ReportWire

Tag: Twitter

  • A day of chaos brings Twitter closer to the brink | CNN Business

    A day of chaos brings Twitter closer to the brink | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    Washington
    CNN Business
     — 

    Two weeks after Elon Musk completed his acquisition of Twitter, the future of the company has never looked less certain.

    In the past week alone, one of the world’s most influential social networks has laid off half its workforce; alienated powerful advertisers; blown up key aspects of its product, then repeatedly launched and un-launched other features aimed at compensating for it; and witnessed an exodus of senior executives.

    The wild swings at Twitter only seemed to accelerate on Thursday with more executive departures, growing chaos over fake, verified accounts and an unusual public rebuke from the US government. Twitter now appears to be on the brink, a point Musk himself seemed to concede on Thursday by reportedly telling employees that bankruptcy could be on the horizon (though it’s far from the first time he’s warned about bankruptcy at one of his companies).

    “Quite the day!” Musk tweeted.

    It’s a stunning reversal of fortunes not just for Musk, who bought the company for $44 billion, but also for a platform used by some of the most powerful people on the planet, including world leaders, CEOs, and the Pope.

    An end to the disruption seemed nowhere in sight on Friday. In its latest reversal on the matter, Twitter said it would re-introduce a gray “Official” badge for select accounts to help confirm their identities. The decision came after Twitter was forced to fend off a wave of verified-account impostors this week, including some posing as former President Donald Trump, Nintendo, and the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, among others. These accounts were the result of Musk’s decision to rush ahead with offering a blue check mark to any account holder willing to pay $8 a month, no questions asked, as he races to find new ways to make money from the platform.

    That paid subscription service, too, was also suspended on Friday with little warning, just two days after its official launch, with the menu option to sign up for Twitter Blue suddenly disappearing from Twitter’s iOS app — the only place the add-on had been offered. It was not immediately clear when the company might restore the offering.

    The gray “Official” badge has become an illustration of the whiplash users, employees, and advertisers have experienced in recent days.

    Hours after the gray badges launched on Wednesday as a way to help users differentiate legitimate celebrity and branded accounts from accounts that had merely paid for a blue check mark, Musk abruptly tweeted that he had “killed” the feature, forcing subordinates to explain the reversal.

    “We’re not currently putting an ‘Official’ label on accounts but we are aggressively going after impersonation and deception,” Twitter’s verified support account tweeted on Wednesday evening.

    The account’s very next tweet, a day and nine hours later, said exactly the opposite: “To combat impersonation, we’ve added an ‘Official’ label to some accounts.”

    Twitter did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the changes to the rollout of Twitter Blue or “Official” badges.

    The paid verification feature’s rocky rollout attracted widespread criticism from misinformation experts who had warned it would make identifying trustworthy information much more difficult, particularly in the critical period following the US midterm elections. Even some of Musk’s fellow high-powered users of the platform had tough feedback.

    “@elonmusk, from one entrepreneur to another, for when you have your customer service hat on. I just spent too much time muting all the newly purchased checkmark accts in an attempt to make my verified mentions useful again,” tweeted billionaire Mark Cuban.

    “Bottom line is that you have a decision to make,” Cuban added. “Stick with the new Twitter that democratizes every tweet by paid accounts and puts the onus on all users to curate for themselves. Or bring back Twitter curation. One makes Twitter time and information efficient. The other is awful.”

    In a Twitter Spaces event held for advertisers this week, Musk pleaded with brands to keep using the platform, after a growing number of companies paused ads, causing what Musk previously described as a “massive drop in revenue.” In the event, Musk sought to appear magnanimous in accepting responsibility for the company’s performance.

    “If things go wrong, it’s my fault, because the buck stops with me,” he told an audience of over 100,000 listeners.

    But privately, Musk’s critics have described the billionaire as dismissive of accountability, even in the face of scrutiny by the Federal Trade Commission, which publicly warned on Thursday, in a rare forward-looking statement, that it is “tracking recent developments at Twitter with deep concern.”

