ReportWire

Tag: underscored-reviews

  • Samsung’s QN90B Neo QLED is a great smart TV — especially for sunny rooms | CNN Underscored

    Samsung’s QN90B Neo QLED is a great smart TV — especially for sunny rooms | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    In the battle between OLED TVs and mini-LED LCD TVs — the two technologies used in today’s best smart TVs — people who need a brighter picture usually go with an LCD. For those who want an intensely bright TV, Samsung has upped the ante with its QN90B Neo QLED 4K Smart TV. It uses its brightness well, creating a crisp picture with excellent contrast that rivals OLED screens.

    The QN90B is about more than brightness. It includes the tech that gamers want to take full advantage of the latest gaming consoles. It also integrates cloud gaming services such as Xbox Cloud Gaming and Amazon Luna so you don’t even need a console to play the best games. While it’s not perfect, it will be a great option for many people.

    A smart, bright TV

    The Samsung QN90B is one of the brightest TVs you’ll find, making it great for sunny rooms. The brightness, along with mini-LED and local dimming tech, also helps it produce excellent contrast in dark scenes. It’s also packed with the latest gaming tech, including cloud gaming.

    samsung-qn90b-LOTR.jpg

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    Did I mention the brightness? Because this TV is really bright. The first thing I needed to do was tone down the brightness to keep it from searing my eyes. The room I used the TV in gets average sunlight and the QN90B’s brightness can overcome a lot more. If you’ve had problems with not being able to see what’s on your TV during the day, this TV should be able to overcome them.

    The QN90B uses mini-LED backlighting and local dimming, which allow for a more nuanced picture. Thanks to those mini LEDs, the images on the QN90B are very sharp and detailed. I especially appreciated the crisp images while watching college football in 4K, where the blades of grass had excellent definition and the ball flew without blurring.

    Related: Samsung’s The Frame 2022 makes a gorgeous and unique TV even better

    The set also has excellent contrast, which is important for seeing details in dark scenes, as are common in shows like House of the Dragon, Sandman and Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power. While it doesn’t support Dolby Vision, it uses HDR10+ to adjust the brightness for each frame so you won’t miss the exquisite details of Khazad-dûm when Elrond visits Durin in The Rings of Power.

    The TV can deliver accurate colors, but I needed to adjust the settings to get a picture that was right for me (more on that below). Overall, I thought the LG C2 produced a more pleasing picture, but others may prefer what the QN90B delivers.

    samsung-qn90b-game-screen.jpg

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    That crisp picture paired with the QN90B’s 120Hz refresh rate and support for variable refresh rate, auto low latency mode, and Nvidia FreeSync Premium Pro result in a great gaming TV. Each of the four HDMI ports supports HDMI 2.1 to take full advantage of your PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S or high-end gaming PC, meaning it can deliver extra-smooth gameplay at 4K.

    Playing Forza Horizon 5 on an Xbox Series X, the screen delivered excellent details without blurring even as the car raced at its fastest speed. In Fortnite, the characters and backgrounds were sharp, though the colors seemed a little off compared to the LG C2.

    The QN90B also includes Samsung Gaming Hub, which lets you stream games from Xbox, Stadia, Geforce Now and other services without a console. Gameplay while streaming isn’t too bad, either: Playing Forza 5 and Fortnite through Xbox Game Pass was similar to the quality you’d get from an Xbox One.

    samsung-qn90b-oled-tv football picture

    Michael Gowan/CNN Underscored

    The speakers in the QN90B produce surprisingly good sound — for a TV. With its 4.2.2 channel audio (55-inch and larger models) and support for Dolby Atmos, voices were easy to hear, and, with Intelligent Mode on, it created an impressively wide sound and even produced a bit of bass.

    So technically you don’t need to add a soundbar. But do yourself a favor and get one for your home entertainment system anyway — it’ll add more depth to the sound and improve bass for a better viewing experience.

    Samsung makes the QN90B in sizes that range from 43 inches ($1.099.99) to 85 inches ($3,299.99), with many models available in between. That means you can find one that’s right for the room you plan to put it in. I tested the 55-inch unit ($1,499.99). Expect similar performance in other models, except for the sound in the 43- and 50-inch units — they have fewer channels than the 55-inch and larger TVs.

    samsung-qn90b-oled-tv brightness

    Michael Gowan/CNN Underscored

    While the final result can be impressive, you may have to work to get a pleasing image on the QN90B’s screen. Out of the box, I found the picture too bright and the colors weren’t right for my room. I really didn’t like the picture produced using the Intelligent Mode setting, which is supposed to automatically adjust to the room conditions; the AI mode of LG’s C2 produced a much better image.

    But the QN90B offers lots of adjustments you can make, so you can find the right settings for you if you take the time. I liked the picture best when I turned off Intelligent Mode; switched to Movie Picture Mode; made some adjustments to brightness and sharpness; turned off Picture Clarity; and increased local dimming to Standard. You see what I mean about working for it.

    The QN90B runs Samsung’s Tizen, which is one of the more robust smart TV operating systems. It has apps for the most popular streaming services, like Netflix and HBO Max. It integrates with Samsung’s SmartThings app to allow for control of other smart devices. It offers voice control through Alexa, Google Assistant or Samsung’s Bixby.

    But on the QN90B, everything seems to take forever to launch and load. In reality, it takes a few seconds, but it is slower compared to a Roku or the relatively speedy WebOS on LG’s evo C2. Those extra seconds while you wait for a show to start are just enough to make your question your choices in life. Of course, you can get around this by adding a streaming device and bypassing Tizen altogether.

    The stand gets in the way

    samsung-qn90b-oled-tv stand setup

    Michael Gowan/CNN Underscored

    Similar to complaints I had about the LG evo C2, the stand Samsung includes with the QN90B — while slick and attractive —  doesn’t work for the way I want to set up my TV. It sticks out about three inches beyond the screen, which meant I had to place my soundbar way out in front of the TV. It also only raises the TV 2.75  inches above the surface — which is better than the C2 — but that can still result in a soundbar or center speaker blocking the bottom of the image.

    Sizes

    43, 50, 55, 65, 75 and 85 inches

    83, 77, 65, 55, 47, and 43 inches

    Panel type

    QLED LCD

    OLED

    Inputs

    4 HDMI (all support HDMI 2.1, one eARC), 2 USB, Wifi, Ethernet, coaxial antenna

    4 HDMI 2.1 (one with eARC), 3 USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, coaxial antenna

    Outputs

    Optical digital audio, Bluetooth

    Optical digital audio, Bluetooth

    HDR

    HDR10+

    Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG

    Audio

    4.2.2 channels, support for Dolby Atmos

    2.2 channels, support for Dolby Atmos

    Price

    From $1,099



    From $1,149

    Fans of LCD TVs will love what the Samsung QN90B offers. It’s oh-so-bright and packed with the latest tech. That allows it to deliver a crisp and detailed picture with excellent contrast.

    My issues with the color were overcome by adjusting the settings, though the QN90B couldn’t match the vibrant colors of the LG C2. In the battle of OLED versus LCD, I still prefer OLEDs — but the differences continue to narrow, and no OLED can come close to the brightness of the QN90B. The LG C2 is the better overall TV, but the QN90B would be the right choice if you have a sunny room and need its extreme brightness.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best first aid kits in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best first aid kits in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Every home needs a dedicated first aid kit, even if just to organize the supplies scattered around in medicine cabinets, drawers and cupboards and make it much easier to grab them in a stressful situation. Whether you’re dealing with a fire, a weather emergency or just a skinned knee, an organized, complete kit can let you treat minor injuries quickly and effectively.

    To find the best first aid kits to keep in your home, car or with you while traveling, we tested 13 popular kits, ranging from pocket-size containers to backpacks full of gear, and consulted with experts at the Red Cross to best understand how to choose the right first aid kit for any situation.

    Best first aid kit overall

    An easy-to-use ring-binder-style design, high-quality products and all the essentials recommended by the Red Cross means you’ll be sure to have everything you need and be able to find it when you need it.

    Best budget first aid kit

    Don’t let the rock-bottom price of this kit fool you — it provides a useful collection of name-brand items packed securely in an easy-to-transport case.

    Best first aid kit for camping, backpacking and outdoor adventures

    In addition to basic supplies for household use, this AMK kit is lightweight, it prioritizes organization and it includes several items specifically for treating common hiking, backpacking and camping issues.

    With a heavy-duty case and a variety of high-quality items inside, this kit was a no-brainer as our top pick overall. Right out of the box we noticed how rugged and well made the case itself felt, complemented by metal grommets and sturdy zipper pulls. A wide handle also made it convenient for carrying around the house during our testing. We’re also big fans of the bright red color, which makes it easy to spot in a cluttered car trunk or backpack.

    What really sets this kit apart from the other models we tested was its ring-binder-style design. Once unzipped, the contents are displayed in clear vinyl pockets that you simply flip through to find the item you want. This design also allows it to lay flat like a book while you use it, and the extra-large sleeve pouches at the front and back of the kit are large enough to store other emergency documents, such as allergy issues or specific medical issues of a family member. When it comes to clear organization and finding first aid items quickly and easily in an emergency, it really doesn’t get much easier than this.

    Its focus on providing clear and concise first aid instructions and information was the other factor that separated this kit from the rest of the pack. In addition to a manual that includes straightforward instructions on dealing with common medical emergencies like choking, stroke, seizures and cardiac issues, the kit also includes several extra-large info sheets. These sheets are presented in large clear pockets on the left-hand side, with their corresponding first aid items on the right-hand side as you flip through.

    This kit was also only one of three other kits we tested that provided all of the essential items recommended by our Red Cross expert, Jeffrey L. Pellegrino. It also included two pairs of non-latex exam gloves, which, as the Red Cross explains, will allow you to change gloves if needed, or allow a second responder to help out at the same time. We were also impressed with the overall quality of the 115 pieces inside. The 1-inch-by-10-yard tape roll was a particular standout, and along with the bandages and dressings, held up really well during hands-on testing. Although the scissors were relatively small compared to the EMT-style shears found in other kits, they had no trouble cutting through the tape or trimming gauze.

    The durability, usability and variety provided by this kit make it just as useful in your cupboard as a go-to home first aid kit as it would in the trunk of your car or backpack on a camping trip.

    The Band-Aid Johnson and Johnson 140-piece first aid kit, with all contents laid out on a white tabletop

    While this kit doesn’t have the quantity or variety of most other options, its rock-bottom price makes it a great choice for those on a budget. We’re honestly not even sure exactly how this kit can be priced this low, considering the bandages alone are worth almost 75% of the cost of the entire kit, and it still provides eight other products! A durable plastic case ensures that everything stays safely inside, and the oversized handle makes it convenient to carry around from place to place.

    Even though there aren’t any spacers or really any organizational elements to this kit (it’s essentially a big lunch box), it was actually easier to find what we wanted than many other kits. Since nearly every item is included in its own separate box, there aren’t a hundred small pieces floating around needing to be organized into sleeves or pouches. When you’re finished with the bandages, or Neosporin, or gauze, you simply put the rest back in its box and toss it back in the kit.

    All of the bandages performed really well in our testing, especially the “Water Block” Band-Aids that stayed put even after washing the dishes. The included Red Cross manual is a great resource and covers a wide range of emergency situations as well as the necessary steps to treat them effectively.

    We’d like to be clear that this kit does not include all the essentials recommended by the Red Cross, such as gloves, a tape roll or a CPR face shield. It also lacks a pair of scissors and tweezers, so you’ll probably want to add those separately. That being said, the pieces that this kit does include are well thought out and all high-quality name-brand products, making this a really practical kit to have on hand for common first aid situations.

    The Adventure Medical Kits Mountain Series Backpacker first aid kit, with all contents laid out on a white tabletop

    What makes this kit so great is that even though it’s designed to be convenient and functional for backpacking and hiking, it’s also versatile enough to be used in your home or stashed in your car for emergencies. Except for a CPR face mask, it provides everything recommended by our Red Cross expert, along with an impressive variety of bandages, including knuckle and butterfly options.

    Our favorite aspect of this kit is its unique design, which unzips to reveal four distinct storage pouches, each labeled with the general purpose of the contents inside. This organizational layout could come in extremely handy when out on a trail or campsite, where you don’t have a convenient surface to unload your kit and find what you need. The semitransparent material helps even more, giving you an idea of what’s inside each pouch before you even unzip it. A fabric handle on top even allows you to hang it from a branch while you work, making things even easier.

    What makes this kit specifically useful for outdoor adventurers, in addition to the well-organized design, are the items most useful for those who may not have immediate access to a pharmacy or health care facilities. Things like insect bite wipes, Diamode tablets for treating diarrhea, moleskin for blisters and a large plastic syringe for irrigating wounds are not always found in all first aid kits. A pair of heavy-duty EMT-style shears — as opposed to cheaper, flimsy scissors — could also come in handy for cutting moleskin, or clothes to help make a tourniquet or splint.

    Another great feature of this kit that was also included in the other two AMK kits we tested is the first aid manual. This “Guide to Wilderness Medicine” was by far the most comprehensive and helpful manual we found in our testing, and with so much information, it would be invaluable if you found yourself in an emergency situation while away from roads or the ability to call for help.

    You need a first aid kit because they keep all your medical supplies together in one place, so if an emergency does occur, you’ll be able to act quickly. If you or a family member needs first aid, you aren’t going to feel like hunting around your house looking for bandages in the bathroom drawer, your desk for a pair of scissors, the medicine cabinet for antibiotic ointment, etc. A first aid kit is also portable, so if someone crashes their bike in the driveway or suffers a campfire burn in the backyard, you can simply grab the kit and be confident that you have everything you need.

    If you’re out of your house on a hike, camping trip, soccer practice or scout outing, a first aid kit is even more important. Even relatively minor injuries can become serious issues if you have to wait until you reach a hospital or civilization to get treatment. This will also prevent you from having to improvise with unsanitary or inappropriate items that aren’t meant for treatment. A sterile bandage is going to be a lot more effective in the long run than a dirty handkerchief or sweaty T-shirt.

    A first aid kit is also an important piece of an effective emergency or disaster kit, which is a larger, more comprehensive kit meant to prepare you for a weather or natural disaster. In this case, you may not have access to a hospital or ambulance for some time, making an effective first aid kit even more important to have on hand.

    Group of bagged first aid kits laid out on a white tabletop

    Alex Rennie/CNN Underscored

    A first aid kit should contain everything you need to treat a variety of common first aid ailments and injuries. Unfortunately, there are a ton of first aid kits on the market, and all of them seem to have a different idea of what exactly should go inside. To help simplify things, we consulted with Jeffrey L. Pellegrino, Ph.D., MPH, senior advisor to the American Red Cross Scientific Advisory Council and professor of emergency management and homeland security at the University of Akron, to tell us the five essential items that you should make sure are in your first aid kit:

    • First aid guidebook
    • Non-latex gloves
    • Assorted self-adhesive bandages, gauze, roller bandages and adhesive tape
    • Triple antibiotic ointment
    • A breathing barrier to prevent transmission of disease while performing rescue breaths.

    It’s worth noting that just because a first aid kit doesn’t include all these items doesn’t mean you should automatically write it off as inferior. If it’s missing one or two components, feel free to purchase them separately. Pellegrino made sure to add that for a kit specifically for children “include any lifesaving medications (epinephrine, inhalers, etc.) that a child might need.”

    Pellegrino recommends asking yourself the following questions to help determine the best kit for you:

    • How many people does the kit need to serve? (A kit for seven people on a kayaking trip needs to be larger than one for a few family members at home.)
    • What are the types of injuries you can expect? (You’ll want to be prepared for more serious injuries on a camping or backpacking trip than a day at the amusement park.)
    • What else do you have to work with? (If you have other supplies to work and improvise with, you can keep the size and weight of your first aid kit down.)
    • Where will it be stored? (Pellegrino explains that first aid kits and their contents are susceptible to the environment, “so where and how you store it is important to it being useful.”)

    Most first aid kits appear to be fairly similar, which makes it tough to confidently choose the best one. Although we’re not licensed first responders, we did our best to evaluate and compare each kit by using criteria based on our research and interviews with experts in the field as well as hands-on testing of each kit’s components. We used these results to select our top choices, and to understand the pros and cons of the rest of our testing pool.

    We interviewed and consulted with several experts in the first aid field, including Pellegrino. Pellegrino helped inform us as to the essential items that should be included in a first aid kit as well as other factors to keep in mind when choosing one. We cross-checked each of our kits with his recommendations, noting which items were missing or of poor quality. It’s worth noting that you can purchase items separately to supplement your kit, so missing an essential item or two isn’t an automatic deal breaker.

    Proper ease of use is essential when it comes to first aid kits, allowing you to use it effectively and efficiently. We evaluated how convenient and straightforward each first aid kit was to use, noting how easy they were to open, find what you want, repack when finished and close back up.

    Being able to find items quickly is essential in an emergency, so it’s important that your kit is well organized. The easier it is to repack everything when you’re finished will also save you hassle and headache when it’s time to use the kit next time. After opening each kit, we went through its compartments, pockets, sleeves and other organizational elements, taking note of how easy it was to locate individual items and how thought out the overall design layout was.

    A first aid kit should be durable enough to withstand a moderate amount of wear and tear without ripping, cracking or coming apart. While using each kit, we paid close attention to their overall sturdiness and durability when it came to straps, clasps, zippers and closures.

    We opened up each kit and did as much hands-on testing as possible with their contents, assessing the quality of the included items. This included applying bandages and tape to our hands and arms and noting how well their adhesive performed, testing any single-use thermometers, tearing open antiseptic wipes to make sure they weren’t dried out and pulling on any examination gloves or masks. We paid close attention to the build quality and material of any tools or instruments, such as tweezers and scissors, which had a broader range in quality than we expected. While some kits provided high-quality EMT shears and metal tweezers, others used cheap, flimsy scissors and plastic tweezers.

    Doom & Bloom Ultimate Compact Grab N’ Go First Aid Kit

    $129 $99 at Doom & Bloom

    If you’re looking for a kit that’s more focused on treating serious, traumatic injuries, this is probably the option for you. It includes several emergency items that weren’t found in any other kit, including a heavy-duty elastic tourniquet, an Israeli compression bandage and blood-clotting granules. What I really liked about this kit is that, in addition to a basic first aid and CPR manual, it also includes a large instructional sheet that walks you through the steps to treat and control severe bleeding injuries. This sheet uses large images and short, straightforward instructions, which is exactly what you want when your adrenaline is pumping and you don’t have time to carefully flip through an entire book. Even the tourniquet has easy-to-follow instructions printed directly on it, clearly indicating how tight to apply it. The quality of all the items in this pack were all legitimate, name-brand products too, unlike some obscure or knockoff items I’ve seen in lower-quality kits. The high price, relatively small amount of light-duty bandages and lack of a CPR face mask ultimately kept this kit out of our top spot, but if those aren’t a deal breaker for you, this is a fantastic kit.

    The relatively bulky size of this kit isn’t the most convenient for those with limited space or those who plan on stashing their kit in their backpack or glove box, but its variety of essential items makes it a good basic option to have on hand at home or a job site. The most valuable feature of this kit is the fact that it includes all of the items recommended by the Red Cross, which was only the case in two other kits we tested. It also includes a nice supply of bandage types and sizes as well as extra-large sterile trauma pads and conforming gauze rolls, essential for minimizing blood loss during serious emergencies. A pair of triangular bandages and safety pins are also convenient for putting together a makeshift sling. Two pairs of gloves was a nice perk as well, as most kits provide only a single set. We were surprised to see that the only medication provided in this kit was a single aspirin packet, whereas almost every other kit provided at least an additional supply of ibuprofen or acetaminophen. The case itself didn’t feel especially durable, though, and I nearly snapped off a hinge clip the first time I tried to open it.

    Even though this kit is essentially just a large, heavy-duty Ziploc bag, I still found it convenient to use (plus, this makes the entire kit completely waterproof). It hits the sweet spot of just enough items to be useful, but not so much that it’s hard to find what you want. A smaller, resealable bag inside helps to store the smaller items, and even if you need to dump out of the contents to locate a specific item, it’s not a big deal to just toss everything back in. It offers a good selection of useful items like burn gels, anti-diarrhea tablets (very valuable if needed on a hike or camping), electrolyte tablets and sting relief pads. We would have liked a little variety in the bandage selection, though, like butterfly or knuckle options. We also appreciated the inclusion of a small sheet of moleskin, but since it’s not precut and there are no scissors included in the kit, you’re going to have a tough time applying it. We also wish the plastic tweezers were metal, although this may have something to do with preventing accidentally puncturing the storage bag itself. Although this kit doesn’t include a first aid manual, it does provide a CPR face shield with detailed CPR instruction printed on it, which is a big plus.

    The compact sibling of the AMK Mountain Backpacker Medical Kit, this AMK kit is just as easy to use and has almost as much convenient, hiker-friendly functionality. Once unzipped, it folds open to reveal three separate organization pouches, each labeled with the basic use of the items inside: “Wound Care/Burn/Blister,” “Medication,” “Cuts & Scrapes” and “Stop Bleeding Fast,” which contains a large trauma pad and rubber gloves. To make things even easier, the specific contents of each of these pouches are printed on the back of the kit, so you can locate what you want before you even unzip it. The comprehensive “Guide to Wilderness Medicine” is a great resource to have on hand while out adventuring, and covers helpful first aid situations like fishhook removal, diabetic emergencies, lightning injuries and altitude illness. In addition to a nice variety of quality bandages, precut moleskin patches and gauze pads, this kit features a really nice pair of EMT-style shears and compact metal tweezers. It does lack a CPR face shield, though, so keep that in mind.

    This compact kit is small enough to fit practically anywhere — it’s about the size of an Altoids tin — and with just 27 items inside, it’s easy to dump out and pick out what you want without much hassle. Despite the limited number of pieces, it still provides an impressive variety of bandages, such as butterfly, knuckle and spot options, as well as antibiotic ointment. I also appreciated the included razor blade, which in the absence of a pair of scissors could be useful for carefully cutting through clothing or stripping cloth to make a tourniquet. Considering the extremely low price, there’s no reason not to grab a couple of these to toss into your tackle box, glove box or backpack, but you’ll still need to purchase a full-size kit if you want to be prepared for a wide range of first aid situations.

    If you’re planning on traveling abroad and want to bring along a first aid kit, this AMK option would be a great choice. My absolute favorite part of this kit is its visual indicator diagrams, which allow you to quickly and accurately explain the details of a first aid situation to others, even if you don’t speak the same language. With the addition of its handy pencil and paper, these visual aids can help you transcend any language barriers. I’ve personally struggled to explain the state of an injured hiker up the trail to a native speaker, and tools like these would have made the situation much easier. The kit itself is also convenient to use, and the transparent sleeves make it easy to find what you’re looking for. It includes a great first aid manual — just like the other AMK kits — and the contents included a nice mix of bandage sizes and styles as well as moleskin for blister treatment. It doesn’t include a CPR breathing barrier, and it curiously lacked a pair of scissors, although that does make it more convenient for air travel.

    Looking for a first aid kit that’s a little more functional? This VSSL kit is stored in a metal tube that doubles as an extremely bright LED flashlight on one end and a compass on the other. A rolled-up sleeve inside contains the first aid items, and when unrolled, it showcases everything in transparent mesh pockets. Unfortunately, unscrewing the end caps and pulling out the sleeve isn’t the most convenient, and it takes some time to accomplish. It’s a tight fit inside the tube too, so reinserting takes a little finesse. That being said, the supplies themselves were of good quality, especially the 3M brand Steri-Strips, which we’ve found to be extremely useful for closing longer cuts that bandages struggle with. This kit didn’t include a pair of scissors, but the compact metal tweezers were nice quality and should hold up well. The disposable thermometers were a nice perk, although I did find them to be 2 degrees lower than my actual temperature when compared to the result from my home thermometer. The 45-piece total is relatively low compared to the other options on our list, so it won’t be practical to cover the needs of more than a couple people. It is completely waterproof, though, which could be a valuable selling point for a kayaker or river rafter.

    This kit probably isn’t for the inexperienced, but if you have the proper training and are confident using professional medical instruments, it could be a good fit. By including advanced medical supplies like a stethoscope, a blood pressure cuff and a range of oral airway sizes, the items in this kit can be used to monitor and treat serious first aid events, as long as you know how to use them. If you’re not specifically trained in these instruments, you could end up doing more harm than good if you attempt to use them during an emergency. The relatively brief first aid manual makes it even more important that a trained responder use this kit. We were most impressed with the sturdiness and organization-friendly design of the backpack itself, which features a mind-boggling amount of compartments, pockets, pouches, sleeves and elastic straps. Many of these are located on the exterior of the bag too, allowing you to store your most used or time-sensitive items within easy reach. The high quantity of items included, in addition to the professional instruments and useful tools like EMT shears, forceps and a penlight for concussion diagnosis, make this kit a practical choice to have on hand at an event like a sports camp or scout trip.

    If you’re interested in a high-end kit that’s designed with durability and variety in mind, this could be exactly what you’re looking for, though it comes at a price. Right out of the box, I could tell that the bag itself was extremely durable, and the clips, Velcro and zippers felt sturdy and secure as well. You can really throw this thing around without worrying too much about damaging it. Inside, the kit opens up into two large compartments, each with their own collection of pockets, sleeves and elastic bands, containing a huge amount of gear. In addition to a great variety and quantity of bandages, gauze pads and tape, it also includes a pair of EMT-style shears — the best quality of all the options I tested — a battery-powered thermometer and a penlight with a handy chart printed on the side for comparing dilated pupils. Items like a finger splint, burn creams and a large Burnshield trauma dressing make this kit especially well suited for camping excursions. All this gear is packed in separate baggies for specific injuries and treatments, making it relatively easy to keep things organized. That being said, some items are hidden in hard-to-find compartments, and if what you’re looking for isn’t in plain view, you may need to take most of the kit apart until you find it. It was also a challenge to repack as well, especially if you forget where everything needs to go.

    This zippered kit is simple to open and use, and it contains a surprisingly large quantity of items, most notably the 187 individual adhesive bandages in a range of sizes. The clear plastic pockets made it easy to see a lot of items at once, although anything stored in the rear sleeves will need a little more digging to access. Considering the low price, you’re definitely getting a pretty good bang for your buck with this kit and its nearly 300 total items. In addition to the basics, it also includes several useful items not always found in kits in this price range, such as sting relief pads, tongue depressors that can be used as finger splints and disposable thermometers. We do wish the 1/2-inch tape rolls were a little wider, but they still provided a decent amount of security during my testing. The small pair of scissors felty pretty cheap and flimsy as well, but in their defense, they did cut through the moleskin sheets and tape during my testing fairly easily. This kit include all the Red Cross essentials except for the CPR breathing barrier, so you’ll need to purchase one separately if that’s a priority.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best rain jackets of 2022 | CNN Underscored

    Best rain jackets of 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Whether you’re camping, commuting or just running errands around town, a trusty rain jacket can keep you protected from even the worst downpours. We tested 14 top-rated jackets from popular brands like The North Face, Patagonia and Arc’teryx for their waterproofness, breathability, durability and so much more to find the best option out there. And after more than three months of testing, there was one rain jacket that stood out above the rest.

    Best rain jacket overall

    The Patagonia Torrentshell outperformed all the other jackets we tested in key areas. It’s ridiculously waterproof and will keep you bone-dry in the worst rain, not to mention it’s extremely breathable, durable and comes with Patagonia’s lifetime Ironclad Guarantee.

    Whether you’re an avid hiker or just need protection from the rain during your commute, the Patagonia Torrentshell 3L is the one rain jacket you should buy.

    Since we couldn’t rely on frequent heavy rainstorms to test the waterproofness of our jackets, we hopped in the shower for 10 minutes with each jacket to see if we would stay dry. It turns out showers, which on average dump 2.1 gallons per minute, are surprisingly good at simulating some pretty extreme rainfall.

