ReportWire

Tag: United States Department of Education

  • Trump administration plan to exclude nursing from professional degrees sparks outcry

    [ad_1]

    A proposal from the Trump administration would exclude nursing from a list of professional degrees, a move that has drawn outcry from nursing advocates, who warn it could worsen the nation’s nurse shortage by limiting how much students can borrow for their training.

    The change stems from changes authorized by the Republicans’ “one big, beautiful bill” act, which introduced a new cap on borrowing for higher education. Starting July 1, 2026, students enrolled in professional degree programs will be restricted to borrowing $50,000 per year, with a $200,000 lifetime cap.

    Students in graduate programs that aren’t deemed professional will be subject to an annual borrowing cap of $20,500 and a lifetime limit of $100,000.

    Nursing professionals say they’re alarmed by the proposed rule’s definition of what constitutes a professional degree, which lists some medical fields, including pharmacy, dentistry and medical doctors, but doesn’t include nursing. Capping loans for nursing students could ultimately restrict students’ access to enrolling in degree programs at a time when the industry is already grappling with a shortage of nurses, they say.

    The proposal would create “obstacles for students who want to pursue advanced degrees, which would most likely lead to decreased students pursuing degrees in nursing,” Kim Litwack, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Nursing, told CBS News. “That means there will be less of these professionals joining the workforce.” 

    In a statement issued earlier this month, the Education Department said the proposal creates a new definition of a professional student to determine who qualifies for the higher loan limits.

    The goal of the changes, including the new loan caps, is to ensure that borrowers won’t face “insurmountable debt to finance degrees that do not pay off,” said Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent in the statement.

    In an email to CBS News, the Education Department said 95% of nursing students won’t be impacted by the borrowing cap. 

    “As for the most expensive outlying 5%, enrolled students are grandfathered into current lending limits to ensure there are no barriers to completion,” said Ellen Keast, the press secretary for higher education at the agency. “We expect that institutions charging tuition rates well above market prices will consider lowering tuition thanks to these historic reforms.”

    What’s a professional degree?

    Under the Education Department’s proposal, a professional degree is one that “signifies both completion of the academic requirements for beginning practice in a given profession, and a level of professional skill beyond that normally required for a bachelor’s degree.”

    The programs that it defines as professional include: pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, law, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry and theology. Students in degree programs that aren’t considered professional — such as those in nursing, physical therapy and physician assistant degrees — would have lower loan caps under the proposed rule.

    Other groups representing professions that were excluded under the proposal also issued objections, such as the Council on Social Work Education, which said it was “disheartened and concerned.” The American Academy of Audiology pointed out that audiology isn’t included, which it said could discourage students from pursuing careers in the field.

    Nursing’s exclusion from the list of professional degree programs “makes no sense,” said Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, president of the American Nurses Association.

    In addition to lowering the loan cap, the “big, beautiful bill” law also eliminates the Grad PLUS program that allows graduate students to borrow up to the full cost of obtaining a degree. 

    Kennedy and other nursing industry advocates who disagree with the omission of nursing as a professional degree are hopeful the proposal could be changed before it’s adopted.

    “It feels like a miscommunication, and we hope the Department of Education changes the proposed language before the rule comes out for public comment. They did add professions to the list before it was released, so they could have added nurses, which clearly belong,” she said. 

    The Education Department said the proposal will be published in the Federal Register, although it didn’t specify a date, and will be open for public comment.

    “A real gut punch”

    Olga Yakusheva, an economist and professor at Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, said limiting how much money nursing students can borrow could curb entry into the field. 

    “It’s going to limit the ability of nurses to apply for graduate school, and on the back end, it will limit the number of nurses available in primary care settings and in hospitals,” she said. “Communities with shortages of physicians will feel this the most.”

    Patricia Pittman, a professor of health policy and management at George Washington University’s Milken Institute School of Public Health, said nurses fill critical medical care gaps in rural communities. The rule could create financial barriers that she says would disincentivize nurses from seeking advanced licensing, which ultimately could harm rural areas.

    “Basically, nobody would be there if it weren’t for these nurse practitioners,” she told CBS News. 

    Pittman also says it will have a negative effect on morale within the nursing profession. 

    “It’s a real gut punch, and the result nurses are going to be angry about this,” she said. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • McMahon says federal school aid will keep flowing as Education Department hands off some duties to other agencies

    [ad_1]

    Education Secretary Linda McMahon told CBS News on Tuesday that federal money to support low-income students and special education will continue to flow as the Education Department shifts some of its grant programs to other agencies, amid the Trump administration’s push to wind down the department altogether.

    The agency announced Tuesday that the Department of Labor will now manage many of the Education Department’s grants to elementary and secondary schools, including the Title I program, which hands out billions of dollars to aid schools with large numbers of low-income students. 

    A handful of other shifts were also unveiled Tuesday. Certain higher education grants will be moved to the Department of Labor, the Department of the Interior will now handle Native American education grants, the State Department will run some international education programs, and the Department of Health and Human Services will take over a small child care grant program and a panel that reviews foreign medical schools.

    McMahon said the department has not decided how to handle some of its other major responsibilities, including its special education grants and its Office for Civil Rights.

    But programs that support low-income students, students with special needs and civil rights will remain in place, even if they’re moved to different agencies, McMahon told CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett on “The Takeout.”

