ReportWire

Tag: Union busting

  • Rockstar Games accused of union busting in the UK

    [ad_1]

    Rockstar Games, developer of Grand Theft Auto VI, has been accused of deliberately laying off employees who were trying to unionize, Bloomberg reports. The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) claims over 30 employees who were eliminated at the developer’s offices in the UK and Canada were either already part of a union or attempting to organize.

    “Rockstar has just carried out the most blatant and ruthless act of union busting in the history of the games industry,” IWGB President Alex Marshall said in a blog post about the layoffs. “This flagrant contempt for the law and for the lives of the workers who bring in their billions is an insult to their fans and the global industry.”

    Besides the disruption of having to find a new job, the union notes that several employees who were let go are particularly vulnerable. “Amongst the staff dismissed were those with visas sponsored by Rockstar and those with medical conditions who will lose access to essential workplace healthcare schemes,” the union says. It adds that “all of those dismissed at Rockstar UK were members of the IWGB Game Workers Union discord channel, and appear to have been targeted for this reason.” In response to the IWGB’s claims, Rockstar’s publisher and owner Take-Two Interactive told Bloomberg that the layoffs had nothing to do with union activity and instead were “for gross misconduct, and for no other reason.”

    Rockstar and Take-Two have come into conflict with employees in the past over their return-to-office policy. Take-Two also laid off staff across multiple studios in 2024 and 2025, potentially motivated by the decision to push back the release of Grand Theft Auto VI to 2026. The game is expected to be a massive hit for the company and the wider industry, which is part of the reason why the IWGB believes the layoffs are motivated by something other than financials.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida Democrats voice support for Brightline workers’ right to organize

    Florida Democrats voice support for Brightline workers’ right to organize

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    U.S. House Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz

    Florida’s entire Democratic U.S. House delegation, including local Congressmen Maxwell Frost (D-10) and Darren Soto (D-9), have voiced support for Brightline workers’ right to organize, following allegations from the Transport Workers Union of union-busting behavior by the rail company.

    “Since 1926, the Railway Labor Act has protected rail workers and their right to form a union and collective bargain — a core principle we all unequivocally support,” the U.S. House delegation of eight Congressional members, led by U.S. House Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, shared in a statement. “With the news of employees working onboard Brightline trains from Miami to Orlando seeking to organize with the Transport Workers Union (TWU), we reaffirm and publicly support the right and ability to organize with the National Mediation Board as intended under the Railway Labor Act.”

    The statement, pretty uncontroversial on its face, comes shortly after TWU president John Samuelsen sent a letter to U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg this month, urging him to direct the DOT to deny additional federal funds to Brightline and to investigate the for-profit passenger train’s “compliance with its obligations” under previously-awarded grants.

    “Faced with workers’ desires to unionize, Brightline and its president, Patrick Goddard, have deliberately chosen the path of confrontation and acrimony,” Samuelsen wrote in a letter to Buttigieg dated Sept. 19. “Although Brightline bosses are anti-worker, President Joe Biden is not.” The U.S. DOT, he continued, “must give funding priority to companies that don’t interfere with workers seeking to unionize.”

    The statement from the Congressional delegation notably does not directly reference union-busting allegations, nor condemn such behavior.

    The Transport Workers Union, representing some 155,000 workers in the transportation industry nationwide, first announced a historic organizing drive among onboard attendants for Brightline in early August. The company, which has been friendly to labor unions out west, runs a high-speed rail line in Florida, from Miami up to its new station in Orlando. The company does not have other union-represented workers in Florida.

    Shortly after the Florida workers filed cards of support for unionization with the National Mediation Board, however (as part of the standard process to request a union election in the rail industry), Brightline hired on attorneys from Littler Mendelson, a firm notorious for its “union avoidance” services, to represent them. An archived list of “do”s and “don’t”s from the firm, for instance, encourages employers to“[t]ell workers that they are free to support the union or not, as they see fit, but you hope they vote against it.” 

    Brightline president Goddard sent an email to Brightline employees last month, according to screenshots shared with Orlando Weekly, where he basically did just that. In his email, Goddard wrote that, while he can now see that some employees feel “unheard,” he’d prefer to approach such discontent “by working together, without a third party involved.”