    According to an internal Slack message posted by a Twitter employee and viewed by CNN, Musk has shown little fear of the FTC regulators overseeing the company’s multiple, legally binding consent agreements committing it to maintaining a robust cybersecurity program and producing written privacy impact reports before launching any new products or services, a requirement that could cover Twitter Blue.

    The company is already facing billions in potential fines from the FTC over alleged privacy missteps dating to before Musk’s ownership. But, the Twitter employee warned colleagues, Twitter could find itself even more legally exposed after the sudden resignation of multiple top Twitter executives charged with fulfilling the company’s FTC obligations, including its chief information security officer and chief privacy officer.

    Forced to address the looming risk of FTC oversight, Musk reportedly struck a conciliatory tone.

    “Twitter will do whatever it takes to adhere to both the letter and spirit of the FTC consent decree,” Musk reportedly wrote in an email to employees Thursday evening.

    The one thing Musk claims is going in his favor at Twitter is user growth, as more people tune in to watch him fumble his way through owning the company.

    “Twitter usage is at an all-time high,” Musk tweeted earlier this week, before adding in a follow-up tweet: “I just hope the servers don’t melt!”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Silicon Valley’s greatest minds misread pandemic demand. Now their employees are paying for it. | CNN Business

    Silicon Valley’s greatest minds misread pandemic demand. Now their employees are paying for it. | CNN Business

    [ad_1]



    CNN Business
     — 

    In the early months of the pandemic, Facebook only grew bigger and more central to our lives. With lockdowns spreading, countless people began shopping, socializing and working on Facebook and other online platforms. As CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in March 2020, usage was so high that the company was “just trying to keep the lights on.”

    Against that backdrop, Zuckerberg’s company went on a remarkable hiring spree. Facebook, which later rebranded as Meta, went from

    48,268
    staffers in March 2020 to more than 87,000 as of September of this year. In other words, it hired another Facebook’s worth of staff. And it looked like the company would only keep hiring to support its ambitious plans to build a future version of the internet called the metaverse.

    On Wednesday, however, Zuckerberg reversed course and laid off more than 11,000 employees, marking the most significant cuts in the company’s history. In a memo to staff, Zuckerberg coughed up some of the hardest words in the English language. “I got this wrong,” he wrote, “and I take responsibility for that.”

    “At the start of Covid, the world rapidly moved online and the surge of e-commerce led to outsized revenue growth,” Zuckerberg wrote. “Many people predicted this would be a permanent acceleration that would continue even after the pandemic ended. I did too, so I made the decision to significantly increase our investments. Unfortunately, this did not play out the way I expected.”

    Silicon Valley operates on many myths, but one of them is the idea of the founder as a visionary who can see key trends coming years if not decades out. But Zuckerberg is one of a growing list of prominent tech leaders who are cutting costs and issuing mea culpas after failing to anticipate a whiplash in the market between 2020 and 2022.

    The tech industry, already seemingly invincible in early 2020, only grew more dominant during the pandemic while other parts of the economy were upended. Consumers shifted spending online. The Federal Reserve maintained near-zero interest rates at the time, giving tech companies easier access to capital. And private and public market valuations for tech companies only seemed to go higher.

    As the world reopened, however, many consumers have returned to their offline lives. Meanwhile, high inflation and fears of a looming recession have cut into consumer and advertiser spending, disrupting the core businesses of many of the biggest names in tech, after years of rapid growth.

    Now the industry is cutting thousands of jobs.

    Last month, home fitness company Peleton — which had been embraced by investors during the pandemic — underwent its fourth round of layoffs in 2022. Last week, payment-processing giant Stripe said it was eliminating 14% of its staff. And Twitter recently announced widespread job cuts after its new owner Elon Musk bought the company for $44 billion, funded in part by debt financing.

    While Musk was largely silent regarding the mass layoffs, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, who ran the company until late 2021, said in a contrite thread that he takes responsibility for the situation. “I grew the company size too quickly. I apologize for that,” Dorsey wrote.

