[ad_1]
[ad_2]Source link
[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
[ad_1]
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday that the suggested legal recognition of Russian sovereignty over captured territory in the east of his country remained a “main problem” in negotiations as President Trump pushes for a deal to end Moscow’s nearly-four-year war on Ukraine.
Ukrainian and American officials met over the weekend in Switzerland to discuss a 28-point proposal floated last week by the White House. They discussed the possibility of Zelenskyy visiting the U.S. this week as part of Mr. Trump’s bid to get an agreement by Thanksgiving, CBS News’ Margaret Brennan reported, citing multiple U.S. and Ukrainian officials familiar with the discussions.
Mr. Trump has described the Thanksgiving deadline as flexible, and he told reporters Saturday that the plan presented last week was “not my final” proposal.
www.president.gov.ua
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was in Geneva for the weekend talks, said “very, very meaningful” progress was made with the Ukrainian and European delegations, but that “there’s still some work left to do and that’s what our teams are going to be doing right now.”
Addressing Sweden’s parliament on Monday, Zelenskyy made it clear one of the key points of contention over the U.S. proposal was a call for Ukraine and the global community to formally recognize some portion of the ground Russian forces have occupied by force as no longer Ukrainian.
“Putin wants legal recognition to what he has stolen, to break the principle of territorial integrity and sovereignty,” Zelenskyy said. “That’s the main problem. You all understand what that means.”
Finland’s President Alexander Stubb said there were still “major issues which remain to be resolved” regarding the U.S. peace proposal, though he also welcomed progress made during the high-stakes talks in Geneva.
Rubio struck a more optimistic tone in describing the weekend talks, saying Sunday that the session in Geneval was “probably the most productive day we have had on this issue” since President Trump came back into office for his second term in January.
Ukrainian State Emergency Service
Rubio stressed that there was more work to do and said he didn’t want to “declare victory or finality.”
The top U.S. diplomat was pressed by reporters but would not offer any insight into which issues were the main sticking points in the peace talks. He called the proposal a “living, breathing document” and said he believed the issues that remained unsettled were “not insurmountable.”
The White House said in a statement Sunday night that U.S. and Ukrainian officials “drafted an updated and refined peace framework” following their discussions, but Russia’s government said Monday that the revisions had not been shared, and that it would reserve judgement.
Putin said Friday that the U.S. proposal could serve as the basis of a negotiated resolution to what his government has refused to acknowledge as a war, but he warned that if Ukraine turned down the plan, Russian forces would remain on the attack, seizing yet more ground.
“We are, of course, closely monitoring the media reports that have been pouring in from Geneva over the past few days,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday, “but we have not yet received anything official.”
“We read a statement that, following the discussions in Geneva, some amendments had been made to the text which we had seen earlier. We will wait. It seems that the dialogue is continuing,” he said, adding that there were no plans for a meeting this week between Russian and U.S. officials on the topic, but that Moscow remained open to dialogue.
The 28-point plan, which U.S. officials said last week had Mr. Trump’s backing, sparked alarm among America’s European allies for being perceived as too favorable to Russia.
Ukraine’s Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, told CBS News’ “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sunday that her country had not agreed to all of the terms in the draft plan, which was leaked to media outlets last week.
“This plan is not about justice and the truth of this war and the aggression,” Stefanishyna said. “It’s about, you know, ending the war and stopping the military engagement.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
WASHINGTON—It started with an October order from President Trump to his national security team: Come up with a plan to end the Ukraine war just as they had halted the fighting in Gaza.
On a flight back from the Middle East, in the afterglow of brokering a deal between Israel and Hamas, envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner began writing the first draft of what would eventually become a 28-point peace framework to end the four-year war, according to U.S. officials and a person familiar with the situation.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
Robbie Gramer
Source link
[ad_1]
(Reuters) -Russian drones swarmed on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early on Tuesday, striking at least one residential building, officials said.
Mayor Vitali Klitschko, writing on the Telegram messaging app, said a building had been hit in the Pechersk district in the city centre.
Pictures posted on unofficial channels showed parts of a building ablaze.
Klitschko also reported disruptions to the city’s power and water supplies.