    “There is a legal process that is currently playing out and we will keep the team updated as more information becomes available,” Goddard wrote.

    Brightline, a private company, has already been awarded billions of dollars in federal grants to construct its high-speed rail line out west — a connection from Las Vegas to Southern California — and has similarly sought out government funds for expansion plans in Florida.

    “Elected officials in Florida are sending a clear message to Brightline — stop interfering with Brightline’s onboard workers’ efforts to form a union,” wrote union president Samuelsen in a statement responding to the congressional delegation’s show of support. “Brightline must stop delaying an election so workers can join the TWU and begin collective bargaining.”

    In addition to anti-union messaging, the TWU has said that Brightline is also trying to delay a union election by claiming it does not fall under the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board, which oversees union elections in the rail and airline industries.

    Instead, Brightline has argued that a union election should take place through the National Labor Relations Board, which oversee private sector labor relations in all other industries. The union, however, has claimed this argument is meant to drag out the organizing process, thus giving Brightline (and their lawyers) more time to intimidate employees against unionization.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Orlando union-busters helped Ohio charter school violate employees’ rights, federal judge finds

    Orlando union-busters helped Ohio charter school violate employees’ rights, federal judge finds

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Courtesy of KIPP Columbus ACTS/Ohio Federation of Teachers-AFT

    Educators and school staff at KIPP Columbus charter schools in Ohio after they went public with their union drive in November 2022.

    An administrative law judge for the National Labor Relations Board found that a charter school operator in Ohio, with the help of a “union avoidance” firm based in Orlando, unlawfully threatened school staff who sought to unionize with the Ohio Federation of Teachers last year.

    School staff at the KIPP Columbus campus’ four K-12 schools — including teachers, intervention specialists, social workers, teaching fellows and student coordinators — filed a petition with the federal labor board for a union election in November 2022, and voted to unionize last May.

    In the months leading up to the vote, however, the union — the KIPP Columbus Alliance for Charter Teachers and Staff — filed charges against the school, alleging unlawful behavior by the school in relation to their staff’s protected right to organize.

    Administrative law judge Christal J. Key, in a decision released last week, found that, with backup from the Orlando-based Labor Pros, the charter school operator did indeed violate their employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act by unlawfully threatening pay freezes during years of contract negotiations if staff voted to unionize.

    School officials and third-party consultants hired through the Labor Pros also illegally threatened to withhold stipends previously agreed upon for intervention specialists at the school who provide specially designed instruction and case management to students with mental and physical disabilities.

    “All money has been stopped,” Labor Pros consultant Vanessa Ramsey reportedly told one specialist during a December 2022 meeting with the school’s superintendent, according to personal testimony from the specialist. “All the stipends and things have been stopped because the union process has started.”

    The schools’ superintendent, Ciji Pittman, had been working with intervention specialists for months alongside other school officials to come to an agreement on these stipends. The stipends were specifically intended as an incentive for overworked specialists who have student caseloads that are above the state’s limit for professionals in their role.

    According to personal testimony from the specialist, shared with the NLRB officials, both Ramsey and Pittman confirmed that, because of the decision by staff to unionize, the stipends were no longer in play.

    “You’re not getting that compensation,” Pittman reportedly told the specialist. “The union stuff started, and so you don’t — you don’t get that anymore.”

    Under the National Labor Relations Act, employers are prohibited from threatening workers with adverse consequences for unionizing, and from discriminating against workers for their organizing activity or sympathies.

    Separately, the union also alleged that the school unlawfully fired a pregnant performing arts teacher for her union activity. This allegation, however, was dismissed by the judge for lack of sufficient evidence.

    As a result of their findings, Key has ordered the charter school, KIPP Columbus, to cease and desist from threatening the rescission of benefits and from threatening pay freezes, and has ordered the school to make the intervention specialists whole, “with interest,” for the caseload stipend.

    The union sees the ruling, all in all, as a win.

