ReportWire

Tag: Twitter

  • X now lets you sort replies so blue checks don’t bury other users’ comments

    X now lets you sort replies so blue checks don’t bury other users’ comments

    [ad_1]

    X has introduced new options for sorting replies that should make it easier to see the comments you’re actually interested in. The social media platform announced that replies can now be sorted by most relevant, most recent and most liked. While the average X user may not be getting hundreds of replies to their posts, the reply section on posts from accounts with thousands or millions of followers can be chaotic. And since replies from , what shows up at the top may not be what’s newest or most pertinent.

    Being able to sort replies by most recent or most liked could help to cut through some of the noise. X hasn’t said how it will determine which replies are most relevant, but it appears that option just shows replies ranked the way already used to seeing them. The change started rolling out this weekend.

    [ad_2]

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link

  • Through the Lens: Scramble Campbell is Red Rocks’ unofficial artist-in-residence

    Through the Lens: Scramble Campbell is Red Rocks’ unofficial artist-in-residence

    [ad_1]

    Editor’s note: An untold number of unheralded artists live in Colorado, those creators who can’t (or don’t want to) get into galleries and rely on word of mouth, luck or social media to make a living. You’ve likely seen them on Instagram, at festivals or at small-town art fairs. This occasional series, Through the Lens, will introduce you to some of these artists.

    The last time you saw a concert at Red Rocks Amphitheatre, there’s a good chance that live-music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell was there, painting a 3-by-4-foot abstract acrylic artwork of the very band you came to see.

    A fixture at the venue, Campbell has created more than 630 live paintings since his debut there in 2000, when he painted the band Widespread Panic. Immersed in the rhythm of the music, the artist moves with the beat, using his paintbrush like an instrument to capture the vibrant spirit and energy of the performance onto his canvas.

    Inspired from a young age by New York graffiti artists Keith Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat, as well as the Spanish surrealist Salvador Dalí, he found his calling in emulating American speed painter Denny Dent, known for creating large-scale, 8-foot canvases of musicians in just 10 minutes, often at the Cherry Creek Arts Festival. Discovering live music painting, he says, transformed his life and solidified his path as an artist.

    “It seems easier to tell you which artists I haven’t painted versus the ones that I have,” he said recently. “I’ve painted over 1,000 live shows and 4,000 canvases in my career. It is a lifetime of going to shows all over the world. It isn’t just Red Rocks. If it’s live music, I will paint it.”

    Q: Where does your name come from?

    A: I was a speed roller skater in the 1970s and ’80s. I had a friend who called me Scramble because of the way I scrambled around the rink. Early on, I was heavily influenced by artists Andy Warhol, Bob Ross, LeRoy Neiman and Dalí. When I decided to make art my career, I felt like all of the influences from these artists were like an alphabet soup of names, a scramble of influences on me. I decided that Scramble would be a fitting name for me. (I also felt that it sounded a lot more creative than Keith and it rhymed with Campbell.)

    Q: Could you give us a brief history of how you became an artist?

    A: When I was in the seventh grade, I wanted to quit school because I knew I wanted to be an artist. My mother luckily convinced me it was wise to stay in school.

    In the late ’80s, New York City was deep in the rave culture and the graffiti scene with rising artists like Haring, Warhol and Basquiat.  They showed their work through nightclubs and public art. They were doing paintings on walls, in the subways and on the streets directly bringing art to the people. I was entranced by their work.

    In 1991, I answered an ad looking for a visual artist to paint live during a music festival. The man who placed the ad was Perry Farrell, of Jane’s Addiction. The music festival was Lollapalooza.

    When I got the job, it felt like the beginning of my career. I had had so many rejections over the years of trying to get into galleries and art shows. It was when I made the crossover from the art world into the music world that I really discovered my path as an artist.

    Live-music painter Keith “Scramble” Campbell looks through some of his archives in his studio at his home in Wheat Ridge on July 24, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    Throughout the ’90s, I did music festivals such as the New Orleans Jazz Festival, Lollapalooza, the HOARD festival, Bonnaroo, Woodstock ’94, the Lilith Fair and even the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta. I have painted Widespread Panic 170 times.

    Q: What kind of artist are you?

    A: At heart, I am really a musician with a paintbrush. My instruments are my canvases, paintbrushes and paints.

    Acrylic paints are the medium of choice for live-music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell. Here, he paints during a Tedeschi Trucks Band show at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    I like to think of myself as a conduit of music, transcribing their energy and their music into a dance on canvas.

    As a live artist, my paintings reflect the concert. I let the music and the environment dictate how I paint. If it’s windy and the music is hardcore, my paintings will reflect that. I’ll paint fast and furiously, the work looking abstract and impressionistic. I dance and move with the music as I paint. If there is a slower song in between, that is the time I take to fill in the details. The musicians, the weather, the people all play a role in the painting I create. I am trying to tell a story of that night. If it rains or is windy, I add that in my paintings. If there is a rainbow I will put that in there.  I am capturing the entire night into one canvas.

    Q: What kind of music do you like to paint to, and do you specifically stay within a specific genre?

    A: I don’t stick to any one genre. I have painted over 1,000 different bands and 4,000 canvases that include jam bands like Widespread Panic and Leftover Salmon to up-and-coming Christian rock bands. Next month, I’ll be painting King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, an Australian rock band. I’ve had the opportunity to paint jazz legends Fats Domino, B.B. King, Chuck Berry, Little Richard and Jerry Lee Lewis. I’ve painted Pete Seeger, Bob Dylan, Prince and other legends like Diana Ross, Melissa Etheridge, Carlos Santana, Blues Traveler, Lady Gaga with Tony Bennett, Johnny Winter and Tom Petty.

    It seems easier to tell you which artists I haven’t painted versus the ones that I have.

    Live music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell, right, gets inundated with requests for selfies with fans while he paints during a recent Tedeschi Trucks Band show at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    Q: How did you end up becoming what seems like the artist-in-residence at Red Rocks?

    A: After a show in Florida, Todd Nance, the drummer for Widespread Panic, traded a summer tour pass for a painting I had done of the band. I ended up at my first Red Rocks show where the band played in June 2000. It was love at first sight when I did that show.

    Since then, I have done over 630 paintings at Red Rocks. I buy my own tickets and pay for every single concert that I go to. Red Rocks does not pay me to be there but they do allow me the space in which to paint.

    Live music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell starts painting Margo Price, the warm-up act to Tedeschi Trucks Band at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    Q: Do you remember the first piece of art you ever got paid for?

