ReportWire

Tag: underscored-reviews

  • The space-saving ProForm Carbon T7 is the perfect treadmill for small spaces | CNN Underscored

    The space-saving ProForm Carbon T7 is the perfect treadmill for small spaces | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Whether you’re looking for a full-time indoor exercise machine or a seasonal addition to your home gym, the compact, easy-to-store Proform Carbon T7 can help cure the winter running blues — and keep you moving any time of the year.

    Best of all, in addition to its smaller footprint, you’ll get many of the same upscale features you’d receive with more expensive treadmills like the ProForm 9000 ($2,300) or NordicTrack Commercial 2450 ($3,000) — for a fraction of the price.

    At just $1,403, the Carbon T7 may seem like a steal, however it’s still an investment for cost-conscious consumers. Which is why I tested this treadmill for a week to see how it stacks up to its more expensive brethren, and whether it’s worth a spot in your home. Here’s everything you need to know before you, ahem, run out to buy your own.

    If you’ve always wanted a treadmill, but didn’t have the space or the cash for a larger machine — the ProForm Carbon T7 is a perfect compromise. No, it doesn’t have the horsepower of larger, pricier treadmills, but you do get a wealth of advanced AI features as well as access to different types of classes with the iFit subscription (which is free for three years). And a smaller footprint paired with a budget price is nothing to sneeze at when you’re thinking about adding to your home gym.

    Compact size and simple storage

    Unlike most treadmills, the Carbon T7 is the perfect size for apartment dwellers and first-time homeowners because of its compact design. And indeed, you don’t need a sprawling McMansion to make room for it in your home. Proform’s unique SpaceSaver design easily allows you to fold the deck up and stow it away vertically whenever you want. And, when you’re ready to use it again, simply kick a bar concealed on the bottom of the treadmill to release the deck back down. The whole process takes less than five minutes and is super convenient. In fact, I used the Carbon T7 in my living room and consistently folded it up to make more space whenever my family was around.

    Fold the treadmill up and simply store it away

    The Carbon T7 also gives you access to the iFit library of streaming fitness classes, which adorns pricier models like the NordicTrack Commercial 2450 or NordicTrack Commercial X32i. Right now, ProForm is generously offering a free three-year iFit subscription with the purchase of every Carbon T7 treadmill. So you’ll initially pay nothing to access over 9,500 streaming workouts including yoga, HIIT, bootcamp, strength training and, of course, thousands of scenic hikes, runs and walks through Mexico, Turks & Caicos, Mount Everest, and more. After that, a comparable family plan will cost you $39 monthly or $396 a year, while individual plans run $15 monthly or $180 a year — which all in all is quite a bit of savings.

    You can even save your favorite classes in a calendar for future sweat sessions or sign up for weight loss programs and challenges on iFit to help stay motivated, as well as train for 10K, 5K and marathon races. I also loved having the option to create my own Google Maps workout, which allowed me to plug in my own destination anywhere in the world and map my own real-life running route with accurate topographical changes and live views. This feature enabled me to run through my old neighborhood in Santa Monica, CA, visit the Eiffel Tower in Paris and run through the Venice Canals in Italy — all in one day.

    Enjoy a huge selection of different classes with the free, 3-year iFit subscription

    The Carbon T7 has two spacious cup holders, a 7” high-definition touchscreen and a built-in fan with four different power levels. It also boasts 2 built-in speakers with Bluetooth audio and a dock to place your device if you prefer to read a book or watch movies on your iPad instead of streaming workouts through the iFit library.

    You can also adjust the incline or speed using quick-touch buttons located below the screen, rather than manually adjusting them to go up and down as you run. I found this especially useful while running at faster speeds, considering I tend to get distracted adjusting the incline and speed up and down when I’m pushing myself harder during HIIT or hill runs.

    iFit also includes several smart features, like the SmartAdjust and Automatic Training. SmartAdjust follows and scales each adjustment that you make during your workouts, then stores the information internally. Going forward, it will then adjust the speed and incline to suit your personal fitness ability. The more often you run, the more closely the computer customizes your iFit classes in the prerecorded instructor-led hikes and runs.

    For example, I was struggling to keep up with one particular instructor during a run through Costa Rica. But by adding SmartAdjust, I could more easily take this class again and still feel challenged. It’s a cool feature that allows the software to get even smarter the more you use it.

    The Automatic Trainer feature is a bit of AI magic which enables you to follow along with the instructor whenever they call out a change in speed or incline during your pre-recorded class — without touching a button. So, if your instructor is running a 7-mile run at a 2-incline, you will too (automatically). The treadmill’s computer virtually does the work, freeing up your hands for more important things like guzzling water or waving frantically at your family to leave you alone until you’re done.

    iFit.jpg

    Full disclosure: I am not a big person. At 5’2”, I’m always in the front row for pictures, I always need a step stool to reach the high shelf, and I’m frequently asked if my parents are home when I answer my door without makeup. So the fact that I felt cramped the first time I started sprinting on the Carbon T7 speaks volumes.

    At 20” X 55,” it was just about OK for someone my size but, as I said, I’m petite. So I can’t imagine it would be extremely comfortable for a taller or larger person to run on this treadmill for an extended period of time. It may be fine for walking or jogging, but if you plan to do intense runs or interval workouts and you’re six feet tall, you might want to see if you can try one before you buy.

    The 7-inch touchscreen is large enough but unfortunately, it doesn't swivel

    It wasn’t a total deal breaker but I didn’t love that the HD touchscreen didn’t swivel or move the slightest bit forward or backward. This was extremely frustrating during hybrid classes like the Bahamas bootcamp series, which required me to get on and off the treadmill to complete the class. This also became a problem when I tried to see the instructor’s strength-training moves during the floor portion of the class.

    Considering the touchscreen’s larger size, it would have been nice to be able to move it around so I could take advantage of my extra floor space as well as iFit’s pre-recorded strength training classes.

    This is a mid-level treadmill with lots of extra features for a modest price point, but you do get what you pay for. The motor on the Carbon T7 doesn’t have enough power to handle all-out sprints for extended periods of time, which doesn’t make it a great choice for serious runners. AT only 2.6 CHP, the motor has significantly less horsepower than more expensive models like the NordicTrack 2450 and Proform 9000.

    The Carbon T7 isn’t the only mid-level treadmill on the market focusing on a space-saving design. Competitors like the Sole F65 offer a slightly wider and longer deck with a similar configuration. With a deck measuring at 22” X 60,” the Sole F65 gives you a slightly roomier running space than the Carbon T7. However, there’s no iFit subscription or tech features like SmartAdjust and Automatic Trainer, and it’s a tad bit pricier at $1,400. You will, however, get a slightly bigger 3.25 CHP motor, which makes it better for more advanced runs.

    Echelon Stride Auto-Fold Connected Treadmill is also a space saving machine and this treadmill folds into place with next to no effort — plus it’s even cheaper at $1,000. However, unlike the Carbon T7, there’s no touchscreen so you’ll have to provide your own device if you want to stream workouts. There’s also no built-in fan or AI features and very little data is recorded during your workouts, so the initial savings may not be worth it if you like to track your metrics while you run.

    And then there’s the Treadly, a no-frills foldable treadmill that retails for just $749. This extra-slim, portable treadmill is smaller and lighter than the Carbon T7, making it easier to store and hide away if you’re even tighter on space. However, there’s no touchscreen, no fan belt and no streaming class subscription, just audio/video games and a live community you can access online. You also can’t run any faster than 5 miles per hour so don’t expect to train for a marathon anytime soon.

    If you’re looking for all of the bells and whistles of a top-of-the-line treadmill or you’re training for your next Ironman race, the Carbon T7 may not be for you. But, if you’re a recreational runner or a parent like myself trying to squeeze in a workout in your spare time, this treadmill offers fantastic value with lots of extra features for a modest price tag.

    There’s plenty of variety, whether you’re looking for scenic runs, hikes, walks, yoga, HIIT, strength training, bootcamps, Tabata, cooking classes and live races. And your whole family can take advantage of the free iFit subscription for up to three years, giving you plenty of options to keep things fun and fresh so you’ll never get bored with your workout routine.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dyson Airwrap vs. Shark Flexstyle: We put these top-tier multi-stylers to the test | CNN Underscored

    Dyson Airwrap vs. Shark Flexstyle: We put these top-tier multi-stylers to the test | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is part of our series Battle of the Brands, in which we compare category-leading products to their counterparts to determine which are actually worth your money.

    Multi-styler technology truly changed the game of at-home hair styling, and it just so happens that two major vacuum brands are also leading the charge of innovative hair tools. The Dyson Airwrap Multi-Styler Complete and the Shark Flexstyle Air Drying & Styling System allow users to bring salon-level results home with a bevy of styling attachments and features. Both tools combine drying and styling technology to streamline your routine, so you can blow dry, style and set your hair all with one device.

    On the surface, the Airwrap and Flexstyle have more similarities than differences — but let’s see how they measure up.

    Dyson’s Airwrap uses enhanced Coanda airflow technology to make styling surprisingly quick and easy, whether you’re going for a sleek and straight look or a volumized and bouncy blowout.

    A dryer, curler, volumizer and smoother all in one, the Shark Flexstyle also uses the Coanda effect for smart hairstyling.

    The Airwrap and Flexstyle are multi-styler tools that offer similar features. Both market themselves as hot-tool alternatives that are healthier for the hair than traditional hair dryers, curling irons or smoothing systems because of temperature-measuring technology. According to Dyson, the Airwrap measures airflow temperature more than 40 times per second, ensuring that the device stays under 302 degrees Fahrenheit. The Flexstyle also constantly measures airflow temperature (Shark says 1,000 times per second), and features a no-heat setting so you can use the device to speed up your air-drying time.

    In terms of look and feel, both are sleek and sophisticated. They take up about the same amount of space; however, the Airwrap comes with a convenient storage case to keep the attachments and device organized between uses. Before I get into the attachment comparisons, let’s take a look at the devices’ respective specs.

    Shark Flexstyle

    Dyson Airwrap

    Size

    1.8 inches x 13.5 inches, with an 8-foot cord

    1.9 inches x 10.7 inches, with an 8.5-foot cord

    Weight

    1.54 pounds

    1.5 pounds

    Number of heat settings

    4, plus cool shot

    3, plus cool shot

    Number of speed settings

    3

    3

    Number of attachments included

    4

    7

    Additional attachments offered

    2 (curling-defining diffuser and wide-tooth comb)

    6 (wide-tooth comb, 3 additional Airwrap barrel sizes and lengths, 2 additional smoothing brush sizes and 1 additional round brush size)

    Storage case

    No

    Yes

    Color options

    1

    2

    I tested the tools side-by-side by using the Shark Flexstyle on the left side of my head and the Dyson Airwrap on the right side of my head. Because my hair is naturally stick-straight, thick and very long, I typically have a lazy approach to hairstyling and opt for air drying most days because of the time and effort it takes to completely style my hair. I found both tools easy to use and durable, and it was a breeze to switch from one attachment to the next, making it feel like one smooth-sailing process, rather than an involved routine with a bunch of separate steps.

    dyson shark hair dryer

    The Airwap and Flexstyle both boast a hair drying feature, which allows you to cut down the number of hair appliances in your routine. (The two brands also happen to make tech-driven hair dryers too, the Dyson Supersonic Hair Dryer and the Shark HyperAir Hair Dryer.) The Airwrap features one Coanda smoothing dryer attachment, while the Flexstyle’s dryer is built into the body of the device and then comes with your chosen dryer attachments based on your hair type (the set for straight and wavy hair comes with a concentrator, while the set for curly and coily hair comes with the concentrator and a diffuser but no smoothing brush). Both recommend starting with towel-dried hair, and then rough drying the hair to 80% before using another styling attachment to finish your look. Each device dried my hair to that 80% state in about 5 minutes, using the max heat and speed settings.

    Between the two, the Flexstyle’s drying feature impressed me the most. To activate its hair dryer, the top of the device rotates and locks in place at an angle. This gives more control for your styling, and almost feels like you’re holding a standard hair dryer.

    Since my hair is straight, I typically use a concentrator attachment on my regular hair dryer to keep it smooth. Having the concentrator attachment on the Flexstyle gave it the same functionality and control.

    The Airwrap’s Coanda dryer attachment, on the other hand, isn’t quite as intuitive. It features two modes, Drying and Smoothing, with the latter utilizing the Coanda technology. The Drying mode features a shot of focused airflow, but it didn’t provide as much control as I’m used to with a regular hair dryer. According to Dyson, the Smoothing mode is for already dry hair, is best for naturally straight or wavy hair and will help tame flyaways. With the Airwrap’s other smoothing attachments, however, I didn’t see a need to use this on already dry hair, and instead tried the Smoothing mode to finish drying my hair. While my hair looked straight and smooth, I didn’t notice any major difference from how it would look after using a standard dryer.

    Dyson Shark smoothing brush

    The Flexstyle has one paddle brush attachment that features short and long bristles, while the Airwrap has two, the Soft smoothing brush and the Firm smoothing brush. I used these to finish my usual straight styled look on 80% dry hair, after using the dryer attachments.

    On the Dyson’s smoothing attachments, the airflow is more concentrated and uses the Coanda technology to attact the hair, however, the Flexstyle’s dual-length bristles gripped my hair the best out of any of the smoothing attachments. Overall, there weren’t any major differences in the final results across the devices — both delivered a straight, sleek look.

    Dyson shark round brush

    To add volume to your ‘do, the Flexstyle offers a large-barreled oval brush, while the Airwap has a round volumizing brush. The Flexstyle’s volumizing attachment more closely resembles the fan-favorite Revlon One-Step Volumizer, whereas the Airwap’s barrel is closer to a traditional round brush.

    Again, I tested these on 80% dry hair. I found that the Dyson’s smaller barrel gave more defined curls, making my hair appear fuller and bouncier. The Shark’s barrel added some volume and a bit of bend to the ends of my hair, but not any super-defined style. Since I have thick hair, I imagine the Flexstyle would make more of a noticeable difference on fine hair.

    Left side: Styled with Shark Flexstyle. Right side: Styled with Dyson Airwrap.

    For me, the Dyson definitely won this round. The round brush was easy to use and gave a polished blowout with minimal effort — I truly love the results every time. In the past, I had tried maneuvering a round brush with a traditional hair dryer and it was always a struggle. My hair would get caught in the brush and I would ultimately give up and just go with straight hair. The Airwrap’s round drying brush combines the two steps, and my hair pulls through easily. I never thought I’d be able to give myself a blowout in under 15 minutes, but here we are!

    Dyson shark curlers

    The Coanda effect curlers are what make these hair tools magic. Both the Shark and Dyson feature this technology, which automatically wraps the hair around the barrel of the curler as the airflow dries and sets the hair. Unlike the wand curlers of my youth (the ones that came with a glove to protect your hand as you hold your hair to the 400-degree tool), there’s no worry of burning any digits with these. The Flexstyle has two 1.25-inch barrels, which direct the curls clockwise or counterclockwise. The previous model of the Airwrap also had separate barrels to switch the direction of the curls, but the current version is able to switch the direction of how the hair is wrapped in a single barrel (a knob at the top can be twisted to choose the direction). Now, the Airwrap comes with two sizes of barrels, a 1.2-inch and 1.6-inch, both with this rotating tip. Dyson also offers two lengths of curling barrels, with one made specifically for long hair. For this story, I tested the Airwrap’s 1.2-inch barrel against the Flexstyle’s curling barrel, since they are closest in size.

    As with the other attachments, the Flexstyle and Airwrap essentially provided the same function with the curlers. However, I found that the Dyson handled my thick hair much better than the Shark. I was able to style my hair with the Airwrap at medium speed, high heat, working in 1-inch sections and it created voluminous, loose curls. For the Flexstyle, I started out with the same settings — medium speed, high heat, 1-inch sections — but had to switch it to high speed because it was struggling to wrap my hair. Even then, the curls weren’t as defined as with the Airwrap.

    Left photo: Left side - Styled with Shark Flexstyle. Right side - Styled with Dyson Airwrap. Right photo: 6 hours after styling.

    By the end of the day, the side styled with the Airwrap had relaxed into waves, while the side styled with the Flexstyle looked virtually straight.

    While the Flexstyle’s hair drying features top that of the Airwrap, Dyson’s device outperformed it overall. The Airwrap’s ability to create next-to-professional-level styles that last — in under 20 minutes — is truly impressive.

    Taking hair type into consideration, I could see that the Flexstyle would work with finer, lighter hair. Since I have thick, heavy hair — and a lot of it — it usually takes more time and power to get styles to set.

    Of course, budget comes into play. With the Airwap at twice the price of the Flexstyle, I would still recommend Shark’s option for those looking for a more budget-friendly multi-styling tool.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lululemon Align vs. a $23 Amazon lookalike: We put these cult-favorite leggings to the test | CNN Underscored

    Lululemon Align vs. a $23 Amazon lookalike: We put these cult-favorite leggings to the test | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This article is part of our series Battle of the Brands, in which we compare category-leading products to their counterparts to determine which are actually worth your money.

    Between the self-care explosion — from yoga and Pilates to meditation — and the pandemic’s resultant work-from-home situation, women are wearing leggings longer and more often than ever before. As such, we’ve become more judicious about which leggings are actually worth investing our money in. Fit, comfort, design and style are musts, as are name brand and cost.

    In recent years, Lululemon’s Align Pants have become a cult-favorite item thanks to their “buttery soft” fabric that makes wearing them 24/7 an easy decision, and a fit that skims the body rather than pinches or droops. Need proof? The pants have more than 20,000 reviews and the #Lululemonalign hashtag on Instagram has more than 9,000 posts attached to it, ranging from influencers’ workout videos and try-on sessions to on-the-go street shoots. While reviewers are hard-pressed to find fault in Align, the price would likely be high on the “cons” list — each pair typically runs between $98 and $128.

    Equally popular on Amazon are Colorfulkoala’s Buttery Soft High-Waisted Yoga Pants, which have a whopping 46,000 positive reviews — hundreds of which liken the pants to Align — and a much (much) cheaper price tag at $23 per pair.

    What’s so great about these leggings, which we named the best workout leggings? They are soft and slinky and literally skim your curves, from waist to ankle. Second, there’s the fabric. Called Nulu, the material is über-soft, sweat-wicking and has a four-way stretch. You can move in these pants — whether you’re doing hot yoga or hopping in and out of your car doing errands.

    Our pick for the best budget leggings of the year, the Colorfulkoalas are available in more than 40 colors and are just as soft as Lululemons, but at a fraction of the cost.

    Lululemon’s Align and Colorfulkoala’s Buttery Soft are both ultra-popular pants designed for yoga. The chief selling point of both options is the super-soft fabric they’re made of.

    Align is comprised of the brand’s proprietary “Nulu” fabric, which is a combination of nylon and lycra that is sweat-wicking, stretchy and, as I’ve mentioned more than a few times, buttery soft. I’ve been an Align devotee for years and can attest that the leggings are great for low-impact exercise like Pilates or yoga — and that they’re so comfortable (and flattering) that I end up wearing them the whole day after my morning workout. Unlike other yoga pants, the Align fabric doesn’t constrict, squeeze or pinch your body, instead it skims over your shape without creating any sort of muffin-top situation.

    Lululemon's Align leggings (left) and Colorfulkoala's leggings (right)

    Having tested Colorfulkoala’s Buttery Soft pants as well, I can say that the nylon/spandex fabric is the closest I’ve ever seen to the Nulu softness, but it’s not quite as buttery as the Align and they have a sheen to them. I didn’t mind the sheen at all, but the Align leggings definitely have a softer, matte texture. Interestingly enough, the Colorfulkoala pants are brushed on the interior and that texture is nearly exact to Align — so they do feel identical on the inside of the leggings, but on the exterior they are shinier.

    Given Align’s matte texture, the fabric can be prone to catching lint or stray hairs, which is more visible on darker colors and patterns. I didn’t experience this with the Colorfulkoala leggings, however, because the fabric’s slight sheen doesn’t attract debris.

    Lululemon's Align leggings (left) and Colorfulkoala Buttery Soft leggings (right)

    More about that fabric: Align’s Nulu fabric is completely opaque. Maybe it’s attributable to the brand’s “see-through pants scandal” from a decade ago, but you’re never going to see someone’s underwear during a downward-facing dog if they’re wearing Align. And nowadays, Lululemon is also double-lining its lighter hues to triple-confirm the coverage (which results in a thicker, cozier feel to the legging). Undies aside, the fabric density also camouflages the other bits you might want to conceal (read: cellulite, a tummy roll, whatever).

    The same cannot be said for Colorfulkoala’s coverage. I tried the leggings in both black and a lighter mauve pink hue and while the black had me covered, the pink was very see-through. I actually wore the pants to Pilates and spent much of the class feeling overexposed. Not just due to my underwear lines being visible, but also those aforementioned bits that I’m not dying to show off — the pant fabric is so thin that, especially in a lighter color, you can see every detail of your tush, legs and beyond. I did appreciate that the waistband is lined, which provides decent tummy control.

    Two pairs of Lululemon's Align leggings (left) and the Colorfulkoala leggings (right)

    In terms of design, both pants are pretty much identical, with flat, exposed seams cut exactly the same way. I didn’t experience any drooping or sagging with either pair — both stay put all day long. The Align waistband is a bit more generous, coming in at 3/8 inches longer than the Colorfulkoala pants’ and thus providing slightly more tummy coverage. Align leggings also have a hidden waistband pocket for keys, cash or credit card, which is a thoughtful detail.

    Both the Lululemon Align and Colorfulkoala High Waisted Yoga Pants are very comfortable to wear all day long. I wasn’t racing to take either pair off after working out, which is a good sign! While their fabrics aren’t identical, both are incredibly soft, and given that their designs are so similar, they fit the same way, contouring your curves rather than pinching or squeezing. Yes, the Colorfulkoala pair are thinner, which affects coverage, but it doesn’t affect comfort at all.

    Lululemon Align High-Rise Pant

    Colorfulkoala Buttery Soft High-Waisted Yoga Pants

    Sizes

    0 to 20

    XS to XL

    Lengths

    17”, 21”, 23”, 25”, 28”, 31”

    25”, 28”, “full length”

    Fabric

    80% nylon, 20% lycra

    80% nylon, 20% spandex

    Color options

    20+

    40+

    Number of reviews

    20,000+

     46,000+

    Care

    Machine wash cold, line dry

    Machine wash and dry

    Lululemon’s Align leggings are the sure bet and worth the investment. Yes, you can buy four to five pairs of Colorfulkoala pants for every one pair of Align, but the quality of Align far outweighs the competition. I’m writing this story while wearing a pair of five-year-old Align leggings that still look and fit like they’re brand-new — the ROI is legit.

    Ultimately what it came down to for me is that I can’t endorse Colorfulkoala’s inconsistent coverage. While the black pair did provide opaqueness, the fabric is still thinner than Align’s Nulu, and that left me feeling more vulnerable, especially as I was doing squats and lunges on a reformer machine. The Align fabric is bulletproof when it comes to coverage and leaves me feeling more confident when I wear them. As a mom of four in my 40s, that is worth the price of admission.

    If budget is a concern, however, Colorfulkoala is a decent legging to buy, but I’d advise sticking to the darker colors and patterns to be safe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Hydrow Rower makes it feel like you’re rowing on the water | CNN Underscored

    The Hydrow Rower makes it feel like you’re rowing on the water | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    By now, most people are familiar with the benefits of a rowing machine, which offers a challenging, low-impact yet effective total-body workout. But as high-tech, connected rowers flood the market and make their way into people’s home gyms, it can be easy to forget that these machines were initially invented to help rowers train for rowing boats on the water. The Hydrow Rower ($2,495) takes the rowing workout back to its roots, featuring classes taught by instructors who, instead of broadcasting from a gym or a studio, are paddling a boat in places like the Charles River in Boston, Massachusetts, or the Potomac River in Washington, D.C.