    “This ruling further confirms what we’ve reported in the past, that during our organizing campaign, KIPP’s management engaged in illegal acts of intimidation and retaliation,” the bargaining committee for the union told Orlando Weekly in a statement.

    “We were not deterred by their actions because we, the workers, have the final say over whether or not we form our union.”

    “We were not deterred by their actions because we, the workers, have the final say over whether or not we form our union.”

    tweet this

    Personal testimony provided by the Labor Pros consultants and school staff at Ohio charter campus reveals that consultants held group and one-on-one meetings with employees on their union rights, with Ramsey doing “most of the speaking,” the judge wrote.

    Records show that Pittman, the superintendent and KIPP Columbus’s high school principal emailed employees, mandating they attend such meetings conducted by the Labor Pros consultants.

    Both consultants hired through the Labor Pros “provided dishonest testimony about the purpose of the meetings,” according to the NLRB judge. Ramsey, for instance, claimed she wasn’t biased one way or another about whether staff voted to unionize.

    The second consultant, Jermaine Webb, testified his job “was to simply provide employees information” and that they “didn’t care if employees supported the Union.”

    During such meetings, Ramsey told school staff that if they voted to unionize, contract negotiations could take years, and in that time, staff’s pay would be frozen. During a presentation, she showed workers a slide that read, “During negotiations, no matter how long they take, employees stay at ‘Status Quo.’”

    Such “futility statements,” as they’re known, are commonly used by employers, their lawyers and union-busting firms to make workers feel that unionizing won’t actually help them, and that they may as well just save themselves the time and abandon the effort.

    This is what allegedly occurred during a recent union drive in Davenport, Florida, where delivery drivers for ReadyRefresh, a bottled water brand, sought to unionize with the Teamsters.

    A mandatory disclosure report filed with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Labor Management Standards shows that KIPP Columbus hired two Labor Pros consultants in December 2022 to provide “third party education and services” to school staff in relation to their organizing rights.

    Mind you, this was about a month after the staff had filed a petition to unionize, with 78% of staff having signed authorization cards in support of the effort — well above the 30% minimum that’s required.

    Altogether, records show the school spent nearly $100,000 over the next couple of months on their campaign to convince school staff not to unionize.

    An agreement filed with the labor department by Labor Pros chief executive and founder Nekeya Nunn, based in Orlando, shows the school, through their legal counsel, agreed to pay the Labor Pros a $10,000 retainer fee for their services and hourly rates of $385 per hour for consultants, and $450 per hour for Nunn, who describes herself on her firm’s website as someone who “believes in keeping companies union-free.”

    On top of that, the agreement also allowed for meal stipends, transportation and lodging expenses to be covered by the employer.

    This kind of pay isn’t unusually high. In fact, it’s pretty standard these days for the Labor Pros and other consultants who work within the lucrative union-busting industry, including other union busters based in Florida (or “persuaders,” as they’re formally known) who have been hired over the years by the likes of Amazon, Amy’s Kitchen, Pfizer, Lowes and Mercedes-Benz.

    According to the Economic Policy Institute, U.S. employers spend more than $400 million per year on union avoidance persuaders like the Labor Pros, which lists its address in reports to the government as either a building in downtown Orlando near Lake Eola or the UPS office on East Central Boulevard.

    Such consultants and firms are required by law to file financial disclosure reports with the Department of Labor’s Office of Labor Management Standards, disclosing agreements they enter into with employers to “educate” employees concerning their organizing or collective bargaining rights.

    However, as Orlando Weekly previously reported, the Labor Pros have a history of filing their reports late or incorrectly — and have at times been one of the “most egregious” offenders in the industry, according to the nonprofit watchdog LaborLab.

    In fact, the report filed by Nunn disclosing her firm’s work for KIPP Columbus lists two persuaders whose names do not match those referenced in Key’s decision.

    According to Key, the two Labor Pros persuaders hired through the Ohio schools’ legal counsel were Vanessa Ramsey and Jermaine Webb. Both provided testimony to the federal labor board during their investigation into the unfair labor practice complaints.

    Nunn, however, lists the consultants hired for the KIPP Columbus campaign as Vanessa Arrington, based in Chicago, and Abram Moore, based in Phoenix. Orlando Weekly was unable to verify the identities of, or find contact information for, either of the two.