(Reporting by Ron Popeski; Editing by Himani Sarkar)
Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.
[ad_2]
Reuters
Source link
[ad_1]
President Trump on Monday touted “big progress” on talks to end the Ukraine war, and Kyiv is doubtless willing to make painful concessions to avoid surrender or U.S. abandonment. No one wants the war to end more than the Ukrainians who are fighting and dying.
But the crucial issue continues to be what kind of peace? So it’s worth describing the conditions that would create a peace with honor in Ukraine and deter a new war whenever Vladimir Putin chooses to invade again.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday described the U.S. peace offer as a “living, breathing document,” and we welcome the red pen to the original 28-point plan that bent hard toward Vladimir Putin. That document would leave a neutered Ukraine that is banned from associating with Western security institutions and vulnerable to a new invasion.
The overriding goal of any peace is letting Ukraine survive as an independent nation that can determine its own future. If its people want to align with Russia, so be it. But every indication is that they want to align with the West, including the European Union and NATO.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
The Editorial Board
Source link
[ad_1]
President Donald Trump presented Ukraine with a “peace deal” on Nov. 21, 2025, which frankly reads more like a surrender plan. But when President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed concerns about the terms, he decided to bully him online.
Trump’s 28-point peace plan has put Ukraine in a sensitive position. Accepting the plan would mean ceding its eastern territories to Russia, capsizing its postwar troops, and abandoning its NATO dreams. On top of it, Trump has threatened that if they refuse the plan, they’re practically on their own. He also wants the Ukrainian leadership to accept the plan by Thanksgiving, i.e., Nov. 27. Failing to do so also invites threats from Russia to continue their offense.
So, it’s Trump’s bullying on the one hand, and Russia’s threat to push on with its offensive on the other. In a speech on Friday, Nov. 21, Zelenskyy called it “one of the most difficult moments in our history.” He explained that the nation is being forced to choose between “loss of dignity” or “losing a key partner.” He also feared that if the war didn’t end now, Ukraine would have to face “an extremely difficult winter.” (via NY Times)
For the sake of his country’s sovereignty, Zelenskyy announced that he would “offer alternatives” to Trump’s 28-point plan. But Trump isn’t having any of it. On Saturday, he asserted that Zelenskyy will “have to like” his proposed plan. If that doesn’t sound like a threat in itself, he continued, “If he doesn’t like it, then you know, they should just keep fighting.”
The words don’t echo like something out of an empathetic leader’s mouth. Trump added that “at some point he’s going to have to accept something.” However, he offered some relief to Kyiv, saying it’s not his final offer, and there’s some room for negotiation. Trump keeps giving mixed signals to Ukraine, but the nation doesn’t have enough time to play around with it.
Then, on Nov. 23, Trump took to his Truth Social to badmouth the Ukrainian leadership and the former U.S. government under Joe Biden. “The War between Russia and Ukraine is a violent and terrible one that, with strong and proper U.S. and Ukrainian LEADERSHIP, would have NEVER HAPPENED,” he wrote. He went on to claim that if he had won the 2020 elections, “there would be no Ukraine/Russia War.”
Patting his own back, he said that “Putin would never have attacked” during his term. He substantiated this claim by asserting that there was “not even a mention” of the war during his first term. “It was only when he saw Sleepy Joe in action that he said, Now is my chance,”” the president wrote. He then diverted his attack to Ukraine, claiming that “UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS.”
Naturally, no part of Trump’s long rant is true. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine began way before even Trump’s first term. In Feb. 2014, Moscow first launched military operations leading to the annexation of Crimea, followed by a seizure of Donetsk and Luhansk. (via Britannica) So, Russia’s intent to attack Ukraine has been clear before Trump took office in 2017.
President Zelenskyy has time and again expressed his thanks to the U.S. for its military and intelligence aid. Yet, after the Sunday attack, the president again reiterated his gratitude. On X, he wrote:
“Ukraine is grateful to the United States, to every American heart, and personally to President Trump for the assistance that – starting with the Javelins – has been saving Ukrainian lives. We thank everyone in Europe, in the G7, and in the G20, who is helping us defend life. It is important to preserve the support.”
