ReportWire

Tag: underscored-reviews

  • The Casper Wave Hybrid Snow is a luxurious memory foam mattress meant to keep hot sleepers cool | CNN Underscored

    The Casper Wave Hybrid Snow is a luxurious memory foam mattress meant to keep hot sleepers cool | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Since launching its first bed-in-a-box, Casper has added higher-end offerings to its lineup, and the new, top-of-the-line Wave Hybrid Snow mattress adds cooling material to the popular Wave Hybrid. As the name “Snow” suggests, it’s meant for hot sleepers who want to keep cool while enjoying the comfort of a foam bed.

    We slept on the Wave Hybrid Snow Mattress for a month, testing to see if its mix of perforated foam and cool-touch fabrics really delivered on the company’s promise.

    A luxury memory foam mattress with cooling features for hot sleepers

    Hot sleepers who need support will love Casper’s Wave Hybrid Snow mattress, which kept us cooler than other memory foam mattresses we’ve tested. And like all Casper mattresses, it comes to you in a compact box that makes it easy to get into your bedroom.

    Memory foam mattress owners often complain that despite their comfort, the mattresses make them hot. The Wave Hybrid Snow mattress attempts to address this with a combination of inner springs, latex and foam, plus a new cool-touch top layer. And, in our testing, we found that we felt less hot on the Hybrid Snow than we did sleeping on traditional memory foam mattresses. Paired with a great cooling pillow and a set of linen sheets, it can definitely help address the needs of hot sleepers looking to avoid overheating during the night.

    The Wave Hybrid Snow felt instantly different when lying on it compared to previous memory foam mattresses we’ve tried and owned. The top fabric feels cool to the touch, as Casper intended, and is immediately refreshing. However, this cool feeling disappears after lying on it for a few minutes. But that’s not the entire story.

    The foam itself felt lighter than other memory foam mattresses, and over the course of the night we found we felt cooler, even after the immediate sensation of cooling from the top fabric layer had diminished.

    According to Casper, beneath the top fabric are three layers to help with cooling. The first layer is perforated foam, followed by a layer of latex with Casper’s “heat delete bands” and another layer of perforated foam, all designed to help disperse heat. Our experience bore out the company’s claims, and we think the Wave Hybrid Snow is a good option for hot sleepers who are fans of memory foam to finally beat the heat.

    Like the rest of Casper’s mattresses, the Wave Hybrid Snow comes in only one firmness level. Based on our experience with the Wave Hybrid Snow and other Casper products we’d say this is comparable to the soft mattresses offered by other brands, and we think that side and back sleepers who like a softer bed will find this supportive and plush.

    While it’s soft, the Wave Hybrid Snow doesn’t skimp on support. The mattress has gel pods under the waist and lower back area to offer more support, and while we didn’t feel these areas while we were sleeping (a good thing), we did find that the mattress was more supportive in the middle, and this was true across the width of the mattress. There is also edge support around the bed’s perimeter to help prevent sagging when sitting on the edge.

    One drawback of some memory foam beds — especially those that ship in a box — is that they have a chemical smell when removing the wrap. The Casper mattress came vacuum-sealed in a bag, but upon opening it we didn’t detect the slightest hint of any chemical smell. Casper’s foams are CertiPUR-US certified, which means they’re made without ozone-depleting chemicals. The brand also tests for low volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions for indoor air quality (less than 0.5 parts per million).

    Casper mattresses come compressed tightly into a box. which isn't just great for saving on shipping. The compact size makes it relatively easy to wrangle the mattress into tight spaces, like this small bedroom, though we struggled a bit with the Wave Hybrid Snow's heavy weight.

    Not only is it nice to get a mattress delivered to your house or apartment, the packaging makes it easier to get it to your bedroom too. Like other Casper products, the queen-size mattress comes in a fairly manageable (though extremely heavy) box, in this case approximately 4 feet high and 2 feet in width and length. It was easy to get into our home and into the bedroom, without any worries about how to squeeze the box through doorframes or pivot on staircases, as with large traditional mattresses. The box has side cutout handles that make it easy to grab while moving it, which was very helpful when moving it around.

    Casper’s mattresses come in only one firmness level, and that includes the Wave Hybrid Snow. Unlike other brands, Casper doesn’t offer a choice of plush, medium or firm, and the company doesn’t specify how firm the Wave Hybrid Snow or any of its mattresses are by comparison with competitors. We found the bed was soft when testing it, so those who prefer firm mattresses may find this too soft.

    I expected this mattress to be heavy — after all, it is a mattress — but I didn’t expect it to be so hefty I wouldn’t be able to move it by myself. I managed to scoot the box with a lot of effort, but I had to enlist the help of a friend to put the 111-pound mattress on the bed and take it out of the vacuum-sealed plastic. Even with the two of us it was still a struggle but doable. (For reference, I’m 5 feett, 2 inches tall, so someone with a bigger stature may not have as much trouble.)

    Instructions and labeling should be clearer

    One might think it’s pretty simple to set up a bed by removing the plastic and letting it inflate. Casper’s instructions were a bit too minimal, however, with just three pictures accompanying instructions to cut the plastic, unroll the bed toward you and then cut the vacuum-sealed plastic to inflate the mattress.

    While this sounds relatively simple enough, as packed it was unclear which was the foot or top of the bed or if there was even a difference, making it confusing to know if we had to turn the bed. We rolled the plastic in the direction pictured (or so we thought), ending up with the bottom side of the bed facing up, meaning we had to flip the 111-pound mattress immediately. We’d love to see clearer labeling on the package itself.

    Overall, the Wave Hybrid Snow is enjoyable to sleep on, comfortable and doesn’t cause any tossing and turning. It doesn’t feel like you’re sleeping on snow like the name might imply, but it does feel cooler. Compared to other memory foam mattresses I’ve tested or owned in the past, this bed releases heat better. It’s a great choice for those who sleep hot and find regular foam mattresses too hot or for those who want a cooler mattress.

    One thing to note: The top layer of foam feels light and airy rather than squishy like some memory foam, which gives less of a sinking feeling than typical memory foam. That’s not to say it doesn’t sink in — it has some give — but it may not be for someone who likes being hugged by memory foam. Also, because it comes in only one firmness level, which I found soft, it’s not for someone who likes a firm bed.

    This bed is pricier than other direct-to-consumer memory foam mattresses (and is at the very top end of Casper’s range). That said, it’s not as pricey as equivalents you might find at brick-and-mortar retailers: The Tempur-Pedic 8° Cooler LUXEbreeze, for example, is much more expensive, at $5,449 for a queen. And if you can snag the Wave Hybrid Snow on sale, it’s an even better deal; we’ve seen it on sale periodically at 25% off, bringing it under $3,000 for a queen, comparable in price to other memory foam mattresses

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best linen sheets of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best linen sheets of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Softer and more durable than cotton, nothing feels as luxurious as a well-worn set of linen sheets. Plus, with their open weave and excellent sweat-wicking properties, linen sheets are great to keep you cool heading into the warmer months of the year, or for regulating warmth along with additional layers in the winter.

    To find the best linen sheets we tried out fourteen popular sets, sleeping on them, washing them repeatedly, and checking carefully for fit and manufacturing quality. All of the sheet sets we brought in were well-made, but we found five sets that, regardless of your budget and tastes, stood out for their softness, fabric weight, and simplicity of ordering.

    The best linen sheets overall

    Among the most luxe feeling we tested, the Parachute linen sheets have pleasant weight in hand and a unique texture. The Parachute sheets come in a broad range of colors and sizes, and each different piece of the bedding set is available individually for replacements or to mix & match with other fabrics.

    A runner-up set of great linen sheets

    The light and gauzy, but durable Citizenry sheets are a master class in stylish rest. Woven in a mill in Portugal from French flax, these have deep pockets and an amply sized top sheet to fit on any depth of bed.

    The softest linen sheets

    The Brooklinen sheets are soft and light, wicking heat away effectively for people who sleep warm, but still regulating heat nicely in cooler climates. Simultaneously high-end and already perfectly worn in, these were delightful from the first touch.

    The best affordable linen sheets

    The Simple & Opulence sheets held their own in comfort and design, with a soft feel out of the box, and lovely satin-stitched piping along the edge of the top sheet. The Simple & Opulence set has the weight and hand of much more expensive sheets, but come at nearly half the cost.

    The best luxury linen sheets

    Offering the best of all worlds, the Cultiver linen sheets feel elegant straight out of the box. Their fit on the bed is impeccable, and they only got softer with repeated washings. Available in more colors than any other sheets we tested, these are sure to satisfy nearly any taste or style.

    We loved the Parachute Linen Sheet Set for its luxurious hand, and weighty feel in hand that most others we tested didn’t possess. They feel great right out of the dryer, and making the bed with these sheets was effortless, and for those who don’t want to commit to a full set from the start, they are also available piecewise.

    We’ve struggled with tight-fitting cotton sheets before, wondering why bed-making must be laborious. The Parachute linens were roomy but not baggy. They fit the bed comfortably, and felt lovingly worn-in from the start. The sheets were soft but also firm––cool and luxurious, it felt like we were sleeping on a cloud. Our only gripe with this set was the tight fit of the pillowcases, barely closing around our standard pillows.

    After laundering, the Parachute sheets softened and wrinkled — a lot. Although all the linen sheets we tested wrinkled after washing (it’s part of linen’s texture), these wrinkled more extensively than most. This didn’t cause problems on our bed, and is pleasant texture if you don’t mind a more natural, mesier look, and you can always iron them on a low setting if it bothers you. That said, the texture is part of the sheets’ luxurious, upscale feel. They also have OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification, meaning they have been independently confirmed to contain no “harmful substances” and are “harmless for human health.”

    We also appreciate Parachute’s a la carte shopping options. For those who use only a duvet, you can purchase just a fitted sheet and pillowcases; a top sheet is a separate add-on. Fitted sheets and pillowcases are available separately too. Parachute sheets come in ample size and color offerings for a diversity of bed sizes and styles. This level of variety, plus a very elegant and plush sleep offering, elevated the Parachute brand to our top spot.

    Citizenry Stonewashed Linen Sheet Set

    The Citizenry Stonewashed Linen Sheet Set smelled great upon arrival and felt equally great right out of the attractive packaging, though their feel was not as luxurious as Parachute’s. With gauzy construction, they’re lovely to slip into, and they softened substantially on first wash. We like that they come in a range of color and size options, too.

    The Citizentry’s sheets are gorgeous. We appreciated the delicately perforated hem on the top sheet and the pillow, making the bed presentation feel like more of an occasion. These are light and gauzy (noticeably more so than Parachute), ideal for summer weather. After the first washing, these sheets softened significantly. They were surprisingly cozy and snuggly. These sheets are roomy widthwise, and may seem a bit baggy on slimmer mattresses. They would be a good choice for deeper mattresses.

    Citizenry’s linen sheets don’t offer the breadth of choices that others do. They come in 12 colors, including neturals and subtle stripes, but they are available in just four sizes.

    Brooklinen Linen Core sheets

    The Brooklinen Linen Core sheets were the softest linen sheets we tested, with much less of a rough fiber feel than anything else we tested. The Brooklinen set arrived already feeling worn in. They were easy to wash, exhibited minimal shrinkage after the first washing, and come in a broad array of size and color choices.

    First and foremost, these sheets are the softest we tested. Crafted from French and Belgian linen, they are comfortable and enveloping. They felt like they had been washed and re-washed dozens of times, already achieving the sought-after worn-in texture that typically takes years to achieve. Along with the Citizenry, these sheets were the softest to the touch, even among linen sheets, which can have a reputation for roughness. The fabric is light and gauzy, making them perfect for hot sleepers or warm summer nights. The Brooklinen sheets are also Oeko-Tex certified.

    We like the handful of thoughtful features added to this set that makes them easy to get on and off when making a bed. The fitted sheets are labeled “Short” or “Long” on each side, so you don’t waste time figuring out which end goes where, and the pillowcases have envelope closures that tidily punctuate your pillow so it’s not exposed beyond the case.

    These sheets don’t offer as much purchasing flexibility as many of the other brands we tried as Brooklinen only offers the flat sheet and pillowcases for individual purchase. But conveniently, they are available in 6 sizes and 12 colors.

    On the downside, the gauzy feel comes at the expense of material weight — the Brooklinen sheets feel thin, and we were able to see our pillows and mattress through the white set that Brooklinen sent for testing. Though they didn’t exhibit any troubling signs of wear and tear, the thin material raised some questions about long term durability, so we’ll keep an eye on them over time. Also, the Brooklinen sheets may be better suited to deeper mattresses, as they were relatively oversized on our slim mattress, and exhibited a lot of bunching after repeated nights of sleep.

    Amazon Simple & Opulence 100% Washed Linen Sheet Set

    The Simple & Opulence 100% Washed Linen sheets cost half as much as many of the sheet sets we tested, without compromising on feel or quality. For less than $150, this is a satisfying set of linens. The flat sheet is adorned with a satin-stitched hem along the top, for a refined touch. These sheets are a bit thicker than others we tried, but felt equally elegant, and were able to hold their own against higher-end options.

    Out of the box, the Simple & Opulence sheets were cool and soft. They felt pleasant against the skin and every time we got out of bed, they left us wanting to get back in. They also fit the bed more snugly than most of the other sets, which was helpful during bed-making, and yielded a tidier-looking final product than others we tested. The Simple & Opulence sheets were slightly less luxurious than other sets we tested and a bit heavier, the high quality at a low cost makes them more than worth the weight.

    Our only gripe about this sheet set was that they were a bit less soft than competitors, though even after a single wash, they softened up substantially, and we think they should break in nicely over time. The fitted sheet was snug on our mattress, and the top sheet was amply sized for tucking in crisp hospital corners.

    The Simple & Opulence sheets come in four size options (twin, full, queen and king) and fifteen colors. They are available in individual fitted and flat sheets, though pillowcase sets are not available separately.

    Cultiver Linen Sheet Set

    The Cultiver linen sheets were hands-down the best linen sheets we tested, with the most luxurious, substantial feel and a light weight in hand.. These sheets felt soft straight out of the box, and only softened with wear. They come in the widest variety of colors of any set we tested, and all of Cultiver’s bedding is sold piecewise or in sets.

    The linen fabric Cultiver uses doesn’t have any of the scratchiness we felt with heavier linen sheet sets, and was forgiving on our skin. These sheets are also breathable, insulating when it’s especially cold, but also wicking heat effectively on warmer nights.

    Each item in Cultiver’s set was perfectly constructed and sized. The fitted sheet is snug on our bed, without any excess fabric bunching in the middle of the mattress, or around the sides. And the pillowcases have an envelope enclosure on the back with ample overlap to fully cover pillows.

    The Cultiver sheets are also the most versatile we tested. They come in seventeen color choices––more than any other set we considered. Cultiver makes it easy to mix and match bedding pieces to suit any preferences, too. They offer duvet sets, sheet sets, and a mixed fitted sheet and duvet set at a slight discount from the total cost of buying each piece individually.

    It’s no surprise that linen sheets make up a lot of our list of the best luxury sheets. Cool to sleep in, and with a substantial, luxurious feel, linen also has a rougher surface texture with more visible and tactile variation than cotton, plus it wears well, getting softer with repeated washing and drying.

    Made from flax, linen is a versatile material that makes some of the best sheets available. Since flax has coarser and longer fiber filaments than cotton, linen fabric can be woven more loosely and with a lower thread count than cotton while maintaining similar strength, which contributes to better breathability. Like cotton, linen is highly absorbent, but linen fabrics wick better than their cotton counterparts, making them good choices for warmer weather, or for layering with other fabrics for effective temperature control. Linen is also considered more durable than cotton, due to its stronger fibers, so a good linen sheet set is a worthwhile investment.

    Unlike cotton sheets, which are typically soft to the touch from the beginning, linen can take several washings to break in (because its fibers are stiffer and less elastic than cotton’s), though linen still softens considerably over time. It also tends to wrinkle with washing and drying, so if you prefer an absolutely smooth look it might not be the best choice. Since linen’s fibers are stronger than cotton, it tends to last longer, so you’ll want to make sure you like the look and feel since you’ll likely have your bedding for a long time.

    Over two years, we considered 25 sets of linen sheets using two primary criteria: quality and variety. We observantly unboxed each set and made notes, laundered them, made our bed multiple times with each set, and sleep tested our top contenders. We noted how they felt to touch, as well as when tossing, sleeping and waking up, and how they felt after laundering and reusing.

    Quality and feel

    • How they feel out of the box: Are they soft or rough? Thick or thin? Luxurious or flimsy? We evaluated the unboxing of each set of sheets on very tactile terms, asking the following questions: How do they feel in your hands? Is this a product you’d want to put on your bed, and against your skin?
    • Comfort level: How do they feel to sleep on? We made notes on each set of sheets as to whether they were soft, stiff, cool, light, heavy or durable. And ultimately, how they affected a night of sleep.
    • How they feel after washing: We evaluated if the sheets softened a great deal after washing and drying, and the wrinkle factor. We also measured each flat sheet before and after laundering, noting how much they shrank out of the box.
    • Pill factor after sleeping or washing: We assessed if each set felt durable after multiple washing and drying cycles, and if the sheets began to pill or degrade. We also noted whether any sets were especially linty after a dryer cycle, or on our bed. (Note: None of these high-quality brands deteriorated at all during our testing process.)
    • Fit on bed: We made at least one bed with each set of sheets, assessing how well they fit a bed, noting if they were tight or loose, gapping or sagging.
    • Number of sizes: We evaluated how many different size options there were for each sheet brand (they all included at least full, queen and king, and those that offered twin, California king or other specialized sizes were awarded higher scores).
    • Colors: We noted how many colors each sheet set was available in; some were available in only three or four, while others were available in upwards of twenty.
    • Availability of individual replacements: We assessed whether you can buy individual sheets and pillowcases for each set for those who need replacements, want to mix and match colors or styles, or simply do not want or need a top sheet, for example.

    The Saphyr Soft Washed Pure Linen sheets are subtle and sophisticated. They have a decorative frayed hem on the top sheet and the pillowcase that differentiates these from any other set we tested. With sheets available in four sizes (full, queen, king and California king) and five colors (Fresh White, Calming Cream, Blissful Blue, Simply Natural and Peaceful Pink), and sold individually. Saphyr came in a very close second to our runner-up, save for its slightly higher price point.

    Lands’ End Garment Washed Linen Solid Sheets

    From $235 at Land’s End

    We didn’t find Lands’ End’s Garment Washed linen sheets as luxurious as some of the more boutique bedding brands. Out of the box, these linens felt soft, thick and already worn in a bit, like they’d been washed a few times already. They were very comfortable to sleep in, though less melty-feeling than the ones we ended up ranking higher, and they did get even softer after a few washings.

    The Rough Linen sheets were stiff out of the box, but they were actually comfortable to sleep on. After one washing, though, the Rough Linen sheets softened significantly. These definitely felt like sheets you could sleep in, wash, dry and sleep in again for many years to come, like a favorite shirt. The brand’s relatively smaller variety of color options and its higher starting price were the primary reasons we didn’t rank these sheets among our absolute faves.

    West Elm’s European Flax linen sheets were also rough and stiff, not unlike Rough Linen, which in this case also makes them feel more high-end. They fit the bed smoothly and tidily, unlike many of the other sets, which gapped around the sides. However, the texture sometimes felt rigid; during our first sleep on these, and a subsequent one after one laundering cycle, West Elm’s pillowcases felt almost scratchy against our faces. West Elm also doesn’t sell these sheets individually, but you can buy extra pillowcases.

    The Snowe linen set was both soft and cool, helping to deliver a good night’s sleep. During our first night of sleep on the Snowe, we noticed that the material felt a little scratchy on our legs, and after one washing and drying cycle, somehow the sheets felt a little stiffer. The Snowe sheets also come in far fewer colors than competitors, and they do not offer separate replacement sheets (they do separately sell a pillowcase set).

    Quince’s European Linen sheets seem well-made, and are among the most affordable linen sheets we tested, but they were scratchier than competitors, and certainly less soft than our recommended budget linen sheets from Simple & Opulence. They’re also somewhat less flexible than other options, with fewer colors to choose from, and exclusively sold in sets.

    The Company Store Legends Hotel sheet set almost didn’t resemble linen at all. These sheets felt like cardboard, even after laundering, and didn’t wrinkle or soften at all in the dryer. We also noticed that after washing these sheets they had a bit of a lingering industrial smell when we put them on our bed.

    We liked the Garnet Hill Solid Relaxed Linen sheets a lot. They are well-constructed, come in a broad array of colors, and are sold individually. That said, they were a bit rough after laundering, and compared to other sets we tested, they weren’t quite as luxurious to sleep with. These should soften quite nicely with time and wear, but we recommend softer options if that’s your main preference.

    Magic Linen’s sheets were among the thickest and heaviest we tested. They released a ton of lint in the dryer (we had to clean the lint trap twice), and required multiple cycles to dry fully. These sheets are hefty––but not in a good way––and weren’t particularly soft. They offer a lot of flexibility in colors and sizing (including options for mattresses with deeper pockets), but we didn’t feel that was enough to push them over the edge.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best weight loss apps in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    Best weight loss apps in 2023, tested by our editors | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A recent global study by Ipsos carried out across 30 countries found that 45% of people globally say they are currently trying to lose weight. According to the CDC, people who lose weight gradually and steadily (about 1 to 2 pounds per week) are more successful at keeping weight off. Using a weight loss app on your smartphone or laptop can help, giving you a convenient and reliable way to track your slow but steady progress.

    “Weight loss apps can be a great way to help adults be aware of their nutrition and lifestyle habits,” says Jaime Coffey Martinez, a registered dietitian and owner and founder of Nutrition CPR LLC, a health and wellness center. Martinez has over 20 years of experience in the fields of medical nutrition therapy, weight loss, functional medicine, sports nutrition, corporate wellness and fitness, private nutrition coaching and pharmaceuticals. “In addition to tracking your food intake,” continues Martinez, “many offer support forums, recipes and an ability to sync with other apps such as fitness trackers and smart scales. These are all beneficial tools in an individual’s weight loss journey.”

    To find the best weight loss app, we tested five candidates over the course of five weeks. On our list were the premium (paid) versions of LoseIt! Premium, MyFitnessPal Premium, MyNetDiary Premium, Noom and WW / WeightWatchers. We tested each of them for ease of setup, design, features and cost.

    We learned two important things during testing. One, all of the apps can help you track your food intake and activity levels, and two, some apps are easier to use and update. After our testing was complete, we named LoseIt! Premium the winner because of its simplicity, intuitiveness and affordability.

    Best weight loss app overall

    We found LoseIt! Premium to be simple and intuitive, and the most affordable of the weight loss apps we tested. It offers robust support for its user community, with active nutrition- and weight loss-related user forum discussions.

    LoseIt! Premium’s beauty is in its simplicity. During testing, we noted that this app’s primary focus is on losing weight. It offers personalized weight loss plans, meal and exercise planning, and food logging. Its home screen was a diary of the food we ate that day. Entering our food consumption was a simple matter of just touching the “Add” button for the meal, and then entering the details of each food item at the top of the screen.

    The LoseIt! Premium app included branded food and drink items, so we were able to enter the brand name of a food — such as Wegmans Pulled Pork Barbecue — and get the number of calories in it. Likewise, we could look for something — such as Bacardi Black Dark Rum — and compare its calories with other types of dark rum. This prevented us from being in a quandary over which item to buy while we shopped.

    An important, but often overlooked, capability of a great weight loss app is its ability to let a user make changes quickly and easily; the LoseIt! Premium app gave us this ability. With some other apps we tested, if we mistakenly entered the wrong food name, removing the entry was often complicated, sometimes seemingly impossible. But edits we made in the LoseIt! Premium app were simple and intuitive.

    To make changes, we just clicked on an entry. To remove an entry, we just clicked the X on the right-hand side in the web app or we slid the entry to the left in the mobile app and touched “Delete.”

    We were able to add activity, including exercise, manually during testing. You could also add activity through the use of a wearable device such as an Apple Watch. The app incorporated our activity in its calorie calculations, meaning we could offset what we ate through activity.

    Once you've started tracking food, the LoseIt! Premium app keeps track of items you eat frequently, making it easier to track items you eat most often.

    LoseIt! Premium also includes robust goal-setting features and support for a community of users. We noted its many lively discussion forums, which were nutrition- and weight loss-related rather than the random discussions we often found in the other apps.

    You can use LoseIt! Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. LoseIt! Premium also offers integration with running apps Runkeeper and Strava.

    You can sign up for a seven-day free trial. You can stay with the free version of LoseIt!, but know that it offers fewer features than the Premium (paid) app. The Premium app costs $40 per year (billed annually), which is the least expensive of the weight loss apps we tested. There is no option to be billed monthly, but you can sign up for a lifetime Premium membership for only $100.

    In a recent report from the CDC, it was found that few Americans eat close to their daily recommendations of fruits and vegetables. One of the ways you can be sure you’re eating enough fruits and vegetables is by tracking your intake in a weight loss app. While there are differences in their approach, all of the weight loss apps we tested depend on you accurately tracking your food intake and recording it in the app. This alone can be crucial to your overall weight loss journey, if only because it can be so easy to forget what and how much you ate if you don’t consistently track it.

    “The main features of most apps are tracking and goal setting,” says Dr. Evan M. Forman, psychology professor and director of the Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Science (the WELL Center) at Drexel University. Dr. Forman is also the author of a clinician guide and workbook called “Effective Weight Loss: An Acceptance-Based Behavioral Approach” for Oxford University Press’s “Treatments that Work” series. “Those are important features, but they are not going to be enough for most people,” continues Dr. Forman.

    “For example, it takes a lot of effort to track everything you eat, and even more effort to do it accurately (which requires a good deal of weighing and measuring). So, most people will need help with motivation, whether in the form of cognitive-behavioral skills or someone to whom they are accountable. They also may need an expert coach who can review their food records for accuracy and to make suggestions.”

    Martinez agrees, adding that people need to keep in mind that weight loss apps are not an exact science into your nutrition, but instead, “more of a window into your intake and habits.”

    Martinez points out that some apps allow individuals to enter a food into the database and the nutrition information may not be entered correctly, causing totals and tracking to be incorrect. In our testing, the better weight loss apps did link to cloud-based databases that contained the calorie content of thousands of foods and other consumables. They showed us the value of standard servings and they even showed us the effect of differing preparation methods, such as whether a food is fried, broiled or eaten raw.

    Unfortunately, some of the apps we tested did indeed have databases with errors or poorly chosen serving sizes. This is the reason why you should remain realistic about what weight loss apps can do for you.

    “I recommend clients use them as a tool but not the holy grail when reviewing their nutrition,” says Martinez. “My biggest piece of advice for clients when using weight loss apps is to not get wrapped around the axle with numbers. Clients can become ‘numbers-obsessed’ and can develop an unhealthy relationship with food. Instead, use them as a guide and to help with accountability. Remember, it is about the journey, not one food or one entry.”

    When it comes to choosing the right weight loss app for you, both Martinez and Dr. Forman have some advice. Martinez says to make sure it includes “the ability to sync with other apps and devices” to track physical activity.

    According to Martinez, weight loss apps are particularly helpful tools because they can provide accountability, motivation and structure to help individuals achieve their overall fitness and healthy lifestyle goals.

    “Apps allow tracking of not only calories but, more importantly, macronutrient balances (carbs, proteins and fats) and habits such as the timing of your meals and snacking,” explains Martinez. “In addition, many apps also track fiber, sugar, water and specific nutrients,” she continues, “which can be instrumental in a targeted approach to proper nutrition based on goals and medical history. The ability to also track lifestyle habits, and sync with other health apps and devices, addresses a multifaceted approach to weight loss.”

    Dr. Forman points out that tracking everything you eat is hard work, so you want an app that makes this as easy as possible. “For instance, you should choose an app that has foods that you eat (whether branded or not) in its tracking database,” he says. “Also, you want an app that makes it easy to create and save custom foods, recipes and meals because that’s a real timesaver.”

    He also advises to make sure the app you choose includes easy ways to sync your weight and physical activity, if you track those using wireless devices like a wireless scale or an activity band or watch. “In addition, many people will benefit from an app that will help you develop important cognitive-behavioral skills and strategies,” he says.

    According to Dr. Forman, people should choose apps that have coaches because they “will help you be successful both in terms of guidance and in terms of accountability,” he explains. “Having regular meetings with a coach is one of the best ways to keep yourself accountable.”

    When all is said and done, people need to remain realistic about what weight loss apps can do for them. These apps don’t always help bring about massive weight loss for everyone who uses them.

    “Weight loss apps are the most convenient, least expensive and therefore most popular method of losing weight,” says Dr. Forman. “[But] if an app doesn’t work for you, don’t give up,” he advises. “Weight loss and weight loss maintenance are supremely difficult and you may well need professional help.”

    During our pre-testing research, we found there are many different weight loss apps available for download. We selected our five candidates by making sure they were all subscription-based, either paid monthly or annually.

    We made sure all five apps we selected could run on both Android or iOS devices and can be used through their respective websites from a desktop or laptop computer. The apps all needed an active connection to the internet to retrieve information such as calorie counts and to their respective cloud services to store their data.

    We installed each of the five apps to our iPhone 13 Pro smartphone running iOS 15.5. The web apps were reached using a variety of browsers running on computers running Microsoft Windows 10 or 11.

    We tested each of them with the following criteria in mind: ease of installation and setup, ease of use, design, features offered and cost.

    To start testing, we first created an account with each app and initiated the sign-up process. Each of the apps required a sign-up process that included questions about current height, weight, gender, goals and, in some cases, more details about lifestyle and activity. Despite being provided identical information, each of the apps produced different weight loss strategies and different durations, and all suggested different goals.

    We tested all five apps by recording meals over the course of five weeks, entering food items into each one at the conclusion of each meal. We depended on the nutrition information contained in each app’s database or we entered nutrition information for foods not contained in the database.

    Lastly, we then checked out the user forums the apps provided, if any, and noted how helpful the topics discussed were.

    MyFitnessPal is a complete calorie counter that also helps keep track of your activity. Food tracking uses a detailed and expansive database with hundreds of millions of entries. Exercise tracking, likewise, includes detailed choices such as a choice of 16 entries under the “Walking” section.

