ReportWire

Tag: ukraine

  • Ukraine’s Kyiv area hit by Iranian-made kamikaze drones

    Ukraine’s Kyiv area hit by Iranian-made kamikaze drones

    [ad_1]

    KYIV, Ukraine — Ukraine’s capital region was struck by Iranian-made kamikaze drones early Thursday, officials said, sending rescue workers rushing to the scene as residents awoke to air raid sirens for the fourth consecutive morning following Russia’s major assault across the country earlier this week.

    Kyiv regional governor Oleksiy Kuleba said the strike occurred in the area around the capital. It wasn’t yet clear if there were any casualties.

    Deputy head of the presidential office Kyrylo Tymoshenko said on Telegram that “critical infrastructure facilities” in the area were hit, without offering any details on which ones.

    In the southern city of Mykolaiv, overnight shelling destroyed a five-story apartment building as fighting continued along Ukraine’s southern front.

    Mykolaiv regional governor Vitali Kim said that an 11-year-old boy was rescued from under the rubble, where he had spent six hours, and rescuers on Thursday morning were searching for seven more people, Kim said.

    He said that the building was hit by an S-300 missile which is ordinarily used for targeting military aircraft, but Russians have apparently been increasingly using them for unprecise ground strikes.

    Early morning attacks on Ukraine’s southern front have become a daily occurrence in Russia’s war as Kyiv’s forces push a counteroffensive aimed at recapturing territory occupied by Moscow.

    Attacks on Kyiv had become rare before the capital city was hit at least four times during Monday’s massive strikes, which killed at least 19 people and wounded more than 100 across the country.

    Western leaders this week pledged to send more weapons to Ukraine, including air defense systems and weapons Kyiv has said are critical to defeating the invading Russian forces.

    Britain said Thursday that it will provide missiles for advanced NASAM anti-aircraft systems that the Pentagon plans to send to Ukraine in coming weeks. It’s also sending hundreds of additional aerial drones for information gathering and logistics support, plus 18 more howitzer artillery guns.

    U.K. Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said that “these weapons will help Ukraine defend its skies from attacks and strengthen their overall missile defense alongside the U.S. NASAMS.”

    The systems, which Kyiv has long wanted, will provide medium- to long-range defense against missile attacks.

    The offer comes as NATO defense ministers meet in Brussels, aiming to help bolster Ukraine’s aerial defenses after Monday’s widespread Russian assault.

    Ukraine’s military said this week that its current air defenses have shot down dozens of incoming Russian missiles and Shahed-136 drones, the so-called kamikaze drones that have played an increasingly deadly role in the war.

    ———

    Follow the AP’s coverage of the war at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asks G7 leaders for help

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asks G7 leaders for help

    [ad_1]

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asks G7 leaders for help – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy implored the leaders of the G7 to provide Ukraine with effective air defense systems to protect against Russia’s aerial bombardment. Charlie D’Agata reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden facing pressure to punish Saudi Arabia after OPEC+ cuts oil production

    Biden facing pressure to punish Saudi Arabia after OPEC+ cuts oil production

    [ad_1]

    President Biden issued a vague warning to Saudi Arabia on Wednesday, after the OPEC+ alliance of oil-exporting nations decided last week to cut oil production by 2 million barrels per day. Biden pledged “consequences” and vowed to “take action” — but some Senate Democrats are demanding a swift and concrete response. 

    Lawmakers like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Bob Menendez have floated ideas including freezing arms sales to Saudi Arabia, which is a member of OPEC+, and pulling all U.S. troops out of the country. 

    OPEC+’s move could push gas prices back up and boost Russia’s oil revenue. The national average for a gallon of on Wednesday was $3.92 — up nine cents in the last week. 

    White House officials had lobbied OPEC+ nations not to cut back. 

    “They are helping and aligning with a murderous, brutal war criminal, Vladimir Putin,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal.

    Biden said Wednesday that he wants to consult with Congress before deciding on any consequences. It’s a delicate situation, given that a rift in the U.S.-Saudi relationship could also rattle oil markets and drive up prices in the month before the midterm elections.    

    Biden himself traveled to Saudi Arabia this summer, even fist bumping Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, despite his alleged role in the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. 

    But punishing Saudi Arabia wouldn’t be simple. CBS News senior security contributor Mike Morell says many of the potential punishments come with downsides. 

    “Denying arms sales to Saudi Arabia not only hurts U.S. firms selling those weapons, but it also hurts the security of the region, because we want the Saudis to have American weapons,” Morell said. “They want to have American weapons because if we ever have to fight Iran together, we want those weapons systems to complement each other.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia escalates attacks after Crimea bridge blast

    Russia escalates attacks after Crimea bridge blast

    [ad_1]

    Russia escalates attacks after Crimea bridge blast – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Kremlin says it has arrested eight people — five of them Russian — in connection with the destruction of a key bridge linking Russia to Crimea. The explosion led to an escalation of attacks across Ukraine. Charlie D’Agata has the latest on the war.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Putin threatens Europe again as Brussels braces for winter

    Putin threatens Europe again as Brussels braces for winter

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    The EU’s energy crisis response is getting bigger, slowly. But so, too, is the threat posed by Russia’s freeze on Europe’s gas supply.

    A new package of measures to bring down the price of gas and protect consumers this winter and beyond — including plans to fully leverage the EU’s collective buying power — will be formally proposed by the European Commission next week.

    But there remains uncertainty about key aspects of the package — including whether the preferred intervention of many countries, an EU-wide cap on gas prices, will be part of it, and if so, in what form. It could also take until November to get next week’s proposals fully signed off and operational, officials said.

    Even as energy ministers deliberated over the measures in Prague on Wednesday, Russia issued new, veiled warnings about the depths of Europe’s vulnerability.

    Speaking at an energy conference in Moscow, the head of Gazprom Alexey Miller warned European homes could still freeze this winter even though EU countries have nearly filled their gas storage capacity.

    At the same event, Vladimir Putin discussed the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines — an act that many Western governments suspect was the work of Russia. Then he added pointedly that the incident had shown how “any critical infrastructure in transport, energy or communication infrastructure is under threat — regardless of what part of the world it is located, by whom it is controlled, laid on the seabed or on land.”

    Noting that one of the pipelines is still potentially operational after the attack, Putin insisted Russia was ready to send gas through it to ease Europe’s pain this winter — bringing his overarching strategy of gas blackmail against Europe right up to date.

    “The ball, as they say, is on the side of the European Union. If they want it, let them just open the tap,” Putin said. “We are ready to supply additional volumes in the autumn-winter period.”

    Putin may still be hoping that when the reality of winter without Russian gas begins to bite, European governments will be more open to such overtures ­— and more willing to rein in support for Ukraine in exchange for an energy lifeline.

    For the EU’s part, Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson was clear that while the bloc faced “difficult times,” countries would withstand the challenges ahead if they “act together, decisively and in solidarity.”

    Speaking at the close of an informal summit of EU energy ministers on Wednesday, she added that the next crisis package will also contain a proposal for a new benchmark price for gas and further measures to reduce demand across the bloc.

    But while a row over capping the price of gas has dominated the debate in recent weeks, momentum has shifted to the idea of joint purchasing on the international market. It is hoped that through this measure the bloc can avoid the situation seen this year when member states outbid one another for supplies when filling gas storage facilities ­— driving up the price for all.

    European Commissioner for Energy Kadri Simson | John Thys/AFP via Getty Images

    In an informal policy paper issued on Wednesday, Germany and the Netherlands set how such a measure could work, by beefing up the existing EU Energy Platform, which was established months ago but then barely used. Efforts to buy gas jointly should be coupled with better EU-wide coordination of gas storage next year, the German and Dutch paper said.

    The proposals point to the extent to which the EU is no longer simply planning how to survive this winter without rolling blackouts. It’s now firmly planning for a crisis next winter too.

    Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol, who also attended Wednesday’s summit in Prague, warned ministers that “the next winter may well be even more difficult.”

    That message was echoed in a sobering briefing from the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, which outlined how challenging 2023 and potentially 2024 could be for the bloc’s energy supply. Amid an expected surge in demand in Asia for liquefied natural gas (LNG), the EU will face greater competition for limited LNG supplies from sources such as the U.S. and Qatar.

    In short, every molecule of gas that remains in European storage after this winter might be vital — and Vladimir Putin knows it.

    Victor Jack and America Hernandez provided additional reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Charlie Cooper

    Source link

  • 6 War-Tested Leadership Rules to Follow During a Crisis

    6 War-Tested Leadership Rules to Follow During a Crisis

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Since Feb. 24, 2022, our usual course of work has changed dramatically. Instead of experimenting with new content formats for fun and easy learning, we had to evacuate our Ukrainian to safe regions in and abroad. This experience has become the most challenging crisis for our company, and the times of Covid-19 now seem only a preparation for the harsh military reality of today. But now, more than half a year after the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, our team has stabilized; we had zero downtime in operations and even accelerated our growth.

    I believe decisive leadership is the secret to living through a crisis and adapting to a new reality — and my company’s managers, as well as the broader team, fully coped with this challenge. These five rules of crisis leadership have helped our core team and each employee maintain business despite the horrors of .

    Related: I Run Two Businesses in Ukraine. Here’s How We’re Resilient Enough to Continue Operating During War

    Rule #1: Foster a culture of leadership at all levels

    Lead at all levels — that means each team member must take ownership of their work. But how do you achieve this when most people usually want somebody to tell them what to do? The answer is in the ladder of control principle described in the book Turn the Ship Around! by David Marquet.

