ReportWire

Tag: United States Congress

  • The economy’s long, hot, and uncertain summer — CBS News poll

    The economy’s long, hot, and uncertain summer — CBS News poll

    [ad_1]

    Never mind the macro stats for the U.S. economy — Americans are hot, and very much still bothered by high prices, with recent reports about GDP growth, stock gains and a strong labor market apparently providing cold comfort. At least so far.

    Instead, most describe the economy as “uncertain,” along with calling it bad, and “struggling” but not improved. 

    So, there’s plenty of lagging skepticism hanging over the public mind after the turmoil of recent years and months of chatter about a potential recession. Almost no one is calling things “stable.”

    And that’s the case despite relatively good feelings about the job market and job security. 

    It’s not just whether one has a job, but what your wages can buy you. Most of those working say their pay is not keeping pace with rising prices. 

    (The fact that most report paying higher electric bills and being forced indoors because of the heat waves may not be helping the mood either.) 

    And even if the rate of inflation is slowing, those price hikes have clearly left their mark. 

    Prices are the No. 1 reason people give when asked why they call the economy bad and the top reason given when they describe their personal financial situation as bad. 

    Interest rates, they report, are also a net-negative on their collective finances. Most, particularly younger people, report it’s harder to buy a home than for past generations. 

    It all adds up to most feeling they’re staying in place financially but not getting ahead, and many feeling that they’re falling behind and concerned about affording things now and retirement in the longer term. 

    As is often the case in these kinds of economic evaluations, what people see at the cashier, or on their bills on the kitchen table, has outsized impact over more abstract economic reports.

    getting-ahead-falling-behind.png

    income-keeping-up-inflation.png

    describe-economy.png

    Here’s that comparison: Americans rate the job market stronger than the overall economy.

    economy-vs-job-market.png

    But many still think the prices they pay are going up. That may comport with macro data saying inflation is slowing, but price increases are still felt by consumers.

    prices-going-up.png

    economy-rating-trend.png

    The politics

    There’s plenty of skepticism about help from political leaders on either side of the aisle. It isn’t good news for the president.

    Most tie both the U.S. economy and their own personal finances (whether bad or good) at least in part to President Biden’s policies — an important measure of both macro and micro connection — and also to that very immediate measure of prices.

    biden-policies-economy-finances.png

    Most don’t think the Biden administration is lowering inflation — another key metric to watch in coming months — and even fewer think congressional Republicans are taking actions that do so, with many not sure what they’ve done. As they campaigned to win the House majority last year, most voters expected them to prioritize dealing with inflation.

    (For that matter, just a quarter think the Federal Reserve’s actions have lowered inflation, though many aren’t sure what it has done.)

    inflation-biden-admin-actions.png

    inflation-cong-reps-actions.png

    inflation-fed-reserve-actions.png

    The race to define “Bidenomics”

    This also shows the challenge President Biden faces in his latest push to get the public to reconsider not just how they think of the economy, which few describe as “rebounding,” but also the meaning of the phrase his   administration has coined, “Bidenomics.” 

    It is not, as of yet, a widely known term by any means.

    The people who say they have heard something of the term skew Republican right now. So, to many of them, it looks more pejorative. Half say they equate it with “higher inflation” and even “tax increases,” by far the top two items chosen. That said, most independents also mention those two items first.

    Democrats are more positive — if they’ve heard of it — so the president at least has some building blocks with his base. Majorities of them say it means “job creation,” “investment in infrastructure,” “help for the poor” and “the middle class” to them.

    bidenomics-familiarity.png

    bidenomics-description.png

    But this economic mood keeps weighing on the president’s overall numbers. His handling of the economy is as low as it’s been, along with his overall approval rating too, which has been hovering in the low-40s range for more than a year, now down to 40%.

    biden-approval-trend.png

    biden-approval-on-economy-trend.png

    The heat

    And yes, most Americans are hot and report feeling unusually high temperatures in all regions of the country, as much of the U.S. sets heat records. They’re coping by staying inside more, keeping their kids inside and economically, one impact they report is having to pay higher electric bills.

    high-temperatures.png

    changes-due-to-high-temperatures.png

    This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,181 U.S. adult residents interviewed between July 26-28, 2023. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as past vote. The margin of error is ±3.2 points.

    Toplines:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing

    Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing

    [ad_1]

    Congress plans next steps after UFO hearing – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Is there life beyond our little blue planet? And how much does the government know about it? Those were the questions a House Oversight Subcommittee attempted to answer Wednesday as they heard testimony from a former Air Force intelligence officer and two Navy veterans. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane reported on what came from the hearing on Capitol Hill.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UFO hearing key takeaways: What a whistleblower told Congress about UAP

    UFO hearing key takeaways: What a whistleblower told Congress about UAP

    [ad_1]

    Washington — A former military intelligence officer-turned-whistleblower told House lawmakers that Congress is being kept in the dark about unidentified anomalous phenomena, known as UAP or UFOs, alleging at a hearing that executive branch agencies have withheld information about the mysterious objects for years.

    David Grusch, who served for 14 years as an intelligence officer in the Air Force and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, appeared before the House Oversight Committee’s national security subcommittee alongside two former fighter pilots who had firsthand experience with UAP.

    Grusch served as a representative on two Pentagon task forces investigating UAP until earlier this year. He told lawmakers that he was informed of “a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program” during the course of his work examining classified programs. He said he was denied access to those programs when he requested it, and accused the military of misappropriating funds to shield these operations from congressional oversight. He later said he had interviewed officials who had direct knowledge of aircraft with “nonhuman” origins.

    Members of both parties questioned how Congress should go about investigating the remarkable allegations, a reflection of the increasing willingness by lawmakers to demand the executive branch be more forthcoming about the phenomena.

    “We’re going to uncover the cover-up, and I hope this is just the beginning of many more hearings and many more people coming forward about this,” said Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Grusch’s claims, but the department has denied his assertions in the past.

    The UAP issue has gained widespread attention from Congress and the public in recent years with the release of several video recordings of the encounters, which typically show seemingly nondescript objects moving through the air at very high speeds with no apparent method of propulsion.

    The Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which Congress established last year to investigate the incidents, has investigated roughly 800 reports of UAP as of May. While military officials have said most cases have innocuous origins, many others remain unexplained. Lawmakers say the military knows more about the objects than it has disclosed to Congress.

    What the witnesses said at the UAP/UFO hearing

    From left to right, Ryan Graves, David Grusch and David Fravor are sworn in to testify during a House subcommittee hearing on UAP on Capitol Hill on July 26, 2023.
    From left to right, Ryan Graves, David Grusch and David Fravor are sworn in to testify during a House subcommittee hearing on UAP on Capitol Hill on July 26, 2023.

    BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images


    In addition to Grusch, the panel heard testimony from Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot who has spoken out about encountering UAP on training missions, and David Fravor, who shot the now-famous “Tic Tac” video of a large object during a flight off the coast of California in 2004. 

    All three witnesses said current reporting systems are inadequate to investigate UAP encounters, and said a stigma still exists for pilots and officials who press for more transparency about their experiences.

    Graves was an F-18 pilot stationed in Virginia Beach in 2014 when his squadron first began detecting unknown objects. He described them as “dark grey or black cubes … inside of a clear sphere, where the apex or tips of the cubes were touching the inside of that sphere.” 

    He said a fellow pilot told him about one incident about 10 miles off the coast, in which an object between 5 and 15 feet in diameter flew between two F-18s and came within 50 feet of the aircraft. He said there was no acknowledgement of the incident or way to report the encounter at the time. 

    UAP encounters, he said, were “not rare or isolated.”

    “If everyone could see the sensor and video data I witnessed, our national conversation would change,” Graves said. “I urge us to put aside stigma and address the security and safety issue this topic represents. If UAP are foreign drones, it is an urgent national security problem. If it is something else, it is an issue for science. In either case, unidentified objects are a concern for flight safety. The American people deserve to know what is happening in our skies. It is long overdue.”

    Grusch served as the National Reconnaissance Office’s representative to the AARO and its predecessor task force. While he said he couldn’t answer many questions about what he knew about classified programs in Wednesday’s open hearing, he said he was “hopeful that my actions will ultimately lead to a positive outcome of increased transparency.”

    Fravor recounted his 2004 encounter with an object off the California coast. He told the subcommittee that the smooth, seamless oval-shaped object was spotted hovering over the water before rapidly climbing about 12,000 feet in the air. It then accelerated and disappeared. It was detected roughly 60 miles away less than a minute later.

    “I think what we experienced was, like I said, well beyond the material science and the capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently or that we’re going to have in the next 10 to 20 years,” Fravor said.

    screen-shot-2020-04-27-at-10-13-16-am.png
    An unidentified object seen in footage captured by the Navy in 2004.

    Department of Defense


    Congress pushes for UAP/UFO transparency

    Wednesday’s hearing took place amid a growing willingness by lawmakers to demand the military and intelligence agencies release more about what they know regarding the mysterious incidents, with many members of Congress citing the potential national security threat posed by unknown objects in or near U.S. airspace. 

    A bipartisan group of senators led by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment to the annual defense spending bill currently making its way through Congress. The measure, modeled off legislation aimed at revealing government records about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, would require executive branch agencies to hand over UAP records to a review board with “the presumption of immediate disclosure.” Agencies would have to justify requests to keep records classified.

    A different House panel heard testimony from Pentagon officials at the first open hearing about the issue in more than 50 years last summer. 

    At Wednesday’s hearing, lawmakers of both parties expressed anger about their inability to get information about UAP from the military and intelligence agencies, describing a system of overclassification that shields reports of incident from public view. 

    “We should have disclosure today. We should have disclosure tomorrow. The time has come,” said Democratic Rep. Jared Moskowitz of Florida.

    “Several of us are going to look forward to getting some answers in a more confidential setting. I assume some legislation will come out of this,” said GOP Rep. Glenn Grothman, the subcommittee’s chairman.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP lawmakers, presidential candidates react to Trump’s arraignment

    GOP lawmakers, presidential candidates react to Trump’s arraignment

    [ad_1]

    GOP lawmakers, presidential candidates react to Trump’s arraignment – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Capitol Hill is reacting to former President Donald Trump’s federal arraignment in Miami on Tuesday. CBS News’ Robert Costa and Scott MacFarlane join with the latest from Republicans in Congress and on the campaign trail.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debt ceiling deal faces bipartisan opposition

    Debt ceiling deal faces bipartisan opposition

    [ad_1]

    Debt ceiling deal faces bipartisan opposition – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Congress is gearing up to vote on a bill that would prevent the U.S. government from defaulting on its debt. Both sides made concessions which they are downplaying as they try and sell the deal to their respective parties. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden hopes for “evidence” of possible debt ceiling deal by Friday’s end

    Biden hopes for “evidence” of possible debt ceiling deal by Friday’s end

    [ad_1]

    Debt limit deal near, sources say


    Debt limit negotiators appear to be closing in on deal, sources say

    06:42

    President Biden told reporters Friday he hopes they will have evidence by the end of the night of a debt ceiling deal between White House negotiators and House Republicans. 

    “With regard to the debt limit, things are looking good,” the president told reporters on the White House South Lawn. “I’m very optimistic. I hope we’ll have some clearer evidence tonight before the clock strikes 12 that we have a deal. But it’s very close, and I’m optimistic.”

    Asked to repeat himself over the roar of Marine One, the president said he’s “hopeful we’ll know by tonight whether we’re going to be able to have a deal.” 

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s negotiating team, and the White House’s negotiating team, have been meeting virtually and in person for days, trying to hammer out disagreements between the parties. 

    Shortly before the president spoke, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen shifted the estimated “X” date — which marks when the U.S. will begin to be unable to pay its bills — to June 5. 

    “The secretary’s letters to Congress since January have estimated that Treasury would have insufficient resources to satisfy the government’s obligations in early June and, with the benefit of additional data on outlays and receipts, the Treasury Department is now able to make a more specific estimate of June 5,” Lael Brainard, director of the National Economic Council, said in a statement Friday evening. “Negotiators have made progress toward a reasonable, bipartisan budget agreement in recent days, and the secretary’s letter underscores the urgent need for Congress to act swiftly to prevent default.”

    The risk of default continues even in the event of a deal, with time running short. Many congressional members are out of town for the Memorial Day holiday, and it will take time to pass legislation through both chambers. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Impasse continues in negotiations over debt ceiling crisis

    Impasse continues in negotiations over debt ceiling crisis

    [ad_1]

    Washington — There appeared to be no significant progress Saturday in debt ceiling talks as the impasse between the White House and Republican congressional leaders continued. 

    Negotiations between representatives for the White House and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy had resumed briefly Friday evening after stalling earlier in the day, but the two sides left the Capitol without a deal.

    McCarthy tweeted Saturday that the “White House is moving backward in negotiations.”     

    In a statement Saturday evening, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre alleged that McCarthy’s team had submitted a deal Friday which “was a big step back and contained a set of extreme partisan demands that could never pass both Houses of Congress.”

    Following a short meeting Friday night, which lasted less than an hour and ended a little after 7:30 p.m., local time — this after the two sides had alleged earlier Friday that talks had completely stalled — the groups departed without an agreement, but were expected to keep the lines of communication open, CBS News learned. 

    Republican Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana told reporters as he was leaving Friday night’s meeting that the two sides had a “candid discussion,” while GOP Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina responded “no” when asked if he thought a deal would be reached over the weekend.

