ReportWire

Tag: underscored-reviews

  • We tested Anastasia Beverly Hills’s best brow products — here are our top 5 favorites | CNN Underscored

    We tested Anastasia Beverly Hills’s best brow products — here are our top 5 favorites | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    “​​When I started doing eyebrows in the early ‘90s, I wanted to fix my own eyebrows because [they were] pencil thin,” says Anastasia Soare, founder and CEO of Anastasia Beverly Hills. “Then, there were no products for eyebrows; I used to mix aloe vera with Vaseline and some eyeshadow to fill in the perfect shape.”

    So she set out to make the perfect products for every type of brow, created a patented brow-shaping method and, in doing so, became a household name. Now 25 years later, the brand is celebrating its milestone with some of the biggest stars. Bringing Kim Kardashian, Jennifer Lopez, Oprah and other trailblazing women together to toast Anastasia Beverly Hills’ anniversary earlier this week, the glamorous occasion highlighted how Soare introduced brows into luxury beauty.

    While the brand now has a full line of color cosmetics, its brow collection remains its crown jewel. With over a dozen products dedicated to the art of perfect arches, there’s something for all brow types, hair colors and skin types as well (Soare notes that this impacts the way you fill in your brows). From cult-favorite brow pencils to newer launches, we tested 10 Anastasia Beverly Hills brow products to find which ones really measure up.

    Whether you’re after an all-in-one brow product or prefer the control of a multi-step routine, Anastasia’s products meet a variety of needs. They play well together, and plenty of them perform just as great on their own, too. Our review takes into consideration varying makeup skill levels, preferences for a more natural brow versus fully sculpted arches and when our own results differed from the general consensus on top-rated products.

    Five editors participated in the testing, with a variety of hair colors (blonde, auburn and dark brunette) and brow types. From thin and sparse to full and bushy to downright average (my brows are medium-full and medium-thick), we tried Anastasia’s most popular brow products to find the universal winners. Here are the results.

    Anastasia’s answer to the soap brow trend, this styling wax helps hold brows up for a lifted, feathery effect. We loved how natural it looked on, and we found that it kept our brows in place all day without flaking. It has a thick gel-like texture that can feel a bit wet when applying, but it then dries into a waxy pomade. For some, this might feel a bit heavy, but if you’re looking for a strong-holding product for stubborn brows, this will help hold them in place. Two of the testers said that this product was enough for their daily brow look. “I’m a huge fan of a natural, lifted brow, so I used it on its own and loved the way it looked,” says social lead Stephanie Griffin, who defines her natural brows as thin and sparse towards the ends.

    Left: No product. Right: With Brow Freeze.

    Brow Freeze is one of Soare’s own personal favorites, and she uses it as the first step of her brow routine, before filling them in with any color. I tried this method and found that fluffing up my brows with Brow Freeze and giving them a bit of shape before applying any brow pencil or powder actually made it easier to see what areas of my brows needed to be filled in.

    Because the product comes in a pot, you’ll need a spoolie to apply it. Anastasia makes a handy Brow Freeze Applicator — which features one flat end to scoop out a bit of the product, and a spoolie end to actually apply it to the brows — that we found essential for smooth application. “It’s definitely worth it to use as it made the process quick and took seconds to apply,” says social strategist Madison Yerke, who has medium-full, fine brows. Just be careful not to overload the spoolie. “One mistake that people do is they use a little too much,” Soare shares. “It’s going to be too cakey, too much product and you don’t get the best result.” Instead, start small and build from there.

    This retractable brow pencil features a triangular tip to make it easier to outline and fill in brows. Overall, we liked the flexibility that the triangular tip gives for application, and having a retractable format is always convenient compared to a traditional pencil that requires sharpening. We also liked having the spoolie on the other end of the pencil, which can be used for blending and shaping.

    “I found it comes out much more muted and dissipated so making strokes isn’t as precise — which is good for me as a newbie,” says senior lifestyle editor Rachel Lubitz. She appreciated the softer pigment for filling in her full, bushy brows and tested the shade Caramel. “This felt more like a pastel crayon than a pencil, and I mean that in a good way,” she explains. “It came out more faded so you could really build the color and it was less obvious what strokes I had made with it.”

    Left: No product. Right: With Brow Definer in Chocolate.

    We also tested the ultra-thin Brow Wiz, which is a skinny, precision-tip brow pencil and one of the brand’s top-rated products at Sephora. Our testers had middling reviews, however, and noted that while the retractable, thin tip was great for filling in detailed strokes, it wasn’t as blendable as the Brow Definer and applied a bit darker overall. For those who opt for a sculpted brow look on the daily, Brow Wiz could be a worthy addition to your routine, but if it’s a five-minute-face kind of day, Brow Definer is by far the less fussy option.

    A surprise hit for all of the testers, the Dipbrow Pomade was easy to apply and delivered buildable color that defines and shades the brows. Reviews editor Tobey Grumet Segal, who has medium-full brows with sparse ends and tested the product in Medium Brown, notes that the product gives a more done-up effect: “I would use this more for going out in the evenings, not daytime,” she says.

    Even so, each of the editors said they would reach for this over a brow pencil, thanks to its user-friendly pigment (you’ll just need a great eyeliner or slanted brow brush on hand to apply it).

    Left: No product. Right: With Dipbrow Pomade in Caramel.

    “Because I had never used a pomade before I assumed that it would come out as super dark, paint-like strokes in the worst way possible, but this ended up being one of my favorites,” says Lubitz, who tested the Caramel shade. “It comes out pretty light so you can build up too, which is exactly what I need. I’d actually wear it alone, and if it still needed some diffusing i’d go back in with the Brow Definer.” Griffin also thinks it makes a great pairing with the Brow Freeze for an easy two-step brow look.

    Both of Anastasia’s pigmented brow gels performed well in our testing, so it’s truly up to personal preference and what kind of brow look you prefer. “With these two tools it’s an all-in-one product: It brushes out your brows, fills them in with pigment and leaves them feeling and looking fuller all at the same time,” Lubitz says. She tested the Dipbrow Gel in the shade Caramel, and the Tinted Brow Gel in the shade Brunette. Each one provided decent hold and color that didn’t flake or smudge once set.

    Left: No product. Right: With Dipbrow Gel in Espresso.

    The Dipbrow Gel scored slightly higher overall due to its matte color and stronger hold. The Dipbrow Gel is also available in a broader shade range that focuses on ash tones, while the Tinted Brow Gel’s shades are more warm-toned. The main difference between the two products is that they have different applicators.

    The Dipbrow Gel has a cone-shaped spoolie that you can easily brush throughout your entire brow, even towards the ends. On several occasions when I’ve been in a rush to get out the door, I’ve used the Dark Brown Dipbrow Gel alone, quickly brushing it back and forth across my brows (trust me! this helps the pigment reach under the hairs too, so you can completely fill them in) before shaping them in place.

    For those that love a natural brow look, Tinted Brow Gel is a great option. It has a lighter hold and tint that gives a full effect without looking as dramatic as the Dipbrow Gel. The pigment looks a bit shimmery in the bottle, but once it dries there isn’t any noticeable shine or sparkle. I also noticed that the Espresso shade I tested looks a bit lighter in the bottle, but it still goes on a deep brunette.

    The Tinted Brow Gel features a straight spoolie that has longer bristles on one side. The long bristles allow you to brush the pigment throughout the brows, while the shorter ones make it easier to target specific areas. “For the fuller parts of my brows I used the longer brush side, and then flipped it over to the shorter brush side to get my sparser strands in the middle of my brows, which I love to accentuate,” Lubitz explains. Meanwhile, I found that the shorter bristles gave me more control overall and I usually defaulted to using that side.

    Left: No product. Right: With Tinted Brow Gel in Chocolate.

    Yerke preferred the Tinted Brow Gel in the shade Chocolate to the Dipbrow Gel in Dark Brown, which she found smeared easily during application. “[The Tinted Brow Gel] felt a lot lighter to wear and I felt like it blended smoother with my eyebrow shape and texture than the Dipbrow Gel did,” Yerke shares.

    With a collection as robust as Anastasia’s, some products are bound to outperform others. We found that the brand’s brow gels and shaping products were the stars, while the filler products, such as the Brow Pen and Brow Powder Duo, fell short.

    Each of the testers experienced finicky application with the Brow Pen — sometimes it would come out too light if not enough pressure was used, but other times it would come out extremely dark and too pigmented to properly blend. Wiping the applicator in between uses helped with consistency, but maintaining the product just adds another step. Additionally, the color itself wasn’t as long-lasting as the brow pencils we tried.

    “It smudged super easily and it was hard to find my eyebrow’s natural shape,” Yerke says. “The pigment was too hard and the texture was too wet. I’d say the pencil or gel would be longer lasting and allows for more wiggle room when making mistakes. Not to mention that the pen came off super easily. I would recommend this only if you’re looking for a serious, thick, dark brow.”

    On the other hand, the Brow Powder Duo allowed for much softer application, but less precision overall. “Although it was buildable, it was hard to get those natural-looking strokes with a powder formula versus a pencil,” says Griffin. Furthermore, we had mixed feelings about the two-tone pigment. While it includes a lighter and darker shade so you can create dimension for your brow, none of the testers felt confident enough with the product to try the ombré effect.

    It’s worth noting, however, that this is another one of Anastasia’s top-rated products and plenty of people have had success with it, whether creating a gradient look or using both colors simultaneously to create the perfect color match for their brows. “The reason why I have two colors in each is to custom blend,” Soare explains. “The inner part of the eyebrow should be lighter, so you use the light color there, and from the highest part towards the end, you could use the darker color.”

    The last product that we didn’t love is the Pro Pencil, a concealer pencil that can be used to highlight your brow bone, clean up the outline of your brows after filling them in or brighten dark circles. All of the testers found it difficult to blend, and the shade range (it comes in three colors) did not go deep enough for darker skin tones. We concluded that if you want to highlight your brow look, it’s better to reach for an actual highlighter, and if you want to conceal, a cream concealer will give a more natural effect.

    For a prestige beauty brand, Anastasia’s products are user-friendly and fairly priced, especially considering it invented the luxury brow category.

    The closest comparison can be made with Benefit Cosmetics, which is similarly accessible at major retailers and also has a robust offering of popular brow products (which our editors also love), but there are a few spots where you can save a few bucks by opting for Anastasia and achieve similar results. For example, Benefit’s Gimme Brow+ Tinted Volumizing Brow Gel is $26, while Anastasia’s Dipbrow Gel is only $20. Both give virtually the same amount of product and fill and shape the brows with ease. The main difference is the applicator — Benefit’s is a petite spoolie, while Anastasia’s is a bit elongated. I’m personally an Anastasia convert on this one.

    Kimiko, Joey Healy and the just-launched KS&CO are other luxury brow brands with stunning products that our editors have tried and loved, but they aren’t as readily available as Anastasia. And while Joey Healy has some products comparable in performance and price, the others are considerably more expensive as well.

    Left: No product. Right: With Brow Freeze, Brow Definer in Dark Brown and Dipbrow Gel in Dark Brown.

    Anastasia Beverly Hills has been making brow products for 25 years, so you can be assured it knows what it’s doing. Its brow stylers are high-quality, beginner-friendly and easy to find (although certain products have been prone to selling out).

    In researching for this story (read: scouring the pages and pages of Sephora reviews), a pattern popped up: reviewer after reviewer would note how they’ve been using a hero Anastasia product, like the Brow Definer, for three, four, five+ years — which makes it even more exciting that some of our top-performing products in our testing were some of the newer releases, like Brow Freeze. Either way, it’s clear that once you’ve found an Anastasia product you love, you stick with it.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best products we’ve tested in January: Smart locks, standing desks and more | CNN Underscored

    The best products we’ve tested in January: Smart locks, standing desks and more | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    CNN Underscored is constantly testing products — be those earbuds, electric razors or smart scales — to find the absolute best in each respective category. Our testing process is rigorous, starting out by spending hours of research to find the top products in each category. Once we create a testing pool of products, we test and retest each product multiple times in real-world settings over several weeks or even months.

    This year, we’ve already tested dozens of products — from smart locks to standing desks to office chairs — to find the best products you need to make life better. Here are the winning products from January.

    The game offers the series’ best gameplay yet

    The minute-to-minute gameplay in Fire Emblem Engage is the best the Fire Emblem series has offered so far. So if you’re an old-school Fire Emblem fan — and care about great tactical role-playing action — then we think Engage is worth picking up.

    A game with likable characters with fun powers and abilities

    Forspoken is an action role-playing game featuring Frey Holland, a young female protagonist trapped in the land of Athia who must use her newfound magical abilities to find her way home. We liked the game’s likable characters, fun powers and abilities, and interesting story.

    Best smart lock overall

    The Yale Assure Lock 2 is a full-featured replacement smart lock with a sleek, modular design that lets you buy just what you need and upgrade as you like. We found it easy to use and share access to our test home, and it integrates easily with smart HomeKit, Alexa and Google Home.

    Best value smart lock

    Detailed instructions make the affordable Wyze Lock Bolt a breeze to install. It’s simple to use whether you’re just looking to get into your home or share codes with guests, plus we think it looks nicer than other budget locks we tested.

    Best scanner app for mobile overall

    During our testing, we found Genius Scan Ultra to be the fastest scanner app, and also the best at performing text recognition on documents. While saving scanned items, we liked the app’s ability to accurately suggest tags based on location, calendar events and document contents.

    Best video editing app overall

    Filmora Video Editor & Maker is a feature-rich video editing app with the largest and most varied content libraries of all the mobile apps we tested. What’s more, we found we could do more with our two test videos we created with Filmora than with any of the other apps we tested.

    Best office chair overall

    The Steelcase Series 1 stood out during testing as one of the most customizable, high-quality, comfortable office chairs on the market, beating out chairs double the price — and making it the best bang for the buck.

    A stylish, minimalist chair to suit almost any office space

    The Verve Chair is Branch’s most stylish office chair. During testing, we found it comfortable and supportive, and its slimmed-down look and simplified adjustments make it a good fit for home office spaces. Armrest adjustment is limited, and it isn’t for the very tall, but it’s a solid piece of furniture if it matches your measurements.

    Best standing desk overall

    The Branch Adjustable Standing Desk is a near-perfect desk that can handle multiple monitors, dual laptops and a plethora of knickknacks. It’s also incredibly sturdy, with one of the best builds we encountered during testing.

    A luxurious solid-wood standing desk that’s worth the splurge

    While most standing desks we tested use medium density fiberboard (MDF) tops, the Ergonofis Sway’s solid-wood surface gave it a more stable feel and a more luxurious, fine-furniture look than any other ergonomic desk we’ve tested.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple’s new HomePod is cheaper and better than before | CNN Underscored

    Apple’s new HomePod is cheaper and better than before | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Once upon a time, Apple made a pretty great wireless smart speaker called the HomePod. A midsized speaker that plugged into the wall, it delivered better sound than most smart speakers and looked more elegant, too.

    Then Apple decided to stop making the HomePod and focused on the HomePod Mini, its smaller sibling. And now, for whatever reason, the company has decided to make the mid-sized HomePod again. It’s a welcome reversal.

    The new HomePod looks a lot like the old one. It does a few new things. And — shockingly — it costs $50 less. Should you get one? That depends on how into the Apple ecosystem you are. If you don’t own an iPhone or iPad, don’t bother. For everyone else, here’s what we think after nearly a week of testing Apple’s new smart speaker.

    A better Siri speaker

    The second-gen HomePod is a great pick for Apple users who don’t already own the previous model, offering lots of smarts and room-filling sound for a good price. The new version updates its support for smart home devices, includes new sensors and features, and — at $299 — costs less than the original.

    At first glance, it’s hard to see much difference between the new HomePod and the one Apple discontinued in 2021. The new one is a little smaller and has a few design differences, but otherwise looks very similar.

    Inside, the second generation HomePod has fewer drivers than the first generation model — five on the new one versus seven on the original — and yet it actually improves on the overall sound. The new HomePod has a better balance of bass, treble and midrange tones; the original HomePod was very bass heavy.

    That makes for a pleasing listening experience. The bossa nova rhythms on Steve Lacy’s “Mercury” were resonant but didn’t overwhelm the vocals; when listening to Jon Batiste’s “Freedom,” the bass thumped powerfully, while the horns were warm and realistic.

    Its design allows for sound to project 360 degrees, and it features room correction software that will adjust the audio to sound best in the space you put it in.

    In head-to-head comparison with the original HomePod, the first-generation model sounded muddy and less vibrant. There’s no comparison between the HomePod Mini and the HomePod; the larger speaker sounds much bigger and better.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 2

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    The second-generation model adds support for Matter, the new smart home standard. That means you can use it as a hub for controlling non-Apple devices and it should be ready for new smart products as they arrive. Matter is open source and meant to promote interoperability; compatible devices work with Alexa and Google Assistant as well as Siri. I was able to use Siri to turn on an Eve Energy smart plug that uses the Thread standard, which will be upgraded to support Matter.

    The speaker also includes temperature and humidity sensors, which can be used to trigger actions based on conditions in your house, such as adjusting a smart thermostat.

    And, if you double down on your HomePod purchase, you can create a left-right stereo pair. The sound improvement is significant when you use two speakers — it creates a very wide sound, and, if you’re listening to audio mixed for Dolby Atmos, makes the music feel like it’s all around you. (Unfortunately, you can’t create a stereo pair with a first-generation and second-generation speaker.)

    One more small change: the power cord is detachable — something that neither the original HomePod or HomePod Mini offered.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 6

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    In a very un-2023 move, the HomePod’s price dropped from $349 to $299. A big criticism of the original HomePod was its price. While $299 isn’t cheap, it makes it more competitive with options such as the $219 Sonos One.

    I found that I liked the HomePod’s overall sound better than the Sonos One, as well as the Sonos Move, an excellent-sounding speaker that costs $399. The Move has the advantage of being portable, though.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 4

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    You need an iPhone or iPad to set up the HomePod — there’s no way around that requirement. And to get software updates, you need to use the Home app. The Home app is also where you can adjust Siri’s settings on the HomePod, set up automations, and create a stereo pair with another second-generation HomePod. So if you don’t own an iPhone or iPad, skip the HomePod.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 5

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    The only way to connect to the HomePod is over Wi-Fi. There’s no Bluetooth option and it lacks an auxiliary input. An auxiliary input would be especially welcome when using two HomePods as a stereo pair; that setup begs to have a turntable connected to it.

    The good thing about using Wi-Fii is that the audio quality is higher than you’d get over Bluetooth, but more input options would increase the usefulness of the speaker.

    You also can’t do much to adjust the sound. While it has room correction software, it doesn’t have an EQ. The only option you have is to reduce bass (you’ll find this in the Home app).

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 8

    Michael Gowan/CNN

    Siri works just fine most of the time for typical smart speaker commands: asking it to play songs, adjust the volume or set a timer. But it did struggle sometimes to act on my request, and it doesn’t quite have the range of Alexa or Google Assistant. For example, you can get Siri to play music from some services other than Apple Music, such as Pandora and Deezer, but Spotify isn’t one of them (Siri can control Spotify on the iPhone, but Spotify hasn’t enabled that feature on the HomePod).

    Size and weight

    6.6 x 5.6 inches, 5.16 pounds

    3.9 x 3.3 inches, 0.76 pounds

    6.36 x 4.9 inches, 4.08 pounds

    Drivers

    Five tweeters, 4-inch woofer

    Dual radiators, full-ranger driver

    Two digital amplifiers, one tweeter, one midwoofer

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Colors

    White, Midnight

    Space Gray, Blue, White, Yellow, Orange

    White, Black

    Smart assistant options

    Siri

    Siri

    Alexa, Google Assistant, Sonos Voice Control

    Price

    $299



    $99



    $219

    As a satisfied owner of the first-generation HomePod, I didn’t see anything in the specs or appearance of the new one that would make me want to upgrade. But the second-generation HomePod makes a strong case. It sounds better, has more features and costs less than the original.

    It isn’t for everyone. If you don’t have an iPhone or iPad, or you mainly use Spotify, you’re better off with a Sonos One or Move. And the HomePod isn’t portable, which may limit its appeal to you.

    But if those things don’t put you off, the HomePod will make Siri more useful to you and brings better sound to your home. Which makes you wonder why Apple stopped making it in the first place — a decision I’m glad it corrected.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best electric razors in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best electric razors in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Electric razors have improved by leaps and bounds in recent years. Unlike the bulky, uncomfortable and not-all-that-effective buzzers you may have tried in the past, the latest models can easily serve as your primary grooming tool. Even manual razor purists can’t deny the convenience of an electric razor, which lets you shave dry, allowing you the option of a close, comfortable shave without shaving cream (or even a bathroom sink) when you’re in a hurry. And wet-dry models can do both, letting you choose whichever method is most convenient on a given day.

    We tested 14 of the most popular electric razors on the market, using them for weeks in our personal shaving routine. We evaluated them on overall shaving performance, ease of use, how easy they were to maintain and clean and their convenience for travel.

    The best electric razor overall

    The Arc5’s five-blade head gave us one of the closest, smoothest shaves in our testing, and that, along with an assortment of high-end features — an ergonomic handle, useful digital display and an effective cleaning dock — made it the best electric shaver overall in our testing.

    The best electric razor on a budget

    A no-frills electric shaver that delivers a surprisingly effective shaving experience at an affordable price. It’s dry-shave only, and not as easy to clean as top models, but it gives you an impressively clean shave for the money.

    A great splurge electric razor

    If you’re looking for a close, smooth and speedy shave and you’re willing to spend a bit more money, the Braun Series 9 will give you that, along with better build quality, an easier to use cleaning dock and an AirPod-style charging case in a luxurious package that’s worth the extra money.

    Combining a high-performance shave with straightforward, user-friendly operation, the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 was an easy choice as my top pick. With its five-blade head and cleaning/charging dock, you’re getting the perks of a high-end model without the intimidating price tag.

    The Panasonic Arc5 LV95 performed well in my shaving tests, delivering a comfortable and surprisingly fast shave across the board: about 3 minutes total to take care of my three-day beard. The five-blade head — four foils and a trimming cutter — worked together to efficiently tackle longer, flat-lying hairs in my three-day growth test, and gave a really close shave the next day during my maintenance shave. I also appreciated that the pivoting head can be locked in place, which is convenient for precision work.

    The ergonomic handle gave the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 a well-balanced, lightweight feel in my hand too, and the textured rubber sides ensured a sturdy grip. The trimmer accessory flips up from the back of the razor head, and made it easy to clean up my sideburns or stray hairs under my nose or neck.

    My favorite feature of the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 — and a great example of its utilitarian design — is the travel lock. A low-profile lever under the power button toggles the lock on and off, with a simple padlock icon to indicate its use. I found this physical control more convenient than the  “hold down the power button for 3 seconds” method used by some other razors, and it took any guesswork out of whether it was activated or not.

    Cleaning the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 can be done either manually by removing the cassette head, or using the included cleaning station. When cleaning manually under the faucet, a “sonic cleaning mode” vibrates the blades extremely quickly for 20 seconds to better dislodge dirt and hair as you rinse it, a feature that made it noticeably more effective than most other razor models. If you prefer a more set-it-and-forget-it method, simply pop the razor into the cleaning station and select the ”clean” mode.

    It's easy to pop off the Panasonic Arc5's head for manual cleaning.

    This process takes about 10 minutes, and although it’s much louder than I expected, I found that the competing Braun stations were equally noisy. The main drawback to the Panasonic cleaning station is that it uses an open reservoir into which you pour a mix of a detergent packet and water, as opposed to using resealable pods like Braun. This means that if you decide to travel with a Panasonic cleaning station, you’ll have to dump out the detergent, which is not ideal.

    The digital display of the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 is simple and provides all of the information you need at a glance. A circular battery level indicator lets you know how long you have before the razor needs a recharge, and a cleaning mode icon tells you when the sonic cleaning mode is initiated. This display also features an automatic timer, which lets you know exactly how long your shaving session lasted (handy for testing, though it may not have much of an impact on your daily routine).

    While the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 isn’t exactly cheap, the user-friendly design, great performance and comfortable shaving experience make it worth the price.

    The Remington F5-5800 electric razor

    I’ll admit that I had my doubts when unboxing the Remington F5-5800, but as soon as I started shaving with it, I understood why it’s been such a popular razor for so long. Although it has an unconventional shape and lacks the sleek, modern look of more recent, higher-end models, the Remington F5-5800 delivers a surprisingly effective shaving experience at a fraction of the price.

    The curved body was a little awkward to hold at first, but I quickly came to appreciate how it naturally placed the blade head in a convenient position for shaving. This design, combined with a pivoting head, made it really easy to comfortably maneuver around the contours of my jaw. Although the head lacks any side-to-side movement, I never felt limited in the flexibility department, so we don’t think this is a drawback; a razor doesn’t need to offer 360-degree pivoting to give you a good shave. Our splurge pick, the nearly flawless Braun Series 9 Pro, also only provides back-and-forth pivoting.

    Its three-blade head — two foils and a single trimming element — gave a close, really comfortable shave, even on my thick, three-day beard. It handled my maintenance shave easily as well, and the pop-up trimmer was perfectly adequate for finishing off any hard-to-reach hairs and evening up my sideburns.

    The Remington F5-5800 lacks a display screen, but a row of LEDs clearly displays the battery level in 20% increments. Although it can be cleaned with water, the Remington F5-5800 is not a wet-dry shaver, which does limit its usefulness a bit. But a major plus, and a feature not found on many other razors, is its ability to operate when the charging cord is plugged in, so you’re not out of luck if you’ve forgotten to charge.

    My major complaint with the Remington F5-5800 is that it feels flimsy compared to more expensive razors — the build quality of the head and blade setup doesn’t feel up to the same level as our overall pick, and some of the functional details aren’t as well thought out. The blade cover doesn’t use any latch or lever mechanism for removal, instead requiring you to grip and pull it off for cleaning, which is not always easy with wet or slippery fingers. Inside, the individual blades were also not fixed to the unit itself, and would fall out when I opened it. These blades were simple to put back in place and stable in use, but the arrangement made cleaning more inconvenient than with the other models we tested.

    Given this, we don’t know if the Remington F5-5800 can offer the long-term durability of our top picks, but it does have a solid reputation. If you’re looking for a cheap, effective dry-shaving razor and don’t need a bunch of bells and whistles, it is a great choice.

    The Braun Series 9 Pro electric razor

    If you want the closest, most comfortable and speediest shave and you’re not concerned about spending quite a bit to get it, the Braun Series 9 Pro is a great choice. It’s clearly a high-quality tool, the latest in a series that the company has been developing for years, with an obvious focus on providing a superior shaving performance.

    The Series 9 Pro has a solid feel, with rubber sides and a textured thumb grip that make it easy to maintain control as you shave. It also made us worry a lot less about accidentally dropping it into the sink or on the counter during use. First, it seems unlikely, and second, it feels built to survive any minor mishap. It felt like a better-built tool than even the other ultra-high-end razor we tested, the Panasonic Arc6.

    My favorite feature of the Braun Series 9 Pro is its multifunctional blade setup, which makes it one of the more versatile razors I tested. With two foils, a standard trimming element and a “ProLift” trimmer, the Braun Series 9 Pro is designed to capture and trim both short and long hairs, as well as awkwardly angled hairs.

    The blades aren’t just there for show — the Braun really delivers on shave speed and quality. I was most surprised at how well, and more importantly, how fast these blades worked, especially during my three-day beard test. I was able to completely shave my three-day beard in about 1 minute and 30 seconds, noticeably faster than the still-speedy Panasonic Arc5 LV95, which clocked in at nearly 3 minutes. It was no surprise that this blade setup also made for one of the most comfortable shaves in my testing, with zero irritation issues.

    You can clean the Braun Series 9 Pro either by popping off the cassette cover and rinsing it under water, or using the cleaning station. Unlike a lot of other models that required a frustrating amount of tugging and squeezing to remove their cassette covers, the Braun Series 9 Pro features two release buttons on either side of the head that allow you to pop it right off. This convenient and functional design (it reattaches with a nice solid click too), only added to my confidence in its overall construction.

    The charging dock/cleaning station ensures that the razor is easy to grab whenever you need it, and you never have to worry about plugging and unplugging a separate power cord every time you want to charge it.

    The dock is easy to use, too. The included cleaning cartridge was simple to slide into place and made things less messy than the dock used with the Panasonic Arc5, which required us to mix our own cleaning solution.

    Once you’re set up, you simply place the razor into the charging dock, press the start button and that’s it. The razor automatically chooses the intensity level of cleaning required. The unexpected noise level of the cleaning mode — it’s loud — was the only real drawback to the Braun Series 9 Pro, although cleaning only took a few minutes.

    The Braun Series 9 Pro also includes a “power case,” an upgraded version of the zippered storage case offered by other razors that works a bit like the charging cases you’re probably familiar with from Apple AirPods and other true wireless headphones. The magnetic lid and sturdy, hard-sided design of this case not only protect the razor during transport, but provide extra power if the razor’s battery runs low. I also really appreciated the dedicated mount for the small cleaning brush, the only razor in my testing pool to offer this.

    For someone who wants their morning routine to be as efficient as possible, without sacrificing comfort or performance, the Braun Series 9 Pro could definitely be worth the investment.

    Best Electric Razors Group Photo

    Alex Rennie/CNN Underscored

    If you love using a manual razor and relish your morning ritual, no, you probably don’t need an electric razor. But if you find that you don’t always have time for a manual shave, dislike the high cost of cartridges or you share a sink with a disorganized roommate, an electric razor can make your routine easier.

    The most obvious benefit of an electric razor is its ability to dry-shave your face. This means that unlike cartridge or safety razors that tether you to a sink and water supply, electric razors let you shave anywhere, which is great if you’re running late for work. You can complete your morning shave anywhere: in the parking lot before walking into work, an office restroom or an airport bathroom after a red-eye flight. (We’ve even seen commuters shaving while they’re stopped at red lights, but we don’t recommend it.)

    Those who want to avoid nicks and cuts or razor bumps will also appreciate the safety of an electric razor. While they can still cause some razor burn if used incorrectly, their blades don’t actually come in contact with your skin, so it’s highly unlikely that you’ll get nicked or scratched, and since they cut your facial hair slightly above the skin’s surface rather than flush like a manual razor, you’re less likely to get razor bumps from ingrown hairs if you have coarse, curly facial hair.

    Even if you prefer to use your favorite shaving cream or gel, most electric razors are “wet/dry” models; the higher-end models we tested are waterproof and can even be used in the shower. Wet shaving with an electric razor doesn’t provide quite the same satisfying feel as using lather with a manual razor, however. Instead of removing foam and hair in uniform strokes, you’re just kind of moving the foam around your face as you go. You’ll get the job done, but don’t expect the same sort of ritual.

    Electric razors have a bit of a learning curve, but once you understand how their blades work and take the time to read their instruction manuals, they’re pretty straightforward.

    Foil razors have thin metal screens that allow your facial hairs to slip through, where they’re cut by a series of small blades vibrating back and forth. Longer hairs can have difficulty entering these small holes, which is why most foil razors also feature a trimmer element with a larger opening. Rotary razors use the same basic concept, but use circular spinning blades and covers that allow beard hairs to slip through. They don’t cut as close as a manual razor — they trim the hair at the inner surface of the foil, so a bit above the skin surface — but today’s foils are very thin to begin with, and multiple elements do a thorough job.

    When shaving with a foil razor, you’ll want to position the head at a 90-degree angle to your face and use light pressure to run it against the grain of your beard. Use your other hand to stretch the skin tight, giving the razor as much tight, flat skin as you can. Your beard grain can change around your neck, so you may need to change your stroke direction in order to capture and trim those hairs.

    With the foil razors we tested, a mix of vertical and horizontal strokes helped smooth out any stubborn areas. For rotary razors, circular strokes are recommended.

    For especially hard-to-reach areas like directly under your nose, stubborn long hairs you just can’t seem to cut or straight sideburns, use the trimmer tool.

    Regardless of the type of razor you use, make sure to use gentle pressure at first to avoid causing irritation or razor burn, which you can still get even through an electric razor’s foil if you push down excessively to catch stubborn growth.

    To choose the best razor for you, the most important factor to consider is your personal shaving routine and frequency.

    If you’re a strict daily shaver, you can probably get away with a simpler — and usually cheaper — model.

    The situation is different if you aren’t an everyday shaver. Electric razors can struggle with longer growth since longer hairs have trouble making their way through the foil. So if you shave infrequently, you’ll benefit from a razor that includes at least one trimming blade in addition to the foil blades. While the foils are best suited for dealing with short stubble, these trimming blades have a larger opening perfect for capturing long or low-lying hairs.

    You should also think about whether you want a razor that includes a cleaning station. While most electric razors are easy to clean yourself by simply popping off the head cover and running under the faucet, if you shave daily, the frequency of this process can be a pain. A dedicated cleaning station uses a solution to thoroughly clean your razor head at the push of a button. These stations can be noisy and add to the overall price, but they do all the work for you, and most double as a charging dock as well.

    When it comes to razor type, I personally didn’t feel much difference between the performance of foil versus rotary models. My research does point towards rotary razors delivering a slightly-less-close shave though, and they can be slightly more irritating to those with sensitive skin.

    We tested each razor initially with a three-day beard. Here, the Panasonic Arc5 makes short work of the growth, giving us a close, clean shave.

    We ran each razor through a comprehensive testing process to better understand their specific differences and accurately compare one versus another. It’s important to note that since everyone’s skin and hair type are different, personal preference will be more subjective with electric razors than other products. I did my best to use my personal experience as more of a comparison tool, instead of concrete fact in regards to comfort and skin irritability. It’s also important to remember that my testing window was relatively brief, and that it can take up to three weeks to fully see how your skin reacts to a razor. I will use my long-term testing results to update this article.

    Since a major selling point of electric razors is their convenience, it’s important that they’re easy to use. Straightforward operation not only translates into a quicker shave — essential for mornings when time is an issue — but a safer one as well. A razor that’s challenging to use is more likely to result in improper technique that results in skin irritation. I evaluated each model’s overall usability and ease of use, noting if the operational controls seemed unnecessarily complicated or if any display screens were too cluttered or vague to be useful. I thoroughly reviewed each razor’s instruction manual as well, evaluating it on how well it explained the specific technique to use the razor properly, as well as how to use any additional features.

    To test the shaving capability of each razor, I first grew a three-day beard and shaved each side of my face with a different razor. I compared how effectively each razor fared with these longer hairs, specifically if they struggled and needed several passes to complete the job. I then used the same razors the next day to judge how they worked as a daily “maintenance” tool. During these tests I noted how the razors felt in my hand, how comfortable the head and blades felt on my face and how close the overall shave felt when I was finished. I also noted their ability to easily maneuver and access challenging areas like under my nose or around my mouth. If applicable, I also tested each razors wet-shave function by shaving with shaving cream.

    After my shaving tests, I cleaned each razor according to its specific cleaning instructions. I noted whether or not removing the razor head was easy or frustrating, and how effectively their small brushes swept away debris. I also evaluated the ease of use and overall performance of any cleaning stations, noting any issues with loading cleaning detergent, noise levels and cleaning mode times.

    Since electric razors are touted for their travel convenience, I compared the type and quality of their travel locks and storage cases, as well as their overall size and weight. Finally, I packed all 14 razors into my luggage for a cross-country flight for a real-world test of their usefulness on the road.