    Its main point is to push authority to as low a level as possible by encouraging people to take responsibility, and its main secret is a slight language change your team usually uses. If your employees ask a manager what to do, all the burden lies on the manager’s shoulders. It may be easier and faster in the , but the team feels less responsible, engaged, and motivated in the long term. We ask people to start their requests with “I intend to…” and add relevant information so that all the manager has to say is, “Very well.” It makes a real difference. People start taking ownership, become more accountable and involved, and turn to the real driving force behind a business. This leadership strategy works at all levels — from top managers to juniors.

    By fostering moving up the ladder of control, you build a culture of leadership where leaders bring up new leaders. This rule is first and foremost; without it, we wouldn’t pass the war test.

    Related: Ownership: The Ultimate Motivator

    Rule #2: Focus on people

    All crucial business decisions and growth are the merits of the people, not a strategy or instrument. That’s why any wise leader should invest in the team, their growth and their feeling of safety to achieve the company’s growth. Research shows that psychological safety at work, when people can act and speak up without fear, is a crucial driver for employee efficiency, healthy relationships at work, and greater . Ultimately, it’s the bottom line for effective decision-making.

    But a severe crisis can mess up all your efforts to build psychological safety at your company, so you must put everything that doesn’t help people stabilize on the back burner for some time and focus on supporting your team. First people, then business. Think about the most critical needs of your employees — health issues, economic challenges or even a life threat — and try to meet them as much as possible.

    That’s why we centered on people’s security during the first day of the war. We evacuated our Ukrainian team with their families to safe places in the west of Ukraine and provided them with temporary accommodation. After a couple of weeks, we relocated part of our team to Poland. After providing security to all our Ukrainian team, we launched a series of meetings with psychologists and team gatherings to share feelings and personal experiences of the war.

    All of that helped us go through and adapt to a challenging period of shock and get back to a stable mode of operation, as far as possible, under the current conditions.

    Related: Why the Ukraine Crisis Should Make You Rethink How You Lead

    Rule #3: Establish priorities and act promptly

    During a crisis, the strategies of having a long-term vision and planning for that future don’t work. You need to come up with a new tactic according to the new reality and be ready to change your plans at any time. However, it’s essential to establish business priorities and keep them focused. Sometimes, it means you need to give up some business directions or cut them down significantly, even if you’ve been working on them passionately for a long time.

    We haven’t stopped providing learning services for our customers for a single day, but our Ukrainian team couldn’t work as usual during the first week of the war. As we directed our resources and efforts toward the safety of our team members and their families, not knowing what would happen next, we held back from investing in new projects. Instead, we decided to focus on actions that would help our business stay afloat during the crisis and continue generating profits.

    Those reactive decisions helped us to go through turbulent times for business, and after a couple of months, when all operations were stable, we picked up new projects again.

    Rule #4: Practice integrative awareness and keep bounded optimism

    In other words, stay confident, don’t give up , but remain in touch with reality. How do you implement it in practice when you lead the company in unprecedentedly uncertain conditions and constantly feel anxious? There is no perfect recipe, but carefully observing the fast-changing reality and your feelings about it can help keep you relatively calm and not spread your anxiety to the team. According to , this approach is called integrative awareness. It allows leaders of all levels to perceive even the most complicated challenges as issues they can solve and lessons all can learn.

    Another critical term for this rule is bounded optimism. Again, it is about being sensitive to severe crisis circumstances but keeping up a positive vision for the future and giving the team a sense of purpose and hope during the crisis.

    Related: What the War in Ukraine Can Teach Entrepreneurs About Collaboration

    Rule #5: Maintain transparent communication

    A crisis is a period when you have more questions than answers, and the best way to communicate about it is to be candid. Tell your team not only what you know, but also what you don’t know. Be clear about the current situation and your next moves to tackle it, and don’t be afraid to appear vulnerable. Though you hold responsibility for your employees, you’ll give them much more hope and support by acting like an actual human to whom they can relate.

    Eventually, acknowledging problems and openly communicating your concerns is much more effective than suppression; it allows the team to respond to emerging challenges and create fresh and potent ideas to deal with them.

    Rule #6: Adapt rapidly

    You can never completely get ready for a crisis, even if you have undergone it once. That’s why it’s important to develop several plans and be prepared for things to get out of hand. In this case, you need to get a hold of yourself, find strength and stability, and start your new plan to fight the crisis. Accepting that things can go wrong ultimately increases the level of resilience and chances to remain flexible and adaptable.

    In Ukraine, we have ascertained the truth of these words in our own experience. A couple of months before Feb. 24, the information field in Ukraine and worldwide was tense with news of a possible Russian attack. In response, our team prepared several contingency plans and various scenarios — from the most positive to the absolute worst.

    Going through a crisis with your team is a crush test and a game-changing experience for your company. And the best you can do to meet it prepared is to start cultivating leadership in your team at all levels, invest in people’s growth, and, of course, work on your awareness, adaptability, and resilience. Take such learning as a priority, and you’ll be prepared practically for anything. As Nelson Mandela put it: “Education is the most powerful weapon you can use to change the world.”

    [ad_2]

    Anton Pavlovsky

    Source link

  • Ukraine bats away Lukashenko’s border threats

    Ukraine bats away Lukashenko’s border threats

    [ad_1]

    KYIV — Ukraine is giving short shrift to increased posturing from Belarus’ authoritarian leader Alexander Lukashenko, who this week pledged to conduct joint deployments with Russian forces and triggered fears that Minsk could be seeking to engineer a false flag operation on the border.

    Belarus’ chief strategic significance in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine is that its territory — and importantly its airfields — are a springboard for attacks against northern Ukraine, most significantly Kyiv. Indeed, Putin used Belarus in exactly this way in the opening phases of the war.

    Crucially, however, Lukashenko has avoided sending his own forces into the conflict, sensing it would be a political disaster.

    Just two years ago, Lukashenko survived massive street protests against his rule by using brutal force, and the heavy casualties that the Belarusian army would probably sustain in the war against Ukraine could reignite popular anger against his rule. His direct involvement in the war would also mean more Western sanctions against a nation that has already been seriously hit by restrictions over the rigged 2020 presidential election.

    Law enforcement officers respond to a protest against President Lukashenko’s rule in 2020 | AFP via Getty Images

    Attention swung back to Lukashenko’s motives this week when he said on Monday that he had agreed with Putin to deploy a joint regional military group. He added that this order had been given two days before, apparently after the explosion of the Russia-Crimea bridge, which Moscow blamed on Ukraine. Lukashenko said that the Belarusian army would form the base of this group.

    Lukashenko also made fake claims about a potential Ukrainian attack against Belarus. He issued a warning to the Ukrainian leadership in the light of supposed information on “strikes on Belarus from the territory of Ukraine.” Think tankers and independent Belarusian journalists considered this to be Minsk laying the ground for a possible false-flag operation.

    “This information was immediately brought to my attention. My answer was simple: Tell the president of Ukraine and other insane people … that the Crimea bridge will be just the thin end of the wedge to them, if only they touch a single meter of our territory with their dirty hands.”

    He made his statement as Russia was hitting Ukraine with barrages of missiles on Monday, and Lukashenko’s reference to the Crimea bridge was most likely a hint at Moscow’s retaliation.

    Despite this escalation in rhetoric, Ukraine’s military is remaining cool-headed about potential risks from Belarus.

    “The units of the Defence Forces are monitoring the situation, there are no signs of the formation of offensive groups on the territory of Belarus,” the general staff said in a statement on Tuesday.

    The Ukrainian political leadership also played down Lukashenko’s provocative talk of the past days. 

    “Lukashenko continues to sell [Belarus’] sovereignty to Russia. The request to deploy Russian contingent in Belarus under false pretenses is the formalization of occupation,” Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, tweeted on Monday.

    Ukraine assesses risks and is ready for any threat from the Belarusian territory, he added. “The situation is under control, currently there is no sign of repeated invasion from Belarus.”

    Ukrainian forces have also added context about how much help they think Belarus is really offering Putin.

    Belarus is “involved in the repair” of Russian military equipment damaged during the war in the Ukrainian territory, the general staff of the Ukrainian armed forces said on Wednesday.

    Perhaps more significantly, the general staff added the first batch of 20 T-72 tanks was removed from storage in Belarus and sent to Russia’s Belgorod region, apparently with the aim of beefing up the army’s depleted reserves in eastern Ukraine.

    Meanwhile, the leader of the Belarusian opposition Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, who ran against Lukashenko in 2020’s fraudulent presidential election and now lives in exile in Lithuania, urged Kyiv on Tuesday to build a joint “alliance against Russian aggression.”

    So far, the relationship between the Ukrainian authorities and Tikhanovskaya’s team has been limited. Unlike many Western leaders, Zelenskyy, as well as other senior Ukrainian officials, has never officially met Tikhanovskaya, much less recognized her as the legitimate leader of Belarus.

    Kyiv has always tried to distance itself from expressing direct sympathy for Tikhanovskaya, one of Lukashenko’s main political rivals, seeking not to provoke the authoritarian leader, who might then refrain from holding back and join Russia’s ground war in Ukraine.

    [ad_2]

    Sergei Kuznetsov

    Source link

  • Russia arrests 8 in bridge explosion as missile attacks in Ukraine lead to nuclear plant blackout

    Russia arrests 8 in bridge explosion as missile attacks in Ukraine lead to nuclear plant blackout

    [ad_1]

    Russia’s main domestic security agency said eight people were arrested over an explosion on a bridge that links Russia to the Crimean Peninsula.