Then on Sunday, during talks in Geneva, the U.S. and Ukraine reportedly discussed a new version of the 28-point deal. In the counter-plan suggested by Ukrainian officials, they refused to cede the Donbas region to Russia. Instead, Ukraine insists that “negotiations on territorial swaps will start from the Line of Contact” after the war ends.
For now, a joint statement from the U.S. and Ukraine claimed that the talks were “constructive, focused, and respectful.” But Russia is yet to respond to the counter-plan.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Kopal
Source link
[ad_1]
In an unusual diplomatic move, Chinese leader Xi Jinping initiated a phone call with President Trump on Monday, discussing Taiwan and Ukraine as Washington, Kyiv and Moscow try to hammer out a plan to end the war.
China has provided crucial diplomatic and economic support to Russia since its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Now as Trump pushes to make a decisive move to end the war, Beijing is seeking to play a more visible role.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2] Lingling Wei[ad_1]
Diplomats from the U.S., Ukraine and Europe are thrashing out changes to a Trump-backed plan to end the war between Moscow and Kyiv, a proposal that critics said was too skewed in Russia’s favor in its first iteration.
Washington expressed optimism about the modifications during what it called “constructive talks” over the weekend.
Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
[ad_2]
Laurence Norman
Source link
[ad_1]
President Trump originally gave Ukraine until Thursday to accept their peace proposal, but overnight Rubio downplayed that deadline after meeting with Ukrainian officials over the weekend, noting he is optimistic with the progress made. It is probably the most productive day we have had on this issue. Maybe in the entirety of our engagement, but certainly in *** very long time. Rubio did not go into detail there. The peace proposal drafted by the US to end the Russia-Ukraine war has sparked concern for both Democrats and some Republicans and also for Kiev. The original plan gives in to many Russian demands that Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelinsky has rejected on multiple occasions, including giving up large pieces of territory. On Sunday night, the White House. Put out *** statement noting the Ukrainian delegation affirmed that all of their principal concerns like security guarantees, long-term economic development, political sovereignty were addressed during the meeting. In *** video statement, Zelinsky said diplomacy has been activated. Rubio called this peace proposal *** living breathing document that could change and made it clear that any final product will have to be presented to Moscow. In Washington, I’m Rachel Herzheimer.
Trump officials express optimism after meeting with Ukraine to end Russia’s war
Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed optimism after meeting with Ukrainian leaders to discuss the Trump administration’s peace plan, despite concerns over the proposal’s concessions to Russia.
Updated: 4:08 AM PST Nov 24, 2025
Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Ukrainian leaders in Europe to address concerns in the Trump administration’s peace plan to end the nearly four-year war between Russia and Ukraine, which has drawn criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans, as well as Kyiv.President Donald Trump initially set a deadline for Ukraine to accept his peace proposal by Thursday, but Rubio downplayed this deadline after meeting with Ukrainian officials over the weekend.”It is probably the most productive day we have had on this issue, maybe in the entirety of our engagement, but certainly in a very long time,” Rubio said.The peace proposal drafted by the U.S. has sparked concern due to its concessions to Russian demands, which Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has rejected multiple times, including the surrender of large pieces of territory. On Sunday night, the White House released a statement that says in part, “The Ukrainian delegation affirmed that all of their principal concerns—security guarantees, long-term economic development, infrastructure protection, freedom of navigation, and political sovereignty—were thoroughly addressed during the meeting.”In a video statement, Zelenskyy said, “Diplomacy has been reinvigorated.”Over the weekend, a group of bipartisan U.S. Senators said Rubio told them on Saturday that the plan had originated with Russia and that it was actually a “wish list” for Moscow rather than a serious push for peace.A State Department spokesperson said that was “blatantly false.” Rubio suggested online that the senators were mistaken, even though they said he was their source of information.”It rewards aggression. This is pure and simple. There’s no ethical, legal, moral, political justification for Russia claiming eastern Ukraine,” Independent Maine Sen. Angus King said of Trump’s proposal.”We should not do anything that makes (Putin) feel like he has a win here,” said Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina. Rubio described the peace proposal as a “living, breathing document” that would continue to evolve and emphasized that any final agreement would need to be presented to Moscow.Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Ukrainian leaders in Europe to address concerns in the Trump administration’s peace plan to end the nearly four-year war between Russia and Ukraine, which has drawn criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans, as well as Kyiv.