    I really enjoyed the close, comfortable shave I got with this compact, inexpensive rotary razor, but the cluttered design and “light stimulation” LEDs seemed at best more trouble than they were worth and at worst just counterproductive. These three LEDs can be switched from blue (to, the company claims, reduce the appearance of acne) to red (which Mowbie claims can rejuvenate the skin) or switched off for a standard shave. While using the LEDs, the manual directs you to “keep the device in the same area for 3 minutes at a time for maximum benefits,” which seemed contrary to best practices for an effective shave. A disclaimer on the Mowbie website didn’t inspire much confidence in the effectiveness of these lights either. All that said, while the lights don’t seem worth it, I loved the compact size, light weight and comfort of the rotary blades, which tackled my three-day growth and maintenance shaves equally well.

    The bright yellow color of this wet/dry Wahl shaver is a refreshing alternative to black and silver options (and makes it easy to find in your bag if you take it with you on the road), and it’s affordable. It wasn’t comfortable to shave with, however, and struggled to cut longer, low-lying neck hairs during my three-day shave test. It also doesn’t have a visual battery level indicator, just a single “low battery” LED to let you know when it’s running low. That said, its ergonomic rubber grip and thick plastic body give it a nice heavy-duty feel, so along with the bright color it is a practical option for travelers who keep it ready in a suitcase or commuters who want something for the glovebox. It just won’t necessarily give you the closest, most comfortable shave. Plus it has a 5-year warranty, the longest of any razor I tested.

    The Panasonic Arc4 wet-dry model was a popular option several years ago, and remains on the market, but advancements in design and technology ultimately put more current models ahead of it on my list. The four cutting elements provided a comfortable, close shave in my testing, especially on longer neck hairs, but the bulky head required a bit of a learning curve to use comfortably. This razor is really easy to clean, too; just pop off the cassette and run it under the faucet. I also appreciated the physical travel lock, which I feel is just easier to use than models that require an extended press of the power button to activate. It’s still a good razor, but if you want a slimmer head with the same cutting power, it’s worth stepping up to a newer Panasonic or getting the more-advanced Braun Series 7 7071cc.

    This multifunctional device is an all-in-one small bath or travel solution, and features a detachable handle, allowing you to swap out the razor head for the included nose/ear trimmer or toothbrush attachments. Although I appreciated its minimal design and straightforward operation, I found the razor attachment lacking in function and performance. It wasn’t able to shave as close as the other options I tested, and the fixed head was less comfortable to maneuver around my jaw. Even though I probably wouldn’t recommend this as your primary razor, it could certainly be convenient as a travel option, especially since it includes a high-quality and roomy storage bag to keep all the extra pieces organized.

    I loved the compact size and comfortable, ergonomic handle of this razor, and the pivoting head gave a great shave during testing. The main drawback of this model is the design of the cleaning/charging station, which automatically initiates a cleaning cycle every time you place the razor inside to charge. The surprisingly loud cleaning cycle makes this especially annoying. You can also charge the razor by plugging it into the cord itself, but this does defeat half the purpose of the dock. The instruction manual was also inexplicably vague, using basic illustrations and almost zero written instructions. (I also tested the Braun Series 7 7085cc, which is almost identical, but is black instead of silver.)

    Andis reSurge

    This Andis razor has a solid, high-quality feel and along with the Andis Profoil Shaver, received high praise from my barber. I personally had issues with its ability to shave longer neck hairs during my testing, which was especially inconvenient due to the lack of a separate trimmer. The head cover was also really difficult to remove for cleaning, and took a few minutes of tugging to finally pry it off. I did appreciate the slick minimal look though, and the magnetic head cover really makes it feel like a high-end tool.

    The unique blade design of the Philips Norelco OneBlade made it one of the most enjoyable razors I tested. Its compact wet-dry head is even smaller than the one on the manual razor I usually use, allowing me to clearly see my shaving area as I went. This combines the convenience of a dry shave with the precision and satisfaction of a manual shaver. This narrow blade does require a few more passes than traditional electric razors, but since it’s essentially a high-performance trimmer, you won’t have to go over the same area multiple times. It did give a slightly less close shave than multi-blade razors, making it better suited to precision trimming and two- to three-day shaves. A multi-blade option would probably be a better choice for daily users.

    Andis Profoil Shaver

    I was really impressed with the performance of this little razor, and the enthusiastic recommendation from my barber gave me confidence that it’s durable enough to last a long time. Even though it lacks the pivoting head of higher-priced models, the flat shape, staggered foils and practically weightless body made this razor easy to angle around the contours of my face. It’s not waterproof though, so you won’t be able to wet shave or clean this razor under the faucet. That said, if you’re looking for a no-frills, dry-shave razor, stop looking and just buy this one.

    If price is no object, and you want a high-performance tool that looks and feels like the Ferrari of razors, the Panasonic Arc 6 is probably what you’re looking for. Its six-blade head (the most of any electric razor) gave an efficient and close shave, and the ultra-smooth head movement had no trouble traversing the contours of my jaw. Although this blade variety and flexibility makes the Panasonic Arc 6 well-suited to tackle a wide variety of hair lengths and types, it would probably be overkill for everyday shavers. Keep in mind that our “splurge” pick, the Braun Series 9 Pro, does a similarly great job and can be had for about $150 less.

    This rotary shaver was a real joy to use, and I was surprised at how well its relatively bulky head was able to reach tighter areas, like under my nose and lips. It also features smartphone connectivity and a mobile app, which monitors your shaving data and provides tips and feedback on your pressure and technique. This app seemed like overkill and likely will be for most, but I could see it being useful for a first-time shaver, or those trying to diagnose the cause of a shaving-related skincare issue. Although the cleaning station is much more compact than other models I tested, it was a bit messy to use, and also does not double as a charging dock.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Ergonofis Sway is a luxurious standing desk with a fine-furniture top and elegant controls | CNN Underscored

    The Ergonofis Sway is a luxurious standing desk with a fine-furniture top and elegant controls | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A standing desk is a standing desk — or is it? Maybe if you’re just looking at it as a way to be less sedentary, but there’s more to a piece of furniture than that.

    Since these ergonomic tools are now widely accepted, the standing desk is a mature concept and many brands are using the same good-quality generic lift legs and controller mechanisms. This means you’re more likely to get a good desk whatever you choose, but also means that you see a lot of samey desks out there.

    But it also means that you have more choices and can zero in on what matters, whether that’s value or the quality of the top and accessories. Our recommendations for the best standing desk mostly use MDF tops — the solid, durable engineered material that makes up a lot of the furniture you likely own — and because of that you can get them in a huge range of finishes, profiles, and sizes to suit your office.

    But the Canadian brand Ergonofis is among the manufacturers who have gone in a different direction, with desktops and a range of accessories and add-ons fabricated from solid woods. And after a couple of months of using one, we think that if you can afford it, the fine-furniture quality top really does separates it from the MDF models. It looks fantastic and the extra heft makes for a very solid work surface, especially noticeable when standing.

    A luxurious solid-wood standing desk that’s worth the splurge

    While most standing desks we’ve tested use MDF tops, the Sway’s solid-wood surface gave it a more stable feel and more luxurious, fine-furniture look and feel than any other ergonomic desk we’ve tried.

    The nicest thing about the Sway is that after using several MDF-topped desks it looks and feels like a piece of fine furniture, not just a tool for work. It’s great if you want your home office to look more “home” than “office” while still taking advantage of the ergonomic benefits of a mechanized desktop.

    Our sample Sway desk, with a solid cherry top (it’s a serious 1.25-inch thick slab of lumber, beautifully finished), matching monitor bridge/shelf and storage drawer, arrived impeccably and securely packaged — should you get one, you can put aside any worries you might have about the wood top getting damaged in transit.

    It looks great, and based on our experience so far the surface should weather nicely over time rather than chipping or discoloring like manufactured surfaces can. We managed to put a small ding in the edge of the drawer front while assembling (apologies!), but frankly it just looks like natural imperfection in the wood and doesn’t detract. The surfaces overall have a rich, robust surface with visible grain that looks great and feels good to the touch. Ergonofis includes a leather coaster for your coffee; a nice touch that’ll help protect the desk.

    The wooden top (we tested in the 30” X 60” size) is quite heavy, assembly was simple, with everything clearly laid out and the directions clear, so we were up and running pretty quickly. The frame (which uses the well-regarded Linak motor drive) includes built-in cable management, so it was easy to keep everything tidy under the desk (the desk ships with a cable net which does the job nicely; we opted for the cable management grid that provides tie-down points and a power bar).

    Once we settled in for use, programming the controller was a breeze. The touchscreen brain can be set up to recall standing and seated positions for four users, and the commands are intuitive. The touch panel itself is beautiful, easy to read even in bright sun, intuitive to use and seems very solidly built. You can set up standing and sitting heights for four users (great if you’re sharing a space) and it’s simple to make small adjustments on the fly — really among the easiest interfaces we’ve tried.

    The monitor shelf Ergonofis supplies simply sits on the desktop (it comes premounted with felt pads), but it was completely stable even loaded with a 32

    The coordinated solid-wood monitor bridge (starting at $195) is a great addition, and while it simply rests on the desktop on felt pads it is stable enough to hold a 32” 4K monitor and a pair of substantial studio monitor speakers without any creaking or wobbling, even while raising and lowering the desk repeatedly.

    The Ergonofis touchpad controller is intuitive and responsive and we enjoyed using it, but the raised glass surface means you can't set down something flat securely on that corner of the desk.

    The Sway uses lovely materials and is a pleasure to use, but that comes at a price — this is an expensive desk. Depending on what species you choose, the Sway can cost from $100 to around $300 more than what an equivalent solid-wood top would cost you from Uplift, who build our favorite standing desk overall (we tested and recommended their MDF-topped model).

    While Ergonofls offers a wide range of convenient accessories, from laptop stands to drawer units, you don’t get quite the number of options Uplift offers (there’s no choice of C-versus T-style lift legs, for instance), and a cable management system isn’t included in the overall price as it is for Uplift’s desks. Ergonofis’ very substantial power and cable management grid and privacy screen is a $235 extra while a simpler power supply/power strip is a little cheaper at $70, but either one brings the overall package price a bit higher than Uplift’s similarly spec’d higher-end offerings.

    And while we love the smooth operation and memory capabilities, the top mounted controller surface does take up precious desktop real estate, and we found ourselves wishing occasionally for a side- or under-the-top mounting (a la Uplift’s solutions) so we could lay something flat across that corner of the desktop. We actually prefer the controller mounting system used on the company’s cheaper Shift standing desk, which places the controls out of the way under the desk surface.

    The Sway is a beautiful desk — one of the nicest standing desks we’ve tried over the years and something that’ll look good in most home offices. It’s easy to share between two people, has plenty of range, is stable and feels great, and if you’re looking to spend more time on your feet in your home office but you want something that looks more like a piece of fine furniture than most models you’ll find on the market, it’s a great choice and you’ll enjoy using it.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The 2023 MacBook Pro makes our favorite premium laptop even better | CNN Underscored

    The 2023 MacBook Pro makes our favorite premium laptop even better | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    The 2021 MacBook Pro marked a return to form for Apple’s highest-end laptop, ditching the stuff we didn’t like (see ya, Touch Bar), bringing back the stuff we did (ports! A MagSafe charger!) and loading it up with the best performance we’d ever seen on a Mac laptop. As such, it’s no surprise Apple didn’t bother adding any new features to its new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros for 2023 — the company just made them even more ridiculously powerful.

    Powered by your choice of Apple’s new M2 Pro or M2 Max processor, the new MacBook Pro is the fastest laptop we’ve ever tested by almost every metric, toppling nearly all competitors on our benchmark tests while making light work of heavy real-world workloads and graphically demanding games. It’s an even better version of our upgrade pick for best laptop, and an easy recommendation for power users willing to invest in the best Apple has to offer.

    But is it the right upgrade for you? After many, many hours of working, video calling and gaming on a 14-inch M2 Pro model, here’s who I think should — and shouldn’t — buy one.

    The best high-end laptop

    If you’re a creative professional, a hardcore power user, or simply feel like splurging on the best that Apple has to offer, the 14-inch MacBook Pro is the laptop to get. It’s an especially great upgrade for first-time Pro buyers, or anyone coming from an old Intel model.

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    The latest 14-inch MacBook Pro is physically identical to the model that launched in 2021, which is to say that it’s the best-designed Mac you can currently buy. What I said about the 2021 MacBook Pro still applies here — it offers the best display, keyboard and ports of any Apple laptop. I’ve tested tons of notebooks in the year-plus since the previous 14-inch MacBook Pro arrived, and getting my hands on the new model was a reminder that none of them feel quite as good to use.

    I was delighted to get my fingers back on the MacBook Pro’s excellent Magic Keyboard, which thankfully ditches the gimmicky Touch Bar for big, satisfying function keys. The Pro’s 14.2-inch Liquid Retina XDR display remains one of the best I’ve ever used on a laptop, with rich colors that made watching movies a joy and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate that allowed me to glide around web pages much more fluidly than I can on Apple’s lower-end Macs. Yes, there’s still a notch up top that allows for the thin bezel, and yes, I’m personally still fine with it. The new MacBook Pro’s booming six-speaker setup filled my entire living room with the sounds of boygenius’ intricate vocal harmonies, and the laptop’s 1080p webcam once again captured my face with much better clarity than most of Apple’s rivals.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 4

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    You still get a much better port selection than Apple’s 13-inch MacBooks, with three Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI, an SDXC card slot, a headphone jack with high-impedance support and a convenient snap-on MagSafe charger that will keep your laptop from going flying if someone trips on the wire. New for the 2023 models is support for up to four monitors on an M2 Max model (up from three on the previous gen) as well as multichannel audio output when connected to an HDMI display. This is truly the ultimate MacBook, and we haven’t even talked about performance yet.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 10

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    The M1 Pro-powered MacBook Pro delivered record-breaking speeds when we tested it back in 2021, and Apple has managed to outdo itself by a significant margin on our M2 Pro model. This is the fastest laptop I’ve ever used, delivering a blazingly responsive experience for everyday tasks while trouncing all of the competition on our demanding performance tests.

    Unsurprisingly, the latest MacBook Pro didn’t break a sweat under my usual workload of Slack, Outlook, Discord, Zoom and way too many Chrome tabs, staying cool, quiet and free of any nasty slowdown while I multitasked. But our benchmark results tell the real story of just how powerful this thing is.

    On the Geekbench 5 multi-core test (which gauges overall multitasking performance), the new MacBook Pro scored a whopping 15,302 — that’s nearly double what we got from the M2 MacBook Air, triple the results of the Surface Laptop Studio and an impressive 37% gain over the already speedy 2021 model.

    The latest MacBook Pro was similarly dominant on our graphics tests, rendering the visually demanding action of Shadow of the Tomb Raider — in 1080p with all settings cranked up — at a smooth and highly playable 55 frames per second. That’s a notable improvement over the 47 fps we got from the M1 Pro model as well as the Surface Laptop Studio (the latter of which has dedicated Nvidia graphics), and nearly double the sub-par framerates we got from the latest M2-powered MacBooks.

    MacBook Pro 14-inch (M2 Pro)

    MacBook Pro 14-inch (M1 Pro)

    MacBook Pro 13-inch (M2)

    Surface Laptop Studio (Intel Core i7, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti)

    Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

    15,032

    12,463

    8,904

    5,108

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider (1080p, max settings)

    55 fps

    47 fps

    29 fps

    47 fps

    Battery test (4K video playback)

    7 hours, 50 minutes

    6 hours, 36 minutes

    6 hours, 4 minutes

    8 hours, 14 minutes

    The spooky cinematic horror of Resident Evil Village ran like a dream on the new MacBook Pro, as I frantically fought my way through hordes of disturbingly detailed werewolves at a silky 80 to 100 fps — and that was with “prioritize graphics” mode on. The framerate got a small boost from Apple’s new MetalFX upscaling tech, which optimizes games for Mac hardware on the fly and is set to also come to upcoming releases like No Man’s Sky and Grid Legends. This is the best triple-A gaming experience I’ve had on a Mac so far, and while MacOS still can’t compete with the massive selection of titles available on Windows gaming laptops, the M2 Pro’s spectacular performance has me hopeful for the future. It’s worth noting that while Apple’s laptop stayed impressively quiet for most activities, the fans did audibly whir up during my more intensive Tomb Raider and Resident Evil sessions.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 2

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    From juggling a workday’s worth of tasks to tearing through the latest blockbuster titles, the new MacBook Pro’s performance is in a class of its own. And here’s the scary part — the M2 Pro model we tested isn’t even the most powerful option out there.

    The 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros can be outfitted with Apple’s even faster M2 Max chips (starting at $2,899), which promise up to 30 percent better graphics performance than the previous generation and offer significantly more memory bandwidth. We’ve yet to test the M2 Max for ourselves, but on the last-gen Macs, we saw a 39% increase in GPU performance from M1 Pro to M1 Max. Those who have a truly grueling workload — whether it be editing 8K video or working with complex 3D graphics — may want to consider the Max, but most creatives should be set for a while even if they opt for the base M2 Pro chip.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 11

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    The new MacBook Pro should get most people through an average workday on the road, but you’ll still want to keep your charger handy. Apple’s notebook lasted a solid 7 hours and 50 minutes on our battery test, which consists of continuous 4K video playback. That’s more than an hour longer than the previous 14-inch model (6:36), and much better than the roughly 6 hours we got from the latest 13-inch MacBook Pro. However, we got slightly better results from Microsoft’s Surface Laptop 5 and Laptop Studio, both of which clocked in at a little over 8 hours.

    It’s also worth noting that while our usual day-to-day multitasking didn’t make much of a dent in the MacBook Pro’s battery, activities like video calls — and especially a few hours of Resident Evil Village — proved to be a significant drain. As such, make sure to pack that power brick accordingly.

    Fortunately, once our MacBook Pro did tap out, the included 67W power adapter did a good job juicing it back up quickly. Apple’s notebook is billed as being able to get a 50% charge in just 30 minutes, which is largely in line with my testing.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 5

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    It should go without saying, but the latest MacBook Pros are an investment — especially if you plan on upgrading them with better processors, memory and storage.

    The 14-inch model starts at $1,999, which gets you an Apple M2 Pro chip with a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU (more cores = better performance) in addition to 16GB of memory, 512GB of SSD storage and a 67W power adapter. We tested an upgraded model with a 12-core CPU/ 19-core GPU, 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage, which brought the total cost to a whopping $3,299. And that’s far from a fully kitted out unit — once you toss in the highest-end M2 Max chip, 96GB of RAM and 8TB of storage, you’re looking at a laptop that can run you as much as $6,299.

    To put that price in perspective, you can currently get Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Studio with an Intel Core i7 processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti graphics and the same starting RAM and storage as the MacBook Pro for a slightly cheaper $1,800. You won’t get the same fast processing speeds as the M2 Pro, but you will get dedicated graphics for comparable gaming and rendering performance, as well as a more flexible 2-in-1 design with a touch screen and stylus support. The Studio maxes out at 32GB RAM and 2TB of storage for $2,800 — that’s plenty for most people, but it also means you can’t go quite as wild with configurations as you can on the MacBook Pro.

    Granted, many of the MacBook Pro’s upgrades will be overkill for many, and I’d argue that you get your money’s worth in terms of performance on any of these configurations. But just be ready to pay up if you want lots of storage or the best possible processor.

    macbook pro 14-inch 2023 review cnnu 6

    Mike Andronico/CNN

    Apple didn’t need to fix what isn’t broken on the 14-inch MacBook Pro, but for those who already own the 2021 model, there’s nothing new here. That includes the same Silver and Space Gray color options, which look fine, but are also a bit dull compared to the more snazzy Starlight (gold) and Midnight (blueish-black) available on the latest MacBook Air. Why can’t power users have some fun too?

    Processor

    Apple M2 Pro or M2 Max

    Apple M2

    Apple M2

    11th Gen Intel Core i5 / Intel Core i7 with Intel Iris X or Nvidia RTX 3050 Ti graphics

    Memory

    16GB / 32GB / 64GB / 96GB

    8GB / 16GB / 24GB

    8GB / 16GB / 24GB

    16GB / 32GB

    Storage

    512GB / 1TB / 2TB / 4TB / 8TB SSD

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    Display

    14.2-inch, 3024 x 1964 Liquid Retina XDR display

    13.3-inch, 2560 x 1600 Retina display

    13.6-inch, 2560 x 1664 Liquid Retina display

    14.4-inch, 2400 x 1600 PixelSense display with touch and pen support

    Camera

    1080p FaceTime HD camera

    720p FaceTime HD camera

    1080p FaceTime HD camera

    1080p webcam

    Speakers

    Six-speaker sound system with Spatial Audio support

    Stereo speakers with Spatial Audio support

    Four-speaker sound system with Spatial Audio support

    Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos

    Ports

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (3), SDXC card slot, HDMI port, headphone jack, MagSafe charging port

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (2), headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (2), MagSafe charging port, headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (2), Surface Connect, headphone jack

    Battery life (rated)

    Up to 18 hours

    Up to 20 hours

    Up to 18 hours

    Up to 19 hours

    Size and weight

    12.31 x 8.71 x 0.61 inches, 3.5 pounds

    11.97 x 8.36 x 0.61 inches, 3 pounds

    11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches, 2.7 pounds

    12.72 x. 8.98 x 0.75 inches, 3.83 pounds

    Price

    From $1,999



    From $1,299



    From $1,199



    From $1,300

    If you’re a creative professional, a hardcore power user, or simply feel like splurging on the best that Apple has to offer, the 14-inch MacBook Pro is the laptop to get. It’s faster than anything else you’ll find for the money, has all the ports you need for transferring multimedia or working with multiple monitors, and packs the best display and keyboard of any MacBook.

    For those getting their first MacBook Pro or upgrading from an old Intel-powered model, the new 14-inch and 16-inch options will prove to be a massive step up in every way — from sheer performance to everyday ease of use. And if you already find yourself hitting a ceiling on your 13-inch MacBook Pro M1, you’ll see some truly significant gains on this model.

    Those who own a 2021 MacBook Pro have no reason to upgrade here, and the much more affordable $1,199 MacBook Air M2 — our overall top pick —  is still more than enough laptop for most people (and can handle light photo and video editing). But if you truly need the extra muscle and are willing to invest in the ultimate MacBook, the latest 14-inch and 16-inch Pros are worth their premium price.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best clothes steamers in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best clothes steamers in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A clothes steamer is the perfect tool to eliminate wrinkles quickly and easily on delicate clothing items or pieces that are too big to fit on an ironing board. Using a heating element and a water reservoir — like an electric tea kettle — a clothing steamer produces a powerful flow of steam that gently removes wrinkles and creases from nearly any fabric.

    We put 13 handheld and upright clothes steamers to the test, tackling a variety of fabric types and articles of clothing. After evaluating each one’s performance, usability and build quality, we found three that’ll keep your clothes and furnishings looking tidy whether you’re at home or on the road.

    Best clothes steamer overall

    With a range of steam settings and attachments that let you take care of any type of clothing, and a stable, simple-to-use design, the Conair Turbo Extreme Steam Handheld Fabric Steamer combines ease of use with maximum functionality.

    Best handheld clothes steamer for travel

    The Chi Handheld Garment Steamer weighs just 1.1 lbs and, thanks to a stick-style design and included travel bag, is perfect for tossing into a suitcase or duffel bag.

    Best upright clothes steamer

    The Rowenta IS6520 Master 360 upright features a unique triangular head that’s effective on a variety of items and, combined with a convenient foot pedal and extra-large water tank, edged out the competition.

    The Conair Turbo Extreme Steam is easy to use, and has intuitive controls and a well-balanced design

    Straightforward controls, a wide range of useful steam levels, convenient attachments and a comfortable, well-balanced design made the Conair Turbo Extreme Steam the best handheld clothes steamer we tested, and our favorite steamer to use overall.

    This steamer performed well in all of our testing right from the beginning. While its start-up time is advertised as 40 seconds, we timed it at just 20 seconds. The wide steamer head powered through our test shirt and dress, and was able to handle wide sections of curtains with each pass. The head’s slots (other models use a pattern of smaller holes) produce a consistent, steady flow of steam, and we experienced minimal spitting or dripping.

    A single adjustment button lets you set how much steam you want to use (the current setting is conveniently indicated using a series of colored LEDs), and we were able to get exactly as much as we needed in our testing. The trigger-style main steam button is easy to press, and since it let us generate steam only when we wanted it, was much more convenient to use than other models that only had a simple off-on switch with a continuous steam flow. The small footprint makes the Conair easy to handle, and the design isn’t top-heavy like some other small steamers, letting us securely set it down between sessions.

    At 7.3 ounces, the Conair Turbo Extreme Steam’s water tank is fairly small compared to other handheld models, but in our testing it was enough to provide about 20 minutes of steaming time per tank. And thanks to the steam trigger and the ability to adjust the output to exactly what you want, you’ll only use the amount of steam you need, maximizing the time between refills. Made of clear plastic, this tank was the easiest to see through compared to any other model’s, making it simple to know when it was running low. It was also easy to remove and reattach, thanks to a sturdy latch mechanism. We turned the steamer upside down repeatedly to test for leaks and never spilled a drop.

    We were also impressed with the three attachments that Conair included with this steamer: a bristle brush for loosening fibers as you go, a spacer to provide some extra room while you are working with delicates, and our favorite, a silicone band that helps pull the fabric taut as you go, letting you work one-handed more easily, and reducing the chances of frustrating steam burns.

    The Chi handheld steamer is compact for travel, and does a great job.

    If you’re looking for a lightweight option that won’t take up valuable room in your suitcase, the Chi Handheld Garment Steamer is a great choice. Its slim, straight body and vertical steam head took a little getting used to, especially compared to the horizontal orientation of every other model we tested, but after a few minutes we figured out how to use it effectively. The slim head was especially effective when it came to eliminating wrinkles around the collar and on the short sleeves of a linen shirt — exactly the kinds of applications in which you’d be likely to use a travel-friendly device like this. The small steamer head and limited capacity make it impractical for use on larger items like curtains, but it’s really not meant for such jobs anyway. And if you’re only looking to occasionally tidy up creases in a shirt or dress, it’s perfect for occasional home use too.

    Even though it weighs just 1.1 pounds, the Chi steamer still has a solid, heavy-duty feel to it, — it isn’t at all flimsy like some other lightweight models. Plus, since the water tank is permanently located inside the handle and doesn’t detach like other models, there aren’t any moving parts that can be cracked or damaged during transport. Although its tank capacity is smaller than most handhelds we tested, it still provides enough steam for 5 minutes of use, plenty for the sort of touch-ups the device is designed for.

    The main drawback of the Chi is the fact that it doesn’t have a base, so you can’t stand it upright when not using it. That said, the convenient trigger-style switch makes this less of an issue, since you can just toss it on a bed or tabletop without worrying about uncontrolled steam damaging anything.

    The Rowenta IS6520 Master 360’s triangular head made it our favorite upright steamer

    The Rowenta IS6520 Master 360 Full Size Garment and Fabric Steamer is well-built, really easy to use, and capable of getting the job done quickly. The Rowenta’s unique triangular steamer head let us reach under collars, into sleeves and along pleats and creases — areas that wide, flat steamer heads tended to struggle with. The top-mounted cradle for this steamer head also securely held it in place between steaming sessions, unlike some other models that felt unstable and flimsy.

    Upright steamers need to have a sturdy, solid construction, and the Rowenta delivers, with a hefty base; a wide, oval-shaped pole; and a heavy-duty hanger on top that could hold an impressive amount of clothing. This stability, combined with the large, textured wheels, helps make this steamer comfortable to use and easy to wheel from room to room. The thick, insulated hose added to the feeling that this steamer was built to last.

    This steamer also includes useful accessories, like a lint pad, a fabric brush and a steam bonnet to prevent any water droplets from contacting your clothes (although we never experienced this). The 1-gallon water tank was big enough to be used for a large quantity of items, and should really cut down on annoying refills.

    The large foot pedal was another convenient feature. We loved not only how big it was, but also the raised shape that was easy to operate and the satisfying click when it powered on and off. (You could also just press this button with your hand if you prefer not to use your foot.) We only took issue with the relatively short power cord, which at 6 feet long is shorter than the other full-size upright steamers we tested.

    Handheld steamers are compact, easy to handle and powerful enough to handle most clothing care tasks.

    When sourcing steamers to test, we researched popular review sites and retailers for well-known standbys, and checked out social media to look for new products readers might want to know more about. Taking price, size and style into consideration, we eventually landed on a set of 13 upright and handheld steamers aimed at home and travel use. We then ran each steamer through a set of tests, comparing and contrasting how they performed while removing wrinkles from a range of fabrics, using three basic test pieces.

    • We bundled up a short-sleeve linen shirt and noted how long it took each steamer to eliminate the wrinkles. We did our best to pay close attention to how well each model worked in the collar and sleeve areas.
    • We bunched up a long cotton dress overnight for maximum wrinkles and used each steamer to smooth out creases. The long length of the dress also made it useful for comparing upright steamers and their ability to securely and conveniently hold them in place during steaming.
    • By steaming long window curtains, we were able to judge each steamer’s ability to process large fabric pieces. This was also a convenient way to judge each steamer’s portability and mobility, especially when reaching up high and down low.

    We also judged the steamers on their overall durability, how easy they were to use and any special features and attachments.

    Steaming your clothes is something you don’t want to spend a lot of time doing, so it’s important that steamers are simple to use once they’ve heated up. We paid close attention to how straightforward the controls were, as well as how comfortable the steamer was to use overall.

    If you’ll be using your steamer on a variety of items, you’ll want it to be versatile enough to use safely and effectively. We compared any and all attachments that came with each steamer, as well as any settings that allowed you to adjust the steam output levels.

    We compared the size of each water tank, which is an effective way to determine how long they’ll steam for and how many items they can get through. We also tested each tank for security and leakage, noting any potential issues.

    We paid close attention to whether or not each steamer spit any water onto the fabric while steaming, something that is both annoying as well as potentially damaging to delicate fabrics. We also flipped each steamer upside down several times to test the security of its water tank.

    We timed how long it took each steamer to begin producing steam after being plugged in, as well as whether or not that steam was powerful enough to effectively eliminate wrinkles.

    We also looked closely at design and build quality, noting whether the steamers felt solid and sturdy or cheap and flimsy. We examined trigger and control mechanisms, water tanks, accessories and wheels and support poles of the upright models. We noted both the type and variety of accessories included with each steamer, as well as whether or not they were actually useful and whether they were well-made or loose and flimsy. We even looked at extras like protective gloves and wrenches or other tools provided by the manufacturer for assembly.

    Finally, we noted the length and specifics of each steamer’s warranty and the type of coverage it offered.

    What’s the difference between a steamer and an iron?

    Upright steamers are great for bigger jobs, letting you hang multiple items and giving you the steam capacity to handle large projects like drapery without refilling.

    While they both use heat and moisture to smooth out wrinkles, steam irons and clothes steamers (you’ll also see them referred to as “garment steamers”) get the job done in different ways. Steamers use heat (supplied via hot water vapor), and since they barely come in contact with the fabric, apply much less stress to the individual fibers of your clothes, making them great for delicates, items that typically need dry cleaning and pressing and the like. And since you don’t need a flat surface to work on, a steamer can be used on large items like curtains.

    Irons use pressure and heat along with steam to physically smooth out wrinkles — they’re perfect for achieving a crisp dress shirt collar or razor-sharp crease. While compressing the fabric fibers makes ironing a bit more effective, it also increases the chances of damage to your clothes, potentially burning them if you leave the iron’s face in contact too long or even melting synthetic fabrics. Since they require an ironing board or other type of flat surface, the process of ironing also takes up more space than even an upright steamer.

    With speedy heat-up times, combined with the fact that they don’t require a bulky ironing board, steamers can be a considerable time-saver compared to an iron. They’re great for quick touch-ups, and smaller handheld models are perfect for travel.

    Either way, if you’re interested in keeping your clothes neat and looking like new, one of these tools should quickly become an essential part of the laundry process.

    A clothes steamer is simple to operate — easier than the irons you’re used to. First, place the item you’re steaming on a clothes hanger; an upright steamer incorporates its own hanger or has a hook to hang yours from. If you’re using a handheld steamer, you’ll probably just want to hold the hanger in one hand and steam with the other, or hang it on a shower rod or the back of a chair.

    After filling up the steamer with water and plugging it in, you simply wait a few minutes for it to warm up and begin emitting steam (depending on the model, you may need to press a trigger or button to produce the steam after heating up). Now, simply run the steamer head gently down the fabric. You don’t need to press down extra hard or anything, just let the steamer do all the work. Stubborn wrinkles may require multiple passes to eliminate them. If you’re still having trouble, try steaming your garment from the inside out.

    Since they barely come in contact with the fabric, steamers are extremely gentle on your clothes; for delicate items, they’re safer than irons. If you’re concerned about damaging any delicate items, make sure to choose a steamer that includes either a low steam setting or attachments that create an extra protective barrier between the steamer face and your fabric.

    You should never steam suede, leather, waxed cotton or any plastic material, any of which can be ruined by heat or moisture. If you’re not sure, always review the care tag on your clothes, as well as the steamer instructions.

    Do I need a handheld clothing steamer or an upright clothing steamer?

    Clothes steamers are available in two types: handheld, small, portable units that you hold in your hand, and upright, larger machines with large water tanks that are connected to the steamer head with a hose, like a canister vacuum. Handheld steamers are convenient to carry around the house, although their relatively small water tanks make them less than ideal if you are working on a big pile of laundry or a wall of curtains — you’ll be refilling often in such cases.

    Upright models are best for those big steaming projects, and their integrated hanging capabilities make it convenient to do all your steaming in one place. Since they don’t integrate the water tank, the heads of upright steamers are also much lighter than handheld units, making them easy to handle and ideal for those who don’t feel like holding extra weight in their hands.

    Jiffy Steamer Esteam Handheld

    This steamer has a great reputation and hassle-free operation, but condensation issues ultimately kept it out of the top spot in our travel steamer testing. It performed well, but quickly accumulated condensation on the steamer head, which left wet spots on fabric as we worked. This was a relatively minor issue, and if you’re an organized traveler and don’t expect to be working on clothing pieces you’ll be putting on right away this likely isn’t going to be a dealbreaker for you.

    The Jiffy Esteam’s oversized handle is comfortable to hold, and at just 2 pounds, it is easy to lift when working on bigger tasks like window curtains (its 10.5-ounce water tank was the largest of any of the handheld steamers we tested, so curtains aren’t out of the question).

    We do wish it had a power button or trigger, however. It starts to heat up as soon as it’s plugged in and emits a continuous stream of steam until it’s unplugged, which was more inconvenient than our top picks. And it’s expensive for what it is — a simple boiler, without controls or moving parts. That said, the minimal design of this steamer should contribute to a long lifespan.

    $35.99 at Bed Bath & Beyond

    Although this Rowenta steamer is comfortable to use and has a sleek, futuristic look, its lack of a flat base means you’re unable to place it upright, which is inconvenient if you’re short on space. The limited capacity of the water tank is a drawback as well, and at 2.5 ounces it is smaller than the majority of the steamers we tested. It did heat up extremely quickly though, and tackled all of our testing really well. We were also big fans of the trigger control, which allowed us to only emit steam when we were ready. It didn’t include as many attachments as some other models, but the brush accessory was well-made and connected to the steamer head with a nice and tight fit. It is relatively inexpensive, so if you’re only looking at small tasks, it is a reasonable option if you’re looking for something on a budget.

