ReportWire

Tag: United States Electoral College

  • How many Electoral College votes does your state have for the 2024 election? This map will show you.

    How many Electoral College votes does your state have for the 2024 election? This map will show you.

    [ad_1]

    A record number of Americans have voted early in the 2024 presidential election, and many millions more are expected to cast their ballots before the polls close in each state on Election Day. But as we’re reminded every four years, it’s not the popular vote that decides who wins the presidency — it’s the outcome of the Electoral College.

    There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and it takes a majority — 270 — to win. In most states, it’s a winner-take-all system — whichever candidate comes out ahead, no matter how slim the margin, gets all of the state’s Electoral College votes. Only two states, Maine and Nebraska, allow their electoral votes to be split.

    The race between Republican former President Donald Trump and Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris will likely come down to a handful of battleground states where voters are closely divided. Of those, Pennsylvania has the most electoral votes at stake, with 19, followed by North Carolina and Georgia with 16 each, Michigan with 15, Arizona with 11, Wisconsin with 10, and Nevada with 6.

    How many Electoral College votes does each state have?

    The number of Electoral College votes each state gets is equal to its total number of U.S. senators and representatives in Congress. This means each state gets at least three, while states with larger populations get more. The District of Columbia also gets three, although it has no voting members in Congress.

    States may gain or lose electoral votes as the population shifts. In the congressional redistricting that followed the 2020 U.S. Census, six states picked up at least one additional House seat — and thus an extra electoral vote — while seven states lost one.

    Which state has the most electoral votes?

    California, the most populous state in the nation, has 54 electoral votes. With a population of over 39.5 million people, according to the 2020 Census, that means California has one elector for every 732,189 residents.

    Texas is next, with 40 electoral votes, followed by Florida with 30 and New York with 28.

    Which state has the least electoral votes?

    Six states with the smallest populations have three electoral votes each: Alaska, Delaware, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming. Washington, D.C., also gets three. In Wyoming, whose population of about 576,850 is the nation’s smallest, that works out to one elector for every 182,283 residents. 

    Which state has gained the most electoral votes?

    Texas gained two electoral votes in 2024, giving it a total of 40 in this year’s presidential race, up from 38 in the 2020 election.

    Five other states — Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina and Oregon — gained one electoral vote each.

    Which state has lost the most electoral votes?

     Seven states lost an electoral vote in 2024: California, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

    The map below shows all the states that gained or lost Electoral College votes for the 2024 election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How does the Electoral College work? A simple explanation for the 2024 presidential election

    How does the Electoral College work? A simple explanation for the 2024 presidential election

    [ad_1]

    Five presidents in U.S. history have won the presidency without winning the popular vote, and the most recent to do so was Donald Trump in 2016. His opponent that year, Hillary Clinton, won over 2.8 million more votes than Trump nationwide, but she lost enough key states to be defeated in the Electoral College, 306 to 232. 

    Trump lost both the popular vote and the Electoral College to Joe Biden in 2020. (Once again the electoral vote was 306 to 232, but this time in the Democrat’s favor.) Trump is the GOP nominee again in the 2024 presidential election, in what’s shaped up to be a tight race against Vice President Kamala Harris. 

    Since its founding, the nation has used the Electoral College to elect the president. Read on to learn more about how it works, its history and what role individual voters play in the outcome of the presidential election.

    What is the Electoral College and how does it work?

    The Electoral College is the process by which Americans elect their president and vice president indirectly through their state’s electors. Candidates must secure 270 electoral votes, a majority of the 538 at stake, in order to win the White House. 

    Before the general election, states select slates of electors. After voters cast their ballots in November, the candidate who wins the popular vote determines which slate of electors — Republican, Democrat or a third party — will cast electoral votes in the Electoral College for the president. 

    In most states, it’s winner-take-all — whoever gets the most votes in the state wins all of its electoral votes. 

    In Maine and Nebraska, the rules are slightly different. They have a proportional representation system in which the winner of each congressional district is awarded one electoral vote, and the winner of the statewide vote is awarded each state’s remaining two electoral votes. Some Republicans were hoping to change Nebraska’s rules to a winner-take-all model, since one of its electoral votes often goes to the Democrat, but the effort fell short

    Electors meet in their respective states in mid-December to cast their votes for the president. The meeting takes place the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December, which falls on Dec. 17 this year. 

    There is no Constitutional provision or federal law that requires electors to vote for the candidate to whom they are pledged, though they almost always do. “Faithless electors” are rare, since the electors are selected by the parties.

    How many electors are in the Electoral College?

    There are 538 electors in total across the 50 states and Washington, D.C. 

    What determines how many electoral votes a state gets?

    Each state is allocated electors based on the size of its congressional delegation. Several states with the smallest populations — Alaska, Delaware, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming — have three electors each, since they have one representative in the House and two senators, while California, the largest, has 54 electoral votes.  Washington, D.C., is also allocated three electors.

    States may gain or lose electors as the population shifts, and there have been a number of changes since the 2020 presidential election.

    In the redistricting that followed the 2020 Census, Texas gained two electoral votes and five states gained one each, while seven states lost one electoral vote.