    White House negotiator Steve Ricchetti told reporters, however, that “we’re going to keep working tonight.”

    Debt Limit
    Steve Ricchetti, counselor to President Joe Biden, shuts the door to a meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s emissaries during negotiations over the debt limit crisis at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, May 19, 2023.

    J. Scott Applewhite / AP


    Earlier Friday, when talks first broke down, Graves — McCarthy’s lead negotiator — accused the White House of being “unreasonable.”

    Leaving that earlier meeting, Graves said “we’re not there.” Graves said the decision was made to take a pause “because it’s just not productive” and “they’re just unreasonable.”

    “The House passed a strong bill that had great savings in it, and it’s responsible, and it puts us on a path to bend the curve. And until people are willing to have reasonable conversations about how you can actually move forward and do the right thing, then we’re not going to sit here and talk to ourselves. So that’s what’s going on,” he said. Graves said he didn’t know when the group might reconvene.

    Exactly what is holding up negotiators wasn’t immediately clear, but the two sides have competing demands and priorities on spending that have left them far apart. 

    A GOP aide believes one of the sticking points could be spending caps, while a Democratic aide was encouraged that the White House appeared to be holding its ground and isn’t “giving away the farm.” The Democratic aide also reiterated that any deal has to be bipartisan in nature. 

    CBS News also learned that Republican negotiators are calling for cutting overall spending while still implementing increases to defense spending, a move which White House officials fear could lead to greater cuts to non-defense discretionary spending, which includes areas such as health care and education.     

    Further complicating matters is the fact that President Biden is in Japan for a meeting of G7 leaders. He was expected to cut his Asia-Pacific trip short and return to Washington Sunday to address the issue. 

    Biden told reporters Saturday from Japan that he was optimistic a deal could be reached.

    “I still believe we’ll be able to avoid a default and we’ll get something decent done,” Biden said.  

    At the Capitol on Friday afternoon, prior to the second meeting, McCarthy said Republicans need “movement by the White House.”

    “We don’t have any movement yet, so yeah, we’ve got to pause,” the speaker said.

    The White House acknowledged that there are “real differences between the parties on budget issues” and said “talks will be difficult,” while adding that “[t]he president’s team is working hard towards a reasonable bipartisan solution that can pass the House and the Senate.”

    The apparent setback came after McCarthy and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday both struck optimistic tones about how talks were proceeding. The speaker said he could “see the path that we can come to an agreement,” and Schumer said negotiators were “making progress.”

    Asked about those comments Friday, McCarthy said he “really felt we were at the location where I could see the path” but “we can’t be spending more money next year, we have to spend less than we spent the year before. It’s pretty easy.”

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said the U.S. could be unable to pay its bills and might default on its debt as soon as June 1.

    “[W]e still estimate that Treasury will likely no longer be able to satisfy all of the government’s obligations if Congress has not acted to raise or suspend the debt limit by early June, and potentially as early as June 1,” Yellen wrote earlier this week.

    Republicans are aiming to slash spending and add work requirements for entitlements, among other things, while Democrats had initially hoped for a “clean” debt limit increase.

    — Ed O’Keefe, Zachary Hudak and Nancy Cordes contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debt ceiling negotiators leave Capitol without deal: “We’re going to keep working”

    Debt ceiling negotiators leave Capitol without deal: “We’re going to keep working”

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Negotiations between representatives for the White House and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy over raising the debt ceiling resumed briefly Friday evening after stalling earlier in the day, but the two sides left the Capitol without a deal.

    Following the short meeting Friday night, which lasted less than an hour and ended a little after 7:30 p.m., local time — this after the two sides had alleged earlier Friday that talks had completely stalled — the groups departed without an agreement, but were expected to keep the lines of communication open, CBS News learned. 

    Republican Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana told reporters as he was leaving Friday night’s meeting that the two sides had a “candid discussion,” while GOP Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina responded “no” when asked if he thought a deal would be reached over the weekend.

    White House negotiator Steve Ricchetti told reporters, however, that “we’re going to keep working tonight.”

    Prior to the meeting, McCarthy told Fox Business that “we’ll be back in the room tonight,” adding that the situation was “very frustrating if they want to come into the room and think we’re going to spend more money next year than … we did this year.”

    “That’s not right,” he said. “And that’s not going to happen.”

    Debt Limit
    Steve Ricchetti, counselor to President Joe Biden, shuts the door to a meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s emissaries during negotiations over the debt limit crisis at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, May 19, 2023.

    J. Scott Applewhite / AP


    When talks broke down earlier Friday, Graves — McCarthy’s lead negotiator — accused the White House of being “unreasonable.”

    Leaving that earlier meeting, Graves said “we’re not there.” Graves said the decision was made to take a pause “because it’s just not productive” and “they’re just unreasonable.”

    “The House passed a strong bill that had great savings in it, and it’s responsible, and it puts us on a path to bend the curve. And until people are willing to have reasonable conversations about how you can actually move forward and do the right thing, then we’re not going to sit here and talk to ourselves. So that’s what’s going on,” he said. Graves said he didn’t know when the group might reconvene.

    Exactly what is holding up negotiators wasn’t immediately clear, but the two sides have competing demands and priorities on spending that have left them far apart. 

    A GOP aide believes one of the sticking points could be spending caps, while a Democratic aide was encouraged that the White House appeared to be holding its ground and isn’t “giving away the farm.” The Democratic aide also reiterated that any deal has to be bipartisan in nature. 

    Further complicating matters is the fact that President Biden is in Japan for a meeting of G7 leaders.

    At the Capitol on Friday afternoon, McCarthy said Republicans need “movement by the White House.”

    “We don’t have any movement yet, so yeah, we’ve got to pause,” the speaker said.

    The White House acknowledged that there are “real differences between the parties on budget issues” and said “talks will be difficult,” while adding that “[t]he president’s team is working hard towards a reasonable bipartisan solution that can pass the House and the Senate.”

    The apparent setback came one day after McCarthy and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer both struck optimistic tones about how talks were proceeding. The speaker said he could “see the path that we can come to an agreement,” and Schumer said negotiators were “making progress.”

    Asked about those comments Friday, McCarthy said he “really felt we were at the location where I could see the path” but “we can’t be spending more money next year, we have to spend less than we spent the year before. It’s pretty easy.”

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said the U.S. could be unable to pay its bills and might default on its debt as soon as June 1.

    “[W]e still estimate that Treasury will likely no longer be able to satisfy all of the government’s obligations if Congress has not acted to raise or suspend the debt limit by early June, and potentially as early as June 1,” Yellen wrote earlier this week.

    Republicans are aiming to slash spending and add work requirements for entitlements, among other things, while Democrats had initially hoped for a “clean” debt limit increase.