    Like most current connected fitness devices and machines, the Hydrow Rower requires an All-Access Membership ($44 per month). And in addition to the rowing classes, this membership also includes an app with other workout formats like strength, Pilates and circuit training, which you can then take anywhere you go.

    I had a blast rowing with these instructors and following along in real-world locales, but is this pricey rower right for your home gym? Here’s what we thought after spending a few weeks working out with the Hydrow Rower.

    The Hydrow Rower is a sleek, premium rowing machine that pairs with a $44-per-month All-Access membership. Yes, it offers a kicking cardio and full-body workout, but we loved how it takes rowing back to its roots with live classes filmed at real-world locales. If may be pricey, but if you want to feel like you’re rowing on the water, this home gym rowing machine is for you.

    Hydrow calls its outdoor, on-the-water rowing workouts Live Outdoor Reality, and that’s exactly what they feel like. When the class begins, you see the instructor (or two, in some cases) in their boat, oars at the ready. There are cameras on the front and back of their boat as well as on the chase boat for wider-angle shots. The instructor has a timer and a device tracking their stroke rate and that’s it; once class starts, they have to lead the workout and offer tips on technique all while navigating bridges, other boaters, chunks of ice, swans and anything else in their path. And as if this weren’t enough, the changes in intensity during the workouts were often synched to the excellent playlists, which make the classes really fly (or float) by.

    Hydrow rowing class

    I was super impressed by all the instructors I rowed with, who are referred to as Hydrow Athletes (and include former Olympians, World Champions and collegiate rowers). They were charismatic, engaging and on the ball. But in some cases, the instructor took a back seat to the setting. The nearly 4,000 rowing workouts currently available on the Hydrow feature cities from Boston, Tampa and Chattanooga to more exotic locales like Seward, Alaska; Prague, Czech Republic; and Bergen, Norway. And in my opinion, a sweat with a breathtaking view is much more enjoyable than one spent staring at my basement wall.

    The workouts, which are broken up into three categories based on intensity (Breathe, Sweat and Drive) were challenging as well. Since the instructor is rowing on the water, there is no adjusting resistance and no cues regarding speed (aka split, or how long it would take you to row 500 meters), though that number is featured on the screen. Instead, classes are built around changes in stroke rate, or rhythm, as the Hydrow Athletes call it. This rhythm number is measured in strokes per minute and you control it by moving faster or slower up and down the slide. Again, this emphasis on rhythm as opposed to split or resistance aligns with the experience of rowing on the water, when rhythm is the only thing you can control.

    Typically, rowing at a higher stroke rate is also going to mean you’re rowing faster, lowering your split (since it will take you a shorter amount of time to row 500 meters). But it is possible to row at a speedy rhythm with less than maximum power. The Ergatta calibrates your fitness level and then gives you split ranges to hit in every workout to help ensure you’re trying your hardest. After a few workouts, I was able to quickly establish a baseline to more easily determine what my split should be — and this helped me challenge myself going forward. So, like most app-based home workouts, whether it’s Peloton or the Lululemon Mirror, you’ll have to be more accountable to hold yourself to a higher standard.

    Delivery, setup and design

    After ordering a Hydrow Rower, your machine is delivered, unboxed and assembled by a team of professionals, which is incredibly convenient. All you have to do is plug it in and connect it to Wi-Fi and you’re ready to row.

    In terms of design, the Hydrow’s silver body and streamlined front end give it a striking appearance. While it doesn’t feel as close to rowing on the water as the Ergatta Rower, the electromagnetic drag is smooth and responsive. The cushioned seat and handle are comfortable and I liked the thick, webbed strap that connects the handle to the rower. As mentioned, since the instructors are rowing outdoors, there’s no adjusting resistance, so as your rowing gets more powerful and consistent, it feels easier. Hydrow refers to the rower as “virtually silent,” though if you don’t use headphones you’ll likely notice a faint whirring with each stroke.

    The screen rotates 25 degrees to either side so you can see it better when you hop off the rower to work out, but it doesn’t rotate as far to the side as the screen on the Echelon Row-S ($1,599). At a little over 7 feet long by 2 feet wide, the physical footprint of the Hydrow is almost identical to the Echelon Row-S and it can also be stored upright, though Hydrow requires the purchase of an Upright Storage Kit that is mounted on the wall for safe standing storage.

    Clean and intuitive interface

    I liked everything about the Hydrow’s interface. All the design decisions the brand made felt both thoughtful and user-driven. For beginners, the first thing you see on the home screen is a 15-minute welcome class, followed by two others that make up the Learn to Row section. These helpful introductory classes, coupled with the fact that the Hydrow Athletes are world-class, competitive rowers who have spent years perfecting the stroke and how to teach it, make this an excellent machine for a beginner.

    The search functions are easy to use and you can either mark your favorite classes or go into your workout history and replay classes directly from that list. There’s a countdown after you press play before the actual class begins, giving you time to get comfortable and strapped in. Most of the rowing workouts (with the exception of the All in One Rows, which have a warmup, workout and cool down) don’t include a cool down, but I like that that when you’re done rowing, the app automatically feeds you a five-minute Cool Down Row so you don’t need to seek one out. In addition to that cool down row, the Hydrow will also begin recommending classes based on your previous choices and fitness level.

    Hydrow pilates class

    Perhaps my favorite of these many thoughtful features was that the Circuit classes, which include rowing and floor exercises, show you the entire class plan before you hit play, including each exercise and the lengths of different segments. This helped me avoid a class with a lot of push-ups on a day when I simply wasn’t in the mood. At 20 minutes long, the Circuit classes are also great to stack with a 10-minute row or Core Pilates workout.

    In addition to rowing workouts and the aforementioned Circuit classes, which were just added to the Hydrow in January, the membership includes strength, Pilates, yoga and mobility classes. As a fan of Pilates, I appreciated that they differentiate between Classical Pilates and classes they call Whole Body Pilates, which feature more Pilates-inspired bodyweight moves — all of which are a great addition to my rowing workouts.

    The strength classes are interesting as well as challenging and the stretch/mobility classes, which focus on the muscles and body parts that require the most love after rowing, feel great. And, of course, all these different formats makes the $44 monthly membership easier to swallow.

    Unlike the leaderboards on many connected fitness machines that place you based on Output, the Hydrow leaderboard is based on meters rowed. Given that the workouts are meant to simulate rowing on the water, in which your progress would be determined based on distance, this makes sense. If you were in a boat racing alongside others, your opponent might pull ahead by a few meters, only to get tired and allow you to catch up and maybe pull ahead. But translate this to a leaderboard on a rowing machine and it can get frustrating.

    Likewise, if you take a few strokes off to rest on the instructor’s recommendation and the rowers around you on the board do not, be prepared to fall. During one 30-minute row, I followed the instructor and took a full minute of rest in the middle of the class — thus losing 25 spots on the leaderboard (most of which I had proudly gained during the previous set of intervals).

    If you’re the type of person who hides the leaderboard or doesn’t pay much attention to it, this won’t bother you at all. But for people who do take motivation from the competition, these features may be irritating.

    Copy of Hydrow_Fall_2020_DSCF1806_LIGHT[16].jpg

    At over $40 per month, the membership fee for the Hydrow is not cheap. Adding insult to injury, there are only around 10 new live rowing classes per week, and many of them first air in the middle of the workday (for comparison, the Echelon Row-S has around 30 live rowing classes per week and the monthly subscription fee is $35, or less if you pay annually). Considering that they are being broadcast live from the water, this does make sense logistically. And, it must be said, none of the other class formats are broadcast live either.

    There are thousands of classes in the on-demand library to choose from, so you’ll never run out of workouts, but with the Hydrow you likely won’t be able to rely on the live class experience for motivation every time you get on the rower.

    In addition to the original Hydrow Rower ($2,495), Hydrow also sells the more compact Hydrow Wave Rower ($1,895). While you get access to all the same classes, the screen is smaller (16 inches versus 22 inches) and doesn’t rotate, the rower itself is 30% smaller and lighter, and the slide and track are made of less premium materials.

    In price, design and class offerings, the Hydrow most closely compares to the Peloton Row ($3,195, then $44 per month). Both machines are an attractive combination of silver and black, both have a screen that swivels and both offer access to classes in other exercise formats as part of the monthly membership (which costs the same). The biggest difference lies in the rowing classes themselves; on the Peloton Row, the instructors teach from a studio and the Hydrow Athletes teach from the water. In fact, the only other rowing machine that does water-based classes is the NordicTrack RW900 Rower ($1,999). The Peloton Row does give you more personalized workout guidance in the form of personal pace targets and form assistance, which could make up for the discrepancy in price.

    As an avid rower, I felt that the rowing classes lived up to the hype and were worth the higher cost. The Hydrow Athletes are engaging, motivating and fun to be with, and the workouts themselves are challenging. I enjoyed the other class formats as well, particularly the Pilates classes, and the interface was intuitive and easy to navigate. Physically, the machine is attractive and feels good to row — plus, you don’t need to assemble it yourself.

    All that said, the price is high (only the Peloton Row, at $3,195, is more expensive), as is the monthly membership fee. If you have a limited budget, you can get a well-built rower like the Echelon Row-S that offers engaging and challenging workouts for less. But if you want workout videos that put you in a rowing boat on the water, plus let you travel around the world while you’re doing it, you can’t do better than the Hydrow Rower.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The best cookware sets of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    The best cookware sets of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Few items in a home will see as much use as cookware, which you may be handling up to three times a day. And considering how you’re using it — open flames, scalding temperatures, grease, and scrubbing pads, just to name a few of the regular rigors pots and pans are subjected to — it’s no wonder that choosing a cookware set can be so complicated.

    Cookware can be a significant investment, and if you spring for an entire set you want it to meet your needs and last for a very long time. However, with so many materials, designs, and price points, it can be difficult to know where to start. That’s why we scoured the options and put them through the paces in a real kitchen to determine which sets were worth it. Read on for the results.

    Best cookware set overall

    Affordable cookware with an excellent variety of pieces, Tramontina’s 12-piece set is crafted from aluminum clad stainless steel and is induction-friendly to boot. A solid choice which checks all the boxes, these pots and pans were our favorite in terms of performance, ergonomics and even non-stick handling. All for a great value.

    Best splurge cookware set

    This gorgeous cookware set from Sardel easily melds form and function with its Italian handcrafted construction. And, this smaller, 4-piece set with two lids, even includes a non-stick skillet for easy clean-up. You’ll love the shiny finish and refined design, which make this cookware a perfect centerpiece for your kitchen — if you’re willing to pay a little extra.

    Best budget cookware set

    Cuisinart is our best budget pick because of its excellent array of pots and pans, including a handy double boiler. We also liked its glass lids and easy to read markings inside the pans for common measurements. Though not fully clad cookware, it did hold up to our testing in the kitchen — and you just can’t beat the low price.

    Best non-stick cookware set

    This copious set from Zwilling uses super durable, non-toxic materials to coat its non-stick pieces. The slickest surface of any cookware set we tested, the pots and pans also clean up easily and dry quickly.

    Newest-zwilling.jpg

    It might be surprising that we named such an affordable set the overall winner, but this cookware has it all. The set includes a nice variety of pieces, with both 8- and 10-inch skillets and a 6-quart saute pan with lid, three different size saucepans (1.5-, 2- and 3-quart), and a stockpot, which covers all your basic kitchen needs and then some. Having smaller pots and pans can be nice for sauces and other small-batch recipes.

    All the pieces are aluminum clad with 18/10 stainless steel, which makes it induction-friendly. Tri-ply construction means you get the best of both worlds in terms of heat conductivity and durability, so these pans weather temperature changes without warping. The 8-inch skillet passed our warp test of plunging a hot pan into ice water without a shudder.

    The pans have a solid, no-frills design that’s in line with what you might expect to find in professional kitchens: very clean and classic, without a lot of branding. The stainless finish resists fingerprints and looks attractive, if slightly utilitarian (you could ding a point for the stockpots not having any taper or pouring spout).

    Importantly these pans handle nicely, too. They have the substantial heft of quality stainless that gives you confidence from the get-go that they won’t warp under pressure, but are still lightweight enough to swirl oil in one-handed, or toss vegetables gently when sauteeing. This is an often underrated quality in cookware, but a vital one because whether you’re slinging pots and pans all day for a living or just taking a smoking-hot skillet from the stovetop to the oven, you want to feel in control of the cookware, and fatigue can make cooking techniques both sloppy and, worst-case scenario, dangerous.

    For the same reason, comfortable ergonomic handles attached with rivets are essential. Comfort level will vary from individual to individual, but these handles were among the easiest to grip and look elegant, too. They’re cast stainless steel, not too round or too thin, and the handles for the pot lids are high enough to accommodate an actual pair of knuckles without grazing the hot metal. The rivets are small and minimal, as low-profile as it gets for riveted handles.

    Where these pans really shine, though, is their performance. The flour test revealed some of the most even heating in a skillet out of all those tested, including several pricier versions. One of the drawbacks of stainless cookware in general is that it isn’t nonstick, but in our fried egg test this skillet fared the best out of the options that weren’t made with nonstick materials: While the egg didn’t slide around in the pan even, it lifted out easily with no sticking and little mess, and the pan cleaned easily afterward, with barely more than a swipe with a damp sponge needed. Stainless sometimes has a tendency to stain when used with oil at high heats but that didn’t happen in our protein-searing test either, and the skillets had deep enough sides to rein in splatters. Even the starch from rice was easily cleaned out of a saucepan easily. The saucepans are nice and deep as well, which helps prevent bubble over. The cookware is rated safe up to 500 degrees F which means a saute pan can go from the stovetop to the oven.

    Given the value for the money, this cookware set is a great choice for anyone who is looking for performance that will last. The combination of tri-ply construction, quality materials, and ergonomic design make for a set that does everything in the kitchen exactly the way it should, and will continue to for years. If it doesn’t, this cookware set comes with a lifetime warranty. If you’re more concerned about even heating, easy handling, and durability than brand names, this is the set for you. It’s what we recommend for anyone looking for a solid set to cook with daily.

    new-sardel-lead.jpg

    Sardel is a relatively new name in the cookware world but the reputation for quality is deserved. If you’re looking for something with a little more aesthetic appeal that’s also going to function well, and are willing to pay more for it, Sardel cookware is the way to go. These pots and pans combine the best of form and function with Italian design and five-ply construction. Though many brands, including All-Clad, have attempted to sell the idea that more layers are better, for the most part, testers have agreed that it’s not really any more conductive than tri-ply — and five-ply is just fancy marketing. But these pans will function as well as tri-ply and may be slightly more durable.

    The Small Set includes a 10-inch nonstick skillet, a 12-inch stainless skillet, a 2-quart saucepan and a stock pot. If you eat eggs or other similarly delicate foods regularly, it’s nice to have a set that includes at least one nonstick pan with the workhorse stainless steel, and Sardel’s  honeycomb-patterned PTFE coating resists scratches and is slick enough to slide a fried egg around in.

    This cookware is a step up designwise from the Tramontina set, with a shinier finish, more elegant handles, and pouring lips, all small touches that make this cookware set seem more refined overall. The branding is minimal, with a simple S logo, so these pots can easily go from stovetop to table. The skillets are larger and shallower, more like a crepe pan, but heat evenly, and the nonstick performs as well as any we’ve tried.

    Looks aside, how do these pans perform? The company claims the 5-ply construction, with three layers of aluminum sandwiched in 18/10 stainless steel, makes for better reactivity, but we didn’t notice these heating any more quickly than tri-ply pans. That said, they did heat and cook evenly and with little effort. The stainless steel pots and pans are oven safe up to 500 degrees F, but even the nonstick is oven safe up to 480 degrees F. The handles are comfortable and riveted, making these pans easy to handle with confidence. The company also offers a 30-day period to try the pans and return them if you’re not satisfied.

    new-cuisinart.jpg

    To be fair, this isn’t fully clad cookware, it’s what is known as “aluminum encapsulated,” or sometimes ”disc bottom,” which is more budget-friendly but lower in quality. Unlike fully clad cookware, which has an inner core of aluminum sandwiched by stainless steel comprising the entire pan, this cookware only has a clad bottom. That can be problematic because you won’t get the same even heating up the sides of the pans (which is really only an issue with skillets, although those do tend to be everyday pieces), and the pans may be bottom heavy.

    These pans are actually well-balanced and easy to maneuver, however, and the rapid heating comes in handy when using the saucepan or stockpot to boil water, or the saute pan to brown meat. It did result in the flour getting a little dark in our tests, but it’s easy enough to adjust by using lower heat. Once we did that, the egg fried as well as any in clad cookware.

    For its price, this cookware not only performs, it’s also well-designed, with touches you normally see in higher-end cookware including dripless pouring rims (that work!), interior measurements so you can tell at a glance how much to fill a saucepan for two quarts, for instance, stay-cool handles and clear glass lids let you see what’s cooking. The set includes the basic pieces as well as a steamer insert. In general, a good set for a budget price — it just may not be the best value over time, as fully clad cookware tends to hold up better and heat evenly for longer. If you’re looking for a better quality set you can invest in long term, Cuisinart makes fully clad sets with many of the same features at a reasonable price point.

    zwilling-lead-1.jpg

    Many home cooks just want a decent pan that’s easy to clean up, and nonstick cookware fulfills that requirement. But recent concerns over chemicals in nonstick coatings has expanded the market for materials. The Zwilling nonstick cookware set uses a traditional polytetrafluoroethylene, or PTFE nonstick coating bonded to metal, but without the harmful PFOA “forever chemicals.” The brand calls its coating DuraSlide and claims that it is much more durable than other kinds thanks to a plasma primer base.

    Our experiments show that there is a lot of legitimacy to this claim. The nonstick coating stood up to tough scraping with metal spatulas and a metal spoon. What’s more, it was one of the slickest surfaces, hands down, of every pan we tested. A fried egg actually slid around in the pan, and likely would have sans butter or fat. The coating even seems to almost repel water, so these pots and pans not only wash super easily, but dry quickly as well.

    The Madura Plus 10-piece set includes 8- and 10-inch skillets, 1.5- and 3-quart saucepans with glass lids, a 2.6-quart sauté pan with a lid, and a 5-quart Dutch oven. All are forged aluminum construction, which means they excel at heating quickly and evenly. The Madura pots and pans are mid-weight, with smooth oval handles and a clean profile. With a matte black finish and brushed nickel accents, they’re sleek looking, something you wouldn’t mind having sitting out on your stove top. The Zwilling logo is emblazoned on both the pans and lids, but it’s fairly discreet. Glass lids allow you to see what you’re cooking, although the handles are screw-on so they have the potential to loosen over time.

    This cookware set is induction friendly, and handles nicely — not too heavy or difficult to maneuver, and they have a dripless pouring rim to keep mess to a minimum. The handles are ergonomic and stay cool during cooking, and the pans didn’t warp even under extreme temperature changes. One caveat with these pans, however, is that they are not designed to be used in high heat or in the oven.

    While this cookware, like any nonstick, isn’t as multipurpose as stainless, it’s a good everyday set. It’s upscale aesthetic along with the unbeatable nonstick performance and durability puts this nonstick cookware set ahead of the rest

    Deciding whether to buy an entire cookware set, instead of stocking your kitchen a la carte, depends on a few key things. Most of us have certain pieces we use day-to-day, so it’s important to check what you already own, what needs upgrading and if it’s worth investing in a basic, quality set.

    For those looking to save some money, buying a set can be more economical than buying individual pieces separately. In addition, buying a set will help with kitchen aesthetics as well, offering a consistent look.

    Nonstick pans offer a quicker, easier way to cook and clean up, but the newest nonstick pans are also a safer alternative to older Teflon cookware. One thing to consider is that non-stick cookware will need to be replaced sooner than other types, mainly because the nonstick coatings will eventually fade. In addition, they won’t hold up as well to metal utensils without scratching.

    There’s a reason most professional kitchens are stocked with stainless steel cookware: It’s incredibly durable. Because stainless is not an excellent heat conductor, however, most modern cookware has an aluminum or copper core, giving you the best of both materials. This process is known as cladding and was patented by its inventor, who would go on to found the company All Clad. Those patents have since expired, so many companies can use the same technology. Clad stainless cookware has a number of benefits that make it ideal for everyday use: It heats evenly, is sturdy without being super heavy, is oven-safe, won’t warp in extreme temperatures, won’t react with acidic foods or be scratched easily by metal tools, and cleans up nicely. It’s also induction-friendly. Stainless can take some getting used to cooking with, however, since it’s not naturally noonstick. Clad stainless cookware is a good choice 99% of the time.

    To save money, some cookware is what is known as partially clad, also called encapsulated cookware or disc-bottom cookware. Only the base of these pots and pans is clad with a disc of aluminum or copper encapsulated in stainless steel. In general, these are not recommended over fully clad because they don’t heat as evenly and can be bottom heavy. If you do want to save money by going for some partially clad pieces, your best bets are saute pans, saucepans, and stock pots, because these don’t need the sides to heat up for cooking food the way skillets do.

    Anodized aluminum is made using an electrochemical process that permanently alters the surface of aluminum pots and pans to make them more durable and nonstick and less reactive. In some cases, these can be much harder than stainless steel, and tend to be less expensive than fully clad cookware while offering many of the same benefits. The main drawbacks of anodized cookware is that it is not induction-friendly, needs to be hand-washed, and has a darker appearance than stainless.

    You may hear cast iron and carbon steel called “naturally nonstick,” but this comes only after repeated seasonings, which can be tedious. Some cast iron is enamel-coated, a process that fuses powdered glass to the metal, which makes seasoning unnecessary. These pans are generally durable and add some color to a kitchen, but can chip, and are heavy. Carbon steel is a much lighter material, so it is more maneuverable, but tends to heat less evenly and be more expensive.

    An affordable and eco-friendly nonstick option, ceramic is an even better heat conductor than metal. Solid ceramic is just clay and water, but ceramic-coated metal cookware may be made from a silicon product. The major complaints about ceramic cookware is that it becomes less nonstick with use and time, and that it isn’t as durable as stainless.

    Each cookware set was unboxed and the pieces washed before use. Testing was done on a Waring Pro professional induction cooktop and a Kenmore Elite gas stovetop. For each set, we put the pieces through the following tests:

    Flour test: Using the smallest size skillet available, one tablespoon of all-purpose flour was sifted evenly to cover the bottom of the dry pan. The skillet was then heated on an induction burner to medium high (setting 4/7n on a Waring 120v induction range, first confirmed by Leidenfrost effect) and observed as the flour browned. The resulting pattern showed how evenly a pan heats, and how difficult it was to clean afterward.

    Egg test: Using the same skillet as the flour test, one-half tablespoon (7.06 g) of unsalted butter was melted on medium on an induction cooktop, then one large egg was cracked into the skillet and fried for a total of two minutes. This tests the pan’s release and cooking.

    The seared protein test: Using the largest skillet of each set, the pan was heated to high (6/7 on an induction cooktop) and one-half tablespoon of extra-virgin olive oil was added. A 3-ounce portion of salmon fillet with skin was added, skin side down, and the heat reduced to medium low (3/7). The fish was cooked for 5 minutes, then was flipped using a metal fish spatula and cooked for another 90 seconds until an instant read thermometer read 120 degrees F. This tested the searing capabilities of the pan, and how well it releases proteins.

    The warp test: The smallest skillet of each set was placed on an induction burner on the highest setting (7/7) and heated for 5 minutes, then plunged directly into ice water (48 degrees F). The pan was observed for any signs of warping.