    Under the Labor Management Reporting Disclosure Act, filers are required to report the full names of all individuals identified in these forms — and must use their real names.

    “Initials and coded names are not acceptable,” according to the Office of Labor Management Standards, which fields these forms.

    A spokesperson for the OLMS told Orlando Weekly earlier this year that the OLMS has civil enforcement authority of these requirements, and (although this never really happens) can also pursue criminal penalties for certain willful violations of reporting requirements, including “false entries” in reports.

    Orlando Weekly reached out to the Labor Pros and Nunn for comment on the administrative law judge’s decision — and the mismatched names — but did not hear back ahead of publication.

    According to the Ohio-based union, bargaining sessions with school leadership to hammer out a contract haven’t been going well, although based on their conduct during their initial organizing drive, they’re not surprised.

    “Over the past year, KIPP management has delayed, obstructed, and drawn out bargaining because they have no incentive to actually reach a deal with us,” the union’s bargaining committee told Orlando Weekly in a statement. “While these bargaining tactics are legal, they go hand-in-hand with KIPP’s illegal anti-union actions. We are looking forward to making progress at our next bargaining date.”

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s Battle with Swedish Unions Is Now Impacting Tesla’s Charging Stations

    Elon Musk’s Battle with Swedish Unions Is Now Impacting Tesla’s Charging Stations

    [ad_1]

    For the past several months, Tesla has been locked in a battle of wills with the labor unions of Sweden. The company’s refusal to ratify a collective bargaining agreement with a small number of workers associated with the Swedish union IF Metall has led to boycotts by other regional unions, turning what should have been a quickly resolved dispute into an ongoing disaster for the electric car company.

    This week, yet another humiliation was visited upon the firm: An additional labor union has decided to take action against the car manufacturer, and this time the end result could be the stifling of Tesla charging stations throughout the country. The Swedish Union for Service and Communications Employees, or Seko, published a statement Wednesday, announcing it would be initiating a “sympathy” action against Tesla over its anti-union policies:

    “IF Metall’s fight is also our fight. By refusing to comply with the rules of the game here in Sweden, Tesla is trying to gain a competitive advantage by giving the workers worse wages and conditions than they would have with a collective agreement. It is of course completely unacceptable. The fight that IF Metall is now taking is important for the entire Swedish collective agreement model. That is why we have chosen to issue another sympathy notice and increase the pressure on Tesla.”

    The impact here could be bad for Tesla, as Seko, which does important electrical work throughout the country, has promised to halt all “planning, preparation, new connections, network expansion, service, maintenance and repairs regarding all of the car brand Tesla’s charging stations in Sweden.” Elektrek has noted that the move could stop the launch of all new Tesla Superchargers within the country.

    Over the past several months, unions throughout Sweden and other parts of Europe have banded together to protect Scandinavia’s labor model from Tesla’s attempted disruption. So-called “sympathy” actions or strikes are a method by which unions not directly connected to a particular conflict can express their support and put pressure on an offending company. As a result, Tesla’s headquarters in Sweden have been subjected to a number of actions. Dock workers, electricians, postal workers, and even garbage collectors have all abandoned the company’s offices, causing serious issues for the company.

    Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has made it clear that he doesn’t like unions—which doesn’t make him particularly unique, as far as the billionaire-class goes. That said, Musk’s anti-union stance is particularly pronounced, even among his peers. He has repeatedly expressed his disdain for collective bargaining and, during one particularly inspired bout of rhetorical bullshit, said of organized labor: “I just don’t like anything which creates kind of a lords and peasants sort of thing”—which is an amazing statement coming from a guy whose cumulative wealth rivals that of any feudal lord in history.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • Blizzard Testers Win Case, Can Now Vote On Forming A Union [Update: Activision Responds]

    Blizzard Testers Win Case, Can Now Vote On Forming A Union [Update: Activision Responds]

    [ad_1]

    Image for article titled Blizzard Testers Win Case, Can Now Vote On Forming A Union [Update: Activision Responds]

    Image: Blizzard

    Back in July, a group of 21 quality assurance workers at Activision’s Albany studio—formerly known as Vicarious Visions—announced their intentions to unionise. Today, the National Labor Relations Board have confirmed that their vote can go ahead.