    MyFitnessPal Premium offers food analysis tools, exercise tracking tools, individualized coaching, a recipe log, a food database, workout routines and smartphone meal scanning.

    You can use MyFitnessPal Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. MyFitnessPal Premium offers integration with running apps Runkeeper and Strava, among other apps.

    MyFitnessPal Premium shows you a summary of your food intake and exercise along with an encouraging message each day.

    You can sign up for a one-month free trial. The paid account option starts off at $20 per month (billed monthly), which adds up to $240 per year. You can also sign up for a 12-month membership — paid upfront — for $80.

    Though we tested the paid version, we noticed that the free version of MyFitnessPal may be all you need. Unlike some apps where the premium version adds some significant features, the free version of MyFitnessPal can be sufficient for most users.

    The premium version of MyFitnessPal eliminates pop-up ads and gives you access to a wider selection of foods. But at $20 per month, you might just decide you can deal with the free version’s ads.

    MyNetDiary Premium offers personalized weight loss plans, meal and exercise planning, food logging, community support and more. Included in MyNetDiary Premium is support for several types of diets, including calorie-counting, keto, low-carb, Mediterranean, vegan, vegetarian and more.

    You can use MyNetDiary Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. MyNetDiary Premium also offers integration with Fitbit fitness trackers, Garmin Connect-enabled devices and with Withings Wi-Fi smart scales, blood pressure monitors and activity trackers.

    It was clear to us that MyNetDiary considers itself in direct competition with MyFitnessPal, if only because of the extensive section on its website explaining the differences between the two. And there are important differences, including MyNetDiary Premium’s support for your smartwatch and extensive support for its free version.

    MyNetDiary Premium shows you a list of foods that you commonly log to make recording meals easy.

    We thought using the free version of MyNetDiary was easier than with MyFitnessPal’s free version. For one thing, we weren’t bombarded with pop-up ads and upgrade offers.

    In addition, MyNetDiary claims that its database is more reliable than MyFitnessPal’s, with all of the food items in the former being verified. This means that we weren’t as likely to search for a food in MyNetDiary’s database and then get several choices back that were different each time.

    MyNetDiary Premium’s account options start off at $9 per month (billed monthly) which adds up to $108 per year. You can also sign up for a 12-month membership of MyNetDiary Premium — paid upfront — for $60.

    Noom offers one-on-one coaching, support groups facilitated by a group coach and daily lessons. Noom’s daily lessons were intended to help us with our weight loss journey. The lessons were aimed at the psychology of weight loss which, the company says, would help build our confidence.

    Noom also offers tools for food logging and calorie and exercise tracking. Its calorie-tracking feature proved to be similar to the other weight loss apps we tested, but some of Noom’s results mystified us during testing.

    For example, when we tried to track more than one cup of coffee during a meal, we got dropped into a part of the app where coffee is measured by the bowl, not the cup — and the size of the bowl is not given. It took us an extra step to track our two cups of coffee.

    Noom provides a handy summary page that shows your daily progress for the types of food you're consuming.

    To us, Noom, the company, appears to have positioned itself as the alternative to WW / WeightWatchers in its ads and positioning. Noom makes a point of stressing that its app is based on psychology rather than on simply counting calories. This may be why the company has recently introduced a stress management program in addition to weight loss.

    You can use Noom as both a web app on your desktop or laptop computer, and as a mobile app on Android devices or iOS mobile devices such as the Apple Watch. On iOS, Noom syncs with a wide range of health and fitness apps, but the company says the app “only syncs your steps and weight information. If you want to sync blood pressure or blood glucose data, you’ll need to use a compatible monitoring device. If the app you’re syncing with Noom only tracks step data (not weight), then the step data will show up in Noom.” The list of compatible apps it can integrate with includes Fitbit, Garmin, iHealth, Misfit, Omron, Polar, Qardio, Runkeeper, Withings and Yoo.

    You can sign up for a seven-day free trial of Noom. The paid account option starts off at $60 per month (billed monthly), which adds up to $720 per year. But it’s also available in multiple-month timeframes, paid upfront. For example, you can pay for a 12-month membership — paid upfront — for $200.

    WW / WeightWatchers is probably the best-known weight loss program around. The program is known for its in-person weekly meetings in which members are motivated by peer contact and advice from professional leaders. WW / WeightWatchers is now also available through a weight loss app that will lead you through the program.

    The WW / WeightWatchers app offers customized food plans, meal planners, a smartphone barcode scanner for easy shopping and a restaurant and recipe database with over 11,000 recipes. It also provides on-demand workouts with the ability to sync with fitness trackers, 24/7 live chat with a coach and weekly progress reports. It also lets you track your activity, food and water intake and weight.

    A significant difference is that the WW / WeightWatchers app — like the in-person program — does not count calories. Rather, the app assigns you a “PersonalPoints Budget,” with an individualized ZeroPoint foods list. The points for each food item are based on a number of criteria for each type of food. ZeroPoint foods are food items that contain zero points. Each user is assigned a daily point target within their PersonalPoints Budget, with the idea that, by staying within the recommended points budget, the user will lose weight.

    WW provides a summary of your daily consumption, but instead of calories consumed, it provides its own points system.

    However, we found the points system in the app to be confusing. This was because points assigned to a food item differed depending on factors other than the characteristics of the food itself. And those differences depended on which of the many customized plans WW / WeightWatchers uses. So, you might find that some fresh fruit contains zero points assigned in your plan but does contain points in another user’s plan. These differences in the app made choosing food while shopping or in meal preparation difficult for us.

    In addition, the company seems to change its plans annually, which means you may have to relearn the program and app each year. Fortunately, though, we thought WW / WeightWatchers seems to be based on sound nutritional principles, so we thought we were healthy while using the app.

    You can use WW / WeightWatchers as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. The app syncs with the WW / WeightWatchers Body Analysis Bluetooth Scale (made by Conair) and auto-tracks your weight for you. The app syncs with Fitbit, Google Fit and Withings activity trackers.

    WW / WeightWatchers’s paid account option starts off at $23 per month or $276 per year (both billed monthly). The app is also included with all WW / WeightWatchers memberships.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing and fitness coverage:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best smart locks in 2023: tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    The best smart locks in 2023: tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    If you’ve ever struggled to pull out your key from the bottom of your bag while juggling groceries and kids, worried about how the cat sitter is going to get in while you’re on vacation, or rushed home from work to let in houseguests, then you’ll understand immediately how a lock that opens at your approach, with a simple tap, or remotely, can make life a whole lot more convenient.

    We spent four months testing 12 of the latest smart locks to see which ones perform the best. Whether you’re looking for an affordable, basic or a top-of-the-line do-everything device, we’ve found the best smart locks for your home.

    Best smart lock overall

    The Yale Assure Lock 2 is a full-featured replacement smart lock with a sleek, modular design that lets you buy just what you need and upgrade as you like. We found it easy to use and share access to you home, and it integrates easily with smart HomeKit, Alexa and Google Home.

    Best value smart lock

    Detailed instructions make the affordable Wyze Lock Bolt simple to install, it’s simple to use whether you’re just looking to get into your home or share codes with guests, and it looks nicer than other budget locks.

    Yale

    The Yale Assure Lock 2 is a full-featured replacement lock with a modular design that lets you buy exactly what you need to get the sort of access you want. Building on the same core unit, you can choose between keypad or touchscreen and keyed and keyless models, and whatever flavor of smart home connectivity suits your setup. It works well, is simple to install, and is simple to upgrade to meet changing smart home standards.

    To be worth the money, a smart lock needs to make life simpler than a plain old lock and key, letting you manage access to your home for you, your family, your houseguests, and whoever else you invite over and the Yale Assure really delivers. Yale’s system lets us provide permanent or temporary access using just geofencing, codes, and remote control more easily than any other lock we tested.

    Using the Yale Access app, you can easily grant codes to anyone you need — we set up access for our family, and our cat sitter right from your phone or smartwatch (we used our Apple Watch); you can also set everything up or control everything via the Apple Home app, even over Bluetooth.

    Through the Yale Access app, I added our son to our lock (he had to download and set up the app on his phone) and was able to grant him PIN access using a code. Granting unique codes lets you see in the app’s history log just who came and went — no need to loan out extra keys or worry about getting them back. I used that for our cat sitter and set up a Smart Alert to notify us when she used the lock. That way we knew what time the cats were last fed, so they couldn’t pretend they were starving when we got home.

    If you use the Wi-Fi module, then you can integrate with Amazon Alexa or Google Home and get full remote access using any of the big three smart home platforms. Z-Wave and Matter Smart models are slated to be available later this year (at $79 each), so you should be able to make the lock work with almost any smart home system.

    We tested the keyless, touchscreen-equipped base unit, along with the Wi-Fi smart module. Installation was simple — you scan a QR code to open a tutorial that walks you through the setup process with detailed info and videos. We didn’t have as smooth an experience with some other locks, and setting up the Yale was much easier and faster. The smart module attaches to the interior of the lock right above the battery and connects to our home Wi-Fi without any issues.

    You can also set the Assure Lock 2 to auto-unlock based on your phone’s location, so you don’t have to have anything in hand to open the door. A “Door Sense” feature can monitor whether when the door is open or closed and will auto lock after a set time (or alert you that it cannot). Smart Alerts can also be set to notify you when specific users have accessed the lock.

    Unique, timed codes can be shared, making this an easy way to give guest access, great for a rental property. You’ll also see a log of who came and went so you’ll know if the cat sitter showed up or if the kids got home from school.

    We tried out a keyless model, but if you opt for a keyless lock you won’t need to worry about the battery running out — a set of prongs on the bottom lets you recharge the lock enough to get access using a 9-volt battery.

    While the Yale Assure Lock 2 has almost all the features we looked for in a smart lock, it doesn’t offer a fingerprint scanner, which some other smart locks do and we enjoyed using as an alternative. The backlit touchscreen keypad was responsive but tapping the right spot to turn on the backlight took a few tries.

    While the Wi-Fi module worked with the Apple and Google platforms, we did have some initial difficulty connecting it to Alexa, it took a couple of tries and didn’t always connect quickly. Response to voice commands via an Amazon smart speaker was wonky.

    Door Sense is a great feature in theory, but frustrating in practice. Understandably, there’s no way for the lock to close the door on its own, but if it kicks on when the door is open, it simply locks the door while it’s open, which isn’t helpful even if you know about it.

    The Assure Lock 2 is more flexible and updatable than most of the competition, and if you don’t need all the features, you don’t have to pay for them. It’s both less expensive and more future-proof than the similarly spec’d Schlage Encode Plus. And the Yale Assure Lock 2 has a sleeker and less cumbersome look (it comes in black, bronze and satin nickel finishes, though no brushed chrome) than some of the bulkier locks we tested, so it’ll integrate with your decor as easily as it will with your smart home devices.

    wyze lock bolt_inline_cnnu

    Wyze

    If you want keyless door entry but don’t want to spend a lot of money, the Bluetooth-only Wyze Lock Bolt is the best value lock we tested. You get multiple options for unlocking the door; using the app, punching in a code on the backlit keypad, or using a fingerprint reader — a surprise at this price, especially one that works as reliably as it does.

    Although it lacks some of the features of a more expensive device like the Yale Assure Lock 2 or the Schlage Encode Plus, the affordable Wyze Lock Bolt looks pretty good on the door and provides most of the features you really need, including guest access, temporary codes, auto lock and a lock history so you know who has come in and out and if there were any failed attempts.

    Detailed instructions made installing the Wyze Lock Bolt easy, and we completed it in 15 minutes. The matte black unit isn’t as slick looking as the Yale Assure Lock 2 or other pricier models, but it isn’t overly clunky looking either.

    Using the lock was simple — it behaved as expected, locking and unlocking without fail — and the fingerprint scanner was responsive. If you prefer to use a code, then you simply type it in and tap the Unlock button. To lock the door when you leave, you simply tap the Lock button. An auto-lock feature can be set to always lock after a certain amount of time, so you never have to worry about whether you forgot to lock the door.

    The Wyze app stores up to 50 different fingerprints so everyone in the household can use it, as well as anyone you trust enough to give open access to. For temporary guest access, for our cat sitter, we assigned a unique code that worked only for the specific dates we would be out of town.

    Wyze says the four included AA batteries should last about a year. Although it does warn you when the battery is running low, there’s a failsafe method in case you do find yourself locked out because of a dead battery. There’s a USB-C port hidden on the bottom of the exterior you can use to quickly charge it up enough to unlock the door.

    While this affordable lock is feature-rich, it is missing a lot of the features you get with more expensive locks with Wi-Fi connectivity, like remote access. It can’t interact with Alexa or Google, so there’s no voice control, there’s no geofencing for auto unlocking, and since it isn’t networked, even if you use other Wyze smart home products it won’t integrate with them, although they share the same app. Also, because it can’t tell whether the door is open or closed (as the Yale Assure Lock 2 can), the Wyze Lock Bolt might lock itself when the front door is left open for a reason.

    The Wyze Lock Bolt is a budget-priced smart lock with many advanced features, including a keypad and a reliable fingerprint scanner for those households that want both. Without Wi-Fi it isn’t as “smart” as some of the competition, but it’s got enough features to make managing access to your home easier.

    Smart locks all do one basic thing — let you lock and unlock your door using an app on your phone or via integration with your smart home system over your network or even remotely. How they do it varies quite a bit. Here are 5 things to consider to help you choose the best smart lock for your home.

    Your smart lock needs to connect to something — your smartphone or your home network — in order to communicate commands.

    Most of the locks we tested used Bluetooth, one of the easiest ways to connect. Bluetooth uses very little power, so the batteries in Bluetooth-only locks can last a very long time (most last a year). On the other hand, it doesn’t have as long a range as Wi-Fi, and since Bluetooth-only locks don’t connect to your network, they don’t offer remote control possibilities — to control a Bluetooth-only lock, you’ll need to be home (so no generating custom codes for surprise guests while you’re at the office) and, even when you are home, you’ll need to be close — ideally no more than 30 feet away from the lock — when using the app.

    More advanced locks connect to your home network via Wi-Fi so you can access them remotely wherever you are. Networking also means they can connect with other smart devices you may already have in the home, whether that means Alexa, Google Assistant, a home security system or a dedicated smart home device. We were pleasantly shocked the first time we set an alarm using our Echo Dot and Alexa let us know our front door was unlocked. And yes, Alexa offered to lock it for us without us having to get out of bed. A very minor downside of a Wi-Fi-enabled unit is that it will use more battery power, so you may need to replace your lock’s batteries more frequently.

    If you’re going to invest in a Wi-Fi smart lock, then make sure you buy one that works with the ecosystem you already use (or prefer, if you’re just building a system). Most of the more expensive locks work with either Amazon Echo and Google Assistant and only a few, like the Ultraloq U-Bolt Pro Wi-Fi, also include support for Samsung SmartThings. Some, like the Yale Assure Lock 2, Level and Schlage Encode Plus, also offer Apple HomeKit support.

    Schlage and the Level Lock+ support the new Apple HomeKey protocol, which lets you unlock  your door with a tap via NFC using your iPhone or Apple Watch and is a super convenient way for Apple households to share access.

    Since these devices aren’t cheap, you’ll likely want to think about future-proofing your purchase. Matter, a new smart-home connectivity standard, has been in the works for years and should be rolling out next year. Apple, Amazon, Google and Samsung, among others, have made commitments to the standard in the effort to solve the issue of smart home devices not talking to each other and to make it easier for the home user. Once devices start to appear sometime in 2023, Matter should provide a standard protocol for smart home devices, regardless of who manufactured them, to talk to each other.

    At this time of transition, however, only two locks we tested have announced support for Matter. Our favorite lock overall, the modular Yale Assure Lock 2, will get a smart module you can purchase to add onto your existing lock, and the Level Lock+ will be updated via firmware. The other locks will all work just fine in the future, of course, it’s just that they won’t be able to take advantage of the new connectivity standard so they may not speak easily to new smart stuff you buy.

    Do you rent or own your home? Smart locks come in two varieties: those that replace your entire lock and those that work on top of your existing hardware.

    Most likely, if you rent, you’ll need a retrofit lock such as the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock or Wyze Lock Bolt. These attach to your current lock, on the inside, where they work like a miniature robotic hand that turns your deadbolt. This means you won’t need to replace anything, rekey your current lock or have to negotiate with your landlord.

    Most of the locks we tested replace an existing deadbolt and door hardware. It’s a straightforward install and most include good directions for installation. On average, it took about 20 minutes to take off an old lock and install a new one on our front door.

    When you swap out the deadbolt on a lock with a key, you’ll likely get new keys to distribute to the family. The Kwikset Halo was one of our favorites in this respect because it comes with a device to rekey your new lock so you can use your existing keys.

    If you do go this route, then you’ll want to consider the design of the new door hardware. Locks like Schlage offer two designs to choose from: a traditional style and a more contemporary style. Most of the others come in just one style. The finish is important as well. Most smart locks come in a matte silver or black but only a few come in a gold or polished brass finish, which can be an issue for some (like us) who live in an HOA that requires a certain color hardware.

    While all of the locks we tested let you lock and unlock the door using your phone, via a mobile app, geofencing or NFC, you should also consider whether you want to use a numerical keypad or fingerprint scanner as your secondary form of access. (There are, by the way, many keypad-only locks that don’t use apps, but those aren’t technically “smart” locks.)

    Some people prefer a keypad lock so they can provide access codes for guests that have time limits and can be revoked. This is a great option for those who rent out their homes or people who have young children who don’t use smartphones just yet.

    For whole family access, fingerprint scanners are fast, worked well in our testing and were easy to set up. Some locks allow up to 50 fingerprints to be stored, so you can add frequent guests or visitors, but you can’t control access remotely (or create time-limited access) like you can with a keypad code. The user will also have to download the lock’s respective app to use the fingerprint access, which can be problematic if you’re dealing with guests or family who aren’t tech savvy. Another downside is, if you live in areas with very cold temperatures, then you do have to remove your gloves to use a fingerprint scanner.

    Most of the better locks come with a feature (often referred to as PIN Genie) which lets you enter a few random numbers to either the beginning or end of your real code as you type it in. This is useful if you’re punching in a code and don’t want anyone near you to see what you’re doing.

    What happens if your lock runs out of battery? This is a concern for many new and potential smart lock users, but it’s unlikely to happen since the locks we tested all gave us ample warning of low-battery status, with an alert through the app or a flashing LED on the lock itself.

    That said, the higher-end locks we tested typically offered either a 9-volt battery terminal or a USB-C port on the underside of the lock that lets you add a quick charge if you arrive home and find the lock out of power.

    We installed and used all 12 locks on a residential front door over a four-month period. It was a little overwhelming at first and we had a friend assist with the first two installations until we got the hang of it. But thereafter, each installation took anywhere from 15 to 30 minutes — averaging around 20 minutes — including removal of the old door hardware and installation of the new lock. No special tools were required, just a screwdriver and a pair of reading glasses. Sometimes a flashlight.

    We then tested the locks in daily use over several weeks. We looked at ease of use, security and access features, ease of rekeying, in what situations an app was required to interact with the lock, smart home integration, and design considerations.

    If you rent a home or apartment and can’t swap out your existing lock, the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock is the best lock you can get right now. You don’t have to replace your deadbolt and or rekey, turning your existing lock into a smart lock. It has built-in Wi-Fi (and HomeKit) so no need for a bridge, and it offers multiple ways to open and lock your door. It’s small, unobtrusive and works reliably.

    While no one looking at your door’s exterior knows it’s there, the lock on the inside of the door gives you smart features like remote access to let someone in or lock your door while you’re not home. The auto-unlock feature (using our phone’s location) worked flawlessly, and an auto-lock feature (with Door Sense) let us know whether our door was open or closed.

    If you purchase the additional optional keypad, you can share permanent, scheduled or temporary access with friends, dog walkers and guests. We preferred this to the basic Wyze Lock, which lets you share unique codes but doesn’t let you create temporary codes.

    With the built-in Wi-Fi, we were able to connect our Alexa device and lock the door using our voice. It also supports Google Assistant and Samsung SmartThings. Most smart locks at this price only work with Alexa and Google. In addition, since it has HomeKit integration, Apple users can lock and unlock the door using an Apple Watch and Siri voice control.

    August says the two CR123 batteries will last three to 6 months, a shorter lifespan than you’ll get from Kwikset, Schlage and Yale locks, which run on four AA batteries. However, since we couldn’t test the lifespan of either type of battery, it’s also important to note that relying on Wi-Fi, which this lock does, does tend to drain the battery faster. You’ll get notifications from the app when the battery level hits 25% but, unfortunately, you can’t check the level in the app.

    The lock itself has a small, round, compact design, making it look just like any other door lock, and it comes in a silver or black finish. It doesn’t look large and clunky on the door’s interior either, as other replacement locks like Kwikset and Schlage do. The app is user friendly, and the installation instructions were clear.

    If you want a video doorbell integrated into your smart lock — either because you don’t have room for both devices or your condo association doesn’t allow a separately mounted camera — then Eufy’s Security Video Smart Lock is expensive but adds a 2K resolution video camera to a full-featured smart lock. It has a fingerprint sensor and a keypad, works with Google and Alexa smart speakers, and you can access the house using the Eufy app or a regular key.

    We found the 2K video quality and experience to be much better than with the more expensive Lockly Vision Elite, and the Eufy lock has features such as linger detection, which lets you know someone is at the door but they haven’t pressed the doorbell yet. The fingerprint sensor is also in a better location, on the front as opposed to on the side of the lock.

    You may want to keep in mind that, even though the video is stored locally on an SD card, there have been reports that thumbnail photos from Eufy security cameras have been uploaded to their cloud servers, even when cloud services were disabled in the app. We’ll update when we know more, but if this concerns you, then you may want to hold off getting a Eufy security camera until the appropriate fixes have been widely distributed.

    The Kwikset Halo Touch Smart Lock is an attractive, reliable fingerprint lock that’s easy to install, works with Alexa and Google voice assistants (though not HomeKit), is simple to use and works well. However, we recommend it only if you aren’t looking for an easy way to share temporary access with pet sitters or renters.

    This smart lock has a fingerprint scanner and a (rekeyable) keyway and you can add up to 50 users. But there’s no keypad. So to share temporary access with others, you need to invite them to download the app and then create an account to use the app controls to gain entry. If your guest is tech-challenged or doesn’t keep their phone charged, then you might want to stick to a smart lock with a keypad.

    The Kwikset Halo Touch Smart Lock comes in two stylish designs: contemporary (in matte black or satin nickel) or a more traditional design, with curved, softer edges (in satin nickel or venetian bronze). However, if you live in an HOA that requires a certain color hardware on your door, then note that it’s not available in polished brass or matte gold.

    The Kwikset SmartCode Electronic Deadbolt isn’t really a smart lock. It has no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity — but it’s the simplest replacement lock we tested and a great choice for anyone who wants the benefits of being able to use codes (giving house or pet sitters or guests access without having to distribute extra physical keys) without having to deal with connectivity, apps or the like. The SmartCode simply adds a 10-button numeric keypad (or touchscreen, depending on which version you get) with a designated lock button to a standard deadbolt, making for a simple and effective solution.

    You can create up to 50 permanent codes and 10 temporary codes at a time (you do all of the programming on the keypad itself).

    The SmartCode proved its worth when we went away for a weekend and our elderly neighbor came to feed our cats. She gets nervous about depending on technology and was worried about not being able to get inside. We created a code for her to use, and after we tried it together, she found it easy and straightforward to use, and had no issues all weekend. Once she entered the code, the door automatically unlocked and the “lock button” flashed green. To lock the door, she pressed the Lock button, and it flashed red to show her it was locked.

    Kwikset makes two versions of the SmartCode electronic lock: the SmartCode 260 (which has physical buttons) and the SmartCode 270 (which has a touchscreen). Both are available in traditional or contemporary styles and nickel or bronze finishes. Both come with Kwikset’s easy rekey tool, which lets you easily reset the lock yourself.

    If beautiful design and Apple HomeKit integration are requirements, then the Level Lock+ is the one to get. With a sleek, understated design (created in partnership with Apple), and Home Key support along with HomeKit, it’s a compelling offering for Apple enthusiasts. Also, the company promises a firmware update to support Matter once it’s available.

    Level gives you multiple ways to access your home. We were able to use a physical key, the Level app, or just a touch of the capacitive surface of the physical lock. You also get programmable NFC key cards, which is great for kids who don’t yet have a smartphone or watch.

    It was easy to create timed access for a guest and to revoke it at any time. If you prefer giving guests access using a unique code, then you’ll need to buy the optional Level keypad ($79).

    The Level Lock+ is a replacement lock, but once installed (which we did in 20 minutes), it looks nothing like a smart lock. Both the interior and exterior hardware are sleek and small, the design incorporates the battery (it uses a watch battery), and all the smarts are inside the lock, not in a clunky module that sits on your door. It comes in satin nickel and black finishes only, so if you live in an HOA that requires gold hardware, then you may not be able to use it.

    What makes this lock so easy for Apple households is that, once you add HomeKey to your Wallet, you can share it instantly with other family members; there’s no need to repeat the setup. We used the auto-unlock feature that unlocked the deadbolt as we approached the door, and we never had to have our phone out. However, if you want to control the lock remotely, then you need to have an Apple Home Hub such as a Home Pod or an Apple TV.

    The Level Lock+ is a compelling lock for Apple users who want an easy-to-use, aesthetically-pleasing design and who don’t mind paying top dollar for it.

    The Lockly Vision Elite is an expensive smart lock, with a built-in video camera doorbell that has a fingerprint sensor, a keypad, a traditional key slot and app-controlled access. It’s also solar-powered so you’ll never have to change the battery. The Vision Elite, like most devices that perform two tasks, doesn’t perform both tasks at the same level; in this case, the lock portion is much better than the video doorbell.

    The integration is great; when someone rang our doorbell, a video screen popped up on our phone to show us who was there, and we could have a two-way conversation or just open the door lock. But the motion detection isn’t great, and the resolution is 1080p, lower than the more affordable Eufy’s 2K resolution.

    The Lockly requires you install its own hub to your router; the lock then communicates directly with this rather than broadcasting over your network. The company claims this keeps your stored video more secure, but it’s another hoop to jump through during installation.

    In our testing, the Schlage Encode Plus was a close runner-up to the Yale Assure Lock 2, but it has been in short supply at the time of publication so we can’t recommend it right now. Plus, it’s pricier and doesn’t provide an upgrade path to the forthcoming Matter smart home standard like the Yale lock does.

    If you have an all-Apple household, then the Encode Plus is worth a look. This touchscreen lock does add HomeKey NFC support (which the Yale Assure Lock 2 skips) along with HomeKit. Apple users can tap their iPhone or Apple watch for easy entry. It also has built-in Wi-Fi, so there’s no need for any modules or hubs, and it integrates with Alexa and Google Home.

    And it’s more expensive than the Yale Assure Lock 2, but the full features and choice of modern or traditional design are a compelling reason to get one, especially for Apple households. You just might have a difficult time finding one.

    The SwitchBot is another retrofit lock that’s suitable for renters looking for a simple installation, but overall, we think the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock is a better choice on performance and aesthetic grounds.

    Like the August, the SwitchBot’s designed to fit right over your existing door lock, so you aren’t making any changes to your door. Installation is fussier than with the August, and the adhesive-mounted black plastic housing is clunkier looking. Once mounted, the SwitchBot lock works well but it has limited features.

    On its own, it can only connect to the app via Bluetooth. You need to purchase the additional Hub Mini if you want to add Wi-Fi, and if you want a key-free experience, then you’ll need to buy the separate keypad (for $40 $30) or the Keypad Touch (for $60) that adds a fingerprint reader and the ability to share codes with guests. Overall, it’s not too expensive, and it’s nice that you only need to buy what you need. But once you add on all the extras, we think the beautifully designed August Wi-Fi Smart Lock is worth paying a little more for.

    Ultraloq’s U-Bolt Pro Wi-Fi is a solid and dependable smart lock, offering several ways to unlock your door, along with support for voice command using Alexa and Google. However, for the money, we think the Yale Assure Lock 2 is a better value.

    The U-Bolt Pro Wi-Fi has both a backlit numerical keypad and a fingerprint scanner, along with other compelling features like built-in Wi-Fi, temporary guest access, and smart auto-lock and unlock with a door sensor. But we had some issues with the fingerprint reliability and, while it integrates with Google and Alexa, there’s no support for Apple HomeKit.

    We found the installation and setup more difficult than the Yale and Schlage locks, and the app instructions weren’t as clear as some of the other locks we tried. The design lets everyone know you have a smart lock installed, and the backlit keys are difficult to see in the dark so you have to punch in a number to get the keypad to light up.

    The Wyze Lock is a reliable and affordable, Wi-Fi-enabled smart lock for users who want to keep their existing door hardware. This makes it a good choice for renters who can’t make changes to their lock or cylinder, and don’t want to spend the extra money for the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock.

    The Wyze Lock gives you many of the features of a smart lock, such as auto-open and auto-lock, (using your phone’s location) remote access and Alexa and Google voice control, and the ability to use your existing key.

    However, you’ll also need to plug the included Gateway into an electrical outlet near the lock, while Wi-Fi is built into the August Wi-Fi Smart Lock. You can share unique codes with guests but can’t limit them to specific times as you can with the August lock. So, if that matters to you, then you should spend the extra money for the August lock or buy the optional wireless backlit keypad (for $24 at Wyze) for the Wyze Lock. But keep in mind that you’ll have to install it on a wall on the outside of your door, which might not be an option for renters.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Start getting yourself out of debt with the Citi Diamond Preferred credit card | CNN Underscored

    Start getting yourself out of debt with the Citi Diamond Preferred credit card | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored reviews financial products such as credit cards and bank accounts based on their overall value. We may receive a commission through the LendingTree affiliate network if you apply and are approved for a card, but our reporting is always independent and objective.

    Story highlights

    The Citi® Diamond Preferred® Credit Card is designed to help people who are struggling with debt

    New card holders get an introductory APR on balance transfers for the first 21 months

    One big disadvantage is that the card doesn’t have a rewards program or any travel benefits

    Our quick take: The Citi® Diamond Preferred® Credit Card can help you pay down your debt, with an introductory balance transfer offer that lasts for an impressive 21 months. However, the card doesn’t earn any rewards, meaning you won’t get any cash back or travel points for your purchases. So once your intro period expires, this isn’t a card to keep in your wallet for the long term.

