ReportWire

Tag: ukraine

  • Calls to move away from the U.S. dollar are growing — but the greenback is still king

    Calls to move away from the U.S. dollar are growing — but the greenback is still king

    [ad_1]

    Calls to move away from relying on the U.S. dollar for trade are growing.

    More and more countries — from Brazil to Southeast Asian nations — are calling for trade to be carried out in other currencies besides the U.S. dollar.

    The U.S. dollar has been king in global trade for decades — not just because the U.S. is the world’s largest economy, but also because oil, a key commodity needed by all economies big and small, is priced in the greenback. Most commodities are also priced and traded in U.S. dollars.

    But since the Federal Reserve embarked on a journey of aggressive rate hikes to fight domestic inflation, many central banks around the world have raised interest rates to stem capital outflows and a sharp depreciation of their own currencies.

    “By diversifying their holdings reserves into a more multi-currency sort of portfolio, perhaps they can reduce that pressure on their external sectors,” said Cedric Chehab from Fitch Solutions.

    To be clear, the U.S. dollar remains dominant in global forex reserves even though its share in central banks’ foreign exchange reserves has dropped from more than 70% in 1999, IMF data shows.

    The U.S. dollar accounted for 58.36% of global foreign exchange reserves in the fourth quarter last year, according to data from the IMF’s Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER). Comparatively, the euro is a distant second, accounting for about 20.5% of global forex reserves while the Chinese yuan accounted for just 2.7% in the same period.

    China is one of the most active players in this push given its dominant position in global trade right now, and as the world’s second largest economy.

    Based on CNBC’s calculation of IMF’s data on 2022 direction of trade, mainland China was the largest trading partner to 61 countries when combining both imports and exports. In comparison, the U.S. was the largest trading partner to 30 countries.

    “As China’s economic might continues to rise, that means that it’ll exert more influence in global financial institutions and trade etc,” Chehab told CNBC last week.

    China — long among the top 2 foreign holders of U.S. Treasurys — has been steadily reducing its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities.

    Mainland China held nearly $849 billion of U.S. Treasurys as of February this year, the latest data from the U.S. Treasury department showed. That’s at a 12-year low, according to historic data.

    Changing dynamics

    Brazil is rebuilding ties with China, former Brazilian diplomat says

    Economic benefits

    The de-dollarization trend is a reflection that U.S. growth is no longer the only story that matters

    Meanwhile, growth of non-U.S. economic blocs also encourage these economies to push for wider use of their currencies. The IMF estimates that Asia could contribute more than 70% to global growth this year.

    “U.S. growth might slow, but U.S. growth isn’t what it’s all about anymore. There is a whole non-U.S. block that’s growing,” said Tinker. “I think there is going to be a re-internationalization of flows.”

    Geopolitical concerns

    Geopolitical risks have also accelerated the trend to move away from U.S. dollar.

    “Political risk is really helping introduce a lot of uncertainty and variability around how much of a safe haven that U.S. dollar really is,” said Galvin Chia from NatWest Markets told “Street Signs Asia” earlier.

    Tinker said what accelerated the calls for de-dollarization was the U.S. decision to freeze Russia’s foreign currency reserves after Moscow invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

    The yuan has reportedly replaced the U.S. dollar as the most traded currency in Russia, according to Bloomberg.

    So far, the U.S. and its western allies have frozen more than $300 billion of Russia’s foreign currency reserves and slapped multiple rounds of sanctions on Moscow and the country’s oligarchs. This forced Russia to switch trade to other currencies and increase gold in its reserves.

    “Now you find that if you disagree with U.S. foreign policy, you risk having those confiscated or frozen. You’ve got to have alternative place to put those assets,” Tinker said. In the Middle East, major oil exporter Saudi Arabia has reportedly signaled it’s open to trade in other currencies other than the greenback

    Although analysts don’t anticipate a complete break away from dollar-denominated oil trade over the short-term, “I think what they’re saying more is, well, there’s another player in town, and we want to look at how we trade with them on a bilateral basis using yuan,” said Chehab.   

    Dollar is still king

    Despite the slow erosion of its hegemony, analysts say the U.S. dollar is not expected be dethroned in the near future — simply because there aren’t any alternatives right now.

    Euro is somewhat an imperfect fiscal and monetary union, the Japanese yen, which is another reserve currency, has all sorts of structural challenges in terms of the high debt loads,” Chehab told CNBC.

    The Chinese yuan also falls short, Chehab said.

    “If you look at the yuan reserves as a share of total reserves, it’s only about 2.5% of total reserves, and China still has current account restrictions,” Chehab said. “That means that it’s going to take a long time for any other currency, any single currency to really usurp the dollar from that perspective.”

    Data from IMF shows that as of the fourth quarter of 2022, more than 58% of global reserves are held in U.S. dollar — that’s more than double the share of the euro, the second most-held currency in the world.

    The international reserve system “is still a U.S.-reserve dominated system,” said NatWest’s Chia.

    “So long as that commands the majority, so long as you don’t have another currency system or economy that’s willing to step up to that international reach, convertibility and free floating and the responsibility of a reserve currency, it’s hard to say dollar will be displaced over the next 3 to 5 years. unless someone steps up.”

    CNBC’s Joanna Tan and Monica Pitrelli contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 424

    Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 424

    [ad_1]

    Here is the situation on Saturday, April 22, 2023:

    Diplomacy and law

    • Russia has announced the tit-for-tat expulsion of more than 20 German diplomats following the removal of Russian embassy staff from Germany. Berlin was destroying ties with Moscow, Russian state media said.
    • Jack Teixeira, the US Air National Guardsman accused of leaking classified documents about the war in Ukraine to a small group of gamers, had been posting confidential material months earlier than previously known and to a much larger chat group, the New York Times has reported, citing online postings it had seen.

    Fighting

    • Russia’s Defence Ministry has reported the capture of three more city blocks by Russian forces fighting in the western part of the destroyed Ukrainian city of Bakhmut.
    • At least five Russian missiles have hit the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv and surrounding districts late on Saturday night, causing some damage to civilian buildings, local officials said. Kharkiv regional governor Oleh Sinegubov said one missile hit a house in the village of Kotliary, while another sparked a major fire in the city.
    • Seventeen apartment buildings have been evacuated in the Russian city of Belgorod near the Ukrainian border after an explosive device was found at the site where a bomb was accidentally dropped by a Russian warplane on Thursday. Russia has acknowledged that one of its Su-34 bombers had accidentally caused the explosion.
    • The son of Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has fought alongside the Wagner mercenary force in Ukraine, according to Wagner’s chief Yevgeny Prigozhin. Peskov’s son, Nikolay Peskov, who lived in the United Kingdom for several years and is also known as Nikolai Choles, previously told the tabloid KP in Moscow that he fought in Ukraine because he considered it his duty.

    Aid and economy

    • A cargo of Russian fertiliser seized by Latvia last year is being shipped to Kenya by the UN World Food Programme, Latvia said. It was not immediately clear if Russia approved of the shipment.
    • Ukrainian state-owned gas company Naftogaz has held talks with Exxon Mobil Corp, Halliburton and Chevron about projects in Ukraine, the Financial Times reported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How one U.S. Air Force veteran is using his voice to fight for Ukraine’s freedom

    How one U.S. Air Force veteran is using his voice to fight for Ukraine’s freedom

    [ad_1]

    How one U.S. Air Force veteran is using his voice to fight for Ukraine’s freedom – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    U.S. air force veteran Mark Lindquist sees parallels between his service in the military and the fight for freedom in Ukraine. He created a podcast to let listeners know why the war in Ukraine matters. Holly William reports from Ukraine.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ukrainians Press Congress To Declare Russian Invasion A Genocide

    Ukrainians Press Congress To Declare Russian Invasion A Genocide

    [ad_1]

    Ukrainians and their allies continue to urge Congress to declare the Russian invasion of their country a genocide, a step lawmakers and the U.S. State Department have been reluctant to formally take so far, despite mounting evidence.