    Twitter headquarters is seen on Friday, October 28, 2022 the day after Elon Musk aquired Twitter for $44 billion.

    Patrick Collison, CEO of Stripe, one of the most valuable startups in the world, similarly told employees that leadership takes responsibility for the pandemic-era miscalculations that resulted in people losing their livelihoods.

    “For those of you leaving: we’re very sorry to be taking this step and John and I are fully responsible for the decisions leading up to it,” Collison wrote. “We were much too optimistic about the internet economy’s near-term growth in 2022 and 2023 and underestimated both the likelihood and impact of a broader slowdown.”

    Other big tech companies, including Amazon, Apple and Google, are now pausing or slowing hiring amid recession fears after a wave of expansion. Amazon, in particular, had seen breakneck growth during the pandemic, doubling its fulfillment centers in a two-year-period, only to shift earlier this year to focusing on “cost efficiencies.”

    The e-commerce giant is now freezing corporate hiring “for the next few months” and reportedly looking to cut costs in some of its unprofitable units. Amazon spokesperson Brad Glasser said senior leadership regularly reviews investment outlook and financial performance, adding, “As part of this year’s review, we’re of course taking into account the current macro-environment and considering opportunities to optimize costs.”

    While there have been layoffs in Silicon Valley over the years, the latest wave of cost cuts appears to be hitting every corner of the industry, including the engineers and coders who were often considered untouchable. The tech bubble may not have burst, but the bubble on top of the bubble certainly has.

    Zuckerberg said Meta’s layoffs would be spread throughout the company, including impacting both its family of apps and the Reality Labs division that is tasked with helping build the metaverse. He noted that some teams — such as recruiting — will be affected more than others.

    With Musk at the helm, Twitter slashed half its staff, including on its ethical AI, marketing and communication, search and public policy teams.

    Roger Lee, a startup founder based in San Francisco, has been closely tracking layoffs in the tech industry since the onset of the pandemic via his website Layoffs.fyi. Initially, his goal was to informally keep track of staffing reductions to help look for potential candidates to recruit for his own company, a digital 401(k) provider for small businesses. Eventually, laid-off workers began submitting their own data and compiling spreadsheets for his website to attract the attention of recruiters.

    “I did not, unfortunately, anticipate the extent to which the layoffs were going to surge,” Lee told CNN Business. With nearly two months still left to go, he said the number of tech employees laid off in 2022 has already surpassed 100,000 based on his data.

    Lee said some of the biggest trends he’s been seeing recently are major job losses across recruiting, human resources, and sales teams. While “engineers are still in better shape relative to the other roles,” Lee said his data indicate even these positions have suffered cuts in recent months.

    “No one knows how long this current period is going to last,” he said.

    Already, there’s been a clear shift in the industry’s mood. Blind, a popular online forum that lets employees at major companies commune anonymously to share interview tips and brag about compensation packages, has emerged as a sobering forum where people are posting about layoffs rather then their jobs.

    Some laid-off workers are also banding together on social media and crowdsourcing spreadsheets for recruiters. These workers have created documents featuring hundreds of names and LinkedIn profiles (as well as visa statuses) of former Twitter and Meta workers.

    While some companies may be better equipped to weather the storm than others, it’s becoming apparent that no company is completely unaffected, said Nikolai Roussanov, a professor of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

    “Tech has been clobbered so much precisely because it has been seen as very immune to fluctuations in the real economy, but in the end, nobody is immune,” Roussanov said. “And that realization, I think, is important and perhaps what contributed to these sky-high valuations coming down pretty quickly.”

    Meta’s market cap has fallen from a peak of more than $1 trillion last year to less than $300 billion. Amazon, meanwhile, has seen its market cap drop by $1 trillion from a peak last summer.