    Black + Decker Advanced Handheld Garment Steamer

    The extremely wide base of this Black + Decker model gave it a sturdy, bottom-heavy feel. This base doubles as the water tank, and was easy to remove and refill when it started running low. We were also a big fan of its trigger lock, which allows you to either press the trigger to get intermittent steam or lock it into place for a continuous flow. The 15-foot power cord was almost twice as long as the other models we tested, making it convenient for those who don’t want to be limited by a short cord. The three head attachments were also well-made and attached to the steamer face securely, and we were especially interested in the shag-carpet-like cover intended for upholstery work. Initially this model performed well in our testing, but unfortunately began spitting water and dripping from the vents. The rubber gasket surrounding the vent plate also became loose after a few minutes of steaming, which no doubt contributed to the leakage.

    $79.99 at Bed Bath & Beyond

    Probably the most versatile model we tested, this Conair steamer features a steam face that doubles as an iron. This iron feature worked reasonably well in our testing, although its round shape isn’t as effective as a traditional triangular iron, so it probably isn’t going to serve as a real replacement. The multiple attachments were a nice benefit though, and the four steam settings, combined with the LED screen, could be really useful for those working with a wide variety of fabric and materials. We also liked the “smart sensor” feature, which automatically turns off the steam when the unit is placed on a flat surface. The wide base gives it a firm foundation, and we never felt like it was in danger of getting accidentally knocked over.

    The Conair’s water tank design was a big drawback, though. It is difficult to remove and reattach, even when carefully following the instructions, and it is made of a dark blue plastic that — although technically transparent — still makes it difficult to easily see the water level.

    If you need to steam a big pile of wrinkly clothes and time is a priority, this no-frills upright steamer from Jiffy is exactly what you need. It doesn’t have the bells and whistles of other models, and we prefer the triangular steamer head on the Rowenta, but the Jiffy’s straightforward operation makes it ideal for efficient, large-scale steaming. Its minimal design makes this steamer feel nice and sturdy, and combined with the brass couplings and thick plastic body gives an overall feeling of durability.

    We were initially put off by the stiff rubber hose, but once it warmed up from the steam it became loose and pliable, and really easy to manipulate. Its four rolling casters — unlike the two-wheeled models that needed to be tipped over to roll — were our favorite feature of this steamer. They’re by far the smoothest wheels we tested, and effortlessly rolled across the floor while we worked.

    The Jiffy’s transparent tank can hold .75 gallons, which should provide up to 1.5 hours of continuous steaming time. I’ve personally known set designers and costume professionals who swear by this steamer, citing its large capacity and no-nonsense operation as essential for getting through a lot of fabric quickly and easily.

    The major drawback for me was the fact that the cradle for the steamer head wasn’t the easiest to use and took a little maneuvering to get it to fit securely. It also doesn’t include a coat hanger or any kind of attachments, but if you prefer a low-profile appliance or plan on transporting it in your car, this could end up being a benefit.

    Conair Turbo Extreme Steam GS121 Professional Steam & Press

    Unlike other upright options that use a minimalist steamer head, this one uses a head similar to a handheld model, with multiple settings to control the steam output. This could be helpful for some who want more control, but we found it to be bulky and awkward to use, and much preferred the lightweight heads of other standup steamers. We were most impressed with the integrated valet-style hanger, which has a series of slots, allowing you to hang up six hangers at the same time. We found this to be a real time-saver that kept our on-deck items ready to be steamed, as well as a place to hang our finished items. We also found the additional set of fabric clips located on the bottom of the support pole to be a unique and helpful feature. They were the perfect distance from the top-mounted clips to hold pants taut while being steamed, something we didn’t find on any other option.

    The large, wide handle of this steamer allowed for an extremely sturdy grip during use, and combined with the dark grey color, gave it a sophisticated, high-end look. This stylish, minimal design made it impossible to see the level of the water tank though, so it was difficult to tell when it was ready for a refill. The main drawback to this steamer is its narrow base, which makes it a bit top-heavy and didn’t feel as sturdy when placing it on a flat surface. It’s also very expensive compared to similar models from more established manufacturers.

    We did appreciate the rubber cover that fit snugly over the face of the steamer for use on delicate items though. This rubber cover was a stylish and refreshing alternative to the plastic attachments of other models, and added to the high-end feel of this steamer. The Steamery Cirrus was definitely the best-looking steamer we tested, and if that’s a priority for you — nothing wrong with wanting an attractive appliance — this is an effective, high-quality option.

    Similar to the other Steamery model we tested, the Cirrus portable, the upright Steamery Cumulus steamer has a stylish, high-end look. The all-grey finish is easy on the eyes, and the bulbous base gives it a futuristic look. That said, we wish this steamer had wheels! All the other upright models we tested had either two or four wheels, and by comparison, this one was significantly less convenient to transport or move around a room when, for example, working on drapery. The steamer head was lightweight and comfortable to use, and the brush head attachment works for a range of fabrics. We were pleasantly surprised by the protective glove included with this model, something no other model included. As someone who has occasionally burned themselves while steaming, or at least been annoyed when trying to manipulate a large clothing item, this glove was a useful addition. Like other Steamery products, it’s priced higher than models from traditional brands.

    This is a great upright option for those who don’t have a need, or desire, for a bunch of extra attachments and accessories. The hassle-free design was our favorite aspect of this steamer, and with just a brush attachment and a removable hanger, it won’t take up much room. We also appreciated the metal fittings that connect the hose with the base, which gave the entire unit a well-built, high-quality feel. It even included a wrench for easy assembly. We also enjoyed the small, minimal design of the steamer head, which made it easy to lift and maneuver around and securely fit into the Y-shaped cradle. Although the water tank was larger than any other option we tested at 1 gallon, it wasn’t transparent, which was a major drawback for me. This might not be a dealbreaker for those who steam infrequently, but if you plan on using your steamer a lot, it’s really helpful to know when you need to refill.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best down comforters of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best down comforters of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is part of CNN Underscored’s “The Reset,” an editorial package featuring all of our articles aimed at giving you the information and product recommendations to help achieve any and all new year resolutions.

    In a time when many are finding it harder to get quality sleep, the right bedding — including the perfect down comforter — can truly make a difference between a great night’s sleep and a tossy-turny night.

    To find the best comforter that will give you that ideal night’s sleep, we tested 11 of the most popular, highly rated options. All the comforters we tested had a similar fill power (basically a warmth rating, which you can read more about below in our buyer’s guide section) and either a sewn-through or baffle box construction (more on this below too). After a few frigid months of testing, evaluating everything from warmth to softness, we found three dreamworthy comforters that can upgrade anyone’s sleep:

    Best down comforter overall

    With the Brooklinen Down Comforter, we truly felt like we were sleeping on a cloud and never wanted to get out of bed. Between the softness of the outer material and the fluffiness of the fill, it’s one of those comforters that make you want to stay in bed all day — 12 months a year.

    Best down comforter for warmth

    If you’re looking for a comforter to give you that extra warmth, The Company Store Legends Hotel Alberta Down Comforter is on the heavier end, giving you the extra weight needed during colder months.

    Best down-alternative comforter

    Not a fan of down and feathers in your comforter? If so, then the Buffy Cloud Comforter is the best down-alternative option. This quality-made comforter will give you a great night’s sleep, thanks to its soft, lightweight build that provides plenty of warmth.

    Have you ever wished you could sleep on the clouds? Well, the Brooklinen Down Comforter is the closest thing to that. From the moment we took it out of the packaging, we had a hunch that this would be a favorite. And we were right.

    The comforter comes in three different weight options: lightweight, all-season and ultra warm. We tested the all-season comforter, and despite it being the middle of winter with temperatures dropping indoors and out, we found it to perfectly balance snuggly warmth with breathability. Though on the heavier end of the spectrum (it boasts a 700 fill power and baffle box design), we never found the comforter to trap too much heat or cause nighttime sweating. The comforter, with its 100% cotton sateen shell, was one of the softest we tested — and the one we kept coming back to cuddle into most nights.

    We also found this machine-washable comforter to be one of the easiest to wash and dry. Since the comforter is lightweight, it fits into a washing machine better than some others and air-dries much quicker.

    Brooklinen offers some of the best return policies. You have an incredibly long 365 days to return or exchange your item if you’re unhappy with it. On top of that, there’s an additional one-year warranty. Compared to all of the other comforters we tested, this is one of the best sleep trial periods we saw. With such an expensive purchase, you’ll want to love your comforter, so the fact that you have a full year to try it out with no strings attached is great.

    If the budget allows, this is a comforter not to miss, especially if you want to snuggle up with the clouds.

    The Company Store Legends Hotel Alberta Down Comforter

    When it comes to warmth and coziness, the Legends Hotel Alberta Down Comforter from The Company Store is unrivaled.

    Full disclosure: This comforter is for truly frosty climates, or especially cold sleepers. Though available in three different weights — light, medium and extra, all of which sport a baffle box construction — we tested and recommend the extra warmth option (which has a 650 fill power). While our main tester, who tends to sleep hot, found this lofty comforter slightly too heavy to sleep with throughout the night, a cold-sleeping family member absolutely loved the warmth the Legends Hotel Alberta Down Comforter provided.

    Aside from the weight, we found that the comforter didn’t crinkle at all when moving around in bed (an annoyance we found with others we tested). Since it’s made with a cotton sateen cover, it is incredibly soft — in fact, it was one of the comfiest of those we tested, in a way that might have you staying in bed for an added snooze cycle.

    This comforter can also easily be used with or without a duvet cover. It comes in five colors — white, ivory, alabaster, cloud blue and platinum — and from a design element looks rich on its own. Most of the other comforters we tested were plain white and truly looked like an insert, requiring a duvet cover to up their aesthetic appeal. We still added a duvet cover to this comforter to make sure one would fit, and it worked perfectly.

    The Company Store also offers a 90-day rest easy guarantee. This allows you to fully use the product — including sleeping with it and washing it — and if it doesn’t work for you, you can return it. On top of that, the company also offers a lifetime guarantee. This allows you to exchange or receive merchandise credit toward a new product if something happens to your comforter. This doesn’t allow you to simply one day decide you no longer like the comforter, but if the seams are coming undone or if the down feathers are clumping together, for example, you can return the product.

    The heavy filling does have a drawback; it was on the larger size for our washing machine. We have a top-loading washing machine, and in the directions it does state “for best wash and dry, use a front-loading commercial washer and dryer.” While this didn’t cause any damage to the comforter or to our machine, we did feel like our washing machine was working harder than normal. If you have a small washing machine, in which bulky items could damage the machine, you might want to steer away from this comforter — and, in fact, any other bulkier comforters.

    While this comforter doesn’t come cheap, if you have the budget, we believe it’s worth it for the sheer warmth it provides.

    Buffy Cloud Comforter

    The Buffy Cloud Comforter was like no other comforter we tested. This down-alternative comforter was by far the best alternative version we tested — and the only one we’d recommend, as the other down alternatives we tested lacked in both quality of construction and comfort.

    The Buffy comforter prides itself on being very environmentally friendly as well. The shell is made from 100% eucalyptus, and the fill is made from 100% recycled PET bottles (BPA-free). On the Buffy site, the brand states that “this keeps 50 plastic bottles out of landfills and protects 12 geese from live plucking.”

    Although this was a new type of material for us — as we typically sleep with a down comforter in our nontesting days — we thought the fabric was very soft and lightweight but still heavy enough to keep us warm throughout the night. The comforter was also very quiet, emitting no crinkling sounds when shifting sleeping positions.

    Buffy also offers a seven-day trial so you can fully test out the comforter before committing to such a large purchase. While this might be on the shorter side when compared to some of the other comforters, within seven days you should get a good sense as to whether or not this comforter works for you.

    If you’re looking for a down alternative, then this is your best bet — especially since the price point is much more reasonable than some of the other luxury comforters on our list. The comforter is well made with quality stitching, is soft to sleep with and has the right warmth to it.

    The basics

    A comforter (or duvet) is two pieces of fabric — a bottom layer and a top layer — sewn together with a certain type of filling material in the middle (most often down, feathers or synthetic materials, known as down alternative) to provide warmth while sleeping.

    While the words “comforter” and “duvet insert” are typically used interchangeably, there are some differences between the two. Typically, a duvet is used with a duvet cover, adding a design element to your overall bedding, whereas a comforter is used on its own, providing both aesthetic appeal and comfort to your bed. Duvets usually have loops on all four corners (some offer even more loops on the sides), allowing you to tie the comforter to the duvet cover. This ensures all materials are secured easily to one another and that the insert won’t shift while you’re sleeping.

    Fill power

    A numerical representation of a comforter’s insulation abilities, fill power is the amount of space that 1 ounce of down occupies (in cubic inches). Therefore, the higher the number, the warmer the comforter. Fill power can range from around 500 (considered lightweight, and ideal for warmer climates) to more than 700 (usually the fluffiest, warmest comforters).

    Pricing

    We were sure to test a wide range of price points, with our testing pool spanning from $30 to upward of $300. After testing so many comforters, we realized that the inexpensive comforters are just that: cheap. They lacked in quality construction, were less effective at keeping us warm throughout the night and, perhaps most important, were mostly downright uncomfortable.

    Therefore, when shopping for a down comforter, we think it’s important to invest in quality — so expect to pay more than $100.

    Sewn-through versus baffle box stitching

    The way in which a comforter is constructed is another important aspect to consider when shopping. Two common terms you’ll see: baffle box and sewn-through. While similar — both work to hold the filling in place — there are minute differences. A baffle box design features thin strips of fabric that connect the top and bottom layers and form box shapes that keep the filing in place while also giving them a bit more room to stretch out. Therefore, comforters with a baffle box construction tend to be fluffier and trap more heat. With a sewn-through construction, the bottom and top layers are sewn together to form down-filled pockets. Though you won’t have any worry about down shifting around with a sewn-through design, it can lead to some increased airflow (and therefore less insulation than baffle box) between the seams.

    After scouring editorial and user reviews, we picked 11 of the most highly reviewed comforters to put to the test. To truly figure out which one was the best, we slept with each one for three nights. Similar to our duvet cover testing, we slept with the comforter right out of the packaging on the first night. The next day, we washed the comforter and then slept with it again for the next two nights. With so many different options, this meant we got some great sleeps along with some not-so-great shut-eye.

    We compared everything from performance to quality, making notes on what we liked and disliked. We also tested comforters in every price bracket to see if price is actually a driving factor to getting a good night’s sleep. While a high-end price didn’t necessarily mean it was our favorite, we did find that the budget options fall into the “you get what you pay for” bracket.

    Here’s how we evaluated each duvet cover to find our winners:

    Performance

    • Sleep feel: We wanted to gauge how each comforter felt while sleeping. Was it soft or stiff? Light or heavy?
    • Initial feel: Immediately after taking each product out of the packaging, we wanted to see how the comforter felt. Is it super stiff and scratchy, or is it already soft and bouncy?
    • Warmth check: Does the comforter provide the right amount of warmth? Or is it too hot or cold while sleeping? We also wanted to determine if the comforter was breathable.
    • Weight: Is the comforter too heavy to maneuver, either while sleeping or storing?
    • Post-wash: After washing each duvet cover, we slept with the duvet cover again to see how it felt.
    • Noise: Even before getting in bed, we rolled the comforter around to see if the comforter was loud and crinkly. Then, when sleeping with the comforter, we noted when the comforter was noisy to sleep with.
    • Washing: We washed every single comforter to see how easy (or difficult) it was to wash each comforter.
    • Storability: After using each comforter, we folded each comforter to see how cumbersome it was to store. We also considered if each came with a bag for easy storage.

    Build quality

    • Materials: We analyzed each comforter to see if it was made up of quality materials and workmanship.
    • Filling: After sleeping and washing each comforter, we noted whether or not the filling stayed in place.
    • Size options: We wanted to make sure that the comforter came in sizes for all bed types.
    • Replacement: Is there a generous return policy or warranty?

    If we had to pick a fourth favorite, then this one from Riley was the best goose down comforter we tested. The comforter offers two different weight options: all-season and extra warmth. We tested the all-season option and thought it was perfect for our sleep needs. The comforter is high-quality, with evenly distributed fill and no crinkling noise. It was also extremely comfortable to sleep with.

    The comforter also came with a perfectly fitting plastic bag for storage purposes. And instead of opening up on the top, which would make it difficult to try to squish the comforter into, it opened on the side, giving you more space to fold up the comforter and just plop it in.

    Although we preferred the Brooklinen thanks to its slightly lighter build, for an all-purpose down comforter, this one was a close second. In fact, if you prefer one with slightly more weight, then the Riley might be a better option for you. You also have 60 days to try out the comforter and a five-year warranty.

    This Pottery Barn duvet insert states that its Sleepsmart technology “continuously adjusts to help maintain a climate of personal comfort at the ideal 37.5 degrees Celsius all night long, so you can wake up rested and refreshed.” Even though we didn’t test this comforter during all four seasons — just the winter months — we felt like this comforter maintained the perfect temperature throughout the night, as we never got overheated — making it the best down comforter for hot sleepers.

    With that being said, the comforter is loud and rigid. Sleeping with a comforter that crinkles all night is never ideal. There’s also no softness to the comforter, which didn’t give us that cozy feel while in bed.

    Even though we like the technology behind the comforter, the lack of softness and the crinkles throughout the night were deal breakers for us. The comforter also only comes in two sizes: full/queen and king/California king.

    This is the second comforter we tried from The Comforter Store. For this particular comforter, the LaCrosse Down Comforter, we tried the ultra warmth weight. This is the brand’s heaviest weight — of four different weight options — and, you guessed it, we found this one to be too heavy for our liking. And we even tested this in the middle of winter in the Northeast.

    Although we did find this comforter to be a little noisy, especially compared to the other The Company Store comforter we tested, it by no means kept us up at night. But if crinkly noises are something you’re looking to avoid altogether, this is something you’ll want to be cautious of.

    The comforter comes in a rainbow of color options — 17, to be exact. This allows you to use the comforter on its own without a duvet cover. Unlike many of the other comforters and duvet inserts we tested, this comforter looks complete on its own. It also comes in every size — twin, twin XL, full, queen, king/king Cal — so it’s a comforter you get for every bed in your house.

    We really wanted to love the Casper duvet, especially since its duvet cover was our absolute favorite one we tested, but this product didn’t do it for us. First, the pros: It’s extremely well made with quality stitching. It also comes with smaller sewn-in boxes to keep the fill from shifting.

    But now, the cons: It’s extremely crinkly, and by far the worst we experienced. It was incredibly noisy, not only while sleeping with it but also while laying it out and putting on the duvet cover, to the point where it didn’t allow us to get a good night’s sleep. The entire night we were too focused on not moving so the comforter wouldn’t wake up ourselves or our sleeping partner. And even after washing this comforter, it didn’t get better. We also found this comforter to be very heavy; thus, we were quite warm throughout the night.

    This duvet did come in the nicest bag of the bunch, allowing it to be stored quite easily. Instead of a plastic bag (which was the case for the others, if the comforter even came with a bag), the Casper comforter came in an extremely durable cloth bag. There was no plastic smell after taking the comforter out of the bag — if stored for a long time — and no chance of the bag breaking.

    If you do want to try it out, then Casper does offer a 30-night risk-free trial. So, if you end up not loving it, you can always return it for a full refund.

    Lands’ End Essential Down Comforter

    From $175 at Lands’ End

    The Lands’ End Essential Down Comforter is perfect for most seasons, although we’d probably steer away from it during those warm summer nights. We tested this comforter in the middle of winter and appreciated the weight it provided. The downside is that it’s slightly crinkly and noisy, but nowhere near as bad as what we experienced with the Casper comforter, and it didn’t impact our sleep. The comforter is filled with 75% down and 25% feathers, which made the comforter nice and fluffy.

    One component that really set this comforter apart is the eight “corner” tabs. Instead of loops on just the four corners — as with most of the comforters we tested — this one offers four additional ones in the middle of each side of the comforter. This means on the top and bottom, along with the right and left side, there are additional loops to keep your duvet insert even more secure. While this is great in theory, when we tested a dozen popular duvet covers, none of them offered these extra ties to secure everything together.

    The Egyptian Bedding Luxurious Siberian Goose Down Comforter arrived in a vacuum-sealed bag. While this was perfect for shipping purposes, it meant we had to let the comforter sit out for a few hours to revert back to its normal fluffiness. If you have an immediate usage, keep this in mind. And even though the packaging came airtight, it came with a larger bag big enough to store the comforter for storage.

    This comforter is very lightweight in feel and quite thin. If you’re looking for a comforter during the summer months, then this will do, but if you’re looking for something for those cold winter nights, this one most likely won’t give you the warmth you’re looking for.

    The comforter was also very lumpy compared to others. The fill within each box bunched up quite a bit and left some areas with absolutely no fill at all.

    Similar to the Lands’ End comforter, there are four extra ties to keep your duvet cover secure, although these ties were much smaller loops, which would make it difficult to use.

    This hypoallergenic comforter is made from 100% microfiber on the face and 100% polyester in the filling. Like most of the down alternatives we tested, this comforter didn’t really make you want to snuggle up with it and didn’t have the same soft and fluffy feel that many of the other comforters provided.

    The comforter came in a vacuum-sealed bag and it was impossible to get it back in after it was taken out. So, even though it arrived in a small package on our front door, there’s no bag for storage purposes.

    The biggest con with this comforter were its corner loops. They were the smallest out of all the comforters we tested, which caused frustration when trying to tie the duvet cover to the insert. This comforter comes in nine solid colors so, while we would definitely recommend using a duvet cover with the white color option, if purchasing one of the other color options, then you might not need a cover from an aesthetic perspective — just keep in mind that the material is sheen.

    As the most budget comforter of the bunch, the quality unfortunately shows. This comforter is a down alternative and is 100% polyester. And similar to the Utopia comforter that we tested, we really don’t love the feel of polyester for sleeping purposes.

    This comforter also has very small loop holes at all four corners, making it very difficult to secure the duvet cover ties together. And while the holes are slightly bigger than the Utopia comforter, it was still too small and caused frustration. With that being said, the brand did offer extra ties on each side of the comforter, but those were also small, too — and, truthfully, unnecessary.

    One of the pros to this comforter is that it folds extremely compact. It comes with a smaller-size plastic bag, which makes storing the comforter easy and takes up less space in your closet.

    The comforter also comes in sizes that the other comforters on this list don’t offer: twin, twin XL, full, queen, oversized queen, king, California king and oversized king. This means if you have a unique bed size, then this comforter could provide you with the necessary solution. There are also 12 different color options, many with reversible designs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 scores: This $10 car phone mount is the best we’ve ever tried | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 scores: This $10 car phone mount is the best we’ve ever tried | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    For those who don’t have cars with GPS-enabled screens, a smartphone is the best way to know where you’re going. However, it’s never a good idea to be constantly looking down to check your phone in your lap or propped up in a cup holder. If you need a better way to hold your phone in the car, you need to try the Vanva Universal Air Vent Car Mount. I’ve had one for months (and even drove cross-country with it) and love how easy it is to install and use. It’s also actually stable and, best of all, only $10.

    If you’re looking for a phone mount that won’t wobble around and will actually hold your phone in place, this is the one for you. It connects to most common air vents, is easily adjustable and, at $10, is a cheap accessory that will make your driving experience a whole lot better. 

    I’ve tried a handful of vent phone mounts over the years, but I’ve never found one I really liked. No matter the brand or flashy promises online, they all turned out to be so frustratingly wobbly and unstable that I’d stop using them after a couple of months. Then, after several hours scrolling on Amazon, I found the Vanva Air Vent Car Mount. Finally, a mount that could hold my phone in a stable, secure position that was easy to use, install and adjust.

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    I can’t believe it took so long to find a car mount I was satisfied with, because I’m really not asking for much. Thankfully, the Vanva checks all the boxes on my list. The first and most important feature I was looking for was stability. A lot of car vent mounts don’t attach in a secure way, so after repeatedly taking your phone in and out of the mount, its connections get loose and your phone starts to sag or the whole thing just falls out. The Vanva, however, has stable connections at both the attachment point to the vent and the ball joint that holds your phone upright. Both tighten down snugly, and after months of using it, my phone hasn’t sagged and I haven’t had to retighten any of the connections at all.

    vanva air vent car mount side inline CNNU

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    This mount’s stability is its star feature, but I also love how easy it is to take your phone in and out of the Vanva. It has an adjustable width that fits phones up to 7 inches, which is more than enough to fit my iPhone 11 with a bulky case, and according to the Amazon listing, it can fit large phones like the iPhone 14 Pro Max too. These adjustable sides clamp down to keep your phone secure and prevent it from flying out if you’re driving on a bumpy road or taking a turn too fast. Plus, the mount has a quick-release button that allows you to quickly and easily take your phone out of the mount with one hand.

    If you are considering buying a Vanva mount, the one thing I’d urge you to do is double-check the type of vents in your car. The Vanva is compatible with horizontal and vertical vents, which are most common, but if you have round or some other special vents it might not fit (there are reference photos on the Amazon listing).

    vanva air vent car mount side detail inline CNNU

    Kai Burkhardt/CNN

    I love the Vanva Air Vent Car Mount. It’s secure and actually does its job like I want it too, which is a lot more than other car mounts I’ve tried. It’s normally priced around $17 — which is a great deal for such a sturdy mount in my opinion — but right now it’s even cheaper at $10. So if you’re looking for a better, safer way to navigate the roads than propping your phone up in a cup holder, check out the Vanva Air Vent Car Mount.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best electric razors in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best electric razors in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Electric razors have improved by leaps and bounds in recent years, and, unlike the bulky, uncomfortable and not-all-that-effective buzzers you may have tried in the past, the latest models can easily serve as your primary grooming tool. Even manual razor purists can’t deny the convenience of an electric razor, which lets you shave dry, allowing you the option of a close, comfortable shave without shaving cream (or even a bathroom sink) when you’re in a hurry. And wet-dry models can do both, letting you choose whatever method is most convenient on a given day.

    We tested 14 of the most popular electric razors on the market, using them for weeks in our personal shaving routine. We evaluated them on overall shaving performance, ease of use, how easy they were to maintain and clean and their convenience for travel.

    The best electric razor overall

    The Arc5’s five-blade head gave us one of the closest, smoothest shaves in our testing, and that, along with an assortment of high-end features — an ergonomic handle, useful digital display and an effective cleaning dock — made it the best electric shaver overall in our testing.

    The best electric razor on a budget

    A no-frills electric shaver that delivers a surprisingly effective shaving experience at an affordable price. It’s dry-shave only, and not as easy to clean as top models, but it gives you an impressively clean shave for the money.

    A great splurge electric razor

    If you’re looking for a close, smooth and speedy shave and you’re willing to spend a bit more money, the Braun Series 9 will give you that, along with better build quality, an easier to use cleaning dock and an AirPods-style charging case in a luxurious package that’s worth the extra money.

    Combining a high-performance shave with straightforward, user-friendly operation, the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 was an easy choice as my top pick. Boasting a five-blade head and cleaning/charging dock, you’re getting the perks of a high-end model without the intimidating price tag.

    The Panasonic Arc5 LV95 performed well in my shaving tests, delivering a comfortable and surprisingly fast shave across the board: about 3 minutes total to take care of my 3-day beard. The 5-blade head — four foils and a trimming cutter — worked together to efficiently tackle longer, flat-lying hairs in my 3-day growth test, and gave a really close shave the next day during my maintenance shave. I also appreciated that the pivoting head can be locked in place, which is convenient for precision work.

    The ergonomic handle gave the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 a well-balanced, lightweight feel in my hand too, and the textured rubber sides ensured a sturdy grip. The trimmer accessory flips up from the back of the razor head, and I made it easy to clean up my sideburns or stray hairs under my nose or neck.

    My favorite feature of the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 — and a great example of its utilitarian design — is the travel lock. A low-profile lever under the power button toggles the lock on and off, with a simple padlock icon to indicate its use. I found this physical control more convenient than the  “hold down the power button for 3 seconds” method used by some other razors, and it took any guesswork out of whether it was activated or not.

    Cleaning the Panasonic Arc5 LV95  can either be done manually by removing the cassette head, or using the included cleaning station. When cleaning manually under the faucet, a “sonic cleaning mode” vibrates the blades extremely quickly for 20 seconds to better dislodge dirt and hair as you rinse it–a feature that made it noticeably more effective than most other razor models. If you prefer a more set-it-and-forget-it method, simply pop the razor into the cleaning station and select the ”clean” mode.

    It's easy to pop off the Panasonic Arc5's head for manual cleaning.

    This process takes about 10 minutes and although it’s much louder than I expected, I found that the competing Braun stations were equally noisy. The main drawback to the Panasonic cleaning station is that it uses an open reservoir into which you pour a mix of a detergent packet with water, as opposed to using resealable pods like Braun. This means that if you decide to travel with a Panasonic cleaning station, you’ll have to dump out the detergent, which is not ideal.

    The digital display of the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 is simple and provides all of the information you need at a glance. A circular battery level indicator lets you know how long you have before the razor needs a recharge, and a cleaning mode icon tells you when the sonic cleaning mode is initiated. This display also features an automatic timer, which lets you know exactly how long your shaving session lasted (handy for testing, though it may not have much of an impact on your daily routine).

    While the Panasonic Arc5 LV95 isn’t exactly cheap, the user-friendly design, great performance and comfortable shaving experience make it worth the price.

    The Remington F5-5800 electric razor

    I’ll admit that I had my doubts on unboxing the Remington F5-5800, but as soon as I started shaving with it, I understood why it’s been such a popular razor for so long. Although it has an unconventional shape and lacks the sleek, modern look of more recent, higher-end models, the Remington F5-5800 delivers a surprisingly effective shaving experience at a fraction of the price.

    The curved body was a little awkward to hold at first, but I quickly came to appreciate how it naturally placed the blade head in a convenient position for shaving. This design, combined with a pivoting head, made it really easy to comfortably maneuver around the contours of my jaw. Although the head lacks any side to side movement, I never felt limited in the flexibility department, so we don’t think this is a drawback, and a razor doesn’t need to offer 360-degree pivoting to give you a good shave. Our splurge pick, the nearly flawless Braun Series 9 Pro, also only provides back and forth pivoting.

    Its three-blade head — two foils and a single trimming element — gave a close, really comfortable shave, even on my thick, 3-day beard. It handled my maintenance shave easily as well, and the pop-up trimmer was perfectly adequate for finishing off any hard to reach hairs and evening up my sideburns.

    The Remington F5-5800 lacks a display screen, but a row of LEDs clearly display the battery level in 20-percent increments. Although it can be cleaned with water, the Remington F5-5800 is not a wet-dry shaver, which does limit its usefulness a bit. But a major plus, and a feature not found on many other razors, is its ability to operate when the charging cord is plugged in, so you’re not out of luck if you’ve forgotten to charge.

    My major complaint with the Remington F5-5800 is that it feels flimsy compared to more expensive razors — the build quality of the head and blade setup doesn’t feel up to the same level as our overall pick, and some of the functional details aren’t as well thought out. The blade cover doesn’t use any latch or lever mechanism for removal, instead requiring you to grip and pull it off for cleaning, which is not always easy with wet or slippery fingers. Inside, the individual blades were also not fixed to the unit itself, and would fall out when I opened it. These blades were simple to put back in place and stable in use, but the arrangement made cleaning more inconvenient than with the other models we tested.

    Given this, we don’t know if the Remington F5-5800 can offer the long-term durability of our top picks, but it does have a solid reputation, and if you’re looking for a cheap, effective dry-shaving razor and don’t need a bunch of bells and whistles, it is a great choice.

    The Braun Series 9 Pro electric razor

    If you want the closest, most comfortable — and speediest — shave and you’re not concerned about spending quite a bit to get it, the Braun Series 9 Pro is a great choice. It’s clearly a high-quality tool, the latest in a series that the company has been developing for years, with an obvious focus on providing a superior shaving performance.

    The Series 9 Pro has a solid feel with rubber sides and a textured thumb grip that make it easy to maintain control as you shave, and made us worry a lot less about accidentally dropping it into the sink or on the counter during use. First, it seems unlikely, and second, it feels built to survive any minor mishap. It felt like a better-built tool than even the other ultra-high-end razor we tested, the Panasonic Arc6.

    My favorite feature of the Braun Series 9 Pro is its multifunctional blade setup, which makes it one of the more versatile razors I tested. With two foils, a standard trimming element, and a “ProLift” trimmer, the Braun Series 9 Pro is designed to capture and trim both short and long hairs, as well as awkwardly angled hairs.

    The blades aren’t just there for show — the Braun really delivers on shave speed and quality, I was most surprised at how well, and more importantly, how fast these blades worked, especially during my 3-day beard test. I was able to completely shave my 3-day beard in about a minute and 30 seconds, noticeably faster than the still speedy Panasonic Arc5 LV95, which clocked in at nearly 3 minutes. It was no surprise that this blade setup also made for one of the most comfortable shaves in my testing, with zero irritation issues.

    You can clean the Braun Series 9 Pro either by popping off the cassette cover and rinsing it under water, or using the cleaning station. Unlike a lot of other models that required a frustrating amount of tugging and squeezing to remove their cassette covers, the Braun Series 9 Pro features two release buttons on either side of the head that allow you to pop it right off. This convenient and functional design (it reattaches with a nice solid “click” too), only added to my confidence in its overall construction.

    The charging dock/cleaning station ensures that the razor is easy to grab whenever you need it, and you never have to worry about plugging and unplugging a separate power cord every time you want to charge it.

    The dock is easy to use, too. The included cleaning cartridge was simple to slide into place, and made things less messy to set up than the dock used with the Panasonic Arc5, which required us to mix our own cleaning solution.

    Once you’re set up, you simply place the razor into the charging dock, press the start button and that’s it. The razor automatically chooses the intensity level of cleaning required.   The unexpected noise level — it’s loud — of the cleaning mode was the only real drawback to the Braun Series 9 Pro, although cleaning only took a few minutes.

    The Braun Series 9 Pro also includes a “power case”, an upgraded version of the zippered storage case offered by other razors that works a bit like the charging cases you’re probably familiar with from Apple AirPods and other true wireless headphones. The magnetic lid and sturdy, hard-sided design of this case not only protects the razor during transport, but provides extra power if the razor’s battery runs low. I also really appreciated the dedicated mount for the small cleaning brush, the only razor in my testing pool to offer this.

    For someone who wants their morning routine to be as efficient as possible, without sacrificing comfort or performance, the Braun Series 9 Pro could definitely be worth the investment.

    Best Electric Razors Group Photo

    Alex Rennie/CNN Underscored

    If you love using a manual razor, and relish your morning ritual, no, you probably don’t need an electric razor. But, if you find that you don’t always have time for a manual shave, dislike the high cost of cartridges, or you share a sink with a disorganized roommate, an electric razor can make your routine easier.

    The most obvious benefit of an electric razor is its ability to dry shave your face. This means that unlike cartridge or safety razors that tether you to a sink and water supply, electric razors let you shave anywhere, which is great if you’re running late for work you can complete your morning shave anywhere: in the parking lot before walking into work, an office restroom, or an airport bathroom after a red-eye flight. (We’ve even seen commuters shaving while they’re stopped at red lights, but we don’t recommend it.)

    Those who want to avoid nicks and cuts or razor bumps will also appreciate the safety of an electric razor. While they can still cause some razor burn if used incorrectly, their blades don’t actually come in contact with your skin, so it’s highly unlikely that you’ll get nicked or scratched, and since they cut your facial hair slightly proud of the skin’s surface rather than flush like a manual razor, you’re less likely to get razor bumps from ingrown hairs if you have coarse, curly facial hair.

    But even if you prefer to use your favorite shaving cream or gel, most electric razors are “wet/dry” models, and the higher-end models we tested are waterproof and can even be used in the shower. Wet shaving with an electric razor doesn’t provide quite the same satisfying feel as using lather with a manual razor, however — instead of removing foam and hair in uniform strokes, you’re just kind of moving the foam around your face as you go. You’ll get the job done, but don’t expect the same sort of ritual.

