ReportWire

Tag: U.S. Economy

  • Here’s what to buy — and avoid — after the U.S. debt ceiling deal, according to analysts

    Here’s what to buy — and avoid — after the U.S. debt ceiling deal, according to analysts

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The rise of Albemarle, the world’s largest lithium producer

    The rise of Albemarle, the world’s largest lithium producer

    [ad_1]

    Demand for lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, is expected to surge, from 500,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate in 2021 to three to four million metric tons in less than a decade, according to McKinsey & Company.

    Albemarle, the world’s top producer of this critical metal and the operator of mines in Australia, Chile and the U.S., says it plans to bring another domestic lithium mine online by 2027 — Kings Mountain in North Carolina. It already operates Silver Peak in Nevada.

    related investing news

    CNBC Pro

    Albemarle is also building a $1.3 billion processing facility in South Carolina, where it will process battery-grade lithium hydroxide. The plant will support the manufacturing of 2.4 million electric vehicles annually and be able to process lithium from recycled batteries.

    Despite that growth, Albemarle faces a number of potential headwinds including a possible economic downturn that could slow the demand for EVs, new battery chemistries that could reduce the need for lithium, battery recycling and additional competitors. Tesla began construction of a lithium refinery in Texas in 2023.  

    To better understand how lithium, known as “White Gold,” is extracted, the challenges involved and where production is moving to next, CNBC got a behind-the-scenes look at Albemarle’s operations in Chile and the U.S.

    Watch the video to learn more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FDA allows temporary import of unapproved Chinese cancer drug to ease U.S. shortage

    FDA allows temporary import of unapproved Chinese cancer drug to ease U.S. shortage

    [ad_1]

    Worker labors on a production line at the factory of Qilu Pharmaceutical in Haikou, Hainan province of China, February 11, 2022.

    Su Bikun | VCG | Getty Images

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has authorized the temporary importation of an unapproved chemotherapy drug from China in effort to ease an acute shortage of cancer drugs in the United States, according to an update posted to the agency’s website Friday.

    Qilu Pharmaceutical, which makes and markets cisplatin injections in China, received FDA permission to export the drug to the U.S. market weeks ago, a document shows.

    A letter dated May 24 from Qilu’s deputy general manager notified health care professionals of the approval.

    Qilu is coordinating with a Toronto-based company, Apotex, to distribute 50-milligram cisplatin vials in the U.S.

    Health care providers can begin ordering the drug Tuesday through their wholesalers.

    Cisplatin is a generic drug that has been available for decades in the U.S. and is distributed by several approved manufacturers. Those manufacturers have been unable to keep up with demand. Qilu’s version of cisplatin is not approved in the U.S.

    Qilu, which is headquartered in the city of Jinan in Shandong province, says it is one of the 10 largest drug manufacturers in China.

    The FDA told CNBC this week the agency was considering imports of unapproved chemotherapy drugs, but it did not at that time disclose the names of any manufacturers who might provide that medication.

    An FDA spokesperson said the agency assesses the quality of unapproved drug imports to make sure they are safe for U.S. patients.

    Doctors say some cancer patients could die if the national shortage of drugs such as cisplatin is not resolved soon. At least 13 other cancer drugs are in short supply across the U.S.

    CNBC Health & Science

    Read CNBC’s latest global health coverage:

    The cancer drug shortages have forced some hospitals to ration medications by reducing the dosage to extend the supply and prioritizing patients who have a better chance of being cured.

    Cisplatin is widely used to treat testicular, lung, bladder, cervical and ovarian cancers among other disease states. Up to 20% of cancer patients are treated with cisplatin and other platinum-based chemotherapy drugs, according to the National Cancer Institute.

    The World Health Organization says the drug is an essential part of basic health care.

    The national shortage of cisplatin began in February after a pharmaceutical company based in India temporarily halted production for the U.S. market.

    Intas Pharmaceuticals decided to temporarily stop production after an FDA inspection last year found a “cascade of failure” in its quality control unit.

    A spokesperson for Intas told CNBC this week the company is working with the FDA to restart production for the U.S., but no date has been set yet.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Russian forces target food and water sources to starve Ukrainians, international law investigation says

    Russian forces target food and water sources to starve Ukrainians, international law investigation says

    [ad_1]

    People receive food from AFAT – Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency on November 28, 2022 in Chernihiv, Ukraine.

    Jeff J Mitchell | Getty Images

    WASHINGTON — Russian occupying forces in Ukraine have employed starvation tactics on civilians by targeting food lines, agricultural harvests and water infrastructure, according to a team of international lawyers helping Kyiv investigate alleged war crimes. 

    The investigators focused their efforts on the city of Chernihiv, which was under siege for a little over two months before Russian troops were expelled from the northern Ukrainian city.

    Catriona Murdoch, a lawyer and expert in starvation-related crimes, described Chernihiv as the “tip of the iceberg in [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s calculated plan to terrorize, subjugate and kill Ukrainian people.”

    The new investigation, which took six months to assemble and was released Thursday, details a number of different starvation tactics employed by Russian forces, including strikes in concentrated areas where civilians gathered to receive humanitarian aid and food supplies.

    “I think our conclusion at this point is that we believe that this would certainly constitute a violation of international humanitarian law,” Murdoch, partner and head of starvation portfolio at international human rights law firm, Global Rights Compliance, told CNBC.

    “The more information we have gathered and analyzed, the more we can say with confidence,” added Murdoch, who leads a Mobile Justice Team, a group of international lawyers and investigators supporting the office of Ukraine’s prosecutor general in starvation crimes.

    Mobile Justice Teams are one component of the Atrocity Crimes Advisory Group, which is funded by the U.S. State Department, European Union and the U.K.’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

    The Kremlin has previously denied that its forces commit war crimes or deliberately target civilians and related critical infrastructure. The Russian Embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    Read more: At least 20 torture centers in Kherson were directly financed by the Kremlin, international lawyers say in a new report

    The report details one such incident on the morning of March 16, 2022, outside a supermarket, which resulted in the deaths of at least 20 civilians.

    According to the report, between 20 to 90 people were waiting in line near the Soyuz grocery store when an explosive with a wide impact range was detonated. Soyuz, according to the lawyers, was known as a place to collect bread deliveries if the store was closed.

    The lawyers identified heavy artillery weapon systems that could have been used in the Soyuz attack and found evidence that Russian drones were operating in the area and could have provided imagery to direct Russian fire.