    Roussanov said current fears of a recession are not unwarranted, but in many ways, “there is a little bit of a self-fulfilling nature to this.” He added: “As these fears become more and more widespread, they slow down people’s consumption, they slow down firm investment, and that kind of snowballs on itself.”

    What’s going on in tech right now is “perhaps a taste of what’s yet to come” elsewhere, Roussanov said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Working remotely is ok if…’: Elon Musk clarifies on Work From Home policy at Twitter, Tesla, SpaceX

    ‘Working remotely is ok if…’: Elon Musk clarifies on Work From Home policy at Twitter, Tesla, SpaceX

    [ad_1]

    Billionaire Elon Musk, on Sunday, said that his Twitter, Tesla and SpaceX staff can work from home if it is not logistically possible to come into the office.

    Musk made this statement while responding to a message on the microblogging site Twitter from an Irish-based worker who said they had been told to return to the office from tomorrow.

    The worker wrote, “As I’m sure you’re aware, Elon Musk has recently bought Twitter and is making harsh and drastic changes that are affecting hundreds of Irish employees’ lives. The most recent of these decisions is that all employees must be in the office by Monday. Many of us work all around this country and are unable to do so. This is in the middle of a housing crisis that Musk has absolutely no idea about, and it is almost impossible to move to Dublin so quickly. This is putting us under an intense amount of stress and uncertainty and unfortunately.”

    He also said, “There is nothing we can do about it. One of the only things that Elon seems to react to is his own ego and the feeling of being unpopular on Twitter.”

    Elon Musk, CEO of Twitter, Tesla and SpaceX, replied that he was not ordering people back into the office.

    He tweeted, “This is false. Anyone who can be in office, should be. However, if not logistically possible or they have essential personal matters, then staying home is fine.”

    The billionaire added that “Working remotely is also ok if their manager vouches for excellence. Same policy as Tesla & SpaceX.”

    Recently, Musk informed the staff, via an email, that he is ending the “work from home” regime permanently. In his letter to employees, Musk reportedly asked employees to brace for “difficult times ahead”.

    Musk had previously eliminated “days of rest” from the calendars of Twitter employees. The “days of rest” are monthly days that employees can take to rest and recharge.

    Musk reportedly asked the employees to work for 40 hours a week. He said that he would only let employees work remotely on a case-by-case basis.

    Musk, who is not a huge fan of working from home, had also asked the Tesla employees to return to the office. He threatened employees with dire consequences if they failed to return to the office.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk pleads with advertisers to stay on Twitter | CNN Business

    Elon Musk pleads with advertisers to stay on Twitter | CNN Business

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Twitter owner Elon Musk pleaded with advertisers to keep using his platform on Wednesday as he sketched out his plans for user verification, content moderation and even his intention to add banking features to Twitter in front of a live audience of over 100,000 users.

    During an hour-long Twitter Spaces session attended by representatives from Adidas, Chevron, Kate Spade, Nissan and Walgreens, Musk said he wanted Twitter to “be a force that moves civilization in a positive direction.”

    An indicator of success, he said, would be whether his decisions lead to growth in users and advertising, while failure would mean the opposite.

    The collection of major advertisers and brands listening to Musk’s remarks underscored the intense interest — and perceptions of risk — generated by Musk’s erratic management of the company over the past week, from launching (and then un-launching) product changes to his sweeping layoffs that hit half the company.

    To his critics, and to companies that have paused advertising on Twitter, Musk asked to be given a chance.

    “I understand if people want to give it a minute and see how things are evolving,” he said. “But really, the best way to see how things are evolving is just use Twitter. And see how your experience has changed. Is it better? Is it worse?”

    Musk repeatedly urged skeptics to use the platform while addressing questions about his proposal to offer blue check marks to users who agree to pay $8 a month — a plan whose rollout has been marred by uncertainty and abrupt changes.

    Users who pay for Twitter Blue, the platform’s subscription service, will not be required to provide identifying information other than a credit card and a phone number, Musk confirmed. Twitter will eventually default to displaying tweets from Twitter Blue subscribers, while tweets from users who do not pay for a blue check mark, he said, would be relegated to a separate page on the site and effectively buried unless viewers sought out that material.