    Electric razors have a bit of a learning curve, but once you understand how their blades work, and take the time to read their instruction manuals, they’re pretty straightforward.

    Foil razors have thin metal screens that allow your facial hairs to slip through, where they’re cut by a series of small blades vibrating back and forth. Longer hairs can have difficulty entering these small holes, which is why most foil razors also feature a trimmer element with a larger opening. Rotary razors use the same basic concept, but use circular spinning blades and covers that allow beard hairs to slip through. They don’t cut as close as a manual razor — they trim the hair at the inner surface of the foil, so a bit proud of the skin surface — but today’s foils are very thin to begin with, and multiple elements do a thorough job.

    When shaving with a foil razor, you’ll want to position the head at a 90-degree angle to your face, and use light pressure to run it against the grain of your beard. Use your other hand to stretch the skin tight, giving the razor as much tight, flat skin as you can. Your beard grain can change around your neck, so you may need to change your stroke direction in order to capture and trim those hairs.

    With the foil razors we tested, a mix of vertical and horizontal strokes with any of the razors we tested helped smooth out any stubborn areas with rotary models. For rotary razors, circular strokes are recommended.

    For especially hard to reach areas like directly under your nose, stubborn long hairs you just can’t seem to cut, and creating straight sideburns, use the trimmer tool.

    Regardless of the type of razor you use, make sure to use gentle pressure at first, to avoid causing irritation or razor burn, which you can still get even through an electric razor’s foil if you push down excessively to catch stubborn growth.

    To choose the best razor for you, the most important factor to consider is your personal shaving routine and frequency.

    If you’re a strict daily shaver, you can probably get away with a simpler — and usually cheaper — model.

    The situation is different if you aren’t an everyday shaver. Electric razors can struggle with longer growth since longer hairs have trouble making their way through the foil. So if you shave infrequently, you’ll benefit from a razor that includes at least one trimming blade in addition to the foil blades. While the foils are best-suited for dealing with short stubble, these trimming blades have a larger opening–perfect for capturing long or low-lying hairs.

    You should also think about whether or not you want a razor that includes a cleaning station. While most electric razors are easy to clean yourself by simply popping off the head cover and running under the faucet, if you shave daily, the frequency of this process can be a pain. A dedicated cleaning station uses a solution to thoroughly clean your razor head at the push of a button. These stations can be noisy, and add to the overall price, but they do all the work for you, and most double as a charging dock as well.

    When it comes to razor type, I personally didn’t feel much difference between the performance of foil vs rotary models. My research does point towards rotary razors delivering a slightly less-close shave though, and can be slightly more irritating to those with sensitive skin.

    We tested each razor initially with a three-day beard. Here, the Panasonic Arc5 makes short work of the growth, giving us a close, clean shave.

    We ran each razor through a comprehensive testing process to better understand their specific differences and accurately compare one vs another. It’s important to note that since everyone’s skin and hair type are different, personal preference will be more subjective with electric razors than other products. I did my best to use my personal experience as more of a comparison tool, instead of concrete fact in regards to comfort and skin irritability. It’s also important to remember that my testing window was relatively brief, and that it can take up to 3 weeks to fully see how your skin reacts to a razor. I will use my long-term testing results to update this article.

    Since a major selling factor of electric razors is their convenience, it’s important that they’re easy to use. Straightforward operation not only translates into a quicker shave–essential for mornings when time is an issue–but a safer one as well. A razor that’s hard or challenging to use is more likely to result in improper technique that results in skin irritation. I evaluated each model’s overall usability and ease of use, noting if the operational controls seemed unnecessarily complicated, or if any display screens were too cluttered or vague to be useful. I thoroughly reviewed each razor’s instruction manual as well, evaluating it on how well it explained the specific technique to use the razor properly, as well as how to use any additional features.

    To test the shaving capability of each razor, I first grew a 3-day beard and shaved each side of my face with a different razor. I compared how effectively each razor fared with these longer hairs, specifically if they struggled and needed several passes to complete the job. I then used the same razors the next day to judge how they worked as a daily “maintenance” tool. During these tests I noted how the razors felt in my hand, how comfortable the head and blades felt on my face, and how close the overall shave felt when I was finished. I also noted their ability to easily maneuver and access challenging areas like under my nose or around my mouth. If applicable, I also tested each razors “wet-shave” function by shaving with shaving cream.

    After my shaving tests, I cleaned each razor according to their specific cleaning instructions. I noted whether or not removing the razor head was easy or frustrating, and how effectively their small brushes swept away debris. I also evaluated the ease of use and overall performance of any cleaning stations, noting any issues with loading cleaning detergent, noise levels, and cleaning mode times.

    Since electric razors are touted for their travel convenience, I compared the type and quality of their travel locks and storage cases, as well as their overall size and weight. Finally, I packed all 14 razors into my luggage for a cross-country flight, for a real-world test of their usefulness on the road.

    I really enjoyed the close, comfortable shave I got with this compact, inexpensive rotary razor, but the cluttered design and “light stimulation” LEDs seemed at best more trouble than they were worth and at worst just counterproductive. These three LED’s can be switched from blue (to, the company claims, reduce the appearance of acne) to red (which Mowbie claims can rejuvenate the skin), or switched “off” for a standard shave. While using the LEDs, the manual directs you to “keep the device in the same area for 3 minutes at a time for maximum benefits,” which seemed contrary to best practices for an effective shave. A disclaimer on the Mowbie website didn’t inspire much confidence in the effectiveness of these lights either. All that said, while the lights don’t seem worth it, I loved the compact size, light weight, and comfort of the rotary blades, which tackled my 3-day growth and maintenance shaves equally well.

    The bright yellow color of this wet/dry Wahl shaver is a refreshing alternative to black and silver options (and makes it easy to find in your bag if you take it with you on the road), and it’s affordable. It wasn’t comfortable to shave with, however, and struggled to cut longer, low-lying neck hairs during my 3-day shave test. It also doesn’t have a visual battery level indicator, just a single “low battery” LED to let you know when it’s running low. That said, its ergonomic rubber grip and thick plastic body give it a nice heavy-duty feel, so along with the bright color it is a practical option for travelers who keep it ready in a suitcase or commuters who want something for the glovebox — it just won’t necessarily give you the closest, most comfortable shave. Plus it has a 5-year warranty too, the longest of any razor I tested.

    The Panasonic Arc4 wet-dry model was  popular option several years ago, and remains on the market, but advancements in design and technology ultimately put more current models ahead of it on my list. The four cutting elements provided a comfortable, close shave in my testing, especially on longer neck hairs, although the bulky head required a bit of a learning curve to use comfortably. This razor is really easy to clean too, just pop off the cassette and run it under the faucet. I also appreciated the physical travel lock, which I feel is just easier to use than models that require an extended press of the power button to activate. It’s a good razor still, but if you want a slimmer head with the same cutting power it’s worth stepping up to a newer Panasonic or getting the more advanced Braun Series 7 7071cc.

    This multifunctional device is an all-in-one small bath or travel solution, and features a detachable handle, allowing you to swap out the razor head for the included nose/ear trimmer or toothbrush attachments. Although I appreciated its minimal design and straightforward operation, I found the razor attachment lacking in function and performance. It wasn’t able to shave as close as the other options I tested, and the fixed head was less comfortable to maneuver around my jaw. Even though I probably wouldn’t recommend this as your primary razor, it could certainly be convenient as a travel option, especially since it include a high-quality and roomy storage bag to keep all the extra pieces organized.

    I loved the compact size and comfortable, ergonomic handle of this razor, and the pivoting head gave a great shave during testing. The main drawback of this model is the design of the cleaning/charging station, which automatically initiates a cleaning cycle every time you place the razor inside to charge. The surprisingly loud cleaning cycle makes this especially annoying. You can also charge the razor by plugging it into the cord itself, but this does defeat half the purpose of the dock itself. The instruction manual was also inexplicably vague, using basic illustrations and almost zero written instructions. (I also tested the Braun Series 7 7085cc, which is identical to, but is black instead of silver.

    Andis reSURGE

    This Andis razor has a solid, high-quality feel and along with the Andis Profoil Shaver, received high praise from my barber. I personally had issues with its ability to shave longer neck hairs during my testing, which was especially inconvenient due to the lack of a separate trimmer. The head cover was also really difficult to remove for cleaning, and took a few minutes of tugging to finally pry it off. I did appreciate the slick minimal look though, and the magnetic head cover really makes it feel like a high-end tool.

    The unique blade design of the Philips Norelco OneBlade made it one of the most enjoyable razors I tested. Its compact wet-dry head is even smaller than the one on the manual razor I usually use, allowing me to clearly see my shaving area as I went. This combines the convenience of a dry shave with the precision and satisfaction of a manual shaver. This narrow blade does require a few more passes than traditional electric razors, but since its essentially a high-performance trimmer, you won’t have to go over the same area multiple times. It did give a slightly less close shave than multi-blade razors, making it better suited to precision trimming and 2-3 day shaves. A multi-blade option would probably be a better choice for daily users.

    Andis Profoil Shaver

    I was really impressed with the performance of this little razor, and the enthusiastic recommendation from my barber gave me confidence that it’s durable enough to last a long time. Even though it lacks the pivoting head of higher-priced models, the flat shape, staggered foils and practically weightless body made this razor easy to angle around the contours of my face. It’s not waterproof though, so you won’t be able to wet shave or clean this razor under the faucet. That said, if you’re looking for a no-frills, dry-shave razor, stop looking and just buy this one.

    If price is no object, and you want a high-performance tool that looks and feels like the Ferrari of razors, the Panasonic Arc 6 is probably what you’re looking for. Its six-blade head (the most of any electric razor) gave an efficient and close shave, and the ultra-smooth head movement had no trouble traversing the contours of my jaw. Although this blade variety and flexibility makes the Panasonic Arc 6 well-suited to tackle a wide variety of hair lengths and types, it would probably be overkill for everyday shavers. Keep in mind that our “splurge” pick, the Braun Series 9 Pro, does a similarly great job and can be had for about $150 less.

    This rotary shaver was a real joy to use, and I was surprised at how well its relatively bulky head was able to reach tighter areas, like under my nose and lips. It also features smartphone connectivity and a mobile app, which monitors your shaving data and provides tips and feedback on your pressure and technique. This app seemed like overkill and likely will be for most, but I could see it being useful for a first-time shaver, or those trying to diagnose the cause of a shaving-related skincare issue. Although the cleaning station is much more compact than other models I tested, it was a bit messy to use, and also does not double as a charging dock.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best office chairs in 2023: Tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    The best office chairs in 2023: Tried and tested | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    If you’re working from home, one key upgrade you should make is swapping out that dining room chair for an actual desk chair that won’t lead to lower back pain.

    In an effort to discover which office chairs are actually comfortable, we spent more than a month testing 12 different options varying in price, function and style. We compared important features like ergonomic design, back and lumbar support and tilt mechanisms — and dug into whether more expensive options are really worth the extra money. In the end, two chairs sat comfortably at the top of our list:

    Best office chair overall

    The Steelcase Series 1 stood out as one of the most customizable, high-quality, comfortable office chairs on the market, beating out chairs double the price — making it the best bang for the buck.

    Best budget buy

    The Alera Elusion Series Multifunction Chair emerged as our best budget pick, standing up to (and in some cases far surpassing) office chairs that retail for more than five times its price point, particularly in the comfort and adjustability categories.

    PHOTO: Hayley Saltzman/CNN

    On its website, Steelcase offers a good deal of information about what makes a quality office chair. The basics: It should “flex with you — helping you change postures while you sit; fit the natural contour of your back; move as you do,” while also allowing your arms to stay straight on your desk and your eyes level with your screen while you recline. After spending nine workdays testing three different Steelcase models, we feel safe in saying Steelcase knows what it’s talking about.

    While all three of the Steelcase chairs received high marks in our testing pool, the Series 1, Steelcase’s most affordable option, blends exceptional comfort and value better than any chair we tested.

    At first glance, the mesh chair’s aesthetic is unassuming, with simple, clean lines and a compact size. When compared with the other products we tested, which sometimes had sharp angles, oddly elongated backrests and unnecessarily large armrests, we found the Series 1 to be one of the better-looking office chairs in our pool.

    But when it comes to chairs, it’s more important that they’re easy on your back than on your eyes. We’re happy to report that with the Series 1, Steelcase marries function to that beautiful form. After three days of sitting in the chair, we felt the seat had the perfect balance of cushiness and firmness (further long-term testing over the past year further supports this). While we were initially concerned that the thick, plastic lumbar adjustment would feel stiff, it wasn’t an issue. The mesh backrest was both flexible and supportive throughout the testing period. The backrest, which has what Steelcase refers to as “Integrated Liveback Technology,” might not look as structured as some of the heavily padded backrests on the market, but it outperformed the cushioned backrests because it moves with you as you work and shift positions.

    As we learned throughout the chair testing process, backrest and seat comfort are negligible if a chair doesn’t allow you to customize it to fit your specific body. This is where the Series 1 really shines. While some of the other office chairs we tested merely offer adjustable seat heights and backrest angles, nearly every aspect of the Series 1 can be adjusted. And as an added bonus, it’s actually easy to make each adjustment with minimal guidance: While several other adjustable models require diagrams, videos and guides for proper setup, the Series 1 generally moves and conforms with the body in a very intuitive way.

    The arm height adjusts within a 5-inch range to help relieve upper back and shoulder fatigue; the arm width adjusts 4 inches overall; arm depth can retract 2 inches to allow the user to get closer to the work surface and into tight corners; seat depth adjusts within a 2.25-inch range to accommodate different leg lengths; lumbar height adjusts over 2.25 inches; the arm caps pivot independently 40 degrees inward and 40 degrees outward depending on your preference; and the seat height adjusts within a 5-inch range. If that list doesn’t mean much to you, here’s the bottom line: This chair is extremely adaptable.

    This ergonomic office chair is less than half the price of several others we tested, yet provides more comfort and flexibility than just about every chair we tested at any price point, making it a clear winner in an expensive market.

    PHOTO: Hayley Saltzman/CNN

    The Steelcase Series 1 might provide the best bang for your buck, but it’s still a fairly hefty purchase at around $400. While the majority of chairs under $200 we tested were more akin to a stack of cinder blocks than a high-end office chair, the Alera Elusion Series Mesh Multifunction Chair offers superb comfort and adjustability (it ranked third in that combined category, bested only by our best overall office chair and the Steelcase Leap Chair) with a very reasonable price tag.

    The Elusion was one of the comfiest chairs we tested. Its thick seat cushion stood up to more expensive chairs, and the breathable mesh back was one of its best features.

    While some of the adjustments on this chair are easier to make than others (though none of them work as seamlessly as with the Series 1), the Elusion does offer all of the customizations you need in a chair. Throughout the testing process, it became clear that height- and width-adjustable arms are key, and this is another area where the Elusion succeeded. While the Elusion’s armrests are very adjustable, they’re not as easy to adjust as the Steelcase armrests. To adjust the armrest width on the Elusion, you have to reach below the seat and turn a knob until you reach your desired position. The buttons for armrest height also feel a bit stiffer and harder to adjust than the mechanisms on any of the Steelcase chairs, but with a bit of force, it’s simple enough to move them. While the Elusion wasn’t the most adjustable product we tried (particularly with regard to armrest angle, which was not adjustable), both the height and the width of the armrests were ultimately more adjustable than the armrests on some of the much pricier competitors.

    One of the least desirable aspects of this chair is its assembly process. Of all the chairs we had to assemble, the Elusion took the longest: a cumbersome 43 minutes (after unboxing) to get the chair set up, not including adjustments. Given the number of chairs that arrive fully assembled, you do have to commit a bit of elbow grease to save some money with the Elusion. The instructions were incredibly vague and we wasted a good amount of time trying to attach the armrests. But given that the assembly is just a one-time inconvenience that results in a very comfortable chair, it was not a deal-breaker, especially at this attractive price point.

    While the Alera Elusion clearly has some limitations to its level of adjustability (most notably in the armrest angle and backrest height categories), its overall comfort level makes it one of the best options for its price tag, even after taking into account the somewhat lengthy assembly process.

    Related: This cheap gaming chair has become my ultimate WFH accessory

    The testing process for these office chairs lasted nearly two months. We unboxed and assembled each chair, paying special attention to the amount of time each unboxing and building process took. For the chairs that required assembly, we logged the amount of time it took to put each chair together. Once each chair was fully built, we reviewed all of the adjustment materials included and adjusted the chair to the proper specifications as much as possible.

    Once the chairs were properly assembled and adjusted, we sat in each chair for three consecutive 9-hour workdays in the exact same office setup and conditions every day. We carefully noted how each chair performed in different positions accommodating various tasks throughout the workday (typing, writing, phone calls and video meetings). We also logged the overall comfort level after several days of sitting and working in each chair. Overall, we evaluated based on what would be the most important to the user: comfort and adjustability, build and length of the warranty.

    To determine the most accurate overall scores for each of these three larger categories, we broke the testing into 10 subcategories:

    Comfort and Adjustability

    • Seat comfort: We noted how the seat felt upon first sitting down, and then re-evaluated at the end of the three-day mark.
    • Backrest comfort: We noted how the backrest felt upon first sitting down, and then re-evaluated at the end of the three-day mark.
    • Armrest comfort: We noted how the armrests felt upon first sitting in each chair, and then re-evaluated at the end of the three-day mark.
    • Adjustability: To evaluate each chair’s adjustability, we made a note of the various features on each chair that could be adjusted, ranked individual adjustability of each feature on a scale of 1 to 15, then averaged these numbers to get an overall adjustability score. We analyzed adjustability on a scale of 1 to 15 for each of the following office chair features: Seat height, seat angle, seat depth, armrest height, armrest width, armrest angle, backrest angle, backrest height
    • Back and lumbar support: We noted the level of lumbar support each chair provided (if any) upon first sitting in the chair. We also analyzed the level of back support each chair provided, paying special attention to how supportive the backrest felt in a range of angles and chair positions. Like the other tests, we then re-evaluated at the end of the three-day mark to determine a final score.
    • Ease of reclining: First, we noted whether each chair allows the user to recline. Then, for the chairs that did include a recline function, we ensured that each chair was adjusted to its loosest or easiest recline setting, then noted how easy it was to recline the chair while sitting in a normal position.

    Build

    • Ease of assembly: For the chairs that required some level of assembly upon delivery, we recorded the amount of time it took to unbox and assemble the chair, from start to finish (not including time spent properly adjusting the chair).
    • Quality of chair materials: We made a note of our first impression of the fabric, armrest materials and finishes on each chair. We paid special attention to how sturdy each chair seemed upon first impression (i.e. did it squeak or seem as though it could fall apart?). We also made a note of these details after three days of sitting in each chair.
    • Overall aesthetic: We assessed each chair’s overall appearance compared with the other chairs on the market and in our testing pool. We also made a note of the variety of color options for upholstery, metals, plastics and other materials used to make each chair.

    Warranty

    • Does it have a warranty? We rated the length and coverage of the warranty for each chair.

    Branch Ergonomic Chair ($329; branch.com)

    This is one of the most affordable chairs we tested. Its biggest attributes, especially at its price point, are its simple aesthetic, its excellent 10-year warranty and its ease of assembly. The Branch chair is also relatively adjustable — offering easy-to-adjust armrests, seat depth and lumbar support. In spite of these positives, the Ergonomic Chair ultimately failed to outperform the Alera chair or the Steelcase Series 1 chair in the key category of comfort.

    The Ergonomic chair’s mesh back and armrests are comfortable enough, and its seat, while less cushy than the Alera Elusion, is adequate. The lumbar support, however, proved to be so uncomfortable that our tester was looking forward to the end of the test period. In spite of adjusting the lumbar support to its lowest and highest heights, and then ultimately consulting with one of Branch’s ergonomic experts (which the brand offers free to every customer), we couldn’t find a height that provided support without causing intense pressure on the lower back. One tester, who’s just over 5-foot-2, was on the lower end of the recommended height requirements for this chair; another, who is 5-foot-5, never experienced lumbar discomfort while using the product. For shorter consumers, this chair isn’t likely to be your favorite. For others, it’s likely a decent option if you’re looking for something a little prettier than the Alera Elusion and more affordable than the Steelcase Series 1.

    Ikea Markus Chair ($199; ikea.com)

    While this was one of the most affordable chairs in our testing pool, it was also one of the least comfortable chairs we tried. It’s still better than a dining room chair, but its thinly cushioned seat was uncomfortable after two days, the armrests were incredibly thin and rubbery, and the lack of adjustability was a major issue. Additionally, we found the backrest to be unnecessarily tall, and given the chair’s lack of adjustability, it just didn’t feel like a fit.

    Herman Miller Aeron Chair (starting at $1,350; amazon.com)

    This was one of the most aesthetically pleasing chairs we tried, and it received a high score for comfort and build across the board. The main downsides here were the steep price tag and relative lack of adjustability.

    Hon Ignition 2.0 Chair ($341, originally $637; amazon.com)

    While this chair received a relatively high score for adjustability, it lacked sufficient lumbar support and had an uncomfortable backrest. Although the backrest angle is adjustable, it was one of our lower-scoring chairs in terms of ease of recline. If you like to be able to comfortably shift back and forth between sitting upright and leaning back, this might not be the best chair for you.

    Steelcase Gesture Chair ($1,487.14; amazon.com)

    Steelcase chairs were some of our favorite products we tested. The Steelcase Gesture received a perfect score in terms of build, ease of assembly, and quality of materials. Its lifetime warranty also gave it high marks, but it simply wasn’t as comfortable as the other Steelcase chairs we tested. If you like a very structured, supportive backrest, this might be a good option for you. If you favor a more flexible, mesh back (and a lower price tag), go with the Steelcase Series 1.

    Steelcase Leap Chair ($858.65, originally $913.17; amazon.com)

    As previously mentioned, this Steelcase chair was actually the highest-rated chair in our testing pool, and it remained exceptionally comfortable even after three days of use. But, despite costing more than twice as much as the Series 1, the only areas where the Leap Chair beat it were in backrest and armrest comfort. Ultimately, product value is a key factor in our product recommendation process, and the Leap’s much higher price tag kept it from being our number one pick.

    AmazonBasics High-Back, Leather Executive Chair (no longer available)

    The best thing we can say about this chair is that it has very comfortable armrests. That aside, the lack of adjustability for the armrests (and for almost every other aspect of the chair) made it one of our least favorite products. This chair also received low marks in terms of build — it started squeaking on day one, and after three days of use, several of the screws fell out of the chair. Even if we concede this could be due to user error during setup, nothing like this happened with any other chair we assembled, so poor quality and assembly instructions are at least partly to blame.

    Humanscale Freedom Chair ($1289.99, originally $1,549; wayfair.com)

    This chair felt comfortable and cushioned without relying on thick, heavy padding. The overall aesthetic is impressive, plus the seat depth and backrest height were more adjustable than many of the products we tried. Unfortunately, the fact that the armrest width and angle didn’t adjust as much as we would have liked made this chair relatively uncomfortable after three days. The default width for the armrests was far too wide for our personal comfort level, even at its most narrow position. If you don’t mind wide-set armrests and you’re looking for a chair with a quality build, this is a solid option.

    Humanscale Diffrient World Task Chair ($623.20, originally $898; wayfair.com)

    This was another high-scoring chair. The mesh moved with us very easily, and overall it felt incredibly supportive yet light. This chair received a perfect score for seat comfort and backrest comfort, and we were impressed to note that its “tri-panel backrest” also provided exceptional lumbar support. Its ease of recline was also seamless — allowing for a supportive backrest no matter how much you choose to lean back. The seat depth and backrest height are both adjustable, which is a plus, but the armrests can only be adjusted up or down. If you think you’ll need to adjust the width and/or angle of the armrests on your chair, you might want to go for a Steelcase product instead. Ultimately, in spite of its high score, the Diffrient World Task Chair didn’t secure a top spot on our list, mainly because of the armrest issue and the fact that this chair normally costs almost twice as much as the Series 1.

    Sihoo Office Chair ($239.99; amazon.com)

    For almost every testing category, our notes on this chair contained some version of “not great, but not awful.” Overall, that’s how we’d have to summarize this chair, too. This chair received very low marks for its one-year warranty, and average scores for build, comfort and adjustability. The seat and backrest are pretty comfortable and the chair adjusts in all of the main ways you’d expect it to, but the armrests are wide-set and contain strange divots, making them some of the least comfortable ones we tried.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best drip coffee maker in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best drip coffee maker in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    There are so many brewing methods to choose from (French press, the currently trendy dalgona whipped, pour-over), but many coffee lovers still rely on the classic, automatic drip for their daily fix. That’s why we tested the best-rated drip coffee makers using a wide range of criteria (outlined below) over the course of several weeks. Bags upon bags of dark roast, light roast and medium roast coffee beans were ground and brewed. We made full carafes, half carafes and single cups. And we tasted the results black, with cow’s milk, almond milk, sweetened condensed milk, cold-brew strength over ice — you name it.

    Many, many pots of coffee later, we settled on four standout drip coffee machines.

    Best drip coffee maker overall

    The Braun KF6050WH BrewSense Drip Coffee Maker produced consistently delicious, hot cups of coffee, brewed efficiently and cleanly, from sleek, relatively compact hardware that is turnkey to operate, and all for a reasonable price.

    Runner-up with a modern bent

    This was, to our eye, the most handsome and minimally designed of the straightforward auto-brewers, delivering a clean, tasty cup. It lost first place only because the touchscreen may not be for every consumer, and brew time is significantly longer than the other machines we tried out.

    Luxury pick for the design-obsessed

    In just near five minutes, the Technivorm Moccamaster 59636 KBG Coffee Brewer turns out a whole pot of pretty perfectly brewed coffee, and the process is as entrancing as a targeted Netflix trailer.

    Best affordable drip coffee maker

    One of the cheapest options we tested, the Mr. Coffee 12-cup brewer is compact, simple to operate and yields a very competitive cup. ​

    CNN Underscored_drip coffee makers_braun body

    We brewed countless pots of coffee with the BrewSense, ranging from light to dark roast, and each one yielded a strong, delicious cup with no sediment, thanks to the gold tone filter, designed to remove the bitterness from coffee as well reduce single-use paper-filter waste. The machine we tested was white — a nice option for those with a more modern kitchen design — but it also comes in black, and it’s compact enough to fit under the cabinets in a smaller space compared to some of the more cumbersome machines we tested.

    The BrewSense is straightforward to operate: It’s designed like a traditional automatic drip machine with manual operating buttons, but with a sleek, modern upgrade. The hardware is a sophisticated combination of brushed metal and plastic, with a glass carafe that feels comfortable in the hand.

    The BrewSense doesn’t have a lot of bells and whistles compared to some of the machines we tested, and that functional ease helped elevate it to the top of our list. You could unbox this machine, flush it through with water once, and be drinking a freshly brewed cup within 15 minutes, all without reading the manual. Brewing is also a nearly silent process, which can be pleasing on early mornings. Some consumers may want a machine loaded with special features, but for those who just want delicious, hot coffee every morning, without spending over a hundred bucks, this is your best bet.

    The BrewSense isn’t perfect: It’s not the fastest we tested — to brew a full pot of 12 cups took upwards of 11 minutes. And we found an annoying error in the instruction manual around how to program the clock (call us rigid, but we insisted on programming the time before using each of the machines!); the directions read to press and hold CLOCK and then SET, but that didn’t work. We had to simply press and hold the CLOCK button and then sort of trial and error our way through the hours and minutes. Meanwhile, the auto-program setup is not as obvious as we’d have liked; though once we got it, it worked like a dream. But otherwise, we found this machine intuitive and easy to operate even without the instruction manual.

    Cleanup could at times be a little messier than some of our other machines. The hot water comes up through the filter basket and spreads the grounds up to the top of the cone, and during one brewing, a tiny bit rose up outside the cone so the top of the brew apparatus needed a little wipedown. Overall, though, for less than $80, this machine delivers the best bang for your buck of anything on the market.

    CNN Underscored_drip coffee makers_cuisinart body

    Coming in just a few points behind the Braun BrewSense was one of the three Cuisinart automatic drip machines we tested: the Touchscreen 14-Cup Programmable.

    We rated all three Cuisinarts highly, but the Touchscreen ranked highest for its combination of progressive design and everyday efficacy. All the Cuisinart products we encountered were well designed, but this one feels special, like when you unbox a brand-new Apple product: Its all-black, shiny surfaces and touchscreen control panel look and feel next-level for an everyday coffee maker (and the price, $235 at Macy’s, more than three times that of the Braun, reflects that).

    But this isn’t just a fancy, aesthetically pleasing machine: It brewed strong, delicious coffee that tasted cleanly filtered but rich. It’s also relatively easy to program and use, given its tech-centric platform. The touchscreen panel features cute little icons signifying one-touch commands to help customize your brew: If you like your coffee bolder, you can select the BOLD feature; if you’re brewing less than half a pot, select the 1 to 4 cups feature for a slower brew with the proper extraction time; adjust the hot plate temperature to low, medium or high; turn the audible brew-cycle-finished tone on or off.

    That tech-centric design is also one of the reasons this didn’t come in at number one, however. As exciting and different as it felt, we did feel that this machine — the only touchscreen model we tested — would feel less intuitive and more laborious than some consumers would want as part of their morning coffee routine. The touchscreen goes dark during the brew process, which yes, is nice-looking, but also feels a bit jarring, like you’re literally in the dark, asking yourself, “What’s going on? Is coffee brewing?” The settings and operating buttons are clear enough when illuminated, but it did take us a few times brewing to get used to how much pressure you need to apply with your fingertip to the touchscreen. We could easily think of people in our own lives who would be flummoxed by this machine if left alone with it and a bag of coffee — and for that, it lost a few points in functionality.

    Also, like its Cuisinart cousins we tested, this one’s a slower brewer. We clocked 11 minutes for eight cups, and if you’re watching your coffee maker brew like, well, a watched pot, it seems like it … takes forever. We understand the appeal of a slower brewing process (pour-over and Chemex fans, we hear you!), but 12 to 14 minutes for a full pot of coffee seems like a long time to wait when you’re thirsty for your morning Joe and you’re not doing it by hand. Finally, not everyone will want to spend more than $200 on a coffee maker. But many may.

    While some consumers might be flummoxed by the technology of this higher-end product, others will embrace it and make it a centerpiece of their kitchen, and rightly so. Form plus function equals morning happiness here.

    CNN Underscored_drip coffee makers_moccamaster body

    We had heard about the Technivorm Moccaster, a machine beloved for its innovative and old-school industrial design, handmade and tested in the Netherlands since 1968, even before we received it for this story. Multiple friends reached out upon hearing that we were testing a Moccamaster, singing the brand’s praises, and one declared it superlative via Instagram DM: “Moccamaster? Test over!” And the Moccamaster arrives with its own best PR too. Its user manual applauds buyers: “Congratulations on your purchase of the World’s Finest Coffee Brewer!” (If you’re spending more than $300 on a coffee maker, perhaps the enthusiasm feels validating.)

    Once we got the apparatus set up — which takes a little focus and time, to be honest — it really did pay off, with possibly the most delicious, hot, fresh cup of coffee we have ever tasted from a home-brewed machine. What’s more, you barely have time to peruse the morning news headlines before the process is done. The Moccamaster brewed 10 cups in less than six minutes, and, on a second trial, six cups in under four minutes. The brew function is almost jarringly fast: Once you turn on the machine, the brewing starts immediately. Then, seeing the water heat in the tank and bubble up through the water transfer tube into the brewer was a throwback to middle-school science experiments in the most pleasing way, like if a lava lamp produced fresh hot coffee after a few mesmerizing undulations.

    We discovered much to love about the Moccamaster, but there also were elements we didn’t adore. Perhaps ironically, they’re about the design. Some love a more hands-on coffee-making process, but some might find that there are just too many moving parts here, literally. We needed to read the directions pretty closely to assemble the parts. Once assembled, and once we digested what was happening brew-process-wise, the machine became fairly easy to operate.

    But each time you use this machine, you have to take the brew basket apart to add a new paper filter (yes, it requires a paper filter, if that makes a difference to you) and coffee grounds, and that basket removal sometimes disrupts the outlet arm and the reservoir lid — not a huge deal, but it could feel like you have to put your coffee maker back together from scratch every morning. Also, the basket lid and outlet arm, through which the hot water travels from the tube to the brew basket, get very hot during the process. It’s fine if you’re aware and cautious, but you wouldn’t want someone to wander up and unknowingly touch the hot part of the brewer.

    And finally, perhaps our most significant beef with this model: When you return the glass carafe to hotplate in between pours, the glass scrapes the warmer in a slightly cringey way.

    The coffee that this striking machine yields, though, may diminish other distractions — we found ourselves moving this maker back to the kitchen counter time and again, because the brew process and its results were superior. If you, like us, are a fan of the Moccamaster, you’re likely to be one for many years to come, which will amortize the steep price tag accordingly.

    CNN Underscored_drip coffee makers_mr coffee body

    We won’t go on and on about the Mr. Coffee 12-Cup, but it brewed a very workable 12 cups, in both taste and temperature, in just nine minutes. The machine came packaged in some pretty intense plastic and cardboard — the unboxing took a full five minutes and a pair of scissors — but once separated from its packaging, this machine’s a breeze to put together. The hardware is very easy to use (and to program to brew at a specific time), even without reading the directions. It’s compact — one of the best small drip coffee makers we tested — and durable, and the lid, brew basket, carafe and removable top half are all dishwasher safe, which wasn’t common among the machines we tested.

    The testing process for these coffee makers was intensive, lasting more than a month. We evaluated each machine based on what would be most important to the user — namely, functionality, durability and design. We tested each machine at least twice (but four to eight times for some) with both dark and light roast freshly ground beans, did a programmed/timed brew when available, and tested the additional functions of the more specialty machines (single-cup, cold brew, tea, milk frothing). We jotted notes about every machine’s unboxing, read every instruction manual, handled and rehandled the hardware, timed the brew of each machine, noted the temperature of the resulting coffee, and tasted and had others taste and weigh in on user experience. We tried to get as acquainted as possible with each of these machines, became fond of a good many of them — and as a result, we drank way too much coffee over the month in question.

    Read on for the categories and their breakdowns.

    Brew function

    • Optimal temperature: We didn’t take the actual temperature of the coffee from each machine, because we don’t think that’s how the average coffee drinker evaluates home brewing — experts recommend that coffee be brewed at between 195 and 205 degrees Fahrenheit, and served immediately, at 180 to 185 degrees — but we scored the perceived temp of each brew against all the others. We tasted each cup immediately after brewing, black, and then with added cold milk, and recorded the results.
    • Taste: The taste of coffee is, obviously, subjective. Two people could spend a lifetime tasting the different coffee varietals and never agree on one. That being said, we tested each machine with both a dark roast and a light roast, keeping the amount of grounds consistent to the machine’s directions. As a result, some machines that recommended using more grounds yielded stronger brews — in those instances, we retested those with less grounds accordingly.
    • Time to brew: For each carafe brewed, we timed the process on an iPhone timer, both for a full carafe and half. For those machines that made single cups, we timed that process as well.
    • Heat retention: We noted whether the machine brewed into a glass or a thermal carafe, and how hot the coffee remained a half hour to an hour after brewing.
    • User-friendliness: We did an initial scan of each machine, evaluating whether a new customer would be able to brew coffee without reading the instruction manual. We then assessed whether the design of each machine is immediately intuitive, and on a more micro level, assessed the settings and buttons on the face of the machine, the markings on the water tank and carafe, how easy the carafe is to fill, and the design of the brew basket.
    • Volume yield: We noted how many ounces each machine can brew.
    • Programmability: We recorded whether you can program the machine to brew at a set time.