    Pros:

    • 0% introductory APR for 21 months on balance transfers made in the first four months after you open the card (17.24% to 27.99% variable APR afterward).
    • 0% introductory APR on all purchases for the first 12 months (17.24% to 27.99% variable APR afterward).
    • No annual fee.

    Cons:

    • No rewards.
    • Limited insurance coverages and purchase protections.

    Current sign-up bonus: Limited time offer — Earn a $150 statement credit after you spend $500 on your card within the first three months of account opening.

    Best for: People looking to transfer existing high-interest debt from another credit card, or finance a large purchase with no interest for an extended period of time.

    The Citi Diamond Preferred is designed for a specific type of person — someone who’s struggling with their credit card bills or who needs to finance some upcoming purchases. And by the way, if that describes you, it’s nothing to be embarrassed about. Many people are dealing with debt, so don’t feel alone if you need a hand getting out of a hole.

    The card has one of the longest introductory periods for balance transfers among credit cards on the market today, which can be a huge lifeline if you need some time to get your financial house in order. You can park your debt or upcoming expenses on the Citi Diamond Preferred and use the extended time to start paying off what you owe.

    With that said, if you’re looking to earn rewards for the things you buy, this isn’t the card for you. There’s no rewards program tied to the card, which means you won’t earn cash back or travel rewards on any purchase you make — even after the introductory APR has expired.

    Click here for the bonus offer on the Citi Diamond Preferred card.

    When it comes to introductory offers, the Citi Diamond Preferred blows many other cards out of the water. First off, new card holders get an introductory 0% APR (Annual Percentage Rate) for 21 months on balance transfers made in the first four months after you open the card, though once those 21 months are over, you’ll pay a variable APR of 17.24% to 27.99% depending on your creditworthiness.

    This means if you have debt on another credit card and you’re currently paying a lot of interest on it, you can transfer that debt over to the Citi Diamond Preferred and not pay any interest for the first 21 months. But it’s important to figure out a plan during that time, because you don’t want to get caught paying the much higher interest rate once the introductory period ends.

    Depending on how much you owe, this could truly save you hundreds or potentially even thousands of dollars. For example, let’s say you have a $5,000 balance on your current credit card, which carries a 16% APR. Over the course of the next 21 months, if you only make the minimum payment, you’ll be paying over $1,000 in interest alone on that debt.

    But if you can transfer that $5,000 balance to a card like the Citi Diamond Preferred, not only will you not have to pay that extra interest, you can instead use the money to pay down what you owe, making it easier to become debt-free.

    It’s important to remember that to be eligible for the introductory APR, you must initiate the balance transfer from your old credit card to the Citi Diamond Preferred within the first four months of being a card holder. There’s also a 5% fee (with a $5 minimum) to transfer your balance. While this will cost you some money initially — $250 on our $5,000 example — it will ultimately save you much more in the long run.

    Amazingly, there’s also an introductory APR offer on purchases made with the Citi Diamond Preferred, but it only lasts 12 months instead of 21 months. Still, this can come in handy if you’re looking to make one or more large purchases that you can’t afford to pay for all at once. Instead, you can pay for them over time interest-free.

    You should never make unnecessary purchases on your credit card that you can’t afford. However, in difficult economic times, an offer like this can be useful as a last resort if you have expenses that you simply can’t avoid, such as a large repair bill. It can also be useful if you need it to make a large once-in-a-lifetime purchase work, such as buying an engagement ring.

    But as with the balance transfer option, you’ll want to make sure to pay off everything you owe on your purchases within the first 12 months after opening the account, as once the introductory period ends, the APR ranges between 17.24% and 27.99% depending on your creditworthiness.

    The Citi Diamond Preferred also comes with a free FICO credit score online and allows you to choose your payment due date, which is extremely helpful for those who pay their credit card bills around their paycheck schedule and need maximum flexibility.

    See if you qualify for the Citi Diamond Preferred card.

    We’re not going to sugarcoat it: The Citi Diamond Preferred doesn’t have a rewards program or many of the benefits that other credit cards come with, which is a huge disadvantage. With many other no-annual-fee cards, you’ll earn cash back or loyalty points on every purchase you make, which typically ranges between 1% and 2% of your purchases. That can put some “free” cash back into your pocket.

    But with that said, if you normally don’t pay your entire credit card bill in full every month, you’re already paying more in interest than you’ll earn in rewards with any credit card. So earning a few extra travel rewards or cash back isn’t worth it if you can save a lot more money by getting rid of the interest you’re paying for those purchases.

    Also, for a limited time, new Citi Diamond card holders can earn a $150 statement credit after spending $500 on purchases in the first three months after opening the account. But while anything you buy will also qualify for the card’s introductory APR on purchases for the first 12 months, you want to avoid adding any more to your already-existing debt. So only buy what you absolutely need and can afford to pay off immediately.

    The Citi Diamond Preferred also won’t provide you with insurance coverage or protection when it comes to travel or shopping purchases. While we wouldn’t expect any fancy perks on a no-annual-fee card, even the very basic protections are mostly missing here.

    And although it’s common to be charged a fee for transferring an existing balance from one card to another, the 5% fee on the Citi Diamond Preferred is relatively high. While you’re getting extra time to pay down your debt without interest, it’s still something to keep in mind when considering whether a balance transfer is worth it, especially if you already have a low APR on your current card or think you can pay off your balance in another month or two.

    CNN Underscored has chosen the Citi® Double Cash Card as our current “benchmark” credit card. That doesn’t mean it’s the best credit card on the market; rather, we use it as a basic standard to compare other credit cards and see where they score better, and where they’re worse.

    Here’s how the Citi Diamond Preferred scores against our benchmark. The features of each card in the below chart are colored in green, red or white. Green indicates a card feature that’s better than our benchmark, red indicates the feature is worse than our benchmark and white indicates the feature is either equivalent or cannot be directly compared to our benchmark.

    KEY DETAILS
    Citi Double Cash Card Citi Diamond Preferred
    Card type Mastercard Mastercard
    Sign-up bonus None Limited time offer: Earn a $150 statement credit after spending $500 on purchases in the first three months of account opening.
    REWARDS
    Earning rate 2% on all purchases (1% when you buy, 1% when you pay it off) None
    Redemption value 1 cent (cash back) N/A
    Ease of basic redemptions Easy N/A
    Advanced redemption options Can transfer ThankYou points to 16 airline partners if you also have the Citi Premier® Card None
    Quality of advanced redemptions Good N/A
    FEES
    Annual fee $0 $0
    Foreign transaction fee 3% 3%
    BENEFITS AND PROTECTIONS
    Travel perks None None
    Purchase protections None None
    Travel protections None None
    Other perks None None
    INTEREST RATES ON PURCHASES AND BALANCE TRANSFERS
    Introductory APR on purchases None 0%
    Length of Introductory APR on purchases N/A 12 months
    Introductory APR on balance transfers 0% 0%
    Length of Introductory APR on balance transfers 18 months 21 months
    Introductory balance transfer fee 3% or $5, whichever is greater 5% or $5, whichever is greater
    APR after intro period ends/standard APR 18.24%-28.24% variable 17.24%-27.99% variable

    When reviewing other credit cards, we use this format and these criteria to compare them with our benchmark. You can read our credit card methodology for more details on what we take into account when it comes to perks, protections and redemption value.

    Apply now for the Citi Diamond Preferred card.

    Although the Citi Diamond Preferred offers one of the longest introductory APR offers on both purchases and balance transfers, there are a few other cards with benefits that come close.

    The Wells Fargo Reflect℠ Card offers a slightly shorter 18-month introductory APR on purchases and balance transfers, and you’ll have a similar 120 days to transfer your balances and get a 0% APR on them (which climbs to a variable APR of 17.24% to 29.24% afterward). You’ll also be charged a lower 3% fee ($5 minimum). But you can also get an extension of the 0% APR for up to 3 months with on-time minimum payments during the introductory and extension periods for a total of 21 months.

    Like the Citi Diamond Preferred, the Wells Fargo Reflect℠ Card doesn’t offer any rewards on the purchases you make, but it does have a few benefits, including roadside dispatch. Plus, if you pay your cell phone bill with the Wells Fargo Reflect, your phone will be protected if it’s damaged or stolen, up to $600 with a $25 deductible, for up to two claims per 12-month period.

    The information for the Wells Fargo Reflect Card has been collected independently by CNN Underscored. The card details on this page have not been reviewed or provided by the card issuer.

    You can also look to the U.S. Bank Visa® Platinum Card, which comes with a 0% introductory APR offer on both purchases and balance transfers for a full 18 billing cycles after you open the account (a “billing cycle” is roughly a month). Once the intro period ends, the APR jumps to a variable 18.74% to 28.74%.

    Again, you’re not going to earn any rewards with the U.S. Bank Visa Platinum, and you’ve only got 60 days after you open the card to make any balance transfers and have them qualify for the introductory offer. But the card also comes with cell phone insurance, so if you pay your cell phone bill with the card, you’ll be covered for damage or theft to your phone for up to $600 with a $25 deductible, for up to two claims per 12-month period.

    If your main goal is to consolidate your existing debt, the Citi Diamond Preferred is an excellent choice.

    This question truly depends on what you’re looking for in a credit card. If you want a card that earns rewards on your everyday purchases or offers perks when you’re traveling or protection on your purchases, then this isn’t the card for you.

    But if your main goal is to consolidate your existing debt without paying interest on any of it for up to 21 months, then the Citi Diamond Preferred is an excellent choice, and a great way to start repairing the damage the pandemic may have wreaked on your finances.

    If that describes you, our recommendation is to apply for this card now and use it during its introductory offer period, then store it away in your sock drawer once you’re done with it. At that point, you’ll hopefully be in a better position financially to get a credit card that offers the chance to earn extra rewards, or one that provides fun travel perks.

    Learn more about the Citi Diamond Preferred Card.

    Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as its best balance transfer credit cards currently available.

    Get all the latest personal finance deals, news and advice at CNN Underscored Money.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Last chance to earn 80,000 bonus points for travel with the Citi Premier credit card | CNN Underscored

    Last chance to earn 80,000 bonus points for travel with the Citi Premier credit card | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored reviews financial products such as credit cards and bank accounts based on their overall value. We may receive a commission through the LendingTree affiliate network if you apply and are approved for a card, but our reporting is always independent and objective.

    Our quick take: The Citi Premier® Card is a top mid-tier credit card that earns Citi ThankYou Rewards points, which can be redeemed for cash back or travel or transferred to the program’s airline and hotel partners at a 1-to-1 ratio. But the card’s current 80,000-point sign-up bonus is going away soon, so it’s important to grab the card now if you can.

    Pros:

    • Earn 3 points for every dollar you spend on air travel, hotels, gas stations, supermarkets and restaurants (including takeout).
    • Points can be redeemed for travel through the Citi ThankYou Rewards travel portal at a rate of 1 cent per point with no blackout dates or restrictions on award availability.
    • Points can also be transferred to any of Citi’s 14 airline partners and 2 hotel partners at a 1-to-1 ratio.
    • Access to World Elite Mastercard benefits.

    Cons:

    • Other credit cards may earn more rewards on everyday purchases.
    • Limited travel insurance and shopping protections.
    • New card holders can’t earn the sign-up bonus if you’ve opened or closed other select Citi credit cards within the past 24 months.
    • $95 annual fee.

    Current sign-up bonus: For a limited time, earn 80,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on eligible purchases within the first three months after opening the account.

    Best for: People looking for a credit card that earns flexible travel rewards, and those who are knowledgeable about the process of booking award travel using the loyalty programs of international airlines.

    Click here for the 80,000-point bonus offer on the Citi Premier card.

    The Citi Premier credit card comes with all of the perks of Citi’s ThankYou Rewards program, but doesn’t cost a fortune from year to year. While you won’t get all the travel benefits of a high-end ultra-premium travel credit card, you’ll earn bonus points in many popular categories, and can redeem them for cash or a number of useful travel options.

    One of the best aspects of the Citi Premier is its many different international loyalty program partnerships. Those who are well versed in redeeming points and miles will enjoy the plethora of options, although beginners who are just starting out with travel rewards might find the choices overwhelming. Fortunately, you can always redeem your ThankYou points using the Citi travel portal at a rate of 1 cent apiece and not have to worry about the complexities of partner programs.

    This is also an excellent credit card to pair with the Citi® Double Cash Card. When you have both the Citi Premier and the Citi Double Cash cards, you can convert the cash back earned on your Citi Double Cash into points that can be utilized by the Citi Premier card. Since the Citi Double Cash card earns 2% cash back on every purchase you make — 1% when you buy, and 1% when you pay it off — you can strategically use the Citi Premier card when you make purchases in its bonus categories, and then use the Citi Double Cash card on everything else.

    And there’s never been a better time to get the Citi Premier. That’s because right now, new card holders can earn 80,000 bonus points after spending $4,000 in the first three months after opening the account. You can easily get $800 in travel value with that bonus — and potentially even more. But this 80,000-point bonus is going away shortly, so if you want to get the card with as many points as possible, now’s the time to apply.

    Get the Citi Premier credit card and earn 80,000 bonus points.

    For a card with a low annual fee, the Citi Premier has some great bonus categories. You’ll earn 3 points for every dollar you spend on air travel, hotels, gas stations, supermarkets and restaurants (including takeout), and then 1 point per dollar on all other purchases. The points don’t expire as long as you keep the card open and there’s no limit to the number of points you can earn.

    Unfortunately, you won’t earn bonus points on all travel-related spending — just air travel and hotels. But, the list of bonus categories includes so many everyday staples that it should be easy to quickly start racking up points, making this card a top earning contender.

    When it comes to redeeming your rewards, one of the easiest methods is to “cash in” your ThankYou points for cash back or a statement credit. However, you’ll only get 0.5 cent per point when you redeem this way, which isn’t a good value. Another option is to redeem your points for gift cards — when you go this route, your points are worth a much better 1 cent apiece.

    But if you’re planning to hit the road, you can also redeem your Citi Premier points for travel in two ways. The first is by using the Citi ThankYou travel portal, which is identical to booking through an online travel agency like Expedia or Orbitz, except that you can pay for your flight or hotel using points instead of cash. You’ll get the same 1 cent per point when you redeem this way, and you can even mix cash and points together if you don’t want to pay entirely with one or the other.

    And if you’re an expert when it comes to travel rewards, transferring your points to one of Citi’s 16 different airline and hotel partners will most likely bring the best value, especially if you’re looking to travel internationally in first or business class. It takes some time and effort to learn how these partner loyalty programs work, but it’s the best way to get maximum value for your points, as well as fly in style.

    While most of Citi’s partners are international airlines, JetBlue’s TrueBlue loyalty program is one domestic transfer option, which means Citi Premier card holders have at least one great straightforward choice when it comes to transferring ThankYou points to book flights on US carriers.

    You can transfer Citi ThankYou points earned with the Citi Premier to JetBlue and easily book domestic flights.

    Other benefits of the Citi Premier include an annual $100 hotel credit on reservations of $500 or more when you book through ThankYou.com, extended warranty protection, damage and theft protection and no foreign transaction fees.

    Additionally, since the Citi Premier is a World Elite Mastercard, you’ll be entitled to World Elite benefits as well, which include a $5 discount on three Lyft rides taken in a month, three free months of DoorDash’s DashPass food delivery membership and access to Mastercard Luxury Hotels and Resorts.

    Apply now for the Citi Premier credit card with an 80,000-point bonus.

    While the Citi Premier card is a solid performer on the travel rewards side, it lacks in the travel and purchase protections departments. In the last two years, Citi has dropped most of the protection benefits you’d expect to see on a travel rewards credit card, especially on one that carries an annual fee.

    In fact, there’s no travel insurance coverage of any kind offered on the Citi Premier. This means you won’t have access to car rental insurance, trip cancellation and interruption protection, trip delay protection, baggage delay protection and more. Many comparable cards, such as the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card, offer all of these coverages, making the Citi Premier — and many other Citi cards — undesirable when it comes to booking vacations with them.

    On the shopping side, you’ll also no longer have access to Citi’s Price Rewind feature or return protection with the Citi Premier. To be fair, these once-common perks have been wiped away from many credit cards in recent years — not just Citi’s — but it’s still an unfortunate loss. There are also no luxury travel benefits on the Citi Premier, such as lounge access or travel statement credits, but that isn’t something we’d expect to see on a mid-tier card that only costs $95 per year.

    Lastly, Citi has some interesting terms when it comes to the sign-up bonus on the Citi Premier. The issuer determines your eligibility for the bonus based on whether or not you’ve opened or closed certain Citi cards in the past. Specifically, in the past 24 months, if you’ve received a bonus for the Citi Rewards+®, Citi ThankYou® Preferred, Citi ThankYou® Premier/Citi Premier® or Citi Prestige®, or if you have closed any of these accounts in the past 24 months, you won’t be eligible for the 80,000-point bonus.

    See if you qualify for the bonus on the Citi Premier credit card.

    CNN Underscored has chosen the Citi Double Cash Card as our “benchmark” credit card. That doesn’t mean it’s the best credit card on the market — rather, it means we use it as a basic standard to compare other credit cards and see where they score better, and where they’re worse.

    Here’s how the Citi Premier scores against our benchmark. The features of each card in the below chart are colored in green, red or white. Green indicates a card feature that is better than our benchmark. Red indicates the feature is worse than our benchmark, and white indicates the feature is either equivalent or cannot be directly compared to our benchmark.

    KEY DETAILS
    Citi Double Cash Card Citi Premier Card
    Card type Mastercard Mastercard
    Sign-up bonus None 80,000 bonus points when you spend $4,000 in the first 3 months after opening the account
    REWARDS
    Earning rate 2% on all purchases (1% when you buy, 1% when you pay it off) 3 points per dollar at restaurants, supermarkets, gas stations, air travel and hotels, and 1 point per dollar on all other purchases
    Redemption value 1 cent (cash back) 1 cent when booking travel through the Citi travel portal, 1.7 cents per point for transfers*
    Ease of basic redemptions Easy Easy
    Advanced redemption options Can transfer ThankYou points to 16 airline and hotel partners if you also have the Citi Premier or Citi Prestige Yes, can transfer points to 16 airline and hotel partners without needing another credit card
    Quality of advanced redemptions Good Great
    FEES
    Annual fee $0 $95
    Foreign transaction fee 3% None
    BENEFITS AND PROTECTIONS
    Travel perks None $5 discount on every three Lyft rides taken within a calendar month, $100 off a hotel stay of $500 or more annually
    Purchase protections None Purchase protection, Extended warranty
    Travel protections None None
    Other perks None None
    INTEREST RATES ON PURCHASES AND BALANCE TRANSFERS
    Introductory APR on purchases None None
    Length of Introductory APR on purchases N/A N/A
    Introductory APR on balance transfers 0% None
    Length of Introductory APR on balance transfers 18 months N/A
    Introductory balance transfer fee 3% or $5, whichever is greater N/A
    APR after intro period ends/standard APR 18.24%-28.24% variable 20.24%-28.24% variable
    * Based on point valuations calculated by frequent flyer website The Points Guy.

    When reviewing other credit cards, we use this format and these criteria to compare them with our benchmark. You can read our credit card methodology for more details on what we take into account when it comes to perks, protections and redemption value.

    Get access to Citi ThankYou rewards with the Citi Premier credit card.

    There are four major types of flexible credit card travel rewards — Citi ThankYou Rewards, Chase Ultimate Rewards, American Express Membership Rewards and Capital One miles. While they’re all great in their own ways, the big difference is in their various airline and hotel partnerships — and based on your personal travel habits, that might easily draw you into one program over another. But if you’re “program agnostic,” here are some other credit cards that are similar to the Citi Premier.

    The Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card is Chase’s mid-tier credit card, with the exact same $95 annual fee, but you’ll earn Chase Ultimate Rewards points that can transfer to 14 airline and hotel partners, some of which are the same as Citi’s and some of which are different. Where this card shines over the Citi Premier is that there are three hotel partners included as well, and you can redeem your Sapphire Preferred points for any flight via the Chase travel portal and get 1.25 cents per point in value.

    You’ll also get many shopping and travel protection benefits with the Chase Sapphire Preferred. For example, if you have to cancel a trip because you get sick or injured, the Sapphire Preferred will reimburse you for your prepaid and nonrefundable travel purchases, while the Citi Premier could leave you with many sunk costs.

    That being said, the Citi Premier has both many more bonus categories, and you’ll even earn 3 points per dollar spent on travel — whereas the Chase Sapphire Preferred only earns 2 points in this category (unless purchased through Ultimate Rewards and you’ll earn 5 points per dollar). So you’ll need to consider whether earning more points or having better travel and purchase protections is a higher priority for you.

    On the other hand, if you’re looking for an American Express card, the American Express® Gold Card is a comparable mid-tier option. The card earns Amex Membership Rewards points which can be transferred to a roster of 20 airline and hotel partners, or redeemed for flights and hotels through Amex Travel.

    The Amex Gold also has the highest bonus categories of all three of these mid-tier card options. The card earns 4 points per dollar on dining worldwide and at U.S. supermarkets (up to $25,000 in purchases per calendar year, then 1x). It also earns the same 3 points per dollar on flights as the Citi Premier (though flights must be booked directly with the airline in order to get bonus points on the Amex Gold) and 1 point per dollar on everything else.

    You’ll also find many travel benefits and monthly credits on the Amex Gold, as well as travel insurance. The big difference, however, is that the Amex Gold comes with a $250 annual fee (see rates and fees), which is significantly higher than the $95 annual fee of the the Citi Premier. So you’ll have to consider if the additional points and perks are worth the cost.

    The Citi Premier is a great choice if you're looking to earn travel rewards with your credit card.

    If you’re looking for a credit card that comes with travel benefits or annual credits, the Citi Premier is probably not the best card for you. Instead, you’d be better off with the Chase Sapphire Preferred or the Amex Gold. Alternatively, if you’re looking for a higher-end card with VIP perks, you’ll want to consider options like the Chase Sapphire Reserve® or The Platinum Card® from American Express.

    But if your prime focus is getting a mid-tier travel credit card and diversifying your points, then the Citi Premier is a solid choice. It earns lots of valuable ThankYou Rewards points at a low annual fee, and Citi’s transfer partners open up many opportunities to book travel on many international airlines. So if you decide the Citi Premier is right for you, make sure you get it now and score 80,000 bonus points toward travel.

    Learn more and apply now for the Citi Premier Card.

    Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as our best credit cards currently available.

    Get all the latest personal finance deals, news and advice at CNN Underscored Money.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best portable chargers in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    Best portable chargers in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Even when working from home, a power supply can be hard to come by, what with your computer, monitor, WiFi hub and other gadgets and gizmos and their wall chargers hogging those sparse outlets. And when you’re on the go, a solid power source is especially a necessity. The solution: a portable charger to keep your phone, tablet and more juiced to the max.

    So to help identify the best options for avoiding that dreaded “low battery” notification, we spent several weeks testing portable chargers — draining devices, charging them up and calculating capacities. Ultimately, we found three winners that each stole the show in their own way.

    Best portable charger overall

    Where the Anker PowerCore 13000 shone most was in charging capacity. It boasts 13,000mAh, which is enough to fully charge an iPhone 11 two and a half times. Plus, it has two fast-charging USB Type-A ports so you can juice a pair of devices simultaneously.

    The most portable

    The ultraportable Belkin Power Pocket 5K is almost the exact same size as an iPhone SE, but weighs even less. And, proving the old adage “big things come in small packages” correct, it packs enough power to fully charge an iPhone 11 from its singular USB Type-A port.

    Best portable charger for iPhone

    The Belkin Boost Power Pocket 5K goes hand-in-hand with iPhones thanks to the inclusion of a Lightning port along with the USB Type A port. That means you can use the same cord to charge your phone and refill the battery.

    underscored anker powercore 13000

    Benjamin Levin/CNN

    Simply put, the Anker PowerCore 13000 packs a ton of value.

    You can charge a lot with this thing — and quickly. The PowerCore 13000 has enough capacity to bring an iPhone 11 to full charge two and a half times, or two Samsung Galaxy S20s from empty to more than 90%. And you won’t be sitting by idly for too long, either, as the PowerCore 13000 takes just 41 minutes to charge an iPhone 11 to 50%, tied for fastest charging in our testing.

    While the PowerCore 13000 doesn’t fully live up to its promise of 13,000mAh (we found it delivers 7918mAh), it hit a respectable 61% of what’s advertised — a percentage that put it about average among all the batteries we tested. In other words: None of the portable chargers we tested fully lived up to their claims, and the PowerCore 13000 still has more charging capacity than most others we tested. (You can read more about how we measured mAhs by scrolling down.) Plus, it’s just a few more bucks than the Belkin Pocket Power 5K for more than double the mAhs.

    The side of the battery houses three ports: dual USB Type-A ports (which are fast-charging) and a micro-USB port to charge the battery itself — allowing you to run several USB-C cables to different devices all at once. When we charged an iPhone 11 and a Nintendo Switch simultaneously, the battery barely heated up. Four LED lights alert you to the charger’s remaining battery life, with a button on the edge to turn the lights on.

    The charger’s matte plastic design feels nice to the touch and resists smudging surprisingly well. It’s about the size of a full wallet, so it’s easy to carry around. And it’s durable: The charger survived our drop tests, which included a 3-foot drop onto grass and a 1.5-foot drop onto carpet, with neither external nor internal damage. (You can read more about our durability testing below.)

    Overall, not only does the Anker PowerCore 13000 pack major mAhs, but it’s got two ports for your USB cables and is fairly small and durable.

    underscored belkin pocket 5k

    Benjamin Levin/CNN

    When we first encountered the Belkin Power Pocket 5K, it was hard to believe its size: just 5 inches long, 2.5 inches wide and a half-inch thick. There are few places this battery won’t fit, yet many devices it’ll charge.

    It was the smallest and the lightest charger we tested; you might even mistake it for the phone in your pocket. This portable charger is really the definition of a personal power bank, easily whipped out of a pocket and held alongside your mobile device.

    The charging capacity of the Power Pocket 5k is modest, but it did come closest to living up to its claimed output out of all the models we tested. While its maximum capacity is stated to be 5,000mAh, we measured it at about 3,655mAh. That’s 73% of the expected value, which is 12% better than average in our testing. While its capacity isn’t huge, it’s more than enough to bring an iPhone 11 or Samsung Galaxy S10 battery back to full life. The only significant downside we could find was the charging speed: It takes a little more than 51 minutes to charge an iPhone 11 to 50%.

    The Anker PowerCore 13000 features four battery-indicating LEDs on its side alongside a button to turn them on. Around the corner are the ports: a single USB-C input along with a micro-USB port to charge the battery with the included charging cable. Like the PowerCore 13000, the Pocket Power 5K received no superficial or internal damage during our drop testing. And you can rest assured that even if you do break it, it comes with a two-year warranty along with a generous $2,500 connected equipment warranty (which covers unlikely electrical damage to tech that was properly plugged into the Pocket Power 5K).

    The wee-as-can-be Belkin Pocket Power 5K is impressive for its size. Although the capacity isn’t huge, it’s more than enough to fulfill the needs of most personal devices and small enough to keep in your pocket everywhere you go — and a bit lighter on the wallet for those on a budget.

    underscored belkin pocket boost 5k

    Benjamin Levin/CNN

    The Belkin Boost Charge Power Pocket 5K offers a bit less capacity than the Belkin Power Pocket 5K, but it’s a match made in heaven for iPhones — and it charges faster, too.

    Along one side of the Belkin Boost Charge resides a USB Type-A port and a Lightning port (MFi-approved) to charge the battery. This is the big deal here — that’s the very same kind of port that your iPhone and iPad has. In other words, as long as you have a Lightning cable to charge your iPhone (we’re going to assume you do), you have a cable to recharge your battery, too. Consolidating cables is a big win in our book. This charger also pairs better alongside a smartphone because it’s lighter than the Anker 13000 and sports more of a rectangular shape, so it fits a bit more snug in the hand.

    The Boost Power Pocket 5K has more than enough juice to fully charge an iPhone 11. It also took a little more than 45 minutes to charge an iPhone 11 to 50%, which is faster than the Belkin Pocket Power 5K by six minutes. The capacity of the BOOST Power Pocket 5K is advertised as 5,000mAh and, during our testing, we measured about 3,415mAh. That’s nearly 70% of the advertised value, making it one of the top three batteries we tested in terms of living up to its promise (the average was about 61%).

    All in all, the Belkin Boost Charge Power Pocket 5K is a terrific personal charger for your iPhone. With both MFi certification and cable consolidation thanks to the Lightning port, it should really stand out to iPhone users.

    We ran each and every portable charger through a series of tests. We charged each battery to full, ran it dry juicing up one or several devices, calculated its capacity and compared charging speeds. At the same time, we took a look at properties like weight, size, build quality and visual design. Whether it was a chunky battery that could charge all our tech, or a slim, sleek battery with enough to fill an iPhone, we put these things through the ringer.

    Read on to see the breakdowns of all our testing categories.

    • Battery Size: We noted how many milliamp Hours (mAh) each battery promised.
    • Meets Estimation: This is where we measured how much each battery could actually provide in mAhs. To do so, we charged a variety of devices with each battery, recording how much battery life (aka what percentage) each device gained. When a device was at about 95%, but the battery was not empty, we immediately swapped it for a different device. Once a battery was empty, we calculated how many mAhs it provided in total across all the devices it charged and then divided the promised total by the recorded value. This allowed us to figure out what percentage of its promised total each battery provided. We used a 0.3M Nomad Universal Cable, plugged into a battery’s USB-A port (fast charging if available), to charge each device. The device pool we chose from for charging was: iPhone 11, iPhone 8, Fire HD 10 tablet, Nintendo Switch and Bose QuietComfort 35 II.
    • Design and materials: We researched what materials each battery was made of, as well as how many color options are available. We also felt out the quality of each battery’s build. Visually, we checked out how each device looked alongside a variety of tech, noting if it appeared too big or small beside it, as well as if you could hold a battery and a phone in the same hand or pocket. The device pool we chose from for this was: iPhone 11, Fire HD 10 tablet and Nintendo Switch.
    • Size and weight: We checked each battery’s dimensions, volume and weight. In our scoring, we favored smaller, lighter devices.
    • Dust resistance: We checked whether the product is rated to resist dust, and to what extent it does so. This test was incorporated into our drop test below. After dropping a device onto grass, we checked how much dust and dirt it picked up. We also look into whether these particles could be dislodged from the ports via shaking the device or using compressed air.
    • Drop Test: We performed two drop tests: 3 feet onto grass and 1.5 feet onto carpet. The former was to simulate a likely drop scenario outdoors, and the latter indoors. After each test, we examined the battery for superficial damage and checked whether it still functioned.
    • Number of ports: We counted the number of ports on each device that could output power. We noted each port type, which could be one of the following: USB Type-A, USB Type-C, micro USB or Lightning. We also noted how many, if any, USB Type-A ports supported fast charging.
    • Wireless charging: We noted whether a device supported wireless charging.
    • Speed of charge: We charged an iPhone 11 from about 5% until it received 50% battery, recording how long the process took.
    • Warranty: We researched the duration of each device’s warranty.