    Russia’s Federal Security Service, known by the Russian acronym FSB, said it arrested five Russians and three citizens of Ukraine and Armenia in the attack on the Kerch Bridge. A truck loaded with explosives blew up while driving across the bridge Saturday, killing four people and causing sections of road to collapse.

    The span opened four years after Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, serving as a symbol of Moscow’s regional dominance as well as a crucial route for getting military supplies to Ukraine and Russian travelers to a popular vacation destination.

    The FSB alleged the detained suspects acted on orders of Ukraine’s military intelligence to secretly move the explosives by a convoluted route into Russia and forge accompanying documents.

    The Russian security services have pointed the finger at Ukraine’s intelligence directorate and its head, Kyrylo Budanov. Ukraine’s Defense Ministry on Wednesday dismissed accusations of Ukrainian involvement.


    Biden says Putin cannot threaten use of tactical nuclear weapons with impunity

    05:01

    “The entire activity of the FSB and the Investigative Committee is nonsense,” Defense Ministry spokesman Andriy Yusov told reporters.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to the blast by ordering missile strikes across Ukraine, where his forces over the last month lost ground in the east and south as Ukraine’s military waged a counteroffensive. 

    The Ukrainian president’s office said on Wednesday that strikes Moscow ordered in retaliation for the bridge attack killed at least 14 people and wounded 34 in the last day. On Monday, Ukrainian authorities said Russian missiles killed 19 people, including five in Kyiv, the capital.

    Meanwhile, the missile attacks caused a crippled nuclear plant in Ukraine to lose all external power for the second time in five days, increasing the risk of a radiation disaster because critical safety systems need electricity to operate, Ukraine’s state nuclear operator said Wednesday.

    Ukrainian nuclear power operator Energoatom said the Zaporizhzhia plant suffered a “blackout” Wednesday morning when a missile damaged an electrical substation, leading to the emergency shutdown of the plant’s last external power source.


    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asks G7 leaders for help

    03:29

    On-site monitors from the U.N.’s atomic energy watchdog reported the last remaining outside line to the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant was restored about eight hours later. The war-related interruption nonetheless highlighted “how precarious the situation is” at Europe’s largest nuclear plant, International Atomic Energy Agency Director Rafael Grossi said.

    All six of the reactors were stopped earlier due to the war. But they still require electricity to prevent them from overheating to the point of a meltdown that could cause radiation to pour from Europe’s largest nuclear plant. Energoatom said diesel generators were supplying the plant but Russian troops blocked a convoy carrying additional fuel for the back-up equipment.

    “Basically what we’ve got here is the weaponization of civil nuclear, perhaps for the first time,” Paul Dorfman, a nuclear expert at England’s University of Sussex said. “And in an increasingly unstable world, it’s important to understand this and what this implies for nuclear worldwide.”

    Ukrainian workers later found a way to repair the line and connected the plant to the Ukrainian power grid, the company said. The chief of Energoatom, Petro Kotin, told The Associated Press last month the plant typically had enough diesel on hand to run the generators — “the station’s last defense before a radiation accident” for 10 days.

    The bombardment also hit civilian buildings. Over the past two days, Russian strikes damaged about 1/3 of the country’s energy infrastructure, Ukrainian Energy Minister German Galushchenko said Wednesday.

    Ukraine’s presidential office said in a morning update that eight Ukrainian regions in southeast were affected by Russian shelling and attacks involving drones, heavy artillery and missiles in the previous 24 hours, while strikes on central and western parts of Ukraine had ceased.


    Russia launches barrage of missiles on Ukraine

    07:57

    More than a dozen missiles were fired at the city of Zaporizhzhia and its suburbs, damaging residential buildings. While part of a larger eponymous region that Moscow has claimed as its own in violation of international law, the city remains in Ukrainian hands. Russian forces control the area about 53 kilometers (33 miles) away by air where the nuclear plant is located.

    Kyrylo Tymoshenko, the deputy head of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, said Russian shelling left at least 14 people dead in the Zaporizhzhia region and the Donetsk region to the east. At least 34 people were wounded in five regions, he wrote on Telegram.

    Ukraine’s southern command said on Wednesday its forces recaptured five settlements in the southern Kherson region, on the western fringe of an arc of Russian-controlled territory in eastern and southern Ukraine.

    Kherson, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Luhansk are four regions recently annexed by Russia, a move condemned as illegal under international law by many countries and the U.N. secretary-general.

    Despite the advance, Ukrainian military analyst Oleh Zhdanov said Ukrainian forces’ counteroffensive in the south was losing pace while regrouping in the east to deliver a “powerful blow” on the front line between the cities of Svatove and Kreminna in Luhansk region.

    Western governments, in the wake of the punishing missile and drone strikes Russia carried out across Ukraine this week, were shipping new weapons systems to Ukraine or gearing up to provide more help: The U.S.-led Ukraine Defense Contact Group and NATO defense ministers held meetings in Brussels on Wednesday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • France orders striking oil workers back to refineries amid

    France orders striking oil workers back to refineries amid

    [ad_1]

    Queue at petrol station in Paris, France
    Lines formed at gas stations as some pumps have been running dry in France because of a strike by energy workers, as seen here on October 12, 2022 in Paris.

    Geoffroy Van der Hasselt/Anadolu Agency/Getty


    Paris — France’s premier ordered striking oil workers back to their refineries on Wednesday, as long lines persisted at gas stations across the country. Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne told France’s parliament that the situation had become “unbearable” in some parts of France, as drivers lined up for hours and many gas pumps ran dry.

    Her decision to order the requisition of essential workers came after a deal was negotiated Monday between oil producer Esso, the French branch of ExxonMobil, and two workers’ unions. Other unions voted to continue the strike at two Esso refineries, despite the order from the government in Paris.

    The striking workers said they would continue their action despite the government’s move. The workers are demanding a pay rise, arguing their salaries cannot keep up with inflation that has soared to almost 6% in France this year. The strike action began two weeks ago, shutting down refineries across much of the north and east of the country.

    Angered by the requisition order, another union joined the strike on Wednesday, extending the blockades.

    FRANCE-SOCIAL-PROTEST-ENERGY-STRIKE-WAGES
    A CGT Trade Union member (C) gestures as he speaks to journalists at the ExxonMobil refinery site, in Port-Jerome-sur-Seine, near Le Havre, northwest France, October 12, 2022.

    LOU BENOIST/AFP/Getty


    Government spokesman Olivier Véran warned that the requisition of essential workers could be extended to strikers at four other refineries, owned by France’s TotalEnergies.

    Officials have said that more than 30% of gas stations across France are now having trouble getting fuel supplies. Véran said, however, that once essential workers were ordered back to an Esso plant in Normandy, it should free up supplies and prompt “a real improvement” in the situation at gas stations.

    There have been some raised tempers in the long lines for gas, but most station owners have said people are trying to make the best of the situation. Riders were seen pushing scooters and motorcycles, rather than wasting precious fuel, and most drivers seemed more worried about the levels in their tanks than the high cost of the gas.

    France Fuel Shortages
    A gas station worker and a police officer set up a ribbon as they close a gas station in Paris, October 11, 2022, amid supply shortages caused largely by strikes that have hit French fuel refineries.

    Christophe Ena/AP


    In Vincennes, just outside Paris, drivers waited in line patiently, hoping their turn would come before the pumps ran dry.

    Najat Hakem, 36, said she had already tried several gas stations that day. “Every time, it says they have diesel, and when it’s my turn they run out, because people jump the queue,” she said. “People on scooters, cars like Ubers, they all say they have a valid reason to jump the queue. But I work, too.” 

    She said the minimum wait was around an hour. “This is my third attempt; I’ve been up since 6.30 a.m.,” she said.

    Odette Libert, 81, said she was in favor of requisitioning the refinery workers and was against the strike.

    “This is not acceptable in France, just because a few people want to annoy everyone. It’s their problem, not the problem of all the French people,” she said. “They have jobs, there are many people who can’t get work. If they don’t want to work there, they should leave and go elsewhere. So, requisition.”


    Gas prices in the U.S. expected to rise

    02:26

    Six of France’s seven refineries have been hit by the strikes. Only the Lavera refinery near Marseille was still operating normally on Wednesday. It is one of the largest refining sites in southern Europe, with the capacity to process 210,000 barrels per day.

    The war in Ukraine has hit energy supplies in Europe hard, and prices have soared since it began. That, in turn, has pushed inflation higher and raised the general cost of living. Inflation in France is currently at 5.6%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden sends a careful but chilling new nuclear message to Putin in CNN interview | CNN Politics

    Biden sends a careful but chilling new nuclear message to Putin in CNN interview | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    It’s never going to feel normal to hear a president discussing the danger of “Armageddon” – especially now, on camera.

    But Joe Biden used an exclusive CNN interview on Tuesday to send another careful, yet clear and chilling message to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the disastrous consequences of using nuclear weapons in the war in Ukraine.

    The first president since the 1980s to really have to game out calculations about nuclear arsenals and deterrence, Biden was asked by Jake Tapper whether he thought that Putin – who has warned he is prepared to use every option in Russia’s arsenal – might consider detonating one of the world’s most heinous weapons as an act of desperation in a losing war.

    Biden replied: “I don’t think he will.”

    But the President, who first touched on this subject at an off-camera fundraiser in New York last week, made crystal clear he was sending a public message to Putin about the dangers of thinking that using a lower yield, tactical nuclear bomb would be an isolated event.