    “They will all still be done,” McMahon said. “They were done before there was a Department of Education, and they will continue to be done.”

    “Special education will not be abandoned,” McMahon added.

    She said the Education Department will still oversee the programs that are being moved to other agencies, and their funding will come from the department’s budget.

    McMahon said permanently moving the Education Department’s responsibilities elsewhere would require congressional approval. But the department has argued that it does have the legal authority to essentially contract out some of its duties to other parts of the federal government.

    She referred to the moves as a “pilot program” and a “proof of concept.”

    “I want to prove to Congress that these transfers of programs are more efficient and that they work,” McMahon said. “And so if we can do that, then hopefully … we can get Congress to vote and to codify those transfers and make it a permanent move.”

    President Trump has taken aim at the Education Department for months, signing an executive order in March directing the department to start closing itself down to the maximum extent required by law. The department has also moved to slash its workforce.

    The administration has argued that the Department of Education is overly bureaucratic and many of its tasks should be overseen by states and localities.

    “The Trump Administration is fully committed to doing what’s best for American students, which is why it’s critical to shrink this bloated federal education bureaucracy while still ensuring efficient delivery of funds and essential programs,” White House spokesperson Liz Huston said Tuesday, adding that “students and teachers don’t need Washington bureaucrats micromanaging their classrooms.”

    Tuesday’s moves drew pushback from the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents thousands of Education Department staffers.

    “Students, educators and families depend on the Department’s comprehensive support for schools, from early learning through graduate programs,” the union said in a press release that called the changes “unlawful” and an “insult” to students. “That national mission is weakened when its core functions are scattered across other federal or state agencies that are not equipped or positioned to provide the same support and services as ED staff.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • AGs reach deal with DOE on education funding

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The Trump administration has agreed to release $1.1 billion in funding for post-COVID-19 pandemic academic recovery it clawed back from Massachusetts and other states before the move was challenged in federal court.

    The agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, announced Friday in a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos, settles a multi-state lawsuit filed in March by Attorney General Andrea Campbell and other Democrats alleging the federal agency’s move to claw back the congressionally approved funding violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm&?56C E96 28C66>6?E[ r2>A36== 2?5 `e @E96C s6>@4C2E:4 2EE@C?6JD 86?6C2= H9@ 7:=65 E96 =2HDF:E 92G6 28C665 E@ 5C@A E96:C 4@>A=2:?E[ H:E9 AC6;F5:46[ @?46 E96 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 92D 366? C646:G65 3J E96 DE2E6D]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 562= “6?DFC6D @FC D49@@=D H:== 92G6 2446DD E@ E96 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 E96J C6=J @? E@ D6CG6 E96:C >@DE GF=?6C23=6 DEF56?ED[ :?4=F5:?8 @FC 9@>6=6DD J@FE9]”k^Am

    kAm“#2E96C E92? 96=A @FC D49@@=D C64@G6C 7C@> E96 56G2DE2E:?8 =62C?:?8 =@DD 2?5 7:?2?4:2= 92C5D9:A 42FD65 3J E96 r~’xs`h A2?56>:4[ E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2EE6>AE65 E@ E6C>:?2E6 7F?5:?8 >62?E E@ 2:5 D49@@= 5:DEC:4ED H:E9 =62C?:?8 =@DD 2?5 C64@G6CJ[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 >@?6J H2D @C:8:?2==J 2==@42E65 😕 a_a` F?56C E96 p>6C:42? #6D4F6 !=2? p4E 2?5 E96 r@C@?2G:CFD #6DA@?D6 2?5 #6=:67 $FAA=6>6?E2= pAAC@AC:2E:@?D p4E[ 3@E9 @7 H9:49 H6C6 2AAC@G65 3J r@?8C6DD 😕 C6DA@?D6 E@ E96 A2?56>:4] xE H2D A2CE @7 2 H:?572== @7 >@C6 E92? S`h_ 3:==:@? E92E E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E 5:DEC:3FE65 E@ AF3=:4 D49@@=D 5FC:?8 E96 96:89E @7 E96 A2?56>:4]k^Am

    kAm%96?!C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?’D 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ H9:49 2AAC@G65 E96 >@?6J[ 82G6 DE2E6D 2? 6IE6?D:@? E@ DA6?5 E96:C C6>2:?:?8 7F?5:?8 E9C@F89 |2C49 a_ae]k^Am

    kAmx? |2C49[ t5F42E:@? $64C6E2CJ {:?52 |4|29@? 2??@F?465 2 7C66K6 @7 E96 7F?5:?8[ 56D4C:3:?8 E96 >@G6 2D A2CE @7 2 H:56C 677@CE 3J E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? E@ “6=:>:?2E6 H2DE6[ 7C2F5 2?5 @G6CDA6?5:?8” 😕 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E] $96 4=2:>65 D49@@= 5:DEC:4ED 92G6 925 A=6?EJ @7 E:>6 E@ DA6?5 E96 7656C2= >@?6J]k^Am

    kAm|4|29@? 3=2>65 E96 7@C>6C q:56? 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 7@C D6EE:?8 2? “:CC6DA@?D:3=6 AC64656?E 3J 6IE6?5:?8 E96 5625=:?6 7@C DA6?5:?8 E96 r~’xs >@?6J 72C 36J@?5 E96 :?E6?565 AFCA@D6 @7 E96 7F?5D” 2?5 D2:5 “:E 😀 A2DE E:>6 7@C E96 >@?6J E@ 36 C6EFC?65 E@ E96 A6@A=6’D 32?< 244@F?E]”k^Am

