[ad_1]
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The White House held a roundtable on Thursday with aviation experts to discuss the impact of the government shutdown on U.S. airports. Chris Sununu, president and CEO of Airlines for America, joins “The Takeout” to break down the discussion.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Rachel Feres lost four members of her family in the deadly plane crash near Washington, D.C., earlier this year. She said that in the aftermath of the crash, flying will never be the same for her, and the government shutdown gave her pause when she came to Capitol Hill this week to advocate for safety reforms.
“I trust that everyone who is going to work is doing their very best to keep us safe, but this is just not a functional way to govern,” she told CBS News. “We deserve better than this. We deserve that our essential systems, our transportation systems, stay open and that the folks who are responsible for keeping those safe are paid on time and that that doesn’t become a football.”
Amid efforts in Congress to reform the nation’s aviation system, Feres and other victims’ family members have been meeting with lawmakers and Jennifer Homendy, chair of the National Transportation Safety Board. Feres’ cousin Peter Livingston, his wife Donna and daughters Alydia and Everly died when an Army Black Hawk helicopter collided with an American Eagle flight over the Potomac River in January.
“Our message has been that aviation safety reform matters,” Feres said. “It matters to the American people. This is a nonpartisan issue. This is an American issue, and we all deserve to know that when we or our loved ones get on a plane, we get off again on the other side.”
Feres and other victims’ family members met with Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, chair of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and the panel’s top Democrat, Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington state.
“I have a lot of confidence in the members on both sides of the aisle who are working hard to ensure that this stays a top priority, but I think anytime, obviously, the government is shut down, we know that infrastructure projects are delayed and we know that the members of the government who are on the job, who are TSA agents and air traffic controllers, may not be getting paid, and that’s a concern for all of us.”
The NTSB’s investigation into January’s crash is ongoing.
The Black Hawk helicopter was flying without a piece of equipment turned on that allows the aircraft to be tracked. The military has a waiver that essentially exempts it from having to use the equipment.
In July, Cruz introduced legislation that would require all aircraft to use the equipment, known as Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast, or ADS-B.
A spokesperson for Cruz said in a statement to CBS News that he’s been working with the victims’ families on the bill since January.
“The Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Reform Act represents an important step forward in aviation safety reform by requiring that all aircraft, military and civilian, use both ADS-B Out and ADS-B In and seeks to hold the Army accountable for failures that may have contributed to the crash,” the spokesperson said. “He is committed to ensuring another accident does not happen again.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
[ad_1]
Washington — Much of the federal government is on the verge of shutting down if Congress does not reach a deal to approve new funding by Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025.
Republicans have proposed extending government funding at current levels until Nov. 21 to allow for members to continue working on full-year appropriations bills. Democrats made a counteroffer to keep the government open through October, but attached health care provisions and restrictions on President Trump’s ability to withhold funding, both of which are nonstarters with most Republicans.
The two sides are dug in on their positions, increasing the chances of a shutdown beginning Wednesday. Congressional leaders met with President Trump at the White House on Monday to search for a path forward, but walked away in the same position.
A government shutdown occurs when Congress fails to pass funding for some or all agencies, which can’t spend money that hasn’t been approved by lawmakers. There have been 14 shutdowns since 1980, with the most recent coming in 2018. That shutdown lasted 34 days.
Here’s what to know about what happens during a government shutdown:
AFP PHOTO/Emmanuel Dunand
Most federal government agencies are funded annually by a dozen appropriations bills that need to be passed by Congress and signed by the president before the start of the new fiscal year on Oct. 1. These are often grouped together into one large piece of legislation known as an “omnibus” bill to speed up the process when Congress inevitably needs to pass a number of them at the last minute.
If the funding deadline passes without Congress authorizing more spending, the government must fully or partially shut down, depending on which agencies are already funded. Ahead of this year’s deadline, none of the 12 appropriations bills have been enacted. Some agencies got an infusion of money in the Republican-passed “one big, beautiful bill” earlier this year, meaning certain programs and functions in some departments will remain funded in the event of a shutdown, chiefly the Defense Department and Department of Homeland Security.
Lawmakers regularly buy themselves more time to finish spending bills by passing what’s known as a continuing resolution, which temporarily extends current funding levels to keep agencies functioning while they work to reach an agreement on new spending.