    Brands will be expected to foot the bill for their own verification on Twitter Blue, Musk said. He did not go into specifics about a separate, gray verification badge Twitter is developing for major brands, government accounts and media outlets — a feature the company has said will not be available for purchase but rather bestowed on high-profile accounts to distinguish them from those who paid for blue check marks. On Wednesday Twitter briefly appeared to have rolled out the grey check mark feature for some users, though Musk soon after tweeted that he had “killed it.” A Twitter product manager working on the feature left the door open for its eventual release.

    Musk also argued, contrary to some of his critics, that well-resourced purveyors of mis- and disinformation would not be able to game the system because they would quickly run out of phone numbers and credit cards, or eventually tire of the effort.

    Musk sought to distill many of the challenges of running a social media platform into a binary.

    “Thinking of it as an information problem, truth is signal and falsehood is noise,” he said. “And we want to improve the signal-to-noise ratio as much as possible.”

    Musk’s expansive plans for Twitter include adding financial products to the mix. It could begin, he said, with Twitter allowing users to pay each other through the platform, with the company setting up each user with an initial gift of $10 to test it out. Over time, Musk added, Twitter will offer the ability for users to transfer money out of its system to third-party banks — and then to market its own banking services.

    “The next step would be a money market account so you can get an extremely high yield on your balance,” Musk said, adding that debit cards and checks could also be a part of the plan.

    Last week, Twitter submitted registration paperwork to the US government that indicated its intent to join the payments industry, and to comply with certain banking regulations. A copy of the paperwork viewed by CNN showed that the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network received the registration filing by “Twitter Payments LLC” on Nov. 4. A FinCEN spokesperson declined to comment on Twitter’s filing, which had been first reported by the New York Times on Wednesday.

    Musk acknowledged brands’ concerns about the presence of hate speech and other offensive content on the platform.

    “I don’t think having hate speech next to an ad is great, obviously,” he said with a chuckle.

    Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of integrity and safety, said Twitter is increasing its investment in ideas to battle hateful content.

    “We think there’s a lot of other stuff we can do, from warning messages to interstitials, to reducing the reach of that content, that we haven’t fully explored in the past,” Roth said, vowing to implement those ideas quickly. Twitter has implemented many of these steps in the past, particularly in response to election and Covid-19 misinformation.

    Musk said he and his teams are at work changing much of Twitter’s existing codebase, partly to support new features such as longform video. That feature, he said, will initially allow paid users to download 10 minutes of high-definition video before gradually lengthening that time limit to 40 minutes and then several hours.

    And he emphasized the importance of Community Notes, formerly known as Birdwatch, a crowdsourced fact-checking feature that Twitter has been testing with some of its users.

    Community Notes, he said, “will obviate the need for a lot of the content stuff that’s currently in place, I think.”

    The sprawling question-and-answer session occasionally delved into the metaphorical and philosophical.

    At one point, Musk appeared to acknowledge that his commitment to “free speech” was not absolute.

    “There’s a giant difference between freedom of speech and freedom of reach,” he said.

    Musk also described Twitter’s existing verification system as a “lords and peasants situation” and compared it to the American Revolutionary War.

    “In the United States, we fought a war to get rid of that stuff,” he said. “Maybe this is a dumb decision, but we’ll see.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Cautions Twitter Could Go Bankrupt Without More Cash

    Elon Musk Cautions Twitter Could Go Bankrupt Without More Cash

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk warned that filing for bankruptcy was a distinct possibility for his newly acquired company, after he laid off half of the staff, which numbered 7,500 earlier this year, and made changes to the platform that are causing users, brands, and advertisers to fly the coop.

    “Sorry that this is my first email to the whole company, but there is no way to sugarcoat the message,” Musk wrote to employees. “Without significant subscription revenue, there is a good chance Twitter will not survive the upcoming economic downturn.”