    kAm“tIE6?5:?8 5625=:?6D 7@C r~’xsC6=2E65 8C2?ED[ H9:49 2C6 😕 724E E2IA2J6C 7F?5D[ J62CD 27E6C E96 r~’xs A2?56>:4 6?565 😀 ?@E 4@?D:DE6?E H:E9 E96 56A2CE>6?E’D AC:@C:E:6D 2?5 E9FD ?@E 2 H@CE9H9:=6 6I6C4:D6 @7 :ED 5:D4C6E:@?[” |4|29@? HC@E6 😕 2 |2C49 ag =6EE6C E@ D49@@= 5:DEC:4ED]k^Am

    kAmqFE r2>A36== 2?5 @E96C pvD D2:5 H9:=6 E96 r~’xs`h 6>6C86?4J 92D 6?565[ E96 ?682E:G6 :>A24ED @7 D49@@= 4=@DFC6D 2?5 @?=:?6 =62C?:?8 A6CD:DE[ H:E9 DEF56?ED 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ =288:?8 24256>:42==J]k^Am

    kAm%96 pvD D2:5 E96 7F?5:?8 — :?4=F5:?8 >@C6 E92? S`b_ >:==:@? 7@C }6H *@C< — H2D 2=C625J 36:?8 FD65 3J D49@@=D 7@C 27E6CD49@@= 2?5 DF>>6C =62C?:?8 AC@8C2>D[ DEF56?E >6?E2= 962=E9 D6CG:46D[ 4=2DDC@@> E649?@=@8J FA8C256D 2?5 @E96C :?7C2DECF4EFC6 ?665D[ 2== @7 H9:49 H@F=5 36 😕 52?86C :7 E96 >@?6J 😀 AF==65 324<]k^Am

    kAm“%96 C6DF=E @7 E96 t5F42E:@? s6A2CE>6?E’D C6D4:DD:@? 😀 2 >2DD:G6[ F?6IA64E65 7F?5:?8 82A E92E 😀 42FD:?8 D6C:@FD 92C> E@ E96 AF3=:4[ 4FEE:?8 @77 G:E2= 65F42E:@? D6CG:46D[ 2== E@ E96 56EC:>6?E @7 E96 DEF56?ED H9@> r@?8C6DD :?E6?565 E@ 36?67:E[” E96 pvD HC@E6 😕 E96 ddA286 4@>A=2:?E]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Elk River School Board discusses Minnesota’s transgender athlete policy, Title IX

    [ad_1]

    Minnesota’s policy on transgender athletes in high school sports is leaving parents and school boards in limbo.

    On Sept. 30, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services determined in a joint finding that the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League both violated Title IX. 

    Federal officials told Minnesota to reverse the state’s transgender athlete policy or lose federal funding. 

    The debate over discrimination and Title IX protections played out in Elk River on Monday night. 

    The school district was preparing to request for clarification from the MSHSL and MDE through a resolution, but school board Chairman John Anderson told WCCO that, after it went through legal, the language got softened up and it lost support.

    The resolution that was pulled urged the MSHSL, the MDE and lawmakers to review transgender student athletic policies for “fairness and safety in girls sports.”

    Board member Mike Nordos said the intent of the resolution was to urge the state high school league to side with the federal government to keep federal money, up to $4 million.

    Board member John Anderson said last year, the Rogers Girls softball team, which is in this district, played Champlin Park, which had a player he describes as a “biological male” on the team, giving what he called an unfair advantage.

    A few school board members tonight disagreed.

    “Let this play itself out,” Board Member Sara Weis said. “This is a debate between federal law and state law. It needs to be worked out within the courts.”

    “I don’t think it is fair for girls sports,” Board Member Mindy Freiberg said. “How can you can look your daughter in the eye and say, ‘I know you’ve worked really hard and you’ve trained,’ and whatever, but it’s just not fair, or that is fair. It’s your opinion versus mine and I do stand with girls and coaches.”

    A few people spoke at the podium during a public comment period during the meeting. One woman said the district is playing politics with students’ lives.

    “If this board were to pursue this policy barring transgender students from playing sports, I have to ask, who is going to enforce it? Who will inspect children’s bodies and determine whether they’re allowed to play? Who will be responsible for outing students, humiliating them?” The woman said.

    The Forest Lake School Board sent a letter to MDE and the MSHSL asking them to follow federal law immediately. 

    [ad_2]

    Jason Rantala

    Source link

  • Minnesota’s transgender athlete policy violates Title IX, federal investigation claims

    [ad_1]

    Federal officials say that the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League both violated Title IX with their policy on transgender athletes, in a Tuesday announcement.

    The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services determined in a joint finding that Minnesota “allowed male athletes to compete” on several girls’ sports teams.

    MDE told WCCO it is “reviewing the letter and remains committed to ensuring every child has the opportunity to thrive in a safe and supportive school community.”

    WCCO also reached out to MSHSL for comment and is waiting for a response.

    The departments issued a proposed resolution agreement to MSHSL and the MDE, ordering them to voluntarily resolve the Title IX violation within 10 days or “risk imminent enforcement action.”