    During our indoor monsoon, the Patagonia kept us completely dry, with only a tiny bit of water trickling in from the gap at the neck when we’d look up, and from the cuffs when we’d raise our arms (which was typical of all the jackets we tested, although some were worse and let tons of water in through the neck — more on that below). The Torrentshell’s three-layer H2No Performance Standard shell is what we have to thank for keeping us dry, and it held up just as well as GORE-TEX, probably the most well-known and trusted waterproof material in the outdoor industry.

    The Patagonia’s durable water repellent (DWR) coating worked perfectly, causing any water that hit the shell to bead and run right off, preventing water from soaking into the jacket and pooling (which happened with a few of the other jackets we tested). Plus, since the water runs right off, we were able to easily shake the Torrentshell dry after our test, meaning you’ll never have to walk into work with a drenched jacket again.

    All of the Torrentshell’s zippers are protected by a flap that didn’t allow a drop of water through, even when we pointed the shower’s stream directly onto them. So unlike most of the jackets we tested — which didn’t have fully waterproofed zippers, allowing water to slowly (and sometimes not so slowly) leak through both the main zipper and the pockets — the Torrentshell protects your phone and other items from getting waterlogged.

    CNN Underscored_best rain jackets-6

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    The only aspect of the waterproofness test where the Patagonia fell a bit short was its hood. While many of the other jackets had super-sturdy storm hoods, the Torrentshell’s wasn’t as large or stiff. The heavy stream from the shower caused the hood to bend a little bit, so the water would sometimes run down our face. To compare, the Arc’teryx Beta LT had our favorite hood, which maintained its shape in the shower and kept the water far from our face.

    The Patagonia Torrentshell is super packable (though not as packable as the teeny tiny Outdoor Research Helium — more on that below) and stuffs into its own pocket. It was also one of the more breathable jackets we tested. So whether you’re hiking through the backcountry or running late for work, you won’t feel as hot and muggy as with other jackets. Plus, its pit vents mean there’s an easy way to dump heat if you’re starting to build up a sweat.

    CNN Underscored_best rain jackets-1

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    While some of the other jackets we tested felt sticky, clammy or even itchy against our bare skin, the Torrentshell had one of the most comfortable interior materials, behind only The North Face’s Dryzzle and the Arc’teryx Beta LT. It also proved quite durable, and only got a couple light marks when we rubbed it against our brick building. However, if you do some rough adventuring and your jacket does get damaged, it’s backed by Patagonia’s Ironclad Guarantee, which means you can send it in and get it repaired (in most cases for free) at any time.

    Outdoor gear isn’t always the most eye-pleasing, which is why we love the Torrentshell’s many color options. There are 11 available at Backcountry and 12 at Patagonia in men’s, and nine colors at Backcountry and 13 at Patagonia available in women’s. Plus, it comes in six sizes from XS to XXL in men’s and seven sizes from XXS to XXL in women’s.

    CNN Underscored_best rain jackets-2

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    Rain jackets are a surprisingly complicated subject, so it’s good to know a little bit about what you’re getting into when buying one. The first thing to know is what these jackets are made out of. For years brands have been innovating waterproof materials that are also breathable and soft so they’re comfortable to wear. If all you want is protection from the rain, you can easily use a plastic poncho, but if you want to move around and not immediately start sweating, you’ll want to opt for a breathable rain jacket.

    The most famous of these materials is GORE-TEX, which you’ve probably seen used in tons of brands and products, including coats, shoes and even gloves. But other brands, such as Patagonia and The North Face, have created their own versions of waterproof fabrics that work in the same basic way. These fabrics are waterproof and breathable at the same time because they have tiny little pores that are so small that water droplets can’t get through, but big enough so the air and vapor from your body can escape.

    This porous membrane is key to this waterproofness, and also part of the layering system that you’ll see in the names and descriptions of rain jackets. There are two-layer, 2.5-layer and three-layer jackets, which tell you about the build of the jacket. A two-layer jacket basically just has the outer material with the waterproof membrane on the inside, a 2.5 has the same construction but with a sprayed or printed material on the inside to protect the membrane. Finally, a three-layer jacket has its outer material, the waterproof membrane and a whole other layer on the inside. There are differences in terms of the weight and feel between all three, but if you’re looking at waterproofness and durability, nothing beats a three-layer jacket because that extra material completely protects the internal membrane so dirt and oils from your skin can’t clog the pores and make it less breathable. All jackets we tested were either 2.5 or three layers.

    The other key to waterproofness is a jacket’s durable water repellent, or DWR. This is a coating that is applied to the outside of a rain jacket so the water will bead up and run right off. DWR coatings stop working after a while, which will lead to the outer layer of your jacket soaking up water. The internal membrane will still keep you dry, but since that outer layer is filled with water it will be harder for your sweat vapor to escape, making your jacket less breathable. However, you can easily reapply your DWR coating with products such as Nikwax.

    You’ll often see ratings for waterproofness with the measurement of millimeters, which can be a little confusing. Waterproofness is denoted this way because it’s rated using the static-column test, which puts the material at the bottom of a 1-inch-diameter tube, which is then filled with water until the material leaks. The millimeter measurement is how tall this water column can get before the materials fail and water gets through; the higher the number, the more waterproof it is.

    Other than waterproofness and breathability, you’ll want to look for different features depending on what you plan on doing. Lots of pockets help with a commute, a storm hood is great if you get caught in a storm on a hike, weight and packability are essential for backpackers and if you’re a climber or biker, you’ll want a helmet-compatible hood.

    To find the best rain jacket, we tested everything from waterproofness and breathability to fit, feel and packability. We broke up our tests into three categories: performance, durability and versatility so we could compare the different features of each jacket against the others directly. Here’s a full breakdown of all the tests we ran.

    Performance

    • Waterproofness: We wore each jacket in the shower for 10 minutes, with all zippers closed and the hood up. We spun around and focused the shower stream on different parts of the jackets, such as the zippers, shoulders and hood. After 10 minutes we took off the jacket and took note of how wet our shirt underneath got and where. We also put tissues in all the pockets of the jacket and saw if they got wet at all during the shower.
    • Breathability: We wore each jacket and rode a Peloton bike for 10 minutes, keeping a consistent, light output. We judged how hot or sweaty we got and how soon into our ride we felt muggy.
    • Fit, feel and stretch: We tried on each jacket multiple times and stretched to see if there were any restrictive areas. We wore the jacket and judged its length as well as how roomy it was in both the torso and arms. We also wore each jacket on our bare arms and judged how comfortable each felt against our skin.
    • Weight: We weighed each jacket on a kitchen scale.

    Durability

    • Rub test: We rubbed the shoulder and arm of each jacket against a brick building five times. We took note of any scuffs, scratches or wear and tear to the material.
    • Zip test: We zipped the main zipper up and down 50 times and took note of how many times it snagged or if it broke. We also paid attention to any deterioration throughout our testing process.
    • Washability: We followed the wash instructions for each jacket and judged if it shrank or deteriorated in any way.
    • Warranty: We researched the warranty for each jacket.

    Versatility

    • Pockets and extra attributes: We counted any extra features, such as pit vents, helmet compatibility, pockets and more.
    • Packability: We packed each jacket (into its own pocket if possible) and compared to see which ones got the smallest.
    • Sizing and colors: We counted how many sizes and colors were available for each jacket in both men’s and women’s versions.

    Arc’teryx Beta LT ($399; arcteryx.com)

    This jacket was fantastic, but it fell just a bit short in a few tests. The fact that it didn’t blow the other jackets out of the water paired with the highest price tag in our testing pool, this jacket is a tough purchase to justify. Like we said earlier, it had our favorite hood we tested, plus its waterproofness and breathability performance was stellar. Its zippers, however, are only water-resistant, not waterproof, and both our shirt and the tissues in our pockets got a bit wet. You can save a lot of money and get a slightly better jacket with the Patagonia Torrentshell.

    Outdoor Research Helium Rain Jacket ($159; outdoorresearch.com)

    This jacket was another one of our favorites, and while it didn’t score extremely high, it was solidly waterproof and breathable. The interior of the jacket is a bit sticky and felt clammy against our skin, but if you’re an avid hiker or backpacker, the Helium’s extreme packability just might be enough to sell you. It was the lightest jacket we weighed, coming in at only 6.26 ounces. For reference, the next lightest was about 7.5 ounces and the next after that was nearly 10 ounces. On top of that, the Helium stuffs down into its sole chest pocket into a tiny package that’s about the size of our hand. So if you’re searching for the lightest jacket that you can throw in your backpack for a thru-hike and don’t care as much about comfort or durability, the Helium is a great choice.

    The North Face Dryzzle Futurelight Jacket ($230; thenorthface.com)

    The North Face’s Dryzzle jacket features the brand’s latest waterproof technology, Futurelight. This membrane is just like GORE-TEX and Patagonia’s H2No, promising extreme waterproofing while maintaining breathability. We were quite impressed with The North Face’s jacket, especially the feel of the jacket both inside and out. However, it didn’t quite separate itself from other great jackets we tested. Our biggest gripe with the Dryzzle was the quality of the DWR coating on the jacket. When water hit this jacket it didn’t immediately bead up and shed like many other jackets we tested. In some places we could see visible spots where the water was soaking into the outer layer. It was one of our highest-scoring jackets, but with a lackluster DWR coating and a higher price tag than our winner we just can’t recommend it.

    REI Co-op Rainier Rain Jacket ($89.95; rei.com)

    This jacket is one of the cheapest we tested but surprised us with its solid scores throughout our testing process. It was solidly waterproof, decently breathable and an overall fantastic jacket. It didn’t score quite as high as the Torrentshell, mostly due to its sticky interior, but if you’re looking for a cheap jacket, the Rainier is a fantastic option.

    Arc’teryx Zeta SL ($299; arcteryx.com)

    The Zeta SL from Arc’teryx was another high-scoring jacket, coming in right around the top. It’s super waterproof and breathable, and its interior feels relatively comfortable. However, like the other Arc’teryx jacket we tested, its zippers aren’t fully waterproof, only water-resistant. It also doesn’t have as many extra features as the Torrentshell, which was a little disappointing for a $300 jacket.

    REI Co-op Drypoint GTX ($173.93, originally $249; rei.com)

    This jacket from REI Co-op was another high scorer but just didn’t do well enough to edge out the competition. It’s also a discontinued item, so it’s only available in one color and stock will eventually run out. Even at a massively discounted price it’s more expensive than our winner, so while it’s a solid jacket, there are better options out there.

    Black Diamond Stormline ($149; rei.com)

    The Stormline was the stretchiest jacket we tested and had quite a high score. It’s nice and light, and felt nice both on the outside and inside. It was mostly waterproof, with just a tiny bit of water getting into the pockets. If you need an extremely stretchy and malleable jacket, the Stormline would be a great pick for you, but overall it couldn’t beat out the other coats we tested.

    Marmot Minimalist ($189; marmot.com)

    This jacket was one of the more breathable jackets we tested, but its pockets — like many others — weren’t waterproof. A bit of water got into the two side pockets, and the tissue inside the chest pocket got completely soaked. It didn’t stand out for any particular reason, but it’s still a solid rain jacket. Just don’t put your phone in its pockets.

    Outdoor Research Microgravity (starting at $149.40; outdoorresearch.com)

    The Microgravity from Outdoor Research fell out of contention after a poor waterproofness test. Again, the pockets were its downfall, and in the Microgravity’s case, so much water came through all of its pockets that our shirt got wet underneath. The interior material also felt quite itchy, so we just can’t justify spending $250 on this jacket.

    L.L.Bean H2Off ($189; llbean.com)

    The L.L.Bean was the heaviest jacket we tested, but it does have tons of pockets to carry everything you need when you go out. However, those pockets are nowhere close to being waterproof. Every tissue we put in its pockets came out drenched.

    Columbia OutDry Ex Nanolite Shell ($300; columbia.com)

    This jacket did not score very well, mainly due to a poor waterproofness test. Its hood channeled the water down our face and right into the jacket itself. We had to look directly at the ground to keep the water out, and couldn’t move our head like we could with other jackets. At the end of our test our shirt was completely soaked. It is incredibly light, but if you’re looking for a packable jacket, go for the $159 Outdoor Research Helium instead.

    Columbia OutDry Ex Reign ($150; columbia.com)

    This jacket had the same hood issue as the other Columbia coat, and water ran right down into the neck of the jacket. It’s heavy, not portable, doesn’t feel comfortable on the inside and isn’t very breathable either.

    Helly-Hansen Moss Hooded Raincoat (starting at $65; amazon.com)

    This jacket didn’t impress us much, as it wasn’t very breathable, didn’t hold up well in our rub test and is the only jacket we tested that you can’t throw in the dryer. It was decently waterproof, but its hood is a little flimsy and its pockets don’t zip close, although the tissues we put in there didn’t get as wet as some other jackets.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best emergency radios in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best emergency radios in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Because severe weather situations can develop extremely quickly, it’s imperative you give yourself as much time as possible to prepare. Emergency radios are designed to give you a head start, providing access to NOAA weather frequencies that can alert you to upcoming or current weather situations like flash floods, hurricanes, blizzards, tornadoes and more. And to make sure you can keep using them as an emergency is happening, many are also designed with hand cranks and solar panels so you can extend their running time practically indefinitely even without access to power. With battery-charging capability and AM/FM bands, they’re also a useful addition to camping or hiking gear.

    We put nine of the most popular emergency radios to the test, comparing their ability to issue alerts and receive emergency weather broadcasts, and assessing how functional and useful they would be in an actual emergency situation.

    The best emergency radio overall

    With easy-to-use alerts, four charging options, a bright LCD screen, a powerful flashlight and straightforward controls, the Midland ER310 outperformed the other radios we tested in every area and makes a valuable addition to your household emergency kit.

    The best emergency radio overall: Midland ER310

    If you’re looking for an emergency radio that’s extremely easy to use while providing a variety of useful bells and whistles, look no further than the Midland ER310, a solidly built weather alert radio that performed well on all of our tests and was simple to use — which means it’ll be there if you need it and you’ll have no problem operating it when you do.

    The ER310 is well-built, with a sturdy, high-quality feel, and the textured body makes it comfortable to pick up and maintain a good grip on while carrying around. Thanks to a large, bright, backlit LCD screen I was able to maneuver through the different bands and frequencies without any trouble, and the clear, helpful instruction manual provided any extra assistance I needed. The ER310 is a weather alert radio, not just a weather band radio, which means it is able to receive emergency-band alerts automatically without you having to tune in first — a useful feature during hurricane season.

    An emergency checklist was included in the box as well, which was a nice perk and valuable for anyone buying this radio as part of a larger household emergency kit.

    The Midland ER310 performed well in testing, providing an impressive 26 minutes of radio time after just 60 seconds of hand cranking. The large handle of the crank was also the most comfortable of all the radios in our group, which can make a big difference if you end up needing it in an extended emergency situation. Its solar panel was also able to charge the radio enough after an hour in direct sunlight to provide full functionality, and filled the battery to 1/3 after six hours. Your results may vary on these measures depending on the speed you turn the crank or cloudiness of the sky, but under the conditions in which we tested, and in relation to the rest of the radios tested, these results put the ER310 at the top of the group.

    Setting up the ER301 to receive alerts and receiving the NOAA weather alert test to confirm couldn’t have been easier, thanks to a dedicated “Alert” button that enables the function. Other radios we tested used a multipurpose button that enabled alerts and functioned as a “menu” button. Even though that’s not a dealbreaker, we appreciated that the ER310 gave us one less step to remember, an additional point in its favor in a stressful situation.

    I was also impressed with the brightness of the integrated flashlight, which provided three settings to choose from: standard, bright and flashing. Lower light settings help to conserve battery life, and come in handy if you need to read a map and not just illuminate a hallway. The placement of the button and raised grip also gave an ergonomic, flashlight-like feel to the whole unit, making it easy to direct the beam where I needed it.

    Its rechargeable 2,600 mAh battery was the second-largest in our testing group, and combined with the three other power options (solar, hand crank or six AAA batteries) makes the Midland ER310 a reliable choice for anyone who wants to be prepared for power outages and have the ability to charge their mobile devices.

    What’s the difference between an emergency radio and regular radio?

    Emergency radios are designed to provide accurate and up-to-date weather information and alerts using the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) network of radio stations, while your typical transistor radio will only receive AM/FM stations. Granted, in an emergency like a hurricane or flood situation, your AM/FM stations may provide weather info, but they’re not going to provide the around-the-clock updates that you get from a dedicated NOAA station. Emergency radios can also offer additional features that can be valuable in an emergency, like hand cranks and solar panel chargers when batteries run low, and USB ports to charge your phone.

    If you think you could be in an emergency weather situation, you should probably get an emergency radio. Power grids can go out, cell towers can go down, phone batteries can die, and in fast-moving weather events, up-to-date information can give you time to get to safety.

    Those who live in areas frequented by dangerous weather events like flash floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes should absolutely have an emergency radio. Plus, according to the National Weather Service, NOAA broadcasts can include non-weather emergencies and natural disasters when appropriate, making them even more useful.

    The extra bells and whistles of an emergency radio may seem gimmicky at first, but considering the uncertain and unpredictable nature of weather and natural emergencies, they can be extremely useful when the time comes. To choose the best option for you, take some time to think about the types of weather emergencies that are common to your area, and the features that would be most helpful to you.

    You should also make sure you’re aware of whether or not you’re buying a weather band radio or a weather alert radio. We suggest a weather alert radio, like the Midland ER310 — these will automatically alert you of weather emergencies whether the radio is turned on and tuned in or not, while weather band radios must be turned on and tuned into the emergency band to receive the alert. Weather band radios have their uses if you’re expecting poor weather, but weather alert radios are more generally useful since situations can change quickly.

    If you want to give yourself as many options as possible when it comes to power, go with a radio that has at least three charging methods. Whether those are solar panels, hand cranks, a rechargeable battery or replaceable alkaline batteries, they all add up to being more prepared for emergencies that could last more than a day or two.

    USB charging capability is another useful feature. Having your radio double as a power bank for your phone can be even more valuable than receiving NOAA transmissions, and can allow you to call for help when necessary. Combined with a manual crank or solar panel, these two features can keep your phone functioning even during power outages.

    The type of light source is another factor to consider. While flashlight-style beams are great for searching around the house when the power goes out, they’re not as useful for tasks like reading or eating in the dark. These activities would benefit from a lantern-style light that can cast a broader beam and doesn’t require anyone to hold it in place.

    A group of seven emergency radios on a grassy lawn, charging in the sun via solar panels.

    Since many of the radios we tested had similar features, and it can be overwhelming to try and choose one without seeing them in person, we ran each one through a comprehensive testing and evaluation process. This allowed us to confidently select our top pick, and will hopefully provide the information you need to choose the best option for you.

    Perhaps most importantly, an emergency radio should be easy to use, since you won’t want to waste precious time searching and pressing buttons or fumbling through an instruction manual during an emergency. We paid close attention to the layout and function of the buttons or dials, and made note of any steps or controls that were confusing or required any trial and error to use correctly.

    To assess performance, we tuned each radio into our local NOAA weather broadcast, comparing both how simple the tuning process was and the clarity of the transmission from our basement. For the radios that were designed to automatically alert you when a weather alert is issued, we activated the “alert” setting, and waited until the NOAA’s weekly alert test, which occurs every Wednesday. We compared how effectively each radio received the alert, as well as how having the “alert” setting activated affected the rest of the radio’s functions. (The Kaito KA340 Weather Alert Radio for example, required you to turn this alert setting off if you wanted to use any other radio function, which seems impractical.)

    After draining the batteries overnight, we evaluated the effectiveness of each radio’s various charging methods. To look at hand-crank charging, we cranked continuously for one minute, then left the radio running on the NOAA weather station and timed how long it took to run out of juice. We noted how ergonomic the crank handles felt, how comfortable they were to use and the effort required to turn them. For radios with solar panels, we again drained their batteries overnight and then placed them in direct sunlight in our backyard. We checked in after an hour to see how much, or if any, battery power was generated, and again six hours later.

    While setting up and testing each radio, we kept a close eye on their overall build quality. We noted whether they felt cheap and flimsy or sturdy and well-built. We also made sure to use all the dials, sliders, knobs and buttons to see if any were loose and rattled around, or if they had a solid, secure feel.

    We explored each radio’s light features, especially those that had multiple settings like SOS beacons or lantern-style LEDS that could be more useful than just a simple flashlight-style beam. We compared their brightness as well, and how simple or confusing they were to turn on and off.

    The storage capacity of the battery, measured in mAh, indicates how much power your radio will be able to hold and how effective it will be when charging a cell phone (current flagship phones have batteries rated in the 3,000-4,000 mAh range). We checked each radios specs to find out their specific mAh, and was surprised to find such a wide range (850 to 4,000 mAh) within our testing group; we preferred radios with more capacity.

    We compared each radio’s power source options, battery capacity, any USB charging abilities and whether or not they had a backlit display. This gave us a better idea of each radio’s overall functionality and the value it could provide in an emergency.

    FosPower Emergency Solar Hand Crank Portable Radio

    A low-cost alternative, the FosPower Emergency Solar Hand Crank Portable Radio still provides a good amount of useful features and four charging options. Its manual tuner knobs were simple to use, and I had no issues quickly finding the NOAA station I was looking for. This is a weather band radio rather than a weather alert model, so it won’t automatically receive NOAA alerts; you’ll have to tune in first when you expect to face threatening weather conditions. This radio lacks the digital tuning and push-button controls of higher-end options, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing — the simple design, without menus or digital control, means there’s little to go wrong, and there’s no need to remember what buttons perform which functions if you’re under stress. And older users may appreciate these manual tuner controls over digital. This radio also provided an impressive 32 minutes of listening time after one minute of hand cranking, but struggled in my solar testing (zero function after one hour). The low price of this radio could be appealing to those looking for a budget-friendly option, but if that’s your priority, we’d recommend shelling out the extra $5 and choosing the similar RunningSnail MD-090P and its 4,000 mAh battery.

    Although the Kaito KA340 Weather Alert Radio had some interesting features, like Bluetooth connectivity and a microSD memory card slot, the confusing layout of the controls makes it difficult to recommend for emergency use. The physical controls — a collection of sliders, knobs and buttons — had a flimsy, loose feel to them, which made it hard to achieve precise volume or radio settings. I was most confused by the lack of visual arrow or indicator on the band selection slider, which made it tough to tell which setting you were selecting. This was made even more challenging by the large range of options (seven!) to choose from. I did appreciate its variety of power options — rechargeable lithium-ion battery, four AA batteries, hand crank and solar panel — and the hand crank in particular provided 26 minutes of radio time after just 60 seconds of cranking. The flashlight threw a nice wide beam, and the large lantern light was a nice perk as well. Although it felt less durable and rugged than the other radios I tested, this could be a useful choice for those interested in taking advantage of the plethora of media inputs. Although this radio is able to receive NOAA alerts, you won’t be able to use any other function while the “alert” setting is selected.

    Midland ER210

    This Midland model is essentially just a scaled-down version of our top pick, the Midland ER310, providing nearly all the bells and whistles in a smaller package. It only lacks the dog whistle and the ability to use disposable batteries, but still provides the same hand crank and solar charging ability, as well as the multi-beam flashlight. I really enjoyed the smaller size of this radio, especially when it came to using the hand crank, although I wish the crank handle had a bit more material to hold onto. Sixty seconds of cranking provided an impressive 32 minutes of listening time, which was one of the longest of the radios I tested. The NOAA weather alert was simple to set up, the straightforward controls made switching between bands easy and I especially liked how the display would flash back to the current time every 10 seconds or so. The backlit LED screen was easy to read in the dark, too. This radio also has a convenient carrying handle like the Midland ER310, which made it comfortable to carry around.

    Midland ER10VP

    If you’re looking for an effective, high-quality radio that won’t take up much room in a drawer or backpack, this 5 by 3 by 1.5-inch Midland model could be just what you’re looking for. The younger sibling of the Midland ER310 and Midland ER210, this radio fits in the palm of your hand and weighs just 8.8 ounces, by far the lightest I tested. Despite the small size, this little radio still provides automatic NOAA alerts without your having to tune in first, a feature that several much larger and more expensive radios did not. You also get a flashlight with three settings, a headphone jack and a handy wrist lanyard so you can attach it to your pack or hang from a tree limb at your campsite. Its controls were extremely easy to use, and setting up the NOAA alert was simple to do as well. The only drawback to this little radio is that it only runs on three AA batteries, so no rechargeable battery, hand crank or solar panels. That being said, Midland claims that its battery will last for up to 26 days when in alert standby mode, which should be sufficient for most emergency situations.

    Midland WR120B/WR120EZ Emergency Weather Alert Radio

    What this Midland radio lacks in portability and power source options, it makes up for in customization. Unlike our other radios that only pick up NOAA weather bands and alerts, this model can be used with S.A.M.E. (Specific Area Message Encoding) programming. This allows you to input your current location and only receive alerts for that area. This radio also allows you to pick and choose the alerts you want to receive, and disable any that you don’t want to be bothered with. These settings may seem complicated, but we were pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to program and configure the specific alerts you want, thanks to the helpful instruction manual. Our favorite feature of this radio was probably the extra-large “Weather” button on the front of the unit, which allows you to get the current weather report at the push of a button. No tuning or band selection needed. Its trilingual settings (English, Spanish and French) also make it useful for potential users who may not use English as their primary language. This radio, however, is really useful only for alerts in advance of an emergency since it does need to be plugged into a wall outlet to function — you’ll need an external power source of some kind to keep it working.

    The most impressive feature of this radio is its 4,000 mAh battery, which is substantially larger than any other model we tested, with the two closest competitors offering 2,600 mAh batteries. This means that the RunningSnail MD-090P should be able to run longer than any other, which also translates to more charging capacity when it comes to using it as a power bank to keep your devices working. This in itself is a hugely valuable benefit in an emergency situation when the power goes out. I also appreciated the powerful flashlight and separate “reading lamp,” which provides a wide, soft light source, perfect for reading a map or book or performing any emergency repair or maintenance tasks. Like the FosPower model we looked at, the RunningSnail is only a weather band radio, and doesn’t have automated weather alert functionality (though it can clearly receive NOAA weather stations). This lack of automatic alerts ultimately kept it out of our consideration for the top spot, but if that’s not a dealbreaker for you, the low price and large battery of this radio could make it a solid all-in-one emergency solution.

    I was a big fan of nearly every aspect of this weather alert radio, except for its 850 mAh battery capacity, the smallest in the testing group. This doesn’t make it a poor choice in itself, but if a long running time before having to recharge is a priority for you, you might want to consider another model. That being said, the controls were simple to use, and the orange backlit display made it easy to work with in low light conditions. It was also the only model I tested that offered radio presets, which could be convenient for those who plan on using its AM/FM radio frequently. I also appreciated the rubber end caps that cover all four corners of the unit, which provided a very durable and rugged feel and made me confident that it could survive a moderate drop or fall. This radio performed well in all performance tests too, providing 32 minutes of listening time after 60 seconds of hand cranking, and it reached half capacity after six hours in the sun.

    The Eton — an update to a well-regarded Red Cross-branded model — exhibited poor enough charging speeds in both the solar and hand crank tests that we wouldn’t recommend it at all. One minute of cranking provided zero power, and even after an additional five minutes, the battery was still dead. An hour in the sun had the same result in my solar test, although after six hours in direct sunlight it did register that two of the three battery bars were filled and the unit was functioning normally. This may well have been a quality control issue — a CNN Underscored editor owns and has used the precursor to this model, the FRX3, and has never encountered this issue — but should you order, you’ll want to make sure it works out of the box.

    It was fairly simple to set up and find the band and station you want, and the NOAA alert worked perfectly — but without the battery power, it won’t last you through a significant power outage. I do wish the flashlight were more powerful or, considering the unit’s height when stood upright, that it featured some kind of lantern-style illumination. The unique X-shaped design does make it easy to carry around, although the large shape may not be convenient if you plan on keeping it in a small drawer or emergency kit.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best solar generators in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best solar generators in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A solar generator pairs a large-capacity rechargeable power station — a big battery, at heart — with a set of portable solar panels, making for a versatile device that can provide backup power for your home during an emergency and do double duty for off-grid activities like camping, tailgating or even DIY projects around your yard. They’re safer to store and use and far simpler to maintain than gas generators, and with people more and more conscious of the threat of storms and wildfires, they make a lot of sense for emergency preparedness.