The Constitution says the Treasury Department cannot spend money without a law authorizing it. Under a statute known as the Antideficiency Act, agencies are required to cease operations — with certain exceptions — in the absence of funding authorized by Congress. The act, a version of which first passed in 1870, with several significant updates since, also prohibits the government from entering into financial obligations without congressional sign-off.
“Treasury cannot pay out any money if there’s not a law providing for who gets the money,” said Matt Glassman, a senior fellow at the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University. “If those annual bills expire, then there is no law appropriating money for certain functions.”
Marie D. De Jesus/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
In a shutdown, the federal government must stop all non-essential functions until funding is approved by Congress and signed into law, except for programs that are funded by other means, like fees or other legislation. Each agency determines what work is essential and what is not. Members of Congress make that determination for their own staff, as well.
“No money can come out of Treasury whether you’re essential or not essential. But who can keep working and incur obligations, even when there are no appropriations — there are three exceptions,” Glassman said.
Those exceptions are defined by the Antideficiency Act. They allow the government to fund operations to protect life and property, and keep officials involved in the constitutional process on the job, like the president, his staff and members of Congress.
All active-duty military members, many federal law enforcement officers and employees at federally funded hospitals are considered essential, along with air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration officers. Each agency determines which of its employees can stay on the job.
In a step that differs from previous shutdowns, the Office of Budget and Management last week told federal agencies to consider permanent mass layoffs for programs or projects that have discretionary funding that runs out on Oct. 1 or that don’t have any alternative sources of funding. The reduction-in-force notices would be in addition to any furlough notices issued during a shutdown, according to a memo sent to the agencies.
“Programs that did not benefit from an infusion of mandatory appropriations will bear the brunt of a shutdown, and we must continue our planning efforts in the event Democrats decide to shut down the government,” the memo said.
Whether employees are essential or not, if their pay is dependent on annual appropriations, they won’t get paid during a shutdown.
Essential employees continue to work during the shutdown, but don’t get paid until funding is restored to their agency. Employees in nonessential positions are typically furloughed until the government is funded again, although that could look different this time if there are widespread layoffs. Under a 2019 law, furloughed employees are guaranteed to receive back pay once the shutdown is over.
A Senate report published in 2019 found that government shutdowns in 2013, 2018 and 2019 cost taxpayers nearly $4 billion, including at least $3.7 billion in back pay to furloughed workers who were not permitted to work.
Entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid continue to function during a shutdown because benefit payments are funded through permanent appropriations that don’t require renewal. Entitlement payments keep going out, but the working budgets of the agencies that oversee the programs require approval by Congress. That means staff could be furloughed, causing delays in enrolling new beneficiaries or other service interruptions.
“Any type of interaction you’re having at a customer service level with the federal government could definitely be affected,” Glassman said.
For example, travel plans could be disrupted if air traffic control and airport security, who are essential workers, do not show up to work in protest for not being paid immediately. Many national parks stayed open during the last shutdown in 2018 and 2019, but understaffing led to vandalism and cuts in visitor services. The parks largely closed during the 2013 shutdown. The U.S. Postal Service continues to operate, since it is self-funded.
Jeff Chiu / AP
Maya MacGuineas, the president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said the public may not notice the effects if the shutdown is short-lived.
“The truth is, most people won’t really feel much of a difference,” MacGuineas said. “If you’ve got a vacation planned to a National Park, you’re going to be [upset] and disappointed. But most people will go on with their everyday lives and interact with the government the same way they do and not feel a big difference. That could get worse, the longer it lasts.”
The Senate report found the 2018-2019 shutdown had widespread impacts across a variety of government functions that ceased or were curtailed during the lapse in funding. It noted that furloughs in many agencies like the SEC, Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety Commission hampered enforcement and investigations. The report said the Justice Department canceled 60,000 immigration hearings.
The effects could be even more pronounced this time around, given the possibility that the administration could use the shutdown to implement mass layoffs, furthering the president’s aim of permanently reducing the federal workforce.
The last government shutdown stretched from December 2018 until January 2019, when congressional funding for nine executive branch departments with roughly 800,000 employees lapsed.
The five-week partial shutdown cost the economy $11 billion, according to a Congressional Budget Office report. The CBO said most of that would be recovered once the shutdown ended, but estimated a permanent loss of about $3 billion.
Businesses across the country that relied on government customers reported a slowdown in business and some said they had to lay off employees. Tens of thousands of immigration court hearings were canceled. Government contractors struggled to feed their families and pay their bills.
Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
The shutdown stemmed from a standoff over Mr. Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion to fund a wall along the border with Mexico. Mr. Trump had vowed to close the government if the funding wasn’t included in spending legislation, but Democrats refused to give in.
Mr. Trump conceded after insisting for weeks that he would not reopen the government without money for the wall, signing a bill to reopen the government for three weeks while Congress negotiated a spending deal.
Three weeks later, Mr. Trump signed a compromise spending bill to avert another government shutdown, ultimately accepting a bill that did not meet his $5.7 billion demand for his long-promised border wall.
Before the early 1980s, the government would typically continue operating as usual even when funding bills hadn’t been passed, but that changed after the attorney general issued opinions stating that it was illegal for the government to spend money without congressional approval.
Since 1980, there have been 14 shutdowns, most of which lasted just a few days.
The longest shutdown in U.S. history was the 2018-2019 lapse, which lasted 34 full days. Before that, the record was 21 days in 1995 and 1996, when President Bill Clinton held out against steep spending and tax cuts favored by Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
This weekend, Missouri’s Republican governor is expected to sign a controversial new congressional map into law. It’s the latest salvo in a redistricting battle. Nikole Killion reports from Capitol Hill.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
President Donald Trump criticized U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and her native country of Somalia in the wake of a failed attempt by her colleagues to censure her in the House this week.
Four Republicans joined Democrats Wednesday to table that resolution, which would have also removed her from committees. U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina, brought it forward because of an interview Omar did in response to conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination last week and reposts she made on social media.
The four-term congresswoman, who represents Minneapolis and some close suburbs, said in a note to constituents that the measure mischaracterized her words and her views.
“I have never supported political violence, and I have always spoken out against it. Attempts to twist my words into something they are not are deeply harmful not just to me, but to our ability to have honest debates in Congress,” she said in an email about a town hall event.
Mr. Trump on Thursday said she is “terrible” and should be impeached. He also slammed Somalia, which Omar fled as a child before coming to the U.S. as a refugee. She later became an American citizen and first ran for Congress in 2018.
“How are they doing? How’s their government? Do they have a president? Do they have a council? Do they have anything? Do they have police? I love these people that come from a place with nothing. Nothing, no anything. And then they tell us how to run our country,” the president told reports aboard Air Force One. “I think if she got censured, that’s great. If she got impeached, that’s even better.”
Omar’s office declined to comment on Mr. Trump’s remarks or his posts on social media.
In one post he said, “what scum we have in our country, telling us what to do and how to do it” after criticizing Somalia as a country plagued by poverty, civil war and corruption.
Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Minnesota, who himself emigrated to the U.S. from Somalia in the early 1990s, said many Somali Minnesotans supported President Trump this past election. The president won 12% of the vote in Minneapolis, a Democratic stronghold, but nearly double that figure in some heavily East African precincts, according to an analysis by the Minnesota Star Tribune.
Trump’s remarks were a “political statement” said Hussein, but said they’ve also caused alarm. “Anytime something like this happens, we as a community are on guard, partially because we have seen political violence that took the life of Charlie Kirk, that took the life of [Rep.] Melissa Hortman, that took the life of many others, and we’re seeing those threats,” he explained. “And so that’s why we are a lot more alarmed when these things are publicly played out.”
Omar has faced threats in the past. Two years ago, a man in Florida was convicted and sentenced for sending an email threatening to kill her.
“Anything can happen, anytime. That’s why it’s important that those around President Trump should remind him that we are in a moment where we just lost a political figure like Charlie Kirk. We can’t be in this moment of continuous contention that rises to a point where individuals may kill,” Hussein said.
[ad_2]
Caroline Cummings
Source link
[ad_1]
BOSTON — A Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group is renewing its criticism of U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan for reneging on a previous pledge to support term limits for congressional lawmakers.