    The agreement requires the two agencies to revise any guidance “permitting males to compete in girls’ sports” to comply with Title IX and submit updated Title IX training, procedure and process materials.

    Under the agreement, MDE must also issue a statewide notice “to all federally funded entities operating interscholastic athletic programs mandating their strict compliance with Title IX by separating athletics and intimate facilities based on sex,” and the notice must require “entities to adopt biology-based definitions of ‘male’ and ‘female’” and have a reminder that non-compliance could place federal funds in jeopardy, according to a press release from HHS.

    Additionally, MDE is ordered to “restore to female athletes all records and titles misappropriated by male athletes competing in female categories,” and to send each athlete an apology letter “for allowing her educational experience to be marred by sex discrimination.” The department must also demand in writing that MSHSL take parallel action.

    Hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding for public schools in Minnesota, which lawmakers defined as a trans refuge state in 2023, are at stake.

    The investigation began in February when MSHSL announced it would not be following an executive order signed by President Trump banning transgender girls and women from competing on sports teams that match their gender identity. Schools that don’t comply with the order risk losing federal funding and could face legal action.

    The U.S. Department of Education elevated the investigation in June and HHS initiated a compliance review around the same time. Officials specifically cited the state champion Champlin Park High School softball team, which was also the subject of another lawsuit because of a transgender pitcher.

    In April, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison announced a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the president’s two executive orders targeting transgender youth and adults violate both the U.S. Constitution and Title IX. The lawsuit requests the court declare the orders unconstitutional and unlawful, Ellison said. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in June for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. A judge heard arguments on the motion earlier this month and has yet to make a decision.

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Riley Moser

    Source link

  • Trump administration could block student loan relief for some workers in public service

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration is proposing a new rule that would bar people with outstanding college loans from relief on that debt if their employers were found to be “undermining national security and American values through illegal means.”

    The proposed rule, announced Monday by the Department of Education, would restrict people from participating in the federal Public Student Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program if the organization they work for is found to be engaging in certain illegal activities. 

    “President Trump has given the Department a historic mandate to restore the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program to its original purpose — supporting public servants who strengthen their communities and serve the public good, not benefiting businesses engaged in illegal activity that harm Americans,” Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said in a statement.

    The loan program, which was launched in 2007 under President George W. Bush, is aimed at helping public employees such as teachers and police officers shed student loan debt. 

    The proposed rule lists some examples of what sorts of activities would be considered illegal, potentially resulting in an organization’s workers being excluded from the public service loan program. Those include assessments that an organization is aiding and abetting terrorism, violations of immigration laws, and what the rule describes as the “chemical and surgical castration or mutilation of children.”

    If an individual with outstanding student loans works for an employer deemed ineligible for the PSLF, the person could still participate in the program but would have to switch to an eligible employer, according to the proposed rule. 

    President Trump spurred the new rulemaking process in March by issuing an executive order that directed the Secretary of Education to revise the public service loan forgiveness program. The Education Department is soliciting public comments on the proposed rule until September 17.

    The White House and the Education Department didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

    The Department of Education said the proposed regulations are necessary to preserve the original intent of the Public Student Loan Forgiveness program, which is to reward public service. The agency also said it wants to protect Americans to ensure their tax dollars do not support organizations engaged in “unlawful activity.”

    “The proposed rules would halt PSLF benefits to employees of organizations that are undermining national security and American values through illegal means, and therefore not providing a public service,” the Education Department said in a statement.

    Critics of the draft regulation said it would allow Education Department officials to improperly exclude some public servants from loan relief under the federal program. The Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group, said in a July blog post that the rule would give the Education Department broad authority to restrict funding to groups whose work conflicts with the Trump administration’s agenda.

    “To be clear, if implemented this proposal would allow the secretary [of education] to disqualify from PSLF any employees of school systems that accurately teach the U.S.’ history of slavery, of health care providers who offer gender-affirming care and of legal aid organizations that represent individuals against unlawful deportations,” Winston Berkman-Breen, legal director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, said in a June 30 public hearing on the proposal. 

    Introduced as part of the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007, the public service loan program cancels outstanding debt for borrowers who make 120 monthly payments, or 10 years worth of payments. Currently, the program provides benefits to all government employers and all qualifying 501(c)(3) employers.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Student loan collections resume as record number of borrowers fall behind on payments

    [ad_1]

    Millions of student loan borrowers could face a wake-up call Monday as the Department of Education resumes collecting on school loans. The restart of collections comes as data from a recent analysis shows delinquency rates among people with student debt are at an all-time high. 

    After nearly five-years since the U.S. government first paused federal student loan payments and interest accrual as a temporary relief measure during the COVID-19 pandemic, May 5 marks the first day the Education Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) restarts collections on defaulted federal student loans. 

    Referrals for collection had been put on hold since March 2020 because of the pandemic. 

    “The level of concern here really depends on the reasons a borrower has not paid their federal student loans. If they don’t have the capacity, they may be overstretched,” Michele Raneri, vice president and head of research at TransUnion, said in a statement. “They may not know they have to pay them, may not be able to find the information on how to do so, or may not have a willingness to pay for one reason or another,” she said.

    Still, one in five borrowers is “seriously delinquent” or has a past-due payment of 90 days or more, according to a new analysis by TransUnion, one of the three major credit bureaus. The analysis looks at the percentage of student loan borrowers at risk of default and the impact that has on their credit scores.  