    The latest effort came this week when Razom for Ukraine, a U.S.-based civil society group, released a letter from 50 genocide scholars, human rights activists and international lawyers to the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs Committee asking them to bring up a genocide declaration that has languished in the House since last year.

    President Joe Biden said in the early weeks of the war that it was a genocide, but his administration has since been much more cautious about the label, which has a legal definition under a 1948 international treaty.

    In February, however, the administration got a little closer, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken declaring that Russia had committed crimes against humanity.

    “These acts are not random or spontaneous; they are part of the Kremlin’s widespread and systematic attack against Ukraine’s civilian population,” Blinken said.

    Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) listens to the testimony of a victim of Russia’s war on Ukraine during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing Wednesday.

    In addition to that declaration and help investigating the alleged war crimes, the U.S. has committed about $71.3 billion in help to Ukraine since the war began, with $43.2 billion of that in military aid, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    In the letter, the Ukraine supporters said it was time for Congress to label the war a genocide.

    “Although we appreciate that executive-branch processes are also common for such determinations, the Kremlin’s genocidal intent and actions are so clear and so evident that a congressional declaration is not only advisable, but absolutely necessary in the spirit of preventing further atrocities,” the letter said.

    Under the 1948 treaty, which was signed by the United States, genocide occurs when there is an attempt to completely or partially destroy a racial, ethnic, national or religious group by at least one of several methods, including killing or causing serious injury to them, creating “conditions of life” meant to destroy the group, imposing measures to prevent births within the group or transferring their children to another group.

    “These acts are not random or spontaneous; they are part of the Kremlin’s widespread and systematic attack against Ukraine’s civilian population.”

    – Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, in announcing Russia has committed crimes against humanity in Ukraine

    Though reports of Russian atrocities have mounted, most recently with video of a purported beheading of a Ukrainian soldier and testimony by two men claiming to be former members of the Wagner mercenary group who said they carried out orders to kill civilians, including children, the State Department is not ready to move beyond the “crimes against humanity” label.

    “The Secretary has not designated Russian atrocities as genocide. We will continue monitoring the situation in Ukraine and will make that determination when appropriate,” a State Department spokesperson told HuffPost in a statement.

    The scholars’ letter was released Wednesday, when the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on war crimes in Ukraine. Lawmakers heard from witnesses who described abducted children taken to Russia and a woman who said she had been beaten and tortured while living under Russian occupation in the Kherson region.

    Committee chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said he had visited Ukraine and heard similar tales.

    “I personally heard an account from a mother who saw her 5-year-old daughter gang-raped to death by 10 Wagner mercenaries, who then threw her dead body on the side of the road,” he said.

    “These are more than war crimes. These are more than crimes against humanity. What we are witnessing in Ukraine is genocide,” McCaul said.

    “These are more than war crimes. These are more than crimes against humanity. What we are witnessing in Ukraine is genocide.”

    – Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee

    The committee office did not respond to a request for comment about whether McCaul planned to bring up the genocide resolution authored by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), which has 21 co-sponsors, including five Republicans.

    In the letter asking for action on the resolution, the experts said, “If we do not recognize this invasion for what it is, we not only fail the Ukrainian people, but we neglect our security interests and our foundational values.”

    “The United States must recognize and help end genocide, and not just memorialize it after the ruination and devastation of a nation.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘What?!’ Orbán throws cold water on Ukraine’s NATO hopes

    ‘What?!’ Orbán throws cold water on Ukraine’s NATO hopes

    [ad_1]

    Hungary’s troubled relationship with neighboring Ukraine spiraled again Friday as Prime Minister Viktor Orbán dismissed the country’s NATO dreams with a one-word tweet. 

    “What?!” the prime minister exclaimed in a Twitter post responding to a POLITICO article on NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg’s declaration in Kyiv on Thursday that “Ukraine’s rightful place is in NATO.”

    Relations between Budapest and Kyiv are tense. Hungary spent years blocking high-level NATO sessions with Ukrainian officials, ostensibly over concerns about the rights of Hungarian speakers in western Ukraine. 

    And despite condemning Russia’s full-scale invasion, Hungary has refused to send weapons to aid its neighbor. Senior Hungarian officials, meanwhile, continue to regularly visit Moscow and maintain close ties to the Kremlin. At the same time, Hungary joining Turkey in blocking Sweden’s NATO bid has frustrated Western capitals.

    NATO allies — including Hungary — decided back in 2008 that Ukraine will eventually join the alliance. But Kyiv’s path to NATO has stalled, and in September Ukraine’s leadership requested an “accelerated accession” to join. 

    But the issue is highly sensitive. Most NATO allies — including the U.S. — want to avoid any big moves on the accession process for Ukraine while the war is ongoing. 

    A group of eastern members is now pushing for NATO to give Kyiv a signal that it is moving closer to the alliance. 

    During his visit to Kyiv, Stoltenberg said he discussed a multi-year NATO initiative to help Ukraine transition away from Soviet-era military equipment to the alliance’s own standards. 

    But it remains unclear what kind of political signal NATO leaders will opt to give Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the alliance’s upcoming summit, scheduled for July. 

    Speaking in Germany on Friday morning, as Ukraine’s partners gathered at Ramstein Air Base to discuss further assistance to Kyiv, Stoltenberg reiterated that for now allies want to keep their eyes on the pressing challenge of helping Ukraine win. 

    “All NATO allies have agreed that Ukraine will become a NATO member,” he said. “But the main focus now is of course on how to ensure that Ukraine prevails.”

    “What we do know is that our support helps Ukraine move toward the Euro-Atlantic integration,” he said, adding, “without a sovereign, independent Ukraine, there is no meaning in discussing membership.”

    [ad_2]

    Lili Bayer

    Source link

  • French-Russian nuclear relations turn radioactive

    French-Russian nuclear relations turn radioactive

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    BRUSSELS — Pressure is building on France to fully cut ties with Russia’s atomic sector as the EU mulls its latest sanctions package against Moscow.

    The European Commission is set to meet with diplomats from the EU’s 27 member countries on Friday to start discussions on the bloc’s 11th round of Russia sanctions. Hitting Moscow’s state-run nuclear company Rosatom — a divisive issue for some EU countries reliant on Russia for nuclear fuel — is likely come under the spotlight once again.

    That means increased scrutiny of France’s ties to Rosatom, the Moscow-based atomic firm.

    Although much commercial cooperation has been frozen or suspended in the past year, French state-controlled companies continue to maintain some ties with Rosatom.

    That’s prompting calls by Ukraine and diplomats from several EU countries for Paris to sever all links with Rosatom, especially given its role in overseeing the Russia-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine.

    “I am sure” that Paris has a moral duty to encourage its state-backed companies to cut ties with Rosatom, Ukraine’s Energy Minister German Galushchenko told POLITICO last month, adding that Kyiv wants all EU countries with links to Russian’s nuclear industry to cut them.

    “All of our public scrutiny has been on Germany and not so much on France,” for ties with Russia, said a diplomat from one EU country, who spoke on condition of anonymity, “whereas I think if you look closely … they haven’t been the best kid in the class either.”

    Paris should at least back long-standing demands from the Baltic countries and Poland to sanction Rosatom, Sven Giegold, a state secretary at Germany’s energy ministry, tweeted last week. “We will try to convince France.”

    In late February, the U.S. slapped sanctions on Rosatom; both Washington and London have sanctioned some of its executives for “deep connections to the Russian military-industrial complex.”

    A Rosatom spokesperson told POLITICO the company has “always taken the view that nuclear energy should remain outside of politics.”

    Despite a strong push from some EU countries and the Commission to target Rosatom executives during previous sanctions discussions, those efforts floundered partly due to pressure from Hungary, where Rosatom is in charge of the expansion of its Paks nuclear power plant. France is also resisting sanctions.