    Subsequent attacks occurred at nearby hospitals “substantially impacting power supplies and thus creating challenging circumstances to treat those injured or dying,” according to the investigation.

    The lawyers and investigators also found that infrastructure related to Chernihiv’s water supply was targeted by aerial bombing.

    Elsewhere in Ukraine, the investigators found that Russian forces prioritized stealing harvests and destroying agricultural machinery.

    Murdoch, who recently returned from Chernihiv, added that she was confident that the perpetrators can be identified.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dimon calls for Washington-Beijing engagement in first China visit since 2021 controversy

    Dimon calls for Washington-Beijing engagement in first China visit since 2021 controversy

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase and Company President and CEO Jamie Dimon testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing on “Annual Oversight of the Nation’s Largest Banks”, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., September 22, 2022. 

    Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

    JPMorgan Chase & Co CEO Jamie Dimon on Wednesday called for “real engagement” between policymakers in Washington and Beijing, as Sino-U.S. relations continue to fray.

    Speaking at the JPMorgan Global China Summit in Shanghai — in his first visit to China since his 2021 apology for joking that JPMorgan would outlast the Chinese Communist Party — Dimon said that security and trade disputes between the world’s two largest economies over are “resolvable.”

    “You’re not going to fix these things if you are just sitting across the Pacific yelling at each other, so I’m hoping we have real engagement,” Dimon said, according to Reuters.

    He advocated for a “de-risking” of the economic ties between the East and West rather than for a full-scale decoupling, as the Wall Street giant seeks to boost its presence in China.

    In November 2021, Dimon expressed “regret” over remarks that JPMorgan would outlast China’s ruling party, seeking to limit damage to the bank’s growth ambitions in the country. The comments that invoked Beijing’s ire came shortly after JPMorgan won regulatory approval to become the first foreign company to establish full ownership of a securities brokerage in China.

    Top U.S. and Chinese commerce officials met last week for “candid and substantive discussions” surrounding bilateral trade and commercial relations, in the first cabinet-level exchange between Washington and Beijing in months.

    National security concerns also underpin a souring of relations between the two superpowers. The U.S. on Tuesday accused a Chinese fighter jet of engaging in an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” while intercepting a U.S. military reconnaissance aircraft in international airspace over the South China Sea.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debt ceiling bill poised to clear key House committee, teeing up final vote

    Debt ceiling bill poised to clear key House committee, teeing up final vote

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — The compromise bill to raise the debt ceiling faced its first major test Tuesday in the House Rules Committee, where two of the panel’s nine Republicans said they would oppose bringing it to the House floor for a vote.

    But a key swing vote Republican on the committee, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, signaled late Tuesday afternoon that he was inclined to support the rule that would send the bill to the floor.

    related investing news

    What happens next with debt deal? Wall Street economists gauge the odds on passage from here

    CNBC Pro

    “I anticipate voting for this rule,” Massie said about two hours into a marathon committee meeting, noting that this would be contingent on reading the final rule at the end of the meeting.

    Massie’s likely support cleared the way for the bill to be approved by seven of the nine Republicans on the committee, enough to send it to the House floor for an expected vote within 24 hours. The panel’s makeup is heavily skewed toward the party in the majority, 9-4, a setup meant to ensure that legislation does not get held up by a few dissenters siding with the minority.

    The floor vote on the Fiscal Responsibility Act is planned for around 8:30 p.m. ET Wednesday, according to a tentative House voting schedule.

    The legislation is the product of a deal hammered out by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and President Joe Biden to cap federal baseline spending for two years in exchange for Republican votes to raise the debt ceiling beyond next year’s elections and into 2025.

    The bill needs to pass the GOP-majority House and the Democratic-controlled Senate before June 5, when the Treasury Department projects the United States would be unlikely to have enough money to meet its debt obligations.

    On Tuesday, a bloc of least 20 conservative Republicans announced they would oppose the compromise deal. They accused McCarthy of caving in to the White House in exchange for “cosmetic” policy tweaks, and not the transformative change they were promised.

    A hardline subset of this group railed against the deal on social media and at a press conference outside the Capitol.

    “It’s not just that every Republican should vote against it. It’s a little bit more than that. This is a career-defining vote for every Republican,” said GOP Rep. Dan Bishop, N.C.

    Several prominent conservative groups also announced opposition to the bill Tuesday, and said they would measure or “score” GOP lawmakers by how they voted on it. The libertarian-leaning FreedomWorks group, the anti-tax Club for Growth and the conservative Heritage Foundation all panned the deal.

    Over the course of the day, opposition to the bill evolved into a more pointed critique by some in the party of McCarthy’s leadership.

    Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, speaks during the House Freedom Caucus news conference to oppose the debt limit deal outside of the US Capitol on Monday, May 30, 2023.

    Bill Clark | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    “Speaker McCarthy should pull this bad bill down. We should stop taking this bill up right now,” GOP Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the Rules Committee, said at a news conference. “And no matter what happens, there’s going to be a reckoning about what just occurred.”

    Bishop told reporters that “no one in the Republican conference could have done a worse job” negotiating the agreement than McCarthy did.

    Roy and Bishop weren’t the only far-right conservatives who implicitly threatened to unseat McCarthy as House speaker if the debt limit bill passed. But whether they follow through on the threats remains to be seen. Under new rules this year, a single Republican lawmaker can bring a no-confidence vote on McCarthy to the floor.

    Some Democrats were also leery of the bill, which contains new work requirements for food stamps, as well as reforms that make it easier to secure energy permits, and cuts to discretionary spending. But progressive leaders in the House stopped short of urging their like-minded members to oppose the bill.

    “The Republicans did not win any major concessions on spending,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., chair of the 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, said on a call with reporters Tuesday. “There is no meaningful debt reduction here…what [Republicans] do get is some of their extreme ideological priorities.”

    Jayapal acknowledged that the bill’s spending caps would require Congress to scale back funding for some domestic programs. “When it comes time to write these appropriations bills, there will be some very, very difficult choices to make,” she said.

    As of Tuesday, the CPC was still deciding whether to “take an official position” on the bill, she said.

    The message from the White House was similarly low-key, with an emphasis on all the GOP asks that were excluded from the bill, not which Democratic priorities were included.