    A: It was 1987 at one of my first group shows at a shopping mall where I sold a drawing of Joey Ramone. It was a studio piece before I was a live-music artist. I guess I have always been a music artist. even from the start.

    Live music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell paints musician Margo Price, the warm-up act to Tedeschi Trucks Band, as she performs at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    Q: Where can we see your art?

    A: On my website (scramblecampbell.com), but I invite people to come see me live at Row 23 at Red Rocks. I also have small paintings, postcards, magnets and other items for sale at the Red Rocks Trading Post.

    Q: Do you have a favorite art piece?

    A: I did a painting of Lou Reed in 1998 in Bethel, N.Y., on the original Woodstock grounds for the 29th anniversary of the original Woodstock. I got to talk to him and meet him afterwards and he signed the back of my painting. There are also paintings I’ve done of legendary musicians, like B.B. King and Fats Domino, who have since died. All of these paintings I love and will never sell.

    Q: What memorable responses have you had to your work?

    A: I showed David Crosby a painting I had just done of him and he said, “Not bad for speed painting.” Another time when I showed my painting to James Brown, he said, “Son, I’d like to thank you for coming out and painting my portrait.” He signed the entire back of the painting and said “I feel good. James Brown.”

    Live music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell paints during the Tedeschi Trucks Band performance at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)
    Live music artist Keith “Scramble” Campbell paints during the Tedeschi Trucks Band show at Red Rocks in Morrison on July 26, 2024. (Photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

    [ad_2]

    Helen H. Richardson

    Source link

  • USWNT wins its fifth Olympic gold medal in women’s soccer with a 1-0 victory over Brazil in final

    USWNT wins its fifth Olympic gold medal in women’s soccer with a 1-0 victory over Brazil in final

    [ad_1]

    PARIS — The U.S. women’s soccer team is golden again.

    And, as has been the case throughout the team’s run at the Paris Games, the Americans have Colorado to thank.

    The United States won its fifth Olympic gold medal by beating Brazil 1-0 on Colorado native Mallory Swanson’s early second-half goal in the tournament final Saturday at the Paris Games.

    The Americans, who hadn’t won gold since the 2012 London Olympics, closed out an undefeated run to the title in their first international campaign under new coach Emma Hayes.

    Along the way, it was the golden feet of Coloradans Swanson, Sophia Smith and captain Lindsey Horan who did the most damage. Swanson finished the tournament with four goals and two assists, while Smith had three goals and one assist.

    Goalkeeper Alyssa Naeher preserved Saturday’s win with a one-handed save on Adriana’s header in stoppage time at Parc des Princes. At the final whistle, the U.S. players celebrated as Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.” played in the stadium.

    The loss is more heartbreak for Brazil and its iconic star, Marta. The six-time world player of the year has never won a Women’s World Cup or an Olympics. This is expected to be her last major international tournament.

    It was the third victory for the United States over Brazil in an Olympic final. The Americans also beat the Brazilians in the 2004 in Athens and four years later in Beijing.

    Brazil has never finished better than runner-up at the Olympics.

    “I’m very emotional. It’s been a dream of mine to be in this position,” said Hayes, a London native. “I have to thank my dad because he’s the one who pushed me to this point to be able to come and coach an unbelievable group of players that have received me so well and taken on board everything I have asked. They are tremendous people and players and role models. Yeah, I love them.”

    United States team players celebrate after defeating Brazil during the women’s soccer gold medal match between Brazil and the United States at the Parc des Princes during the 2024 Summer Olympics, Saturday, Aug. 10, 2024, in Paris, France. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco)

    Three years ago in Tokyo, the U.S. settled for the bronze medal. The Americans were knocked out in the quarterfinals at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Games.

    Swanson’s 57th-minute goal came in her 100th appearance with the United States.

    Tom Cruise and former U.S. soccer star Megan Rapinoe were among those in the crowd.

    The U.S. also won gold in 1996 at the Atlanta Games in the first women’s soccer tournament at the Olympics.

    [ad_2]

    Anne M. Peterson

    Source link

  • After universal preschool’s rocky start in Colorado, “things are much better” in year two — though challenges remain

    After universal preschool’s rocky start in Colorado, “things are much better” in year two — though challenges remain

    [ad_1]

    As Colorado’s universal preschool program moves into its second school year this month, officials are hoping to leave its rocky rollout in the rearview mirror.

    By the end of July, more than 31,000 4-year-olds matched with state-funded preschool providers for the coming year, according to the most recent data for the core program from the Colorado Department of Early Childhood. Most will receive up to 15 hours of free classtime per week, though about 11,100 of them — about 3,000 more than last year — are expected to qualify for 30 hours each week, after state officials expanded eligibility criteria for the extra class time.

    The number of providers participating in the program — in-home day cares, private practices, religious schools and public schools — has grown by about 150, to more than 2,000 statewide for this school year, Universal Preschool Program Director Dawn Odean said.

    Taken together, that data points to the year-two stabilization of a program whose inaugural year, hiccups and all, was akin to “building the plane as we were flying it,” Odean said.

    Colorado’s program was officially born in April 2022, when Gov. Jared Polis signed the bill to create it and the new Colorado Department of Early Childhood. The program was set for a fall 2023 launch. That left about 16 months to stand up the department, bring about 1,800 participating providers into the new system and sign up tens of thousands of families.

    Officials also had to find and fill the gaps between concept and reality — including budget crunches caused by a participation rate about 20% higher than expected.

    But entering year two of the $344 million program, Odean and local coordinating organizations are hopeful the initial struggles were growing pains associated with its launch. Department officials expect to meet or surpass last year’s sign-up numbers soon, and they hope to see enrollment increase by up to 5%.

    “In a nutshell, I’ll tell you things are much better,” said Elsa Holguín, president and CEO of the Denver Preschool Program. It’s one of the local coordinating organizations, or LCOs, that act as a link between the state department and on-the-ground providers. “Things have gotten better for the families, things have improved for the child care providers and things have improved for the LCOs.”

    But, she added, there’s always room for refinement.

    “Are we where we need to be? No. We still have some work to do across the spectrum,” Holguín said.

    The rollout of year two is still underway, with parents now able to walk through local providers’ doors to sign up for free preschool, space permitting, rather than being required to apply online. The full enrollment figures for this year won’t be available until the fall.

    Aleia Medina, 5, second from right, and classmates attend a morning class with Rosario Ortiz at the Early Excellence Program of Denver on Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

    Adapting to last year’s high enrollment

    Ahead of last year’s launch, expectations for the first year began shifting about as soon as public planning for it began.