    To choose the best solar generator, we tested 13 devices for an entire summer in the hot Florida sun to determine which device could reliably provide the most power with the least fuss. We considered factors such as portability, ease of setup, price, industrial design, technology and innovation when making our final selections.

    The best small-capacity solar generator

    Bluetti’s EB70S packs the latest LFP battery chemistry and plenty of capacity into a compact package that’s great for camping, on-the-go preparedness, a car emergency kit or taking any place you need reliable power.

    The best medium-capacity solar generator

    With updated features, an upgrade LiFePO4/LFP battery, a ton of ports and easy expansion, the new EcoFlow Delta 2 outperformed everything in its class in our testing. It hits the sweet spot for most people who need portable power and a dependable emergency backup.

    The best high-capacity solar powered generator:

    Easy to use, packed with the most up-to-date features and battery technology, and expandable enough to serve as a whole-house emergency generator, the EcoFlow Delta Pro beat impressive competitors in our testing, emerging as the best large solar generator.

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 716 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: No
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: 800W
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 200W
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to 8mm DC
    • Output Ports: (4) 110V AC (2 grounded), (2) 5V/3A USB-A, (2) 100W USB PD, (2) regulated 12V/10 DC, (1) 12V car, 15W wireless charge pad
    • App Managed: No
    • Weight: 21.4 pounds
    • Charge Time: 4 hours
    •  Panel Tested: Jackery 200W
    • Warranty: 2 Years

    The Bluettti EB70S offers a high-capacity battery (716 watt-hours) and an inverter capable of handling up to 800 watts worth of devices in a compact, portable package perfect for everything from camping to keeping your critical devices going in a blackout. It is packed with output ports, and the two USB PD 100Ws and wireless charging pad make it ideal if you want to charge mobile devices quickly. It is capable of handling most of your small-device power needs, whether it’s a laptop, tablet, smartphone, LED lighting unit (it has a built-in lantern as well in case you read at night), BBQ controller, mini refrigerator or small fan.

    Functionality doesn’t need to mean ugly. The rectangular unit with rounded edges and an integrated folding carrying handle looks a bit like an old-school boombox and comes in four colors; our testing sample was a bright blueish-green. It’s small enough, along with a single panel, to keep in a car at all times.

    The EB70S isn’t just pretty. Under the hood is one of the least expensive solar generators on the market using the latest lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) battery chemistry, which charges faster, runs cooler and lasts longer. In theory, this unit will last a very long time, an estimated 2,500+ full charge cycles, according to the manufacturer, meaning it should be there when you need it

    At 21.4 pounds, the Bluetti EB70S is light enough to move around easily. The power supply for AC charging is a separate unit, further lightening the load. The DC inverter port for the AC adapter input and the solar cable is an 8A barrel type, used by several manufacturers including Jackery, one of the most popular, so panels should be easy to find. For testing, as we didn’t have Bluetti’s 200W panel on hand, we used one of Jackery’s 200W SolarSaga units, which plugged right in without any intermediate adapter cables. It worked just fine, so MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking, the converter technology that manages solar panel to battery connections) compatibility on the unit is good.

    The user interface is straightforward. One small button activates the four AC outlets, another activates the USB and other DC ports. Another button activates a front-panel light. A small LED color display indicates input and output watts, along with battery capacity, which is displayed as a pictograph of a battery with five fill bars rather than a percentage. The battery management system on this unit is very simplistic, perhaps overly so — it doesn’t indicate depletion or charge completion times. Additionally, if the battery is full or at a high level of charge and it is not discharging, it won’t show any wattage input. It’s information that would be nice to have, but given the overall solid performance, missing it is by no means a dealbreaker.

    The unit was easily able to drive all of our variable test loads of 60W to 200W, and with a solar panel hooked up, our small 60W freezer never depleted the battery, even on days of mixed weather.

    With a full 200W load using dual 70W fans overnight, we could drain it in about three and a half hours, but this is a heavy continuous load for a small generator designed primarily for camping and short-term usage.

    With the speedy recharge rate, even at about 50% efficiency on the panel, we could go from day to night uninterrupted for two consecutive days running a 100-watt load without depleting the unit. The only time we ran into issues was after a day of rain with no sun at all.

    An EcoFlow Delta 2 solar generator with expansion battery, set up on a stone patio

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 1,024 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: Yes, secondary 1,024 Wh battery
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: 1,800-2,200Wx
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 500Wx
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to XT-60
    • Output Ports: (6) 110V AC (2 grounded), (4) 5V/2.4A USB-A (2 fast charge), (2) 100W USB PD, (2) DC 5521, (1) 12V car
    • App Managed: Yes
    • Weight: 27 pounds
    • Charge Time: 4 hours 
    • Panels Tested: EcoFlow 400W, EcoFlow 160W
    • Warranty: 2 Years

    The new LiFePO4/LFP-based 1024 Wh EcoFlow Delta 2 arrived towards the very end of our testing period, after we had already evaluated its predecessor, the original 1300 Wh Li-ion-NMC Delta. But after testing, the EcoFlow Delta 2 completely upset our decision matrix — it’s that good. With an expanded feature set and the latest technology and capabilities, it simply outperformed everything else in its class.

    A slimmed-down version of EcoFlow’s Delta Pro, the new Delta 2 uses the same LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry and has Wi-Fi and Bluetooth onboard to enable smart management with an excellent, extremely detailed app with many configurable settings. The rear of the generator has two grounded AC ports, four ungrounded, and three 12V ports, with one car and a dual 5521 (for devices such as routers with barrel connectors where you might want to avoid the use of a power brick). An internal AC power supply simplifies cabling, and the EcoFlow Delta 2 has a dedicated AC power cord.

    Solar/12V charging uses an XT-60 modular connector and a PV4-to XT-60 adapter cable. It has a 500W DC solar input (allowing you to charge it using two of EcoFlow’s 160W panels, two 220W panels or a single 400W panel) or via an AC inverter (more on that later).

    The compact 160W/220W panels are light and easy to carry; with multiples a single person can easily carry them out one at a time, unzip them from their fabric cases, and lie them down on a driveway or pool deck area (which is exactly what we did with these) You can also prop them up easily using the carrying case, which doubles as a stand, but it might be good to have one other person help you with that. The 400W panel is larger, but is of the same folding, four-segment “floppy” or flexible design. It’s more cumbersome because of its large size and weight, and while a single person could lay it out flat, it took two of us to position it when we set it up on the stand.

    Connecting a single panel to the generator only requires using a single MC4 to XT-60 bridge cable that connects to the panel’s positive and negative wires (you can’t mix it up, it’s a “keyed” connection) and attaching the bridge cable to the rear of the panel. The generator does the rest and displays the incoming wattage on the display and in the app. If you need to connect more than one panel, they can be serialized by attaching the positive pole of the MC4 connection of the first panel to a negative pole of the other panel, and then connecting the bridge cable to the other positive and negative poles. This can be done for up to three 160W panels on the Delta 2, for a maximum power input of 480W. EcoFlow also has a “parallel” connector cable to simplify this if you need to, particularly in situations where you might use three or more panels, but we did not have one of these for testing.

    Like its big sibling, the Delta 2 is expandable. While its onboard battery capacity is slightly smaller than the similarly priced units we tested, you can double the power of the EcoFlow Delta 2 to 2,048 Wh with an expansion battery unit. (The battery expansion port is on the side and uses a thick proprietary connector cord.) That gives you the flexibility of choosing portability over power, or should you realize you need more “oomph” after the fact. The 1,200W of AC input capacity (up to 1,500W with the additional battery pack connected) allows it to charge quickly.

    That said, given the high AC draw, we recommend you use the app and limit the input to 800W or less unless you have nothing else plugged into the circuit when charging it. We managed to trip a breaker charging the unit from a shared circuit in our garage charging at the default maximum speed setting in the app. While it’s easy enough to reset a breaker, it is not something you want to deal with when it’s easily avoidable using the Delta 2’s well-thought-out management features.

    The Delta 2 lets you charge from AC and solar simultaneously; we tried this setup and the unit prioritizes AC over solar most of the time (not a surprise given that the AC side of the unit supplies more current and solar is subject to variable weather conditions and solar exposure). It’s a useful option for faster charging or keeping the unit consistently charged without relying entirely on the grid.

    While the main display is simple enough, most users will likely want to use the app for monitoring status and adjusting settings. It allows you to control multiple EcoFlow devices at once and get real-time information about the state of charge and power flow. You also can alter settings, such as turning ports on and off, adjusting input wattage and upgrading firmware.

    We used the unit in both 1,024 Wh and 2,048 Wh configurations with the external battery. Given the 27-pound weight of the generator (and slightly less for the external battery) we found it fairly easy to drag around the house in two separate parts if we needed to move it away from its primary charging position on the patio. We had no issues running our maximum loads with the EcoFlow Delta 2, particularly when the second battery was connected and using a single 400W panel.

    In our estimation, the Delta 2 with an extra battery for a total of 2,048 Wh of capacity and 400W of solar panels is probably the “sweet spot” for a small family looking for an emergency backup generator to cover essentials. 100W to 300W of variable output is a realistic load to plan for if you consider the typical appliances that might be connected in an emergency scenario, such as lower-wattage LED lights (typically in the 10W to 20W range), a small refrigerator, fans, personal electronics and higher-wattage small appliances for cooking for 10-20 minutes at a time. We found that with this setup we were able to go for at least three to five days using our 60W-200W variable test load under medium cloud conditions, with plenty of capacity left on hand.

    The EcoFlow Delta Pro solar generator, with an extension battery, set up side by side on a stone patio

    Key specs

    • Battery Capacity: 3,600 Wh
    • Battery Chemistry: LFP/LiFePO4
    • Expansion Capacity: Yes, add up to two 3,600 Wh batteries for a total of 10,800 Wh
    • Home Electrical Panel Integration: Yes, with a proprietary transfer switch
    • Maximum AC Inverter Capacity: up to 4,500W
    • Maximum Solar DC Input Capacity: 1,600W
    • Panel to Generator Charge Interface: MC4 to XT-60
    • Output Ports: (4) 110V AC, (1) 30A 125V, (4) 5V/2.4A USB-A (2 fast charge), (2) 100W USB PD, (2) DC 5521, (1) 12V car, (1) 12.6V 30A Anderson Powerpole
    • App Managed: Yes
    • Weight: 99 lbs
    • Charge Time: 4 hours (1.7 hours with X-Stream Adapter and 40A L2 EV Charger)
    • Panel Tested: EcoFlow 400W
    • Warranty: 3 Years (with registration)

    The EcoFlow Delta Pro, released in 2021, is similar to the Delta 2 in overall design and basic capabilities, with the latest LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry, onboard Bluetooth and Wi-Fi that let you access the smart battery management system via a well-designed app, an integrated power supply, MC4 to XT-60 solar input connectivity and an identical informative display.

    But the Delta Pro is a much bigger unit, and not just physically. The Delta Pro’s base battery capacity is 3,600 Wh, so if you are driving a 200W load, you can run it for 18 hours before depleting the battery, assuming there’s no recharge. And if that’s not enough, it can accommodate two additional 3,600 Wh batteries (connected with thick proprietary charging cables) for up to 10,800 Wh capacity, which begins to compete with gas generators. The inverter can drive up to 4,500W of load from its four 120V AC, six USB ports, three 12V, a 12V 30 Anderson connector, and a 30A 125V RV port.

    For most people that should be enough to power even some larger appliances like a refrigerator or freezer. along with lighting and personal electronics through a power outage. Since it is a viable alternative to smaller gas or propane/natural gas generators, you can buy EcoFlow’s Smart Home Panel, a transfer switch with a subpanel that lets you directly connect two EcoFlow Pros (each with up to two additional batteries) to your home electrical system and power up to 10 circuits.

    With all of that on tap, the Delta Pro is physically large. It weighs 99 pounds, though it has integrated wheels with a pull-out handle, so you can roll it (more like drag it) to wherever it needs to be.

    The 400W panels weigh just over 35 pounds each. As we noted with the Delta 2, the 400W panels use MC4-type locking connectors and are built with a folding, four-segment “floppy” or flexible construction, which can be used flat or angled. They come in heavy fabric carrying bases which function as an angular stand and use carabiner clips to connect to the panel.

    The 400W panels are more cumbersome than the 160W panels supplied with the smaller EcoFlow units, and you may need two people to position them when the stand is used. The panels are IP68 rated, meaning they can handle being rained on — and during the testing period, sitting out on our driveway for weeks at a time in the South Florida summer, they were rained on continuously. They continued to operate flawlessly despite the deluges.

    You can charge from solar or AC. The solar input lets you connect up to four 400W panels at 1,600W. You can charge from a 120V outlet, of course, but to fill this monster at high speeds, EcoFlow sells an “X-Stream” adapter that allows you to use a J1772 connector (like a Level 2 240V 40A/50A EV charging circuit) to fill the 3,600 Wh battery at over 3,000W.

    But that doesn’t mean you can’t overtax your home electrical circuit trying to AC charge it. We did encounter an issue where the power draw during 110V AC charging exceeded the capacity of the shared circuit (15A) to which the Delta Pro was connected; it caused the breaker to flip. To address this, we isolated the device to its own circuit and lowered the AC power draw in the app to a more modest 800W, which, as with the Delta 2, we suggest you do unless your circuit is sufficient to handle AC charging at the maximum draw.

    There wasn’t a load we could throw at this unit it could not handle, including 1,800W espresso machines, induction cookers and hair dryers in addition to our lineup of personal electronics, fans and small appliances. To really stress out the Delta Pro we used dual True 2A rated 24-inch undercounter commercial refrigerators, which had a peak draw of about 480W when the compressors were running at full blast, both at the same time.

    In a continual consumption scenario with no solar connection for recharging, according to the built-in display and the app (as we were monitoring it) the 3,600 Wh battery on the Delta Pro would deplete in seven and a half hours, and with a single external battery, in about 14 or 15 hours with a total of 7,200 Wh. Adding a second battery (we’re extrapolating, since we didn’t test with a second battery) would provide about 22 hours of continuous draw (and that’s without a solar panel hooked up).

    In real-world use, with only periodic compressor bursts from the refrigerators and twin 400W panels giving us at least 550W of continual recharge at about 70% efficiency during the day, we didn’t tax the Delta Pro much at all. Similarly, using a 1,800W induction cooker, running a boiling pot of water, continuously, got us about two hours of total use from a fully charged single battery with no solar recharging, but that’s not a realistic application. Yu’d use an appliance like this for only about 15 to 20 minutes at a time to make meals, and we rarely ran it above 800W-1,000W for medium-heat cooking. Practically, it doesn’t make a dent.

    So did we max out the capabilities of this monster setup? No, not by any means. And realistically, your typical family running emergency loads will not either. Suffice it to say, this bodes well for the Delta Pro’s usefulness in emergency situations, and at the very least it should be a good solution to avoid having to toss a fridge or freezer full of food after a long power outage.

    EcoFlow even sells a setup meant to address a particularly challenging situation: the EV charging adapter lets you use the NEMA TT-30 30A 125V port with a grounding adapter to charge an electric car. Just be aware that EV batteries are really big, so you can’t expect to fill up that easily, at least not right out of the box. With the base 3.6 kWh in the Delta Pro, you only get about 5% charge on a 77 kWh battery or a 15% charge with 10.8 kWh if both external batteries are connected. With 1,600W of panels connected, you could fully charge your vehicle in a day or two (perhaps three) if solar conditions are optimal, but it’s a bit of a stretch and you wouldn’t be able to use it for anything else. But if you’re stuck in a snowy cabin with a pooped-out electric vehicle, you should be able to get enough charge to make it to a charging station.

    First off, a solar generator isn’t really a “generator.” It’s a large rechargeable battery pack (not that different from the devices you might carry around to charge your phone while traveling), integrating an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) with surge protection and an inverter and line conditioner to power your AC devices.

    These devices are known as “solar generators” because they’re designed to be charged using a solar panel, making them suitable for long-term use in emergencies or off the grid (they can also be charged from a wall outlet). A wide range of battery capacities are available, from large models that can keep critical appliances going and the lights on during an emergency, to lightweight models more suitable for camping or tailgating.

    In order to supply power to a wide range of devices, solar generators offer a variety of AC outlets, 12V DC ports, a standard cigarette lighter port and 5521 barrel-type ports, in addition to Anderson power ports. The more sophisticated, higher-power generators may also have 125V 30A outlets for powering an RV. Some solar generators can directly integrate with home generator transfer panels to power AC circuits.

    Solar generators also come with USB ports for charging phones and small devices. The number of USB ports varies from two to four on smaller units and can be as high as six to eight on larger units, with a mix of USB-A 2.4v and 5V ports and USB-C with power delivery (PD) ports from 18W to 100W capacities.

    In addition to basic watt-hour and inverter capacities, solar generators have different types of ports for connecting various devices. The number of 120V AC ports is typically one or two on smaller units and three to six on medium and larger units. The inverters on the generators themselves, however, have a maximum wattage rating, so nothing stops you from plugging a power strip into a single AC port and using the maximum wattage of the generator.

    The inverters on the generators we reviewed are “pure sinewave,” which is the cleanest power you can get from an AC generator. They create a steady, continuous wave of electricity providing a smooth, oscillating current, also known as power conditioning. Some electronics require pure sinewave electricity, such as medical equipment and other appliances with AC motors, pumps and compressors.

    Some solar generators have integrated power supplies for fast charging and can be directly connected using cables to external 110V AC and 12V DC power sources. In contrast, others use transformer bricks similar to ones you see on other consumer appliances such as personal computers. A separate power supply typically generates less heat and somewhat lowers the generator’s weight, making the cabling more complicated. The larger units typically also include integrated fans to cool the battery compartment; the battery management system controls them and spins them up and down as needed.

    LED and LCDs on these devices display basic data such as state of charge, current wattage output, input and estimated times until charge and depletion (some also have touchscreen user interfaces). Some generators also have wireless capabilities and are managed using a mobile application using Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. The benefit is remote visibility into real-time generator performance from the comfort of wherever you want to view it and alter any settings that may be needed, such as activating and deactivating inverter ports, changing inverter charge speed so as not to overtax a circuit and updating the firmware.

    How to choose and use a solar generator

    The performance of solar generators is measured in watt hours (Wh). For example, imagine you have a load of 100W (which may be typical of a large fan and a portable refrigerator), and your solar generator’s capacity is 1,000 Wh. Then you could keep the load (the fan and portable fridge) for approximately 10 hours before the battery power is depleted (assuming there is no interim recharge by your solar panels, as happens at night).

    When operating a solar generator, shield it from the elements somewhere like behind your front door, on a covered porch/patio or inside a vehicle. Some solar panels are rated for continuous outdoor use and are weatherproofed. However, the generators should never be exposed to water, rain or extreme heat. For this reason, we also recommend purchasing extension cables for optimizing generator/panel placement. In our testing, we used 25-foot extensions, so we had a sufficient length between the panels and the generator.

    The heart of any solar generator unit, the cell is where chemical energy is stored for use as electrical energy. Cells have used a variety of lithium-based chemical formulations; many batteries have used Lithium-Ion Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) though Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), also referred to by its chemical formula LiFePO4, has gained popularity in the industry lately since it allows for faster charging and discharging and many more charge cycles and it lasts longer.

    NMC batteries are, however, more common, since they are lighter and more energy-dense (and smaller, which is why you see them in smartphones, tablets, smartwatches and portable batteries). However, they have relatively slow charge and discharge rates, which makes them less efficient in use (in the battery world, the measurement of charge speed and rate of depletion/discharge are known as the C rating, and higher is faster).

    In addition to having a lower C rating than LFP batteries, Lithium Ion-NMC batteries only have a lifespan of about 500 full charge cycles. In contrast, LFP batteries can handle over 3,000 cycles. LFP batteries also don’t generate as much heat as NMC batteries, making them safer and ideal for use in solar generators and electric vehicles.

    The BMS, a microprocessor-controlled device embedded in the solar generator, combined with software algorithms, ensures the battery’s safety and longevity by regulating the charging and discharging of the cells. It accomplishes this by monitoring the voltage and current of each cell in the battery pack and balancing them as needed. The BMS also shuts down the system if it detects an unsafe condition, such as over-voltage or over-temperature.

    The inverter converts the direct current (DC) output from the batteries and the solar panels to the alternating current (AC) that your home uses (for lamps, appliances and most gadgets). The inverter on a solar generator is rated in output watts (W). A small generator typically has a rating of about 500W, a medium-sized about 1,200W, and a large unit 2,000W or higher.

    In other words, the output wattage gives you an idea of how many devices can draw power from the generator simultaneously. A single electric fan might have a maximum draw of 70W, but a hairdryer or a portable induction burner running at maximum power may draw as much as 1,600W to 1,800W and overtax a medium-sized unit. Inverters also handle the combined input wattage from AC and DC power, so your maximum solar panel capacity is determined by the inverter’s capacity. If your inverter has a maximum input capacity of 400W, you cannot use more than two 200W panels or four 100W panels.

    A solar panel comprises photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert sunlight into direct current (DC) electricity. In a home setup, the DC current is then sent to an inverter, which is converted into alternating current (AC), the type of electricity used in your home. In a solar generator, energy is stored in the battery cells for conversion to AC (or use as DC) later.

    Solar panels integrate with solar generators using MPPT (maximum power point tracking) controllers. MPPT is a standard technology that manages the conversion from panel output. Generally speaking, any MPPT-compatible panel from any manufacturer can be used with any solar generator, providing the correct connector cables and adapters are also used (such as Anderson, MC4/PV4, XT-30/XT-60, and various barrel connectors) and that the maximum voltage and combined input wattage into your inverter is not exceeded. However, it is possible to run into cable incompatibilities and capacity mismatches, so we’d recommend you pair panels sold by your generator manufacturer with your generator for the highest compatibility and optimal performance.

    A solar panel’s performance depends on atmospheric conditions and your panel efficiency; inverters are about 95% efficient. That is: Is the sun shining? Even if you have a panel rated at 100W, you may find that it doesn’t work as well in cloudy or hazy weather, or if the panels are not in direct sunlight, or depending on the sun’s orientation during the day. Your panels could operate at 50% or less efficiency, maybe 50W. We never saw any manufacturer’s panels performing higher than 80% efficiency during our testing in South Florida during the summer of 2022, where we had light to medium cloud cover. Therefore, when making recharge calculations against the watt-hour capacity of your generator, assume a panel efficiency of 50% or less, depending on your typical weather conditions.

    Solar panels are rated by their power output in watts, and portable panel sizes can range from as small as 50 watts to as high as 400 watts. You’ll want to make sure you do not exceed the maximum input capacity of the generator from the panel array; most MPPT charge controllers do not allow you to hook up panels that exceed voltage requirements. Some vendors (such as Goal Zero) will enable you to “oversubscribe” your panel wattage (such as using 1,200W of total capacity when the inverter input capacity is only 600W) during less favorable conditions. However, once the conditions become favorable again, any excess energy is lost as heat.

    Depending on its design, a solar generator may be able to accommodate multiple solar panels hooked up in parallel, connected by long cables that use a variety of different types of connectors, which vary by manufacturer. Some panels are of a rugged, heavier, foldable metal design (also referred to as “briefcase”), and others are of a flexible, floppy design. Although they are heavier, these panels are generally easier to set up due to their rigid structure, and a single person can easily set up multiple panels. Briefcase designs are typically outdoor-rated, designed for continuous use and can be rained on without damaging the components.

    In contrast, the larger floppy designs can be more challenging to set up by a single person, are typically not rated by the manufacturer for continuous outdoor use and are recommended to be removed from the elements during bad weather. However, in most cases, this only applies to the cable connections, so if you seal those with duct tape, there’s no reason why you can’t leave such solar panels outside for days at a time; we certainly did for our testing, and we encountered no malfunctions.

    A solar generator set up on a patio, with multiple cable runs visible between patio furniture as well as an Astro refrigerator

    All generators were tested from June through August 2022 in variable sun conditions and varying weather. Generators were placed on a covered patio away from the elements. Long extension cables were connected to the panels placed outside the patio on a large outdoor pool deck. Panels were left outside for a week at a time.

    The test load included two 70W stand fans, a 60W AstroAI 15L refrigerator/freezer run at -4 degrees Fahrenheit for maximum load and 20W of LED lamps. Incidental loads included a 1,800W portable induction burner, a 1,800W espresso machine, a 1,600W hair dryer and dual 2A 240W commercial refrigerators. Various generators charged other generators to test maximum inverter loads. 15A and 20A circuits with GFCI were used for AC charging generators when solar conditions were unfavorable or to test dual-charging configurations.

    We measured whether the units were able to handle the test loads in terms of total wattage draw on the inverter, and measured how long it took for the battery to run out under typical real-world loads with the solar panels attached.

    We paid careful attention to ease of setup and use, simplicity of monitoring and industrial design and build quality issues, looking at how the design affected performance and use, potential issues with the durability of components, and the terms of the manufacturer’s warranty.

    Founded in 2012, Jackery is one of the oldest companies in the portable power station industry, and was key in popularizing these types of products. Its 500 series power station has been on the market since 2019 and is one of the most popular small solar generators. With its friendly industrial design and bright orange-and-black utilitarian look with monochrome LCD, it has spawned many clones.

    The Explorer 500’s battery chemistry also puts it behind the times. It uses a Lithium-Ion NMC battery, which runs hotter, charges more slowly and offers shorter lifespans with fewer charge cycles. That said, NMC batteries are lighter and more energy-dense, and the Explorer 500 is a solid, affordable performer, though it lacks up-to-date features like USB-C PD outputs for faster charging of modern portable electronics, still offering only USB-A ports. In addition to an external AC adapter that connects to its barrel-style DC power port, it uses a proprietary Jackery-to-barrel cable for its solar connection.

    The Jackery 1000 Pro is the popular battery brand’s newest portable power station, but as with its smaller sibling, it’s a bit behind the competition at this point. It uses a Lithium-Ion NMC, and with its larger battery pack, it needs more cooling than similarly sized LFP-based devices. Jackery claims 1,000 charge cycles, however, perhaps enabled by the unit’s dual onboard fans. We’d expect these to run quite a bit at higher loads. That said, given that NMC batteries are lighter and more energy-dense, the 1000 Pro packs a solid amount of capacity into a lightweight case. It’s got more contemporary USB-C PD ports on board as well, making it more useful all around with today’s mobile devices and laptops.

    For fast charging you can use a lot of panels. Large proprietary dongles connect to two Jackery panel cables, which attach to twin barrel-shaped solar connector jacks, letting you use up to four 200W panels on the 1000 Pro, which can get you a full charge in under two hours. The dongles aren’t used in simple two-panel or single-panel configurations.

    While it’s nice to have the options, we felt the extra connectors made for overly complex cable runs, and worry about difficulties in diagnosing problems should something go haywire. Also, unlike cables using locking MC4, Anderson or XT60 connectors, these cables can be disconnected by a simple tug, so you’ll want to watch out for dogs, kids or simple clumsiness.

    We had no issues running our test loads on 1000 Pro, and Jackery has one of the industry’s better warranties, providing up to five years of coverage if products are purchased directly from the company or an authorized reseller (Amazon works, if you fill out an application on Jackery’s site after purchasing). While we think for the long term purchasers would be better served going with a LiFePO4/LFP-based unit, Jackery’s warranty provides some peace of mind for those more comfortable with the older Lithium-Ion NMC-based technology.

    The Jackery Explorer 2000 Pro, the bigger model in the popular company’s lineup, uses the same Lithium-ion NMC battery technology and floppy-style, 18.2-pound SolarSaga 200W panels as the 1000 Pro, connecting with the same dongles to support up to six panels on this model for fast charging and supplying 2,160 watt-hours of capacity.

    Like its smaller siblings, the Explorer 2000 Pro proved an able performer in our testing and had no trouble pushing the loads we connected. Plus it is covered by Jackery’s long warranty if you buy direct. It just isn’t the most up-to-date solar generator, so especially at this capacity and price, we’d suggest looking at something more up to date.