    Durability

    • Everyday durability: For this category, we assessed how the machine responded to being handled during setup, filling the water tank, adding the grounds, removing and replacing carafe to serve, cleanup, and how durable the hardware felt.
    • Build quality: We noted what materials the machine is built from, e.g., plastic, metal, brushed metal, glass, and the tangible feel of each machine in a user’s hands.
    • Serviceability: We noted the ease of opening and taking apart the removable parts of each machine, in the case it would need to be serviced.

    Setup and breakdown

    • Ease of assembly: We observed how long it took to unbox the machine, put it together, and do an initial water flush before the product could be used.
    • Size of machine: We assessed how much counter space each machine took up, and how easy it is to move and store.
    • Ease of clean: After each brewing, we took note of how easy it was to clean the brew basket, the carafe, and the surrounding hardware.

    Aesthetic

    • First impression: We observed our first impression of each machine, noting details of design, color, size, feel — whether this machine looked attractive on our counter.
    • Color options: We researched if the machine came in any colors besides black.

    Warranty

    • We checked the number of years of warranty of each machine.

    Ninja Hot and Cold Brewed System ($179.99, originally $199.99; amazon.com)

    We tested two Ninja machines, both of which have some very appealing features. The hot and cold brew system brewed an excellent pot of hot coffee in less than five minutes, as well as a very tasty single cup (in multiple sizes), a less easy feat to perfect. It also brews coffee intended to be served directly over ice, an option that lots of consumers will like. We love the cool, minimalist glass carafe, though the lid features a big hole in the middle for pouring, which can lead to some splashing.

    This machine, though prolific in function, lost points because the water tank — plastic with prominent ridges — feels cheap and devolves the user experience a bit (with this machine, thankfully, the plastic tank is in the back, hidden from view, but does need to be handled every time you add water). Another problem with this machine: The water tank doesn’t have marking measurements, only half carafe, and full carafe, and two sizes of single cup. Without ounce or cup markings, how does one know how much water to add versus amount of coffee grounds? The Ninja machines come with a special-sized coffee scoop, different amounts on each end of the scoop, but it was bothersome that the water and the coffee amounts couldn’t be more standardized without relying only on the provided removable accessories (which, for the record, are cute — there’s a removable frothing wand). A lot of performance features with this machine also means a busy control panel that also feels a bit high-maintenance.

    Ninja Specialty Coffee Maker with Glass Carafe ($159.99; amazon.com)

    The Ninja Specialty is similar to the hot and cold brewed one, with one major difference: The water tank is adjacent to the brew basket, and visible to the eye. This one also brews a very nice cup of hot fresh coffee, and has nifty added functions, too, like myriad sizes of individual cups, half and full carafes, and an over-ice option. The placement of the water tank front and center here, though, makes this one less appealing than the hot and cold option; the tank, similarly, feels flimsy and cheap, a factor that’s difficult to overlook in user experience. For those who like the Ninja brand products (they make blenders and other items), though, there’s a lot of function for your buck here.

    Cuisinart PerfecTemp 14-Cup Programmable Coffeemaker ($99.95, originally $185; amazon.com)

    The most basic of the Cuisinart options we tested, this one brewed a nearly perfect cup at, for this reviewer, a perfectly hot temp (even after adding significant cold milk, we still had a steaming hot cup), thanks to an adjustable carafe temp. This machine is solid and well-designed, with one downside (for us): Brewing time was 14 minutes for eight cups, nearly double the time of some of the other brewers we tested.

    Cuisinart Coffee Center 10-Cup Thermal Coffee Maker and Single Serve Brewer ($200.98, originally $229; amazon.com)

    Our third Cuisinart brews only 10 cups into a thermal carafe, but has the handy bonus feature of a single-serve brew — with an attachment to use prepackaged coffee pods, or an adorable mini filter to use fresh grounds. (Note: The mini filter is a bit of a chore to clean because it is so small.) Like its Cuisinart siblings above, this machine makes good coffee, but the single-serve brewer does make the whole of the hardware more cumbersome. One annoying design issue: There’s an on/off switch on the side of the machine, whose placement feels not intuitive.

    Breville BDC450 Precision Brewer ($299.95; amazon.com)

    We were giddy upon opening this fancy brewer with much to offer: standard brew, fast, gold (what even is that, I wondered at first glance!), cold brew, single cup (with a sold separately attachment), and a customizable to your preferences setting. The options are exciting, but also overwhelming. The user is prompted to enter the consistency of their water, on a hard to soft scale — do all home coffee drinkers know the texture of their tap water? Also, does the average coffee drinker know what Gold Cup certification is? These feel like niche details for an automatic drip machine.

    Big picture, the Breville brewed a good pot of coffee, quite quickly, but we didn’t find it hot enough. The whole apparatus is beautifully designed, with sleek brushed metal and a lightweight, handsome carafe lovely enough to join a brunch table. But digging in further, we found this machine just to be … too much. Too much hardware — it doesn’t fit easily under our cabinets. Too many options — we needed to read up on a bunch of coffee wisdom before we could even set up the machine to our preferences. There are lots of users who would find this machine the sweet spot of function and sophistication, and enjoy exploring all of its specialties, but for those looking for turnkey coffee-making, this is a little extra.

    Black+Decker 12-Cup Programmable Coffeemaker, Black, CM1160B ($19.99; target.com)

    The most affordable automatic drip machine we tested, the Black & Decker 12-cup, is also a solid choice. It brewed eight tasty cups in eight short minutes — overall a good user experience. Hardware-wise, it felt a bit less durable than its closest rival, the Mr. Coffee, but it’s programmable and super easy for near the cost of two lattes with an extra shot.

    Bonavita Connoisseur 8-Cup One-Touch Coffee Maker ($145.99; amazon.com)

    The Bonavita Connoisseur has its fans, but we had multiple issues with the machine. This pleasingly retro-looking apparatus brews a nice cup quickly and at a good temperature, but the user experience leaves much to be desired. Simply put, the design feels flawed. The lid of the carafe needs to be removed before brewing, so the coffee just brews directly into a wide-open carafe — this was so counterintuitive to us, even after three or four brew tries, that it diminished the experience of the brew process. The brewer also gets very hot during brewing — so hot that we wondered if it might actually be a safety issue. Lastly, after brewing, we screwed the carafe lid back on and tried to return the carafe to underneath the brewer — sure, maybe we were still sleepy, maybe not enough caffeine yet — but the carafe doesn’t fit under the brewer with the lid on; the entire top of the machine popped off. This affects storage of the machine, too; because the carafe lid and the brew basket don’t both fit into the hardware at the same time, there’s always one piece loose.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best shower heads of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best shower heads of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Anyone who’s spent a night in a dingy motel knows that not all shower heads are created equal. And these days, when self-care is a priority and we’re spending more time at home than ever, upgrading your shower head is a no-brainer. First up: deciding the flow that’s right for you. Are you a rain shower devotee or someone who prefers intense water pressure pointed directly at your back’s aching muscles? Next up: finding a quality head that is easy to install, doesn’t leak, looks great and, of course, delivers one heck of a shower.

    To help you narrow down the selection — trust us, there are thousands out there — we spent hours researching the top options on the market and decided on 11 shower heads to test, retest and triple-test over the past several months. The good news (beyond the fact that we’re very, very clean) is that all those IRL showers resulted in four winners:

    Best shower head overall

    The Kohler Forte Shower Head’s three spray settings are each incredibly different and equally successful. There’s the drenching, full-coverage rain shower, the pulsating massage and the “silk spray” setting that is basically a super-dense mist.

    Best low-flow shower head

    Limiting water flow to just 1.5 GPM, this compact head is serious about sustainability. And even with all that environmental friendliness, it still manages to deliver a deluge of water and a very satisfying shower.

    Best dual shower head

    The Attract will have you feeling like you’re showering at a 5-star hotel. With an ultra-broad face and handheld shower head, this gets you three shower heads in one: Use the main rain shower head, the hand shower or both simultaneously for a head-to-toe water immersion experience.

    Best budget shower head

    The Wassa High-Pressure Shower Head is ultra compact (it’s only 3 inches wide) but delivers an intense, high-pressure stream of water out of 45 silicone jets, providing the perfect marriage of a rain shower and massage setting.

    Kholer shpwer head in line.jpg

    Amazon

    The primary reason the Kohler Forte topped our list is because of the immersive shower experience it provides. Delivering a powerful rainfall spray, comprised of big, full droplets of water, the shower head’s main “full coverage” setting is all-encompassing and perfect for daily use. The intense pressure makes washing shampoo and conditioner out of your hair a quick process, and it’s super helpful when rinsing off soaped-up little ones who are much shorter and farther away from the head.

    The water also manages to be gentle due to those full droplets that are created, thanks to the brand’s “Katalyst” air-induction technology, which forces 2 liters of air per minute into the shower head. Whereas competitors’ streams seem to blend together, we could literally feel each droplet being issued out by this Kohler standout.

    Fear not — Forte’s other settings are equally great. The pulsating massage can target specific areas, making it perfect for a post-workout shower, delivering a pummeling force of water to sore muscles and other aches. And then there’s the “silk spray” setting. Typically, this type of setting is ineffective at best, creating a steamy mist that isn’t able to rinse off anything. The Forte’s mist setting, however, produces a dense spray that is ultra light but also still full enough to get all your washing needs done.

    The Forte manages to achieve all of this while also being low flow. At only 1.75 GPM (2.5 is the federally mandated ceiling for GPM; more info on GPM below), the shower head is not only WaterSense-certified but also California Energy Commission-approved — disproving the notion that low-flow shower heads are synonymous with low pressure.

    Elegant in design, Forte comes in six finishes — the French gold hue is hot in the bathroom design world right now, but it will cost you an extra $37. The 5.5-inch-wide shower head isn’t the biggest on our list, but it’s also not the smallest. While it won’t be the focal point of your bathroom (turn to Glacier Bay’s giant square shower head if you’re looking for wow factor), Forte’s graceful sloped shape and broad head will blend in beautifully with glamorous and no-frills bathrooms alike.

    This shower head was also incredibly easy to install; it took less than two minutes from opening the box until it was attached and running. It came preinstalled with a washer (many of the others required us to manually install those), so all we had to do was screw the head onto the shower arm, though the instructions suggested using a wrench to tighten.

    And it’s easy to clean too: Just rub the head’s silicone jets and any mineral buildup will come right off. Truly, the only thing we could find wrong with this product was its limited warranty, which covers it for just one year — this was the lowest warranty of all our tested shower heads, which typically offered five- to 10-year (or, in some cases, lifetime) warranties.

    Overall, if you’re looking for a shower head that checks all the boxes and delivers a consistently powerful water stream, the Forte is a sure bet and worth its relatively high price.

    high sierra in line.jpg

    Amazon

    The importance of water conservation in the United States and world beyond is clear, and if it’s a top-of-mind concern for you, then let us introduce you to the High Sierra Classic Plus. The lowest of the low-flow heads on our list, the Classic Plus boasts a 1.5 GPM, making it both WaterSense-certified and California Energy Commission-approved. As mentioned above, there is certainly a high-efficiency shower head stigma, with some believing these heads would deliver nothing but an ineffectual trickle of water. The Classic Plus dispels the notion, however, by producing a bursting stream of high-pressure water, easily rinsing off soap and dirt.

    Perhaps what we loved most about this head during multiple tests was just how purist the product is. Single-function and made solely of metal — trust us, this is not the shower head industry norm! — the Classic Plus is small but mighty. Measuring 1 inch by 1 inch by 3 inches, the fixed shower head weighs just about half a pound, and yet it’s able to produce a wide, forceful stream that easily rinsed products out of even the longest hair. More eco-friendly details to know: Made in the USA, the Classic Plus’ compact size correlates to a smaller carbon footprint, as the company uses less material and energy during the manufacturing process.

    The nozzle’s patented design is worth mentioning too, as it’s unlike any other shower heads we tested. Shooting water out of one single orifice — rather than, say, via a pressure regulator and through dozens of tiny silicone jets — the Classic Plus is virtually clogproof. This design also makes installation a breeze; just screw it onto the shower arm, and voila, it’s attached. Same goes for cleaning, as you just run your finger through the hollow cavity to do so.

    We also liked the product’s customizability. Available in four finishes (chrome, nickel, oil-rubbed bronze and polished brass), the Classic Plus comes in three flow rates as well (1.5, 1.8 and 2 GPM). If the shower arm height is over 6.5 feet high, the brand recommends opting for a 1.8 or 2 GPM, which dispel larger water droplets, to ensure that optimal rinsing can be achieved. And if you want to save even more water, opt for the trickle-head version, which comes with a turn-off valve that reduces water to a trickle while you’re lathering or shaving (or chasing a toddler to get back into the shower).

    Perfect for smaller and outdoor showers, the High Sierra Classic Plus emits a surprisingly strong, consistent spray for its miniature size. If you’re looking for something with more bells and whistles, this isn’t the shower head for you. But if you’re A-OK with a simple product that delivers a nonstop drenching stream, all while conserving water, the Classic Plus is your best bet.

    moen in line.jpg

    Moen

    One look at the Moen Attract and it’s easy to see that the shower head would be right at home in a fancy hotel. Simultaneously tasteful and luxurious-looking, the Attract’s oversize “rain shower” head (measuring 6.75 by 3.75 inches) topped our list not only because of its lustrous aesthetics but also because it delivers a doozy of a shower. It’s no wonder the head has raked in nearly 1,900 likes on Home Depot.

    For one, there’s the fact that it’s a dual shower head, offering up a powerful stream via the rain shower head, in addition to six effective sprays via the handheld. When testing it out, we felt pampered by the three-in-one optionality, whether succumbing to rainfall deluge from the main head alone, opting for one of the intense handheld sprays or combining both for all-encompassing water coverage. The shower heads continually deliver a blissed-out experience akin to something you’d expect from a spa.

    In addition to the superb water pressure coverage and consistency, we were also smitten with the Attract’s highly intuitive design. Specifically, we’re talking about the “Magnetix” technology, wherein the handheld lives in a magnetic dock, easily releasing and snapping back into place. Unlike other dual shower heads on the market, where you have to maneuver the handheld back into a slippery, narrow dock adjacent to the main head, the Attract seamlessly lands on the magnetic dock, conveniently located directly under the main head. This positioning is genius, because when combining the two heads, they’re able to work in unison, delivering one giant stream of immersive water. More to know: We appreciated the water-conservation-friendly “pause/trickle” button on the handheld — which allows users to stop water flow midshower while they, say, shave their legs or lather up — and the fact that the water temperature stayed consistent once the pause button was released.

    Speaking of water conservation, a chief selling point of the Attract is that while being totally luxurious, it’s also a high-efficiency shower head, emitting 1.75 GPM (which is toward the lower end of the heads we tested). WaterSense-certified and California Energy Commission-approved, the Attract proves that low flow doesn’t have to mean low quality.

    Like most dual shower heads, the Attract comes with more parts and pieces, which added to our installation time. All in all, from box opening to shower running, the installation took about 10 minutes. In terms of cleaning, the silicone nozzles are easy to wipe off, and the chrome version we tested out was indeed spot-resistant.

    The Moen Attract checks all the luxe boxes — it’s beautiful to look at, it’s smartly designed, it delivers an incredible shower experience and it’s eco-friendly to boot. The only reason it didn’t make it as our top overall shower head is because, well, not everyone has the room or need for a dual shower head.

    Here’s the thing about the Wassa High-Pressure Shower Head: When we heard that it was $19 and had more than 11,000 positive reviews and a 4.8-star rating on Amazon, we were pretty much sold. Testing the head in-person proved what the many reviews touted, which is that this shower head delivers an incredibly powerful rain spray given its compact, 3-inch-wide head size and budget price. Reminder, folks: It costs less than 20 bucks.

    If water pressure is your top priority, then you should seriously consider this shower head. Described as both “heavenly” and “magical” by myriad Amazon reviewers — one even called it a “power wash” for your shower — we were eager to discover for ourselves what exactly all the excitement was about. And, no surprise here, Wassa lived up to the hype. Shooting water out of 45 silicone jets, we found the stream to be intense and direct, and we could literally feel every single one of those 45 jets bearing down on us. While some Amazon reviewers complained that the pressure was too extreme to, say, wash your face, we’d have to disagree; the pressure is strong, for sure, but not to a level of discomfort. And if you’re worried about stream coverage, fear not, as a swivel ball joint makes it easy to maneuver the head, directing the stream to your desired angle.

    There are some downsides, however, such as the head’s 2.5 GPM flow. Yes, this makes it WaterSense-certified, but it’s at the higher end of GPM levels in heads that we tested and it’s a no-go for Californians (more on that below). There’s also the fact that this shower head is single-function, with zero fancy settings to choose from. The product’s simple design, however, works to its advantage when it comes to installation and cleaning — both were easy and fast.

    While the Wassa is missing some of the luxe features you’ll experience with pricier competitors — namely, a multitude of spray settings — you won’t find a better shower head at this price point. It’s totally sufficient for any bathroom out there.

    After scouring the shower head market for bestselling, top-rated, trending and critically hailed options, we corralled a test group of 11 shower heads that (on paper) met the standards buyers are most interested in, including design, build, function, aesthetics and price.

    We then tested each unit by taking a minimum of three showers — including a quick rinse, a long luxurious soak and the ultimate test: washing down four kids after a long summer day. Our testing process was intensive, lasting several months. In addition to those overall shower experiences, we also evaluated:

    • Water pressure and coverage: This category was clearly a biggie. Here, we were looking for an intense, consistent stream that was maintained throughout different settings and when switching from main shower head to handheld.
    • Stream coverage: We noted the width of each head’s stream and whether or not they could deliver a full-body drench.
    • Spray settings: While some of the heads we reviewed were single-function, others had as many as nine spray settings. We analyzed whether the settings were decipherable and effective, and noted the user-friendliness of switching back and forth between settings.
    • Leakage: We assessed whether the shower head leaked from its connection to the wall, from the head itself when turned off and from the head when switching between settings.
    • Build quality: We ranked the shower heads on signs of damage over time, build quality, quality of materials and the tangible feel of the products in hand. Specifically, we also noted what each shower head was made of (e.g., metal, chrome finish, plastic, etc.).
    • Ease of cleaning: After each shower, we took note of how easy it was to clean the shower head’s spray jets (and handheld, if applicable) and the surrounding hardware.
    • Ease of assembly: We noted how long it took to unbox each shower head, how many parts were in each box and whether the parts were clearly labeled.
    • Ease of installation: We assessed if the directions were clear and accurate, whether any special tools were required and how long it took to install the shower head and its additional parts (if applicable) from start to finish.
    • First impression: We observed our first impression of each shower head, homing in on the design, the size, the shape and whether it looked attractive on a standard subway-tiled shower wall. We also noted what type of bathrooms the heads would be best suited for, from commercial use to a luxe master suite.
    • Market comparison: We compared and contrasted the shower head to the vast options on the market, noting the design merits and flaws of each.
    • Color options: We researched if the head came in any colors besides the standard chrome.
    • We checked the number of years of warranty of each product.
    • Since 1992, all shower heads have been federally mandated to have a lower flow rate — specifically 2.5 GPM — in order to conserve water nationwide. The bonus for consumers is that it’s also going to save you on your utility bill (yay!). Some regions have gone even further in their regulations. California, for example, has instituted a mandatory 1.8 GPM standard. As a result, brands are responding, creating high-efficiency shower heads that meet or surpass the federal standards. Any product with a 2.5 or lower GPM receives a WaterSense certification label from the EPA.

    For the aesthetically driven, this sleek, ultra-modern rain shower head from Glacier Bay takes the design cake. The extra-wide — it’s 9 inches wide, people! — square-shaped head offers up a whopping 81 rub-clean jets that work to deliver a wide rain shower. Available in five finishes, including trendy hues matte black and gold, the shower head can be installed in under two minutes and features a 1.8 GPM, making it WaterSense-certified. Ultimately, the head didn’t make our “best” list because its water pressure didn’t overwhelm. While rain shower heads overall tend to be delicate, this one felt extremely soft to us after multiple test drives. Bottom line: This shower head looks and feels much fancier than its price tag suggests.

    $29.99 $24.99 at Bed Bath and Beyond

    Similar to the Moen Attract, this dual shower head features a fixed rainfall head, clocking in at 6 inches wide, in addition to a high-power handheld. How it differs, though, is in price. With the RainSpa head, you get a huge shoulder-to-shoulder stream, six spray settings (including a pause option) and easy-to-clean jets for under $25. If you’re a Bed Bath & Beyond Beyond+ member, you can snag it for $19.99. Though it’s a great choice for those looking for a dual shower head at a bargain, the product did have some weaknesses. Its myriad components, coupled with the chrome-finished material that has a cheaper feel, led to a less satisfying overall experience than the higher-end Moen. So, although they perform similarly, we think you’re better off spending more on the Moen for a better build quality that’s likely to hold up longer.

    Delta In2ition 2-in-1 5-Spray 6-Inch Dual Wall-Mount Fixed and Handheld Shower Head

    Boasting one of the more clever design schemes of all the heads we tested, the Delta In2ition features a built-in handheld that magnetically attaches by sliding into the main shower head. The two units can be used in unison or separately, together delivering a wide stream of extra-large droplets. We found the handheld’s water pressure to be rather low, or “gentle,” making it a good option for kids. We also experienced some leakage when switching the water from the shower head to the handheld. It did earn points for its innovative design and compact footprint, however, not to mention its 1.75 GPM and WaterSense certification.

    American Standard Spectra+ Touch 4-Function Shower Head

    If you’re looking for a big ol’ fixed shower head, this is a decent option. At more than 7 inches wide, the Spectra+ offers up a full-body drenching stream. What’s different from most heads is that you can switch between settings by simply touching anywhere on the outer ring of the circular head — no levers or pulleys required. We love the four pretty finishes too. Ultimately, the downside for us was the Spectra+’s less-than-intense water pressure and its plastic composition, which lent a slightly cheaper look and feel than some of the others in our testing pool.

    AquaStar Elite High-Pressure 6-Setting Luxury Spa Hand Shower

    AquaStar Elite works as both an overhead shower and a handheld, but its big selling point is the antimicrobial jets that, the company claims, repel bacteria, thanks to a built-in Microban coating, which never washes away. Whether this makes any difference or not, we found the head’s settings to be strong and effective, with the pulsating massage to be the most powerful of any we tested. The narrow stream coverage is what kept it from earning a top spot on our list, but all in all, we’d say this is great for a guest or kids bathroom.

    Hydroluxe 1433 Handheld Shower Head & Rain Shower Combo

    $24.99 at Amazon

    Beloved by more than 10,000 Amazon reviewers and rocking a 4.4-star rating, this dual shower combo is a solid purchase for anyone on a budget. Boasting all the bells and whistles of a fancier brand — five highly effective spray settings (everyone, truly, should experience “power rain”), an oversize 4-inch-wide face, rub-clean jets and a sleek chrome finish — this shower head is a steal at this price. That said, if powerhouse water pressure is a must, you’ll want to look elsewhere.

    For those who simply can’t get enough spray settings, let us introduce you to Waterpik’s PowerPulse, which has a whopping nine on offer. And having tested them all out multiple times, we can attest that the water pressure intensity and consistency remain forceful throughout. Designed specifically to deliver a therapeutic, massage-like shower, the head’s targeted stream does just that. The downside: Its simple, utilitarian look might be a bit out of place in a glam bathroom. It was a hair off from being chosen a winner for its performance (it worked just as well as our top pick) but came up significantly short in terms of build quality. Still, this is a great choice for those who don’t care about appearance and want a cheaper option than the Kohler Forte.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best sports bras of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best sports bras of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret that a supportive and comfortable sports bra is crucial to achieving a great workout, whether you’re headed to hot yoga, taking a spin on the Peloton or training for a marathon.

    To help you find the best sports bra for your body and workout preference, we had nine reviewers test 18 popular bras. Our panel put them through months of workouts — both leisurely (errands) and high-octane (running) — and in the end we found four bras that you should absolutely get.

    Best overall sports bra

    All of our testers — even those with 38G and 36DD chest sizes — found the ultra-supportive Nike Dri-Fit Swoosh to be the most comfortable sports bra they’d ever worn. The soft, breathable, sweat-wicking fabric and simple zip-front design kept everyone comfortable even in high-octane workouts.

    Best running sports bra

    We love Lululemon’s leggings, and the Lululemon Run Times high-impact sports bra lived up to the company’s reputation with padded, adjustable, crossable straps and sweat-wicking fabric that kept our testers comfortable through high-intensity runs.

    Best low-impact sports bra

    If you want to stick to low-impact fitness, Lululemon’s dainty Flow Y Nulu racerback bra crafted from the same soft material as its Align leggings is perfect for everything from leisurely strolls to Pilates reformer classes.

    Best sports bra for lounging

    A sports bra that is as comfortable as it is cute, the Girlfriend Paloma has a racerback design and features a buttery soft fabric made from 79% recycled plastic bottles.

    Nike

    The Nike Dri-Fit Swoosh Women’s Medium-Support Padded Zip-Front Sports Bra scored our top spot because it checks all the boxes — fit, support, comfort and an ingenious design. Hailed by our reviewers as the most comfortable sports bra they’ve ever worn, the Swoosh’s sweat-wicking Dri-Fit fabric, made from recycled polyester fibers, kept us cool and dry workout after workout. Even during our hardest sessions, the mesh backing kept us feeling cool and the stretch band never retained moisture — a big selling point for anyone who prefers to head straight from working out to running errands. This bra won’t get stinky or gross, and trust us, it’s so comfortable, you’ll want to keep it on straight till bedtime.

    The Dri-Fit Swoosh fit all of our testers snugly, supporting larger chests sizes just as easily as smaller ones, with straps that evenly distribute weight without pinching or digging. The bra’s stretchy fabric and band provide a compressive feel — but not constrictive — ensuring that your breasts evenly fill up the bra without any air pockets or empty gaps. In terms of sizing, it comes in XS to 2XL, and we found the measurements to be accurate. One of our reviewers is a 36DD, ordered a large and found it to be her exact size.

    The zipper closure turned out to be the best thing about this bra. Not only is it super sturdy, but it keeps breasts securely tucked away. Don’t worry about it coming undone; there’s also a hidden buckle inside the bra providing backup protection. The zipper is a savior post-workout too, making it simple to shed your bra — no more wrangling sweaty fabric over your face and head like traditional bras.

    We found the Dri-Fit Swoosh washed beautifully, with the removable insert pads even staying in place after multiple washes and dries. In terms of style, the bra’s simple design is totally worth showing off — the zipper and mesh design details keep it from being boring — and it matches most Nike swoosh-bedecked leggings. And if you absolutely don’t want to show off your sports bra, the zipper lays flat and won’t leave any bumps under your tank or tee.

    underscored lululemon run times sports bra red

    Lululemon

    Lululemon’s Run Times is a running-specific encapsulation-style bra that offers complete support for cups B through G during even the most fast-paced road or track workouts. Molded cups lift and separate the breasts, while the thick, padded straps are not only adjustable but also crossable for even more support. The result is a full-coverage bra that not only keeps your bust steadfastly in place but is also so comfortable it can be worn all day. One of our reviewers felt the straps helped to improve her posture during the workday, and that it fit so well she forgot she was wearing a bra.

    In addition to adjustable straps, the Run Times has a soft, stretchy hook-and-eye closure band that allows for even more customization. Sized like a traditional bra — most of the five colorways are available in 32B to 42G — the Run Times’ fit is incredibly accurate, with the straps and cups seemingly molding to the body, lifting and supporting the chest without smashing or constricting. Our reviewers attested their bras felt like they were made specifically for them, with zero gaps or awkward space in the cups.

    The perforated panels on the front and back keep air flowing throughout, which was a game changer for our running reviewers. And despite the bra’s nylon/Lycra fabric being somewhat thick, we found it successfully wicked sweat from the body during runs and high-intensity workouts.

    All in all, this bra was our top pick for running because it offers incredible support for chests of all sizes during high-intensity runs while also keeping users dry and cool.

    underscored lululemon Flow Y Nulu Bra sports bra white

    Lululemon

    If the Lululemon Flow Y Nulu Bra Light Support taught us anything during our review process, it was not to judge a book by its cover — or, rather, not to judge a bra by how it looks on the hanger. Made from the brand’s lightweight, buttery soft, four-way stretch “Nulu” fabric (80% nylon, 20% Lycra), the compression-style bra looks flimsy at first. But it offers plenty of support to keep your bust in place for a medium-intensity workout. Our reviewers, a 34C and a 36C, tested it through a variety of exercises — from Pilates reformer and Core Power Yoga classes to treadmill runs and strength training — and found the bra moved with their bodies and stayed ultra supportive with zero bouncing.

    That said, design-wise, the wireless bra does offer less coverage than most. Featuring skinny racerback straps, the Flow Y manages to compress the breasts and keep them separated (removable pads help with this) without any pinching or digging at the shoulders or band area. While you can rest assured that you’ll never spill out over the top of this bra, know that cleavage will be on display if you’re wearing it solo. Our reviewers also felt that the bra’s continuous support and compression was a bit much after a few hours — this isn’t our first choice for all-day wear. It excels during your workout, but we found that the band started to feel tight as the day went on, prompting us to take it off.

    In terms of wicking, the fabric’s claims hold true. We tested it out during a hot yoga class and the bra kept us dry, despite the fact that we were sweating profusely. Beyond that, the fabric never chafed our skin, and it washed beautifully, with zero pilling after more than a dozen cycles. The bra caters to small cup sizes (A to C) and is available in sizes 2 to 14 (basically ranging from a 28A to a 44C), so larger sizes are out of luck. While both our reviewers found a size 6 adequately fit their chests, we recommend sizing up if you’re on the cusp of two sizes, since the bra has a tight fit. Available in more than a dozen colors and patterns, you can coordinate with a slew of Lululemon leggings and shorts, because who doesn’t love to match?

    What stands out the most is this bra’s minimalist design. There are no bells and whistles here — just a great-feeling fabric and simple, flattering silhouette that hugely delivers on support for low- and medium-impact workouts.

    underscored girlfriend collective paloma sports bra navy

    Girlfriend Collective

    Let’s face it: Not every day is a workout day. But why not ensconce your body in something that is supportive yet incredibly comfortable anyway, such as the Girlfriend Paloma Racerback Bra? Yes, you can throw this bra on for low-impact workouts, but our reviewers unanimously agreed that they preferred it for all-day wear, and tested it while partaking in activities ranging from lounging and running errands to Zooming from home and traveling across the country.

    The Paloma is a full-coverage, wireless bra with a longer design than most we tested, with the built-in support band landing mid-torso. It also has a flattering scoop neck and thick racerback straps that evenly distribute the weight of the chest without any digging or pinching.

    One Underscored editor likened this bra’s snug, supportive fit to a “nice hug on my chest.” The soft material (made from recycled plastic bottles and spandex) clings to the body, supporting your breasts in a way that is compressive and gentle all at once, with zero riding up — even after a full 10 hours of wear.

    The Paloma may not work for everyone, however. The bra is available in sizes XS through 6XL, and while our reviewers with smaller chests (34B and 34C) found the bra’s size and fit to be perfect, our reviewer with a bigger cup size (32H) struggled with the fit — the medium smashed her breasts, but sizing up would have resulted in the band being too large.

    The four bras we recommend can cover all your workout needs. From a zippered workhorse that can handle anything to a supportive and adjustable running bra, a skimpier yoga option and a cozy, wear-all-day essential. But what do you need to know before you choose the sports bra that’s best for you?

    No matter what size your breasts are, they need proper support when you exercise. Though your chest has pectoral muscles, none of those reside in or support your breasts. Which means you’re going to need some help if you want to stave off the forces of gravity while you move.
    First, finding your correct size is key. You can measure around your chest to find the band size, then measure around the largest part of your bust for cup size. Next, you’ll want to consider the type of exercise you’ll be using it for: low impact for things like strength training, yoga, Pilates and walking; medium impact for activities like spinning, skiing or boxing; or high impact for exercise like running, HIIT and Zumba.

    Finally, you’ll choose between the three different styles of sports bras. Compression bras restrict breast movement by compressing them against your chest, while encapsulation bras use individual cups to lift breasts, keeping them separate. A combination compression/encapsulation bra offers extra support with a combination of techniques — mainly for larger cup sizes.

    There are many factors that go into creating a quality sports bra. To assess them, and to find out how the bras worked over a wide range of sizes, we had nine Underscored staffers review each bra at least four times each over the course of several months. Our testers put each bra through low-, medium- and high-intensity workouts, in addition to a rigorous “lounge” assessment. We relied on the following categories and subcategories to investigate the best sports bras:

    • Support: Arguably a sports bra’s most important factor is support — does it adequately reduce breast movement during exercise?
    • Versatility: Can the bra effectively handle busts of all sizes? Can it do so in a full spectrum of workout levels? If not, what types of workouts is it best suited for?
    • Wicking: A bra that keeps you cool even during the most rigorous workout is the bra you want to buy, which is why we kept a close eye on how well each bra’s fabric wicked away sweat from the body while also staying dry.
    • Comfort: How long would you want to wear this bra? All day, or is it something you’re ready to take off when the workout is over?
    • Material: Is the material stretchy? Does it maintain its stretch without becoming loose? How does it feel against the skin?
    • Fit: How does the bra fit your body? Is it snug and supportive without being constrictive? Was there any pinching or digging at the straps or band? If it’s encapsulation-style, do the cups mold to the body? Are there any gaps or spaces?
    • Adjustability: Being able to adjust a bra on the fly is a huge bonus, which is why we paid special attention to whether our contenders featured any adjustable straps or bands, and how successful that optionality was within the bra.
    • Coverage: Does the bra provide adequate coverage to achieve an optimal workout? Is cleavage visible? Where on the torso is the band located?
    • Innovative details: We love a bra that goes the extra mile, and that can include anything from a mesh backing, ventilated fabric, adjustable band or J-hooks that convert U-backed bras into a racerback.
    • Pads: Are removable pads included? If so, do they stay put or do they slide around?
    • Was the brand’s sizing chart accurate? Was the bra size on par with the sizes reviewers typically order? If not, did the bra run small or large?
    • Is the bra cute enough to warrant showing off? Or is it purely functional and something best kept under a T-shirt? Does it come in a variety of colors/patterns? Does it have matching leggings or bike shorts to coordinate with?
    • Is the bra worth its price? If more than $50, is it worth the investment?

    Featuring just the right amount of coverage, this bra was a close contender for best overall slot. We loved the breathability the mesh backing offered, the compression-style support (that never felt constrictive) and the soft, sweat-wicking material. Available in sizes XXS to XXXL, the bra is currently available in nine cute colorways and patterns, each of which has coordinating leggings and bike shorts. Downsides (there weren’t many!) included no adjustable components and that the back band wasn’t as soft at the bra’s front band.

    A solid running bra option for busts big and small, it comes in sizes 30A to 38G, and the bra is incredibly comfortable (enough for all-day wear) and supportive, even when tested during high-intensity runs. We loved the padded, adjustable shoulder straps that can transform the bra into a racerback with a J-hook, the hook-and-eye closure and that it is a compression/encapsulation combo, with molded cups and outstanding support. More to know: The bra’s ventilated fabric actually works — we stayed dry during even the sweatiest of workouts. Downsides were that the bra did get wet when we were drenched with sweat, and that the design was more function-inspired rather than form-inspired, meaning we wish it were a little bit prettier, like all the stylish wares Sweaty Betty is known for.