The group U.S. Term Limits has paid for a billboard ad along Interstate 93 in Methuen, criticizing the Westford Democrat for backing away from a proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution limiting House members to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
kAmxE’D E96 D64@?5 E:>6 E96 8C@FA 92D E2C86E65 %C292?[ H9@ H2D C66=64E65 E@ 2 7@FCE9 E6C> 😕 }@G6>36C 27E6C CF??:?8 F?@AA@D65 😕 E96 bC5 r@?8C6DD:@?2= s:DEC:4E[ H9:49 :?4=F56D bd 4@>>F?:E:6D]k^Am
kAm“%C292? A=65865 E92E D96 H@F=5 DFAA@CE E96 &]$] %6C> {:>:ED 2>6?5>6?E =:>:E:?8 4@?8C6DD:@?2= E6C>D[” rt~ }:4@=2D %@>3@F=:56D D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “*6E D96 3C@<6 96C A=6586] %96 A6@A=6 @7 |2DD249FD6EED 56D6CG6 E@ @H 9@H #6AC6D6?E2E:G6 %C292? 😀 A=2J:?8 E96 s]r] 82>6[ 2?5 E92E D96 5:5 ?@E 9@?@C 96C E6C> =:>:ED AC@>:D6]”k^Am
kAm%C292? D:8?65 E96 A=6586 😕 a_`g 3FE E96 8C@FA D2:5 D96 92D D:?46 232?5@?65 96C DFAA@CE] $96 :D?’E 2 4@DA@?D@C @7 E96 =2E6DE E6C> =:>:E 3:==[ 7:=65 3J &]$] #6A] #2=A9 }@C>2?[ #$@FE9 r2C@=:?2[ 2?5 he @E96C >@DE=J v~! 4@DA@?D@CD]k^Am
kAm%C292? H2D 7:CDE 6=64E65 E@ E96 D62E 😕 a_`g 27E6C 6>6C8:?8 7C@> 2 4C@H565 s6>@4C2E:4 AC:>2CJ @7 `_ 42?5:52E6D 2?5 H:??:?8 E96 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] $96 D6CG6D 2D 4@492:C @7 E96 w@FD6 s6>@4C2E:4 !@=:4J 2?5 r@>>F?:42E:@?D r@>>:EE66[ H9:49 @G6CD66D E96 >:?@C:EJ 42F4FD’ DEC2E68:4 4@>>F?:42E:@?D[ 2>@?8 @E96C C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D]k^Am
kAm“r@?8C6DDH@>2? %C292? C2? 7@C r@?8C6DD 3642FD6 (2D9:?8E@? :D?’E H@C<:?8[ 2?5 D96 😀 4@>>:EE65 E@ =@H6C:?8 4@DED 2?5 4C62E:?8 @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C H@C<:?8 72>:=:6D =:<6 E96 @?6 D96 8C6H FA :?[” 2 %C292? DA@<6D>2?[ uC2?4:D vCF32C[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “$96 H:== 4@?E:?F6 AFD9:?8 7@C C67@C>D E92E 7:?2==J >2<6 8@G6C?>6?E H@C< 36EE6C[ :?4=F5:?8 32??:?8 >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 7C@> EC25:?8 DE@4
kAm}@?6 @7 E96 DE2E6’D “>6>36C[ 2==s6>@4C2E:4 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@? 92G6 D:8?65 @? E@ E96 4FCC6?E G6CD:@? @7 E96 E6C> =:>:ED C6D@=FE:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 w@FD6 |:?@C:EJ (9:A z2E96C:?6 r=2C< 2?5 #6A] $6E9 |@F=E@?[ 2 $2=6> s6>@4C2E H9@ H@? 2 D:IE9 E6C> =2DE J62C]k^Am
kAm%96 3:==3@2C5 25 E2C86E:?8 %C292? 😀 A2CE @7 2 ?2E:@?H:56 42>A2:8? 3J &]$] %6C> {:>:ED E@ “:?7@C> E6C> =:>:ED DFAA@CE6CD” H96C6 42?5:52E6D 2?5 =2H>2<6CD DE2?5 @? E96 :DDF6]k^Am
kAm%96 8C@FA[ H9:49 92D E:6D E@ #6AF3=:42? 2?5 {:36CE2C:2? 8C@FAD[ D2:5 A@==:?8 92D D9@H? 2E =62DE gaT @7 p>6C:42?D[ DA2??:?8 56>@8C2A9:4D 2?5 A@=:E:42= 277:=:2E:@?D[ DFAA@CE 4@?8C6DD:@?2= E6C> =:>:ED]k^Am
kAm|@C6 E92? `d_ >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 92G6 A=65865 E@ DFAA@CE E96 &]$] %6C> {:>:ED C6D@=FE:@?[ E96 9:896DE ?F>36C @7 E6C> =:>:ED A=6586 D:8?6CD[ E96 8C@FA D2:5]k^Am