    A promise of 10 hours a week of free classtime for all preschoolers turned into 15, with some students qualifying for double that time — considered full-day schooling — based on family circumstances. But months later, officials raised the threshold to qualify for 30 hours as overall enrollment rates shot up about 20% higher than expected, leaving some families feeling like the rug was yanked out from under them.

    Initially, the state had planned to offer extra time to children deemed at risk if they qualified under an eligibility category — by having an individualized education plan, being a dual-language learner, coming from a low-income family or being in foster care.

    When demand outpaced expectations, state officials changed the criteria to add base household income limits, at a middle-class level, as an additional qualification. Students still had to qualify under at least one other factor.

    Meanwhile, providers and families were chafing at a confusing enrollment process that drew critical attention from state lawmakers.

    But officials point to a number of under-the-hood changes since then to smooth out operations.

    Voters in November approved a ballot measure last fall that allowed the state to keep $23.7 million in excess tobacco tax proceeds that help pay for the program. Officials expanded the criteria for 30 hours of free classtime to include all families who are at or below the federal poverty line, expanding access to some 3,000 more children. And the state streamlined enrollment processes to smooth out some of those first-year wrinkles.

    “We’re ecstatic with year one as far as the number of children served and the number of providers participating — but (we) certainly knew that we stood up the program, and the process to enroll and register, in a fairly compressed timeline, which created some challenges,” said Odean, the state’s preschool program director, in an interview this week.

    She also acknowledged the legal battles that played out in the first year.

    A group of school districts had sued over the rollout, claiming that it hurt students with special needs and left school districts in a lurch. A judge ruled in July that the districts lacked standing to sue, while also acknowledging the “headaches” they faced, according to Chalkbeat.

    In a separate January lawsuit, two Catholic schools sued over a nondiscrimination clause for preschool providers. That suit was largely rejected, but not before the state removed the nondiscrimination clause. About 40 religious schools are registered as universal preschool providers in the state this school year.

    Odean said she couldn’t comment on the particulars of the lawsuits, but she appreciated the conversations they spurred about how to make sure families get the preschool they want — even if she wished they didn’t take the form of litigation.

    Hunter Fridley, 4, counts the number of classmates during a morning class with Rosario Ortiz at the Early Excellence Program of Denver on Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
    Hunter Fridley, 4, counts the number of classmates during a morning class with Rosario Ortiz at the Early Excellence Program of Denver on Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

    Private providers’ low enrollments “concerning”

    When it came to preparing for school this year, Holguín, the Denver Preschool Program’s CEO, said preregistration for families and other changes to enrollment, in particular, “changed our world” by making it easier to connect them with preschool providers.

    Diane Smith, director of the Douglas County Early Childhood Council, another LCO, likewise said the state’s program is better positioned this year “in many ways” — though it’s still too early to make a definitive call.

    She still identified a number of focus areas for the future, including a desire for more lead time between announced changes to the program and when they’re implemented, along with more predictable, consistent funding for providers. And, of course, the unending work of making sure every family that wants to participate knows about the program and how to enroll in it.

    In short, the first-year growing pains haven’t quite waned, Smith said, even as she excitedly reports that more providers have signed up to provide universal preschool in her area.

    “Some people are bigger worriers than I am,” Smith said. “I’m the type who says ‘Yes, this is a little bit of a challenge, but I think intentions are always good.’ We’re looking to move forward and we have.”

    Dawn Alexander, executive director of the Early Childhood Education Association of Colorado, which advocates for private preschool providers, warned that some of her members were starting to fret about “concerning” low early enrollment numbers — though she, too, cautioned that it was too early to raise a red flag.

    Many families seem to be choosing school districts’ programs for their 4-year-olds, Alexander said, meaning that private preschools lose out on those enrollments. The older, less care-intensive preschool children help round out the rosters of many facilities that also provide day care for infants and toddlers, she said. Losing those populations can put their entire business at risk.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Coltrain

    Source link

  • X Is Boosting the Far Right’s UK Riots as Telegram Scrambles for Control

    X Is Boosting the Far Right’s UK Riots as Telegram Scrambles for Control

    [ad_1]

    As asylum centers are boarding up ahead of another predicted day of violent protests across the UK on Wednesday, X owner Elon Musk has stoked tensions by labeling UK prime minister Keir Starmer “#TwoTierKier” and spreading a far-right conspiracy theory that claims white rioters are being dealt with more severely than minorities by police.

    For days now, Musk has sought to use his huge influence to suggest that diversity was causing the riots: “If incompatible cultures are brought together without assimilation, conflict is inevitable,” Musk wrote. Responding to a video of riots in Liverpool on Monday, Musk warned: “Civil war is inevitable.”

    Six thousand police officers are on standby in response to far-right figures sharing a list of dozens of targets, including locations of asylum centers and offices of lawyers who help asylum seekers. Officials are facing resistance from X to take down posts that are deemed a threat to national security, according to a report by the Financial Times.

    After the death of three children in Southport during a mass stabbing attack last week, which sparked the riots, conspiracies flooded social media platforms, including X. But it was on Telegram where much of the initial organization for the attacks took place.

    Far-right channels not only posted information on locations and times for protests, but shared information on how to construct Molotov cocktails and set fire to buildings, according to a WIRED review of multiple Telegram channels.

    But, while Musk and X have done little to quell their activity, Telegram appears to have taken action against at least one channel which has been set up to spread hatred and disinformation around the Southport stabbings.

    The “Southport Wake Up” Telegram channel was set up within hours of the stabbing incident last week and soon amassed a huge following. It shared details about local protests but quickly descended into making violent threats against named individuals and locations.

    On Monday night, Telegram appeared to remove the channel, which at that point had almost 15,000 members. It is unclear if Telegram made this decision itself or if it was at the direction of the authorities in the UK.

    The creator of the channel, who has been flagged to police by researchers but has not been publicly named, has attempted to set up new channels several times, but they have all been shut down within hours of being established.

    Telegram told WIRED that its moderators were “actively monitoring the situation and are removing channels and posts containing calls to violence.”

    A spokesperson told WIRED the Home Office could not comment on whether they had called for the Stockport Wakeup telegram channel to be blocked, as “it’s an operational issue.”

    Many far-right figures had migrated to Telegram in recent years after being kicked off all other platforms, because of Telegram’s notoriously lax approach to censorship. But since Musk’s takeover of Twitter in November 2022, many of those previously exiled extremists have been welcomed back, including Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, the leader of the now-defunct English Defense League (EDL), who goes by the name of Tommy Robinson.