    Bandier All Access Chorus Bra

    $58 From $9 at Bandier

    Great for lower-impact workouts like yoga and Pilates, this compression bra features spaghetti straps and a Y-back that are dainty and flattering as well as a hidden elastic band on the inside of the bra. We loved the sweat-wicking fabric that always stayed dry and the hefty support of the bra. That said, it offers less coverage than most — if you’re cleavage-averse, this is not the sports bra for you. And if you’ve got a bigger bust, it’s likely not going to offer enough support for a rigorous workout.

    From American Eagle and Aerie’s workout brand, Offline, comes this ultra-soft and cozy bra that we found best fit for lounging or low-impact workouts. Super cute in design, the bra comes in sizes XXS to XXL and in four basic hues (gray, black, navy and green). Matching leggings and joggers are available. The biggest fault we could find was that the bra’s band retained moisture, often becoming wet during our sweatiest workouts.

    Target for the win! This sports bra is a no-brainer for two reasons — first, it’s got adjustable straps that can be crisscrossed and an adjustable hook-and-eye closure band. Second, it’s only 24 bucks. We also love the size inclusivity (34B to 40DD), how comfortable it is and that it provides a hefty dose of support for a medium-impact workout. But beware: We found the sizing to run small, so we’d recommend going up if you’re on the cusp.

    $75 $38 at Brooks Running and From $24 at Amazon

    We love most products from running store Brooks — its running sneakers are among our favorites — so it’s no surprise that this running bra is up to snuff. Featuring adjustable straps and a hook-and-eye back closure, the encapsulation-style bra has molded cups separating and supporting the breasts and comes in sizes 30B to 44F. While it got the job done, the bra’s tight band and looser cups made for an awkward fit, especially when compared to the bras that topped our list.

    More than 1,500 Amazon reviewers love this bra for fuller busts, and we get why — it’s chock-full of adjustable options (strap lengths, J-hook for racerback optionality, ultra-wide hook-and-eye closure) and provides a consistent fit. We also like that it is super supportive and was described by one of our reviewers as being “absolutely comfortable enough for all-day wear.” That said, another reviewer found the bra’s band to be so tight that it left red marks around her rib cage — and said she would be happy to never wear the bra again. The good news is that sizing comes in 28D to 40G; the bad news is that the bra is definitely not cute enough to show off on its own.

    A medium- to high-impact bra for fuller-busted individuals — cup sizes go up to a KK — this underwire option features two molded cups that encapsulate each breast like a traditional bra, in addition to several adjustable options like straps that can convert to a racerback with a J-hook and a hook-and-eye closure. Unlike a lot of options out there for bigger chests, this one is pretty cute, and it did a great job at wicking away sweat during intense workouts. The bra’s biggest shortcoming was tricky sizing due to the UK size chart, which we were ultimately able to cheat, thanks to adjustable straps (for example, we tested a 32H when a 32FF would have been a better fit).

    Boasting more than 3,000 reviews on intimates brand Knix’s website and a 4.7-star rating, the Catalyst is a great option for medium- to high-intensity workouts for a variety of bust sizes — it can accommodate sizes 32A to 42F. The encapsulation bra has molded cups that separate and stabilize the breasts in addition to adjustable straps and a hook-and-eye closure. We found that it offers tons of support for larger busts during rigorous workouts and is super comfortable and appropriate for all-day wear. The downsides include the price — though it’s currently on sale, the bra typically retails for $89 — and the fact that the band’s width should be a bit longer, with more hook-and-eye closures. More to know: Our smaller-busted reviewer felt the sizing was off and the support wasn’t up to snuff.

    For the price, this bra is a good investment for low- to medium-impact workouts. The cute design features a scoop neck, wide cross-back straps and a sweat-wicking material that gets the job done. We recommend sizing up, and we wish the fabric were a bit softer — even after several washings, it remained rigid and led to a bit of chafing around the band.

    Similar in fabric to our best overall bra by Nike, this Dri-Fit alternative features a one-piece pad that is inserted via a pocket at the top of the bra. Appropriate for medium-impact workouts, the bra comes in more than 15 colors and sizes XS to 2XL — we recommend sizing down, as it tends to run big. The biggest flaw we found was that the pocket at the top of the bra often gaped open, resulting in an ill fit.

    Boasting nearly 900 reviews on the Athleta website, the Advance Bra is a bestseller for the brand for a few reasons. In addition to offering an adjustable band and straps, the compression bra has tons of ventilation, thanks to the open back and sweat-wicking and quick-drying fabric. For us, the biggest problem was fit — the band was universally tight on all of our reviewers, and we didn’t love the fact that you had to both pull the bra over your head and fasten the band via hook-and-eye clasps in order to get it on.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best workout headphones in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best workout headphones in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Anyone who spends time working out, inside or outdoors, understands the importance of a good set of headphones. Studies have demonstrated that music can make exercise more enjoyable, and even improve your workouts, so having a good set of headphones is essential. And the latest headphone are better suited for exercise use than ever, with secure fit, intuitive controls and weather- and sweatproof designs that let you concentrate on your workout without worrying about losing an earbud. There are even models specifically designed to let you safely listen while you’re working out in the great outdoors.

    To find the best exercise headphones for any kind of workout, we put leading models into action as part of our own daily workout regimens in the gym, at home and on the streets and trails, judging them on design, noise isolation, comfort, fit, battery life, IP rating, sound quality and usability. And in the end, we found some great headphones that should work for you whether you’re a gym rat or prefer the open road.

    The best workout headphones overall

    We used the Beats Fit Pro in the gym and all day for work, play and commutes, and found their secure, sweat-resistant design and superb audio make them a perfect fit for anyone’s workout, no matter whether you’re an Apple or Android user,

    The best headphones for running and outdoor workouts

    The Shokz OpenRun Pro bone conduction headphones don’t sound as good as sealed earbuds like the Beats Fit Pro, but we loved them for running and hiking, since they let you hear your surroundings as clearly as you would without wearing headphones at all.
    underscored lead beats fit pro

    Tobey Grumet/CNN

    The Beats Fit Pro earbuds offer all of the performance of Apple’s first-generation AirPods Pro in a more secure-fitting package that’s perfect for more active pursuits but great for everyday use too. In fact, they’re not just our favorite workout headphones, but they’ve been our recommended headphones for Apple users in general for the past year. Their reliable fit, easy-to-use touch controls and snug wingtip design meant that even over months of intense exercise testing, they never fell out — not one single time.

    The smooth rubber and light weight of 5.6 grams per earbud (they are much more compact than the similarly featured Powerbeats Pro) made us nearly forget we were wearing the Beats Fit Pro, and they were never loose or in need of fiddling with the fit while exercising. The flexible wings and tips with pressure-relieving vents made a real difference during workouts. Once secured, it took extra effort to remove them — even on purpose.

    That matters not just because we got a better music-listening experience, but because the secure fit let us concentrate on our workouts. We didn’t miss a minute of our virtual workouts — which included everything from running and rowing to lifting weights to core and yoga work — and never had to spend time fiddling with a loose earbud while moving. Plus, with IPX4 water resistance, we didn’t have to worry about sweat or using them in rainy conditions.

    febfavs Hayley - Beats Fit Pro

    Hayley Saltzman/CNN

    Plus, the controls (an advance over the first-gen AirPods Pro, and more like the current second-generation model) are simple to maneuver, and again let us stay focused. Just tap and click either bud to pause, play and skip tracks or to answer and hang up a call.

    Since the Beats Fit Pro make a great everyday headphone, their long battery life — around 6 hours on their own and up to 30 hours, including multiple refreshes from a fully charged case, as found in our in-depth testing — comes in handy. Also, unlike AirPods with third-party wings, these can charge in the case, wings intact, making them much handier for use, despite the slightly larger charging case.

    In addition to the great sound, intuitive controls and excellent noise-canceling capabilities, the Beats Fit Pro are just the most comfortable, best-fitting earbuds we’ve ever used. And when it comes to working out, sometimes you just need to get back to the basics.

    Read the full review

    shokz openrun pro 5

    Ashley Mateo/CNN

    The Shokz OpenRun Pro look and feel unlike the headphones you’re used to. Rather than sitting in your ear canals or over your earlobes, the business ends of these Bluetooth headphones rest just in front of your ears, on your cheekbones.

    The Shokz work using what’s known as “bone conduction” technology to deliver sound not through the air but through your cheekbone. Yes, your cheekbone. In standard over- or in-ear headphones, sound vibrations travel through the air down the ear canal to the eardrum where your brain processes these vibrations and interprets them as sounds. Bone conduction technology bypasses the eardrum and sends vibrations via the bones located in your upper cheek and jaw to your cochlea, or inner ear, and on to your brain.

    You’ll have to keep in mind that the sound quality is definitely worse than traditional sealed earbuds or suspended speaker designs like the Bose Sport Open or JLab Open Sport. It’s tinnier, and has the same sort of relationship to more listening-oriented headphone sound that blasting music from your phone or computer does to relaxing in front of a good stereo system.

    But that’s to be expected when you’re not delivering sound directly into your eardrum, and we found the sound quality of the OpenRun Pro perfectly adequate for workout purposes. It’s improved over previous bone-conduction headphones we’ve tried, with better bass and plenty of punch if you like bass-heavy music while working out.

    shokz openrun pro 1

    Ashley Mateo/CNN

    Realistically, even if you’re using a good sealed in-ear headphone like the Beats Fit Pro in transparency mode while you’re running, you aren’t looking for a fully immersive audio experience anyway. With the OpenRun Pro, we really enjoyed having situational awareness that let us hear traffic and the world around us just as well as we would without headphones.

    Unlike most of the Bluetooth workout headphones we’ve tested, the Shokz OpenRun Pro aren’t a true-wireless model. The earpieces are connected by a springy titanium band that runs around the back of your neck and hooks over your ears. Regardless of activity, the OpenRun Pro remained comfortable throughout our testing, without pinching or discomfort, and didn’t conflict with oversized sunglasses, a hat or both. And despite the barely-there feel, they didn’t budge during any workout, not even during high-intensity interval training. Battery life is a reasonable 10 hours, which got us through a week of runs and outdoor workouts.

    Read the full review

    A good-sounding open-ear workout headphone

    With an ear-hook design that supports a miniature, highly directional driver at the top of your earlobe, outside the ear canal, the Bose Sport Open let you hear your surroundings and your music without compromising sound quality as in many similar designs.

    A workout headphone that you can wear all day

    If you want a pair of excellent-sounding workout earbuds that make it easy to both block out and let in the outside world, the Jabra Elite 7 Active are well worth the purchase.

    An affordable open-ear headphone

    The JLab Open Sport are a unique, affordable and worthwhile pair of open-ear earbuds that make it easy to stay alert while exercising, but fit, weight and a touchy user interface make them better for light exercise and everyday use than for hardcore workouts.

    The workout headphones overall

    The best running headphones

    Weight

    0.18 ounces per bud

    1.02 ounces

    Ambient noise/transparency mode

    Yes (via Transparency Mode)

    Yes (via open design)

    Battery life (rated)

    Up to 6 hours

    Up to 10 hours

    Quick charging

    1 hour from a 5-minute charge

    1.5 hours from a 10-minute charge

    Noise cancellation

    Yes

    No

    Water and dust resistance

    IPX4

    IP55

    Colors

    Black, white, Sage Grey, Stone Purple

    Pink, black, blue, beige

    Price

    $160



    $180

    Noise cancellation and situational awareness

    Everybody loves noise cancellation, and it’s not just for the office or travel — it’s a great feature to look for in exercise headphones. Whether you’re listening to music in the gym or following along with a class or virtual trainer, it’s great to be able to block out the external world and really focus. Plus you can keep your tunes at an acceptable level so you won’t damage your ears.

    On the other hand, if your exercise regimen takes you outdoors, you won’t want to close off your ears from the world around you. Luckily, most noise-canceling models include a transparency mode that uses the headphone’s call microphones to let in some external sound, letting you maintain situational awareness. This will let you participate in conversations and — more importantly — keep you aware of important noise like traffic, trail users you might not be able to see or a cyclist coming up behind you. The best transparency modes include some noise-canceling features, like wind noise filtering, which are great if you’re out for a run.

    Noise-canceling headphones are typically sealed — they depend on a silicone or foam tip that fits snugly into your ear, piping sound directly into your ear canal. Those are great for indoor workouts, and using them in transparency mode lets them work outdoors as well.

    But if you really want to prioritize staying aware of your surroundings, an open-ear design lets you hear the outside world just as well as you would if you weren’t wearing headphones. Most of the open designs on the market use an ear hook or a clip secured to glasses frames to suspend a miniature, highly directional speaker above your ear. Others use bone conduction, in which tiny, powerful drivers that rest on your cheekbones work a bit like miniature subwoofers, transmitting vibrations and sound directly to your inner ear via your skull. Neither approach provides sound quality anywhere near as good as sealed models, but if you’re hitting the road or trail for some miles that likely isn’t a priority.

    Comfort, fit and stability

    While AirPods Pro and Galaxy Buds are great for general use, there’s a reason they’re not our first choice for workouts: They just aren’t designed to stay in your ears during exercise. The best way to keep your headphones steady is to consider a pair that uses wings, fins, hooks or clips (you can add third-party wings or hooks to your AirPods Pro, of course, but then they won’t fit in the charging case). These devices keep the earbuds secure in your ears, even while running, HIIT training and most any other activity, and they let you focus better since you won’t be checking to see if you’ve lost an earbud every few seconds. Plus we’ve found that the more stable fit is generally more comfortable, especially when you’re sweaty. All the headphones we tested also come with a set of at least three differently sized ear tips which will help ensure a better fit for different shaped ears.

    The majority of the headphones we tested — like most Bluetooth headphones today — will last through about a day of use on a single charge, and most come with a charging case that extends that to a week or so of all-day use.

    Since you may only be using them for a couple of hours at a time, this may not be a primary concern, though if you’re a long-distance runner or cyclist, you’ll want to make sure that the single-charge battery life is long enough to get you through the day.

    Water and sweat resistance

    All of the workout headphones we tested are water-resistant to some degree, typically described using an IP (ingress protection) rating, which uses two digits to describe protection against dust and moisture (if it isn’t rated against one or the other, you’ll see an “X” in one of the places. This will ensure that you won’t ruin the electronics after an intensely sweaty workout, a dusty trail run or in the rain. The dust scale runs from 1 to 6 and the water resistance scale runs from 1 to 9. An IP rating of IPX1 includes no dust resistance and only mild moisture protection; a rating of IPX9 is fully waterproof; a rating of IP68 is dustproof and can survive immersion in water

    Usability and controls

    The last thing you want to do while working out is to stop and mess with controls, which is why most workout headphones let you do basic things with touch controls, like adjust audio or skip, pause or forward tracks. Some go further, allowing you to make and take calls, summon a voice assistant or switch out the level of noise isolation, all with a simple tap. We much preferred models that let us access all necessary functions directly from the headphones themselves, letting us concentrate on our workout.

    Aside from the lowest-priced options, many exercise headphones use an app to access higher-level functions. Though you can certainly use them without it, the app can help you customize features like EQ as well as noise cancellation and awareness levels. Some also get more granular, letting you choose how you appoint your touch controls, but if getting what you need or making a quick adjustment is too confusing or annoying, the app won’t be of much help. Simple, straightforward apps are best if you’re trying to use them during workouts.

    Last — but not least — is audio quality. Just because you’re exercising doesn’t mean you need to tolerate poor audio quality, especially if you’re working out indoors. It’s no accident that our favorite pair of workout headphones overall — the Beats Fit Pro — has also been our overall favorite headphone for Apple users, at least in part because it sounds so good. We make an exception for outdoor exercise, where we think it’s worth sacrificing a little, whether you use a transparency mode or go with an open-ear design, in order to stay safe.

    To help find the best options, we put a variety of workout headphones to use as part of our daily workouts, at home, in the gym and outdoors in conditions ranging from sweltering heat to cool rainy days. While we did assess sound quality for each headphone, we weighted other factors — effectiveness of transparency modes, ease of use under stress, comfort — more heavily than we would when assessing headphones for everyday use.

    To check fit and comfort in real-world situations, we used them on long and short runs, through indoor endurance sessions such as cycling, running, dance and HiiT classes, which included jumping jacks, burpees, jumps, sit-ups and crunches. And we used them while we lifted weights, did yoga and pilates and did barre classes.

    Special attention was paid to how they stayed in our ears during stress tests and how they worked — and how easy they were to operate — when we were sweaty or wet. We assessed noise isolation in indoor settings, checking the headphones’ ability to stifle the noises we didn’t want to hear in the gym.

    For running and hiking use, we checked out how well transparency modes (or other hear-through technologies, such as bone conduction or other open-ear designs) let us maintain situational awareness and hear traffic and other street or trail users. We also made sure to note how easy it was to control the headphones while on the move and if any companion apps were simple to use when our heart rates were up.

    We really enjoyed runs with the Jaybird Vista 2, a full-featured, noise-canceling all-day true wireless headphone with a compact (and wireless) charging case and a well-thought-out companion app. The ANC was effective for focus (especially in blocking out a noisy bike trainer) while the SurroundSense transparency mode (which includes an adjustable wind-filtering setting in the companion app) was good for outdoor runs, letting us hear traffic easily. The fit is nice and secure too, courtesy of a well-designed wing and compact profile. It’s also IP68-rated, so you can get it really wet without worry in situations where you might not want to risk the Beats Fit Pro.

    We only had minor complaints. The combination of the tight seal and SurroundSense noticeably amplified our foot strikes while running, and we didn’t find the wind filtering terribly effective in stiff winds (it’s better suited for blocking out environmental noise while running on a fairly still day). And Bluetooth connections were a little flakier than with Beats or Apple products — we got some dropouts at 10-12 feet from a phone when moving around from routine to routine with the device on a table.

    The Vista 2 is a great all-around workout headphone that comes in cheaper than the Beats Fit Pro and is better suited for extreme situations (though it’s not clear you should be wearing headphones at all in those cases), but we give the edge to the Beats for better iOS integration, Bluetooth connectivity and audio quality.

    With a neat foldable earhook design, the Soundcore Sport X10 manages to fit a secure-fitting workout headphone into a compact case (USB-C charging only; it won’t charge wirelessly). A couple of our testers felt that the flexible, rubbery hook was substantial enough that it felt bulky and got uncomfortable during use, especially when worn with sunglasses. We were able to get a reasonably secure fit, though we felt that it wasn’t as solid as we were able to get with wing designs like the Jaybird Vista 2 or Beats Fit Pro, or with larger earhook designs like the Bose or Treblab headphones we tested.

    Like many of the recent headphones in the Soundcore line, the X10 sound great (Anker have really done their homework here) and the app offers a ton of EQ options (along with meditation exercises). Noise cancellation is included, with a transparency mode (with a wind noise reduction setting), though these modes weren’t on par with the Beats or Jaybird models we tested. That said, these are much cheaper than the rest of the competition, and given the very impressive sound quality and range of features, they’re a compelling budget choice, though best if you don’t run in sunglasses.

    Another budget workout headphone, the Treblab X3 Pro has the most basic features of any model we tested — just a simple design, without noise canceling, transparency modes or app integration. With flat-profile, full-size ear hooks, they worked better with sunglasses than the Soundcore Sport X10, and were very secure on road and trail runs. The X3 Pro doesn’t match our top recommendations in audio playback quality, however, and the big hooks mean a big charging case that you may not want to take with you unless you’re wearing a hydration pack. Without noise canceling and transparency you either get a good seal and decent isolation or a loose fit and very little, but given the nonslip hooks you don’t need to depend on a tight seal for them to stay put and that can work well enough in letting you hear your surroundings. This does make them less useful for outdoor sports, however — but if you want something inexpensive, basic and secure for gym workouts, the treadmill or Peloton, the X3 Pro may fit the bill.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best pour-over coffee makers of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best pour-over coffee makers of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    While we like a classic drip coffee maker when a full pot is absolutely necessary and can appreciate the quick convenience of a single-serve pod, a pour-over is the best way to recreate the rich, robust, full-flavored coffee you get at a specialty shop. Besides the soothing ritual involved with making pour-over coffee, the method is favored by professional and amateur baristas alike because a precise pour can extract the most flavor out of your beans into your cup.

    To help determine which pour-over maker you should add to your coffee-making routine, we rounded up eight highly rated and reviewed models to put through the wringer. We tested six flat-bottom- and cone-shaped versions and two larger all-in-one carafe-style designs, ranging in price from about $14 to $50. While many looked quite similar, they varied in materials (glass, porcelain, plastic and stainless steel), whether they required special filters, and how much coffee they produce with one pour.

    After testing each version three times (more on that below) — and, we’re not going to lie, some serious caffeine jitters — we found one clear winner.

    Best pour-over coffee maker overall

    We found the flat-bottom, three-hole design of the Kalita Wave 185 Pour-Over Coffee Dripper allowed for the most even and consistent brewing of all models tested. The Kalita produced the most robust coffee, maintained spot-on temperature, and the most even saturation of the grounds.

    Sure, at first glance the Kalita Wave looks pretty much the same as the other coffee drippers we tested, but it doesn’t take long to discover that the nuances of its design lead to a superior brew. Unlike its cone-shaped contenders, the Japanese-made Kalita features a flat bottom with three drip holes, which enables more easily and evenly saturated coffee grounds.

    The flat-bottom shape and its larger surface resulted in a rich and robust single cup of coffee, and was also the most user-friendly of the drippers that required a swirled pour, producing between 16 to 26 ounces at a time. Where grounds tend to be pushed up the sides of a cone-shaped design, the Kalita grounds stay even, so the water stays in contact with all the grounds longer, allowing for more consistent and sustained extraction.

    The actual brew time is quite quick: During our testing it took just 2 ½ minutes from our first pour of water until the last drip of coffee landed in our mug. All the while, the temperature of the brew stayed nice and hot ( at 160.5 degrees), topped only by the Chemex in heat retention. Setting up the Kalita is as simple as removing it from its box and giving it a soapy rinse.

    Another plus: The Kalita has a 4-inch wide base so it can be rested atop a wide-mouth mug (not all drippers tested can accommodate that). And while we prefer the heat-resistant, lightweight glass model, it’s also available in multiple colors, as well as porcelain, stainless steel and copper materials. It’s also a breeze to clean: The plastic base twists off easily and it’s all dishwasher safe.

    If we had a nit to pick with this dripper it’s the fact that it is made to be used with special Kalita Wave white paper filters. A bit pricey at about $17 for 50 (by comparison, other makers use regular Melitta No. 2 filters that are $20 for 600), they’re available on Amazon, but sometimes are out of stock, so we recommend grabbing a couple of boxes at a time when you have the chance.

    Overall, at less than $30, the Kalita Wave consistently delivers great-tasting, full-bodied, piping hot coffee, and its flat-bottom design means even pour-over novices should see great coffee-shop-worthy results.

    Best pour-over coffee maker for beginners

    The OXO Brew Pour-Over Coffee Maker is perfect for beginners, as it takes the guesswork out of the pouring process. Simply fill the water tank to your desired amount and let it control the flow rate. Just don’t expect the coffee to be as robust as with the Kalita.

    Best pour-over coffee maker for multiple cups

    When you need to make several cups at once, you can’t go wrong with the glass Chemex pour-over coffee maker. It delivers a light, flavorful, balanced brew every time. An all-in-one model, there’s no need for a separate carafe.

    Best pour-over coffee maker overall

    Best pour-over coffee maker for beginners

    Best pour-over coffee maker for multiple cups

    What we loved

    With three drip holes, the Kalita Wave enables more easily and evenly saturated coffee grounds. The maker produced a rich and robust single cup of coffee, was user friendly and easy to clean.

    Clearly marked with measuring lines, the OXO Brew’s plastic tank holds up to 12 ounces of water and regulates the drip for you. With the OXO Brew, there’s zero need to worry about pouring too much or too little water, getting the swirl just right, allowing enough time for the grounds to bloom and settle, etc.

    This aesthetically pleasing coffeemaker also produces wonderfully light, delicious, flavorful coffee. An all-in-one model that serves as carafe, dripper and pitcher, it can brew up to eight cups at a time, making it a fantastic alternative for a couple or small group.

    What we didn’t like

    Our one sour point with this dripper is the fact that you have to use special Kalita Wave white paper filters for brewing, which are a bit pricey at about $17 for 50.

    The coffee was not as robust as that produced by some of the other models; we found it to be a bit on the weak side. However, by experimenting with adding more grounds at a finer size, we were able to home in on a bolder brew.

    Obviously, it takes longer to brew eight cups and keeping all that coffee warm among fewer drinkers can be a challenge. This maker also requires special Chemex paper filters that aren’t exactly the cheapest.

    Key Specs

    Makes between 16 to 26 ounces in 2 ½ minutes

    Holds up to 12 ounces of water and self- regulates the drip. Makes coffee in about 2 ½ minutes

    Makes eight cups in a little over four minutes

    Price

    $24.99



    $17.95



    $46.68

    New at this? To make pour-over coffee, a dripper is placed on a cup or carafe and hot water (at around 200 degrees) is poured over pre-measured coffee grounds, which are then filtered into a cup or carafe. The speed of the pour, swirl technique, amount of water, amount of grounds, size of grounds and type of filter can all be adjusted to reach your favorite flavor profile.

    And while it all looks pretty simple — most drippers are smaller than a cereal bowl and come with no other accessories — perfecting the pour-over requires practice, experimentation and a few extra tools.

    Before you begin, you’ll need a kettle to boil water (we used an electric tea kettle, but many experts recommend a long-neck version for better control). You can, of course, use pre-ground coffee beans, but for the best, freshest flavor, you’ll want to use a burr grinder (we used the Breville Virtuoso) on whole beans right before you’re ready to start. If your grinder doesn’t feature a built-in measuring system, you’ll need a digital kitchen scale to control the amount of grounds used. Until you get the hang of it, you may also need a glass measuring cup to be sure you’re not using too much or too little water to brew your cup.

    We used the traditional pour-over coffee-making ratio of 2 rounded tablespoons of medium-sized grounds to 6 ounces of water, testing both a light and a dark roast for flavor comparisons. (Too coarse a grind will deliver weaker coffee, while too fine a grind can make it bitter.) Overall, we preferred the light roast for this method, as the dark resulted in a very intense brew. For each dripper, we poured water evenly and gently, swirling it from the center out until the grounds were just saturated, then waited 30 seconds for the grounds to bloom and settle back down (carbon dioxide is released when the hot water hits the coffee, causing it to bubble up). Then we added the remaining water. We also used a timer to measure how long each dripper took from the first pour to the last drip.

    We tested how hot each cup of coffee was (the National Coffee Association recommends serving fresh coffee at 180 to 185 degrees, while a study in the National Library of Medicine finds 140 degrees, plus or minus 15 degrees, to be the drinking optimal temperature for test subjects). And, finally, we sampled each brew, drinking the coffee black and noting its taste, intensity and whether any extra flavors showed up that shouldn’t be there.

    We didn’t notice much of a difference in heat temperature among the models. The Chemex was hottest, but the others were all in the same general range. They also all took about the same time to brew — right around two minutes (not including, of course, the two larger-capacity carafes).

    In general, we preferred the glass or ceramic/porcelain drippers to the stainless steel models. While stainless steel options have the benefit of not needing a paper filter (which not only saves money but is also more eco-friendly), we found they do allow small particles to seep into the coffee. That means you get a cloudier color, a less-crisp taste and that grounds sometimes find their way into your cup. We experienced none of those issues when we used paper filters.

    Performance

    • Optimum temperature: According to the National Coffee Association, the optimum temperature for freshly brewed coffee is typically 180-185 degrees, while studies have shown coffee drinkers like the temp to be around 140 degrees. Using that standard we measured the temperature of each cup using a food thermometer, rating each machine on its heat.
    • Quality of brew: We noted how the coffee tasted after being brewed, including whether it was overly bitter or weak, if flavors or acidity existed that shouldn’t be there, and whether too much — or not enough — heat impacted its taste.
    • Filters: We assessed whether or not the coffee dripper required a paper filter, and, when a paper filter was needed, whether it had to be specific to the model. We also looked at the prices and availability of those specific filters.
    • Brew time: We pulled up our stopwatch app to keep track of how long it took to brew the coffee from the first pour to the last drip, with shorter brew times scoring more points.
    • User-friendliness: From unboxing and setup to brewing, we took notes on how easy each machine was to use, including whether the design was intuitive or overly complicated and whether any extra steps were needed in comparison to other models.
    • Serving size: For each device, we noted how many cups of coffee each dripper could produce.
    • Dripping: We noted whether each coffee dripper caused any dripping upon removal from the cup or carafe.

    Durability

    • Everyday durability/signs of damage: For this category, we noted how easy or difficult each coffee machine was to set up, whether its parts felt sturdy or weak, and if standard use could cause any damage to the parts.
    • Build quality: We observed the materials each brewer was constructed of — metal, plastic, ceramic/porcelain — and how those materials affected the brew.
    • Cleaning: We made notes on how easy or difficult it was to clean each coffee dripper, including whether it was dishwasher safe.

    Warranty: We noted the number of years of warranty for each machine.

    Hario V60 Ceramic Coffee Dripper ($24.48; amazon.com)

    If you’ve been wanting to give pour-over coffee a try without making a huge investment, at less than $25, the handsome Hario V60 is a nice option. Able to brew up to 10 ounces at a time, this cone-shaped ceramic dripper features spiral ribs that allow more room for the coffee grounds to expand. Also available in glass and metal, as well as multiple colors, it includes one large hole, which means the speed at which you pour your water will have more of an impact on the flavor than, say, the Kalita.

    Like other models, the Japanese-made Hario sells specialized No. 2 filters for its dripper (about $10 for 100), which certainly isn’t super convenient, and its smaller base means it won’t fit well on an oversized mug. We liked that it came with a cute little handle and a plastic measuring spoon, but it brewed at a lower temperature than most of its competitors, and while still better tasting than what you’d get from a traditional coffee machine, it had a more watered-down finish than the winning drippers.

    Bee House Ceramic Coffee Dripper ($32.86; amazon.com)

    Like the Hario, the Bee House, also made in Japan, is elegant in white ceramic (and also comes in blue, brown and red). The short, curved handle gives it a unique aesthetic and we liked the fact that it features holes near the base that allow you to see how much coffee has been brewed without having to lift the dripper up off your cup. But the oblong bottom was awkward when placing the apparatus on top of a mug and it just didn’t work well at all with a wide-mouthed mug.

    The coffee it produced, meanwhile, ranked high among those tested, resulting in a nice, clear and light flavor that was not at all bitter and had a good mouthfeel. We also appreciated that it doesn’t require its own special filters and can be used with Melitta No. 2 filters (you can get 600 filters for about $20 on Amazon and find them in most supermarkets). And for those who hate the waste of filters, we tried it with a reusable cloth filter and found it did a fine job.

    Bodum Pour-Over Coffee Maker with Permanent Filter ($22; amazon.com)

    Available in sizes ranging from 12 to 51 ounces and three colors, we opted for the 34-ounce all-in-one pour-over carafe from Bodum. Similar in design to the Chemex, and at half the price, one big difference here is that the Bodum includes a reusable stainless steel mesh filter. While that will save you a lot of dough on buying paper filters, unfortunately, it will cost you when it comes to flavor. We found the stainless steel filters allow small amounts of sediment to seep through into the coffee, causing cloudiness and a slightly bitter taste. The coffee was also on the low end when it came to heat, which means a second cup is almost too cold to drink. And while Bodum offers a one-year limited warranty on the product, glass is not covered by it, which seems pretty useless. On the bright side, the collar is easy to remove and the whole thing is dishwasher safe. It also comes with a measuring spoon and works swiftly, brewing four cups in about four minutes.

    Yitelle Stainless Steel Pour-Over Coffee Cone Dripper ($15.94, amazon.com)

    First, the things we like about this inexpensive option: With a wide base, it fits nicely on oversized coffee mugs. The stainless steel mesh, cone-shaped design means there’s no need to buy paper filters. It brews some of the hottest coffee of the drippers we tested, clocking in at just over two minutes when it comes to brew time. It’s also dishwasher safe, comes with a handy little cleaning brush and a stainless steel scooping spoon and the brand features a no-questions-asked lifetime warranty.

    But when you get down to it, your coffee’s taste is what really matters and we found not only little bits of grounds in the bottom of our cup, but also a cloudiness and bitterness that canceled out all the good.

    Melitta Pour-Over Coffee Cone Brewer and No. 2 Filter Set ($13.95; amazon.com)

    For those looking to just dip their toes in the pour-over coffee pool, Melitta’s inexpensive, easy-to-use plastic cone-shaped version is a great starter option. Available in black or red, it uses the brand’s widely available brown No. 2 filters (a pack is included in this package combo), has a clever design that allows you to see into the cup during the brew process and fits nicely atop a variety of mug sizes. Producing drip coffee and filters since 1908, Melitta’s dripper gets high ratings on Amazon with reviewers praising it for being dishwasher safe, lightweight and allowing you to see into the cup. Where it falters for us, though, is the plastic build, which makes it feel far less sturdy than glass or ceramic models, causing us to stress out that it would tip over while pouring our hot water. The coffee’s flavor, meanwhile, was fine, but more often than not presented as pungent and did not impress us.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best sleep masks of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best sleep masks of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Sleep masks may seem to all be the same, but from how much light they block out to the amount of pressure they apply to your eyes, these sleep aids can indeed vary greatly. So over the course of more than a month, we tested nine sleep masks to find the best option out there. We focused on the uniqueness in design, how much light each filtered out and comfortability during several nights’ worth of sleep. Ultimately, one won us over for its dream-inducing design choices.

    Best sleep mask overall

    The Mavogel Cotton Sleep Eye Mask features a genius nose wire, so it blocks all — and we mean all — of the light. The mask is soft on the eyes and comfortable on the head, and it never so much as budged during the night, no matter our sleep position.

    You don’t always have to pay top dollar to get the best the world has to offer. Case in point: the Mavogel Cotton Sleep Eye Mask.

    Let’s get right to our favorite thing about this mask: the adjustable nose wire. Similar to the nose wire in the face masks that we have become all too familiar with, the Mavogel’s nose wire lets you get the perfect light-blocking, lock-in-place fit. Many masks had a slight crack of light around the nose bridge. This mask, though, formed the best seal around the edges, blocking out more light than any other mask we tested.

    The 100% cotton fabric is some of the softest jersey we’ve ever felt against the eyes. The Mavogel is so light, soft and airy that it has a barely there feeling. While we found all masks to press on our eyelids ever so slightly so that blinking was noticeable, this mask provided the lowest amount of pressure on the eyelids of all of the nonelevated masks that we tried.

    It’s the slim, nonelevated profile of the Mavogel that makes it a winner for all sleep styles: back, side, stomach — or combination somewhere in between. It withstood a rigorous tossing-and-turning test like a champ by not budging out of position — thanks to that nose wire — and hair was not tangled in the strap. We do wish that the adjustable head strap were a tad wider to spread out the line of pressure around the head, but it was so subtle that we’re really splitting hairs to make this comment. Tapered wings connecting the strap and mask prevent light leakage from the sides and these little ditties did the job just right. Other masks that we tested had much larger wings without a larger observed benefit.

    And, although more than half of the masks that we tested come with their own travel bag or box, this one was the most well thought out. The small pouch comes with a little carabiner so that it can easily be clipped onto any travel bag. The only thing we don’t like about the bag is that the mask has to be folded to fit inside, which affects one of the most brilliant things that this mask offers: a nose wire. We found that the nose wire can become deformed over time if you keep folding it up to fit into the pouch.