    Although other bigger countries have also not spoken up during discussions, diplomats from four EU countries argued Paris was hiding behind Budapest on nuclear sanctions.

    Ukraine’s Energy Minister German Galushchenko said that Kyiv wants all EU countries to cut links to Russian’s nuclear industry | Stephanie Lecocq/EPA-EFE

    “Because Hungary has been very clear, very vocal, very visible on that question, I think some other countries, including France … don’t really need to lobby for their cause,” said one of the diplomats.

    The French foreign ministry told POLITICO: “The European Union and its member states have not adopted sanctions targeting civil nuclear power,” while adding that “France and the United States … continue to cooperate with Russia in the areas of nuclear safety and security.”

    Close ties

    For France, “Rosatom is above all a client,” said Valérie Faudon, general delegate with the French Nuclear Energy Society, while adding that Paris doesn’t depend on Russia for its security of supply.

    Paris and Moscow’s nuclear ties, which date back to the Cold War, are most apparent in the links between Rosatom and state-controlled EDF, France’s largest utility that runs the country’s nuclear fleet. It signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Rosatom on green hydrogen in 2021, as well as a joint declaration to develop research cooperation.

    The Rosatom spokesperson called it “a win-win partnership” that is “a driver of development both in the field of nuclear energy and scientific projects.”

    “There are areas in which we mutually develop our relations, for example, projects in third countries, nuclear fuel cycle development, exchange of experience in nuclear safety development,” the spokesperson said.

    That’s not the only link.

    When Rosatom builds a nuclear plant abroad, it often relies on technology from French companies — typically spending up to €1 billion per project, Faudon said. Those orders usually include command and control systems from Framatome, which is majority-owned by EDF.

    Framatome has an ongoing role in Russian nuclear construction projects around the world, including at Paks. The company aims to set up a joint venture with Rosatom to produce nuclear fuel in western Germany, a project that has been sharply criticized by local authorities.

    The French firm also signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Rosatom in December 2021 to expand collaboration on fuel fabrication and other technologies. 

    Framatome didn’t comment on its ongoing contracts but with reference to the 2021 agreement, a company spokesperson said: “Everything has been postponed until further notice,” adding that Framatome will “re-examine the agreement if and when that is appropriate.”

    EDF declined to comment.

    French company Framatome has an ongoing role in Russian nuclear construction projects around the world | Pool photo by Laurent Cipriani/EPA-EFE

    Orano, a French firm specializing in nuclear fuel that is partly state-owned, sold used uranium fuel stocks to Rosatom for reuse outside France until late last year. The company said this contract is “now settled” and it has “set up a specific process for monitoring and prior approval of activities” relating to any “Russian stakeholder.”

    And while France isn’t dependent on Russia for its nuclear fuel and security of supply, it bought enriched uranium worth €359 million from Moscow last year, more than three times the amount it bought in 2021.

    It’s not the only such sale to the West. The U.S. bought $830 million of enriched uranium from Russia last year. Moscow also supplies fuel to reactors in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Finland, Slovakia and Hungary.

    Decontamination effort

    Those close commercial links are leading to calls for action by lawmakers and diplomats.

    “It would be the right thing to do for the French government to, like the German government, make great effort to … stop [nuclear] cooperation as long as Putin does not end the war against Ukraine,” said Engin Eroglu, a German MEP with the Renew grouping who has been vocal on Russian nuclear issues.

    In February, the European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution calling on Rosatom to face sanctions. 

    Although France hasn’t backed sanctions against Rosatom, it says it’s working to help other EU countries shift away from Russia on nuclear and the country said it would fall in line with any trade measures.

    “The principle of sanctions is that they should do more damage to the Russians than to the Europeans,” said a senior official with the French energy ministry. “France, for its part, does not depend in any way on Russian natural uranium. We are working with our partners who are dependent on Russian uranium to put an end to this dependence.”

    France last week also joined a G7-related alliance “aimed at displacing Putin from the international nuclear energy market” alongside Britain, the U.S., Canada and Japan.

    Despite that, diplomats from five EU countries told POLITICO that French state firms have an ethical responsibility to fully sever links with Rosatom.

    “State-backed companies have a moral duty to cut ties” with Moscow, said one of the diplomats, to avoid “supporting the system.”

    Giorgio Leali contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Victor Jack

    Source link

  • Spain ships 10 Leopard tanks to Ukraine

    Spain ships 10 Leopard tanks to Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Six Leopard tanks have left Spain and are on their way to Ukraine to ramp up its military capacity, Reuters reports.

    The tanks have been loaded onto cargo vessel on Friday and will be shipped by sea to Poland, according to the news agency.

    At the end of February, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez announced that he would send a total of 10 Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine. He faced opposition from far-left Podemos, the junior partner in his ruling coalition, which has warned this will only escalate the war and has instead pressed for peace talks.

    Western allies have been ramping up the supply of military hardware to Ukraine as it prepares to face a potential renewed Russian offensive this spring. Germany hesitated for months on whether to send its tanks to Ukraine, eventually giving in to international pressure.

    Now, leaked U.S. cables revealed that alongside Spain, also Germany, Norway, Portugal, Greece and Finland are planning to send tanks to the invaded country.

    The model of tank Spain is shipping is among the older ones the country possesses, German media outlet ZDF said. The Western European country owns almost 350 Leopard 2 tanks in total.

    [ad_2]

    Leonie Kijewski

    Source link

  • Baltics blast China diplomat for questioning sovereignty of ex-Soviet states

    Baltics blast China diplomat for questioning sovereignty of ex-Soviet states

    [ad_1]

    The Baltic states of Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia are demanding an explanation from Beijing after China’s top envoy to France questioned the independence of former Soviet countries like Ukraine.

    Lu Shaye, China’s ambassador to France, said in an interview on Friday with French television network LCI that former Soviet countries have no “effective status” in international law.

    Asked whether Crimea belongs to Ukraine, Lu said that “it depends how you perceive the problem,” arguing that it was historically part of Russia and offered to Ukraine by former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev.

    “In international law, even these ex-Soviet Union countries do not have the status, the effective [status] in international law, because there is no international agreement to materialize their status as a sovereign country,” he said.

    The comments sparked outrage among Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia — three former Soviet countries.

    Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkēvičs said in a tweet that his ministry summoned “the authorized chargé d’affaires of the Chinese embassy in Riga on Monday to provide explanations. This step is coordinated with Lithuania and Estonia.”

    He called the comments “completely unacceptable,” adding: “We expect explanation from the Chinese side and complete retraction of this statement.”

    Margus Tsahkna, Estonia’s foreign minister, called the comments “false” and “a misinterpretation of history.”

    Gabrielius Landsbergis, Lithuania’s foreign minister, shared the interview on Twitter with the comment: “If anyone is still wondering why the Baltic States don’t trust China to “broker peace in Ukraine,” here’s a Chinese ambassador arguing that Crimea is Russian and our countries’ borders have no legal basis.”

    Kyiv also pushed back strongly against the ambassador’s comments.

    “It is strange to hear an absurd version of the ‘history of Crimea’ from a representative of a country that is scrupulous about its thousand-year history,” Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, said in a tweet on Sunday. “If you want to be a major political player, do not parrot the propaganda of Russian outsiders.”

    France in a statement on Sunday stated its “full solidarity” with all the allied countries affected, which it said had acquired their independence “after decades of oppression,” according to Reuters. “On Ukraine specifically, it was internationally recognized within borders including Crimea in 1991 by the entire international community, including China,” a foreign ministry spokesperson was quoted as saying.

    The foreign ministry spokesperson also called on China to clarify whether the ambassador’s statement reflects its position or not.

    The row comes ahead of a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg on Monday, where relations with China are on the agenda.