    [ad_2]

    David Gilbert, Isabel Fraser

    Source link

  • Former Broncos safety Justin Simmons to visit Saints

    Former Broncos safety Justin Simmons to visit Saints

    [ad_1]

    Justin Simmons could be on the verge of finding a new home.

    The former Broncos safety is set to visit the New Orleans Saints on Wednesday, a source familiar with the situation told The Denver Post. The news was first reported by Nick Underhill of NewOrleans.Football.

    Simmons is one of the best free agents available. In eight seasons with the Broncos, Simmons recorded 604 tackles, 30 interceptions and 65 passes defended. Simmons’ interception total is the most by a player since 2016.

    [ad_2]

    Ryan McFadden

    Source link

  • Keeler: Broncos put QB Bo Nix third on their depth chart? Sean Payton needs to stop trolling Broncos Country and get on with the rebuild

    Keeler: Broncos put QB Bo Nix third on their depth chart? Sean Payton needs to stop trolling Broncos Country and get on with the rebuild

    [ad_1]

    Why does Sean Payton have to be such a pain in the ash?

    Jarrett Stidham is ballast. Zach Wilson is insurance. Any meaningful Broncos snap in 2024 that isn’t devoted to Bo Nix is a snap wasted, a dollar burned. A pile of cinders, right next to the smoldering $53 million you just gave Russell Wilson to hurt himself in Pittsburgh.

    Can we just get on with it? Please? Declaring Steady Stiddy as your starter, as Payton more or less did for Sunday’s preseason opener at Indianapolis, is just delaying the inevitable. It’s cute for cute’s sake. It’s either an epic troll job or a backdoor message to Nix, picked 12th in this past spring’s draft to be your franchise quarterback, that his present isn’t promised.

    “I’m not ready for a depth chart, but I have to get (the league) a depth chart,” Payton said after Tuesday’s practice. “So it’s easy to push the (younger) players to the back of the line and then make sure it’s kind of where we sit right now.

    “And that’s really it. No, it’s a good question, but I’m not trying to send messages at all.”

    Whatever. No. 10 turns 25 in February. Start the meter or get a different cab.

    This isn’t 2021. This isn’t about Drew vs. Teddy, about dividing the family and picking a side. This isn’t about an unproven coach who desperately needs to win now, the way Uncle Vic Fangio had to and didn’t.

    Broncos Country should be united around Nix, until he gives them ample cause, gives them enough evidence, to cut bait and turn the page. Which might be never.

    But dang it, there’s only one way to find out.

    It’s about 2025. And 2026. And 2027. Until then, you’re thumb-wrestling with the Raiduhs for third in the AFC West.

    [ad_2]

    Sean Keeler

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers for Antitrust Violations due to Boycott

    Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers for Antitrust Violations due to Boycott

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s social media platform X has filed a lawsuit against a group of advertisers, alleging that a “massive advertiser boycott” cost the company billions in revenue and violated antitrust laws. The suit, filed Tuesday in a Texas federal court, targets the World Federation of Advertisers and member companies Unilever, Mars, CVS Health, and Orsted.

    X, formerly known as Twitter, claims the Global Alliance for Responsible Media coordinated an advertising pause after Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of Twitter in late 2022. Musk announced the lawsuit on X, declaring “now it is war” after two years of unsuccessful negotiations.

    X CEO Linda Yaccarino stated the lawsuit partly relies on evidence from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, which indicated an illegal boycott organized by several companies. The committee, led by Republicans, recently investigated anticompetitive practices in online advertising.

    The suit focuses on the early days of Musk’s takeover, separate from a 2023 incident where advertisers left X over concerns about ads appearing next to hate speech. Musk had previously criticized these advertisers, accusing them of “blackmail.”


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


    Follow Media Bias Fact Check: 

    BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mediabiasfactcheck.bsky.social

    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Media_Bias_Fact_Check/

    Threads: https://www.threads.net/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/MBFC_News

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mediabiasfactcheck

    Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@mediabiasfactcheck

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

    Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/mbfcnews/

     

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 23.2K other subscribers

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers, Says Boycotts Violated Antitrust Law

    Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers, Says Boycotts Violated Antitrust Law

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk told advertisers to “go f–k yourself” last fall at the conference above, and today he’s suing them for allegedly colluding to boycott his social media platform X.

    The lawsuit brought by X in federal court in Texas names the World Federation of Advertisers as well as individual companies Mars, CVS, Unilever and Orsted, a Danish clean energy firm. Many corporations bailed when racist and antisemitic content seemed to explode on Twitter after Musk acquired it in the fall of 2022. Theyve remained wary, and Musk himself has amplified controversial posts. The suit doesn’t claim advertisers can’t boycott, but that they can’t decide together to do it.

    “Defendants conspired, along with dozens of non-defendant co-conspirators, to collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue from Twitter [now X] … Concerned that Twitter might deviate from certain brand safety standards for advertising on social media platforms set through GARM, the conspirators collectively acted to enforce Twitter’s adherence to those standards through the boycott.”

    GARM is the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.

    “This is an antitrust action relating to a group boycott by competing advertisers of one of the most popular social media platforms in the United States,” X’s suit said. “GARM’s members “did, abruptly and in lockstep, boycott Twitter by discontinuing entirely or substantially reducing their previously substantial advertising purchases,” calling it a conspiracy and collusion.

    The company is asking for a jury trial with “trebeled” compensatory damages as well as injunctive relief, saying there is still boycotting.

    X said its brand safety standards are comparable to those of its competitors, and meet of exceed GARMs parameters, but also that each social media platform should be free to set its own brand safety standards. It believes that the “free market would see platforms with inefficient standards lag behind.”

    Whether or not you buy that, the issue in the suit is “collective action among competing advertisers to dictate brand safety standards to be applied by social media platforms.”

    “The brand safety standards set by GARM should succeed or fail in the marketplace on their own merits and not through the coercive exercise of market power by advertisers acting collectively to promote their own economic interests through commercial restraints at the expense of social media platforms and their users.”

    The issue is the subject of an active investigation by the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, which emboldened the suit by an interim report finding that “The extent to which GARM has organized its trade association and coordinates actions that rob consumers of choices is likely illegal under the antitrust laws and threatens fundamental American freedoms.”

    X described a major economic hit from the boycotts. “X became a less effective competitor to other social media platforms in the sale of digital advertising and in competing for user engagement on its platform. By sharply curtailing its revenues, the boycott has reduced X’s ability to invest in new or improved functionality, thus harming the consumers who use X’s platform.”