    “It’s usually a sign of a good compromise if there’s some folks who are a little bit unhappy on each side,” National Economic Council Deputy Director Bharat Ramamurti told CNBC.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    “I think the macro economic impact of this deal is likely to be fairly minimal,” he said, adding that the deal was about as good as Biden could have hoped for in a bill that could pass the GOP-controlled House.

    The Office of Management and Budget also released a formal statement of policy Tuesday urging House members to support the bill, saying it “reflects a bipartisan compromise to avoid a first-ever default.”

    But before the bill could receive a vote in the full House, it needs approval by a majority of the Rules Committee. Ahead of Tuesday’s committee meeting, two Republican members, Roy and Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina said they planned to block the bill.

    “I’m on Rules Committee,” Norman said Tuesday outside the Capitol. “If we can stop [the bill] there, I will stop it.”

    That approach was precisely what Massie, the swing vote, said he objected to. “When people want to express their ideology, the floor of the House on the actual final passage of the bill is the place to do that,” he said, not the committee room.

    If the Fiscal Responsibility Act were to stall in the Rules Committee, it would resurrect the imminent threat of a debt default, with less than a week before the deadline.

    This is a developing story, please check back for updates.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Traders turn optimistic on debt ceiling deal — and one strategist says it’s a ‘market opportunity’

    Traders turn optimistic on debt ceiling deal — and one strategist says it’s a ‘market opportunity’

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, DC – MAY 26: U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks to members of the media after arriving at the U.S. Capitol on May 26, 2023 in Washington, DC. Speaker McCarthy discussed the latest development of the debt ceiling negotiations with the White House. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Win Mcnamee | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Analysts are broadly optimistic that the deal to raise the U.S. debt ceiling will pass a divided Congress.

    Their comments come after U.S. President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy reached an agreement over the weekend to raise the debt ceiling to avoid a first-ever government default.

    In the midst of this turmoil, investors may be able to find a “market opportunity,” according to Stephen Pavlick, partner and head of policy at Renaissance Macro Research.

    Negotiators have agreed to some Republican demands, such as stricter work requirements for low-income Americans.

    The compromise also sees the debt ceiling suspended until Jan. 1, 2025, pushing it past the 2024 presidential election. Spending will also be largely held flat for 2024, except for defense and veterans, while 2025 will see a 1% increase in spending.

    Even though the in-principle deal has been reached between the two sides, it will still need congressional approval by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

    “I think it is virtually certain that it will be passed,” said Jeremy Siegal, professor of finance at Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He said he had “very little doubt that they weren’t going to reach an agreement… this is going to be a done deal and voted positively on Wednesday.”

    He called the suspension of the debt limit till 2025 a “good decision,” and said he had expected it would be only delayed for a year.

    “I think that they decided that they wanted to go after the next election to raise that debt limit, and not have another debate that could distract the American public from the main issues that separate the country.”

    Republican or Democratic victory?

    Still, some Republican lawmakers criticized the deal after the announcement, while other hardliners have threatened to sink the deal.

    Pavlick predicts that McCarthy has the support of a “majority of Republicans” in the House, “but that majority can vary significantly.”

    Speaking to “Squawk Box Asia” on Monday, Pavlick noted that about 75 hardline Republicans will probably oppose the deal, pointing at the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, as well as hardline Democrats.

    As such, with Republicans only holding a slim majority of 222-213 in the house, Pavlick said he thinks McCarthy will have to rely on moderate Democrats to get the bill to pass.

    “So it’s really going to be on President Biden to deliver the 75 more moderate votes to make sure it has enough to pass the House. I think if it does that, then the Senate passage is probably assured.”

    To Pavlick, the deal was a “Republican victory.”

    “The fact that there was a negotiation is, in itself a win for Republicans,” he said pointing out that Biden said that he would not negotiate about the debt limit earlier this year, but was “forced into this.”

    He said the Democratic Party could have “done away with this when they had control of Congress during the end of last year, two years ago. And they chose not to.”

    U.S. debt ceiling deal is a 'democratic victory,' says David Roche

    David Roche, president and global strategist for Independent Strategy saw this as a “Democratic win.”

    He expects the deal will pass the House with Democratic support, although, like Pavlick, he said right-wing Republicans will likely vote against it.

    As the bill allows borrowing through 2024, the country will likely be able to put this issue behind until it comes up again in 2025, Roche said.

    Investing opportunities

    Pavlick said the U.S. Treasury is going to have to “refill their coffers”, and if investors are looking at a scenario where the Federal Reserve is going to cut rates, “this might actually provide [a] market opportunity,” he said.

    Pavlick suggests investors could look at buying Treasury bonds to “lock in some of those higher yields.”

    Stock picks and investing trends from CNBC Pro:

    Separately, Siegal pointed out that U.S. futures pointed to slight gains, and said it’s because a likely deal “does clear a little bit of uncertainty.”

    However, the main worry ahead for investors will be the “tremendous tightening” that the Federal Reserve has done, Siegal warned.

    “The bank problems, that will not lead to a crisis of bank deposits but tightening of lending standards, particularly for small- and mid-sized companies. And I am concerned about the second half of the year and possibly what we might see is now is a focus on those problems.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. review of China tariffs won’t depend on trade ‘breakthrough:’ deputy U.S. trade representative

    U.S. review of China tariffs won’t depend on trade ‘breakthrough:’ deputy U.S. trade representative

    [ad_1]

    A Chinese and US national flag hang on a fence at an international school in Beijing on December 6, 2018. (Photo by Fred DUFOUR / AFP) (Photo by FRED DUFOUR/AFP via Getty Images)

    Fred Dufour | Afp | Getty Images

    The United States is taking an analytical approach to its review of whether to keep tariffs on Chinese goods in place and will not base outcomes on any “breakthrough” in U.S.-China trade relations, Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Sarah Bianchi told Reuters.

    The Biden administration is not assuming any such breakthrough will happen, but will continue dialogue with China at various levels, Bianchi said in an interview on Saturday as a ministerial meeting of the U.S.-led Indo Pacific Economic Framework talks wrapped up.

    “We are conducting the review from an analytical perspective. We’re not base-casing any breakthrough in the trade relationship” with China as part of the review, Bianchi said. “We’re not assuming that that will happen.”

    Instead, USTR is continuing to study industry and stakeholder comments on the duties consulting with the U.S. Commerce Department, the Treasury and other agencies to determine which categories make strategic sense, she said.