    Musk sold nearly $4 billion worth of Telsa stock since reaching his deal to buy Twitter for $44 billion last month. He told Twitter employees on Thursday that he was selling his other company’s stock in order to “save Twitter.”

    On top of mass layoffs and unwelcome platform changes, Musk told employees on Wednesday in an email that he is requiring them to come into the office for a minimum of 40 hours per week, ending the company’s work-from-home policy; he added that he had to personally approve any remote work requests.

    Musk also said in the email, “We need roughly half of our revenue to be subscription,” alluding to the new controversial blue checkmark subscription service. The blue checkmark, which used to indicate a user’s verified identity to combat misinformation and scam accounts, now costs $8 per month and can be given to anyone who will pay. It’s unclear whether eventually users will have to show identity verification for a blue checkmark. 

    In the email, Musk mentioned the growing bot problem: “Over the next few days, the absolute top priority is finding and suspending any verified bots/trolls/spam.” 

    He echoed this on Twitter: “Going forward, accounts engaged in parody must include ‘parody’ in their name, not just in bio.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Ironically, it was difficult to even find this tweet from the real Elon Musk’s Twitter account. One must sift through a sea of fake Elon Musks to find the real one, as a number of users are demonstrating the dangerousness of the new blue checkmark’s leniency, pairing his name with a paid-for checkmark. 

    CNN pointed out that under the new blue checkmark system, Twitter gave Jesus Christ verified status

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Kelly Rissman

    Source link

  • Layoffs could weaken Twitter in its biggest global growth markets | CNN Business

    Layoffs could weaken Twitter in its biggest global growth markets | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    New Delhi
    CNN Business
     — 

    It’s less than two weeks since Elon Musk completed his acquisition of Twitter and already there are concerns that the company is choosing to ignore key risks in its biggest international growth markets.

    Twitter laid off thousands of employees across the company on Friday, including staff in India and Africa. The California-based company already had a turbulent relationship with governments in these regions, and tech experts fear that a diminished workforce will leave the platform more vulnerable than ever to misinformation and political pressure.

    Musk’s Twitter laid off nearly all the employees in its only African office just four days after it opened in the Ghanaian capital Accra, multiple sources with knowledge of the situation told CNN.

    Twitter announced that it would open its first African office in Ghana in April 2021, but its employees had been working remotely until last week. The sources told CNN that only one employee appears to have been retained in the Ghana office after the global job cuts.

    “It’s very insulting,” one former employee said on condition of anonymity. “They didn’t even have the courtesy to address me by name. The email just said ‘see attached’ and yet they used my name when they gave me an offer.”

    The company has reportedly also made sweeping reductions in India, one of its biggest markets. It laid off more than 90% of its staff in Asia’s third-largest economy over the weekend, according to a Bloomberg report this week, which cited unnamed sources. Twitter did not respond to multiple requests for comment by CNN.

    The Bloomberg report came two days after the Economic Times newspaper reported that Twitter had let go of 180 of about 230 employees in the country, citing unnamed sources.

    Free speech advocates say that slashing the workforce is bad news for both employees and users in Twitter’s international markets.

    Raman Jit Singh Chima, senior international counsel and Asia Pacific policy director at digital rights group Access Now, said that Twitter had just begun “protecting vulnerable communities” on its platform in India, and now it has sent a “clear signal” that it won’t be investing in public policy and online safety teams anymore.

    Even before the layoffs, Twitter was going through a tough time in both India and Africa.

    India’s ruling party has intensified a crackdown on social media and messaging apps since last year. American tech firms have repeatedly expressed fears that the country’s rules may erode privacy and usher in mass surveillance in the world’s fastest growing digital market. India says it is trying to maintain national security.

    As a result, Twitter had spent months locked in a high-stakes standoff with the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi over orders to take down content. This year, it even launched a legal challenge over orders to block content.