    X CEO Linda Yaccarino, in a video and a letter to advertisers posted on X, explained why the platform is suing them — because they are disrupting “the marketplace of ideas” as well as costing X billions of dollars.

    “To those who broke the law, we say enough is enough. We are compelled to seek justice for the harm that has been done by these and potentially additional defendants, depending what the legal process reveals.”

    [ad_2]

    jillg366

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers Over Alleged Boycott

    Elon Musk’s X Sues Advertisers Over Alleged Boycott

    [ad_1]

    X today filed a lawsuit against a group of major advertisers for allegedly conspiring to withhold advertising dollars from the social media platform, which, since Elon Musk’s takeover, has been seen as more amenable to hosting controversial content.

    The suit, filed in federal court in Texas, says dozens of advertisers followed the recommendation of a key advertising coalition, Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), to boycott buying ads on X since Musk bought the company. The suit says this turn of events cost the company billions of dollars in revenue. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for violation of US antitrust law.

    The right-wing video site Rumble, founded more than 10 years ago as an alternative to YouTube and positioned as a platform “immune to cancel culture,” announced on Tuesday that it had filed a similar lawsuit. “GARM was a conspiracy to perpetrate an advertiser boycott of Rumble and others, and that’s illegal,” the company posted on its X account.

    The US House Judiciary Committee, which is controlled by Republicans and has expressed concern about censorship of right-wing views on social media, has been investigating GARM. In a preliminary report in July, the committee found that “the extent to which GARM has organized its trade association and coordinates actions that rob consumers of choices is likely illegal under the antitrust laws and threatens fundamental American freedoms.” X’s lawsuit draws heavily from internal GARM emails reviewed by the congressional panel.

    In a video shared to X, X CEO Linda Yaccarino said she was “shocked” by the evidence uncovered by the House Judiciary Committee that there had been a “systematic illegal boycott against X.” Yaccarino attempted to rally X users with references to free speech in her statement. While pointing directly at the camera, she alleged that the advertisers were “targeting our company, and you, our users,” and “threatening your global town square.”

    “People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is constricted,” Yaccarino said.

    The Brussels-based World Federation of Advertisers, which oversees GARM, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuits. X’s lawsuit also names Unilever, Mars, CVS, and a Danish energy company as defendants, while Rumble’s suit additionally targets the ad agency WPP. None of the companies immediately responded to requests for comment.

    X’s lawsuit contends that advertisers in the past had to individually strike deals with social media companies to set boundaries around what types of content they would sponsor. Through GARM, advertisers have been able to aggregate their power, establish industry standards for content moderation, and enforce them. In X’s view, GARM now has too much say over the content social media platforms may allow.

    “In a competitive market, each social media platform would set the brand safety standards that are optimal for that platform and for its users, and advertisers would unilaterally select the platforms on which they advertise,” the complaint states. “But collective action among competing advertisers to dictate brand safety standards to be applied by social media platforms shortcuts the competitive process and allows the collective views of a group of advertisers with market power to override the interests of consumers.”

    [ad_2]

    Paresh Dave, Lauren Goode

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s X Is Leaving San Francisco

    Elon Musk’s X Is Leaving San Francisco

    [ad_1]

    The social media company X is closing its San Francisco office “over the next few weeks,” according to an internal email sent out by CEO Linda Yaccarino earlier today. “This is an important decision that impacts many of you, but it is the right one for our company in the long term,” Yaccarino wrote in the email, first reported by The New York Times.

    Employees in San Francisco reportedly will be moved to new locations in the Bay Area, “including the existing office in San Jose and a new engineering focused shared space with [xAI, Musk’s AI startup] in Palo Alto,” the note said. The company’s executive team is said to be working on “transportation options” for staff. X did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.

    The official announcement comes a few weeks after Musk said in a post on X that he planned to move X and SpaceX headquarters to Texas. X would move to Austin, specifically, Musk said at the time. Bloomberg reported earlier this year that X had already been staffing up a trust and safety team for X based in Austin.

    While the state of Texas is known to be more business-friendly than California—it has one of the lowest tax burdens in the US—Musk’s publicly stated reasoning for the move to Texas was more ideological than financial. He said at the time that the “final straw” was a new California law that aims to protect the privacy of transgender children, which he perceived to be “attacking both families and companies.” He also said that he’s “had enough of dodging gangs of violent drug addicts just to get in and out of the building.”

    The latest update from Yaccarino suggests it’s the San Francisco office, specifically, that is the thorn in X’s side. And it’s an about-face for Musk, who tweeted a year ago that, despite incentives to move out of San Francisco, X would not move its HQ out of the city. “You only know who your real friends are when the chips are down,” he waxed poetically on X. “San Francisco, beautiful San Francisco, though others forsake you, we will always be your friend.”

    The shuttering of the X office marks the end of an era for the company formerly known as Twitter, and for the historic Mid-Market neighborhood that in the 2010s managed to lure in burgeoning tech companies like Twitter, Uber, Spotify, and Square.

    Twitter’s earliest offices were in SoMa, or the South of Market neighborhood of San Francisco, until 2011, when then mayor Ed Lee instituted a controversial tax break for tech companies. The ruling erased the 1.5 percent payroll tax for companies that moved into certain Mid-Market buildings. Twitter jumped at the opportunity.

    The company was considered an anchor tenant in a densely populated neighborhood marked by homelessness and open drug use. Suddenly an airy, high-end food market, a Blue Bottle Coffee shop, and tech workers with MacBooks and overpriced sneakers dotted Market Street, alongside people in various states of distress camped out in front of still-vacant storefronts.

    [ad_2]

    Lauren Goode

    Source link

  • Stoic & Genuine is closing; owners stepping down from two other restaurants

    Stoic & Genuine is closing; owners stepping down from two other restaurants

    [ad_1]

    Denver’s Union Station just wrapped up an $11 million renovation, but that wasn’t enough to keep its first restaurant tenant in the house.

    Stoic & Genuine was the first restaurant to open in the historic building when it reopened with a hotel, shops, restaurants and bars in 2014. But restaurant owners Beth Gruitch and Jennifer Jasinski announced that the seafood spot, at 1701 Wynkoop St., will serve its last spoonful of caviar and buttery lobster roll on Sept. 1. They cited an expiring lease and changing market conditions as the main factors behind the decision.

    Downtown Denver has struggled to bounce back since the COVID-19 pandemic. Offices remain vacant and pedestrian traffic is down, especially in the midst of the lengthy and ongoing 16th Street Mall renovation. Other downtown restaurants, like Bistro LeRoux and Three Saints Revival, have called it quits as a result.