    With a design very much like Jackery’s but with LiFePO4/LFP cells under the hood, the Oupes 1800, which offers 1,488 watt-hours of battery capacity and an 1,800W AC inverter, sits between the Jackery 1000 and 2000. It may fit the bill, though it doesn’t offer as long a warranty, nor does the brand have as long a history in power stations.

    We hooked the Oupes up to Jackery and Geneverse’s 200W panels and cabling (both of which appear to come from the same factory) and its own floppy four-segment 100W panels, which also appear quite similar to Jackery’s in design, and got good results all around. That said, we’d probably look to more established brands for this sort of product.

    Previously known as Generark, and like Oupes and numerous others, Geneverse is also making LFP-based Jackery lookalikes, which includes selling panels that are spitting images of the SolarSaga 200W, except that they are grey. Otherwise the cabling and dongle setup is identical to what Jackery sells currently for its 1000 Pro and 2000 Pro line.

    Their HomePower One Pro eschews the orange and black color palette of the Jackery 1000 Pro, opting for a dark plastic grey casing and a blue and black display with a data layout similar to its competitors. It has a 1,210 Wh battery, a 1,200W inverter and an 800W DC input, giving it a slight edge over the Jackery 1000 Pro in power output.

    Geneverse’s other advantages over the Jackery 1000 Pro include Wi-Fi-based app management, but we thought the app wasn’t nearly sophisticated or as well-designed as what we saw from EcoFlow, Goal Zero or even Bluetti. Its functionality is pretty basic, and felt its connectivity was not particularly reliable.

    Geneverse provides a five-year warranty if you buy directly from the company.

    Goal Zero, founded in 2009, is one of the standard-setters for the portable solar power station industry. It’s known for making well-made, exceptionally engineered products for people who work and play outdoors. The devices are expandable, utilizing the company’s Yeti Link/Yeti Tank 1,200 Wh lead acid battery technology, and can also power up to four of your home circuits with their Home Integration Kit transfer switch and subpanel.

    The Yeti 1500X is a powerful mid-size solar generator with a 1,516 Wh battery based on lithium-ion NMC chemistry. It can drive 2,000W of connected load with its inverter and can charge at up to 600W DC.

    It boasts an excellent app with smart systems management and notifications with reliable Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity (in our testing, the Goal Zero app and smart functionality stood out in particular, excelling compared to most products we looked at). Goal Zero is also one of the few manufacturers using a briefcase-style metal outdoor-rated panel design for its 100W and 200W panels, making it ideal for longer-term installations. The panels use Anderson-style parallel connections, which are more rugged than those used by most of the competition, and the cables are thicker. Despite their increased heft, we felt the Goal Zero panels were easier to set up than their “floppy” competitors due to their rigidity and stability.

    When charging with AC, the Yeti uses an external power adapter connected to the single Anderson charge port to reduce excess heat. Unlike several other devices we looked at, you can’t “dual charge” the Yeti with both AC and solar connected simultaneously.

    Despite employing less desirable battery chemistry than their competitors, the products performed exceptionally well with our test loads. Additionally, their rugged designs would be a good choice for many outdoor sporting/recreation and work scenarios. While we think overall LiFePO4-based designs are a better investment at this point, especially when you’re spending this much money, the Goal Zero Yeti models are solid, dependable and highly usable alternatives.

    If you want something big and built for the outdoors, the Goal Zero Yeti 3000X is a larger version of the company’s 1500X power station. Like its smaller sibling, it has a 2,000W inverter and can charge at 600W DC. The primary difference between the two is that the 1500X has a 1,516 Wh battery and bigger, heavier 3000X (which can roll on wheels) has a 3,032 Wh battery.

    If you need the additional capacity but want to stick with the tried and true, or need the Goal Zero’s bulletproof build and well-designed system of cables, panels, and accessories the Yeti 3000x maks a lot of sense.

    Until the EcoFlow Delta 2 showed up, the Anker 757 was our category winner for a medium-sized solar generator. It is still a strong contender, with LiFePO4/LFP battery chemistry and a good combination of features and performance at its price point. A 1,200 Wh LFP battery and six AC ports on its 1,500W inverter, plus a wide variety of USB and other DC outputs (as you’d expect given Anker’s background in mobile device charging) make it a versatile and capable unit.

    The Anker 757 does, however, lack the app management features of its competitors, it has no expansion capability and the unit is heavy for its size. Considering the inverter and battery size, we also felt the DC input capacity — only 300W — was anemic, making for slower charging than its competition. However, Anker boasts one of the best warranties in the industry, at five years, so it may still be a good choice for those who intend to use it heavily.

    The Lion Energy Safari ME is a small solar generator meant to be used with a large expansion battery as part of a bigger setup. Like the Goal Zero units, it boasts a heavy-duty design and uses outdoor-rated “briefcase” style 100W folding metal panels connected with thick cables terminating in Anderson connections. The 922Wh base LiFePO4/LFP battery is on the small side for other generators at this price point, but the device is expandable to 2,970 Wh, and has a 2,000W inverter capacity.

    We liked the ruggedized metal build of the unit. Still, we wished the 585W DC solar input was higher, and the panel capacity was 200W (or higher) like Goal Zero’s, as they aren’t very space-efficient for the amount of power they generate. We also discovered the unit employs an electromechanical switch (rather than digital) for locking onto AC versus DC solar inputs and isn’t designed to be plugged into both simultaneously. If you do, the generator clicks rapidly (and loudly) when there’s no solar input power at night — an issue the company is looking to resolve in the next hardware release.

    With so many new expandable models on the market, the Lion Energy Safari ME isn’t that great a value proposition. It is very expensive for the capacity the base unit offers out of the box, and even pricier when expanded to near 3,000 Wh compared to its competitors. In addition to a lack of app management, we felt that the unit was also short on the number and capabilities of AC and USB ports compared to its competitors. Given the “industrial” design and price point, we feel it should have a more extended warranty than a single year.

    As with EcoFlow and its Delta Pro, Bluetti is pushing the envelope on what a solar generator can do. With 2,048 Wh of LiFePO4/LFP battery capacity onboard, a full range of AC and DC outputs (including a 30A 125V NEMA TT-30 outlet for RV power and two 15W wireless charging pads) and the ability to add an additional 4,096 Wh capacity with dual 2,048 Wh B230 LFP batteries, for a total of 6,144 Wh, you can build a very large system around the AC200MAX. (If that’s not enough, Bluetti offers the 5,100 Wh EP500 and the 3,072 Wh AC500, which is expandable to 18,000 Wh of capacity for a whole-house emergency solution.)

    As with EcoFlow and Goal Zero, Bluetti has a sophisticated app, though it only has Bluetooth connectivity, not Wi-Fi. We found that it lost connection more often than the competition, and we had to reestablish it manually. The generator has a touchscreen display that allows you to configure every option, however, so an app isn’t essential to get the most use out of the AC200MAX.

    We had no issues with test loads on the device, and the company’s floppy 350W panels were easy to hook up and performed well. If you are looking for a generator with a lot of battery power and expansion capabilities at a reasonable price point, the AC200MAX would be a good choice, though EcoFlow’s Delta lineup is a bit easier to use and manage.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 scores: The pocket-size Perilogics Phone Mount is a must-have travel accessory | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 scores: The pocket-size Perilogics Phone Mount is a must-have travel accessory | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Traveling can be a daunting task for even the most seasoned of adventurers. Between delays and cancellations, lost luggage, uncomfortable seats, loud neighbors and much more, there’s a lot that can make what should be a straightforward travel journey less than ideal. So when a product comes around that helps to relieve some of those travel pains, we’re interested.

    Enter the Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount. Sitting with your neck cranked at a 45-degree angle to watch a film on your phone is not an option if you want to arrive at your destination without severe stiffness and pain. This small yet effective phone mount is meant to serve as the perfect solution to any in-flight entertainment viewing difficulties.

    I tried the Perilogics Phone Mount on a recent flight, and it’s become a staple in my travel wardrobe — and beyond. Here’s why.

    This multipurpose phone mount is the perfect addition to any traveler’s packing list. It works with most devices and, ultimately, can make any flight experience much more comfortable with an eye-level viewing experience. At just less than $15, this pocket-size device is a must-have for any traveler.

    I’ve flown a lot. As in, for several years, I’ve been averaging more than 100,000 miles flown per year (minus the largely stationary pandemic years, of course). The one issue that’s always existed for me: how to watch my favorite downloaded films and TV shows from my phone without cramping my neck.

    Especially as more and more airlines are doing away with seatback entertainment screens, it’s become ever more important to bring your own entertainment. I stumbled on the Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount while scrolling through Amazon travel essentials, and I was intrigued by its nearly 10,000 positive reviews. And, as it turns out, this small but mighty device has single-handedly solved a painful travel problem for me.

    underscored  underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount

    This simple-to-use seatback phone holder is a game changer for travelers of all budgets. Not only is it a budget in itself at just $13, but everyone can use it if you’ve got something to watch on your phone that isn’t available as part of the in-flight entertainment system (think Netflix exclusives, YouTube videos and the like).

    First off, it’s worth noting that this phone mount can work with just about any mobile device, regardless if you’re an Apple aficionado, a Google fanatic or anything in between. It worked with all of the Apple devices I tried — including while in a phone case. The company says that it can accommodate any screen up to 6.7 inches — in other words, all Apple iPhone devices will fit.

    underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount

    Once you’ve got your phone secured in the mount comes the fun part: getting it perfectly positioned for optimal viewing. This thing turns — like, a lot. The dual joints of the mount offer a multidirectional 360-degree rotation, allowing it to contort into some truly remarkable shapes. Ultimately, it’s finding the best way to situate the mount for a supreme horizontal viewing experience from your seat. And, as an added bonus, if you can arrange your phone in a manner that allows, you’ll still have access to your charging port to keep your device fully charged up for the full length of your movie.

    Once you’re ready to stabilize the mount, expand the 1.5-inch clamp and attach it to a part of the seat directly in front of you. When I tried using the device on a recent flight, I attached it to the literature pocket above the tray table, which worked perfectly. The clamp itself is padded with silicone, so it won’t move around if you have to touch your screen or if your plane hits some turbulence. And, thanks to the silicone padding, the mount felt perfectly secure and capable of potentially holding my iPhone 12 Pro Max for hours on end.

    underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount3

    My one slight gripe with the device was that the clamp was rather difficult to extend, requiring a bit of force to do so. For this reason, I recommend only attaching the mount to the seat in front of you when your phone is properly situated and you’re ready to stream so as to avoid disturbing your forward neighbor. Let’s face it, no one wants to be that annoying passenger who’s constantly banging the seat in front of them.

    This travel game changer goes above and beyond in helping to improve the travel experience, and it can also fit in the palm of your hand. When you’re done using the device, fold it back up into its compact stature and store it in any travel backpack or carry-on bag. On my flight, I found the device to be small enough to fit in my pocket during boarding so I didn’t have to get up and access my backpack in the overhead bin.

    It wasn’t until I returned home from my short weekend trip did I realize the number of other uses for the Perilogics Phone Mount. While it’s largely marketed as great for use on airplanes and in transit, it’s also a great tool to use at home. Tired of holding your phone in bed? Put it in its horizontal mode to sit flat on a bedside table. Want to watch a cooking tutorial while you’re making dinner? Clamp the mount onto a secure kitchen surface. For less than $15, this score of an item goes beyond use on a plane to help make at-home life more hands-free and convenient.

    underscored underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount2

    I love the Perilogics Phone Mount for its simple, effective structure and ability to solve one of the bigger points of in-flight comfort. I’ll be bringing it along on all of my upcoming summer trips and beyond.

    Looking for a travel credit card? Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as our best travel credit cards currently available.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 scores: The pocket-size Perilogics Phone Mount is a must-have travel accessory | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 scores: The pocket-size Perilogics Phone Mount is a must-have travel accessory | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Traveling can be a daunting task for even the most seasoned of adventurers. Between delays and cancellations, lost luggage, uncomfortable seats, loud neighbors and much more, there’s a lot that can make what should be a straightforward travel journey less than ideal. So when a product comes around that helps to relieve some of those travel pains, we’re interested.

    Enter the Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount. Sitting with your neck cranked at a 45-degree angle to watch a film on your phone is not an option if you want to arrive at your destination without severe stiffness and pain. This small yet effective phone mount is meant to serve as the perfect solution to any in-flight entertainment viewing difficulties.

    I tried the Perilogics Phone Mount on a recent flight, and it’s become a staple in my travel wardrobe — and beyond. Here’s why.

    This multipurpose phone mount is the perfect addition to any traveler’s packing list. It works with most devices and, ultimately, can make any flight experience much more comfortable with an eye-level viewing experience. At just less than $15, this pocket-size device is a must-have for any traveler.

    I’ve flown a lot. As in, for several years, I’ve been averaging more than 100,000 miles flown per year (minus the largely stationary pandemic years, of course). The one issue that’s always existed for me: how to watch my favorite downloaded films and TV shows from my phone without cramping my neck.

    Especially as more and more airlines are doing away with seatback entertainment screens, it’s become ever more important to bring your own entertainment. I stumbled on the Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount while scrolling through Amazon travel essentials, and I was intrigued by its nearly 10,000 positive reviews. And, as it turns out, this small but mighty device has single-handedly solved a painful travel problem for me.

    underscored  underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount

    This simple-to-use seatback phone holder is a game changer for travelers of all budgets. Not only is it a budget in itself at just $13, but everyone can use it if you’ve got something to watch on your phone that isn’t available as part of the in-flight entertainment system (think Netflix exclusives, YouTube videos and the like).

    First off, it’s worth noting that this phone mount can work with just about any mobile device, regardless if you’re an Apple aficionado, a Google fanatic or anything in between. It worked with all of the Apple devices I tried — including while in a phone case. The company says that it can accommodate any screen up to 6.7 inches — in other words, all Apple iPhone devices will fit.

    underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount

    Once you’ve got your phone secured in the mount comes the fun part: getting it perfectly positioned for optimal viewing. This thing turns — like, a lot. The dual joints of the mount offer a multidirectional 360-degree rotation, allowing it to contort into some truly remarkable shapes. Ultimately, it’s finding the best way to situate the mount for a supreme horizontal viewing experience from your seat. And, as an added bonus, if you can arrange your phone in a manner that allows, you’ll still have access to your charging port to keep your device fully charged up for the full length of your movie.

    Once you’re ready to stabilize the mount, expand the 1.5-inch clamp and attach it to a part of the seat directly in front of you. When I tried using the device on a recent flight, I attached it to the literature pocket above the tray table, which worked perfectly. The clamp itself is padded with silicone, so it won’t move around if you have to touch your screen or if your plane hits some turbulence. And, thanks to the silicone padding, the mount felt perfectly secure and capable of potentially holding my iPhone 12 Pro Max for hours on end.

    underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount3

    My one slight gripe with the device was that the clamp was rather difficult to extend, requiring a bit of force to do so. For this reason, I recommend only attaching the mount to the seat in front of you when your phone is properly situated and you’re ready to stream so as to avoid disturbing your forward neighbor. Let’s face it, no one wants to be that annoying passenger who’s constantly banging the seat in front of them.

    This travel game changer goes above and beyond in helping to improve the travel experience, and it can also fit in the palm of your hand. When you’re done using the device, fold it back up into its compact stature and store it in any travel backpack or carry-on bag. On my flight, I found the device to be small enough to fit in my pocket during boarding so I didn’t have to get up and access my backpack in the overhead bin.

    It wasn’t until I returned home from my short weekend trip did I realize the number of other uses for the Perilogics Phone Mount. While it’s largely marketed as great for use on airplanes and in transit, it’s also a great tool to use at home. Tired of holding your phone in bed? Put it in its horizontal mode to sit flat on a bedside table. Want to watch a cooking tutorial while you’re making dinner? Clamp the mount onto a secure kitchen surface. For less than $15, this score of an item goes beyond use on a plane to help make at-home life more hands-free and convenient.

    underscored underscored Perilogics Universal In-Flight Airplane Phone Mount2

    I love the Perilogics Phone Mount for its simple, effective structure and ability to solve one of the bigger points of in-flight comfort. I’ll be bringing it along on all of my upcoming summer trips and beyond.

    Looking for a travel credit card? Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as our best travel credit cards currently available.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best plant identification apps for mobile in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    Best plant identification apps for mobile in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Spring has officially sprung and people will be spending more time in the great outdoors as the season gears up. Whether you’re looking for help in identifying plants along your morning hike or in designing the flower or food garden of your dreams, there is a mobile plant identification app that can help you. Ditto if you’re wondering if that glossy leaf your loved one pulled up while camping is poison ivy, if that house plant your cat just nibbled on will make it sick, or for any particular reason you may have.

    “We are driven to identify plants for many reasons,” explains Erin C. Hill, Ph.D., an Academic Specialist in the Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU). “Sometimes it is a curiosity about the world around us,” she writes, and at “other times it is out of the desire or need to manage areas like gardens, agricultural fields, restored habitats, and/or natural preserves.” Dr. Hill’s responsibilities include collaborating on plant and seed identification as a member of MSU’s Plant & Pest Diagnostics team.

    In her article, Dr. Hill discusses how plant identification apps for smartphones have seen “significant improvements” over the past several years, and how these apps offer folks “the opportunity to take a photo and get an instant identification in many cases.” With this in mind, we’ve tested five plant identification apps available on Android and iOS that you can use to quickly find out what plant you’re interested in, whether you’re hiking outdoors with loved ones or starting an indoor garden that you want your pets to be safe around.

    Over the course of several weeks, we’ve tested FlowerChecker, LeafSnap Premium by Appixi, PlantID by Control, PlantNet and PlantSnap Pro on a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone. Ultimately, we named PlantNet our top overall pick due to its level of accuracy that made the process of identifying our test plants a breeze.

    Best plant identification app for mobile overall

    During testing, we found PlantNet easy to use, accurate and fast. This free app guides you during setup, lets you search by map or flora, and suggests you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve its plant identification.

    PlantNet was the fastest, most accurate plant identification app tested on our Android phone. We found the app easy to use, highly accurate and able to provide fast identification.

    • Pricing: Free
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS, web
    • Supported languages: 45 languages including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Turkish
    • Key features: Collaborative user platform; searchable database containing over 45 floras and 46,050 species; plants are searchable by theme (invasive plants, useful plants, weeds and world flora) or by geographical flora map (plants found in Africa, Asia, Central America, Europe, North America and Oceania-Pacific); identify plants by their leaf, flower, fruit or bark; enable geolocation (GPS) to improve identification

    PlantNet is a collaborative “citizen science project” dedicated to worldwide plant biodiversity monitoring. The mobile app launched in 2013 and the app, along with a web version, was made available for both botanists and the general public. Since then, anyone all over the world can use the app to take a photo of a plant and send it to the app for identification.

    How PlantNet works

    The app is based on image recognition and relies on member involvement, so it’s important to provide it with quality images. So, first, you take a photo and send it to the app. Next, it automatically compares the image to the thousands of images other users have added to its botanical database. Then, the app lets you view a list of potential species that might match. You then “vote” for the species that seems to be the right one. The algorithm collects that information and analyzes it against the database’s images from other users. It then decides the plant’s identity and informs you of the decision. PlantNet claims its database contains over 45 floras and 46,050 plant species.

    PlantNet’s origins and sponsors

    PlantNet was developed by computer engineers and botanists from a consortium that has gathered multiple French research institutes as sponsors of the project, including the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) and the Tela Botanica network. It is supported by the Agropolis Foundation.

    Easy setup, helpful advice

    Installation of PlantNet on our Android smartphone was a breeze. Once installed, the app gave us the choice to follow its guided setup screens or to skip them. Initially, we planned to skip them but, ultimately, we decided to follow the guided prompts since the app advised us we’d get better, more accurate identifications if we did. In no time, we successfully created our account. Users can immediately join different Groups, which are collections of users who share common interests or geographical location. We joined some groups that interested us. PlantNet’s five most popular groups each contain over 1,000 members. The app’s most popular groups are:

    • Flowers of France,
    • Plants of Europe,
    • Medicinal plants, herbs, and foraging for wild edibles,
    • Cactus and succulents, and
    • Houseplants.

    PlantNet also offers helpful advice on how to take a good plant picture for the app, and provides examples of what they don’t want and what they do want, which we appreciated as we began testing.

    • Step 1: Use your smartphone’s camera to zoom in on one flower (or leaf, fruit, stem),
    • Step 2: Click on the in-frame item to focus on it, and
    • Step 3: Take the picture, making sure it contains just one organ (item) and is centered, sharp, without fingers, and has a natural or neutral, blurred background.
    PlantNet offers helpful advice on how to take a good plant picture for the app, including bad examples of what they do not want and good examples of what they do want.

    Accurate plant identification

    PlantNet can identify plants and trees by analyzing a photo of their leaf, flower, fruit or bark. The app guided us to an easy-to-use screen where we could snap a plant’s photo and ask for an identification back. We took a photo of each of our test plants both inside our local garden center and at home. We then asked PlantNet to identify each plant and waited for the answer. The whole process of snapping a pic and then receiving an answer took mere seconds each time. PlantNet correctly identified all of the plants we asked it to, down to the finest detail. The app was able to tell us that the flower in question was not only a tulip, for example, but that it was Didier’s tulip (Tulipa gesneriana), a species of plant in the Liliaceae (or lily) family. Other apps we tested weren’t so detailed and accurate.

    In our local garden center, we used the PlantNet app on our Samsung smartphone to identify these pretty flowers. PlantNet quickly and correctly identified them as Didier’s tulips or Tulipa gesneriana, a species of plant in the Liliaceae (or lily) family.

    PlantNet recommended we enable its geolocation (GPS) feature to automatically and more accurately identify our plants, which we did. We could identify plants via the Map option or the Special Floras option. The Map option includes searches for plants found in Africa, Asia, North America, Canada, Central America, Europe, and Oceania-Pacific.

    The Special Floras option includes search themes such as World flora, Useful plants, Weeds, Invasive plants, Useful plants of Tropical Africa and Useful plants of Asia. You can also have it identify plants commonly found in regions, parks and protected areas.

    With PlantNet, you can identify plants using the Map or Special Floras options. Special Flora areas include regions, parks and protected areas, etc. The app recommends you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve the identification.

    Like most of the other apps we tested, PlantNet is available in multiple languages. The app can be used by plant enthusiasts all across the world for this reason. But at 45 languages, it supports the most of all the apps we tested, including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Turkish.

    There really wasn’t anything we didn’t like about PlantNet. This plant identification app does what it claims to do, and does it quickly and accurately.

    PlantNet was fast and highly accurate in our plant identification tests. Given that PlantNet is also free and easy to use, we recommend it as the go-to plant identification app for most people.

    best plant identification apps5_inline_cnnu

    If you or your loved ones are outdoors in nature for any reason, it’s important to avoid poisonous plants like poison ivy or poison oak since nobody wants the rash that can result from touching their leaves. Plant identification apps can help you identify harmless flowers and plants you may want to purchase for your garden or backyard but they can also help you avoid poisonous plants you may encounter. Just use your smartphone to snap a pic of the unknown plant to identify it before touching it.

    But we’re only human — what if you forget to take your smartphone on your hike or other outdoor activity? There are additional precautions you can take to avoid rashes from poisonous plants. Namely, be sure to educate yourself first before touching unknown plants. In its article, “Outsmarting Poison Ivy and Other Poisonous Plants,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discusses how you can recognize poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac. To avoid getting rashes, the FDA offers the following tips (which we’ve condensed and summarized):

    • Tip 1: Educate yourself. The FDA advises you to learn what poison ivy, oak, sumac and other poisonous plants look like so you can avoid them. Watch the FDA’s educational video on what to know.
    • Tip 2: Keep tools clean. According to the FDA, it is a good idea to wash your garden tools and gloves regularly. The FDA suggests wearing long sleeves, long pants (tucked into boots) and impermeable gloves if you think there’s a chance you might be working near poison ivy.
    • Tip 3: Wash your pet. The FDA says most pets are not sensitive to poison ivy, but the oil can stick to their fur and cause a reaction in someone who pets them. So, wash your pet if it was playing outside alone or was on a hike in the woods with you. The FDA points out that your pet may have brushed up against poison ivy, oak or sumac. Use pet shampoo and water to wash your pet, and the FDA again advises wearing impermeable gloves while doing so.
    • Tip 4: Clean yourself. Wash your skin in soap and cool water as soon as possible if you come in contact with a poisonous plant. The FDA says the sooner you clean your skin, the greater the chance you can remove the plant oil or help prevent further spread.
    These tulips are pretty but considered unsafe for dogs, cats and horses.

    Any new parent knows that baby-proofing the house is a crucial step in helping to keep their baby safe. Pet parents, too, need to be mindful of dangers lurking inside as well as outside the home. Did you know certain plants can be lethal to animals if ingested? In its article, “Potentially Dangerous Items for Your Pet,” the FDA notes the plants and flowers that can be harmful if your pet eats them. According to the FDA, the potentially dangerous items listed “can vary in how toxic they are to pets. Some may be only mildly toxic while others may cause severe illness or even death.”

    The FDA continues by pointing out that “the degree of toxicity often depends on several factors,” including the type of animal (cat, dog, or other species) that ate the item, how much the animal ate, and which part of the plant (bulb, flower or leaf) was eaten.

    Related: How to start an indoor garden and what to buy for one, according to experts

    You can also find toxicity information for plants from a pet poison control center such as the Animal Poison Control Center (APCC) of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). You can contact its APCC regarding any animal poison-related emergency at 888-426-4435, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The ASPCA offers comprehensive, detailed lists of plants that are toxic and non-toxic to cats and dogs. The following are 10 plants commonly found in the home or in the yard that are toxic to dogs, cats and horses; they are listed in alphabetical order. Note the clinical signs of illness to watch out for.

    • Plant 1: Aloe VeraCan cause vomiting (not in horses), lethargy, diarrhea
    • Plant 2: Azalea Can cause vomiting (not in horses), diarrhea, weakness, cardiac failure
    • Plant 3: CarnationCan cause mild gastrointestinal signs, mild dermatitis
    • Plant 4: ChrysanthemumCan cause vomiting, diarrhea, hyper-salivation, incoordination, dermatitis
    • Plant 5: DaffodilCan cause vomiting, salvation, diarrhea; large ingestions cause convulsions, low blood pressure, tremors and cardiac arrhythmias. Bulbs are the most poisonous part
    • Plant 6: DaisyCan cause vomiting, diarrhea, hyper-salivation, incoordination, dermatitis
    • Plant 7: GeraniumCan cause vomiting, anorexia, depression, dermatitis
    • Plant 8: Hydrangea Can cause vomiting, depression, diarrhea
    • Plant 9: ParsleyCan cause photosensitization (sunburn, dermatitis); large amounts are needed to cause this effect
    • Plant 10: TulipCan cause vomiting, depression, diarrhea, hyper-salivation. Highest concentration of toxin in bulb
    This orchid is considered safe for this curious dog.

    We conducted part of our testing for this review in our local Pike’s Nurseries garden center. In its How-To section of its website, Pike’s Nurseries says that if pet parents have their heart set on owning a certain plant or plants, that they should do their “research and be strategic about placement (like hanging plants and tall shelves).”

    Pike’s Nurseries also suggests trying a faux version of a toxic houseplant to be completely safe. The following are some nontoxic house plants that the garden center says are safe for pets:

    best plant identification apps4_inline_cnnu

    During our pre-testing research, we found a large number of plant identification apps from which to choose. We selected our five candidates to test based on desired features, user reviews, and availability on at least Android and iOS mobile platforms. We downloaded each of the five plant identification apps to a Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone. We evaluated the apps based on their ease of installation and use, key features, pricing, any notable differentiators and the overall user experience.

    To test the accuracy of the identification processes, we made multiple trips to our local Pike’s Nursery (which is one of 15 garden centers in the metro Atlanta region of the United States). With their permission, we snapped photos of different plants on display inside the store. We had all the plant identification apps try to identify some Tulipa gesneriana (Didier’s tulips), Polyscias scutellaria (shield aralia or plum aralia), Ficus pumila (creeping fig or climbing fig) and Viola wittrockiana (garden pansy).