    Who chooses the electors?

    The electors are chosen before the general election by their respective political party. Their sole purpose is to meet in their state following the November election and cast two votes — one for the president and one for the vice president.

    Who are the electors?

    Each party’s slate of electors may include state and local elected officials, party leaders, community activists and others affiliated with the party. They are typically chosen “to recognize their service and dedication to that political party,” the National Archives explains.

    There are no major qualifications, but members of Congress and certain other office-holders are barred from participating, along with anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion.

    What happens if there’s a tie in the Electoral College?

    In the rare event that there’s a tie in the Electoral College — which in the modern era would mean each candidate wins 269 electoral votes — members of the newly elected House of Representatives would decide the outcome of the presidential election, while the Senate would select the vice president.

    This type of contingent election would also take place if neither candidate wins a majority. This could occur if a third-party candidate wins some of the electoral votes or if there are a number of “faithless electors” who break their pledge and vote for a candidate other than the one who won the state’s popular vote.

    If it went to the House, each state would get a single vote, regardless of the size of its congressional delegation, and the 50 House delegations (the District of Columbia would not participate) would select one of the top three presidential candidates.

    The vice president would be selected by a simple majority in the Senate, and all senators would have a vote. As a result, it’s possible that the president and vice president could be from different parties.

    Since the 12th Amendment was ratified in 1804, there have been contingent elections twice.

    In 1824, four presidential candidates split the vote, and no candidate won an electoral majority. John Quincy Adams won the election in the House, even though Andrew Jackson had won a plurality of the popular and electoral votes.

    And in 1837, Martin Van Buren won a majority of electoral votes, but Virginia’s 23 electors refused to support his vice presidential candidate, Richard Johnson, and became faithless electors. That left Johnson one vote short, leading to a contingent election in the Senate, which he won easily.

    Why do we vote if the Electoral College picks the president?

    Five presidents in U.S. history have lost the popular vote and still managed to win the election, leading some to wonder why the nation continues to keep the Electoral College in place. The Electoral College was established in Article II of the Constitution and could be repealed by constitutional amendment. But that’s a difficult road. Amendments require a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states, or 38 of the current 50.

    In a 2023 Pew Research poll, 65% of Americans said the president should be elected through the popular vote, not the Electoral College. Hundreds of proposals have been introduced in Congress to change the process over the years. There’s also a multi-state effort called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which has been adopted by 17 states and Washington, D,C. That proposal would ensure that the winner of the popular vote gets all of the electoral votes in the states that signed the compact — but it would only go into effect if enough states agree.

    So why keep the Electoral College in place if there’s so much frustration from Americans? According to the National Archives, the Founding Fathers saw the Electoral College as a middle ground between giving the decision to Congress or to a direct vote by citizens. Proponents say it keeps less populous states from being underrepresented by discouraging candidates from campaigning disproportionately in urban centers that are more heavily populated. 

    What’s the history of the Electoral College?

    The Founding Fathers established the Electoral College in the Constitution in 1787. The term “Electoral College” does not appear in the nation’s historic document, but the word “electors” does, the National Archives noted.

    The ratification of the 12th Amendment in 1804 changed some of the rules for the Electoral College. For example, it required separate electoral votes be cast for the president and vice president. With the ratification of the 23rd Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia received three electors.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Walz says “Electoral College needs to go,” but campaign says that’s not its position

    Walz says “Electoral College needs to go,” but campaign says that’s not its position

    [ad_1]

    In a California fundraiser hosted at Gov. Gavin Newsom’s home Tuesday in Sacramento, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz advocated for doing away with the Electoral College system, stating that “we need a national popular vote.”

    “I think all of us know the electoral college needs to go,”  the Democratic vice presidential candidate said. “But that’s not the world we live in. So we need to win Beaver County, Pennsylvania. We need to be able to go into York, Pennsylvania, and win. We need to be in western Wisconsin and win. We need to be in Reno, Nevada and win.”

    The comments were immediately seized on by the Trump campaign and prominent Republicans, who accused Walz of attempting to throw the results of a victory by former President Donald Trump into question if Trump were to win in November.

    Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt questioned if Walz was attempting to lay “the groundwork to claim President Trump’s victory is illegitimate?” in an X post.

    In a statement provided to CBS News, a spokesperson for the Harris-Walz campaign said that “Walz believes that every vote matters in the Electoral College and he is honored to be traveling the country and battleground states working to earn support for the Harris-Walz ticket. He was commenting to a crowd of strong supporters about how the campaign is built to win 270 electoral votes. And, he was thanking them for their support that is helping fund those efforts.” 

    Getting rid of the Electoral College is not a position the campaign holds, a campaign official said. 

    The comment from Walz, and the swift clarification, comes just days after he told Bill Whitaker on “60 Minutes” that his running mate, Vice President Kamala Harris, said he needs to be more careful when he speaks.

    Since being thrust into the national spotlight, the Minnesota governor has faced scrutiny about his misrepresentations of his military status regarding when he retired from the Army National Guard as well as his whereabouts when pro-democracy protests broke out in China and Hong Kong in 1989. 

