ReportWire

Tag: underscored-testing

  • The best robot mops in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best robot mops in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A robot mop — much like a robot vacuum, but armed with a water tank and microfiber cloths or mop pads that wipe your floor in place of or in addition to a dust bin — can be incredibly useful as part of your regular cleaning.

    We tested eleven models — three dedicated mops and eight mop-vacuum hybrids — to find the most effective and efficient automated assistants to help you keep your floors clean.

    Best robot mop overall

    The compact, inexpensive iRobot Braava Jet 240 is simply the best robot mop for the money. While it doesn’t have the smarts of more expensive models and can’t do double duty as a vacuum, its efficient design and simple pattern-based navigation deliver impressive cleaning.

    Best robot vacuum and mop combo

    The Bissell SpinWave 2-in-1 Robotic Mop and Vacuum is an attractive and capable robot mop-vacuum with good performance, Wi-Fi connectivity and superior mopping ability to the other hybrid models we tested.

    Best luxury robot vacuum and mop combo

    The Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni offers the best hands-off cleaning experience and fast and accurate mapping, and won’t mop your carpeting. The cleaning station empties the robot’s dustbin, cleans its mop and refills the water tank.

    For the price, the iRobot Braava Jet 240 is the best robot mop we tested. For keeping your hard floors neat and tidy without you having to manually mop every day, the iRobot Braava Jet 240 is a handy, affordable tool to have in your cleaning closet.

    The iRobot Braava Jet 240 won our hearts with its compact design before we even started mopping. It’s small, lightweight (3 pounds) and has a handle so you can easily carry it from room to room. Its low 3.3-inch profile allows it to get under furniture and into hard-to-reach places, while the squared-off edges mean it can get into corners and along baseboards in a way that round robots just can’t. It even did a good job maneuvering around a toilet base. It also uses a removable rechargeable battery so there’s no need to take up valuable floor space with a charging dock.

    Despite its small size, the Braava Jet 240 delivered a big clean. With a vibrating cleaning head (like our favorite affordable hybrid, the Bissell SpinWave) and the ability to use cleaning solution (iRobot’s solution only) in the water tank, the Braava Jet 240 actually mops the floor rather than simply using a cloth to wipe it down with water. The robot uses proprietary cleaning pads (available in both disposable and washable varieties) that, when attached to the bottom of the robot, tell it which cleaning mode to begin. There are three cleaning modes to choose from: dry sweeping, damp sweeping and wet mopping.

    The iRobot Braava Jet 240 comes with a set of mop pads tailored to the different cleaning modes; swapping in and out is simple and tidy using the eject button.

    Even though the robot isn’t Wi-Fi-connected and lacks smart features (you can, if you like, control the robot via Bluetooth from the iRobot Home app), it uses an efficient cleaning pattern that covers the whole kitchen floor, especially along the baseboards. The Jet 240 impressively maneuvered around a hallway carpet, cleaning the open floor alongside it while avoiding ever going onto the carpet. This is something many of the more expensive, advanced hybrid robot mops could not do. If you need to, you can create a virtual “wall” to confine the Braava Jet 240 to a single space just by pushing two buttons on the robot itself — very convenient indeed.

    It did great on tile and hardwood floors, leaving no streaks as it cleaned up cat-litter-dusted paw prints, though on a tile floor we noticed some water accumulation on some of the grout, as the cleaning pads don’t apply enough pressure to reach into crevices. It dried quickly but it’s not clear the grout is getting as clean as the floor is. And while it couldn’t handle dried dirt and tougher stains as well, none of the robot mops excelled in that area.

    Bissell SpinWave 2-in-1 Robotic Mop and Vacuum

    The Bissell SpinWave 2-in-1 Robotic Mop and Vacuum is the only robot mop we tested in this category that uses dual spinning pads, which were far more effective in our testing than the standard flat mop pads employed on the other models. The SpinWave did a great job getting up dirt and splatter spots from my tile kitchen floor and didn’t leave streaks on the hardwood floors. It was the only model that didn’t make me feel like my kitchen had just been lightly Swiffered with a damp cloth.

    While all the other robots we tested call for using only plain water in the water tank, the SpinWave can use cleaning products, and Bissell includes a trial size bottle of multi-surface floor cleaner in the box (you can buy other floor- and task-specific formulations through the Bissell app or online, like pet multi-surface with Febreze, wood floor cleaner and one for tough messes and odors).

    The SpinWave has sensors to help it automatically detect and avoid carpeting when it’s mopping. This wasn’t perfect — it did end up mopping onto the edge of a dining room carpet — so if you’re using it in an open-floor-plan home with a mix of hardwood or tile surfaces and carpeting, we recommend keeping an eye on it if you’re running it through the whole house (we carried it from kitchen to bathroom for mopping sessions).

    You’ll need to swap tanks (the robot comes with a dry tank for vacuuming and a wet tank for mopping) to use the SpinWave as a vacuum and a mop. You can’t do both at the same time as you can with some of the more expensive models (though it does pick up some solid debris while mopping). The circular mop pads attach to the bottom of the water tank and are easily removed for washing.

    The Bissell SpinWave’s rotating mop pads did a better job than many of the simple cloth pads used on other inexpensive mops and mop-vacuum hybrids.

    In vacuum mode, the SpinWave uses a rotating brush roll and dual spinning edge brushes on the bottom to help pick up debris and pet hair in vacuum mode. I found it did a pretty good job on low-pile carpet and hardwood floors. Three suction power levels — low, mid and max — are available.

    While the SpinWave may lack the more advanced features found on pricier models, like mapping and the ability to set virtual keep-out zones, The Bissell app gives you access to some connected features like remote controls, a selection of cleaning modes and power levels and scheduled cleaning. You can also set the SpinWave to mop in auto mode, and the robot will run straight rows, or you can use spot mode for concentrated messes and spills.

    If mopping the floors is something you do regularly, and you’re looking for a hybrid model that doesn’t cost a fortune, the Bissell SpinWave 2-in-1 Robotic Mop and Vacuum is the right robot for you, delivering one of the best mopping experiences — and certainly the best experience for the money — we found in a robot mop-vac.

    Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni

    Truthfully, no one really needs a $1,500 robot house cleaner, and it’s reasonable to ask if you should spend so much on a robot that isn’t able to wash your dishes or bring you a drink. But the Deebot X1 Omni is the best we’ve seen of a new generation of robots. Its advanced AI object detection and laser mapping really work, and it offers the most hands-off user experience I’ve ever had. Combine that with powerful vacuuming and mopping capabilities and an auto-empty docking station that cleans the mop pads and refills the water tank, and you may find yourself coming up with ways to justify spending the money.

    Choosing between the Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni and its close competitor, the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra, is difficult because they both performed so well in navigating and mapping as well as in our cleaning tests. Both pair their respective companies’ top-end robot with an advanced dock that auto-empties and auto-fills the robot, theoretically giving you a totally hands-off cleaning experience (at least on a daily basis; at longer intervals you’ll have to empty and refill the dock itself).

    Based on our testing, the Deebot X1 robot wins out over the Roborock S7 MaxV with a sleeker look, a smaller footprint and — significantly, since this is a major downside of cheaper robot mops — an unerring ability to detect and avoid carpets. In our testing, it got to the very edge of the carpeting and turned around each time. We wanted to give it a cat treat and say, “good robot!”

    First and foremost, the Deebot X1 does a great job mopping and vacuuming. Dual spinning mop pads provide better scrubbing capability than the flat cloth style used on other robots so that it cleans much more than surface dirt. It picked up coffee, dried ketchup and other stains better than the other robots I tested.

    The Deebot’s mix of detection systems, mapping software and effective automation and remote control really made it stand out. Mapping was a huge pain point on the other robots we tested, often taking two or three attempts to get the house mapped and even then sometimes failing or losing the map entirely. The Deebot X1 Omni, on the other hand, mapped our testing house near-perfectly in 12 minutes. This made it super easy to use the app to set rooms and to create dividers and no-go zones (though it sometimes took a few tries to rename zones and rooms within the Deebot’s app).

    Using both a Lidar scanner and an AI-backed camera system, the Deebot excelled in our testing at object avoidance. It never bumped into furniture, even in a dark room, and it made its way around obstacles like pet toys. You can also view the camera’s output as a live feed if you want to check in when you’re not home, and you can even use two-way audio if you might want to communicate with someone remotely. The floor-level perspective is great for recording video of pets (you can steer the robot remotely to get an optimal point of view). You can record 15-second clips on your phone using the app, though there’s no cloud storage (for privacy reasons) and the robot always announces when the camera has been turned on or off.

    The Deebot has its own proprietary voice assistant, Yiko (pronounced ee-Koh), which lets you give the robot more specific commands than those available through Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant (which it also supports). You can say “OK Yiko” to stop and start a mopping or vacuuming session, send it to a specific room or ask it to clean a certain area. Yiko worked well in our testing, though it occasionally responded to unrelated conversations, asking me what we wanted it to clean.

    The Ecovacs Deebot X1’s docking station is large, but it’s taller and shallower and easier to place unobtrusively in a room than the dock used by the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra.

    The Deebot X1 Omni auto-empty docking station has tanks for both dirty and clean water, as well as one for dust and debris, making for a relatively massive unit, 5 inches taller than the corresponding Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra dock, though the Omni dock’s bags and tanks are larger in capacity, meaning you’ll have to deal with filling and emptying less often. Also, despite its taller profile, the Deebot Omni base station is not as deep as the Roborock Ultra, and the robot docks farther inside the base, taking up less space in the room. Clear tanks make it easy to see how much dirty water has been collected and when it’s time to top off the clean water container. There’s also a hidden container for extra bags and cleaning tools.

    The robot always returned to the docking station when mopping was finished, and automatically washed the mopping pads and re-filled the water tank. It also air dries the mop pads, so they don’t smell mildewy. You can set how long you’d like the drier to run but it does make a little humming noise while it’s drying.

    The Deebot X1 Omni isn’t perfect. It lacks a dedicated spot-cleaning or edge-cleaning mode (though you can use app or voice controls to have it clean a specific area, which takes a few extra steps). It only used plain water to clean; you can’t use any sort of soap or floor-cleaning solution. And, of course, it’s very expensive. But if you want near-flawless navigation and a virtually hands-off wet and dry cleaning experience, the Deebot X1 Omni delivers.

    If you’re looking to save the effort of regular manual mopping and you have a lot of hard floors, a robot mop can help you keep things clean much in the way a robot vacuum can. Like a robot vacuum, a mopping robot is best thought of as a way to make weekly or monthly cleanings easier rather than as a full-on floor care solution. Like their single-purpose vacuuming cousins, even the most high-tech robot can’t reach every corner of your home and will not replace your full-size canister vacuum or upright vacuum.

    And no mopping robot is going to get your floors as clean as a handheld mop or sponge and a little elbow grease. There’s not a whole lot of scrubbing taking place, for one thing (think Swiffer more than mop), and the majority won’t pick up sticky, greasy messes since they are only using water to clean. They do help, but you have to be realistic about your expectations.

    Hybrid robot mop-vacuums are worth it if you lack the space for both devices. All of these will work as typical robot vacuum cleaners, picking up pet hair from the floors and low pile carpeting, even under furniture, and will mop your hard floors as well, keeping the house tidy. All of the models we tested except for the most expensive occasionally mopped our carpets (if we wanted to wet-clean those, we’d rather have a carpet cleaner), so they require supervision if this is a concern, and you might want to plan on carrying them to locations where they are needed.

    Now that the next generation of home cleaning robots has entered the field, we wouldn’t recommend spending more unless you can really afford one of the next-generation models, with more complete base stations and more elaborate automation, mapping and location features.

    Mapping technology is a pain point for many of the last-generation high-end robots (like the Ecovacs Deebot T8+ and Roborock S7+) and you can’t use the high-end features you’re paying for until the mapping is done. The good news is that the next-gen robots are superb at mapping, so if you want all those features and obstacle avoidance as well as the ability to avoid carpeting while mopping, splurge on the newer Ecovacs Deebot Omni X1 or Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra. Otherwise, stick with the far less expensive iRobot Braava Jet 240, or if you want something that also vacuums, get the Bissell SpinWave.

    These more-advanced hybrid mop vacuums, like the Ecovacs Deebot X1 and Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra, really do perform as advertised, offering hands-off autonomous house cleaning once you set them up (though as with the cheaper models, you’ll still have to take care of periodic deep cleaning the old-fashioned way). But if more hands-off cleaning is what you’re looking for, these might be worth the splurge. You just need to figure out which of their features are more important to you.

    If you’re interested in the most effective robot mop — say you have more hard floors than carpets and don’t mind attaching the mopping pads when you want to mop — the Ecovacs Deebot Omni X1 has more useful features, like the ability to self-dry the mopping pads and an on-board voice assistant for robot control.

    If you have lots of low-pile carpeting and want a robot that’s a good vacuum and can take care of a smaller amount of mopping on a single pass through your house without having to swap out tools, get the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra, which can lift its mop while it goes over the carpets.

    We looked at 11 models with a wide variety of features and price points and at two more full-featured next-generation units, which claim to do it all: mop, vacuum, empty the dust bin, refill the water tank and wash the mop for you.

    With each robot, we looked at how well it mopped and vacuumed, and how easily it transitioned between the two. Wi-Fi-connected robots were also judged on the effectiveness and ease of use of their apps, how well they did at mapping the house and how easy it was to define and use virtual boundaries.

    Each model was given multiple runs across mostly low-pile carpeting and hardwood floors in an approximately 1,500-square-foot home with two furry cats. We looked at how well they mopped the floor and whether they were able to detect and avoid carpeting.

    iRobot’s more advanced Braava Jet m6 adds Wi-Fi and a lot of smart features that might make sense if you also have an advanced Roomba vacuum, but from a mopping perspective it performs identically to the cheaper Braava Jet 240.

    The Braava Jet m6 has a larger water tank so you don’t have to fill it as often and the see-through tank means you always know when it needs to be refilled, but we recommend saving some money and buying the cheaper Braava Jet 240 unless you already have (or plan to buy) an I-series, S-series or 900-series Roomba and plan to use the Imprint Link feature to coordinate vacuuming and mopping between the two devices.

    More advanced smarts let the m6 map your house, understand keep-out zones, respond to voice commands and navigate obstacles and stairs. It will dry sweep or wet mop floors, like the 240, and you can adjust how much water or cleaning solution it sprays as it goes. It cleans the room in efficient, neat rows and covers every inch of the floor, including edges without ever going on carpeting. It can also target specific areas within a room and head back to the dock to recharge when necessary.

    The Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra (which combines the Roborock S7 MaxV robot vacuum and the Ultra self-cleaning docking station) is a next-generation home cleaning system that competes directly with (and cleans just as well as) the Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni. Like that system, once you set up the S7 MaxV Ultra, you shouldn’t have to deal with it until you need to fill or change out tanks in the docking station, meaning you can let it work on its own for weeks at a time. The Ultra dock is currently out of stock, but should be available in May; if you can’t wait, the S7 MaxV Plus (including Auto-Empty Dock) is available at Amazon and Roborock for $1,159.99.

    The Roborock has many of the same features as the Deebot X1, such as advanced, AI-based object and obstacle detection using a combination of Lidar and optical cameras; a livestreaming camera that lets the robot do double duty as a mobile security camera and fast and accurate home mapping. It is a big jump in technology and features from the Roborock S7+.

    While on the Deebot X1 you need to swap out tools when you want to mop, you can leave the mopping pads on the S7 MaxV and it can transition from vacuuming mode to mop mode automatically during a single run, so long as your carpet isn’t too deep. This feature (called “VibraRise”) was introduced on the last-generation high-end Roborock units like the S7+ and it lifts the mop brushes by 5mm when it senses low-pile carpeting so it doesn’t mop the carpet as it vacuums. If the carpet is taller than that and the mop heads are still attached, the S7 MaxV simply avoids it, much as the Deebot X1 would during a mopping run. The mop pad is also lifted off the floor as the robot charges so it air dries (the Ultra dock doesn’t have a forced-air dry function like the Deebot X1’s Omni dock).

    In practice, the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra system was reasonably effective, though neither the Roborock or the Ecovacs can really clean every floor surface in your whole house in a single pass unless you have the specific mix of low-pile carpet and hard floors that the Roborock is designed for. The S7 MaxV Ultra did a really nice job on hardwood floors, mopping the whole width of the pad and leaving no streaks, something the less-expensive robots had difficulty with.

    The Ultra Empty Wash Fill Dock is very large and bulky, made of black plastic, and leaves the three tanks exposed rather than hidden away as on the Deebot Omni dock, and it’s just not as pleasing a design aesthetically. The water tanks are not see-through either, so to check the water levels, you need to pull them out and open them up to see in. The power cord in the back is very thick and long and there’s not enough space behind the dock to coil it, making it difficult to push it up against a wall. You’ll need a lot of clearance for this massive cleaning system, even given that it has less capacity than the Ecovacs system.

    For now, despite the very useful VibraRise system, for most households we’d give the edge in next-generation robot mop-vacuuming hybrid technology to the Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni

    The Roborock S7+, the company’s previous top-of-the-line unit, doesn’t have the advanced AI object-avoidance capabilities or security camera functions of the new S7Max Ultra, but it’s about as good as previous-generation models get.

    The S7+ vacuums well, with increased suction as it detects carpeting. The robot uses “Sonic Mopping,” a function that vibrates the mopping pad very quickly (the company claims 3,000 vibrations per minute) to break up dirt. In our testing this wasn’t able to handle dried dirt or greasy spills, but it does have a useful “high intensity mopping” mode for better spot cleaning.

    As the S7+ passed over carpeting the indicator light on the robot changed from blue, for mopping mode, to white, for vacuum mode, though our carpets did get ever-so-slightly damp. This wasn’t out of line with our expectations since the function is only meant to work with very low-pile carpets. The auto-empty dock adds simplicity and convenience to using the robot. It automatically empties the robot’s dust bin when it returns to the charging station.

    Though it uses Lidar navigation to efficiently map the house, it had trouble getting started. Initially, it wanted to go through the same room a few times while never making it to the bedroom, and if it needed to go back to recharge, it started the mapping process over. It did finally complete a map, and we were able to use the app to set no-mop zones and cleaning schedules, as well as adjust suction power of the vacuum and the amount of water flow when mopping. Like with other robots, you can create invisible walls and see the route the robot is taking.

    The S7+ is available with a slightly simpler auto-empty dock, which the company claims you shouldn’t have to manually empty for up to 8 weeks (depending, of course. on how dirty your house gets, how many pets you have and how much they shed, and so forth).

    The Roborock S7+ is a really good, well-designed hybrid robot with unique features but the $949 price tag is too high compared to the equally capable Ecovacs Deebot T8+ which sells for $200 less. You can buy just the S7 robot for $649 if you can live without the self-emptying feature.

    Like the Roborock S7+, the Ecovacs Deebot T8+ is a capable hybrid robot mop-vac with an auto-empty station. It can vacuum and mop at the same time using separate dry and wet tanks. You can run it with or without the mop attachment on.

    Ecovacs says the T8 can automatically detect and avoid carpeting when the mopping pad is on, but it didn’t always detect them in my testing. Since it can’t raise its mop like the Roborock can, it wound up mopping parts of the carpets before we pulled it away.

    It automatically boosts the suction power when it’s vacuuming carpeting and does a good job picking up pet hair. It’s quiet and handles door sills better than other models and does a good job maneuvering around furniture.

    The Auto-Empty Station is smaller than the Roborock’s, though it will still hold about 8 weeks worth of debris, depending on usage. It worked well, but we did have one instance of cat hair getting stuck in the suction tube and we had to clean it out by hand.

    Like with other connected robots, once you map your home, you can set scheduled cleanings, create boundaries and virtual walls and control the water flow in each room while mopping. And just like other connected robots, mapping was an exercise in frustration. It took multiple tries, going over the same rooms and recharging over and over until it finally completed.

    The iLife A11 does only an average job cleaning. It did well picking up cat hair but left some cat litter on the bathroom floor. It also left some hair on low-pile carpeting. This won’t replace your standalone vacuum, but for a scheduled quick run through the house in between deeper cleanings, this will get the job done.

    As with most last-generation robots, the A11 can map your home, and be controlled via an app or by a hardware remote. Also as is usual, the mapping process can be frustrating but once you complete it, it will store up to three maps in memory. You can set zones, so the robot mops in one zone and only vacuums in another. The A11 also has Lidar-based smart navigation to avoid objects in its path.

    Its two-in-one dustbin holds both water and debris so it can vacuum and mop in a single pass. The two-in-one dustbin can be replaced with a larger, dedicated dust bin if you just want to use the A11 as a vacuum.

    The app lets you adjust power and mode while vacuuming and mopping. You can increase the suction of the vacuum from eco to standard to turbo and adjust the amount of water that is dispensed in mopping mode. You can do the same on the remote control, along with switching between edge mode and spot clean.

    One warning: it doesn’t come with a protective base to keep things dry under the robot while docked, so you’ll want to take off the mopping cloth after each use if your charging base is on a wood floor.

    The iLife Shinebot W450 does a good job mopping floors, but it didn’t perform as well as the similar iRobot Braava Jet m6 or cheaper and simpler Braava Jet 240. It’s a mopping robot with smart navigation and an app that lets you adjust cleaning modes and target the area you want cleaned, but at 11 inches round and 4.7 inches high, it’s not going to get under furniture, near baseboards, under cabinets and around toilets.

    In addition, for a robot that’s supposed to simplify your life, it requires way too much work to use it. You’ll have to open the robot to access and fill the tank, and it’s difficult to put back together (we managed to spill a tank of water on the floor). Once charged, in order to start a cleaning run, you need to manually lift it off its charging base and place it on the floor you want cleaned. It has a handle to carry and move it, but it can’t start itself or return to the dock to recharge on its own.

    It’s really too bad, as once the W450 gets to cleaning it does a good job. It has two tanks, one to collect dirty water and one for clean water so it’s not just pushing dirt around. First it sprays (water and cleaning fluid, if you’re using it) then it scrubs with a roller brush, sucks away the dirty water and wipes off any residue water, so your floors dry really quickly. Of course, then you have to empty and wash the dirty water tank when it’s done.

    The V8s is an older model in the iLife product line, and has dropped in price to where it no longer feels overpriced for what it can and can’t do. That said, while it is a capable mop, as a hybrid it has trouble navigating around carpet, and you are better served confining it to your kitchen or other hard-floored rooms, or sticking with a dedicated mop robot. As a vacuum, it’s actually a good hard-floor pet hair option because of its suction tube design, but the lack of roller brushes means it can’t handle low-pile carpet, cutting into its potential versatility.

    In our open-plan test home, the V8s did a good job mopping the kitchen floor, but unfortunately, as it went from kitchen to dining room to living room (transitioning from hardwood floors to low-pile carpeting), it couldn’t detect the low-pile carpeting and went right over it, squirting water along the way.

    This iLife robot uses a suction tube, much like a traditional vacuum cleaner, rather than the roller or bristle brushes used on other robots. This lets it do a better job than some of the other models we tested at cleaning up pet hair, as the debris is sucked up right into the bin without getting tangled up in a roller brush. It does great on hardwood and tile floors, but the downside of having no roller brush is that it doesn’t do a very thorough job on low pile carpeting.

    It can’t vacuum and mop in a single pass, so you have to swap out the dustbin and water tank each time you change modes. It also doesn’t come with a floor mat so if you leave it on the charging base with the water tank attached you might end up with water stains on your floor. We recommend putting in the dust tank and letting the water tank empty and dry between uses.

    The Eufy RoboVac X8 Hybrid is a Wi-Fi-connected robot mop-vacuum hybrid with high-end features like smart navigation and in-app mapping and scheduling, but it only does an average job vacuuming and mopping. To make space for the water tank, the dust bin is slightly smaller than in the standalone X8 vacuum we reviewed in our test of the best robot vacuums, and the mop functionality is lacking. There are no mop-specific controls so you can’t adjust how much water is put down for a specific task.

    Mapping was frustrating and inconsistent. While you can create no-go zones to keep the mop off your carpeting, these didn’t persist in memory during our testing, and were ignored as the robot ran.

    In its favor, the Eufy X8 Hybrid lets you mop and vacuum in a single pass, which certainly makes it more efficient. Some of the other units require you to swap out the dust bin and water tank each time you change from vacuum to mop, and it includes a translucent mat to protect your floor if you keep the mop cloth on while charging the device.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best air mattress in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best air mattress in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    You may not use an air mattress often, but when the time comes, you’ll want one that’s reliable, comfortable, and easy to inflate and store. You don’t want to struggle to set it up, you need it to be supportive enough to provide a good night’s rest and the last thing you or your guests want is to wake up in the middle of the night, floundering in a half-deflated blob of vinyl.

    We set out to find the best air mattress, putting seven top models to the test, judging them on their comfort while sleeping, as well as their overall usability when it comes to setting up, inflating, deflating, and storage. If you haven’t shopped for an air mattress in a while, you’ll be surprised to find how comfortable and convenient they are nowadays, but even among this impressive group we found an outstanding choice that should make you and your guests happy.

    The Best Air Mattress Overall

    In addition to providing the most comfortable night’s sleep during testing, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress uses a built-in pump for quick and convenient inflation, and features a raised pillow that helps mimic the feel of a real bed.

    Alex Rennie/CNN Underscored

    While many of the air mattresses I tested were similar in design, pump operation, and dimensions, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress was a clear winner when it came to overall comfort. Not only does it feature a soft, velvety flocking covering the top, it’s designed with a raised pillow area on one end. This area provides just enough head and neck support to mimic the effect of a headboard, making it feel much more like a real bed to me than any other option.