    “We’re taking a look at what’s economically sound,” added Bianchi, who oversees USTR’s engagement in Asia.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump imposed the tariffs in 2018 and 2019 on thousands of imports from China valued at some $370 billion at the time, after a “Section 301” investigation found that China was misappropriating U.S. intellectual property and coercing U.S. companies to transfer sensitive technology to do business.

    The duties currently range from 7.5% on many consumer goods to 25% on vehicles, industrial components, semiconductors and other electronics. Among the major categories that escaped tariffs were cellphones, laptop computers and videogame consoles.

    The review was required by Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 four years after the tariffs were first imposed and it started with initial notification steps in May 2022. Bianchi declined to say when the review would be completed, but added that this was “reasonable” by the end of 2023.

    Tariff exclusions on 352 import categories from China were extended by USTR at the end of 2022 for another nine months and are now set to expire on Sept. 30. Some trade experts in Washington view that date as a possible decision point in the tariff review.

    Inflation arguments

    As the review got underway last May, some Biden administration officials argued in favor of lifting some of the tariffs as the Biden administration struggled to contain high inflation.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen that eliminating “non-strategic” tariffs would reduce costs for specific goods, while Trade Representative Katherine Tai argued that the duties represent “significant leverage” over China.

    Bianchi noted that inflation-related discussions over the tariffs have died down as inflation has eased.

    Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao raised objections the Section 301 tariffs as an issue of concern during a meeting with Tai in Detroit on the sidelines of an Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation trade meeting.

    Wang’s meeting with Tai and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo the day before were the first cabinet-level exchanges between Washington and Beijing in months amid a series of trade and national security setbacks, including the U.S. downing of a Chinese spy balloon that transited the continental U.S.

    Bianchi said it was important to the global economy for the U.S. and China to maintain a healthy dialogue, even if they disagree.

    “These are the two largest economies in the world and we need to be talking at different levels, even if they’re difficult conversations,” she said.

    “On trade right now, there aren’t many similar perspectives,” she said of the U.S. and China. “I’m not sure where it will lead, but I think the conversations will continue to be a difficult, but I think it’s important that we have them.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A U.S. recession would be ‘good news’ for markets, says Destination’s Michael Yoshikami

    A U.S. recession would be ‘good news’ for markets, says Destination’s Michael Yoshikami

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Michael Yoshikami, founder and CEO of Destination Wealth Management, discusses the outlook for monetary policy and why a U.S. recession would be positive for markets.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S., China’s top commerce officials meet to discuss trade concerns

    U.S., China’s top commerce officials meet to discuss trade concerns

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. and China flags stand behind a microphone at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing on April 9, 2009.

    Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

    U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo sat down with her Chinese counterpart Wang Wentao in Washington D.C. on Thursday to discuss “concerns” surrounding bilateral trade.

    Marking the first cabinet-level exchange between the two countries in months, the U.S. talked about American companies operating in China.

    According to a readout by the Commerce Department, “The two had candid and substantive discussions on issues relating to the U.S.-China commercial relationship, including the overall environment in both countries for trade and investment and areas for potential cooperation.”

    Raimondo also “raised concerns about the recent spate of PRC [People’s Republic of China] actions taken against U.S. companies operating in the PRC,” it said.

    The bilateral exchange between Raimondo and Wang comes as market observers keep a close eye on whether the U.S. will curb American investments into China, as relations between the world’s largest economies sour.

    Read more about China from CNBC Pro

    The Group of Seven leaders met Hiroshima over the weekend, and vowed to “de-risk and diversify” from Chinese reliance, adding that some of Beijing’s practices “distort the global economy.”

    The high-level talks come as China reportedly conducted inspections on U.S. audit firms in the mainland over national security breaches.

    Earlier this week, China announced it will ban some purchases of products from U.S. memory chipmaker Micron — barring operators of “critical information infrastructure” in China after a security review conducted by the Cyberspace Administration of China.

    In response, the U.S. Commerce Department’s spokesperson said, “We firmly oppose restrictions that have no basis in fact.” He said the department will engage with the Chinese government to “detail” its position and seek clarity.

    In the release published by China’s Ministry of Commerce after his meeting with Raimondo, Wang also raised concerns over U.S. policies on semiconductors and export controls.

    “The two sides agreed to establish communication channels to maintain and strengthen exchanges on specific economic and trade concerns and cooperation matters,” it said.

    Wang is expected to meet U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai during his visit to the U.S. where he is set to attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation trade ministers’ meeting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Potential U.S. rating downgrade comes as ‘no surprise,’ economist says

    Potential U.S. rating downgrade comes as ‘no surprise,’ economist says

    [ad_1]

    Share

    Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, discusses U.S. debt ceiling talks and Fitch’s decision to put the United States’ AAA long-term foreign-currency issuer default rating on negative watch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Share of six-figure earners living paycheck to paycheck jumps, report finds. Advisor offers ways to break the cycle

    Share of six-figure earners living paycheck to paycheck jumps, report finds. Advisor offers ways to break the cycle

    [ad_1]

    Where you live determines your financial standing

    Depending on where you live, $100,000 may not stretch that far, according to Anuj Nayar, LendingClub’s financial health officer.

    A separate report by SmartAsset analyzed how far six figures will go in America’s 25 largest cities. In New York, for example, $100,000 amounts to just $35,791 after accounting for taxes and the high cost of living. 

    In contrast, a six-figure salary is worth much more in Memphis — roughly the equivalent of $86,444 due to a lower cost of living and no state income tax. (Here’s a breakdown of how much you need to earn to afford to live in the country’s most popular cities.)

    Colorful cafe bars at the iconic Beale Street music and entertainment district of downtown Memphis, Tennessee.

    benedek | iStock | Getty Images

    In general, 69% of city dwellers live paycheck to paycheck, 25% more than their suburban counterparts, LendingClub found.

    “While income is obviously a major factor, where you live appears to be almost equally important in factoring whether a consumer is living paycheck to paycheck,” Nayar said.

    Along with surging mortgage rates and home prices, rents are still higher in many cities across the country, according to the latest data from rental listings site Rent.com

    How to determine if you should rent or buy in the current real estate market

    As of last month, 29 of the 50 most populous U.S. cities notched year-over-year rent increases, Rent.com found.

    Compared to two years ago, rents have jumped more than 16% — that’s the equivalent of a $275 increase in monthly rent bills, according to Jon Leckie, researcher for Rent.

    “That kind of growth over such a short period of time is going to put a lot of pressure on pocket books.”