    We then compared all the apps’ accuracy and speed in their identifications. Since the plants were already identified by labels and signs in the store, all we had to do was note whether or not the apps’ identifications matched the plants’ store labels and signs. We also had all the apps try to identify a Schlumbergera (Christmas cactus), a plant we had inside our home during testing. We compared all the apps’ accuracy as they tried to identify this plant, too.

    For this review, we focused on how well each app would work for the average user, no matter the reason for using it — gardening, hiking, walking or various other outdoor activities. After all, if an app is hard to use, falters in key metrics such as accuracy or reliability, or otherwise presents obstacles while using, then the app can’t be deemed useful as a practical matter.

    best plant identification apps2_inline_cnnu

    • Pricing: Free to install but charges $1 per correct plant identification
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: English
    • Key features: Identification of plants, moss, lichens and fungi; identification is performed by international botanists and horticulture experts rather than by a computer algorithm. You take a photo of an unknown plant, send it to their team of experts and one or more of them will collaborate to identify it for you. They will provide the genus (taxonomy rank), species and the common name of the plant along with the level of certainty of the identification.

    FlowerChecker is a plant identification app that is easy to install and use but its plant identification process is much different than the rest of the apps we tested. And that’s because a team of human experts — botanists and horticulture professionals — do the actual plant identification work here, not artificial intelligence (AI) or other automation within the app.

    When we took a photo of each of our test plants and sent off our “What is this?” queries, the expert would respond with the correct identification. The experts are touted as being, well, experts, and they may very well be. However, they remained anonymous. We would have liked it better if they were identified by full name, title or other credentials.

    Also, the response time with FlowerChecker is unpredictable. It took as long as a day or more for us to get the results to some of our queries but, with others, we received results within an hour. There was just no way to tell in advance how long the question-and-answer process would take.

    FlowerChecker alerts you when your plant identification request is fulfilled and tells you which of its botanists answered your query. You will receive the Genus, Species and the Common name of the plant along with the level of certainty of the identification.

    FlowerChecker uses an unusual pricing model. It’s free to install but we had to pay one credit — or approximately one US dollar — before we could even see the results of our plant query. One credit per query can add up! So, the app gets the cash upfront, so to speak, for correct identifications. However, the good news is, the app only charges for accurate results. So, if the team cannot identify a plant correctly, the app lets you know you owe nothing, a nice touch.

    • Pricing: $5 per month (billed monthly) or $26 per year (billed annually). No free trial for Premium version
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: 23 languages including Arabic, Chinese, Dutch, English, French, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Slovak and Turkish
    • Key features: Identification of plants, flowers, fruits and trees; searchable database containing over 32,000 plant species from all over the world; unlimited plant identification; unlimited reminders; step-by-step plant care guides; plant care reminders; ability to share identifications with friends; lets you create collections of your favorite plants

    LeafSnap Premium is simple to install and setup is a breeze. It has some accurate and easy-to-use features, too, including a basic plant Identifier and a deeper, more accurate Advanced Identify function. The Advanced Identify function can identify a plant in three ways: from a photo of the whole plant, from a photo of its flower or from its leaf only. Being able to identify a whole plant from just its leaf can come in handy for pet parents. If you have a cat and see a leaf hanging from said cat’s lip, for example, that may be enough to identify what the cat just bit into and whether or not that was a safe snack for kitty.

    LeafSnap Premium’s basic plant Identifier worked well, too, during our testing, providing mostly fast, accurate identifications in all of our test cases.

    There’s also a Diagnostics feature to help you figure out what to do to make your plant healthier, which can be handy if you’re clueless about plant woes and how to fix them.

    (left to right): Here we took a photo of the Polyscias scutellaria (Shield aralia) plants in our local nursery. LeafSnap Premium correctly identified their delicate, lacy green foliage as well as identified the Ficus pumila (Climbing fig) plants displayed next to them.

    LeafSnap Premium is available for $5 per month or $26 per year. This app’s annual cost is on the pricier end of the plant identification apps we tested, but it might be worth the expense if you need to use it for an extended period of time.

    • Pricing: After a three-day free trial, PlantID costs $10 per month (billed monthly)
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS, web
    • Supported languages: English, Czech
    • Key features: Identification of over 12,000 plants including flowers, trees, bushes, fungi and lichens from all over the world; offers rock identification; Health Assessment feature identifies 100 plant diseases; uses machine learning (ML)

    PlantID is a plant identification app that is easy to install, set up and, for the most part, use. PlantID adds a fun additional feature to plant identification: rock identification. This can be neat for those interested in rocks for gardening purposes or just as a hobby.

    However, during testing, this feature brought up an unexpected result. When we took a photo of the tulips on display inside our local nursery, we asked the app to identify them. But we must have hit the wrong button in the app or included an item unseen to us in addition to the tulips in the photo. Why? Because we received a surprising and confusing identification: amethyst!

    Perhaps the app spotted an amethyst near the plant in the photo we took? Whatever the reason, the app identified the flower as an amethyst instead of a tulip. But when we tried again and this time hit the correct button, the app correctly identified the tulips. And much to our delight, PlantID also correctly identified the rest of our test plants.

    (left to right): Plant ID can identify both plants and rocks. When we snapped a photo of the yellow Viola wittrockiana, Plant ID initially and incorrectly identified them as an Amethyst (match rate: 21 percent). But we tried again and its second attempt was accurate (match rate: 57 percent).

    One thing we didn’t like was PlantID’s chintzy trial period. A three-day freemium potentially sets the user up to subscribe to the $10-per-month app before they realize the trial period has expired.

    • Pricing: After a seven-day free trial, PlantSnap Pro costs $20 per year (billed annually)
    • Supported platforms: Android, iOS
    • Supported languages: 37 languages including Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish
    • Key features: Identification of plants, flowers, cacti, succulents and mushrooms; searchable database containing over 600,000 plants; the iOS version uses auto-detect, augmented reality (AR) and machine learning (ML); offers gardening tips and plant care instructions; lets you create collections of your favorite plants

    PlantSnap Pro is a plant identification app that is easy to install, set up and use. To set up, you just need to give the app access to your smartphone’s camera and gallery for the app to function. A couple of clicks later and the app is ready.

    This plant identification app offers some neat features we appreciated. Its “auto detect” feature can automatically find the plant in your photo and it helps you with cropping options, too. The app also offers guides to help you care for the plant and recommends a few products to help you care for it, too. (But you can skip that recommendation part entirely if you prefer.)

    The app has an active community of plant lovers who you can chat with to help resolve your plant issues, share photos, and dive into other plant-related discussions.

    All good things aside, PlantSnap Pro’s accuracy was more than a little off in two instances, which was disappointing. When we took a photo of a Christmas cactus on our table, the app incorrectly identified it as a Dracaena arborea. And inside our test nursery, the app identified Didier’s tulips as just generic tulips.

    (left to right): During testing we found PlantSnap’s accuracy to be a bit off, as it incorrectly identified more than one test plant. Here it identifies our Christmas Cactus (Schlumbergera sp.) as a Dracaena arborea.

    PlantSnap Pro offers a seven-day free trial, which is very much welcomed and gives you sufficient time to try out the app. Once you commit, its $20 annual cost is highly affordable.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing coverage:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How does Stanley’s new Quencher tumbler compare to the cult-favorite original? | CNN Underscored

    How does Stanley’s new Quencher tumbler compare to the cult-favorite original? | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Unless you live under a rock — or don’t have an Instagram account — you’re likely familiar with Stanley’s cult-favorite Adventure Quencher Travel Tumblers. The cup of choice among countless influencers, the Adventure Quencher was launched in 2016 by Stanley, a 109-year-old brand known for camping gear and rough-and-tumble outdoors accessories.

    While an unlikely duo, Stanley and content creators are now a recipe for success that other brands are trying desperately to emulate: Today, the cup sells out within minutes of literally every single restock, thanks to influencers urging their massive followings to buy it the second it becomes available. Not only has the Adventure Quencher amassed a waitlist over 150,000 people long since its inception, but #stanleytumbler has more than 25M views on TikTok.

    An early adopter of the Adventure Quencher, I’m here to say that all this hype is, in fact, worthy. As a product tester, I get a lot of items sent my way, from leggings and sports bras to toasters and water bottles. A couple of years ago, amid the sea of swag on my dining room table, the Stanley cup not only stood out and piqued my interest, but it quickly became my daily go-to.

    Currently in stock at Amazon in a few colors, the Adventure Quencher is also in the news because it just got a new and improved sister cup dubbed the Quencher H2.0 Flowstate Tumbler, which just launched today in a new soft matte finish. Given my love of the original, I had to try out Stanley’s latest iteration and (spoiler) it’s really good. Here’s why.

    It’s hard to improve on such a good thing, but Stanley’s done it with the Quencher H2.0 Flowstate while managing to keep the price exactly the same ($20 to $45). Slightly tailored, the small changes make a big difference.

    Stanley Adventure Tumbler 1 Amazon.jpg

    What makes the cup oh-so-great? Well, for one, it’s enormous. Sure, it comes in 14-, 20- and 30-ounce formats, but everyone who’s in on the Stanley secret knows that the 40-ounce size — which has a trusty built-in handle — is the way to go.

    And that enormity also lends itself to keeping me extremely hydrated. I’m a hyper-thirsty person anyways, but the Adventure Quencher’s huge size allows for less time refilling and more time drinking. If I refill it just twice in one day, I’m close to hitting The U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s recommended 92 ounces a day consumption. The cup’s double-wall insulation also keeps beverages hot for seven hours and iced for two full days — seriously, it’s true, ice cubes stay intact for 48 hours.

    Another detail I love is that despite its size, the Adventure Quencher has a tapered, slim base that fits into my car cup holder. This is big for me (and all the suburban moms who adore it), because I’m in my car a dozen hours every week driving my kids around, and having all the necessities in there (including water) is a must. More to know: If you’re not a straw person, no worries — the cup has a rotating cover allowing for three positions: straw, sipping spout or full-cover closure (more on that below).

    And there’s the hype factor. It’s a simple equation if you think about it. Everyone wants the Adventure Quencher and it’s really hard to get. Strangers often come up to me while I’m running errands or sitting on the soccer field sidelines to ask a) if the cup is as good as people say and b) how I managed to get one. Point being: People notice this cup, they want to talk about it and, subsequently, they want one too. All the cute colorways — from neutral creams to bubblegum pink — also make the cups perfect for the ’gram. Oh, and I’d be remiss not to mention that it can be popped into the bottom rack of the dishwasher at the end of the day. (Though, full disclosure, I keep mine bedside for middle-of-the-night hydration!)

    Stanley Tumbler 3

    It’s hard to improve on such a good thing, but Stanley’s done it with the Quencher H2.0 Flowstate while managing to keep the price exactly the same ($20 to $45). Slightly tailored, the small changes make a big difference.

    That handle I mentioned earlier, for instance, is a key part of the original Adventure Quencher’s success — it’s ergonomic and makes carrying the large cup a breeze — and the Quencher H2.0 has a new two-toned “comfort grip” that lines the handle. Is this a necessary detail? No. Do I love it? Absolutely. Not only does it look great, but it also feels luxurious and helps me get a better grip on the handle. Oh, and the Quencher H2.0’s 30-ounce size comes with a handle, whereas the Adventure Quencher 30-ounce doesn’t.

    The Quencher H2.0’s straw also got upgraded with a new silicone seal that wraps the straw base and aims to prevent spilling. Full disclosure: If you knock over your Adventure Quencher, water is going to flood out onto the floor. This new “splash-resistant” detail isn’t completely watertight, but it definitely slows the spillage down to a drip, which is about as good as you’re going to get with a straw tumbler-style cup.

    And while this detail is invisible to the eye, I’m a huge supporter of Stanley’s commitment to sustainability, which is front and center in the Quencher H2.0 — the cup is made from material composed of 90% recycled stainless steel.

    What we didn’t liked about the Adventure Quencher and Quencher H2.0 Flowstate Tumbler

    Stanley Tumbler 4

    There’s not much to be mad about when it comes to this cup. If I had to pick something I’d home in on the fact that neither of the Quencher cups is spillproof, making it a no-go for long-distance traveling. For instance, you can’t throw the cup in your tote as you would an airtight water bottle. When traveling this summer, I was without my beloved Adventure Quencher and, as a result, drinking way less water. It’s not often you miss a cup every day while you’re out of town, but that’s exactly where I was.

    Stanley Tumbler 2.jpg

    I’ve tried a ton of cups and water bottles over the years and the Quenchers are hands down my favorite, even over spillproof bottles, mainly because the Stanley cups’ straw design makes it super easy to be drinking on the go, whereas a water bottle requires unscrewing a cap or flipping up a spout — sure, that takes only a second, but it adds a preliminary step to every sip I take.

    When compared to other cups with straws, the Stanley tumblers definitely win in the quality and design categories. The Reduce 40-Ounce Cold1 Insulated Stainless Steel Straw Tumbler Mug is a fan favorite at Target and it has a nifty sip-or-straw lid and a cheaper $25 price tag, but it doesn’t fit in standard cup holders, and while promising to keep water cold for 34 hours, I found ice melting after a few hours.

    I’m a big fan of the Yeti’s coolers, chairs and beyond, but the Rambler 25-Ounce Stackable Cup is also inferior to the Quenchers due to its lack of a handle — which makes carrying it around cumbersome and stressful when my hands are full! — and a bare-bones lid that only accommodates a straw. (Editor’s note: Yeti recently launched a new Rambler Mug, which comes in 25- and 35-ounce capacities and does feature a handle.) If you want a spout/locked lid, you have to spend an additional $10 on the brand’s beloved Magslider Lid.

    You can’t go wrong with either the Stanley Adventure Quencher Travel Tumbler or the newer Stanley Quencher H2.0 Flowstate Tumbler, but if I was forced to pick, I’d go with the new and improved Quencher H2.0 Flowstate. The sealed straw spout and silicone-lined handle have me smitten, and the recycled nature of the cup makes it a feel-good, planet-friendly choice.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best robot vacuums of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best robot vacuums of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Robot vacuums are designed to make your life easier, cleaning the floors so you don’t have to. Or at least, don’t have to do it as often. They’re particularly great for keeping up with pet hair but can also keep your house tidy when you’re just too busy (and they’ll do it better because they don’t mind vacuuming every day).

    The best robot vacuums will skillfully and thoroughly clean your floors with little or no effort from you. We tested 9 robot vacuums to see which one is best at navigating a home, picking up dirt and simplifying your life.

    The best robot vacuum overall

    The iRobot j7+ is the best robot vacuum you can buy right now, with simpler mapping, more cleaning power and smarter features than anything else we tested.

    The best affordable robot vacuum

    The Eufy 11s may not be smart, but its brute force approach covered our test area almost as well as the connected robots, plus it’s quiet, slim enough to reach under most furniture and does a great job cleaning.

    The best robot vacuum for pet hair

    The budget-priced iLife V3S Pro uses a suction tube like a traditional vacuum cleaner rather than the roller brushes employed by other robot vacuums, and does a better job picking up pet hair without clogging.

    The best value self-emptying robot vacuum

    If you want the convenience of a self-emptying vacuum but want to save a couple of hundred dollars over an iRobot or Samsung, the Shark IQ XL cleans and performs almost as well for a lot less.

    The iRobot j7+ is the best robot vacuum you can buy right now. It beat out all the others in mapping, creating virtual boundaries and detecting and avoiding obstacles, which means it’s the best “set it and forget it” smart robot vacuum — and it even empties itself. More importantly, it picks up dust and debris and cat litter from hardwood floors and low-pile carpeting better than the others we tested.

    iRobot uses what it calls Dirt Detect, focusing more cleaning effort when it detects a concentration of dirt. I spilled cat litter on the hardwood floor and the j7+ recognized it as a “dirt event.” It got to the end of the cat litter spill, reversed itself back to the beginning of the spill area and took another pass at it. It did this several times until all the litter was picked up. Even litter that got scattered by the sweeping motion of the side brush was eventually picked up.

    The j7+ leaves behind neat rows of just-vacuumed carpeting and the powerful suction of the unit was able to pick up cat litter and pet hair in my bedroom carpeting. Its multi-surface rubber brushes on the underside kept the brush from getting tangled with pet hair; only the iLife V3S Pro did a better job at not getting tangled, but that’s because it doesn’t have a roller brush like the j7+ or the other robot vacuums we tested.

    j7+ full shot2.jpg

    When the j7+ is done cleaning, it returns to the base and empties itself into a bag in the larger dustbin at the back of the base. You need to change that bag every two months or so, but other than that, you likely won’t have to interact with it very much at all.

    In our testing, the j7+ was the easiest robot to direct while mapping, doing a much better job than the Neato BotVac (which couldn’t complete mapping our typical single-floor home in time) and the Shark IQ, which required a lot of work editing and creating virtual dividers to mark rooms. With the j7+, it was easy to set up virtual no-go zones (we blocked off the area around our cat condo). Once the J7+ completes the initial mapping setup of your home — which takes some effort and input from you — the robot takes care of the rest.

    robot-j7-map.PNG

    The j7+ also did a superb job of steering clear of items like headphones and lamp cords, outdoing similar high-end smart robots like the Samsung JetBot+ courtesy of its front-mounted sensor and lights. Right now it only recognizes certain objects like cords, headphones and pet waste, but once you’ve mapped your home, it requests feedback after encountering objects and over time it will learn more about what you leave out and add more objects to its list of items to be avoided.

    At just 3.4 inches high, the j7+ fits more easily under furniture than the taller Samsung JetBot+. The Clean Base is shorter and shallower than Samsung’s emptying bin base, taking up less space in a room or under a table. It also has a hidden storage area where you can stash your extra bags.

    The Roomba j7+ is not perfect. Those high-end smart features will cost you: At $699 it’s one of the most expensive vacuums we tested. It’s also the loudest robot vacuum we tested. There’s no such thing as it sneaking up on you; you’ll always know when its running. When the vacuum empties itself into the base following a cleaning run, it’s like a jet engine taking off. Luckily it doesn’t last too long. It would be nice to have the option to keep it from emptying after certain runs as it gets super loud, but it is a minor downside for such an effective robot vacuum.

    Underscored best robot vacuum Eufy 11s

    If you don’t want smart features like mapping, don’t need a self-emptying dustbin and don’t mind picking up before you start the vacuum, the Eufy 11S is the budget robot vacuum we recommend. It’s a basic and affordable vacuum with a slim profile, good suction and quiet operation, and should work well for anyone who wants to maintain their floors in between manual vacuuming.

    The Eufy does a superb job picking up dirt, excelling on hardwood floors, tile and low-pile carpets. It filled its dustbin with pet hair and cat litter, though it wasn’t able to get up all the litter on a higher-pile carpet.

    What sets the Eufy 11S above the budget competition is the ability to change the power level while the unit is cleaning. It offers Standard, Boost IQ and Max. This is the only unit we tested that lets you change the power and suction level while the vacuum is operating. The more expensive Shark IQ XL and the Ecovacs Deebot N79S can only be changed with the remote when the unit is stopped. I appreciated this feature as I was able to turn on Boost IQ and then Max when the vacuum got close to the living room, which has a medium-pile carpet. It performed admirably climbing up onto the carpet to clean, though it did get stuck several times on the base of my barstools and had to be rescued.

    Unlike our overall pick, the Eufy 11S doesn’t have any smart mapping features, so you can’t create a map or direct it with Alexa or Google — it’s a classic “bump bot” and finds its way by random or bounce navigation, running in a straight line until it bangs into an obstacle like a table or chair leg. This ends up in surprisingly good overall coverage, but you may find that some areas that trap the robot (under a table, for instance) get lots of attention, and more open areas (like the middle of the living room) just get one quick pass.

    It took a few hours for the vacuum to fully clean my entire home, which is about 1,500 square feet, and watching as it maneuvered in and out of my office several times for varying lengths of time made me a little frazzled, but to get smart linear navigation, you’ll need to spend at least $200 more.

    Luckily the Eufy has a recharge and resume feature, so if it runs low on battery, it makes its way back to the base to recharge itself and when ready resumes the cleaning job. In our testing this worked well, except for the fact that it resumed right in the middle of a dinner with friends, but it was easy enough to stop the cleaning run by pressing the button on the vacuum.

    The Eufy is smart enough to keep itself from getting into trouble — in our testing, it had no trouble detecting stairs with a combination of infrared sensors and anti-drop sensors. And at just 2.8 inches tall, the Eufy 11S is almost a full inch shorter than the slightly more expensive Roborock S4, allowing it to get under more furniture like console tables and kids’ beds.

    The dustbin on the 11S needs to be emptied manually, like others in this price range. It’s easy to open and empty, even easier than the higher-end Shark IQ XL. Since there’s no indicator to show when the bin is full, we recommend emptying it each time it returns to the base to recharge. This ensures the bin won’t fill up mid-cleaning run. You’ll also get the satisfaction of seeing how much dirt and pet hair the vacuum picks up that you might not otherwise be able to reach.

    The included remote lets you create a schedule for the vacuum; however, you can only set a single daily schedule. Otherwise, you can either press the button on the machine itself to start a cleaning job or use the remote, which comes with a handy guide to the button symbols on the back. There are five different cleaning modes to choose from: Auto sends the vacuum from room to room, Spot cleans a specific area and Edge will send the vacuum hugging the walls of your house for perimeter cleaning. You can also choose a single room or pilot the robot with the directional arrows on the remote.

    If you live in a home without high-pile carpets and find yourself constantly vacuuming up pet hair or dirt, and don’t need the ability to map your home and create virtual walls or no-go zones, the Eufy 11S is a top choice.

    Underscored best robot vacuum  iLife V3S Pro

    If your main struggle is keeping up with pet hair and small pieces of debris like cat litter, you don’t need to spend hundreds of dollars to get a well-performing robot vacuum. In our testing, the iLife V3S Pro did the best job on cat hair and cat litter on my hardwood floors.

    The V3S Pro uses a small suction opening to scoop up debris, much like a regular vacuum, instead of the spinning roller brush on the bottom used by most robots. While the suction isn’t the strongest I’ve seen on devices in this price range, it avoids having hair and carpet threads build up and get stuck in a brush, and therefore helps it pick up more hair and dirt. Two side brushes with three bristles each push hair and dirt into the robot’s path, and do a great job.

    Like the Eufy 11s, this vacuum uses random, or bump and run navigation, so while it does take time to clean the house, it covers every room. Again like the Eufy, it returns to the charging base if it runs out of battery before the house is finished and then resumes the job once fully charged. Infrared sensors keep it off the stairs, though like other bump bots, it can’t avoid obstacles like lamp cords.

    The iLife V3S Pro was able to transition easily from a rug to a floor and back up onto the rug without any problem. Because of its low 11.8-inch-by-3-inch profile, it also fits under a dresser that the Shark IQ and iRobot j7+ couldn’t get under.

    iLife has dustbin on top.jpg

    Though it doesn’t alert you when the bin is full, it’s easy to access the dustbin from the top of the unit, right under the cover (most other vacuums have it located on the side).

    As with other inexpensive robots, you can only set a single daily schedule; the V3S Pro also offers three cleaning modes — whole floor, spot and edge — accessible from the included remote.

    If you’re a pet parent who needs help keeping hardwood, tile or low-pile carpeting fur-free, the iLife V3S Pro is the right vacuum for you. If getting pet hair out of high-pile carpeting is a priority, you should step up to the iRobot 694, which has two brush rollers that work great on higher-pile carpets, but that will cost you about $100 more and the iLife does a better job overall.

    Underscored best robot vacuum Shark IQ XL

    If you like the idea of a self-emptying robot vacuum but not the high price tag of the iRobot Roomba j7+, then we recommend the Shark IQ XL. It has smart features such as linear navigation, in-app mapping, scheduling and voice control. You can’t schedule specific rooms to be cleaned with the Shark IQ XL, nor can the robot automatically adjust power levels to deal with different types of flooring like the Roomba j7+, but you get a lot of functionality and effective cleaning for about $200 less on average.

    Like other self-emptying robot vacuums, the Shark IQ XL returns to the base and empties its contents. The Shark, however, is the only vacuum we tested that features a bagless self-emptying base. To empty it, you simply detach the bin and empty it manually over the trash. This can get messy as dust flies around, but you save money buying replacement bags.

    shark-base-station-robovac.JPG

    The base itself stands about 15 inches tall and has a window so you can see how full it is. Shark says it will hold about a month’s worth of cleaning.

    Another feature that stands out on the Shark IQ XL is Evacuate and Resume, which is designed for homes with lots of pet hair. Instead of waiting for the vacuum to run out of battery and return to the base, where it will empty its onboard dustbin, in this mode it will return and empty the dustbin after 30 minutes of cleaning, so the robot itself doesn’t fill up with pet hair. Once it empties itself, it picks up where it left off.

    The Shark IQ XL navigates efficiently in a linear fashion and easily gets over and around furniture. It’s the only vacuum out of the 11 we tested that was able to get up and over the base of barstools without getting stuck.

    It can get just as loud as the iRobot when cleaning, especially on Max mode, but in our testing, it did a good job on pet hair and cat litter.

    If you want a self-emptying robot vacuum with smart features and don’t mind emptying the dirt bin yourself, this is a step up from the Shark Ion and Ecovacs Deebot N79S. While it lacks some of the smarts of the more expensive iRobot Roomba j7+, you might find it to be just the right mix of smarts and convenience.

    If you’re pressed for time or have a pet who sheds, a good robot vacuum is a worthwhile investment. They’re particularly great for pet owners, since even if you depend on a traditional vacuum cleaner, a basic robot can stay on top of the hair, dander and litter on a daily basis, making your chores a little easier once you get around to a deep clean.

    A robot vacuum does require some amount of time and input from you. More advanced models require you to set up a map and define the zones of your house you’ll want them to clean or stay away from, and even the best vacuum can get stuck and need human intervention.

    Robot vacuums can’t do everything or completely replace an upright, canister or stick vacuum. They aren’t the best tools for taking care of household accidents or heavily soiled areas, and if they end up running over anything messy (pet waste or spilled liquids) they can make things worse.

    Even the most advanced models can’t get into every crevice and hard-to-reach space, and they can’t vacuum upholstery, drapes, closets, drawers and kitchen cabinets, or anything else that isn’t a horizontal surface.

    But for staying ahead of dust and dirt buildup, they’re solid investments that will save you time, and as part of an overall cleaning schedule they make a lot of sense.

    robots-4-up-group.jpg

    Consider the layout of your home and whether you have mostly hardwood floors or deep-pile carpeting. If you live in a Victorian-style home or have medium- to high-pile carpeting, a robot vacuum will likely require a lot of input from you. However, if you live in a more modern, open-flow style of home with tile or hardwood floors, a robot vacuum is a great option. You’ll also want to ask yourself how much time you want to devote to prepping the house before you vacuum.

    If you don’t mind picking up toys and lamp cords and anything else that might get in the way or get snarled in the roller brush, then you can get one of the more affordable robot vacuums. These robots — such as our budget recommendation, the Eufy 11s — typically run in a random “bump and run” fashion, and don’t have any smart mapping features, so they’ll run for a long period of time to clean the whole house instead of progressing intelligently from room to room.

    But just because you’re not spending a lot of money on a smart unit doesn’t mean you’re not going to get a clean house. In our testing, we found there are some models that clean really well and can do almost as good a job as a higher-priced option.

    If you’re not willing to devote the time to prepping the house, then opt for the LiDAR-enabled, connected robot vacuums — like our overall recommendation, the iRobot Roomba j7+ — that are smart enough to detect and steer clear of obstacles. Spending the time during the initial setup, mapping your home and creating in-app “no-go zones” will save you the hassle of decluttering each time you run the vacuum.

    You’ll pay more money for these models, but you get the capability of setting schedules, designating specific rooms to be cleaned and using voice assistants like Alexa and Google Assistant to control your vacuum.