    The King Koil Luxury Air Mattress provided a comfortable amount of full-body support as well. I’ll admit, the “coil-beam construction” sounded a bit gimmick-y, but these internal, air-filled coils seemed to work as advertised. They really provided the ideal amount of support for me, mimicking a real mattress more convincingly than the other mattresses we tested. Since these coils are spaced throughout the mattress, edge to edge, I never felt like the sides were going to give way and cause me to roll out, which is sometimes the case in less-supportive mattresses. I did experience a small amount of deflation over my 48 hours of testing, but it was minimal enough to chalk up to standard stretching of the new material. In fact, in addition to the two nights of sleeping, I also found myself laying down on it throughout the day, just to experience the comfort and support.

    At 20 inches high, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress is convenient to climb into at night, and more importantly, comfortable to roll out of in the morning. Air mattresses that are lower to the ground were just more difficult to get into and out off, and the process involved more grunting and bending than we were prepared to do first thing in the morning. This was definitely not the case with the King Koil.

    Image of the side of a King Koil air mattress, showing the built-in pump mechanism

    The pump was both easy to use and quick to fill, fully inflating the mattress in just 1 minute 50 seconds. You simply twist the valve you want to use—either inflate or deflate—press the power switch and you’re all set. The power cord also conveniently stores inside a little storage cubby with a latching door, keeping everything nice and tidy when it’s time to store the mattress away.

    As for storage, despite its luxurious height and internal structure the King Koil packs up very tidily into a storage sack small enough to tuck into the back of a closet. Some competitors were stiff and difficult to fold up easily, and others were too large even folded away into their stuff sacks to store away easily.

    A King Koil air mattress folded down to its storage size.

    The materials used in the mattress and pump appear to be of high quality, and I never felt like any elements or components were flimsy, loose, or weak. Deflation was a breeze as well, taking just 1 minute 50 seconds to go from full to completely empty. It took me less than a minute to fold it up and slide it back into the included storage bag too, thanks to the illustrated instructions in the manual.

    A packed King Koil air mattress in its storage bag, sitting on a living room floor, watched over by a small brown and white dog seated on a couch.

    The King Koil Luxury Air Mattress is not cheap relative to the competition, but the overall comfort, build quality and speedy inflation makes it worth the money.

    How do you take care of an air mattress?

    Even high-quality air mattresses won’t last forever, but there are things you can do to extend their lifespan. Make sure to not only avoid punctures by keeping your pets off the bed—even small dogs can have sharp toenails that can puncture or scratch through an air mattress—but also avoid unnecessary pressure by preventing rambunctious kids from jumping or walking on it. This extra pressure can place more stress on the seams, causing splits and cracks over time. Insta-bed also advises you to avoid placing the mattress against the wall, to avoid hidden carpet tacks.

    You should also take the time to vacuum your mattress after every use. Accumulated crumbs and other small debris can also pose a potential puncture threat, especially when you’re folding it up and squeezing it down during deflation.

    The most important thing to remember is that cold temperatures can make vinyl stiffen, so if it’s being stored in a cool area, like a basement or attic, make sure to allow your air mattress to come to room temperature before inflating. If not, the vinyl may lack the flexibility it needs to expand safely, which can cause cracks or splits in the material. The Insta-bed manual also recommends this warming up period after your bed is delivered to your doorstep, since it could have been sitting outside for longer than you think.

    If your bed does get damaged, it’s not a lost cause. Every mattress I tested included a patch kit for leaks, which, if applied properly, can easily fix the problem. And should your built-in pump go haywire, some mattresses allow you to still fill them manually with a separate pump.

    Yes, you can take an air mattress camping. If you’d prefer to sleep well off the ground and not have to worry about roots and uneven ground impairing your sleep, they could be a great choice. However, you’ll need to be aware of their limitations and the effects they may have on your trip.

    First, since air mattresses are extremely vulnerable to punctures, you won’t want to lay it directly on the ground, and take care to keep it clear of stray campfire embers that could melt the vinyl. While patching holes is a solution, it’s not really a project that’s ideal to perform out in the wilderness. Keep in mind that you can just as easily puncture your mattress when it’s folded up, so don’t pack it with sharp objects. Air mattresses are also relatively heavy, and depending on how long you plan on carrying them to your site, this weight can be more trouble than it’s worth.

    Perhaps most importantly, you’ll need to make sure you have a reliable way to inflate your air mattress. If you want to take advantage of the convenience and quick performance of built-in pumps, you’ll need to have a power source, like a car cigarette lighter, or a campsite power hookup. If you’ll be away from electricity, you’ll need to go with a mattress that comes with a battery-powered pump, like the Intex Dura-Beam Standard Single-High Air Mattress, or a mattress with a manual foot pump. If these limitations sound like they won’t work with you and your trip, you’ll probably be better off with a camping pad.

    To help better understand the benefits and drawbacks of the air mattresses we tested, we ran each mattress through a comprehensive battery of real world tests, from setup to packing and unpacking and, of course, sleeping, evaluating them across a range of criteria but focusing on comfort and convenience.

    Since air mattresses are frequently set up in areas not typically used for a bed, and sometimes last-minute, it’s really important that they’re easy to use. Nobody wants to fumble around with a confusing air pump or have to go digging for an instruction manual when you just want to get to sleep. I paid close attention to how simple—or complicated—each mattress was to operate, from unboxing, to setup, inflation, deflation, and finally storage. Specifically, I noted any specific issues with the pump operation controls, and the helpfulness of each mattresses instruction manual.

    To accurately judge each mattress on the most important measure performance — it’s comfort and support while sleeping, I slept on each model for two nights, noting both how comfortable their soft topper was, as well as overall stability. I also paid close attention to any deflation issues overnight. Although minor deflation is expected with new air mattresses—the vinyl material stretches—I did my best to notice any significant deflation that could indicate actual issues down the road. I compared each mattresses pump as well, evaluating them on how easy they were to setup, notable noise differences, and how long it took them to fully inflate the mattress.

    After testing each mattress, I then deflated, rolled (or folded) up each mattress and stored it and any pumps in their included storage bag. I noted how easy this process was from start to finish, paying attention to how well the pump deflated the mattress, if there were any included instructions that made it easier to fold up the mattress correctly, and how easy it was to fit into the storage bag.

    During all of this testing, I kept track of any issues that caught my eye when it came to build quality. Flimsy switches or valve openings, and any noticeable seam or molding issues with the vinyl or soft topper all helped me evaluate one mattress vs another.

    In addition to these testing categories, I also compared specific metrics like overall weight, the dimensions of each mattress when folded up, and warranty lengths.

    A solid runner-up, the SoundAsleep mattress gave us a comfortable, supportive night’s sleep, and was a breeze to setup and inflate. Once you unfold it, you simply plug in the power cord and turn the control dial to “inflate” and you’re all set. That’s it. The velvet topper was nice and cozy, and I could definitely tell that it had some kind of structural support inside that helped keep it’s shape. Although I did experience some deflation after two nights of sleeping, it didn’t appear to be leak-related and could be chalked up to some standard stretching of the material. The only real drawback I had was a minor design issue with the power cord storage. Unlike other mattresses that provide a small latched door to keep the folded cord inside, this mattress only provides an open hole that you just kind of cram the cord into. It’s also worth noting that this model doesn’t include instructions for folding/rolling up the mattress for storage. This was a fairly straightforward process, so certainly isn’t a dealbreaker, but a diagram could certainly come in handy if you don’t remember how it was folded when you unboxed it. This mattress is also just 18 inches high, as opposed to the 20 inches of the King Koil, which was the primary reason it didn’t take my top spot.

    If you’re extra-sensitive to changes in air mattress inflation and prefer a specific level of firmness, this is the bed for you. The “never flat” pump will automatically power on if it detects that the bed is beginning to deflate, even a small amount, pumping it back up to your desired setting. You can choose between 3 of these settings—plush, medium, and firm—and the pump will maintain that setting at all times. If you’re worried about the noise of the pump interrupting your sleep, you shouldn’t be. I’m a fairly light sleeper and never woke up once during either night, despite the mattress remaining perfectly full the entire time. I kept the mattress next to my desk during the day to monitor the pump, and when it would power on for a few moments, I was really surprised at the low noise level. The supportive structure and velvet topper was comfortable as well, making this a favorite during testing. Keep in mind that you do have to keep it plugged in at all times to take advantage of the never-flat feature, which might limit where you can place it in your room. Plus, unlike the King Koil that covers the sides of the mattress with a soft black velvet, this model has exposed vinyl all around,giving it more of an “air mattress” feel, as opposed to the King Koil, which felt more like a real bed — but this is still a very comfortable air mattress.

    If a speedy inflation time is your priority, consider this high-quality EnerPlex mattress and its built-in pump. It took just 1 minute and 21 seconds to fully inflate, which was the fastest of all the mattresses we tested. The pump itself was simple to use: you just plug it in, rotate the inflation valve to open it, and press the power button. This mattress also scored major points in overall comfort during my sleep test, and its “coil beam construction” definitely provided a good amount of support throughout the night. I also appreciated the non-skid bottom too, which kept it firmly in place when getting in and out. Its 2-year warranty is twice as long as any other mattress I tested, making it well-suited for those who plan on using it frequently. Unfortunately, its 18-inch height was noticeably less comfortable to get in and out of than the 20-inch King Koil. That being said, if the King Koil is unavailable, this mattress is a great alternative.

    Intex Dura-Beam Standard Single-High Air Mattress

    The ultra-low price and compact size of this Intex mattress makes it a great choice for campers or those who are on an extra-tight budget. I was surprised at how comfortable this model felt during the night too, and the inner support system provided more structure than I expected at this price point. That said, its 10-inch height was definitely more of a challenge to get in and out of than the taller options I tested. Although the battery-powered pump took the longest to inflate—4 minutes—it was by far the quietest among the group we tested, which might be worthwhile if noise is a concern (apartment dwellers take note). I do wish the intake valve fit the pump a bit better, as I had to continually press the valve adapter into the port the entire time it was operating. Another drawback: Intex doesn’t include the six “C” batteries required for the Dura-Beam’s pump. I had to purchase these separately, so keep that in mind if you don’t already have them on hand.

    I really enjoyed the subtle “bumpers” on the edge of this mattress, which created a cozy, secure sleeping surface, and gave me the confidence that I wouldn’t accidentally roll out in the event of overnight deflation. At 22 inches, it was also the tallest of the models I tested, which made it really easy to get out of in the morning. The internal horizontal support beams gave it a nice and sturdy feel, and provided a really comfortable sleep overall. The pump was simple to use too, with just a simple dial to rotate from side to side. The main drawback to the this mattress was its inflation time. It took the longest to fill up, 4 minutes and 10 seconds, so keep that in mind if speedy inflation is a priority. At 21 pounds it’s also the heaviest of my testing pool, though not by much.

    The Coleman GuestRest mattress, unlike most of the competition in this price range, uses an external pump, which I found much less convenient than the built-in units. While the ability to use the pump for other items could be useful to some—like if you have pool toys, inflatable kayaks, or balloons—it was extremely loud by comparison, ultimately reaching a pitch that I would describe as “screaming”, and its ill-fitting adapter required you to hold it tightly in place during the inflation process. If you anticipate having to fill up your mattress late at night, this is not the mattress for you. I did appreciate that the pump and inflation instructions were both included in the instruction manual, as well as printed on the side of the mattress itself, which would be convenient if you lose the manual. In the pump’s defense, it did fill the mattress relatively quickly, taking just 3 minutes and 37 seconds to get a nice firm mattress. It’s also nice and compact, making it convenient to store when not in use.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best electric toothbrushes in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best electric toothbrushes in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Good oral hygiene is important for everyone, and electric toothbrushes promise to make the process of caring for those pearly whites a whole lot easier. Built-in timers, apps and multiple brushing modes don’t just do a better job than a manual toothbrush, they also teach you to take better care of your teeth.

    To find the best electric toothbrushes, we brought in 10 electric toothbrushes and brushed our teeth — a lot — while testing every feature and consulting with dental professionals to determine which features were really helpful. Our teeth felt nice and clean at the end of the three-week testing period, and in the process we found four great models that will get your oral health dialed in.

    Best electric toothbrush overall

    Affordable, full-featured, effective and compatible with many varieties of replacement brush heads from Philips and third parties, the Sonicare 4100 is an great way to improve your oral hygiene routine. A gentle mode makes it easy for beginners to get used to high-tech brushing.

    Best smart electric toothbrush

    The Oral-B iO Series 9 offers more features and modes than any electric toothbrush we tested, from multiple modes to suit any brushing goal to a connected app that really provides useful feedback. It’s pricey, but a 60-day guarantee makes it easy to see if it will work for you.

    Best electric toothbrush for travel

    The slim, compact Philips One by Sonicare comes with a form-fitting case and has 30 days of battery life, making it the perfect electric toothbrush for travel. It doesn’t have all the features of some more expensive brushes, but offers more than enough to keep up your tooth care routine on the road.

    Best affordable electric toothbrush

    The Brightline Sonic Rechargeable Toothbrush gives you a straightforward electric toothbrush experience that won’t break the bank. Its simple feature set makes it easy to use, and it offers inexpensive brush head replacements with a subscription plan.

    Looking for an excellent electric toothbrush at an affordable price? If so, the Philips Sonicare 4100 is one of the best out there. The 4100 has been around for many years, and we found it as comfortable, easy and effective to use as more expensive models, with simple, useful features like a pressure sensor and timer that make a big difference versus traditional manual toothbrushes.

    Although the Philips Sonicare 4100 isn’t as feature-packed as some toothbrushes that cost a few hundred dollars, those extra features aren’t always needed. The Phillips offers only a single brushing mode, with low and high intensity levels. The straightforward controls let you easily change the settings as you brush. During testing, the Sonicare 4100 felt very comfortable in hand, and the brush head (several varieties are available from Philips; we tested with the supplied standard heads) was gentle against our teeth and gums, getting into those hard-to-reach places and getting our teeth sparkling clean.

    A two-minute timer reminds you to brush for the full two minutes per most dentists’ recommendations, and even better, during that time a “Quadpacer” timer vibrates every 30 seconds, guiding you to move to another quadrant of your mouth — helping to make sure all teeth are cleaned equally. You can also pause the toothbrush — for up to 30 seconds — and the timer will start off right where it left off.

    One of our favorite features of the toothbrush — and one we didn’t find with some of the other lower-priced toothbrush options — is the pressure sensor. While using an electric toothbrush, you’re meant to let the brush head do the work rather than scrubbing. So during the brushing session, if you press too hard and apply too much pressure, the Sonicare 4100 will vibrate and an indicator light will flash, giving you a warning. Dr. Mark Wolff, professor of restorative dentistry at the University of Pennsylvania, emphasized the importance of controlling the pressure while brushing since “brushing too aggressively can wear the gums and tooth structure, resulting in recession and tooth sensitivity to cold.”

    Everything on the Philips is well thought-out from a design perspective. On the backside of the toothbrush, there’s a notch to keep the toothbrush from rolling around, ensuring the brush head is always kept off the surface if lying flat. And just like most Philips products, a plastic case is included to keep the brush head clean during storage or travel.

    For those new to electric toothbrushes, the Phillips 4100 has an EasyStart feature turned on by default; this gently increases the power over the first 14 brushings. Since electric toothbrushes feel different than a manual toothbrush, this allows you — and your teeth — to adapt to the toothbrush over a week’s time.

    Other features include a brush head replacement reminder, low battery indicator, 14-day battery life and two-year warranty. The 4100’s charging base uses a USB-A connector, although a wall adapter isn’t included, so you’ll have to supply your own.

    The Philips Sonicare 4100 is one of a pair of Philips electric toothbrushes (the other is the Sonicare 4700) that has received the American Dental Association (ADA) seal of acceptance, which means that it has been evaluated for efficacy and safety by a team of independent dental and scientific experts.

    The Oral-B iO Series 9 smart electric toothbrush on a stone countertop

    The Oral-B iO Series 9 is by far the best smart toothbrush we tested, with an app that offered consistently accurate and useful feedback. The brush itself — a sleek metal unit with a colorful LCD display — offers seven different modes, the most out of any toothbrush we tested, along with the full suite of standard features such as an easy-to-view pressure sensor indicator and two-minute timer (with 30-second pulsing quadrant reminders).

    The seven modes include daily clean, intense clean, whitening, gum care, sensitive, super sensitive and tongue clean. Registered dental hygienist Nicole Barbour, who works for a practice in Newton, MA, told us that while most of the patients she sees only need a standard mode, a sensitive setting can be beneficial for those who are at higher risk for enamel wear, gingival attachment or tooth sensitivity. She also suggested that the gum care setting — when used with a compatible brush head — can help remove bacteria from the gum line. However, she did go on to say that there’s not enough independent data available as to whether or not all modes are in fact beneficial and exceed your regular standard mode. And for most patients, multiple mode options aren’t necessary.

    But if you’re a patient that has a specific oral need, this toothbrush allows you to fully personalize your brushing experience with its many modes. And while all brush heads are compatible for each mode type, you’ll receive the best experience by purchasing the Oral-B brush head specific to your selected mode.

    The oscillating brush, which rotates side to side rather than vibrating like the other brushes we tested, is much quieter than the other Oral-B toothbrushes in our test group, and we found it moved smoothly from one tooth to another. Oral-B also claims the “round brush head pulsates to loosen plaque and then oscillates and rotates to sweep the plaque away.”

    While it might seem like overkill for some, I appreciated the Oral-B’s smart features. With this feature, you can sync your toothbrush to the Oral-B app on your phone, which will guide you through your brushing session. When brushing, I found it very useful to be guided through each quadrant of my mouth and to see (via the 3D tracking feature) which surfaces and sections of my mouth weren’t brushed enough. With this app, you can either watch in real time or review your brushing later.

    On a busy morning, I find that I don’t always have the patience to truly focus on brushing my teeth properly, so this kept me in check and you might find similarly. Barbour told us that “most patients are in the habit of brushing in a way that may not be effective for plaque removal of all surfaces and using a smart app can benefit patients as they practice proper brushing technique and adaptation.” However, she did go on to say that “paying too much attention to the app can backfire if it distracts too much attention.”

    The app also tracks your total brush time and the amount of pressure for every brushing session. Barbour told us that seeing this information can help a patient make changes to their brushing habits as needed and improve efficacy. Wolff agreed and mentioned that tracking your brushing sessions and showing the history to your hygienist will allow them to “give you some customized instructions to improve your homecare.”

    Within the app, you are also given daily coaching tips based on your brushing habits to help you with future sessions. Conveniently, you don’t have to keep your phone in front of you while you brush. So long as your phone is within Bluetooth range, it will record your session. You don’t get the live guidance, but you will get the data on brushing time and pressure. We also found the accuracy of the app to be top-notch, which is not something we found with all of the other Bluetooth-compatible toothbrushes we tested. Within the app, you can also set up a brush head reminder and various challenges to ensure you are receiving the best oral care possible.

    Although it costs significantly more than most of the brushes we tested, the packaging comes with four brush heads in total, a magnetic charger that takes just three hours for a full charge and a travel case. The travel case even comes with its own plug for easy charging on the go.

    If you are looking for a toothbrush that will truly track your brushing habits — correctly — this is by far our favorite smart electric toothbrush we tested. Those who need some guidance while brushing or have specific oral health goals in mind will absolutely love this brush. But if you don’t believe you’ll use many of the capabilities or don’t have the need for guided brushing, and don’t want to have your phone with you at all times in the bathroom, then you probably don’t need to splurge on such an expensive toothbrush. You also might want to take into consideration the cost of replacement brush heads, as they are significantly more expensive than most of the models we tested at close to $10 per brush head.

    If you’re on the fence, you can try out the Oral-B iO Series 9 toothbrush for 60 days and if you aren’t happy, you can receive a full refund.

    The Philips One by Sonicare electric toothbrush on a stone countertop

    The Philips One by Sonicare is slim and incredibly compact. It comes in a form-fitting case that fits the brush perfectly and barely takes up any space in your toiletry bag, making it a great travel companion. Plus it comes in seven colors, making it easy for each member of your family to identify their own toothbrush.

    One of the best aspects of the toothbrush is that the rechargeable battery lasts up to 30 days, double or triple the battery life of most other electric toothbrushes we tested, allowing you to truly not worry about your toothbrush running out of battery while on the road. If you don’t want to have to worry about recharging the battery, you can instead opt for a battery-operated version of the Philips One toothbrush. The functionality of the toothbrush is exactly the same, although it runs on a single AAA battery, which lasts for approximately 90 days.

    No charging base is included with the rechargeable version; the toothbrush is also charged by a USB-C cable, so you can use the same charger you’d use with many phones, computers and other electronic devices. So although a USB-C charger comes with the Philips One toothbrush, if you happen to leave it at home, there’s a good chance you’ll be able to find another one in your bag (or perhaps get a loaner from the hotel’s front desk). A four-stage battery indicator lets you know how much life is left, and if you’re caught out, a full charge takes around eight hours.

    Although the brush doesn’t alert you to pressure like the Sonicare 4100, it has a two-minute timer, with a quadrant indicator that buzzes every 30 seconds as a reminder to move to the next section of your mouth. As with the larger Philips models you can also pause the toothbrush for up to 30 seconds and the timer will restart from the pausing point.

    We found the replaceable brush head to be very similar to a manual brush, with W-shaped bristles that let us get into tight spaces (Philips doesn’t offer any alternative brushes like it does for its main Sonicare lineup). The bristles were soft and gentle, leaving our teeth feeling extremely clean and much better than a manual toothbrush.

    A Brightline Sonic Rechargeable Toothbrush on a stone countertop

    The Brightline Sonic Rechargeable Toothbrush is as simple as they come. It doesn’t offer a pause-and-resume feature or a pressure indicator or convenience features like LED indicators, but it really delivers on basic performance, making it a good option for those wanting to try an electric toothbrush without breaking the bank. We found that the toothbrush was able to get into tight spaces between our teeth and the vibration was perfect. Our teeth felt sparkly clean and even after many uses, the bristles were fully intact.

    The Brightline allows you to adjust the intensity up and down to a level that works for your liking, though. Unlike some of the other toothbrushes, there is no indicator telling you that you are on a high or low setting, so you have to hold down the power button until you find by feel the intensity setting that works for you. Fortunately, the toothbrush remembers your vibration setting for your next brushing session. If you want something that gives you more visual direction, the pricier Brightline Sonic 5-Mode option has dedicated modes, from gentle to whitening, with LED indicators, but performance is similar.

    The toothbrush has a built-in two-minute timer with a 30-second quadrant reminder, although there is no pause functionality. This means if you need to take a break while brushing, the timer resets, which doesn’t allow you to keep track of the full 30-second or two-minute requirement. Brightline claims a full charge will give 25 days of use, one of the longest battery life spans of all of the toothbrushes we looked at.

    Replacement heads for this toothbrush are relatively inexpensive. The box comes with two brush heads, but you can purchase a four-pack for less than $10. At approximately $2.50 per head, this makes owning the Brightline more economical than many of the other brands.

    The only real downside is that the Brightline doesn’t have a pressure indicator — one powered toothbrush feature that is highly recommended by dental professionals we spoke to. It also doesn’t have different head options and is a little bulkier than most, but it gets the job done at an affordable price.

    Most dentists — along with the American Dental Association — recommend that all adults and children brush their teeth for two minutes twice a day to effectively remove plaque. Dr. Andrea Zandona, professor and chair of the Department of Comprehensive Care at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, explains that this length of exposure to fluoride toothpaste “is important to achieve the best cavity protection benefits.”

    Although you can certainly brush for two minutes with a manual toothbrush, electric toothbrushes have automatic timers and pressure sensors, as well as various brushing modes that may help you do a more thorough job of brushing your teeth and gums and, most importantly, just make it easier to do a good job brushing. Basically, whatever your oral hygiene needs or goals, it’s worth making room in your bathroom for an electric toothbrush.

    The American Dental Association suggests that this is even more the case for people who have dexterity challenges — children, people with disabilities or the elderly — or those who have dental appliances such as braces.

    However, the dental professionals we consulted all reiterated that an electric toothbrush won’t do all of the work for you. You still have to use it correctly, positioning the brush at the proper 45-degree angle to your teeth and gums and gently moving the brush head with proper pressure to cover the entire tooth surface.

    Amy King, a registered dental hygienist at Chestnut Dental Associates in Needham, MA, told us that she has seen a dramatic improvement in the oral hygiene of patients who use electric toothbrushes, so long as they use them correctly and with the appropriate settings. She sees “less inflammation and less bleeding,” and that “in some cases, people who use electric toothbrushes and admit to not flossing regularly, have gums that look as good if not better than those that floss regularly.”

    During our testing, we found a few specific functions to be extremely important during our brushing sessions. Below is a description of each functionality and options to look for when considering a toothbrush.

    Built-in timer

    As we learned, brushing for a full two minutes is extremely important when brushing your teeth. Fortunately, every toothbrush we tested included a built-in two-minute timer, which allowed us to not cheat on our brushing session. Additionally, many toothbrushes also include a vibrating alert every 30 seconds that reminds you to move on to the next quadrant of your mouth, making it easier to remember to cover all of your teeth. Many toothbrushes, although not all, allow you to pause your toothbrush for up to 30 seconds without resetting the timer.

    Pressure sensor

    The pressure you apply when brushing might not be something you actively think about. You definitely don’t want to do harm to your teeth because you really only have one set. Applying too much pressure against your teeth and gums, Zandona told us, can erode the enamel on your tooth and cause gum recession, while also wearing out your toothbrush. Dr. Evan Novick, an endodontic specialist at Novick Endodontics in Charlotte, NC, told us that “multiple studies have shown anything more than light pressure does more harm than good and a pressure indicator on a toothbrush is extremely beneficial to a patient.” Fortunately, many electric toothbrushes have the capability to let you know when you are applying too much pressure.

    Brushing modes 

    All electric toothbrushes offer a brush head that vibrates or pulsates, but some offer multiple brushing modes: gum care, sensitive, whitening, pro clean and more. Depending on the brush, these modes may simply be intensity settings targeted for different brushing tasks, or in more advanced models — such as the Philips Sonicare 6100 and Oral-B iO Series 9 — these modes actually vary the pattern of a brush’s oscillating or pulsating motion, and are often designed to work with specific replacement brush heads tailored to work with those motions.