    Crafted Concepts founders Jennifer Jasinski, left, and Beth Gruitch, right, have decided to take a step back from their restaurant group and hand over operations for Ultreia and Bistro Vendôme. (Provided by Bryan Grant for Crafted Concepts)

    In addition to closing Stoic & Genuine, Gruitch and Jasinski, a James Beard award-winning chef, have decided to step away from two of their other well-known restaurants, Ultreia, a Spanish tapas restaurant also located in Union Station, and Bistro Vendome, a French food standard that moved from its longtime home in Larimer Square in early 2023 to Denver’s Park Hill neighborhood.

    “Conductors pass the baton. It’s time to pass along stewardship of these beautiful places,” Jasinski said in a statement. “Surviving the pandemic and the changes to downtown Denver has left us in a great place to make this move.”

    Ultreia partner Adam Branz will return as executive chef and sole owner of the Spanish tapas restaurant, which opened in 2017. Branz took a few years off to start Split Lip, an Eat Place inside Number Thirty Eight (home to one of the best burgers in Denver), which he will continue operating.

    [ad_2]

    Lily O'Neill

    Source link

  • PHOTOS: 10th anniversary of Colorado’s Taste of Ethiopia Festival

    PHOTOS: 10th anniversary of Colorado’s Taste of Ethiopia Festival

    [ad_1]

    The Taste of Ethiopia festival at Parkfield Lake Park in Denver on Aug. 4, 2024. Colorado’s Taste of Ethiopia Festival celebrated its 10th anniversary with an extended two-day event on Aug. 3 and 4, 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Helen H. Richardson

    Source link

  • Clock is ticking to clean the Front Range’s dirty air by 2027. The region’s off to a bad start this summer.

    Clock is ticking to clean the Front Range’s dirty air by 2027. The region’s off to a bad start this summer.

    [ad_1]

    Colorado has three years to lower ground-level ozone pollution to meet federal standards, and this summer’s hazy skies — caused by oil and gas drilling, heavy vehicle traffic and wildfire smoke — are putting the state in a hole as it’s already logged more dirty air days than in all of 2023.

    “Our state has taken a lot of steps to improve air quality, but you can see it in the skies, you can see it in the air, that we still have work to do,” said Kirsten Schatz, clean air advocate for the Colorado Public Interest Research Group.

    Two months into the 2024 summer ozone season, the Front Range already has recorded more high ozone days than the entire summer of 2023. As of Monday, which is the most recent data available, ozone levels had exceeded federal air quality standards on 28 days. At the same point in 2023, there had been 27 high-ozone days.

    The summer ozone season runs from June 1 to Aug. 31. However, the region encompassing metro Denver and the northern Front Range this year recorded its first high ozone day in May, and in some years ozone pollution exceeds federal standards into mid-September.

    The region is failing to meet two air quality standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency.

    The first benchmark is to lower average ozone pollution to a 2008 standard of 75 parts per billion. The northern Front Range is in what’s called “severe non-attainment” for that number, meaning motorists must use a more expensive blend of gasoline during the summer and more businesses must apply for federal permits that regulate how much pollution they spill into the air.

    The second benchmark requires the region to lower its average ozone pollution to a 2015 standard of 70 parts per billion, considered the most acceptable level of air pollution for human health. In July, the EPA downgraded the northern Front Range to be in serious violation of that standard as the region’s ozone level now sits at 81 parts per billion. The state must now submit to the EPA a new plan for lowering emissions.

    Colorado needs to meet both EPA benchmarks by 2027, or it will be downgraded again and face more federal regulation.

    Of the 28 days the state has recorded high ozone pollution levels, 17 exceeded the 2008 standard of 70 parts per billion, according to data compiled by the Regional Air Quality Council, an organization that advises the state on how to reduce air pollution.

    That’s bad news for the region after state air regulators predicted Colorado would be able to meet that standard by the 2027 deadline. The EPA calculates average ozone pollution levels on a three-year average, so this summer’s bad numbers will drag down the final grade.

    “It’s not a good first year to have,” said Mike Silverstein, the air quality council’s executive director.

    Smoke from wildfires near and far

    Ground-level ozone pollution forms on hot summer days when volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides react in the sunlight. Those compounds and gases are released by oil and gas wells and refineries, automobiles on the road, fumes from paint and other industrial chemicals, and gas-powered lawn and garden equipment.

    It forms a smog that can cause the skies to become brown or hazy, and it is harmful to people, especially those with lung and heart disease, the elderly and children. Ground-level ozone is different than the ozone in the atmosphere that protects Earth from the sun’s powerful rays.

    Wildfire smoke blowing from Canada and the Pacific Northwest did not help Colorado’s pollution levels in July, and then multiple fires erupted along the Front Range over the past week, creating homegrown pollution from fine particulate matter such as smoke, soot and ash. Ultimately, though, the heavy smoke days could be wiped from the calculations from 2024, but that decision will be made at a later date.

    Still, June also saw multiple high ozone days, and air quality experts say much of the pollution originates at home in Colorado and cannot be blamed on outside influences.

    The out-of-state wildfire smoke sent ozone levels skyrocketing the week of July 21 to 27, Silverstein said, but it’s not the reason the numbers are high. The week prior saw ozone levels above federal standards, too, and wildfire smoke had not drifted into the region.

    “Pull the wildfires out and we would probably still have had high ozone,” he said.

    Jeremy Nichols, senior advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, also warned that wildfires should not be used as an excuse for the region’s air pollution.

    “While the wildfires are out of our control, there is a whole bunch of air pollution we can control,” he said. “I don’t want to let that cover up the ugliness that existed here in the first place.”

    Nichols blames oil and gas drilling for the region’s smog. The state is not doing enough to regulate the industry, he said.

    “We actually need to recognize we are at a point where oil and gas needs to stop drilling on high ozone days,” Nichols said. “Just like we’re told to stay home on high ozone days, business as usual needs to stop. I don’t think we’ve clamped down on them and in many respects they are getting a free pass to pollute.”

    Legislation that would have prevented drilling on high ozone days failed during the 2024 session.

    However, the air quality council has approved two measures to reduce emissions in the oil fields and is preparing to send those to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for approval.

    One proposal would require drilling companies to eliminate emissions from pneumatic actuating devices, equipment driven by pressurized gas to open and close valves in pipelines, Silverstein said. Oil companies already are required to make 50% of those devices emission-free, and the federal government also is requiring them to be 100% emission-free by 2035. But Colorado’s proposal would accelerate the timeline, he said.