    The Otterbox Otterspot is unlike any portable charger we’ve seen before. The system works as follows: A disk-shaped charging pad can charge mobile devices wirelessly, as well as the included disk-shaped battery via charging pins. The battery, which can be stacked up to three on the pad, can charge devices wirelessly or with a cable and then be recharged upon the pad. Wirelessly, it only delivered 2,519mAh to an iPhone 11. With a wired connection, it provided 3,134mAh. This is significantly less than, say, the 3,655mAh from the Belkin Pocket Power 5K with the same 5,000mAh promise. Overall, the Otterbox Otterspot is an awesome concept that may need some work on the capacity end.

    TheAnker PowerCore III Sense 10K is a beautiful charger. It comes in multiple vibrant colors and features a woven yarn surface on top and matte plastic below. Unfortunately, it only provided 4,189mAh of its expected 10,000mAh capacity. This is 42% of the expected value, compared with the 61% the Anker PowerCore 13,000 was able to achieve. Despite its aesthetic beauty and quality build, this battery dropped the ball on capacity.

    The Anker PowerCore II 20000 is the same price as the Anker PowerCore III Sense 10K, but provides 12,300mAh of its promised 20,000mAh. This is a more respectable 61.5% of what’s expected. The battery is pretty hefty and large, but it feels very durable and has a unique texture that eliminates most smudging. Compared to its 20,000mAh counterpart, the Elecjet PowerPie Power Bank, it weighs way less and provides more mAhs.

    The Aukey 8,000mAh Power Bank was a favorite among those we tested. It’s quite slim, and a little lighter than the Anker PowerCore 13000. Out of the 8,000mAh expectation, it delivered 5509mAhs, which is almost 70%. That’s impressive, made better by three functional output ports and wireless charging (a feature that didn’t end up working on our unit). But despite this battery’s promising properties, it fell short of the PowerCore 13000’s capacity at a higher price, and it didn’t charge an iPhone 11 nearly as fast.

    The Elecjet PowerPie Power Bank lists the same 20,000mAh capacity as the Anker PowerCore II 20000, except it reached just 11,969mAh, or about 60% of what we expected. It also weighs more and has a less sleek design, which didn’t help it score-wise. Overall, it’s got a lot of juice to provide, but it didn’t find a place among the winners.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I’ll never travel without the Twelve South AirFly Bluetooth adapter again. Here’s why | CNN Underscored

    I’ll never travel without the Twelve South AirFly Bluetooth adapter again. Here’s why | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Very seldom does a product come along that completely changes how we travel. There are already such a vast number of products that have elevated how we fly — from ultra-supportive neck pillows to blackout eye masks and even AirTags that help us track our luggage at every step of the journey. The Twelve South AirFly Duo is another game-changer that every frequent — and occasional — traveler should carry with them.

    Simply put, with this Bluetooth wireless transmitter, it becomes possible to watch and listen to films, TV shows and more from an in-flight entertainment system via your own wireless headphones. In other words, you can say goodbye to the often-terrible airline-supplied wired headphones and keep your favorite noise-canceling Bluetooth headphones in your ears.

    A travel must-have for watching in-flight entertainment with your own headphones

    We swear by the small but mighty AirFly Duo. The Bluetooth wireless transmitter is a fantastic packing addition for any traveler who’s keen to use their favorite headphones without sacrificing quality sound. It’s small and lightweight, extremely easy to pair with Bluetooth devices — including non-Apple devices! — and carries 20+ hours of use on a single charge. If you travel often, the AirFly Duo is a sound investment.

    Ultimately, the AirFly Duo solves one of the most annoying problems about air travel: the inability to listen to the in-flight entertainment system with your own quality set of headphones or earbuds. AirFly calls itself “the missing link between wireless headphones and wired headphone jacks,” meaning that you can also use AirFly well beyond the airplane, including on treadmills, gaming devices and more. The product works by plugging into the headphone jack of almost any electronic device, connecting to your Bluetooth wireless headphones and, really, that’s it.

    It’s the simplicity of the AirFly Duo that we particularly love. Upon receiving the device, you’ll get the AirFly itself — which measures a compact 4.1 inches — a quick start direction booklet, charging cable and a handy drawstring protective pouch, which can easily fit in a travel backpack or even in your pocket. Really, no more is needed, and we appreciate that Twelve South gives you just the essentials without overdoing it.

    Emily McNutt

    Pairing the AirFly with your favorite set of wireless headphones couldn’t be easier. After fully charging the device with the included charging cable, we were able to pair our set of AirPods Pro within 30 seconds with the push of a couple of buttons — one on the AirFly and one on the AirPods case. During our testing on a nearly completely full airplane, the AirFly had no difficulties producing sound without interfering with other Bluetooth headphones in the small space.

    What we particularly loved about the AirFly Duo is the fact that you can share audio with your travel partner. Because the device can be connected to two wireless Bluetooth devices at the same time, you and your travel partner can simultaneously watch the same movie in flight. Say goodbye to starting and pausing a film on your individual screens at the exact same time — the AirFly Duo ensures you stay in sync during your film or TV show.

    When we tested the AirFly Duo on our transatlantic flight from London to New York, the device’s battery lasted throughout the entire journey. According to Twelve South, the AirFly Duo can last 20 hours on a single charge. And even if you do need to charge it, we love that you can do so while simultaneously using it via the external plug. So long as there’s a power source nearby — including from a TSA-approved battery pack — you can keep your AirFly going.

    Even if you’re not an Apple user, the AirFly is compatible with devices beyond AirPods as well. And, if the Duo doesn’t suit your needs, there are other AirFly options out there. There’s also the AirFly Pro ($55 at Amazon), which, in addition to being capable of connecting two sets of headphones, also allows you to put the device into Receive Mode to send audio from your phone to a car or speaker.

    There’s plenty to love about the AirFly Duo. From its small and compact size, including the handy drawstring pouch, to the ease in connecting the device to your favorite headphones, it’s a terrific product that travelers should be excited to try out.

    There’s so much to love about the AirFly Duo that it was difficult for us to pinpoint any flaws. However, we found it a bit annoying that when turning the AirFly off and then back on again, there was a slight lag in connecting our Bluetooth-equipped wireless headphones. Though after a few seconds, the two devices paired on their own without an issue. If nothing else, you may just have to be patient and not attempt to “over-pair” your AirFly. Let it do its thing — because it really does it well.

    If we’re going to be very picky, the AirFly Duo isn’t exactly cheap. At just under $50 per device, it is an investment. That being said, it’s an investment that we believe is worth it — especially if you travel frequently.

    Will we be flying without the AirFly Duo again? Probably not. Overall, the ease of the device makes it worth carrying along on every trip. It’s compact enough to store in any travel bag, easy enough to connect with a number of devices and perhaps best of all, you can say goodbye to airline-supplied headphones forever. If you travel frequently — or seldom but have other places to use the transmitter — the AirFly devices are an absolute no-brainer.

    Looking for a travel credit card? Find out which cards CNN Underscored chose as our best travel credit cards currently available.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Sea to Summit Cinder Quilt is the perfect companion for ultralight, ultrawarm adventures | CNN Underscored

    The Sea to Summit Cinder Quilt is the perfect companion for ultralight, ultrawarm adventures | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret that sleeping bags are an essential piece of camping gear. Without one, you’ll likely spend the night shivering in your tent once the sun goes down. But have you ever heard of a camping quilt?

    Quilts — and no, not the kind sitting on your grandma’s couch — make a great companion for hikers and campers looking for a lightweight sleep system for their outdoor adventures. Unlike a traditional sleeping bag, they’re designed without an underside or hood, which helps cut down on weight and volume.

    While most campers opt for a standard rectangle or mummy sleeping bag for their outdoor adventures, camping quilts are most often used by backpackers, thru-hikers and anyone who’s into ultralight camping like hammock campers. They also make a great additional layer on top of a regular sleeping bag on extra-chilly nights.

    We tested the Sea to Summit Cinder Down Quilt on a few camping trips this season to see what the hype’s all about. Here’s what we found.

    A down quilt that gives you all the warmth without the weight

    The Cinder is a super-packable down quilt designed for weight-conscious backpackers or campers who want an extra layer of warmth. Snag this quilt if you want more versatility for how you sleep outside, like an extra layer during the colder seasons, a throw blanket for around the fire or a lightweight option for warm weather camping.

    Quilts make all the difference for folks who want to hit the trail with less weight or head to the campground with an extra layer of warmth. Similar to sleeping bags, quilts are filled with either real or synthetic down and are used as a top cover while sleeping or hanging out at home or the campsite.

    As an avid car camper myself, an ultralight sleep system isn’t usually something I bring with me to the campground. I’m used to packing heavier-duty and heavier-weight sleeping bags (or extra blankets) in my SUV when I know it’s going to be cold. However, when I heard about the Sea to Summit Cinder Quilt, I knew I had to give it a try.

    While pricey, the Sea to Summit Cinder Quilt’s versatility and quality makes it worth the investment. This quilt can be used in a variety of ways and during all seasons: Bring it with you backpacking as a lightweight alternative, throw it on top of your sleeping bag for an added layer of warmth or use it as a blanket while camping in warmer months.

    Lightweight and versatile

    When you’re headed out on a long thru-hike or multi-day backpacking trip, it’s imperative to consider how much weight is in your pack. The Cinder Quilt’s ultimate use case was intended as a lighter alternative to a full-size sleeping bag for the backcountry. Because the quilt has no backside or hood, it’s much smaller than your average sleeping bag. Sea to Summit insulated this quilt with a super lofty 750+ fill power down, which ensures a “lowest comfort temperature” rating down to 35 degrees Fahrenheit.

    It also comes with an included stuff sack that allows you to compress the quilt even more. When compressed in its stuff sack, the quilt is about the same height and width as two Nalgene water bottles and weighs in at just under 1.5 pounds (23.3 ounces).

    Erica Zazo/CNN

    If you’re not into backpacking but want a warm extra layer to bring to the campground with you, the Cinder is also a great option. This fall, while staying with a group of friends at Kettle Moraine State Forest — Southern Unit, I was thankful to have brought my Cinder Quilt. For mid-October, we had unseasonably cold weather, and the temperatures dropped into the low 30s at night.

    To stay protected from the cold, I threw the Cinder Quilt on top of my normal sleeping bag before bed for an extra layer of warmth. Temperatures the first night dropped down to 31 degrees Fahrenheit and the quilt kept me warm all night. Putting the sleeping quilt on top of my regular sleeping bag added up to 10 degrees of additional warmth, since I usually sleep in 40 degrees in my regular bag without feeling chilly. I decided to put the Cinder inside my regular sleeping bag on night two when the temperatures hovered around 36 degrees Fahrenheit and had to take the quilt out because I got too hot eventually.

    The Cinder is clearly a great option if you want to supplement the sleep system you already have to be more cold weather-ready. However, it’s more versatile than that. The Cinder Quilt is a fantastic throw blanket around the campfire (or even in your living room), thanks to a set of pouches in the top corners that allowed me to put my hands in and hug the quilt even tighter around my body. Talk about super cozy.

    Smart design and features

    For such a simple quilt, the Cinder comes with a surprisingly thoughtful design and a smart set of features. Sea to Summit designed this quilt with its own QuiltLock system for a more secure and snug fit around sleeping bags and sleeping pads.

    sea to summit cinder quilt inline 1 CNNU

    Erica Zazo/CNN

    On top of snaps that help secure the Cinder Quilt to any Sea to Summit sleeping bag, it also comes with four removable and adjustable straps that allow you to secure the quilt around the back of any sleeping pad for a more snug fit. The removable straps can also be loosened or tightened depending on how much space you need for your body between the sleeping pad and the top quilt.

    At the top and bottom of the quilt is a built-in drawstring that can be pulled tight to cinch together and create a foot box in chilly weather or around your neckline to prevent unwanted drafts. This comes in handy on cooler or windy nights, especially since this quilt does not have a hood.

    While the Cinder Quilt is a great option for spring, summer and early fall, come cool weather months, you might want to rethink using this as a stand-alone sleep system. It makes a great additional layer on top of a regular sleeping bag; however, this quilt likely won’t keep you warm in cold weather on its own.

    As mentioned, when using this quilt inside of my regular sleeping bag while car camping, I started to get hot — so hot that I started to sweat. The result: My skin started to stick to the inside of my Cinder Quilt. Nylon, polyester and taffeta quilts tend to hold up best for comfort in warm weather, whereas nylon is notoriously known to stick to your skin, especially when sweating.

    sea to summit cinder quilt inline 2 CNNU

    Erica Zazo/CNN

    If you wear this quilt in warmer weather, it’s best to avoid sleeping in your birthday suit. Instead, stick to wearing a T-shirt (or long sleeves if it makes sense) and sleep pants made of a fabric that’s known to wick sweat, such as merino wool or synthetic material like polyester. You can also bring a sleeping bag liner to cozy up in. That way the extra layer will prevent your skin from sticking to your sleeping pad and quilt.

    The Cinder Quilt is no small investment. At $249, it’s a hefty price tag for a piece of outdoor gear. That said, the Cinder is on par with, if not more affordable than, similar quilts on the market. (We dive into how it stacks up to the competition below.) Key features that factor into the high price point are the fact that it’s insulated with 100% RDS down, insulated at 750+ fill power and Sea to Summit’s reputation as a brand that designs products that are built to last.

    While no two quilts are created exactly alike, they all share a commonality: They make great camping companions because of their versatility, packability and added warmth.

    In general, the more expensive the sleeping quilt, the warmer and more compact you can expect it to be. The Cinder is very comparable to competitors on the market in terms of weight, comfort temperature rating and price. However, during my testing, I found the Cinder Quilt to be a very high-performing and reliable quilt for a very fair price.

    Similar to the REI Co-op Magma Trail Quilt and Therm-a-Rest Corus Quilt, the Cinder Quilt clocks in at just over 1 pound and each of these bags falls within 5 degrees of each other for lowest comfort temperature rating. The biggest differences come into play when comparing fill power and price point. The REI Magma Trail is the priciest comparable quilt ($329), but it packs down the smallest to a 3-liter volume in its stuff sack. Of the three quilts, the Magma Trail also promises the most warmth. The Therm-a-Rest Corus packs down to a slightly lower volume at 4 liters in its stuff sack and comes in at only a slightly higher price point ($269.95) than the Sea to Summit Cinder Quilt.

    Here’s a full breakdown of these three very comparable quilts:

    Whether your adventures take you deep into the backcountry, your local state park or a campout in your own backyard, the Cinder Quilt can be a helpful piece of gear to add to your camping checklist. Its versatility to be used as a stand-alone quilt or an extra layer on top of a regular sleeping bag means you have more opportunity to use it after your investment. From its packability to its sustainable design, the Sea to Summit Cinder Down Quilt is a piece of gear I can promise you won’t regret buying.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best sous vide cooker in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best sous vide cooker in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Sous vide (the phrase means “under a vacuum”) is the process of cooking food that’s been sealed in a plastic bag slowly in a temperature-controlled water bath. First developed for institutional use, the method offers incredible precision, and over the past few decades it’s become more and more popular with ambitious home cooks interested in getting perfect results when preparing delicate and expensive proteins such as seafood or premium cuts of meat.

    We tested ten of the most popular sous vide cookers, preparing a wide variety of proteins, vegetables and more over the course of several months to find the best sous vide immersion circulator for your money.

    Best sous vide circulator overall

    The Inkbird ISV-200W offers the best balance of features, build quality, performance and value of all the sous vide immersion circulators we tested. Whether you’re a veteran or just experimenting with the technique, it’s a great choice.

    Inkbird ISV-200W

    • Power output: 1,000 watts
    • Warranty: 1 year

    Honestly, when we began this process of evaluating sous vide devices, we expected that one of the bigger and more established brands would get top honors here, but as it turns out, the inexpensive Inkbird ISV-200W has the best combination of features, build quality, and functionality for the money.

    The Inkbird has a 1000-watt heating element so it has quick water bath temperature recovery, an easy-to-use and read main control display, the manual touch button controls are simple to set target temperatures and timers, and the clamping mechanism for attaching to pots is straightforward, and ergonomically sensible.

    You can manually set temperatures and timers with the Inkbird Smart App (available for iOS or Android) to support all its home automation and smart controller products. With it, you can create presets for frequently used temperatures and timings and pick/modify from 14 preconfigured recipes (such as “ultimate carrots”).

    So what is not to like? Frankly, not much. It’s true that Anova and some of the others on this list that are more expensive are smaller, sleeker and have fancier displays, but from a basic functionality standpoint, they don’t actually cook any better, and most of them have lower-wattage heating elements, meaning slower heating.

    Inkbird’s current model is the ISV-200W; it is nearly identical to the older ISV-100W save for a few minor changes. The 200W also has a slightly lower temperature range and a food burn protection function that shuts the unit down if the water completely evaporates in the cooking pot. For the time being, the ISV-100W is still available for around the same price and we think you’d be happy with either unit.

    The sous vide cooking technique — in which you cook food by immersing it in a water bath that remains at a constant temperature rather than over a heat source — was developed in France during the early 1970s, and became popular when it was used in the first-class kitchens on the SNCF, the French national railway system, during the 1980s. Institutions and fine dining restaurants in Europe and the US adopted this efficient, tidy cooking style shortly thereafter.

    The advantage of the process was that it could easily produce identical, precision-cooked meals for large numbers of people in institutional settings and restaurants, where there was a need to prep food hours before service was needed.

    But home cooks who sampled food cooked using the method began finding ways to get the same results at home, first turning to commercial devices and ultimately taking advantage of smaller models designed for home use.

    While circulators used to cost thousands of dollars (they were designed for institutional large-scale cooking setups), the price has come down as sous vide circulators meant for home use have proliferated. The method became broadly popular in the mid-2010s, and today miniaturized sous vide circulators — small wand-shaped appliances that attach to the side of a stock pot or large plastic container — are widely available.

    A classic sous-vide application is to cook a steak perfectly in the immersion bath, and then finish it in a pan to give it a crust.

    Sous vide circulators may seem techy, but the process is quite simple. Whether you’re using a large device meant for commercial kitchens or a home wand circulator, all sous vide circulators work and cook the same way, and you’ll get identical results. The bigger, more expensive units may come up to temperature slightly more quickly and are more robust for professional kitchen dependability, but you’ll get identical results from any sous vide with a little practice.

    Sous vide circulators work by cooking food that’s been sealed in a plastic bag (you can use traditional zipper-seal bags but most enthusiasts use a vacuum sealer to do this — the term “sous vide” translates as “under a vacuum” after all) slowly at a stable, controllable temperature giving you finer-grained control over doneness than you can get with other methods (you get much greater stability than you would by monitoring the temperature of a simmering stockpot with an instant-read meat thermometer, for instance.

    To get this level of fine control, sous vide techniques take advantage of water’s capacity to hold heat. You immerse the circulator wand in a water bath along with the food to be cooked (typically a protein, though you can sous vide almost anything) sealed in a plastic bag; the device uses its heating element to bring the water bath to the desired temperature, circulates it with a pump, and maintains the temperature using a thermocouple sensor and PID (like in an espresso machine), all controlled by an onboard computer (that in turn may communicate with an app). There’s no pressure involved as in a pressure cooker — basically your food takes a very precisely controlled warm bath for as long as it takes to cook to a perfect doneness.

    After cooking in the water bath at the desired temperatures and for the appropriate amount of time, your dish is ready to eat, or the protein (such as a steak or fish filet) can quickly be finished by searing in a pan (to create a crust) before serving.

    The timing of sous vide immersion depends on the size, weight, type of food being cooked, and the desired level of doneness. A protein cannot “overcook” in sous vide in the traditional sense because its internal temperature cannot exceed the temperature of the bath itself. However, if you cook a protein for too long (for several hours exceeding the target doneness time), you’ll get food with a mushy texture.

    sous vide cooking in small stockpot underscored

    bonchan/iStock

    First, take a piece of meat – like a beef filet or an individual steak – and place it in a waterproof bag, adding seasonings or marinades as desired. You can’t do anything with the ingredients once they are in the bag and in the bath, so this is the step in which you can add flavors.

    Next, you’ll want to seal the bag so it can withstand the cooking process. Vacuum bags are perfect for sous vide cooking. Most of the bags we tested for our review of the best vacuum sealers can withstand 70°C (158°F) for up to 12 hours and at 80°C (176°F) for a maximum of 6 hours before a heat seal failure, making them very well suited to the sous vide process. You can also use zipper-lock style bags, though we recommend using freezer bags since they are more durable.

    Preheat your water bath to your desired cooking temperature using the immersion circulator — you can even start with hot water from the tap without worries, since the water doesn’t actually touch the food (for any other sort of cooking you should use cold water since hot tap water can contain more dissolved metals). Immerse the sealed bag of food into the water bath, and set the device to circulate.

    A vacuum sealer is a perfect partner for a sous vide cooker.

    Once the bag is in the bath, you can adjust temperature as needed or the recipe requires, or let it remain at a stable temperature for the duration. From that point, sous vide cooking is very much a passive experience — more along the lines of using a slow cooker. Once your food is sealed in the bag (along with marinades, seasoning, and fats), the bag is placed into the circulating hot water, and you walk away until the timing of the cook is complete.

    There are many recipes online, and most devices come with time and temperature guides on their apps or in provided instructions. But as an example, if you want a perfect medium rare steak, set it to 126 degrees Fahrenheit, along with the required time, such as 90 minutes, depending on the steak’s thickness. Doing so will ensure the meat reaches and stays at your desired doneness.

    Once your ingredients are done, you have the option of finishing with other methods. For example, while steaks emerge from the bath perfectly and uniformly done, they’ll lack the char or crust that marks a perfect traditionally prepared steak. All you have to do before serving is give it a quick sear (with cooking oil or butter) to brown the outside.

    You don't need to limit yourself to steaks; all kinds of proteins (like these perfectly-cooked scallops) and vegetables lend themselves to sous vide cooking.

    While sous vide devices became popular for cooking meats, you can use a circulator for cooking anything that you might have poached in the past with less mess and effort.

    Salmon or other fish filets can be cooked perfectly medium rare and served hot from the circulator with their juices or chilled for a lovely brunch dish.

    Do you want to jump on the ”jammy egg” trend? Eggs don’t even need to be removed from their shells or placed in a plastic bag. Just follow restaurateur and cookbook author J. Kenji López-Alt’s tutorial on this subject; he has already done all the experimentation to get perfect eggs — whatever doneness is perfect for you.

    Turkey works great sous vide. This past Thanksgiving we cooked boneless breast sous vide at 150° F for 3 hours. All we did was season it lightly. After it had chilled, we opened the vacuum bag, sliced off the turkey breast, removed the excess juices to contribute to the gravy, and resealed the turkey slices. On Thanksgiving itself, all we had to do was reheat it again with the immersion circulator, and it was the most tender and juicy white meat we’ve ever had.

    Vegetables are amazing cooked sous vide. Just add a tiny dash of salt, and a teaspoon of butter when sealing your prepped veggies. Only the smallest amount of fat is needed because when it melts; there is no air in the bag to get in the way of it surrounding the vegetables.

    Do you love grilled chicken wings but want to cut down on the fat? Season and vacuum seal your prepared raw wings. A good tip is to make extra divided into meal-size portions, each in its own sous vide bag. Cook the wing bags in a sous vide water bath to 160°F for several hours. Chill in an ice bath when they are done. Now, when you want chicken wings for dinner, you only need to open a bag and grill them to crisp the skin. If you want them coated, toss the crisp wings in sauce and put back on the grill to caramelize. You might notice a lot of juices inside the bag. Drain that off, but save it! This is a delicious, concentrated broth that will gel hard when cold.

    You can even use your sous vide circulator for tasks beyond food. For example, mixologists are using immersion circulators to extract flavors into alcohols for custom liqueurs, and you can infuse olive oil with herbs using sous vide as well.

    All of the sous vide immersion circulators we tested performed well, and gave us identical results. This is great, because it means that you can choose based on features, and it’s great for the technique because it means that the tools have matured to the point where they are basically a commodity. Everything we looked at had plenty of power and plenty of pump capacity to tackle the recipes a home cook is likely to attempt.

    The cookers we tested differed primarily in design, build quality, and food service grade certifications (an important consideration in commercial-grade units), as well as total heating element power output, circulator pump variable flow rate (again, more of a consideration for commercial units) and also the sophistication of their smartphone apps,

    The heating element’s wattage rating determines how quickly the water bath can be brought up to the desired cooking temperature — this is important because when you add cold food to the hot water cooking medium, the water temperature may drop – especially if you add a large chunk of refrigerated meat. A unit with a higher wattage heating element (we think a 1,000 watt unit is fine for home use) will recover temperature more quickly.

    Apps are not typically required for operation on most units (the Breville Joule is an exception in our test group; it only works via an app) but can make things easier for beginners. We preferred to have the option of an onboard display and manual controls. Sous vide apps will usually incorporate remote monitoring and manual control (view current bath temperature, set timers, and set temperature) and also the ability to pick food cooking programs from a list, such as a medium-rare strip steak, or a salmon filet, to ensure foolproof cooking for novices.

    Most of the immersion circulators we tested have a large, hinged, clothespin-like clamp (secured by a tension spring); we preferred them for ease of use and ergonomics. Anova uses an older design, an adjustable screw mechanism, which we found harder to use and felt might be more difficult for anyone with dexterity issues..

    We dedicated an area of our home kitchen to test these devices, immersing in 8 and 16-quart stock pots filled with water to the top fill indicator of each unit, with a variety of manufacturer vacuum sealers, vacuum bags, and test proteins, including beef, chicken, and pork.

    First and foremost, we wanted to see how well each product performed in cooking our test proteins. Every sous vide device we looked at could cook our test proteins within the allotted time periods with no interruption.

    We looked carefully at the materials each unit and its accessories were built with, and how well designed and constructed each device was, assessed how easy each circulator was to set up and to operate, and looked at ergonomic considerations as we tested. We also looked at warranty coverage, and assessed how easy it was to contact the manufacturer with questions or concerns.

    Anova Precision Cooker

    • Power: 1,000 watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    Anova is the most well-known brand in home sous vide cookery, and its Precision Cooker was important in popularizing the technique in 2014 and there’s still quite a lot to like about the device. With 1000 watts of power, it can handle just about every immersion cooking task that a typical home cook can throw at it; and it has an excellent industrial design, featuring a bright, white, circular LED with large numbers that make it very easy to read. It’s also a product with excellent build quality and feels very durable.

    So why didn’t it top our list when it sits at the top of so many competing product evaluations at other outlets? It’s now expensive for what it is, given that other products on the market now effectively do the same thing for less. We also don’t like the screw-style clamps on their circulators that potentially present issues for people with dexterity issues (such as the elderly or disabled); it’s the only product right now in the segment that uses them, and they’ve used the same design for years.

    Anova Precision Cooker Pro

    • Power: 1,200 Watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    Anova’s Precision Cooker Pro is a slightly larger, more powerful model, and an excellent product with a somewhat larger rectangular white-on-black LED display, but it is probably overkill for most home cooks and if you’re interested in Anova, the smaller model should work just as well.

    Anova Precision Cooker Nano

    • Power: 750 watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    The Nano is the smallest in the Anova Precision Cooker lineup, with a maximum heating element power of 750W. It’s an app-controllable device, but only with Bluetooth, so it you can’t keep an eye on things if you leave the house. The display and control layout is similar to the Precision cooker, but it uses a lower-cost LCD component that isn’t as bright.

    At this price we think the Inkbird or Instant Brands units (which support Wi-Fi) are more useful and a better deal.

    Breville Joule

    • Power: 1,100 watts
    • Warranty: 1 year

    The Joule brand was, like the Anova, a key device in the popularization of home sous vide cooking. And there’s a lot to like about the current Joule, now a Breville product: it’s small, at 1.3lbs (20.8oz) with an ultra-sleek design; and has excellent power output for its diminutive size — a whopping 1100W, putting it in the same category as the Anova Precision Pro. It’s also probably got the best smartphone app in the industry, with a wide array of recipes and guidance.

    But at $245, it’s expensive, and the only way you can operate it is with the app: it’s completely headless with no manual controls. That’s something you need to be comfortable with as a home cook — on all of the other circulators we tested, app control is an extra rather than a requirement. Would it have been a big deal for Breville to integrate a simple control head on the Joule? Perhaps even a removable one? At this price point, it should have.

    Breville Polyscience HydroPro CS700

    • Power: 1,450 watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    If you are the type of home cook who has professional aspirations, find yourself preparing large cuts of meat on a regular basis, or just want the best, then look no further than the Polyscience HydroPro, which is a commercial-quality sous vide circulator designed for restaurant or catering use.

    From an industrial design perspective, the HydroPro is impressive. In terms of materials alone, you know you are working with something designed for a professional kitchen environment, as it weighs 67.2 oz and is made almost entirely of stainless steel, with an IPX7 water resistance rating, an NSF Food Equipment Certification and cUL commercial ratings for use in professional environments. The large, full color TFT display unit is covered with impact-resistant Corning Gorilla Glass (the stuff used on high-end smartphones), and the device can even be completely disassembled without tools for extended cleaning. The clamp is extremely heavy-duty with a very strong spring, so you’ll never need to worry about it slipping and requiring adjusting. It also has a professional carrying case made of padded black nylon.