    Either way, these brushing modes let you personalize your brushing experience to address your needs. Novick told us that he feels only some of the brushing modes had real benefits. For example, the sensitive setting is ideal for someone with hypersensitive gums or for a prescribed amount of time after a dental procedure. However, he has not found any differences in the color of the teeth of patients who have used the whitening modes on their electric toothbrushes.

    Intensity levels

    Most electric toothbrushes offer multiple intensity levels. This allows you to select a low, medium or high power option, which changes the speed at which the brush head oscillates or vibrates (this is distinct from “modes,” which may change the pattern of the head’s movement).

    Many hygienists love variable intensity as it allows those new to using an electric toothbrush to ease into it and get used to the feeling. Registered dental hygienist Ana Perez, also from Chestnut Dental Associates, told us that this feature “helps patients that have very sensitive teeth or gum recession/root exposure because the toothbrush can go gentler or slower on those areas while still removing plaque and biofilm effectively.”

    Smart features

    Some of the newer, higher-end toothbrushes allow you to connect your toothbrush to an app on your phone where the app will guide you through your brushing session, the idea being that over time the feedback will teach you to be a better brusher. Many of the apps will also record data from your session, such as how long you brushed and areas of your mouth that were missed.

    Hygienist Amy King feels that these apps can be very beneficial to anyone who wants to improve their oral health. “Using an electric toothbrush app,” she says, “is like having an in-home brushing tutor and allows the patient the opportunity to practice their brushing technique and habits conveniently in the privacy and comfort of their home.” While she’s seen a lot of interest, she has found that the apps aren’t for everyone — while many of her patients use their electric toothbrushes every day, more often than not, they have stopped using the companion apps.

    King and several other hygienists also appreciated when patients brought in their historical brushing data, so check with your dentist’s office to see if that might be valuable for them.

    To help find the best options, we picked out 10 of the most popular and well-reviewed electric toothbrushes ranging from just $30 to upwards of $300. We went through the entire brushing process with each electric toothbrush — multiple times — and tested all of their functionality. We brushed every which way possible to truly put them to the test, while comparing their overall performance and effectiveness.

    So, over the course of a lot of brushing sessions, we assessed all of the brushes in the following areas.

    Installation and setup

    We checked out whether each brush ran on a battery or used a rechargeable battery, as well as whether it shipped with a base or charging cable. We measured how long the brush would run on a single charge or battery swap. We also checked out what type of brush heads the toothbrushes came with, what sorts of replacements were available and how easy they were to swap.

    For the brushes that used companion apps and were connected via Bluetooth, we checked out how easy it was to connect, set up an account and start using the app.

    We also looked at design, assessing whether the brushes included cases or brush-head covers for storage and travel and well-designed bases for use in a bathroom, and checked out handling in general.

    Performance

    We looked for brushes that offered an automated two-minute timer, the most useful feature according to the dental professionals we talked to. We also looked for 30-second quadrant timers, which keep you moving the brush to cover the entire mouth.

    Beyond that, we checked out if and how well a pressure sensor indicator (letting you know if you are brushing too hard or soft) was implemented, and tried out all of the brushing modes and intensity levels where those were an option.

    We also assessed app accuracy for the connected smart toothbrushes, checking to see if the recordings of our brushing sessions matched our notes.

    And importantly, we paid attention to what the brushes felt like to use and how clean they left our mouths feeling.

    Maintenance

    We looked at how often brush heads should be swapped and how easy it was to clean each brush. We also looked at the cost of replacement brush heads, and whether they were compatible with generic brush heads for less, as well as the availability of subscription options.

    We also noted whether a satisfaction guarantee or warranty was supplied, and whether the brushes we examined had received the ADA Seal of Acceptance.

    The Oral-B Pro 1000 costs about the same as our top pick, the Philips Sonicare 4100, and also comes from a well-respected brand, but offers fewer useful features at the same price. The toothbrush comes with an oscillating brush head, where we found the pressure to be too strong. Additionally, the toothbrush was incredibly loud and sounded like a freight train was in the bathroom.

    Like most other electric toothbrushes, there’s a two-minute timer (with 30-second indicators), but after the two minutes is up, the toothbrush will keep on going. This is great for those looking to brush for longer, but you’ll have to remember to switch it off when you’ve had enough.

    This toothbrush comes with a single cross-action brush head, but is compatible with many other Oral-B brush heads — such as ones that are geared towards flossing, sensitivity and precision. You can purchase a year’s worth of replacement brush heads at slightly over $5 per head, or there are also subscription options from Oral-B directly (although we found them significantly cheaper on Amazon). There are also many generic brush heads for this toothbrush, which can cost less, as low as $1 to $2 per head.

    At this price point, we wish it offered a more noticeable pressure sensor indicator (there’s no visible lamp, just tactile feedback) and multiple intensity levels. The pressure sensor functionality just stops the oscillation once you brush too hard — which you might not even notice — and doesn’t offer any indicators, such as a vibrating handle, beeping sound or light on the handle as we saw with many of the other toothbrushes. A full charge also only lasts for approximately 10 days, which is less than most of the other brushes tested.

    The Oral-B Genius 6000 offers many useful features — an oscillating brush head, pressure sensor and built-in timer — as well as five different modes, which will help you pick the best brushing type for your personal needs. But the corresponding app is one of the most cumbersome to use among the smart brushes we tested.

    The only way to get the full picture of your brushing is to hold the phone up directly in front of your face, while also brushing. This is incredibly difficult and simply didn’t work for us, at least not handheld. You’ll need to purchase a suction cup phone holder for your mirror, or have space for a stand. If not, you’ll lose the option of tracking your brushing coverage — which is the best part of the app. It’s also very loud, similar to the Oral-B Pro 1000 toothbrush.

    The Philips Sonicare 9900 Prestige — the company’s latest premium smart toothbrush — has only a single button onboard, with all of the other controls accessible only through the app. We found the app itself simple to use and helpful, with a clear layout for tracking your brushing progress and plenty of real-time feedback on how much pressure and motion you’re using (and should use). It accurately tracked our movements and gave us good feedback, but we felt that the brush made us rely on our phone more than the other smart brushes we tested.

    The Sonicare 9900 Prestige offers three intensity settings and five different cleaning modes, and has customizable vibration alerts that let you avoid scrubbing too hard or applying too much pressure. While the app will only track your progress if you leave it open while brushing, the brush itself saves your settings from session to session, so you don’t have to set everything up again each time.

    The design makes cleaning easy, and the brush comes with a slim leather travel case and USB-C travel cable, making it easy to take the toothbrush on the road. It comes with an all-purpose brush head, but it’s compatible with the many Philips Sonicare heads on the market.

    We loved using this toothbrush, but we’d only recommend it if you are very committed to smart features and plan to always — and we mean always — have your phone on you while brushing your teeth. But, if you are dedicated to oral hygiene and looking for the best feedback possible, then this app will give you just that.

    The Hum by Colgate offers one of the sleekest designs with its slim handle and small base. Aesthetically, it’s a nice touch next to the bathroom sink and there are multiple color options to complement your bathroom decor. It’s also incredibly light to hold, making brushing your teeth an easier feat.

    The brush offers three different levels of intensity and has a companion app to track the frequency, duration and accuracy of your brushing. We found, however, that while frequency and duration tracking were spot-on, it occasionally didn’t correctly identify which section of our mouth was being brushed. We did appreciate some of the app’s other features, such as the ability to use sensors on the brush to give us real-time reminders on our technique, noticing when we strayed away from holding the toothbrush at a 45-degree angle.

    We didn’t like the brush head’s shape and size as much as the Philips Sonicare heads, but appreciated the included tongue brush on the back of the brush head. While a toothbrush’s brush head can also clean your tongue, we preferred the dedicated brush, which got into the spaces on my tongue more easily and left me feeling like it had done a better job cleaning.

    We tested the rechargeable version of this toothbrush, but there’s also a cheaper battery-operated version available. The design is identical and functionality is similar save for offering only two intensity levels instead of three.

    The Philips Sonicare 6100 is a step up from the Philips Sonicare 4100, with a very similar look and feel. However, the main difference is that the 6100 version offers three intensity levels and three different modes — the default clean mode, along with whitening and gum care, which offer different brush head motions and automatically set the timer accordingly. To get the best results from these modes, Philips suggests purchasing brush heads designed specifically to take advantage of them.

    Similar to the 4100 version, the Philips Sonicare 6100 also offers a two-minute timer with 30-second pulser (with pausing capability), a pressure sensor indicator, brush head replacement reminder, 14-day battery life and two-year warranty.

    The Philips Sonicare also comes with a travel case, which is on the larger side, but it can fit the toothbrush and two brush heads.

    Although this toothbrush offers slightly more features than the 4100 version, for more than double the cost, we didn’t think this toothbrush offers enough enhancements to make it worth it. However, if you are specifically looking for a toothbrush that specializes in whitening your teeth or taking care of your gums, then this toothbrush has those options.

    The subscription Quip Electric Toothbrush looks very similar to a manual toothbrush, but based on our testing, is only a slight step up. While it vibrates, it’s less intense than any other brush we tested and we felt there wasn’t enough pressure, leaving us to brush our teeth with a traditional scrubbing motion. If you prefer a more gentle pressure, this might work for you, but we believe the majority of users will be disappointed, especially since there’s only one intensity setting.

    The Quip doesn’t have multiple modes, adjustable intensity or any of the extra features that fancier brushes have. However, unlike your everyday toothbrush, there’s a built-in two-minute timer and 30-second indicators to help ensure you’re brushing your teeth for the appropriate amount of time.

    We tested the “smart” version of the Quip (there are cheaper options that don’t have any smarts), which uses an app to tracks information such as brushing duration, coverage, strokes and intensity, alerting you if you are brushing too hard or too fast. Although limiting, for the information gathered, we found it to be incredibly accurate. You can also earn Quip points for brushing your teeth, which you can redeem for rewards like discounts on refills.

    Unlike most of the other toothbrushes we tested, the Quip runs on a single AAA battery rather than a rechargeable battery pack. This comes in handy if you’re traveling or just limited on electrical outlets, especially since the battery lasts for approximately 90 days.

    A $5 quarterly subscription gets you a replacement brush head and AAA battery every three months. You can also get the brush head and battery for the same price a la carte, but the subscription gives you a lifetime warranty on the toothbrush (otherwise you get only a year) so it’s a somewhat better deal. You can cancel your subscription or skip a delivery at any time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best first aid kits in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best first aid kits in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Every home needs a dedicated first aid kit, even if just to organize the supplies scattered around in medicine cabinets, drawers and cupboards and make it much easier to grab them in a stressful situation. Whether you’re dealing with a fire, a weather emergency or just a skinned knee, an organized, complete kit can let you treat minor injuries quickly and effectively.

    To find the best first aid kits to keep in your home, car or with you while traveling, we tested 13 popular kits, ranging from pocket-size containers to backpacks full of gear, and consulted with experts at the Red Cross to best understand how to choose the right first aid kit for any situation.

    Best first aid kit overall

    An easy-to-use ring-binder-style design, high-quality products and all the essentials recommended by the Red Cross means you’ll be sure to have everything you need and be able to find it when you need it.

    Best budget first aid kit

    Don’t let the rock-bottom price of this kit fool you — it provides a useful collection of name-brand items packed securely in an easy-to-transport case.

    Best first aid kit for camping, backpacking and outdoor adventures

    In addition to basic supplies for household use, this AMK kit is lightweight, it prioritizes organization and it includes several items specifically for treating common hiking, backpacking and camping issues.

    With a heavy-duty case and a variety of high-quality items inside, this kit was a no-brainer as our top pick overall. Right out of the box we noticed how rugged and well made the case itself felt, complemented by metal grommets and sturdy zipper pulls. A wide handle also made it convenient for carrying around the house during our testing. We’re also big fans of the bright red color, which makes it easy to spot in a cluttered car trunk or backpack.

    What really sets this kit apart from the other models we tested was its ring-binder-style design. Once unzipped, the contents are displayed in clear vinyl pockets that you simply flip through to find the item you want. This design also allows it to lay flat like a book while you use it, and the extra-large sleeve pouches at the front and back of the kit are large enough to store other emergency documents, such as allergy issues or specific medical issues of a family member. When it comes to clear organization and finding first aid items quickly and easily in an emergency, it really doesn’t get much easier than this.

    Its focus on providing clear and concise first aid instructions and information was the other factor that separated this kit from the rest of the pack. In addition to a manual that includes straightforward instructions on dealing with common medical emergencies like choking, stroke, seizures and cardiac issues, the kit also includes several extra-large info sheets. These sheets are presented in large clear pockets on the left-hand side, with their corresponding first aid items on the right-hand side as you flip through.

    This kit was also only one of three other kits we tested that provided all of the essential items recommended by our Red Cross expert, Jeffrey L. Pellegrino. It also included two pairs of non-latex exam gloves, which, as the Red Cross explains, will allow you to change gloves if needed, or allow a second responder to help out at the same time. We were also impressed with the overall quality of the 115 pieces inside. The 1-inch-by-10-yard tape roll was a particular standout, and along with the bandages and dressings, held up really well during hands-on testing. Although the scissors were relatively small compared to the EMT-style shears found in other kits, they had no trouble cutting through the tape or trimming gauze.

    The durability, usability and variety provided by this kit make it just as useful in your cupboard as a go-to home first aid kit as it would in the trunk of your car or backpack on a camping trip.

    The Band-Aid Johnson and Johnson 140-piece first aid kit, with all contents laid out on a white tabletop

    While this kit doesn’t have the quantity or variety of most other options, its rock-bottom price makes it a great choice for those on a budget. We’re honestly not even sure exactly how this kit can be priced this low, considering the bandages alone are worth almost 75% of the cost of the entire kit, and it still provides eight other products! A durable plastic case ensures that everything stays safely inside, and the oversized handle makes it convenient to carry around from place to place.

    Even though there aren’t any spacers or really any organizational elements to this kit (it’s essentially a big lunch box), it was actually easier to find what we wanted than many other kits. Since nearly every item is included in its own separate box, there aren’t a hundred small pieces floating around needing to be organized into sleeves or pouches. When you’re finished with the bandages, or Neosporin, or gauze, you simply put the rest back in its box and toss it back in the kit.

    All of the bandages performed really well in our testing, especially the “Water Block” Band-Aids that stayed put even after washing the dishes. The included Red Cross manual is a great resource and covers a wide range of emergency situations as well as the necessary steps to treat them effectively.

    We’d like to be clear that this kit does not include all the essentials recommended by the Red Cross, such as gloves, a tape roll or a CPR face shield. It also lacks a pair of scissors and tweezers, so you’ll probably want to add those separately. That being said, the pieces that this kit does include are well thought out and all high-quality name-brand products, making this a really practical kit to have on hand for common first aid situations.

    The Adventure Medical Kits Mountain Series Backpacker first aid kit, with all contents laid out on a white tabletop

    What makes this kit so great is that even though it’s designed to be convenient and functional for backpacking and hiking, it’s also versatile enough to be used in your home or stashed in your car for emergencies. Except for a CPR face mask, it provides everything recommended by our Red Cross expert, along with an impressive variety of bandages, including knuckle and butterfly options.

    Our favorite aspect of this kit is its unique design, which unzips to reveal four distinct storage pouches, each labeled with the general purpose of the contents inside. This organizational layout could come in extremely handy when out on a trail or campsite, where you don’t have a convenient surface to unload your kit and find what you need. The semitransparent material helps even more, giving you an idea of what’s inside each pouch before you even unzip it. A fabric handle on top even allows you to hang it from a branch while you work, making things even easier.

    What makes this kit specifically useful for outdoor adventurers, in addition to the well-organized design, are the items most useful for those who may not have immediate access to a pharmacy or health care facilities. Things like insect bite wipes, Diamode tablets for treating diarrhea, moleskin for blisters and a large plastic syringe for irrigating wounds are not always found in all first aid kits. A pair of heavy-duty EMT-style shears — as opposed to cheaper, flimsy scissors — could also come in handy for cutting moleskin, or clothes to help make a tourniquet or splint.

    Another great feature of this kit that was also included in the other two AMK kits we tested is the first aid manual. This “Guide to Wilderness Medicine” was by far the most comprehensive and helpful manual we found in our testing, and with so much information, it would be invaluable if you found yourself in an emergency situation while away from roads or the ability to call for help.

    You need a first aid kit because they keep all your medical supplies together in one place, so if an emergency does occur, you’ll be able to act quickly. If you or a family member needs first aid, you aren’t going to feel like hunting around your house looking for bandages in the bathroom drawer, your desk for a pair of scissors, the medicine cabinet for antibiotic ointment, etc. A first aid kit is also portable, so if someone crashes their bike in the driveway or suffers a campfire burn in the backyard, you can simply grab the kit and be confident that you have everything you need.

    If you’re out of your house on a hike, camping trip, soccer practice or scout outing, a first aid kit is even more important. Even relatively minor injuries can become serious issues if you have to wait until you reach a hospital or civilization to get treatment. This will also prevent you from having to improvise with unsanitary or inappropriate items that aren’t meant for treatment. A sterile bandage is going to be a lot more effective in the long run than a dirty handkerchief or sweaty T-shirt.

    A first aid kit is also an important piece of an effective emergency or disaster kit, which is a larger, more comprehensive kit meant to prepare you for a weather or natural disaster. In this case, you may not have access to a hospital or ambulance for some time, making an effective first aid kit even more important to have on hand.

    Group of bagged first aid kits laid out on a white tabletop

    Alex Rennie/CNN Underscored

    A first aid kit should contain everything you need to treat a variety of common first aid ailments and injuries. Unfortunately, there are a ton of first aid kits on the market, and all of them seem to have a different idea of what exactly should go inside. To help simplify things, we consulted with Jeffrey L. Pellegrino, Ph.D., MPH, senior advisor to the American Red Cross Scientific Advisory Council and professor of emergency management and homeland security at the University of Akron, to tell us the five essential items that you should make sure are in your first aid kit:

    • First aid guidebook
    • Non-latex gloves
    • Assorted self-adhesive bandages, gauze, roller bandages and adhesive tape
    • Triple antibiotic ointment
    • A breathing barrier to prevent transmission of disease while performing rescue breaths.

    It’s worth noting that just because a first aid kit doesn’t include all these items doesn’t mean you should automatically write it off as inferior. If it’s missing one or two components, feel free to purchase them separately. Pellegrino made sure to add that for a kit specifically for children “include any lifesaving medications (epinephrine, inhalers, etc.) that a child might need.”

    Pellegrino recommends asking yourself the following questions to help determine the best kit for you:

    • How many people does the kit need to serve? (A kit for seven people on a kayaking trip needs to be larger than one for a few family members at home.)
    • What are the types of injuries you can expect? (You’ll want to be prepared for more serious injuries on a camping or backpacking trip than a day at the amusement park.)
    • What else do you have to work with? (If you have other supplies to work and improvise with, you can keep the size and weight of your first aid kit down.)
    • Where will it be stored? (Pellegrino explains that first aid kits and their contents are susceptible to the environment, “so where and how you store it is important to it being useful.”)

    Most first aid kits appear to be fairly similar, which makes it tough to confidently choose the best one. Although we’re not licensed first responders, we did our best to evaluate and compare each kit by using criteria based on our research and interviews with experts in the field as well as hands-on testing of each kit’s components. We used these results to select our top choices, and to understand the pros and cons of the rest of our testing pool.

    We interviewed and consulted with several experts in the first aid field, including Pellegrino. Pellegrino helped inform us as to the essential items that should be included in a first aid kit as well as other factors to keep in mind when choosing one. We cross-checked each of our kits with his recommendations, noting which items were missing or of poor quality. It’s worth noting that you can purchase items separately to supplement your kit, so missing an essential item or two isn’t an automatic deal breaker.

    Proper ease of use is essential when it comes to first aid kits, allowing you to use it effectively and efficiently. We evaluated how convenient and straightforward each first aid kit was to use, noting how easy they were to open, find what you want, repack when finished and close back up.

    Being able to find items quickly is essential in an emergency, so it’s important that your kit is well organized. The easier it is to repack everything when you’re finished will also save you hassle and headache when it’s time to use the kit next time. After opening each kit, we went through its compartments, pockets, sleeves and other organizational elements, taking note of how easy it was to locate individual items and how thought out the overall design layout was.

    A first aid kit should be durable enough to withstand a moderate amount of wear and tear without ripping, cracking or coming apart. While using each kit, we paid close attention to their overall sturdiness and durability when it came to straps, clasps, zippers and closures.

    We opened up each kit and did as much hands-on testing as possible with their contents, assessing the quality of the included items. This included applying bandages and tape to our hands and arms and noting how well their adhesive performed, testing any single-use thermometers, tearing open antiseptic wipes to make sure they weren’t dried out and pulling on any examination gloves or masks. We paid close attention to the build quality and material of any tools or instruments, such as tweezers and scissors, which had a broader range in quality than we expected. While some kits provided high-quality EMT shears and metal tweezers, others used cheap, flimsy scissors and plastic tweezers.

    Doom & Bloom Ultimate Compact Grab N’ Go First Aid Kit

    $129 $99 at Doom & Bloom

    If you’re looking for a kit that’s more focused on treating serious, traumatic injuries, this is probably the option for you. It includes several emergency items that weren’t found in any other kit, including a heavy-duty elastic tourniquet, an Israeli compression bandage and blood-clotting granules. What I really liked about this kit is that, in addition to a basic first aid and CPR manual, it also includes a large instructional sheet that walks you through the steps to treat and control severe bleeding injuries. This sheet uses large images and short, straightforward instructions, which is exactly what you want when your adrenaline is pumping and you don’t have time to carefully flip through an entire book. Even the tourniquet has easy-to-follow instructions printed directly on it, clearly indicating how tight to apply it. The quality of all the items in this pack were all legitimate, name-brand products too, unlike some obscure or knockoff items I’ve seen in lower-quality kits. The high price, relatively small amount of light-duty bandages and lack of a CPR face mask ultimately kept this kit out of our top spot, but if those aren’t a deal breaker for you, this is a fantastic kit.

    The relatively bulky size of this kit isn’t the most convenient for those with limited space or those who plan on stashing their kit in their backpack or glove box, but its variety of essential items makes it a good basic option to have on hand at home or a job site. The most valuable feature of this kit is the fact that it includes all of the items recommended by the Red Cross, which was only the case in two other kits we tested. It also includes a nice supply of bandage types and sizes as well as extra-large sterile trauma pads and conforming gauze rolls, essential for minimizing blood loss during serious emergencies. A pair of triangular bandages and safety pins are also convenient for putting together a makeshift sling. Two pairs of gloves was a nice perk as well, as most kits provide only a single set. We were surprised to see that the only medication provided in this kit was a single aspirin packet, whereas almost every other kit provided at least an additional supply of ibuprofen or acetaminophen. The case itself didn’t feel especially durable, though, and I nearly snapped off a hinge clip the first time I tried to open it.

    Even though this kit is essentially just a large, heavy-duty Ziploc bag, I still found it convenient to use (plus, this makes the entire kit completely waterproof). It hits the sweet spot of just enough items to be useful, but not so much that it’s hard to find what you want. A smaller, resealable bag inside helps to store the smaller items, and even if you need to dump out of the contents to locate a specific item, it’s not a big deal to just toss everything back in. It offers a good selection of useful items like burn gels, anti-diarrhea tablets (very valuable if needed on a hike or camping), electrolyte tablets and sting relief pads. We would have liked a little variety in the bandage selection, though, like butterfly or knuckle options. We also appreciated the inclusion of a small sheet of moleskin, but since it’s not precut and there are no scissors included in the kit, you’re going to have a tough time applying it. We also wish the plastic tweezers were metal, although this may have something to do with preventing accidentally puncturing the storage bag itself. Although this kit doesn’t include a first aid manual, it does provide a CPR face shield with detailed CPR instruction printed on it, which is a big plus.

    The compact sibling of the AMK Mountain Backpacker Medical Kit, this AMK kit is just as easy to use and has almost as much convenient, hiker-friendly functionality. Once unzipped, it folds open to reveal three separate organization pouches, each labeled with the basic use of the items inside: “Wound Care/Burn/Blister,” “Medication,” “Cuts & Scrapes” and “Stop Bleeding Fast,” which contains a large trauma pad and rubber gloves. To make things even easier, the specific contents of each of these pouches are printed on the back of the kit, so you can locate what you want before you even unzip it. The comprehensive “Guide to Wilderness Medicine” is a great resource to have on hand while out adventuring, and covers helpful first aid situations like fishhook removal, diabetic emergencies, lightning injuries and altitude illness. In addition to a nice variety of quality bandages, precut moleskin patches and gauze pads, this kit features a really nice pair of EMT-style shears and compact metal tweezers. It does lack a CPR face shield, though, so keep that in mind.

    This compact kit is small enough to fit practically anywhere — it’s about the size of an Altoids tin — and with just 27 items inside, it’s easy to dump out and pick out what you want without much hassle. Despite the limited number of pieces, it still provides an impressive variety of bandages, such as butterfly, knuckle and spot options, as well as antibiotic ointment. I also appreciated the included razor blade, which in the absence of a pair of scissors could be useful for carefully cutting through clothing or stripping cloth to make a tourniquet. Considering the extremely low price, there’s no reason not to grab a couple of these to toss into your tackle box, glove box or backpack, but you’ll still need to purchase a full-size kit if you want to be prepared for a wide range of first aid situations.

    If you’re planning on traveling abroad and want to bring along a first aid kit, this AMK option would be a great choice. My absolute favorite part of this kit is its visual indicator diagrams, which allow you to quickly and accurately explain the details of a first aid situation to others, even if you don’t speak the same language. With the addition of its handy pencil and paper, these visual aids can help you transcend any language barriers. I’ve personally struggled to explain the state of an injured hiker up the trail to a native speaker, and tools like these would have made the situation much easier. The kit itself is also convenient to use, and the transparent sleeves make it easy to find what you’re looking for. It includes a great first aid manual — just like the other AMK kits — and the contents included a nice mix of bandage sizes and styles as well as moleskin for blister treatment. It doesn’t include a CPR breathing barrier, and it curiously lacked a pair of scissors, although that does make it more convenient for air travel.