kAm|F49 @7 E96 DFAA@CE 7@C E6C> =:>:ED 2>@?8 =2H>2<6CD 4@>6D 7C@> #6AF3=:42?D[ H9@ 4@?EC@= E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6[ 2?5 >@DE @7 E96 4@DA@?D@CD @7 E96 ;@:?E C6D@=FE:@? 2C6 v~! =2H>2<6CD] #6A] y2C65 v@=56?[ s|2:?6[ 😀 @?6 76H s6>@4C2ED E@ D:8? @? E@ E96 3:==]k^Am
kAm%@ D6E E6C> =:>:ED[ E96 ;@:?E C6D@=FE:@? H@F=5 ?665 E@ 36 2AAC@G65 H:E9 2 EH@E9:C5D G@E6 😕 r@?8C6DD @C 2 ?2E:@?2= 4@?G6?E:@? @7 DE2E6 =68:D=2EFC6D] xE H@F=5 2=D@ ?665 E@ 36 C2E:7:65 3J E9C66BF2CE6CD @7 E96 DE2E6D E@ 36 25565 E@ E96 &]$] r@?DE:EFE:@?]k^Am
kAm“&]$] %6C> {:>:ED DE2?5D FA 282:?DE 8@G6C?>6?E >2=AC24E:46] (6 2C6 E96 G@:46 @7 E96 p>6C:42? 4:E:K6?[” E96 8C@FA A@DE65 @? :ED H63D:E6] “(6 H2?E 2 8@G6C?>6?E @7 E96 A6@A=6[ 3J E96 A6@A=6[ 2?5 7@C E96 A6@A=6 – ?@E 2 CF=:?8 4=2DD H9@ 42C6 >@C6 23@FE 562=D E@ 36?67:E E96>D6=G6D[ E92? E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED]”k^Am
kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am
[ad_2]
By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter
Source link
[ad_1]
Congress’ month-long summer recess is over and lawmakers are back in session, returning to what has become familiar territory: a looming government funding deadline. Caitlin Huey-Burns explains.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
BOSTON — A Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group is renewing its criticism of U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan for reneging on a previous pledge to support term limits for congressional lawmakers.
The group U.S. Term Limits has paid for a billboard ad along Interstate 93 in Methuen, criticizing the Westford Democrat for backing away from a proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution limiting House members to three terms, or six years, and senators to two terms, or 12 years.
kAmxE’D E96 D64@?5 E:>6 E96 8C@FA 92D E2C86E65 %C292?[ H9@ H2D C66=64E65 E@ 2 7@FCE9 E6C> 😕 }@G6>36C 27E6C CF??:?8 F?@AA@D65 😕 E96 bC5 r@?8C6DD:@?2= s:DEC:4E[ H9:49 :?4=F56D bd 4@>>F?:E:6D]k^Am
kAm“%C292? A=65865 E92E D96 H@F=5 DFAA@CE E96 &]$] %6C> {:>:ED 2>6?5>6?E =:>:E:?8 4@?8C6DD:@?2= E6C>D[” rt~ }:4@=2D %@>3@F=:56D D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “*6E D96 3C@<6 96C A=6586] %96 A6@A=6 @7 |2DD249FD6EED 56D6CG6 E@ @H 9@H #6AC6D6?E2E:G6 %C292? 😀 A=2J:?8 E96 s]r] 82>6[ 2?5 E92E D96 5:5 ?@E 9@?@C 96C E6C> =:>:ED AC@>:D6]”k^Am
kAm%C292? D:8?65 E96 A=6586 😕 a_`g 3FE E96 8C@FA D2:5 D96 92D D:?46 232?5@?65 96C DFAA@CE] $96 :D?’E 2 4@DA@?D@C @7 E96 =2E6DE E6C> =:>:E 3:==[ 7:=65 3J &]$] #6A] #2=A9 }@C>2?[ #$@FE9 r2C@=:?2[ 2?5 he @E96C >@DE=J v~! 4@DA@?D@CD]k^Am
kAm%C292? H2D 7:CDE 6=64E65 E@ E96 D62E 😕 a_`g 27E6C 6>6C8:?8 7C@> 2 4C@H565 s6>@4C2E:4 AC:>2CJ @7 `_ 42?5:52E6D 2?5 H:??:?8 E96 86?6C2= 6=64E:@?] $96 D6CG6D 2D 4@492:C @7 E96 w@FD6 s6>@4C2E:4 !@=:4J 2?5 r@>>F?:42E:@?D r@>>:EE66[ H9:49 @G6CD66D E96 >:?@C:EJ 42F4FD’ DEC2E68:4 4@>>F?:42E:@?D[ 2>@?8 @E96C C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D]k^Am