    “What I am talking about, I am talking to Putin. He, in fact, cannot continue with impunity to talk about the use of a tactical nuclear weapon as if that’s a rational thing to do,” Biden said, before warning of dangerous consequences of such a move.

    “The mistakes get made, the miscalculation could occur, no one could be sure what would happen and it could end in Armageddon,” he said, again stressing that a nuclear blast that kills thousands of people could lead to events barreling way out of control.

    Biden is stating the fear of some strategists who warn about a ladder of escalation that could occur if a nuclear bomb is used and triggers reprisals by the West – even though any initial US response would certainly go no further than conventional military action.

    He also appears to be trying to create a narrative of deterrence around the specific situation in Ukraine. The logic of the US and Russia’s long-range strategic nuclear arsenals is that the use of them is deterred because a conflict would be suicidal for both sides. That equation does not exist in Ukraine, since the country has no nuclear arsenal and it’s hard to conclude that it represents a vital national interest that would lead Washington to respond in kind to Putin going nuclear. By stressing that even a tactical device – which could be small enough to destroy an airbase or large enough to reduce a city to ruins – could lead to something worse, Biden seems to be almost seeking to create a new chain of calculations in Putin’s mind.

    Two moments in Tapper’s interview brought home the burden now borne by the man who is followed everywhere he goes by a military officer carrying the nation’s nuclear codes.

    First the CNN anchor asked the President to state the US red line for the US and NATO in Ukraine and what Washington would do if Putin bombed a nuclear plant in Ukraine or set off a tactical nuclear weapon.

    “It would be irresponsible for me to talk about what we would or wouldn’t do,” Biden said.

    Then, Tapper prodded the President over whether the Pentagon had gamed out scenarios. Biden soberly replied: “The Pentagon didn’t have to be asked.”

    Watch the full exclusive interview with President Joe Biden

    Most experts and strategists estimate that there are many reasons why Putin would stop short of using a nuclear weapon – among them the possible risk of radioactive fallout crossing into Russia or the fact that the use of a tactical nuclear weapon may not actually be a sensible strategic option in the war.

    But the fact he’s pushed himself into a corner, along with his obliviousness to civilian loss of life underscored again by his callous assaults on Ukrainian cities this week, suggests that a humanitarian impulse is unlikely to be part of his calculation. And Biden himself said in the interview that while he believed Putin was a “rational actor,” he had made significant miscalculations and his objectives were not rational. That leaves open the possibility of even more decisions that appear irrational to the West but may seem reasonable in Putin’s warped logic.

    That is why Biden and experts who have dedicated their careers to staving off a nuclear apocalypse say the possibility that Putin may go nuclear must be taken so seriously – even if the chances remain very low and the US would likely be able to detect well ahead of time if Russia’s atomic devices were on the move.

    “It’s not a probable event. It’s not even likely,” said Joseph Cirincione, a nuclear non-proliferation expert and former president of the Plowshares Fund, said on CNN’s “Newsroom” on Tuesday.

    “But this is a low probability, high consequence event. If he uses even one nuclear weapon, he’s bringing us into a whole new world. He’s causing massive damage. And he’s running the risk of escalation with exchanges from the West that could lead to further exchanges, et cetera.”

    Cirincione explained that even if Putin’s saber rattling represented a political threat designed to scare the West, it cannot be discounted.

    “He has the means. He has the doctrine that allows him to use it. And he has the motive. He is losing this war. He has to do something to try to turn the tide of battle in desperation. He might turn to a nuclear weapon.”

    While some critics have faulted the President for mentioning words like “Armageddon” and comparing his rhetoric to that of Putin, the motivations of the two men are very different. At a minimum, the Russian leader is boasting about nuclear weapons to scare the world. Biden is speaking publicly to stave off the possibility of disaster.

    One reason the war in Ukraine is so dangerous is that nearly eight months in, there remains no prospect of any genuine diplomatic process that could defuse it. Ukraine’s forces, using US and allied weapons systems, are making remarkable progress on the battlefield and are determined to repel an unprovoked invasion that has caused carnage and extensive destruction. Putin has thrown so much personal prestige and Russian blood into the war he can hardly afford any outcome he cannot spin as a win, despite his autocratic grip on Russia.

    Biden signaled in the Tapper interview that he saw no real rationale to meet Putin when both leaders are expected to be at the G20 summit in Indonesia next month. But he did leave one intriguing door open to the Russian leader, saying he’d sit down with Putin if he were willing to discuss the fate of US basketball star Brittney Griner, who was sentenced in August to nine years in prison after pleading guilty to drugs smuggling. The US says Griner and another American, former US Marine Paul Whelan, have been wrongfully detained. Washington has offered to swap jailed Russian arms trafficker Viktor Bout for the two Americans.

    “Look, I have no intention of meeting with him, but look, if he came to me at the G20 and said, ‘I want to talk about the release of Griner,’ I would meet with him, but that would depend,” Biden said.

    The President also downplayed the idea that more generally there was anything to talk about.

    “He’s acted brutally, I think he’s committed war crimes, and so I don’t… see any rationale to meet with him now.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s unsolicited idea for Taiwan welcomed by Beijing, slammed in Taipei | CNN Business

    Elon Musk’s unsolicited idea for Taiwan welcomed by Beijing, slammed in Taipei | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    Hong Kong
    CNN Business
     — 

    As tensions between China and Taiwan simmer at their highest point in decades, officials in both places have clashed in recent days over an unsolicited idea from billionaire Elon Musk.

    The world’s richest man suggested in an interview that hostilities between the two could be resolved if Taipei handed some control of the democratically governed island to Beijing, prompting praise from China and predictable outrage in Taiwan.

    “My recommendation … would be to figure out a special administrative zone for Taiwan that is reasonably palatable, probably won’t make everyone happy,” Musk told the Financial Times in an interview published on Friday. “And it’s possible, and I think probably, in fact, that they could have an arrangement that’s more lenient than Hong Kong.”

    China’s ambassador to the United States, Qin Gang, thanked Musk for his suggestion in a tweet Saturday, calling for “peaceful unification and one country, two systems.”

    But Taiwan’s representative to the US, Bi-khim Hsiao, wrote: “Taiwan sells many products, but our freedom and democracy are not for sale.”

    China’s ruling Chinese Communist Party views Taiwan as part of its territory, despite having never governed it, and has long vowed to “reunify” the island with the Chinese mainland, by force if necessary. Taiwan, a democracy of 23 million people, strongly objects to Beijing’s claims to the island.

    Beijing has offered Taiwan a “one country, two systems” system of governance, similar to Hong Kong, but that has been rejected by all of the island’s mainstream political parties and the proposal has received very little public support.

    In a briefing on October 7, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said the “Taiwan question is China’s internal affair.”

    “China’s position on resolving the Taiwan question is consistent and clear. We remain committed to the basic principle of peaceful reunification and ‘one country, two systems,’” she said. “At the same time, we will resolutely defeat attempts to pursue the ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist agenda, push back interference by external forces, and safeguard our sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

    Wang Ting-yu, a senior lawmaker for Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party, slammed Musk in a Facebook post on Saturday. “Musk’s solution is all about victim concessions,” he said.

    Musk’s comments about Taiwan come days after he angered Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for tweeting a “peace” plan between Russia and Ukraine, proposing that Kyiv permanently cede Crimea to Moscow and hold new referendums in regions annexed by Russia – this time under the supervision of the United Nations.

    “Which Elon Musk do you like more?” Zelensky asked his Twitter followers, using the social media platform’s poll function.

    “One who supports Ukraine,” or “One who supports Russia.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ukraine recaptures 5 settlements in Kherson region

    Ukraine recaptures 5 settlements in Kherson region

    [ad_1]

    KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian forces recaptured five settlements in the southern Kherson region, according to the southern Operational Command.

    The villages of Novovasylivka, Novohryhorivka, Nova Kamianka, Tryfonivka and Chervone in the Beryslav district were retaken as of Oct. 11, according to the speaker of the southern command Vladislav Nazarov.

    The settlements are in one of the four regions recently annexed by Russia.

    Meanwhile, Russia’s top domestic security agency said Wednesday it arrested eight people on charges of involvement in the bombing of the main bridge linking Russia to Crimea, while an official in the southern Ukrainian city of Zaporizhzhia said Russian forces carried out more strikes there.

    The Federal Security Service, known by the Russian acronym FSB, said it arrested five Russians and three citizens of Ukraine and Armenia over Saturday’s attack that damaged the Kerch Bridge between Russia and the Crimean Peninsula — a crucial thoroughfare for supplies and travel whose much-ballyhooed construction under Russian President Vladimir Putin cost billions.

    A truck loaded with explosives blew up while driving across the bridge, killing four people and causing two sections of one of the two automobile links to collapse.

    Ukrainian officials have lauded the explosion on the bridge, but stopped short of directly claiming responsibility for it.

    The FSB alleged that the suspects were working on orders of Ukraine’s military intelligence to secretly move the explosives into Russia and forge the accompanying documents.

    It said the explosives were moved by sea from the Ukrainian port of Odesa to Bulgaria before being shipped to Georgia, driven to Armenia and then back to Georgia before being transported to Russia in a complex scheme to secretly deliver them to the target.

    Putin alleged that Ukrainian special services masterminded the blast, calling it “an act of terrorism,” and responded by ordering a barrage of missile strikes on Ukraine.

    Russia’s onslaught continued in the Zaporizhzhia region and eponymous city on Wednesday, shattering windows and blowing out doors in residential buildings, municipal council secretary Anatoliy Kurtev said. There were no immediate reports of casualties, though Kurtev warned locals of the possibility of a follow-up attack.