    How to break the paycheck-to-paycheck cycle

    High earners and urbanites are often susceptible to “lifestyle creep,” said CFP Carolyn McClanahan, founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida. 

    As consumers earn more, they spend more, she said, particularly on eating out or deliveries through DoorDash, as well as additional subscription services. It’s easy to “fall into the trap of too much convenience spending.”

    To break the cycle, “the first thing to do is look at convenience spending and figure out ways to cut the spending that is not bringing them value,” said McClanahan, who also is a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council

    “Immediately divert that money to savings to create an emergency fund.” Once you have three to six month set aside, “start saving more for other goals.”

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Hurricane has landed:’ Activist investor Jonathan Litt doubles down on office space short

    ‘Hurricane has landed:’ Activist investor Jonathan Litt doubles down on office space short

    [ad_1]

    A major activist investor is betting stalled return-to-office plans will stir up more trouble in commercial real estate.

    Land and Buildings’ Jonathan Litt has been shorting REITs with high office space exposure for three years, and he has no plans to shift gears.

    “If you have no rent growth and your vacancies are going up and you have giant operating expenses to run an office building, you’re going backwards fast,” the firm’s chief investment officer told CNBC’s “Fast Money” on Tuesday.

    Litt first warned Wall Street an “existential hurricane” was about to hit the sector in May 2020. Now, he’s saying the “hurricane has landed.”

    He’s doubling down on the call — citing spiking interest rates and high inflation. Litt calls them two factors he didn’t anticipate when he first started shorting these companies in May 2020.

    DC-based JBG Smith Properties is one of Litt’s major shorts. It’s down 58% since the World Health Organization declared Covid-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. So far this year, JBG Smith is off 20%.

    “Washington, DC is one of the toughest markets in the country today,” noted Litt. “They have a substantial office portfolio.”

    He adds the crackdown on lending is compounding the problems.

    “This isn’t a work from home story anymore. This is a financing story. It’s kind of like them mall business went from the mall problem to the financing problem,” Litt said. “Now, it’s a financing problem. And as these debts come due, there’s really nowhere to go because lenders aren’t lending to the space.”

    JBG Smith did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Disclaimer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WTO chief pushes for reglobalized supply chains to cut down bottleneck risks

    WTO chief pushes for reglobalized supply chains to cut down bottleneck risks

    [ad_1]

    Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, director general of the World Trade Organization (WTO), speaks during the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) annual meeting in New York, on Monday, Sept. 19, 2022.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    World Trade Organization Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala urged diversification in global supply chains, amid ongoing efforts to progress the body’s reform.

    “There is an overconcentration of manufacturing in certain sectors in certain countries,” she told CNBC’s Martin Soong on the sidelines of the latest weekend summit of G-7 (Group of Seven) major economic powers in Hiroshima, Japan. “I agree that we need to build resilience, that the world cannot be reliant on a few countries for a few key products.”

    She gave the examples of pharmaceuticals and the dearth of Covid-19 vaccine available to certain importing regions, as producers introduced export restrictions during the pandemic. She also referenced the worldwide shortage of critical semi-conductor chips, which has created bottlenecked manufacturing in the technological and automotive industries.

    The WTO’s chief pitched the dual benefits of pursuing diversification in developing countries to simultaneously boost their economic growth and meet global supply requirements.

    “Let’s reglobalize by situating diversifying industries into these countries. We kill two birds with one stone. One is we build global resilience beyond just our neighbors and our friends, because you never know who is your friend. Your friend today can be not your friend tomorrow,” she argued.

    “Let’s look for those areas where we have the right environment, diversify and use that to bring them in from the margin into the global system. That will re-spur growth in those countries and in the world.”

    The emphasis on “reglobalization” comes as geopolitical tensions and recent U.S. legislation have stoked worries over the potential fragmentation of global trade.

    The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act — a sweeping green package of tax, health and climate legislation signed by President Joe Biden in August last year — introduced subsidies to galvanize the domestic production of electric vehicles, at the same time unlocking “serious concerns” within the European Union over the outlook for their own exported goods.

    The fate of Western trade with key manufacturing hub China has also come under question, although G-7 leaders explicitly restated they are not pursuing a policy of economic decoupling from Beijing in their latest communique of Saturday.

    “Our policy approaches are not designed to harm China nor do we seek to thwart China’s economic progress and development. A growing China that plays by international rules would be of global interest. We are not decoupling or turning inwards. At the same time, we recognize that economic resilience requires de-risking and diversifying,” they said, nevertheless noting the need to take collective and individual steps to invest in their own “economic vibrancy” and dwindle “excessive dependencies in our critical supply chains.”

    The WTO faces struggles closer to home, amid bids to reform one tier of its global trade dispute settlement system, the Appellate Body, which the U.S. Trade Representative’s office in February 2020 accused of “persistent overreaching” and extending its own power “at the expense of the authority of the United States and the other WTO members.”

    The Appellate Body has been effectively paralyzed following the U.S. blockage of adjudicator appointments in recent years.

    “Our goal is a fully functioning (dispute system) by 2024,” Deputy United States Trade Representative Maria Pagan told Reuters in January. The WTO’s Okonjo-Iweala said Washington and other countries have been engaging in dialogue to overhaul the Appellate Body, stressing her desire to “move beyond the discussion to specific proposals.”

    Asked about reports over an U.S. reform suggestion that both the plaintiff and the defendant must agree before moving a dispute to the attention of the Appellate Body, the director-general said that such a pitch had yet to materialize as a formal proposal.

    “I think those are some ideas maybe that people might have heard, the U.S. talk about, and so on. But we don’t have proposals yet on paper.”

    The WTO is set to hold its next Ministerial Conference — the so-styled MC13 — in February 2024.

    “We may not have completed the reform by then,” she noted, nevertheless adding, “I hope and expect that we will have done a great deal of work that will show that the organization is moving purposefully towards reforming that system.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How UnitedHealth Group grew bigger than the nation’s biggest banks

    How UnitedHealth Group grew bigger than the nation’s biggest banks

    [ad_1]

    UnitedHealth Group has the highest price per share of any company on the Dow Jones Industrial Average and it’s the tenth heaviest-weighted stock on the S&P 500.

    In fact, not only is UnitedHealth the biggest health-care conglomerate in the United States based on market cap and revenue, it’s even bigger than JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest bank.