    — Ed O’Keefe, Zachary Hudak and Nancy Cordes contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Congressman speaks out after staffers assaulted by man with baseball bat

    Congressman speaks out after staffers assaulted by man with baseball bat

    [ad_1]

    Congressman speaks out after staffers assaulted by man with baseball bat – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Police in Virginia arrested a man who allegedly assaulted two of Rep. Gerry Connolly’s staffers with a metal baseball bat. The Democratic representative spoke with CBS News’ Nikole Killian about the attack.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden, McCarthy postpone debt limit meeting to next week

    Biden, McCarthy postpone debt limit meeting to next week

    [ad_1]

    Biden, McCarthy postpone debt limit meeting to next week – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    President Biden and top Republicans are postponing a planned White House meeting on the debt ceiling. CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane joins with the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Small businesses raise alarm over default amid debt limit fight

    Small businesses raise alarm over default amid debt limit fight

    [ad_1]

    Gloria Larkin is frustrated. She’s worried Congress is about to hurt small business owners like her and her clients if they cannot reach a deal over the debt limit

    “This issue of default with a subsequent recession would drastically have a negative impact on our business personally because it would cause our clients, our customers, to condense their spending,” Larkin said. Her company TargetGov helps businesses pursue federal contracts across the country – everything from construction opportunities to cybersecurity, even work cleaning office buildings.

    Larkin, like many of the nation’s small business owners, is concerned over a looming threat of the government being unable to pay its bills. If the United States defaults on its debt for the first time, economists warn it would cause financial and economic turmoil affectig just about every aspect of the economy. 

    “We’re just rebounding from COVID, et cetera, that so many small businesses didn’t even survive,” Larkin said. “Now those of us who are hanging on by a thread, Congress wants us to now put up with their theatrics in threatening something they don’t even need to. Oh my gosh, it’s just political theaterics that they’re creating anxiety at a small business level that is extraordinarily damaging to our small business psyche.” 

    Sixty-five percent of small business owners say they will be negatively affected if Congress fails to raise the debt limit, according to a new survey by Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Business Voices. Ninety percent of small business owners believe it’s important for the government to avoid default on the nation’s debt. 

    Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen informed congressional leaders in a letter Monday that the U.S. might not be able to pay its bills as soon as June 1 and urged lawmakers to raise or suspend the debt limit as soon as possible. Doing so is not about future spending, but paying for the debt already incurred. Yellen said even waiting until the last minute could hurt business and consumer confidence, raise short-term borrowing costs for taxpayers, and negatively impact the U.S. credit rating.

    “These survey results make clear that a default would have very negative ramifications for small business owners,” said Joe Wall of Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Voices. “Over the coming weeks, America’s small business owners will be looking to Washington for certainty and a sound resolution to the nation’s credit crunch.”

    Among small business owners surveyed, 53% said it is “absolutely essential” the federal government not default on its payments. Another 30% said it’s “very important.” 7% said it’s somewhat important, and 2% said it’s not important. 

    But Congress appears no closer to reaching a deal than it did in January when Yellen first urged action. House Republicans passed a bill that includes dramatic spending cuts that are dead on arrival in the Senate. The Biden Administration has maintained it would like Congress to pass a clean debt limit bill and spending can be addressed separately. 

    While 90% of small business owners believe it’s important for the government to avoid default – 81% of those surveyed said it is important for Congress to enact spending cuts in conjunction with raising the debt ceiling. That includes 40% who said it’s “absolutely essential” and 29% who said it’s “very important.”

    President Biden has invited congressional leaders to the White House on May 9 for a meeting to discuss the debt limit. 

    But if a deal is not reached by the so-called “X-date,” more than just small businesses would feel the impact. A default on the debt could impact when Social Security checks, military pay, veteran benefits and more go out to millions of Americans. It would roil the financial markets, analysts have warned, and lead to higher borrowing costs for businesses, governments and everyday Americans. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Authorities in China question staff at U.S. consulting firm Bain & Company in Shanghai

    Authorities in China question staff at U.S. consulting firm Bain & Company in Shanghai

    [ad_1]

    Chinese authorities have questioned staff at Bain & Company’s Shanghai office, the U.S. consultancy giant said Thursday.

    “We can confirm that the Chinese authorities have questioned staff in our Shanghai office. We are cooperating as appropriate with the Chinese authorities. At this time, we have no further comment,” the company told CBS News in an emailed statement.

    The Financial Times, which first reported the news Wednesday, said that according to multiple sources, police made a surprise visit to the office two weeks ago. Phones and computers were taken away, but no one was detained, the newspaper said.

    Fog covering Shanghai, China at sunrise.
    A file photo shows the skyline of Shanghai, China, blanketed in thick fog as the sun rises.

    Getty/iStockphoto


    The news will likely fuel concern among U.S. companies operating in China that Beijing might take retaliatory action against them for Washington’s moves against Chinese firms.

    Last month, U.S. due diligence firm Mintz Group said Chinese police had arrested five of its local employees and shut down its Beijing office. Chinese authorities later said the company was being investigated for “illegal” activities. A few days later, China’s top cybersecurity regulator said it was investigating leading U.S. computer chip maker Micron Technology and would review its products over “national security concerns.”


    China sets 5% GDP growth target for 2023, plans to increase military spending

    03:45

    Tensions have escalated in recent months between Washington and Beijing. In February, the U.S. shot down an alleged Chinese spy balloon. Beijing insisted the object was a benign weather monitoring device.

    In March, the chief executive of social media giant TikTok, Shou Zi Chew, was grilled by U.S. lawmakers about the app’s data security and privacy practices amid concern in the U.S. that the company could share data with Chinese authorities. TikTok has insisted that it operates independently from China’s government, but there is a growing belief in Washington that the platform represents a national security threat.

    Just last week, meanwhile, FBI agents arrested two people who have been accused of operating an illegal Chinese police station in New York City. The U.S. Justice Department has called the operation a bid to influence and intimidate dissidents critical of the Chinese government in the U.S.

    As U.S.-China relations have soured, U.S. businesses operating in the country believe they have already suffered from the fallout.

    “There certainly is a chill in the air,” Michael Hart, who heads the American Chamber of Commerce in Beijing, told CBS News in March. “Companies feel like they’re squeezed out of certain industries, and so there is a question mark that many U.S. companies have about, you know, are we really welcome?”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump attorneys reveal new details about recovered documents and say Justice Dept. should

    Trump attorneys reveal new details about recovered documents and say Justice Dept. should

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Lawyers for former President Donald Trump sent a letter to Congress on Wednesday urging the Justice Department to “stand down” in its investigation into the former president’s handling of sensitive records after he left the White House, according to a copy of the letter reviewed by CBS News.  

    The correspondence — from attorneys Timothy Parlatorre, Jim Trusty, John Rowley and Linsdey Halligan — offers a possible preview of the Trump team’s defense of the former president as he faces the possibility of criminal prosecution by special counsel Jack Smith after documents with classified markings from Trump’s time in office were recovered at his Florida residence. 