    Zaporizhzhia, which sits fairly near the front line between Russian and Ukrainian forces, has been repeatedly struck with often deadly attacks in recent weeks. It is part of a larger region, including Europe’s largest nuclear power plant now in Russian control, that Moscow has said it has annexed in violation of international law. The city itself remains in Ukrainian hands.

    To the south, in a Russian-controlled area of the region, a powerful blast struck the city of Melitopol — sending a car flying into the air, mayor Ivan Fedorov. There was no word on casualties.

    The new clashes came two days after Russian forces began pummeling many parts of Ukraine with more missiles and munition-carrying drones, killing at least 19 people on Monday alone in an attack the U.N. human rights office described as “particularly shocking” and amounting to potential war crimes.

    Tuesday marked the second straight day when air raid sirens echoed throughout Ukraine, and officials advised residents to conserve energy and stock up on water. The strikes knocked out power across the country and pierced the relative calm that had returned to the capital, Kyiv, and many other cities far from the war’s front lines.

    “It brings anger, not fear,” Kyiv resident Volodymyr Vasylenko, 67, said as crews worked to restore traffic lights and clear debris from the capital’s streets. “We already got used to this. And we will keep fighting.”

    The leaders of the Group of Seven industrial powers condemned the bombardment and said they would “stand firmly with Ukraine for as long as it takes.” Their pledge defied Russian warnings that Western assistance would prolong the war and the pain of Ukraine’s people.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the G-7 leaders during a virtual meeting Russia fired more than 100 missiles and dozens of drones at Ukraine over two days. He appealed for “more modern and effective” air defense systems — even though he said Ukraine shot down many of the Russian projectiles.

    The Pentagon on Tuesday announced plans to deliver the first two advanced NASAMs anti-aircraft systems to Ukraine in the coming weeks. The systems, which Kyiv has long wanted, will provide medium- to long-range defense against missile attacks.

    In a phone call with Zelenskyy on Tuesday, President Joe Biden “pledged to continue providing Ukraine with the support needed to defend itself, including advanced air defense systems,” the White House said.

    Ukraine’s defense minister tweeted that four German IRIS-T air defense systems had just arrived, saying a “new era” of air defense for Ukraine had begun.

    ———

    Follow the AP’s coverage of the war at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden says Putin ‘totally miscalculated’ by invading Ukraine but is a ‘rational actor’ | CNN Politics

    Biden says Putin ‘totally miscalculated’ by invading Ukraine but is a ‘rational actor’ | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]

    Watch Jake Tapper’s exclusive interview with President Joe Biden on CNN Tonight with Jake Tapper at 9 p.m. ET Tuesday.



    CNN
     — 

    President Joe Biden said in an exclusive CNN interview Tuesday he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin is a “rational actor” who nonetheless badly misjudged his ability to invade Ukraine and suppress its people.

    “I think he is a rational actor who has miscalculated significantly,” Biden told Jake Tapper as Russian bombardments on civilian targets in Ukraine signaled another turning point in the months-long war.

    Coming as the conflict in Ukraine approaches its eighth month, the interview with Biden provided fresh insight into his thinking as top US officials watch the fighting unfold in Ukraine with escalating concern.

    Biden, who warned last week the risk of “nuclear Armageddon” was at its highest level in 60 years, said in the interview that threats emanating from Russia could result in catastrophic “mistakes” and “miscalculation,” even as he declined to spell out how precisely the United States would respond if Putin deploys a tactical nuclear device on the battlefield in Ukraine.

    And he said there would “consequences” for Saudi Arabia after it partnered with Moscow to announce a cut in oil production, a move that could cause gas prices to increase as November’s midterm elections approach.

    Biden, his top officials and fellow Western leaders have spent the past several months debating what steps Putin may take as his troops suffer embarrassing losses on the battlefield in Ukraine.

    Whether Putin is acting rationally has been a subject of intense debate as leaders work to predict his next steps. While Biden said Tuesday he believed Putin himself was rational, he characterized the Russian leader’s aims in Ukraine – which Putin laid out in an angry speech as he launched the war in February – as ridiculous.

    “You listen to what he says. If you listen to the speech he made after when that decision was being made, he talked about the whole idea of – he was needed to be the leader of Russia that united all of Russian speakers. I mean, it’s just I just think it’s irrational,” Biden said.

    Going further, Biden said Putin wrongly believed Ukrainians would submit to Russian invasion – a misjudgment that’s been disproved by fierce resistance inside the country.

    “I think the speech, his objectives were not rational. I think he thought, Jake, I think he thought he was going to be welcomed with open arms, that this was the home of Mother Russia in Kyiv, and that where he was going to be welcomed, and I think he just totally miscalculated,” Biden said.

    Indeed, a counteroffensive launched by Ukraine last month was successful in retaking territory previously held by the Russians, including critical transportation hubs. The losses proved the latest major embarrassment for Russia, whose military has struggled over the course of the seven-month war.

    This week, however, Russia launched one of its fiercest bombing campaigns since invading in late February. At least 19 people have been killed and more than 100 wounded across the country, as far away as the western city of Lviv, hundreds of miles from the war’s main theaters in eastern and southern Ukraine.

    Asked whether he would meet Putin at next month’s Group of 20 summit in Indonesia, Biden said he didn’t see a good reason for a sit-down.

    “It would depend on specifically what he wanted to talk about,” Biden said, adding if Putin wanted to discuss the jailed American basketball star Brittney Griner then he would be open to talking.

    “But look, he’s acted brutally, he’s acted brutally,” Biden said. “I think he’s committed war crimes. And so I don’t, I don’t see any rationale to meet with him now.”

    Watch the full exclusive interview with President Joe Biden

    After Biden warned last week the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” was at its highest point since the Cuban Missile Crisis, he told Tapper he didn’t believe Putin would ultimately take that step.

    “I don’t think he will,” Biden said when asked by Tapper whether the Russian leader would use a tactical nuclear weapon – a prospect US officials have watched with concern as Russian troops suffer embarrassing losses on the battlefield.

    “I think it’s irresponsible for him to talk about it, the idea that a world leader of one of the largest nuclear powers in the world says he may use a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine,” Biden added.

    Biden said even Putin’s threats have a destabilizing effect, and warned of the potential errors in judgment that could ensue.

    “The whole point I was making was it could lead to just a horrible outcome,” he told Tapper. “And not because anybody intends to turn it into a world war or anything, but just once you use a nuclear weapon, the mistakes that can be made, the miscalculations, who knows what would happen.”

    “He, in fact, cannot continue with impunity to talk about the use of a tactical nuclear weapon as if that’s a rational thing to do,” Biden added later. “The mistakes get made. And the miscalculation could occur, no one can be sure what would happen and could end in Armageddon.”

    Biden refused to disclose what a US response would look like should Putin follow through on his nuclear threats. But he said the Department of Defense had proactively developed contingencies should the scenario come to pass.

    “What is the red line for the United States and NATO, and have you directed the Pentagon and other agencies to game out what a response would be if he did use a tactical nuclear weapon or if he bombed the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine or anything along those lines?” Tapper asked.

    “There’s been discussions of that, but I’m not going to get into that. It would be irresponsible of me to talk about what we would or wouldn’t do,” Biden said.

    “Have you asked the Pentagon to game it out, though?” Tapper asked.

    “The Pentagon didn’t have to be asked,” Biden said.

    Biden spoke to Tapper a few hours after meeting virtually with members of the Group of 7 industrialized nations, who heard from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the need to bolster his country’s air defenses amid the new Russian bombardments.

    Zelensky told the meeting that “common efforts to create an air shield for Ukraine” must be intensified amid a barrage of Russian cruise missile and drone attacks.

    White House officials have said the US is prepared to further bolster Ukraine’s air defenses, including through missile defense systems that Biden expedited delivery of over the summer.

    Yet Russia’s intense aerial assault of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv and on civilian infrastructure suggested Putin could be employing new tactics meant to terrorize Ukrainians as the winter approaches.

    Biden speaks Tapper during the interview.

    Biden told Tapper he believed it was time to “rethink” the US relationship with Saudi Arabia after the kingdom partnered with Russia to cut oil production, a rebuke after intensive White House efforts to prevent such a decision.

    “I am in the process, when the House and Senate gets back, they’re going to have to – there’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done with Russia,” Biden said.

    The decision by the Saudi-led OPEC+ oil cartel to cut production last week prompted anger at the White House, where officials said Biden was personally disappointed by what they called a “shortsighted” decision.

    The move, which came three months after Biden visited Saudi Arabia and met its de facto leader Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has the potential to raise gas prices in the weeks ahead of November’s midterm elections.

    “Let’s get straight why I went,” Biden said. “I didn’t go about oil, I went about making sure that we made sure that we weren’t going to walk away from the Middle East.”

    After reaching highs over the summer, gas prices had been steadily decreasing, providing Biden and his top aides a potent talking point in the lead-up to the elections.

    But a combination of factors, including rising demand and maintenance at some US refineries, has caused prices to begin ticking back up. The OPEC+ decision is poised to aggravate those factors.

    For Biden, the decision was a particular affront because of his efforts over the summer to repair ties with Saudi Arabia, despite the kingdom’s woeful human rights record and bin Salman’s role in the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

    This story has been updated with more from the interview with Biden.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Books To Read About Russia And Ukraine

    The Books To Read About Russia And Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    Reading Twitter threads is fine, but if you want a deeper understanding of an issue, it’s a good idea to read books. Below is a look at books to read on Russia and Ukraine that will enhance your knowledge of the war and both countries.