    And it is a Wall Street darling, with experts optimistic about the company’s future: 22 of 25 analysts currently label it a buy.

    “If I had to pick one stock, only one stock to buy, I’d buy United[Health],” said Ana Gupte, principal at AG Health Advisors.

    UnitedHealth “has had superior stock performance over everybody else for two reasons,” said Lance Wilkes, managing director and senior research analyst at Bernstein Research. “One would be strategic vision and the other is strategic capital management.”

    UnitedHealth has increased its annual revenue since 2012 by more than $100 billion, when adjusted for inflation. It achieved this by engaging in a unique acquisition strategy. It started with smaller deals that have grown while many of UnitedHealth’s competitors such as Aetna and Humana or Anthem and Cigna tried to broker much larger ones, only to be stopped by regulators.

    Conversely, UnitedHealth leaned into a vertical-integration strategy, buying up smaller companies and building them into its growing health-care business.

    UnitedHealth’s size makes it “relatively immune to economic cycles” due to the company’s wide diversity, Gupte said. “It makes it very attractive from an economic cycle and a macro environment perspective.”

    Until recently, its acquisition strategy allowed it to grow without catching too much scrutiny from regulators. But in January 2021, UnitedHealth and Change Healthcare announced a nearly $8 billion all-cash deal that was challenged by the Department of Justice due to antitrust concerns.

    Health-care companies “are becoming more and more [like] utilities,” Wilkes said. “Consequently, I think they’re going to have very large market shares because … you wouldn’t want redundant services through the system.”

    “I think at this point you we would consider UnitedHealth Group just kind of like … core health infrastructure at this point in America,” said Matt Stoller, director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project and author of Goliath: The Hundred Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy.” “It’s too big to manage.”

    “UnitedHealth Group is committed to improving the health system for everyone, advancing evidence-based practice and aligning incentives across the system to ensure people get the right care at the right time in the right place,” UnitedHealth Group told CNBC.

    “Because we serve people throughout every aspect of the health system, we have a unique ability to identify opportunities to better integrate care and benefits, develop solutions and deploy them at scale to improve access, lower costs and make the experience better for patients and providers,” it said.

    Watch the video above to learn how UnitedHealth Group grew so big and what that means for the U.S. health-care system.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fed may be forced to defy market expectations and hike more aggressively, economist says

    Fed may be forced to defy market expectations and hike more aggressively, economist says

    [ad_1]

    Traders react as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is seen delivering remarks on a screen, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), May 3, 2023.

    Brendan McDermid | Reuters

    The U.S. Federal Reserve may be forced to defy market expectations by raising interest rates aggressively again later this year if sticky inflation and tight labor markets persist, according to Daniele Antonucci, chief economist and macro strategist at Quintet Private Bank.

    Having hiked by 25 basis points to take the fed funds rate into the 5%-5.25% target range earlier this month, the market is pricing around a 60% probability that the central bank pauses its monetary tightening cycle at its June meeting, according to the CME Group’s Fed Watch tracker of prices in the fed funds futures market.

    The Fed has been hiking rapidly over the past year in a bid to rein in sky-high inflation, but the market expects policymakers to begin cutting rates before the end of the year. Annual headline inflation fell to 4.9% in April, its lowest for two years, but remains well above the Fed’s 2% target.

    Meanwhile, the labor market remains tight, with jobless claims still close to historically low levels. Job growth also hit 253,000 in April despite a slowing economy, while the unemployment rate sat at 3.4%, tied for the lowest level since 1969. Average hourly earnings rose 0.5% for the month and increased 4.4% from a year ago, both higher than expected.

    Antonucci told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Friday that Quintet disagrees with the market’s pricing of rate cuts later in the year.

    “We think this is a hawkish pause — it’s not a pivot from hawkish to dovish — it’s a pause, the level of inflation is high, the labor market is tight, and so markets can be disappointed if the Fed doesn’t lower rates,” he said.

    Given the strength of the labor market, Antonucci suggested that a rate cut “seems an implausible scenario and it is only the first issue.”

    “The second one is that the tension here is that if the labor market remains strong, if economic activity doesn’t eventually deteriorate to a point to have a recessionary environment and disinflation, the Fed may have to tighten policy more aggressively and then you have a recession including an earnings recession,” he added.

    “The Fed may need to hike more aggressively if inflation stays elevated.”

    Antonucci’s position mirrored messaging from some members of the Federal Open Market Committee this week, who have reiterated the importance of waiting to monitor the lagged effect of prior rate increases but also indicated that the data does not yet justify a dovish pivot.

    Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester said Tuesday that the central bank is not yet at the point where it can “hold” rates, while Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan suggested on Thursday that the data so far does not justify skipping a rate hike at the June meeting.

    Investors will be closely watching a speech from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell on Friday for clues as to the FOMC’s potential trajectory.

    “Jerome Powell has been particularly critical of the ‘stop and go’ monetary policy in the 1970’s that contributed to the stagflationary underpinning of the economy, and which required an aggressive monetary policy to restore price stability,” said Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist at LPL Financial.

    “If he mentions this when he speaks on Friday, the market could interpret it as signal that unless the data improves markedly regarding inflation, he’ll advocate another rate hike.”

    Krosby added that the week’s “Fedspeak chorus” has served to remind markets that the central bank’s mandate is to restore price stability, and that the FOMC is prepared to raise rates again to “get the job done if inflation doesn’t cooperate.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren presses regulators for answers on First Republic takeover

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren presses regulators for answers on First Republic takeover

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., greets Martin Gruenberg, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, during the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing in Dirksen Building on Tuesday, March 28, 2023.

    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    WASHINGTON — Sen. Elizabeth Warren is asking federal financial regulators for answers over what she called a “deeply troubling” deal that saw JPMorgan Chase take over First Republic Bank.

    In a letter to regulators ahead of a Senate hearing on the matter, Warren highlighted that the deal, which is expected to produce a $2.6 billion gain for JPMorgan, resulted in a $13 billion loss to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund.

    Warren’s letter, dated Wednesday, is addressed to Martin Gruenberg, chairman of the Federal Deposit Investment Corp., and Michael Hsu, acting comptroller of the currency, an independent division of the Treasury Department.

    Both Gruenberg and Hsu will testify before the Senate Banking committee on Thursday. A spokesperson for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said the agency does not comment on congressional correspondence. A representative for the FDIC told CNBC that it will respond directly to Warren.

