday to a federal prosecutor involved in the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, demanding answers for what they allege is Justice Department interference in the yearslong case into the president’s son.

    Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, called on Lesley Wolf, the assistant U.S. attorney for Delaware, to appear before the committee by Dec. 7, according to a copy of the congressional subpoena obtained by The Associated Press.

    “Based on the committee’s investigation to date, it is clear that you possess specialized and unique information that is unavailable to the committee through other sources and without which the committee’s inquiry would be incomplete,” Jordan wrote in an accompanying letter to Wolf.

    The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The subpoena to Wolf is the latest in a series of demands Jordan and fellow Republican chairmen have made as part of their sprawling impeachment inquiry into President Biden. The president’s son and brother James received subpoenas last week as Republicans look to gain ground in their nearly yearlong investigation, which has so failed to uncover evidence directly implicating the president in any wrongdoing.

    The inquiry is focused both on the Biden family’s international business affairs and the Justice Department’s investigation into Hunter Biden, which Republicans claim has been slow-walked and stonewalled. The U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware has been investigating Hunter Biden since at least 2019, as CBS News has reported.

    Wolf, who serves with David Weiss, the U.S. attorney for Delaware and now special counsel in charge of the case, has been accused by whistleblowers from the Internal Revenue Service of “deviating from standard investigative protocol” and showing preferential treatment because Hunter Biden is the president’s son.

    Republicans have claimed that it was clear that the prosecutors didn’t want to touch anything that would include Hunter Biden’s father. In one instance, Gary Shapley, an IRS employee assigned to the case, testified that in a meeting with Weiss and Wolf after the 2020 election, he and other agents wanted to discuss an email between Hunter Biden associates where one person made reference to the “big guy.” Shapley said Wolf refused to do so, saying she did not want to ask questions about “dad.”

    In another incident, FBI officials notified Hunter Biden’s Secret Service detail in advance of an effort to interview him and several of his business associates in order to avoid a confrontation between two law enforcement bodies. 

    Justice Department officials have countered these claims by pointing to the extraordinary set of circumstances surrounding a criminal case into a subject who at the time was the son of a leading presidential candidate. Department policy has long warned prosecutors to take care in charging cases with potential political overtones around the time of an election, to avoid any possible influence on the outcome.

    Weiss himself appeared for a closed-door interview this month and denied accusations of political interference.

    “Political considerations played no part in our decision-making,” he told the committee.

    Nonetheless, Republicans are demanding Wolf appear before lawmakers as she has “first-hand knowledge of the Department’s criminal inquiry of Hunter Biden,” and refused a voluntary request to come in over the summer.

    Jordan wrote in the letter to Wolf: “Given your critical role you played in the investigation of Hunter Biden, you are uniquely situated to shed light on whether President Biden played any role in the department’s investigation and whether he attempted, in any way, to directly or indirectly obstruct either that investigation or our investigation.”

    Source link