    Vladimir Putin: Many experts agree that without Vladimir Putin, Russia likely would not have launched its large-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. An excellent place to learn more about the Russian leader is Syracuse University Professor Brian D. Taylor’s The Code of Putinism, which explains the worldview of Putin and his closest supporters. Another outstanding book about Putin is journalist Catherine Belton’s Putin’s People, subtitled “How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took on the West.” In All the Kremlin’s Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin, Russian journalist Mikhail Zygar paints a vivid portrait of those around Putin and the influence of the security apparatus.

    In Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia, Timothy Frye argues that Putin is similar to other autocrats—much weaker than he appears, in part because he must rely on weak state institutions. Journalist Shaun Walker’s The Long Hangover: Putin’s New Russia and the Ghosts of the Past gives context to what became Putin’s ultimate plan for Ukraine. He writes that Putin used “a simplified narrative of the Second World War to imply Russia must unite once again against a foreign threat.”

    Peter Pomerantsev’s Nothing is True and Everything is Possible, Adventures in Modern Russia is an inside look from a former TV producer at the early freedom on Russian TV in the post-Soviet period—and how Putin and his allies snuffed out that freedom. In Between Two Fires, New Yorker Moscow correspondent Joshua Yaffa explains Putin’s control of Russian media, the belief in the need for a strong central leader, the compromises many Russians make and events that hinted at the wider invasion of Ukraine.

    The lost opportunity of Russia becoming a Western-style democracy with an economy not encumbered by corruption—if that opportunity existed—can be found in several books about reforms during Boris Yeltsin’s rule before Putin became president. These books include Chrystia Freeland’s Sale of the Century: The Inside Story of the Second Russian Revolution, Anders Åslund’s Russia’s Capitalist Revolution and Karen Dawisha’s Putin’s Kleptocracy, where she argues that a “kleptocratic tribute system [is] underlying Russia’s authoritarian regime.”

    In Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate, M. E. Sarotte provides a comprehensive history of the expansion of NATO following the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of communist regimes in Eastern Europe. Anne Applebaum’s Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956 and Timothy Garton Ash’s The Magic Lantern: The Revolution ’89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague explain why so many people in Eastern Europe wanted their countries to join NATO.

    A genre of books exists that could be called “You should have listened to me about Putin.” They include Garry Kasparov’s Winter Is Coming: Why Vladimir Putin and Enemies of the Free World Must Be Stopped, Fiona Hill and Clifford Gaddy’s Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin, and Mark Galeotti’s We Need to Talk About Putin: How the West Gets Him Wrong, where Galeotti correctly predicted: “It is hard to see any substantive improvement in relations with Russia, so long as Putin is in the Kremlin.” A post-February 2022 entry is The Russia Conundrum by Mikhail Khodorkovsky—who suffered for years in a Russian prison but believes “Russia can be saved from an endless succession of dictatorships, that she can become a normal country.”

    Putin’s Other Wars: Russian armed forces have committed widespread human rights abuses in Ukraine, including torture, bombing hospitals and attacking civilians. Anna Borshchevskaya describes similar atrocities in Putin’s War in Syria: Russian Foreign Policy and the Price of America’s Absence.

    Mark Galeotti explains the brutal tactics used in Russia’s Wars in Chechnya 1994-2009. (Galeotti will release Putin’s Wars: From Chechnya to Ukraine in 2022.) Ronald Asmus describes Russia’s invasion of Georgia and the world’s response in A Little War that Changed the World: Georgia, Russia and The Future of the West.

    Soviet and Russian History: Books on the Russian Revolution by Richard Pipes and Sheila Fitzpatrick are an excellent place to begin learning about the Soviet period, as well as Antony Beevor’s new book Russia: Revolution and Civil War, 1917-1921. Beevor’s book reads like a novel. Orlando Figes takes a longer perspective in Revolutionary Russia, 1891-1991: A History and The Story of Russia. A broad overview of Russian history can be found in Mark Galeotti’s A Short History of Russia, while Rodric Braithwaite writes about Russia: Myths and Realities.

    Robert Conquest’s The Great Terror: A Reassessment describes the Soviet government’s mass killings and repressions, while Anne Applebaum (Gulag: A History) and Alexander Solzhenitsyn (The Gulag Archipelago) detail the horrors of the Soviet prison camp system. Two more good books are Paul R. Gregory’s Terror by Quota and Lenin’s Brain And Other Tales From The Secret Soviet Archives, which describes the perversity of Soviet terror under Stalin, noting authorities used central planning to “assign execution and imprisonment targets . . . on a regional basis.”

    A small number of the lives Stalin destroyed are depicted in My Father’s Letters: Correspondence from the Soviet Gulag (by Memorial) and in such classic works as Hope Against Hope and Hope Abandoned by writer Nadezhda Mandelstam, the wife of poet Osip Mandelstam.

    Biographies of Stalin include two by Robert Tucker (Stalin as Revolutionary and Stalin in Power) and two by Stephen Kotkin (Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 and Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941).

    Simon Sebag Montefiore and Robert Service are also biographers of Stalin whose works should be read. Service also wrote Lenin: A Biography, A History of Modern Russia: From Tsarism to the Twenty-First Century and The End of the Cold War: 1985-1991. William Taubman wrote biographies of Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev. Dmitri Volkogonov, a former Soviet colonel who became a notable Russian historian, writes short, compelling portraits of the USSR’s leaders in Autopsy of an Empire: The Seven Leaders Who Built the Soviet Regime.

    Ukraine: An excellent history of Ukraine accessible to Western readers is The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine by Serhii Plokhy. Another well-written book on Ukraine is Anna Reid’s Borderland: A Journey Through the History of Ukraine, where, like Plokhy, she details tragic events in Ukraine that include Russian suppression of its culture, language and aspirations, Stalin’s famine, the Holocaust, World War II and Chornobyl, followed by its vote for independence and Russian interference and aggression in the years after that vote. Robert Conquest’s Harvest of Sorrow and Anne Applebaum’s Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine provide comprehensive examinations of the Soviet-created famines that caused the deaths of millions of Ukrainians.

    Yale Professor Timothy Snyder’s book Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin describes how Ukrainians (and others) suffered before and during World War II: “In the middle of Europe in the middle of the twentieth century, the Nazi and Soviet regimes murdered some 14 million people. . . . This is a history of political mass murder.” He separates these 14 million from the casualties caused by military conflict. (Snyder has made his course lectures on Ukraine available free online.) In The Devils’ Alliance: Hitler’s Pact with Stalin, 1939-1941, Roger Moorhouse rejects “the Kremlin’s postwar exculpatory line that Stalin was merely buying time by signing the pact.”

    For a longer frame of reference on Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014, there is The Crimean War: A History by Orlando Figes, who writes, “As for the Tsar, Nicholas I, the man more than anyone responsible for the Crimean War, he was partly driven by inflated pride and arrogance, a result of having been tsar for 27 years, partly by his sense of how a great power such as Russia should behave towards its weaker neighbors, and partly by a gross miscalculation about how the other powers would respond to his actions.” Readers will find parallels to the present.

    Journalist Tim Judah (In Wartime: Stories from Ukraine) writes, “For too long Ukraine, the second-largest country in Europe after Russia, was one of the continent’s most under-reported places.” That is no longer the case.

    Books about Ukraine’s post-Soviet period make clear that Russia’s war against Ukraine started in 2014, not in February 2022, as many in Western countries may think. In A Loss: The Story of a Dead Soldier Told by His Sister, Olesya Khromeychuk tells a heartbreaking story about her brother. He died fighting in the Donbas for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in 2017. The book reminds us how many lives a war can damage.

    Ukrainian journalist Stanislav Aseyev, author of In Isolation: Dispatches from Occupied Donbas, writes about the “underground torture chambers in Donetsk” where he found himself: “It was here, in prison, that I witnessed dozens of lives broken . . . but also the power of human will in situations that seemed entirely hopeless.”

    Ukraine vs. Darkness: Undiplomatic Thoughts by Olexander Scherba, a Ukrainian diplomat and former ambassador to Austria, is a prescient analysis of Russia’s intentions toward Ukraine written before the large-scale February 2022 invasion.

    Ukrainian writer Andrey Kurkov wrote Ukraine Diary: Dispatches from Kiev to describe the protests that started in 2013 and their aftermath. In The Fight of Our Lives: My Time with Zelenskyy, Ukraine’s Battle for Democracy, and What It Means for the World, Julia Mendel, the former press secretary to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, writes about the early days of the war and fills in biographical details about her former boss.

    Russian and Ukrainian Literature: Russian authors have contributed to the world’s culture even though Russian and Soviet leaders have killed, nearly killed and censored many of the country’s greatest writers.

    Soviet authorities killed Isaac Babel (born in Odesa), tormented Boris Pasternak for publishing Doctor Zhivago abroad and winning the Nobel Prize for Literature, prevented Mikhail Bulgakov from publishing his best novel (Master and Margarita) during his lifetime, and the list could go on. Fyodor Dostoevsky survived a Russian prison camp, and Alexander Solzhenitsyn lived through the Soviet Gulag. Leo Tolstoy was fortunate not to die during the Crimean War.

    Among the best-known works of Russian writers are Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anna Karenina and War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy, the plays and short stories of Anton Chekhov, Alexander Pushkin’s Eugene Onegin, Mikhail Lermontov’s A Hero of Our Time, Ivan Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons, Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Yevgeny Zamyatin’s We (a precursor to Orwell’s 1984). See also the works of Soviet writer Vladimir Voinovich.

    Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, of course, wrote other well-known novels and short stories. Turgenev’s A Sportsman’s Notebook is credited with influencing Tsar Alexander II’s decision to end serfdom in Russia. Turgenev was arrested and spent some time in prison.

    Modern-day Russian writer Sergei Lebedev has written stories, such as about the poisoning of regime opponents, that hit close to home. Another contemporary Russian writer, Vladimir Sorokin, author of Day of the Oprichnik, lives in exile due to his opposition to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    Russia ruled over Ukraine and suppressed the Ukrainian language. As a result, writers such as Nikolai Gogol typically wrote in Russian, even though he was born in Ukraine. He moved to Petersburg as a young man and wrote short stories set in Russia and Ukraine. His most well-known novel is Dead Souls.

    Taras Shevchenko (1814-1861) is Ukraine’s most famous poet. He wrote in Ukrainian and is credited with promoting Ukrainian culture, although Russian authorities suppressed his writings. There are several books available that translate his works. Contemporary Ukrainian writers include Andrey Kurkov (Grey Bees), Oksana Zabuzhko (Fieldwork in Ukrainian Sex), Serhiy Zhadan (Voroshilovgrad) and others.

    This list of books about Russia and Ukraine is not comprehensive, but a good place to start.

    [ad_2]

    Stuart Anderson, Senior Contributor

    Source link

  • Russia escalates strikes on Ukrainian civilian areas

    Russia escalates strikes on Ukrainian civilian areas

    [ad_1]

    Russia escalates strikes on Ukrainian civilian areas – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Russian missiles rained down across Ukraine for the second straight day. Russia’s military appeared to be targeting residential areas. Charlie D’Agata reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russia’s war in Ukraine | CNN

    Russia’s war in Ukraine | CNN

    [ad_1]

    Moscow is running thin on military weapons and staving off “desperation at many levels inside Russian society,” according to the head of the UK’s largest spy agency.

    “We believe that Russia is running short of munitions, it’s certainly running short of friends,” Jeremy Fleming, director of Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), told BBC Radio 4’s ‘Today’ program.

    “We’ve seen, because of the declaration for mobilization, that it’s running short of troops. So I think the answer to that is pretty clear. Russia and Russia’s commanders are worried about the state of their military machine,” Fleming said Tuesday.

    When asked if the Kremlin is desperate amid President Vladimir Putin’s faltering military campaign in Ukraine, Fleming added: “We can see that desperation at many levels inside Russian society and inside the Russian military machine.”

    Fleming’s comments came after Russia launched a wave of deadly strikes across Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities Monday, damaging critical infrastructure and killing at least 19 people.

    “Russia, as we’ve seen in the dreadful attacks yesterday, still has a very capable military machine. It can launch weapons, it has deep, deep stocks and expertise. And yet, it is very broadly stretched in Ukraine,” Fleming said.

    The violent strikes follow Putin’s announcement of immediate military escalation in September, in which he threatened the possibility of nuclear retaliation.

    “I think any talk of nuclear weapons is very dangerous and we need to be very careful about how we’re talking about that,” Fleming said when asked about Putin’s nuclear threats.

    GCHQ Director Jeremy Fleming delivers a speech at the Watergate House in London, England, on February 14, 2019.

    “I would hope that we would see indicators if they started to go down that path. But let’s be really clear about that, if they are considering that, that would be a catastrophe in the way that many people have talked about,” he added.

    In a speech later Tuesday, Fleming will also say Russians are increasingly counting the cost of the invasion of Ukraine and are seeing “how badly” Putin “has misjudged the situation.”

    “With little effective internal challenge, his decision-making has proved flawed. It’s a high stakes strategy that is leading to strategic errors in judgement. Their gains are being reversed,” Fleming will say in an address at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) annual security lecture in London.

    The senior spy chief will also say that ordinary Russians are “fleeing the draft.”

    “They know their access to modern technologies and external influences will be drastically restricted. And they are feeling the extent of the dreadful human cost of his war of choice,” he will say.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What are tactical nuclear weapons and how might Putin use them?

    What are tactical nuclear weapons and how might Putin use them?

    [ad_1]

    Russian President Vladimir Putin said this month he’s not bluffing about using nuclear weapons. If he were to follow through on that threat, it’s likely his weapon of choice would be tactical nuclear weapons. And he’s not the only one talking about these weapons. North Korea’s recent missile tests involved “tactical nuclear” drills to simulate hitting the South, according to the North’s state-run media. 

    What are tactical nuclear weapons? 

    Tactical nuclear weapons are sometimes referred to as “small nukes,” even though they still cause devastating fatalities and destruction. They are designed for limited strikes against relatively close specific targets, like command posts, instead of destroying cities from afar. 

    The explosive yield of tactical nuclear weapons can range from under one kiloton to about 100 kilotons, whereas strategic nuclear weapons can have a yield up to one thousand kilotons. The bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 were between 12 and 21 kilotons. The one dropped on Hiroshima weighed 9,700 pounds and a 10,800-pound bomb leveled Nagasaki.  

    Tactical nuclear weapons can have a similar yield or greater — up to several times as powerful as the Nagasaki bomb — but they are often smaller and more portable. For instance, during the Cold War, the Soviet Union developed devices small enough to fit into a suitcase-sized container. 

    Why were tactical nuclear weapons developed, and have they ever been utilized? 

    No one has ever used a tactical nuclear weapon in combat. Both the U.S. and the Soviet Union developed them early on during the Cold War as a method of deterrence. The NATO allies had them in Europe as part of their “flexible response” strategy to show the Soviet Union and its allies that any conflict, even one with conventional weapons, could have nuclear consequences. 

    How many deaths could result from a tactical nuke? 

    There is a wide range. Over 70,000 people are estimated to have died immediately when the U.S. bombed Hiroshima. Thousands of others later died due to poisoning from the radiation. 

    Tactical nuclear weapons, by design, do not have as much radioactive fallout, since they are used against a specific target, but there is still some fallout. 

    Nuclear historian Alex Wellerstein has built a simulation called NukeMap to estimate the effects of nuclear strikes. According to NukeMap, if the Davy Crockett, the smallest U.S.nuke ever produced, were to be used on a neighborhood in Washington, D.C., it would kill 3,270 people and injure 3,620. Other tactical nuclear weapons are larger and would result in a more devastating death toll. 

    How many tactical nuclear weapons are there now? 

    The most recent public U.S. intelligence estimates estimate Russia has up to 2,000 tactical nuclear weapons in its stockpiles. The U.S., on the other hand, has slightly more than 200

    The U.S. and other western countries decided decades ago to scale down their tactical nuclear weapon inventories because they believed there were more efficient deterrence methods and because of the risk that the small, portable weapons could get into the wrong hands, like terrorists. 

    How could Putin use a tactical nuclear weapon? 

    Putin could decide to launch a demonstration strike over the Baltic Sea or Black Sea as a scare tactic — not hitting people or infrastructure but proving capable of using nuclear weapons. Or he could conduct a strike against Ukrainian infrastructure, like a Ukrainian military base. 

    Russia could deploy a tactical nuclear weapon by ground, air or sea, using missiles that normally carry conventional explosives. 

    What would Putin gain by using a tactical nuclear weapon? 

    It’s not clear Russia would gain anything from using a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine. President Joe Biden told CBS News’ “60 Minutes” in September that if Russia were to use a tactical nuclear weapon, “they’ll become more of a pariah in the world than they ever have been. And depending on the extent of what they do will determine what response would occur.”

    The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said that if Putin decided to use a tactical nuclear weapon, it would likely be because he wants to shock Ukraine into surrendering or cut off western aid. But ISW doubts that such a strike would achieve either of these objectives. 

    How would the U.S. respond to a tactical nuclear weapon strike? 

    President Biden said at a private fundraiser this month that the world might face “the prospect of Armageddon” if Putin decided to use nuclear weapons and that the administration is trying to figure out what Putin’s “off-ramps” might be so that the situation does not escalate. 

    National security adviser Jake Sullivan said on “Face the Nation” last month the administration has warned Russia of “catastrophic consequences” if it resorts to using nuclear weapons, but he offered no further specificity. 

    At this point, the U.S. has not assessed that Putin has made a decision about using a tactical nuclear weapon, Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder said in a press briefing last week.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Putin, Erdoğan to meet in Kazakhstan

    Putin, Erdoğan to meet in Kazakhstan

    [ad_1]

    Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Kazakhstan’s capital Astana on Wednesday on the sidelines of a regional summit, a Turkish official told AFP Tuesday.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday that potential talks between Russia and the West might be discussed during the meeting. The leaders are both attending the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA).

    Last month, the two leaders met on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Uzbekistan.

    NATO member Turkey has so far refrained from joining Western sanctions against Russia and instead attempted to play the role of a mediator, hosting talks with officials from Moscow and Kyiv and arbitrating a grain deal alongside the U.N. to ensure safe food exports out of blockaded Ukrainian ports. It has also supplied drones to Ukrainian forces. But it is also accused of war profiteering, helping others in the evasion of international embargoes for its own benefit.

    Turkey’s Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu on Tuesday called for a cease-fire “as soon as possible,” after the Russian strikes across Ukraine on Monday, which killed at least 19 people and wounded more than 100.

    Putin will also meet with UAE ruler Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi in Saint Petersburg on Tuesday, according to Kremlin spokesman Peskov.