    The heating element boasts a whopping 1450W of power so you can throw the most demanding cooking loads at it, with very little concern for temperature recovery time and water bath heat stability. It also has three selectable circulation speeds, up to 17L per minute, and a companion mobile application called “Sous Vide Toolbox” provides recipes tailored to the thermal conductivity of the food, with choices for animal proteins, eggs, vegetables, fruits, legumes, custard, and yogurt.

    Vesta Imersa

    • Power: 900 watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    Vesta Precision, a Seattle-based company known for its sous vide and vacuum sealer kits, has taken a different approach to immersion circulation cookery than the rest of the vendors on our list, with a focus on food safety. All of their sous vide units require the user to start the timer when the water bath reaches temperature manually.

    For example, if you set your bath to 165F, with a two-hour cooking time, the timer will not actually start once the target temperature is reached (which was the case with the other units we tested). Instead, it notifies the user by beeping at the device and notification via the app that the target temp has been reached.

    We asked their customer service about this because at first we thought this was a fault in the device. But Vesta reasons that they feel having the timer start automatically means it is more likely a user would put the food into the water bath during the pre-heat stage, which could potentially be a safety issue.

    Feature-wise, the Vesta Imersa is middle-of-the-road, with a 900W heating element, Weighing in at 40 ounces, it is about the same size as the Inkbird, and looks much like the Anova Precision or Instant Brands units, with a bright white-on-black LED display, prominent controls and a large and easy to use tension clamp. The app allows for both manual programming and picking from recipe lists and is fairly straightforward.

    Vesta thoughtfully supplies a quality set of laminated sous vide temperature guides organized by type of food that are held together by a metal ring, which is nice to have to keep in a drawer if you want a quick reference guide to cooking temperatures for proteins. We wish Vesta sold this for anyone to purchase, not just as a freebie with its products.

    Vesta Imersa Elite

    • Power: 900 watts
    • Warranty: 2 years

    The Imersa Elite is a bit of an odd duck, as it eschews the wand-style design of all the other units on this list with a squared-off upside-down u-shaped design that eschews the clamp – the display half of the unit is oriented so it faces outward from the stockpot on a swivel mechanism as the circulator half is immersed into your water bath.

    It uses the same app as the Imersa Precision, and as with that unit it prompts the user to start the main cooking timer when the bath reaches the target temperature instead of doing it automatically. It even has the same 900W heating element as the wand version. The main reason why we aren’t recommending it is that we felt that it was especially sensitive to overfill, and we ended up tripping the error sensor when we had it filled just to the max line and rotated the pot to see the display, causing vigorous water movement in the pot.

    Instant Brands Accu Slim Sous Vide Precision V2

    Instant Brands Accu Slim

    • Power: 800 watts
    • Warranty: 1 year

    The Accu Slim V2, from Instant Brands (famous for the Instant Pot pressure cooker and the Vortex air fryer) is as uncomplicated as sous vide circulators get, with clean lines, simple touch button controls, and a bright white-on-black LED display with large numbers for easy readability. It’s considerably smaller and lighter than the Inkbird (it weighs 29 oz. versus. the Inkbird’s 40 oz.) but is slightly less powerful at 800 watts, so it’s a better choice for somebody preparing smaller portions in a smaller stockpot — say two chicken breasts or fish filets at a time rather than a whole roast.

    The Accu Slim is not Wifi or Bluetooth-controlled, so there’s no app to worry about– just set it from the onboard controls and walk away; it’s as easy to deal with as these devices get. The large tension clamp is easy to attach to any pot you choose, the water fill line on the heating element/circulator pipe is prominently marked, and we had no issues with overflow that could cause the device to enter an error state. We used it during Thanksgiving to reheat a large vac-sealed bone-in turkey breast that was precooked to target temperature at a relative’s house in a 12-quart stockpot, and it worked like a champ.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best vacuum sealers in 2022, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    Best vacuum sealers in 2022, tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Vacuum sealers — devices that suck the air out of a plastic bag and then heat-seal it for storage in the refrigerator or freezer — are great for prepare food to freeze for later use, or to save money by purchasing meat in bulk and processing it into smaller portions. Long a favorite tool of hunters, outdoorspeople and serious gardeners, they’re also great for preparing food for use with an immersion circulator for sous vide cooking at home.

    To find the very best vacuum sealers for your kitchen, we looked at 11 top-rated models, bagging and sealing dozens of cuts of meat, fish and seafood along with a variety of starches and vegetables, and refrigerating and sous vide cooking the results. In the end we came up with four great units that should fit any need and budget.

    The best vacuum sealer overall

    The FoodSaver Vacuum Sealer VS3150 has a completely removable vacuum chamber with an integrated drip tray, which made thorough cleanup during testing easy, even if we wanted to clean it after each bag. Our meat juices and marinades were easily sucked into the chamber, preventing any contamination.

    The best budget vacuum sealer

    A big benefit of the Geryon Vacuum Sealer E2900-MS is that it was easy to clean during testing. The base of the unit is completely removable from the top lid/clamshell containing all of the electronics and the motor/heat strip. And if you don’t think you’ll be using a vacuum sealer all the time and just want a basic model that won’t break the bank, the Geryon should meet your needs.

    The best vacuum sealer for serious home cooks

    The main advantage of the FoodSaver Vacuum Sealer VS4840 is its automatic vacuum and seal function — we didn’t need to fiddle with the lid or line the bag perfectly up to the vacuum chamber during testing. It’s a neat feature that really simplifies things if you buy large cuts of meat and process them into smaller portions to keep in the freezer to use later.

    The best handheld vacuum sealer

    The FoodSaver Multi-Use Handheld FS2160 offers a useful marination function, which automatically turns the vacuum on and off over the course of 10 minutes when attached to a container. During testing, we found this function periodically released and increased vacuum pressure, forcing the marination juices into the meat. It made our grilled chicken wings even more delicious.

    FoodSaver VS3150

    • Warranty: 5 Years
    • Handheld sealer attachment

    FoodSaver is the 800-pound gorilla among home vacuum sealers — the company is the longest established manufacturer of these products, with its first sealer released in 1987. FoodSaver has a large lineup of models, but the FoodSaver VS3150 offers the best combination of features and utility for the money of all of the vacuum sealers we tested. It’s easy to understand and use, easy to clean, works with a wide selection of bags and containers, and gave us solid results in our testing.

    The FoodSaver has a modern, clean clamshell design, with bag storage and the vacuum chamber integrated into the bottom shell and a bag cutter and main controls on the top lid. On the right side of the bottom shell, you’ll find the locking clamp; this provided a tight seal throughout our time with the device. A handheld sealer attachment fits into a storage compartment in the top lid.

    We found ourselves using the handheld quite a bit. It’s great for marinating (using FoodSaver’s nicely designed storage containers) and the reclosable bags and containers are convenient to use if you want to keep items like cheese and cold cuts in the refrigerator where they’ll be frequently accessed, but you still want to take advantage of vacuum sealing to keep them fresh as long as possible. The handheld attachment also doubles as an accessory port for sealing Mason jars when the Mason jar attachment (purchased separately) is connected.

    In a nod to one of our favorite uses for a vacuum sealer — preparing food for sous vide cooking in a water bath — in addition to the usual dry, moist and pulse vacuum modes, the FoodSaver features a “Sous Vide” mode which “stutters” the vacuum automatically, presumably for optimizing the seal for juicier food items — we didn’t find this made much of a difference with sous vide bags versus the “moist” setting and it felt like a bit of a gimmick to us.

    An important reason we put the FoodSaver VS3150 on the top of our list is that, like other FoodSaver models, it has a completely removable vacuum chamber with an integrated drip tray, which makes thorough cleanup easy, even if you want to do it after each bag. We don’t know why others, like Anova, do not, as residue poses a potential food safety concern, especially when dealing with raw proteins in sous vide applications. Meat juices and marinades can easily be sucked into the chamber, causing potential contamination. Whatever vacuum sealer you choose, the vacuum chamber should be inspected after each use and cleaned thoroughly if exposed to any raw meat products — the FoodSaver just made it easier to do this effectively than the other models we tested.

    As you’re shopping, you may find several similar models from FoodSaver with slightly different model numbers. There are several 3000-series devices in different finishes, but we had a similar experience across the lineup and expect you should, too.

    Geryon Vacuum Sealer E2900-MS

    Geryon E2900-MS

    • Warranty: 2 Years
    • Easy to clean

    If you don’t think you’ll be using a vacuum sealer all the time and just want a basic model that won’t break the bank, the Geryon should suit your kitchen.

    At 2.6 pounds and 14 inches across, it’s one of the smallest and lightest units we looked at, so it’s easy to tuck away in a cabinet when you aren’t using it. It doesn’t have internal bag storage (though if you don’t need to keep it at the ready all the time, this likely won’t matter to you).

    The Geryon seals just fine; it has toggleable “moist” and “dry” settings that work well to deal with juicy foods. We had no issues with the bags we used it on, and it can accommodate the same 8-inch and 11-inch standard bags that the bigger and more expensive models use. It even has an accessory port to seal foods in containers (with a dedicated “canister” button).

    Understandably given the low cost, it’s a little more finicky to use than our top pick — it uses a simple snap attachment for the upper and lower pieces and not a locking clamp like the much more expensive FoodSavers or Anova units.

    As with the FoodSaver models, a big benefit of the Geryon is that it’s easy to clean. The base of the unit is completely removable from the top lid/clamshell containing all of the electronics and the motor/heat strip so that it can be cleaned thoroughly (even completely immersed under soapy water) after operation. Frankly, we wish all basic sealers were designed like the Geryon.

    FoodSaver Vacuum Sealer VS4840

    FoodSaver VS4840

    • Warranty: 5 Years
    • Automatic vacuum and seal function

    While we think the FoodSaver 3150 will fit the needs of just about any home kitchen, the FoodSaver 4840 is a step up because it includes all the features of the 3000 series, along with a mode that combines auto-vacuum with auto-seal, so you don’t actually have to touch any controls to start the vacuum seal process, making it ideal for folks who are handling raw ingredients and helping to minimize user error. If you typically buy large cuts of meat and process them into smaller portions to keep in the freezer to cook later, the VS4840’s for you.

    The main advantage of this model is the automatic vacuum and seal function — you don’t need to fiddle with the lid or line the bag perfectly up to the vacuum chamber; just guide the opening of the bag towards the chamber with the lid closed and the device will automatically draw it in (using a motorized roller mechanism) and begin the vacuum and sealing process. It’s a neat feature that really simplifies things and makes for less of a mess if you are the kind of cook who typically buys large cuts of meat and processes them into smaller portions to keep in the freezer to use later.

    As with the VS3150, the VS4840 has a built-in handheld tool, and integrated storage for it on the left side of the unit — simply retract it from its compartment, and a spring-loaded mechanism allows it to furl back into its spool when needed. In our opinion, this is a significant improvement over the 3000 series because while that model also has a permanently attached handheld, it isn’t on a spring-loaded retractable spool; the tubing just coils behind the unit, so it’s a cleaner design.

    The unit also features a lighted progress bar, which gives you slightly more insight into how long the vacuum process is going than some of the other models we tested. As with the 3000 series, the 4840 has a removable easy-to-clean vacuum chamber in the event juices and other liquids get pulled out of the food and into the chamber during the vacuum process.

    The best handheld vacuum sealer: FoodSaver Multi-Use Handheld Vacuum Sealer and Marinator FS2160

    FoodSaver Multi-Use Handheld Vacuum Sealer and Marinator FS2160

    FoodSaver FS2160

    • Warranty: 5 Years
    • Handheld-only sealer

    Along with the full-featured sealers we tested that included a handheld extension, we tested a couple of handheld-only sealers. These devices work only with reusable bags and containers that have a compatible valve; typically you are tied into the company you purchased from to find compatible bags and containers. Used with their corresponding bags, they work well to seal and store food.

    The FoodSaver FS2160 edged out the Zwilling for a couple of reasons. It had a more convenient charging base, which was intuitive to use and doubled as a storage solution. The Foodsaver FS2160 also offers a useful marination function, which automatically turns the vacuum on and off over the course of 10 minutes when attached to a container. This function, which most of company’s countertop versions also have, periodically releases and increases vacuum pressure to force the marination juices into the meat — we did this with some chicken wings that we grilled, compared with some that were simply just bag marinated and we definitely tasted a difference in the intensity of the marinade.

    Part of the benefit of the FoodSaver system is the quality of its vacuum containers and resealable bag as they are essential to the use of the handheld unit, which is optimized for quick use, marination and food preservation. We really like the 10-cup container that was sent to us for evaluation, which is strongly constructed out of a high-impact plastic and has a very tight vacuum seal, a marination setting that corresponds with the unit’s marination mode, and a prominent pressure release knob — although it does require a few days of use to break it in for smooth operation as it initially requires quite a bit of force to open. You can get these bags individually or in kits pairing a 10-cup and 3-cup container for $35.

    Vacuum-sealed bags of asparagus, carrots, courgettes, peppers and shallots, for sous vide cooking.

    A vacuum sealer is a device used to remove the air from a specialized plastic bag or a food container, creating a vacuum. This removes the oxygen, inhibiting bacterial growth, which helps preserve the food inside, allowing sealed items to last weeks or even months longer in the refrigerator or freezer. Vacuum sealers are often used for packaging cooked and raw proteins and vegetables for storage, preparing marinades, and sealing food in bags for immersion circulation with sous vide cooking.

    A vacuum pump is the heart of a vacuum sealer; it moves air out of the vacuum chamber (either the slot into which the top of the vacuum bag is inserted or a handheld attachment or hose). Vacuum pumps can typically be run in several modes to suit various food preparation needs:

    • Dry: For optimal vacuuming and sealing of dry foods.
    • Moist: For vacuuming and sealing moist or juicy foods.
    • Pulse: For manual start and stop of the vacuum function, such as sealing crunchy or brittle foods or soft ones like breads.
    • Sous vide: For optimal vacuuming and sealing bags in sous vide cooking. This is similar to the Moist function but removes slightly less air.

    Vacuum sealers work by making a tight seal; first you clamp the bag into the vacuum chamber, which is surrounded by a rubber gasket. Some models have vacuum chambers with removable drip trays so they can be easily cleaned; you’ll want to look for a model with such trays because they make cleaning much easier, meaning you get a better seal and don’t run the risk of nasty buildup in the device.

    Once the bag is locked in place and the air has been removed, you trigger the sealing process itself. A sealing strip —  typically PTFE (Teflon) fiber tape with a nonstick surface, with a heating element under it — runs along the edge of the chamber.. This is placed at the entrance of the vacuum chamber and is heated with an element, typically a wire running underneath the tape, to create the heat seal for the vacuum bag.

    The vacuum bags themselves are typically made of food-grade polyamide and polyethylene for oxygen impermeability, ease of secure sealing and use in the refrigerator, freezer or in sous vide cooking. While sous vide immersion tolerances vary between products, typically, they can withstand 70° C (158° F) for up to 12 hours and at 80° C (176° F) for a maximum 6 hours before a heat seal failure. Many bags can be re-cut, re-sealed, and washed several times before discarding.

    Bag brands are generally interchangeable between vacuum sealer units and come either pre-cut in two sizes or uncut spools, depending on the manufacturer and application. On countertop units you’ll find a bag holder, and you can use the built-in bag cutter to trim to your desired length.

    Bags meant for handheld sealers generally use a proprietary valve specifically designed for the handheld device for which it was made. We have had some success using those from one manufacturer with another’s device (i.e., using a Zwilling resealable bag with a FoodSaver handheld and vice versa.) but we can’t promise compatibility. These bags open and close with a zipper-style seal.

    Beef, salmon and chicken breast in vacuum-sealed bags for sous vide cooking.

    All of the countertop models we looked at in this article are edge sealers — you fill a plastic bag with food, insert the open end of the bag into the vacuum sealer’s vacuum chamber, the vacuum process starts, and once the air’s been sucked out of the bag it finishes the process with a heat seal along the edge of the bag.

    Regardless of price point and exterior dimensions, all of the edge sealing units we tested accommodate both 8-inch-wide and 11-inch-wide bags. Given the overall uniformity of sealer designs, we also experienced consistent sealing performance across all brands we looked at — none did a better or worse job creating a vacuum or seal than any of the other competing products. This also indicates to us that the actual pump component used by most of these products is fairly standardized.

    Handheld sealers

    Some countertop edge sealers include handheld attachments and you can also find standalone handheld models. These are designed to use with containers or jars, or with proprietary resealable bags for short-term storage of things like cheese, cold cuts and resealable containers.

    A chamber sealer differs from an edge sealer in that it pumps all of the air out of a large chamber that an entire bag is placed in rather than out of the bag itself. This means you can seal moist or wet food items that would be impossible with an edge sealer, though models made for use at home may limit you to smaller portions of food due to the size of the chamber.

    You’ll mostly find chamber sealers primarily for professional use in the food service industry; these models are much larger than what you’ll find for home use and are very expensive. Only recently have lower-cost, and smaller chamber devices made it into the consumer space, such as the Anova Precision Chamber unit. Due to limited product availability and for the purposes of publishing the first version of this article, we did not look at chamber sealers.

    Vacuum sealing a bag containing beef topped with red onions, garlic and rosemary.

    We dedicated an area of our home kitchen to test these devices, using a variety of manufacturer bags along with several different sous vide circulator units (which were used to test bag integrity).

    With each sealer, we checked to see how easy it was to prep and seal bags for use, and once prepped, how well each product performed in removing the air from the bag and creating the heat seal. We were pleased to find that every edge sealer we tested made a satisfactory seal.

    We paid attention to the materials used in the construction of each device, and to the overall build quality, as well as investigating whether each sealer employed any tech or design elements to make it more functional than the competition.

    Since food safety is an important consideration, we paid careful attention to how simple it was to clean each sealer and how easy it was to reset between uses when sealing multiple bags.

    We also checked on warranty coverage and how easy it was to contact customer service for each brand we assessed.

    While the Anova is sleek and attractive, with excellent build quality, and features a “Sous Vide” sealing mode, we eliminated this device because the chamber is not removable for cleaning. It has ample bag roll storage with an integrated cutter and a clamping mechanism, but the FoodSaver 3000 series is better designed, and the Geryon is a better device for those on a budget.

    This unit is very similar to the 3000 series except that it lacks a built-in handheld; instead, it has an accessory port for attaching one if you buy it separately. As with other FoodSaver units, the vacuum chamber with its drip tray can be removed for easy cleaning.

    Similar to the Anova, with integrated bag roll storage and cutter, and a better clamping mechanism than the less expensive units, it also does not have a removable vacuum chamber, so it was eliminated, especially as it’s more expensive than the Anova.

    We dismissed this as the vacuum chamber isn’t removable, and the heat tape is located on the lid, which makes it more prone to burning yourself when lifting the lid when the heat is on. You are much better served by the Geryon, which offers a superior design for only a few dollars more.

    Nearly identical to the NutriChef internally and externally (and so far as we can tell electronically and mechanically), we dismissed this inexpensive unit for the same reasons — it’s difficult to clean and easy to burn yourself on the lid-mounted heat tape. Go for the Geryon at this price.

    The Vesta, with its elegant and sleek design, seems better than the really cheap ones we looked at primarily because the vacuum chamber can be removed for cleaning. Still, for the price, and considering it doesn’t have a clamping mechanism like the Anova or FoodSaver VS2150, we’d say give this one a pass.

    Zwilling Fresh & Save Vacuum Sealer Machine 6-Piece Starter Set

    $80 at Amazon, for the sealer, storage container and four reusable sous vide bags

    The Zwilling is a solid performer, though we prefer the FoodSaver FS2160 overall because of its charging base that’s simpler to use. Zwilling’s reusable bags are very well designed, with a solid valve attachment and a circular liquid barrier insert that makes sous vide use easier, and the company offers a wider variety of plastic and glass vacuum containers.

    The good news is that FoodSaver resealable bags and containers and Zwilling bags and containers are relatively compatible between the devices, so it doesn’t matter really which of the devices you own if you want to use the bag and container accessories from the other — we thoroughly tested both types of bags and containers with both units, and they worked fine in our testing with either machine, manufacturer claims aside.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This heated massage gun made pummeling my muscles feel relaxing | CNN Underscored

    This heated massage gun made pummeling my muscles feel relaxing | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Ever used a hot compress to ease a headache or soaked in a hot bath to soothe sore muscles? Heat is an easy, accessible way to self-treat a variety of issues. This is why companies are now directly building these benefits into recovery products like the Gravity Relax handheld deep tissue massager.

    Because heated massage guns are so new to the market, it’s almost impossible to find trusted research on them. But according to a 2021 study published in the journal Life, we do know that continuous, low-level heat therapy provides pain relief, improves muscular strength and increases flexibility. And localized heat therapy has also been shown to increase blood flow — supplying tissues with fresh blood and oxygen while flushing out waste to aid recovery.

    Combine the benefits of heat with percussion therapy — which can be as effective as massage therapy and foam rolling in reducing muscle soreness, according to a 2021 study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health — and you’ve got a one-two punch of feel-good recovery.

    I tested the Gravity Relax during the week after I ran the New York City marathon and took it with me on my first ski trip of the season the following week. Here’s what I thought.

    With a fantastic combination of heat and massage, this portable heated massage gun is the perfect companion after long runs or the gym, days on the slope or even for deep relaxation after hours in your office chair.

    Ashley Mateo/CNN Underscored

    One of the standard measures of a massage gun is revolutions per minute, or how many times the head can hit your muscle in one minute. The higher the speed, the higher the intensity of the percussion. The Gravity relax has a range of 1400 to 3200 RPM, and 30 individual levels of intensity (you can increase or decrease the intensity via the touchscreen on the device).

    Honestly, I did not see a need for this many levels — but I liked how easy it was to change the intensity (with a single hand!) when moving from the large muscles of my quads, which I really enjoy pummeling at the highest intensities, to my more sensitive calves. In the end, I didn’t find much of a difference between, say, levels 15 and 16 or 29 and 30; I would increase/decrease by about 5 at a time for a noticeable effect.

    Gravity Massager 3

    Ashley Mateo/CNN Underscored

    The Gravity Relax comes with six attachments: a ball head, flat head, D-shaped head, U-shaped head, air-cushion head and hot massage head. Most of those are standard for modern massage guns, but the one that isn’t standard — the heated head — was the one I was most interested in (and used the most). It’s made from metal and comes with three temperature levels: 96.8 degrees Fahrenheit to 105.8 degrees Fahrenheit, 109.4 degrees Fahrenheit to 114 degrees Fahrenheit, and 116 degrees Fahrenheit to 125 degrees Fahrenheit. Without the percussion engaged, I could feel the heat almost immediately, but it took a few minutes to reach the highest temperatures; the more intense the percussion, the less intense the heat felt. Though it would be hard to know if the heat had anything more than a placebo effect while working out the kinks during post-marathon recovery, boy, did it feel good on my tired, cold muscles after a full day of skiing.

    Gravity Massager 5

    Ashley Mateo/CNN Underscored

    With so many powerful “mini” massagers on the market — see: the Roll Recovery R1, Hyperice Hypervolt Go 2 and Theragun Mini — I found the Gravity Relax to be a little bulky. It’s about the size of a hair dryer, which isn’t a big deal for at-home use, but I did have to rearrange things in my carry-on to fit it. it also comes in an attractive storage case that houses all the attachments and chargers, but that was way too much to travel with, so I opted to bring only the gun and heated attachment.

    Related: I’ll never travel without the Roll Recovery R1 massage gun again

    I have an entire drawer full of chargers for all kinds of tech, from massage guns to fitness trackers to vibrating foam rollers, and I wish companies would agree on one universal charger. It doesn’t help that the Gravity Relax requires two chargers: a 17V power adapter for the gun itself, and a Type-C charger for the heated attachment. Fortunately, I almost always travel with a Type-C charger and the gun has enough juice for five hours of use, but it’s still frustrating to have to keep multiple chargers on hand for a single device.

    Gravity Massager 6

    Ashley Mateo/CNN Underscored

    The most well-known percussion gun brands, Theragun and Hyperice, don’t offer heated attachments. Plus, the Gravity Relax offers a wider range of RPM than both (the Theragun Pro, $599, has a range of 1750 to 2400 RPM, while the Hyperice Hypervolt 2 Pro, $399, has a range of 1700 to 2700 RPM), and does so at a more affordable price. However, with an amplitude — aka how deep a gun can penetrate into your muscles — of 8mm, the Gravity Relax is significantly less powerful than those other guns, which have amplitudes of 16mm and around 14mm, respectively.

    There are a few other heated massage guns available: The $169.99 Urikar Pro 2 heats up to 113 degrees Fahrenheit and has a range of 1200 to 3600 RPM and a 15mm amplitude, while the $229.99 Lifepro Fusion FX heats up to 131 degrees Fahrenheit and has a range of 1600 to 3200 RPM and a 10mm amplitude. Both are more powerful (and more expensive) but don’t get as hot as the Gravity Relax.

    What I liked most about the Gravity Relax was the soothing effect of the heat. And overall, it is more of a relaxing experience than the standard jackhammering you might expect from a massage gun. You’re not going to get the same level of penetration as with stronger devices, but if you’re not totally beating up your body in the gym (or on the slopes) and looking for a tiny performance edge, this device is similar enough to others on the market — with a more accessible price along with the added benefit of heat therapy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These 100% Norg snow goggles bring the mountains into focus no matter the conditions | CNN Underscored

    These 100% Norg snow goggles bring the mountains into focus no matter the conditions | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Previously known for renowned motocross goggles, 100 Percent is finally bringing its expertise to the slopes. An iconic brand, dedicated as much to design as to performance, 100 Percent recently debuted three new great-looking goggles for skiers and snowboarders — promising the same attention to comfort and visual clarity, albeit in a very different type of frame.

    The Norg is 100 Percent’s flagship model, and the unique geometric style—with a molded ridge around the nose and bottom of the lens—guarantees you’ll stand out on the mountain. But beyond looking cool AF, these goggles were built to handle all kinds of terrain and conditions. I put them to the test during a day of skiing at Solitude Mountain in Utah.

    100 Percent has finally lent its expertise to snow goggles, and the Norg is its flagship product. Gorgeously styled with a unique design built for comfort, these goggles are the perfect companion for any snowy terrain.

    Different light conditions on the mountain call for different lenses. A number of companies make interchangeable goggle lenses, but the ones on the Norg were the easiest I’ve used yet. For starters, the lens sits in a super flexible mold (with the lens removed, you can literally twist it like you would wring out a wet washcloth without comprising the structure). Then, embedded in the frame are eight secure magnetic touch points that correspond to magnets in the lens, making it a cinch to peel off one lens and pop on another. My fingers lose all mobility in the cold, and I was still able to swap out my lenses between runs while my hands were encased in bulky ski gloves.

    Being able to see the details in the snow can be the difference between shredding and “yard sale”-ing down the mountain. The entire Norg goggle was designed to support crystal clear optics: that soft, flexible frame wraps around a super stiff lens—made from shatterproof and impact-resistant polycarbonate—which prevents any distortion in your eyeline.

    On top of that, 100 Percent’s HiPER lenses filter out certain color wavelengths to create more contrast in your surroundings, making it easier to pick out obstacles in the snow—like rocks and roots, since the November snow was thin in Utah. I especially noticed how much clearer the details were in flat light, like when the sun went behind one side of the mountain and I was suddenly skiing in the shade. Plus, they’re anti-fog (I didn’t have any issues with my breath clouding up the lens, even when I tucked in my neck gaiter for warmth), and have a hydro and oleophobic coating to keep them smudge-, scratch-, and moisture-free.

    Ashley Mateo

    There’s a lot of tech packed into the Norg, but $250 is still a lot for goggles. That said, all of its color options (there are seven available) do come with a low-light lens, so you’re essentially getting two interchangeable lenses for the price of one. If the price still seems prohibitive, the brand’s Snowcraft goggle rings up at $180, and their entry-level goggle, the Okan, is $110. Those models don’t have the same amount of features as the Norg, which is the brand’s flagship style, but you’ll still get superior visual quality and a comfortable fit.

    100 Percent isn’t the first to use a magnetic lens swapping system. The Anon M4 Toric is the fourth goggle from the brand’s magnetic lineup, which has graduated from six contact points to nine (plus, a facemask magnetically clips to the bottom of the goggles); but it’s even more expensive at $70 more than the Norg. Smith’s I/O Mag ChromaPop goggles start at $270 and use seven magnetic touchpoints instead of eight, while the brand’s $320 4D Mag also employs a magnetic system and opens up your field of view with a unique bend at the bottom of the lens. In terms of visual clarity, I haven’t experienced anything like the Norg outside of Oakley’s PRIZM technology; it feels like there is almost nothing on your face.

    100 Percent’s Norg goggles may not be the first to offer easily interchangeable magnetic lenses, but they do it incredibly well—especially considering these are the first snow offerings from the brand. Not only is it easy to switch between lenses, but the frame is super comfortable (a major selling point for those skiing or boarding from first tracks to last chair) and oh so stylish. A true mesh of form and function.

    But it’s the visual clarity that sets these apart from their competition—with no distortion due to the shape or color of the lens, they allow you to take in your surroundings on a whole other level.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 10 tools to elevate your home cocktail bar | CNN Underscored

    10 tools to elevate your home cocktail bar | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Whether you’re an accomplished cocktailian or mixologist or you think the best drink is the one someone else makes for you, you can set up a home bar can produce quality cocktails with just a few inexpensive, simple tools.

    But before you begin your home bar journey, it’s a good idea to spend some time with a cocktail menu. If you want to get insight into how to make your favorite drinks, Caroline Pardilla, digital cocktail editor for Imbibe Magazine, recommends getting to a bar around the time it opens to ensure you’ll have the full attention of a bartender (order an espresso martini so you make sure you’re at your sharpest).

    “Sit at the bar in front of where the bartender is making drinks,” says Pardilla. “That way not only can you watch how they’re making the drinks but you can ask them questions while they’re making them.”

    While you might get inspiration, Robert Simonson, a cocktail writer for the New York Times and author of “Modern Classic Cocktails,” cautions home mixologists to not “aim for the stars,” and try to re-create exactly what you had at a cocktail bar because that bar might be using special syrups, infusions or even custom glassware that could be difficult to find.

    “Keep it simple at home,” says Simonson. “The drinks we make the most at home are old-fashioneds, negronis and Manhattans. They’re classic and easy. You can perfect the simplest drinks, making them better and better.”