    [ad_2]

    Antonia Zimmermann

    Source link

  • Ukrainian girls’ math team wins top European spot during olympiad

    Ukrainian girls’ math team wins top European spot during olympiad

    [ad_1]

    The Ukrainian girls’ mathematics team won the top European team in the 2023 Olympiad, the European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad announced on its website Tuesday. There were 55 teams – 38 from Europe – from around the world competing in this year’s international mathematics competition in Slovenia. 

    China nabbed the top overall mathematics prize, followed by the United States and Australia, with Ukraine placing fourth– but first overall among European competitors. In total, 213 high school-age girls took part in the competition; European countries such as Italy, France, Finland and the Netherlands sent 115 contestants, with the remainder coming from countries as diverse as Mexico, Brazil, Israel and Saudi Arabia. To compete in the international competition, the girls had to win a national competition in their home country, the organization said.

    screen-shot-2023-04-20-at-3-24-02-pm.png
    Ukrainian team at the European Girls’ Mathematical Competition.

    European Girls’ Mathematical Competition via Facebook


    Over two consecutive days, girls solved three mathematical problems and had four and a half hours to write solutions. Answers were scored and medals were awarded based on the problem’s complexity. Ukraine’s team took home 1 gold medal and 3 silver medals –making them the most successful European team in the competition. Over all there were 26 gold medals awarded and 36 silver medals awarded, according to results posted on the organization’s website.

    Ukrainian media reported that a participant’s mother, Liudmyla Frankevych, posted on her social media that the girls ” never aim for participation” but instead “only for victory” – and this year “they managed it for glory!”

    In 2022, the European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad, which has been running math competitions for a decade, decided to exclude Russia as a country eligible to participate due to its invasion of Ukraine. Four Russian girls were allowed to compete as private citizens, but not represent the country, the organization said.

    Later that year, Ukrainian Yuliia Zdanovska, a contestant in 2016 and 2017 and a silver medalist, was killed by Russian shelling in the city of Kharkiv. Zdanovska, who dreamed of teaching math to kids in rural villages, was 21 years old, according to the organization.

    After Zdanovska’s death, the math department at Massachusetts Institute of Technology started a free math enrichment program for Ukrainian refugees in her honor. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Frustrating’: Ukraine slams EU for failing to deliver on ammo plan

    ‘Frustrating’: Ukraine slams EU for failing to deliver on ammo plan

    [ad_1]

    Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba slammed the EU on Thursday for failing to “implement its own decision” to jointly purchase ammunition for Ukraine as the bloc’s members spar over how to enact the plans.

    “The inability of the EU to implement its own decision on the joint procurement of ammunition for Ukraine is frustrating,” Kuleba said on Twitter, marking a considerable change in tone from Kyiv toward the club it hopes to join.

    EU leaders agreed last month on the idea to band together and draw money from a communal pot to help deliver Kyiv up to 1 million shells in the next 12 months as Ukraine fights off Russia’s invasion. But negotiations have hit an impasse at the ambassador level over how to spend the €1 billion set aside for joint contracts.

    Kuleba said this was a test of the EU’s ability to make crucial new security decisions and whether the bloc truly has “strategic autonomy” — echoing the favorite term used by French President Emmanuel Macron when he recently stirred up controversy by saying Europe must not become “America’s followers.”

    The main point of contention in the ammunition purchase talks revolves around how much to restrict the money to EU manufacturers, and whether to include companies in places like the U.S. and U.K.

    France has been leading the charge to keep the money within the bloc, while others, including Poland, fear that Europe’s defense industry may not be up to the task of delivering 1 million shells to Ukraine in the promised timeframe of 12 months.

    Talks will likely continue next week, meaning EU foreign ministers won’t have a deal in hand when they meet on Monday in Luxembourg to discuss the war.

    “For Ukraine, the cost of inaction is measured in human lives,” Kuleba said.

    [ad_2]

    Wilhelmine Preussen

    Source link

  • Ukrainian troops to begin training on US-made tanks in next few weeks

    Ukrainian troops to begin training on US-made tanks in next few weeks

    [ad_1]

    RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany — American-made Abrams tanks that Ukrainians will use for training will arrive in Germany in the next few weeks, allowing soldiers to begin learning to use the much-anticipated armor, according to two U.S. Defense Department officials. 

    U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is expected to announce the move at a Friday press conference after the 11th meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a gathering of more than 40 nations dedicated to supporting Kyiv against Russia’s all-out assault, said one of the DoD officials, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive operations.

    The 31 M1A1 Abrams tanks — a Ukrainian battalion’s worth — will arrive at the Grafenwoehr Training Area in Germany by mid-to-late May, according to the officials. The training will begin a week or two later, after the tanks go through a maintenance period. 

    But the tanks the Ukrainian armed forces will train on in Germany are different from the ones that will eventually arrive in Ukraine for use on the battlefield, the first DoD official added, noting that those are still being refurbished.

    The training on how to operate and maintain the Abrams is expected to take up to 10 weeks and may include instruction on how to maneuver in combat, the official said. Some 250 Ukrainians are expected to go through the training program, which is run by 7th Army Training Command.

    The U.S. is accelerating the delivery of the Abrams by opting to send older M1A1 versions, rather than the newer M1A2 type originally planned to go to Ukraine. The Pentagon anticipates the tanks will arrive on the battlefield by the end of the year.

    During his opening remarks ahead of the contact group meeting, Austin applauded his counterparts for their donations. He noted that Italy, France, Canada and Norway are also providing air defense systems, while Estonia has spent more than 1 percent of its GDP on Ukraine.

    “Our common efforts have made a huge difference to Ukraine’s defenders on the battlefield. And they underscore just how badly the Kremlin miscalculated,” Austin said. “After more than a year of Russian aggression and deceit, this contact group is as united as ever and more global than ever.”

    The group is also working to deliver defense systems to counter Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure, Austin said. Two Patriot missile defense systems, including one from the U.S. and one made up of components from Germany and the Netherlands, arrived in Ukraine on Wednesday.

    In total, the members of the contact group have provided more than $55 billion in security assistance for Ukraine since the group’s founding a year ago. The U.S. alone has provided $35 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since the full-scale invasion began, including the most recent package of $325 million.

    [ad_2]

    Lara Seligman

    Source link

  • Ukraine’s corn and wheat exports are set to plummet. Here’s what that means for the world’s food supply

    Ukraine’s corn and wheat exports are set to plummet. Here’s what that means for the world’s food supply

    [ad_1]

    An aerial view of the Turkish-flagged ship “Polarnet” carrying grain from Ukraine is seen at the Derince Port, Kocaeli, Turkiye on August 08, 2022. 

    Omer Faruk Cebeci | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

    Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine is causing a global shift in the trading of grains — which feed billions of people every day — and Ukraine’s harvest this year could plummet by as much as 50% compared to before the war.

    Both Ukraine and Russia were among the world’s top producers of commodities such as wheat and barley before the war broke out in February 2022. But the conflict saw the price of U.S. wheat and corn futures hit decade highs (with one benchmark wheat contract hitting an all-time high) and sparked volatility in global wheat prices throughout the year. Prices stabilized in 2023, dropping around 13% in the year to date.

    “Trade flows change and fluctuate, they always have,” said Andrew Whitelaw, co-founder and director of Episode 3, an agricultural analysis firm. “Bearing in mind that 20-odd years ago, Russia wasn’t an important exporter of grains … It’s grown in the last 20 years [and] Ukraine and Russia have now become the top exporters.”

    And while last year’s yield and export of grains such as wheat from Ukraine were still significant despite the war and closure of ports in the Black Sea, the quantities harvested and shipped this year are likely to reduce.

    The Black Sea Grain Initiative, a deal brokered by the U.N. in Turkey to guide ships safely out of Ukrainian ports, was only extended by 60 days in March — a reduction on the previous 120-day period.

    Whitelaw described last year’s wheat crop as “pretty good” in Ukraine and “absolutely fantastic” in Russia, but said Ukraine’s harvest is likely to be down around 20% in 2023 because farmers have sown fewer crops.