    “I speak like everybody else speaks. I need to be clearer. I will tell you that,” Walz told CBS News in a press gaggle last week.

    The Electoral College was established by the Constitution, so changing it would require a Constitutional amendment. But calls to do so have gained traction in some Democratic circles, such as after 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by about 3 million votes, but lost the electoral vote to Trump. The same occurred to former Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 presidential race. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 63% of Americans favor the election being decided by who wins the popular vote, not the Electoral College system.

    In the Electoral College system, there are a total of 538 electoral votes, divided among the states in a way that mirrors each state’s congressional delegation, with one vote allocated for each member of the House, plus two more for the two senators. Most states have a winner-take-all system, which means that all of the state’s electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election forecasters say Minnesota is set to be more competitive this presidential election

    Election forecasters say Minnesota is set to be more competitive this presidential election

    [ad_1]

    MINNEAPOLIS — Following President Joe Biden’s poor debate performance last week, a key election forecaster shifted Minnesota from “likely Democratic” in this presidential race to “lean Democratic,” signaling the state is more competitive than it was four years ago when Biden won easily. 

    University of Virginia’s “Sabato’s Crystal Ball” at its Center for Politics changed its rating for Minnesota in wake of that debate. Analysts also downgraded Michigan from “leans Democratic” to a “toss-up.”

    “President Biden’s debate performance was so bad that it has forced us to reassess some of our assumptions about the race,” wrote Kyle Kondik, in the post about the change. 

    Mr. Biden in a campaign speech on Friday in Wisconsin—a key battleground that will be an essential state on the path to victory in 2024—vowed he is staying in the race, despite some Democrats calling for him to withdraw following the debate. 

    “Let me say this as clearly as I can: I’m staying in the race,” he told supporters in Madison.

    Wisconsin has been a purple state in recent years, but Minnesota has gone blue every presidential election since Richard Nixon won here in 1972.

    Like forecasters at the University of Virginia,  Larry Jacobs, political scientist at the University of Minnesota and director of the university’s Center for the Study of Politics and Governance, believes the race for the state’s 10 Electoral College votes will be close between former President Donald Trump and Biden. 

    The president cruised to victory in Minnesota in 2020, defeating Trump by seven percentage points. But in 2016 the race was much closer—Trump lost to Hillary Clinton by less than two percentage points.

    Turnout will be key, Jacobs said, and he pointed to the presidential primary results in Minnesota this spring. Nearly 46,000 Democrats—19%—voted “uncommitted” over President Biden to protest his position on the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. 

    “This just underscores that Minnesota is going to be closely contested in 2024. If the Biden campaign does not put up the money and the resources and the candidate time, they may well lose here,” Jacobs said.

    Biden’s visit in nearby Wisconsin comes two days after Democratic governors convened in Washington to meet with the president at the White House to shore up support in wake of the debate. After the meeting, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz pledged his support for Biden and said he is “fit for office.”

    Trump’s team is expanding its footprint in Minnesota, as the campaign eyes flipping it in 2024. There are plans to open eight additional field offices in the state.

    “If Trump wants to spend his time and money trying to campaign in blue states, be our guest,” Biden campaign spokesperson Caroline Stonecipher told CBS News last month.

    CBS News reports the Democratic National Committee is investing $500,000 in Minnesota this election and that the Trump campaign’s strategy in the state had no bearing on its own.

    Another nonpartisan group that analyzes elections, The Cook Political Report, still has Minnesota in the “likely Democratic” column.

    [ad_2]

    Caroline Cummings

    Source link

  • 16 Fake Trump Electors Face Felony Charges In Michigan

    16 Fake Trump Electors Face Felony Charges In Michigan

    [ad_1]

    Michigan’s attorney general is charging 16 Republicans with multiple felonies after they are alleged to have submitted false certificates indicating they were the state’s presidential electors despite Joe Biden’s 154,000-vote victory in 2020. What do you think?

    “I wonder if we’ll ever find out who won the 2020 election.”

    Estelle Kearney, Credit Analyst

    “Fine, then what’s the legal way to overthrow an election?”

    Frankie Roberts, Unemployed

    “I guess this is the thanks that getting politically involved gets you.”

    Steve Norman, Tattoo Consultant

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michigan secretary of state unpacks charges against fake electors

    Michigan secretary of state unpacks charges against fake electors

    [ad_1]

    Michigan secretary of state unpacks charges against fake electors – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Sixteen Michigan residents are facing felony charges for falsely claiming to be presidential electors for former President Donald Trump after he lost the 2020 election, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced Tuesday. Each of the 16 alleged false electors have been charged with eight felony counts. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson joins “America Decides” to discuss the charges.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Should We Fix America’s Broken Electoral System?

    How Should We Fix America’s Broken Electoral System?

    [ad_1]

    A majority of Americans believe that U.S. democracy is in crisis, and many point to issues with the nation’s electoral system, from dark money donations to voter suppression. The Onion polled all 330 million Americans for their solution to fix America’s broken electoral system.

    [ad_2]

    Source link