    The rice test: The smallest saucepan of each set was used to cook one cup of jasmine rice according to package directions. The rice was rinsed, combined with one and a half cups of water in the saucepan and brought to a boil. The rice was then reduced to a simmer and the saucepan covered with its lid for 15 minutes.

    Pots and pans were also washed with dish soap and hot water. We noted the aesthetics and any functional features like ergonomic and stay-cool handles, pour spouts, and how well finishes stood up to fingerprints and stains. We considered the materials and construction of each cookware set, as well as its delivery on quality for value and any warranties offered.

    This set is new from OXO, a brand with a great balance of form and function, and was an extremely close second to our winning nonstick pan. This cookware set is utilitarian but also pleasing to the eye with matte gray and brushed stainless and a textured bottom. The handles are comfortable to grip and this cookware set is one of the few tested that has its handle rivets flush with the pan’s interior, which helps prevent debris from building up there, a common problem. That said, the lack of an opposing handle to grip on the saute pan feels like an oversight. The nonstick is free of harmful chemicals and cooks and cleans like a dream, but we did manage to scratch it (it took an effort, however). This set is also oven-safe to 600 degrees F (without lids) which is impressive for nonstick.

    This set is like a higher-end version of our winner, but in terms of design and performance, functions much the same. The brand has gained favor in the culinary world and does a lot of restaurant supply — the cookware set even came with an offer for a free online cooking class, which is a nice touch. And these are good, quality pots and pans, no doubt. They passed all tests with flying colors. At this pierce point, though, we were left wanting something more than a one-time cooking class. While durable and practical, these pans aren’t the prettiest to look at, and the nonstick was tougher to clean and showed more scratches in our tests than others.

    Known for their classic enameled cast-iron, Le Creuset is no stranger to quality cookware, and this set further exemplifies that. It’s design-forward with a mirror finish, obvious branding (so obvious one wonders why they have to include so many stickers on their products, which was an annoyance), and an appealing design. The flared pouring lips and interior measurements are nice touches as well, but as far as performance, this cookware was less consistent with even heating in both the flour and egg test. If you want cookware that’s instantly recognizable and are a sucker for a brand name, this may be a good fit. Otherwise, there are better ways to spend your money.

    This was definitely the most-fun-to-unbox set of cookware, as these ceramic-coated aluminum pots and pans come in a variety of colorways and with a complimentary fabric lid hanger and storage solution. The cookware is simple but modern, with curved stainless handles, and it includes a skillet, saute pan, saucepan and stockpot with lids. So you don’t get as many pieces as other cookware sets, but what you do get is well-designed and sturdy. It’s nonstick that’s free of harmful chemicals and oven safe up to 550 degrees F. It’s also more conductive than stainless, so heed the box’s warning to use medium to low heat. It’s not as versatile as stainless clad for everyday use, but if you’re going to invest in a second set, this could easily be the one for you.

    This nonstick set has similar issues to the Cuisinart set with uneven heating because of its aluminum encapsulated base. It’s also got a more basic design that wasn’t our favorite, but the brushed metal handles are comfortable and the pan was easy to clean. It comes with a 10-year guarantee against the nonstick chipping or flaking. You get one lid for the price of two because two of the pans are the same size, which can save on storage space. Also, the small skillet was fairly deep, which can help keep sauces from splattering and making a mess.

    This brand originated tri-ply technology and sweeps most reviews, so our non-recommendation may be surprising. This isn’t a bad set by any means, but we could not get past the ergonomics of the handles, which have a distinctive but unwieldy flattened V-shape. Some people don’t mind, and some might even prefer it, but our testers found it unnerving to sling hot pans by such a flimsy, uncomfortable grasp. This cookware set also failed to distinguish itself from comparable products by either design or performance. In fact, while the skillet seemed impervious to scratching, oil stains were extremely hard to remove.

    This is the brand’s midrange cookware set, made with tri-ply construction. In our tests, it always performed just slightly below other similar products, however, and was definitely harder to clean. The pans are a little heavier and not as easy to handle as others as well, and are only oven safe to 450 degrees F. The heating was also little less even.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L review: A close-to-perfect bottle with a few shortcomings | CNN Underscored

    HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L review: A close-to-perfect bottle with a few shortcomings | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Whether you’re traveling into the backcountry or internationally, clean water isn’t always a guarantee. Yes, you can buy bottled water if you’re in a different country, but what’s even better is carrying a bottle that can filter water from nearly any fresh water source in the world.

    There are a few bottles with integrated filters on the market, including the LifeStraw Peak Series Bottle, which we reviewed in the past. But when we heard that HydraPak — a brand famous for high-performance, outdoor-centric water storage products — was making a collapsible bottle with a built-in filter, we knew we had to try it.

    We got our hands on the new HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L to give it a try, and after weeks of testing, there are a few things we don’t like but still a lot to love about this bottle.

    It isn’t perfect, but this collapsible bottle has an incredible flow rate and a durable exterior, making it a top dog in the market of bottles with built-in filters. Difficulty keeping it clean, particularly in the long term, hold it back from being a truly great option.

    Collapsible water bottles with integrated filters seem to be a growing trend in the outdoors industry, and we couldn’t be happier about it. Carrying a completely separate filtering system can be cumbersome in the backcountry, and these all-in-one water bottles are not only great for drinking clean water in nature but also while traveling.

    The HydraPak Flux+ 1.5L has all the benefits you’d expect from a bottle in this category. Its collapsibility is stellar, its filter allows you to drink water from nearly any water source and it’s designed to be as small and light as possible.

    hydrapak flux+ filter lifestyle CNNU

    This is HydraPak’s first foray into filtering, but you don’t have to worry: The filtering technology is up to par. According to HydraPak, the filter is a single stage, smaller than .2 micron hollow fiber filter that can remove 99.9999% of common waterborne bacteria, 99.999% of parasitic cysts per EPA Guide Standards and NSF P231 and 99.999% of microplastics per NSF 42 greater than or equal to 3.0 microns in size. That’s the same percentages as LifeStraw Peak Series Collapsible Water Bottle’s filter for parasitic cysts and microplastics; however, the LifeStraw can remove more bacteria at 99.999999%.

    To test the filter, we filled the bottle with a bunch of soil and filtered the water into a clean cup. Not a spec of dirt made it through the filter; however, it still had quite a bit of dirt taste to it (similar to the LifeStraw). The biggest surprise, though, was just how good the flow rate of the HydraPak Flux+ is. We’ve used other water filters before, including the LifeStraw Peak Series bottle and the Sawyer Squeeze, but the HydraPak easily has the fastest flow rate of any filter we’ve tested. That means drinking out of the bottle is much easier, and it actually feels like drinking from a normal bottle.

    hydrapak flux+ lead CNNU

    The bottle’s flow rate wasn’t only fast, but it was consistent too. During our filtering tests, most filters immediately slow down as the soil clogs up the filter. That wasn’t the case with the HydraPak. Even after filtering multiple bottles of extremely dirty water, it kept its super-high flowrate.

    On top of its speed and efficacy, we absolutely loved how small the HydraPak Flux+ can get. It scrunches down onto itself to about the size of a softball, and can get even flatter if you remove the filter. The bottle has a loop on the top that not only acts as a way to clip your bottle onto your backpack but can also fold over the scrunched-up bottle to keep it compact. Although, when the filter is inside the bottle, it’s really hard to get the loop around the entire bottle. For that reason, we wish the loop were just a little bit bigger or had some stretch to it.

    hydrapak flux+ collapsed lifestyle CNNU

    The bottle can pack down super small, which helps it fit into any bag, but when it’s full, the HydraPak Flux+ has an impressive 1.5-liter capacity. In testing, we really enjoyed this size, as it’s bigger than your standard water bottle but doesn’t feel massive.

    Another great aspect of the HydraPak is its material and overall shape. It’s got a completely flat bottom, which means when the bottle is full (but only when it’s full), it can actually stand up by itself. The material also feels a lot thicker than that of the LifeStraw bottle we tested, which ended up getting a tiny hole after a few months. We’ll keep using the HydraPak bottle and squeezing water through it to keep this post updated with any durability issues.

    There’s a lot to love about the HydraPak Flux+, but there are a few things we didn’t like. The biggest issue in our opinion is the fact that you can’t backwash the filter. Most other filters come with some sort of syringe so you can push clean water back through a clogged filter, which cleans it and helps it retain its peak flow rate. The HydraPak Flux+’s 42mm filter doesn’t have this option.

    To clean it, HydraPak recommends dipping the filter in clean water and shaking it around to loosen up and remove any debris. After our filtration tests we did this, but after more than 10 rounds of shaking the filter, bits of soil were still coming out. This is an annoying and time-consuming process in the short term, but since there isn’t a way to quickly and effectively get all the debris out, the long-term flow rate of the filter doesn’t seem promising. HydraPak states the filter should be replaced after a year or after 1,500 liters of water have been filtered, depending on the quality of water. In comparison, LifeStraw says its filter’s life span is 2,000 liters.

    hydrapak flux+ flow rate lifestyle CNNU

    The filter itself is tough to clean, and the bottle itself isn’t a walk in the park either. Unfortunately, you can’t throw it in the dishwasher, but with a bottle brush you can scrub the insides pretty easily.

    One last thing we wanted to point out was that the cap of the HydraPak Flux+ can be quite hard to open. You’re supposed to flip it open, then twist, but the lip on the cap is small and it took a lot of effort to pop it open, especially when it was brand new.

    The HydraPak Flux+ is quite similar to the LifeStraw Peak Series Collapsible bottle, but we do like HydraPak’s option a bit more. The filter might not last as long since you can’t backwash it, but we think the LifeStraw’s lack of durability really sets it back. Katadyn also has a collapsible water bottle, which we haven’t tested yet, but it’s famous for its stellar flow rate.

    If you don’t want to deal with the shortcomings of the all-in-one bottles, you can mix and match your filter and reservoir to find your perfect pair. There’s a wide variety of options, including HydraPak’s new 28mm filter — the size that fits standard plastic water bottles — which is a direct competitor to others that have long been popular in the backpacking community like the Sawyer Squeeze. There are other filters that come in the 42mm size like the Katadyn BeFree, and you can even use HydraPak’s Plug-N-Play adapter to attach a 42mm reservoir to a 28mm filter. However, we still haven’t found the Goldilocks bottle that packs everything into one neat package so you can skip all the research.

    HydraPak’s Flux+ 1.5L water bottle has a great flow rate and is built with thick, durable materials. We wish its filter were easier to clean and keep up, but overall it’s a great option in the collapsible bottle scene. If you don’t want to parse through different reservoirs and filters and want one do-it-all bottle, and you don’t mind replacing the filter cap every once in a while, the HydraPak Flux+ is a great pick.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These genius leggings are designed to enhance your yoga mat | CNN Underscored

    These genius leggings are designed to enhance your yoga mat | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Between my frequent yoga habit and side hustle as a certified personal trainer with a specialization in orthopedic exercise, I spend an inordinate amount of time wearing, thinking about and writing about leggings. I thus couldn’t have been more excited to try out Maät’s leggings designed for practicing yoga without having to source any additional cushioning mid-flow.

    While yoga is notoriously gentle on the joints — it’s fairly low-impact if you skip any jumping, and it advocates for deep, rhythmic breaths to facilitate movement — yoga without a mat can be painful and distracting. Grab a mat, and you should be fine, right? Not so fast. While a yoga mat has long been deemed an essential accessory to any successful yoga practice, research from the journal Phenomenology and Practice identifies the yoga mat as a barrier to entry for some folks in the way that it forces us to accumulate “more stuff” in the name of connecting with our bodies. “When it comes to a ‘serious’ practice,” writes author Gillian Lemermeyer, “the idea of the mat being necessary, even essential, persists.”

    Like yoga mats, we’re constantly shifting the way we think about and use leggings (how many times is TikTok going to force me to buy the ones that scrunch up like an angry face at the butt?). What was once deemed an ‘80s aerobics essential has now become a wardrobe staple for casual and advanced yogis alike, making room for leggings to enter the market with unique features like built-in knee pads to replace that towel you need to keep on hand for your knees. That’s where Maät comes in.

    The addition of a built-in knee pad is a brilliant way to make yoga more accessible to those suffering from pain or limited by the sheer space and weight of a yoga mat.

    When Maät founder and designer Fiona Devaney noticed she needed to keep placing a towel under her knees during yoga poses to alleviate pain, she sought out a more time-efficient solution: leggings with built-in knee pads, inspired by the blissful built-in cushion she once experienced in a wetsuit while surfing. Born out of that discovery was the brand’s 1.0 Legging, which features a built-in moto-like tapered knee pad, and is designed with a soft yet durable material that offers slight compression and four-way stretch. They come in five versatile colors from army green to Metal for $148 a pop. Who are they for? Anyone who needs a little extra TLC at the knee region, or anyone practicing without a mat — either because they’re traveling or can’t be bothered to schlep it to the studio.

    MAAT lead image.jpg

    There’s lots to love about these leggings. Their compressive material and high-waisted fit offer a tucked-in feeling, which not only provides extra comfort, but reduces muscle fatigue, increases power output, and reduces joint and muscle strain. During wear-testing in a power yoga class, the seams felt secure during poses that require advanced range of motion at the hip flexors, like standing half-split, happy baby and bound bird of paradise. From a visual perspective, the knee pads are a far cry from something nerdy you’d strap on before rollerblading down a boardwalk. The curved seams surrounding the pads are intentionally designed to elongate the leg while offsetting any bulk.

    The pads themselves, made of 100% foam covered by polyester and spandex, are nothing short of genius. When I practiced on both my hardwood floors and scratchy living room carpet, they provided a dreamy, pillowy-like sensation that enhanced my willingness to stay in knee-centric poses I resent, but know I should do more often, like cat-cow, camel and bird dog. While I, luckily, sorted out my patella issues in physical therapy a couple years ago, I can absolutely see how these leggings could support someone during their practice living with knee discomfort, be it degenerative or post-operative (under the supervision of their doctor or physical therapist, of course).

    Along with power yoga, I tested these leggings during a Pure Barre class, which requires participants to spend an extended amount of time on all fours during movements like modified push-up and glute kickbacks. This places an inordinate amount of strain on the standing knee, which can detract from staying stable and engaged through the working leg. This time around, I felt like I could go on forever, all because my standing knee felt that much more supported atop the built-in knee pad.

    For such a technical legging, I was surprised to see how simple they are to care for. Like any high-performance legging, they hold up best when hand-washed and line-dried, but they can also go in the machine on a cold, gentle cycle inside-out (just be sure to avoid folding them at the knee pad when storing so as to retain their shape).

    While I appreciate the yoga-forward marketing, the brand sells itself short by pigeonholing itself into that narrow box. I can see these leggings serving as complete miracles for folks who spend lots of time doing housework, gardening or any other type of physical labor that requires transitional sit-to-stand movements. I kept the leggings on to scrub my bathroom, and let me tell you, my toilet has never been so clean.

    MAAT photo 1.jpg

    As a short person at around 5 foot 3 inches, my knees are positioned quite lower than the average person’s, or at least lower than that of the prototype the brand used when designing these leggings. That means the built-in knee pads sit right at my shin bone below the knee, where I don’t necessarily need any padding during my workout. Due to this mismatch, I experienced a lot of bunching at the ankle, which not only caused slight discomfort and sensory overload, but limited ankle mobility and range of motion. Once I gathered the material at my thigh, I was able to experience the bliss of the knee pad. While the knee pad is not an eyesore by any means, you do feel its presence when walking or standing, making it — for me — more trouble than it’s worth.

    While the brand was kind enough to send me two of their models — the charcoal and black leggings — I gravitated towards the charcoal for their slick, high-performance Tula fabric made of polyester and elastane, which is evocative of the Lululemon Wunder Train leggings I wear for everything from hot yoga to Peloton boot camps. The charcoal model provided more sweat-wicking properties than the black version, the brand’s original offering made of supplex and spandex that reminded me of the lounge-friendly Everlane 24/7 leggings that I reviewed last year (and promptly lived in). If you tend to sweat a lot, the material used in the black legging might not do the trick. Thankfully, because of its dark color, you won’t have to worry about any sweat stains.

    The thing about a yoga mat is that it cushions virtually every facet of your body during your practice. What worries me about using these leggings solo — sans mat — is that the user is now lacking wrist support during poses like downward dog or chaturanga, or head support during shavasana or supine spinal twists. Your best option is to pair these leggings with a mat, or if that’s not feasible, some sort of travel-friendly microfiber towel to absorb sweat and additional impact.

    Workout clothing — and specifically leggings — is an incredibly personal choice because our bodies are all shaped differently and we all move differently. The addition of a built-in knee pad is a brilliant way to make yoga more accessible to those suffering from pain or limited by the sheer space and weight of a yoga mat. While I had to finagle them to stay aligned with my knee, a taller person may find these leggings to be the difference between skipping a workout due to limitations or enthusiastically maintaining a yoga routine. At the very least, they make for a stellar gift for that one athletic friend who seems to have everything already, but can totally benefit from a functional wardrobe staple on, off — and maybe even without — the mat.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Galaxy S23 and S23+ make the best Android phone even better | CNN Underscored

    The Galaxy S23 and S23+ make the best Android phone even better | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    It’s getting hard to think of ways that Samsung’s Galaxy phones could be better, which is why the company hasn’t reinvented the wheel for 2023. The Galaxy S23 and S23+ are all about subtle but smart refinements to our pick for the best Android phone, retaining the same gorgeous display and excellent cameras while delivering even faster performance, a more streamlined look and some of the best battery life we’ve ever tested on a smartphone.

    That said, the S23 isn’t the most exciting update for recent Galaxy buyers, and Samsung’s unique flavor of Android may not be ideal for everyone. So who are the S23 and S23+ for? Here’s what I think after living with Samsung’s latest flagship for a week.

    The Galaxy S23 is the best overall Android phone for the money, offering great performance, excellent cameras and some of the best battery life we’ve tested on a phone.

    A slick design and a gorgeous display

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 4

    The Galaxy S23 and S23+ are two of the nicest phones I’ve gotten my hands on, offering some refinements from last year’s models without messing with what already works. The S23’s matte rear panel gives it a smooth, distinguished look that stands out from the glossy, smudge-prone competition —  especially now that the camera bump from older models is gone.

    Whereas the Galaxy S22 features a fairly large housing for its three camera lens, the new S23 models are completely seamless on the back. Sure, the new camera lenses are bigger and stick out more, but I personally prefer the bump-free design. This minimalist, matte look also does a great job highlighting the gorgeous Lavender and Cream color options I tested, which offer just enough pop while still being slick and subdued. If those colors aren’t your thing, you can also nab the phone in Green, Phantom Black, Graphite and Lime, the latter two of which are exclusive to Samsung’s website.

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 6

    I found the standard 6.1-inch Galaxy S23 to be the perfect size for my hands — the 6.6-inch S23+ was still pleasantly lightweight, but its larger design often made using it a two-handed affair. Both of these phones sport curvy, glossy edges (unlike the flatter sides of the S23 Ultra) that felt a bit slippery to me, so you’ll want to grab a case if you don’t want to worry about it falling out of your hands. That said, if I were to pick my next phone by looks alone, the Galaxy S23 would be at the top of my list.

    At this point, it feels redundant to say that a Samsung phone has a bright, colorful and ultra-smooth display, but it’s once again a major highlight of this year’s Galaxy device. I spent most of my time with the S23+ and its beautiful 6.6-inch AMOLED screen, which popped with color whether I was flipping through my app library or taking in the cosmic blues and reds of the Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania trailer. Samsung’s 120Hz displays continue to be some of the most fluid I’ve tested, allowing me to flip through websites and Reddit threads at lightning speed while making the basic iPhone 14’s 60Hz display look sluggish by comparison.

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 2

    Most modern smartphones are pretty fast these days, but I was still struck by just how speedy and snappy the Galaxy S23 was in everyday use. This phone did everything I needed it to with lightning-fast responsiveness, whether I was flipping between more than a dozen open apps or scrolling through Twitter and Chrome at the same time in multitasking mode while a YouTube video played in picture-in-picture. When I switched over to the console-like action of Call of Duty Mobile, I was able to smoothly shoot and slide my way around the battlefield without any nasty slowdown or excessive heat — with the graphics and framerate both cranked to the max, no less.

    This great performance can be chalked up to the phone’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, which is the same one you’ll find in the more expensive S23 Ultra model. It proved to be just as impressive in our benchmark tests as it did in day-to-day testing, with performance scores that either kept up with or completely crushed the competition.

    On Geekbench 6, the latest version of our general-use benchmark for everyday speed, Samsung’s phone turned in an impressive multi-core score of 5,163. That’s nearly neck-and-neck with the standard iPhone 14, a little bit behind the iPhone 14 Pro and significantly ahead of the Google Pixel 7 that’s powered by Google’s own Tensor G2 processor. You’ll have a very hard time taxing this phone, and if you’re a heavy multitasker or gamer, you’ll be set for at least the next few years.

    The Galaxy S23’s fast performance is complemented by its equally snappy OneUI 5.1 software, which puts a Samsung-flavored skin on the latest Android 13 operating system. While the overall interface is busier than stock Android (more on that later), I found it easy to bounce around my go-to apps and quickly adjust settings on the fly. There are also some handy new perks this time in the form of Modes and Routines, which let you set up useful automations and profiles that allow the Galaxy S23 to behave exactly how you want it to throughout your day.

    For example, I set up a work mode that only allowed select notifications from 9 to 5, as well as a sleep mode that kept my phone completely silent at night. You can even link specific wallpapers to specific modes, such as the less-distracting blue background I use during the day and the photo of my dog I have active on off-hours. And that’s just scratching the surface — you can program Modes and Routines to activate all sorts of functions based on everything from your current activity (like running) or even a specific location. It’s all very easy to set up, and more than reminiscent of how Apple’s Focus profiles work on iOS 16.

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 3

    The Galaxy S22’s excellent cameras are a big reason it earned our best Android phone spot last year, and the Galaxy S23 doesn’t make any huge changes to that winning formula. Samsung’s latest flagship once again takes great shots that are bursting with color and detail under most lighting conditions, this time with some noteworthy upgrades to selfies and night shots.

    The S23’s triple camera setup is virtually the same as last year, packing a 50-megapixel wide camera, a 12-megapixel ultrawide lens for those extra-panoramic shots, and a 10-megapixel telephoto camera that enables the phone’s super-impressive 30x Space Zoom. It’s not quite as exciting on paper as the ridiculous 200-megapixel shooter we loved on the more expensive S23 Ultra, but it’s still a perfectly good setup that gave us great photos, selfies and videos in all kinds of environments.

    I found the Galaxy S23 to especially shine in bright daylight, capturing a gorgeous, sunny blue sky that looked more bold and vibrant than what I got from the iPhone 14 and Pixel 7. Samsung’s phone captured every sprinkle of cinnamon in a shot of a dirty chai latte, and the dramatic portrait mode shots I took of my dog were frame-worthy.

    If you like taking shots of stuff in the distance, the 30x Space Zoom on the S23 is once again a winner. I was able to clearly read the text of a very distant billboard that I shot with full zoom enabled, and also managed to get some decent snaps of the Empire State Building from my balcony in Queens. There was a significant loss of detail when using the full 30x zoom — I’d recommend 10x for the best results — but the fact that the S23 can even get that far is impressive. Samsung’s entry-level flagships don’t have the same wild 100x Space Zoom as the pricier S23 Ultra, but you still get much deeper zoom than on the iPhone 14 (5x) or the Pixel 7 (8x).