    Chima fears that Twitter’s depleted workforce may not have the ability to “challenge” the government and its problematic orders anymore. Musk’s other business interests — including a plan to sell Tesla vehicles in India — may further complicate the picture.

    “Musk’s simplistic understanding of free speech coupled with his desire to bring his other businesses to India and secure licensing for those,” make it hard for Twitter to push back, he explained.

    India’s tech ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

    The company also went through a challenging period in Nigeria last year.

    Last June, the Nigerian government suspended Twitter’s operations in the country, accusing the social media firm of allowing its platform to be used “for activities that are capable of undermining Nigeria’s corporate existence.”

    The ban was announced just two days after Twitter deleted a tweet by President Muhammadu Buhari that was widely perceived as offensive. In the tweet, Buhari threatened citizens in the southeast region following attacks on public property.

    Nigeria decided to lift the ban only in January this year.

    Tech experts now fear that the company will find it even harder to navigate new laws in emerging markets.

    “Given India’s adversarial stance against big tech, companies like Twitter have always needed an army of public policy experts in the country to deal with whatever is thrown at them,” said Nikhil Pahwa, Delhi-based founder of tech website MediaNama, adding that he fears Twitter will “struggle to keep pace” with policy changes in India.

    Twitter does not share user numbers, but according to India, the platform has 17.5 million users in the country. Last year, India released new technology rules, which were aimed at regulating online content and require companies to hire people who can respond swiftly to legal requests to delete posts, among other things.

    Pahwa said that while certain “statutory positions” Twitter was forced to fill in order to comply with these rules will stay, he is unsure about the fate of other departments, including public policy, business and content moderation — all of which are key to thriving in growth markets.

    Analysts are also concerned globally about the impact these layoffs will have on misinformation.

    In the United States, there are worries that the growing tumult inside Twitter could weaken its safeguards for the midterm elections.

    Yoel Roth, the company’s head of safety and integrity, said on Friday about 15% of workers in the trust and safety team were let go.

    There are similar concerns in India, where social media activity is expected to ramp up as the country prepares for major state elections in the coming months.

    Content moderation is particularly tricky in India, where over 22 languages and hundreds more dialects are spoken. Digital rights groups had been demanding an increase in investment in the activity for years.

    “Content moderation has to be specific to geography,” said Vivan Sharan, partner at Delhi-based tech policy consulting firm Koan Advisory Group.

    “Are they interested in treating all users equally?” he wondered.

    — Larry Madowo contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk warns Twitter could face bankruptcy as top executives flee

    Elon Musk warns Twitter could face bankruptcy as top executives flee

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk told Twitter staff Thursday to brace for “difficult times ahead” and warned that the company could go bankrupt if it doesn’t find new ways of making money.

    Speaking at an all-employee meeting on Thursday, Musk said Twitter was losing money and that “bankruptcy isn’t out of the question,” according to reporting from Platformer and Bloomberg

    The revelations marked another whirlwind day since Musk took control of the social media platform. 

    Late Wednesday night, Musk sent his first email to employees, ordering them to stop working from home and to show up at the office Thursday morning, reversing the work-from-anywhere policy Twitter implemented during the pandemic.

    “Sorry that this is my first email to the whole company, but there is no way to sugarcoat the message,” wrote Musk, before he described a dire economic climate for businesses like Twitter that rely almost entirely on advertising.

    “Without significant subscription revenue, there is a good chance Twitter will not survive the upcoming economic downturn,” Musk said. “We need roughly half of our revenue to be subscription.”

    The following day, Musk called his first “all-hands” meeting, where he gave a bleak assessment of the company’s finances and expanded on the in-person work requirement.

    Musk said that while “exceptional” workers would be allowed to work remotely, others who didn’t like it could quit, said an employee at the meeting who spoke on condition of anonymity out of a concern for job security. Musk himself is known for putting in arduous workweeks, and has claimed to have worked 120-hour weeks, including all 24 hours of his 47th birthday.