President Donald Trump initially set a deadline for Ukraine to accept his peace proposal by Thursday, but Rubio downplayed this deadline after meeting with Ukrainian officials over the weekend.
“It is probably the most productive day we have had on this issue, maybe in the entirety of our engagement, but certainly in a very long time,” Rubio said.
The peace proposal drafted by the U.S. has sparked concern due to its concessions to Russian demands, which Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has rejected multiple times, including the surrender of large pieces of territory.
On Sunday night, the White House released a statement that says in part, “The Ukrainian delegation affirmed that all of their principal concerns—security guarantees, long-term economic development, infrastructure protection, freedom of navigation, and political sovereignty—were thoroughly addressed during the meeting.”
In a video statement, Zelenskyy said, “Diplomacy has been reinvigorated.”
Over the weekend, a group of bipartisan U.S. Senators said Rubio told them on Saturday that the plan had originated with Russia and that it was actually a “wish list” for Moscow rather than a serious push for peace.
A State Department spokesperson said that was “blatantly false.”
Rubio suggested online that the senators were mistaken, even though they said he was their source of information.
“It rewards aggression. This is pure and simple. There’s no ethical, legal, moral, political justification for Russia claiming eastern Ukraine,” Independent Maine Sen. Angus King said of Trump’s proposal.
“We should not do anything that makes (Putin) feel like he has a win here,” said Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
Rubio described the peace proposal as a “living, breathing document” that would continue to evolve and emphasized that any final agreement would need to be presented to Moscow.
Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -A united and coordinated European Union position is key to ensuring a “good outcome” from talks on ending the war in Ukraine, European Council President Antonio Costa said on Monday after speaking to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
“Spoke with Zelenskiy ahead of this morning’s informal EU leaders’ meeting on Ukraine peace efforts, to get his assessment of the situation. A united and coordinated EU position is key in ensuring a good outcome of peace negotiations – for Ukraine and for Europe,” Costa wrote on X.
(Reporting by Sudip Kar-Gupta, Editing by Timothy Heritage)
Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.
[ad_2]
Reuters
Source link
[ad_1]
(Reuters) -Two young street musicians who were jailed for more than a month in Russia for singing anti-Kremlin songs have left the country after being released from detention, according to Russian media reports.
Vocalist Diana Loginova, 18, and guitarist Alexander Orlov, 22, were detained on October 15 in central St Petersburg after an impromptu street performance by their band Stoptime of the popular song “Swan Lake Cooperative” by exiled Russian rapper Noize MC – a vocal Kremlin critic – went viral on Russian social media. Stoptime’s drummer, Vladislav Leontyev, was also arrested.
Citing sources, St Petersburg newspaper Fontanka reported that Loginova left Russia after being released from custody on Sunday. Another source told the Kommersant daily both Loginova and Orlov were now outside the country. Neither outlet said where they are now.
Orlov and Loginova’s lawyer, Maria Zyryanova, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Loginova could not immediately be reached for comment.
The case against the musical trio garnered significant media attention in Russia, where public expressions of dissent are rare. Authorities have cracked down on any opposition to the Kremlin since Russia went to war in Ukraine in February 2022.
Singers who are critical of the authorities have fled the country and are cast as traitors by pro-Kremlin politicians. Many have been designated as “foreign agents”, a label which has Soviet-era connotations of espionage.
The Stoptime trio have cycled in and out of Russian courts since their initial arrest in October, serving short jail stints for minor violations such as blocking access to the metro and petty hooliganism.
Loginova, a student at a music college, was also found guilty of “discrediting” the Russian army and fined 30,000 roubles ($379) for singing another anti-Kremlin song.
Rights groups refer to such arrests as “carousel arrests” – multiple busts for minor offences, with suspects being detained anew each time they are released.
Loginova and Orlov left detention on Sunday after finishing their most recent sentence, St Petersburg media outlets reported. The two got engaged during their cycle of incarceration, they told reporters in October.