    The Galaxy S23 mostly held up well in low light, as the outdoor shots I captured of the Manhattan skyline in the evening were nearly as colorful and detailed as what I got during the day. However, when I took things inside to photograph a small, dimly lit punk show in Brooklyn, there was some noticeable blur. When photographing my neighborhood at night on both the Galaxy S23 and iPhone 14, I could see houses more clearly — and the neon signage of local restaurants more boldly — on Samsung’s phone.

    galaxy s23 camera selfie

    Some of my favorite shots I snagged on the Galaxy S23 came from the phone’s selfie cam, which enjoys a nice bump to 12 megapixels up from 10. The camera’s zoomed-out group selfie mode made it easy to squeeze a friend into my shot without sacrificing any detail, while portrait mode took some excellent headshots with that nice bokeh effect. I was especially impressed by how much I could customize my portrait shots after the fact, with various filters, adjustable blur levels and some seriously impressive “studio lighting” that hid the fact that I was sitting in a dark bedroom. I didn’t notice a massive jump in selfie quality compared to the Galaxy S22, but fine details (such as the individual hairs of my scraggly beard) did come through with less pixelation.

    The Galaxy S23 can shoot video at up to 8K at 30 frames per second, or up to 4K at 60 fps. I mostly stuck to the latter, and everything from the rippling waves of a river to the arrival of a speeding train looked gloriously smooth — when I was under decent lighting, at least. The clips I captured of the aforementioned concert were a bit less fluid due to the lack of light, but were still crisp and watchable enough to land on my Instagram story.

    As is the case almost every generation, the Galaxy S23’s camera skews toward colorful and more saturated, the iPhone 14 takes shots that are more neutral and natural, and the Pixel 7 is somewhere in the middle. They’re all fantastic camera phones, and picking between the three is a matter of personal preference — and also comes down to how much you care about special features like Google’s Magic Eraser and the iPhone’s auto-stabilizing Action mode. While I’m personally partial to the way photos look on the iPhone, the Galaxy S23’s superior zoom, copious customization options and great overall color and detail make it one of the best mobile shooters out there.

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 8

    You can confidently leave that portable charger at home — the Galaxy S23+ is one of the longest-lasting phones I’ve ever tested. Samsung’s phone lasted an incredible 20 hours and 47 minutes on our battery test, which consists of continuous 4K video playback. That’s a significant improvement over the 13 to 14 hours we got from last year’s S22+ and S22 Ultra models and crushes the 15 hours we got from the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro. It was second only to the OnePlus 11, which lasted a smidge longer at 21 hours and 36 minutes.

    This strong benchmark performance was mirrored in the real world, as I often went days without having to plug the Galaxy S23+ in during basic day-to-day use. And thanks to the Super Fast Charging 2.0 technology packed inside, I was able to juice up quickly, often going from 50% to a full charge in less than an hour. Your mileage may vary on the standard Galaxy S22 with its slightly smaller battery and lower rated charging speeds, but overall, these are some of the longest-lasting smartphones you can buy.

    galaxy s23 review cnnu 7

    As smooth as Samsung’s OneUI interface is, I find it to be pretty busy and cluttered compared to the clean Android experience you get on a Google Pixel phone. The phone comes preloaded with folders’ worth of Samsung and Microsoft apps, which could be useful if you’re deep in the Samsung ecosystem or want to get Office work done on the go. But for everyone else, these apps may seem like unnecessary and confusing bloatware (do we really need a Galaxy Store on top of the Google Play Store for apps?)

    Granted, it’s easy enough to delete the software you don’t want, and there are a ton of launchers and themes available to make your Galaxy phone look and behave exactly how you want. But after using the Galaxy S23 side-by-side with a Pixel 7, I much prefer the latter’s cleaner, simpler user experience.

    Display

    6.1-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X Full HD display, 120Hz

    6.6-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X Full HD display, 120Hz

    6.1-inch 2532 x 1170 Super Retina XDR display, 60Hz

    6.3-inch 1080 x 2400 OLED display, 90Hz

    Memory

    8GB

    8GB

    6GB

    8GB

    Storage

    128GB / 256GB

    256GB / 512GB

    128GB / 256GB / 512GB

    128GB / 256GB

    Processor

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

    Apple A15 Bionic

    Google Tensor G2

    Rear cameras

    50-megapixel wide camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 30X Space Zoom

    50-megapixel wide camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 10-megapixel telephoto camera with 30X Space Zoom

    48-megapixel main camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 12-megapixel telephoto

    50-megapixel wide camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera

    Front camera

    12-megapixel wide camera

    12-megapixel wide camera

    12-megapixel TrueDepth camera

    10.8-megapixel

    Size and weight

    5.76 x 2.79 x 0.3 inches, 5.93 ounces

    6.21 x 3 x 0.3 inches, 6.91 ounces

    5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31 inches, 6.07 ounces

    6.1 x 2.9 x 0.3 inches, 6.9 ounces

    Colors

    Green, Phantom Black, Lavender, Cream, Graphite, Lime

    Green, Phantom Black, Lavender, Cream, Graphite, Lime

    Midnight, Purple, Starlight, Product Red, Blue

    Obsidian, Snow, Lemongrass

    Price

    From $800



    From $1,000



    From $800



    From $399

    The Samsung Galaxy S23 makes the best Android phone even better, packing speedy performance, great all-around cameras and some of the best battery life we’ve ever seen into a design that looks better than just about any other phone on the market. If you’re long overdue for an upgrade (think Galaxy S20 or older) or are jumping into the Samsung fold for the first time and want to spend $1,000 or less, the S23 and S23+ are the Android phones to buy.

    If you’re not on a strict budget and want even better cameras — and an included S Pen for taking notes — the $1,200 Galaxy S23 Ultra is worth the splurge. And if you’re looking to save money (or just want a cleaner Android experience), the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro can both be found for less than $600 these days, as long as you can live with slower performance and lower overall battery life. But for everyone else in the middle, the Galaxy S23 is the best overall Android phone for the money.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This folding walking pad changed the way I exercise at home forever | CNN Underscored

    This folding walking pad changed the way I exercise at home forever | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    This review is brought to you by my desire to not turn into the most annoying person in the world: I am in love with the walking pad I splurged on on Prime Day and, like a newlywed in the throes of marital bliss, I want literally everyone else in the world to know this joy.

    So, in an effort to avoid alienating everyone I know by shouting, “I LOVE MY WALKING PAD YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE WALKING PAD LIFESTYLE” at them, here I will tell you about my walking pad and why it’s inspired such passion for the walking pad lifestyle.

    The FYC walking pad is lightweight, easy to store and set up and, best of all, it comes in pink! It’s completely changed the way I exercise at home — so much so that I now look forward to using it every single day.

    I decided to buy a walking pad after seeing them on Instagram. I was influenced (yes, I sure was), and I have no regrets!

    Surely you have seen the walking pad girlies, as they call themselves and as I now, regrettably, have come to think of myself: They’ve got standing desk setups with velvet chairs on casters that can be rolled quickly away when it’s time to take to the pad. When they take to the pad, they walk while they work, getting those crucial steps in while they go about their work-from-home day. Then, when they’ve walked enough, they simply unplug the machine and roll it back to its storage space.

    As someone who has worked from home for over a decade, I’ve avoided at-home exercise in favor of the gym — quite simply because going to the gym got me out of the house every day. Naturally, that took a left turn in 2020, but once I was able to, I returned to my work-from-home/workout-at-the-gym routine. Unfortunately, that changed after I tore my ACL and faced many months of physical therapy to recover the use of my right knee. The injury, and the resulting anxiety that came along with the recovery process, changed my relationship to the gym. I needed to consider alternatives, and the walking pad felt like an obvious solution.

    underscored fyc under desk treadmill 1.jpg

    While I loved the look of the sleek walking pads that were just that — a pad — because of my mobility and anxiety issues, a handle was a nonnegotiable feature for me. So, from a starting place of the Umay walking pad I kept seeing on Insta, which had the looks, functionality and ease of storage I wanted, I sought out similar models that had a handle attachment.

    Walking pads all have the same basic functionality — a belt on a frame on which one walks, jogs or runs — but within the category, there are a number of features to consider when picking the model that’s right for you. Here are the factors I considered, and some of the models I looked at before deciding that the FYC walking pad was the one for me.

    Size and storage: One of the things walking pads have going for them that other comparable pieces of home exercise equipment don’t is that they are slim and easy to store. Some models, like WalkingPad’s folding treadmill, even fold in half for more space-saving. When deciding on a walking pad, look at the dimensions as well as the weight to determine its ease of storage.

    underscored fyc under desk treadmill 2.jpg

    Capacity: If you are tall or heavyset, you will need to check the product specs to ensure the walking pad can accommodate your size. To avoid accidentally stepping off the belt, tall people will want a longer belt to account for the length of their stride. The Rhythm Fun walking pad has a 47-inch belt and a 300-pound weight capacity, compared to the FYC model, with its 41-inch long belt and 265-pound weight capacity.

    Ease of assembly: I did not want to fool with any sort of assembly! Many walking pads are essentially ready to go right out of the box. Simply unpack it, apply a small amount of silicone lubricant (included) to the space between the belt and the frame and you’re ready to walk. (Models with handles will require the barest of assembly: The handle, which is packed separately, just needs to be screwed into the base and no tools are required. If you can change a lightbulb, you can set up the handle no problem.)

    Handles and work surfaces: A handle was a must-have for me, which limited my choices to a degree. But, if you’re looking to use a walking pad in concert with a standing desk (i.e., without a safety rail) the field is wide open, including walking pads with built-in standing desks, like the Goplus 3-in-1.

    Incline: Most walking pads do not have an adjustable incline the way traditional treadmills do, but walking pads that incline are available. However, a drawback to the incline functionality is that it makes the machines heavier and bulkier.

    underscored fyc under desk treadmill 3.jpg

    Cost: Walking pads are typically in the $200 to $500 range, and price fluctuations are common. I purchased the (pink) FYC walking pad for $309.99; as of this writing it is $399, although the white model is available for $314. Chelsea Stone, our very own deals editor and an absolute genius, told me to pick out a few walking pads I like, drop them in my Amazon cart and wait. It was amazing advice that allowed me to monitor the ever-fluctuating prices of these things and pull the trigger when I felt like I was getting a deal.

    Color: Most walking pads are either black or white, sometimes gray. Fairly standard exercise equipment colors, really. But you are not limited to such an uninspired palette! Walking pads in colors like blue, green, red and, yes, pink are easy enough to find.

    Yes.

    I’ll level and tell you I felt very silly for even considering spending 30 extra dollars for the pink colorway. I felt even sillier after I slept on it and decided, “Yep, I need the pink one. And I’m going to spend 30 extra dollars to have it. This is who I am.”

    I felt much less silly when the thing arrived, because the pink colorway absolutely delights me! At the time of purchase, I would absolutely not have considered spending $100 extra for the pink, but now that I have it, to be honest, an extra $100 would be worth it — that’s how much of a positive difference the color of this thing makes to me. Most people will not feel that way! But if you are a person for whom aesthetics are important, it is my recommendation that you allow yourself to spend a little extra on a walking pad just because of the way it looks.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Under $25 Scores: Yeti’s koozie is our favorite way to keep cans cold | CNN Underscored

    Under $25 Scores: Yeti’s koozie is our favorite way to keep cans cold | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    I love koozies. Every time I crack open a drink, I’m always wrapping it up in a koozie to keep it colder for longer. My obsession with cold drinks might stem from my endless testing of insulated water bottles, but my distaste for warm beer is another likely culprit.

    I’m not really sure how, but I have a collection of koozies stuffed in a drawer that seems to never stop growing. However, I just tried the Yeti Colster Can Insulator, and it’s so good it might replace my whole drawer of can covers.

    Our new favorite way to keep cans cold

    Anyone who uses a koozie should replace it with the Yeti Colster Can Insulator. It keeps drinks a lot colder for a lot longer than a normal koozie, and it’s the only insulator I’ll use from now on.

    I’m always prowling the internet for fun, cheap products, and koozies are no exception. There are all sorts of cute and funny things you can put a can in (read: Puffin Drinkwear’s flannel), but when I realized Yeti had a can insulator I knew I had to try it.

    Yeti’s reputation of making fantastic products from water bottles to coolers is no secret. So I wanted to find out if the Colster Can Insulator would be as useful, practical and effective as Yeti’s other stuff. Spoiler alert: It is.

    First things first: The Yeti Colster Can Insulator is amazing at keeping drinks cold. I threw a can in there right out of the fridge and it stayed refreshingly cold the whole time I drank it. Normal koozies do an OK job at this, but I always find my drinks to be around room temperature during my final few sips. Not with the Yeti. Using the same technology featured in the brand’s insulated water bottles, my can stayed so cold for so long, I really don’t think I can go back to other koozies.

    yeti colster can insulator inline CNNU

    On top of its fantastic insulation, the Colster Can Insulator comes in 11 different colors and can even be customized with all sorts of designs, text and logos for a few extra bucks. The insulator is also available in different sizes so you can fit tall cans for larger drinks or slim cans for seltzers. The standard 12-ounce Colster I tested fit normal beer and soda cans perfectly. Bottles fit too, though not nearly as well as cans.

    If you use koozies, it’s time to upgrade. After testing the Yeti Colster Can Insulator, I can confidently say it’s the best way to keep canned drinks cold I’ve ever tried. It’s my new favorite koozie, and at only $25 it should be yours too.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best best budget earbuds of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best best budget earbuds of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    If you’re shopping for the best wireless earbuds on the market, you really don’t have to look any further than our top picks in the Apple AirPods Pro and Beats Fit Pro. They check all the most important boxes, including a wide soundstage, best-in-class noise cancellation and portability.

    But not everyone wants to break the bank on a pair of earbuds, and honestly, you don’t have to. Some of the newest budget earbuds are nearly on par with the AirPods Pro in sound quality, playback time and connectivity.

    We regularly test the latest and most popular earbuds under $100 to help you save money without sacrificing great audio and features. And after trying out dozens of models, here are the two that currently stand above the rest.

    Best budget earbuds overall

    We’ll make this really simple for you: If you want to spend less than $100 on wireless earbuds, you won’t find a better pair than the EarFun Air.

    We know it might seem almost too good to be true, but these budget wireless earbuds have almost everything you can ask for.

    Let’s start with the sound, which is just as good as the Apple AirPods Pro in controlled, quiet, indoor settings. The sound is expansive, deep and about as good as any high-end options. Keep in mind, though, the EarFun Air don’t have any active noise cancellation and depend entirely on sound isolation created by the soft plastic ear tips when inserted into your ear canal. So, it was no surprise to us when these buds fell short of providing the clarity and quality sound that other leading noise-canceling buds do in noisy settings. Still, there was enough passive soundproofing that we could enjoy our favorite songs.

    We tested these earbuds across a wide variety of musical genres, including classical, rock, pop and dance. In every single category, the EarFun Air shined. Songs like “Bad Guy” by Billie Eilish and “Get Lucky” by Daft Punk were driven by punchy bass lines and electronic rhythm sections. Other iconic songs, such as Beethoven’s “Moonlight Sonata” and Herbie Hancock’s “Watermelon Man,” were balanced, with moments of clarity on both the high and low end. We struggled to find any song that didn’t sound great in these earbuds — and could discern no difference compared to Apple’s AirPods Pro in controlled, quiet settings.

    For most people, the high-quality sound is probably a big enough selling point, but in case you’re looking for extras, the EarFun Air feature plenty. One of our favorite additions is an IPX7 waterproof rating, meaning they can be submerged into about 1 meter of water for about 30 minutes. We don’t often see waterproofing on devices this cheap, so of course, this came as a huge plus and one we gladly accepted. In terms of practical use cases, this means you can wear them in light rain or even while working out. Heck, you can even wash off these earbuds under the faucet without much worry. It’s not the flagship feature, but we think it works as a great insurance policy for protecting your investment.

    Another major benefit to these headphones is the four-way microphone, which assists in much better sound isolation during phone calls and video conferencing. The sound isolation is not as clean as other high-end over-the-ear headphones like the Bose Noise-Canceling Headphone 700, and the controls are nowhere near as easy to manage as the competing Apple earbuds, but we still found these earbuds to be formidable during work hours. We used the EarFun Air during regular work hours for more than a week with no problem. Some colleagues even commented on how great they looked and sounded. Put simply, they can perform everyday tasks just as well as many earbuds that cost twice their price.

    Beyond sound and microphone quality, the EarFun Air earbuds had impressively long battery life with a full seven hours of playback, as advertised, and an extra 28 hours in the case. Although we were skeptical they’d last as long as the company promised, our weeks of testing proved these claims to be true. The EarFun Air rarely needed to be charged and typically lasted the full duration of their marketed battery life. In comparison to other budget options, EarFun Air stretched an hour longer than the next closest (the EarFun Air Pro) and surpassed the most affordable option in the group by more than two hours.

    So what’s the catch to such a great-sounding, affordable pair of earbuds? We found that the connectivity and controls were nowhere near as intuitive as the AirPods Pro, but just as intuitive as most other budget models. Across the board, connectivity between sub-$100 earbuds and devices wasn’t as instantaneous as Apple AirPods. Luckily, you need to pair the earbuds only once per device, so this should not be a deal breaker, unless you’re frequently switching between devices.

    By comparison, the Apple AirPods Pro and Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro both offer fast pairing and easy switching between devices made by the same company. The touch controls on the EarFun Air were simply less useful than either of the more expensive Apple and Samsung options we tested them against — but we found that we could still very easily control the sound through our phones. Still, we wouldn’t have minded seeing a companion app to let us customize and equalize the sound, but for half the price of the competitors with audio that’s just as good, we really couldn’t complain.

    For most people, pressing a couple of extra buttons during the setup is well worth the savings — and we promise you will not be able to tell the difference in audio and performance.

    Best noise-canceling budget earbuds

    If you’re willing to pay a bit more for quality active noise cancellation, the EarFun Air Pro 3 are the best earbuds you can get for $80.

    Active noise cancellation

    No

    Yes

    Ambient sound

    No

    Yes

    Battery life (rated)

    Up to 7 hours

    Up to 9 hours

    Wireless charging

    Yes

    Yes

    Water resistance

    IPX7

    IPX5

    Ear tip sizes

    XS, S, M, L

    XS, S, M, L

    Colors

    Black

    Black

    Price

    $40



    $80

    For most people buying budget earbuds, the most important detail is the sound quality. We used a wide range of tracks to ensure that we tested just about every popular musical genre. Our list included a mixture of classic rock, with soaring guitars; classical, focused on the open space of popular sonatas; and, of course, pop and electronic to test out the bass. We wore each of the headphones for hours at a time to get a better feeling for how they fit. We also did our best to analyze each device’s controls, and how reliable and customizable they were.

    We generally love Anker products and really wanted to recommend this pair of affordable earbuds, but after hours of testing, we simply couldn’t in good conscience. The Soundcore Life 2 earbuds fell just a bit short in all of the most important categories. But the sound quality isn’t exactly bad, and it was generally well balanced with decent range.

    When you compare them to other earbuds in the category, though, they just weren’t quality enough to stack up against some of the best, namely the EarFun Air. With only two microphones dedicated to noise cancellation and six hours of battery life, we found that they fell just short of earning an enthusiastic recommendation.

    We need to emphasize: Not all EarFun earbuds are created equally. The EarFun Free have decent sound quality and a reasonable six hours of battery life, with 24 extra hours available in the charging case. But we found that sound quality and comfort were not as nice as their higher-priced counterparts.

    All of the EarFun earbuds we tested consistently ranked among some of our favorite budget earbuds, but we think the slight differences in sound quality and comfort make the other models a better option.

    The Jabra Elite 3 are an extremely close contender to one of our top spots, and if we were going by looks alone, they’d be the clear winner. These are the sleekest buds you can buy for less than $80, with a low-profile design and reliable physical controls that mimic much of what makes Jabra’s more expensive earbuds great. However, the lack of active noise cancellation and wireless charging holds them back against the EarFun Air Pro 3 in terms of overall value.

    We challenge you to find a worse pair of earbuds on the market. Let’s start with the case, which doesn’t even come with a lid. Yes, you read that right. The JLab Audio Go Air use magnets to connect the earbuds to the charging case, with the assumption that you’ll never drop or jolt them hard enough to knock them out. We should be clear: We never dropped or lost the earbuds during our testing period, but it frankly seems like a disaster waiting to happen.

    Let’s assume you don’t drop them and you want to set them up with your phone. Well, good luck! We had to reconnect these headphones several times just to get them working properly. What should have been a 30-second setup turned into a five-minute operation. When they finally connected, we were disappointed to realize it was all for naught. These earbuds practically ruined Billie Eilish’s “Bad Guy” for us. There was a complete lack of soundspace, depth and range. We’re not sure we’ve ever heard anything as truly terrible and unenjoyable as these earbuds. Please, no matter what you decide, avoid these earbuds at all costs. You deserve better.

    You’re not going to find anything groundbreaking in these buds, but for most people, that’s probably just fine. The sound quality is middling at best, with an active bass boost option and decent EQ modes when you click a button on the earbuds.

    The battery life is also weak at just three hours — but, on the bright side, they offer good sound isolation from the wind and come with IP55 dust and water resistance, which make them a great choice as workout earphones. Plus, at under $50, you won’t miss them if you forget them in your gym locker. If you can afford it, though, we’d recommend spending a little more for the EarFun Air.

    Skullcandy Sesh

    For all of the marketing and celebrity endorsements that go into Skullcandy headphones, you’d think they’d provide better-sounding earbuds. Unfortunately, the Skullcandy Sesh earbuds were a disappointment. Usually it’s easy to justify the lack of performance because Skullcandy headphones typically look cool, but these earbuds are so small and hard to see that they’re far from a fashion statement.

    The sound was fine — not terrible — but lacked bass on some of our favorite dance and disco songs. The highs were also a little too high, creating an overall lack of balance in sound quality. Add poor battery life and a terrible microphone, and you have yourself yet another pair of earbuds made for the clearance rack.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Galaxy S23 Ultra review | CNN Underscored

    Galaxy S23 Ultra review | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Let’s get right to the point: Samsung’s Galaxy S23 Ultra is a boring upgrade compared to last year’s S22 Ultra, but it’s easily one of the best phones you can buy.

    The S23 Ultra, Samsung’s highest-end member of the new Galaxy S23 series, is one of the first smartphones that completely justifies its high price tag. At $1,200 and up, it’s by no means a cheap phone, but the experience you get in exchange is simply spectacular. From the beautiful AMOLED screen and 200-megapixel camera to the huge battery and S Pen, it’s one of the best Android phones I’ve ever used. The only thing it can’t do is fold in half.

    But is it the right Android phone for you? Let’s break it down.

    The ultimate big-screen smartphone

    If you lean toward Android and are willing to pay more than $1,000 on your next phone, the Galaxy S23 Ultra has the best combination of cameras, performance and features for its price.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-2

    The biggest new feature on the Galaxy S23 Ultra is on the back. Samsung included its all-new 200-megapixel ISOCELL HP2 sensor, which acts as the primary camera. It’s a major step up in terms of megapixels compared to the S22 Ultra, which carried over the 108-megapixel camera from the S21 Ultra.

    You may be asking yourself, “What do I need a 200-megapixel camera for?” It seems like pure overkill and a marketing tactic on the surface, and to some extent, it is. The sensor uses a technology called pixel binning that groups a ton of the megapixels together to create larger pixels and produce smaller images. These smaller images, 12 megapixels in size by default, can lean on the extra resolution from the sensor for more detail and light. It’s the same technique other phones like the iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7 use with their larger-than-average cameras.

    In bright lighting conditions, you’d be hard-pressed to find a significant difference between shots captured on the S23 Ultra and those from other flagship phones. Samsung still keeps saturation boosted a tiny bit while balancing out highlights and exposure to create some pretty stellar results. You simply can’t take a bad picture with this camera.