    The second proposal would tell companies to stop performing blowdowns, which is when workers vent fumes from pipelines before beginning maintenance to clear explosive gases, when an ozone alert is issued, Silverstein said.

    “There are thousands of these very small events, but these small events add up to significant activity,” he said.

    Gabby Richmond, a spokeswoman for the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, said the industry supports the new regulations. She said operators also were electrifying operations where possible and voluntarily delaying operational activities on high ozone days.

    “Our industry values clean air, and we are committed to pioneering innovative solutions that protect our environment and make Colorado a great place to live,” Richmond said in a statement. “As a part of this commitment, we have significantly reduced ozone-causing emissions by over 50% through technology, regulatory initiatives and voluntary measures — all in the spirit of being good neighbors in the communities where we live and work.”

    “Knock down emissions where we can”

    Meanwhile, people who live in metro Denver and the northern Front Range are asked to do their part, too.

    [ad_2]

    Noelle Phillips

    Source link

  • Ex-CSU Rams coach Steve Addazio joins ESPN as analyst

    Ex-CSU Rams coach Steve Addazio joins ESPN as analyst

    [ad_1]

    The Daz is joining the Disney family.

    Former CSU Rams football coach Steve Addazio, whose Fort Collins tenure was short and tempestuous, is transitioning to television. ESPN announced that Addazio has joined the network as a college football analyst and will start calling games later this month.

    Addazio posted a 4-12 record at CSU from 2020-21 and had a 61-67 career record as a head coach with the Rams, Boston College (2013-19) and Temple (2011-12). He was fired at CSU in December 2021, a few days after completing a 3-9 season and after being ejected from a 52-10 home loss to Nevada, then coached by Jay Norvell.

    [ad_2]

    Sean Keeler

    Source link

  • Colorado’s next wolves won’t come from Washington tribes, leaving state to search again for new source

    Colorado’s next wolves won’t come from Washington tribes, leaving state to search again for new source

    [ad_1]

    The Washington tribes that agreed to provide wolves to Colorado’s reintroduction program have rescinded their offer, forcing state wildlife officials to seek a different source — a search that has proved difficult in the past.

    The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation said they would no longer provide the wolves after speaking with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, which has reservation land in Colorado. The Washington tribes — which had been expected to be a major source for the next round of the reintroduction effort — withdrew their agreement in a June 6 letter to Colorado Parks and Wildlife.

    “It has come to our attention that necessary and meaningful consultation was not completed with the potentially impacted tribes,” wrote Jarred-Michael Erickson, chairman of the Colville business council, in the letter. “Out of respect for the sovereignty, cultures and memberships of Indian Tribes in Colorado and neighboring states, who may be impacted by this project, the Colville Tribes cannot assist with this project at this time.”

    Colorado voters in 2020 narrowly decided to reintroduce gray wolves and mandated that state wildlife officials do so by Dec. 31, 2023.

    The plan detailing how CPW will execute the reintroduction effort states that the agency should release a total of 30 to 50 wolves within the next few years, a target it plans to reach by relocating 10 to 15 wolves every winter.

    The controversial vote has caused deep frustration in Colorado’s ranching communities, where people say the wolves will negatively impact their businesses and ways of life. Support for the reintroduction primarily came from urban Front Range communities, while the rural areas where wolves would live opposed the measure.

    Since the first December releases, wolves have killed or injured at least 14 cattle and nine sheep — including 8 sheep killed or injured last weekend.

    Documents from the Colville Tribes’ business council show that the council discussed the issue on June 6 after learning Colorado officials “failed to consult” with the Southern Ute Tribe about the wolves.

    The Southern Ute Indian Tribe has concerns about the wolves potential impact on livestock, deer and elk herds and their use of the Brunot Area hunting rights reserved for tribal members, tribal leadership said Thursday in a statement. Tribal leaders said they would continue to work with Colorado Parks and Wildlife “to establish a framework for working together that enables the state to implement its reintroduction program while simultaneously recognizing the sovereign authority of the Tribe on tribal lands and the interest shared by the Tribe and the State in the Brunot Area.”

    So far, CPW’s monthly maps showing where the wolves have roamed have indicated activity in the central and northern mountains, far from the Southern Utes’ southwestern Colorado reservation. But plans call for the next round of releases to occur farther south.

    Colorado wildlife officials struggled last year to find a state or tribe willing to provide wolves for reintroduction here. The three states identified as ideal for sourcing wolves — Idaho, Montana and Wyoming — all rejected Colorado’s request for wolves.

    CPW spokesman Joey Livingston on Thursday declined to discuss source negotiations and said the agency would issue a statement when it finds a source.

    [ad_2]

    Elise Schmelzer

    Source link

  • Don Lemon sues Elon Musk and X for $35 million, claiming fraud over canceled content deal

    Don Lemon sues Elon Musk and X for $35 million, claiming fraud over canceled content deal

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk moving SpaceX from California to Texas


    Elon Musk moving SpaceX from California to Texas

    01:15


    Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor, is suing Elon Musk and his social media network X for $35 million, alleging fraud and breach of contract after the billionaire abruptly scrapped a content partnership between them in March. 


    The lawsuit, posted by Variety, which earlier reported on the legal claim, claims that Musk and X promised that Lemon would have “full authority and control over the work he produced even if disliked” by the Tesla CEO and his executives. Lemon also alleges he never received any pay for his content deal, which the lawsuit states amounted to a “guaranteed” $1.5 million in the first year. 


    Lemon’s attorney, Carney R. Shegerian, and a representative for X didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. 


    Lemon’s suit comes less than five months after the much-touted content deal fell apart even before it officially started. X announced the arrangement was ending just days before its maiden broadcast was set to air on X in March, while Musk derided Lemon’s approach at the time as “basically just ‘CNN, but on social media.’” 


    The first episode, which Lemon released on social media after the content deal was canceled, showed a sometimes prickly conversation with Musk in which the billionaire defended his prescription usage of ketamine, saying the drug helped him alleviate a “negative chemical mind state.” Musk also complained in the interview about the way Lemon was asking questions, describing it as “not cogent.


    The lawsuit alleges that Musk and his representatives, including X CEO Linda Yaccarino, “deliberately misrepresented what they intended to do,” which it claims was to capitalize on Lemon’s name and professional status to rehabilitate X’s reputation after major advertisers fled the service following Musk’s endorsement of an antisemitic post.