    Those in default face an uphill battle: Failing to make a payment means the government can withhold portions of Social Security benefits and tax refunds and garnish wages. Defaulting on a loan can also tank your credit score, which in turn can make it more difficult to obtain a loan in the future.

    Read on for more information about the state of student loan borrowing as default collections resume.

    Millions at risk of defaulting

    The credit bureau’s findings underscore how student loan repayments have struggled to get back on track since COVID-19. Payments on student loans were paused in March 2020 and didn’t resume until October 2023. 

    For borrowers across the U.S. who didn’t have to worry about making payments for years, the resumption of student loan payments presented a challenge for many individuals struggling financially.

    Out of the 19.6 million student loan borrowers, TransUnion found that roughly 20% are at risk of defaulting. The figure — which TransUnion estimates could be much higher — outpaces the credit bureau’s previously recorded all-time high of 15.4% in 2012. 

    For its analysis, TransUnion looked at those susceptible to being 90-days past due on their loans. That winnowed the field of borrowers from roughly 42 million to a total of 19.6 million borrowers. Excluded from this report were people in deferment or forbearance, as well as private student loan borrowers.

    As the federal student aid website outlines, loan servicers can report borrowers who are behind on their loans for 90 days or more to the national credit bureaus. 

    On average, people who faced default lost an average of 63 points, TransUnion found, although those with higher credit scores were at risk if losing much more. Those in “super prime” credit territory — defined by a spokesperson for TransUnion as a credit score of 781 or higher — saw an average credit score decline of 175 points as a result of impending student loan defaults.

    “Borrowers can review their credit report to see what loan servicers are reporting,” Raneri told CBS MoneyWatch. “This can also help people find who to contact if they have a loan they didn’t expect to see.”

    To minimize student loan defaults, prioritizing income-driven repayment (IDR) plans — which tabulate the monthly payment based on what someone makes and their family size — along with better outreach to borrowers and automation could go a long way, Pew Charitable Trusts says in an online post.

    “Data-sharing could also be used to automatically enroll borrowers into an IDR plan if they fall severely behind on payments, a move that could significantly curb future defaults by connecting borrowers with affordable payments,” wrote Regan Fitzgerald, senior manager; Brian Denten, officer; and Ilan Levine, senior associate at Pew’s Student Loan Initiative.

    All told, the nation’s nearly 43 million student loan borrowers hold a collective $1.6 trillion in debt, according to the Education Department. Agency data indicates that over 5 million of these borrowers have not made a monthly payment in over 360 days, while only 38% are on track with their repayment plans.

    Secretary of Education: Long overdue

    Student loan collections were upended during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, during President Trump’s first term in office, the Education Department paused student loan payments and knocked interest rates to zero to give borrowers some breathing room.

    When former President Biden took office in 2021, he extended the loan repayment deadline multiple times until Congress passed a law directing payments to resume in October 2023. The Biden administration made several attempts to deliver a student loan debt relief during his time in office, but his efforts were stymied by courts.

    While student loan repayments resumed over a year and a half ago, Monday, May 5, is the first day since March 2020 the Department of Education is collecting repayments from borrowers who have struggled to meet their payment deadlines. For U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, the return is long overdue.

    “American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies,” said McMahon in an April statement. “The Biden Administration misled borrowers: The executive branch does not have the constitutional authority to wipe debt away, nor do the loan balances simply disappear. Hundreds of billions have already been transferred to taxpayers.”

    contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Student loan borrowers in default face garnished wages, Education Department says

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Education Department will soon begin collecting payments for student loans that are in default, including through wage garnishment for potentially millions of borrowers, the department announced Monday.

    Beginning May 5, the Education Department will begin involuntary collections through the Treasury Department’s offset program, which claws back delinquent debts by withholding payments such as tax refunds, federal salaries and Social Security benefits. 

    More than 5 million borrowers are in default and 4 million more could be in the same position in a few months, which would put nearly a quarter of the federal student loan portfolio in default, according to the Education Department. Less than 40% of borrowers are current on their student loan payments. 

    In the next two weeks, those in default will receive emails informing them of the next steps and urging them to look into repayment options. Wage garnishment notices will be sent out later this summer. 

    No federal student loan has been referred to collections since March 2020 when President Trump paused payments and interest accrual during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Biden administration extended that pause, which ended in October 2024. 

    Former President Joe Biden sought to wipe out student loan debt for tens of millions of people during his four years in the White House, but the effort was repeatedly rejected by courts, including a 2023 ruling by the Supreme Court. Still, the Biden administration erased student loan debt for more than 5 million borrowers through other forgiveness programs

    Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the Biden administration “misled” borrowers about its authority to waive debt. 

    “Going forward, the Department of Education, in conjunction with the Department of Treasury, will shepherd the student loan program responsibly and according to the law, which means helping borrowers return to repayment — both for the sake of their own financial health and our nation’s economic outlook,” she said in a statement Monday. 

    The announcement from the department added, “There will not be any mass loan forgiveness.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Two courts just blocked parts of Biden’s SAVE student loan repayment plan. Here’s what to know.

    Two courts just blocked parts of Biden’s SAVE student loan repayment plan. Here’s what to know.

    [ad_1]

    Two courts on Monday issued temporary injunctions against the Biden administration’s flagship student loan repayment plan, decisions that experts say are likely to create new hurdles and uncertainties for millions of borrowers. 