    It’s at night that the extra megapixels make a difference. Because they’re binned, the pixels are far larger than on other phones, which results in more light intake. This photo of a neon sign is sharper and more lifelike on the S23 Ultra than it looks on the iPhone 14 Pro. In a similar vein, these shots of some of the skyscrapers in New York City paint a nearly accurate picture of what I saw beyond the viewfinder, save for a few overblown light glares.

    You can also capture wildly large 200-megapixel photos. There’s a button in the camera app that lets you turn it on, and boy is it fun to play with. You won’t want to use it all the time since it’ll eat away at your storage a lot faster than normal photos, but if you want to capture something with a ton of detail or plan to print the photo after it’s taken, this is the mode to be in.

    Of course, the buck doesn’t stop at the main camera. Samsung packs in three additional lenses: a 12-megapixel 120-degree ultrawide, a 10-megapixel telephoto with 3x optical zoom and a 10-megapixel periscoping telephoto lens with 10x optical zoom. These cameras are basically identical to the S22 Ultra, save for one major improvement: optical image stabilization, which is so good that you’d think your phone were on a gimbal when taking zoom shots.

    Speaking of which, the S23 Ultra is equipped with Samsung’s signature 100x Space Zoom, which is extremely fun to play with. Not only do you get lossless zoom up to 10x, but each hybrid zoom level between it and 100x is extremely high in quality. The S23 Ultra once again puts every other phone in the United States to shame when it comes to zoom. I mean, just look at these examples!

    Video quality is also great. Tech reviewers widely consider the iPhone to be the best for taking videos, myself included. But with the S23 Ultra, you can get shots that go toe to toe with clips captured on the latest Apple smartphones, including some that best it. I recorded a couple of 4K, 30 frame-per-second clips during a recent trip to New York and compared them to my iPhone, and I was surprised to find that the quality was nearly equal. I still think the iPhone is an overall smoother shooter (especially when switching lenses while recording), but the S23 Ultra makes it a close race.

    The rest of the camera experience is just as fantastic. Portrait mode photos look amazing; the Expert RAW camera app from Samsung gives you a high amount of control over how your photos look, thanks to professional controls and Adobe Lightroom integration; night mode helps in especially dark situations; and the ultrawide camera remains wide enough to capture full landscapes without missing out on anything important.

    The selfie camera is also solid. At 12 megapixels, it sounds like a downgrade from the old 40-megapixel sensor, but Samsung vastly improved the quality of the selfies it takes. There’s much better lighting and detail, and you can record 4K video at 60 frames per second (the first for any Galaxy selfie shooter).

    Overall, this is one of the best camera experiences you can have on a smartphone. The Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro come second to this phone in a lot of different ways, from sensor resolution and zoom capabilities to image quality and versatility. It’s a little absurd just how good it is, which makes this $1,199 phone worthy of its “Ultra” name.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-7

    Those cameras sit on the back of a smartphone that’s pretty striking to look at. Samsung uses a frosted glass finish for the backplate and shiny aluminum rails for the sides, which looks plenty premium. Speaking of the sides, they’re a lot flatter than they used to be, which gives the device a very similar feel to previous Galaxy Note devices.

    The S23 Ultra comes in four standard colors: Phantom Black, Lavender, Cream and Green (the color I got to review). There are also four colors exclusive to samsung.com: Lime, Sky Blue, Graphite and Red. They’re a lot flashier than the normal finishes are, so if you’re looking to add a little style to your next phone, you might want to pick it up from Samsung’s website.

    Samsung also made the S23 Ultra more durable. The device uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back, an upgrade from the Victus Plus glass on the S22 Ultra. It provides increased durability against accidental drops, and it’s safe from dust and water, thanks to an IP68 certification that lets you soak your phone in 1.5 meters of water for up to 30 minutes.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra

    The 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display on the S23 Ultra is as beautiful as it was on the S22 Ultra. Samsung continues to deliver some of the best screens you’ll find on any phone with amazing clarity, color calibration and contrast. Everything from watching the latest movies to flipping through TikTok is pleasing to the eye, and it’s pin-sharp, thanks to the 3088 x 1440 resolution.

    For this generation, Samsung reduced the curves on the left and right sides so that content doesn’t spill over as easily. It’s especially helpful with the S Pen, since you have more room to draw. It’s also just a lot nicer to look at — whether you’re watching a movie or playing a game — since you won’t have to deal with light reflecting off the curves in the glass.

    Speaking of light glare, the S23 Ultra is brighter than the S22 Ultra, making it a lot easier to see in direct sunlight. The S22 Ultra could reach a peak of 1,300 nits, whereas the S23 Ultra can go all the way up to 1,750 nits. Walking around sunny Manhattan earlier this month, I was easily able to see everything on the screen, even when I had my sunglasses on. My iPhone 14 Pro Max can get a bit brighter at 2,000 nits, but I found that difference to be indistinguishable next to the Ultra.

    Ultra-fast performance and incredibly responsive software

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-4

    This is one of the fastest smartphones I’ve ever used.

    Samsung packed the S23 Ultra to the brim with high-powered specs. Not only can you get 8GB or 12GB of RAM and up to 1TB of UFS 4.0 storage (aka the fastest storage available on smartphones), but there’s also a specially tuned Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor. It’s essentially the same chip you’ll find in other 2023 Android flagships like the OnePlus 11, but Samsung convinced Qualcomm to let them crank up the CPU and graphics a bit so the S23 series is slightly faster than the rest.

    The extra power is evident in the chart below, where we compare the OnePlus 11’s Geekbench scores to those on the S23 Ultra. Of course, Apple’s A16 Bionic inside the iPhone 14 Pro is still the most powerful chip, but the 8 Gen 2 For Galaxy doesn’t fall far behind.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra

    iPhone 14 Pro

    OnePlus 11

    Pixel 7 Pro

    Geekbench 5 multi-core

    4,907

    5,396

    4,817

    1,533

    Processor

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 For Galaxy

    Apple A16 Bionic

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

    Google Tensor G2

    In day-to-day usage, I found the S23 Ultra to be one of the fastest smartphones out there. I put it through the wringer, constantly cycling between apps, taking tons of pictures and videos, jotting down notes, using split-screen multitasking to arrange my calendar and more. By no means did I use the phone lightly, yet it was still able to keep up perfectly well with whatever I threw at it.

    I fired up Asphalt 9 like I do with most phones I test, and it ran perfectly well. I didn’t experience any dropped frames or slowdowns, and the phone stayed nice and cool the entire time.

    Compared to other phones I’ve tested like the iPhone 14 Pro Max, Pixel 7 Pro and OnePlus 11, the S23 Ultra is a screamer. It even feels snappier than the Pixel and, at times, the iPhone since Samsung’s software animations are quicker.

    Speaking of software, One UI 5.1 — based on Android 13 — is what you’ll get out of the box with the S23 Ultra. By far, this is the best version of Samsung’s skin I’ve come across. It’s nearly identical to One UI 5.0 in terms of functionality and looks (besides a few customization options for your lock screen and some changes in system apps), but it’s a lot more responsive and efficient this time around.

    I used the Galaxy Z Fold 4 running One UI 5.0 for a good while, so I’ve got a feel for how snappy it was. In short, I really liked it, but it definitely felt a tad slower than Google’s Pixel software or Apple’s iOS. One UI 5.1 flips that on its head, as the S23 Ultra feels just as fluid and snappy. Is it the new processor? The faster storage? Just good old-fashioned software optimization? I’m going with the latter, because everything from launching apps to scrolling Twitter feels more responsive than any Samsung phone I’ve reviewed in the past.

    What’s more, Samsung is promising four years of Android upgrades for the S23 Ultra as well as five years of security patches. If you buy this phone, you can sleep well knowing your phone will be supported for years to come.

    The S Pen remains as useful as ever

    Galaxy S23 Ultra S Pen

    Truth be told, I’m not the biggest S Pen user, but I find that I love using it every time I come back to a phone that has one. The S23 Ultra’s S Pen — which lives in the same silo at the bottom — is identical to the one from the S22 Ultra, which means you get a bunch of note-taking features like screen-off memos, which let you jot down notes while your phone is asleep; screenshot tools; a GIF creation tool; camera shutter controls, thanks to the side button; and a very, very low 2.8 milliseconds of latency.

    All in all, if you’re a fan of the S Pen, you’ll feel right at home with the stylus on the S23 Ultra. Plus, you’ve got that flatter screen for more room to write.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-11

    The Galaxy S23 Ultra packs a 5,000mAh battery, which is the same size as the battery in last year’s S22 Ultra. Unlike that phone, the S23 Ultra is somehow able to last even longer on a full charge. We found the S22 Ultra could last about a day and a half, whereas the S23 Ultra could get you easily through two full days.

    I kid you not, I’ll unplug the phone at about 7:30 a.m., use it all day long to handle my everyday tasks and take plenty of pictures, then end my day around 11 p.m. and still have 55% to 65% left in the tank. Plus, standby time is stupendous — I only ever lose about 5% to 6% when leaving the phone off its charger at night.

    The device is equipped with 45W fast wired charging which, while not the fastest you’ll find in the US, is ample to charge from zero to 50% in about 30 minutes. You also get 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, allowing you to recharge your earbuds on the go. Samsung definitely included everything you’ll need when it comes to juicing up.

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-9

    Some people love big phones; others despise them. If you’re part of the second group and are enticed by the vast capabilities of the S23 Ultra, you’re gonna have to deal with a size that can only be described as gargantuan.

    This phone is huge. Like, really huge. It’s a bit taller than the iPhone 14 Pro Max and a tad slimmer, thanks to the taller aspect ratio, but the boxy corners and flat sides make it feel even bigger than it actually is. There’s a large group of people who will find the flat sides to be a lot nicer than the curved sides of the S22 Ultra, but I’m not one of them. I definitely prefer the old, tapered edges given how much more comfortable they were to hold.

    It’s also pretty heavy. At 234 grams, it’s 6 grams lighter than the iPhone 14 Pro Max but also 22 grams heavier than the Pixel 7 Pro. This phone is the quintessential definition of a brick in your pocket.

    The software remains bloated and full of ads

    Galaxy S23 Ultra-6

    Remember all that praise I gave Samsung’s software earlier? Despite it being as good as it is, it’s not perfect.

    Samsung bundles all of its own apps with the S23 Ultra, which doesn’t pose a problem until you realize how many there are. I counted 58 on my unit, and that doesn’t include other preinstalled apps like Microsoft 365 and Netflix. It eats up a fair amount of storage space, collectively reducing your phone’s overall capacity by about 20 to 30 gigabytes. For those who don’t use Samsung’s stock apps and prefer alternatives like Google’s, it’ll feel like a waste of space.

    Samsung is also still displaying advertisements in its own apps, which looks and feels as crummy as you’d think it does. The amount of ads it shows has luckily decreased over previous Galaxy phones, but they’re still around. Samsung Pay and Galaxy Store like to advertise promotions from third parties, while the Samsung Members app regularly reminds me to preorder a Galaxy S23 Ultra … while I’m holding one.

    These issues aren’t deal breakers, but they can certainly be nuisances, especially when you’re spending $1,200 on a new phone.

    Display

    6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X Quad HD display at 120Hz

    6.1-inch Super Retina XDR display, 120Hz

    6.7-inch 1440 x 3120 OLED display, 120Hz

    Processor

    Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

    Apple A16 Bionic

    Google Tensor G2

    Storage

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB

    128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB

    128GB / 256GB / 512GB

    Memory

    8GB / 12GB

    6GB

    12GB

    Rear cameras

    200-megapixel wide camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, dual 10-megapixel telephoto cameras with 100X Space Zoom

    48-megapixel main camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 12-megapixel telephoto

    50-megapixel wide camera, 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 48-megapixel telephoto camera

    Front camera

    12-megapixel

    12-megapixel

    10.8-megapixel

    Colors

    Phantom Black, Lavender, Cream, and Green (everywhere); Lime, Sky Blue, Graphite, and Red (Samsung exclusive)

    Deep purple, Gold, Silver, Space Black

    Obsidian, Snow, Hazel

    Size and weight

    6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches, 8.25 ounces

    5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches, 7.27 ounces

    6.4 x 3 x 0.3 inches, 7.5 ounces

    Price

    From $1,200



    From $999



    From $599

    Unless your software preferences lie in the Apple world, the Galaxy S23 Ultra is a stellar handset that consistently checks every box you should look for when buying a new phone. It has an amazing screen, excellent battery life, awesome performance and some of the best cameras you can get.

    $1,200 is a lot of money for a new phone, especially these days. If you can live without features like the 200-megapixel camera and S Pen, the regular Galaxy S23 can be had for hundreds less and still gives you great performance, battery life and software features. Similarly, Google’s flagship Pixel 7 Pro is almost always on sale, sometimes for $599 to $699, which is nothing short of an amazing deal.

    But if money’s not an issue and you do pull the trigger, you won’t regret it. The Galaxy S23 Ultra is by far the best phone you can get for over $1,000.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best laptops of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best laptops of 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Whether you work from home, go to an office or just want something to keep yourself entertained, a good laptop is all but a necessity these days. But with so many brands and models to choose from, finding the right notebook for you can be overwhelming.

    That’s where we come in. We extensively test the latest laptops on the market from the likes of Apple, Dell and Samsung in order to help you figure out what’s actually worth spending your money on. Whether you’re in search of the perfect MacBook, a tricked-out gaming notebook or just something basic for your daily emails, here are our picks for the best laptops you can buy now.

    Best Apple laptop

    The MacBook Air M2 is the best Apple laptop for most people, perfect for everyday multitasking and able to handle a good amount of gaming and video editing. It’s the fastest laptop you can get for the money, and an especially big upgrade if you’re coming from an Intel-powered Mac.

    The MacBook Air M2 is the new gold standard for Apple laptops, marrying some of the best performance we’ve ever seen in a notebook with an overhauled and attractive design that has lots of practical benefits.

    The biggest refresh to the MacBook Air in over a decade, Apple’s new laptop ditches the iconic wedged look of old in favor of a more uniform chassis that’s in line with the latest 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros. And while it doesn’t appear slimmer than the M1 Air at first glance, it actually is, with pleasingly thin 11.3-millimeter edges and a 2.7-pound body that’s marginally lighter than its predecessor. That all translates to a laptop that we’ve found incredibly easy to pick up, and one that we barely felt in our backpack while on the go.

    The M2 Air also adopts all of the modern niceties of the larger MacBook Pros, including the display. You get a noticeable amount of extra screen space compared to the previous MacBook Air (and the new M2 MacBook Pro) at 13.6 versus 13.3 inches, plus the M2 ditches the thick black borders of old for a thin, seamless bezel, while content still pops with plenty of color and detail.. Apple’s Magic Keyboard feels as great as ever on the latest Air, and you get satisfying, full-size function keys for making quick adjustments — no dreaded Touch Bar here.

    Perhaps the biggest physical upgrade to the M2 Air is the revamped MagSafe charger, which, like on the bigger MacBook Pros, allows you to easily attach and detach the charging cable with a quick magnetic snap. On top of reducing the chances that your laptop goes flying after someone trips on your wire, the MagSafe port also frees up the two USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports for your accessories. We still wish the MacBook Air’s port selection wasn’t so slim (the larger MacBook Pros have HDMI, an SD card reader and an additional USB port), but the addition of MagSafe is a welcome one — as is the nice color-matched braided cable and compact charging brick that includes an extra port for charging your phone.

    Other notable upgrades include a 1080p webcam that looks marginally better than the 720p one on previous models, as well as a more robust sound system that pumps out rich (but not speaker-replacing) audio. And then there’s the Air’s new Apple M2 processor, which makes it one of the fastest laptops we’ve ever tested.

    The MacBook Air M2 held up to our usual multitasking workload (a mix of email, video calls, Slack, Discord and way too many Chrome tabs) without ever breaking a sweat, and stayed cool and quiet during hours of light music production in Ableton Live. But our benchmark results tell the real story. The MacBook Air posted the highest single-core result we’ve ever gotten on Geekbench 5 (which measures general performance), and came impressively close to the new MacBook Pro M2 when it came to multi-core and graphics capabilities. We also saw roughly a 16% gain in overall performance scores compared to the MacBook Air M1 from 2020. You can certainly do some light gaming on this machine, though we saw low framerates and an excess of heat when running Shadow of the Tomb Raider at its maximum settings. That highlights one of the few advantages of the otherwise dated $1,299 MacBook Pro M2, which sports an internal fan for better sustained performance under pressure.

    The MacBook Air M2 frequently got us through long workdays with plenty of battery to spare, largely matching up to Apple’s 18-hour battery rating. However, on our more intensive battery test, which consists of continuous 4K video playback, the MacBook Air’s 5 hours and 21 minutes of runtime fell to the new MacBook Pro by about 45 minutes. Expect great day-to-day endurance, but definitely keep a charger handy for gaming or video-editing sessions.

    The new MacBook Air’s biggest caveat is its price — starting at $1,199, it’s $200 more expensive than the still-excellent MacBook Air M1. You’ll get marginally better performance from the M2 chip, but the real question is this: Are you willing to pay an extra $200 for a bigger display, a better webcam, a sleeker design and a useful MagSafe charger? If the answer is yes, and if you’re coming from an Intel-powered Mac or getting your first MacBook, then the MacBook Air M2 is the best laptop you can buy. But if you’re on a budget and can live without those modern conveniences, the $999 (and often discounted) MacBook Air M1 remains an excellent purchase.

    Best Windows laptop

    The Dell XPS 13 is the best Windows laptop you can buy, offering a stunning display, a great keyboard and long battery life within an attractive, slim design that’s easy to take anywhere.

    The upgrade pick

    If you’re a creative professional or a hardcore power user, or you simply feel like splurging on the best that Apple has to offer, the 14-inch MacBook Pro is the laptop to get. It’s an especially great upgrade for first-time Pro buyers, or anyone coming from an old Intel model.

    Best 2-in-1 laptop

    The Surface Pro 8 delivers fast performance, a vivid display and an excellent keyboard within a versatile, detachable design. It’s also a much better value than the newer Surface Pro 9, which doesn’t add much beyond slightly faster processors and an optional 5G variant.

    Best gaming laptop

    The Asus ROG Strix G15 Advantage Edition offers the best combination of performance, battery life, features and value of any gaming laptop we’ve tested, all packed into an attractive and highly customizable design.

    Display

    13.6-inch, 2560 x 1664 Liquid Retina display

    13.4-inch, 1920 x 1200 display

    14.2-inch, 3024 x 1964 Liquid Retina XDR display

    13-inch, 2880 x 1920 display

    15.6-inch, 1920 x 1080 and 300 Hz display

    Processor

    Apple M2

    12th Gen Intel Core i5 / i7

    Apple M1 Pro or M1 Max

    11th Gen Intel Core i5 / i7

    AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX with AMD Radeon RX 6800M graphics

    Memory

    8GB / 16GB / 24GB

    8GB / 16GB / 32GB

    16GB / 32GB / 64GB (M1 Max only)

    8GB / 16GB / 32GB

    16GB

    Storage

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    512GB / 1TB SSD

    512GB / 1TB / 2TB / 4TB / 8TB

    128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB

    512GB

    Camera

    1080p FaceTime HD

    720p

    1080p FaceTime HD

    1080p front camera, 1080p rear camera with 4K video

    N/A

    Ports

    Thunderbolt 4 (2), MagSafe charging port, headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 (2), microSD card slot (USB-C to USB-A adapter included)

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (3), SDXC card slot, HDMI port, MagSafe charging port, headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 (2), Surface Connect port, headphone jack

    USB-C (1), USB-A (3), HDMI, Ethernet port, headphone jack

    Battery life (rated)

    Up to 18 hours

    Up to 12 hours

    Up to 17 hours

    Up to 16 hours

    8 hours

    Size and Weight

    11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches, 2.7 pounds

    11.63 x 7.86 x 0.55 inches, 2.59 pounds

    12.31 x 8.71 x 0.61 inches, 3.5 pounds

    11.3 x 8.2 x 0.37 inches, 1.96 pounds

    13.8 x 10.2 x 1.1 inches, 5.5 pounds

    Price

    $1,199



    $799



    $1,999



    $900



    $1,300

    While there are a number of factors to consider when choosing the right laptop, we advise that you start by figuring out how much display you need. Most laptops are available in display resolutions ranging from 1080p to 4K (3840 x 2160), and in screen sizes from 13 to 17 inches. Many Windows machines also offer optional touch displays.

    We think a 13- to 15-inch laptop at 1080p is the sweet spot for most people, as you’ll get very good clarity and a decent amount of real estate within a machine that’s still fairly portable and reasonably priced.

    Display: 13 inches to 15 inches at 1920 x 1080
    Processor: 12th Gen Intel Core i5 or i7, AMD Ryzen 5 5000 or Apple M1/M2
    RAM: 8GB or more
    Storage: 512GB or larger solid state drive
    Ports: At least two USB-C connections

    A higher screen resolution means you can see more detail when using apps and watching movies, or get more screen real estate for apps (assuming you are willing to look at very small text), but it can also drive the price of a laptop up considerably. So a 4K display (or alternative display technology options like OLED, also available in very high screen resolutions) makes the most sense if you do a lot of graphics work or use your laptop as your main entertainment screen for movies and TV (though you’ll get the most benefit if you choose a 15-inch or larger display). Also think about how you’ll be using your laptop — a slim 13-inch notebook is ideal for working on the road, while a 17-inch machine isn’t quite as portable, but will get you more screen space (and possibly more power) for working at your desk.

    Many Windows-based machines also offer optional touch displays, but we generally feel that you can skip this to save some cash. Unless you’re looking to carry only one device and are specifically looking for a 2-in-1 laptop that doubles as a tablet, we think a dedicated tablet does a better job at touch, and touch doesn’t add that much functionality to a laptop.

    Many modern laptops are slim on connectivity options, usually packing a handful of USB-C ports in addition to a microSD card reader and a headphone jack. If you want a laptop that can connect to USB-A gadgets (and chances are you have a lot of those) as well as traditional HDMI cables for external displays, you’ll want to check out some of the thicker, business-class Windows notebooks out there from manufacturers like Acer and Lenovo. Alternatively, you can pick up a USB-C hub to augment your Mac or Windows laptop’s connectivity options.

    Windows laptops come with a swath of processor options, but we consider the latest 11th Gen Intel Core i5 or the AMD Ryzen 5 5000 series to offer a good amount of performance for everyday multitasking for the price. And to back that processing power up, we recommend opting for at least 8GB of RAM to keep all of your apps running smoothly. If you’re someone who does heavy creative work such as video and photo editing, it’s worth considering Core i7/Ryzen 7 as well as 16GB to 32GB of RAM. And if you’re a gamer, you’ll need a laptop with discrete graphics, starting with at least an Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti or AMD RX 5600 XT.

    Of course, you’ll also have to decide between Windows and Mac, which largely comes down to personal preference. Windows can be found on the largest range of laptops, including budget notebooks and powerful 2-in-1 workstations, and offers a better selection of gaming software. Meanwhile, macOS is limited to a handful of Apple’s own laptops, and is ideal for folks who already own lots of Apple products thanks to its ability to sync up with your iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch. Windows laptops can be found for as cheap as a few hundred dollars, whereas MacBooks occupy a premium middle ground that starts at $999 for the MacBook Air or $1,999 for the higher-end MacBook Pros.

    As with every CNN Underscored review, we rigorously test devices both quantitatively and qualitatively. For laptops, we made the decision to benchmark first to get a standard for quantitative performance. If you’ve read our standalone laptop, tablet or mobile phone reviews, these tests will be familiar.

    On Windows laptops, we performed GeekBench 5 and PCMark 10 tests. These run the laptops through a series of workflows and application processes, many of which you’d find yourselves (and we found ourselves) completing on a daily basis. For Mac laptops, PCMark 10 is not available, so Geekbench 5 was performed. If a laptop is gaming-capable, we run it through the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark to see how it’ll hold up against many of the best PC games.