    Looking for a first aid kit that’s a little more functional? This VSSL kit is stored in a metal tube that doubles as an extremely bright LED flashlight on one end and a compass on the other. A rolled-up sleeve inside contains the first aid items, and when unrolled, it showcases everything in transparent mesh pockets. Unfortunately, unscrewing the end caps and pulling out the sleeve isn’t the most convenient, and it takes some time to accomplish. It’s a tight fit inside the tube too, so reinserting takes a little finesse. That being said, the supplies themselves were of good quality, especially the 3M brand Steri-Strips, which we’ve found to be extremely useful for closing longer cuts that bandages struggle with. This kit didn’t include a pair of scissors, but the compact metal tweezers were nice quality and should hold up well. The disposable thermometers were a nice perk, although I did find them to be 2 degrees lower than my actual temperature when compared to the result from my home thermometer. The 45-piece total is relatively low compared to the other options on our list, so it won’t be practical to cover the needs of more than a couple people. It is completely waterproof, though, which could be a valuable selling point for a kayaker or river rafter.

    This kit probably isn’t for the inexperienced, but if you have the proper training and are confident using professional medical instruments, it could be a good fit. By including advanced medical supplies like a stethoscope, a blood pressure cuff and a range of oral airway sizes, the items in this kit can be used to monitor and treat serious first aid events, as long as you know how to use them. If you’re not specifically trained in these instruments, you could end up doing more harm than good if you attempt to use them during an emergency. The relatively brief first aid manual makes it even more important that a trained responder use this kit. We were most impressed with the sturdiness and organization-friendly design of the backpack itself, which features a mind-boggling amount of compartments, pockets, pouches, sleeves and elastic straps. Many of these are located on the exterior of the bag too, allowing you to store your most used or time-sensitive items within easy reach. The high quantity of items included, in addition to the professional instruments and useful tools like EMT shears, forceps and a penlight for concussion diagnosis, make this kit a practical choice to have on hand at an event like a sports camp or scout trip.

    If you’re interested in a high-end kit that’s designed with durability and variety in mind, this could be exactly what you’re looking for, though it comes at a price. Right out of the box, I could tell that the bag itself was extremely durable, and the clips, Velcro and zippers felt sturdy and secure as well. You can really throw this thing around without worrying too much about damaging it. Inside, the kit opens up into two large compartments, each with their own collection of pockets, sleeves and elastic bands, containing a huge amount of gear. In addition to a great variety and quantity of bandages, gauze pads and tape, it also includes a pair of EMT-style shears — the best quality of all the options I tested — a battery-powered thermometer and a penlight with a handy chart printed on the side for comparing dilated pupils. Items like a finger splint, burn creams and a large Burnshield trauma dressing make this kit especially well suited for camping excursions. All this gear is packed in separate baggies for specific injuries and treatments, making it relatively easy to keep things organized. That being said, some items are hidden in hard-to-find compartments, and if what you’re looking for isn’t in plain view, you may need to take most of the kit apart until you find it. It was also a challenge to repack as well, especially if you forget where everything needs to go.

    This zippered kit is simple to open and use, and it contains a surprisingly large quantity of items, most notably the 187 individual adhesive bandages in a range of sizes. The clear plastic pockets made it easy to see a lot of items at once, although anything stored in the rear sleeves will need a little more digging to access. Considering the low price, you’re definitely getting a pretty good bang for your buck with this kit and its nearly 300 total items. In addition to the basics, it also includes several useful items not always found in kits in this price range, such as sting relief pads, tongue depressors that can be used as finger splints and disposable thermometers. We do wish the 1/2-inch tape rolls were a little wider, but they still provided a decent amount of security during my testing. The small pair of scissors felty pretty cheap and flimsy as well, but in their defense, they did cut through the moleskin sheets and tape during my testing fairly easily. This kit include all the Red Cross essentials except for the CPR breathing barrier, so you’ll need to purchase one separately if that’s a priority.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best emergency radios in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best emergency radios in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Because severe weather situations can develop extremely quickly, it’s imperative you give yourself as much time as possible to prepare. Emergency radios are designed to give you a head start, providing access to NOAA weather frequencies that can alert you to upcoming or current weather situations like flash floods, hurricanes, blizzards, tornadoes and more. And to make sure you can keep using them as an emergency is happening, many are also designed with hand cranks and solar panels so you can extend their running time practically indefinitely even without access to power. With battery-charging capability and AM/FM bands, they’re also a useful addition to camping or hiking gear.

    We put nine of the most popular emergency radios to the test, comparing their ability to issue alerts and receive emergency weather broadcasts, and assessing how functional and useful they would be in an actual emergency situation.

    The best emergency radio overall

    With easy-to-use alerts, four charging options, a bright LCD screen, a powerful flashlight and straightforward controls, the Midland ER310 outperformed the other radios we tested in every area and makes a valuable addition to your household emergency kit.

    The best emergency radio overall: Midland ER310

    If you’re looking for an emergency radio that’s extremely easy to use while providing a variety of useful bells and whistles, look no further than the Midland ER310, a solidly built weather alert radio that performed well on all of our tests and was simple to use — which means it’ll be there if you need it and you’ll have no problem operating it when you do.

    The ER310 is well-built, with a sturdy, high-quality feel, and the textured body makes it comfortable to pick up and maintain a good grip on while carrying around. Thanks to a large, bright, backlit LCD screen I was able to maneuver through the different bands and frequencies without any trouble, and the clear, helpful instruction manual provided any extra assistance I needed. The ER310 is a weather alert radio, not just a weather band radio, which means it is able to receive emergency-band alerts automatically without you having to tune in first — a useful feature during hurricane season.

    An emergency checklist was included in the box as well, which was a nice perk and valuable for anyone buying this radio as part of a larger household emergency kit.

    The Midland ER310 performed well in testing, providing an impressive 26 minutes of radio time after just 60 seconds of hand cranking. The large handle of the crank was also the most comfortable of all the radios in our group, which can make a big difference if you end up needing it in an extended emergency situation. Its solar panel was also able to charge the radio enough after an hour in direct sunlight to provide full functionality, and filled the battery to 1/3 after six hours. Your results may vary on these measures depending on the speed you turn the crank or cloudiness of the sky, but under the conditions in which we tested, and in relation to the rest of the radios tested, these results put the ER310 at the top of the group.

    Setting up the ER301 to receive alerts and receiving the NOAA weather alert test to confirm couldn’t have been easier, thanks to a dedicated “Alert” button that enables the function. Other radios we tested used a multipurpose button that enabled alerts and functioned as a “menu” button. Even though that’s not a dealbreaker, we appreciated that the ER310 gave us one less step to remember, an additional point in its favor in a stressful situation.

    I was also impressed with the brightness of the integrated flashlight, which provided three settings to choose from: standard, bright and flashing. Lower light settings help to conserve battery life, and come in handy if you need to read a map and not just illuminate a hallway. The placement of the button and raised grip also gave an ergonomic, flashlight-like feel to the whole unit, making it easy to direct the beam where I needed it.

    Its rechargeable 2,600 mAh battery was the second-largest in our testing group, and combined with the three other power options (solar, hand crank or six AAA batteries) makes the Midland ER310 a reliable choice for anyone who wants to be prepared for power outages and have the ability to charge their mobile devices.

    What’s the difference between an emergency radio and regular radio?

    Emergency radios are designed to provide accurate and up-to-date weather information and alerts using the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) network of radio stations, while your typical transistor radio will only receive AM/FM stations. Granted, in an emergency like a hurricane or flood situation, your AM/FM stations may provide weather info, but they’re not going to provide the around-the-clock updates that you get from a dedicated NOAA station. Emergency radios can also offer additional features that can be valuable in an emergency, like hand cranks and solar panel chargers when batteries run low, and USB ports to charge your phone.

    If you think you could be in an emergency weather situation, you should probably get an emergency radio. Power grids can go out, cell towers can go down, phone batteries can die, and in fast-moving weather events, up-to-date information can give you time to get to safety.

    Those who live in areas frequented by dangerous weather events like flash floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes should absolutely have an emergency radio. Plus, according to the National Weather Service, NOAA broadcasts can include non-weather emergencies and natural disasters when appropriate, making them even more useful.

    The extra bells and whistles of an emergency radio may seem gimmicky at first, but considering the uncertain and unpredictable nature of weather and natural emergencies, they can be extremely useful when the time comes. To choose the best option for you, take some time to think about the types of weather emergencies that are common to your area, and the features that would be most helpful to you.

    You should also make sure you’re aware of whether or not you’re buying a weather band radio or a weather alert radio. We suggest a weather alert radio, like the Midland ER310 — these will automatically alert you of weather emergencies whether the radio is turned on and tuned in or not, while weather band radios must be turned on and tuned into the emergency band to receive the alert. Weather band radios have their uses if you’re expecting poor weather, but weather alert radios are more generally useful since situations can change quickly.

    If you want to give yourself as many options as possible when it comes to power, go with a radio that has at least three charging methods. Whether those are solar panels, hand cranks, a rechargeable battery or replaceable alkaline batteries, they all add up to being more prepared for emergencies that could last more than a day or two.

    USB charging capability is another useful feature. Having your radio double as a power bank for your phone can be even more valuable than receiving NOAA transmissions, and can allow you to call for help when necessary. Combined with a manual crank or solar panel, these two features can keep your phone functioning even during power outages.

    The type of light source is another factor to consider. While flashlight-style beams are great for searching around the house when the power goes out, they’re not as useful for tasks like reading or eating in the dark. These activities would benefit from a lantern-style light that can cast a broader beam and doesn’t require anyone to hold it in place.

    A group of seven emergency radios on a grassy lawn, charging in the sun via solar panels.

    Since many of the radios we tested had similar features, and it can be overwhelming to try and choose one without seeing them in person, we ran each one through a comprehensive testing and evaluation process. This allowed us to confidently select our top pick, and will hopefully provide the information you need to choose the best option for you.

    Perhaps most importantly, an emergency radio should be easy to use, since you won’t want to waste precious time searching and pressing buttons or fumbling through an instruction manual during an emergency. We paid close attention to the layout and function of the buttons or dials, and made note of any steps or controls that were confusing or required any trial and error to use correctly.

    To assess performance, we tuned each radio into our local NOAA weather broadcast, comparing both how simple the tuning process was and the clarity of the transmission from our basement. For the radios that were designed to automatically alert you when a weather alert is issued, we activated the “alert” setting, and waited until the NOAA’s weekly alert test, which occurs every Wednesday. We compared how effectively each radio received the alert, as well as how having the “alert” setting activated affected the rest of the radio’s functions. (The Kaito KA340 Weather Alert Radio for example, required you to turn this alert setting off if you wanted to use any other radio function, which seems impractical.)

    After draining the batteries overnight, we evaluated the effectiveness of each radio’s various charging methods. To look at hand-crank charging, we cranked continuously for one minute, then left the radio running on the NOAA weather station and timed how long it took to run out of juice. We noted how ergonomic the crank handles felt, how comfortable they were to use and the effort required to turn them. For radios with solar panels, we again drained their batteries overnight and then placed them in direct sunlight in our backyard. We checked in after an hour to see how much, or if any, battery power was generated, and again six hours later.

    While setting up and testing each radio, we kept a close eye on their overall build quality. We noted whether they felt cheap and flimsy or sturdy and well-built. We also made sure to use all the dials, sliders, knobs and buttons to see if any were loose and rattled around, or if they had a solid, secure feel.

    We explored each radio’s light features, especially those that had multiple settings like SOS beacons or lantern-style LEDS that could be more useful than just a simple flashlight-style beam. We compared their brightness as well, and how simple or confusing they were to turn on and off.

    The storage capacity of the battery, measured in mAh, indicates how much power your radio will be able to hold and how effective it will be when charging a cell phone (current flagship phones have batteries rated in the 3,000-4,000 mAh range). We checked each radios specs to find out their specific mAh, and was surprised to find such a wide range (850 to 4,000 mAh) within our testing group; we preferred radios with more capacity.

    We compared each radio’s power source options, battery capacity, any USB charging abilities and whether or not they had a backlit display. This gave us a better idea of each radio’s overall functionality and the value it could provide in an emergency.

    FosPower Emergency Solar Hand Crank Portable Radio

    A low-cost alternative, the FosPower Emergency Solar Hand Crank Portable Radio still provides a good amount of useful features and four charging options. Its manual tuner knobs were simple to use, and I had no issues quickly finding the NOAA station I was looking for. This is a weather band radio rather than a weather alert model, so it won’t automatically receive NOAA alerts; you’ll have to tune in first when you expect to face threatening weather conditions. This radio lacks the digital tuning and push-button controls of higher-end options, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing — the simple design, without menus or digital control, means there’s little to go wrong, and there’s no need to remember what buttons perform which functions if you’re under stress. And older users may appreciate these manual tuner controls over digital. This radio also provided an impressive 32 minutes of listening time after one minute of hand cranking, but struggled in my solar testing (zero function after one hour). The low price of this radio could be appealing to those looking for a budget-friendly option, but if that’s your priority, we’d recommend shelling out the extra $5 and choosing the similar RunningSnail MD-090P and its 4,000 mAh battery.

    Although the Kaito KA340 Weather Alert Radio had some interesting features, like Bluetooth connectivity and a microSD memory card slot, the confusing layout of the controls makes it difficult to recommend for emergency use. The physical controls — a collection of sliders, knobs and buttons — had a flimsy, loose feel to them, which made it hard to achieve precise volume or radio settings. I was most confused by the lack of visual arrow or indicator on the band selection slider, which made it tough to tell which setting you were selecting. This was made even more challenging by the large range of options (seven!) to choose from. I did appreciate its variety of power options — rechargeable lithium-ion battery, four AA batteries, hand crank and solar panel — and the hand crank in particular provided 26 minutes of radio time after just 60 seconds of cranking. The flashlight threw a nice wide beam, and the large lantern light was a nice perk as well. Although it felt less durable and rugged than the other radios I tested, this could be a useful choice for those interested in taking advantage of the plethora of media inputs. Although this radio is able to receive NOAA alerts, you won’t be able to use any other function while the “alert” setting is selected.

    Midland ER210

    This Midland model is essentially just a scaled-down version of our top pick, the Midland ER310, providing nearly all the bells and whistles in a smaller package. It only lacks the dog whistle and the ability to use disposable batteries, but still provides the same hand crank and solar charging ability, as well as the multi-beam flashlight. I really enjoyed the smaller size of this radio, especially when it came to using the hand crank, although I wish the crank handle had a bit more material to hold onto. Sixty seconds of cranking provided an impressive 32 minutes of listening time, which was one of the longest of the radios I tested. The NOAA weather alert was simple to set up, the straightforward controls made switching between bands easy and I especially liked how the display would flash back to the current time every 10 seconds or so. The backlit LED screen was easy to read in the dark, too. This radio also has a convenient carrying handle like the Midland ER310, which made it comfortable to carry around.

    Midland ER10VP

    If you’re looking for an effective, high-quality radio that won’t take up much room in a drawer or backpack, this 5 by 3 by 1.5-inch Midland model could be just what you’re looking for. The younger sibling of the Midland ER310 and Midland ER210, this radio fits in the palm of your hand and weighs just 8.8 ounces, by far the lightest I tested. Despite the small size, this little radio still provides automatic NOAA alerts without your having to tune in first, a feature that several much larger and more expensive radios did not. You also get a flashlight with three settings, a headphone jack and a handy wrist lanyard so you can attach it to your pack or hang from a tree limb at your campsite. Its controls were extremely easy to use, and setting up the NOAA alert was simple to do as well. The only drawback to this little radio is that it only runs on three AA batteries, so no rechargeable battery, hand crank or solar panels. That being said, Midland claims that its battery will last for up to 26 days when in alert standby mode, which should be sufficient for most emergency situations.

    Midland WR120B/WR120EZ Emergency Weather Alert Radio

    What this Midland radio lacks in portability and power source options, it makes up for in customization. Unlike our other radios that only pick up NOAA weather bands and alerts, this model can be used with S.A.M.E. (Specific Area Message Encoding) programming. This allows you to input your current location and only receive alerts for that area. This radio also allows you to pick and choose the alerts you want to receive, and disable any that you don’t want to be bothered with. These settings may seem complicated, but we were pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to program and configure the specific alerts you want, thanks to the helpful instruction manual. Our favorite feature of this radio was probably the extra-large “Weather” button on the front of the unit, which allows you to get the current weather report at the push of a button. No tuning or band selection needed. Its trilingual settings (English, Spanish and French) also make it useful for potential users who may not use English as their primary language. This radio, however, is really useful only for alerts in advance of an emergency since it does need to be plugged into a wall outlet to function — you’ll need an external power source of some kind to keep it working.

    The most impressive feature of this radio is its 4,000 mAh battery, which is substantially larger than any other model we tested, with the two closest competitors offering 2,600 mAh batteries. This means that the RunningSnail MD-090P should be able to run longer than any other, which also translates to more charging capacity when it comes to using it as a power bank to keep your devices working. This in itself is a hugely valuable benefit in an emergency situation when the power goes out. I also appreciated the powerful flashlight and separate “reading lamp,” which provides a wide, soft light source, perfect for reading a map or book or performing any emergency repair or maintenance tasks. Like the FosPower model we looked at, the RunningSnail is only a weather band radio, and doesn’t have automated weather alert functionality (though it can clearly receive NOAA weather stations). This lack of automatic alerts ultimately kept it out of our consideration for the top spot, but if that’s not a dealbreaker for you, the low price and large battery of this radio could make it a solid all-in-one emergency solution.

    I was a big fan of nearly every aspect of this weather alert radio, except for its 850 mAh battery capacity, the smallest in the testing group. This doesn’t make it a poor choice in itself, but if a long running time before having to recharge is a priority for you, you might want to consider another model. That being said, the controls were simple to use, and the orange backlit display made it easy to work with in low light conditions. It was also the only model I tested that offered radio presets, which could be convenient for those who plan on using its AM/FM radio frequently. I also appreciated the rubber end caps that cover all four corners of the unit, which provided a very durable and rugged feel and made me confident that it could survive a moderate drop or fall. This radio performed well in all performance tests too, providing 32 minutes of listening time after 60 seconds of hand cranking, and it reached half capacity after six hours in the sun.

    The Eton — an update to a well-regarded Red Cross-branded model — exhibited poor enough charging speeds in both the solar and hand crank tests that we wouldn’t recommend it at all. One minute of cranking provided zero power, and even after an additional five minutes, the battery was still dead. An hour in the sun had the same result in my solar test, although after six hours in direct sunlight it did register that two of the three battery bars were filled and the unit was functioning normally. This may well have been a quality control issue — a CNN Underscored editor owns and has used the precursor to this model, the FRX3, and has never encountered this issue — but should you order, you’ll want to make sure it works out of the box.

    It was fairly simple to set up and find the band and station you want, and the NOAA alert worked perfectly — but without the battery power, it won’t last you through a significant power outage. I do wish the flashlight were more powerful or, considering the unit’s height when stood upright, that it featured some kind of lantern-style illumination. The unique X-shaped design does make it easy to carry around, although the large shape may not be convenient if you plan on keeping it in a small drawer or emergency kit.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best solar generators in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best solar generators in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A solar generator pairs a large-capacity rechargeable power station — a big battery, at heart — with a set of portable solar panels, making for a versatile device that can provide backup power for your home during an emergency and do double duty for off-grid activities like camping, tailgating or even DIY projects around your yard. They’re safer to store and use and far simpler to maintain than gas generators, and with people more and more conscious of the threat of storms and wildfires, they make a lot of sense for emergency preparedness.

    To choose the best solar generator, we tested 13 devices for an entire summer in the hot Florida sun to determine which device could reliably provide the most power with the least fuss. We considered factors such as portability, ease of setup, price, industrial design, technology and innovation when making our final selections.

    The best small-capacity solar generator

    Bluetti’s EB70S packs the latest LFP battery chemistry and plenty of capacity into a compact package that’s great for camping, on-the-go preparedness, a car emergency kit or taking any place you need reliable power.

    The best medium-capacity solar generator

    With updated features, an upgrade LiFePO4/LFP battery, a ton of ports and easy expansion, the new EcoFlow Delta 2 outperformed everything in its class in our testing. It hits the sweet spot for most people who need portable power and a dependable emergency backup.

    The best high-capacity solar powered generator:

    Easy to use, packed with the most up-to-date features and battery technology, and expandable enough to serve as a whole-house emergency generator, the EcoFlow Delta Pro beat impressive competitors in our testing, emerging as the best large solar generator.

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 716 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: No
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: 800W
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 200W
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to 8mm DC
    • Output Ports: (4) 110V AC (2 grounded), (2) 5V/3A USB-A, (2) 100W USB PD, (2) regulated 12V/10 DC, (1) 12V car, 15W wireless charge pad
    • App Managed: No
    • Weight: 21.4 pounds
    • Charge Time: 4 hours
    •  Panel Tested: Jackery 200W
    • Warranty: 2 Years

    The Bluettti EB70S offers a high-capacity battery (716 watt-hours) and an inverter capable of handling up to 800 watts worth of devices in a compact, portable package perfect for everything from camping to keeping your critical devices going in a blackout. It is packed with output ports, and the two USB PD 100Ws and wireless charging pad make it ideal if you want to charge mobile devices quickly. It is capable of handling most of your small-device power needs, whether it’s a laptop, tablet, smartphone, LED lighting unit (it has a built-in lantern as well in case you read at night), BBQ controller, mini refrigerator or small fan.

    Functionality doesn’t need to mean ugly. The rectangular unit with rounded edges and an integrated folding carrying handle looks a bit like an old-school boombox and comes in four colors; our testing sample was a bright blueish-green. It’s small enough, along with a single panel, to keep in a car at all times.

    The EB70S isn’t just pretty. Under the hood is one of the least expensive solar generators on the market using the latest lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) battery chemistry, which charges faster, runs cooler and lasts longer. In theory, this unit will last a very long time, an estimated 2,500+ full charge cycles, according to the manufacturer, meaning it should be there when you need it

    At 21.4 pounds, the Bluetti EB70S is light enough to move around easily. The power supply for AC charging is a separate unit, further lightening the load. The DC inverter port for the AC adapter input and the solar cable is an 8A barrel type, used by several manufacturers including Jackery, one of the most popular, so panels should be easy to find. For testing, as we didn’t have Bluetti’s 200W panel on hand, we used one of Jackery’s 200W SolarSaga units, which plugged right in without any intermediate adapter cables. It worked just fine, so MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking, the converter technology that manages solar panel to battery connections) compatibility on the unit is good.

    The user interface is straightforward. One small button activates the four AC outlets, another activates the USB and other DC ports. Another button activates a front-panel light. A small LED color display indicates input and output watts, along with battery capacity, which is displayed as a pictograph of a battery with five fill bars rather than a percentage. The battery management system on this unit is very simplistic, perhaps overly so — it doesn’t indicate depletion or charge completion times. Additionally, if the battery is full or at a high level of charge and it is not discharging, it won’t show any wattage input. It’s information that would be nice to have, but given the overall solid performance, missing it is by no means a dealbreaker.

    The unit was easily able to drive all of our variable test loads of 60W to 200W, and with a solar panel hooked up, our small 60W freezer never depleted the battery, even on days of mixed weather.

    With a full 200W load using dual 70W fans overnight, we could drain it in about three and a half hours, but this is a heavy continuous load for a small generator designed primarily for camping and short-term usage.

    With the speedy recharge rate, even at about 50% efficiency on the panel, we could go from day to night uninterrupted for two consecutive days running a 100-watt load without depleting the unit. The only time we ran into issues was after a day of rain with no sun at all.

    An EcoFlow Delta 2 solar generator with expansion battery, set up on a stone patio

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 1,024 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: Yes, secondary 1,024 Wh battery
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: 1,800-2,200Wx
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 500Wx
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to XT-60
    • Output Ports: (6) 110V AC (2 grounded), (4) 5V/2.4A USB-A (2 fast charge), (2) 100W USB PD, (2) DC 5521, (1) 12V car
    • App Managed: Yes
    • Weight: 27 pounds
    • Charge Time: 4 hours 
    • Panels Tested: EcoFlow 400W, EcoFlow 160W
    • Warranty: 2 Years

    The new LiFePO4/LFP-based 1024 Wh EcoFlow Delta 2 arrived towards the very end of our testing period, after we had already evaluated its predecessor, the original 1300 Wh Li-ion-NMC Delta. But after testing, the EcoFlow Delta 2 completely upset our decision matrix — it’s that good. With an expanded feature set and the latest technology and capabilities, it simply outperformed everything else in its class.

    A slimmed-down version of EcoFlow’s Delta Pro, the new Delta 2 uses the same LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry and has Wi-Fi and Bluetooth onboard to enable smart management with an excellent, extremely detailed app with many configurable settings. The rear of the generator has two grounded AC ports, four ungrounded, and three 12V ports, with one car and a dual 5521 (for devices such as routers with barrel connectors where you might want to avoid the use of a power brick). An internal AC power supply simplifies cabling, and the EcoFlow Delta 2 has a dedicated AC power cord.

    Solar/12V charging uses an XT-60 modular connector and a PV4-to XT-60 adapter cable. It has a 500W DC solar input (allowing you to charge it using two of EcoFlow’s 160W panels, two 220W panels or a single 400W panel) or via an AC inverter (more on that later).

    The compact 160W/220W panels are light and easy to carry; with multiples a single person can easily carry them out one at a time, unzip them from their fabric cases, and lie them down on a driveway or pool deck area (which is exactly what we did with these) You can also prop them up easily using the carrying case, which doubles as a stand, but it might be good to have one other person help you with that. The 400W panel is larger, but is of the same folding, four-segment “floppy” or flexible design. It’s more cumbersome because of its large size and weight, and while a single person could lay it out flat, it took two of us to position it when we set it up on the stand.