    The letter portrays a hasty transition from the White House after the 2020 election amid Trump’s unproven claims of election fraud in which “White House staff simply swept all documents from the President’s desk and other areas into boxes” that were then transported to Florida. 

    According to the letter, earlier this year Parlatore and Trusty were given access to the initial 15 boxes of records and documents sent from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort to the National Archives in January 2022. Archived officials ultimately uncovered documents with classified markings, prompting a referral to the Justice Department. 

    The lawyers’ search of those boxes revealed briefings for phone calls with foreign leaders were likely interspersed with “newspapers, magazines, notes, letters, and daily schedules,” the letter said. Staff from the National Archives had replaced the potentially classified records with placeholder inserts that described their contents. The specific contents of the 15 boxes, including the potential notes from calls with foreign leaders, had not been previously reported before the letter was sent to Congress. 

    News of the letter was first reported by CNN

    But the letter neither addresses why the attorneys were given access to the records or why the Trump legal team was able to look through the 33 boxes of additional records taken from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI after the execution of a search warrant last August. That court-authorized search yielded an additional 103 documents with classified markings, according to the Justice Department. 

    The attorneys lay the blame for the transfer of the classified documents not on their client, but on “inconsistent” White House practices for handling sensitive records. They accuse federal investigators of going outside the norms by shutting down what they describe were cooperative talks in order to put Trump on the defensive. 

    “Any doubts that the presence of marked documents in the boxes was the result of White House institutional processes, rather than intentional decisions by President Trump, should have been dispelled by the recent discovery of marked documents at the residences of President Biden and Vice President Pence,” the letter argues, pointing to recent discoveries that both President Joe Biden and former Vice President Mike Pence notified the Justice Department that they, too, had uncovered documents with classified markings from their tenures as vice president. 

    “All indications are that the presence of marked documents at Mar-a-Lago was the result of haphazard records keeping and packing by White House staff and GSA,” the lawyers wrote,  “President Trump has directed us to immediately notify DOJ of the discovery of marked documents at Mar-a-Largo and we have faithfully done so.”

    The lawyers point out that they are not making any representations as to whether the documents with classified markings were in fact classified and allege the Justice Department has not given them any update on their status. Trump has previously argued he declassified the documents, though he has never offered any proof of doing so. 

    A spokesman for the special counsel’s office declined to comment. 

    The attorneys’ letter to Congress excludes certain details from the federal probe into Trump’s handling of potentially sensitive records, including that the Justice Department said it is investigating the potential obstruction of federal investigators as they attempted to recover the potentially classified documents.

    Last year, a source familiar with the matter told CBS News that federal investigators questioned a Mar-a-Lago aide who said he moved boxes of documents at the behest of the former president. Investigators subpoenaed security camera footage in Mar-a-Lago, which contributed to their concern that the investigation was being obstructed.

    And last month, Trump’s attorney, Evan Corcoran, was compelled to answer questions about communications with his client after an appeals court enforced a Justice Department subpoena for his testimony. 

    Corcoran no longer represents Trump in the documents matter, sources tell CBS News, and he is not listed on the letter sent to Congress on Wednesday. But he is still representing the former president in special counsel Jack Smith’s probe into the events surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack and efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. 

    Trump’s attorneys accused Justice Department officials of being “misguided” and “eager to criminalize this document dispute with NARA,” later alleging that the Biden and Pence documents cases — which so far do not seem to include concerns of obstruction after the two ment acted cooperatively — were handled differently.  

    The former president’s legal team conducted subsequent searches at Trump properties, according to the letter, and sources familiar with the matter told CBS News a small number of additional documents with classified markings were recovered. 

    The attorneys criticized the Justice Department and special counsel’s work on the document case as “antithetical to the principles of a fair and impartial search for the truth” and urged Congress to instead try to come up with effective procedures for handling classified documents in the White House. 

    “The stakeholders to these matters should set aside political differences and work together to remediate this issue and help to enhance our national security in the process,” they wrote. 

    It would be unusual for lawmakers to attempt to influence a federal investigation, but the letter sent on Wednesday did offer House Republicans further material for their efforts to discredit the Trump probes as political. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawmakers give conflicting accounts of how Jan. 6 defendants being treated in jail after touring facility

    Lawmakers give conflicting accounts of how Jan. 6 defendants being treated in jail after touring facility

    [ad_1]

    Congressional Integrity Project Video Truck Circles DC Jail
    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) (L) talks to the media as the Congressional Integrity Project video truck showing 12 minutes of footage from the Jan. 6 insurrection drives around the DC Department of Corrections on Mar. 24, 2023 in Washington, DC. 

    Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for Congressional Integrity Project


    A congressional tour of the Jan. 6th defendants’ wing of the Washington, D.C. jail ended with contradictory accounts of how the accused Capitol rioters are being treated behind bars.

    In a post-tour news conference disrupted by protesters, hecklers and some physical confrontations among those in the audience, Republican House members claimed the Jan. 6 defendants are being deprived of due process, some medical care and services afforded to other jail inmates. 

    But Democratic House members who joined the tour argued the Jan. 6 defendants are receiving uniquely favorable conditions — with access to entertainment equipment, freedom of movement and 24-hour medical care access.

    The two-hour Friday afternoon tour for the bipartisan group of House members included a lengthy visit with some of the Jan. 6 defendants who are being held in pretrial detention in the D.C. jail. The House Republicans who joined the tour, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, said the defendants have been held for unacceptably long durations awaiting trial.  

    “They’re entitled to a quick and speedy trial,” Greene said. “That’s not happening here.”   

    She claimed the defendants lack access to some of the education programs and sports television viewing offered to other D.C. inmates.

    Rep. Byron Donalds, Republican of Florida, said the lengthy pretrial detention terms are a violation of “constitutional rights and constitutional principles.”

    But Democratic Reps. Jasmine Crockett, of Texas, and Robert Garcia, of California, slammed the Republicans’ criticism. Crockett contended that the Jan. 6 defendants were the recipients of “privilege,” including freedom to move and individual jail cells, as opposed to shared cells. 

    Crockett said, “Jan. 6 (defendants) had more access to technology (than other defendants).” Crockett, who was an attorney before she was elected to Congress, told reporters, “They have access to laptops and tablets. It’s unlike anything I’ve ever seen.”

    She also said the Jan. 6 defendants had access to yoga classes, were able to send text messages to family and could enroll in programs to earn their GEDs while in jail.

    There were contradictory allegations about the medical care received by Jan. 6 defendants inside the jail. 

    But Greene argued that the inmates are not receiving full or proper care, including one accused rioter who is a cancer patient.  

    However, Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia disputed that notion and said the Jan. 6 defendants had access to “24-hour medical care” and a “very professional” staff.  