    Lemon alleges he incurred “hundreds of thousands of dollars” to create his own media company to produce the X content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Don Lemon sues Elon Musk and X, claiming fraud over canceled content deal

    Don Lemon sues Elon Musk and X, claiming fraud over canceled content deal

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk moving SpaceX from California to Texas


    Elon Musk moving SpaceX from California to Texas

    01:15

    Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor, is suing Elon Musk and his social media network X, alleging fraud and breach of contract after the billionaire abruptly scrapped a content partnership between them in March. 

    The lawsuit, posted by Variety, which earlier reported on the legal claim, claims that Musk and X promised that Lemon would have “full authority and control over the work he produced even if disliked” by the Tesla CEO and his executives. Lemon also alleges he never received any pay for his content deal, which the lawsuit states amounted to a “guaranteed” $1.5 million in the first year. 

    Lemon’s attorney, Carney R. Shegerian, and a representative for X didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. 

    Lemon’s suit comes less than five months after the much-touted content deal fell apart even before it officially started. X announced the arrangement was ending just days before its maiden broadcast was set to air on X in March, while Musk derided Lemon’s approach at the time as “basically just ‘CNN, but on social media.’” 

    The first episode, which Lemon released on social media after the content deal was canceled, showed a sometimes prickly conversation with Musk in which the billionaire defended his prescription usage of ketamine, saying the drug helped him alleviate a “negative chemical mind state.” Musk also complained in the interview about the way Lemon was asking questions, describing it as “not cogent.

    The lawsuit alleges that Musk and his representatives, including X CEO Linda Yaccarino, “deliberately misrepresented what they intended to do,” which it claims was to capitalize on Lemon’s name and professional status to rehabilitate X’s reputation after major advertisers fled the service following Musk’s endorsement of an antisemitic post.

    Lemon alleges he incurred “hundreds of thousands of dollars” to create his own media company to produce the X content.

    Editor’s note: The initial version of the story mistakenly reported that Don Lemon is suing Elon Musk for $35 million. The damages haven’t been specified. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As wildfires sweep through the Front Range, residents ponder whether to stay or go

    As wildfires sweep through the Front Range, residents ponder whether to stay or go

    [ad_1]

    As wildfires burned thousands of acres across the Front Range on Wednesday, some residents heeded early morning calls to leave while others opted to stay put on land that already required extra self-sufficiency.

    At the Dakota Ridge High School, the evacuation site for the Quarry fire burning near Deer Creek Canyon in Jefferson County, John Banks coughed in the parking lot as smoke from the fire threatening his neighborhood hung heavily in the air.

    Banks and his wife, Diane, fled the fire early Wednesday after a 1:30 a.m. phone call ordered them to evacuate.

    The couple slept in their car overnight with their rescue cat, Mea, and the few items they scooped from their home after the evacuation call: medications, some clothes, John’s oxygen tanks and cancer medications, and Mea’s food and litter.

    They left everything else behind in the home where they’ve lived for 34 years.

    “These are just things,” said Banks, 78.

    He paused, emotion creeping into his voice.

    “If you lose things, you still have your friends, your family.”

    The couple found a hotel to stay in for the next night and planned to spend Wednesday going to pre-scheduled doctor appointments.

    “Life throws spitballs at you,” John Banks said. “But you keep going.”

    When the couple arrived at the evacuation center at Dakota Ridge High School at 3 a.m. Wednesday, they were one of the first people to arrive.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Finley, Elise Schmelzer

    Source link

  • Rockies blow early lead, drop fifth straight in series-opening loss to Angels as Cal Quantrill gets roughed up

    Rockies blow early lead, drop fifth straight in series-opening loss to Angels as Cal Quantrill gets roughed up

    [ad_1]

    Colorado’s Angel-filled nightmare continued in Tuesday’s series opener in Anaheim.

    The Rockies entered the game with the lowest winning percentage against the Angels of any opponent in franchise history at .311. And that mark slipped a little more after the Rockies blew an early lead en route to a 10-7 defeat at Angel Stadium.

    Right-hander Cal Quantrill was roughed up in the defeat, yielding a season-high seven runs in 3 2/3 innings.

    “We had the lead 6-2, we had the lead 6-4,” Rockies manager Bud Black told reporters. “It was surprising and frustrating for Cal that he couldn’t get through this one. He’s been so good for us all year, so that was unexpected.”

    Colorado jumped on right-hander Griffin Canning right off the bat, with two runs in the first inning and then four in the second.

    Kris Bryant’s sacrifice fly and Brendan Rodgers’ RBI double made it 2-0 early, then after Taylor Ward’s two-RBI single off Quantrill in the bottom of the frame, Ezequiel Tovar’s sacrifice fly plus Ryan McMahon’s three-run homer gave the Rockies a commanding early lead.

    But Quantrill — who remains in a Rockies uniform despite being the subject of trade speculation up through Tuesday’s deadline — wasn’t sharp.

    The right-hander lacked command of his signature pitch, the splitter. Los Angeles got a two-RBI double by Matt Thaiss in the third, then Ward and Thaiss drove home runs in the fourth to swing the lead back to the Angels, 7-6, and chase Quantrill from the game.

    “There were some elevated pitches, and (Quantrill) threw a number of splits and that was part of the gameplan, he just didn’t have the feel for it,” Black said.

    Tovar tied the game in the seventh off southpaw Jose Quijada via the shortstop’s 18th homer of the year, tying Michael Toglia for a team high. Tovar was the Rockies’ lone baserunner after the second inning.

    Los Angeles retook the lead, again, in the bottom of the seventh via Jo Adell’s monstrous solo homer, a 439-foot shot to center off right-hander Jake Bird.

    The Angels then added on to that late lead via Zach Neto’s push bunt and Thaiss’ RBI single that plated two more runs off Justin Lawrence.

    “The pitching wasn’t up to par at all today,” Black said. “We didn’t hit in (a four-game sweep in) San Francisco… Today we hit, and we didn’t pitch.”

    Thaiss finished with five RBIs, and is the first player in Angels history to drive in five runs and have two steals in a single game. Thaiss is also just the second catcher in MLB history to accomplish that feat, joining Hall of Famer Mickey Cochrane, who did it for the Tigers in 1934.

    Meanwhile, the Colorado offense couldn’t muster another surge with the game on the line, getting set down in order in the eighth by Ben Joyce before fellow right-hander Hunter Strickland did the same to the Rockies in the ninth.

    Wednesday’s pitching matchup

    Rockies LHP Kyle Freeland (2-4, 6.23 ERA) at Angels TBA

    7:38 p.m. Wednesday, Angel Stadium

    TV: Rockies.TV (streaming); Comcast/Xfinity (channel 1262); DirecTV (683); Spectrum (130, 445, 305, 435 or 445, depending on region).

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Newman

    Source link