    By sticking to a smaller set of cocktails initially, you can also keep to a budget and avoid buying expensive bottles of liquor that you don’t use often. Morten Krag, who runs The Cocktail Blog, suggests that stocking a home bar is like making a grocery list.

    “Start making a top 10 list of your favorite cocktails,” recommends Krag. “For each drink, list out the necessary ingredients, bar tools and glassware. This will help you build a shopping list and ensure that you have the supplies needed to make the drinks you think are most important to you.”

    The joy of the home bar is that it can be whatever you want, a distilled reflection of your tastes, says Simonson. “The good thing about drinking at home is that if you love drinking out of fancy coupe glasses, you can do that if it gives you pleasure. If you want to drink out of a juice glass, you can do that too. Nobody’s looking.”

    Once you know what drinks you want to make, getting the right equipment ensures you spend more time enjoying what you’ve crafted. Our trio of cocktail writers recommend 10 tools that will help you elevate your home cocktail bar.

    Amazon

    Both Krag and Simonson note that ice — even though it comprises roughly one-quarter of your cocktail — is the most overlooked ingredient. Large format ice cubes — such as the 2-inch cubes made by the Tovolo tray — will melt slower than smaller rocks (cocktail bar slang for ice), keeping your drink from getting diluted. The covers on these silicone molds should also help prevent odors from other food in your freezer from getting trapped in your ice.

    Pro tip: Simonson recommends that about 15 minutes before you grab your ice molds you place your glasses in the freezer to help keep cocktails colder for a longer period of time.

    $20 at Bed Bath & Beyond

    oxo 2-in-1 citrus juicer_inline_cnnu

    Bed Bath & Beyond

    The Oxo is a well-thought-out juicer with a measuring cup base that tapers in the middle to make it easy to grip while you’re squeezing a lemon for a daiquiri. “Fresh ingredients definitely make a difference in cocktails,” says Pardilla. “It’s worth the extra effort of juicing.”

    The juicer also comes with two reamer attachments (the pointed tops that help extract the juice, but not the pulp, from citrus): a larger one for oranges and grapefruits (try a paloma) and a smaller attachment for lemons and limes.

    homestia bar jigger_inline_cnnu

    Amazon

    The Homestia Bar Jigger makes it easy to measure spirits and mixers. As to why you need a jigger, Simonson simply explains that “measuring drinks correctly results in the best drinks.” This jigger holds up to 1 ounce (with clear markings for 1/2 ounce or 3/4 ounce) in the smaller cup and 2 ounces (with a line at 1 1/2 ounces) in the larger cup. It also comes in black, silver or gold.

    briout bar spoon_inline_cnnu

    Amazon

    Martini fans should pick up a pair of Briout bar spoons. The long-handled, twisted, stainless steel spoon is designed to stir drinks like martinis that don’t need to be shaken because they don’t have dairy or citrus juice.

    “A regular spoon won’t work,” explains Simonson. “A bar spoon spins within your grasp and goes fluidly around the perimeter of a mixing glass.”

    oxo cocktail strainer_inline_cnnu

    Amazon

    The Oxo cocktail strainer keeps little bits of ice and pulp from getting into your whiskey sour or daiquiri. And this stainless steel Hawthorn strainer fits both the top of the Anchor Hocking pint glass and cocktail shakers, so you can have clearer cocktails.

    $70 at Crate & Barrel

    elevated craft hybrid cocktail shaker cocktail strainer_inline_cnnu

    Crate & Barrel

    The stainless shaker from Elevated Craft has a built-in jigger and strainer, and it’s dishwasher-friendly (although we’d recommend hand-washing). “Not only is it user-friendly with screw-on components so you don’t have to worry about leakage but insulated so you won’t freeze your hands when shaking,” says Pardilla. “Just make sure to shake the cocktail for only 10 seconds or so or you risk overshaking and diluting it.”

    anchor hocking pint mixing glass_inline_cnnu

    KegWorks

    The 16-ounce Anchor Hocking Pint Mixing Glass has enough space to stir together spirits and ice for drinks like a negroni. It’s inexpensive yet still has a good heft and can double as a beer glass on game day. Keep in mind, this utilitarian glass doesn’t have a pour spout, so a strainer helps to transfer your cocktail to your drinking glass.

    extra long cocktail muddler_inline_cnnu

    A Bar Above

    If you regularly add herbs (we’re thinking of mint juleps and mojitos here) or fruit to drinks, A Bar Above’s cocktail muddler is an effective masher. The 12-inch wooden muddler will easily reach the bottom of a glass or your shaker, and the flat end should squish without tearing delicate leaves. You can also use it to crush ice (in a plastic bag or bar towel) in a pinch.

    kuhn rikon swiss peeler_inline_cnnu2

    Sur La Table

    The inexpensive Kuhn Rikon Swiss Peeler does a great job of separating the peel from the pith to help you garnish cocktails. It’s lightweight and makes it easy to grab thin slices of orange peel that can lend a nice pop to a negroni or old-fashioned without slicing up your knuckles. I steal mine from my bar to use in my kitchen frequently to peel potatoes too.

    luxardo maraschino cherries_inline_cnnu

    Williams-Sonoma

    Luxardo cherries have been adding color and body to drinks for more than a century. Simonson notes that “it’s worth investing in decent garnishes,” and the complex sweet Italian cherries preserved in syrup can add depth to a Manhattan or Last Word. These lustrous red cherries would be right at home on a bar alongside olives for martinis and fresh lemons for a gin fizz.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best wireless chargers in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best wireless chargers in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Wireless chargers can help you tame clutter, let you use a single charger for almost any phone and even spark joy, assuming you’d rather see a sleek charging pad on your counter, desk or nightstand than a rat’s nest of cables. Multi-device chargers can further simplify your setup, giving you a single spot for your phone, smartwatch, wireless headphones or even a second phone. Wireless charging may never be as fast or efficient as wired charging, but it can be a lot more convenient.

    We tested 31 wireless chargers to find the best Qi stands and pads, the best MagSafe chargers for iPhone 12 and 13 and the best 3-in-1 Apple chargers that can also charge an Apple Watch and AirPods case.

    Best Qi wireless charging pad overall

    This sleek, understated 10W charging pad looks better than other chargers in its price range and charges just as well. Its 25W wall adapter has a 5-foot cord for easy placement. Our one quibble is that it uses a barrel connector instead of USB.

    A classy 15W wireless charging pad for Android and iPhone

    The Otto Q is both stylish and practical, with a luxury-minimal aesthetic that reminds us of high-end audio equipment, and performance to match, giving up to 15W to phones like the OnePlus 9 that support that charge rate. It doesn’t come with a wall adapter, but it uses USB-C, so it’s easy to find one.

    Best Qi charging stand

    The BoostCharge 15W is reasonably priced, charges well and avoids the pitfalls of many other stands. It connects via USB-C, comes with a wall adapter and, unlike some cheap-looking stands we tested, it looks good enough to fit in anyplace.

    Best fast charging stand for Samsung phones

    If you have a Samsung phone that can fast charge at 15W, this is the stand you’ll need to get the best charging speed. If you don’t, there’s no reason to buy this.

    Best wireless charger for iPhone 12 and 13

    The iPhone 12 and 13 can charge twice as fast via MagSafe as they can over standard wireless charging, and the magnets built into the phones and charger ensure perfect alignment every time. Too bad the cable’s so short, though.

    Best magnetic Qi charger for iPhone 12 and 13

    It doesn’t charge as fast as a MagSafe-certified adapter, but this magnetic wireless charger attaches to MagSafe phones just as securely and has a 5-foot cable, which makes it more useful for bedside or couchside charging.

    Best Qi charging bowl/valet tray

    A capable 10W Qi charger perched over a plastic bowl. It looks good and is perfect for dumping your pocket’s contents at the end of the day. The fake wood grain and golden underglow give it a certain je ne sais quoi.

    Best modular wireless charging system

    A mix-and-match wired and wireless charging station that supports everything from headphones to phones to tablets, the BaseLynx can be customized to fit the whole family’s devices.

    Best Apple charging station for phones without MagSafe

    At $50, the Zens 4-in-1 is an astonishing deal, with two 10W charging pads, an Apple Watch charger and a 5W USB port. And it comes with a 45W USB-PD charger.

    A great vertical Qi Apple charging station

    If you don’t need MagSafe and prefer a stand that holds your phone in a vertical orientation, the Anker PowerWave is a solid option, though you’ll have to supply your own Watch charging puck.

    Best MagSafe Apple charging station

    Technically this is the only MagSafe-certified 3-in-1 Apple charger at press time, but we like the sculptural look, with both iPhone and Watch charger suspended gently in the air, plus a spot at the base for your AirPods.

    Logitech Powered Pad

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 10W (9W for Samsung, 7.5W for iPhone)
    • AC adapter: 25W, integrated cable
    • Cable length and type: 5 feet, integrated with barrel connector
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 3.35 x 3.35 x 0.5

    The Logitech Powered Pad’s reasonable price, good charging performance, understated looks and 5-foot cord make it a solid wireless charger for any room in the house. Most cheaper wireless chargers look cheaper, and plenty of prettier chargers don’t work as well. Its biggest drawback is that it uses a proprietary AC adapter; many other wireless chargers use standard USB cables and wall adapters, which are easier to replace if necessary.

    The Powered Pad’s squircle shape, matte finish and four color options (graphite, white, lilac and blue sage) work well with modern and contemporary decor. It has a pinpoint white status LED that stays on while your phone is charging, but it doesn’t blink and isn’t very bright, so it’s tolerable in dark rooms unless you’re a particularly light-sensitive sleeper.

    In testing, the Powered Pad delivered 9W to a Samsung S21 Ultra 5G and 7.5W to iPhones, the maximum each can get from a standard Qi charger. It can also charge Qi wireless headphone cases, like the AirPods Pro case, though positioning can be tricky for devices smaller than the charging pad.

    At around $30 from Logitech, the Powered Pad costs about as much as an inexpensive 10W Qi pad, plus the 18W USB-A charger needed to power it, but it looks better than any of the cheap ones we tested, and there’s no risk of plugging it into an underpowered wall adapter. The 25W wall adapter ensures the Powered Pad gets enough power, and while it’s quite tall at 2.25 inches, most USB-A chargers that can power a 10W Qi pad are just as tall when the USB cable is plugged in, and most proprietary wall adapters take up more room around the outlet.

    If you can tolerate a proprietary power adapter, the Logitech Powered Pad is a great wireless charging pad for a desk, nightstand or dresser. If you prefer a USB connector, want a charging stand rather than a pad or have a recent iPhone, there are more compelling options below.

    A classy 15W USB-C wireless charging pad for Android and iPhone: Moshi Otto Q ($39.95 without USB-C adapter; amazon.com)

    Moshi Otto Q

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 15W (9W for Samsung, 7.5W for iPhone)
    • AC adapter: Not included, requires 18W (9V/2A) or greater USB-C PD 3.0 adapter
    • Cable length and type: 3.5 feet, USB-C to C
    • Dimensions (diameter x height, in inches): 4 x 0.45

    If you want a charger you can show off (or at least one that complements your decor), consider the Moshi Otto Q. With its heathered gray fabric top and metal-look case, it resembles Scandinavian hi-fi equipment and doesn’t look out of place on a nightstand, dresser or console table. It can deliver up to 15W to the (vanishingly few) Android phones that support it, 9W to Samsung phones and 7.5W to iPhones.

    At 4 inches in diameter, the Otto Q is among the largest charging pads we tested, but it doesn’t feel large, possibly because of the tapered base, and possibly because it’s not a featureless black slab. A grippy rubber ring around the Qi coil helps with phone placement, and a white LED on the front of the pad blinks when your device is charging.

    That LED is one of the Otto Q’s few downsides. Its pattern — two fast blinks, then one slow — reads to us more as “there’s a problem” than “I’m charging normally.” Fortunately, it’s not very bright, but the blink could be distracting in a dark bedroom.

    The Otto Q is powered via USB-C, and requires an 18W or higher USB-PD charger. If you don’t already have one, we recommend the compact, inexpensive Anker 511 Nano ($13.59; amazon.com). We prefer USB-C rather than USB-A because powerful USB-C chargers are smaller and cheaper than their USB-A equivalents. You’re also more likely to have a 20W USB-C charger hanging around than an 18W USB-A charger, and therefore much less likely to accidentally plug into an underpowered adapter.

    Best Qi charging stand: Belkin BoostCharge 15W ($40.53; amazon.com)

    Belkin 15W Stand

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 15W (9W for Samsung, 7.5W for iPhone)
    • AC adapter: 24W USB-A Quick Charge 3.0
    • Cable length and type: 4 feet, USB-A to C
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 3.94 x 3.94 x 4.72

    The Belkin BoostCharge 15W Is a perfectly fine wireless charging stand. It isn’t exciting, per se, but it lacks the shortcomings of many other stands we tested. First, it connects via USB-C rather than Micro USB like the Anker PowerWave Stand or the 10W Belkin. Unlike the Anker and the YooTech X2, it comes with a USB adapter, in this case 24W USB-A. It supports charge rates up to 15W, if you happen to have an LG V40 or OnePlus 9, or one of the few other Android phones that can hit 15W on a standard charger; it’s also one of the very few wireless charging stands that can exceed 5W on a Google Pixel 3, though few people have those anymore.

    The circular base and ovoid stand are inoffensive, as is the matte soft-touch top and (for some reason) glossy black base. It has a white pinpoint charging LED in the front. It doesn’t look as low-budget as the Yootech X2, and the design isn’t as polarizing as the framework stand of the 10 Belkin BoostCharge we tested.

    Like most stands we tested, the Belkin BoostCharge 15W can’t charge an iPhone 12 Mini or 13 Mini; the Qi charging coils don’t line up with those smaller phones. We don’t consider that a deal breaker, though, because the 12 and 13 Mini can and should use MagSafe or magnetic Qi chargers instead. It also can’t charge Samsung phones at 15W; fortunately, our next pick can.

    Best fast charging stand for Samsung Phones: Samsung 15W Fast Charge Wireless Charging Stand ($79.99; bestbuy.com)

    Samsung 15W Stand

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 15W (Samsung only; 10W for other Android, 7.5W for iPhone)
    • AC adapter: 25W USB-C “Super Fast Charger”
    • Cable length and type: 3 feet, USB-C to C
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 4.64 x 2.95 x 4.44

    If you have a Samsung phone that supports 15W wireless charging, like the Galaxy S10, S20, S21, Note 10, Note 20 or various Folds and Flips, you should get a 15W Samsung Fast Charge charging stand. Other 15W Qi chargers won’t charge Samsung phones at 15W, and the Samsung charger won’t charge other phones at 15W. Sometimes life is like that.

    The Samsung Fast Charge Wireless Charging Stand does charge other Android phones at up to 10W, and iPhones at 7.5W, like most of the other chargers we tested, so it’s still useful in mixed-phone-ecosystem situations, a phrase I can’t believe I typed at 8 p.m. on a Saturday one week before Christmas.

    The Samsung is the only charger we tested with an active cooling fan, but you can only control it from a Samsung phone. Also, the status LED glows red when the phone is charging correctly, which is counterintuitive.

    Best wireless charger for iPhone 12 and 13: Apple MagSafe Charger ($34; amazon.com or $39.99; apple.com)

    Apple MagSafe

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 15W (iPhone 12 and 13 series only; 12W for iPhone 12 Mini and 13 Mini)
    • AC adapter: Not included; requires 20W (9V/2.22A) or greater USB-C Power Delivery adapter
    • Cable length and type: 39-inch integrated USB-C
    • Dimensions (diameter x height, in inches): 2.2 x 0.23

    If you have any phone in the iPhone 12 or 13 families — including the Mini, Pro or Pro Max — you should consider a MagSafe charger. Rings of magnets on the charger and the phone ensure perfect alignment, and iPhones can charge at up to 15W on a MagSafe charger, compared to 7.5W on a Qi charger. And unlike with a regular wireless charger, you don’t have to leave your phone sitting around while it’s charging; you can use it normally. It even leaves the Lightning port free for wired headphones. (Whether that’s a good thing depends on your relationship with screen time and is outside the scope of this article).

    There are a couple of catches, of course. First, though any Qi charger will charge the phone, and plenty already exist that can attach to the magnetic ring, only certified chargers get MagSafe speeds, and there are very few of them. Apple’s MagSafe Charger costs between $32 and $40, has a paltry 3-foot cable and doesn’t include the 20W USB-C charger you’ll need to use it. Second, if you keep your phone in a case, you’ll need one that’s MagSafe-compatible. That’s not a huge deal; plenty of Apple and third-party cases work. And third, MagSafe charging can output a lot of heat, which will cause the charge rate to drop until the phone’s internal temperature goes down.

    Oh, and the iPhone 12 Mini and 13 Mini are capped at 12W charging via MagSafe, rather than 15W, for heat dissipation reasons.

    Still, if you have a MagSafe-compatible phone and want fast wireless charging, it’s worth getting a MagSafe charger. If you’re interested in the magnetic part but don’t mind a slower charge, you can also consider a magnetic Qi charger like the one we recommend below.

    Best magnetic Qi charger for iPhone 12 and 13: Anker 313 Magnetic Wireless Charger Pad With USB-C Charger ($22.99; amazon.com)

    Anker Magnetic Wireless Charger

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 7.5W for iPhone, 10W for Android (but see text)
    • AC adapter: 20W USB-C Power Delivery
    • Cable length and type: 5 feet integrated USB-C
    • Dimensions (diameter x height, in inches): 2.36 x 0.35

    If you don’t have an iPhone 12 or 13, there’s no reason to buy a magnetic Qi charger. They attach to the ring of magnets in MagSafe-compatible phones, but they’re regular Qi chargers, so they’re limited to 7.5W. Unlike MagSafe chargers, which deliberately drop their charging to a snail’s pace if they detect non-iPhones (thanks, Apple!), magnetic Qi chargers will charge other phones just fine, but since those other phones lack the magnetic ring, they’re harder to align than a regular Qi charger.

    The reason to buy a magnetic Qi charger, then, is if you have a MagSafe phone but want something you can’t get with an official MagSafe charger, like a cord that’s more than 3 feet long.

    For that very specific use case, the Anker 313 Magnetic Wireless Charger Pad is pretty good! It has a 5-foot cord, which is 2 more feet than Apple gives you, it’s only a little larger than the MagSafe charger and instead of costing $30 to $40 without a USB-C wall adapter, it’s $23 and comes with a 20W USB-C charger that costs around $15 by itself. That means the Anker charging pad costs about $8. Eight bucks!

    Anker’s charging pad and cord are less bulky than the one on the Belkin Wireless Magnetic Charger, and its magnets are much stronger than the Mophie Snap+. If you want a bedside or couchside charger with longer reach than Apple’s MagSafe and don’t mind the slower charging, it’s a good deal.

    Tylt Bowl

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 10W (7.5W for iPhone)
    • AC adapter: 24W USB-A
    • Cable length and type: 58-inch USB-A to C
    • Dimensions (diameter x height, in inches): 7 x 2.36

    Does anyone need a wireless charging bowl with yellow underglow, fake wood grain on the outside and fake copper (or faux terra cotta?) on the inside? I don’t know. But I tested 28 wireless chargers for this article and the Tylt Bowl was the only one that sparked joy.

    The Tylt is a plastic bowl, about 7 inches in diameter, with a 10W Qi charging pedestal in the middle at about rim height. The inside is a semi-glossy copper colored plastic, while the outside has an unconvincing wood grain pattern. A golden light shines down into the bowl from the stand when your phone is charging.

    The light will probably be too much if you charge your phone in your bedroom at night. I charge mine in my bathroom (I’m trying to keep my phone out of the bedroom), so the underglow makes a perfect night light, and the bowl is a great holding place for my wallet, various pocket knives, arguably too much jewelry for a 36-year-old father of three and other pocket contents. The overall effect is a bit like a video game loot drop, or someone trying to make a point about the veneration we give our phones.

    There are other classy ways to combine a wireless charger and a pocket dump/valet tray, like the Courant Catch:3 ($100; amazon.com), and sure, they can spark a different kind of joy: the quiet joy of a tasteful, well-appointed accessory. But sometimes you need the big dumb joy of a wireless charging bowl with fake wood grain.

    Scosche BaseLynx

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 10W (7.5W for iPhone), 12W USB-A (x3), 18W USB-C Power Delivery (x2), 5W Apple Watch
    • AC adapter: 5-foot AC cable
    • Cable length and type: 1-foot USB-C to C; 1-foot USB-C to Lightning
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 13.2 x 5.7 x 1

    The Scosche BaseLynx Modular Charging System is a great way to make a family charging station for all your devices, whether or not they support wireless charging. If you only want a single Qi charging pad, you can get it for around $50, but if that’s all you need, there are less expensive, less bulky options. The appeal of the BaseLynx is that you can add modules as needed and power them all with a single AC cable.

    We tested the Pro Kit, which starts at $146.96 in black ($199.95 in white, as tested). It consists of a 10W Qi charging pad; Apple Watch charging module; the Vert, which holds three devices vertically and has an 18W USB-C port and two 12W USB-A ports; and the EndCap, which adds another 18W USB-C port and 12W USB-A port. With all these modules, the BaseLynx kit is large, at more than 13 inches wide and almost 6 inches deep. But we were able to charge a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra on the Qi pad, an Apple Watch, an iPad, an iPhone 12 Mini, an iPhone 11 and a Google Pixel 3 at the same time. And we could still fit a second Qi charger and a second Apple Watch charger before running out of power overhead.

    If you have the space, and the need, to charge a half dozen or more devices at once, the BaseLynx system is worth considering. If your needs are more modest, you can save space and money with something more compact. Scosche tells us a MagSafe module is coming soon, but as of December 2021 it is not yet available.

    Zens 4-in-1 Wireless Charger

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: 10W (7.5W for iPhone) on each Qi pad; 5W for each USB port
    • AC adapter: 45W USB-C Power Delivery
    • Cable length and type: 3-foot USB-C to C
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 7.3 x 3.5 x .43

    If you have an iPhone, Apple Watch and AirPods, it makes sense to get a charging station that can handle all three at once. But in 2022, it doesn’t make sense to spend a lot of money on one that doesn’t support MagSafe; if you have an Apple Watch and AirPods but an iPhone 11 or earlier, there’s a good chance you’ll upgrade to a newer phone before long, and that phone will have MagSafe. So after testing six Qi Apple charging stations, which ranged in price from $40 to $150, we recommend the Zens 4-in-1 if it stays near $50, or the Anker PowerWave 3-in-1 if it’s still around $40.

    The original price of the Zens 4-in-1, around $140, is more than anyone should pay for a 3-in-1 charger without MagSafe in the year of Luigi 2022. But it’s been around $50 recently, and at that price it’s a steal. The Zens 4-in-1 has two 10W Qi charging zones and two 5W USB ports. It can charge two phones at 10W each (one in portrait, one in landscape), plus an Apple Watch and a low-powered USB accessory, like a set of Bluetooth headphones.

    The Zens comes with a 1-foot Apple Watch charging cable, which plugs into its rear USB port and slots into a holder on the back right of the pad. There’s no cable management at all, so that cord is just hanging out there. It doesn’t look great, but it also means you can remove and reuse the cable easily (though the Apple Watch adapter clip is permanently affixed, unlike the one on the Mophie Wireless Charging Stand+).

    There’s no divot, dimple or other easy way to align a headphone case to either charging pad — we had some trouble getting a set of AirPods Pro to charge at first — but both pads can charge at up to 10W, rather than limiting one to 5W, as most charging stations do. This adds to the Zens’ longevity. The 45W USB-PD charger and braided USB-C cable are also usable elsewhere. Not that you should buy a charging pad you’re planning to part out, but it’s much more sustainable than, say, the Logitech Powered 3-in-1 or the Mophie 3-in-1, which both cost over $140 and have proprietary AC adapters and nonremovable Apple Watch chargers.

    Anker PowerWave 3-in-1

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: Stand: 10W (7.5W for iPhone); Pad: 5W; Watch: 5W
    • AC adapter: 18W USB-A Quick Charge 2.0, included
    • Cable length and type: 58-inch USB-A to C
    • Dimensions (W x D x H, in inches): 6.5 x 3.75 x 4.25

    If you’d rather look at your phone in vertical mode and don’t mind supplying your own Apple Watch charging puck, consider the Anker PowerWave 3-in-1. It’s a step down from the Zens in most respects — its charger is less powerful, the headphone charging area is limited to 5W and partially blocks the view of the Apple Watch and it doesn’t include an Apple Watch charging cable. But it’s the next best option if the Zens isn’t available at the current steep discount.

    The Anker PowerWave 3-in-1 has a 10W Qi charging stand, a 5W Qi pad for wireless AirPod cases and a stand with a slot for an Apple Watch charger. The Apple Watch charger isn’t included. Instead, Anker provides an internal USB port under the bottom cover, along with a clever routing system for the 3-foot charging cable the Apple Watch comes with.

    Unfortunately, the AirPod charging area is right in front of the Watch charger, so the headphone case will partially block your view of the Watch in nightstand mode. There’s also no divot or indicator to help with AirPod case placement; you just have to make sure the pad’s charging indicator lights up.

    The 18W USB-A charger included with the PowerWave 3-in-1 is less powerful and less useful than the 45W USB-PD one that comes with the Zens, but it’s still streets ahead of any proprietary charger.

    This may sound like faint praise compared to the Zens, but if the Zens isn’t heavily marked down, the Anker is the better buy if you don’t want to wait until you have a MagSafe phone.

    Belkin 3-in-1

    Key Specs

    • Maximum charge rate: MagSafe: 15W (12W for iPhone 12 Mini and 13 Mini); Watch: 5W; Pad: 5W
    • AC adapter: 15V/2.67A AC adapter with integrated cable
    • Cable length and type: 59-inch, barrel connector
    • Dimensions (diameter x height, in inches): 5.3 x 5.3

    The Belkin BoostCharge Pro 3-in-1 looks like a sculpture or a jewelry store window display. Its MagSafe-certified charging pad and Apple Watch charger are suspended on slim metal arms above its base, so your watch and phone float in the air, while your AirPods charge in an indentation in the matte white base. It’s one of the most striking designs we’ve seen; it’s also the only MagSafe-certified 3-in-1 charger available (though a new Belkin 3-in-1 MagSafe charging pad is up for preorder now), and there are plenty of stands that require you to bring your own MagSafe charger; we haven’t tested those.

    In our testing, the MagSafe pad delivered 12W charging to an iPhone 12 Mini (non-Minis can expect 15W) while charging the Watch and AirPods as well. The Belkin connects to its proprietary 40W charger via a 5-foot cable with a barrel connector. We’d prefer USB-C, but proprietary adapters are common in multi-device chargers. There’s no charging indicator for the watch or MagSafe pads, just the Qi pad on the base, but charging indicators aren’t that important for magnetic chargers since you can’t really misalign them.

    At $150, the BoostCharge Pro is expensive, and it takes up a lot of room, with a 5.3-inch-diameter base; both phone and watch extend past the base’s edges when charging. But thanks to its slim metal support arm, it doesn’t look bulky. It also doesn’t support fast charging for the Apple Watch Series 7, though Belkin’s new 3-in-1 will.

    If your smartphone or headphones charge wirelessly, they probably use the Qi induction charging standard. All iPhones released since 2017 support Qi, as do most (but not all) Android smartphones, especially high-end ones. You can stick your phone on any Qi charger and expect it to charge, but if you make sure your charger supports your phone’s maximum charge rate, you’ll get faster charging and less frustration.

    Any Qi charger you can buy will charge your device at 5W, which is to say slowly. Most current Android phones support wireless charging at up to 9W or 10W. Some can hit 15W on a standard 15W Qi charger; others, like certain Samsung and OnePlus phones, support higher wireless charging rates but only using their own chargers. If you’re not sure what charge rates your phone supports, check the manufacturer’s specification page for your phone.

    The iPhone 8 and newer can charge via Qi at up to 7.5W, but the iPhone 12 and 13 series also support MagSafe, Apple’s proprietary magnetic wireless charging standard, at up to 15W (12W for the 12 Mini and 13 Mini).

    Regardless of the phone, induction charging isn’t as fast as wired charging. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G, which we used for testing, can charge via USB-C at 25W. Samsung’s wireless chargers can hit 15W; on a standard Qi charger, it’s limited to 9W. So it’ll charge almost three times faster with a cable than on a wireless charger. The iPhone 13 can charge at up to 20W via Lightning cable, 15W on MagSafe and just 7.5W on a standard wireless charger. If you’re in a hurry, plug it in.

    Wireless charging is also energy inefficient — by some calculations it takes 40% more energy to charge a phone wirelessly than by plugging it in. Every 10W wireless charger we tested required at least a 15W wall adapter.

    But wireless charging is convenient and requires less messing around with cables. It also means households with more than one type of phone can all use the same chargers. And for overnight charging, or any time you don’t need the absolute fastest charge, it’s a nice option to have.

    best wc 4.jpg

    Nathan Edwards/CNN

    We tested a total of 28 wireless chargers: 12 single-device Qi chargers, eight multi-device Qi chargers, four magnetic Qi chargers and four MagSafe devices.

    We tested every Qi charger with an iPhone 11, an iPhone 12 Mini, a Google Pixel 3 (which is limited to 5W charging except on specific chargers, where it can hit 10) and a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G, which (bear with us) can charge at up to 9W or 10W on certain Qi chargers, and up to 15W on Samsung Fast Charge 2.0 chargers.

    If the charger came with a wall adapter, we used it; if not, we made sure to use one that gave sufficient juice to the Qi charger.

    We measured power draw from the wall using a TP-Link Kasa smart power strip ($49.99; amazon.com), taking wireless charging overhead into account. To ensure each phone was getting its highest possible charge rate, we kept the batteries below 40% by running 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme stress test, which devours around 10% of the phone’s charge in 20 minutes.