    Republicans on the jail tour “were treating some of these folks like they’re celebrities,” Garcia told reporters. “That’s quite shameful in my opinion,” adding, “we were in an open room with people that attacked our country.”

    In the two years since the Jan. 6 attack, the number of defendants in the D.C. jail has generally ranged from 20-40.

    In a statement Friday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said the current inmates include “17 who are charged with violently assaulting federal officers and nine of them already convicted of that crime or other equally serious offenses.”

    Relatives of some of the Jan. 6 defendants hold a nighty protest outside the jail, which has been led by the mother of Ashli Babbitt. Babbitt was shot and killed while breaching a door into the House Speaker’s Lobby on Jan. 6, 2021, as members of Congress were trying to evacuate and get away from the mob. The protests have been taking place nightly since Aug. 1, 2022. Another organizer, Nicole Reffitt, of Texas, estimates 5,000-8,000 people watch a live stream of video feeds of the protest.

    During the news conference Friday by House Republicans, hecklers and demonstrators shouted and used a whistling device to drown out the audio of the lawmakers. Another protester deployed a large video screen displaying images of some of the most violent moments of the Capitol attack within sight of the news conference. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Secret Service has declaration of Brazilian ATM thief who reportedly says George Santos

    Secret Service has declaration of Brazilian ATM thief who reportedly says George Santos

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. Secret Service has received and is reviewing a sworn declaration from a Brazilian man who claims Rep. George Santos was “in charge of” a fraud scheme that led to the man’s arrest in 2017 for installing skimmers at a Seattle bank ATM, a person familiar with the matter confirmed to CBS News.

    Santos was interviewed in 2017 by Secret Service investigators, and the probe remains open, according to two sources.

    The declaration is a “significant” development, A.T. Smith, a former deputy director of the Secret Service said. 

    “Could this jumpstart a new inquiry? Yes,” said Smith, now a law enforcement analyst for CBS News. “Probably what the service would want to do, they would probably need to interview that individual again personally and take a sworn statement themselves.”

    The declaration was obtained and published by Politico. In the document, Gustavo Ribeiro Trelha claimed Santos taught him how to use skimmers — which steal personal information from cards inserted into ATM machines —  when they were roommates near Orlando, Florida. 

    “I am coming forward today to declare that the person in charge of the crime of credit card fraud when I was arrested was George Santos / Anthony Devolder,” Trelha wrote in the declaration, referring to a name Santos used in the past. The declaration was sent by an attorney for Trelha to the Secret Service, a U.S. attorney’s office and the FBI.

    Trelha was arrested at Seattle’s Pike Place Market in 2017 and later that year entered a guilty plea to one federal count of felony access device fraud and was deported to his native Brazil. The night of his arrest, investigators recovered an empty FedEx package bearing the address of Santos’ Florida apartment from Trelha’s rental car, leading investigators separately from two agencies, the Seattle Police Department and the Secret Service, to Santos. The Secret Service is the federal agency charged with investigating credit and bank card fraud.

    Santos was questioned by phone by a Seattle detective, according to a law enforcement source, and later tracked down in New York City by Secret Service agents, turning over two cellphones during an interview there according to the two sources familiar with the federal investigation.

    Santos was neither charged nor named a suspect in the investigation. Santos has declined to discuss the case. An attorney for Santos did not reply when asked about Trelha’s declaration.

    At a bail hearing for Trelha in May 2017, Santos traveled to Washington State and appeared on Trelha’s behalf. Santos described himself as a family friend, and claimed to the judge that he was an aspiring politician who worked for the investment firm Goldman Sachs. After being elected to Congress years later, he acknowledged that he never worked for the financial firm.

    But Trelha tells a different story in his declaration, saying Santos “stole” money that Trelha’s family had sent for bail, and he portrayed Santos as the brains of the operation.

    “Santos taught me how to skim card information and how to clone cards. He gave me all the materials and taught me how to put skimming devices and cameras on ATM machines,” Trelha said in the declaration.

    Trelha wrote in his declaration that he visited an Orlando warehouse where Santos “had a lot of material — parts, printers, blank ATM and credit cards to be painted and engraved with stolen account and personal information.”

    The warehouse “is a lead that should probably be run out” by investigators, Smith said, adding that if there’s a record of Santos renting storage space there, “it would add some credence to the declaration.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Freedom Caucus offers deal to raise debt ceiling

    House Freedom Caucus offers deal to raise debt ceiling

    [ad_1]

    The House Freedom Caucus launched its opening salvo in the upcoming fight over raising the nation’s debt ceiling Friday, as members of the conservative group said they would agree to raise the debt limit for the first time in their careers if several of President Biden’s legislative accomplishments are rolled back and strict limits on government spending are implemented.

    “Members of the House Freedom Caucus, who have never voted for a continual debt ceiling increases, will support a solution to responsibly address the impending debt ceiling crisis,” said Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Scott Perry, the group’s chairman, in a press conference Friday. “Simply put, the plan is to shrink Washington and grow America.”

    Many in the Freedom Caucus, which numbers over 40 members, were among the detractors who sought concessions from Rep. Kevin McCarthy before agreeing to support his election as House speaker — and others ultimately voted “present” rather than support him. The Republican majority in the House is a slim one, just 9 votes. Without the Freedom Caucus’ support, McCarthy risks a rebellion from his right flank. Perry and other members of the Freedom Caucus expressed confidence that McCarthy would not cut a deal with Democrats to raise the debt ceiling.

    The group wants to hold spending levels at 2022 fiscal-year levels for 10 more years, which it says would save $3 billion in the long term.

    In the near term, the caucus members want to pull back money already appropriated by the Democratic-led Congress during the first two years of Mr. Biden’s term, taking aim at some of his signature legislative accomplishments: blocking his $400 billion student loan forgiveness plan, which is currently making its way through the courts, pulling back unspent COVID-19 funds that haven’t yet been allocated, recouping $80 billion for the IRS to bolster its workforce and replace retiring employees and cancelling billions of dollars allocated for climate change projects through the climate, health care and tax law passed last year.

    The group also proposes policies it says will help domestic growth — by limiting the administration’s ability to write new regulations and ending other rules related to domestic energy production. The Freedom Caucus also wants to see the implementation of 1990s-era work requirements on welfare programs that passed under President Bill Clinton.

    The group unveiled its plan a day after President Biden unveiled his $6.9 trillion budget, which the White House claims would reduce the deficit by nearly $3 trillion over the next decade by raising trillions of dollars in taxes on the wealthy and corporations. House Republicans have not yet released their budget, but McCarthy has rejected the notion of a “clean” debt ceiling increase with no spending cuts. The president and speaker last met in early February to talk about spending.

    In a statement, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre called the Freedom Caucus proposal “a gut-punch to the American middle class” that wouldn’t reduce the deficit.