    The rulings take aim at the Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, plan, which was created a year ago by the Biden administration to address long-standing issues with the Department of Education’s previous income-driven repayment plans, or IDRs. SAVE has proved to be popular with borrowers and now has more than 8 million enrollees.

    But the SAVE plan was challenged by several Republican-led states that argued the plan overstepped the Biden administration’s authority. They also claimed it could lead to financial harm due to lost revenue because it offers loan forgiveness in fewer years than earlier plans. On Monday, judges in Kansas and Missouri ruled partially in favor of those arguments, halting some aspects of the SAVE plan and throwing its workings into doubt. 

    “It’s just chaos, and it’s unworkable chaos,” said Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing counsel of the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group for people with student loans, about the court injunctions. “Borrowers right now need to hang tight” because there are so many questions about the SAVE plan’s future. 

    Here’s what to know about the status of the SAVE plan following this week’s legal setback.

    What did the courts decide? 

    In a ruling from Kansas, U.S. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree placed an injunction on the next phase of the SAVE program, which had been scheduled to take effect on July 1. Those include a major overhaul that would have cut many borrowers’ payments in half starting next month. 

    In Missouri, U.S. District Judge John A. Ross in Missouri, blocked the SAVE plan from providing any additional loan forgiveness. Under the loan relief initiative, some borrowers can qualify for forgiveness after 10 years of repayments, instead of the typical 20 or 25 year span. 

    Can borrowers still enroll in the SAVE plan?

    Yes, according to the Department of Education.

    “While we are assessing the rulings, borrowers can still enroll in the SAVE Plan. We will be sharing more information with borrowers soon,” the Department of Education said on its website.

    If my student debt has been forgiven, could that be reversed? 

    That’s not certain, but It doesn’t appear so, according to Yu of the Student Borrower Protection Center. 

    “People who have received cancellation should be able to keep the cancellation,” Yu said. “It was in the Kansas case where the judge said once cancellation happens, you can’t unscramble the egg.”

    She added, “It doesn’t mean reinstating loans, but for everybody else this is incredibly chaotic.”

    What happens to student loan repayments on July 1? 

    Yu said it appears enrollees won’t get the benefit of lower payments beginning on that date, as the SAVE plan had promised. 

    Under the plan, payments for undergraduate loans were scheduled to be cut in half for many borrowers beginning next month. Repayments were slated to be cut from 10% to 5% of discretionary income above 225% of the federal poverty line. 

    For instance, a household with two people earning a combined $60,000 annually would have their income (up to 225% of the poverty line) protected from repayment, or about $44,370. That would give them discretionary income of about $15,630, with their repayments currently capped at 10% of that, or about $130.25 a month. 

    But starting on July 1, those payments would have been cut to 5% of their discretionary income, or about $65.13. That now appears to be halted by the Kansas ruling. 

    What happens with future efforts to forgive student loans? 

    That’s one of the questions that needs to be resolved. The Missouri judge wrote that his injunction applies to “those provisions of the SAVE plan that permit loan forgiveness,” but added that whether that becomes permanent will depend on how the litigation proceeds.

    “How long do these borrowers need to stay on the hook for these loans, especially those near to the cancellation period — what does this mean for them?” Yu said. “Those are very important questions that don’t have answers.”

    What is the Biden administration saying? 

    The White House on Monday said the Department of Justice “will continue to vigorously defend the SAVE Plan.”

    The Biden administration will appeal both decisions, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre wrote on X on Tuesday. 

    “Republican elected officials and special interests sued to block their own constituents from being able to benefit from this plan — even though the Department has relied on the authority under the Higher Education Act three times over the last 30 years to implement income-driven repayment plans,” said Education Secretary Miguel Cardona in a statement. 

    What are the Republican states that sued saying?

    Republican officials applauded the legal decisions. Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a Republican, called the Kansas injunction a “victory for the entire country.”

    “As the court correctly held, whether to forgive billions of dollars of student debt is a major question that only Congress can answer,” he said in a statement. “Blue collar Kansas workers who didn’t go to college shouldn’t have to pay off the student loans of New Yorkers with gender studies degrees.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Could higher salaries solve the U.S. teacher shortage?

    Could higher salaries solve the U.S. teacher shortage?

    [ad_1]

    Could higher salaries solve the U.S. teacher shortage? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The U.S. Department of Education says there’s a shortage of teachers across the nation, with 40 states reporting public school staff levels that are lower than they were before the pandemic. Daniel Pink, contributing columnist at The Washington Post, joins CBS News to examine what can be done to end the shortage.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oklahoma teachers mistakenly got up to $50,000 in bonuses. Now they have to return the money.

    Oklahoma teachers mistakenly got up to $50,000 in bonuses. Now they have to return the money.

    [ad_1]

    Oklahoma education officials are attempting to claw back at least $290,000 in bonuses they mistakenly paid out to several teachers.

    After awarding them bonuses of between $15,000 and $50,000 each last fall, the Oklahoma State Department of Education earlier this month demanded at least nine unintended recipients to return the funds by the end of next month, watchdog organization Oklahoma Watch reported last Thursday, citing interviews it conducted with affected employees. A total of $185,000 went to teachers who didn’t qualify for the program at all, and $105,000 was overpaid to teachers who qualified for a lesser amount, the outlet reported.