    Thanks to its unique nose bridge, effective side wings and staying power, we’re confident you won’t find a better sleep mask — especially considering its $10 price.

    Build

    • Light blockage: A sleep mask that doesn’t block the light is like a swimming pool without water. That’s why we weighted this category more than others. Masks that even showed the slighted crack of light lost a point. We tested in broad daylight and at night in a less-than-pitch-black New York City apartment.
    • Material composition: When something is going to sit on your eyes all night while you sleep, it has to be soft and breathable. While testing, we were careful to note whether the skin where the mask touched felt hot, cold or uncomfortable at all. We also paid attention to how our eyes felt after a night of rest with the mask on. Were they dry? Did they feel stifled? The softer and more breathable the mask, the higher the score.
    • Face shape versatility: No two faces are exactly the same, and that becomes glaringly apparent when trying to find an eye mask that works for everyone. We judged each mask on its ability to accommodate a variety of face shapes and sizes, nose types, cheekbone types and eye types. The more versatile, the higher the score.
    • Overall build: We stretched elastics, balled them up, washed them, dried them and slept in them to see how they held up to typical wear and tear. Then we judged which ones took a beating, still worked and looked like new.
    • Packability: Sleep masks are a popular travel companion for frequent flyers, and our top pick had to pack well. We looked at how the mask itself withstood being jammed into a suitcase or purse and whether it came with a travel bag of its own. Masks lost points for getting wrinkled or damaged and also for damaging other objects in the bag.
    • Weight: Going into this test we weren’t sure if weight would matter or not, so we decided to weigh each mask and then determine if that had an impact. It turned out that it wasn’t a consistent way to judge a mask. Some lighter masks felt better than heavier and vice versa, so we ended up blending this with the comfort score.
    • Washability: This was another surprising category. We had assumed that at least one of the masks would be machine-washable, but none of the masks that we tested met that expectation. We judged by how difficult each mask was to clean, dry and make ready to wear again. Some did better with the press of an iron, while others could be rinsed in the morning and worn in the afternoon without any fuss. One was completely unwashable. The highest points went to the masks that could be cleaned well without extra steps or difficulty.
    • Color options: We like options when it comes to a personal accessory like this, so masks that offered more colors and patterns got higher marks.

    Function

    • Rest quality: Now, this category was a tricky one. We judged how well a mask stayed on while sleeping, but sometimes it didn’t matter if it fell off. Why? We kept on sleeping and didn’t even notice the mask was missing because it helped us fall asleep so hard. We considered that a win, minus a point or two.
    • Stability: The last thing that we want is to notice the mask in a way that’s distracting, painful or annoying. Masks that shifted, were noticeable or even — gasp! — woke us up lost points. We especially noted if it caused uncomfortable pressure on the head, eyes or face. If a mask stayed put and felt invisible, it came out on top.
    • Heat/dryness: Ew. We hoped we wouldn’t come across a mask that really failed this test, and luckily we didn’t. Some felt dry and some felt a little swampy, so they lost points, but none were a total fail. Phew.
    • Adjustability: During this test we measured each eye mask and band to determine the minimum and maximum head circumference and then weighed that against the averages for adult men and women. It was surprising to see how far a few masks strayed from meeting the average in both directions.
    • Hair damage: Wearing an elastic band around your head all night could cause breakage or other hair damage, so we put each mask to the test. Masks that left our hair less tangled and with more typical bedhead got higher scores.
    • Warranty: Because masks tend to be low-ticket items, a guarantee or warranty turned out to be elusive at best. If one was available in any fashion, it got points. Three of the eight finalists that we tested fell into that category.

    Sleeping in the Ostrichpillow Eye Mask, on our backs or our sides, was the stuff of dreams. We slept in total darkness peacefully, and even if we had to get up in the middle of the night, it was simple to remove the mask and reapply it without much fumbling. One drawback to this mask, because of the soft but structured cups around the eyes with the Ostrich — very successful at keeping the mask in place and blocking light — sleeping facedown doesn’t feel natural at first. So, considering the price difference, we think you’re better off with the all-around great Mavogel.

    With an almost identical score as our winner, the Brooklinen Mulberry Silk Eye Mask didn’t disappoint much. This simple flash of fine fabric worked like a boss and felt like the luxury experience we expected. It did keep our skin feeling cool throughout the night and our hair untangled in the morning, and it was able to comfortably accommodate sleep in almost any position. However, because it lacks a Velcro closure and adjustable nose wire, it wasn’t as adjustable as our winner, which caused a string of differences. Differences include a smidge of light leakage and a tighter fit over the eyelids, not to mention it couldn’t accommodate as wide of a window of head circumferences.

    The MZOO Eye Mask comes with a pillow of satin-covered foam surrounding each eye, elevating the mask. This is a brilliant feature for eye comfort because eyes can blink naturally without feeling the mask, and there isn’t any pressure on the eyelids. Bonus: It also provides an extra light barrier and is perfect for people with false eyelashes. The mask is more for back sleepers, though, as it is incredibly comfortable — so long as you’re not on your side or stomach. Roll over to your side and those cozy light-blocking foam pads may cause the mask to push out of position, cause too much pressure on the eye area or both.

    IMAK Compression Pain Relief Mask and Eye Pillow

    This mask was noticeably different from the other masks that we tested. First of all, it’s very heavy at 186 grams. That’s because it’s filled with little beads that nestle into your cheeks and eyebrows to provide a soothing pressure. The very narrow elastic headband felt like a joke, but it actually worked pretty well. Obviously, this mask isn’t for side or stomach sleepers, or for people who toss and turn at night, because of its bulk. In fact, it’s really not great for a full night of sleep. But it is excellent for a de-stressing nap on your back or even in your desk chair.

    In our testing pool, this low-priced mask didn’t come close to the score of our winner, but it held its own and came in fifth place overall. This mask is your standard, run-of-the-mill sleep mask. If a mask that reflects your personality is just as important as the fit, then this mask — that comes in a staggering 24 color, pattern and art options — is your match. It’s easy to pack, comes with a storage bag, blocks out most of the light and works for a variety of sleep styles and face shapes. However, it does not meet the top-tier standards in a bunch of areas. The Alaska Bear Eye Mask’s silk caught on my eyelashes when I blinked. It also got very wrinkled after it came off during the night and left hair slightly tangled. So, for the same price, we’d much rather get the Mavogel.

    The Nidra’s cupped design makes it look like a tiny strapless bathing suit top for your eyes. It also looks almost exactly like another mask that we tested: the Bucky. This mask impressed us less than our winner, but that doesn’t mean the Nidra is a total throwaway. Those weird eye cups are actually extremely comfortable for people who blink or open their eyes in their sleep — or who wear false lashes. But it did not come through in many of our tests. It came off early in the night due to shifting. Hair was staticky after a night of wearing the mask, and the mask itself got deeply wrinkled after one night. We wouldn’t recommend throwing this into a suitcase without putting it in a bag or box — it doesn’t come with one — because the Velcro can snag on other fabrics and objects. The brand does offer a 30-day money-back guarantee, however, which was one of the most generous guarantees in our testing pool. Overall, this mask was fine but not great.

    Admittedly, we were excited to test this mask. Tempur-Pedic is known for its incredibly comfortable, conforming foam in all of its uses, and an eye mask seemed like a natural extension. Unfortunately, this mask ended up with the second-lowest score out of all eight masks that we tested. This is proof that you don’t always get what you pay for. Why? The Tempur-Sleep Mask is just too bulky, without purpose. The extra rolls of foam around the bottom are so big that the mask wouldn’t stay under my eyes. My cheeks pushed them up on top of my eyelids. The fabric collected dust and lint more than any other mask tested, and it felt drier on the skin and eyes than the other masks. Another point of issue was the pressure on the nose and cheeks that actually got to a point of hurting and waking me up. The Tempur-Sleep Mask cannot be washed, it absorbs creams and moisture from the skin and the Velcro closure will snag fabrics if not carefully packed separately in a suitcase. However, this mask blocks out light like nobody’s business, and if you have the right face shape, it could be a dream. It also comes with the most robust warranty that we tested at a full year. We have seen some seriously glowing reviews of this mask, so we were truly surprised at our findings. The Tempur-Sleep Mask simply didn’t win against the competition.

    When we took this out of the packaging we thought there was a mistake. It looked like we got another Nidra. But after closer inspection, we did find a few differences that lowered its overall score. There were also a couple of elements that scored higher than the Nidra but didn’t take it into star status. The Bucky mask ever so slightly larger, which oddly made it less effective at blocking light. The material felt a little more rough and textured than the Nidra and other masks that we tested. We like that it comes in seven colors and unique prints, including marble, floral and even tie-dye. One cool thing about the Bucky — and the Nidra, for that matter — is that it fits a wide range of head sizes, from 16.5 inches to 25 inches un-stretched, making it an option for kids as well as adults. Although this unique cupped mask has its perks, it wasn’t enough to win us over in the end.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best water bottles of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best water bottles of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    An insulated water bottle can keep you hydrated and help you cut down on plastic and paper waste — why buy bottled water or coffee if you can bring your own from home? But with an endless stream of water bottles making numerous claims about technological innovations and insulating properties flowing into the market, it’s easy to get lost in all the options.

    To determine which bottles are truly worth their price tag, we culled thousands of insulated water bottles down to 14 contenders after reading through reviews and browsing bestselling bottles across the internet. We then put them through a litany of tests to determine which is the absolute best. (For more on our testing process, scroll down.) After two months of testing and drinking a whole lotta water, we narrowed down our picks to two bottles that stood out from the rest.

    Best overall water bottle

    The Yeti Rambler came out on top during our testing thanks to its stellar thermoregulation, amazing durability and fantastic chug cap that gives you a comfortable and quick drinking experience while maintaining easy access to the superwide mouth.

    Best budget water bottle

    The 21-ounce Healthy Human Stein was a surprise standout in our testing for its durability and effective thermoregulation. We didn’t love the lid, but you can add the optional Flip n Sip lid to make the drinking experience easier. Plus, it comes in a dizzying range of colors and three sizes to fit most tastes and needs.

    26-Ounce Yeti Rambler

    While the Yeti Rambler is a bit on the pricier side, this water bottle is easily the best one we tested. Not only does it keep your drinks hot or cold for hours and hours, it’s solidly durable and has the best lid we’ve ever tested. Plus, the Rambler is customizable, available in 14 colors and five sizes (12-ounce, 18-ounce, 26-ounce, 36-ounce and 46-ounce) and it’s even dishwasher-safe.

    While there are other bottles with great insulation that are reasonably durable, what pushes the Rambler past any other option on the market in our eyes is its standard-issue chug cap. This lid is made of two components: one that screws into the bottle and contains a spout, and another that twists on top of that to keep it protected. This two-tiered system means that whenever you want to take a swig of water, you can unscrew the top and chug away out of the spout. But when it’s time to refill your bottle with water and ice, you can take the whole contraption off, revealing the Yeti’s ultrawide mouth.

    The Yeti Rambler's Chug Cap

    Other bottles we tested offered spout lids, but those often must be purchased separately, and none of them worked as seamlessly as the Rambler’s. The Rambler easily had the easiest drinking and filling experience out of all the bottles we tested thanks to this lid, which also retained little to no coffee flavor after our tests.

    Best of all, we love that with the Rambler you don’t have to give up much on aesthetics to get top-notch performance. The Yeti bottle comes in a bunch of bold, stylish colors, including a light blue, an olive green and even an eye-catching pink. What’s more, starting at an extra $5 you can customize your bottle with all sorts of designs from plain text and monograms to state emblems and even logos you upload yourself.

    The Yeti Rambler strikes the perfect balance between being a sturdy, insulated bottle that you can take on your roughest adventures while still looking good when it’s standing on your desk. Its customizability, ease of cleaning and ingenious chug cap are all reasons why no matter where you go, we think you’ll love having a Yeti Rambler at your side.

    21-Ounce Healthy Human Stein

    Hovering around $30 depending on which color you choose, this water bottle from Healthy Human was one of the top bottles we’ve tested. Its counterpart, the Healthy Human Curve, actually won our overall best spot last year. The Curve has had some issues with stock and is sometimes hard to find, but luckily the Stein is basically the same bottle as the Curve, just without the wavy design, which helped the bottle’s ergonomics but was a love-it-or-hate-it from the aesthetics side.

    Along with the other bottles we tested this year, the Healthy Human did an excellent job at retaining temperature, especially over our shorter time intervals. Plus, during our first batch of testing it scored the highest out of all the bottles we tested for durability. After dropping it on its bottom as well as on its lid, the bottle barely showed signs of abuse, aside from some paint chipping on the bottom. It was one of the only contenders that didn’t turn into a wobbly vessel that could barely stand up. Coming in at 21 ounces, its success during the drop test may have been due to it being one of the lighter options, though the 26-ounce Yeti and other smaller bottles we tested didn’t perform as well when given the same treatment.

    Where the Stein falls a tad short is its lid and mouth. The mouth isn’t nearly as big as the Rambler’s, so while filling up the bottle isn’t a chore, it’s definitely harder to get ice in as quickly as you can with the Yeti. The lid comes equipped with a carabiner and didn’t retain any bitterness after our coffee test; however, it’s a simple screw-on lid, so you drink directly from the bottle’s mouth instead of from a spout. You can, however, buy the Healthy Human Flip n Sip lid for an extra $14.99, which makes the drinking experience much better.

    The Stein comes in 39 different color options and three sizes (16-ounce, 21-ounce and 32-ounce), with different availability depending on the size you choose. The selection isn’t limited to base colors like other bottles, and includes fun designs such as Mirage, Willow Oak and more. The Healthy Human Stein also comes in recyclable packaging, which is nice for those motivated to buy a reusable bottle to reduce plastic waste.

    The Healthy Human Stein is a solid bottle that can keep your drinks hot or cold for as long as you need and won’t immediately dent or break when you drop it. Its lid isn’t the best, but its color selection and remarkably low price make it a bottle worth buying.

    For our 2023 update, we retested a handful of top-performing water bottles, conducting another round of thermoregulation tests and adding a coffee test to see if the bottles or lids retained any bitterness after being washed.

    Most bottles we tested had similar thermoregulation abilities, so we measured over a shorter period of time in this year’s tests to mimic everyday behavior. In our original testing, we measured hot water after 12 hours and cold water after 24, but this time we cut down the testing time to six hours for hot and 12 for cold since you (hopefully) won’t be drinking nine-hour-old coffee, and if you’re keeping up on your daily intake of water, it should definitely be time for a refill before the 24-hour mark.

    Since the top-tier bottles have similar thermoregulation abilities, we paid more attention to things that will affect your experience on a day-to-day basis like durability and drinkability. Our two winners were the two most durable bottles we’ve ever tested, both coming out relatively unscathed after being dropped three times onto concrete.

    We spent hours testing all 15 water bottles to make sure they met the demands of everyday use. That meant testing how long they keep water cold, how long they keep water hot, how they fare during a drop, how easy they are to drink from and so much more. Here’s a breakdown of what we tested and how we did it.

    Performance

    • Hot water test: We poured water just after it had finished boiling (starting temps all measured within a few degrees of each other, ranging from 202.4 to 207.1 degrees Fahrenheit) into each of the bottles and measured the temperature with a liquid thermometer immediately after the pour, then after six hours and 12 hours. For our second round of testing we only measured again after six hours.
    • Cold water test: We poured tap water from a sink on its coldest setting directly into the bottles and measured the temperature (starting temps all measured within 1.4 degrees of each other, ranging from 47.5 to 48.9 degrees Fahrenheit) with a liquid thermometer immediately after the pour, then after 12 hours and 24 hours. During our second round of testing, we filled the bottle all the way up with ice, then poured cold water and measured the temperature after 12 hours.
    • Drinkability: We drank from the bottles’ standard caps both while standing still and walking, noting how prone each bottle was to spilling and splashing.
    • Leak test: We shook the bottles, held them upside down and threw them in a backpack for a commute to see if any water leaked.
    • Coffee test: We poured freshly brewed coffee into each bottle and laid it on its side for several hours. Then we washed the bottle and lid and conducted a taste test to see if either component retained any flavor from the coffee.

    Durability

    • Drop test: We dropped each bottle three times from 5 feet above concrete on its lid and three times from 5 feet above concrete on its body. We noted if the bottle was still usable (if the insulation or lid broke), then assessed the amount of dents and other damage.
    • Cleanliness: We tried to clean each bottle with a normal sponge, then with a bottle brush. In this test, we also considered how quickly we could add ice to the bottle.

    Portability

    • Weight: We weighed each empty bottle in pounds on a food scale.
    • Carrying options: We noted any loops on the bottles, how many average-size fingers fit inside and how comfortable it was to hold.
    • Grip: We felt the paint on each of the bottles and ordered them from least grippy to most.

    We previously named the S’well bottle the best bottle for holding temperature, but after reconsidering how you’d use a water bottle in a day-to-day capacity, figured that whether a bottle can retain temperature better than others over 24 hours isn’t as important as durability and drinkability. Because of that, the S’well bottle dropped a bit in our rankings because it got extremely dented in our drop tests, and its small mouth means it’s a lot harder to clean and that filling it up with normal ice is basically impossible.

    The wide-mouth version of Klean Kanteen solves the small-mouth problem on the standard Klean Kanteen bottle (which we also tested), and touts a large lid and a sturdier body. It performed amazingly in the original cold water test, coming in second behind the S’well, but didn’t do as well with hot water. If you’re not into the Yeti or the Healthy Human, the Klean Kanteen TKWide would be our next pick.

    A Hydro Flask is a Hydro Flask. If you’re already set on buying one, you won’t be disappointed, but we just don’t think it’s the best option out there. It’s a great-looking bottle, but its performance wasn’t on par with many of the other options we tried. The biggest warning we’d give is not to drop the Wide Mouth version on its lid, because it popped right off and spilled water everywhere during our tests. The first time this happened we thought it could be a faulty lid, but after a second lid had the same problem, we decided to pin it on poor design.

    Hydro Flask Standard Mouth

    The Standard performed equally as well as, if not better than, the Wide. Plus, it’s smaller, which means less weight to carry around. You can’t pour ice in as fast, but the smaller opening also means it’s easier to drink from. Just be careful about drops. After our tests it got so damaged it lost its insulation abilities.

    This Klean Kanteen had stellar performances with thermoregulation. The biggest downsides were the small mouth (with a weirdly tiny lid) and the fact that the body got so damaged it caused the insulation technology to fail.

    This bottle performed quite well, especially with thermoregulation. The lid has a little magnet so it doesn’t hit you in the face while you drink. Its biggest downside: The cap broke off when we dropped it.

    If you’re considering CamelBak, go with the Chute Mag over the Carry Cap. The lid on the Carry Cap has a big loop, which is nice to hold, but it snapped off pretty easily during the drops.

    The Miir also did well in thermoregulation, outdoing both the Yeti and Sigg. However, it lost favor during the drop test, when the lid broke on the first drop. We didn’t test wide-mouth Miir bottles, only the standard. If you’re careful, Miir is a great option for a smaller, portable bottle.

    Sigg Hot and Cold One Thermo Flask

    This bottle performed well during the temperature tests, just about matching the Yeti Rambler. It’s a good-looking bottle featuring a lid with a locking mechanism and a built-in tea filter. Where it really fell apart was when we dropped it on that lid. It broke on the first drop. You can normally order replacement lids (though they’re out of stock now), but compared to the other bottles it just wasn’t sturdy enough.

    This bottle is beautiful, scoring the highest in pure design. But it’s also expensive and scored the lowest in our testing, especially in thermoregulation, where it had the third-worst score after the Takeyas. The lid shattered on the drop test.

    Takeya Standard

    The Takeya bottle underperformed with thermoregulation. The cap features a nifty little spout for fast drinking that unscrews to reveal a wide mouth, but it just wasn’t enough to overcome the poor insulation.

    The Active is basically the same as the Takeya Standard, with a few nice improvements. Most notable is the rubber boot on the bottom, which is well worth the extra $5 if you want to buy a Takeya. While it didn’t completely eradicate dents, it made a big difference and prevented any paint chipping on the bottom.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best portable induction cooktops in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    The best portable induction cooktops in 2022 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Long the go-to option for recipe demonstrators, food vendors, dorm room cooks and even professional chefs, a portable induction cooktop is more than just a simple hot plate. These single-burner devices come in handy even in the best-equipped kitchen. Whether you’re experimenting with induction to learn new techniques or cut down on using your stove, looking for a tabletop device for family hotpot nights or need extra cooking space at the holidays, induction burners are a convenient way to increase your kitchen’s cooking capacity quickly and efficiently.

    To find the best portable induction cooktops for your kitchen, we spent the depths of winter preparing classic meals like French onion soup and beef bourguignon on a handful of different models to find the best options.

    Best overall portable induction cooktop

    Compact and powerful, the Duxtop is quick to heat food, and cooks more evenly than any other we tested. This burner also comes with a bevy of useful settings like a child safety lock, timer and boil and keep warm presets.

    Best budget portable induction cooktop

    At about half the price of the 9600LS, the Duxtop 8100MC Portable Induction Cooktop is just as powerful and equally great at cooking, though it drops the convenience features and isn’t as attractively styled.

    The Duxtop 9600LS Portable Induction Cooktop was the best all-around induction burner we tried. It excelled on our cooking tests, handling a variety of tasks with ease. Since an induction cooktop can heat pans directly and efficiently via electromagnetism, it can get up to temperature much faster than a flame or traditional electric burner, and the Duxtop 9600LS got up to temperature the quickest of the competition (and held that temperature more accurately). It cooked just as well as our brand new LG electric range, but in a fraction of the time.

    The Duxtop 9600LS was the top-performing burner in our cooking tests. With 1800 watts of power, and temperature settings ranging from 130 degrees to 460 degrees Fahrenheit, the 9600LS handled every ingredient and task we tested well. It boiled two quarts of water in 4 minutes, quicker than some cooktops that took upwards of 5 minutes to reach a full boil. The 9600LS burner also gently sauteed onions, caramelizing them perfectly, rather than blackening or charring, as happened with the other cooktops we tested. At the highest heat setting, the 9600LS also beautifully browned a beef chuck roast in a cast-iron skillet.

    The 9600LS is compact — about 11.5 inches wide by 14 inches deep — and suited even to cramped kitchens, and its design is clean and functional, with a responsive, easy-to-read angled control panel that enabled us to make the most of this burner’s cooking capabilities. You can adjust the burner’s output by either power level or temperature; we found it easier to maintain a steady simmer using the power settings (rather than temperature selection). A child safety lock, timer, boil and keep warm settings round out the selection of useful features.

    The only issue we encountered was the high-pitched whine common to induction cooktops when used with certain cookware. This was actually less severe with the 9600LS than with the other cooktops we tested, so a point in its favor if you are sensitive to the sound.

    Duxtop 8100MC Portable Induction Cooktop

    The Duxtop 8100MC is a great alternative for the occasional user, someone on a budget or people tight on space. For around half the cost of the 9600LS, the Duxtop 8100MC cooks nearly as well, browning meat, sauteing onions and holding a simmer better than the competition. It even brought water to a boil faster than its bigger sibling, in around 3.5 minutes.

    The 8100MC is slightly more compact than the 9600LS (it’s about an inch shorter in depth), and has a similarly intuitive design, though the aesthetics are a bit less slick and the display more minimal. Like the 9600LS, the 8100MC lets you adjust settings by temperature or power level, though those settings are not as granular, spaced in increments of 40 degrees Fahrenheit rather than 20 degrees as on the 9600LS — even more so than with the higher-end model, we found it easier to stick to adjusting the burner output by power instead.

    The 8100MC also has a timer function, but it lacks a child lock or presets for boiling water and similar common uses. That said, the lack of presets didn’t feel like a dealbreaker, because it’s still possible to simply set the burner on low (or high) and maintain a constant temperature regardless of having a specialized button for it. We liked the 8100MC’s tactile buttons, by the way, which were a pleasure to use.

    As with the 9600LS and the rest of the cooktops we tested, the Duxtop 8100MC produced a whine when in use, but again, we didn’t find that to be a dealbreaker.

    ic 2.jpg

    Alex Arpaia/CNN Underscored

    Induction cooktops work very differently from the electric or gas ranges you might be familiar with, and their advantages over both traditional technologies make them a great addition to your meal prep routine. Rather than transferring energy by thermal conduction to your pots and pans (which is what’s happening when you use a flame or an electric coil), an induction burner heats the pan directly via electrical induction.

    An induction burner works by passing a rapidly oscillating current through a coil of wire located under the burner surface. This creates a magnetic field (you probably remember this from experimenting with electromagnets in school) and the current (which is alternating at a high frequency) produces an eddy current in a pan placed atop the coil; resistance within the pan then creates heat.

    For this to happen, the pan has to be made of a ferrous material, which is why aluminum and copper cookware don’t work on induction surfaces. Cast iron and most stainless steel cookware should work fine. A good way to test is by bringing a small magnet with you when you’re shopping for cookware — if a magnet sticks to the bottom of a pan you’re interested in, it will work on an induction cooktop. Luckily, the great majority of high quality cookware we’ve tested recently, from dutch ovens and cast-iron skillets to nonstick pans, is induction compatible, and manufacturers, recognizing the interest in the technology, have been making compatibility clear in packaging and labeling.

    The benefits of induction are many (you can find a nice write-up on the finer points of induction over at Fine Cooking). Induction burners are at least twice as fast as gas or electric burners for most tasks. Since induction doesn’t depend on transferring thermal energy, induction burners are both comfortable to work in front of and very safe — only the pan itself is heated during cooking so there’s no residual heat and the burner’s surface remains relatively cool. And there’s of course no environmental risk or climate impact, as there is with gas burners.

    Single-burner portable induction cooktops are a great way to experiment with the technology if you’re considering swapping out your gas or electric stove, or to incorporate it into your routine if you rent and don’t have that option. About the footprint of a food processor, they’re great for temporarily adding additional capacity to your kitchen for the holidays or for family meals like hotpot that require a heat source at the table. Since they’re cool to to the touch, they’re a lot safer than traditional electric hotplates — and they’re superior performers too. And they’re easy to keep clean and to store away when not in use.

    An issue common to induction burners — and we encountered it to some extent on every burner we tested — was that they tend to emit a high-pitched whine, whistling, rattling or humming sound when pots or pans are on the activated burner. Although the sound was annoying to us, some people are more sensitive to it than others and your mileage may vary. Either way, it is not cause for concern or the result of a defective burner.

    The whining noise is more pronounced at high-heat settings, or in lightweight pans, pans smaller than the burner coils or pans with little food, Heavier cookware (like cast-iron pans) can mitigate it somewhat, as can always making sure to choose pans that fully cover the burner area.

    ic 1.jpg

    Alex Arpaia/CNN Underscored

    We tested each induction burner with an array of simple, but standard cooking tasks, noting which models performed especially well or poorly and if there were any design issues that impacted functionality. We assessed the burners across a range of criteria.

    We tested how well the burners sauteed onions, noting whether they caramelized or if they started browning and burning. We also tested the high-heat searing abilities of the burners by browning large chunks of chuck roast for a beef bourguignon. And finally, we did a couple simple tests to see how quickly the burners were able to boil water, and subsequently, if they were able to consistently hold a simmer.

    Out of the box, we noted things like preset cooking functions, the size of each burner and quality of construction. We also paid attention to any useful features like a child safety look or cooking timer. If any burners beeped when making setting selections, or when the timer was up, we also took note of that. Finally, we noted how tactile the buttons were, and if any were especially unresponsive. Some burners only had membrane control panels, while others had physical buttons and switches.

    Isiler’s Portable Induction Cooktop was a close second to the two Duxtop cooktops we recommend. This burner’s large footprint — it’s about an inch deeper than the Duxtorp 9600LS — is what ultimately pushed it out of contention. If you have a lot of counter space, this burner worked as well as our main recommendations, but in my small Brooklyn apartment, that extra depth meant it was harder to use and store.

    The popular and affordable Max Burton 6400 Digital Choice Induction Cooktop has an attractive look, with an angled display that makes setting the burner simple. We ultimately dismissed this burner because its heat settings weren’t granular enough to maintain a simmer — we could get water to boil or entirely still. It also has a higher-pitched whine than others, which was difficult to tolerate, and burnt onions rather than nicely caramelizing them.

    The NuWave PIC Flex Precision Induction Cooktop has a bunch of great features, like heat settings with the appropriate cooking style (boil, sear, simmer, etc.) listed, and no noticeable whine at any setting. But the NuWave only lets you adjust temperature incrementally (though in relatively fine increments of 10 degrees Fahrenheit), offering only low, medium and high power selections (we much preferred models that let us fine-tune burner output by both power and temperature). It was the only burner that didn’t have a power off button, which we found inconvenient, and it lacked a child safety lock.

    The Zavor Pro Portable Induction Cooktop works well, and offers a lot of functionality, like numerous preset cooking settings. If you’re highly sensitive to noise, this burner might be a good choice, as we didn’t notice a whining sound when using this model. However, the Zavor has the largest footprint of the models we tested, was more expensive than most induction cooktops (costing well over $100, even on sale) and its heat settings are incrementally adjustable only by temperature, not by power level, which we missed when trying to hold a simmer.

    The design of the Aobosi Induction Hob is visually appealing, and it’s a steal for around $56, but we found the buttons tough to use, and it was unable to consistently maintain a simmer.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best places to buy glasses online in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best places to buy glasses online in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Ordering glasses online used to be something you did as a last resort, a way to pick up a budget pair or just to try something new without breaking the bank. But with more and more fashion-forward brands online than ever, venerable brick-and-mortar opticians launching web shopping and the industry as a whole embracing the idea, it’s easier than ever to get that new look or get that new prescription with a few clicks.

    We tried a dozen of the leading online eyeglass retailers, and after months of shopping, measuring, ordering and wearing the results for work, workouts and everyday, we’ve found the best online eyeglass retailers for you, whether you’re looking to save money, find something specific you can’t get close to home or just want access to the widest range of styles.

    The best place to buy prescription glasses online overall

    A huge selection of name and house brands and great try-on tools make it easy to find what you want, and the retailer made us a great pair of glasses. A short return period is the only real downside

    The best online eyeglasses on a budget

    With the lowest prices on average and an ever-expanding catalog of frames and lenses, Zenni’s the least expensive way to get great glasses online. You’re locked into store credit if you don’t like your glasses, but there’s a lot to choose from even so.

    The best place to buy performance glasses and workout sunglasses

    It’s hard to find great performance frames even at most optical shops, and Roka’s stylish, lightweight, nonslip glasses are great for anybody active.

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    With a mix of affordable house brands and good deals on a range of premium brands, Eyebuydirect offers flexible, complete search tools and a shopping process that is smooth and easy to navigate, with superior VR/AR try-on tools. If you’re looking for value comparable to Zenni’s but want the option of browsing familiar names, it’s hard to beat.

    Eyebuydirect’s collection is huge, which means you’ll find both a wide range and a lot of variations on similar themes. The search tools let you filter effectively by enough criteria that you can narrow things down quickly.

    We really liked the glasses we got from Eyebuydirect, especially given the inexpensive pricing. The fully spec’d browline pair we ordered compared very favorably to name-brand versions of the same concept from Ray-Ban and others, with solid build, very clear optics and a wide field of vision in the premium progressive prescription we ordered, and the fit was in order with what we’d expected from the online fit tools. A pair of basic Wayfarer-style frames we ordered as readers similarly met our expectations, with quality acetate construction and similarly good optical quality to the pricier pair.

    Basic single-vision prescriptions are very inexpensive (well under $100), while pricing for a fully loaded pair, before discounts, runs about $400 for house brands ($100 more than Zenni) and in the $500 to $600 range for branded options like Ray-Ban. This is still very affordable compared to many brick-and-mortar opticians and high-end retailers, where you’d spend in the neighborhood of $1,000 for a similarly spec’d pair but not far off major discount retailers like Costco.

    Eyebuydirect’s try-on tools are the most complete and easy to use of all of the eyeglass retailers we tested. A full-featured viewer works with your live webcam, an uploaded still image or a recorded video, and lets you enter your PD measurement and even adjust the fit of the virtual frames on your nose, which we didn’t encounter anywhere else — it really makes the fitting experience better and gave us the best sense of how the frames might look when worn.

    Like most low-cost online retailers, Eyebuydirect doesn’t directly accept insurance, but the site provides a simple way of applying for reimbursement from a wide range of vision insurance plans, potentially saving you money even over other lower-cost online retailers, depending on your plan’s out-of-network coverage.

    Two-day delivery (one day faster than even Zenni’s express service) is available for a select range of frames, with single-vision prescriptions — it’s about the cheapest way to get a pair of glasses in a hurry. With regular shipping, we got our glasses in nine business days.

    Interestingly, and perhaps understandably given the need to keep down costs, you don’t get a case with your Eyebuydirect glasses — just a cardboard box. If you’ve bought glasses in the past this is probably welcome (since there’s definitely a drawer full of excess cases somewhere in your house), but it can be a little inconvenient if you’re new to eyewear.

    You have only 14 days to return your glasses if you don’t like them, among the shortest return periods of any online glasses retailer we looked at. That said, you do get a full refund (unlike Zenni, where you get a 30-day window but only store credit), so if you don’t like their styles, you can easily recoup your investment and shop elsewhere.

    While overall Eyebuydirect’s frames are of good quality and comparable to everything else in the under-$300 price range that we saw, some of the more basic plastic frames we checked out did feel a bit cheap by comparison with Zenni’s similarly priced frames. We don’t expect they’d fail in use or anything, but if you want a luxury feel you might not want to select the least expensive frames on offer here — Zenni has a slight edge here at the low end.

    One flaw in Eyebuydirect’s ordering system — which most people might not find an issue, admittedly — is that it doesn’t flag multifocal prescriptions that are out of spec for a given frame until you’ve made your way through most of the ordering process (and the alert doesn’t give enough clear advice on what to do or what’s wrong). We’d prefer to see this alert earlier in the process.

    Underscored best glasses Zenni product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Zenni’s pricing has always been hard to beat, but as the company has expanded its range of styles and options, it’d be hard to recommend that online glasses shoppers looking to save money go anywhere else. Zenni also has the best shopping tools and prescription management of any of the online glasses retailers we looked at, and its prescription entry tool was the most flexible of the bunch, even letting you manage multiple orders for different members of a family. If Zenni’s styles work for you, you really can’t lose.

    Zenni has been a consistently popular choice because it sells a full-featured pair of glasses for significantly less on average than its competitors. It’s possible to get a pair with all the fixings — premium, high-index progressive lenses, with the latest Transitions XtraActives photochromic treatment and a full suite of protective coatings — for under $300, even before coupons or discounts. Plus, the company has made the shopping and ordering process among the simplest and most straightforward of all the retailers we looked at for this review.

    The company’s offerings have expanded over time, and while styles tend toward bright, fun colors and fashion-forward looks, you can get anything from classic wire rims to wraparound nylon activewear models at this point. Everything is well made, with quality fittings like spring hinges employed across the line. That said, Zenni’s glasses don’t have the fine-tuned, substantial feel you’d get from a luxury frame — Zenni’s acetate finishing is not always up to the level of a Moscot or Salt frame, for instance — but at the price is a whole lot of bang for the buck. The pairs we received were all solidly built, with no creaking or looseness, and adjustments were easy to make where needed. Nothing feels cheap here.

    If you already know what you like (or just prefer precision), you can search the company’s catalog by almost any parameter you can think of, from color to any frame or lens dimension, by specific number or range. It’s just better than any other site we tried (though Eyebuydirect gets pretty close). Zenni’s virtual try-on tool lets you see every frame on a search result page already displayed on your face, a helpful guide for comparison shopping.