    “This year, there’s things like — in Ukraine — lack of access to finance, lack of access to fertilizers, fuel, labor, but also the price of grain in Ukraine is really low. So, the incentive for the farmers to plant it is lower,” he told CNBC via phone.

    “We’re seeing lower acreages or area devoted to these crops in Ukraine, which means that probably the larger impact of it may be felt this year, from a supply and demand fundamentals [perspective] than last year.”

    The Ukraine losses will need to be made up elsewhere over time, including from Russia itself but with a stronger focus on US, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina.

    Aakash Doshi

    Citi Research

    Indeed, figures from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization suggest that 20-30% of the acreage of winter wheat crops sown in Ukraine last year will not be harvested this summer because of a lack of fuel availability.

    Aakash Doshi, who is head of commodities, North America at Citi Research, said that Ukrainian grain harvests and exports this year could be down as much as 50% on pre-war levels.

    Ukraine had a bumper corn crop of 42 million metric tons (mmt) in 2021, per Citi Research figures, and the bank estimates this will reduce to between 21 and 22 mmt in 2023/24.

    For wheat, the 2021 harvest was 33mt, according to Citi Research, and its forecast for this year “might be 16-17mmt,” Doshi told CNBC by email.

    As well as crop yields, exports will also reduce, he said. “Grain trade flows from Ukraine should see volumes decline, but not as much as outright production declines, since domestic consumption is weak. 2023/24 Ukraine grains exports (corn + wheat) might be 27-30mmt, down 15-18mmt from 2021/22,” he added.

    A Polish farmer during an April 12, 2022 protest against Ukrainian grain imports, which have lowered prices for crops in Poland.

    Attila Husejnow | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    There is a current surplus of Ukrainian grain in Central European countries, creating a rift with countries including Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria and Slovakia.

    Falling prices caused protests among Polish farmers as well as the resignation of Poland’s Agriculture Minister Henryk Kowalczyk this month. On April 7, his successor Robert Telus said exports of grain from Ukraine to Poland would be limited and halted “for now,” according to a Reuters report.

    Longer term, Doshi sees opportunities for grain exports from North and South America to the Middle East, North Africa and Asia, and if crops are good, from Australia to East Asia.

    “In other words, the Ukraine losses will need to be made up elsewhere over time, including from Russia itself but with a stronger focus on U.S., Canada, Brazil, and Argentina exportable surplus,” Doshi said.

    Agricultural analyst Whitelaw also said the market is likely to shift, including from Russia. “The trade flows will have to change and there’s not that many places that you can get large volumes of grain to replace the volumes that Russia has been [providing]. And so, it really is down to … South American countries, the U.S., parts of Europe and Australia,” he said.

    Global food trade

    The war in Ukraine has contributed to rising food prices, with inflation above 5% in more than 80% of low-income countries, according to World Bank figures.

    But while restrictions on exports from Ukraine have had an impact on food prices, rising energy and fertilizer costs are likely to have an even greater effect, according to research by a team at Edinburgh University led by Peter Alexander, published in February. The study suggests that there could be up to 1 million additional deaths in the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa if high fertilizer prices prevail this year.

    Longer term, the picture is complex. Climate change causing extreme weather is already damaging the food system, according to Alexander, a senior lecturer at Edinburgh University’s Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems. But how this could develop is unclear, he told CNBC: “The impact of future extreme weather … drought, heat, flooding, is really not well understood.”

    A key risk is if grain production halts in a number of places at once, Alexander added, known as “multiple breadbasket failure.”

    “There’s definitely the possibility that we could see that type of event in the future, which could have really negative consequences for lots of people,” he added.

    In late February, British supermarkets limited customer purchases of certain fresh fruits and vegetables due to shortages.

    Matthew Horwood | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Factors affecting the price and availability of commodities and food overall are many and varied — bad weather in Morocco and Spain was blamed for a shortage of fruit and vegetables in the U.K. in February, but additional paperwork due to Brexit was also cited, plus high energy prices.

    Ways to prevent food shortages around the world are also not straightforward, with many “competing narratives,” according to Alexander. For example, localizing food chains may not help.

    “The reason why we have a globalized food system, and the reason why food has become cheaper and cheaper over the last decades, is because … competitive advantage [means] we produce food where it’s the easiest to produce it, where it has the lowest inputs … If we start bringing everything back more locally, it actually is less efficient as a food system,” he said.

    “For example, in the U.K., we are self-sufficient in wheat, but we are still subject to the global market for wheat prices,” he added.

    Also, higher food prices aren’t necessarily a bad thing, according to Alexander. “Rather than try to maintain artificially low food prices, or food prices that don’t reflect all the costs … maybe we can make the healthier, more sustainable foods, we can subsidize them for everybody,” he suggested.

    Reducing meat consumption in developed countries might also be an option. “We need a more equitable and more efficient food system, which does very likely involve dietary change from a Western perspective,” Alexander added.

    Another debate is over how much grain should be used for biofuels versus food supplies. In biofuel, grain is used to produce ethanol, which is blended with gasoline to cut down emissions.

    Reducing the grain used to produce ethanol by 50% in the U.S. and Europe “would compensate for all the lost exports of Ukrainian wheat, corn, barley and rye,” according to the research company World Resources Institute in a post published on April 1 2022, about five weeks after Russia invaded Ukraine.

    “We still have large amounts of grain around the world that is not used for food … in our industrial processes, ethanol, biodiesel, those types of products. I expect we’ll see more of that debate in the coming couple of years,” Whitelaw said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Justice Department asks Congress for more authority to give proceeds from seized Russian assets to Ukraine

    Justice Department asks Congress for more authority to give proceeds from seized Russian assets to Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Justice Department is asking Congress to expand its ability to give proceeds from seized Russian assets to the people of Ukraine, as it continues its fight against Russia’s invasion. 

    The U.S. is “leaving a lot of money on the table” from those forfeitures, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco testified before Congress Wednesday.

    “The millions we are seizing and forfeiting because of export control violations, we can’t transfer those proceeds to Ukraine,” Monaco told the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday. “There are measures of accountability to make sure that those assets get transferred.” 

    Under current law, federal officials are only able to utilize money seized in specific instances in which individuals illegally evade U.S. sanctions.  

    Under the authority of a federal task force known as KletptoopCatpure, federal authorities have seized numerous assets allegedly tied to Russian oligarchs and those supporting Russia, including luxury yachts, jets, and mansions. In all, according to the Justice Department, $500 million in Russian assets have been targeted and more than 30 individuals charged. 

    In December, Congress passed a law directing the State Department to allocate specific proceeds from assets seized by Justice Department investigators for the benefit of Ukraine. And in February, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that he had authorized the first transfer of forfeited Russian assets for use in Ukraine — $5.4 million seized from alleged sanctions evader and Russian oligarch, Konstantin Malofeyev

    Monaco said the Justice Department wants Congress to broaden the government’s forfeiture authority to include those who violate trade laws known as export controls. These laws govern the transfer of certain types of items and technology — like radars, satellite sensors, drones, toxins and more — to people in foreign countries or to foreign nationals in the U.S. This week, prosecutors accused the president of a building materials company of illegally engaging in $150 million in trade with sanctioned Russians, allegedly paying them in return for metal products used in steelmaking. 

    The deputy attorney general also urged Congress to pass a law giving the Justice Department authority to prosecute certain crimes against humanity. There currently remains a legal loophole where certain atrocious crimes are not covered by war crimes or genocide statutes. Monaco said a new statute would close the gap and offer the authority needed to bring more criminal accountability to places like China and Venezuela.

    “Right now, we cannot pursue the type of lawless activity…that has gone on in Venezuela, the types of atrocities that have been committed by the Chinese against the Uyghurs. We can’t pursue that type of justice here in U.S. courts without crimes against humanity statute,” Monaco said Thursday. 