Drummer Leontyev also served multiple short sentences and was released earlier this month.
Amnesty International had called for the musicians’ release, saying “their only ‘crime’ is singing songs that challenge the suffocating official narrative.”
Loginova’s mother Irina previously told reporters that she thought her daughter and her bandmates had done nothing wrong and did not know why their concerts had attracted so much attention from the authorities and the media.
(Reporting by Lucy Papachristou; editing by Mark Trevelyan)
Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.
[ad_2]
Reuters
Source link
[ad_1]
First, Ukrainian survivors recount deadly bus attack. Then, Montana’s fight to block public land sales. And, a look at the rooms left behind after school shootings.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
BEIJING (Reuters) -China’s Premier Li Qiang pitched closer collaboration to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in new energy, smart manufacturing, biomedicine and intelligent driving during a meeting on Sunday on the sidelines of the G20 summit, Xinhua reported.
Relations between the world’s second- and third-largest economies have improved significantly over the past month, after Chinese export curbs on chips and rare earths caused major disruptions for German firms and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul to cancel a visit to Beijing last month due to China rejecting all but one of his meetings.
German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil made the first official visit of Merz’s premiership last week, stabilising ties by meeting China’s top economic official Vice Premier He Lifeng, as U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs weigh on the two major exporters.
Merz is also expected to visit China soon.
Li said he “hoped Germany would maintain a rational and pragmatic policy toward China, eliminate interference and pressure, focus on shared interests, and consolidate the foundation for cooperation,” a state media readout released late on Sunday quoted China’s second-ranking official as saying.
For all the friction over Beijing’s support for Russia and its actions in the Indo-Pacific, and Berlin’s vocal criticism of China’s human rights record and state-subsidised industrial policy, the two countries remain bound by a vast and mutually advantageous commercial relationship.
“China is willing to work with Germany to seize future development opportunities … in emerging fields such as new energy, smart manufacturing, biomedicine, hydrogen energy technology, and intelligent driving, Li said in Johannesburg, South Africa, which is hosting the first G20 summit on the continent.
China bought $95 billion worth of German goods last year, around 12% of which were cars, Chinese data shows, putting it among the $19 trillion economy’s top 10 trading partners. Germany purchased $107 billion of Chinese goods, mostly chips and other electronic components.
But Berlin stands out for China as an investment partner, having injected $6.6 billion in fresh capital in 2024, according to data from the Mercator Institute for China Studies, accounting for 45% of all foreign direct investment into China from the European Union and the United Kingdom.
For Germany, China represents a practically irreplaceable auto market, and is responsible for almost a third of German automakers’ sales. German chemicals and pharmaceuticals firms also have a large presence in the country, although they are facing increasing pressure from domestic competitors.
(Reporting by Joe Cash; Editing by Richard Chang)
Copyright 2025 Thomson Reuters.
[ad_2]
Reuters
Source link
[ad_1]
Russia’s bombardment of Ukrainian cities is relentless as Vladimir Putin tries to plunge civilians into a winter of cold and darkness.
President Putin’s war, approaching four years, threatens to draw in all of Europe. Targeting civilians has been an international war crime since 1949. The crimes you’re about to see are hard to watch. Putin is hitting homes, schools, hospitals, and seven months ago, a city bus. In the city of Sumy, Bus Route 62 takes you to the university, the mall and on to the airport. The fare is 20 cents. Last April, Palm Sunday, there was only standing room as two ballistic missiles bolted through the sky of a clear, holy, day.
The body is wrapped to preserve the evidence in the hope of a future trial. But a Ukrainian war crime prosecutor wanted us to see it, wanted the world to see the steel corpse where 16 civilians were killed.
We climbed aboard with prosecutor Vitalii Dovhal who showed us the shrapnel that sliced through the bus.
Scott Pelley: This is from what the military calls an anti-personnel warhead. It’s designed to kill as many people as possible.
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): And it doesn’t [distinguish], whether it’s a soldier, or a child, or a retiree. This little square will not spare anyone. And this is exactly why this is a war crime.