    “Without a complete regulatory review, and at a cost of $13 billion to the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund, the nation’s biggest bank — already too big to fail — got a bargain deal on a failing bank that made it even bigger,” wrote Warren, D-Mass.

    JPMorgan, the largest U.S. bank, acquired First Republic’s deposits and the bulk of its assets May 1 after regulators seized the bank — resulting in the biggest bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis. First Republic was seen as the weakest link in the banking system following the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in March.

    “Our government invited us and others to step up, and we did,” JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said in a press release May 1. “Our financial strength, capabilities and business model allowed us to develop a bid to execute the transaction in a way to minimize costs to the Deposit Insurance Fund.”

    The FDIC allowed JPMorgan to take over the total package of First Republic’s assets for less than they were worth, according to Warren, a longtime critic of Wall Street. Meanwhile, the agency will bear 80% of the credit losses on the bank’s mortgages and commercial loans, she said.

    She also asked questions about the process through which JPMorgan was selected from a pool of bidders.

    The Massachusetts Democrat is seeking answers from Gruenberg and Hsu about whether the agency indeed resolved the bank failure at the lowest cost to the federal insurance fund, as is required by law.

    The FDIC declared a systemic risk exception to avoid taking a least-cost route toward guaranteeing uninsured deposits after SVB and Signature failed, but this method was not applied to First Republic. Instead, the insurance fund was allowed to take a multibillion-dollar loss after billions of dollars worth of the bank’s uninsured deposits were rescued during the deal, Warren said.

    “The FDIC appeared to prioritize First Republic’s uninsured deposits at the bank before the Insurance Fund,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Global debt nears record highs as rate hikes trigger ‘crisis of adaptation,’ top trade body says

    Global debt nears record highs as rate hikes trigger ‘crisis of adaptation,’ top trade body says

    [ad_1]

    HIROSHIMA, JAPAN – MAY 17: People walk beneath a banner promoting the Group of 7 (G7) summit at a shopping street on May 17, 2023 in Hiroshima, Japan. The G7 summit will be held in Hiroshima from 19-22 May. (Photo by Tomohiro Ohsumi/Getty Images)

    Tomohiro Ohsumi | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    The global debt pile grew by $8.3 trillion in the first quarter to a near-record high of $305 trillion as the global economy faced a “crisis of adaptation” to rapid monetary policy tightening by central banks, according to a closely-watched report from the Institute of International Finance.

    The finance industry body said the combination of such high debt levels and rising interest rates has driven up the cost of servicing that debt, triggering concerns about leverage in the financial system.

    Central banks around the world have been hiking interest rates for over a year in a bid to rein in sky-high inflation. The U.S. Federal Reserve earlier this month lifted its fed funds rate to a target range of 5%-5.25%, the highest since August 2007.

    “With financial conditions at their most restrictive levels since the 2008-09 financial crisis, a credit crunch would prompt higher default rates and result in more ‘zombie firms’ — already approaching an estimated 14% of U.S.-listed firms,” the IIF said in its quarterly Global Debt Monitor report late Wednesday.

    The sharp increase in the global debt burden in the three months to the end of March marked a second consecutive quarterly increase following two quarters of steep declines during last year’s run of aggressive monetary policy tightening. Non-financial corporates and the government sector drove much of the rebound.

    “At close to $305 trillion, global debt is now $45 trillion higher than its pre-pandemic level and is expected to continue increasing rapidly: Despite concerns about a potential credit crunch following the recent turmoil in the banking sectors of the U.S. and Switzerland, government borrowing needs remain elevated,” the IIF said.

    The Washington, D.C.-based organization said aging populations, rising health care costs and substantial climate finance gaps are exerting pressure on government balance sheets. National defense spending is expected to increase over the medium term due to heightened geopolitical tensions, which would potentially affect the credit profile of both governments and corporate borrowers, the IIF projected.

    “If this trend continues, it will have significant implications for international debt markets, particularly if interest rates remain higher for longer,” the report noted.

    Total debt in emerging markets hit a new record high of more than $100 trillion, around 250% of GDP, up from $75 trillion in 2019. China, Mexico, Brazil, India and Turkey were the largest upward contributors.

    In developed markets, Japan, the U.S., France and the U.K. posted the sharpest increases over the quarter.

    Banking turmoil and a ‘crisis of adaptation’

    The rapid monetary policy tightening exposed frail liquidity positions in a number of small and mid-sized banks in the U.S. and led to a series of collapses and bailouts in recent months. The ensuing market panic eventually spread to Europe and forced the emergency sale of Swiss giant Credit Suisse to UBS.

    The IIF suggested that corporations have undergone a “crisis of adaptation” to what it termed a “new monetary regime.”

    “Although recent bank failures appear more idiosyncratic than systemic — and U.S. financial institutions carry much less debt (78% of GDP) than in the run-up to the 2007/8 crisis (110% in 2006) — fear of contagion has prompted significant deposit withdrawals from U.S. regional banks,” the IIF said.

    Basic rules of banking seem to be forgotten in the U.S. banking system, says illimity Bank CEO

    “Given the central role of regional banks in credit intermediation in the U.S., worries about their liquidity positions could result in a sharp contraction in lending to some segments, including underbanked households and businesses.”

    This contraction of credit conditions could particularly affect small businesses, the IIF said, along with causing higher default rates and more “zombie firms across the board.”

    Zombie firms are companies with earnings that are sufficient to allow it to continue operating and pay the interest on its debt, but not to pay off the debt, meaning any cash generated is immediately spent on debt. The company is therefore “neither dead nor alive.”

    “We estimate that around 14% of U.S. companies can be considered zombies, with a substantial portion of these in the healthcare and information technology sectors.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ripple CEO says more crypto firms may leave U.S. due to ‘confusing’ rules

    Ripple CEO says more crypto firms may leave U.S. due to ‘confusing’ rules

    [ad_1]

    “Confusing” regulations in the U.S. will push more crypto companies to leave the U.S. as firms like Ripple look to hire and invest outside the country, the CEO of blockchain services company Ripple told CNBC in an exclusive interview.

    “Europe really has provided leadership and countries like UAE … the growth you’re seeing … even the U.K. and Singapore — they’re providing the clarity about how they will regulate these digital assets,” Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said Thursday.

    “And that allows through those rules of the road that allow entrepreneurs, investors to engage constructively with regulators,” Garlinghouse said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia.”