    • Size and shape: Since wireless chargers sit out on display, they might as well look good and not take up too much room.
    • Materials: What is the charger surface made of? Does it help with heat management? How does it feel? Does it collect dust or fingerprints?
    • Ease of positioning: If your phone’s induction coil isn’t aligned with the charging coil, it could charge very slowly or not at all. We checked how easy it was to place each phone on each charger; for stands, we checked both portrait and landscape mode. For devices with multiple charging zones, we paid special attention to how tricky it was to align the case for the Apple AirPods Pro, which can charge via Qi or MagSafe.
    • Power requirements: Wireless charging is inefficient. A 10W Qi charger requires at least 15W of input power. We checked every charger’s power requirements and its AC adapter, if included.
    • Cable length: A longer cable lets you put the charger farther from an outlet. Simple.
    • Charging indicators: A status LED can tell you if your phone is charging, if an obstacle is detected or if it’s fully charged. But a too bright LED or one that blinks or changes color can be distracting in dark rooms, and one that’s in a weird place may be blocked by the device. Many chargers we tested turn off their status LEDs after a few seconds, which is nice for bedrooms but does mean that if your phone isn’t aligned properly, you may not realize until morning that it didn’t charge.
    • Power connectors: Every wireless charger we tested connected to its adapter via Micro USB, USB-C or a barrel connector integrated into a proprietary charger. USB-C is best, since great compact 20W USB-PD and Quick Charge 3.0 adapters cost as little as $14, and USB-C to C cables are reliable and easy to find. Barrel connectors tend to have bulky wall adapters and are harder to replace if something goes wrong but do ensure that the charger is getting enough power from the wall. Micro USB is the worst of both worlds. Micro USB to C cables aren’t allowed in the USB spec, so every charger we tested that connects via Micro USB requires an 18W (9V/2A) USB-A wall adapter, which most people don’t have lying around. If you plug your wireless charger into an underpowered adapter, it’ll be excruciatingly slow. It’s easy enough to get an 18W USB-A wall adapter like the Anker PowerPort+ 1 ($13.59; amazon.com), but they’re bulkier than 20W USB-C adapters, and less useful
    • Charge rate: Does the charger deliver as much power as it claims? Does it hit the maximum input rate of the device being charged?
    • Heat management: Does the charger or device get too warm? Can it dissipate heat effectively?
    • Coil whine: Many wall adapters, and some Qi chargers, can make a high-pitched noise when powered. Sometimes it’s down to the individual unit; we’ve tested plenty of identical chargers where one unit whines and the other doesn’t. And not everyone is bothered by coil whine; some people don’t even hear it. Still, we noted any coil whine we found.
     best wc 1.jpg

    Nathan Edwards/CNN

    Anker PowerWave Base Pad ($19.99; amazon.com)

    This bar-shaped pad couldn’t deliver full power to any of the four phones we tried it with, and at 5.8 inches by 2.8 inches by .47 inches, it’s as large as many smartphones, which Anker claims helps with phone alignment. It doesn’t include an AC adapter; by the time you add one, it costs as much as more powerful, better-looking options.

    Mophie 15W Charging Pad ($40.53; amazon.com)

    This compact 15W charger performed as well as the Logitech Powered Pad and Moshi Otto Q on our tests (though we didn’t have a 15W phone to test with). If you prefer a status indicator that turns off after a few seconds, or like the look, it’s a decent option, though the AC adapter (integrated to the barrel connector) is a bit bulky, and the faux suede top tends to look disheveled unless you brush the nap in the same direction. We prefer chargers that don’t require brushing. The Logitech Powered Pad costs less and feels more substantial, while the more expensive Moshi Otto Q also supports 15W charging but uses USB-C, so it’s more flexible, and we think it looks better.

    Courant Catch:1 Essentials ($40; staycourant.com)

    The Catch:1 Essentials 10W single-device charger is beautiful, with a linen top, matte soft-touch sides and a color-matched USB-C to A cable (though no AC adapter). It has a white pinpoint charging indicator at the rear of the pad, next to the USB port; it won’t bother you at night, but it’s also hard to see without rotating the pad.

    At $40 without the AC charger, the Catch:1 Essentials is around the same price as the Moshi Otto Q, though because it uses a C to A cable instead of C to C, the Courant is a little less flexible. (You can always swap cables, but then you lose the color-matching.) If you like the style and don’t mind the price, it’s a good option, and may be the one linen thing in your house that doesn’t need to be ironed.

    Qi wireless charging stands

    best wc 2.jpg

    Nathan Edwards/CNN

    Google Pixel Stand (2nd Gen) ($79; amazon.com)

    The second-generation Pixel Stand works with any device that supports Qi wireless charging, but it should only be considered if you have a Pixel 6 or Pixel 6 Pro. With either of those phones, you’ll be able to take advantage of up to 23W wireless charging. You’ll also get some Pixel-exclusive features like the ability to customize the charging speed between three presets and turn your phone into a mini smart display when it’s docked. It can rotate through photos, act as a sunrise alarm and help to triage an influx of notifications. These proved handy in our testing and worked without flaw — additionally, it could save you some money if you opt for this instead of a fully functional smart display like the Nest Hub. Still, though, it’s not cheap at $79.99 and isn’t the only route to achieve fast wireless charging; most would be better served by one of our top picks.

    Belkin BoostCharge 10W ($34.99; amazon.com)

    The 10W Belkin BoostCharge looks less like a charging stand and more like someone put a circular charging pad on an odd frame. Many other reviewers love it, and it does hit its advertised charging rates. It comes with an 18W USB-A charger (our unit had noticeable coil whine) and a 4-foot Micro USB to C cable. If you like the look, or at least don’t mind it, it’s a decent option, but Belkin’s 15W charger is around the same price and has a more conventional, if bland, look.

    Yootech X2 ($13.59; amazon.com)

    The Yootech X2 stand has a few things going for it. It doesn’t come with a wall adapter, but at least it connects via USB-C rather than Micro USB, which is rare for a wireless charger this inexpensive. It’s one of the few stands we tested that can charge an iPhone 12 Mini in portrait mode, and it’s one of even fewer chargers that can charge a Pixel 3 at 10W instead of 5W. It works fine, but the semigloss black finish and LED charging indicator, which wraps around the entire base of the stand and glows green, seem to have fallen out of the late 1990s.

    Anker PowerWave Base Stand ($19.49; amazon.com)

    If you already have an 18W USB-A charger, the Anker PowerWave Base Stand can save you some money. It comes with a 4-foot Micro USB cable but no wall adapter. Like most stands we tested, it can’t charge an iPhone 12 Mini, and the blue charging indicator ring may not be to everyone’s tastes, but it charges other iPhones and Androids at up to 10W, and its design is better than many other budget stands.

    best wc3.jpg

    Nathan Edwards/CNN

    Belkin Magnetic Portable Wireless Charger ($39.99; amazon.com

    Belkin’s magnetic Qi adapter has a 6-foot cord rather than 5 (Anker) or 3 (Apple); its cord is also thicker, which could feel reassuringly solid or unnecessarily bulky, depending on your preferences. The charging pad, at .47 inches, is also twice as thick as Apple’s or Mophie’s, and half again as thick as Anker’s. It’s also the only one with a status LED. It comes with a 20W USB-C charger like the Anker and Mophie.

    Mophie Snap+ Wireless Charger ($34.99; amazon.com)

    Don’t get this. The magnets are much weaker than any other magnetic Qi charger we tested and barely hold in place. It comes with one of Mophie’s magnetic ring sticker adapters, which you can use to make a non-MagSafe phone compatible with magnetic Qi chargers, but it barely sticks to those either, and they interfere with other accessories.

    Anker 623 MagGo 2-in-1 Wireless Charging Station ($79.99; amazon.com)

    The Anker 623 MagGo is the most interesting charging stand we tested. It’s a surprisingly heavy violet-colored cylinder with a MagSafe-compatible Qi charger on top. That top flips forward up to 60 degrees to become a charging stand for MagSafe phones and reveals a second Qi charging pad underneath. That 5W charging pad is meant for AirPods, though in our testing it was able to charge phones as well, albeit slowly. And of course the main charging pad is limited to 7.5W for iPhones; it’s “MagGo,” not MagSafe.

    The 623 also comes in blue, white and dark gray, and includes a 5-foot USB-C to C cable and 20W USB-C charger. There are plenty of more practical magnetic charging stands for iPhones, and some that are actually MagSafe certified. But this one’s fun, and it does what it’s supposed to. For plenty of people that’ll be enough.

    Courant Catch:2 Essentials ($79.99; bedbathandbeyond.com)

    The Catch:2 Essentials is a five-coil Qi charger that can charge up to two devices at once. It’s striking, with a “Belgian linen” top surface and color-matched USB-C to A charging cable. Unlike the Catch:1, it comes with an AC adapter, a color-matched 18W USB-A brick. Its five charging coils means you don’t have to be as precise about positioning as you would with a single-coil charger, though it can only charge two devices at once.

    While it can charge a phone at up to 10W (9W for Samsung, 7.5W for iPhone) as well as a wireless charging case or other Qi device, it can’t do two phones at their top charge rates due to the 18W charger. (Wireless charging is inefficient; getting 7.5W to the phone requires 10W to 11W of power from the wall). Our test charger’s AC adapter also had notable coil whine.

    Mophie Wireless Charging Stand+ ($76.41; amazon.com)

    This pad and stand combo can charge iPhones at up to 7.5W and compatible Android phones at up to 10W (9W for Samsung phones), and it can do so to two phones at once. It doesn’t come with an Apple Watch charger, but it does include an adapter for one that clips to the back left or center of the pad; the Watch charger plugs into a USB port at the rear. There’s no cable routing, though, and Mophie’s proprietary charger is bulky and ours had notable coil whine.

    Mophie 3-in-1 WIreless Charging Stand ($139.95; amazon.com)

    We like the clever Apple Watch charging puck, but this stand is just too expensive for what it offers. The proprietary charging brick showed up with something rattling around inside; we used the identical charger from the Mophie Wireless Charging Stand+, above, which suffered from coil whine.

    Logitech Powered 3-in-1 Charging Dock ($148.38; amazon.com)

    The Logitech Powered 3-in-1 Dock, with its sci-fi curves, was the best-looking multi-device Qi charger we tested, though it takes up a decent amount of room, and it’s expensive. The pad and stand can each charge at up to 10W at the same time (7.5W for iPhones, 9W for some Samsung phones), though small phones (like the iPhone 12 Mini) can’t charge on the stand. Amazon reviewers complain that the watch charger angle is too vertical, so Apple Watches with heavy bands fall off, though I didn’t experience this with my (lightweight) Sport Band. The proprietary AC adapter is a bit bulky but has a 6-foot cable that helps with positioning.

    Though we love the design of the Logitech Powered 3-in-1, it costs more than most people should pay for a non-MagSafe 3-in-1 charging station, unless you have enough other Qi charging devices to justify it, or you love the design enough.

    Satechi Trio ($119.99; bestbuy.com)

    We like that the Satechi Trio comes with an Apple Watch charger, and that it folds flat for storage. It comes with a 24W USB-C charger, which is nice. But the Trio is larger than other 3-in-1 charging pads we tested, and since the top is metal, it’s clanky and unpleasant to use on phones without cases.

    Nytstnd Quad ($171.75, from $229; Nytstnd.com)

    The Nytstnd Quad has a five-coil, two-device Qi charger; an Apple Watch puck; a wired tablet charging area; and an optional valet tray for your pocket contents, all wrapped in leather inside a hardwood ply frame. The Qi charging coil has magnets to help MagSafe phones align properly, and the tablet charger comes in both USB-C and Lightning models.

    Unfortunately, the 36W wall adapter lacks the juice to charge everything at its full rate at once, unlike the Scosche BaseLynx. The tablet connector, which is fixed in place with a slight swivel, seems like an easy failure point, and the fit and finish, especially on the oak-stained version we tested with the valet tray, doesn’t justify its high price.

    Belkin MagSafe 2-in-1 15W Fast Charging ($96.10; amazon.com)

    One of the few third-party MagSafe chargers, this shares the sci-fi pedestal design of the Belkin Boost Charge Pro 3-in-1 but drops the Apple Watch charger. It’s a good choice if you don’t have an Apple Watch but do have a MagSafe phone and earbuds with a wireless charging case. Surely dozens of people.

    Apple MagSafe Duo Charger ($129; apple.com)

    The MagSafe Duo Charger is clever, compact and incredibly expensive for what it does. It can charge a MagSafe phone (at up to 14W) and an Apple Watch at the same time, then fold into a 75-millimeter-by-80-millimeter-by-15-millimeter square. It connects via a USB-C to Lightning cable, which is included, but requires a 20W or greater USB-C charger, which isn’t. Well-heeled frequent flyers could consider it, especially if you can write it off, but business travel isn’t exactly booming again. Maybe if it were half the price!

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • We tried the Yeti Yonder, the brand’s lightest water bottle yet | CNN Underscored

    We tried the Yeti Yonder, the brand’s lightest water bottle yet | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Known for its lineup of rough and tough wares — from coolers and bags to chairs and blankets — Yeti is the go-to brand for nature lovers and sideline-sitting parents alike. While the indestructibility of Yeti gear is a huge selling point for consumers, the brand is equally popular because of its smart design details. Never is this strategic engineering more apparent than in Yeti’s latest product drop, the Yonder Water Bottle.

    Yeti recently launched its lightest water bottle yet make from BPA-free plastic. It’s available in two sizes: 25 ounces and 34 ounces.

    Available in 25-ounce and 34-ounce formats, Yonder is a big deal for two reasons. First, it’s the lightest water bottle Yeti has ever created, making it super portable. Second, it’s also the brand’s first-ever non-insulated water carrier, comprised of BPA-free plastic. Basically, Yonder was created to deliver on Yeti’s high-performing, ultra-durable reputation, while simultaneously being light enough to accompany users in previously unexplored terrain.

    To get them there, Yeti tested and tweaked Yonder amongst more than 150 professional outdoorsmen and women, including mountaineer and filmmaker  Jimmy Chin and climber Conrad Anker, who provided insights that were then incorporated into the water bottle’s development. Read: Yonder was made by outdoorsmen for outdoorsmen!

    While I’m decidedly not that, I am a huge fan of Yeti’s drinkware — the vacuum-sealed, stainless steel Rambler Tumbler holds my coffee during the morning school drop off, while the Wine Tumbler is my go-to for neighborhood happy hours. As such, I was excited to take both sizes of the Yonder for a spin over the past week, testing it on the go, during workouts and yes, throughout my many daily kiddo carpools. Check out my Yonder experience below.

    yeti yonder courtney cnnu 2.jpg

    Courtney Thompson

    Not surprisingly, my favorite detail about Yonder is its concurrent capacity and lightweighted-ness. To compare, the 34-ounce Yonder weighs .67 pounds, whereas the 30-ounce Yeti Rambler Tumbler clocks in at 1.1 pounds. Yonder is nearly a half-pound less, despite carrying an additional four ounces of liquid.

    Point being: Yonder’s portability claim holds up, which leads me to my second favorite design detail — the clip or carry handle. While it can fit into backpack side pockets, both sizes of the Yonder bottle feature a big ol’ built-in handle atop the screw cap that can be slipped through a backpack strap or attached to your bag via a carabiner. The result? Easy access, people! And because the Yonder cap is two parts (a screw cap plus a wide-mouth spout that can also be removed), you can quickly detach the cap, take a sip and reattach the bottle while you’re on the go.

    More about that cap — it’s 100% leak proof. I even let my 8-year-old son test this out and trust me, if a third grader can’t break something, no one can. Despite vigorous shaking and using the Yonder as a football, the bottle remained completely watertight. And it survived drops, kicks and bangs galore, with nary a scratch. The brand acknowledges that Yonder will attain scratches over time, but its shatterproof claim definitely held up for me (and my kid).

    Another perk of the Yonder cap’s two-part system is that while the controlled, wide-mouth spout makes for easy sipping and quick refills, it also screws off, making for equally easy hand-washing. And if you’re a dishwasher person, fear not, the bottle can be washed on the top and bottom racks. Say it with me: Amen!

    I’m almost done talking about this cap, I promise. But I’d be remiss to not mention that both parts are lined with small grooves that make it super easy to grip and open, even with gloves on or with wet hands. This is certainly a small design detail, but one that can have a big impact depending on how you’re using the water bottle.

    Lastly, I like that price. To score such a high-quality product for under $30 is always going to be a win for me.

    yeti yonder courtney cnnu 1.jpg

    Courtney Thompson

    By eliminating the weighty insulation, you lose the ability to keep drinks hot or cold for long periods of time. In fact, hot drinks can’t be stored in Yonder at all, nor can carbonated beverages. And while the smaller, 25-ounce size bottle fits nicely into the car cup holder, the bigger 34-ounce (my preferred size) does not. I was able to sort of wedge it into my Chevrolet Suburban’s cup holder, but there was no way it was fitting into the smaller option in my husband’s sedan.

    Another (minor) complaint is that Yonder can’t be customized like most of the other Yeti gear.

    It’s no secret that I also love the Stanley Quencher cup for a host of reasons, chief among them being the fact that the straw allows for nonstop, all-day hydration. In this department, the Yonder is inferior because you have to unscrew the cap every time you want a sip of water. That said, the Stanley’s biggest limitation is that it’s not leakproof and isn’t great for traveling, which is Yonder’s strength.

    When compared to the slew of plastic water bottles in my pantry, Yonder wins again because while most brands claim to be leak proof, the Yeti water bottle actually is. And it’s lighter and more rugged than any other I’ve tested. Whereas plastic options from Target prove to be flimsy over time, the Yonder definitely looks and feels like it’s going to stand the test of time. And in the event it doesn’t, you can call on the brand’s five-year warranty.

    yeti yonder review inline

    Yeti

    If you’re looking for a lightweight, leakproof water bottle that can take a beating on the road — whether you’re commuting to work, white water rafting or hitting the slopes — the Yonder will deliver, particularly if insulation and beverage temperature aren’t important to you. Available in four transparent colorways, the Yonder might cost a bit more than the competition, but it’s money well spent.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Peloton Tread brings personal training to your treadmill | CNN Underscored

    The Peloton Tread brings personal training to your treadmill | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret that the online exercise boom, paired with the pandemic, has transformed how people work out. While gyms don’t seem to be going away anytime soon, there are those who appreciate having access to virtual personal trainers and classes at their fingertips — in the comfort of their own home. And though there are plenty to choose from, Peloton has remained a widely known option, due as much to its popular instructors as well as its well-reviewed equipment.

    Though the company’s bike may be the most infamous (thanks, Mr. Big), the Peloton Tread (starting at $3,495, not including a separate $44 per month membership) has fast become a recognizable and high-tech option in the online fitness space — bringing together one of the sleekest treadmill designs with a robust online fitness platform.

    I’ve owned the Peloton Tread for over a year, and here’s everything you need to know before you decide to invest in one for your own home gym.

    The Peloton Tread is a no-brainer for Peloton addicts who want to add a treadmill to their home gym. Sleek, good-looking and compact, it comes with a big old 24-inch touchscreen to better see your favorite instructors. But with a price tag starting at $3,500 (though you can nab one now for the holiday price of $3,300), there are other treadmills that might be a better, and more affordable, fit.

    Many treadmills are bulky, taking up large sections of a room. A large gray rectangle is not what most people appreciate when it comes to decor. The Peloton Tread handily bucks those trends with a sleek, compact design that fits snugly into small rooms.

    The 68” L x 33” W x 62” H footprint keeps the tread from filling a room without sacrificing running space, boasting a generous 59” of belt length. Taller runners with longer strides will have no issues on the Tread. Plus, its formidable design includes a large touchscreen, bright red and black color scheme, textured running belt, and slim form factor.

    My Tread sits in a fairly small 13’ x 11’ room that doubles as my home office, and it doesn’t feel cramped. I still have plenty of room next to the tread for other activities as well, like weightlifting and yoga.

    Niko Vercelletto

    Ergonomic control knobs and buttons

    One of the most thoughtful features of the Peloton Tread are the intuitive control knobs on each side of the machine. Other treadmills have the standard speed and incline buttons at the front, but reaching forward can interrupt your running stride — and having to keep doing this throughout a run can get annoying.

    By putting a control knob to your right and left, the Tread allows you to increase or decrease the incline and speed with just one quick swipe. Additionally, each knob has a button in the middle that allows you to jump to the next highest level. For example, pressing the button at 3.2 speed will jump the speed to 4.0.

    One disappointment is there are no jump buttons for decreasing speed and incline. However, the knobs are almost always responsive and rarely do I find myself having to swipe the knob more than once.

    tread3.jpg

    Niko Vercelletto

    Peloton is known for their personal training ecosystem. There are just over 50 instructors across many disciplines — biking, bootcamps, meditation, stretching, running, and even boxing, to name a few — all of whom are professionals in their craft (as well as being excellent and personable entertainers). And this ecosystem is translated almost flawlessly to the Tread.

    Here are a few of my favorite features which help take my home workouts to the next level:

    ●  Stackable Classes: To mix things up, you can create a playlist of sorts, or “Stack,”of different classes that will flow one after another. Before your workout, you manually select which classes you want and they get put in your “Stack.” For example, you can stack a running warm-up class, HIIT class, then post-run stretch. After one class ends, you click a button on screen to start the next class, avoiding any wasted time thinking about what you want to do next.

    ●  Social and Competition Features: The Peloton software includes many ways to keep your motivation high for exercising. Achievements and monthly challenges offer fun incentives while in-class leaderboards unlock your competitive side. And thought it’s not an exclusive feature to the Tread, it even comes with a webcam so you can do classes together with your friends.

    ●  Body Metrics: The Tread helps you work on every muscle with Body Activity. Nothing needs to be set up to access body metrics. The software will show you which muscles you have worked on in the last 7 to 30 days. Want to grow your glutes, but only 10% of your classes have targeted them? You will get personalized class recommendations that hit glutes. Muscle weaknesses quickly become your strengths. You can Body Activity under your profile overview on the Tread.

    While the Peloton Tread is a great-looking treadmill with one of the most popular and powerful online fitness platforms, the price puts it in competition with some of the highest-end treadmills on the market. Yet, for its $3,495 pricetag, it may lag behind the rest of the comparably priced field when it comes to performance, depending on the treadmill.

    For example, when I compare the Peloton Tread to the NordicTrack Commercial X22i treadmill priced at $3,499, the NordicTrack boasts many of the same features as the Tread. Yet the Commercial X22i spanks the Tread with -6 to 40% incline control compared to the Peloton’s 0 to 12.5%. The NordicTrack treadmill also comes with integrated push-bars and sled grips for even more exercise options, as well as two built-in fans to keep you cool during your workout — neither of which are included in the Peloton Tread. Plus, an iFit subscription is cheaper than the All-Access Peloton Membership (though that is also due to the lack of celebrity instructors).

    If you’re only planning on doing runs on the Peloton Tread, a rotating screen may not be a big deal. However, it becomes a hindrance when trying out other classes, like strength, stretching, yoga, and bootcamps.

    For the most part, the big 23.8” screen is perfectly viewable if you’re on the tread or standing next to it. However, there have been times when the arms of the treadmill block the screen when I’m on the floor. I sometimes have to get up multiple times to check what the instructor is doing because I didn’t understand their instructions.

    If you have a TV near your tread, you can cast the workout to the TV to get a bigger screen (one of the Tread’s best features). But if you don’t, you’re stuck either having the Tread’s screen sometimes obscured or transitioning the workout to the Peloton app on your phone or tablet which can take up time.

    The Peloton Bike+ has a rotating touchscreen that makes getting off the bike seamless for other classes. Hopefully this feature makes it into future editions of the Tread.

    As much as I love the Peloton software on the Tread, there are some connectivity quirks that need to be ironed out.

    First, some Bluetooth headphones have trouble connecting. While the most popular brands, AirPods and Galaxy Buds, connect almost flawlessly, lesser known brands can be finicky. My JBL Endurance Peak 2 earbuds, for example, sometimes connect without issue and other times it takes multiple minutes before the Tread recognizes them.

    Second, the Tread can only directly connect to one smartwatch and one fitness app: the Apple Watch and Strava. You can sync workout statistics to other smartwatches and apps, like the Galaxy Watch and Samsung Health, but only if your watch and preferred fitness app can sync with Strava. For such a popular and high-priced machine, the lack of direct connectivity to the Tread is disappointing.

    The Peloton Tread is a great treadmill in its own right. However, there may be better options for you if the Tread’s price tag isn’t appealing.

    If you still want to be part of the Peloton ecosystem without paying the luxury price, the Horizon 7.8 was made for you. At $2,000, the Horizon has powerful speakers, QuickDial controls that are similar to the Peloton Tread, same running belt length, and Bluetooth options for heart rate tracking. This tread was engineered specifically to be used with Peloton or similar streaming apps at a much lower price point.

    And if you don’t care about the Peloton ecosystem, but still want interactive fitness, the Bowflex T22 starts at $2300. The tread includes a 1 -year JRNY fitness membership and has the same-sized screen and running belt length as the Peloton Tread. You can even watch Netflix, Hulu, or Amazon Prime while working out on the Bowflex.

    There are also foldable treadmills, like the Horizon T101, that are about as space-saving as you can imagine. They are also significantly cheaper, with some going as low as $350. Just don’t expect quality or a rich feature list with foldables. In that way, the Peloton Tread is a good compromise between cutting-edge interactive fitness and a sleek, space-saving design.

    But what about other at-home online fitness platforms? Peloton’s software is most often compared to Tonal ($3,495) and the Lululemon Studio Mirror ($1,495). While neither of them provide running workouts, obviously, they both offer a range of classes, from strength training to HIIT workouts. Also, both hang on the wall, saving much more space than the Peloton Tread. Both platforms also cost roughly the same per month as Peloton’s All-Access Membership ($44): Tonal at $49 and Mirror at $39.

    tread2.jpg

    Niko Vercelletto

    When Peloton broke onto the scene in 2012, it began to redefine how people would exercise. And when we were relegated to our homes during lockdown, it became a lifeline for many exercise enthusiasts and beginners alike.

    The Peloton Tread continues that legacy with a compact, sleek design and industry-leading software that truly pushes people to be their best. Yet, this comes at a cost. If all you need is a basic treadmill and don’t care about the Peloton ecosystem, you may want to look elsewhere. The high price may not be affordable for those who just need to run indoors and the Tread’s feature list is smaller than other treadmills at this price point.

    However, my wife is an avid runner and she has used the Tread to train for half-marathons multiple times. And not wanting to break my daily streak, I find myself doing at least one class a day. Since getting the Tread, it has truly put exercise at the front of our minds as well as in our daily lives.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best smartwatches of 2022: Apple & Samsung | CNN Underscored

    Best smartwatches of 2022: Apple & Samsung | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Shopping for a smartwatch might seem easy at first, but it can quickly become daunting. If you’re an iPhone user, you clearly think of the Apple Watch first — but it’s 2022 and there are four models to pick from: Series 8, SE, Ultra and Hermès. Or maybe Fitbit’s Sense or Versa that mixes heavy health features with some communication convenience catches your eye. And if you’re on Android, is the Samsung Galaxy Watch worth a look with the redesigned Wear OS?

    Well, we’ve done the legwork by continually testing smartwatches day by day, week by week and month by month this year. As each new model hits the market, we strap it to our wrist and put it through the wringer. Of course, that means this guide is ever evolving, evidenced by a new winner. After copious testing, here are the best smartwatches out now:

    Best overall smartwatch

    For those still rocking with a Series 4 Apple Watch or older, the Series 8 is a great upgrade and also a good choice for first-time smartwatch buyers. With a familiar feel, the Series 8 has excellent performance, beautiful design and lot of new features.

    Best Android smartwatch

    The Galaxy Watch 5 is the best Android smartwatch for most people, offering long battery life, good performance and plenty of fitness tracking capabilities.

    Best budget smartwatch

    The Apple Watch SE gets you the modern Apple Watch design and everyday usability for a good price. It’s lacking the always-on display and core health features like ECG and blood oxygen readings, but at the end of the day, it’s a great entry point.

    From $379 at Amazon and $399 at Apple

    Max Buondonno/CNN

    Some may be disappointed by how similar the Apple Watch Series 8 looks and feels to the Series 7, but Apple has nearly perfected its formula for a smartwatch, and there’s no need to fix something that isn’t broken.

    The Series 8 still comes in 41mm and 45mm case sizes, which means all of your old bands will work with whichever model they’re designed for.The screens are also the same, nearly reaching the edges of each different Series 8 model with rounded sides. You also get the same level of durability as the Series 7 with a crack-resistant screen, IP6X dust resistance and WR50 water resistance (meaning it can survive at up to 50 meters underwater). It’s not as durable as the new Apple Watch Ultra, but it’s still enough for everyday use. The screen is beautiful to look at, it gets up to 1,000 nits bright and is great outdoors, the form factor is slim and doesn’t get in the way and its weight makes it easy to forget about when working out.

    Despite the familiar feel, there are a lot of new features on the Series 8, mainly thanks to watchOS 9, the latest version of the Apple Watch’s software. New watch face options, upgraded Health stats especially for avid runners and triathletes, medication tracking, sleep tracking and personalized app notifications for you to stay up-to-date.

    The Series 8 also includes Crash Detection, which appears to be one of the most advanced crash-detecting features available on a smartwatch. If it detects you’ve been in an accident, your watch will give you an option to make an emergency call. If you remain unresponsive, emergency services will be automatically contacted and provide dispatchers with your location.

    Overall, the Apple Watch Series 8 doesn’t boast a huge load of features that make it different from our previous best smartwatch pick, the Series 7. But, the slight and simple changes do make it upgrade and deserving of a place on the wrists of those who don’t already have an Apple Watch or are coming from one that’s four to five years old.

    Galaxy Watch 5

    Max Buondonno/CNN

    If you feel like you’ve seen the Galaxy Watch 5 before, you’re not mistaken. The design of the watch is basically identical to the Watch 4 from last year, down to the case and display sizes.

    Mind you, that’s not a bad thing. The Watch 4 already has a great design, so it’s no big deal to see Samsung repeat it this year. There is one physical difference worth pointing out, also found on the Watch 5 Pro: the shape of the sensors on the bottom. Samsung made them slightly curvier this year so they sit a bit deeper on your wrist. This helps to improve their accuracy.

    It’s also a pretty durable watch. You can use the water lock feature to lock the touchscreen to avoid any accidental taps from water drops during aquatic activities.

    The Sapphire Crystal glass is a nice amenity and adds peace of mind in case you bump into something or drop your watch while putting it on. We also liked the touch-sensitive bezel, which lets you do things like scroll, zoom in and more without blocking the screen itself with your finger.