    The errant payments were awarded to educators who applied for the bonuses last fall through a statewide program designed to recruit teachers for hard-to-fill roles in Oklahoma schools through pay-based incentives, according to the outlet. Oklahoma’s education department made the payments in error because its staff did not sufficiently vet the information provided in the applications, the watchdog reported.

    “I got an email … it was like the second week of January, saying I have to pay it back by the end of February,” special education teacher Kristina Stadelman told Oklahoma Watch, adding she used the money for several home improvement projects and a down payment on a car for her growing family. “I’m like, how am I supposed to do that?”


    New York City schools feel strain of migrant surge

    03:10

    State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters, who implemented the program, suggested in a memo sent Monday to legislative leaders that some of the errant bonuses were because teachers had “misrepresented their experience and qualifications.” He blamed the media for much of the fallout.

    “The press has jumped the gun on their reporting, excluding vital details on the contracts and our auditing system,” Walters wrote in the memo, obtained by The Associated Press. “The fact of the matter is that over 500 teachers were recruited to Oklahoma classrooms through this program.”

    The repayment demands have Oklahoma’s education agency drawing fierce criticism from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, some of whom say the teachers shouldn’t be forced to give the money back. Average teacher pay in Oklahoma is about $54,800, which ranks 38th in the country, according to the National Education Association.

    A department spokesman did not respond to the Associated Press’ request for comment on how many bonuses were paid in error or how it intends to claw them back. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • More than 300,000 student borrowers given wrong repayment information, Education Department says

    More than 300,000 student borrowers given wrong repayment information, Education Department says

    [ad_1]

    More than 300,000 people were given incorrect information about their student loan repayments as resumption of debt payments began this month, the Education Department said on Thursday. 

    The agency has directed servicers to alert affected borrowers and place them into administrative forbearance until their correct payment amount is calculated in order to minimize the impact on them, the Education Department told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    The issue is affecting some borrowers in the new income-driven repayment plan from the Biden administration, called the SAVE plan, including some that should have had $0 owed under the new structure, the agency said. The mistake adds to some of the problems facing borrowers this month as their payments are due for the first time in more than three years, including customer service issues with their loan servicers.

    “We’ve seen a lot of confusion and a lot of huge gaps from the servicers and the Department of Education,” said Braxton Brewington of the Debt Collective, an advocacy group for people with student debt. “People are getting billed the wrong amounts, so when they have the problems they aren’t able to reach their servicer.”


    New warnings about scammers as student loan payments resume

    02:56

    The wrong information was provided to fewer than 1% of the 28 million borrowers who are reentering repayment this month, the Education Department said. 

    “Because of the Department’s stringent oversight efforts and ability to quickly catch these errors, servicers are being held accountable and borrowers will not have payments due until these mistakes are fixed,” the agency added.

    Earlier this month, 19 state attorneys general wrote to the Education Department that they were alarmed by “serious and widespread loan servicing problems” with the resumption of repayments this month. Long wait times and dropped calls are making it difficult for borrowers to get answers to questions they have for their servicers, the Student Borrower Protection Center said earlier this month. 

    SAVE repayment plan

    The new SAVE repayment plan has about 5 million people enrolled it, the Biden administration has said. Income-driven repayment plans like SAVE, or IDRs, calculate a borrower’s monthly payment by pegging it to a percentage of their discretionary income. 

    People enrolled in the SAVE plan will have their monthly payments reduced from 10% to 5% of their discretionary income, although the 5% rate won’t go into effect until mid-2024. 

    The Biden administration has said payments for many borrowers enrolled in SAVE will be cut in half. 

    Meanwhile, borrowers also have the “on-ramp” that will help protect them in case they miss a payment, are late or send a partial payment. This is a one-year leniency program that began on Oct. 1, 2023 and ends on Sept. 30, 2024.

    Borrowers who miss or are late in their payments won’t be considered in default, nor will they be reported to the credit reporting agencies or to collection agencies. 

    The Education Department “instituted its on-ramp program to provide borrowers a smooth transition into repayment where they will not be harmed if they miss a payment,” it said on Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How differences in school infrastructure funding can contribute to inequity among districts

    How differences in school infrastructure funding can contribute to inequity among districts

    [ad_1]

    How differences in school infrastructure funding can contribute to inequity among districts – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Mary Filardo, executive director of the 21st Century School Fund, explains how school infrastructure funding can contribute to inequity among school districts.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • More than 800,000 student loan borrowers are getting billions of dollars in debt forgiveness this week

    More than 800,000 student loan borrowers are getting billions of dollars in debt forgiveness this week

    [ad_1]

    This week, more than 800,000 student loan borrowers with billions of dollars in debt will start to have their loans discharged.

    The one-time account adjustment comes after the Biden administration last month announced it would forgive student loans for 804,000 borrowers with a combined $39 billion in federal student loan debt. These borrowers have been in income-driven repayment (IDR) plans for more than 20 years and “never got the credit they earned” under IDR plans, the White House said in a statement Monday.

    “Hundreds of thousands of borrowers weren’t accurately getting credit for student loan payments that should have delivered them forgiveness under income-driven repayment plans,” President Joe Biden said in the statement. They “will start to see their student debt canceled” this week.


    Halved payments and forgiven debt: How the new student loan forgiveness plan might affect you

    02:19

    How will I know if my loan is forgiven?