    She faced calls from senators to designate Russia a state sponsor of terrorism, an authority that lies with the State Department. Monaco said there is no legal obstacle to this designation, but that the State Department and President Biden are not in favor of the move. A bill calling on the State Department to designate Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism passed the Senate last year. 

    The focus on Russian war crimes and combating the aggression in Ukraine came just days after Ukrainian Prosecutor General Andriy Kostin met with Garland and Monaco about law enforcement  in the region. Kostin said his nation and U.S. officials are working to “deprive” Russia of resources that finance its war. 

    Garland suggested that accountability for war crimes isn’t coming soon, but added that the Justice Department has a “very long memory” for war crimes and crimes against humanity and in the long run, he expects there will be accountability for perpetrators.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ukraine’s Patriot missile systems arrive as Kyiv aims to boost defenses against Russia

    Ukraine’s Patriot missile systems arrive as Kyiv aims to boost defenses against Russia

    [ad_1]

    Ukraine’s Patriot missile systems arrive as Kyiv aims to boost defenses against Russia – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    U.S.-made Patriot missile systems from Germany have arrived in Ukraine. CBS News senior foreign correspondent Holly Williams joined Errol Barnett and Lana Zak to discuss how this could be a game-changer for Kyiv.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Two Russians claiming to be former Wagner commanders admit killing children and civilians in Ukraine | CNN

    Two Russians claiming to be former Wagner commanders admit killing children and civilians in Ukraine | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Two Russian men who claim to be former Wagner Group commanders have told a human rights activist that they killed children and civilians during their time in Ukraine.

    The claims were made in video interviews with Gulagu.net, a human rights organization targeting corruption and torture in Russia.

    In the video interviews posted online, former Russian convicts Azamat Uldarov and Alexey Savichev – who were both pardoned by Russian presidential decrees last year, according to Gulagu.net – described their actions in Ukraine, during Russia’s invasion.

    CNN cannot independently verify their claims or identities in the videos but has obtained Russian penal documents showing they were released on presidential pardon in September and August of 2022.

    Uldarov, who appears to have been drinking, details how he shot and killed a five- or six-year-old girl.

    “(It was) a management decision. I wasn’t allowed to let anyone out alive, because my command was to kill anything in my way,” he said.

    According to Gulagu.net, the testimonies were given to founder and Russian dissident Vladimir Osechkin over the span of a week. It said Uldarov and Savichev were in Russia when they spoke.

    “I want Russia and other nations to know the truth. I don’t want war and bloodshed. You see I’m holding a cigarette in this hand. I followed orders with this hand and killed children,” Uldarov said, describing his motivation for the interview.

    The Wagner Group is a Russian private mercenary organization fighting in Ukraine, headed by Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin.

    It has recruited tens of thousands of fighters from Russian jails, offering freedom and cash after a six-month tour. It’s estimated by Western intelligence officials and prison advocacy groups that between 40,000 and 50,000 men were recruited.

    Uldarov said in the eastern Ukrainian cities of Soledar and Bakhmut – which have seen some of the fiercest fighting – Wagner mercenaries “were given the command to annihilate everyone.”

    “There is a superior over all the commanders – it’s Prigozhin, who told us not to let anyone get out of there and annihilate everyone,” he added. CNN has previously reported on former Wagner fighters making similar claims.

    Uldarov has since appeared to recant his account in a video call with Prigozhin-linked Russian news agency RIA-FAN.

    At one point in the interview, Savichev described how they “got the order to execute any men who were 15 years or older.”

    He also talked about getting orders to ‘sweep’ a house. “It doesn’t matter whether there is a civilian there or not. The house needs to be swept. I didn’t give a f**k who was inside,” he said.

    “Whether a hut or a house, the point was to make sure that there wasn’t a single living person left inside,” he said. “You can condemn me for this. I will not object. It’s your right. But I wanted to live, too.”

    Savichev said Wagner fighters who did not follow orders were killed.

    Wagner Group chief Prigozhin confirmed on his Telegram channel that he had watched parts of the video, and threatened retribution against the two former Wagner fighters. “As for what (Osechkin) filmed, I looked at the pieces of video I managed to see,” he said. “I can say the following: if at least one of these accusations against me is confirmed, I am ready to be held accountable according to any laws.”

    But Prigozhin said that “if none is confirmed, I will send a list of 30-40 people who are spitting at me like Osechkin (there is a whole list of them, including the scum that fled Russia) that the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine is obligated to hand over to me for a ‘fair trial,’ so to speak.”

    “They will not be “civilians” for us, and especially not children, whom we have never touched and do not touch. This is a flagrant lie. These people (spreading the lies) are our enemies, and we will deal with them in a special way.”

    Earlier, Prigozhin said on Telegram: “Regarding the execution of children, of course, no one ever shoots civilians or children, absolutely no one needs this. We came there to save them from the regime they were under.”

    Andriy Yermak, head of the Ukrainian president’s office, said in a tweet Monday that the group must be held accountable.

    “Russian terrorists confessed to numerous murders of Ukrainian children in Bakhmut and Soledar. Confession is not enough. There must be a punishment. Tough and fair. And it will definitely be. How many more crimes like these have been committed?” he said.

    In February, CNN spoke to two former Wagner fighters who described how recruited Wagner convicts are pushed to the front lines in a human wave, reminiscent of World War I charges. Deserters, or those who refuse orders are killed and there was no evacuation of the wounded, they said.

    In January, US Treasury Department designated Wagner Group as a significant transnational criminal organization, and imposed a slew of fresh sanctions on a transnational network that supports it.

    The US Department of State concurrently announced a number of sanctions meant to “target a range of Wagner’s key infrastructure – including an aviation firm used by Wagner, a Wagner propaganda organization, and Wagner front companies,” according to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hand over $1B of Russian ‘blood money,’ Ukraine tells Shell

    Hand over $1B of Russian ‘blood money,’ Ukraine tells Shell

    [ad_1]

    Oil and gas giant Shell must donate more than $1 billion in unexpected profits from the potential sale of its assets in Russia to help rebuild Ukraine, according to a top Kyiv official.

    In a letter to CEO Wael Sawan, dated April 18 and seen by POLITICO, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s economic adviser Oleg Ustenko called on Shell to share with Ukraine any profits from a potential Russian buyout of the British firm’s stake in a Siberian fossil fuel venture.

    “If completed, this sale would represent the transfer of more than $1 billion in Russian cash into Shell’s accounts. That would be blood money, pure and simple,” Ustenko wrote.

    “We call on Shell to put any Russian sale or dividend proceeds to work for the victims of the war — the same war that those assets have fuelled and funded,” he added.

    Following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year, Shell announced it would exit the Russian market and write off up to $5 billion of assets and investments in the country as a result.

    That included a 27.5 percent stake in the Sakhalin-2 project, a major oil field and offshore gas drilling venture in the Russian far east. The company wrote down around $1.6 billion for its stake in the site, and the Kremlin’s move to nationalize the venture in July last year raised concerns the firm would lose its capital.

    However, Russian business media reported earlier this week that the government signed off on a trade in which the country’s second-largest gas producer, Novatek, would buy out Shell’s stake for 95 billion rubles — currently worth around $1.16 billion. Shell has previously said it is not involved in any negotiations on the issue.

    Shell declined to give a public comment, but pointed out that the company is not actively engaged in any business with ongoing operations inside Russia, is not party to any current negotiations for the sale of a stake in Sakhalin-2 and has no clarity over what would happen to the proceeds from such a sale.

    “We appreciate that as of this moment, Shell may not have a choice on whether to accept this offer,” Ustenko conceded in the letter, but maintained there is an “overwhelming” moral case for donating any such profits.

    Rebuilding from the rubble

    According to NGO Global Witness, the funds would amount to more than a tenth of the total repair bill for attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, which a U.N. report last week warned could be as high as $10 billion.