    Connecting a single panel to the generator only requires using a single MC4 to XT-60 bridge cable that connects to the panel’s positive and negative wires (you can’t mix it up, it’s a “keyed” connection) and attaching the bridge cable to the rear of the panel. The generator does the rest and displays the incoming wattage on the display and in the app. If you need to connect more than one panel, they can be serialized by attaching the positive pole of the MC4 connection of the first panel to a negative pole of the other panel, and then connecting the bridge cable to the other positive and negative poles. This can be done for up to three 160W panels on the Delta 2, for a maximum power input of 480W. EcoFlow also has a “parallel” connector cable to simplify this if you need to, particularly in situations where you might use three or more panels, but we did not have one of these for testing.

    Like its big sibling, the Delta 2 is expandable. While its onboard battery capacity is slightly smaller than the similarly priced units we tested, you can double the power of the EcoFlow Delta 2 to 2,048 Wh with an expansion battery unit. (The battery expansion port is on the side and uses a thick proprietary connector cord.) That gives you the flexibility of choosing portability over power, or should you realize you need more “oomph” after the fact. The 1,200W of AC input capacity (up to 1,500W with the additional battery pack connected) allows it to charge quickly.

    That said, given the high AC draw, we recommend you use the app and limit the input to 800W or less unless you have nothing else plugged into the circuit when charging it. We managed to trip a breaker charging the unit from a shared circuit in our garage charging at the default maximum speed setting in the app. While it’s easy enough to reset a breaker, it is not something you want to deal with when it’s easily avoidable using the Delta 2’s well-thought-out management features.

    The Delta 2 lets you charge from AC and solar simultaneously; we tried this setup and the unit prioritizes AC over solar most of the time (not a surprise given that the AC side of the unit supplies more current and solar is subject to variable weather conditions and solar exposure). It’s a useful option for faster charging or keeping the unit consistently charged without relying entirely on the grid.

    While the main display is simple enough, most users will likely want to use the app for monitoring status and adjusting settings. It allows you to control multiple EcoFlow devices at once and get real-time information about the state of charge and power flow. You also can alter settings, such as turning ports on and off, adjusting input wattage and upgrading firmware.

    We used the unit in both 1,024 Wh and 2,048 Wh configurations with the external battery. Given the 27-pound weight of the generator (and slightly less for the external battery) we found it fairly easy to drag around the house in two separate parts if we needed to move it away from its primary charging position on the patio. We had no issues running our maximum loads with the EcoFlow Delta 2, particularly when the second battery was connected and using a single 400W panel.

    In our estimation, the Delta 2 with an extra battery for a total of 2,048 Wh of capacity and 400W of solar panels is probably the “sweet spot” for a small family looking for an emergency backup generator to cover essentials. 100W to 300W of variable output is a realistic load to plan for if you consider the typical appliances that might be connected in an emergency scenario, such as lower-wattage LED lights (typically in the 10W to 20W range), a small refrigerator, fans, personal electronics and higher-wattage small appliances for cooking for 10-20 minutes at a time. We found that with this setup we were able to go for at least three to five days using our 60W-200W variable test load under medium cloud conditions, with plenty of capacity left on hand.

    The EcoFlow Delta Pro solar generator, with an extension battery, set up side by side on a stone patio

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 3,600 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: Yes, add up to two 3,600 Wh batteries for a total of 10,800 Wh
    • Home Electrical Panel Integration: Yes, with a proprietary transfer switch
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: up to 4,500W
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 1,600W
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to XT-60
    • Output Ports: (4) 110V AC, (1) 30A 125V, (4) 5V/2.4A USB-A (2 fast charge), (2) 100W USB PD, (2) DC 5521, (1) 12V car, (1) 12.6V 30A Anderson Powerpole
    • App Managed: Yes
    • Weight: 99 lbs
    • Charge Time: 4 hours (1.7 hours with X-Stream Adapter and 40A L2 EV Charger)
    • Panel Tested: EcoFlow 400W
    • Warranty: 3 Years (with registration)

    The EcoFlow Delta Pro, released in 2021, is similar to the Delta 2 in overall design and basic capabilities, with the latest LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry, onboard Bluetooth and Wi-Fi that let you access the smart battery management system via a well-designed app, an integrated power supply, MC4 to XT-60 solar input connectivity and an identical informative display.

    But the Delta Pro is a much bigger unit, and not just physically. The Delta Pro’s base battery capacity is 3,600 Wh, so if you are driving a 200W load, you can run it for 18 hours before depleting the battery, assuming there’s no recharge. And if that’s not enough, it can accommodate two additional 3,600 Wh batteries (connected with thick proprietary charging cables) for up to 10,800 Wh capacity, which begins to compete with gas generators. The inverter can drive up to 4,500W of load from its four 120V AC, six USB ports, three 12V, a 12V 30 Anderson connector, and a 30A 125V RV port.

    For most people that should be enough to power even some larger appliances like a refrigerator or freezer. along with lighting and personal electronics through a power outage. Since it is a viable alternative to smaller gas or propane/natural gas generators, you can buy EcoFlow’s Smart Home Panel, a transfer switch with a subpanel that lets you directly connect two EcoFlow Pros (each with up to two additional batteries) to your home electrical system and power up to 10 circuits.

    With all of that on tap, the Delta Pro is physically large. It weighs 99 pounds, though it has integrated wheels with a pull-out handle, so you can roll it (more like drag it) to wherever it needs to be.

    The 400W panels weigh just over 35 pounds each. As we noted with the Delta 2, the 400W panels use MC4-type locking connectors and are built with a folding, four-segment “floppy” or flexible construction, which can be used flat or angled. They come in heavy fabric carrying bases which function as an angular stand and use carabiner clips to connect to the panel.

    The 400W panels are more cumbersome than the 160W panels supplied with the smaller EcoFlow units, and you may need two people to position them when the stand is used. The panels are IP68 rated, meaning they can handle being rained on — and during the testing period, sitting out on our driveway for weeks at a time in the South Florida summer, they were rained on continuously. They continued to operate flawlessly despite the deluges.

    You can charge from solar or AC. The solar input lets you connect up to four 400W panels at 1,600W. You can charge from a 120V outlet, of course, but to fill this monster at high speeds, EcoFlow sells an “X-Stream” adapter that allows you to use a J1772 connector (like a Level 2 240V 40A/50A EV charging circuit) to fill the 3,600 Wh battery at over 3,000W.

    But that doesn’t mean you can’t overtax your home electrical circuit trying to AC charge it. We did encounter an issue where the power draw during 110V AC charging exceeded the capacity of the shared circuit (15A) to which the Delta Pro was connected; it caused the breaker to flip. To address this, we isolated the device to its own circuit and lowered the AC power draw in the app to a more modest 800W, which, as with the Delta 2, we suggest you do unless your circuit is sufficient to handle AC charging at the maximum draw.

    There wasn’t a load we could throw at this unit it could not handle, including 1,800W espresso machines, induction cookers and hair dryers in addition to our lineup of personal electronics, fans and small appliances. To really stress out the Delta Pro we used dual True 2A rated 24-inch undercounter commercial refrigerators, which had a peak draw of about 480W when the compressors were running at full blast, both at the same time.

    In a continual consumption scenario with no solar connection for recharging, according to the built-in display and the app (as we were monitoring it) the 3,600 Wh battery on the Delta Pro would deplete in seven and a half hours, and with a single external battery, in about 14 or 15 hours with a total of 7,200 Wh. Adding a second battery (we’re extrapolating, since we didn’t test with a second battery) would provide about 22 hours of continuous draw (and that’s without a solar panel hooked up).

    In real-world use, with only periodic compressor bursts from the refrigerators and twin 400W panels giving us at least 550W of continual recharge at about 70% efficiency during the day, we didn’t tax the Delta Pro much at all. Similarly, using a 1,800W induction cooker, running a boiling pot of water, continuously, got us about two hours of total use from a fully charged single battery with no solar recharging, but that’s not a realistic application. Yu’d use an appliance like this for only about 15 to 20 minutes at a time to make meals, and we rarely ran it above 800W-1,000W for medium-heat cooking. Practically, it doesn’t make a dent.

    So did we max out the capabilities of this monster setup? No, not by any means. And realistically, your typical family running emergency loads will not either. Suffice it to say, this bodes well for the Delta Pro’s usefulness in emergency situations, and at the very least it should be a good solution to avoid having to toss a fridge or freezer full of food after a long power outage.

    EcoFlow even sells a setup meant to address a particularly challenging situation: the EV charging adapter lets you use the NEMA TT-30 30A 125V port with a grounding adapter to charge an electric car. Just be aware that EV batteries are really big, so you can’t expect to fill up that easily, at least not right out of the box. With the base 3.6 kWh in the Delta Pro, you only get about 5% charge on a 77 kWh battery or a 15% charge with 10.8 kWh if both external batteries are connected. With 1,600W of panels connected, you could fully charge your vehicle in a day or two (perhaps three) if solar conditions are optimal, but it’s a bit of a stretch and you wouldn’t be able to use it for anything else. But if you’re stuck in a snowy cabin with a pooped-out electric vehicle, you should be able to get enough charge to make it to a charging station.

    First off, a solar generator isn’t really a “generator.” It’s a large rechargeable battery pack (not that different from the devices you might carry around to charge your phone while traveling), integrating an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) with surge protection and an inverter and line conditioner to power your AC devices.

    These devices are known as “solar generators” because they’re designed to be charged using a solar panel, making them suitable for long-term use in emergencies or off the grid (they can also be charged from a wall outlet). A wide range of battery capacities are available, from large models that can keep critical appliances going and the lights on during an emergency, to lightweight models more suitable for camping or tailgating.

    In order to supply power to a wide range of devices, solar generators offer a variety of AC outlets, 12V DC ports, a standard cigarette lighter port and 5521 barrel-type ports, in addition to Anderson power ports. The more sophisticated, higher-power generators may also have 125V 30A outlets for powering an RV. Some solar generators can directly integrate with home generator transfer panels to power AC circuits.

    Solar generators also come with USB ports for charging phones and small devices. The number of USB ports varies from two to four on smaller units and can be as high as six to eight on larger units, with a mix of USB-A 2.4v and 5V ports and USB-C with power delivery (PD) ports from 18W to 100W capacities.

    In addition to basic watt-hour and inverter capacities, solar generators have different types of ports for connecting various devices. The number of 120V AC ports is typically one or two on smaller units and three to six on medium and larger units. The inverters on the generators themselves, however, have a maximum wattage rating, so nothing stops you from plugging a power strip into a single AC port and using the maximum wattage of the generator.

    The inverters on the generators we reviewed are “pure sinewave,” which is the cleanest power you can get from an AC generator. They create a steady, continuous wave of electricity providing a smooth, oscillating current, also known as power conditioning. Some electronics require pure sinewave electricity, such as medical equipment and other appliances with AC motors, pumps and compressors.

    Some solar generators have integrated power supplies for fast charging and can be directly connected using cables to external 110V AC and 12V DC power sources. In contrast, others use transformer bricks similar to ones you see on other consumer appliances such as personal computers. A separate power supply typically generates less heat and somewhat lowers the generator’s weight, making the cabling more complicated. The larger units typically also include integrated fans to cool the battery compartment; the battery management system controls them and spins them up and down as needed.

    LED and LCDs on these devices display basic data such as state of charge, current wattage output, input and estimated times until charge and depletion (some also have touchscreen user interfaces). Some generators also have wireless capabilities and are managed using a mobile application using Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. The benefit is remote visibility into real-time generator performance from the comfort of wherever you want to view it and alter any settings that may be needed, such as activating and deactivating inverter ports, changing inverter charge speed so as not to overtax a circuit and updating the firmware.

    How to choose and use a solar generator

    The performance of solar generators is measured in watt hours (Wh). For example, imagine you have a load of 100W (which may be typical of a large fan and a portable refrigerator), and your solar generator’s capacity is 1,000 Wh. Then you could keep the load (the fan and portable fridge) for approximately 10 hours before the battery power is depleted (assuming there is no interim recharge by your solar panels, as happens at night).

    When operating a solar generator, shield it from the elements somewhere like behind your front door, on a covered porch/patio or inside a vehicle. Some solar panels are rated for continuous outdoor use and are weatherproofed. However, the generators should never be exposed to water, rain or extreme heat. For this reason, we also recommend purchasing extension cables for optimizing generator/panel placement. In our testing, we used 25-foot extensions, so we had a sufficient length between the panels and the generator.

    The heart of any solar generator unit, the cell is where chemical energy is stored for use as electrical energy. Cells have used a variety of lithium-based chemical formulations; many batteries have used Lithium-Ion Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) though Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), also referred to by its chemical formula LiFePO4, has gained popularity in the industry lately since it allows for faster charging and discharging and many more charge cycles and it lasts longer.

    NMC batteries are, however, more common, since they are lighter and more energy-dense (and smaller, which is why you see them in smartphones, tablets, smartwatches and portable batteries). However, they have relatively slow charge and discharge rates, which makes them less efficient in use (in the battery world, the measurement of charge speed and rate of depletion/discharge are known as the C rating, and higher is faster).

    In addition to having a lower C rating than LFP batteries, Lithium Ion-NMC batteries only have a lifespan of about 500 full charge cycles. In contrast, LFP batteries can handle over 3,000 cycles. LFP batteries also don’t generate as much heat as NMC batteries, making them safer and ideal for use in solar generators and electric vehicles.

    The BMS, a microprocessor-controlled device embedded in the solar generator, combined with software algorithms, ensures the battery’s safety and longevity by regulating the charging and discharging of the cells. It accomplishes this by monitoring the voltage and current of each cell in the battery pack and balancing them as needed. The BMS also shuts down the system if it detects an unsafe condition, such as over-voltage or over-temperature.

    The inverter converts the direct current (DC) output from the batteries and the solar panels to the alternating current (AC) that your home uses (for lamps, appliances and most gadgets). The inverter on a solar generator is rated in output watts (W). A small generator typically has a rating of about 500W, a medium-sized about 1,200W, and a large unit 2,000W or higher.

    In other words, the output wattage gives you an idea of how many devices can draw power from the generator simultaneously. A single electric fan might have a maximum draw of 70W, but a hairdryer or a portable induction burner running at maximum power may draw as much as 1,600W to 1,800W and overtax a medium-sized unit. Inverters also handle the combined input wattage from AC and DC power, so your maximum solar panel capacity is determined by the inverter’s capacity. If your inverter has a maximum input capacity of 400W, you cannot use more than two 200W panels or four 100W panels.

    A solar panel comprises photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert sunlight into direct current (DC) electricity. In a home setup, the DC current is then sent to an inverter, which is converted into alternating current (AC), the type of electricity used in your home. In a solar generator, energy is stored in the battery cells for conversion to AC (or use as DC) later.

    Solar panels integrate with solar generators using MPPT (maximum power point tracking) controllers. MPPT is a standard technology that manages the conversion from panel output. Generally speaking, any MPPT-compatible panel from any manufacturer can be used with any solar generator, providing the correct connector cables and adapters are also used (such as Anderson, MC4/PV4, XT-30/XT-60, and various barrel connectors) and that the maximum voltage and combined input wattage into your inverter is not exceeded. However, it is possible to run into cable incompatibilities and capacity mismatches, so we’d recommend you pair panels sold by your generator manufacturer with your generator for the highest compatibility and optimal performance.

    A solar panel’s performance depends on atmospheric conditions and your panel efficiency; inverters are about 95% efficient. That is: Is the sun shining? Even if you have a panel rated at 100W, you may find that it doesn’t work as well in cloudy or hazy weather, or if the panels are not in direct sunlight, or depending on the sun’s orientation during the day. Your panels could operate at 50% or less efficiency, maybe 50W. We never saw any manufacturer’s panels performing higher than 80% efficiency during our testing in South Florida during the summer of 2022, where we had light to medium cloud cover. Therefore, when making recharge calculations against the watt-hour capacity of your generator, assume a panel efficiency of 50% or less, depending on your typical weather conditions.

    Solar panels are rated by their power output in watts, and portable panel sizes can range from as small as 50 watts to as high as 400 watts. You’ll want to make sure you do not exceed the maximum input capacity of the generator from the panel array; most MPPT charge controllers do not allow you to hook up panels that exceed voltage requirements. Some vendors (such as Goal Zero) will enable you to “oversubscribe” your panel wattage (such as using 1,200W of total capacity when the inverter input capacity is only 600W) during less favorable conditions. However, once the conditions become favorable again, any excess energy is lost as heat.

    Depending on its design, a solar generator may be able to accommodate multiple solar panels hooked up in parallel, connected by long cables that use a variety of different types of connectors, which vary by manufacturer. Some panels are of a rugged, heavier, foldable metal design (also referred to as “briefcase”), and others are of a flexible, floppy design. Although they are heavier, these panels are generally easier to set up due to their rigid structure, and a single person can easily set up multiple panels. Briefcase designs are typically outdoor-rated, designed for continuous use and can be rained on without damaging the components.

    In contrast, the larger floppy designs can be more challenging to set up by a single person, are typically not rated by the manufacturer for continuous outdoor use and are recommended to be removed from the elements during bad weather. However, in most cases, this only applies to the cable connections, so if you seal those with duct tape, there’s no reason why you can’t leave such solar panels outside for days at a time; we certainly did for our testing, and we encountered no malfunctions.

    A solar generator set up on a patio, with multiple cable runs visible between patio furniture as well as an Astro refrigerator

    All generators were tested from June through August 2022 in variable sun conditions and varying weather. Generators were placed on a covered patio away from the elements. Long extension cables were connected to the panels placed outside the patio on a large outdoor pool deck. Panels were left outside for a week at a time.

    The test load included two 70W stand fans, a 60W AstroAI 15L refrigerator/freezer run at -4 degrees Fahrenheit for maximum load and 20W of LED lamps. Incidental loads included a 1,800W portable induction burner, a 1,800W espresso machine, a 1,600W hair dryer and dual 2A 240W commercial refrigerators. Various generators charged other generators to test maximum inverter loads. 15A and 20A circuits with GFCI were used for AC charging generators when solar conditions were unfavorable or to test dual-charging configurations.

    We measured whether the units were able to handle the test loads in terms of total wattage draw on the inverter, and measured how long it took for the battery to run out under typical real-world loads with the solar panels attached.

    We paid careful attention to ease of setup and use, simplicity of monitoring and industrial design and build quality issues, looking at how the design affected performance and use, potential issues with the durability of components, and the terms of the manufacturer’s warranty.

    Founded in 2012, Jackery is one of the oldest companies in the portable power station industry, and was key in popularizing these types of products. Its 500 series power station has been on the market since 2019 and is one of the most popular small solar generators. With its friendly industrial design and bright orange-and-black utilitarian look with monochrome LCD, it has spawned many clones.

    The Explorer 500’s battery chemistry also puts it behind the times. It uses a Lithium-Ion NMC battery, which runs hotter, charges more slowly and offers shorter lifespans with fewer charge cycles. That said, NMC batteries are lighter and more energy-dense, and the Explorer 500 is a solid, affordable performer, though it lacks up-to-date features like USB-C PD outputs for faster charging of modern portable electronics, still offering only USB-A ports. In addition to an external AC adapter that connects to its barrel-style DC power port, it uses a proprietary Jackery-to-barrel cable for its solar connection.

    The Jackery 1000 Pro is the popular battery brand’s newest portable power station, but as with its smaller sibling, it’s a bit behind the competition at this point. It uses a Lithium-Ion NMC, and with its larger battery pack, it needs more cooling than similarly sized LFP-based devices. Jackery claims 1,000 charge cycles, however, perhaps enabled by the unit’s dual onboard fans. We’d expect these to run quite a bit at higher loads. That said, given that NMC batteries are lighter and more energy-dense, the 1000 Pro packs a solid amount of capacity into a lightweight case. It’s got more contemporary USB-C PD ports on board as well, making it more useful all around with today’s mobile devices and laptops.

    For fast charging you can use a lot of panels. Large proprietary dongles connect to two Jackery panel cables, which attach to twin barrel-shaped solar connector jacks, letting you use up to four 200W panels on the 1000 Pro, which can get you a full charge in under two hours. The dongles aren’t used in simple two-panel or single-panel configurations.

    While it’s nice to have the options, we felt the extra connectors made for overly complex cable runs, and worry about difficulties in diagnosing problems should something go haywire. Also, unlike cables using locking MC4, Anderson or XT60 connectors, these cables can be disconnected by a simple tug, so you’ll want to watch out for dogs, kids or simple clumsiness.

    We had no issues running our test loads on 1000 Pro, and Jackery has one of the industry’s better warranties, providing up to five years of coverage if products are purchased directly from the company or an authorized reseller (Amazon works, if you fill out an application on Jackery’s site after purchasing). While we think for the long term purchasers would be better served going with a LiFePO4/LFP-based unit, Jackery’s warranty provides some peace of mind for those more comfortable with the older Lithium-Ion NMC-based technology.

    The Jackery Explorer 2000 Pro, the bigger model in the popular company’s lineup, uses the same Lithium-ion NMC battery technology and floppy-style, 18.2-pound SolarSaga 200W panels as the 1000 Pro, connecting with the same dongles to support up to six panels on this model for fast charging and supplying 2,160 watt-hours of capacity.

    Like its smaller siblings, the Explorer 2000 Pro proved an able performer in our testing and had no trouble pushing the loads we connected. Plus it is covered by Jackery’s long warranty if you buy direct. It just isn’t the most up-to-date solar generator, so especially at this capacity and price, we’d suggest looking at something more up to date.

    With a design very much like Jackery’s but with LiFePO4/LFP cells under the hood, the Oupes 1800, which offers 1,488 watt-hours of battery capacity and an 1,800W AC inverter, sits between the Jackery 1000 and 2000. It may fit the bill, though it doesn’t offer as long a warranty, nor does the brand have as long a history in power stations.

    We hooked the Oupes up to Jackery and Geneverse’s 200W panels and cabling (both of which appear to come from the same factory) and its own floppy four-segment 100W panels, which also appear quite similar to Jackery’s in design, and got good results all around. That said, we’d probably look to more established brands for this sort of product.

    Previously known as Generark, and like Oupes and numerous others, Geneverse is also making LFP-based Jackery lookalikes, which includes selling panels that are spitting images of the SolarSaga 200W, except that they are grey. Otherwise the cabling and dongle setup is identical to what Jackery sells currently for its 1000 Pro and 2000 Pro line.

    Their HomePower One Pro eschews the orange and black color palette of the Jackery 1000 Pro, opting for a dark plastic grey casing and a blue and black display with a data layout similar to its competitors. It has a 1,210 Wh battery, a 1,200W inverter and an 800W DC input, giving it a slight edge over the Jackery 1000 Pro in power output.

    Geneverse’s other advantages over the Jackery 1000 Pro include Wi-Fi-based app management, but we thought the app wasn’t nearly sophisticated or as well-designed as what we saw from EcoFlow, Goal Zero or even Bluetti. Its functionality is pretty basic, and felt its connectivity was not particularly reliable.

    Geneverse provides a five-year warranty if you buy directly from the company.

    Goal Zero, founded in 2009, is one of the standard-setters for the portable solar power station industry. It’s known for making well-made, exceptionally engineered products for people who work and play outdoors. The devices are expandable, utilizing the company’s Yeti Link/Yeti Tank 1,200 Wh lead acid battery technology, and can also power up to four of your home circuits with their Home Integration Kit transfer switch and subpanel.

    The Yeti 1500X is a powerful mid-size solar generator with a 1,516 Wh battery based on lithium-ion NMC chemistry. It can drive 2,000W of connected load with its inverter and can charge at up to 600W DC.

    It boasts an excellent app with smart systems management and notifications with reliable Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity (in our testing, the Goal Zero app and smart functionality stood out in particular, excelling compared to most products we looked at). Goal Zero is also one of the few manufacturers using a briefcase-style metal outdoor-rated panel design for its 100W and 200W panels, making it ideal for longer-term installations. The panels use Anderson-style parallel connections, which are more rugged than those used by most of the competition, and the cables are thicker. Despite their increased heft, we felt the Goal Zero panels were easier to set up than their “floppy” competitors due to their rigidity and stability.

    When charging with AC, the Yeti uses an external power adapter connected to the single Anderson charge port to reduce excess heat. Unlike several other devices we looked at, you can’t “dual charge” the Yeti with both AC and solar connected simultaneously.

    Despite employing less desirable battery chemistry than their competitors, the products performed exceptionally well with our test loads. Additionally, their rugged designs would be a good choice for many outdoor sporting/recreation and work scenarios. While we think overall LiFePO4-based designs are a better investment at this point, especially when you’re spending this much money, the Goal Zero Yeti models are solid, dependable and highly usable alternatives.

    If you want something big and built for the outdoors, the Goal Zero Yeti 3000X is a larger version of the company’s 1500X power station. Like its smaller sibling, it has a 2,000W inverter and can charge at 600W DC. The primary difference between the two is that the 1500X has a 1,516 Wh battery and bigger, heavier 3000X (which can roll on wheels) has a 3,032 Wh battery.

    If you need the additional capacity but want to stick with the tried and true, or need the Goal Zero’s bulletproof build and well-designed system of cables, panels, and accessories the Yeti 3000x maks a lot of sense.

    Until the EcoFlow Delta 2 showed up, the Anker 757 was our category winner for a medium-sized solar generator. It is still a strong contender, with LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry and a good combination of features and performance at its price point. A 1,200 Wh LFP battery and six AC ports on its 1,500W inverter, plus a wide variety of USB and other DC outputs (as you’d expect given Anker’s background in mobile device charging) make it a versatile and capable unit.

    The Anker 757 does, however, lack the app management features of its competitors, it has no expansion capability and the unit is heavy for its size. Considering the inverter and battery size, we also felt the DC input capacity — only 300W — was anemic, making for slower charging than its competition. However, Anker boasts one of the best warranties in the industry, at five years, so it may still be a good choice for those who intend to use it heavily.