    Where the Galaxy Watch 5 shines is in fitness. Samsung includes the same 3-in-1 BioActive sensor as the Watch 4 line, which combines optical heart rate, electrical heart signal and bioelectrical impedance analysis sensors into a single unit. These sensors power the features many come to expect from modern smartwatches like heart rate tracking, body composition monitoring, electrocardiogram (ECG) support and blood oxygen levels.

    Samsung did increase the size of the batteries in the Galaxy Watch 5, and in our testing the battery life lasted about 30 to 35 hours. Compared to other watches like the Apple Watch Series 7, this is actually excellent battery life. The Watch 5 is easily one of the longest-lasting smartwatches on the market — that is, if you’re willing to adjust your usage patterns.

    1-apple watch se review underscored

    Jacob Krol/CNN

    Starting at $249 and offering many of the standout features of the Series 6, the Apple Watch SE retains the modern Apple Watch design with a larger display compared to the Series 3 and the S5 processor that debuted in the Series 5.

    The Apple Watch SE also boasts the Apple-made S5 processor — the same one inside the Series 5. Put simply: That means that the SE delivers big value.

    Our favorite new feature is real-time translations via Apple’s virtual assistant. It’s quite handy to get a quick translation right from your wrist and without opening a dedicated app. Most impressively, it shows how capable the S5 chip inside really is.

    Apple Pay works just as well — and as quickly — as with the Series 5 and Series 6. And, thanks to watchOS 7, the Apple Watch SE can track hand-washing just the same as the Watch 6. The microphones specifically listen for water from a faucet, hand motions and even the sound of soap being pumped from a bottle. And when it detects you’re washing your hands, you’ll see a countdown appear on your wrist. Once the 20 seconds is up, you’ll feel a vibration and hear a short jingle. You can also choose to receive a reminder once you’re back home to wash your hands. This taps into the GPS built inside and some improvements to Apple Maps.

    Sleep tracking is on board as well and allows you to set a goal for the number of hours you want to sleep and tracks whether or not you’re hitting that goal. You won’t find data about different cycles like you might on a Fitbit, but it’s the same sleep tracking experience as on the Series 6 or any other Apple Watch that supports the feature. It just won’t track your blood oxygen periodically overnight.

    The fitness aspects on the SE are essentially the same experience you’ve had on every other Apple Watch with move and exercise goals you can track. You can also use the Workout app to pick from a plethora of exercises — indoor or outdoor cycling, functional strength training, barre, dance, running, jogging, surfing and countless others — that the Apple Watch SE will accurately track through an array of sensors. We didn’t notice any slowdowns or tracking differences between the SE and Series 6. Both were able to get an accurate number when it came to calories burned, minutes exercised and heart rate tracked throughout.

    The Watch SE features heart rate tracking, noise level monitoring, fitness tracking and fall detection. What’s sacrificed here, compared to the Watch 6, is a faster processor, quick charging capability, a brighter display, ECG readings, blood oxygen monitoring and the always-on display.

    We missed the always-on display the most. It just makes the Apple Watch feel more like an actual wristwatch. Secondly, the health features like blood oxygen and ECGs (as well as a more advanced heart rate sensor) might make you opt for Series 6.

    The Apple Watch SE delivers a tremendous amount of value with minimal compromises — as any Apple SE product should. If you can look past no electrical heart rate sensor, blood oxygen monitoring and an always-on display, it’s the clear choice when looking for the most value.

    As Underscored does with any product we test, we went deep on these watches. In many cases, it’s using them as any consumer would, wearing them daily, using them for workouts, maxing out the battery and, of course, seeing how they hold up to normal wear and tear.

    Any wearable, including a smartwatch, is a very personal product, and your preference can be heavily dependent on your phone of choice. That’s why we tested every watch with an iPhone SE, an iPhone 11, an iPhone 11 Pro, an iPhone 11 Pro Max, a Galaxy S20 and a Pixel 4 XL (except, of course, the Apple Watch Series 6, Series 3 and SE, which only work with an iPhone).

    We carefully went through the setup process, noting any necessary apps and extra steps each watch required. (For instance, how easy was it to set up notifications, one of the key features of a smartwatch?) We also considered third-party app and watch face availability, along with the ability to customize the overall look of the watch face.

    We asked ourselves how easy it was to complete routine tasks, like viewing a weather forecast, checking daily agenda or sending a message. With everything set up, we wore each watch for several days, monitoring battery life with normal usage with the occasional workout mixed in, and continued to note how easy each watch was to use and any signs of wear and tear.

    We paid close attention to activity tracking and health features. With the latter, we established a baseline with consumer-facing devices that are designed to just track those metrics (i.e., SpO2 or heart rate).

    Once we had a good enough understanding of a watch, we rated it.

    If you’re a serious athlete or adventurer — or simply willing to pay up for the most advanced Apple Watch experience out there — the Apple Watch Ultra is worth the money. For everyone else, the Apple Watch Series 8 remains a great pick.

    With a great balance of features, specs and fitness tools, the Google Pixel Watch is probably the closest Wear OS watch you can call the “Apple Watch for Android.” If you have a Pixel phone or you’re a fan of the Fitbit brand, snagging this watch is a no-brainer. But, if you own another non-Apple phone like a Samsung Galaxy, you should look toward the excellent Galaxy Watch 5.

    The Watch 5 Pro is a bigger, more durable version of the Watch 5 that also touts more advanced GPS tracking. It’s a good pick for people who do lots of biking or hiking, but most people are better off with the standard Watch 5.

    The Apple Watch Series 3 currently starts at $229 at Walmart and offers almost everything the Series 6 and SE do. But then we considered that the hardware that makes up this watch is now a few years old, and as watchOS continues to grow and progress, the Series 3 will begin to slow down as Apple adds more features to watchOS or, even worse, support for future updates and features will eventually leave the Series 3 behind. That doesn’t mean that the features it has now will go away — and it’s a fine watch with these features — but to future-proof your investment, the Series 6 or Watch SE are better choices.

    Fitbit’s Sense watch has a ton of health-related sensors and features. It can measure how stressed you are, track blood oxygen levels and monitor your skin’s temperature while you sleep, and a future update will enable ECG readings to check for irregular heartbeats. Of course, it does all of the staple fitness tracker stuff that Fitbit helped pioneer, like counting steps, active minutes, workouts and sleep. But after testing it, the Sense feels more like a medical device than a smartwatch. You have to use a specific watch face at night in order to track your Sp02, for example. There’s a ton of potential with Sense, but the overall experience needs to be refined. And then you need to know what to do with all of that data. If you want a watch that can give you lots of health info then, well, the Sense might make sense for you.

    The Fitbit Versa 2 is a very good but very basic smartwatch. Its primary focus, and what it does best, is tracking activities and sleep — but after that, it falls short of what the Apple Watch Series 3 or Galaxy Active 2 can do.

    The Garmin Instinct Solar has the unique feature of being able to recharge itself using solar power. That’s right — the watch face is a miniature solar panel that sips on sunrays to slowly replenish the battery. As such, Garmin estimates 24-day battery life off a single charge, as long as you’re outside for three hours a day in direct sunlight. In our testing, 12 days of use between charges was the norm. (We clearly need to get out more.) Tracking workouts, hikes and walks via the watch and dedicated GPS was simple once we got the hang of the watch’s interface. Where the Instinct Solar fell short was with its smartwatch capabilities. You can’t limit which apps send alerts to your watch — it’s all or nothing. If you spend a lot of time outdoors and you want a watch that’s built and designed for an active lifestyle without the often unnecessary smartwatch features like granular alerts, then the Instinct Solar makes a compelling offering.

    OnePlus took a different approach with it’s $159 OnePlus Watch. Instead of using Google’s Wear OS to power the watch, they created a a custom operating system. After two weeks of testing, it’s clear the software is what’s holding back an otherwise great-looking smartwatch.

    You can’t install third-party apps and are stuck with what is included out of the box. So if you prefer Spotify over the OnePlus Music app, well, you’re out of luck. There are also several syncing issues between the watch and the OnePlus health app. For example, our nightly sleep metrics are only visible on the watch, and the same can be said about our step counts. Oddly, there’s also no way to change the clock from keeping time in 24-hour format to 12-hour format.

    Walks and runs do sync over to the OnePlus Health app, but we have questions about the overall accuracy of step counts and distance. One highlight of our testing has been battery life —- the OnePlus Watch truly does offer up to 14 days of use off a single charge. OnePlus told us the company is working on software updates. Right now though, the OnePlus Watch is better viewed as a first-generation device that needs a lot of work to compete with an activity band, let alone a smartwatch.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kim Kardashian spent 3 years creating Skims’ new bras — we put them to the test | CNN Underscored

    Kim Kardashian spent 3 years creating Skims’ new bras — we put them to the test | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Anyone who’s ever tightened a limp bra strap, tugged at a pinching underwire or, cringe, taken a deep breath only to discover a too-tight band, well, they know the pain of an ill-fitting bra. And while there are thousands of bra options on the market — all of which promise comfort, support, sexiness and myriad other selling points — only a small fraction actually deliver on those promises.

    Which brings me to Skims’ latest innovation: The undergarments brand founded by Kim Kardashian recently dropped a “system of bra solutions” that has been three years in the making. Claiming to provide incredible support and the best shape while “feeling like you’re wearing nothing,” Skims rolled out a slew of new bra styles to complement the cozy bralettes they’ve become known for since the brand first launched. (Side note: I stan the Skims Fits Everybody Triangle Bralette, and could write an entire story about why I love that style alone, but mainly you need to know it’s supportive, cozy and sexy all at once and I wear it 24/7… even when I’m sleeping.)

    “Guys, these are the most comfortable bras you’ll ever wear,” said Kardashian in an official teaser for the bras posted on YouTube. “I’ve always found bras to be so uncomfortable and constricting, my bra was the first thing I’d take off when I got home. We started to develop underwire bras because I really wanted to figure out how to blend the comfort and ease of a bralette with the shape and support of an underwire bra.”

    To get there, Skims conducted a year of fitting trials and wear tests, where women of every shape and size put the bras through the wringer. “The feedback we received means that there really is a bra style here that fits every single need, shape, want that you can possibly imagine,” said Kardashian.

    It’s no secret I’m a fan of Skims ever-expanding wares. From swimwear to the viral Fendi collab, I’ve been perpetually impressed not only with the accurate sizing, fit and Instagrammability of it all, but most importantly the quality. But whereas the previous Skims lingerie was more about cozy options, with this latest rollout, Kardashian entered the “serious bra” world. How did they hold up?

    This silky mesh collection featuring unlined molded cups comes in two styles: balconette and demi.

    These ultra comfortable bras are meant to fit like a second skin. Choose from four styles: The longer line, overhead Scoop and Plunge Tank Bras, and the regular Scoop and Plunge styles with a more traditional back closure.

    Available in demi and scoop cuts, this lightweight bra is designed to lift and shape thanks to a 3D woven knit “foam” cup.

    I tested the No Show Molded Unlined Demi Bra ($58), which is available in 32A to 44F sizes. Light as a feather and whisper-thin, this bra is proof that Kardashian was not joking when she said she wanted it to feel like you’re wearing nothing. IRL, when holding the raw-cut mesh bra, it actually looks and feels like stockings. When I put it on, I have to say it felt like no other bra I’ve ever tried on. Like most women, I’ve been covering up my chest in padded or lined bras for decades to avoid nip slips, so my mind was actually a little blown when I put on this completely sheer and unlined bra. It was totally liberating and sort of made me feel like a ’90s supermodel.

    Having tested the bra for more than a month, I can say that I’m still obsessed with it. It’s super sexy and gives off a braless look under clothes — you can see nipple outlines through thinner material, so keep that in mind when you’re considering buying! Most importantly, it’s chock full of support via the comfortable underwire and the fit was accurate, with zero gaping or pinching. I also love the seamless nature of the fabric, which has an invisible edge and seemingly lies completely flat on your skin.  One downside: The silky straps (which I looove) can become a little loose after a full day of wear and usually require tightening.

    We also had a reviewer test out the Naked Plunge Tank Bra ($58), which is a wireless, full-coverage option that comes in sizes XXS to 5X. Comprised of nylon-spandex blend fabric, the second-skin bra is also incredibly supportive, even for larger busts. “I had a Large DD and found the fit to be spot on,” said our reviewer. “The bra itself is quite stretchy, so it’s forgiving size-wise, but I felt it was just the right amount of snug without feeling suffocating. I’ve basically refused to wear an underwire since before the pandemic, so in the last few years, I’ve tried a lot of wireless, pullover bras. The main issue with most of these bras is that they aren’t supportive enough for someone with a larger chest — Skims doesn’t have that problem. I found this bra to be ultra-supportive and smoothing, not to mention extremely comfortable.” Beyond that, she also found that the bra produced just the right amount of cleavage and that the wide straps were not only comfortable, but also invisible under clothing.

    Naked Plunge Tank Bra

    A third reviewer was able to test the Naked Scoop Bra ($44) for us and declared it, “One of the most comfortable bras I’ve tried.” Buttery soft and stretchy to boot, the full-coverage, wireless bra comes in sizes XXS to 5X and features adjustable straps and a hook-and-eye closure. “This is so much more comfortable than the underwire bras I own,” she said. “It’s like a combination of a bralette, sports bra and traditional bra all in one. It’s lightweight like a bralette, supportive and simple like a sports bra and gives a nice foundation like a traditional bra. It also has slightly wider straps than traditional bras, which adds some extra support.” And what about negatives? Our reviewer found none! And even added that she wants this style in multiple colors.

    Naked Scoop Bra

    Two of the bras we tested — one a Naked style, one a Weightless option — had abrasive seams that irritated our skin. While likely a one-off design flaw, in both instances we stopped wearing the bra because of the discomfort.

    Though a huge fan of the bra, the reviewer of the Naked Plunge Tanks did note that the conservative-cut of the bra would rule out skimpier tops, and that the bottom of the tank tended to roll up a bit, requiring her to pull it down throughout the day.

    Naked Plunge Bra in Onyx.jpg

    Skims

    When it comes to fit, comfort and design, Skims reigns supreme. And the wireless and underwired bra options we tested proved to be incredibly supportive, even for larger chests. Speaking of, we are here for the size inclusivity! With sizes XXS to 5X, 32A to 44F, Skims has an option for every body type out there.

    And the brand handily beats out the competition when it comes to cache. With 4.5 million Instagram followers — not to mention Kardashian’s 333 million followers — Skims creates a frenzy of excitement around each and every new product launch with lots of sneak peeks and previews. If you’re lucky enough to get your hands on an item, the hype delivers, especially in the sexy department. Whether you’re wearing a soft tank bra or a completely sheer balconette bra, you’re going to channel the brand’s provocative joie de vivre, which is worth the price of admission.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best flannel sheets of 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best flannel sheets of 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is a part of CNN Underscored’s Guide to Sleep, a weeklong focus on everything you need to sleep better. We’ll be featuring new products and exclusive deals all week, so check in every morning to see what’s new and be sure to subscribe to the CNN Underscored newsletter to see it all.

    For those living in colder climates, in homes with a chillier average room temp in winter, there’s good news: It’s flannel sheet season.

    Popularized as an outdoor work garment after the Industrial Revolution, thanks to its warmth, sturdiness and affordability, flannel was popularized in the United States by the mid- to late 19th century when it was used to make long underwear and household items like bedding.

    Flannel is constructed from cotton and machine-made fibers, and is brushed on one or both sides, which gives it its soft, cozy feel. That brushed surface is what allows flannel to trap air and retain body heat while still remaining breathable — and that’s what makes it a popular bedding material, specifically in winter. Like linen, flannel is intended to be absorbent and moisture-wicking, so well-made flannel in theory should not cause sweaty sleeping. So, while they’re generally warmer than basic cotton sheets, their softness does lend them to year-round use.

    One user note about flannel sheets: Similar to linen sheets, washing flannel does create significant lint buildup in the dryer, particularly after the first wash. This reduces with subsequent washes, in our experience. And because of the brushed-on-both-sides nature of good-quality flannel sheets, consumers can expect some pilling — a shedding of the residual fibers — especially in the first few uses of the sheets.

    Overall, we tested 10 sets of top-rated flannel sheets in a range of prices. After weeks of testing, these proved to be the best:

    Best overall flannel sheets

    Luxurious without feeling overly thick or too weighty, Garnet Hill offers a delectably comfortable flannel sheet at a mid- to high-end price point, starting at $197 for a queen set (which includes two pillowcases, a fitted sheet and a flat sheet). These flannels come in lots of varieties of color and size, and instill confidence you’re getting a quality product that’ll last for years to come.

    Best lightweight flannel sheets

    Very close to our overall favorite because it is both supremely cozy and the most lightweight of all the sets we tested is West Elm’s organic flannel sheet, which starts at $135 for a full set. These sheets didn’t come out on top because they’re available in only two colors and cannot be ordered à la carte like Garnet Hill’s sheets.

    Best heavyweight flannel sheets

    If you’re sleeping in really cold weather and you want to feel positively bundled, then L.L.Bean makes a weighty flannel sheet for you — at a competitive price for the level of craftsmanship therein at $129 for a queen set.

    Best bargain flannel sheets

    Also delivering an excellent and very warm night of sleep, Pinzon by Amazon turns out a substantial flannel sheet at just $79.95 for a queen set. That’s half the price of some of the other higher-end brands, but you won’t feel like you’re sacrificing quality.

    Garnet Hill Hemstitched Supima Flannel Bedding

    From straight out of the packaging through to waking up on a chilly morning, Garnet Hill’s Hemstitched Supima Flannel sheets were our best overall. Garnet Hill’s product offered a warm, restful night of sleep without feeling overheated, which was a factor with some of the other sets.

    Garnet Hill’s flannel sheets are crafted in a family-run mill in Portugal from 100% American-grown Supima — that stands for superior pima, which is a first-rate type of cotton grown in the USA, with an extra-long staple fiber that promises increased strength, softness and color retention. Supima is combed to remove impurities, and brushed multiple times for extra softness. It’s then treated with a “velvet” finishing process that seals the color and richness of the fabric, ensures the quality of the drape and reduces any pilling. And indeed, the Supima cotton here translates into a luxurious softness and smoothness without feeling overly fuzzy or clingy.

    The design of the Garnet Hill sheets is simple and pretty, with a stitched hem on the top of the top sheet and on the pillowcases, and they’re available in 11 tasteful colors, more than any other brand we tested, including some untraditional options like a cool green and light pink. At 60-inch-by-80-inch width and depth for a queen set, these felt roomier than some of the other sets. The fitted sheets are elasticized for a better fit; we found a bit of gap on the fitted sheet with plenty of width overhang on the top sheet to tuck. Some may prefer a tighter-fitting sheet, but we didn’t mind not having to struggle to make the bed.

    We didn’t personally experience any pilling after washing this set, and they continued to feel extra soft to the touch after the first few washes and dries, perhaps even more than right out of the packaging. While we can’t say with certainty that Garnet Hill would last years longer than the other sets we tested, they felt of substantial quality and durability, like bedding we would happily take out of storage at the first sign of a crisp autumn chill.

    What set these over the top, in addition to their comfort and high-end feel, is their variety: You can buy individual fitted and top sheets and pillowcases for ease of replacement, and in a generous five different sizes. And bonus: You can get them monogrammed (which makes a sweet gift).

    At $197 for a set of queen sheets, the price of these was on the steeper side for flannel sheets, but that price tag delivers a high-end, very well-made, satisfying product.

    West Elm Organic Flannel Solid Sheet Set

    West Elm’s Organic Flannel sheets were among our favorites to sleep in. Also made in Portugal, and brushed and sheared for greater softness, West Elm’s flannels felt less fuzzy as well as smoother and sleeker than most of the other brands, if sleekness is a thing you can say about a flannel. Because of the lower fuzz factor, these felt higher end than a lot of the others. Like a lot of the West Elm catalog, these sheets felt sophisticated, modern and cool.

    West Elm’s sheets were one of the cooler sets of sheets — which is to say, they were still warm and cozy, providing a comfortable, restful night of sleep without any overheating. These were easy to sleep in even when temperatures outside were still in the 70s, making these our flannel pick for warmer weather. Some of the other sets we tested felt equally high-quality and lovely to the touch but were heavier and thus less comfortable when the weather was warmer. In fact, for warmer sleepers like our tester, this was a set we wanted to return to night after night — they were snuggly and inviting like your favorite pajamas.

    These are also Global Organic Textile Standard and Oeko-Tex certified to a standard of 100, which means they’re tested in a third-party lab, assured to be free from 300 harmful substances and meet strict standards, such as having a minimum of 70% organic fibers. Like the Garnet Hill sheets, West Elm’s are generously sized, with plenty of room in both the fitted and top sheets. After multiple wash and dry cycles, we did see a bit of pilling, which is to be expected even with high-quality flannels. But through laundering and continued sleep, these maintained an excellent bed fit and retained their softness and high-quality feel.

    These ranked slightly lower than our highest only because you can’t buy replacement sheets or pillowcases, and because they’re available in just two colors: light gray and stone white. The color limitation didn’t bother us that much, though, as it feels on-brand for West Elm in that neutral-palette chic-comfort kind of way. The sets come in four sizes (twin, full, queen and king).

    If you’re looking for cozy sheets that won’t have you waking up sweaty (and you don’t expect to order individual sheets), then West Elm’s Organic Flannel Solid Sheet Set is the one for you.

    L.L. Bean Ultrasoft Comfort Flannel Sheet Set

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, our favorite flannel sheet in the toastiness department came from winter wear go-to L.L.Bean. At the unboxing of this set, our first impression was, well, the name fits — these are in fact ultrasoft and they do exude comfort. This L.L.Bean set feels higher end, thanks to woven-in-Portugal brushed cotton and a Bean-exclusive process that removes surface fibers to create a velvet-like finish. These cost two-thirds of the price of two of our other top winners but don’t feel like a compromise in quality at all — and that was of course appealing as well.

    The Ultrasoft Comfort sheets feel even softer and more comfortable after going through the washer and dryer, without any pilling or fading. They’re a more snug fit than our other winners, with little gap on the fitted sheet and less extra length on the top sheet, and they seemed to fit the bed slightly better after the first washing and drying. They’re also available in a generous nine colors and four sizes — a good amount of variety.

    These are a warmer sleeper than some of the other sets, which is why we picked them as our best for cold winter nights. (They’re not as warm, we found, as L.L.Bean’s Premium Supimas, which we also tested, but they’re also not as expensive.) These felt like a midweight flannel — which translates to perfectly comfortable on a warmish early fall evening, and on a chilly winter morning, we still wanted to linger with these and a hot cup of tea.

    Pinzon Signature Cotton Heavyweight Velvet Flannel Sheet Set

    One of our favorite warmer flannel sheet sets was the Amazon Pinzon Signature Cotton Heavyweight Velvets. Right out of the box, these were a thicker, warmer, durable-feeling sheet. They’re extra insulated and fluffy, kind of like a new stuffed animal but without feeling like you’re sleeping in children’s bedding.

    Pinzon sheets are made from 100% cotton velvet with a double-napped finish on both sides, rendering them extra soft and velvety to the touch. They’re 190-gram heavyweight flannel, a detail that reflects the number of ounces it takes to make up a yard of fabric, which explains why they feel heavier and are longer-lasting. They provided a restful, comfortable night of sleep in both colder and warmer weather — we didn’t feel weighed down by these on early fall nights like with some of the other sets. These were a roomier fit on the bed, not tight but not baggy either. They wash and dry without shrinking or pilling and retain their sturdiness after laundering.

    Pinzon are available in 11 different colors or patterns, but only queen, king and California king sizes, and you can’t buy replacement sheets or pillowcases, which cost these a few points in overall rank. If a mid-price, good-quality, snuggly sheet is on your list, these hit the mark.

    These admirably held their own among all the sets tested, but unlike some of the higher-priced sheets, these are not made from Supima cotton, nor are they certified organic — a factor reflected, fairly enough, in their price. For close to $80, though, the Pinzon feel — and sleep — more pricey.

    We tested 10 sets of flannel sheets based on two primary criteria: quality and variety.

    We unwrapped each set and snuggled right into them to record initial impressions. We made notes, prepared a bed with the sheets, slept on them straight out of the packaging, washed and dried them in the dryer and reapplied them to the same bed and slept on them again, multiple times. (Note: As did the linen sheets we tested, all the sets of flannel sheets created a lot of dryer lint during the first drying cycle — like, a “stop the dryer cycle and scoop out the lint partway through” amount of lint.) We noted how they felt to touch, against the face and the body, as well as when tossing, sleeping and waking up, and how they felt after laundering and reusing. We took note of which sets felt warm and cozy, which felt sturdy or maybe too heavy and which may have prompted any noticeable body temperature issues.

    Quality and feel

    • Initial feel: How do they feel right out of the box: Are they soft? Are they thick or about average? High-quality-feeling or less so? We opened each set of sheets asking the following questions: How do they feel in your hands? Is this a product you’d want to put on your bed and against your skin?
    • Sleep feel: How do they feel to sleep on? We made notes on each set of sheets as to whether they were soft (or too soft), fuzzy, cozy, heavy and high-quality, and ultimately, how they promoted a night of sleep.
    • How they feel after washing: We evaluated if the sheets softened a great deal after washing and drying, and the wrinkle factor. (Note: The wrinkle factor was medium to high for most of them after being dried without ironing.)
    • Durability after sleeping and washing/drying: We assessed if each set felt durable after multiple washing and drying cycles, and if the sheets began to pill or fade or get worn in any way.
    • Fit on bed: We made a bed with each set of sheets multiple times, assessing how well they fit, noting if they were tight or loose, gapping or sagging. (Note: many of the sets, even the more expensive ones, were roomier in both width and length than the regular cotton sheets we usually use.) We noted if the fitted sheet was marked with which end is top or bottom, if there was enough width and length on the top sheet to tuck under the top mattress and, overall, if the bed-making process was laborious at all.

    Options

    • Number of sizes: We evaluated how many different size options there were for each sheet brand (nearly all included at least full, queen and king, and those that offered twin, California king or other specialized sizes were awarded higher scores).
    • Colors: We noted how many colors each sheet set was available in; some were available in only two, while others were available in upward of 10.
    • Availability of individual replacements: We assessed whether you can buy individual sheets and pillowcases for each set for those consumers who need replacements, want to mix and match colors or styles or simply do not want or need a top sheet, for example.

    On the higher end of both quality and price of the sheets we tested fell L.L.Bean’s Premium Supimas. These felt thicker than most of the sets and sumptuous to the touch, with a pretty stitched hem at the top of the top sheet and pillowcases. This set was exceedingly cozy, but in warmer weather, perhaps just too warm — we imagined these are a perfect fit for a cold Northeast night in a cabin. And if that is your reality, and you get these, they’re likely to last for years to come. These sheets were wider and roomier than a lot of the other sets. They’re available in only three sizes — full, queen and king — but you can order separate full- and king-size pillowcases.

    L.L.Bean Premium Supima Flannel Sheet Collection

    A more affordable option that also offered a restful night of sleep were The Company Store’s Legends Hotel Velvet Flannels. They were soft, snuggly, comfortable and warm, and woven from 100% combed cotton — a cotton made from removing the shortest fibers and impurities — in Portugal. But they felt slightly less luxe to the touch and flimsier of fabrication than some of the more expensive brands mentioned earlier. These sheets fit our bed perfectly, and are conveniently labeled TOP at one end of the fitted sheet. They’re available in four sizes and in 11 colors, and can also be monogrammed.

    The Company Store Legends Hotel Velvet Flannel Sheets

    $278 for a queen set at Boll & Branch

    Luxury bedding maker Boll & Branch also turns out a lovely flannel set from fair trade organic cotton that is GOTS certified and Oeko-Tex certified to standard 100. Boll & Branch prides itself on sourcing from ethical factories with fair wages and environments. Its flannels are also made in Portugal, and are brushed and sheared for a more velvety finish. The quality of these was noticeable to the touch, and they were sturdy and warm, without overheating, at least in colder temperatures. On warmer nights we found these to be a little too heavy, though, and for the higher price there were other sets we enjoyed just as much as these. They’re a wider fit like many we tested, though not noticeably so. They do come in six different sizes, but only five colors, and you can’t purchase replacements.

    Boll & Branch Flannel Sheet Set

    If you’re looking for a kid-friendly, more affordable set of flannel sheets, Home Fashion Designs at Walmart are a good destination. These 100% Turkish cotton flannel sets are comfy and warm without being too hot and sturdy without being too heavy, and they deliver solid nights of rest. They come in eight cute patterns, including the moose-pine-tree motif we tested, along with penguins, polar bears, winter wonderland and a number of others. Perhaps expected based on the price, Home Fashion Designs did feel of a quality notch below many of the others we tested, but they were certainly comfortable and more than satisfactory. These served a tighter fit than many of the others, which we didn’t mind, per se, but wouldn’t have objected to a little more length on the sides of the top sheet either. You can’t buy replacements, but the price point here makes buying multiples a bit more feasible.

    Home Fashion Designs Flannel Sheets

    Another solid choice in the lower-price category is the cotton flannel set from Mellanni. The main descriptor we noted in evaluating the Mellanni sheet set was “fuzzy” — imagine sleeping with a child’s teddy bear enveloping you. They started out very soft, and after a washing and drying, they got even softer. These fit the bed narrower than a lot of the sets we tested, and we would like a little more to tuck on the sides, thank you very much. These were a runner-up to the Pinzon by Amazon set in the best bargain flannel sheet category, but they just didn’t feel as high-quality as the Pinzon. They offer a lot of variety, though, with six sizes and nine colors at an attractive price.

    Mellanni 100% Cotton Flannel Sheet Set

    At $29 for an entire set of twin sheets, the Threshold Printed Sheets are the least expensive set we tested. For this price range, these are solid and satisfying, but they didn’t rank as our bargain winner because the quality doesn’t feel as high as the other sets. These were the only set that came in a cute bag with a Velcro closure, which is a nice touch. They come in nine cute patterns (floral, plaid and stripes), but note that the pattern is printed only on the top side of the top and fitted sheets, and the pattern-printed side is softer and snugglier than the nonprinted side. These are a warmer sleeper but suitably comfortable, particularly for the price. If this is the price range you seek and you don’t need your sheets to last for decades to come, then we do recommend these.

    Threshold Printed Sheet Set

    [ad_2]

    Source link