    How are you with touching dirt and pet hair clumps? If you don’t mind emptying the dustbin after every cleaning run, a standard robot vacuum will work for you. If you’d prefer never to touch the dirt, opt for the self-emptying models that automatically empty themselves into a bag or bin. The bag usually only needs to be changed every 60 days or so.

    robot-vacuum-test-group.jpg

    After researching which robot vacuums to test, we settled on 11 models with a wide variety of features and price points. We set up each vacuum, downloading apps and creating accounts where necessary. We ran each vacuum multiple times through an approximately 1,500-square-foot home with two cats, hardwood floors and mostly low-pile carpeting.

    We sent them on a normal run of the house cleaning run as well as runs with handfuls of cat litter on the floor and carpeting.

    We assessed all the models on the following criteria:

    • Suction power
    • Noise level
    • Navigation style
    • App ease of use
    • Mapping ability
    • Ease of setting virtual no-go boundaries
    • Ability to schedule cleaning
    • Ability to schedule cleaning of individual spaces
    • Ability to navigate furniture, corners and other obstacles
    • Effectiveness of picking up pet hair and litter
    • Cleaning effectiveness on various surfaces (hardwood floors, tile, low- and high-pile carpets)

    We also evaluated the individual vacuums based on:

    • Ease of use
    • Availability of remote/app-based control
    • Self-emptying or onboard bin only
    • Size and ease of placement of base
    • Ability to return to base
    • Number and type of brushes
    • Height of unit and ability to maneuver under furniture and reach tight spaces

    Samsung’s JetBot+ is a high-end, feature-rich machine that has LiDAR navigation and a self-emptying base. At 21 inches tall and 9 inches deep, the base is just so big and noticeable; we much prefer the smaller, less obtrusive base of the iRobot j7+. The vacuum has a forward camera and obstacle detection, but our testing found it not to be as precise as the iRobot j7+.

    Mediocre suction capability, random navigation and difficulty finding its base made this a nonstarter for us. While the vacuum has features such as voice control and in-app scheduling, it didn’t function half as well as the similarly priced Eufy 11S.

    The Eufy RoboVac X8 is packed with smart features and offers four different suction levels for powerful cleanup. It uses AI to detect and avoid obstacles and builds a virtual map that you can watch in real time, something other vacuums don’t do. It took a few tries to get our unit to create the initial map. It also got into a few tangles with power cords and had to be rescued but did a great job scooping up a cat toy that I later found in the dustbin. It’s a solid machine, but at $599, you can get the self-emptying and superior iRobot Roomba j7+ for just a hundred dollars more.

    With features such as in-app mapping, scheduling and no-go zones, the Neato BotVac D8 was promising. The signature D-shape design of the machine makes it easier to get into corners and edges, and it was the easiest of all the connected vacuums to set up.

    However, we couldn’t get it to complete the mapping process despite several attempts and a call to customer service.

    The vacuum uses LiDAR to map and navigate along with infrared drop sensors to detect stairs, but it kept mistaking the base of my cat condo for stairs and asked to be moved away from it. Though it claims a whopping 180 minutes of runtime, it ran down at 110 minutes and died before it made it back to its base.

    The iRobot Roomba 694 is a solid robot vacuum with some extra features, thanks to its ability to connect to the iRobot Home app. You can schedule cleaning sessions or use a voice assistant to start one, but even though it’s connected, you can’t map your home or target areas to be cleaned. We don’t think the extra connected features are worth the extra money, so for $50 less, we found the Eufy 11S to be a better vacuum.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This ultra quiet Eufy Pet Water Fountain kept my cats hydrated with filtered water | CNN Underscored

    This ultra quiet Eufy Pet Water Fountain kept my cats hydrated with filtered water | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    You can lead a cat to water, but nobody can make them drink. Yes, while cats are notoriously independent, Eufy has figured out how to, at the very least, give my pampered pets 24/7 access to clean drinking water. The simple, attractive Pet Water Fountain lets you toss that dirty water bowl and offers filtered H2O on demand for cats and small dogs that are looking for a cool, long drink.

    The Eufy Pet Water Fountain uses a filtration system and a motor to continuously circulate up to 2 liters of water for cats to drink (or play with). And because it’s just slightly larger than a pop-up box of tissues, it won’t stand out in your kitchen, bathroom or anywhere you decide to place it.

    It’s a win-win in my house because not only does it encourage my two cats to drink more, which is good for their health, but they also love the movement of the water. And, because it holds about a week’s worth of water, I don’t have to think about it for a few days or worry that one of them may have knocked over the dish while I’m out. And I definitely don’t miss washing out that slobbery bowl every day.

    The Eufy Pet Water Fountain is a good-looking drinking fountain for cats and small dogs. Not only does it allow you to fill it up and forget about it, but you will enjoy peace of mind that your animals have constant access to clean, filtered water that can’t easily be knocked over when you’re out. The sleek design allows you to place it more prominently in your home and a built-in LED light will alert you if it’s getting low.

    Since I keep it on my kitchen counter, I love how sleek looking this Eufy Pet Water Fountain is. Before this, I used the Catit pet water fountain, which, though cheaper at $20, looks like a kitschy green and white plastic flower and is not something I want to place prominently in my home. When I unboxed the Eufy fountain I was immediately drawn to the minimalist stainless steel and white design, and appreciated the clear water container that would allow me to check the water level at a glance. Easy-to-read maximum and minimum level marks let me know when/if I need to add water (I usually go about four to five days before refilling), and if I don’t get around to it quickly enough, a hard-to-ignore red LED light appears on the base.

    eufy fountain close cnnu.jpg

    At 7.48 by 7.48 by 6.22 inches tall, it’s also compact and can be placed almost anywhere you like, as long as it’s within 3 feet of an outlet to power the motor. While the container technically holds 3 liters of water, in actuality it can only circulate 2 liters, or about half a gallon, since the fountain won’t operate if it’s below the minimum water level.

    New Jersey veterinarian Dr. Sue Tobias says drinking running water from a fountain is more natural for cats, as their instinct is to drink running water from a stream or a river. “Some cats like to drink water from an open faucet because they like the dripping water, and they like to put their paws in it and play. House cats need to be encouraged to drink more water and this is a great way to do that.”

    Due to its smaller capacity, Eufy says the fountain is designed for cats as well as dogs up to 30 pounds — though dogs may not be quite as fascinated by the running water. Dr. Tobias uses a pet water fountain for her own two cats and points to the customization options it offers. For smaller pets that can’t (or don’t like to) bend their neck, they can drink from a higher point. And more importantly, the fountain’s movement tends to intrigue animals and encourages hydration.

    One of the biggest drawbacks of the previous Catit fountain I used was the incessant humming noise the electric pump made. And that got even louder when the water level ran low. But the Eufy Pet Water Fountain was quiet on all fronts.

    Eufy got smart and placed the motor in the base of the unit, instead of in the water tank. Not only does that keep it quiet, but it also keeps it from getting gunked up with all the slime and junk floating in the water tank. The pump itself can be easily removed and washed as part of the regular cleaning routine.

    eufy black white cat cnnu.jpg

    Forget rinsing out a water dish every day. With the Eufy Pet Water Fountain, you only need to perform a thorough cleaning and change out the filter (four-pack refills can be purchased online for $20) once a month to keep things clean. The carbon and resin filter traps any dirt, food or dust but I find the pet saliva on the food-grade stainless steel dish can get slimy pretty quickly.

    Once a week I unplug it and take apart the fountain, emptying and cleaning the water tank, the dish, the spout and the pump. A simple wipe-down with warm water is all it takes and it’s easy to put back together. I don’t think any of the aforementioned gunk affects the taste of the water, since my cats never seem to notice, but I like knowing their drinking water is filtered and slime-free.

    It’s difficult to find fault with a fountain that doesn’t make any noise or mess, but I do have small quibbles with pet water fountains overall.

    First, at $20 for a four-pack, the cost of filters can add up. Each brand uses a different type of filter that should be replaced every month and if they’re not, then you’re basically serving your pet recycled dirty water instead of clean, filtered water. It’s important to change them regularly, so be aware of the cost of replacements ahead of time.

    My biggest concern: What happens if the power goes out when you’re not home? Once the water level gets too low, or if it loses power, the pump stops working and the water becomes inaccessible. This would only be an issue when leaving your cats alone for a day or two, but for a lot of folks, it’s the reason they purchase a product like this. When I go away, I’ll leave out an extra bowl of water just in case and hope neither of the kitties knock it over so they can watch it trickle.

    eufy orange cat cnnu.jpg

    The Eufy Pet Water Fountain is a time-saving and entertaining way to encourage pets to drink more water, especially for cats who dislike drinking from a bowl. In fact, this $45 fountain has made a huge difference in my cats’ daily water intake. And because its sleek look makes it more attractive and it’s easy to clean and maintain, you’re more likely to keep up with regular maintenance.

    Using it also means you won’t have to put out fresh water every day or wash the water dish each night, and the red light on the fountain alerts you when the water level is running low. If you have finicky cats or small dogs who could benefit from more hydration, this could lead them to cleaner water — just let them think it was their idea.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Earn bonus cash back on all of your purchases with the Chase Freedom Unlimited | CNN Underscored

    Earn bonus cash back on all of your purchases with the Chase Freedom Unlimited | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored reviews financial products based on their overall value. We may receive a commission through our affiliate partners if you apply and are approved for a product, but our reporting is always independent and objective.

    Our quick take: The Chase Freedom Unlimited® can be an excellent addition to your wallet if you want a simple cash back card with no annual fee that earns generous rewards on everyday spending.

    • No annual fee.
    • Earns 5% back on Lyft rides (through March 2025) and travel booked through Chase Ultimate Rewards.
    • Earns 3% cash back at restautants and drugstores.
    • Earns 1.5% cash back everywhere else.
    • Ability to convert cash back rewards to points if you have another card that earns Chase Ultimate Rewards.
    • 0% introductory APR on purchases and balance transfers for the first 15 months (then 19.49% to 28.24% variable).
    • Provides trip cancellation and interruption coverage and a rental car damage waiver when you charge travel expenses to the card.
    • Approval is subject to the Chase 5/24 rule.
    • Rental car damage waiver is secondary to your car insurance or other policy.
    • 3% foreign transaction fee on purchases originating abroad.

    Current sign-up bonus: Earn $200 after spending $500 in the first three months of account opening. Plus, earn 5% cash back on grocery purchases (excluding Target and Walmart) on up to $12,000 spent in the first year.

    Best for: People who want elevated rewards in common spending categories and the ability to convert cash back to valuable points.

    The Chase Freedom Unlimited is a popular cash back card offering many benefits and rewards. It has no annual fee and earns unlimited 1.5% cash back on all purchases, making it ideal for those who want to earn elevated base rewards on all spending. The card also offers additional bonuses, like 5% cash back on travel purchased through Chase Ultimate Rewards and 3% cash back at restaurants and drugstores.

    Typical for a cash back card, Freedom Unlimited offers 0% introductory APR for 15 months on both purchases and balance transfers. This makes it a great choice for those wanting to consolidate credit card debt and have more time to pay it off. Your APR will increase to a variable APR between 19.49% and 28.24%.

    One of the best features of the Chase Freedom Unlimited is its ability to be combined with other cards from the Ultimate Rewards program, like the Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card or Chase Sapphire Reserve® cards. This allows cardholders to convert their cash back to points and redeem them for even more valuable rewards, such as first-class flights or hotel stays.

    Overall, the Chase Freedom Unlimited is an excellent choice for those looking for an easy way to earn flexible rewards. It also pairs great with an Ultimate Rewards-earning card like the Sapphire Reserve, helping you earn more rewards and convert them to valuable points.

    The Chase Freedom Unlimited offers a generous rewards program with no annual fee, making it an attractive option for many consumers. You can earn 1.5% cash back on all purchases, with no limit on how much you can earn.

    Another advantage of the Chase Freedom Unlimited is its flexibility in redeeming rewards. You can redeem your rewards for statement credits, travel purchases, gift cards and more. Additionally, your points never expire as long as your account remains open and in good standing.

    The Chase Freedom Unlimited also offers an introductory 0% APR period for 15 months on both balance transfers and purchases made within the first 60 days of opening your account. This can be a great way to save money if you need to make a large purchase or want to pay down existing debt without incurring interest charges during this period.

    For all its positive attributes, the Chase Freedom Unlimited has some drawbacks worth noting.

    First, the card’s rewards structure is less generous than other cash back cards. The card offers a baseline 1.5% cash back on all purchases, which is lower than the 2% cash back offered by the Citi® Double Cash Card. This means you will not be able to maximize your rewards with this card as much as with other cards.

    Second, the sign-up bonus for the Chase Freedom Unlimited is relatively low compared to other rewards cards. The sign-up bonus is only $200 after spending $500 within three months of opening an account. Cardholders also get 5% cash back on grocery spending during the first year, but that’s limited to the first $12,000 you spend in this category.

    Meanwhile, you could get a card like the Sapphire Preferred and convert its 60,000-point welcome bonus to $600 cash back. Granted, the Sapphire has a $95 annual fee, but the welcome bonus would still make up for that. Since the Freedom Unlimited is subject to the Chase 5/24 rule, you should consider whether the card’s perks and welcome bonus are worthwhile.

    Lastly, the card charges a 3% foreign transaction fee on purchases originating abroad. That’s not ideal on international travel if you want to use the Freedom Unlimited’s 1.5% cash back base rate to earn rewards. Travel expenses add up substantially and you should be able to use your card to earn rewards without a penalty.

    CNN Underscored has chosen the Citi Double Cash Card as our “benchmark” credit card. That doesn’t mean it’s the best credit card on the market — rather, it means we use it as a basic standard to compare other credit cards and see where they score better and worse.

    Here’s how the Chase Freedom Unlimited scores against our benchmark. The features of each card in the below chart are colored in green, red or white. Green indicates a card feature that is better than our benchmark. Red indicates the feature is worse than our benchmark, and white indicates the feature is either equivalent or cannot be directly compared to our benchmark.

    KEY DETAILS
    Citi Double Cash Card Chase Freedom Unlimited
    Card type Mastercard Visa
    Sign-up bonus None Earn a $200 bonus after you spend $500 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. Plus, earn 5% cash back on grocery store purchases (excluding Target and Walmart) on up to $12,000 spent in the first year
    REWARDS
    Earning rate 2% on all purchases (1% when you buy, 1% when you pay it off) 5% cash back on travel booked through Chase Ultimate Rewards, 5% cash back on Lyft rides (through March 2025), 3% cash back on drugstore purchases, 3% cash back at restaurants (including takeout and eligible delivery services) and 1.5% cash back on all other purchases
    Redemption value 1 cent (cash back) 1 cent (cash back)
    Ease of basic redemptions Easy Easy
    Advanced redemption options Can transfer ThankYou points to travel partners if you also have the Citi Premier℠ or Citi Prestige® Can transfer Ultimate Rewards points to travel partners if you also have a Sapphire Preferred or Sapphire Reserve.
    Quality of advanced redemptions Good Good
    FEES
    Annual fee $0 $0.
    Foreign transaction fee 3% 3%
    BENEFITS AND PROTECTIONS
    Travel perks None None
    Purchase protections None Purchase protection and extended warranty coverage.
    Travel protections None Trip cancellation and interruption insurance and rental car damage waiver.
    Other perks None None
    INTEREST RATES ON PURCHASES AND BALANCE TRANSFERS
    Introductory APR on purchases None 0%.
    Length of introductory APR on purchases N/A 15 months
    Introductory APR on balance transfers 0% 0%
    Length of Introductory APR on balance transfers 18 months 15 months
    Introductory balance transfer fee 3% or $5, whichever is greater 3% or $5, whichever is greater
    APR after intro period ends/standard APR 18.49%-28.49% variable 19.49%-28.24% variable

    When reviewing other credit cards, we use this format and these criteria to compare them with our benchmark. You can read our credit card methodology for more details on what we take into account when it comes to perks, protections and redemption value.

    Hands holding various US dollar notes.

    If the Chase Freedom Unlimited isn’t a good fit for you, there are other options that you might want to consider. For example, the Citi Double Cash we mentioned earlier earns 2% cash back on all purchases — 1% when you spend and 1% when you pay your bill. This could provide a better return than the Freedom Unlimited if you don’t dine out or spend at drugstores, where the Freedom Unlimited earns 3% cash back.

    Alternatively, those with who spend a lot on gas, groceries or online shopping may consider the Blue Cash Everyday® Card from American Express. This card earns 3% cash back at U.S. supermarkets (up to $6,000 per year, then 1%), 3% cash back on U.S. online retail purchases (up to $6,000 per year, then 1%), 3% cash back at U.S. gas stations (up to $6,000 per year, then 1%) and 1% cash back everywhere else.

    The card currently offers new cardholders $200 back after spending $2,000 in the first 6 months of account membership. Plus, it has 0% intro APR on purchases and balance transfers for 15 months from the date of account opening. It then goes to a variable APR between 18.74% and 29.74%. Like the Freedom Unlimited, the Blue Cash Everyday has no annual fee (see rates and fees).

    Further, the Chase Freedom Flex Credit Card is similar to the Freedom Unlimited in both name and welcome bonus. The card has no annual fee and offers a $200 welcome bonus after $500 spent in the first three months of account opening, plus 5% cash back on up to $12,000 in grocery spending during the first year (excluding Target and Walmart).

    Beyond this bonus, the Freedom Flex earns 1% cash back on all purchases and 5% on rotating categories (on the first $1,500 spent each quarter). The card also offers 0% APR on purchases and balance transfers for the first 15 months of account opening (then 19.49% to 28.24% variable).

    Chase Freedom Flex vs. Chase Freedom Unlimited: Which credit card is best for you?

    Whether or not you should get the Chase Freedom Unlimited card depends on your individual needs and financial situation. It’s a great card for maximizing everyday spending and provides a generous 0% APR offer. If you can pair it with a card that offers more generous category bonuses and earns Ultimate Rewards points, you can maximize your rewards further. This makes the Freedom Unlimited a great card to pair with the Sapphire Preferred.

    However, the Freedom Unlimited might not be the best option for someone looking for travel-related benefits like zero foreign transaction fees. Ultimately, it’s important to consider your needs and compare different cards before deciding which one is right for you.

    Click here for rates and fees of the Blue Cash Everyday card.

    Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as our best credit cards currently available.

    Get all the latest personal finance deals, news and advice at CNN Underscored Money.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This featherlight mid-layer is always in my pack — Arc’teryx Atom Hoody review | CNN Underscored

    This featherlight mid-layer is always in my pack — Arc’teryx Atom Hoody review | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Having your layering strategy down to a science is critical when exploring high-altitude peaks, venturing out in shoulder season or on summer backpacking trips in the mountains. Whether you’re exploring Utah’s high desert or Montana’s Northern Rockies, once the sun sets, the temperature is likely to drop far and quickly.

    Hailing from British Columbia, an area known for its snowy alpine summits and gray, drizzly weather, Arc’teryx is often considered the best of the best when it comes to designing lightweight, breathable, insulated layers that wick sweat while keeping your core toasty. The Atom Hoody has been around for ages, and it’s a staple of this warm, weather-shedding ethos.

    I’ve had my Atom for just over six years, and it’s still going as strong as the day I purchased it (albeit a little stained from too many morning cups of cowboy coffee). It’s the first thing I throw into my pack as an extra layer on sunny SoCal day hikes and the middle layer that keeps me safe and dry when I’m charging down ski slopes or backpacking through the Himalayas. Let’s get into what makes this piece so great.

    Arc’teryx’s Atom Hoody is a versatile insulated jacket that belongs in virtually everyone’s pack, whether you’re out on a shoulder season day hike, skinning up a snow slope or enjoying a drizzly Pacific Northwest stroll. It sheds mellow precipitation with ease and offers breathable warmth for cold weather cardio. Warmer than your regular old hoody but lighter than your bulky puffy, the form-fitting Atom features synthetic insulation and stretchy fleece panels, and it’s available in both men’s (named the Atom LT Hoody) and women’s sizes.

    As one of the lightest in its category (10.9 ounces for the women’s model), the Atom Hoody offers breathable synthetic warmth for uphill winter pursuits and shoulder season excursions where you need an extra layer but don’t want to sweat through your big puffy. The outer fabric is soft, durable and great at shedding light weather, while intuitive, zippered pockets mean your valuables won’t get lost.

    Atom Hoody 3

    If you live in the dreary Pacific Northwest or like to head out in snow flurries, the Atom Hoody’s water-resistant Tyono 20 face fabric will feel like a godsend. It manages to stay miraculously breathable while allowing precipitation to ball up on the outside of the jacket so that you don’t get soaked to the bone. On an REI expert-led basic mountaineering course near California’s Mount San Antonio, my group got tossed into a mellow snowstorm while hiking up an icy slope. Others in my group had to stop and whip out their rain shells, but I happily noticed that the Atom Hoody was doing its job perfectly — repelling the flakes while keeping me cozy.

    Down is great for a lot of things in the outdoor world, but staying warm in wet weather is not one of them. At 10.9 ounces, the Atom Hoody rivals many of its down cousins in terms of weight, and the synthetic insulation is not only vegan, but it’s also superior at holding its loft and insulation when a storm rolls in. Tack on the stretchy performance fleece side panels, and you’ve got yourself a comfortable outdoor jacket that’s breathable where you need it and warm where it matters.

    Atom Hoody 5

    About a year after I bought my Atom Hoody, I had a zipper failure that broke my heart. The central zipper that made the entire jacket a jacket had split and didn’t want to close back up, ever. Luckily, Arc’teryx has a guarantee that, if it’s not looking ragged and overused, your gear should not fail for its “practical product life span.” So, I brought my piece into the Los Angeles store, spoke to a representative and was able to get a new zipper sewn in for free. It was good for my wallet and great for the environment.

    The brand labels its Atom Hoody as having a “fitted fit,” meaning that it’s designed to stay close to the body throughout the chest, waist and hip while still allowing for natural freedom of movement when climbing or trekking. Personally, I love this design, because, unlike my bulky down puffy, I can go out to a brewery after hitting the trail with my friends and not have to worry about looking and feeling like a marshmallow.

    When a product has been the staple of an established brand for over a decade, major flaws tend to get tweaked and worked out. That being said, there were a few small things we didn’t love about the Atom.

    Atom Hoody 1

    Yes, the Atom Hoody is a whiz at shedding light precipitation (like those pesky PNW drizzles or spring snowfall), but when left in a heavy downpour for an extended period of time, the outer Tyono 20 fabric does soak through, leaving you wet. The good news? Because the interior is stuffed with Coreloft Compact 60 insulation, it’ll keep insulating even when drenched.

    Atom Hoody 6

    I can’t stress enough that this jacket, though insulated, can’t quite hold up to the warmth of my less flattering puffies. I’ve brought it along on a warm July backpacking trip in the High Sierras, sure, but only when I knew that the low would never dip below 45, and I had an excellent sleeping bag in tow, just in case. For four-season comfort (or staying extra toasty on the trail), try the Atom Heavyweight Hoody, which is basically the same model with added insulation, or the Beta Insulated Jacket.

    Like with many Arc’teryx products, the Atom Hoody comes in at the higher end of “normal” in its category. If you’re looking to save a little dough, Kuhl’s The One Insulated Hoodie and REI Co-op’s Flash Insulated Hybrid Hoodie both come in at just under $180. For fans of groovy, psychedelic colors, Cotopaxi has a bold choice with its Teca Calido Hooded Jacket, for just $150. As is common with outdoor gear, you often get what you pay for, and the Arc’teryx Atom is lighter and more breathable than other hooded zip-ups in its class.

    Atom Hoody 2

    Arc’teryx has done it again with the Atom Hoody, creating a slim-fitting, versatile jacket that’s just as at home skinning up a snowy peak as it is on an autumn leaf-peeping day hike in the foothills. It sheds light weather with ease while remaining ultra breathable for cold weather cardio. While I wish it were just a touch warmer so I could bring it on more summer backpacking trips, it’s still the first thing I throw into my day pack at any time of year to add a cozy extra layer that’ll hold up in the wind, light rain and snow.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 scores: The Kasa Spot indoor security camera offers peace of mind on a budget | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 scores: The Kasa Spot indoor security camera offers peace of mind on a budget | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    There’s a long list of reasons you’d want to have a security camera inside your home. A connected camera makes it easy to check in on your pets, keep tabs on your kids or add a layer of peace of mind when you’re away from home.

    But the problem is that most home security cameras either are expensive or require some form of a monthly subscription — and if they are affordable, the video quality isn’t good enough to actually be useful. And I’ll be honest, I fully expected the Kasa Spot to fall into that last category. But after using it for a week, it’s now clear to me that it’s a definite score.

    If you’re looking to spend less than $25 on a security camera for keeping tabs on your home, the Kasa Spot handles all the basics extremely well.

    When it comes to home security cameras, I’ve tested a lot of them. I’ve tested cameras that cost hundreds of dollars and have expensive subscriptions from companies such as Ring, as well as inexpensive cameras that often trigger an automatic feeling of “that’s probably too good to be true.” Sometimes, however, you’re surprised with a product, as was the case with the original Wyze Cam.

    So, when my editor asked to take a look at the Kasa Spot, I was cautiously optimistic after looking over the spec sheet and learning that the camera had a microSD card slot for local storage, 24/7 recording, and 1080p/15fps video. I’ve reviewed several TP-Link cameras, so I knew what to expect from the app.

    From experience, an inexpensive home security camera such as this one either does just enough to justify the low cost, providing good-enough picture quality and a reliable app experience, or the video and pictures are overly pixelated and the app is so slow it’s not worth spending any money on.

    And, without spoiling too much, I can say the Kasa Spot is firmly in the justifiable purchase column.

    Related: The best home security systems we’ve tested

    The Kasa Spot camera is surprisingly capable and has a robust list of features for something you don’t have to spend a lot on. You get 1080p HD video, although the camera defaults to 720p to save space on your microSD card when you enable 24/7 recording.

    The video quality looks good enough that I’d feel comfortable using it to check in on my kids, or a pet or even use the footage should someone sneak into my office. The night vision footage is a little too bright for my liking, but you can still get the gist of what’s going on in the video and identify who or what triggered a recording. And because the Kasa Spot’s video is capped at 15 frames per second, you’ll see some pixelation in clips, especially if there’s a lot of movement. But, again, it’s not to a point where the video isn’t useful.

    casa spot screengrab cnnu.jpg

    The best part? You don’t have to sign up for any sort of subscription to get cloud storage or the ability to remotely access the camera’s livestream or recordings. Although, I do have to mention that it took longer than I’d like for the camera’s stream to load when I tried to view it while I was away from my house.

    Motion alerts along with notifications when a person was detected in the camera’s 113-degree field-of-view arrived within a few seconds of new activity. And, I’ll mention it again, you don’t need a subscription for person detection, even though some security cameras require a monthly fee for alerts that go beyond standard motion detection.

    kasa spot screenshots cnnu.jpg

    Whenever you can find a reliable gadget for under $25, it’s a score. But when you can find a security camera that has 24/7 recording to a microSD card, doesn’t rely on a monthly subscription, reliable activity alerts and has good-enough video quality, you can’t really pass it up.

    The Kasa Spot does everything you’d want an indoor security camera to do well enough that it’s easy to look past some of its quirks. And if you decide you want a home security camera with higher-quality video capabilities, you can pick up the 2K version for under $35.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 score: The Stouchi MagSafe Continuity Camera Mount turns your iPhone into a webcam | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 score: The Stouchi MagSafe Continuity Camera Mount turns your iPhone into a webcam | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    As much as I love using Macs, there’s one glaring problem with them: their built-in webcams. The problem is particularly pronounced in Apple’s best MacBooks, but even the newest iMac and the incredible Apple Studio Display have webcams I find wanting. It’s not that they’re terrible — they get the job done, and often better than Windows-running alternatives — but given how fantastic even the front-facing selfie camera is on years-old iPhones, it feels like Apple, ahem, phoned it in on its computers.

    Apple, seemingly recognizing this, gave us an alternative with the Continuity Camera feature, introduced in macOS Ventura and iOS 16. This delightful feature lets you use your iPhone’s main camera as a webcam, and it works better than you’d think. Of course, to keep your hands free during video calls, you’ll need a mount, and that’s where the Stouchi MagSafe Continuity Camera mount comes in.