    Regardless of operating system, we put each laptop through our standard battery test, which involves charging the laptop to 100%, setting brightness to 50% and engaging airplane mode to ensure connectivity is off. We then loop a 4K video file with the sound set to 15% until the battery dies and the machine turns off.

    The combination of battery and benchmark testing gives us a quantitative feel for the devices and a hard number for each that can be used for comparisons. We then used each laptop as our daily driver for work, play and entertainment tasks, testing the battery to see if it could last through a full day of tasks, watching a movie to get a feel for the display and, of course, running a bunch of different applications.

    Some minor drawbacks aside, the 14-inch MacBook Pro are great for video editors, 3D artists, developers or any other kind of power user who could benefit from tons of processing and graphics muscle. Our M1 Pro-powered 14-inch model can juggle demanding creative tasks without breaking a sweat and outperforms the already beastly M1 MacBooks by a good margin. And the option to upgrade to a higher-core M1 Max chip means that you can spec these laptops out with enough speed to handle just about anything. As our previous best upgrade pick, the Macbook Pro 14-inch is still a good option for those willing to invest in a feature-packed and future-proof MacBook.

    The MacBook Air M1 was our best Apple laptop pick for nearly two years running and is still one of the best laptops you can buy. Its zippy M1 performance and long battery life continue to hold up against newer competitors, and its keyboard and display remain some of the best you can get at this price. We think the MacBook Air M2’s updated design, MagSafe charger and faster performance are worth the extra $200, but for those on a budget, the MacBook Air M1 is a fantastic value — especially since it’s often on sale.

    In terms of sheer performance, the MacBook Pro M2 is one of the best laptops we’ve tested. Its M2 processor runs circles around anything in its price range, and makes this machine ideal for intensive video editing and graphics work. It can also survive a full day of work on a charge, and endured close to an hour longer than the MacBook Air on our tests.

    However, all of this awesome power is stuck in a dated design that looks and feels exactly like the last few iterations of the 13-inch MacBook Pro. That means you’re getting a Touch Bar you probably don’t want, a meh 720p webcam and the same old 13.3-inch Retina display with thick black borders around the edges. Those considering the 13-inch MacBook Pro should either opt for the MacBook Air M2 — which has similar performance and a much better design for $100 less — or splurge for the far more expansive 14-inch MacBook Pro.

    The Surface Laptop 5 is an extremely close runner-up for the title of best Windows laptop, offering a big, beautiful and uniquely tall screen; a great keyboard; and strong overall performance and battery life. But its design, while attractive, is a bit dated and bulky compared to the competition, and you’ll get better specs for the money on the XPS 13.

    The Surface Pro 9 retains everything great about the Surface Pro 8, but doesn’t add much. It’s virtually the same as the 2021 model, just with faster 12th Gen processors, a nixed headphone jack and an optional 5G configuration that makes serious performance sacrifices for always-on connectivity. Unless you need 5G or like the Pro 9’s color options, you’re better off saving your cash on the still-great Pro 8.

    The Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro 360 is an excellent 2-in-1 laptop, offering fast performance and more than 11 hours of battery life. If you’re deep into the Samsung ecosystem, you may find its plethora of preloaded first-party apps useful — but if you’re not, you’re looking at lots of bloatware. On top of the Book 2 Pro 360’s excess software and relatively low display resolution, we still prefer the Surface Pro 8’s more versatile, detachable design.

    The $600 Surface Laptop Go 2 is a very good pick for students or folks on a tight budget, offering dependable performance and just about the best build quality you can find for the price. Though, realistically you might want to get the $650 model that comes with a more usable 256GB of storage and fingerprint reader. When you factor that in, we still think the $549 Dell Inspiron 14 is the best overall value for Windows users.

    In terms of sheer performance and versatility, the Surface Laptop Studio is arguably Microsoft’s best notebook yet. Thanks to its durable, flexible hinge, this 2-in-1 works well as a laptop for everyday multitasking, a sturdy drawing tablet and a stand-up display for giving presentations or watching movies.

    It’s also the only Surface with optional discrete Nvidia graphics, making it ideal for demanding visual tasks and even some light PC gaming. However, with an expensive starting price that only gets higher if you opt for a dedicated GPU and more processing power, we’d only recommend this machine to artists, video editors and general power users.

    The Surface Go 3 packs a full Windows 11 experience and a surprisingly good webcam into a tiny 10-inch tablet, which turns into a comfortable mini laptop once you attach a Type Cover keyboard. However, its performance can be frustratingly slow at times, and its alluring $400 starting price quickly balloons closer to $800 once you configure it with a keyboard and halfway decent processor.

    The 16-inch MacBook Pro has everything we love about our upgrade pick in the 14-inch model, just with a larger screen and a few more configuration options for really maxing out the processor. It’s a great choice if those two things matter to you (and if you have the cash to spare), but we think the 14-inch MacBook Pro’s lower starting price and more portable design make it the better pick for most power users.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hogwarts Legacy is the Harry Potter game fans have been waiting for | CNN Underscored

    Hogwarts Legacy is the Harry Potter game fans have been waiting for | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    In the quarter century or so since fans first fell in love with the Harry Potter franchise, there have been no shortage of opportunities to interact with the series’ iconic characters and locations from behind a gamepad. But while faithful followers of “The Boy Who Lived” have enjoyed everything from the early book-based action-adventures and brick-busting Lego entries to a title entirely dedicated to Quidditch, they’ve never been able to fully live out their Wizarding World fantasies in an immersive, cinematic, interactive experience.

    Hogwarts Legacy — recently released for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X and gaming PCs and coming to Switch later this year — aims to finally fulfill this wish, putting witch and wizard wannabes under the robes of a customizable character and unleashing them in a sprawling, open-world action role-playing adventure to rival anything Harry, Ron and Hermione ever tackled in the books or on the big screen.

    But does this wickedly anticipated, long-in-the-making game deliver on that promise, offering an experience as refreshing as a Butterbeer? Or does it leave a bad taste in your mouth like the grossest of Bertie Bott’s Every Flavor Beans? Let’s hop on our brooms and find out.

    The Wizarding World game fans have always wanted

    While a few flaws occasionally sap it of its magic, Hogwarts Legacy is, by and large, the immersion-ratcheting Wizarding World game fans have long been waiting for.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 7

    For the series’ most passionate fans, Hogwarts Legacy will justify its admission price the second they set foot in the titular school. The game’s story, taking place about 100 years prior to the events of the books and films, finds players wielding the wand of an original character — a fifth-year student they customize cosmetically. But the earlier time period and lack of a familiar protagonist don’t come at the cost of presenting the most fully realized version of Hogwarts ever committed to any medium.

    Not limited by a book’s descriptions or film’s scenes, Hogwarts Legacy’s take on the enchanted place of learning is a massive, detail-drenched playground just begging to be explored. It’s packed with the expected gameplay elements — from main missions and side quests to optional challenges, myriad collectibles and countless character interactions — but it’s also brimming with secrets, surprises, call-outs, nods and Easter eggs.

    Tons of familiar locations and events, such as the Grand Hall and Sorting Ceremony, are accounted for and beautifully realized. As are subtler inclusions, such as the moving paintings, pesky poltergeists and so many other fan-focused touches you’ll encounter at every turn. But it’s the unknown elements — the environments, encounters and interactions previously left off the page and limited to our imaginations — that make this the definitive Hogwarts experience. For every well-established nook, there’s a new cranny just waiting to be discovered.

    While the purest of Potterheads may have trouble pulling themselves from the school’s hallowed halls, they’ll want to make their way to other familiar areas, such as Hogsmeade and the Forbidden Forest. Like Hogwarts, these areas not only enjoy the fullest realizations they’ve ever seen, but they’re also fully explorable, filled with critical objectives and optional gameplay, and packed with opportunities to author your own Potter-like adventures.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 4

    If you’ve played any number of open-world action RPGs over the last few years, Hogwarts Legacy’s formula will feel comfortably familiar. Like recent releases, Horizon Forbidden West and Gotham Knights — or any of the last three Assassin’s Creed entries — it contains a massive map filled to the brim and beyond with activities to keep you busy. But while its inclusion of combat, crafting, questing, collectibles, character progression systems, puzzles and other expected elements might read like a rote genre checklist, none of it feels phoned in or thoughtlessly implemented.

    On the contrary, rather than simply grafting gameplay onto a nostalgia-stinging presentation, Hogwarts Legacy organically weaves the aforementioned interactions, activities and challenges into its well-established universe. Early in the game, you can tackle a quest involving the fetching of five lost books. It’s an objective that could easily result in a time-filling errand, but it instead leverages its rich universe to become something more. The quest-giver is a quirky student who, while trying to cast a load-lightening spell, accidentally grants her books the gift of flight. This leads you to the stunning Hogwarts library, where you’ll hunt and capture the winged tomes with deft use of the Accio spell.

    It’s a minor side quest, but it’s also a meaningful representation of the game’s larger ability to consistently turn the potentially mundane into the, er, magical. Other examples include the stat-based gear system, which doesn’t apply boosts to the usual chest plates and helmets but might find you benefiting from a damage buff while wearing a very Potter-like striped scarf or enjoying some extra defense thanks to a smart pair of spectacles.

    It doesn’t hurt that developer Avalanche Software was thrown some softballs, like integrating resource gathering and crafting — two genre staples — into Hogwarts Legacy’s Herbology and Potions classes. Similarly, the universe’s Floo magic is an obvious stand-in for fast-travel. But the studio also deserves credit for deftly delivering on these obvious interpretations. While traversing the massive world by broom or creature mount is a no-brainer, it also could’ve been a mechanical nightmare. But it’s handled so wonderfully in Hogwarts Legacy, delivering one of the game’s most immersive, joyful experiences.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 9

    Just as mixing a Wiggenweld concoction in Potions class translates perfectly to crafting your typical med pack, learning spells and other combat skills as part of the Hogwarts curriculum makes for the ideal marriage of gameplay and source material. The classes strike the perfect balance between leaning into the license’s signature charm but also outfitting you with butt-kicking abilities. As in the books and films, fans are treated to eccentric professor introductions and personality-packed in-class antics, but these moments never overstay their welcome. Instead, they perfectly support your progression path, as you learn and upgrade spells and other skills.

    Once on the battlefield, these magic abilities shine even brighter, both literally — shooting from your wand with eye-popping effects — and figuratively, supporting a deep, layered combat system that never had us wanting for more traditional weapons. While spells come in the expected elemental varieties, ably frying and freezing foes with a flick of the wrist, these powers barely scratch the surface of what’s possible once behind your wand. With dozens of spells, broken into various specializations — like Damage, Control, Force and Unforgivable Curses — there’s no shortage of ways to vanquish evil with style to spare.

    And while many casts are reserved for non-combat purposes, such as puzzling and lock-picking, your arsenal’s still busting at the seams with wand-spawned skills that’ll benefit you when surrounded by unsavory sorts. Whether you’re facing a small goblin army, tackling a pair of towering trolls, thinning a cave’s arachnid population or simply teaching human adversaries some manners, you’re also encouraged to mix things up and experiment with your evolving bag of monster-slaying tricks.

    Spamming favorite spells will only get you so far, so combining multiple magic types — and maybe tossing in the occasional Chinese Chomping Cabbage for good measure — is key to not only surviving but appreciating the depth of the enormously rewarding combat system. Powerful Ancient Magic, which also ties into the game’s central narrative mystery, adds yet another layer, essentially serving as supers that can turn the tables on even the most menacing mythical monsters.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 8

    Hogwarts Legacy works as both a fan-servicing licensed game and an open-world action RPG, but it’s not without some cracks in the castle floor. Because its authenticity and attention to detail are often so strong and absorbing, areas lacking this level of care can feel underwhelming. Some of the spaces that fill out the map — stretches that aren’t specifically part of Hogwarts, Hogsmeade or the Forbidden Forest, for example — can feel sparse and more like generic fantasy environments than true Potter-level counterparts.

    Repetition can also sully the experience late in the game, when enemy variety begins to run dry and combat encounters start to feel recycled. This occasional late-game tedium, combined with the more lackluster environments, had me wondering what a less ambitious, more contained Hogwarts Legacy might look like. Would it have worked better if it took place entirely on the school grounds, much the way Batman: Arkham Asylum unfolded within the borders of the titular psychiatric facility? The game’s scale and scope is undoubtedly impressive, but sometimes it feels like it shot for the stars when maybe it should’ve stopped at the moon.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 6

    Some of the series’ signature magic is also missing from the supporting characters and, more so, your relationships with them. Strong friendships with peers — and even close bonds with professors and other adult characters — have always been as important to the franchise as its fantastic beasts. And while Hogwarts Legacy certainly aims for this, allowing you to interact with a large cast of colorful characters — some even surnamed Weasley and Black — the bonds and friendships forged rarely deliver the emotional depth of the source material’s. More often than not, you’ll feel like a lone-wolf hero with lots of close acquaintances but no real ride-or-die relationships.

    It’s also hard to ignore major omissions, such as the absence of Diagon Alley and playable Quidditch, which seem like missed opportunities. It’s maybe not entirely fair to fault the developer for not including something, especially when these elements could arrive at a later date via downloadable content or in the inevitable sequel. Still, it’s difficult to hop on your broom and not imagine how cool it’d be to hit the figurative gas and hurl yourself toward a Golden Snitch.

    Finally, while Hogwarts Legacy allows you to gather and care for a menagerie of magical creatures, the feature serves as more of a collectible petting zoo than meaningful gameplay inclusion. It’s certainly a welcome addition, one fans will surely appreciate, but I would’ve traded my most powerful wand for the opportunity to bond with (and battle alongside) a creature companion. On the plus side, you can pet every cat you encounter, an act made all the more comforting by the soothing “purr” emitting from the PS5’s DualSense controller.

    hogwarts legacy review cnnu 1

    Minor flaws and wish lists aside, Hogwarts Legacy succeeds in delivering the Harry Potter game — minus the boy wizard — we’ve always wanted. It piles the fan service as high as the titular school’s tallest spire, then complements it with varied, compelling gameplay that’d do any action RPG proud.

    And while that core gameplay experience impresses on its own merits, it also, crucially, is thoughtfully woven into the fabric of the beloved franchise. The result isn’t simply a solid action RPG with a pretty Potter paint job but an authentic, immersive, cinematic interactive experience that’ll have longtime fans raising frothy mugs of Butterbeer in celebration.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The iRobot Roomba Combo j7+ is the best robot vacuum and map | CNN Underscored

    The iRobot Roomba Combo j7+ is the best robot vacuum and map | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    A robot vacuum cleaner may no longer be the cutting edge technological wonder it once was, but finding one that can also thoroughly mop your home, with nary a finger lifted, is a dream many of us are still holding out for.

    So it was a pleasant, but not altogether unexpected, surprise that iRobot, the company that started the robot cleaning craze, has also cracked the code for a combination vacuum and mop with its new Roomba Combo j7+ ($1,100).

    The industrious Roomba Combo J7+, which is an advanced step-up from our Best Robot Vacuum, the Roomba J7+, checked all the boxes of good floor scrubbing, advanced mapping features, ease of use and the key ability to stop your carpets from accidentally getting run over with a dirty, wet mopping pad. This last ingenious feature is done using robotic arms to lift the mop pad out of the way when it senses carpeting.

    After a few weeks of simultaneously mopping and vacuuming my house, which has hardwood and tile floors as well as area rugs and wall-to-wall carpeting, I can sincerely recommend the Combo j7+ as a premium, time-saving device. It easily mapped my entire home, (more on mapping later) avoided obstacles like my cat’s toys and the bar stools in the kitchen, and more importantly, never once accidentally dragged a wet mopping pad over my carpets. In fact, I admit to spending way too much time watching for the exact moment when the robotic arms lifted the mop pad before it navigated onto my area rug. Did I mention it can double as mindless entertainment?

    Here’s everything you need to know before you invest in this clever, yet not inexpensive, robot vacuum and mop.

    The newest addition to the iRobot line of hands-off cleaning products, the Roomba Combo j7+ is a mastermind mashup of vacuum and mop. With a robotic arm that lifts the mop pad above even the highest pile carpet, it will do all your dirtiest cleaning with just the push of a button. Though it’s not cheap, for those who are looking to cut back their housework, it’s well worth the $1,100 pricetag.

    Here’s why this new technology is such a big deal. In my previous testing of other combo mop/vacuum robots, like the Deebot X1 Omni and the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra, I had to make compromises to get close to the hands-off user experience of the Roomba Combo J7+.

    The Deebot X1, like many robot vacuum cleaners, has just one internal dust bin. That means that when you want to mop the floors, you need to take that bin out of the robot and replace it with the included water tank. Because the tanks are separate, I was never able to send the device on a simultaneous mop and vacuum run. And though the Roborock S7 has room to hold both tanks, the robot’s arm didn’t always rise high enough above the carpets, which left my rugs damp  — and again led me to mop and vacuum separately.

    The Combo j7+ turns out to be the ideal solution for homes with a mix of hard floors and carpeting, especially if you have higher pile rugs. The robot arm lifts to the top of the robot, leaving the rug bone dry and allowing the vacuum to hunt down the pet hair and dust. And the single internal dust bin holds both dirt and water.

    It’s your robot vac and you can mop if you want to

    Though the Combo j7+ can run in vacuum only mode, it will automatically switch to vacuum and mop mode by sliding the mop pad to the robotic arm on top of the device.

    To wit, when I first ran the vacuum, the app asked if I wanted to add the mop pad and fill the tank with water and some cleaning solution. I did both and it automatically transitioned to the combo vacuum and mop mode. I sent it on its way, curious to see how it would navigate my front entryway — which is hardwood flooring with an area rug in the middle. It vacuumed the rug first, before deploying the robot arm to lower the mopping pad to tackle the floor space.

    Again, the magic of the Combo j7+ is that the mop will only be brought down if the robot detects a hard surface such as wood or tile. If it senses carpeting, it backs away. I picked it up a few times and moved it to the other side of the room to see if it would go over the rug to get back, but it never did. Instead, it worked its way around.

    iRobot1.jpg

    Familiar iRobot design and details

    Aside from the robotic arms, which you don’t see unless they’re moving the mop pad from the top rear of the device, the Combo j7+ looks almost identical to our favorite robot vacuum, the j7+. The design is sleek and modern looking with a matte black plastic body and brushed aluminum circular top piece, with the iRobot logo in the center. There’s just one button on the vacuum that lets you start and pause the vacuum or long-press it to send it home. Underneath you’ll find iRobot’s dual rubber brushes that do a great job keeping pet hair from getting tangled up.

    Like other iRobot vacuums with a “plus” in its name, the j7+ includes The Clean Base, which is iRobot’s version of a base/docking station. It also includes a waste bin, which simply allows the robot to empty its contents into a bag while it recharges. Though it’s strangely noisy when it empties itself, like a jet engine flying overhead, it’s done quickly enough. I especially appreciate that the waste bag will hold about two months’ worth of debris before needing to be changed, depending on how frequently you clean your floors and whether you have pets that shed a lot. Because the less I have to do, the better.

    The Clean Base is fairly large at 13 inches x 12 inches x 14 inches, so you’ll need to find a space that can accommodate it. Ideally you need about a foot of space on either side of the base for the robot to maneuver itself into place. I placed it in a corner of my guest bedroom with 8 inches on either side and it managed to get in and out quite easily. The robot itself is 13.3 inches x 13.3 inches x 3.4 inches tall and easily fits under my living room couch and other low furniture.

    Other combination robot mop/vacuums I tested made it feel like I was dragging a damp rag around the house, mainly because they only used water in the tank. iRobot is one of just a handful of brands that lets you add floor cleaner (the company recommends using Bona Floor Cleaner Solutions) which makes a big difference.

    If you’re looking for a deeper clean, there are adjustments you can make in the app. For instance, in my kitchen, I have it set to mop twice on the Ultra setting, which puts down the most amount of water. The downside to this is that I have to refill the water tank when it inevitably  runs out, which is fine if it’s mopping while I’m home (I’ll get an alert on my phone), but not so great if I decide to let it clean while I’m out and about.

    On the hardwood floors in my living room, I have it set to do only one pass on the standard mode. I can change that to Eco (the least amount of water) mode for rooms that need a lighter cleaning.

    For any robot vacuum to navigate your home while better avoiding obstacles (like your dining room chairs, kitchen stools, etc), it needs a proper and precise map. The Combo j7+ accomplishes this by adding even more sensors than the original j7+, paired with a front-facing camera and the iRobot OS 5.0.

    Many robots I tested took hours to map my house, sometimes running out of battery and having to go back to the base to recharge before resuming the job. But I found iRobot’s mapping to be superb, delivering a full map of my 1500 square foot home in just one and a half hours. The new sensors helped it differentiate areas that have carpeting opposed to flooring.

    As you use it, the Combo j7+ continues to learn about your space, suggesting locations that might need an extra cleaning run, as well as prompting you to add “clean zones” and “keep-out zones” on the map. For instance, I’ve created a “cat litter clean zone” in my guest bathroom and I can do nifty things like ask my Voice Assistant (Alexa, Google or Siri)  to send the iRobot to clean it up when the litter clutters the floor. (There are also voice commands specific to mopping and vacuuming so you can tell it to mop the kitchen floor or vacuum the bedroom.) I also set up a virtual keep out zone around my kitchen bar stools. For some reason the robot gets stuck on the raised base of the stool, so a virtual wall keeps it from attempting to climb it.

    That camera also helps the robot learn and detect obstacles in its path, like maneuvering around headphones and lamp cords on the floor, even a pair of shoes I left out. The camera takes photos of items it sees so after a run, you’ll be asked to review the photos, and let the robot know if the headphones are a temporary or permanent obstacle. Of course, machine learning still leaves something to be desired: It once identified one of my cats under the bed as an obstacle. However, all my responses do help it get smarter with every cleaning run.

    Though my cats use a litter box, iRobot does offer a Pet Owner Official Promise, or P.O.O.P if you will, which claims it can detect and avoid accidental pet messes. If the unthinkable happens and the robot fails to identify it as an obstacle, creating an even bigger mess which I won’t describe, iRobot promises to replace the robot for free. And, yuck.

    iRobot4.jpg

    The biggest complaint I have is the size of the mop pads. The Roborock and the Ecovacs Deebot X1 Omni both have mop pads that are twice as large, so they are quicker to cover more space. Because the iRobot Combo tucks the mop away while vacuuming, its mop footprint is noticeably smaller.

    In addition, because the water tank shares space with the dirt tank, it’s also smaller and needs to be filled more frequently. But for me, that’s a small price to pay for the convenience and reliability of a robot that can perfectly vacuum and mop with just the press of a button on my phone (or the utterance of a voice command).

    I also found that the Clean Base docking system, though smaller and more attractive than some of the competition, is not as comprehensive. While it automatically sucks out the debris from the robot, it does not clean the mop pad. For me, this was a compromise I could live with and had no problem manually removing and washing the mop pad — in the sink or the washing machine — after each cleaning job. The Combo j7+ comes with two microfiber mopping pads and you can buy additional 2-packs online for $20.

    One thing I’d love to see iRobot add is a “Do Not Empty” feature, which could keep the robot from emptying its dustbin after every cleaning. Since it’s so loud, this is something I would rather do manually, when it’s convenient for me, not when someone is napping or I’m on a Zoom work call.

    iRobot3.jpg

    With the addition of the Combo j7+, iRobot has taken my favorite robot vacuum and made it even better with the addition of a well appropriated mopping feature. The retractable robotic arms, in combination with the obstacle avoidance, advanced mapping technology and a relatively small footprint, make this the best combo mop/vacuum I’ve tested to date.

    Not only does it get the job done with minimal intervention, but it does an outstanding job keeping my floors free of cat hair and my carpets from getting wet. In addition, its higher arm lift makes it the best choice for anyone with high pile carpets.