    The Lion Energy Safari ME is a small solar generator meant to be used with a large expansion battery as part of a bigger setup. Like the Goal Zero units, it boasts a heavy-duty design and uses outdoor-rated “briefcase” style 100W folding metal panels connected with thick cables terminating in Anderson connections. The 922Wh base LiFePO4/LFP battery is on the small side for other generators at this price point, but the device is expandable to 2,970 Wh, and has a 2,000W inverter capacity.

    We liked the ruggedized metal build of the unit. Still, we wished the 585W DC solar input was higher, and the panel capacity was 200W (or higher) like Goal Zero’s, as they aren’t very space-efficient for the amount of power they generate. We also discovered the unit employs an electromechanical switch (rather than digital) for locking onto AC versus DC solar inputs and isn’t designed to be plugged into both simultaneously. If you do, the generator clicks rapidly (and loudly) when there’s no solar input power at night — an issue the company is looking to resolve in the next hardware release.

    With so many new expandable models on the market, the Lion Energy Safari ME isn’t that great a value proposition. It is very expensive for the capacity the base unit offers out of the box, and even pricier when expanded to near 3,000 Wh compared to its competitors. In addition to a lack of app management, we felt that the unit was also short on the number and capabilities of AC and USB ports compared to its competitors. Given the “industrial” design and price point, we feel it should have a more extended warranty than a single year.

    As with EcoFlow and its Delta Pro, Bluetti is pushing the envelope on what a solar generator can do. With 2,048 Wh of LiFePO4/LFP battery capacity onboard, a full range of AC and DC outputs (including a 30A 125V NEMA TT-30 outlet for RV power and two 15W wireless charging pads) and the ability to add an additional 4,096 Wh capacity with dual 2,048 Wh B230 LFP batteries, for a total of 6,144 Wh, you can build a very large system around the AC200MAX. (If that’s not enough, Bluetti offers the 5,100 Wh EP500 and the 3,072 Wh AC500, which is expandable to 18,000 Wh of capacity for a whole-house emergency solution.)

    As with EcoFlow and Goal Zero, Bluetti has a sophisticated app, though it only has Bluetooth connectivity, not Wi-Fi. We found that it lost connection more often than the competition, and we had to reestablish it manually. The generator has a touchscreen display that allows you to configure every option, however, so an app isn’t essential to get the most use out of the AC200MAX.

    We had no issues with test loads on the device, and the company’s floppy 350W panels were easy to hook up and performed well. If you are looking for a generator with a lot of battery power and expansion capabilities at a reasonable price point, the AC200MAX would be a good choice, though EcoFlow’s Delta lineup is a bit easier to use and manage.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best plant identification apps for mobile in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    Best plant identification apps for mobile in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Spring has officially sprung and people will be spending more time in the great outdoors as the season gears up. Whether you’re looking for help in identifying plants along your morning hike or in designing the flower or food garden of your dreams, there is a mobile plant identification app that can help you. Ditto if you’re wondering if that glossy leaf your loved one pulled up while camping is poison ivy, if that house plant your cat just nibbled on will make it sick, or for any particular reason you may have.

    “We are driven to identify plants for many reasons,” explains Erin C. Hill, Ph.D., an Academic Specialist in the Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU). “Sometimes it is a curiosity about the world around us,” she writes, and at “other times it is out of the desire or need to manage areas like gardens, agricultural fields, restored habitats, and/or natural preserves.” Dr. Hill’s responsibilities include collaborating on plant and seed identification as a member of MSU’s Plant & Pest Diagnostics team.

    In her article, Dr. Hill discusses how plant identification apps for smartphones have seen “significant improvements” over the past several years, and how these apps offer folks “the opportunity to take a photo and get an instant identification in many cases.” With this in mind, we’ve tested five plant identification apps available on Android and iOS that you can use to quickly find out what plant you’re interested in, whether you’re hiking outdoors with loved ones or starting an indoor garden that you want your pets to be safe around.

    Over the course of several weeks, we’ve tested FlowerChecker, LeafSnap Premium by Appixi, PlantID by Control, PlantNet and PlantSnap Pro on a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone. Ultimately, we named PlantNet our top overall pick due to its level of accuracy that made the process of identifying our test plants a breeze.

    Best plant identification app for mobile overall

    During testing, we found PlantNet easy to use, accurate and fast. This free app guides you during setup, lets you search by map or flora, and suggests you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve its plant identification.

    PlantNet was the fastest, most accurate plant identification app tested on our Android phone. We found the app easy to use, highly accurate and able to provide fast identification.

    • Pricing: Free
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS, web
    • Supported languages: 45 languages including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Turkish
    • Key features: Collaborative user platform; searchable database containing over 45 floras and 46,050 species; plants are searchable by theme (invasive plants, useful plants, weeds and world flora) or by geographical flora map (plants found in Africa, Asia, Central America, Europe, North America and Oceania-Pacific); identify plants by their leaf, flower, fruit or bark; enable geolocation (GPS) to improve identification

    PlantNet is a collaborative “citizen science project” dedicated to worldwide plant biodiversity monitoring. The mobile app launched in 2013 and the app, along with a web version, was made available for both botanists and the general public. Since then, anyone all over the world can use the app to take a photo of a plant and send it to the app for identification.

    How PlantNet works

    The app is based on image recognition and relies on member involvement, so it’s important to provide it with quality images. So, first, you take a photo and send it to the app. Next, it automatically compares the image to the thousands of images other users have added to its botanical database. Then, the app lets you view a list of potential species that might match. You then “vote” for the species that seems to be the right one. The algorithm collects that information and analyzes it against the database’s images from other users. It then decides the plant’s identity and informs you of the decision. PlantNet claims its database contains over 45 floras and 46,050 plant species.

    PlantNet’s origins and sponsors

    PlantNet was developed by computer engineers and botanists from a consortium that has gathered multiple French research institutes as sponsors of the project, including the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) and the Tela Botanica network. It is supported by the Agropolis Foundation.

    Easy setup, helpful advice

    Installation of PlantNet on our Android smartphone was a breeze. Once installed, the app gave us the choice to follow its guided setup screens or to skip them. Initially, we planned to skip them but, ultimately, we decided to follow the guided prompts since the app advised us we’d get better, more accurate identifications if we did. In no time, we successfully created our account. Users can immediately join different Groups, which are collections of users who share common interests or geographical location. We joined some groups that interested us. PlantNet’s five most popular groups each contain over 1,000 members. The app’s most popular groups are:

    • Flowers of France,
    • Plants of Europe,
    • Medicinal plants, herbs, and foraging for wild edibles,
    • Cactus and succulents, and
    • Houseplants.

    PlantNet also offers helpful advice on how to take a good plant picture for the app, and provides examples of what they don’t want and what they do want, which we appreciated as we began testing.

    • Step 1: Use your smartphone’s camera to zoom in on one flower (or leaf, fruit, stem),
    • Step 2: Click on the in-frame item to focus on it, and
    • Step 3: Take the picture, making sure it contains just one organ (item) and is centered, sharp, without fingers, and has a natural or neutral, blurred background.
    PlantNet offers helpful advice on how to take a good plant picture for the app, including bad examples of what they do not want and good examples of what they do want.

    Accurate plant identification

    PlantNet can identify plants and trees by analyzing a photo of their leaf, flower, fruit or bark. The app guided us to an easy-to-use screen where we could snap a plant’s photo and ask for an identification back. We took a photo of each of our test plants both inside our local garden center and at home. We then asked PlantNet to identify each plant and waited for the answer. The whole process of snapping a pic and then receiving an answer took mere seconds each time. PlantNet correctly identified all of the plants we asked it to, down to the finest detail. The app was able to tell us that the flower in question was not only a tulip, for example, but that it was Didier’s tulip (Tulipa gesneriana), a species of plant in the Liliaceae (or lily) family. Other apps we tested weren’t so detailed and accurate.

    In our local garden center, we used the PlantNet app on our Samsung smartphone to identify these pretty flowers. PlantNet quickly and correctly identified them as Didier’s tulips or Tulipa gesneriana, a species of plant in the Liliaceae (or lily) family.

    PlantNet recommended we enable its geolocation (GPS) feature to automatically and more accurately identify our plants, which we did. We could identify plants via the Map option or the Special Floras option. The Map option includes searches for plants found in Africa, Asia, North America, Canada, Central America, Europe, and Oceania-Pacific.

    The Special Floras option includes search themes such as World flora, Useful plants, Weeds, Invasive plants, Useful plants of Tropical Africa and Useful plants of Asia. You can also have it identify plants commonly found in regions, parks and protected areas.

    With PlantNet, you can identify plants using the Map or Special Floras options. Special Flora areas include regions, parks and protected areas, etc. The app recommends you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve the identification.

    Like most of the other apps we tested, PlantNet is available in multiple languages. The app can be used by plant enthusiasts all across the world for this reason. But at 45 languages, it supports the most of all the apps we tested, including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Turkish.

    There really wasn’t anything we didn’t like about PlantNet. This plant identification app does what it claims to do, and does it quickly and accurately.

    PlantNet was fast and highly accurate in our plant identification tests. Given that PlantNet is also free and easy to use, we recommend it as the go-to plant identification app for most people.

    best plant identification apps5_inline_cnnu

    If you or your loved ones are outdoors in nature for any reason, it’s important to avoid poisonous plants like poison ivy or poison oak since nobody wants the rash that can result from touching their leaves. Plant identification apps can help you identify harmless flowers and plants you may want to purchase for your garden or backyard but they can also help you avoid poisonous plants you may encounter. Just use your smartphone to snap a pic of the unknown plant to identify it before touching it.

    But we’re only human — what if you forget to take your smartphone on your hike or other outdoor activity? There are additional precautions you can take to avoid rashes from poisonous plants. Namely, be sure to educate yourself first before touching unknown plants. In its article, “Outsmarting Poison Ivy and Other Poisonous Plants,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discusses how you can recognize poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac. To avoid getting rashes, the FDA offers the following tips (which we’ve condensed and summarized):

    • Tip 1: Educate yourself. The FDA advises you to learn what poison ivy, oak, sumac and other poisonous plants look like so you can avoid them. Watch the FDA’s educational video on what to know.
    • Tip 2: Keep tools clean. According to the FDA, it is a good idea to wash your garden tools and gloves regularly. The FDA suggests wearing long sleeves, long pants (tucked into boots) and impermeable gloves if you think there’s a chance you might be working near poison ivy.
    • Tip 3: Wash your pet. The FDA says most pets are not sensitive to poison ivy, but the oil can stick to their fur and cause a reaction in someone who pets them. So, wash your pet if it was playing outside alone or was on a hike in the woods with you. The FDA points out that your pet may have brushed up against poison ivy, oak or sumac. Use pet shampoo and water to wash your pet, and the FDA again advises wearing impermeable gloves while doing so.
    • Tip 4: Clean yourself. Wash your skin in soap and cool water as soon as possible if you come in contact with a poisonous plant. The FDA says the sooner you clean your skin, the greater the chance you can remove the plant oil or help prevent further spread.
    These tulips are pretty but considered unsafe for dogs, cats and horses.

    Any new parent knows that baby-proofing the house is a crucial step in helping to keep their baby safe. Pet parents, too, need to be mindful of dangers lurking inside as well as outside the home. Did you know certain plants can be lethal to animals if ingested? In its article, “Potentially Dangerous Items for Your Pet,” the FDA notes the plants and flowers that can be harmful if your pet eats them. According to the FDA, the potentially dangerous items listed “can vary in how toxic they are to pets. Some may be only mildly toxic while others may cause severe illness or even death.”

    The FDA continues by pointing out that “the degree of toxicity often depends on several factors,” including the type of animal (cat, dog, or other species) that ate the item, how much the animal ate, and which part of the plant (bulb, flower or leaf) was eaten.

    Related: How to start an indoor garden and what to buy for one, according to experts

    You can also find toxicity information for plants from a pet poison control center such as the Animal Poison Control Center (APCC) of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). You can contact its APCC regarding any animal poison-related emergency at 888-426-4435, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The ASPCA offers comprehensive, detailed lists of plants that are toxic and non-toxic to cats and dogs. The following are 10 plants commonly found in the home or in the yard that are toxic to dogs, cats and horses; they are listed in alphabetical order. Note the clinical signs of illness to watch out for.

    • Plant 1: Aloe VeraCan cause vomiting (not in horses), lethargy, diarrhea
    • Plant 2: Azalea Can cause vomiting (not in horses), diarrhea, weakness, cardiac failure
    • Plant 3: CarnationCan cause mild gastrointestinal signs, mild dermatitis
    • Plant 4: ChrysanthemumCan cause vomiting, diarrhea, hyper-salivation, incoordination, dermatitis
    • Plant 5: DaffodilCan cause vomiting, salvation, diarrhea; large ingestions cause convulsions, low blood pressure, tremors and cardiac arrhythmias. Bulbs are the most poisonous part
    • Plant 6: DaisyCan cause vomiting, diarrhea, hyper-salivation, incoordination, dermatitis
    • Plant 7: GeraniumCan cause vomiting, anorexia, depression, dermatitis
    • Plant 8: Hydrangea Can cause vomiting, depression, diarrhea
    • Plant 9: ParsleyCan cause photosensitization (sunburn, dermatitis); large amounts are needed to cause this effect
    • Plant 10: TulipCan cause vomiting, depression, diarrhea, hyper-salivation. Highest concentration of toxin in bulb
    This orchid is considered safe for this curious dog.

    We conducted part of our testing for this review in our local Pike’s Nurseries garden center. In its How-To section of its website, Pike’s Nurseries says that if pet parents have their heart set on owning a certain plant or plants, that they should do their “research and be strategic about placement (like hanging plants and tall shelves).”

    Pike’s Nurseries also suggests trying a faux version of a toxic houseplant to be completely safe. The following are some nontoxic house plants that the garden center says are safe for pets:

    best plant identification apps4_inline_cnnu

    During our pre-testing research, we found a large number of plant identification apps from which to choose. We selected our five candidates to test based on desired features, user reviews, and availability on at least Android and iOS mobile platforms. We downloaded each of the five plant identification apps to a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone. We evaluated the apps based on their ease of installation and use, key features, pricing, any notable differentiators and the overall user experience.

    To test the accuracy of the identification processes, we made multiple trips to our local Pike’s Nursery (which is one of 15 garden centers in the metro Atlanta region of the United States). With their permission, we snapped photos of different plants on display inside the store. We had all the plant identification apps try to identify some Tulipa gesneriana (Didier’s tulips), Polyscias scutellaria (shield aralia or plum aralia), Ficus pumila (creeping fig or climbing fig) and Viola wittrockiana (garden pansy).

    We then compared all the apps’ accuracy and speed in their identifications. Since the plants were already identified by labels and signs in the store, all we had to do was note whether or not the apps’ identifications matched the plants’ store labels and signs. We also had all the apps try to identify a Schlumbergera (Christmas cactus), a plant we had inside our home during testing. We compared all the apps’ accuracy as they tried to identify this plant, too.

    For this review, we focused on how well each app would work for the average user, no matter the reason for using it — gardening, hiking, walking or various other outdoor activities. After all, if an app is hard to use, falters in key metrics such as accuracy or reliability, or otherwise presents obstacles while using, then the app can’t be deemed useful as a practical matter.

    best plant identification apps2_inline_cnnu

    • Pricing: Free to install but charges $1 per correct plant identification
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: English
    • Key features: Identification of plants, moss, lichens and fungi; identification is performed by international botanists and horticulture experts rather than by a computer algorithm. You take a photo of an unknown plant, send it to their team of experts and one or more of them will collaborate to identify it for you. They will provide the genus (taxonomy rank), species and the common name of the plant along with the level of certainty of the identification.

    FlowerChecker is a plant identification app that is easy to install and use but its plant identification process is much different than the rest of the apps we tested. And that’s because a team of human experts — botanists and horticulture professionals — do the actual plant identification work here, not artificial intelligence (AI) or other automation within the app.

    When we took a photo of each of our test plants and sent off our “What is this?” queries, the expert would respond with the correct identification. The experts are touted as being, well, experts, and they may very well be. However, they remained anonymous. We would have liked it better if they were identified by full name, title or other credentials.

    Also, the response time with FlowerChecker is unpredictable. It took as long as a day or more for us to get the results to some of our queries but, with others, we received results within an hour. There was just no way to tell in advance how long the question-and-answer process would take.

    FlowerChecker alerts you when your plant identification request is fulfilled and tells you which of its botanists answered your query. You will receive the Genus, Species and the Common name of the plant along with the level of certainty of the identification.

    FlowerChecker uses an unusual pricing model. It’s free to install but we had to pay one credit — or approximately one US dollar — before we could even see the results of our plant query. One credit per query can add up! So, the app gets the cash upfront, so to speak, for correct identifications. However, the good news is, the app only charges for accurate results. So, if the team cannot identify a plant correctly, the app lets you know you owe nothing, a nice touch.

    • Pricing: $5 per month (billed monthly) or $26 per year (billed annually). No free trial for Premium version
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: 23 languages including Arabic, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Slovak and Turkish
    • Key features: Identification of plants, flowers, fruits and trees; searchable database containing over 32,000 plant species from all over the world; unlimited plant identification; unlimited reminders; step-by-step plant care guides; plant care reminders; ability to share identifications with friends; lets you create collections of your favorite plants

    LeafSnap Premium is simple to install and setup is a breeze. It has some accurate and easy-to-use features, too, including a basic plant Identifier and a deeper, more accurate Advanced Identify function. The Advanced Identify function can identify a plant in three ways: from a photo of the whole plant, from a photo of its flower or from its leaf only. Being able to identify a whole plant from just its leaf can come in handy for pet parents. If you have a cat and see a leaf hanging from said cat’s lip, for example, that may be enough to identify what the cat just bit into and whether or not that was a safe snack for kitty.

    LeafSnap Premium’s basic plant Identifier worked well, too, during our testing, providing mostly fast, accurate identifications in all of our test cases.

    There’s also a Diagnostics feature to help you figure out what to do to make your plant healthier, which can be handy if you’re clueless about plant woes and how to fix them.

    (left to right): Here we took a photo of the Polyscias scutellaria (Shield aralia) plants in our local nursery. LeafSnap Premium correctly identified their delicate, lacy green foliage as well as identified the Ficus pumila (Climbing fig) plants displayed next to them.

    LeafSnap Premium is available for $5 per month or $26 per year. This app’s annual cost is on the pricier end of the plant identification apps we tested, but it might be worth the expense if you need to use it for an extended period of time.

    • Pricing: After a three-day free trial, PlantID costs $10 per month (billed monthly)
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS, web
    • Supported languages: English, Czech
    • Key features: Identification of over 12,000 plants including flowers, trees, bushes, fungi and lichens from all over the world; offers rock identification; Health Assessment feature identifies 100 plant diseases; uses machine learning (ML)

    PlantID is a plant identification app that is easy to install, set up and, for the most part, use. PlantID adds a fun additional feature to plant identification: rock identification. This can be neat for those interested in rocks for gardening purposes or just as a hobby.

    However, during testing, this feature brought up an unexpected result. When we took a photo of the tulips on display inside our local nursery, we asked the app to identify them. But we must have hit the wrong button in the app or included an item unseen to us in addition to the tulips in the photo. Why? Because we received a surprising and confusing identification: amethyst!

    Perhaps the app spotted an amethyst near the plant in the photo we took? Whatever the reason, the app identified the flower as an amethyst instead of a tulip. But when we tried again and this time hit the correct button, the app correctly identified the tulips. And much to our delight, PlantID also correctly identified the rest of our test plants.

    (left to right): Plant ID can identify both plants and rocks. When we snapped a photo of the yellow Viola wittrockiana, Plant ID initially and incorrectly identified them as an Amethyst (match rate: 21 percent). But we tried again and its second attempt was accurate (match rate: 57 percent).

    One thing we didn’t like was PlantID’s chintzy trial period. A three-day freemium potentially sets the user up to subscribe to the $10-per-month app before they realize the trial period has expired.

    • Pricing: After a seven-day free trial, PlantSnap Pro costs $20 per year (billed annually)
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: 37 languages including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish
    • Key features: Identification of plants, flowers, cacti, succulents and mushrooms; searchable database containing over 600,000 plants; the iOS version uses auto-detect, augmented reality (AR) and machine learning (ML); offers gardening tips and plant care instructions; lets you create collections of your favorite plants

    PlantSnap Pro is a plant identification app that is easy to install, set up and use. To set up, you just need to give the app access to your smartphone’s camera and gallery for the app to function. A couple of clicks later and the app is ready.

    This plant identification app offers some neat features we appreciated. Its “auto detect” feature can automatically find the plant in your photo and it helps you with cropping options, too. The app also offers guides to help you care for the plant and recommends a few products to help you care for it, too. (But you can skip that recommendation part entirely if you prefer.)

    The app has an active community of plant lovers who you can chat with to help resolve your plant issues, share photos, and dive into other plant-related discussions.

    All good things aside, PlantSnap Pro’s accuracy was more than a little off in two instances, which was disappointing. When we took a photo of a Christmas cactus on our table, the app incorrectly identified it as a Dracaena arborea. And inside our test nursery, the app identified Didier’s tulips as just generic tulips.

    (left to right): During testing we found PlantSnap’s accuracy to be a bit off, as it incorrectly identified more than one test plant. Here it identifies our Christmas Cactus (Schlumbergera sp.) as a Dracaena arborea.

    PlantSnap Pro offers a seven-day free trial, which is very much welcomed and gives you sufficient time to try out the app. Once you commit, its $20 annual cost is highly affordable.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing coverage:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best mops in 2023, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    The best mops in 2023, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    You can sweep and vacuum all you like, but if you have hardwood, vinyl or tile floors and run into sticky residue or stuck-on grime, you’re going to have to mop. There’s good news, though. Mops have come a long way since the bulky, stringy, soggy swabbers of old, and are smaller, tidier and easier to use than ever. Most will be able to tackle a wide range of flooring types too, making it easy to get your entire home clean with fewer tools and a minimum of fuss.

    We put 11 popular mops, including string, spin, spray and pad models, to the test, evaluating them on how they performed while tackling three challenging cleaning tasks as well as on overall build and durability. We were able to confidently land on three favorites that should let you tackle any cleanup large or small, on any surface in your home.

    Best mop overall

    The O-Cedar EasyWring Microfiber Spin Mop combines a hands-free wringing bucket with lightweight, triangular mop head that’s perfect for both mopping and spot-scrubbing on any surface.

    Best mop for smaller jobs

    The Oxo Good Grips Microfiber Spray Mop Kit features a multifunctional design — providing two heads in one — making it a convenient tool to quickly grab and use for both quick cleanups.

    Best mop for hardwood floors

    If you’re looking for a mop specifically to take care of hardwood surfaces, the Bona Hardwood Floor Premium Spray Mop is simple and effective, and includes a bottle of Bona’s hardwood floor cleaner.

    O-cedar-spinner-best-mops-best-overall

    Wringing out a mop head is generally a messy task, but the new generation of spin mops has made the task a lot easier. The O-Cedar EasyWring Spin Mop has the process dialed in, making it easy to keep your mop head clean and ready to go. It’s also a solidly built mop with a smart, easy-to-handle design that did a great job scrubbing up dirt and grime in our tests.

    A manual foot pedal on the rear of the EasyWring bucket powers a spinning basket that, when a wet mop head is placed inside, quickly removes excess liquid. It works extremely quickly, and since you don’t have to bend over or even use your hands at all, it really cuts down on overall cleaning time. It felt solid and durable as well, even when pumping away as hard as I could, and never felt like it was vulnerable to cracking or snapping.

    The mop itself is comfortable to use and its lightweight design means it’s easy to carry around and maneuver while you mop. You can even adjust the length from 24 to 48 inches to suit your height or the reach your job requires. The mop head is made of microfiber strings that are more absorbent than they appear, and can really soak up large amounts of liquid in a single pass. The head’s triangular design makes it easy to get into corners and to clean around furniture legs. I found that the relatively short length of these strands also made it easy to spin and dry out the head, unlike the longer loops of the Libman Wonder Mop, which were messier and more challenging to control when soaking wet.

    Most importantly, the O-Cedar’s scrubbing capabilities were superior to the pad-based mops we tested. The mop head fared well in my bathroom tile tests, easily taking care of soap residue, soaking up cleaning liquid, and capturing loose dirt without just moving it around. The head cleaned up easily in the laundry using a regular wash and dry cycle too, and was ready for action again the following day. Plus, since the mop ships with three microfiber scrubbing heads, you’ll be able to tackle extra-large cleaning projects without needing to wait for a wash cycle to get finished.

    The only real drawback to this mop is the large bucket size. At 20 inches long it might be too bulky to store in a  bathroom closet, although this large size does make it practical for larger, whole-house mopping jobs.

    OXO-Good-Grips-spray-mop-best-mops

    While it wasn’t quite as effective in handling dirt as our top pick, the lightweight, hassle-free design of the multifunctional Oxo Good Grips Microfiber Spray Mop makes it a perfect choice for tackling quick cleanups and spills.

    The manual trigger was large enough to use comfortably, and also felt nice and sturdy when pumping away; we preferred it to battery-powered sprayers like the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood and Floor Spray Mop. At 2.4 pounds it was effortless to carry around the house and up and down the stairs with ease.

    Our favorite feature of this mop is the detachable mop pad. If you come upon a stubborn spot that it can’t remove, you can simply detach it with a simple latch, revealing a small scrubbing head. The small size of the scrubber allows you to really lean into it as you work, and the rougher texture took care of even the toughest sticky residue. Often, features like this feel like gimmicks — unreliable, ineffective or just out of place in the overall design of the product — but not in this case. The scrubber pad is both useful and honestly really fun to use. We found ourselves searching for spots and stains to use it on.

    The wet mopping pad was absorbent enough to work well on hardwood, and the spray trigger made it easy to control the precise amount of cleaner being dispersed. The pad didn’t do as good a job at capturing and removing the potting soil mess on the bathroom tile as the O-Cedar, however, and ended up spreading it around more than actually picking it up.