    Made for Mac laptops and iPhones with MagSafe — that is, a ring of magnets embedded in the phones that lets you connect compatible chargers and other magnetic accessories to the phone — it purports to pull triple duty as an easy iPhone laptop mount, a one-handed iPhone stabilizer and a kickstand for when you want to watch YouTube and, I don’t know, eat a burger.

    If you’re looking for a cheap way to mount your iPhone to your Mac to use it as a webcam, the Stouchi delivers.

    I wanted to see what was out there for easy Continuity Camera mounts with MagSafe compatibility, and I didn’t want to shell out $30 or $40 for what amounts to a circle with magnets in it. Stouchi showed up in the search results, and having the same basic design and features of the Belkin Continuity Camera mount, I decided to pick it up. Worst case, it’s not good and I can return it. But if it works? Well, if it means turning my iPhone into a superb webcam for less than 20 bucks, you can go ahead and sign me up.

    Turns out, the Stouchi Continuity Camera mount is a great under $25 score. Webcams are pricey if you want a decent one, and if you want a good one, you have to sell your firstborn. No, really, there’s a contract and everything. But even when you get the best webcams — I’m talking something like the famed 4K Logitech Brio, here — once you get them hooked up, they just aren’t really … that nice.

    The Stouchi mount, on the other hand, is dirt cheap, and if you’ve already got any iPhone made in 2018 or later, it’s almost guaranteed to have a nicer rear camera than what you’d find on most dedicated webcams. The mount itself is a solid little product. It’s mostly aluminum, with a padded, grippy surface with a magnetic ring beneath it. On the back, a flip-out hook lets you hang your phone on your MacBook’s display, with the rear camera facing you. Even better, it has a built-in kickstand that has a ring for your finger, making one-handed use easy. It’s small enough to be unnoticeable in your pocket too, so you can just keep it there all day if you want.

    Stouchi one-handed cnn.jpg

    I had some concerns that the metal body might scratch my laptop. Being unwilling to put that to the test against my precious MacBook Air, I decided to try scratching an old aluminum-backed iPad I have lying around, and to my relief, the Stouchi mount gave first, leaving marks on the iPad that easily wiped off, while the finish of the mount had clearly rubbed off a bit.

    Related: MacOS Ventura brings small but significant upgrades to your MacBook or Mac desktop

    There are a couple of things to note, however: The little kickstand on the back is flimsier than the Belkin Continuity Camera mount for MacBooks, and won’t hold my iPhone 13 Pro up at extreme angles, where Belkin’s mount will. Also, the Stouchi mount is slightly heavier than the Belkin option, making the tipping point before your MacBook screen starts to fall backward ever-so-slightly sooner. That’s not ideal, but it’s far from a deal breaker, especially for 20 bucks.

    Stouchi as phone mount kickstand cnnu.jpg

    So before you go looking for a true stand-alone webcam, consider picking up the Stouchi MagSafe Continuity Camera mount. Even if the Continuity Camera feature doesn’t work for you (although it should if you follow our handy guide), it’s a nice little Pop Socket stand-in for one-handed phone use and kickstand purposes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss vs. Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Polish: Which lip gloss is best? | CNN Underscored

    Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss vs. Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Polish: Which lip gloss is best? | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is part of our series Battle of the Brands, in which we compare category-leading products to their counterparts to determine which are actually worth your money.

    Celebrities and social media have made big, full lips a lasting trend. While some turn to lip flips and fillers to get the effect, products like the popular Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss and Buxom’s Full-on Plumping Lip Polish can help you achieve a pillowy pout without any needles.

    Formulated with ingredients that “irritate” the lips, you’ll feel the glosses give a tingling sensation — but does this actually mean they are visibly plumping the lips? I put the glosses to the test, comparing how they look and feel side-by-side.

    This plumping lip gloss comes in a bunch of shiny shades — sheer, semi-opaque and with or without shimmer.

    Shiny and sparkly, Buxom’s Full-on Plumping Lip Polish gives sheer to medium color in over 60 shades.

    To compare the two products, I tested one clear shade and one pigmented shade of each. For the Dior Lip Maximizer, I first tried the clear holographic shade 002 Opal. The formula has a cooling, tingly sensation that lingers as you wear the gloss thanks to the menthoxypropanediol (a synthetic derivative of menthol). It doesn’t have an overt flavor, but it has a slightly minty, sweet scent.

    I’m not usually a lip gloss wearer because I don’t like the sticky feeling, but I found the Dior Lip Maximizer to be smooth and nourishing. It contains cherry oil, jojoba esters and hyaluronic acid, which give it that moisturizing effect. The clear shade left a shiny finish and I found that my lips looked a bit pinker and plumper the longer I wore it.

    Left: No product. Middle: Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss in 002 Opal. Right: Buxom Full-on Plumping Lip Polish in Dominique.

    The Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Polish delivered a similar effect. I tested the clear shade Dominique, which has visible shimmer in the tube. When I applied it, however, it didn’t look sparkly on my lips, instead leaving a high-shine finish that I found gave more of a lacquered effect than the Dior Addict Lip Maximizer. It also felt tingly due to menthol glycerin acetal. It had an overall stronger cooling effect than Dior’s gloss, but I didn’t find that it necessarily made my lips look plumper (just more glossy).

    Moreover, Buxom’s Plumping Lip Polish has a much stickier feeling than the Dior Lip Maximizer. It feels thicker and although it contains hyaluronic acid, it left my lips feeling dehydrated when I wiped the gloss off. It also has a sweet vanilla scent that you can taste on your lips.

    For the next shade, I wanted to compare reds. I chose the Dior Addict Lip Maximizer 028 Dior 8 Intense, a bold semi-opaque brick red. The color payoff was fantastic, giving a super glossy color that lasted throughout the day. Even after removing the gloss, some of the pigment was left on my lips. The bold color also made my lips appear the plumpest out of any of the glosses I tested. Like the clear shade, it had the same comfortable, smooth feeling with a lingering tingle.

    Left: No product. Middle: Dior Addict Lip Maximizer Plumping Gloss in 028 Dior 8 Intense. Right: Buxom Full-on Plumping Lip Polish in Natalie.

    Buxom only offers sheer reds in its Plumping Lip Polish, so I tried the shade Natalie, a juicy cherry red. In product photos online, it looks like a deeper berry red, so I was surprised to see that it is a bright cherry red. In fact, it looks pretty close to the 028 Dior Intense shade in the tube, but when applied it has a sheer finish, just giving a light layer of color to the lips that looks more pink than red. The flexibility of the sheer shade means that you could layer it on top of red lipstick for a bolder color. Alone, it gave my lips a juicy look, but not necessarily more plump than the Dior option.

    Even though Dior continues to expand its shade offerings of the Dior Addict Lip Maximizer (there are now 23), Buxom has it beat with a whopping 67 shades of the Full-On Plumping Polish. Buxom’s range particularly focuses on a variety of nudes and pinks, but it also has some purple and red tones, too. The variety includes shimmer, sparkle and iridescent finishes.

    If you prefer a shiny lipgloss that’s still sparkle-free, however, Dior has better options. The Dior Addict Lip Maximizer has nine shades without shimmer, from sheer fuchsia to semi-opaque nude rosewood to the bold red that I tested.

    dior maximizer vs buxom full-on

    It’s also worth noting that Buxom recently released the Plump Shot Collagen-Infused Lip Serum as another option for those after the full lip effect. It contains the same menthone glycerin acetal, plus cassia oil (found in cinnamon) and capsaicin (found in chili peppers) which magnify the tingly sensation.

    I tested the Plump Shot too, but found that the Full-On Plumping Polish was the closest comparison to the Dior Addict Lip Maximizer in look and feel. The Plump Shot’s tingly effect is initially stronger than the Plumping Polish, but it subsides after a few minutes. It does, however, have more nourishing ingredients than the Plumping Polish — like avocado oil, jojoba seed oil, collagen — so it feels more smooth than sticky on the lips, similar to the Dior Addict Lip Maximizer.

    The Buxom Plumping Lip Polish is a worthy choice for those who want ultra-juicy lips, and at $25 you’ll save some money over Dior’s gloss, but based on how the product feels, Dior’s formula is much more comfortable to wear. It feels moisturizing and light even with the telltale tingle. Plus, if you’re after a shiny, pigmented pout without the shimmer, Dior’s shade range has plenty of options. And while the plumping effect was not super transformative for either of the products, you can amplify the effect with some strategic lip liner before applying the plumping gloss for an enhanced look.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Allbirds’ most trendy sneaker is here — find out if The Riser is worth it | CNN Underscored

    Allbirds’ most trendy sneaker is here — find out if The Riser is worth it | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    It’s officially cute sneaker season, and that can only mean one thing: retiring my snow-stained boots to finally look put together for the first time all year. As someone who lives in Montreal, Canada, the weather is often too unpredictable to invest in a pair of luxurious sneakers for everyday wear, but I’d do anything for journalism.

    That’s why I was super thrilled to put Allbirds’ new lifestyle shoe to the test: The just-launched The Riser is designed with the brand’s most popular natural materials like canvas, tree fiber, wool, bio-based foam and natural rubber. Stick around to find out if the trendy new shoes might be a fit for you.

    Available in four different colors, Allbirds’ newest lifestyle shoe is designed for all-day wear and is made from natural materials like canvas and eucalyptus tree fiber.

    If you’re a fan of all things Allbirds, the newest kid on the brand’s block might be a wise addition to your spring wardrobe: The Riser is a lifestyle shoe designed for all-day comfort that you can rock with a flowy skirt as easily as you can a matching tracksuit on a Hot Girl Walk. Its allure lies in its use of natural materials like canvas around the forefoot and heel for support, eucalyptus tree fiber along the eyestay pieces around the laces and tongue as a durable and earth-friendly alternative to nylon ripstop, ethical merino wool as a functional design element that also provides extra comfort at the heel, sugarcane-based foam at the midsole for some pep in your step, and natural rubber for proper traction derived from the latex vessels of rubber-yielding plants.

    They ring in at $135 per pair, come in four versatile colorways — Honey Rust, Indigo, Natural Black and Natural White — and are available in men’s and women’s whole sizes 7 to 14 and 5 to 11, respectively.

    allbirds riser marissa cnnu.jpg

    While first impressions are everything, I like to think of myself as the Paula Abdul of judges, giving most things the benefit of the doubt and ability to redeem themselves. First, their look is unmistakably 2023, boasting both a futuristic vibe with an angular heel and sole mixed with a little bit of dad sneaker vibes to anchor them back down to earth. It’s not something I would reach for personally (I struggle to take fashion risks and stand out too much), so these definitely took me out of my comfort zone in a way that I appreciate.

    Next, I love that the colorway I chose — Natural White with a Blizzard sole — is more of a creamy beige hue, which can be slightly more forgiving in inclement weather or walks through grass and mud than a standard bone-white shoe. While I’m personally not a huge fan of the other funkier colorways because my outfits tend to use brighter color palettes, they each create a serious style statement while still feeling versatile. Plus, the gender-neutral look is much appreciated for this gal who prefers shopping in the men’s section.

    The Riser 2

    As a relatively short person at 5 foot 3, I’ll seize any opportunity to get a bit of extra lift. I love how noticeably taller I felt in these sneakers, thanks to their 1.25-inch platform (depending on when you’re measuring from) and how said heel boasts a sharp and boxy silhouette that drives the futuristic theme home. I appreciate how the subtle pointed toe further elongates my legs, making them far more flattering than I anticipated.

    I can’t help but value the brand’s tremendously obsessive attention to the fabrics used. Each one not only feels luxurious to the touch but also serves as an eco-friendly alternative to other common shoe materials that play a part in irreparable damage to the planet (no petroleum-based nylon, chemicals or pesticides were used in the making of these shoes, and they’re carbon neutral).

    Evocative of some of my favorite running shoes from brands like Lululemon, Hoka and Reebok, the outsoles at the tip and heel are slightly rounded, allowing you to more easily propel yourself forward with each step. I have a high instep, which has always made it challenging to find the perfect fit, but I was pleased to find the collar didn’t suffocate my ankle. Instead, I felt grounded and supported in the shoe.

    The Riser 1

    Because Allbirds’ Tree Flyer sneakers fit like a cushion and a feather mixed into one, I had high hopes. From the exterior, their wide toe box looks like it would accommodate a foot like mine that’s on the brink of developing bunions from years of heel-wearing, competitive dance, marathon training and working as a personal trainer. If you’ve got a similar foot profile to mine and are used to a heavily cushioned shoe, these might not be it, likely because The Riser’s thick material occupies some of that space that might otherwise be best suited for, well, your foot.

    In a two-hour walk around my neighborhood and a jaunt through the grocery store (I like to test out my shoes not just in motion but using dynamic movements like turning, starting, stopping and standing), the platform heel didn’t provide the plush surface I was hoping for. I realize most shoes require a break-in period, so I wore them around my house for three full days of working, cleaning and cooking. I regret to say that I breathed a sigh of relief when I took them off. While the brand claims the midsole foam conforms to your foot over time, life is too short for long-and-drawn-out break-in periods when you’ve got a pair of fuzzy Crocs staring you down.

    Footwear is such a personal investment because our feet are all shaped differently, and we all use them in different ways, from our gait style to intended activity. While these sneakers are certainly beautiful in their fabrics used, their futuristic-meets-retro silhouette and their subtle heel for a (literally) elevated take on any old sneaker you’ve got lying around at home, as well as their reasonable price at $135 a pop, they don’t quite work for my unique purposes or how I prefer a shoe to fit.

    However, if you’re lucky enough to try The Riser on and find them comfortable for your particular foot, you’re in for virtually limitless styling opportunities for as long as the weather permits.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best mops in 2023, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    The best mops in 2023, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    You can sweep and vacuum all you like, but if you have hardwood, vinyl or tile floors and run into sticky residue or stuck-on grime, you’re going to have to mop. There’s good news, though. Mops have come a long way since the bulky, stringy, soggy swabbers of old, and are smaller, tidier and easier to use than ever. Most will be able to tackle a wide range of flooring types too, making it easy to get your entire home clean with fewer tools and a minimum of fuss.

    We put 11 popular mops, including string, spin, spray and pad models, to the test, evaluating them on how they performed while tackling three challenging cleaning tasks as well as on overall build and durability. We were able to confidently land on three favorites that should let you tackle any cleanup large or small, on any surface in your home.

    Best mop overall

    The O-Cedar EasyWring Microfiber Spin Mop combines a hands-free wringing bucket with lightweight, triangular mop head that’s perfect for both mopping and spot-scrubbing on any surface.

    Best mop for smaller jobs

    The Oxo Good Grips Microfiber Spray Mop Kit features a multifunctional design — providing two heads in one — making it a convenient tool to quickly grab and use for both quick cleanups.

    Best mop for hardwood floors

    If you’re looking for a mop specifically to take care of hardwood surfaces, the Bona Hardwood Floor Premium Spray Mop is simple and effective, and includes a bottle of Bona’s hardwood floor cleaner.

    O-cedar-spinner-best-mops-best-overall

    Wringing out a mop head is generally a messy task, but the new generation of spin mops has made the task a lot easier. The O-Cedar EasyWring Spin Mop has the process dialed in, making it easy to keep your mop head clean and ready to go. It’s also a solidly built mop with a smart, easy-to-handle design that did a great job scrubbing up dirt and grime in our tests.

    A manual foot pedal on the rear of the EasyWring bucket powers a spinning basket that, when a wet mop head is placed inside, quickly removes excess liquid. It works extremely quickly, and since you don’t have to bend over or even use your hands at all, it really cuts down on overall cleaning time. It felt solid and durable as well, even when pumping away as hard as I could, and never felt like it was vulnerable to cracking or snapping.

    The mop itself is comfortable to use and its lightweight design means it’s easy to carry around and maneuver while you mop. You can even adjust the length from 24 to 48 inches to suit your height or the reach your job requires. The mop head is made of microfiber strings that are more absorbent than they appear, and can really soak up large amounts of liquid in a single pass. The head’s triangular design makes it easy to get into corners and to clean around furniture legs. I found that the relatively short length of these strands also made it easy to spin and dry out the head, unlike the longer loops of the Libman Wonder Mop, which were messier and more challenging to control when soaking wet.

    Most importantly, the O-Cedar’s scrubbing capabilities were superior to the pad-based mops we tested. The mop head fared well in my bathroom tile tests, easily taking care of soap residue, soaking up cleaning liquid, and capturing loose dirt without just moving it around. The head cleaned up easily in the laundry using a regular wash and dry cycle too, and was ready for action again the following day. Plus, since the mop ships with three microfiber scrubbing heads, you’ll be able to tackle extra-large cleaning projects without needing to wait for a wash cycle to get finished.

    The only real drawback to this mop is the large bucket size. At 20 inches long it might be too bulky to store in a  bathroom closet, although this large size does make it practical for larger, whole-house mopping jobs.

    OXO-Good-Grips-spray-mop-best-mops

    While it wasn’t quite as effective in handling dirt as our top pick, the lightweight, hassle-free design of the multifunctional Oxo Good Grips Microfiber Spray Mop makes it a perfect choice for tackling quick cleanups and spills.

    The manual trigger was large enough to use comfortably, and also felt nice and sturdy when pumping away; we preferred it to battery-powered sprayers like the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood and Floor Spray Mop. At 2.4 pounds it was effortless to carry around the house and up and down the stairs with ease.

    Our favorite feature of this mop is the detachable mop pad. If you come upon a stubborn spot that it can’t remove, you can simply detach it with a simple latch, revealing a small scrubbing head. The small size of the scrubber allows you to really lean into it as you work, and the rougher texture took care of even the toughest sticky residue. Often, features like this feel like gimmicks — unreliable, ineffective or just out of place in the overall design of the product — but not in this case. The scrubber pad is both useful and honestly really fun to use. We found ourselves searching for spots and stains to use it on.

    The wet mopping pad was absorbent enough to work well on hardwood, and the spray trigger made it easy to control the precise amount of cleaner being dispersed. The pad didn’t do as good a job at capturing and removing the potting soil mess on the bathroom tile as the O-Cedar, however, and ended up spreading it around more than actually picking it up.

    Oxo-good-grips-best-mops-scrubber-detail

    The Oxo kit includes a great selection of accessories and attachments, especially considering the low price. You get three wet mopping pads, three scrubbing pads and two reusable bottles, and thanks to the hanging loop on top of the handle, it won’t need to take up any valuable floor space. The instruction manual even includes a pair of recipes for making your own cleaning solution.

    Bona-mop-best-mops

    If your priority is cleaning hardwood flooring, the Bona Hardwood Floor Premium Spray Mop is a great choice. It includes a 34-oz bottle of Bona hardwood floor cleaner — a product that we’ve used on hardwood flooring for years — which can easily be refilled with large Bona refill jugs. This bottle was really simple to pop in and out too.

    The manual trigger makes it easy to dispense a precise amount of cleaner, so we never had to worry about too much soaking the flooring. The mop was very comfortable to use, thanks to a soft foam grip on the handle, and the extra wide pad — 16.5 inches — let us cover a lot of area in a short time.

    This pad can be used to dry mop as well, so there’s no need to pull out a separate broom and dustpan to prep your floors. The kit only includes a single pad, however, so we suggest grabbing an extra to have on hand for large jobs.

    Large liquid spills and stuck-on grime, dirt and other residue on hard floors that sweeping and vacuuming just can’t handle call for a mop. By combining a liquid cleaner with a textured scrubbing head, mops can dislodge the spill or residue, as well as absorb and contain it, leaving you with a clean floor. It’s worth noting that for small spills, a cleaning spray and a rag or paper towels should suffice, but it’s not really practical to clean a whole room or even a large area that way.

    There are three basic types of mops to choose from: traditional “string mops” with a shaggy head that you wring out in a bucket, squeeze or spin out; spray mops that have a flat pad and use a built-in reservoir to spray cleaner onto the floor; and basic pad-and-handle designs that require you to apply floor cleaner from a separate container.

    String mops are good for larger cleaning jobs, since their buckets provide a large supply of cleaner, meaning you can clean large areas (there’s a reason you’ll see these used by professional cleaners). With longer handles designed to be used without bending over (many newer designs are even adjustable), they are much more comfortable to use than old-school options, and new materials like microfiber make the pads easier and faster to wring out than older string mop heads. The buckets themselves can still be bulky and heavy to move around though, so keep that in mind.

    Pad mops are just that: a pad, typically microfiber and either disposable or washable, connected to a handle. They typically don’t come with a bucket or cleaning reservoir. Some pad mops are meant to be used dry on hardwood surfaces, while others can be used with a cleaning solution, though you’ll need to apply that from a separate container. Some are available in very wide sizes, and can be effective and efficient for lighter cleaning in large rooms without a ton of obstacles.

    Spray mops are akin to pad mops, but have a built-in cleaner reservoir and applicator, are relatively low maintenance and typically provide everything you need to get mopping right away. Their pads don’t have as much surface area as string mops and thus aren’t able to absorb as much liquid, and you don’t have a way to easily wring them out when they get saturated, so they are better suited for smaller mopping jobs like tidying up a single room unless you have a supply of pads ready to switch out during big projects. Some spray mops, like the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood and Floor Spray Mop use disposable pads, which are convenient for those who don’t want to hassle with laundry, but are less eco-friendly than reusable pads.

    Mopping is an essential element of cleaning any home with hard floors, but it takes a little planning. First, make sure to clear the floor of dry debris like pet hair and dirt — whether you do that with a handheld vacuum or cordless vacuum or by sweeping, or dry mopping (some mops are designed for or include a separate pad specifically for dry mopping). If using a string mop, fill your bucket with your cleaning solution (choose one that is designed for your specific flooring type), dunk your mop head and then wring it out until it’s damp but not dripping wet. If it’s too wet, you can damage your floors and increase the drying time.

    Then, using a figure-eight pattern, work from one end of the room to the other, pushing the mop but walking backwards so you don’t tread on the newly damp floor. If you encounter stubborn spots, apply some extra downward pressure and go back and forth a few extra times. Once your mop becomes dirty — this will depend on the state of your floors to begin with — rinse your mop head in the bucket, wring it out, and continue mopping. For especially dirty floors, you may need to employ a second “rinsing” bucket (or use your sink) to keep your mop head clean enough to work effectively.

    You use a spray mop or flat pad mop in essentially the same way — working your way backwards — but instead of figure-eights, work in straight lines. When the pad becomes too dirty to clean effectively, either rinse it off in the sink and wring it out by hand or replace it with a fresh one.

    Although some flooring materials — namely hardwood and some engineered laminate materials — require a more delicate touch, most hard flooring should be safe to mop.

    Ceramic tiles and linoleum are sturdy and are typically sealed well enough to be mopped without incident, but floors with more seams, like hardwood and vinyl plank can be more vulnerable to excess moisture. For these floors, make sure to use only the least amount of liquid possible to get the job done, and never allow water or cleaning solution to sit or pool for any length of time.

    You should also make sure to use the proper cleaning solution for your specific type of flooring. You’ll find many cleaning solutions formulated for different surfaces, though a dish soap and water solution works well for many surfaces. You’ll want to stay away from any abrasive cleaners, keep oil soaps to wood floors and only use bleach-based cleaners on tile floors. If you’re not sure what to use, or whether or not your mop can be used on your flooring (especially if you’re dealing with materials like cork or bamboo), take the time to carefully review the manufacturer’s recommendations.

    If your floors are severely worn, cracked or buckled you might want to consult with a flooring professional about repairs before beginning a mopping routine.

    Regardless of the type and size of the mop, it should be easy and comfortable to use. We paid close attention to both how the mop felt in our hands, as well as how easy — or difficult — it was to use any of its components and accessories. We looked at everything from attaching pads and heads, removing filling, and inserting cleaning reservoirs to how well the head could pivot and rotate around obstacles.

    We noted if any assembly was required when unboxing each mop, and if so, how straightforward or complicated it was. We also reviewed the instruction and use manuals for each mop, making sure they clearly explained how to put their product together, and we looked at whether the mop, bucket, and accessories were easy to store when not in use.

    We checked on whether the mop itself and any accessories or attachments, like liquid containers, pads or buckets, were made of quality materials, and took note if any components were flimsy or felt like they could fail with frequent use.

    If the mop heads were machine washable — nearly all of them were — we ran them through a full wash and dry cycle according to their instructions. We noted how well they held up during washing, examining if they begin to unravel or fall apart, appear to lose their structural integrity or feel like they lost any of their absorbency or scrubbing texture.

    We assessed performance on the three types of flooring that most commonly require mopping in the average home.

    • Hardwood flooring: We used each mop to completely mop a large section of sealed hardwood flooring, paying close attention to how well it removed dirt as well as absorbed excess liquid. We noted how dry (or not dry) we were able to get the mop head, since too much liquid can easily damage hardwood flooring, especially older planks like mine. We also checked how the floors looked after drying, making note of any leftover swirls, streaks or cleaning residue.
    • Linoleum kitchen tiles: After pouring 1/4 cup of soda on linoleum kitchen tiles we allowed it dry for a bit, then used each mop to clean it up. This helped to see how effective each mop was when it came to moderate scrubbing, as well as how absorbent they were in terms of removing excess liquid.
    • Bathroom tile: To test each mop’s ability to clean up stubborn bathroom floor messes, we rubbed a bar of soap on hard bathroom tiles, then rubbed in a handful of potting soil, creating a truly challenging mess. Each mop was judged based on its ability to both scrub up the soap residue, absorb the cleaning liquid and capture and contain the dirt without just pushing it around the room.

    Oshang Flat Floor Mop and Bucket Set

    $65 $50 at Amazon

    The Oshang Flat Floor Mop’s distinctive bucket features two slots, one for dunking your mop head and the other, narrower slot for squeegeeing the dirty water off and drying the pad. You can run the mop head through the drying slot as many times as you like, depending on how much water you want to remove. This made it effective for both hardwood floor work and tasks that you want a bit more water for, like the soap residue on bathroom tiles (though the pads weren’t the most effective scrubbers we tested). It also includes two wet and two dry pads, so you’re set for larger tasks. The compact footprint of the bucket makes this a good option for those who don’t have a lot of storage space.

    Bosheng Mop and Bucket

    $50 $40 at Amazon

    The Bosheng’s slotted bucket design is great for getting your mop head dry without bending over, but it wasn’t as easy to use, durable or effective as the otherwise very similar Oshang Flat Floor Mop and Bucket Set, which we would recommend in its place unless you’re on a very tight budget.

    This mop features an extra-large head — 15 by 5 inches — and a nearly 60-inch handle, making it well-suited for covering large areas quickly and efficiently. The clamping mechanism that attaches the pad to the mop head was impressive as well, and allowed for attaching and removing the pad far more easily than other pad mops that used Velcro attachments. The thick, heavy-duty stainless steel handle made it easy to maneuver the mop around the floor, and the pads can be used to dry mop, so no need to break out the broom and dustpan. The main drawback of this mop was the connection between the handle and the mop head itself, which felt flimsy and unstable. This was a shame because the rest of the unit had a nice, sturdy feel to it. The large size of this mop head could also be inconvenient for those with tight or cluttered spaces.

    The Libman Wonder Mop’s substantial microfiber strips were both good at scrubbing and long enough to reach around furniture legs and into tight spaces (between the wheels of a mobile kitchen island, for instance), and the packages included three extra mop heads. But the microfiber strips that make up the head were long enough to wrap around furniture legs and the wheels of my kitchen island, and the mop head popped right off during use and required reattachment several times, so we’re unsure that it would stand up under regular use.

    The O-Cedar cloth mop is well-built, with a sturdy metal pole that threads right into the mop head, while still remaining extremely lightweight at just 1.3 pounds. The microfiber loops are absorbent, but more importantly, they made it possible to perform aggressive scrubbing on problem areas. This made it one of the standouts in our kitchen and bathroom tile testing, and the looped design was ideal for capturing and containing dirt and debris. It didn’t fare too well on hardwood flooring though, as it just didn’t have the surface area to efficiently cover larger rooms. If you prefer a simple looped mop head, and are willing to purchase the separate quick-wring bucket needed for wringing it out, this could be a great choice.