    “Extreme MAGA Republicans’ proposals would ship manufacturing jobs overseas, in a crushing blow to states from Ohio to Georgia to Arizona – and would provide a windfall of economic benefits to China,” she said. She went on to say that they would cut Medicare, defund police, weaken U.S. efforts to compete with China and cut border security funding — all to provide tax breaks to corporations and the wealthiest Americans.

    Perry insisted that under this plan, “the benefits under Social Security and Medicare are not going to be cut.”

    “A default on our debt would trigger an economic and financial catastrophe,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee Friday. “I urge all members of Congress to come together to address the debt limit without conditions and without waiting until the last minute.”

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates that at a date between July and September the U.S. will be unable to meet its debt obligations if Congress does not act.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats come around on TikTok ban, reflecting willingness to challenge China

    Democrats come around on TikTok ban, reflecting willingness to challenge China

    [ad_1]

    Washington — More Democrats in Congress have been vocally supportive of banning Chinese-backed TikTok in the U.S. in recent months, reflecting what experts say is an increased willingness to challenge Beijing and crack down on the massively popular video app.

    The growing number of Democrats backing a TikTok ban has coincided with rising tensions with China and renewed national security concerns about the vast trove of data TikTok collects on its millions of American users, information that officials warn could be accessed by the ruling Chinese Communist Party. (ByteDance, TikTok’s Beijing-based parent company, has said that the company protects user data and does not share information with the Chinese government.)

    The showdown over a Chinese surveillance balloon that drifted over the U.S. before being shot down off the coast of South Carolina last month only heightened calls in Congress for action against TikTok and foreign adversaries over technology that could be used to spy on Americans.

    “TikTok is a modern-day Trojan horse of the [Chinese Communist Party], used to surveil and exploit Americans’ personal information,” Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, the Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said last month. “It’s a spy balloon in your phone.” 

    In February, McCaul’s committee advanced a bill that would give President Biden the power to ban the app on all mobile devices in the U.S. and take aim at other foreign technologies. All Democrats on the House panel voted against that measure, citing concerns that it was overly broad and could be used to block tech from U.S. allies. 

    But all Democratic senators supported a bill banning TikTok from federal devices in December. A bipartisan group of senators, led by Democrat Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican John Thune of South Dakota, recently unveiled their own bill that would allow the president to crack down on foreign apps like TikTok. Ten other senators co-sponsored the bill, including five Democrats. The White House said President Biden supported the measure, the first time he has signaled a willingness to ban TikTok.

    Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday, March 7, 2023.
    Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday, March 7, 2023.

    Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    In February, Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado called on Apple and Google to immediately remove TikTok from their app stores because of national security concerns. 

    “Unlike most social media platforms, TikTok poses a unique concern because Chinese law obligates ByteDance, its Beijing-based parent company, to ‘support, assist, and cooperate with state intelligence work,’” Bennet, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote in a letter to the tech giants’ CEOs. Days after Bennet’s letter, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told ABC’s “This Week” that a TikTok ban “should be looked at.” 

    Keith Krach, a former undersecretary of state for economic growth, energy and the environment in the Trump administration, said members of both parties have long backed taking action against Chinese technology, even if Republicans have been more outspoken in the past.

    “I had a lot of closed-door sessions with Congress,” Krach said. “And honest to God, I could not tell the difference between a Democrat and a Republican when it comes to the China issue, particularly when it comes to technology.” 

    Rising tensions with China over a range of geopolitical hot-button issues — including China’s saber-rattling over Taiwan, potential support for Russia in Ukraine and the spy balloon —  “galvanized bipartisan focus on this national security issue,” said Len Khodorkovsky, a former State Department official under Trump. 

    Hannah Kelley, a research assistant at the Center for a New American Security, likewise said Democrats’ willingness to speak out in favor of taking action against TikTok reflects “a convergence in the urgency and action needed to address those concerns.” She pointed to frustrations over continuing negotiations between TikTok and the Treasury Department over steps the company could take to address national security concerns and continue operating in the U.S.

    “I think a lot of that urgency comes from sort of a valid impatience with how long the [Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States] process has taken and continues to take,” she said, referring to the federal regulator responsible for reviewing certain foreign investments in the U.S. 

    Jim Lewis, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the risk posed by TikTok has become apparent to lawmakers over the past year, and Democrats’ willingness to challenge China could be seen through the lens of the 2024 elections. 

    “Nobody wants to be cast as being soft on China, so that’s probably why you’re seeing a lot more support than you saw a few months ago,” Lewis said. 

    While support for a TikTok ban appears to be growing among many Democrats, others have said the app could avoid being cut off from the U.S. market if the company finds an American buyer.

    “The company must either divest from dangerous foreign ownership, or we will take the necessary steps to protect Americans from potential foreign spying and misinformation operations,” Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats, said in a news release with Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida announcing another bipartisan bill in February.

    Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the ranking member of the House select committee on China, has also supported a ban as long as the company “remains under [Chinese Communist Party] control.” The Illinois Democrat, along with committee Chairman Rep. Mike Gallagher, Republican of Wisconsin, introduced legislation in February targeting the app.

    But Krishnamoorthi has expressed doubts that the app would actually be banned on a national level. 

    “I don’t think it’s going to get banned,” he told “Face the Nation” in February. “All we’re saying is if TikTok is going to operate here, don’t have that user data and algorithms controlled by an adversarial regime.”

    TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is set to testify before the House Energy and Commerce Committee later this month as bipartisan pressure builds to take action against the company. A spokeswoman for the company said the public debate is “divorced from the facts” and the “significant advances” it has made in implementing safeguards

    “A U.S. ban on TikTok is a ban on the export of American culture and values to the billion-plus people who use our service worldwide,” TikTok spokeswoman Brooke Oberwetter said in a statement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “Boy Meets World” star Ben Savage is running to take Adam Schiff’s House seat

    “Boy Meets World” star Ben Savage is running to take Adam Schiff’s House seat

    [ad_1]

    Ben Savage, the actor who rose to fame as Corey Matthews on the hit ’90s ABC sitcom “Boy Meets World,” is running for Congress. 

    The actor announced his run on Instagram this week, saying, “Together, we can do better.” 

    “I am a proud Californian, union member and longtime resident of District 30 who comes from a family of unwavering service to our country and community,” Savage said in his announcement. “I firmly believe in standing up for what is right, ensuring equality and expanding opportunities for all.” 

    Savage is vying for the California seat currently held by Rep. Adam Schiff, who in January announced he is putting in his own bid for Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Senate seat in 2024. Feinstein announced in February that she will not seek reelection in 2024. 

    Savage is running as a Democrat, according to his filing with the Federal Election Commission.   

    “It’s time for new and passionate leaders who can help move our country forward,” Savage said in his announcement. “Leaders who want to see the government operating at maximum capacity, unhindered by political divisions and special interests.” 