The crime scene is a city of 250,000 less than 20 miles from Russia. Most days in Sumy are interrupted by an air raid. And so it was last April 13, Palm Sunday, for passengers on Bus Route 62. Tetiana Pohorelova was taking Lisa to her grandparents.
Tetiana Pohorelova (translated): Lisa is a little girl. She wants to pick her own outfits, and we are always late. I wanted to catch that bus. The next one wouldn’t come for an hour.
Natalia Tenytska and her son, Maksym, were headed to the mall.
60 Minutes
Natalia Tenytska (translated): It was the day before my son was going to have his school picture. We were going to buy some nice clothes.
On one of Ukraine’s holiest days, the bus happened to be on Peter and Paul Street. At the same moment, a warhead was bearing down, with great precision, at 2,000 miles an hour … one blow on more than a dozen cameras.
Natalia Tenytska (translated): It got dark inside. My ears started ringing. People were shouting to open the doors.
Tetiana Pohorelova (translated): The first thing I thought was that I could feel my body. I thought, ‘okay, I can feel everything, Lisa is screaming so, we’re alive.’
Lisa’s screams carried on into the street. Tetiana is saying to her daughter, “Wait my little sunshine. It’s going to be alright. You have a little cut, a little cut.”
60 Minutes
Tetiana Pohorelova (translated): Everything looked destroyed. I saw broken branches. There was the smell of burning and soot. And there were people lying on the ground… people who—you understand.
Maksym (translated): In the front of the bus, everyone was dead. I was walking on dead bodies.
Natalia Tenytska (translated): I urged him to leave [me] and run, but he said, ‘No, that’s never going happen.’ He broke what was left of the window with his feet, so we could escape.
That’s Natalia and Maksym, among 25 surviving passengers. Many others, on the street, were cut down. In the lower right corner, a 47-year-old musician, a pianist, Olena Kohut had watched the bus pass.
Hit by shrapnel. Bleeding out. she would live — two more steps.
Altogether, 35 civilians killed, two children —and 145 wounded.
Prosecutor Vitalii Dovhal responded from his church. He told us:
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): I have never seen such a horror in my life.
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): Lots of people were lying on the pavement. I saw that bus that had burned.
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): It was all mud, dust, blood, crying and bodies.
Scott Pelley: You seem to be saying this isn’t war, this is murder.
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): In my opinion, yes. It is just unimaginable to use such powerful, high-precision weapons in the central part of a city.
Dovhal’s investigation shows there were two missiles, among the most accurate in the Russian arsenal. The first wrecked Sumy State University’s conference center. The second, Peter and Paul Street. They’re among hundreds of Russian war crimes and we have seen many over the years in Ukraine: a school in Chernihiv, a hospital in Izium, apartments in Borodianka.
Scott Pelley: Mr. President, I’m glad to see you again, sir.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy: Thank you for coming.
Last April, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met us on a playground where a missile killed nine children and 10 adults.
All of those, so many more, and now this, make Ukraine the largest crime scene in the world. Ukraine’s top prosecutor told us that the number of war crime investigations now open at the beginning of the fall, is 178,391.
Beth Van Schaack: They are systemic. Literally, everywhere that Russia’s troops have been deployed.
60 Minutes
Few know the big picture like Beth Van Schaack. Until recently she was U.S. ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice. She directed American support for Ukraine’s investigations.
Beth Van Schaack: Attacks happen in towns and villages where there are no discernible military objectives. The attack seems to be calculated to make as much destruction as possible and to terrorize the civilian population. So, it’s an effort to subjugate and to terrorize the community in order to get the country to essentially capitulate.
The reason for Russia’s terror is to take back territory it lost with the fall of the Soviet Union. Ukraine won independence 34 years ago. It’s a democracy about the size of Texas. Of all of the crimes here, Putin faces one arrest warrant. In 2023, the International Criminal Court charged him in a campaign against Ukrainian children.
Beth Van Schaack: He is accused of abducting Ukrainian children in a systematic way. It’s a war crime. It’s a war crime of unlawful transfer of civilians, and in this case dozens and dozens of Ukrainian children.
Scott Pelley: And these children are being kidnapped?