kAm“r@?8C6DDH@>2? %C292? C2? 7@C r@?8C6DD 3642FD6 (2D9:?8E@? :D?’E H@C<:?8[ 2?5 D96 😀 4@>>:EE65 E@ =@H6C:?8 4@DED 2?5 4C62E:?8 @AA@CEF?:E:6D 7@C H@C<:?8 72>:=:6D =:<6 E96 @?6 D96 8C6H FA :?[” 2 %C292? DA@<6D>2?[ uC2?4:D vCF32C[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “$96 H:== 4@?E:?F6 AFD9:?8 7@C C67@C>D E92E 7:?2==J >2<6 8@G6C?>6?E H@C< 36EE6C[ :?4=F5:?8 32??:?8 >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 7C@> EC25:?8 DE@4
kAm}@?6 @7 E96 DE2E6’D “>6>36C[ 2==s6>@4C2E:4 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@? 92G6 D:8?65 @? E@ E96 4FCC6?E G6CD:@? @7 E96 E6C> =:>:ED C6D@=FE:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 w@FD6 |:?@C:EJ (9:A z2E96C:?6 r=2C< 2?5 #6A] $6E9 |@F=E@?[ 2 $2=6> s6>@4C2E H9@ H@? 2 D:IE9 E6C> =2DE J62C]k^Am
kAm%96 3:==3@2C5 25 E2C86E:?8 %C292? 😀 A2CE @7 2 ?2E:@?H:56 42>A2:8? 3J &]$] %6C> {:>:ED E@ “:?7@C> E6C> =:>:ED DFAA@CE6CD” H96C6 42?5:52E6D 2?5 =2H>2<6CD DE2?5 @? E96 :DDF6]k^Am
kAm%96 8C@FA[ H9:49 92D E:6D E@ #6AF3=:42? 2?5 {:36CE2C:2? 8C@FAD[ D2:5 A@==:?8 92D D9@H? 2E =62DE gaT @7 p>6C:42?D[ DA2??:?8 56>@8C2A9:4D 2?5 A@=:E:42= 277:=:2E:@?D[ DFAA@CE 4@?8C6DD:@?2= E6C> =:>:ED]k^Am
kAm|@C6 E92? `d_ >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD 92G6 A=65865 E@ DFAA@CE E96 &]$] %6C> {:>:ED C6D@=FE:@?[ E96 9:896DE ?F>36C @7 E6C> =:>:ED A=6586 D:8?6CD[ E96 8C@FA D2:5]k^Am
kAm|F49 @7 E96 DFAA@CE 7@C E6C> =:>:ED 2>@?8 =2H>2<6CD 4@>6D 7C@> #6AF3=:42?D[ H9@ 4@?EC@= E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6[ 2?5 >@DE @7 E96 4@DA@?D@CD @7 E96 ;@:?E C6D@=FE:@? 2C6 v~! =2H>2<6CD] #6A] y2C65 v@=56?[ s|2:?6[ 😀 @?6 76H s6>@4C2ED E@ D:8? @? E@ E96 3:==]k^Am
kAm%@ D6E E6C> =:>:ED[ E96 ;@:?E C6D@=FE:@? H@F=5 ?665 E@ 36 2AAC@G65 H:E9 2 EH@E9:C5D G@E6 😕 r@?8C6DD @C 2 ?2E:@?2= 4@?G6?E:@? @7 DE2E6 =68:D=2EFC6D] xE H@F=5 2=D@ ?665 E@ 36 C2E:7:65 3J E9C66BF2CE6CD @7 E96 DE2E6D E@ 36 25565 E@ E96 &]$] r@?DE:EFE:@?]k^Am
kAm“&]$] %6C> {:>:ED DE2?5D FA 282:?DE 8@G6C?>6?E >2=AC24E:46] (6 2C6 E96 G@:46 @7 E96 p>6C:42? 4:E:K6?[” E96 8C@FA A@DE65 @? :ED H63D:E6] “(6 H2?E 2 8@G6C?>6?E @7 E96 A6@A=6[ 3J E96 A6@A=6[ 2?5 7@C E96 A6@A=6 – ?@E 2 CF=:?8 4=2DD H9@ 42C6 >@C6 23@FE 562=D E@ 36?67:E E96>D6=G6D[ E92? E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED]”k^Am
kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am
[ad_2]
By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter
Source link
[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
[ad_1]
Washington — Whether in Washington, D.C., or back in their home states, Democratic Rep. Hillary Scholten of Michigan and Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee are constantly on guard.