    Look for an email from your loan servicing company, which began alerting people about the debt forgiveness on Monday, according to ABC News.

    The Biden administration has targeted borrowers enrolled in IDR plans for forgiveness because of “historical failures” of the system. 

    IDR plans work by calculating monthly repayment sums based on the borrower’s income. That payment can be as low as $0 a month, for borrowers who don’t earn an income.

    Student loan borrowers enrolled in an IDR plan should technically be eligible for forgiveness after making either 240 or 300 monthly payments on an IDR plan or a standard repayment plan, according to Department of Education regulations. That includes borrowers with monthly payments as low as $0.


    Here’s how Biden’s “on-ramp” for student loan repayments can help borrowers

    03:12

    However, reviews by the Education Department of IDR payment-tracking procedures “revealed significant flaws” in the system that suggested borrowers were “missing out on progress toward IDR forgiveness,” according to a statement from the DOE last year.  In addition, the department’s review of Federal Student Aid suggested that struggling borrowers were placed into forbearance by loan servicers, in violation of DOE rules.

    On July 14, the Department of Education informed borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans who have accumulated the equivalent of either 20 or 25 years of qualifying monthly payments that they would soon receive notices confirming their debt was canceled

    “For far too long, borrowers fell through the cracks of a broken system that failed to keep accurate track of their progress towards forgiveness,”  U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said in a statement at the time.

    The federal relief will completely wipe out student loan debt for more than 614,000 people, according to the White House statement Monday.

    The Education Department did not immediately reply to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment. 


    How to prepare for the resumption of student loan payments

    03:44

    Who qualifies for the new student loan forgiveness? 

    While some borrowers in IDR plans are heaving a sigh of relief this week, millions of Americans will soon need to make payments on their student loans for the first time in more than three years. 

    Interest will start accruing on September 1, and loan repayments will begin in October

    Roughly 43.5 million Americans have taken on student loans, with the average borrower owing $37,787, Federal Reserve Bank of New York data shows. 

    Last year, President Biden announced his administration would cancel up to $20,000 in student loan debt for millions of Americans, a touchstone of his presidential campaign. However, the Supreme Court blocked the administration’s plans in June, ending the program before discharges could begin. 

    For those facing repayments that they’re thinking of skipping, options exist

    One is the new Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, an income-driven repayment program, which opened in July. The SAVE program was developed as an alternative for borrowers to avoid the pitfalls of traditional IDRs, such as interest that can snowball.

    The program could cut monthly payments in half or even to $0 for borrowers. Many will save up to $1,000 a year on repayments, according to the Biden administration.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 9 million Americans wrongly told they were approved for student debt forgiveness

    9 million Americans wrongly told they were approved for student debt forgiveness

    [ad_1]

    About 9 million Americans with student loans who had applied for the Biden administration’s student-debt forgiveness program mistakenly received emails last month that said their applications had been approved. 

    The messages were part of updates the Department of Education issued in November to inform 16 million debt relief applicants that they had been approved to have up to $20,000 forgiven. But an additional 9 million people received emails saying they had received loan forgiveness when they had not been approved for relief because the process was halted due to legal challenges, according to officials. And others who hadn’t yet applied for the student loan relief program also received the email. 

    The error was made by Accenture Federal Services, a contractor with the Education Department, which sent the emails on November 22 and 23. The mistake may only compound confusion among some borrowers about the debt-relief program, which for now remains in limbo due to several legal challenges, with the Supreme Court earlier this month agreeing to hear one of the cases. 

    About 26 million people had applied for the loan relief effort prior to the court rulings that have effectively stopped the Biden administration’s ability to accept new applications. In the meantime, the Biden administration has extended the pause on student debt repayments, which were slated to resume in January, until as late as June 30, 2023, to give borrowers more breathing room while the legal challenges move forward.

    On December 8, the Job Creators Network, a conservative group, said it submitted a request to the Supreme Court to hear a second case relating to the loan-relief program. It is asking the high court to reject the Biden administration’s request to stay a lower court decision that blocks the loan-forgiveness plan. 

    In its request, the Job Creators Network is asking the Supreme Court to hear its case on the same day it hears the other legal challenge to the program, which stems from a case brought by six Republican-led states that are arguing the Biden administration is overstepping its executive powers with the loan-relief program.

    The Job Creators Network had sued in October, arguing the Biden administration violated federal procedures by failing to seek public input on the program. 

    “Corrective action”

    “Communicating clearly and accurately with borrowers is a top priority of the Department,” a spokesperson for the Education Department said in an email to CBS MoneyWatch. “We are in close touch with Accenture Federal Services as they take corrective action to ensure all borrowers and those affected have accurate information about debt relief.”

    The email subject line incorrectly informed 9 million recipients: “Your Student Loan Debt Relief Plan Has Been Approved.” However, the text of the letter was accurate, letting those recipients know that the determination of their eligibility would continue “if and when we prevail in court.”

    Corrected emails will be sent to those recipients and those who received the email in error within the next few days. 

    In a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, Accenture blamed the issue on “human error.”

    “Accenture Federal Services regrets the human error that led to an email being sent to a number of student loan debt relief applicants with an inaccurate subject line,” the firm said. “Working closely with the Department, Accenture Federal Services will review quality control measures to support accurate and timely communications to applicants in the Student Loan Debt Relief program.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link