    “It would be egregious if Shell kept this money,” said Louis Wilson, who leads Ukraine policy at the NGO. “This is money they’ve told the world they’ve written off as a loss and it’s money that comes straight from the Russian oil and gas sector. Shell has already set a precedent that profits from the war should go to Ukraine.”

    In March 2022, the energy firm said it would donate $60 million to humanitarian causes in Ukraine following an outcry over its decision to purchase a cargo of Russian crude to be refined into petroleum products. While the trade did not contravene sanctions at the time, Shell admitted “it was not the right decision” and apologized.

    In an interview with POLITICO last month, Ukrainian Energy Minister German Galushchenko urged major energy companies to donate excess revenues to his country.

    “A lot of energy companies get enormous windfall profits due to the war,” he said. “I think it would be fair to share this money with Ukraine. To help us to restore, to rebuild the energy sector.”

    That idea is getting some support from EU countries — although the final decision of whether to send cash to Ukraine is up to companies and their shareholders.

    [ad_2]

    Gabriel Gavin

    Source link

  • Kremlin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza given 25 years in prison for condemning war in Ukraine | CNN

    Kremlin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza given 25 years in prison for condemning war in Ukraine | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Vladimir Kara-Murza, a prominent Russian human rights advocate and Kremlin critic, has been sentenced to 25 years in prison after publicly condemning Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

    Kara-Murza was initially detained one year ago, hours after an interview with CNN in which he criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “regime of murderers.”

    He was on trial for criminal offenses that included treason, spreading fake news about the Russian army, and facilitating activities of an undesirable organization. Russia criminalized criticism of the military following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year. The court said he would serve his sentence “in a strict regime correctional colony.”

    “Based on the results of the trial, for Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza, by partial addition of sentences, to be sentenced to a final sentence of imprisonment for a term of 25 years to be served in a strict regime correctional colony. The verdict of the Moscow City Court has not yet entered into force,” a statement from the court read.

    Kara-Murza will appeal the sentence, his lawyer, Vadim Prokhorov, told CNN on Monday.

    The activist’s detention has been decried by international human rights organizations and prompted sanctions by the Biden administration last month.

    Monday’s sentencing draws further attention on Putin’s brutal crackdown against freedom of expression, which has intensified since he invaded Ukraine last February.

    Kara-Murza has long been critical of Putin and has survived two poisonings.

    In March 2022, he spoke before the Arizona House of Representatives against the war, and in an interview with CNN in April 2022, the political dissident condemned Putin’s regime for targeting critics. He was arrested shortly afterwards for “failing to obey the orders of law enforcement,” according to his wife.

    The sentencing quickly drew further international condemnation of Putin. Amnesty International called the decision a “chilling example of the systematic repression of civil society” under the Kremlin that is “reminiscent of Stalin-era repression,” and UN Human rights chief Volker Tuerk described it as a “blow to the rule of law and civic space in the Russian federation.”

    “No one should be deprived of their liberty for exercising their human rights, and I call on the Russian authorities to release him without delay,” Tuerk said.

    The British government criticized what it called the “politically motivated” sentencing. “Vladimir Kara-Murza bravely denounced Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for what it was – a blatant violation of international law and the UN Charter. Russia’s lack of commitment to protecting fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression, is alarming,” Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said on Monday.

    And German government spokesperson Andrea Sass said the trial showed “how the Russian justice system is instrumentalized against him and many of his compatriots and also shows what a shocking extent the repression has reached in Russia in the meantime.”

    The charge of treason in Russia was broadened in 2012 to include consultations or any other assistance to a foreign state or international or foreign organizations. It was used against Kara-Murza over his condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    In March, the United States imposed sanctions on a number of Russian individuals connected to what the Treasury Department called Kara-Murza’s “arbitrary detention” and called for his “immediate and unconditional release.”

    In the final hearing of his trial last week, Kara-Murza said he was “proud” of his political views.

    “I’m in jail for my political views; for speaking out against the war in Ukraine, for many years of struggle against Putin’s dictatorship, for facilitating the adoption of personal international sanctions under the Magnitsky Act against human rights violators. Not only do I not repent of any of this, I am proud of it,” Kara-Murza said.

    The original Magnitsky Act, signed into law in December 2012, blocks entry into the US and freezes the assets of certain Russian government officials and businessmen accused of human rights violations. The law was subsequently expanded to give global scope to the Russia-focused legislation.

    Kara-Murza said he blamed himself for not being able to convince enough of his “compatriots” and politicians of democratic countries of the danger that the current regime in the Kremlin poses for Russia and the world.

    He also expressed that he hoped “that the day will come when the darkness over our country will dissipate.”
    “Even today, even in the darkness surrounding us, even sitting in this cage, I love my country and believe in our people,” he added. “I believe that we can walk this path.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A weapons stockpile and asymmetric warfare: how Taiwan could thwart an invasion by China — with America’s help | CNN

    A weapons stockpile and asymmetric warfare: how Taiwan could thwart an invasion by China — with America’s help | CNN

    [ad_1]


    Taipei, Taiwan
    CNN
     — 

    When Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen defied warnings from China to meet with US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in California earlier this month, Beijing’s aggressive military response reverberated around the world.

    In actions that only fueled fears that communist-ruled China may be preparing to invade its democratically ruled neighbor, the People’s Liberation Army simulated a blockade of the island, sending an aircraft carrier and 12 naval ships to encircle it, and flying over a hundred warplanes into its air defense identification zone during a three-day military drill.

    China’s ruling Communist Party, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory despite never having controlled it, described the drills as “joint precision strikes” that should serve as a “serious warning against the Taiwan separatist forces.”

    The message, in Taipei’s mind, seemed clear. China appeared “to be trying to get ready to launch a war against Taiwan,” the island’s Foreign Minister Joseph Wu told CNN’s Jim Sciutto.

    That blunt assessment will likely have raised doubts in some quarters over whether the island’s military preparations for such a scenario are sufficient.

    Taipei recently – and very publicly – announced an extension to mandatory military service periods from four months to a year and accelerated the development of its indigenous weapons program to boost its combat readiness.

    But analysts say a recent announcement – one that has perhaps gone less remarked upon in the global media – could prove a game-changer: talks between Taipei and the United States to establish a “contingency stockpile” of munitions on Taiwan’s soil.

    In remarks that were not widely picked up at the time, Defense Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng told Taiwan’s parliament in March that Taipei was in discussions with the US over a potential plan to set up a war reserve stock on the island – a measure made possible by a provision in the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), signed into law by US President Joe Biden last December.

    And while Taiwan has long been a purchaser of weapons from the US, military experts say the creation of such a stockpile could be vital to the island’s defense because – as China’s recently simulated blockade showed – it could be incredibly difficult to supply the island with additional weapons if war does break out.

    Unlike Ukraine, Taiwan has no land borders so any supplies would have to go in by air or sea – delivery methods that would be highly vulnerable to interceptions by the Chinese military.

    It is therefore vital for Taiwan to stock up ammunition on the island before any conflict begins, said Admiral Lee Hsi-min, who served as Chief of the General Staff for the Taiwanese military between 2017 and 2019.

    “Having a war reserve stockpile is crucial and meaningful for Taiwan,” he said. “Even if the United States does not want to intervene directly with military force, those kinds of stockpiles can still be very effective for our defense.”

    Taiwan has also repeatedly raised concerns about delays in US weapon deliveries amid the war in Ukraine. Following his meeting with Tsai, Speaker McCarthy tweeted: “Based on today’s conversations, it’s clear several actions are necessary: We must continue arms sales to Taiwan and make sure such sales reach Taiwan on time.”

    Patriot surface-to-air missile systems at Warsaw Babice Airport in the Bemowo district of Warsaw, Poland, on 06 February, 2023.

    The talks over the possible stockpile beg the question: What exactly does Taiwan need for its defense?

    For decades, the Taiwanese military has been purchasing fighter jets and missiles from the United States, which continues to be the single biggest guarantor of the island’s safety despite not having an “official” diplomatic relationship.