    Of course, at $1,100, you will pay more for these advanced features. So, if you already own an excellent smart robot vacuum, you may prefer to add iRobot’s less expensive standalone robot mop, iRobot Braava Jet 240 ($200) to your cleaning repertoire.

    But if you’re looking for one product to both vacuum and mop your home, that won’t look like it lost its way from the set of a sci fi film, the Combo j7+ is the robot for you.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ring Car Cam review: Ring’s expertise goes on the road | CNN Underscored

    Ring Car Cam review: Ring’s expertise goes on the road | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Ring’s latest product isn’t meant for your home. Instead, the $250 Ring Car Cam is a souped-up dash cam designed to help you keep an eye on your car when you’re driving it, or when it’s parked.

    Just like the rest of Ring’s security camera lineup, you can view the camera’s live feed and receive motion alerts when someone is inside your car via the Ring app, thanks to built-in LTE connectivity. Also, like the rest of Ring’s lineup, that means yet another optional subscription.

    I’ve had the Ring Car Cam installed in a 2020 Kia Telluride, and have grown to appreciate having a video catalog of anything and everything that’s happened in and around my car. Below you’ll find some things I liked about the Ring Car Cam and some things I would love to see changed or improved.

    A uniquely smart dash cam

    If you want a dash cam that has all of the advanced smarts of Ring’s home security products (and can live without a built-in display), the Ring Car Cam is a great way to keep tabs on your vehicle.

    A sleek design and good video quality

    Lead Ring Car Cam

    The Ring Car Cam has a unique design, at least when it comes to dash cams. Instead of using suction cups to stick to your windshield, with a cable running down along your dash and to a USB port or 12V adapter, the camera is attached to a mounting arm that’s held in place by the pressure of being wedged between your windshield and dash along with an adhesive strip.

    At the top of the arm is where the brains of the Car Cam are located. The inside edge of the housing features a cabin-facing camera with a 148-degree horizontal by 82-degree vertical field. Also on the inside edge of the camera are two very small floodlights, a microphone and a small indicator light to let you know when it’s powered on and recording. On the interior side of the camera’s housing is a privacy shutter that flips up or down and physically covers the interior camera lens while simultaneously disabling the microphone.

    Outside of some cable routing issues (more on that below), I liked the sleek look of the Ring Car Cam as it blended into the design of the car. Its minimal design doesn’t have any extra buttons or frills. It’s a double-ended camera with a privacy shutter, and that’s it. There aren’t any buttons or unnecessary features on the exterior of the camera — all interactions outside of flipping the shutter up or down are done through the app.

    Up top, you’ll find a blue circle light ring that’s very similar to the light that’s been used on various Amazon Echo products to indicate when Alexa is listening to you. In this case, it lights up to let you know when the camera is recording. On the opposite side of the Car Cam’s housing is the exterior-facing camera, with a slightly smaller field of view than the cabin camera at 111 degrees horizontal by 56 degrees vertical.

    Both cameras are listed as HD cameras, but Ring’s website states that video during live view as well as local playback is capped at 540p, while cloud highlights and any downloaded clips are 1080p.

    The first time I viewed a recorded video clip, I was surprised at how clear and crisp the video looked. I fully expected to see a dash cam-like video clip, lacking any true color or depth. But clips recorded on the Car Cam look just like what I’d expect from a Ring Video Doorbell or Spotlight cam. Even at night, the video clips offer enough detail that I’m able to clearly make out what a person is doing, or the fact that there’s a car off in the distance.

    I’ve observed video during live view and downloaded clips, both of which have some form of pixelation when there’s fast movement (such as in the background as the car is moving), at least from the interior camera. The exterior-facing camera has some pixelation as well, but that’s to be expected from a camera with a field of view that’s full of movement.

    Ring Car Cam 5

    Ring’s first hit product was its Video Doorbell, not only because it started recording once someone pressed the doorbell’s button, but because it would also send alerts when motion was detected near your door. The alerts were a quick and easy way to know if something or someone was nearing your door, even if they didn’t ring the bell.

    The same philosophy is in place with Car Cam, only Ring has implemented lessons learned and given users better controls over where the camera is watching for motion alerts. More specifically, you’re able to pick if you want to receive alerts for any and all motion detected near your car or if you only want alerts to arrive for motion detected inside your car.

    All alerts will result in notifications for activities such as when a car drives, or maybe even when a person walks by your car. Interior alerts will capture if someone breaks into your car and nothing else. The downside here, of course, is that if someone were to back into your car or open and hit your car with their car door, the camera isn’t going to capture it.

    I’ve left the interior alerts enabled during my time testing the Ring Car Cam and have found them to be reliable, alerting me only when someone is getting in the car, and occasionally as someone is standing next to the car, peering into the window.

    The Ring app makes viewing and managing clips easy

    Ring Car Cam 3

    Ring’s app is built for and around quickly accessing and watching video clips or a livestream from one of your account’s cameras. And that’s arguably even more important when it comes to a camera that’s embedded in something mobile like a car. Fortunately, the Ring app delivers on this front.

    When viewing a Ring Car Cam clip or live view, you can quickly switch between the inside and front-facing cameras by tapping on the camera icon at the top of the screen. The icon was instantly familiar to me because it’s the same icon I’ve seen smartphone makers use in the camera app to switch between the rear and front-facing cameras.

    When viewing the camera’s timeline, events are labeled in the same fashion as the company’s doorbells or floodlight cameras. Live view sessions are orange and motion is blue, but there’s a new category labeled “Driving,” which, you guessed it, indicates that the car was in motion and being driven. The new category makes it easy to find a specific clip should you need to.

    In addition to viewing either camera’s recordings, you can view the current GPS location of the car with just a few taps in the app. You can also delete all location history that’s stored within the app at any time in the Car Cam’s settings page.

    Ring Car Cam 2

    Ring is owned by Amazon, so it makes sense that Alexa is being used for a Ring Car Cam feature that offers a different kind of peace of mind. If you have the optional Traffic Stop feature turned on, you can say, “Alexa, record” at any time and the camera will begin recording video inside and out, along with audio from inside the car. The recording will last 20 minutes or stop as soon as the car starts moving.

    It’s a feature that can be used if you’re in an accident, if you witness an accident or if you’ve been pulled over and want to document your interaction with the police.

    I’m sure this is just the beginning of Ring taking advantage of Alexa on the Ring Car Cam.

    For the privacy-conscious, Ring states that the voice commands are all processed on the camera itself and your voice commands are never transmitted to its servers. And, again, the feature is completely optional. I actually had to go into the settings for the Car Cam in the Ring app and enable it after setup.

    Ring Car Cam 4

    Inside the Ring Car Cam’s box is everything you need to install. The camera is already attached to an arm, the base of which is wedged between your windshield and dashboard. Also included in the box is an ODB-II adapter that plugs into your car’s diagnostics port, and a power cable that you need to run from the ODB-II port on your car, up along your dash and to the right side of the camera’s base.

    Most cars made after Jan. 1, 1996, are equipped with an OBD-II port, but I suggest checking your car’s manual for its location. As I just mentioned, you do need to run a USB cable from your port to the camera to provide it with power, and depending on where your OBD-II port is, the cable may be a safety hazard. (In fact, during installation the app asks where your car’s OBD-II port is located, and if it’s in the middle of your console, you’re instructed to return the Car Cam for a full refund.)

    Also included in the box are some adhesive clips for cable routing and a small blue stick that’s designed to help wedge the cable between your front windshield and dash. In total, I think I spent maybe five minutes going through the installation process as I was guided by the app. But I found cable management to be an issue.

    Ideally, the power cable should be tucked down, between the dashboard and the windshield, out of sight. And at first, that’s exactly how I had the cable routed. But as soon as I wedged the base of the camera’s arm between the dashboard and the windshield, the cable popped right out. I tried to push the cable back down, only for it to come back out. I eventually figured out that the pressure being put on the dashboard but the arm that’s holding the camera was causing enough separation, there wasn’t anything there to hold the cable in place.

    If this were a more permanent install, I’d most likely use some of the included adhesive clips to hold the cable in place and just deal with the cosmetic fallout. But even then, there’s probably a good 2 to 3 feet of excess cable that I’d have to deal with.

    Outside of using some sort of rechargeable battery pack, I don’t see how Ring can get around the need to route a cable from the OBD-II port — which, by the way, allows the camera to draw power at any time. I just wish it weren’t as messy.

    Ring Car Cam 6 .jpg

    The Ring Car Cam has an LTE radio built into it, allowing for an always-on and available connection to Ring’s servers and the Ring app on your phone. In turn, you can view a livestream of either camera and use two-way audio wherever the car is.

    But that always-on connectivity comes with an additional cost. More specifically, Ring Protect Go is $6 per month or $60 per year. If you’re already a Ring Protect subscriber, that price is in addition to your current plan.

    To be clear, you can use Ring Car Cam without a Protect Go subscription, but you won’t receive push alerts for motion, the camera will have to wait for a Wi-Fi connection to upload video and you won’t be able to use two-way video and live video.

    It’s understandable that Ring can’t take on the added expense of LTE connectivity for every Car Cam that’s installed, but subscription fatigue is real, especially when there are plenty of other great dash cams available.

    Ring Car Cam 7 .jpg

    In addition to the physical privacy shutter, I’d love to see Ring add an Alexa-based voice command to temporarily turn off the interior camera and microphone. Due to the nature of my wife’s volunteer work, there are often times when she’s on the phone regarding a child’s legal case, discussing private — and privileged — information about the child, their parents, caretakers and their case. As such, having the Ring Car Cam record audio and video of the call isn’t ideal. (She’s not allowed to even discuss her cases with me.)

    Over the last week or so of testing, she’s tried to get into the habit of flipping the privacy shutter up to prevent the camera from recording any video of inside the car, along with the audio. But, it’s not a perfect solution. Either she forgets to flip the shutter up because it’s one more physical action — while driving — that she has to take, or she forgets to flip the shutter back down after the call is over.

    If there were some sort of “Alexa, disable inside recording” or “Alexa, enable privacy mode for 20 minutes” voice command she could give just before she is getting on a call, that’d remove the need to remember to use or remove the privacy shutter. A hands-free privacy trigger would be a welcome addition.

    Number of cameras

    2

    2

    1

    Video quality

    1080p

    1080p front, 720p rear

    1080p

    Field of view

    External-facing, 119.5 degrees diagonal. Cabin-facing 153-degrees diagonal

    140 degrees

    140 degrees

    Display

    No

    2.5-inch HD IPS display

    No

    Storage

    Cloud and local

    MicroSD card not included

    MicroSD card, 32GB or 64GB included

    GPS

    Yes, viewable in Ring app

    Yes, with emergency alerts and map overlay on video clips

    Yes, with map overlay on video clips

    Subscription

    $6/month, $60/year

    N/A

    N/A

    Price

    $250



    $300



    $100

    The $250 Ring Car Cam takes peace of mind on the road by bringing the company’s home security and camera knowledge inside your car. The added subscription is sure to be an instant turn-off for some, and that’s understandable. However, the Ring app makes it incredibly easy to view, download and share video clips of anything happening inside or near your vehicle, even without a subscription.

    For those who already have Ring cameras around their home, the familiarity aspect, combined with the Ring Car Cam’s overall quality and experience, can’t be beat. But for those who’d prefer not to deal with a subscription, or don’t feel comfortable with an Alexa-equipped camera in their car, the Nextbase 322GW or Scotch NEXTS10032-ET — our two best dash cam picks — are both worthy alternatives.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best smart speakers 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best smart speakers 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Smart speakers go beyond just playing music. They provide control over your other home devices, answer queries and connect you with friends and family — and the best ones should execute all those tasks equally well. We’ve been testing smart speakers for years, reviewing each new iteration as it hits the market, and we’ve whittled the long list of smart speakers down to the best four:

    The best smart speaker overall

    The fourth-gen Echo pushes out a soundstage that’s unmatched at its price point. Alexa is constantly getting smarter and giving you more control over your information as well.

    The best smart speaker for Apple users

    The second-gen HomePod is a great pick for Apple users who don’t already own the previous model, offering lots of smarts and room-filling sound for a good price. The new version updates support for smart home devices, includes new sensors and features, and costs less than the original.

    The best sounding smart speaker

    If sound quality is the be-all and end-all for you, the Sonos One is the Goldilocks of smart speakers. It’s not exorbitantly expensive yet it still packs the critical hardware (two amplifiers, a woofer and a tweeter) to deliver robust sound.

    The best budget smart speaker

    The latest Amazon Echo Dot improves on our favorite budget smart speaker with better audio, Wi-Fi extension capabilities and a better LED display on the clock model.

    1-underscored amazon echo fourth gen review

    The fourth-gen Echo really embodies all that a smart speaker can and should be. It plays music clearly and richly, gives you easy access to information and can control your smart home devices.

    First off, we were really jiving with the futuristic ball shape during our tests of the Echo. Not only does it take up less space in terms of height, but it adds a casually futuristic touch to a shelf or countertop. Our favorite part of the design is that Amazon moved Alexa’s light ring from the top to the bottom, but in use it provides more function: The LEDs reflect off the surface that the device is on, making it easier to see the colors.

    The fourth-gen Echo pushes sound out of the front (and front sides) courtesy of two tweeters and a woofer. It represents the largest soundstage we’ve ever heard in a core Echo speaker. And you don’t have to be shy about bumping up the volume; the Echo gets room-filling loud, more so than the Nest Audio and HomePod Mini, though the HomePod Mini delivers more clarity at higher volumes.

    Amazon also upped the audio quality across all tones — low, mid, high and bass — by adding in room-reading technology that can auto-mix tracks based on the Echo’s surroundings. It will detect how close it is to walls, for instance, and analyze in real time to make adjustments. (You can still make manual adjustments via an equalizer in the Alexa app.)

    The Echo also shone because of Alexa, who’s gotten smarter and quicker; in just six years her response time has nearly doubled. Alexa and the Google Assistant are still pretty much neck and neck (with Siri a bit further behind), but Alexa has especially grown in the realms of handling nuances of the English language and recognizing different voices. For instance, Alexa on the Echo had no trouble detecting whether it was this tester speaking or another household member.

    It’s also easy to catch Alexa’s attention, as the fourth-gen Echo boasts six built-in microphones. With modest volume levels, we never had to raise our voice, though we did have to at times with the volume at its maximum.

    Alexa isn’t just for random information, either, but can also control the smart home. The fourth-gen Echo contains the core connectivity you need (Wi-Fi and Bluetooth), and tosses in Zigbee and Amazon Sidewalk as well — two smart home standards that make it more seamless to connect various devices. Essentially, when you buy a Zigbee smart bulb or plug, you won’t need to purchase a hub also, as the fourth-gen Echo can connect to it and get it set up for use. It makes the fourth-gen Echo a more all-in-one device than most other speakers.

    Amazon has also been adding in more control to ensure privacy. Via the Alexa app for Android and iOS, you can wipe your history and adjust settings to make you more comfortable with having Alexa in your home. Plus, you can always mute the microphone to cut her off from listening for the wake word.

    At $100, the fourth-gen Echo delivers robust audio performance, provides access to Alexa and can power the smart home in a futuristic build.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 5

    At first glance, it’s hard to see much difference between the new HomePod and the first generation version. The new one is a little smaller and has a few design differences, but otherwise looks very similar.

    Inside, the second-generation HomePod has fewer drivers than the first-generation model — five on the new one versus seven on the original — and yet it actually improves on the overall sound. The new HomePod has a better balance of bass, treble and midrange tones; the original HomePod was very bass-heavy.

    Its design allows for sound to project 360 degrees, and it features room correction software that will adjust the audio to sound best in the space you put it in. In a head-to-head comparison with the original HomePod, the first-generation model sounded muddy and less vibrant. There’s no comparison between the HomePod Mini and the HomePod; the larger speaker sounds much bigger and better.

    The second-generation model adds support for Matter, the new smart home standard. That means you can use it as a hub for controlling non-Apple devices and it should be ready for new smart products as they arrive. Matter is open-source and meant to promote interoperability; compatible devices work with Alexa and Google Assistant as well as Siri.

    It isn’t for everyone. If you don’t have an iPhone or iPad, or you mainly use Spotify, you’re better off with a Sonos One. And the HomePod isn’t portable, which may limit its appeal to you.

    But if those things don’t put you off, the HomePod will make Siri more useful to you and brings better sound to your home.

    sonos one best smart speakers

    The Sonos One quickly rose to the top of our testing pool in terms of sound, delivering extraordinary performance in our audio tests. At $199.99, the Sonos One packs a punch bigger than its relatively small size would have you think was possible.

    A tweeter, a woofer and two amplifiers are packed inside to power the Sonos One. All three work together with an onboard processor to properly mix a track and deliver a clear listening experience. It also produces the appropriate amount of pop and vibrancy with each track. That way a pop song like “Paper Rings” by Taylor Swift or “Sucker” by the Jonas Brothers can really produce a dynamic mix with strong bass, high vocals and tones across the spectrum. It can also get considerably louder over our top pick, the fourth-gen Echo, without introducing muddiness or crackling. If you want a louder and true stereo experience, you can easily create a stereo pair with an additional Sonos One. Syncing the two speakers is super easy and takes just a few minutes via the Sonos app.

    To a degree, it’s the best of both worlds from the HomePod Mini and the fourth-gen Echo. You get a bold and full mix even at full blast. Bass is exceptionally strong, even at higher volumes, and acts as a weight for a track. You’ll notice some shaking on the speaker itself at higher volumes, but it’s minimized thanks to a grip on the bottom of the Sonos One. There’s even a threaded mount on the bottom, and Sonos makes several mounts as well.

    You get your pick of an assistant on the Sonos One and can select either Google Assistant or Amazon’s Alexa as the default voice assistant via the Sonos App. (That app and a Sonos account are required for setup.) And using either of these assistants on the Sonos One is nearly an identical experience to using it on a first-party device from either brand. You can ask questions, control other devices and ask for music. Sadly, the ability to make calls with Alexa or Google Assistant aren’t here, and you can’t drop in on other Echo or Nest devices.

    Like other smart speakers, the Sonos One listens for the respective wake word courtesy of four microphones — all of which you do have the ability to mute. This is good news for those with privacy concerns and anyone who doesn’t want the assistants accidentally chiming in. You’ll know the microphone is muted thanks to an orange glow from an LED on top of the device.

    The same Android or iOS app used for setup comes into play when linking music services. Sonos One can pull from music saved on your device or a service like Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, Tidal, Pandora, iHeartRadio and SiriusXM, among others. (With some, you will need a paid account to enable this integration.) You can conveniently control all of this with the Sonos app, and if you ever choose to expand your Sonos system, it’s all managed through the app as well.

    Apple is thrown into the mix, as the Sonos One supports AirPlay 2, which means that from an iOS, iPadOS, macOS or watchOS device you can select the Sonos One and control what’s playing natively. Neither Echo nor Nest speakers offer this, and it’s nice that Sonos is willing to work with all platforms.

    We think the Sonos One is the ideal choice if you want an assistant-agnostic smart speaker that focuses on bold and clear audio. You’d be hard-pressed to find better sound at $199.

    echo dot with clock 5th gen review cnnu 3

    At first glance, the Echo Dot with Clock looks a lot like the fourth-gen model, with fabric covering the top half of the sphere-shaped device, while the bottom is wrapped in matte plastic. There are four slightly raised controls on the top for volume, mute and action — all of which can be used to trigger Alexa — and it comes in muted Charcoal and Glacier White colors.

    But look closely and you’ll notice that the LED display on the front now has a brighter, scrolling display so it can show things like the time, the weather, the music you’re listening to and all kinds of helpful information.

    The Echo Dot’s also features two new sensors: one for temperature and an accelerometer for using gestures to interact with the speaker. In addition to voice control, you can tap the top of the Dot to do things like play and pause music, and snooze your alarm or a timer. As for the temperature sensor, yes, it tells you the temperature of whatever room it lives in. But it turned out this was more useful than it sounds, particularly if you have Alexa Routines set up in your home. For instance, this sensor can interact with other smart home devices to turn the overhead fan on or off when the room hits a certain temperature.

    As for sound performance, the Echo Dot won’t give you the rich, crisp sound of a more expensive piece of audio equipment, but it sounds pretty darn good for a small Bluetooth speaker. The updated fifth-gen model uses a larger driver for clearer vocals and deeper bass.

    If you’re in the market for a new smart speaker or you’re using a much older Echo smart home device, the Echo Dot with Clock is an affordable way to add smart functionality and music to any room in the house.

    Before deciding on our testing pool, we spent time crafting a testing methodology and rubric for rating smart speakers. Given the players in the space and main use cases of these devices, we focused on three main areas: audio quality, convenience and the smart assistants.

    Audio quality was the largest category, both in points and subsections, allowing us to look at an overall mix while also examining tones across the spectrum and the clarity within each. We had a range of test tracks that we played on all speakers at varying volumes and in different spaces.

    Core songs used in testing include “Let It Be,” “Hotel California,” “Light On,” “Born to Run,” “Domino,” “I’m on Fire,” “Dancing in the Dark,” “What a Man Gotta Do,” “Ex’s & Oh’s,” “Rosalita,” “Yellow Submarine,” “Dance Tonight,” “Higher Love,” “You Make My Dreams,” “Get Down Tonight,” “Alaska,” “Exile,” “Heroes,” “Ghosts,” “Pink Houses,” “Closer,” “Sweet Thing,” “Shape of You,” “Honky Tonk Women,” “Jack of Speed,” “Slow Burn,” “Monkey Man,” “American Girl,” “Sucker,” “Paper Rings” and “House of a Thousand Guitars,” among others.

    Convenience was top of mind throughout the testing process as, at the end of the day, a smart speaker should be helpful and not hinder experiences. You want to be able to get the assistant’s attention with relative ease (having the microphones accurately pick up the request and for the processing to be done correctly). We also took a look at privacy on each one and settings that the user could enable or disable.

    Convenience also carried over into its smart home capabilities and how these smart speakers can integrate. Do they offer extra connectivity to help get devices online? Can they make minute adjustments on individually connected gadgets? Can we group gadgets together? Do they support out-of-home control? These were just a few of the questions we posed and answered.

    In terms of design, we looked at the materials used and how those both fit into the home along with compatible devices. Some opt for a classic speaker look, while devices like the HomePod Mini or 2020 Echo’s embrace the spherical design language. Nest Audio looks like a small pillow — we don’t recommend sleeping on it, though. We looked for the expected controls along with the all-important ability to mute microphones.

    After unboxing the smart speakers, we tested the setup and how intuitive it was to complete. Did you need to sign up for an account? How long did it take to set up? We also looked at whether each device had a warranty and, if so, for how long.

    Our previous pick for best speaker for Apple users, the Homepod Mini can serve as the centerpiece to your smart home system. It not only has the technology inside give you out-of-home control for door locks, cameras, sensors and countless other gizmos, but Siri is also a lot better at fielding these requests. The HomePod Mini also has great sound; getting loud without muddling audio quality. No snapping, crackling or popping hindered whatever track we chose to play. The only downside: it’s not an option for anyone without an iPhone.

    The Echo Studio is the most expensive Echo, but it’s also the best-sounding one thanks to its almost delirious amount of speakers. But a not-so-sleek build, too-steep price and limited support for 3D music kept it from getting a top pick. We feel, for half the price, the fourth-gen Echo is a much better buy.

    $299 at Apple

    Apple’s $299 HomePod focuses squarely on delivering the best sound possible. It has seven tweeters, a larger woofer and multiple amplifiers that all push out sound, alongside a custom chip to mix it in real time. But it lacks as a smart speaker, with no extra connectivity features and a price that pushes it far from affordability.