    Oxo-good-grips-best-mops-scrubber-detail

    The Oxo kit includes a great selection of accessories and attachments, especially considering the low price. You get three wet mopping pads, three scrubbing pads and two reusable bottles, and thanks to the hanging loop on top of the handle, it won’t need to take up any valuable floor space. The instruction manual even includes a pair of recipes for making your own cleaning solution.

    Bona-mop-best-mops

    If your priority is cleaning hardwood flooring, the Bona Hardwood Floor Premium Spray Mop is a great choice. It includes a 34-oz bottle of Bona hardwood floor cleaner — a product that we’ve used on hardwood flooring for years — which can easily be refilled with large Bona refill jugs. This bottle was really simple to pop in and out too.

    The manual trigger makes it easy to dispense a precise amount of cleaner, so we never had to worry about too much soaking the flooring. The mop was very comfortable to use, thanks to a soft foam grip on the handle, and the extra wide pad — 16.5 inches — let us cover a lot of area in a short time.

    This pad can be used to dry mop as well, so there’s no need to pull out a separate broom and dustpan to prep your floors. The kit only includes a single pad, however, so we suggest grabbing an extra to have on hand for large jobs.

    Large liquid spills and stuck-on grime, dirt and other residue on hard floors that sweeping and vacuuming just can’t handle call for a mop. By combining a liquid cleaner with a textured scrubbing head, mops can dislodge the spill or residue, as well as absorb and contain it, leaving you with a clean floor. It’s worth noting that for small spills, a cleaning spray and a rag or paper towels should suffice, but it’s not really practical to clean a whole room or even a large area that way.

    There are three basic types of mops to choose from: traditional “string mops” with a shaggy head that you wring out in a bucket, squeeze or spin out; spray mops that have a flat pad and use a built-in reservoir to spray cleaner onto the floor; and basic pad-and-handle designs that require you to apply floor cleaner from a separate container.

    String mops are good for larger cleaning jobs, since their buckets provide a large supply of cleaner, meaning you can clean large areas (there’s a reason you’ll see these used by professional cleaners). With longer handles designed to be used without bending over (many newer designs are even adjustable), they are much more comfortable to use than old-school options, and new materials like microfiber make the pads easier and faster to wring out than older string mop heads. The buckets themselves can still be bulky and heavy to move around though, so keep that in mind.

    Pad mops are just that: a pad, typically microfiber and either disposable or washable, connected to a handle. They typically don’t come with a bucket or cleaning reservoir. Some pad mops are meant to be used dry on hardwood surfaces, while others can be used with a cleaning solution, though you’ll need to apply that from a separate container. Some are available in very wide sizes, and can be effective and efficient for lighter cleaning in large rooms without a ton of obstacles.

    Spray mops are akin to pad mops, but have a built-in cleaner reservoir and applicator, are relatively low maintenance and typically provide everything you need to get mopping right away. Their pads don’t have as much surface area as string mops and thus aren’t able to absorb as much liquid, and you don’t have a way to easily wring them out when they get saturated, so they are better suited for smaller mopping jobs like tidying up a single room unless you have a supply of pads ready to switch out during big projects. Some spray mops, like the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood and Floor Spray Mop use disposable pads, which are convenient for those who don’t want to hassle with laundry, but are less eco-friendly than reusable pads.

    Mopping is an essential element of cleaning any home with hard floors, but it takes a little planning. First, make sure to clear the floor of dry debris like pet hair and dirt — whether you do that with a handheld vacuum or cordless vacuum or by sweeping, or dry mopping (some mops are designed for or include a separate pad specifically for dry mopping). If using a string mop, fill your bucket with your cleaning solution (choose one that is designed for your specific flooring type), dunk your mop head and then wring it out until it’s damp but not dripping wet. If it’s too wet, you can damage your floors and increase the drying time.

    Then, using a figure-eight pattern, work from one end of the room to the other, pushing the mop but walking backwards so you don’t tread on the newly damp floor. If you encounter stubborn spots, apply some extra downward pressure and go back and forth a few extra times. Once your mop becomes dirty — this will depend on the state of your floors to begin with — rinse your mop head in the bucket, wring it out, and continue mopping. For especially dirty floors, you may need to employ a second “rinsing” bucket (or use your sink) to keep your mop head clean enough to work effectively.

    You use a spray mop or flat pad mop in essentially the same way — working your way backwards — but instead of figure-eights, work in straight lines. When the pad becomes too dirty to clean effectively, either rinse it off in the sink and wring it out by hand or replace it with a fresh one.

    Although some flooring materials — namely hardwood and some engineered laminate materials — require a more delicate touch, most hard flooring should be safe to mop.

    Ceramic tiles and linoleum are sturdy and are typically sealed well enough to be mopped without incident, but floors with more seams, like hardwood and vinyl plank can be more vulnerable to excess moisture. For these floors, make sure to use only the least amount of liquid possible to get the job done, and never allow water or cleaning solution to sit or pool for any length of time.

    You should also make sure to use the proper cleaning solution for your specific type of flooring. You’ll find many cleaning solutions formulated for different surfaces, though a dish soap and water solution works well for many surfaces. You’ll want to stay away from any abrasive cleaners, keep oil soaps to wood floors and only use bleach-based cleaners on tile floors. If you’re not sure what to use, or whether or not your mop can be used on your flooring (especially if you’re dealing with materials like cork or bamboo), take the time to carefully review the manufacturer’s recommendations.

    If your floors are severely worn, cracked or buckled you might want to consult with a flooring professional about repairs before beginning a mopping routine.

    Regardless of the type and size of the mop, it should be easy and comfortable to use. We paid close attention to both how the mop felt in our hands, as well as how easy — or difficult — it was to use any of its components and accessories. We looked at everything from attaching pads and heads, removing filling, and inserting cleaning reservoirs to how well the head could pivot and rotate around obstacles.

    We noted if any assembly was required when unboxing each mop, and if so, how straightforward or complicated it was. We also reviewed the instruction and use manuals for each mop, making sure they clearly explained how to put their product together, and we looked at whether the mop, bucket, and accessories were easy to store when not in use.

    We checked on whether the mop itself and any accessories or attachments, like liquid containers, pads or buckets, were made of quality materials, and took note if any components were flimsy or felt like they could fail with frequent use.

    If the mop heads were machine washable — nearly all of them were — we ran them through a full wash and dry cycle according to their instructions. We noted how well they held up during washing, examining if they begin to unravel or fall apart, appear to lose their structural integrity or feel like they lost any of their absorbency or scrubbing texture.

    We assessed performance on the three types of flooring that most commonly require mopping in the average home.

    • Hardwood flooring: We used each mop to completely mop a large section of sealed hardwood flooring, paying close attention to how well it removed dirt as well as absorbed excess liquid. We noted how dry (or not dry) we were able to get the mop head, since too much liquid can easily damage hardwood flooring, especially older planks like mine. We also checked how the floors looked after drying, making note of any leftover swirls, streaks or cleaning residue.
    • Linoleum kitchen tiles: After pouring 1/4 cup of soda on linoleum kitchen tiles we allowed it dry for a bit, then used each mop to clean it up. This helped to see how effective each mop was when it came to moderate scrubbing, as well as how absorbent they were in terms of removing excess liquid.
    • Bathroom tile: To test each mop’s ability to clean up stubborn bathroom floor messes, we rubbed a bar of soap on hard bathroom tiles, then rubbed in a handful of potting soil, creating a truly challenging mess. Each mop was judged based on its ability to both scrub up the soap residue, absorb the cleaning liquid and capture and contain the dirt without just pushing it around the room.

    Oshang Flat Floor Mop and Bucket Set

    $65 $50 at Amazon

    The Oshang Flat Floor Mop’s distinctive bucket features two slots, one for dunking your mop head and the other, narrower slot for squeegeeing the dirty water off and drying the pad. You can run the mop head through the drying slot as many times as you like, depending on how much water you want to remove. This made it effective for both hardwood floor work and tasks that you want a bit more water for, like the soap residue on bathroom tiles (though the pads weren’t the most effective scrubbers we tested). It also includes two wet and two dry pads, so you’re set for larger tasks. The compact footprint of the bucket makes this a good option for those who don’t have a lot of storage space.

    Bosheng Mop and Bucket

    $50 $40 at Amazon

    The Bosheng’s slotted bucket design is great for getting your mop head dry without bending over, but it wasn’t as easy to use, durable or effective as the otherwise very similar Oshang Flat Floor Mop and Bucket Set, which we would recommend in its place unless you’re on a very tight budget.

    This mop features an extra-large head — 15 by 5 inches — and a nearly 60-inch handle, making it well-suited for covering large areas quickly and efficiently. The clamping mechanism that attaches the pad to the mop head was impressive as well, and allowed for attaching and removing the pad far more easily than other pad mops that used Velcro attachments. The thick, heavy-duty stainless steel handle made it easy to maneuver the mop around the floor, and the pads can be used to dry mop, so no need to break out the broom and dustpan. The main drawback of this mop was the connection between the handle and the mop head itself, which felt flimsy and unstable. This was a shame because the rest of the unit had a nice, sturdy feel to it. The large size of this mop head could also be inconvenient for those with tight or cluttered spaces.

    The Libman Wonder Mop’s substantial microfiber strips were both good at scrubbing and long enough to reach around furniture legs and into tight spaces (between the wheels of a mobile kitchen island, for instance), and the packages included three extra mop heads. But the microfiber strips that make up the head were long enough to wrap around furniture legs and the wheels of my kitchen island, and the mop head popped right off during use and required reattachment several times, so we’re unsure that it would stand up under regular use.

    The O-Cedar cloth mop is well-built, with a sturdy metal pole that threads right into the mop head, while still remaining extremely lightweight at just 1.3 pounds. The microfiber loops are absorbent, but more importantly, they made it possible to perform aggressive scrubbing on problem areas. This made it one of the standouts in our kitchen and bathroom tile testing, and the looped design was ideal for capturing and containing dirt and debris. It didn’t fare too well on hardwood flooring though, as it just didn’t have the surface area to efficiently cover larger rooms. If you prefer a simple looped mop head, and are willing to purchase the separate quick-wring bucket needed for wringing it out, this could be a great choice.

    There’s a lot to like about this electric mop, as well as a few things that kept it out of the top spot. First of all, it’s really well-made, and the entire unit felt sturdy and solid. It came nearly fully assembled, too; you just attach the top part of the handle to the base, and that’s it, you’re ready to go. The twin rotating pads Velcroed easily to the base, and when turned on, worked almost like a self-propelled lawnmower, requiring almost no effort to push forward. Unfortunately, even though this mop did fairly well in our testing, this rotating action did end up leaving some faint swirl patterns on hardwood and kitchen tile. These were fairly easy to remove with another mop, but that really defeats the purpose altogether. The automatic operation also means that you aren’t really able to add any extra pressure if you encounter stubborn spots, so it’s only suited for lighter-duty cleaning. At over $100, this is an expensive option but it did include a large, 80-ounce jug of multi-surface cleaner.

    This large head makes it perfect for cleaning a large room with minimal passes — it worked incredibly fast in our hardwood floor testing — but it is inconvenient to use in tighter spots, like in the bathroom. That said, it did perform well overall, and was absorbent enough to really soak up a decent amount of liquid. It did suffer the same problem as other large pad mops, like the Mr. Siga Professional Microfiber Mop, in that its large surface area made it difficult to apply direct pressure to stubborn grime and sticky residue. It’s really better for lighter work. Putting a foot on the mop head and pressing down does the trick, but that’s certainly not an ideal solution, and likely not great for overall longevity of the mop. It’s worth noting that this mop includes a dedicated dust mop head (no other mop we tested had such an accessory), which worked really well for clearing dust and pet hair.

    It’s hard to deny the convenience of the disposable pads of the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood Floor Spray Mop. Instead of having to deal with reusable pads that need to be laundered after every use, you simply use these until they get dirty and toss them in the trash. This may not be the most eco-friendly approach, however, and several third-party providers offer reusable pads. Just remember that the more you clean, the more pads and cleaning solution you’ll need to purchase, which can really add up if you have a lot of floor to mop. The pads included with this model were not as absorbent as we would like, and struggled in our bathroom tile tests — they felt too slippery to actually capture and pick up the soap residue and dirt. That said, the mop is solidly built, and the dual sprayers covered an impressive amount of flooring. The dispenser is battery-operated. which could be a nice perk for those who don’t want to continually squeeze a trigger every time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best products we tested in March 2023: Flashlights, photo printers and more | CNN Underscored

    The best products we tested in March 2023: Flashlights, photo printers and more | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored is constantly testing products — be those flashlights, photo printers or food dehydrators — to find the absolute best in each respective category. Our testing process is rigorous, starting out by spending hours of research to find the top products in each category. Once we create a testing pool of products, we test and retest each product multiple times in real-world settings over several weeks or even months.

    This year, we’ve already tested several hundred products — from PS5 games to smartphone apps to wireless speakers — to find the best products you need to make life better. Here are the winning products from March.

    Wireless earbuds with incredible battery life and comfort

    If you’re looking to spend less than $100 on a pair of noise-canceling earbuds — and want something stylish and low-profile — it’s hard to do much better than the Jabra Elite 4.

    An impressible and uniquely stylish set of wireless earbuds

    If you’re looking to spend less than $150 on a quality set of noise-canceling earbuds — and want something that stands out from the pack — the Nothing Ear (2) are worth it.

    A good audiophile option

    If you’re willing to splurge on a stylish pair of headphones with true audiophile-grade sound (and can live without features like active noise cancellation), the Master & Dynamic MH40 are worth the investment.

    An excellent small wireless speaker

    The Era 100 produces a bigger sound than the Sonos One without increasing the size much and delivers impressive bass for a small speaker. It adds Bluetooth and the option for external sources through a line-in adapter. But the price has gone up again.

    Room-filling sound from one speaker

    The Era 300 makes it easy to bask in immersive spatial audio — with its wide sound, it feels like you’re listening to more than one speaker. Thanks to crisp treble and deep bass, it sounds good with regular stereo music, too. It’s packed with features, but you pay a premium for the privilege.

    Best drip coffee maker overall

    The Braun KF6050WH BrewSense Drip Coffee Maker produced consistently delicious, hot cups of coffee, brewed efficiently and cleanly, from sleek, relatively compact hardware that is turnkey to operate, and all for a reasonable price.

    Unique outdoor rowing experience with a clean, intuitive interface

    The Hydrow Rower is a sleek, premium rowing machine that pairs with a $44-per-month All-Access membership. Yes, it offers a kicking cardio and full-body workout, but we loved how it takes rowing back to its roots with live classes filmed at real-world locales. It may be pricey, but if you want to feel like you’re rowing on the water, then this home gym rowing machine is for you.

    The perfect treadmill for running in smaller spaces

    If you’ve always wanted a treadmill but didn’t have the space or the cash for a larger machine, the ProForm Carbon T7 is a perfect compromise. No, it doesn’t have the horsepower of larger, pricier treadmills, but you do get a wealth of advanced AI features as well as access to different types of classes with the iFit subscription (which is free for three years). And a smaller footprint paired with a budget price is nothing to sneeze at when you’re thinking about adding to your home gym.

    A cult classic trail runner with even better traction

    Fans of the Lone Peak series will love the new 7s for their wide width and upgraded grip, while newcomers to this shoe might be surprised at its lack of cushioning and zero-drop design. Either way, Altra has managed to deliver yet another awesome trail sneaker, with slip-proof laces and just the right amount of breathable mesh.

    A close-to-perfect bottle with a few shortcomings

    It isn’t perfect, but the collapsible HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L bottle has an incredible flow rate and a durable exterior, making it a top dog in the market of bottles with built-in filters. Difficulty keeping it clean, particularly in the long term, holds it back from being a perfect option.

    The definitive version of a survival horror masterpiece

    Resident Evil 4 is an outstanding retelling of the 2005 original single player story for modern audiences. Everything from the upgraded combat and mobility to the striking audio and visuals go a long way in making this the definitive take on Resident Evil 4.

    Best food dehydrator overall

    With hassle-free operation and consistent drying, the Nesco Gardenmaster offered the best balance of simplicity and performance of any food dehydrator we tested, and is a great choice for anyone looking to preserve herbs, fruits and vegetables or meats.

    A plush bed in a box that’s great for side or back sleepers who appreciate softness

    Leesa’s Legend Mattress is an excellent mattress for side sleepers, with soft support to alleviate pressure and back pain and a breathable top cover and ventilated foam layer to keep you cool.

    A useful sleep aid that focuses on calm breathing

    The Dodow sleep aid is a unique and useful device. It helped us fall asleep faster, and more consistently. It isn’t hard to learn to sync your breath with the light, and once you get used to the process, you’ll feel the results. Just breathe in when it expands and out when it contracts.

    An attractive, multitasking bedside assistant

    The Hatch Restore 2 is an all-encompassing sleep machine that uses light and sound to help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. The accompanying app gives you access to a library full of colored lights, white noise, sleep stories and guided meditation. But where the Restore 2 really shines is its amazingly pleasant Sunrise Alarm, which wakes you gently and more humanely than the average alarm clock.

    A convenient, app-based countertop oven for busy cooks

    The Tovala Smart Oven Air Fryer offers a simple, fresh meal delivery service for one and Wi-Fi connected, one-touch cooking. A great budget toaster oven if you order meals, it jumps to a pricier, less useful purchase if you’re more interested in cooking from scratch. However, if you’re looking to save time and energy, then this countertop oven beats out supermarket frozen food and takeout.

    Best meal planning app overall

    During testing, we found Eat This Much Premium easy to set up. Its meal customization options and editable grocery lists are a delight to use and we appreciated its comprehensive recipe library. It also had the best online help and customer support of the meal planning apps we tested.

    Best plant identification app for mobile overall

    During testing, we found PlantNet easy to use, accurate and fast. This free app guides you during setup, lets you search by map or flora, and suggests you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve its plant identification.

    The ideal travel backpack if you want to pack for several days away without checking a bag

    The Incase A.R.C. Travel Pack is equal parts backpack and suitcase. Its butterfly-style packing system lets you maximize space for packing clothes and other essentials, while it has a separate laptop compartment and plenty of additional pockets. While it’s on the pricey side, its durable exterior and versatility make this a solid addition to your travel wardrobe.

    Best checked suitcase overall

    With fantastic internal organization and compression, a durable exterior and comfortable handles, the Away Medium suitcase was the most well-rounded bag we tested, with a great combination of maneuverability, capacity, durability and style.

    Best robot mop overall

    The compact, inexpensive iRobot Braava Jet 240 is simply the best robot mop for the money. While it doesn’t have the smarts of more expensive models and can’t do double duty as a vacuum, its efficient design and simple pattern-based navigation deliver impressive cleaning.

    Best robot vacuum overall

    The iRobot Roomba j7+ is the best robot vacuum you can buy right now, with impressive cleaning power and smart mapping that creates virtual boundaries to detect and avoid obstacles.

    Best office chair overall

    The Steelcase Series 1 stood out as one of the most customizable, high-quality, comfortable office chairs on the market, beating out chairs double the price — making it the best bang for the buck.

    The perfect sub-$400 monitor for your home office

    The LG UltraFine 4K is a great sub-$400 monitor for anyone looking to upgrade their home office, offering great 4K picture quality and plenty of ports.

    Best photo printer overall

    In our tests, the Pro 200 turned out prints comparable in quality much more expensive models, and running costs are relatively low. Straightforward setup and impressive results made it the best value among the photo printers we tested.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best air mattress in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best air mattress in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is a part of CNN Underscored’s Guide to Sleep, a week-long focus on everything you need to sleep better. We’ll be featuring new products and exclusive deals all week, so check in every morning to see what’s new.

    You may not use an air mattress often, but when the time comes, you’ll want one that’s reliable, comfortable, and easy to inflate and store. You don’t want to struggle to set it up, you need it to be supportive enough to provide a good night’s rest and the last thing you or your guests want is to wake up in the middle of the night, floundering in a half-deflated blob of vinyl.

    We set out to find the best air mattress, putting seven top models to the test, judging them on their comfort while sleeping, as well as their overall usability when it comes to setting up, inflating, deflating, and storage. If you haven’t shopped for an air mattress in a while, you’ll be surprised to find how comfortable and convenient they are nowadays, but even among this impressive group we found an outstanding choice that should make you and your guests happy.

    The Best Air Mattress Overall

    In addition to providing the most comfortable night’s sleep during testing, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress uses a built-in pump for quick and convenient inflation, and features a raised pillow that helps mimic the feel of a real bed.

    King Koil luxury underscored best air mattress

    While many of the air mattresses I tested were similar in design, pump operation, and dimensions, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress was a clear winner when it came to overall comfort. Not only does it feature a soft, velvety flocking covering the top, it’s designed with a raised pillow area on one end. This area provides just enough head and neck support to mimic the effect of a headboard, making it feel much more like a real bed to me than any other option.

    The King Koil Luxury Air Mattress provided a comfortable amount of full-body support as well. I’ll admit, the “coil-beam construction” sounded a bit gimmick-y, but these internal, air-filled coils seemed to work as advertised. They really provided the ideal amount of support for me, mimicking a real mattress more convincingly than the other mattresses we tested. Since these coils are spaced throughout the mattress, edge to edge, I never felt like the sides were going to give way and cause me to roll out, which is sometimes the case in less-supportive mattresses. I did experience a small amount of deflation over my 48 hours of testing, but it was minimal enough to chalk up to standard stretching of the new material. In fact, in addition to the two nights of sleeping, I also found myself laying down on it throughout the day, just to experience the comfort and support.

    At 20 inches high, the King Koil Luxury Air Mattress is convenient to climb into at night, and more importantly, comfortable to roll out of in the morning. Air mattresses that are lower to the ground were just more difficult to get into and out off, and the process involved more grunting and bending than we were prepared to do first thing in the morning. This was definitely not the case with the King Koil.

    Image of the side of a King Koil air mattress, showing the built-in pump mechanism

    The pump was both easy to use and quick to fill, fully inflating the mattress in just 1 minute 50 seconds. You simply twist the valve you want to use—either inflate or deflate—press the power switch and you’re all set. The power cord also conveniently stores inside a little storage cubby with a latching door, keeping everything nice and tidy when it’s time to store the mattress away.

    As for storage, despite its luxurious height and internal structure the King Koil packs up very tidily into a storage sack small enough to tuck into the back of a closet. Some competitors were stiff and difficult to fold up easily, and others were too large even folded away into their stuff sacks to store away easily.

    A King Koil air mattress folded down to its storage size.

    The materials used in the mattress and pump appear to be of high quality, and I never felt like any elements or components were flimsy, loose, or weak. Deflation was a breeze as well, taking just 1 minute 50 seconds to go from full to completely empty. It took me less than a minute to fold it up and slide it back into the included storage bag too, thanks to the illustrated instructions in the manual.

    A packed King Koil air mattress in its storage bag, sitting on a living room floor, watched over by a small brown and white dog seated on a couch.

    The King Koil Luxury Air Mattress is not cheap relative to the competition, but the overall comfort, build quality and speedy inflation makes it worth the money.

    How do you take care of an air mattress?

    Even high-quality air mattresses won’t last forever, but there are things you can do to extend their lifespan. Make sure to not only avoid punctures by keeping your pets off the bed—even small dogs can have sharp toenails that can puncture or scratch through an air mattress—but also avoid unnecessary pressure by preventing rambunctious kids from jumping or walking on it. This extra pressure can place more stress on the seams, causing splits and cracks over time. Insta-bed also advises you to avoid placing the mattress against the wall, to avoid hidden carpet tacks.

    You should also take the time to vacuum your mattress after every use. Accumulated crumbs and other small debris can also pose a potential puncture threat, especially when you’re folding it up and squeezing it down during deflation.

    The most important thing to remember is that cold temperatures can make vinyl stiffen, so if it’s being stored in a cool area, like a basement or attic, make sure to allow your air mattress to come to room temperature before inflating. If not, the vinyl may lack the flexibility it needs to expand safely, which can cause cracks or splits in the material. The Insta-bed manual also recommends this warming up period after your bed is delivered to your doorstep, since it could have been sitting outside for longer than you think.

    If your bed does get damaged, it’s not a lost cause. Every mattress I tested included a patch kit for leaks, which, if applied properly, can easily fix the problem. And should your built-in pump go haywire, some mattresses allow you to still fill them manually with a separate pump.

    Yes, you can take an air mattress camping. If you’d prefer to sleep well off the ground and not have to worry about roots and uneven ground impairing your sleep, they could be a great choice. However, you’ll need to be aware of their limitations and the effects they may have on your trip.

    First, since air mattresses are extremely vulnerable to punctures, you won’t want to lay it directly on the ground, and take care to keep it clear of stray campfire embers that could melt the vinyl. While patching holes is a solution, it’s not really a project that’s ideal to perform out in the wilderness. Keep in mind that you can just as easily puncture your mattress when it’s folded up, so don’t pack it with sharp objects. Air mattresses are also relatively heavy, and depending on how long you plan on carrying them to your site, this weight can be more trouble than it’s worth.

    Perhaps most importantly, you’ll need to make sure you have a reliable way to inflate your air mattress. If you want to take advantage of the convenience and quick performance of built-in pumps, you’ll need to have a power source, like a car cigarette lighter, or a campsite power hookup. If you’ll be away from electricity, you’ll need to go with a mattress that comes with a battery-powered pump, like the Intex Dura-Beam Standard Single-High Air Mattress, or a mattress with a manual foot pump. If these limitations sound like they won’t work with you and your trip, you’ll probably be better off with a camping pad.

    To help better understand the benefits and drawbacks of the air mattresses we tested, we ran each mattress through a comprehensive battery of real world tests, from setup to packing and unpacking and, of course, sleeping, evaluating them across a range of criteria but focusing on comfort and convenience.