Beth Van Schaack: They’re being kidnapped. They’re being subjected to Russification, to military training. They’re forced to deny their Ukrainian roots. And ultimately, they’re often put up for adoption or placed in foster homes in Russia.
Scott Pelley: What is the point?
Beth Van Schaack: The point is to ultimately undermine the idea that Ukraine is an independent country and to raise these children as Russian children who deny their own cultural heritage.
Putin and his allies who are secure in Russia, are unlikely to face justice. But Ukraine is holding trials. There have been 211 convictions, many Russian troops, though nearly all of the defendants are at large. Still, prosecutor Vitalii Dovhal has patience. He showed us where evidence for future trials is warehoused, including crashed drones and mangled missiles.
60 Minutes
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): On each part we find a serial number. We identify the part, where the part was manufactured and when this missile was assembled in a factory.
In the Palm Sunday massacre, serial numbers, like fingerprints, identified Russian ballistic missiles with 1,000-pound warheads. Ukrainian intelligence pinpointed the Russian units involved.
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): We already know the individuals who gave the orders to carry out the attacks.
Scott Pelley: Do you have any reason to hope for justice?
Vitalii Dovhal (translated): I am convinced that those responsible for the strike at the central part of the city on Palm Sunday will be punished. The military commanders who made the decision to launch these missiles. I am convinced.
Natalia Tenytska (translated): They’re killing civilians. It’s elimination of the Ukrainian nation. They’re just wiping our cities off the face of the earth.
We interviewed Maksym and Natalia, Tetiana and Lisa in the conference center destroyed by the first missile. We could see where the warhead crashed through to the basement. The Russians claim they were aiming at a military awards ceremony. But prosecutor Vitalii Dovhal says that doesn’t explain how no troops were hit and why two missiles fell on civilians.
Scott Pelley: You have quite a stake in the future of Ukraine, and I wonder what is your hope?
Tetiana Pohorelova (translated): I would like the Russians to answer for what they’ve done. I don’t wish death on those people. I want them to learn how it feels to live in fear. I wish Ukraine could see the end of the war. And I want people to be able to live in their own homes. That’s it.
Near our interview, we found a room where, it looked to us, like a victim may have fallen. Close by, in the bomb dust on the table, someone had drawn a line. we don’t know what they meant, but with so many innocent victims murdered without justice perhaps the question was “why?”
Produced by Nicole Young. Associate producer, Kristin Steve. Broadcast associate, Michelle Karim. Edited by Peter M. Berman.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
The controversial 28-point plan dropped suddenly by the Trump administration to Ukraine as a take-it-or-leave it proposition mere days ago was mostly the result of several weeks of negotiations behind the scenes between Steve Witkoff and his Russian counterpart Kirill Dmitriev that excluded not only Ukraine and its allies but even some key US officials.
Faced with a Thanksgiving holiday deadline, European officials are racing to buy Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy more time with their own counter-proposal on how to end the war that will be presented to US officials on Sunday in Switzerland.
This reconstruction on how the ultimatum came about and who was really behind it is based on conversations with several people familiar with the deliberations who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss delicate negotiations.
Read More: Ukraine Seeks NATO-like Shield From US, Counter-Plan Says
For Europeans, the alarm went off when a new player was introduced to the scene: US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, a close friend of JD Vance going back to their days at Yale Law School. It was he who told their ambassadors and Ukraine officials in an urgent tone that US President Donald Trump had run out of patience, that Ukraine was in a bad position and that Kyiv had to agree to concede territory.
The fact that it was a figure close to the vice president tasked to push the plan during a trip to Kyiv this past week was telling. It was a weighty assignment typically undertaken by high-level diplomats, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio or other foreign diplomats. Vance and Rubio have had different takes on how the war should end, with Vance taking a more isolationist bent and Rubio much warier of being manipulated by Russia.
Read More: Vance and Rubio Offer Clues to Trump’s Emerging Foreign Policy
Before European leaders and Zelenskiy jumped into action, they needed to try and understand who was most responsible for the framework. They had been entirely shut out and it wasn’t clear who had the most influence with Trump on the issue.
As Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk quipped pointedly on X: “Before we start our work, it would be good to know for sure who is the author of the plan and where was it created.”