    $100 at B&H Photo Video

    As we noted in our full review, the Nest Audio features a nice design that presents itself with Google DNA front and center. It also delivers deep integration with Google, something Android users will appreciate. Alexa is just a smarter assistant as a whole, and sound quality was lacking with this smart speaker. It delivered on clarity but not in its ability to get loud or fill a room.

    $50 at B&H Photo Video

    The donut-sized Nest Mini was neck and neck with the Echo Dot — however, sound quality and speed left us wanting more. Audio was clear at lower volumes, but the Nest Mini didn’t achieve loud volumes and, at its maximum volume, it introduced crackling.

    Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best MacBook in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    Best MacBook in 2023 | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    If you need a new Apple laptop, it’s a really good time to buy one. The newest MacBooks are faster and longer-lasting than ever, and offer a range of options depending on how much power you need. The MacBook Air M2 is the best laptop for most people, thanks to its blazing speed, slim design and reasonable price, while the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros provide lots of ports, more advanced displays and even more power for creative professionals. And if you’re on a budget, the 2020 MacBook Air is still a great buy today. After testing all of Apple’s current MacBooks, here are our picks for the ones you should buy right now.

    The best overall MacBook

    The MacBook Air M2 is the ideal MacBook for most people, packing the best performance you can get for the price into a slim, modern design with lots of practical upgrades over the previous generation.

    The new MacBook Air M2 offers some of the best laptop performance within a slick, practical design for a reasonable price, making it the best overall MacBook for most people.

    A bold refresh from the long-standing Air design we last saw in 2020, the latest MacBook Air mixes things up with more uniform edges, larger physical function keys and a more seamless display that lets you see more at once (as long as you’re cool with a notch). It’s basically a miniature version of the excellent 14-inch MacBook Pro chassis, but without the added power and ports that serious creatives might need. It also remains true to its namesake, with a 2.7-pound, 11.3mm thin design that’s a breeze to pick up and take to work.

    The MacBook Air’s shaved-down bezels give the display itself a noticeable bump in real estate (13.6 versus 13.3 inches), and images and videos pop a bit more, thanks to the jump from Apple’s Retina to its Liquid Retina technology. And the Magic Keyboard feels as great as it does on any modern MacBook, with enough travel and feedback to keep us typing away comfortably for hours on end.

    Old-school Mac fans will be happy to see the return of the MagSafe charger, which attaches and detaches with a quick magnetic snap to make charging a little easier — and prevent your MacBook Air from hitting the ground if someone trips over the charging cable. The MagSafe connection also keeps the Air’s Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports free for accessories, which is good considering you get only two.

    MacBook Air M2 review 1

    The MacBook Air M2 offers a wealth of smaller quality-of-life upgrades over its predecessor, including a sharper 1080p webcam and a richer quad-speaker system. But for many folks, the real selling point will be the performance.

    The Apple M2 processor that powers the latest Air delivered some of the best speeds we’ve ever tested on a laptop. On top of handling our usual workload (including video calls, messaging apps and countless Chrome tabs) and some light music production without a hiccup, the MacBook Air M2 toppled virtually all competitors on our benchmarks. Apple’s latest laptop produced the highest single-core result we’ve ever gotten from Geekbench 5, and came very close to the pricier MacBook Pro M2 on the multi-core and graphics tests. It also performed about 16% better than the MacBook Air M1 on general performance tests. The M2 Air can even handle some light gaming, though it ran a bit hot and produced some relatively low frame rates when trying to run demanding titles like Shadow of the Tomb Raider at higher settings. Still, when it comes to everyday productivity — and some light creative work — this is a machine you can rely on.

    The MacBook Air M2 delivered fairly strong battery life in day-to-day use, often going an entire day before needing a recharge. That said, it drained in a pretty quick five hours and 21 minutes during our more demanding 4K video playback test, falling behind the MacBook Pro M2 by roughly 45 minutes. If you plan on doing anything beyond light web surfing and emailing, you’ll want to keep the charger handy.

    The new MacBook Air’s improved design and performance does come at the expense of a higher base price: $1,199, a whole $200 more than the MacBook Air M1. We’d recommend going with the 512GB storage configuration (a 256GB solid-state drive will fill up fast), which bumps the machine up to $1,499. You may also want to consider upgrading to 16GB of memory for serious multitasking and general future-proofing, which would bring the total cost to $1,699. But even with those added expenses, we think the MacBook Air M2 is worth the investment for those upgrading for the first time in a while — or getting their first MacBook.

    The best budget MacBook

    If you’re looking to spend less than $1,000 on a MacBook, the older MacBook Air M1 remains a great option. You’ll be sacrificing the newer model’s larger screen, better webcam and useful MagSafe charger, but you’ll still be getting a sleek and powerful laptop that’s faster than virtually anything at this price.

    The upgrade pick

    If you’re a creative professional or a hardcore power user, or you simply feel like splurging on the best that Apple has to offer, the 14-inch MacBook Pro is the laptop to get. It’s an especially great upgrade for first-time Pro buyers, or anyone coming from an old Intel model.

    Display

    13.6-inch, 2560 x 1664 Liquid Retina display

    13.3-inch, 2560 x 1600 Retina display

    14.2-inch, 3024 x 1964 Liquid Retina XDR display

    Processor

    Apple M2

    Apple M1

    Apple M2 Pro / M2 Max

    Memory

    8GB / 16GB / 24GB

    8GB / 16GB

    16GB / 32GB / 64GB / 96GB

    Storage

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB SSD

    512GB / 1TB / 2TB / 4TB / 8TB SSD

    Camera

    1080p FaceTime HD camera

    720p FaceTime HD camera

    1080p FaceTime HD camera

    Ports

    Thunderbolt 4 (2), MagSafe charging port, headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (2), headphone jack

    Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (3), SDXC card slot, HDMI port, headphone jack, MagSafe charging port

    Battery life (rated)

    Up to 18 hours

    Up to 18 hours

    Up to 18 hours

    Size and weight

    11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches, 2.7 pounds

    11.97 x 8.36 x 0.16-0.63 inches, 2.8 pounds

    12.31 x 8.71 x 0.61 inches, 3.5 pounds

    Color options

    Silver, Space Gray, Midnight, Starlight

    Silver, Space Gray, Gold

    Silver, Space Gray

    Price

    $1,199



    $999



    $1,999

    Once we had all the models on hand, we began the unboxing process and charging them up to 100%. (Many laptops come with some power out of the box, but very rarely do they ship topped up.)

    As with every CNN Underscored review, we rigorously test devices both quantitatively and qualitatively. For laptops, we made the decision to benchmark first to get a standard for quantitative performance. If you’ve read our standalone laptop, tablet or mobile phone reviews, these tests will be familiar.

    We performed GeekBench 5 tests. These run the laptops through a series of workflows and application processes, many of which you’d find yourselves (and we found ourselves) completing on a daily basis. We also run the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark, which runs the demanding computer game at 1080p with all settings cranked up to see how well a system can handle gaming and graphically intensive tasks.

    Regardless of operating system, we put each laptop through our standard battery test, which involves charging the laptop to 100%, setting brightness to 50% and engaging airplane mode to ensure connectivity is off. We then loop a 4K video file with the sound set to 15% until the battery dies and the machine turns off. These tests are monitored in person as well as via two cameras to ensure accuracy.
    The combination of battery and benchmark testing gives us a quantitative feel for the devices and a hard number for each that can be used for comparisons. We then used each laptop as our daily driver for work, play and entertainment tasks, testing the battery to see if it could last through a full day of tasks, watching a movie to get a feel for the display and, of course, running a bunch of different applications.

    The MacBook Pro M2 offers some of the fastest performance of any laptop we’ve tested, but its design is frustratingly dated. You still get an older Retina display with thick bezels, a 720p webcam and the Touch Bar, which we don’t find nearly as useful as a good set of physical function keys. Unless you specifically want a machine with an internal fan for especially grueling tasks, the cheaper MacBook Air M2 offers virtually the same level of performance — plus a more modern chassis — for a lower price.

    The 16-inch MacBook Pro has everything we love about our upgrade pick in the 14-inch model, just with a larger screen and a few more configuration options for really maxing out the processor. It’s a great choice if those two things matter to you (and if you have the cash to spare), but we think the 14-inch MacBook Pro’s lower starting price and more portable design make it the better pick for most power users.

    Now, with the M1 Macs fully available, the performance of these models are a bit dated. If you’re in the market right now, we’d suggest an M1 MacBook Air for most people. That said, if you see a good deal on the Intel 13-inch, it could be worth the plunge.

    The 16-inch MacBook Pro from 2019 was previously our video editing and creative laptop of choice, thanks to its strong performance and connectivity options. However, it’s since been phased out by the 2021 16-inch model, which offers far more ports, a more advanced Liquid Retina XDR display and significantly better performance, thanks to your choice of Apple’s M1 Pro and M1 Max chips.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The EarFun Air Pro 3 are the best sub-$80 earbuds I’ve ever used | CNN Underscored

    The EarFun Air Pro 3 are the best sub-$80 earbuds I’ve ever used | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    When you realize exactly what the EarFun Air Pro 3 have to offer, you might think the $80 price tag is a typo. These earbuds come bearing great audio quality, a robust app with tons of customization options and active noise cancellation that rivals sets that cost triple the price. They’re yet another winner from the folks behind our favorite affordable earbuds, and I’m not quite sure how EarFun continues to get away with offering so much for so little.

    That said, the Pro 3 aren’t the sleekest buds around, and their affordable price does come with some compromises in regards to build quality and controls. But those were all minor drawbacks to a mostly blissful few weeks of listening to music, catching up on podcasts and making phone calls for hours on end while silencing all of the noise around me. Here’s why I think the EarFun Air Pro 3 are the best $80 earbuds you can buy.

    The $80 earbuds to get

    If you’re looking to spend less than $80 on your next pair of earbuds — without sacrificing high-end features like ANC and sound customization — the EarFun Air Pro 3 are the ones to get.

    Great comfort and impressive sound

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 1

    I’ve been using the EarFun Air Pro 3 in place of my usual AirPods Pro 2 for several weeks now, and I occasionally forget I even made the switch. That’s how great these buds feel and sound.

    The Air Pro 3 feature the same kind of soft silicone tips you’ll find on more expensive rivals from Apple and Samsung. They’ve felt secure and comfy from the moment I first popped them in, and while they’re not quite as lightweight as my AirPods Pro, it was still easy to forget I was wearing them throughout long hours of working, walking and commuting. You even get a total of four swappable eartips (large, medium, small and extra small) — that’s on par with the latest AirPods Pro, and more than the three sets that most big-name earbuds offer.

    EarFun’s latest buds also sound fantastic, holding up equally well for my usual mix of loud punk and sad, slow indie rock. I could easily pick out each of boygenius’ three vocalists as their  voices swirled together during the emotional “Emily I’m Sorry,” and enjoyed plenty of bouncy bass and crisp guitars when jamming Paramore’s “This Is Why.” There was a noticeable boost in clarity and stereo separation when I went back to my AirPods Pro, but EarFun’s buds come admirably close for something that costs a fraction of their price.

    I used the Air Pro 3 for hours’ worth of phone calls, and never got any complaints about the quality of my voice. The recordings I captured with EarFun’s buds did have a bit of fuzz to them, but they were perfectly audible — and not too far behind the AirPods Pro 2 in terms of clarity.

    Good active noise cancellation and tons of features

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 4

    It’s commendable enough that the EarFun Air Pro 3 even have active noise cancellation and ambient sound, two perks that aren’t very common on earbuds that cost less than $80. It’s even more impressive that these features work extremely well.

    The Air Pro 3’s active noise cancellation helped keep me focused while at home and immersed in my music on the go, significantly dampening the sounds of construction and chatty subway cars while also quieting my dog’s ever-unnerving licking noises. And when I needed to pay attention to my surroundings, the buds’ ambient sound functionality did a similarly good job keeping me aware of nearby people and cars while out for walks. The Air Pro 3 performed nearly identically to my AirPods Pro 2 when it came to blocking out noise — if anything, EarFun’s buds were a little more suppressive against a noisy bedroom fan. The Pro 3’s ambient noise also held up well to Apple’s Transparency mode, though the sound of the wind became more unpleasantly harsh when it brushed up against EarFun’s buds than it did with the AirPods.

    You’ll also get a surprising amount of customization and features for the price, with a full-featured EarFun Audio app for iOS and Android that lets you tweak everything from the sound to the controls. On top of giving you an easy way to glance at your buds’ battery life and switch between noise control modes, the app offers a full equalizer where you can activate pre-set profiles (like Bass Boost and Treble Reducer) or create and save your own. I personally prefer how the Air Pro 3 sound out of the box, but the various presets did have a noticeable effect, and are a nice extra for folks who like to tinker — something you can’t do on Apple’s earbuds.

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 3

    I was shocked to discover that the Air Pro 3’s controls are fully customizable, a feature you won’t find on some buds that cost twice as much. I didn’t love that the earbuds required me to double-tap to pause my music by default, but the app made it easy for me to switch to a much more convenient single tap. You can create custom commands for single, double, triple taps and even long-presses, allowing you to assign out functions like skipping tracks and summoning your virtual assistant however you like. While I definitely miss the more tactile pinch controls and handy volume slider on my AirPods Pro 2, I found the Air Pro 3’s controls to be mostly reliable once I configured them the way I liked (more on that later).

    There’s a Game Mode that’s designed to reduce audio latency while you’re gaming, which feels like a gimmick you can probably ignore. I didn’t notice a real change when playing Vampire Survivors with and without the feature on, though it’s possible that serious Call of Duty or PUBG players may benefit from the purported boost. I was a bit amused that the Product Tutorial button takes you to a Google Doc of the instruction manual rather than providing tips directly within the app, but I still appreciate that there’s quick access to help.

    The Air Pro 3 can even stay connected to two devices at once, something that made it easy to go from watching a YouTube video on my laptop to playing a song on my phone without any annoying re-pairing. This kind of multi-point connectivity isn’t very common on cheap earbuds, and while Apple has its own instant-switching technology when using your AirPods across iPhones, iPads and Macs, they technically can only be paired to one device at a time.

    Long battery life and wireless charging

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 5

    I’ve always found EarFun’s buds to be some of the longest lasting around — at any price range — and that continues to be the case with the Air Pro 3. I typically enjoyed three to four straight days of heavy use before even getting a low battery warning, something that’s consistent with the earbuds’ rating of nine hours from the buds alone and 45 total hours with the charging case. That’s a big leap from the AirPods Pro 2’s rating (6 hours from the buds, 30 from the case), and lines up with my testing; I typically have to recharge my AirPods as frequently as every two to three days.

    And unlike many affordable earbuds (and even some expensive ones), the EarFun Air Pro 3’s case supports wireless charging. That gives them a big advantage over the similarly priced Jabra Elite 3 and Pixel Buds A, and the second-gen AirPods that go for a much pricier $129.

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 7

    While the EarFun Air Pro 3 punch well above their weight in terms of sound quality and features, they still look and feel like a pair of budget earbuds. I found the Pro 3’s thick, long stems to stick out quite a bit, and while they may be smaller and sleeker than last year’s Air Pro 2, I found myself yearning for the more low-profile look of my AirPods Pro and Jabra Elite 3.

    The same goes for the bulky charging case, which feels flimsy, takes up more pocket space than most of my other earbuds, and accumulated quite a few scuffs and scratches after a few days on the road. This level of build quality is common among the budget buds I’ve tested, but it is worth noting that the Air Pro 3’s excellent, affordable audio comes at the expense of its aesthetics.

    earfun air pro 3 review cnnu 8

    While I commend how robust and customizable the Air Pro 3’s touch controls are, they aren’t as consistent as I’d like. EarFun’s buds generally responded well to my various taps, double-taps and long presses, but there were times when they were overly sensitive, leading me to skip a song that I simply meant to pause. I also noticed a slight delay between tapping the buds and getting a response from them. It’s far from a dealbreaker (especially at this price), but the similarly cheap Jabra Elite 3 have much more reliable physical buttons, and the base AirPods are more accurate when it comes to responding to touch.

    Also, it’s a small nitpick, but I hate that the Air Pro 3 don’t automatically pause my music when I take them out of my ears (it won’t happen until they’re closed in the case). This is something that the AirPods and most modern earbuds are smart enough to do these days, and led to multiple instances of music and podcasts continuing to play when I didn’t want them to.

    Active noise cancellation

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Ambient sound

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Battery life (rated)

    9 hours (earbuds), 45 hours (with case)

    7 hours (earbuds), 28 hours (with case)

    6 hours (earbuds), 30 hours (with case)

    Wireless charging

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Water resistance

    IPX5

    IP55

    IPX4 (earbuds and case)

    Ear tip sizes

    XS, S, M, L

    S, M, L

    XS, S, M, L

    Software support

    iOS, Android

    iOS, Android

    iOS

    Colors

    Black

    Lilac, Gray, Light Beige, Navy Blue

    White

    Weight

    0.18 ounces

    0.16 ounces

    0.19 ounces

    Price

    $72



    $80



    $200

    The EarFun Air Pro 3 are the best low-cost earbuds I’ve ever used. They sound great, offer active noise cancellation that rivals the AirPods Pro and deliver a staggering amount of features — some of which you won’t even find on much more expensive models. If you’re looking to spend no more than $80 on your next wireless earbuds, the Air Pro 3 are the ones to get.

    That said, there are some worthy alternatives to consider in this price range. The $80 Jabra Elite 3 have a much sleeker design and more reliable physical controls, but you’ll be sacrificing active noise cancellation for those perks. And if your budget is firmly under $50, the standard EarFun Air remain our overall best budget earbuds pick. Apple aficionados will have a smoother experience with the oft-discounted AirPods 2nd Gen, but again, you’ll be giving up noise cancellation as well as tons of customizability. The fact that the Air Pro 3 comfortably replaced my AirPods Pro 2 for weeks speaks volumes, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find a better overall value than what EarFun is offering here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple’s new HomePod is cheaper and better than before | CNN Underscored

    Apple’s new HomePod is cheaper and better than before | CNN Underscored

    [ad_1]

    Once upon a time, Apple made a pretty great wireless smart speaker called the HomePod. A midsize speaker that plugged into the wall, it delivered better sound than most smart speakers and looked more elegant, too.

    Then Apple decided to stop making the HomePod and focused on the HomePod Mini, its smaller sibling. And now, for whatever reason, the company has decided to make the midsize HomePod again. It’s a welcome reversal.

    The new HomePod looks a lot like the old one. It does a few new things. And — shockingly — it costs $50 less. Should you get one? That depends on how into the Apple ecosystem you are. If you don’t own an iPhone or iPad, don’t bother. For everyone else, here’s what we think after nearly a week of testing Apple’s new smart speaker.

    A better Siri speaker

    The second-gen HomePod is a great pick for Apple users who don’t already own the previous model, offering lots of smarts and room-filling sound for a good price. The new version updates support for smart home devices, includes new sensors and features, and costs less than the original.

    HomePod 2nd-gen versus 1st-gen

    At first glance, it’s hard to see much difference between the new HomePod and the one Apple discontinued in 2021. The new one is a little smaller and has a few design differences, but otherwise looks very similar.

    Inside, the second-generation HomePod has fewer drivers than the first-generation model — five on the new one versus seven on the original — and yet it actually improves on the overall sound. The new HomePod has a better balance of bass, treble and midrange tones; the original HomePod was very bass-heavy.

    That makes for a pleasing listening experience. The bossa nova rhythms on Steve Lacy’s “Mercury” were resonant but didn’t overwhelm the vocals; when listening to Jon Batiste’s “Freedom,” the bass thumped powerfully, while the horns were warm and realistic.

    Its design allows for sound to project 360 degrees, and it features room correction software that will adjust the audio to sound best in the space you put it in.

    In a head-to-head comparison with the original HomePod, the first-generation model sounded muddy and less vibrant. There’s no comparison between the HomePod Mini and the HomePod; the larger speaker sounds much bigger and better.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 2

    The second-generation model adds support for Matter, the new smart home standard. That means you can use it as a hub for controlling non-Apple devices and it should be ready for new smart products as they arrive. Matter is open-source and meant to promote interoperability; compatible devices work with Alexa and Google Assistant as well as Siri. I was able to use Siri to turn on an Eve Energy smart plug that uses the Thread standard, which will be upgraded to support Matter.

    The speaker also includes temperature and humidity sensors, which can be used to trigger actions based on conditions in your house, such as adjusting a smart thermostat.

    And, if you double down on your HomePod purchase, you can create a left-right stereo pair. The sound improvement is significant when you use two speakers — it creates a very wide sound, and, if you’re listening to audio mixed for Dolby Atmos, makes the music feel like it’s all around you. (Unfortunately, you can’t create a stereo pair with a first-generation and second-generation speaker.)

    One more small change: The power cord is detachable — something that neither the original HomePod or HomePod Mini offered.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 6

    In a very un-2023 move, the HomePod’s price dropped from $349 to $299. A big criticism of the original HomePod was its price. While $299 isn’t cheap, it makes it more competitive with options such as the $219 Sonos One.

    I found that I liked the HomePod’s overall sound better than the Sonos One, as well as the Sonos Move, an excellent-sounding speaker that costs $399. The Move has the advantage of being portable, though.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 4

    You need an iPhone or iPad to set up the HomePod — there’s no way around that requirement. And to get software updates, you need to use the Home app. The Home app is also where you can adjust Siri’s settings on the HomePod, set up automations and create a stereo pair with another second-generation HomePod. So if you don’t own an iPhone or iPad, skip the HomePod.

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 5

    The only way to connect to the HomePod is over Wi-Fi. There’s no Bluetooth option and it lacks an auxiliary input. An auxiliary input would be especially welcome when using two HomePods as a stereo pair; that setup begs to have a turntable connected to it.

    The good thing about using Wi-Fi is that the audio quality is higher than you’d get over Bluetooth, but more input options would increase the usefulness of the speaker.

    You also can’t do much to adjust the sound. While it has room correction software, it doesn’t have an EQ. The only option you have is to reduce bass (you’ll find this in the Home app).

    apple homepod 2nd gen review cnnu 8

    Siri works just fine most of the time for typical smart speaker commands like asking it to play songs, adjust the volume or set a timer. But it did struggle sometimes to act on my requests, and it doesn’t quite have the range of Alexa or Google Assistant. For example, you can get Siri to play music from some services other than Apple Music, such as Pandora and Deezer, but Spotify isn’t one of them. (Siri can control Spotify on the iPhone, but Spotify hasn’t enabled that feature on the HomePod.)

    Size and weight

    6.6 x 5.6 inches, 5.16 pounds

    3.9 x 3.3 inches, 0.76 pounds

    6.36 x 4.9 inches, 4.08 pounds

    Drivers

    Five tweeters, 4-inch woofer

    Dual radiators, full-ranger driver

    Two digital amplifiers, one tweeter, one midwoofer

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Wi-Fi, AirPlay

    Colors

    White, Midnight

    Space Gray, blue, white, yellow, orange

    White, black

    Smart assistant options

    Siri

    Siri

    Alexa, Google Assistant, Sonos Voice Control

    Price

    $299



    $99



    $219

    As a satisfied owner of the first-generation HomePod, I didn’t see anything in the specs or appearance of the new one that would make me want to upgrade. But the second-generation HomePod makes a strong case. It sounds better, has more features and costs less than the original.

    It isn’t for everyone. If you don’t have an iPhone or iPad, or you mainly use Spotify, you’re better off with a Sonos One or Move. And the HomePod isn’t portable, which may limit its appeal to you.

    But if those things don’t put you off, the HomePod will make Siri more useful to you and brings better sound to your home. Which makes you wonder why Apple stopped making it in the first place — a decision I’m glad it corrected.

    [ad_2]

    Source link