“Mr. Burchett and I are both people of strong faith, so I can say I put faith over fear every single day, and I continue to do this job,” Scholten told CBS News when asked if she feels safe.
“No, I don’t feel safe. But my head is on a swivel all the time,” Burchett added. “Trust, but verify.”
Nearly 9,500 threats and concerning statements were made against Congress in 2024, according to U.S. Capitol Police.
Under a new pilot program, lawmakers are getting a temporary increase of up to $20,000 for security upgrades at their homes, plus $5,000 per month to hire personal security.
The program was launched this month following a meeting before the summer recess between House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. It runs through the 2025 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.
“At the end of September, we’re going to look at that, evaluate all the data points, see how effective it was, how it was utilized, and then make decisions going forward,” Johnson told CBS News. “We have to protect member security and everybody who works here on the Hill.”
The program follows a wave of political violence, from the assassination attempt against President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, in July 2024, to a pair of shootings in June in Minnesota that killed Democratic Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, and left another Democratic Minnesota lawmaker and his wife wounded.
Immediately following the Minnesota shootings, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said he asked Capitol Police to increase security for senators.
Scholten says that threats and shootings targeting politicians “is not a partisan issue,” noting that the Minnesota shootings occurred exactly eight years to the day that Republican Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana was shot and wounded at a Republican Congressional Baseball team practice.
Scholten has resumed public events in her Grand Rapids district. She had postponed a town hall after learning she and other congressional members were named to the Minnesota shooting suspect’s hit list.
“I was at home alone with my two kids, and I was terrified,” Scholten said of her reaction when she first learned of the Minnesota shootings. The suspect was not captured until nearly two days after the shootings.
“Obviously at home is where we’re most vulnerable,” Burchett said. “I was swatted. I’ve been accosted in airports.”
Burchett said he doesn’t know what lawmakers on both sides of the aisle can do to tone down the rhetoric, calling the situation “very difficult.”
“I think doing things like this, you know, coming together and recognizing areas in which we do have agreement,” Scholten said.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A longtime Democratic House lawmaker from Texas said Thursday he won’t run for another term if a Republican redistricting plan pushed by President Trump stands as law in the state.
The announcement from 78-year-old Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who has served in Congress since 1995, means Texas Democrats appear to have avoided a potentially messy congressional primary between Doggett and 36-year-old Rep. Greg Casar.
The new congressional lines that Republicans are attempting to pass in Texas created a situation where Doggett, who represents Texas’ 37th congressional district, and Casar, who represents the 35th congressional district, would likely have had to run against each other on the Democratic side in the 37th district due to new boundaries reshaping Casar’s current seat into one favorable to Republicans.
Getty Images
Both Casar and Doggett currently represent parts of Austin, Texas. Casar’s current seat would be massively redrawn in the proposed changes.
Doggett said in a campaign statement Thursday that “if the courts give Trump a victory in his scheme to maintain control of a compliant House, I will not seek reelection in the reconfigured CD37, even though it contains over 2/3rd of my current constituents.”
Casar, who is in his second term, is chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Doggett was the first Democrat in Congress to call on then-President Joe Biden to leave the 2024 presidential race after his disastrous presidential debate.
Before Doggett’s announcement Thursday, he had publicly attempted to encourage Casar to run in the redrawn 35th district rather than challenge him in a primary for the 37th district.
“My only war is against Trump!” Doggett wrote on social media earlier this month. “2seats better than 1. Abandoning winnable majority Hispanic #TX35 to challenge me in #TX37 helps Trump, divides progressives.”
Doggett pointed to the political tensions in his statement Thursday, saying, “I had hoped that my commitment to reelection under any circumstances would encourage Congressman Casar to not surrender his winnable district to Trump. While his apparent decision is most unfortunate, I prefer to devote the coming months to fighting Trump tyranny and serving Austin rather than waging a struggle with fellow Democrats. If Trump extreme gerrymandering prevails, I wish Congressman Casar the best.”
“Lloyd Doggett is an Austin institution,” Casar said in a social media post following Doggett’s announcement. “I’ve learned so much from him. I’m grateful to him. The fight for democracy continues.”