The picture that emerged was that Witkoff and Dmitriev forged the plan during an October meeting in Miami that included Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, who worked with Witkoff on the Israel-Gaza peace deal, according to people familiar with the matter.
Rubio hadn’t been fully looped in until late. Trump also found out about it at the last minute, but he blessed it once he was briefed. The White House didn’t immediately respond to messages left for comment.
A deal would give him a win as he faces a domestic political slump, with Democrats shellacking his party in early November elections, raising the possibility of painful midterm election results next year. A previously pliant Republican-led Congress is also bucking his wishes to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, with whom Trump once had a relationship before they fell out.
In addition, the US president has taken an increasingly aggressive posture in the Caribbean and is weighing a possible strike against Venezuela.
Meanwhile, Zelenskiy is battling a corruption scandal that threatens to engulf his powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak. So he’s feeling the heat, too, back home.
For Trump, what matters is getting a deal, not the fine print. But for Ukrainians, the devil is in the details. Their fears that Russia drafted large swathes of the document unbeknown to them were proved right. The document still bears the hallmarks of a direct translation from Russian with oddly formulated sentences.
The measures would force Ukraine to cede large chunks of land, reduce the size of its military and forbid it from ever joining NATO. The plan would also reestablish economic ties between Russia and the US, the world’s largest economy.
To try and correct course, Ukraine and its European allies will insist that discussions with Russia on any territorial swaps can only take place once the war ceases along the current line of contact. They also want a security agreement that mirrors NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense clause, among other measures.
Read More: Finland’s Stubb and Italy’s Meloni Spoke to Trump on Ukraine
Efforts to find a resolution have gone through operatic fits and spurts since Trump returned to the White House in January, when he pledged to stop the fighting in a matter of days.
The current episode is no less dramatic than previous ones that saw Zelenskiy upbraided by Vance and Trump in an Oval Office meeting. Back then, European leaders rushed to the White House following a hastily-staged summit with Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska in August. Their suspicion was that Putin had a strange hold on Trump. The sly smile the Russian president flashed in the backseat of “the beast” car did little to put them at ease.
When Trump suddenly declared in October he was up for a second summit with Putin, this time in Budapest, it felt like a replay of the summer. However, this time, the Europeans were grateful to have Rubio in their corner. The meeting was cancelled after the US top official had a call with his Russian counterpart and realized the Russians hadn’t budged on their asks.
What they didn’t know was that in the background, Witkoff was putting together what came to be the 28-point plan. They believed Rubio had displaced the special envoy and real estate mogul as the key US interlocutor on Ukraine.
US Senator Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican, said that Rubio — while en route to Geneva — told him and US Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat from New Hampshire, that the 28-point plan is a Russian proposal and that “it is not our recommendation. It is not our peace plan.”
Read More: Ukraine Talks Take Center Stage as G-20 Summit Closes: TOPLive
Rubio later wrote on X that the peace proposal was authored by the US and that it offers a strong framework for negotiations. But his choice of words was careful: “It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”
He traveled to Geneva for the talks on Sunday, joining Witkoff and Driscoll. Ukraine is represented by Yermak. It’s unclear if the Americans even want to see the Europeans together with the Ukrainians.
Driscoll has been in constant contact with Witkoff and Vance as he became the new interface with European officials. Before this past week, his public comments about Russia and Ukraine were largely based on his calls for technological reform in the US military, based on how the two countries have deployed drones on the battlefield.
Vance’s deputy national security adviser, Andy Baker, has also been heavily involved, the people said, in yet another sign of Vance’s influence.
Confronted with pushback, Trump wasn’t irate. He told NBC on Saturday that the proposal is “not my final offer,” hinting that contrary to what Driscoll had said behind closed doors, there was perhaps room for maneuver.
Yet his mood worsened on Sunday.
Ukraine’s leadership has “EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS,” he said in a social media post.
A lot will depend on how talks in Switzerland go, and in which direction US planes go to next: back home or further east, toward Moscow.
[ad_2]
Natalia Drozdiak, Alberto Nardelli, Mario Parker, Bloomberg
Source link