    “Frankly, it’s why you’re seeing entrepreneurship and investment flowing into other jurisdictions — and certainly Europe has been a significant beneficiary of the confusion that has existed in the U.S.,” he added.

    His comments come after the crypto firm announced Wednesday it had bought Metaco, a Swiss crypto custody services firm, at a time when U.S. regulators are cracking down harshly on companies like Ripple and crypto exchange Coinbase.

    I think it’s fair to say the U.S. has made it as confusing as possible as to what the rules of the road are for the crypto industry. The SEC has really been at the forefront of that confusion.

    Brad Garlinghouse

    CEO, Ripple

    The Metaco acquisition is expected to expand Ripple’s suite of products and allow it to access an attractive clientele that includes Citi and BNP Paribas.

    “We think Metaco is a perfect fit, from where we’re trying to grow our customers today,” said Garlinghouse.

    Crypto firms have threatened to leave the U.S. in a bid to send a signal to regulators that the country may miss out on a key technological innovation.

    Ripple is fighting a lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC has accused Ripple, Garlinghouse and the firm’s co-founder Chris Larsen, of breaching securities laws by selling XRP without first registering it with the SEC. XRP is the native cryptocurrency on the Ripple network.

    Unfortunately, [the crackdown] has encouraged companies like Ripple to invest more outside of the U.S.

    Brad Garlinghouse

    CEO, Ripple

    “Unfortunately, that has encouraged companies like Ripple to invest more outside of the U.S.,” said Garlinghouse, adding that 95% of Ripple’s customers are non-U.S. and most of Ripple’s hiring this year will be outside of the U.S.

    Garlinghouse said Ripple is in a good financial position. Ripple funded the Metaco purchase with $250 million of cash off its own balance sheet, according to him.

    “Ripple has a very strong balance sheet and we are leaning in and playing offense and this is just an example of that,” said Garlinghouse.

    “Be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy,” he said, quoting investor billionaire Warren Buffett.

    Coinbase responds to SEC's threat of formal charges

    On Ripple’s listing plans, Garlinghouse said they are “not in a hurry to list” and “not in need to raise more capital.”

    “So if we were to consider [to list], it would be at a time and place that made sense. We wouldn’t want to do that unless we felt like it actually enhances the ability to grow the business, the customer experience,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. Debt Default Would Cause Mortgage Rate Spike, Home Sales Slump

    U.S. Debt Default Would Cause Mortgage Rate Spike, Home Sales Slump

    [ad_1]

    A default on the nation’s debt, if Congress is unable to raise the federal debt ceiling in coming weeks, would boost mortgage rates by at least two percentage points and cause a slump in home sales as costlier financing puts real estate beyond the reach of more Americans, according to Jeff Tucker, a Zillow senior economist.

    While it’s still unlikely the federal government will fail to pay its bills, the chances have increased in recent weeks because of an ongoing stalemate in Congress, Moody’s Analytics said last week. The chance of a debt default now stands at 10%, up from a previous estimate of 5%, the research firm said.

    “Any major disruption to the economy and debt markets will have major repercussions for the housing market, chilling sales and raising borrowing costs, just when the market was beginning to stabilize and recover from the major cooldown of late 2022,” said Zillow’s Tucker.

    The average U.S. rate for a 30-year fixed home loan likely would rise to 8.4% in coming months, he said, from last week’s 6.35%, as measured by Freddie Mac. That increase in borrowing costs would cause home sales to slump by 23%, while the U.S. unemployment rate likely would balloon to 8.3% from last month’s 3.4% as the economy entered a recession, Tucker said.

    It would be a “self-inflicted disaster,” Tucker said.

    Jaret Seiberg, the housing policy analyst for Cowen Washington Research Group, views Tucker’s estimates as possibly too conservative.

    “Our view is that the Zillow report may be a best-case scenario as our concern is that credit markets will freeze up if there is a default,” Seiberg said.

    Comments made by former President Donald Trump during a CNN “Town Hall” last week increased the chances of a debt disaster, Seiberg said. Trump told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins a debt default “could be nothing” and might be just “a bad week or a bad day.”

    That stands in stark contrast to remarks he made while he was in the White House. On July 19, 2019, Trump described the nation’s obligation to pay its bills as “a very, very sacred thing in our country” and added, “I can’t imagine anybody ever even thinking of using the debt ceiling as a negotiating wedge.”

    With a razor-thin Republican majority in the House of Representatives, even a few hold-outs inspired by Trump’s remarks could doom a chance to come to an agreement about raising the debt cap, Seiberg said. Negotiations over the debt ceiling aren’t about how much to spend – they’re about paying bills already incurred.

    “We continue to view a default as unlikely, but that is premised on our belief that politicians realize how dangerous a default would be for the economy,” Seiberg said. “The problem is that unlike in prior fights, not every political leader agrees, as we heard this week from former President Donald Trump. It is why we cannot rule out a default.”

    While economists agree that a failure of the U.S. government to pay its bills would be a recession-inducing catastrophe, they don’t agree on the “X date,” meaning the day a default would begin. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen puts the month as June, and the earliest potential day as June 1. The U.S. Treasury said in January it would use “extraordinary measures” to move money around to delay a default as long as possible.

    Goldman Sachs economists estimate the U.S. “will likely exhaust its cash and borrowing capacity by late July.” Zillow puts the default date as “almost certainly by August, depending on the flow of income tax receipts this spring.”

    “It is impossible to predict with certainty the exact date when Treasury will be unable to pay all of the government’s bills,” Yellen told the Independent Community Bankers of America on Tuesday. “Every single day that Congress does not act, we are experiencing increased economic costs that could slow down the U.S. economy.”

    The mortgage market is already showing signs of investor fear. Last month, the spread between 30-year fixed mortgage rates and 10-year Treasury yields reached the widest in almost 40 years. When spreads are wide, the mortgage rates that track the 10-year Treasury yield are higher than they normally would be as investors demand a risk premium.

    In May’s first week, the spread was 2.95 percentage points, close to the 3.07 in mid-March that marked the widest margin since 1987, and beating the 2.96 in late December 2008 that was the biggest spread of the Great Recession, comparing Freddie Mac’s weekly rate average with 10-year Treasury data from the Federal Reserve.

    “We are already seeing the impacts of brinksmanship,” Yellen said. “The U.S. economy hangs in the balance.”

    [ad_2]

    Kathleen Howley, Senior Contributor

    Source link