The controversy surrounding the GOP-led Texas redistricting effort has dragged on for weeks after some Democratic Texas state legislators fled the state during a special session in order to prevent Republicans from having a quorum that would allow them to vote on overhauling the state’s congressional maps.
Eventually they returned, assured that California Democrats are working to counter the congressional gains Texas Republicans are looking to make. On Wednesday, the Texas House passed the bill that will shift the state’s congressional maps to potentially give Republicans five more U.S. House seats.
The bill is expected to soon easily pass the Senate and then be signed into law by the Republican governor of Texas. A challenge in court to the new map appears likely.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
In his three-hour interview with podcaster Joe Rogan, Donald Trump dug in on his false claims about voting, election fraud and his loss in the 2020 presidential election. Rogan helped encourage some of these claims.
The interview, released late Friday, came on the same day that the former president, on his social media network, re-posted threats to prosecute lawyers, voters and election officials he deems to have “cheated” in the 2024 election.
Here’s a look at some of the claims by the Republican nominee for president and the truth.
WHAT TRUMP SAID: “I won by like — they say I lost by like — I didn’t lose.”
THE FACTS: Trump did lose in 2020 to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s claims that fraud cost him the race were investigated repeatedly.
Trump’s own attorney general said there were no signs of significant fraud. The Republican-run state Senate in Michigan, one of the swing states where Trump claimed fraud occurred, came to the same conclusion after a lengthy investigation. An investigation by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau in Wisconsin, ordered by the state’s GOP-controlled Legislature in another state Trump claimed to have been defrauded from winning, also found no substantial fraud.
Rogan chortled when Trump was arguing, correctly, that his loss was close. Trump lost the election narrowly in six swing states. If about 81,000 votes had flipped, Trump could have won Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Wisconsin and gotten enough support in the Electoral College to remain president.
Trump misstated that margin as 22,000 votes.
WHAT TRUMP SAID: “What happened is judges don’t want to touch it. They would say, ‘you don’t have standing.’ They didn’t rule on the merits.”
THE FACTS: That’s not true. Trump and his supporters lost more than 50 lawsuits trying to overturn the election.
A group of Republican-affiliated election lawyers and legal scholars reviewed all 64 of the Trump lawsuits challenging the 2020 election and found only 20 of them were dismissed by judges before a hearing on the merits. In 30 cases, the rulings against Trump came after hearings on the merits.
In the remaining 14 cases, the report for Stanford University’s Hoover Institution found, Trump and his allies dropped their lawsuits before they even got to the merits phase. “In many cases, after making extravagant claims of wrongdoing, Trump’s legal representatives showed up in court or state proceedings empty-handed, and then returned to their rallies and media campaigns to repeat the same unsupported claims,” the report states.
WHAT TRUMP SAID: “We should go to paper ballots.”
THE FACTS: Trump and Rogan both argued that voting machines are unreliable and that the United States should rely on paper ballots. Trump even cited his billionaire tech mogul supporter Elon Musk’s enthusiasm for such a change.
Almost all of the country already made that switch, however.
In 2020, more than 90% of the election jurisdictions in the U.S. used paper ballots, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The next year, the federal Election Assistance Commission changed its guidelines to recommend every jurisdiction use paper.
The only state not to use a voting system with paper ballots or a paper trail of any sort is Republican-run Louisiana.
What to know about the 2024 Election
WHAT TRUMP SAID: “They used COVID to cheat.”
THE FACTS: Trump’s central argument is that a grand Democratic conspiracy changed voting procedures during the coronavirus pandemic to make mail voting more popular and that the conspirators then rigged the election against him through those mail votes. That’s not what happened.
When the pandemic first hit during the 2020 presidential primary in March, Republican and Democratic election officials quickly switched to encourage mail voting to avoid crowded polls. This was relatively uncontroversial until Trump turned against it, claiming it would lay the seeds for potential fraud.
In doing so, Trump was returning to his usual playbook, claiming that any election he doesn’t win is fraudulent. He made that claim about the first contest he lost, Iowa’s 2016 Republican caucus. He even claimed he lost the popular vote in 2016 because of voting by illegal immigrants, though a presidential commission he empaneled to find evidence of it disbanded without finding any proof.
THE FACTS: Isolated cases of voters fraud have long occurred, but in modern times have not reached the levels needed to sway a national election. An Associated Press review found fewer than 475 cases in all six battleground states that Trump lost by more than a combined 300,000 votes — far too little to change the outcome.
[ad_2]