    The prescription data entry tool is simple and straightforward (it was surprisingly obscure on several competitor sites), and we found it easy to place orders for multiple prescriptions for different people within the same order, which was not the case for the great majority of eyeglass retailers we checked out. There’s also great account-based record-keeping, which regular customers will appreciate, making it easy to revisit past orders, reorder and keep prescriptions organized. On tools and pricing, Zenni sits comfortably at the top of the heap.

    Zenni offers a limited selection of frames with single-vision prescriptions with a “Fast Frame” three-day delivery guarantee. But even outside of the models covered by the two-day offer, shipping is very fast (we received one of our orders, a pair of progressive, photochromic curved exercise glasses — a tall order for most manufacturers — in seven business days, and the others within two weeks).

    While Zenni will make almost anything, there are limits — for instance, it’s optically challenging to make progressive prescriptions in a highly curved lens, and to avoid distortion most manufactures don’t make stronger prescriptions (+/- 4.00 or above) in that format.

    Luckily for Zenni shoppers, rather than simply kicking you back to the beginning of your order without clear explanation (as we found with GlassesUSA), the Zenni site gives you an informative alert when you’ve tried to order something that’s gone over the line, making it easy to figure out what to do.

    Zenni’s main downside is that though it has a 30-day no-questions-asked return policy, you can only return for store credit (toward another pair of Zenni frames) or you can choose a 50% refund. If you find after trying them on that you don’t like the overall look or feel of Zenni’s frames or lenses, you’re out of luck. That said, the typically low prices offset the potential loss (and the range of styles is broad enough you’ll likely be fine with one of the looks, at least as a spare pair), but it’s worth keeping in mind.

    There’s no in-home sample try-on available, either as part of shopping or fitting — that’s in keeping with most of the lower-priced competition, but the company would be very hard to quibble with at all if they offered such a thing.

    Annoyingly, Zenni doesn’t put measurements on their frames. While it’s easy enough to look these up in your account on the Zenni site, it’s nice to have the numbers handy if you ever want to look elsewhere in the future. Like the return policy, it seems calculated to keep you in the Zenni ecosystem, which is understandable from the company’s perspective but is not particularly consumer-friendly.

    The best place to buy performance glasses and workout sunglasses: Roka

    Underscored best glasses Roka product image

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Roka has carved out an interesting niche. It offers a small number of fashionable styles, but all with an activewear focus. With lightweight nylon frames, replaceable (and adjustable) nonslip nose pads and arm contact points used in all of the frames the company sells, these glasses are always ready for action. The range of styles is much more limited than most of the online eyeglass brands, but the focused approach is much like the one Apple’s taken with the Apple Watch Ultra: These glasses are meant to be high-end fitness devices that you can wear all the time.

    We’ve been running and cycling and doing outdoor chores for several months using a pair of Roka’s Hamilton frames, and we’ve found them as comfortable and nonslip as claimed, comparing very favorably with mainstream performance models from Oakely, Tifosi and other specialist brands. They’re also stylish and have great optical clarity, as good as anything we saw from any of the makers we tested.

    The replaceable “Geko” nose pads (you get three sizes in the box, much like you might with silicone ear tips for earbuds) really make a difference in getting a secure nonslip fit even when you’re sweaty — they really stay put, even when running or cycling on a hot, humid day, a challenge for every other frame we tried. The three sets of nose pads made it easy to get a good fit, and there’s a good few millimeters of variation available.

    Roka doesn’t offer a huge variety of styles — you mostly get a bunch of variations on the slightly oversized chunky look, though in lightweight materials and with a gentle curve for better performance, along with some vintage-style looks and a few mixed material and browline styles. It’s utilitarian, but uniformly good-looking and should suit a wide variety of faces.

    Roka has a 30-day return policy, though it deducts a $20 restocking fee (waived if you’re returning because the company didn’t get your prescription right). This isn’t that significant a cost given the relative expense of the glasses themselves, so we consider it a reasonably good policy in the context of the brands we reviewed for this piece.

    If you don’t have a current prescription, Roka partners with the online vision test provider Visibly to offer a virtual vision test. There’s a $25 fee for the service. We didn’t assess this for purposes of this piece (and may return as more of these services emerge), but the option is there and integrated with the process.

    Roka is relatively expensive compared to many of the other brands we checked out, with a fully decked-out pair of photochromic progressives costing around $750. While this is probably offset for most potential buyers by the fact it’s actually pretty hard to find good performance eyewear even at most brick-and-mortars, especially if you don’t like the sci-fi look of Oakely’s offerings, keep in mind that you won’t save a ton of money over the in-store experience.

    As of this writing it appears that Roka has discontinued its in-home try-out option, which we appreciated during the shopping process.

    Underscored best glasses GlassesUSA product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    GlassesUSA, a sizable online retailer that’s part of Optimax, one of the big international eyewear companies, offers a huge selection. With a ton of familiar name brands along with house brands such as Muse, Ottoto and Revel, there’s likely to be something you’ll like here, whether you’re looking for oversized aviators or chunky acetate, retro or futuristic.

    Shopping tools begin with a style quiz that aims to point you in the right direction based on some questions about what you’re currently wearing, along with your stylistic and brand preferences. It got us in the ballpark pretty effectively, but you can fine-tune to be as general or specific as you like.

    From there you can use a very well-implemented virtual try-on service that lets you upload an image (which then works across the site on search result and detail pages), and GlassesUSA also provides interesting tools like a prescription scanner that lets you scan your existing glasses (assuming they are an up-to-date prescription) if you don’t have a copy handy. The GlassesUSA virtual try-on tool asks you to place crosshairs on your pupils to take a virtual PD measurement, then to enter your actual PD if known — this made for about the most accurate sizing of any of the virtual try-on tools we tested, in line with Eyebuydirect’s great tool.

    Pricing is on the low end — so long as you take advantage of the company’s frequent sales and discount codes. If you sign up for an account you’ll get daily coupon offers — a blessing and a curse if you like to save money but don’t like marketing emails. The discount codes can save you a lot of money; we regularly saw 40% off or buy-one-get-one-free offers that amounted to very significant savings. If you’re interested in any of GlassesUSA’s frames, you’ll want to sign up for an account and keep an eye on the site’s coupons and promotions page.

    As is typical of the sites in this review, you’ll get the best deal on simple single-vision prescriptions — progressives, high-index lenses, tints and coatings can add up, though you’ll generally save compared to brick-and-mortar opticians.

    We received our pairs in two weeks, about on average for the retailers we tested. We really liked the glasses we got from GlassesUSA (we stuck to the Muse house brand). Fit and finish were excellent overall (we found one small tooling mark on the edge of a frame piece, but it was in an area on the rear face of the frame that was invisible and couldn’t be felt. Prescriptions were cut accurately and sizing was exactly in line with the virtual try-on.

    While virtual try-on tools are everywhere on the GlassesUSA site, the images are presented in a fairly low resolution, and while it’s easy to get a sense of proper sizing it’s tough to make a call on colors or patterns. (This was really the case for most of the sites we reviewed, so it isn’t necessarily a strike against GlassesUSA.) We found we had to spend some time comparing sample 360-degree photos of models rather than just judging solely by our own uploaded photos in order to make final decisions.

    If you sign up for an account, GlassesUSA is very persistent about getting your business. At one point after browsing while logged in, a representative called us on the phone to offer a coupon — it was a good offer, but some shoppers may find such policies overly aggressive.

    With great virtual tools and useful search, GlassesUSA has made it very easy to comparison shop its huge selection, and it’s easy to find a great pair of glasses whether you’re interested in house brands or premium names. Abundant discount codes keep the prices low, but you’ll get a lot of them.

    Warby Parker Underscored best glasses product image

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    The brand most people think of when they think of buying glasses online, Warby Parker is an independent online retailer (with an expanding brick-and-mortar presence) that offers a range of house-branded stylish frames. The overall look tends toward retro styles — if you’re into chunky acetate, there’s a lot to choose from.

    Warby Parker built its reputation on its home try-on program: Before the practice was widely adopted the company made it easy to try things on in person even if you don’t live near a Warby Parker location. Once you’re found some frames you’re interested in (you can follow the site’s advice about finding the best width for your face to begin narrowing things down) you put together a list of up to five frames, place a no-cost order, and the company will send out a home try-on kit of frames with clear lenses for you to check out (you can repeat the process once you return them if nothing ends up working out).

    The virtual try-on tool in the Warby Parker app (this one is much better than the tool available on the desktop site, which is fairly limited) gave us a good idea of what might work for us, so we requested a home try-on kit of five likely candidates aiming for a range of sizes that would give us an idea of the overall dimensions of Warby Parker stuff, then picked one and went ahead and placed an order. Warby Parker doesn’t do any photo-based fitting based on the home-try on; the samples are strictly intended to give you a better idea of what fits and how it’ll look.

    Warby Parker is an in-network provider for many insurance plans and provides links to apply for out-of-network reimbursement for many others. The company estimates you can save an average of $100 on a pair of glasses each year by using insurance, bringing its average prices down significantly, especially for single-vision prescriptions.

    Like most of the retailers we checked out, pricing ranges from inexpensive (especially for basic single vision) to middle of the pack if you need anything more elaborate. You’ll spend less with Warby Parker than you would on brand name at many independent brick-and-mortar shops, though it isn’t bargain-basement either. A complete pair of glasses with a single-vision prescription with standard coatings comes in around $100. If you order a high-index progressive prescription with the full suite of coatings and a photochromic lens you’ll probably come in a bit over $400.

    We quite liked the retro-styled Kimball frames we ended up ordering, though the acetate had a couple of rough edges that needed a little emery cloth and polishing (we could also have visited a Warby Parker location for this — always an option if you are near one — but chose to take care of it at home since we had tools on hand).

    Warby Parker’s design approach is minimal to a fault, and the site’s clean look does a nice job setting off the frames visually, and is in keeping with the overall aesthetic, but makes some important information a little more obscure than we’d like.

    Also, the shopping approach is very much mobile-first: the desktop browser version of the site’s virtual try-on tools can give you a general idea of how a frame might look, but they are much less developed than those within the Warby Parker mobile app (which does a pretty good job). We’d love to see these features brought more in line (the company has plans to do this in the coming year), and fuller information for each frame supplied in both the browser and mobile versions of the shop.

    Standard measurements — lens width, bridge, and arm length — for each frame are given, but where some competitors have begun providing lens height (which isn’t part of the standard sizing given for most frames but is useful to figure out how much coverage a pair will provide for progressives or sunglasses) you’ll just have to go ahead and order the home try-on kit or visit a Warby Parker retail store to confirm what you like will work for you — that’s fine, but it makes it harder to rule frames in or out in the first round of a shopping venture. While searching the site you can filter frames by width (there are five, from extra narrow to extra wide), you can’t search the collection by size in millimeters (which is useful if you know what you like, you’re not looking to make a switch and feel confident that you like your current glasses or know exactly what you like); we appreciated this feature in our top picks’ shops.

    As the pioneering independent direct-to-consumer online glasses brand, Warby Parker continues to maintain an interesting curated selection of stylish frames, at fair prices relative to bigger chains. Shopping tools are minimal, though the impact is offset a bit by its very useful home try-on kit and the option of visiting a store for fittings if you like.

    Underscored best glasses LensDirect product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    LensDirect is an independent retailer best known as an online contact lens retailer (the company has been in that business for decades), but it has moved into glasses as well, offering a small, well-curated lineup of house-branded frames tending toward chunky, retro styles.

    Both pairs of glasses we got from LensDirect — a retro-styled chunky acetate frame and a Wayfarer-like sunglass frame — were of very high quality throughout (though the first pair arrived damaged and needed replacement — more on that below). Lenses were accurately cut, the finish of the frame was excellent and fit corresponded reasonably well with what we expected from given sizing and virtual try-on tools.

    Pricing is middle of the range for online shops; a basic pair with single-vision lenses, no tints and standard coatings starts at $74; progressives with high-index photochromic lenses will end up in the $400 to $500 range depending on style and specifics — at least before discounts. As with many of the shops we looked at, you’ll want to look out for special offers, sales and coupon codes — the savings can be pretty significant, knocking $100 or more off the final cost.

    LensDirect also offers a lens replacement service; the company will take a frame you already own (with some limitations) and replace the lenses (costs range from $59 on up to just over $300, depending on prescription type, tints and coatings), and while we didn’t test this or similar services (such as Lensabl), they’re certainly an alternative if you own expensive frames you already like that aren’t overly worn.

    Since we received a damaged frame, we did need to deal with LensDirect’s customer support, and we were impressed with its handling of the situation. Every representative we interacted with was very responsive and helpful.

    Only a limited selection of LensDirect’s frames allow for virtual try-on. While we found plenty of styles to our taste within this group, you may well find that the glasses that interest you aren’t available for a look. That said, measurements tracked well with what we expected given our experience of other glasses frames, so if you know exactly what you’re looking for you should be able to try similar frames in the tool to triangulate on what you want.

    We didn’t love LensDirect’s prescription upload system — you upload a PDF or photo of your prescription, and once you’ve placed the order an optician contacts you by email to confirm. There’s not a good way to look back at your order to confirm that the order’s gone through with the data you intended, however. (Zenni and Eyebuydirect, for example, make all of the information you’ve entered available at every point in the process.)

    This led us into making an error as we initially tried to place an order for two separate pairs of glasses with two different prescriptions, and managed to order both with the same prescription, leaving no record anywhere of the second Rx.

    LensDirect has a great range of styles, and offers great-looking vintage looks at a very reasonable price once discounts are rolled in. The shopping experience is a little clunkier than our top recommendations, but we were easily able to find frames that really suited us and felt the resulting glasses were among our favorites of the group.

    Underscored best glasses Liingo product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Liingo highlights their excellent home try-on program, and we felt it was a great option to have and let us get a pretty good idea of what we wanted. And if you’re not happy, they have a very generous return policy: 60 days, twice as long as most online glasses retailers, and they cover shipping.

    Liingo has a solid search and shopping features, a well-thought-out virtual try-on tool that provides useful feedback on fit as well as a general guide to what size ranges will work (this was accurate in our testing, recommending a “medium” width in our case — a general recommendation, but certainly correct in the company’s sizing). A smartphone app lets you scan your current glasses (assuming you’re happy with them) to generate a prescription if you don’t have one on hand.

    We requested a sample kit and ended up ordering three pairs from it, though after checking out the sample kit we decided on different frame colors. The pairs we received were all of very high quality (on par with Warby Parker’s offerings and GlassesUSA’s house brand Muse lineup) , with spring hinges, securely fitted lenses and a solid finish save for a couple of barely perceptible tooling marks.

    Prices are relatively low: Basic pairs including single-vision prescriptions start at well under $100, and fully decked-out progressives with photochromic lenses will run you in the neighborhood of $400.

    Liingo isn’t in-network with any insurance provider, but the company will assist you with the proper forms and an itemized receipt to submit for out-of-network reimbursement (of course you’ll want to check to make sure what your vision coverage includes).

    Liingo gives you a 60-day return period, with full refunds — the longest of any of the retailers we looked at, which should give you more freedom to experiment with the frames on offer.

    Liingo offers a relatively limited selection of frames compared to Eyebuydirect or Zenni. The range of styles is pretty representative of common styles, from Wayfarer-inspired styles to round and square and rectangular acetate, browline, and wireframe, but if you are looking for a wide range of funky styles or are very particular about finding a variant of something in exactly the size and shape you want, you may be out of luck.

    We liked Liingo’s selection of stylish frames, and the company delivers a good quality pair of glasses for a reasonable price. Frame selection is somewhat limited, but a home try-on kit makes it easy to make decisions with confidence, as does the two-month return window.

    Underscored best glasses Caddis product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Caddis has, in the past, addressed the needs of fashionable Gen Xers and Boomers with a line of quirky readers, and introduced prescription lenses more recently. The overall aesthetic is chunky, oversized and fun, with bright colors and fanciful touches — extreme coastal grandmother, if your grandmother promoted indie shows in Portland.

    Caddis bills itself as a “cult,” and the site highlights the lifestyle angle, with stories of the company’s charitable efforts, a magazine-style blog featuring the varied activities of the company’s very hip fans, playlists, some interesting culture writing and more.

    We liked that once we ordered our frames, we were sent a sample along with instructions for taking a photograph for proper fitting (this is, as mentioned above, particularly helpful for setting segment height for progressive lenses). The resulting glasses we received were of very high quality and smooth finish, with a premium feel that compared to frames that cost much more. The lenses were well-cut, with a wide field of vision from distance to reading (the oversized lens are really nice for reading).

    As befits the older crowd Caddis addresses, the company’s single-vision pricing is high. It’s more favorable on the high end: high-index photochromic lenses, even with a progressive prescription, top out at just over $500. If you like Caddis’s style, you’ll get your money’s worth.

    Caddis has an impressive range of styles and colors, but the great majority run towards the chunky and oversized; if you’ve got a small or narrow face, you might be out of luck. The Caddis site features a ton of beautiful product photography, but the shopping experience is still a work in progress. If you browse the prescription glasses collection you won’t find any measurements — they’re only given for readers. Luckily the same frames are used for both sides of the operation, which you might not realize at first unless you do some poking around.

    Caddis’s prices are relatively high at the low end: you’ll be paying about what you would at an optician, as frames with single-vision lenses begin around $250. But the glasses are of very good quality and are, in our opinion, worth the money if you like the style.

    The brand doesn’t try to be all things to all people, so options are somewhat limited, but if you like the aesthetic you can’t really go wrong with Caddis’s frames, which back up their looks with solid builds and quality optics.

    Underscored best glasses Lenscrafters product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    As one of the biggest optical chains in the US, LensCrafters probably needs no introduction. If you’ve ever purchased glasses, you’ve probably bought a pair from the Luxottica-owned brand. It’s moved into online retail now, providing an overall similar experience to its sibling online-only brand Glasses.com, but with the added bonus of a hybrid approach that takes advantage of its brick-and-mortar locations to get you an exam or a fitting. The site really seems built more as an entry to LensCrafters’ in-person shopping than a standalone experience (which, of course, is why Glasses.com exists).

    Shopping tools are very complete and usable. The site has a wealth of informational content on pretty much every aspect of eyewear and eye care, along with the full suite of things we like: clear, easy-to-find, complete measurements for each frame; virtual try-on tools; a tool to mark favorites while shopping for easy comparison; and more. And while the company doesn’t offer samples for try-on, for many frames it will direct you to a local LensCrafters shop where you can try on in person

    LensCrafters is big on options. As you might expect given how big LensCrafters is, you get a ton of options for lens types, coatings, tints and such. Where some smaller retailers offer two choices of Ray-Ban lens tints, you’ll find five at LensCrafters.

    Pricing is in line with what you’d expect in store. Basic prescriptions in house-brand frames are available for $100, while premium-brand frames with progressive prescriptions and all the fixings can run in the $600-$800 range. Discount codes are readily available, however.

    LensCrafters is one of the few online retailers we checked out that is in-network with a number of vision insurers, including sibling brand EyeMed. This makes it easier to save around $100 on one pair per year (the typical allotment via vision coverage), since you won’t have to apply for reimbursement as with most online opticians.

    We did get very well-made glasses here, both branded (Ray-Ban, in this case) and house brand, with clean construction, well-made lenses with good optical quality and even a data sheet on lens manufacture (a curiosity for the most part, but perhaps useful for customer service or replacement in the event of an issue).

    Perhaps because it is just one element of the company’s hybrid approach, the LensCrafters site is something of a work in progress. Account signup and login can be glitchy, requiring multiple attempts at username and password selection before we managed to get it working, and we were repeatedly logged out during the shopping and checkout process. We noticed that we were repeatedly recommended styles that were out of stock or discontinued. It’s possible this has to do with fluctuating in-store stock, but we didn’t run across this issue on Glasses.com.

    LensCrafters’ site gives you a ton of options, but it’s a little clunky considered on its own. But it makes a lot of sense as a tool for getting set up to visit a brick-and-mortar LensCrafters shop with a clear plan of action.

    Underscored best glasses Glasses.com product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Glasses.com is the web-only retail storefront for the Luxottica brands. The offerings are similar to LensCrafters’, though you’ll find a more streamlined experience and some different models on sale between the two shops.

    As you shop, you’ll want to pay attention to sales and special offers, which can reduce prices by a significant amount. We waited for a 50% off lenses offer, which we were able to couple with a 20% off total coupon, bringing the price of pair of Ray-Bans with all available options down to a very reasonable price — not quite in the Zenni range, but competitive with online-first retailers like GlassesUSA and Warby Parker.

    Glasses.com is an in-network provider for a range of major insurance plans (including EyeMed, its sibling Luxottica company). so depending on your coverage you may be able to save without having to put in for reimbursement.

    As with LensCrafters, we really liked the glasses we got from Glasses.com — the brand-name (Oakley in this case) and house-branded frames and lenses were well-executed, with clear optics and solid fit and finish. All spare parts for the Oakleys were included, and as with LensCrafters, you get a data sheet detailing the lens construction.

    Like its sibling site LensCrafters, Glasses.com’s site is a bit of a work in progress. While shopping, we met repeated glitches like hung virtual try-on tools, and we were unpredictably and repeatedly signed out of our account. It’s annoying, and we expect will improve over time, but it introduces some unnecessary friction.

    If you like LensCrafters’ selection, don’t plan on visiting a physical store and want a slightly slicker online shopping experience, Glasses.com gives you that, along with a discount structure more like other online-only direct-to-consumer brands.

    Underscored best glasses Eyebobs product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    The quirky Minneapolis shop — which came to national attention as the supplier of heroic host Bernard’s readers on the Westworld series — offers a range of really interesting styles, with high-quality material, great fit and finish and refreshingly straightforward styles.

    Like Caddis, Eyebobs has dug in on quirky, fun looks, with a selection of frames ranging from the chunky to the downright sculptural in a broad spectrum of colors to match (or clash productively) with any ensemble. Even the names are fun.

    Since the looks on offer can be fairly extreme, Eyebobs has plenty of assistance to walk you through the process. A quiz gets you in the ballpark, and a virtual try-on tool (a little clunky on the site, but very accurate via the mobile app) gives you an accurate preview of how the frames might look on your face.

    If that’s not sufficient, Eyebobs has a team of personal stylists to assist you. During the shopping process, you can set up a free appointment to talk through some frames that might suit your personal taste (even if you might not think so at first).

    Pricing is simple and reasonable, if not cheap. All of Eyebobs’ frames (save for designer collaborations like the current Lake & Harriet line) are priced the same: Readers are $95, sunglasses $135, basic single-vision pairs start at $245 and pairs made with all of the possible options (high-index photochromic progressives) top out at $485.

    We ordered a pair of Waylaid readers (one of the brand’s signature styles) in a crystal gray shade that — while not on the more extreme end of Eyebobs’ style — suited our look. They arrived within a week; the fit lined up perfectly with our expectations based on try-on with the mobile app, and we were impressed with the fit and finish.

    Eyebobs’ personal stylist service has some scheduling glitches and we found it impossible to actually get in touch with a stylist. It’s not clear from the email invitation that you need to log into the site and confirm your appointment, or where to obtain the meeting address itself. It’s a great idea, but the implementation needs work.

    If you’re looking for something that grabs attention, whether with bright colors or sculptural shapes, Eyebobs has you covered. Good shopping and fit tools, fair pricing and a simple process make it easy to experiment.

    Underscored best glasses Jins product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Jins, a Japanese brand with New York City, San Francisco, and Los Angeles retail stores, concentrates on classic looks in wire and plastic, generally offering similar styles in standard and oversized versions. While more and more brands offer low-bridge fits nowadays, Jins has focused on flexible, inclusive fitting more than any other brand we ran across; even many of their acetate frames have adjustable nose pads, and many others are offered in multiple fit options.

    The Jins site is very clear and simple to shop. Search tools are effective; full measurements are given for each frame in a clear, easy-to-navigate layout; a favorites collection tool lets you put interesting frames aside for later comparison; and virtual fit tools are fast and accurate.

    Jins’ range of fit is impressive. While our acetate frames fit out of the box without adjustment, they offered a lot more range than many similar models we looked at from other manufacturers given the addition of large adjustable nose pads as used on many wire and browline styles. This makes the frames a little bulkier, but if you’ve had trouble finding a good fit, it is likely worth it, and the streamlined styles are very accommodating.

    Pricing is relatively inexpensive, with single-vision pairs available starting at $90; progressive photochromics can run between $330 and $430, depending on frame selection. They also come with a 30-day warranty.

    Jins has had stock issues lately and has run into some shipping delays. To their credit, Jins warned us of this during the ordering process and estimated that our pair of readers might take as long as a month to arrive. That said, our order arrived in just over two weeks, which was a pleasant surprise. At time of publication it looked like many styles were out of stock, at least in some colors, so it’s worth browsing with an open mind.

    If you’re in need of stylish frames with a low nose-bridge fit, you’ll find a treasure trove of options at Jins. Just be aware that frames go out of stock quickly and be flexible on colors and styles and you’ll likely find a frame you’ll like.

    High-end luxury styles from home: Alexander Daas

    Underscored best glasses Alexander Daas product shot

    Michael Berk/CNN Underscored

    Alexander Daas, a California-based high-end optician with a celebrity following, has moved into full-service online retail, offering their own house brand along with a full range of other luxury brands. It’s not cheap — in fact, it’s about as expensive as you’d expect given the lineup — but they make a great pair of glasses and if you’re interested in high-fashion brands and your local doesn’t carry them, Alexander Daas can provide those options at a distance. It isn’t for everybody, but it’s an interesting option for very high-quality frames.

    While the site experience is very minimal, ordering is straightforward, with clearly laid-out options for choosing lens materials, coatings and so forth. Prescription entry is via upload of an image — not our favorite sort of system, but customer service is very responsive and followed up by email to confirm within a day.

    Also, once we placed our order, we received a pair of sample frames of the style we’d ordered, along with instructions on taking a photo to set segment height (we ordered a progressive prescription). We followed the directions, submitted photos and got a confirmation from an optician same day. The finished glasses arrived in just over a week.

    The glasses we received from Alexander Daas were of very high quality — possibly the best construction and finish of anything in the test group. Lenses had great clarity as well. We’d ordered all of the options — thin photochromic lenses along with blue-light filtering — and were impressed by the optical clarity.

    The shopping experience is pretty basic. You don’t get elaborate search tools, just filtering by brand, material and style. The idea is that you’ll be choosing primarily on aesthetics in any case, but especially given the brand’s emphasis on carrying a range of fits (and they advertise their broad selection of frames with narrow sizes meant for people with smaller faces), it would be nice to see full measurements and a tool to search by size (or better yet, a virtual try-on feature).

    Pricing is on par with high-end brick-and-mortar opticians. Frames begin at around $240 before lenses, and range on up past $700, so once you add your prescription and whatever tints and coatings you need, it’s easy to end up north of $1,000.

    If you’ve got luxury taste (and the budget to match) but don’t have access to a high-end optician in your area, Alexander Daas has you covered — and they make a great pair of glasses.

    First off, we can’t tell you what you like. If you’re like us, you wear glasses every day, and choosing a pair of frames has mostly to do with your personal style — which is why it’s great that there are a ton of good online retailers, since you get broad access to an endless range of looks.

    All of the retailers we looked at for this review were able to deliver a well-cut prescription in a timely fashion. Thus in our testing we focused on which retailers provided the best overall retail experience, ensuring that we’d get a great pair of frames built with a perfectly executed prescription and the options we’d requested, comparable to what we’d get from a brick-and-mortar optician.

    What did we find? Basically, online shoppers are spoiled for choice and anyone who lives outside of a major urban center will likely find a bigger range of styles and fits online than they will locally. We’ve zeroed in on the best of the bunch, and no matter what you’re looking for and what size your budget, we should be able to point you in the right direction.

    That depends. If you shop around online, it’s very likely that you will save money versus purchasing at your local optician — though exactly how much will depend on a few factors.

    If you have a simple prescription — single vision, below +/- 4.00 — and don’t want an ultra-thin lens or special coatings or tints, across the board you’ll likely spend around $100. Should you need something more complex, you’ll spend more, though likely less than you would on brand-name pairs at a local optical shop.

    You do give up the benefits that come with in-person fitting, dispensing and adjustments, though these matter less if you have a straightforward single-vision prescription, and depending on your budget it may well be worth spending more to have access to a knowledgeable professional.

    If you’re interested in brand names, you should watch for sales, coupons and discount codes as you would with any other online shopping. Over the course of our testing, we were typically able to find discounts of up to 40% off the price of our orders. Many retailers also offer second pairs at a steep discount, so it’s worth keeping an eye out.

    An open question is insurance, which can cover a significant amount at most brick-and-mortar opticians, narrowing the gap pretty significantly with online offerings. That said, depending on your coverage and where you shop, you might get a break on your online order too. Insurance plans typically cover one pair of glasses per year (though generally only a portion of the cost, usually around $100).

    Most low-cost retailers — Zenni, for example — don’t accept insurance (they aren’t in-network with any plan). Some (GlassesUSA, for instance) ease the process of asking for out-of-network reimbursement via many plans with convenient links to the necessary forms.

    You’ll have the easiest time with insurance if you go with the brick-and-mortar hybrids or retailers associated with the big optical corporations. LensCrafters and Glasses.com are in-network providers for a number of popular insurance plans (and are sibling brands of EyeMed). VSP, another major insurer, runs its own online store, Eyeconic.

    Get your prescriptions and measurements in order

    If you plan to buy glasses online, you can go get an eye exam anywhere you like, get a prescription and use it anywhere you like. The FTC’s Eyeglass Rule requires any eye doctor you see to provide you with a prescription. Easy enough.

    But you need another measurement to get a pair of glasses made accurately: your pupillary distance (PD) — the distance between the centers of your pupils. While the optometrist and ophthalmologist we saw locally were happy to provide this number for us, this can be more difficult to obtain, especially if you get your eye exam through a doctor whose practice is housed within or linked to a dispensing optician. Dispensing opticians have long argued that the PD measurement is part of the fitting process and not part of the prescription, and most states have not defined it as such, putting it in a gray area.

    Brick-and-mortar shops are sometimes reluctant to give PD information to a patient who isn’t a glasses customer, out of the understandable fear that they’re giving up business and that they may be held liable in the event that whoever does fill the prescription may do substandard work. That said, many doctors do understand that patients want freedom of choice as to where to shop, and you should absolutely ask.

    If you can’t get your PD from your doctor, however, you can take the measurement yourself, either using a ruler (this is much easier to do if you can get somebody to help) or by marking a current set of glasses and checking your focus (which takes some practice).

    Since it’s difficult to be precise, many online glasses retailers have made taking a PD measurement even simpler, offering tools within their browser and mobile apps to take these measurements, typically based on webcam or phone camera photos taken with a reference card in the frame. We tried these in every case they were available, and each time got a measurement that corresponded with our ophthalmologist-provided PD (we visited an independent doctor who does not dispense).

    One note: On our own we weren’t able to capture this in the same detail as we were able to get at the ophthalmologist, who measured us at a slightly asymmetrical 62 mm/ 63 mm split. That said, we were unable to notice the difference in lenses made with and without the asymmetry, and many vendors don’t accept a two-number measurement in any case, saying (as did the optometrists we spoke to) that such a small difference is unlikely to be perceptible in a lens, especially if you wear single-vision.

    Pupillary distance asymmetries are more important to get just right if you wear progressives (and your PD will be slightly different for distance and close-up vision, making for a more complicated measurement). If you’ve got a complex prescription you may want to consult an independent ophthalmologist to make sure you have the most precise measurement.

    If you do wear progressives or bifocals, you may want to look for one of the few online retailers (Caddis and Alexander Daas for example) who take an additional measurement in order to set the segment height and lessen the chance that you’ll have to send them back for adjustment. This typically involves sending you a sample frame to physically try on and having you submit a photo of you wearing them. Retailers who sell online but also have brick-and-mortar locations (Warby Parker, LensCrafters/Glasses.com) can provide this service in person as well as part of a traditional in-person fitting.

    Roka formerly offered this sort of service, but has dropped it since we tested; their representative told us that their in-house algorithm did a more consistent job of setting segment height than they were able to do using photos, given that the customer-submitted photos varied so much in lighting, quality of focus and so on.

    That said, we got perfectly usable lenses in all cases, regardless of how this measurement was taken or synthesized.

    Transitions lenses and various other light-reactive or “photochromic” lens formulations have been around since the mid-1960s, and while they’ve had a reputation for dowdiness they do come in handy if you drive or spend time outdoors and don’t want to carry around an extra pair of glasses.

    Older versions of the technology never quite got clear indoors, and for that reason many have avoided them, not wanting to look like they were Hollywood stars trying pretending to stay incognito (one Underscored staffer dismissed a pair out of hand, saying, “Who are these for, Elton John?”). The bigger issue affecting their usefulness is the fact that most formulations don’t get dark in the car (because of UV protection film applied to windshields), keeping them from working in one of the most useful applications for sunglasses.

    New formulations do solve this problem. We suggest looking out for a shop that offers Transition’s XtraActive treatment, which in our testing darkens quickly in a car (and, to some extent, indoors in brightly sunlit rooms), We didn’t find it offered widely yet, but it’s worth it if you’re in and out of the car or on and off the bike a lot during your day.

    Luxottica and the independents

    As you may have read, the Italian company Luxottica owns a big share of the optical business worldwide. Exactly how big a share isn’t quite clear, and there are other big optical groups like Optimax out there as well, but a lot of recognizable brands are under the Luxottica umbrella.

    Aside from owning a whole lot of popular eyewear brands such as Ray-Ban, Oliver Peoples, Persol and many others, it owns a big portfolio of retailers, including LensCrafters, and it’s moved into online retail as well, with both LensCrafters’ own site and the more digital-first Glasses.com. Whatever opinion you may hold as to the meaning of Luxottica’s presence in the industry, their brands are very popular, and should you be interested in them, the company’s own retail outlets are an option.

    There are many independents to choose from — including major digital retailers Warby Parker and Zenni — who don’t carry any Luxottica or Optimax brands, but focus on their own house-brand offerings. Other independents may carry a mix.

    We began by researching the online eyeglass retail landscape and putting together a list of the best-regarded and most popular premium and discount online-first retailers as well as mainstream and luxury brick-and-mortar opticians that offer a full online shopping experience without requiring a store visit.

    While doing this round of research, we got an eye exam from a local provider, so we could begin with a fresh prescription. The ophthalmologist we saw provided PD along with the prescription, so we were able to begin the process with all the data we needed. We obtained two prescriptions, both progressive: one for general distance viewing and the other for mid-range/computer/desk use. Where it was possible to order two or more pairs with separate prescriptions in a single purchase we attempted to do so.

    Once we arrived at our final list, we then went ahead and placed at least one order with each retailer. Since we can’t account for everyone’s sense of style, we ordered frames in styles, shapes and materials that we were accustomed to, including a range of wire, acetate, nylon and rimless models.

    Where possible, to get a sense of the range of a retailer’s representative offerings, we ordered two pairs: one with the most affordable frames offered, standard lens thickness and no additional coatings and another with a premium frame with high-index lenses and the full complement of additional coatings offered. Where retailers offered curved exercise-oriented glasses (which can be difficult to find even through brick-and-mortar retailers) we ordered a pair.

    We made careful notes on the ordering experience, trying out any virtual fitting tools across a range of styles, noting whether the site allowed for easy shopping of and comparison between multiple styles and reading through each site’s range of educational and informational material to assess its usefulness.

    When they were offered, we made appointments for and took advantage of remote fitting services. Since we were looking for the most generalizable experience, we did not use any brick-and-mortar resources.

    [ad_2]

    Source link