    Last month, the Biden administration made headlines with its approval of potential arms sales to Taiwan worth an estimated $619 million, including hundreds of missiles for its fleet of F-16 fighter jets.

    But Admiral Lee said Taiwan urgently needed to stock up on smaller and more mobile weapons that would have a higher chance of surviving the first wave of a Chinese attack in an all-out conflict – which would likely include long-range joint missile strikes on Taiwanese infrastructure and military targets.

    In a high-profile book published last year, titled “Overall Defense Concept,” Lee argued that Taiwan should shift away from investing heavily in fighter jets and destroyers, as its military assets were already vastly outnumbered by China’s and could easily be paralyzed by long-range missiles.

    Last year, China’s defense budget was $230 billion, more than 13 times the size of Taiwan’s spending of $16.89 billion.

    Admiral Lee Hsi-min, during an interview with CNN in Taipei, Taiwan.

    So instead of matching ship for ship or plane for plane, Lee argued, Taiwan should embrace an asymmetric warfare model focused on the procurement of smaller weapons – such as portable missiles and mines – that are hard to detect but effective in halting enemy advances.

    “In Ukraine, their military has used Neptune anti-ship missiles to sink Moscow’s battleships,” he said. “Asymmetric weapon systems will allow us to maintain our combat capabilities. That is because if our enemies want to destroy them, they will need to get closer to us, which makes them vulnerable to our attack.”

    “If we can establish good enough asymmetrical capability, I believe China won’t be able to take over Taiwan by force, even without United States’ intervention,” he added.

    Though the US maintains close unofficial ties with Taiwan, and is bound by law to sell arms to the island for its self-defense, it remains deliberately vague on whether it would intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion, a policy known as “strategic ambiguity.”

    Under this year’s National Defense Authorization Act, passed by the US Congress and signed by US President Joe Biden, Taiwan will be eligible to receive up to $1 billion in weapons and munitions from the United States to counter China’s growing military threat.

    The act also allows for the creation of a regional contingency stockpile, which would enable the Pentagon to store weapons in Taiwan for use if a military conflict with China arises.

    In a response to CNN for this article, a spokesman at Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense confirmed it is in discussions with the United States on the definition of a “contingency”, the types of munition that can be operated immediately by its armed forces, and the timeline for shipping the items.

    The ministry added that the move is aimed only at meeting Taiwan’s defensive needs, as opposed to “pre-stocking” munitions on the island.

    The US Indo-Pacific Command declined to provide details about the progress of talks on creating the stockpile but said it would continue to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.

    Meanwhile, China’s Foreign Ministry told CNN that it “resolutely opposes” any military exchanges between the United States and Taiwan, adding that Beijing will take “all necessary measures” to defend its sovereignty and security interests.

    A Javelin anti-tank weapon is fired during a joint military exercise between US and Philippine troops in Fort Magsaysay on April 13, 2023.

    Lin Ying-yu, an assistant professor from Tamkang University who specializes in military affairs, said that if a contingency stockpile were to be created, it should focus on amassing munitions already in use by Taiwan’s military to ensure operational effectiveness.

    “I think some of the weapons that the US might be willing to provide include the Stinger and the Patriot missiles,” he said. The Stinger is a surface-to-air missile that can be fired by a single soldier, while the Patriot missile defense system is capable of intercepting enemy missiles and aircraft.

    Admiral Lee said another weapon that could be stockpiled was the Javelin, a US-made portable anti-tank weapon system that has been widely used by the Ukrainian military to target Russian tanks.

    The National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System, or NASAMS, could also be useful for targeting Chinese warplanes, he said, as it was capable of firing the medium-range AIM-120 missile from ground level.

    Other weapons that should be considered included the loitering munition drone – a so-called “suicide drone” that can be carried by a single soldier and is capable of destroying high-value targets – as well as other anti-armor and anti-ship weaponry, he added.

    “If you have a high enough number of these kinds of asymmetrical weapon systems that survive the initial attack, you can keep most of your fighting capabilities intact and stop the enemy from conducting a landing operation,” Lee said.

    Another question that arises is how many weapons or missiles Taiwan would need to defend itself against China.

    Experts said providing a concrete number was difficult because the possible combat scenarios were so varied.

    In his book, Admiral Lee wrote that the Chinese military could resort to different options in attempting to bring Taiwan under its control.

    In an all-out war, China could fire long-range missiles to destroy Taiwanese infrastructure and military targets before attempting to send its ground troops across the Taiwan Strait.

    Other scenarios with limited military action could include an aerial and naval blockade around Taiwan, or the seizure of Taiwan’s small outlying islands that are close to the Chinese coast.

    However, Lin suggested the number of missiles that Taiwan likely needs would be in the “tens of thousands.”

    Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen with US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California on April 5, 2023.

    He said one relatively simple way of calculating the number of missiles required involves estimating the total number of offensive military assets owned by the enemy, and the effectiveness of Taiwan’s defensive weapons. “For example, if our enemy has 1,000 missiles and we have a success rate of 25%, then we will need about 4,000 anti-ballistic missiles.”

    In addition to weapons, Taiwan’s military could benefit from mobile radar systems that would enable it to receive military signals from the US, Lin added. These would be useful in conducting electronic warfare, as the US military would be able to help identify potential enemy targets even if ground radar systems had been destroyed.

    “Even though the United States does not have troops on the ground in Ukraine, it has been able to tell the Ukrainian military where to fire their weapons by sending signals from its electronic warfare aircraft,” Lin said. “We need to make sure we have the necessary equipment to link with US military systems at times of war.”

    There were other reasons the discussions with the US over the possible stockpile were important, Admiral Lee said, and they went beyond issues of storing up ammunition and spare parts.

    “(Having a contingency stockpile) is very crucial, because it sends a signal to China that the United States is determined to assist in our defense,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russians defect to Ukraine to fight invasion

    Russians defect to Ukraine to fight invasion

    [ad_1]

    Russians defect to Ukraine to fight invasion – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine continues, but some Russians have defected to fight against the assault. Holly Williams speaks with two Russians who are now fighting for Ukraine.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Putin meets with China’s defense minister in Moscow

    Putin meets with China’s defense minister in Moscow

    [ad_1]

    Russians defect to Ukraine to fight invasion


    Russians defect to Ukraine to fight invasion

    01:52

    Russian President Vladimir Putin met with China’s defense minister on Sunday, underscoring Beijing’s strengthening engagement with Moscow, with which it has largely aligned its foreign policy in an attempt to diminish the influence of the United States and other Western democracies.

    Putin and Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu met with Gen. Li Shangfu less than a month after Chinese leader Xi Jinping held a three-day state visit to Moscow.

    China has refused to criticize Russia’s military actions in Ukraine and blames the United States and NATO for provoking Moscow. But China’s foreign minister said last week that China wouldn’t be helping Russia with weapons, as the U.S. and other Western allies have feared.

    State councilor Li Shangfu (right) swears an oath after he was elected during the fifth plenary session of the National People's Congress (NPC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 12, 2023.
    State councilor Li Shangfu (right) swears an oath after he was elected during the fifth plenary session of the National People’s Congress (NPC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 12, 2023.

    NOEL CELIS/AFP/Getty Images


    Officially, China remains neutral in the Ukraine conflict. However, Xi’s trip emphasized how China is increasingly becoming the senior partner in the relationship as it provides Russia with political cover and an economic lifeline during the Ukraine conflict.

    In comments opening the meeting, Putin praised the general development of Russia-China relations.

    “We are also working actively through the military departments, regularly exchanging information that is useful to us, cooperating in the field of military-technical cooperation, conducting joint exercises, moreover, in different theaters: in the Far East region, and in Europe, and at sea, and on land and in the air,” he said, according to the Kremlin.

    Li said that the countries’ relations “outperform the military-political unions of the Cold War era. They rest on the principles of nonalignment, and are very stable.”


    [ad_2]

    Source link