    Savage starred in “Boy Meets World” from 1993-2000. He reprised the role in 2015 for the spinoff “Girl Meets World,” which ran for three seasons. He also starred as kidnapper Nathaniel Kibby in the 2022 Lifetime true crime movie “Girl in the Shed: The Kidnapping of Abby Hernandez.”

    The announcement seems to have garnered support from both fans and co-stars of the ABC series, with one person commenting, “Boy meets congress!” 

    Fellow “Boy Meets World” actor Matthew Lawrence, who played Jack Hunter, said, “Let’s go!!!” 

    Savage wrote on his campaign website that his priorities will include improving police-citizen interactions through more intensive training and “checks and balances to root out corruption.” He also wrote that he will fight for more affordable housing and veteran resources, protect unions, push for universal pre-k, school meals and community college, and work to secure more funding for mental health and substance abuse services. He also said it’s “important that we codify Roe v. Wade” and said that he will “oppose offshore drilling” initiatives while supporting environmental regulations. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China likely to be focus of worldwide threats in congressional hearing

    China likely to be focus of worldwide threats in congressional hearing

    [ad_1]

    The actions and intentions of the Chinese government are likely to be a central focus when top U.S. intelligence leaders testify on global security threats this week, as questions linger about Beijing’s potential plan to send lethal aid to Russia, its role in obfuscating the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and the aim of its recently discovered surveillance balloon program, which dramatically heightened tensions with the U.S.

    The annual worldwide threats hearings take place Wednesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee and Thursday before the House Intelligence Committee, and feature testimony from Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, CIA Director William Burns, FBI Director Christopher Wray, National Security Agency Director Gen. Paul Nakasone and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier. 

    The hearings offer a rare opportunity for lawmakers and the public to hear directly from intelligence leaders, whose agencies do not offer regular press briefings and whose activities and budgets are partly or mostly classified.  

    Leaders’ testimony will coincide with the release of a comprehensive yearly intelligence community report that serves as an unclassified scene-setter for national security priorities. Last year’s assessment – which was released before Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine – said “competition and potential conflict between nation-states remains a critical national security threat,” citing increasingly belligerent signals from Beijing, Moscow, Tehran and Pyongyang.  

    Sen. Angus King, independent of Maine who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a briefing for reporters Tuesday that he had read this year’s report and found it “sobering.” 

    “My recommendation is, don’t read it just before you go to sleep,” King said. 

    Among the topics expected to be raised in the hearings are the threat of nuclear proliferation, the risks of another global pandemic, current terrorism hotspots, and the increasingly destabilizing effects of climate change. Recent intelligence community reports on the possibility that COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident and the cause of a mysterious neurological affliction known as Havana Syndrome that has sickened hundreds of U.S. officials are also likely topics, as are the reauthorization of a controversial surveillance program referred to as Section 702 and the handling by government officials of classified documents.   

    “I want to hear about more than just China,” House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Jim Himes, Democrat of Connecticut, said Tuesday in a virtual event hosted by the Washington Post. “Because we’ve become so focused on China, we have probably not focused as much as we used to other threats that are ongoing out there.” 

    Still, lawmakers of both parties are expected to focus many of their questions on the increasingly tense relationship between the United States and China, which Haines last year called an “unparalleled priority” and a “formidable challenge” for the intelligence community. 

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — launched days before last year’s hearings took place, and now having entered its second year — has absorbed significant resources and attention, intelligence leaders have acknowledged. Still, they have consistently said China remains the U.S.’s top long-term geopolitical challenge. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s effective consolidation of power and the obscured visibility into his government’s decision-making processes have complicated the Biden administration’s efforts to improve its relationship with Beijing.

    “In that kind of a system, a very closed decision-making system when nobody challenges, you know, the authority of their insights of an authoritarian leader, you can make some huge blunders as well,” CIA Director Burns said in a recent interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” adding the agency was working “very hard” to gain insights into Xi’s thinking. 

    King, who last year probed leaders on the intelligence community’s ability to assess a given military’s will to fight — citing past flawed assessments of Kabul’s fall during the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and Ukrainians’ ability to hold off a Russian assault on Kyiv — said that issue would be worth revisiting amid the specter of a China-led invasion of Taiwan.

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence later said it would launch a review of the community’s ability to assess foreign militaries’ resilience. 

    “It’s an issue that isn’t going to go away. And as we’ve learned about Afghanistan and Ukraine, it’s one of the most important data points. It’s one of the hardest to quantify, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try,” King said. 

    “As we’re talking about Taiwan, I think that’s a very relevant question that we in the Congress and the president should have, before making final decisions about what level of commitment there should be,” he said. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Republicans seek more information about classified documents found in Biden’s private office

    House Republicans seek more information about classified documents found in Biden’s private office

    [ad_1]

    House Republicans are calling on the Biden administration to release more information about its handling of documents marked classified found in a private office once used by President Biden.

    The request from Republican House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer comes after the committee interviewed Gary Stern, the top lawyer for the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), in January.

    Stern told the committee that NARA had drafted a statement in response to the CBS News report on Jan. 9 that classified documents had been found at the Penn Biden Center in Washington. But that statement, Stern said, was never sent to news organizations.

    Asked by the committee to say who prevented the statement from being published, Stern declined. “According to [Justice Department] guidance, I’m not supposed to talk about the, you know, content of our communications with other parties,” he replied.

    Comer is now seeking to answer that question. His letter, sent to White House chief of staff Jeff Zients Tuesday, requests communication and documents “regarding the withholding of NARA’s statement it intended to issue on January 9, 2023.”

    The letter notes that NARA issued a statement in February 2022 after The Washington Post reported classified records had been found at former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate.

    Comer also asks whether Mr. Biden would release his personal attorneys’ communications with NARA. The president is under no obligation to do so, though NARA already has. Under the Freedom of Information Act, a limited batch of those emails was made public in February.

    Comer set a March 21 deadline for the White House to comply with his request. Tuesday’s letter follows three previous letters from the committee seeking documents and communications regarding the classified document matter.

    In early November, personal attorneys for Mr. Biden discovered around 10 documents marked classified at an office used by him between 2017 and 2019. The papers originated from Mr. Biden’s service as vice president and some were marked top secret.

    Mr. Biden’s attorneys informed White House counsel of the finding and notified the National Archives. The Archives’ inspector general then informed the Department of Justice.

    In December, more classified documents were found at Mr. Biden’s Wilmington home.

    The White House did not acknowledge that classified documents had been found at the office space until CBS News sought comment on the story in mid-January. Later that week, it acknowledged those found at the house.

    Throughout, Mr. Biden has maintained that he had no knowledge of the classified material in his possession and has been cooperating with Justice Department officials since November.

    Special counsel Robert Hur is now in charge of the case.

    [ad_2]

    Source link