    There’s a lot to like about this electric mop, as well as a few things that kept it out of the top spot. First of all, it’s really well-made, and the entire unit felt sturdy and solid. It came nearly fully assembled, too; you just attach the top part of the handle to the base, and that’s it, you’re ready to go. The twin rotating pads Velcroed easily to the base, and when turned on, worked almost like a self-propelled lawnmower, requiring almost no effort to push forward. Unfortunately, even though this mop did fairly well in our testing, this rotating action did end up leaving some faint swirl patterns on hardwood and kitchen tile. These were fairly easy to remove with another mop, but that really defeats the purpose altogether. The automatic operation also means that you aren’t really able to add any extra pressure if you encounter stubborn spots, so it’s only suited for lighter-duty cleaning. At over $100, this is an expensive option but it did include a large, 80-ounce jug of multi-surface cleaner.

    This large head makes it perfect for cleaning a large room with minimal passes — it worked incredibly fast in our hardwood floor testing — but it is inconvenient to use in tighter spots, like in the bathroom. That said, it did perform well overall, and was absorbent enough to really soak up a decent amount of liquid. It did suffer the same problem as other large pad mops, like the Mr. Siga Professional Microfiber Mop, in that its large surface area made it difficult to apply direct pressure to stubborn grime and sticky residue. It’s really better for lighter work. Putting a foot on the mop head and pressing down does the trick, but that’s certainly not an ideal solution, and likely not great for overall longevity of the mop. It’s worth noting that this mop includes a dedicated dust mop head (no other mop we tested had such an accessory), which worked really well for clearing dust and pet hair.

    It’s hard to deny the convenience of the disposable pads of the Swiffer WetJet Hardwood Floor Spray Mop. Instead of having to deal with reusable pads that need to be laundered after every use, you simply use these until they get dirty and toss them in the trash. This may not be the most eco-friendly approach, however, and several third-party providers offer reusable pads. Just remember that the more you clean, the more pads and cleaning solution you’ll need to purchase, which can really add up if you have a lot of floor to mop. The pads included with this model were not as absorbent as we would like, and struggled in our bathroom tile tests — they felt too slippery to actually capture and pick up the soap residue and dirt. That said, the mop is solidly built, and the dual sprayers covered an impressive amount of flooring. The dispenser is battery-operated. which could be a nice perk for those who don’t want to continually squeeze a trigger every time.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best cooling fans of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best cooling fans of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    If you’re looking to keep cool during the hottest months without running up your energy bill, a great cooling fan is your best bet. Used alone or along with your AC, a good fan can help you stay cool and alert on long Zoom calls in your home office or study sessions in your dorm room, and keep your house or apartment a whole lot more comfortable.

    We researched hundreds of models and brought in 13 highly rated options for testing. Over the course of four steamy summer weeks, we found that all of the fans did a similarly good job of keeping our test space cool but varied widely in features, build quality and usability. So while you’ll likely be happy with whichever fan you choose, we’ve picked out the best tower, pedestal and floor fans to suit your space.

    Best cooling fan overall

    The Honeywell tower fan has a small footprint and sleek design, a sturdy base and 8 speed settings, plus it’s quiet and affordable.

    Best splurge fan

    With striking design and impressive features, the Dyson is unlike any other fan we tested and is far more expensive, but it combines a fan, heater and air purifier, potentially replacing three appliances.

    Best pedestal fan

    This Rowenta fan had the sturdiest base and rod of the pedestal fans we tested, a clearly labelled control panel, and easy-to-assemble and maintain metal grilles.

    Best floor fan

    This Vornado fan is compact, sturdy and powerful, with a tiltable head and adjustable speed knob that is easy to use.

    Honeywell HYF290B fan

    A tower fan gives you great cooling performance with a small footprint, so it’s easy to place in a living room, bedroom or anywhere you’d prefer to tuck an appliance out of the way. The Honeywell Quietset Whole Room tower fan is well-built, quiet and affordable, with a solid, stable build and a beautiful, colorfully laid-out control panel that was simpler to figure out and use than the competition.

    The Honeywell Quietset was easier to assemble than the other tower fans we tested, with tool-free construction and a simple connection to the base that was a lot easier to deal with than the other tower models we looked at. Once we put it together, despite the Honeywell’s light weight, it was more stable than its competitors — some other lightweight towers, like the Lasko, wobbled with a push.

    Eight speed settings — more than the other tower fans we tested — give you the ability to fine-tune, though the three lower speeds were very similar in our testing. The clearly labeled controls and comfortable remote made it easy to click through the settings; other models were more finicky and difficult to adjust.

    As a unit that’s likely to be placed in a bedroom, we especially appreciate that the Honeywell let us not just dim its control panel lights but turn them off entirely. None of the other fans we tested offered this kind of control, which let us choose whether we wanted to sleep in total darkness or to just dim the controls so they weren’t distracting.

    Dyson HP09 fan

    The Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde HP09 impressed us with its effective cooling, quiet performance, solid build and ease of use — plus, it doubles as a space heater and air purifier, and can even monitor levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde (thus the name).

    As you’d expect (and likely demand given the price), the Dyson was more solidly built and stable in construction than any of the other tower fans we looked at. It also offered more fine-grained control over its various settings than any of the other units. Tool-free assembly made it simple to put together, and along with nicely engineered front panel controls, including an LCD screen and a slick remote that attaches magnetically for storage, the Dyson offers an app that not only lets you control the unit but also monitor pollutant levels.

    It’s radically different from everything else we tested, but if you’re interested in all of its features and your budget allows for its stratospheric price, it may be worth the splurge if you’re interested in all of the features, which potentially let you replace three separate appliances.

    Rowenta VU5670 fan

    While a pedestal fan isn’t as easy to slip into your decor as a tower, it gives you better coverage in larger rooms, since the blades clear your furniture. The Rowenta Turbo Silence Extreme VU5670 was the sturdiest, best built and easiest to adjust of the pedestal fans we tested, and with the tallest extension, it should be more usable in larger spaces than the other towers.

    The Rowenta was easier to put together than the other pedestal fans, taking us less than 15 minutes to assemble, and it came better packed than any other fan we looked at — there was so much cardboard packaging that it gave us pause, even if it is sourced from recycled materials.

    Once put together, the heavy base, secure connections and solidly built extension rod made it the most stable of the towers we checked out, even though it adjusted to a taller height than the Black+Decker, Lasko and Honeywell models. The head unit was easy to adjust, with soft clicks indicating the four available angles. The other towers were all stiffer-feeling and more difficult to tweak to a desired position.

    Controls were straightforward and easy to use, and the Rowenta’s remote control (which replicates all of the front panel controls) fit nicely in our grip; the remote stores in a slot on the back of the head unit when not in use. Some of the others lacked anywhere to stow the remote, meaning it’s likely to be lost.

    Vornado 533DC fan

    A floor fan (which can be placed on a desk or table as well) is easy to place almost anywhere, making it great to have on hand to cool a space like a kitchen, office or bath when needed. The Vornado Energy Smart 533DC was lighter than the others we tested and easier to carry around our testing space, even though it was more sturdily built and easier to adjust than its competitors.

    At 3.44 pounds, the Vornado was significantly lighter than some of the other fans, like the 9.25-pound Lasko Wind Machine 3300. Rubber grips on its underside kept it stable on any setting, and it resisted toppling when we tried to jostle it, unlike some of the other lightweight models like the Black+Decker BFB09W.

    The Vornado’s directional settings were easy to select and secure in operation, and while it wasn’t quite as adjustable as the Lasko Wind Machine 3300, it gave us a good range of usable settings. We also preferred the Vornado’s silver speed dial, which let us adjust settings with one continuous, smooth, quiet motion, over the controls on the other circulators.

    The one downside we found was that, technically, the Vornado Energy Smart 533DC was the loudest of the bunch, though all of the fans we tested were quieter than our reference Conair 1875 hair dryer set on low. We didn’t find even the Vornado’s noise distracting enough while we worked, read or slept nearby in the same room.

    Lastly, the Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan is covered by a 10-year limited warranty, which is much longer than the 1-year warranties of the Black+Decker BFB09W, the Honeywell HT-900 and the Lasko 3300 circulator fans we tested.

    While all of the fans we tested performed well at their fundamental job — moving air around efficiently and saving you from having to crank up your window air conditioner — the type of cooling fan you’ll want to purchase depends on the size and type of space you want to use it in, the size of the fan and your budget. Whatever you select, a fan is a cost-effective way to cool your home, but we have some tips.

    A floor fan is great if you need something that’s compact enough to fit on a table or desk, and it’s something you can move around to use as needed. Circulator fans — the design made familiar by Vornado and also found in units like the Black+Decker and Honeywell models we tested — are great examples of personal fans that don’t take up a lot of space.

    If you want something more powerful and plan to use it all the time but don’t have a ton of space (and don’t want to make your fan a visual centerpiece in your room), a tower fan is a great choice. With a small footprint and plenty of cooling power, a tower fan is great for a living room or bedroom, where you want to keep the air moving without a lot of visual distraction.

    A pedestal fan, which places a traditional fan-blade head on top of a long extension pole, is a more in-your-face design choice. But because the blade unit is placed high enough to clear your furniture, it can circulate air through a larger space — it’s great for everything from patios to basements to rec rooms.

    Since most fans within a given category work pretty well, budgeting more gives you more features and better aesthetics. You can find super-affordable basic units like the approximately $17 Black+Decker circulator, or scale up to the striking, feature-laden, multipurpose Dyson tower at just under $770.

    Whichever you choose, you’ll benefit from better air circulation and should find yourself depending less on your air conditioning.

    We tested 13 fans over four summer weeks to find the most effective and efficient indoor fans available. In our testing pool, we included oscillator/oscillating fans, bladeless fans and other electric fans that were adept at circulating the air in our basement. Some fans had a battery-powered remote control and some did not.

    To test the fans, we unboxed, assembled and ran the fans for hours while we were sleeping, reading and writing in the room. We took notes on ease of setup, design and features, customization, performance, energy efficiency, noise level, battery, warranty, user manual, ease of cleaning, price and more.

    We set up all the fans, one at a time, in the same spot and plugged into the same outlet in our approximately 1,250-square-foot finished basement. We tracked the falling temperature of the room during our tests using the SensorPush HTP.xw Wireless Thermometer/Hygrometer with its iOS app on an iPhone 11; the SensorPush device was calibrated using a Boveda One-Step Calibration Kit. This was the same SensorPush we used when we tested the best dehumidifiers. This time, we noted the temperature of the basement before and after our two-hour tests by examining reports sent from the SensorPush.

    To track energy consumption, we plugged each fan into a P3 International Kill A Watt EZ electricity usage monitor while running them for two hours at their highest speed, without oscillation. We noted the amps and watts used during those two hours.

    We also recorded the fans’ noise levels by using the Sound Level Meter (SLM) app from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) on our iPhone 11, which was set upon a table 36 inches away from the fan. We measured the noise levels produced by each fan over a one-hour period while running at its highest speed without oscillation (if the fan was capable of oscillating) in our quiet basement using the NIOSH app.

    While all the models we tested made an audible hum in operation, in the end, each unit measured at an average level of around 52.6 decibels (dB) — no louder than the hum of a running refrigerator and not loud enough to interfere with conversation or sleep. Therefore, any of the fans we tested would be suitable for most spaces around your house, home office or dorm room.

    Setup

    • Plug and play: Can we unbox an assembled fan and immediately plug it in?
    • Ease of assembly: Is the fan easy to assemble?
    • Tools required: Can you assemble the fan by hand, or do you need tools of any kind? Are those tools included?
    • Downloadable app: Is there an iOS and Android app available?
    • Smart plug: Can the fan work with a smart plug?


    Design and features

    • Footprint: Does the fan have an upright, vertical build?
    • Materials: Are the fan parts made of plastic or metal?
    • Buttons: Are the fan’s buttons easy to reach and intuitive to learn?
    • Cord: How long is the fan’s power cord?
    • Extension cord: Does the manufacturer recommend using the fan with an extension cord?
    • Oscillation: Does the fan move from side to side, or does it oscillate within a fixed base?
    • Fixed or oscillating: Does the fan give you the choice between oscillating or stationary?
    • Oscillation angle: Can the fan’s oscillation angle be customized between 45, 90, 180 and 350 degrees?
    • Control panel: Does the fan have one and does it show ambient temperature readings?
    • Autopilot mode: Does the fan have this mode, and does it work when the room temperature hits a certain threshold?
    • Voice controls: Does the fan support Alexa or Siri and the like?


    Customization

    • Control via an app: Can you control the fan using a mobile app?
    • Scheduling: Does the fan offer you the ability to set a custom schedule?
    • Adjustable height: Can you adjust the height of the fan’s stand?
    • Pivot or tilt: Does the fan’s head pivot or tilt?
    • Airflow: Can you adjust the direction and angle of the airflow?
    • Settings: Is it easy to adjust the fan’s settings?
    • Mobility: Can the fan be moved from room to room with a built-in carrying handle?


    Performance

    • Reliability: Does the fan work as intended?
    • Room size: Can the fan cool off a medium to large room on a hot day?
    • Programmable timer: Does the fan come with a sleep timer? How many hours can you preprogram it to run before turning off?
    • Settings: Does the fan have a mode that simulates a natural breeze?
    • Remote control: Does the fan come with a remote control and are batteries included?
    • Docking: Does the fan provide a docking option to keep the remote control stored when not is use?
    • Speed settings: How many speeds does the fan operate in?
    • Noise level: Do the settings range from a near-silent, 26 dB Sleep setting and a comfortably quiet, 28 dB White Noise setting up to more powerful settings?
    • Range: How many feet does the fan’s airflow reach?
    • Night mode: Does the fan’s control panel have a night mode so you can turn off the screen or buttons when napping or sleeping?


    Energy efficiency

    • Watts used: Is the fan energy efficient? Does it draw 36 watts or less at full blast?


    Battery

    • Requirement: Does the fan require batteries?
    • Type: What kind of battery does the fan or fan’s remote control use?


    Warranty

    • Length: How many years is the included warranty good for?
    • Type: What does the warranty cover?


    User manual

    • Languages: How many languages is the user manual available in?
    • Usefulness: Does the user manual help you with setup and use?
    • Type: Is a printed user manual included out of the box and can it also be found online?


    Ease of cleaning

    • Removable grille: Does the fan have grilles, and are they removable to clean?
    • Blades: Does the fan have blades, and are they accessible to clean?
    • Filter: Does the fan require a filter, and does it come with one filter replacement out of the box?
    • Filter replacement: How easy is it to order another filter?

    We found this Vornado fan simple to set up, as it slid in almost one solid piece out of the box, but we needed to assemble its two base halves together and then screw them tighter together using a screwdriver. A screwdriver was not needed to assemble the Honeywell Quietset Whole Room HYF290B tower fan, which was the easiest tower fan for us to set up. The Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde HP09 tower fan did not require us to find a screwdriver either. We thought the Vornado Whole Room was quite sturdy and powerful, as it cooled off our basement testing area, but we quickly realized that it does not oscillate from side to side; rather, it circulates the room’s air from within the unit. This is unlike the Honeywell Quietset Whole Room HYF290B tower fan, which we set to oscillate on eight different speed settings. The Vornado Whole Room 184 is also taller than the Lasko 36-Inch 2511 tower fan and is much taller than the Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde HP09 tower fan. The Vornado Whole Room 184 is also just slightly taller than the Honeywell Quietset Whole Room HYF290B tower fan. This makes the Vornado a fan that’s a bit more difficult to include in your room without it being in the way.

    From $68 at Amazon or $74 at Walmart

    This Lasko fan was easy for us to set up, but once set up, we found the unit to be a bit wobbly in its base, unlike the sturdy bases of the Honeywell Quietset Whole Room HYF290B tower fan and the Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Formaldehyde HP09 tower fan. The wobbling action of the Lasko did not happen on its own during testing, but rather, after we gently pushed the tower from side to side; it rocked from side to side as a result. It was not sturdy and rigid like the other towers we tested, which gave us pause in recommending it to anyone with pets or small children, for example. We did like the remote control of this fan, which let us turn it on and off, select its three speed settings, set it to oscillate and set the timer for one, two and four hours. This timer button was surprisingly missing from the remote control of the Honeywell Quietset Whole Room HYF290B tower fan, even though the Honeywell includes a timer on its control panel on top of the unit.

    Honeywell Double-Blade Whole Room HSF1640B Standing Fan

    This Honeywell fan was simple for us to assemble, and we found it sturdy as well. We could easily make it oscillate from side to side, and we thought it provided good airflow during testing. Its construction and materials are markedly similar (almost identical) to that of the Black+Decker Dual Blade BFSD116B standing fan. The only differences we found during testing was that the Honeywell Double-Blade Whole Room standing fan has a shorter rod/extension rod, but its front and rear plastic grilles are much simpler to assemble than those of the Black+Decker, thanks to the Honeywell’s five well-placed and well-designed clips on its rear grille.

    Lasko 16-Inch Oscillating 2521 Standing Fan

    This Lasko fan was easy for us to assemble, too. It also operated quietly enough in the room that we didn’t notice it made much noise while we tested it. But we noticed it was shorter and weighed less than the other pedestal fans we tested, making it less durable and sturdy. We also noticed that it was quite easy for us to pull up on the fan’s rod (to lift the fan up to carry it across the room) but have the entire rod lift out from its base when we did so. Luckily, we only tried moving it when it was turned off, but we could see how this could be a potentially dangerous action should anyone try to move it even a foot away while it’s turned on.

    Vornado Whole Room 783 Standing Fan

    This Vornado fan did not require us to do much assembling other than putting its head onto its rod and curved U-shaped base. It doesn’t come with a remote control, and it doesn’t feature a control panel. It simply has a three-speed dial on the back of the unit’s circular head, much like the Lasko 16-Inch Oscillating 2521 standing fan. The whole look of this Vornado Whole Room 783 reminded us of the Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan, as its head is basically the same, just larger, and it sits on a long metal pole and base. Though powerful and well made, we think the other fans we tested would look better in a home or dorm environment, as the Vornado is kind of bulky and hard to miss visually.

    Black+Decker Dual-Blade BFSD116B Standing Fan

    $66 $63 at Amazon or $70 $53 at Walmart

    This Black+Decker fan was easy to assemble — that is, until we tried to attach its rear and front grilles together. There is a plastic ring that secures the two grilles together, but we found the fan’s one flimsy clasp on the front grille was not enough to firmly secure the two grilles together. We kept wrestling with the three parts of the fan to make them work; it took us about 20 minutes longer to assemble this fan than it did all the others in our testing. Once assembled, though, we were able to set the fan to oscillate and found it cooled off our testing room nicely. However, we cannot recommend this fan due to its unnecessary difficulty in assembling what should be a simple grille attachment.

    This Lasko fan was easy for us to set up since, like the other circulator fans we tested, it requires no assembly; we just lifted it out of its box and plugged it in. We liked its fully tiltable head, which we were able to push all the way around (almost 360 degrees) to cool off either side of our testing area. But we found its blue control knob on the back of the fan to be a bit cumbersome to reach, as we had to tilt the fan down to access it, and even then, the knob felt a bit wobbly in our grip. This was unlike the firm, smooth motion we enjoyed while turning the knob on the Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan. The Lasko Wind Machine 3300 circulator fan is also much bigger than the other floor fans we tested, so we had trouble sitting it atop our desk, which quite frankly, it isn’t designed to do. This is unlike the Honeywell Turbo Force HT-900 and the Black+Decker 9-Inch BFB09W circulator fans we tested since they’re compact enough to fit atop a desk or table as well as the floor. Even though we appreciated Lasko’s built-in carrying handle on top of the fan, its 9.25-pound weight made it more difficult for us to carry from one part of our testing area than the 3.44-pound Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan.

    This Honeywell fan is powerful for its size and provides a good, cooling airflow. We tilted its head to see how many angles we could direct its airflow in but found the circular motion of the tilt to be choppy and loud, unlike the smooth, silent tilting action of the winning Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan. The Honeywell also has a small speed dial on the back of its head that only fits the tips of our index finger and thumb comfortably. The dial let us turn it to set three different speeds, and with each turn, we heard a loud clicking sound. This was unlike the dial on the Vornado, which lets you grip it comfortably as you smoothly and quietly rotate it around clockwise and back.

    This Black+Decker fan was able to fit onto our testing desk with ease, its footprint taking up less space than the other circulator fans we tested. Its three speed settings were easy for us to adjust during testing; all we had to do was simply turn the small manual dial on the lower right-hand side of the fan in a clockwise direction. Its dial was easier for us to reach than the blue dial on the back of the Lasko Wind Machine 3300 circulator fan, but we found the clicking sounds the Black+Decker 9-Inch BFB09W circulator fan’s dial made as we turned it through its three speed settings to be loud — as loud as the three-speed dial on the back of the Honeywell Turbo Force HT-900 circulator fan. In contrast, we were able to adjust the Vornado Energy Smart 533DC circulator fan’s speed dial with one continuous, smooth motion — with just a barely audible click when the fan is turned from the “off” position.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best products we tested in March 2023: Flashlights, photo printers and more | CNN Underscored

    The best products we tested in March 2023: Flashlights, photo printers and more | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored is constantly testing products — be those flashlights, photo printers or food dehydrators — to find the absolute best in each respective category. Our testing process is rigorous, starting out by spending hours of research to find the top products in each category. Once we create a testing pool of products, we test and retest each product multiple times in real-world settings over several weeks or even months.

    This year, we’ve already tested several hundred products — from PS5 games to smartphone apps to wireless speakers — to find the best products you need to make life better. Here are the winning products from March.

    Wireless earbuds with incredible battery life and comfort

    If you’re looking to spend less than $100 on a pair of noise-canceling earbuds — and want something stylish and low-profile — it’s hard to do much better than the Jabra Elite 4.

    An impressible and uniquely stylish set of wireless earbuds

    If you’re looking to spend less than $150 on a quality set of noise-canceling earbuds — and want something that stands out from the pack — the Nothing Ear (2) are worth it.

    A good audiophile option

    If you’re willing to splurge on a stylish pair of headphones with true audiophile-grade sound (and can live without features like active noise cancellation), the Master & Dynamic MH40 are worth the investment.

    An excellent small wireless speaker

    The Era 100 produces a bigger sound than the Sonos One without increasing the size much and delivers impressive bass for a small speaker. It adds Bluetooth and the option for external sources through a line-in adapter. But the price has gone up again.

    Room-filling sound from one speaker

    The Era 300 makes it easy to bask in immersive spatial audio — with its wide sound, it feels like you’re listening to more than one speaker. Thanks to crisp treble and deep bass, it sounds good with regular stereo music, too. It’s packed with features, but you pay a premium for the privilege.

    Best drip coffee maker overall

    The Braun KF6050WH BrewSense Drip Coffee Maker produced consistently delicious, hot cups of coffee, brewed efficiently and cleanly, from sleek, relatively compact hardware that is turnkey to operate, and all for a reasonable price.

    Unique outdoor rowing experience with a clean, intuitive interface

    The Hydrow Rower is a sleek, premium rowing machine that pairs with a $44-per-month All-Access membership. Yes, it offers a kicking cardio and full-body workout, but we loved how it takes rowing back to its roots with live classes filmed at real-world locales. It may be pricey, but if you want to feel like you’re rowing on the water, then this home gym rowing machine is for you.

    The perfect treadmill for running in smaller spaces

    If you’ve always wanted a treadmill but didn’t have the space or the cash for a larger machine, the ProForm Carbon T7 is a perfect compromise. No, it doesn’t have the horsepower of larger, pricier treadmills, but you do get a wealth of advanced AI features as well as access to different types of classes with the iFit subscription (which is free for three years). And a smaller footprint paired with a budget price is nothing to sneeze at when you’re thinking about adding to your home gym.

    A cult classic trail runner with even better traction

    Fans of the Lone Peak series will love the new 7s for their wide width and upgraded grip, while newcomers to this shoe might be surprised at its lack of cushioning and zero-drop design. Either way, Altra has managed to deliver yet another awesome trail sneaker, with slip-proof laces and just the right amount of breathable mesh.

    A close-to-perfect bottle with a few shortcomings

    It isn’t perfect, but the collapsible HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L bottle has an incredible flow rate and a durable exterior, making it a top dog in the market of bottles with built-in filters. Difficulty keeping it clean, particularly in the long term, holds it back from being a perfect option.

    The definitive version of a survival horror masterpiece

    Resident Evil 4 is an outstanding retelling of the 2005 original single player story for modern audiences. Everything from the upgraded combat and mobility to the striking audio and visuals go a long way in making this the definitive take on Resident Evil 4.

    Best food dehydrator overall

    With hassle-free operation and consistent drying, the Nesco Gardenmaster offered the best balance of simplicity and performance of any food dehydrator we tested, and is a great choice for anyone looking to preserve herbs, fruits and vegetables or meats.

    A plush bed in a box that’s great for side or back sleepers who appreciate softness

    Leesa’s Legend Mattress is an excellent mattress for side sleepers, with soft support to alleviate pressure and back pain and a breathable top cover and ventilated foam layer to keep you cool.

    A useful sleep aid that focuses on calm breathing

    The Dodow sleep aid is a unique and useful device. It helped us fall asleep faster, and more consistently. It isn’t hard to learn to sync your breath with the light, and once you get used to the process, you’ll feel the results. Just breathe in when it expands and out when it contracts.

    An attractive, multitasking bedside assistant

    The Hatch Restore 2 is an all-encompassing sleep machine that uses light and sound to help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. The accompanying app gives you access to a library full of colored lights, white noise, sleep stories and guided meditation. But where the Restore 2 really shines is its amazingly pleasant Sunrise Alarm, which wakes you gently and more humanely than the average alarm clock.

    A convenient, app-based countertop oven for busy cooks

    The Tovala Smart Oven Air Fryer offers a simple, fresh meal delivery service for one and Wi-Fi connected, one-touch cooking. A great budget toaster oven if you order meals, it jumps to a pricier, less useful purchase if you’re more interested in cooking from scratch. However, if you’re looking to save time and energy, then this countertop oven beats out supermarket frozen food and takeout.

    Best meal planning app overall

    During testing, we found Eat This Much Premium easy to set up. Its meal customization options and editable grocery lists are a delight to use and we appreciated its comprehensive recipe library. It also had the best online help and customer support of the meal planning apps we tested.

    Best plant identification app for mobile overall

    During testing, we found PlantNet easy to use, accurate and fast. This free app guides you during setup, lets you search by map or flora, and suggests you enable geolocation (GPS) to improve its plant identification.

    The ideal travel backpack if you want to pack for several days away without checking a bag

    The Incase A.R.C. Travel Pack is equal parts backpack and suitcase. Its butterfly-style packing system lets you maximize space for packing clothes and other essentials, while it has a separate laptop compartment and plenty of additional pockets. While it’s on the pricey side, its durable exterior and versatility make this a solid addition to your travel wardrobe.

    Best checked suitcase overall

    With fantastic internal organization and compression, a durable exterior and comfortable handles, the Away Medium suitcase was the most well-rounded bag we tested, with a great combination of maneuverability, capacity, durability and style.

    Best robot mop overall

    The compact, inexpensive iRobot Braava Jet 240 is simply the best robot mop for the money. While it doesn’t have the smarts of more expensive models and can’t do double duty as a vacuum, its efficient design and simple pattern-based navigation deliver impressive cleaning.

    Best robot vacuum overall

    The iRobot Roomba j7+ is the best robot vacuum you can buy right now, with impressive cleaning power and smart mapping that creates virtual boundaries to detect and avoid obstacles.

    Best office chair overall

    The Steelcase Series 1 stood out as one of the most customizable, high-quality, comfortable office chairs on the market, beating out chairs double the price — making it the best bang for the buck.

    The perfect sub-$400 monitor for your home office

    The LG UltraFine 4K is a great sub-$400 monitor for anyone looking to upgrade their home office, offering great 4K picture quality and plenty of ports.

    Best photo printer overall

    In our tests, the Pro 200 turned out prints comparable in quality much more expensive models, and running costs are relatively low. Straightforward setup and impressive results made it the best value among the photo printers we tested.

    [ad_2]

    Source link