    The ruling came about because—and stop me if you’ve heard this one before—publishers Activision Blizzard initially opposed the move, saying that a larger group of 88 developers should be included in the vote, a textbook piece of union-busting that has also been tried at other Activision studios going through the process of unionisation.

    In this case it hasn’t worked; the NLRB’s ruling today clears the path for the workers to vote on forming a union, disagreeing (in a detailed breakdown explaining each of the studio’s departments, how their work differs and how underpaid testers are) with Activision’s claims that “we believe every employee in Albany who works on Diablo should have a direct say in this decision”.

    The ruling concludes:

    Based on the above, I conclude that the employees in the petitioned-for unit share a community of interest. I have also considered the similarities that exist among the developers and compared this to the testers. Developers are organized in separate departments, but departments that ultimately report to the head of the Diablo franchise. Developers have a diverse set of skills, training, and duties, but use these skills in a complementary manner in a production process that includes significant amount of contact and a high degree of functional integration. Compensation varies, but many terms and conditions of employment do have overlap among the developers.

    Comparing the developers’ community of interest to that of the testers I find that the distinct interests of the testers outweigh the similarities that exist with the developers. As noted, the testers participate in the same game development process that includes significant contact and functional integration. However, testers are separately organized in their own department and their supervisory hierarchy is entirely separate from the Diablo franchise. Testers also have a specific set of skills and duties different from the developers. Finally, testers are paid significantly less than developers. Moreover, the evidence of interchange between testers and developers is extremely limited. For these reasons I find any shared interests between the testers and developers do not outweigh the separate interests that make the petitioned-for unit an appropriate unit.

    The ruling instantly clears the path for an election, which will begin soon; ballots will be sent out on October 27, with votes being counted on November 18.

    A current employee at the studio, though not one of the testers involved in the vote, told the Washington Post “It’s about time. Our QA testers are some of the most talented and skilled people working in our company and they are critically undervalued by corporate. I think that all games workers need a union, but QA is in especially dire need.”

    Update 10:00pm ET: Lulu Cheng Meservey, Activision Blizzard’s Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Chief Communications Officer, has responded to the finding on internal communications, writing:

    Hey all, quick heads up on something important. It’s a long one but wanna be thorough so thanks for bearing with me. This afternoon the NLRB (national labor relations board) determined that -20 QA (quality assurance) testers working on Diablo in Albany will be eligible to form a union and if the union wins the vote will be included in the bargaining unit.

    Where the company stands on that: fully respects the NLRB process, and fully supports the employees’ right to choose how they want to be represented. Also has the view that people who work closely together should be able to make decisions like that collectively – ie, we disagree that a handful of employees should get to decide for everyone else on the future of the entire Albany-based Diablo team. We think a direct dialogue between company and employees is the most productive route.

    Examples: through direct dialogue we’ve already converted contingent QA staff to full time, increased pay, increased benefits, opened up access to the bonus program, and offered more opportunities for professional advancement (which would also result in more pay).

    We feel collective bargaining is comparatively slow- once agreement is in place takes over a year on average according to a Bloomberg analysis. During the long contract negotiation companies from giving any pay/bonus/benefit increases without a special arrangement with the union, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics has reported that non-union employees generally get larger pay raises than union-represented groups. That’s consistent with what we saw with Raven, where there have only been three bargaining sessions since the union was certified there almost 6 months ago, due partly to the union cancelling pre-planned bargaining sessions for a month.

    I’m sharing all of that because having a streamlined process is a reason why the company prefers direct discussions – but ultimately it’s up to employees and everyone should get to vote their own preference in a fair election.

    What happens next with this is that ballots will be mailed to eligible Albany-based employees on Oct. 27, need to be returned by Nov. 17, and will get counted by the NLRB on Nov. 18.

    More to come as the process continues but wanted to share asap. Thanks so much for reading everyone.

    [ad_2]

    Luke Plunkett

    Source link