    [ad_2]

    Wilhelmine Preussen

    Source link

  • 5 things to know for Oct. 11: Ukraine, Rail strike, Trump, School shootings, Speeding | CNN

    5 things to know for Oct. 11: Ukraine, Rail strike, Trump, School shootings, Speeding | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    If you’re planning to take a trip this winter, now’s the time to pounce on the best prices available for airfares. Some travel experts recommend securing holiday flights before Halloween because prices typically increase considerably as Thanksgiving gets closer.

    Here’s what else you need to know to Get Up to Speed and On with Your Day.

    (You can get “5 Things You Need to Know Today” delivered to your inbox daily. Sign up here.)

    Air raid sirens sounded in multiple regions of Ukraine today after Russia launched new missile attacks. This comes after Russia unleashed a wave of attacks across Ukraine on Monday, killing at least 19 people and injuring more than 100 others, according to Ukrainian officials. Critical infrastructure was hit in several regions and in the capital Kyiv, where dozens of fires broke out, Ukraine’s emergency services said. Numerous areas in the region are still without power today following the barrage of Russian strikes that were partly targeted at energy facilities to leave Ukrainians without electricity. President Joe Biden spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday, condemning the strikes and pledging continued US security assistance “including advanced air defense systems.”

    The threat of a freight rail strike is back after a major union of railroad workers rejected a tentative agreement Monday with the nation’s freight carriers. More than half of the 23,000 members in one of the largest rail unions opposed the agreement, meaning the two parties will now enter negotiations in hopes of reaching a deal. Without a new deal, there could be a strike that significantly impacts the nation’s already struggling supply chains. But such a strike would not occur until at least November 19, according to the union. The Biden administration has been desperate to avoid a strike because major railroads carry 30% of the nation’s freight and a strike could cause shortages and higher prices for essentials like food and gasoline. A strike could also force factories without parts to close and leave store shelves empty during the holiday shopping season. 

    Romans: There is a move afoot here for better quality of living

    New emails released by the General Services Administration debunk claims made by former President Donald Trump and his allies that the government agency is to blame for packing boxes from the White House that ended up at his Mar-a-Lago residence after his presidency. Former presidents are allowed to take certain government materials and office equipment to set up a permanent office away from the White House. But that does not include the sort of classified documents Trump took to Mar-a-Lago – which are at the center of an ongoing Justice Department criminal investigation. Trump and his allies have said GSA was responsible for classified documents being at his Florida home. The newly released emails, however, make clear that the boxes had already been packed and sat shrink-wrapped in an empty office space.

    Here’s why Trump-appointed judge Aileen Cannon’s decisions are under scrutiny

    Prosecutors and defense attorneys will present closing arguments today in the sentencing trial of the Parkland school shooter. This will be the last opportunity for them to make their cases before the jury will help decide whether the gunman will be sentenced to death or to life in prison. The imminent conclusion of the trial comes almost a year after the 24-year-old shooter pleaded guilty to 17 counts of murder and other charges for the February 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, in which 14 students and three school staff members were killed. Separately, in Uvalde, Texas, the school district’s superintendent announced his retirement Monday after new details surfaced about the Robb Elementary School massacre, which left 19 students and two teachers dead.

    Families of victims and survivors testify in Parkland shooter trial

    The National Transportation Safety Board has recommended a new vehicle system that could stop drivers from speeding. The technology essentially recognizes speed limits and either issues visual or audible alerts when a driver is speeding or prevents vehicles from going above those limits. New York City has become the first city in the US to test the speed-limiting technology in 50 of its fleet vehicles. “There’s no reason today, with so much technology and so much awareness, that anybody should die at the hands of an automobile,” said Meera Joshi, New York City’s Deputy Mayor for Operations. After more than 20,000 deaths on US roads this year alone, the NTSB has called on the federal government to start incentivizing car makers to put speed-limiting systems in new cars, according to a report. It will be up to automobile manufacturers whether they introduce the technology.

    Actor William Shatner shares what it’s like traveling to space

    “Everything I had expected to see was wrong,” Shatner wrote in a new biography. Learn about the actor’s life-changing experience aboard a suborbital space tourism flight.

    Football player Sebastian Gutierrez swaps pizza shop for the New England Patriots

    A former pizza shop worker is now earning his dough in the NFL! Read his inspirational story here.

    How dogs changed the course of civilization

    Did you know dogs were the first animal that humans ever domesticated? Here’s how adorable fur babies became a part of our daily lives.

    Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd reunion delights ‘Back to the Future’ fans

    The pair had an epic reunion at Comic Con 37 years after the release of the sci-fi comedy. (Can you believe it’s been 37 years? Take a second to remember those good old days.)

    Shaquille O’Neal reiterates his desire to buy an NBA team

    The four-time NBA champion shared a cryptic message about his wish to buy an NBA team “back home.” Here are some possibilities where that could be.

    Eileen Ryan, a veteran actress and the mother of actor Sean Penn, has died, Penn’s publicist shared in a statement. She was 94. Ryan appeared in more than 60 television shows and films over her long career, including the acclaimed films “Magnolia” and “I Am Sam.”

    $18 million

    That’s the prize Dustin Johnson won after clinching the inaugural LIV Golf championship, tournament officials announced Monday. The 38-year-old made the switch from the PGA Tour to the Saudi-backed rebel series in June. The controversial LIV Golf series has caused a rift in professional golf, as LIV golfers have been banned from the PGA Tour for participating in the breakaway series.

    “No child should ever be subjected to such racist, mean and dehumanizing comments, especially from a public official.”

    – Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin and his husband, issuing a family statement after his fellow council member, Nury Martinez, made racist remarks about him and his Black child. In leaked audio obtained by the Los Angeles Times, Martinez says Bonin, a White man, appeared with his son on a float in a Martin Luther King Jr. Day parade and “handled his young Black son as though he were an accessory.” The Times reported that Martinez also said of Bonin’s child, “Parece changuito,” or “He’s like a monkey.” Following the backlash for an array of offensive comments heard in the audio, Martinez resigned as Los Angeles City Council president on Monday.

    Fall temperatures for the Northeast as rain hits Florida

    Check your local forecast here>>>

    Today is National Coming Out Day

    Every year on October 11, National Coming Out Day celebrates the act of “coming out” – when an LGBTQ person decides to publicly share their gender identities or sexual orientation. Watch this 2-minute video to learn how the rainbow flag became a symbol of LGBTQ pride. (Click here to view)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk draws rebuke by suggesting Taiwan accept rule by China

    Elon Musk draws rebuke by suggesting Taiwan accept rule by China

    [ad_1]

    Taiwan’s premier on Tuesday said Elon Musk “doesn’t know much” about the self-ruled island, after the billionaire suggested it should become part of China. The world’s richest man has sparked anger in Taiwan over an interview he gave to the Financial Times which touched on Taiwan’s fraught relationship with its giant neighbor.

    Taiwan lives under constant threat of invasion by Beijing, which claims the democracy as part of its territory, to be taken one day. 

    “This is not a matter of if they will invade, it’s a matter of when they will invade,” Admiral Lee Hsi-min, who used to head Taiwan’s armed forces, told correspondent Lesley Stahl about China on “60 Minutes” on Sunday amid escalating tension between the democratic, self-governing island and China. 


    Life in Taiwan with China flexing its military might | 60 Minutes

    13:33

    In the Financial Times interview published Friday, Musk said he believed Taiwan should strike a “reasonably palatable” agreement with Beijing to become a “special administrative zone” of China.

    That model is used by Beijing to run Macau and Hong Kong.

    Beijing’s leaders have long suggested the same model for Taiwan although it has always been a non-starter for the vast majority of Taiwanese.


    Hong Kong observes 25 years of independence from British rule

    02:15

    Premier Su Tseng-chang — Taiwan’s most senior politician after the president — became the highest-ranking official yet to address Musk’s comments, which he dismissed on Tuesday.

    “Musk is a businessman,” Su told a parliamentary session. “He has a big car factory in Shanghai and he wants to promote his electric vehicles… a businessman may say this today and say that tomorrow”.

    “Musk only speaks for himself but he really doesn’t know much about Taiwan and he also doesn’t understand cross-strait relations,” Su added.

    Bloomberg Pictures Of The Year: Extreme Business
    Elon Musk, center, reacts as Robin Ren, vice president of sales, second left, Ying Yong, mayor of Shanghai, second right, and Wu Qing, vice mayor of Shanghai, right, applaud during an event at the site of Tesla’s manufacturing facility in Shanghai, China, January 7, 2019.

    Qilai Shen/Bloomberg/Getty


    Polls have consistently shown that a large majority of Taiwan’s people have no appetite to be ruled by China, something that has deepened after Beijing deployed a sweeping political crackdown in Hong Kong.

    Musk is a notoriously outspoken business figure, especially on Twitter, where he frequently wades into social and geopolitical causes.

    His comments on Taiwan were praised by multiple Chinese officials, including Beijing’s ambassador to Washington Qin Gang.

    Last week Musk became embroiled in a social media spat with Ukrainian officials including President Volodymyr Zelenskyy over his ideas on ending Russia’s invasion.


    Russia launches biggest attack on Ukraine in months

    07:43

    Musk proposed a peace deal involving re-running under U.N. supervision annexation referendums in Moscow-occupied Ukrainian regions, acknowledging Russian sovereignty over the Crimean peninsula and giving Ukraine neutral status.

    Kyiv’s ambassador to Germany Andriy Melnyk replied bluntly: “F*** off is my very diplomatic reply to you.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link