    Since air mattresses are frequently set up in areas not typically used for a bed, and sometimes last-minute, it’s really important that they’re easy to use. Nobody wants to fumble around with a confusing air pump or have to go digging for an instruction manual when you just want to get to sleep. I paid close attention to how simple—or complicated—each mattress was to operate, from unboxing, to setup, inflation, deflation, and finally storage. Specifically, I noted any specific issues with the pump operation controls, and the helpfulness of each mattresses instruction manual.

    To accurately judge each mattress on the most important measure performance — it’s comfort and support while sleeping, I slept on each model for two nights, noting both how comfortable their soft topper was, as well as overall stability. I also paid close attention to any deflation issues overnight. Although minor deflation is expected with new air mattresses—the vinyl material stretches—I did my best to notice any significant deflation that could indicate actual issues down the road. I compared each mattresses pump as well, evaluating them on how easy they were to setup, notable noise differences, and how long it took them to fully inflate the mattress.

    After testing each mattress, I then deflated, rolled (or folded) up each mattress and stored it and any pumps in their included storage bag. I noted how easy this process was from start to finish, paying attention to how well the pump deflated the mattress, if there were any included instructions that made it easier to fold up the mattress correctly, and how easy it was to fit into the storage bag.

    During all of this testing, I kept track of any issues that caught my eye when it came to build quality. Flimsy switches or valve openings, and any noticeable seam or molding issues with the vinyl or soft topper all helped me evaluate one mattress vs another.

    In addition to these testing categories, I also compared specific metrics like overall weight, the dimensions of each mattress when folded up, and warranty lengths.

    A solid runner-up, the SoundAsleep mattress gave us a comfortable, supportive night’s sleep, and was a breeze to setup and inflate. Once you unfold it, you simply plug in the power cord and turn the control dial to “inflate” and you’re all set. That’s it. The velvet topper was nice and cozy, and I could definitely tell that it had some kind of structural support inside that helped keep it’s shape. Although I did experience some deflation after two nights of sleeping, it didn’t appear to be leak-related and could be chalked up to some standard stretching of the material. The only real drawback I had was a minor design issue with the power cord storage. Unlike other mattresses that provide a small latched door to keep the folded cord inside, this mattress only provides an open hole that you just kind of cram the cord into. It’s also worth noting that this model doesn’t include instructions for folding/rolling up the mattress for storage. This was a fairly straightforward process, so certainly isn’t a dealbreaker, but a diagram could certainly come in handy if you don’t remember how it was folded when you unboxed it. This mattress is also just 18 inches high, as opposed to the 20 inches of the King Koil, which was the primary reason it didn’t take my top spot.

    If you’re extra-sensitive to changes in air mattress inflation and prefer a specific level of firmness, this is the bed for you. The “never flat” pump will automatically power on if it detects that the bed is beginning to deflate, even a small amount, pumping it back up to your desired setting. You can choose between 3 of these settings—plush, medium, and firm—and the pump will maintain that setting at all times. If you’re worried about the noise of the pump interrupting your sleep, you shouldn’t be. I’m a fairly light sleeper and never woke up once during either night, despite the mattress remaining perfectly full the entire time. I kept the mattress next to my desk during the day to monitor the pump, and when it would power on for a few moments, I was really surprised at the low noise level. The supportive structure and velvet topper was comfortable as well, making this a favorite during testing. Keep in mind that you do have to keep it plugged in at all times to take advantage of the never-flat feature, which might limit where you can place it in your room. Plus, unlike the King Koil that covers the sides of the mattress with a soft black velvet, this model has exposed vinyl all around,giving it more of an “air mattress” feel, as opposed to the King Koil, which felt more like a real bed — but this is still a very comfortable air mattress.

    If a speedy inflation time is your priority, consider this high-quality EnerPlex mattress and its built-in pump. It took just 1 minute and 21 seconds to fully inflate, which was the fastest of all the mattresses we tested. The pump itself was simple to use: you just plug it in, rotate the inflation valve to open it, and press the power button. This mattress also scored major points in overall comfort during my sleep test, and its “coil beam construction” definitely provided a good amount of support throughout the night. I also appreciated the non-skid bottom too, which kept it firmly in place when getting in and out. Its 2-year warranty is twice as long as any other mattress I tested, making it well-suited for those who plan on using it frequently. Unfortunately, its 18-inch height was noticeably less comfortable to get in and out of than the 20-inch King Koil. That being said, if the King Koil is unavailable, this mattress is a great alternative.

    Intex Dura-Beam Standard Single-High Air Mattress

    The ultra-low price and compact size of this Intex mattress makes it a great choice for campers or those who are on an extra-tight budget. I was surprised at how comfortable this model felt during the night too, and the inner support system provided more structure than I expected at this price point. That said, its 10-inch height was definitely more of a challenge to get in and out of than the taller options I tested. Although the battery-powered pump took the longest to inflate—4 minutes—it was by far the quietest among the group we tested, which might be worthwhile if noise is a concern (apartment dwellers take note). I do wish the intake valve fit the pump a bit better, as I had to continually press the valve adapter into the port the entire time it was operating. Another drawback: Intex doesn’t include the six “C” batteries required for the Dura-Beam’s pump. I had to purchase these separately, so keep that in mind if you don’t already have them on hand.

    I really enjoyed the subtle “bumpers” on the edge of this mattress, which created a cozy, secure sleeping surface, and gave me the confidence that I wouldn’t accidentally roll out in the event of overnight deflation. At 22 inches, it was also the tallest of the models I tested, which made it really easy to get out of in the morning. The internal horizontal support beams gave it a nice and sturdy feel, and provided a really comfortable sleep overall. The pump was simple to use too, with just a simple dial to rotate from side to side. The main drawback to the this mattress was its inflation time. It took the longest to fill up, 4 minutes and 10 seconds, so keep that in mind if speedy inflation is a priority. At 21 pounds it’s also the heaviest of my testing pool, though not by much.

    The Coleman GuestRest mattress, unlike most of the competition in this price range, uses an external pump, which I found much less convenient than the built-in units. While the ability to use the pump for other items could be useful to some—like if you have pool toys, inflatable kayaks, or balloons—it was extremely loud by comparison, ultimately reaching a pitch that I would describe as “screaming”, and its ill-fitting adapter required you to hold it tightly in place during the inflation process. If you anticipate having to fill up your mattress late at night, this is not the mattress for you. I did appreciate that the pump and inflation instructions were both included in the instruction manual, as well as printed on the side of the mattress itself, which would be convenient if you lose the manual. In the pump’s defense, it did fill the mattress relatively quickly, taking just 3 minutes and 37 seconds to get a nice firm mattress. It’s also nice and compact, making it convenient to store when not in use.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best electric scooters in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best electric scooters in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    While the scooter rental business has cooled off, electric scooters are here to stay. Increasingly popular as personal transportation, these micromobility machines with electric motors and straightforward controls are a great solution for last-mile transportation (getting home from the train or bus, for instance). They’re nimble enough to transport you quickly, and you won’t break a sweat while riding to work. And since they’re much smaller and lighter than most bikes, they’re easy to carry up stairs, stow under a desk or hide away in a closet.

    We checked out seven popular models — and spent some time riding a Lime rental scooter — determining their range, speed and overall feel and ease of use over a variety of terrains and surfaces, and getting a sense of how we could integrate them into our daily routine. After all that, we found a couple of great scooters that can improve your commute, no matter what your budget.

    The best electric scooter overall

    The Segway Ninebot Max strikes the best balance between power, range and compactness of any electric scooter we tested. It’s simple to learn and use, and the powerful motor and comfortable ride easily tackled every route. 

    The best budget electric scooter

    At around half the price of our top pick, this Segway scooter has less power and range, but doesn’t compromise on build or ride quality and offers the same straightforward, easy-to-use controls as the rest of the Ninebot lineup.

    Striking a better balance between power, range and compact size than any other scooter we tested, the Segway Ninebot Max was our favorite electric scooter overall. Riding the Segway Ninebot Max is about as easy as it gets, and we were ready to hit the streets after about a minute of experimenting. The thumb throttle is responsive but not too jerky, and the mechanical handbrake allows for confident, gradual control of your speed, as well as more-sudden stops if needed. The display — a vertical screen in the center of the handlebars — clearly shows the current speed, speed setting and battery level. A single button is used to power on the unit, toggle through the three speed settings and activate the LED headlight. It’s as easy as they come.

    The 350W of power supplied by the motor allowed me to easily hit speeds of up to 20 MPH on the flats, and really impressed me with how well it handled the incline portions of my testing route. Unlike similar scooters that struggled with hills, the Segway Ninebot Max seemed to relish the challenge, and was able to maintain a solid 14 MPH on the steepest grade we climbed during testing, second only to the much larger Apollo City Pro. Thanks to the impressive battery capacity, this scooter also seemed to have a never-ending range, making it 21.4 miles before finally depleting its battery. The overall ride itself was smooth and comfortable too, and the 10-inch tires (it ships with traditional tires that use inner tubes) handled small bumps and cracks without too much discomfort to the rider. Some of the competition ships with solid rubber tires, which aren’t really suited to riding any distance.

    The Segway mobile app was reliable in our testing, while the apps from other brands felt like they were still working the bugs out. The app provides a battery percentage level — very convenient when charging — and provides a map of your entire route, using shades from light green to dark red to indicate your speed in different areas. Plus, you can lock the scooter with the touch of a button. (This “lock” simply prevents it from accelerating and sounds a constant beep if anyone tries to push it away. Not exactly 100% effective, but could definitely discourage a would-be thief walking by.)

    Just like the other Segway Ninebot scooters in our testing, the Ninebot Max had impressive build quality and intentional, well-thought-out overall design. It’s clear that Segway has been doing this a long time, unlike other scooter brands that felt like they were still working out design and functionality issues.

    The only real drawback to the Segway Ninebot Max (aside from the price, and assuming it is within your budget) is its weight. At 41.2 pounds, it’s not the easiest to carry around, but it’s important to remember that this extra battery weight is what allows for its long range, and that’s always going to be a trade-off. If you want a comfortable ride and don’t want to constantly worry about your battery level, this could be the perfect option.

    Underscored best electric scooters Segway Ninebot F30

    The scaled-down sibling of the Segway Ninebot Max, the Segway Ninebot F30 features the same high-quality construction and straightforward controls of our top pick — though with a bit less power and range — at a much lower price. Plus, you still get all the perks that come with the Segway mobile app, like route maps, Bluetooth locking capability and real-time battery level percentage.

    The biggest difference between the F30 and the Max, other than the much lower price, is its range. I was only able to hit 9.3 miles on the Segway Ninebot F30 before the battery died, which was on the lower end of my testing pool. This limited battery range does allow the F30 to weigh about 8 pounds less than the Max, and at 33 pounds total, it’s relatively easy to carry around after folding. The smaller battery pack also makes the F30 sleeker and more compact, without the extra bulk of longer-range scooters. If you don’t have a lengthy commute or really need to cover more distance, it may be worth stepping down to the F30.

    Despite the limited range, the F30 was still able to generate speeds of up to 16 MPH, although it struggled a bit on my hill test, topping out at 11 MPH. The controls are essentially the same as the Max, with a thumb accelerator throttle and mechanical hand brake, although the F30 uses a traditional bicycle bell that does add a little clutter to the handlebar area. The 10-inch pneumatic tires provide a much smoother ride than the solid tires of the similarly priced Unagi Model One or Swagger 5 Boost. Charging was a breeze as well, and it only took 4 hours to bring the battery level from 0 to 100%. Thanks to the 2.5W LED headlight and brake lights, you won’t feel like you’re compromising on safety features either.

    If range isn’t as much of a priority, and you’re working with a limited budget and the Ninebot Max is beyond your means, you really can’t go wrong with the F30.

    An electric scooter folds into a compact, easy-to-carry package that takes up less room than even most small folding bicycles, making it a good option for commutes that also involve public transportation. And they're easy to store at your destination.

    Electric scooters can be an efficient and convenient mode of transportation, but only if they work for you and with your lifestyle. Take the time to really think about your travel and commute needs and how you’ll be using it, and you’ll be able to figure out whether a scooter is for you.

    Electric scooters really shine in “last mile” applications, filling in part of a commute that isn’t covered by other transportation. They can eliminate time spent walking to the bus stop or train station, waiting around for the next scheduled service or driving around looking for a parking spot in your car. They’re ideal for supplementing other forms of transportation.

    Of course, if you live close enough to where you work or shop, a scooter can take you directly from your front door to your job or errand. An electric scooter can also be a practical choice for those who might otherwise ride a bicycle, but don’t want to arrive at work sweaty and out of breath, and are put off by the expense of an electric bike (or have nowhere to store one). They’re also useful for short errands that don’t involve too much cargo (since scooters can’t take racks or panniers like bikes). In those cases, though they’re not exactly cheap, electric scooters can easily pay for themselves if they let you avoid spending money on bus or train fare, or fuel and parking costs for your car.

    One thing to keep in mind is that scooters with bigger motors and bigger batteries may be able to take you further, but they’re much bulkier and can weigh quite a lot — the heavier models we looked at weigh nearly 50 pounds, making them tough to wrestle onto a bus or train and inconvenient to store. That extra power, then, can mean diminishing returns, since the additional oomph means they weigh nearly as much as an e-bike, which will typically have far more range, versatility and carrying capacity.

    Consider your local climate as well. If you live in a particularly wet or cold part of the country, it might be worth the extra cost or time to stay dry and warm inside a bus, train car or personal vehicle. Even if you’re open to braving the elements, try and choose one with a higher IP rating. This number will indicate how resistant your scooter is to moisture. For example, the IPX4 rating for the Unagi Model One means that it is “resistant to splashes in any direction”, while the sturdier Apollo City Pro gets an IPX6 rating, meaning it “can resist high-pressure, heavy sprays of water.” None of the scooters we looked at were rated for immersion, so you’ll want to take care.

    The most important feature to consider when choosing an electric scooter is probably range. Your scooter won’t be much use if it doesn’t have the battery capacity to get you where you need to go (and back home if you’re not going to be charging it in the meantime). This gets a little tricky because the actual range is going to be different depending on rider weight, any inclines or hills on your route, your speed and even the outside temperature. It’s important to know that the advertised range from the manufacturer is based on ideal conditions (low rider weight, perfectly flat and smooth ground, low speed, etc.), so I’d recommend cutting the stated range in half to get a more accurate number.

    I’d also recommend only purchasing a scooter that complies with UL (formerly known as Underwriters Laboratories) standards. The lithium-ion batteries inside electric scooters can catch fire and explode while charging, and a UL certification will ensure that you’re not bringing an untested or unreliable battery into your home. All of the scooters in our testing pool are UL-listed.

    Pneumatic tires — with inner tubes, like bicycle tires — are another feature we recommend, since they soak up the shock of rough surfaces, bumps and cracks, providing better handling and a more comfortable ride. Some cheaper scooters are sold with solid rubber tires that may be puncture-proof, but give you a much less comfortable ride,

    If you want to ensure you’re getting to your destination as fast as possible, look at the maximum speed offered by each unit. Lighter-duty scooters top out at about 15-20 MPH, while beefier models can reach up to 35 MPH. Most scooters let you select a top speed limit, so you can choose to stick to lower speeds if you like.

    Yes, but the specifics of exactly where you can and cannot ride your scooter will depend on the specific rules and regulations in your area. They’re not quite a moped, but also not really a bicycle, so it will require a little research to figure out exactly how you’re supposed to ride your scooter in a way that’s both legal and safe for you and other drivers. Some states haven’t made it clear, while others have adopted rules similar to those governing electric bicycle use.

    For example, the California DMV states that, “You can only drive motorized scooters on a bicycle path, trail, or bikeway, not on a sidewalk, and you cannot exceed a speed of 15 mph.” They also must stick to the right-hand curb, so they’re not allowed in a left-hand turn lane at a stoplight, for example. In this case, you’d need to dismount and use the crosswalk like a pedestrian before entering the bike lane again. They also must stick to roads with a speed limit no greater than 25MPH.

    In our experience, this is solid advice regardless of what the law might prescribe. As a general rule of thumb, we’d recommend sticking to quieter side streets and neighborhoods, avoiding busier thoroughfares and intersections with cars traveling at high speeds, and using multi-use paths where available (and where e-scooter use is allowed).

    Regardless of the city you’re in, and contrary to what you’ve probably seen, you shouldn’t ride your electric scooter on the sidewalk. Not only is it dangerous to pedestrians — especially if they walk out of a doorway into the scooter’s path — there are also obstacles and debris that can cause you to lose your balance. If the sidewalk is your only safe means of travel, dismount your scooter and walk it down the sidewalk.

    They might look like toys, but electric scooters can be just as dangerous, or more so, than other types of personal transportation. Since widespread adoption of electric scooters only dates back to 2017, there has been little long-term research, but some numbers are starting to emerge.

    This 2019 study conducted in two Los Angeles emergency rooms found that over the course of a year, 249 patients were admitted with electric-scooter-related injuries, compared to 195 bicyclists and 181 pedestrian injuries over the same period. While most injuries were minor, 40% of those electric scooter injuries were head injuries, likely due to the relaxed attitude towards helmet-wearing on electric scooters (the study authors wrote that 94.3% of observed scooter riders in their community rode without helmets).

    A 2022 UCLA data analysis of injury data since 2014 suggests that the injury rate for electric scooters was 115 per 1 million rides, more comparable to the injury rate for motorcyclists (estimated at 104 injuries per 1 million motorcycle rides) than to the much lower rates for pedestrians and cyclists.

    Given these emerging insights and considering the high top speeds achievable by the larger scooters we looked at, we would always recommend wearing a well-fitted helmet when riding a scooter, whether your city requires one or not.

    This might sound obvious, but it’s important to actually learn how to properly operate your scooter before hitting the streets, and not just hop right on and hit the accelerator. Make sure to follow any riding instructions or tips in the included user manual, and I’d also recommend taking the time to first get used to riding your scooter in a parking lot or on quiet neighborhood streets. This will help you be aware of riding quirks that you may not otherwise be aware of until you’re traveling at high speeds or in traffic. For example, I quickly noticed in my testing that it was difficult to look over my shoulder without losing my balance, or take a hand off the handlebar to signal or wave at another driver, and I would need to decrease my speed before attempting to do either.

    Underscored best electric scooters Segway Ninebot lineup

    We ran each scooter through a comprehensive testing process to get a clear idea of exactly what makes one model different from another. This made it easy to compare them for rating purposes, as well as accurately explain who they might be best for.

    Since the whole point of purchasing an electric scooter is to make your commute more convenient, it’s important that they’re easy to use. Straightforward operation not only makes for a more comfortable and relaxing riding experience, it also increases overall safety. By spending less time and attention manipulating controls and adjusting ride settings, you can fully focus on the road ahead and your surroundings. I judged each scooter on how easy it was to step on and start riding, as well as operate any in-ride functions like blinkers, bells and speed settings. I also compared each scooter’s charging function, noting types of plugs required and any frustrating issues like a lack of real-time battery level during charging.

    Then, to establish and compare actual battery range, I drove each scooter on the same pre-set route — which included a large hill section and several different surface types — until the battery was completely exhausted. I then timed how long it took to charge that depleted battery back to 100%. (These two metrics are essential for determining whether your scooter can both handle the length of your commute, and charge quickly enough to get you back home at the end of the workday.) I also used these rides to judge each scooter’s top speeds as well as overall power, paying attention to how easily the scooter maintained its speed when ascending the hill or if it struggled and slowed down significantly.

    I also compared each scooter’s controls while riding, focusing on how comfortable and responsive the throttle and brake systems were, as well as additional features like directional blinkers and headlights. To evaluate how convenient each scooter was to store when not in use, I folded up and carried each model up and down a flight of stairs. I noted any issues with overall comfort and weight, as well as the security of the hinge and locking mechanism used.

    I also judged the overall build quality and construction of each scooter, noting how well-built the larger components seemed to be, and inspecting smaller elements like throttles, bells, kickstands and brake handles. I looked to ensure that all these elements were sturdy and solid, and noted if any felt flimsy or cheap.

    It won’t be a practical choice for those who prefer a lightweight, sleek-looking option, but if you want a scooter that can go extremely fast and travel extremely far, the Apollo City Pro could be a great choice. Its twin 500W motors allowed me to easily hit 26 MPH, and a more adventurous rider could adjust the max speed up to 32 MPH. I was most impressed with the range of this scooter, and was able to travel for 25 miles before exhausting the battery. With front and rear suspension, the Apollo City provided the most comfortable, bump-free ride, which, combined with the wide 10-inch pneumatic tires, allowed it to roll over large cracks and divots that lighter-duty scooters would be unable to handle. My biggest takeaways from testing the Apollo City Pro were its heavy weight — 65 pounds is far too heavy to carry around comfortably — and the poorly designed hook system used to lock the frame in place after folding. This hook easily falls out of place when the scooter is set down, which is frustrating as well as a potential safety risk. The buggy, frustrating mobile app was a big drawback as well.

    If security is a priority, you’ll appreciate the two lock options — a digital code that stops the motor from operating and a physical combination lock — provided with the Gotrax G4. The wide display is also really easy to read, and when the scooter is stopped, the speedometer reverts to an odometer, making it easy to see how far along you are on your trip. The 11.8-mile range was relatively low, however, and the black control buttons weren’t very convenient to make out while riding. My favorite feature of the Gotrax G4 is its heavy-duty latch system that keeps the frame locked into place when folded down. On some other large scooters, such as the Apollo City Pro, a slicker-looking but flimsier, less-secure latch is used. On the Gotrax, the bright red clip and fender hook are made with thick metal instead of plastic, giving the entire until a very solid, heavy-duty feel and look that worked great

    Overall, the Niu KQi3 Max scooter provided a comfortable, stable ride during testing, and would be a great choice for anyone with the budget for a higher-end option. The halo-style LED headlight, large rear brake light and side reflectors make it well-suited for nighttime riders too, and the Bluetooth connectivity allows you to quickly lock the unit with your smartphone — great for running inside a store or to an appointment (though it wouldn’t stop someone from carrying it away, so you’ll want to be sure of your surroundings). My favorite feature of the Niu KQi3 Max are the rubber handlebar grips, which have a really grippy, tacky feel to them, making it easy to maintain a tight grip while riding, even when my hands got sweaty. The eight hour charging time is longer than most though (especially compared to the 5 hours of the Segway Ninebot Max), so it might not be practical for those with long commutes and charging accessibility issues.

    The Niu KQi3 Pro has all the same bells and whistles as its more powerful sibling, the Niu KQi3 Max, but in a smaller, more affordable package. As with the pricier model, the mobile app allows you to quickly lock the unit, preventing anyone from riding it, and it emits a loud beep if someone tries to move it. The app also makes it easy to adjust settings — you can select custom speeds, toggle between kilometers and miles per hour, and activate cruise control. Its folding mechanism is simple enough to use, although at 44.75 pound I wish the KQi3 Pro was a bit lighter. The limited battery range of 16 miles is ultimately what kept this scooter out of our top spot, but if that’s not a priority too, the comfortable ride, sturdy construction, and easy operation still make it a great choice.

    It doesn’t have the sleek, high-end design of more expensive scooters, but the Swagger 5 Boost is still capable of zipping you around easily, and a total bargain at its current price. It does have some overall design drawbacks though, as well as operational issues. Its handlebar grips were not only difficult to line up and screw on during assembly, but I also found them easy to accidentally unscrew while riding, a potential safety issue. The display was also inconvenient to read, using dark blue digits on a black background. The throttle and brake controls didn’t have the smooth, controlled feel of other models I tested. Its solid tires, similar to the Unagi Model One’s, also made for a very bumpy ride. All that being said, the low price could still make this scooter a reasonable choice for the rider on a tight budget.

    Although it had the same solid feel, straightforward controls and easy-to-use mobile app as the other Segway models I tested, at 48.5 pounds, the F65 is ultimately just too heavy to carry around on a daily commute, especially if you need to navigate a flight of stairs, lug it onto a train or bus or the like. It does feature directional blinkers though, which makes it a great option for city and nighttime riders, and their controls were easy to turn on and off with a thumb switch. Its 700W-max motor allowed me to easily climb inclines during my testing, and the impressive range — 22.5 miles — was the second longest of all the scooters we tested (only the Apollo City Pro gave us more mileage). If you don’t plan on folding and carrying this scooter, and long range is a priority, the Segway Ninebot F65 could work, but at its weight you might want to consider an e-bike (if it fits your budget).

    With minimal exposed cabling and a handlebar uncluttered by a bell or mechanical handbrake, it’s easy to appreciate the sleek, streamlined design of the Unagi Model One. This stripped-down design not only looks good, but also makes it an extremely easy-to-use machine. Unfortunately, the Unagi is best suited to smooth surfaces and short rides, as the solid tires and lack of any suspension make for a bumpy and uncomfortable ride over rough pavement or asphalt surfaces. I felt every crack and bump as I rode. Also, the 9-mile range was the shortest of all the scooters in our testing. It was the easiest to fold and carry, however. The Unagi Model One folds down and locks into place without having to deal with any extra latches or hooks, and its light weight — just 26.5 pounds — made it the most comfortable option to carry around. So if you just want something sleek and small for a short ride to public transportation, the Unagi might be the ticket.

    The only non-foldable option I tested, the rental-only Lime Gen4 is noticeably sturdier-feeling than the folders, and has a low center of gravity that made for a surprisingly comfortable ride. It also featured angled handlebars that swept back, similar to a bicycle, unlike the straight bars of all my other scooters. This made the Lime Gen4 more comfortable to ride for long periods of time, and easier to maintain control and balance. I noticed that I was also able to briefly take one hand off the handlebar when I needed to signal other cars or scratch my nose, something I had difficulty doing when using straight handlebars. It was inconvenient to track down an available scooter though, not to mention find one that had enough battery to bring me to my destination. I was also surprised by the cost of a Lime scooter. My first ride, with a base fare of $3.50, ended up costing me $19.10 for a 4.9-mile, 26-minute ride. If that were half of my commute, I’d be spending $191 per workweek, which is not ideal — clearly making the argument for scooter ownership.

    [ad_2]

    Source link