    “He has never been a fan of remote work from the start,” MarketWatch reporter Andrew Keshner told CBS News.


    Elon Musk fires top executives after Twitter takeover

    02:21

    Layoffs, then resignations

    Half a dozen high-profile leaders left Twitter this week, following the carnage of about 3,700 layoffs last week, or half of Twitter’s head count.

    Departures include Twitter’s chief privacy officer, Damien Kieran; its chief compliance officer, Marianne Fogarty; and its chief information security officer, Lea Kissner, who tweeted Thursday that “I’ve made the hard decision to leave Twitter.”

    The latest resignations also include that of Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of trust and safety, a previously little-known executive who became the public face of the company’s content moderation after Musk took over. An executive confirmed Roth’s resignation to coworkers on an internal message board seen by The Associated Press.

    Roth’s resignation is a “huge loss” for Twitter’s reliability and integrity, said his former coworker and friend Emily Horne.

    “He’s worked incredibly hard under very challenging circumstances, including being personally targeted by some of the most vicious trolls who were active on the platform,” said Horne, who oversaw global policy communications at Twitter until 2018. “He stayed through all of that because he believed so deeply in the work his team was doing to promote a public conversation and improve the health of that conversation.”


    Twitter asks dozens of former employees to return days after massive layoffs

    06:11

    Since the layoffs, Twitter has asked some of the fired staff to return. In the meantime, experts say the dramatically smaller headcount will likely make it harder for the platform to uphold its legal obligations to ensure users’ data privacy. 

    Cybersecurity expert Alex Stamos, a former Facebook security chief, tweeted Thursday that there is a “serious risk of a breach with drastically reduced staff” that could also put Twitter at odds with a 2011 order from the Federal Trade Commission that required it to address serious data security lapses.

    “Twitter made huge strides towards a more rational internal security model and backsliding will put them in trouble with the FTC” and other regulators in the U.S. and Europe, Stamos said.

    FTC is watching

    The FTC said in a statement Thursday that it is “tracking recent developments at Twitter with deep concern.”

    “No CEO or company is above the law, and companies must follow our consent decrees,” said the agency’s statement. “Our revised consent order gives us new tools to ensure compliance, and we are prepared to use them.”

    The FTC would not say whether it was investigating Twitter for potential violations. If it were, it is empowered to demand documents and depose employees.

    In an email to employees seen by the AP, Musk said “Twitter will do whatever it takes to adhere to both the letter and spirit of the FTC consent decree.”

    “Anything you read to the contrary is absolutely false. The same goes for any other government regulatory matters where Twitter operates,” Musk wrote.

    Twitter paid a $150 million fine in May for violating the 2011 consent order. Its updated version established new procedures requiring the company to implement an enhanced privacy protection program as well as  beef up info security. The new procedures also require the company to include an exhaustive list of disclosures Twitter must make to the FTC when introducing new products and services — particularly when they affect personal data collected on users.

    “If Twitter so much as sneezes, it has to do a privacy review beforehand,” tweeted Riana Pfefferkorn, a Stanford University researcher who said she previously provided Twitter outside legal counse


    MoneyWatch: Twitter delisted from the New York Stock Exchange

    06:51

    Musk is fundamentally overhauling the platform’s offerings and it’s not known if he is telling the FTC about it. Twitter, which gutted its communications department, didn’t respond to a request for comment from the AP Thursday.

    The mercurial CEO, who has been fined over cavalier tweets in the past, has a history of tangling with regulators. “I do not respect the SEC,” Musk declared in a 2018 tweet, referring to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The consequences for not meeting FTC’s requirements can be severe — such as when Facebook had to pay $5 billion for privacy violations.

    Appeal to fleeing advertisers

    Musk’s memo and staff meeting echoed a live-streamed conversation on Twitter Spaces Wednesday in which Musk tried to assuage advertisers, who have been fleeing Twitterciting a rise in hate speech on the platform, since he took control of it late last month and dismissed its top executives. 

    Advertisers including Oreo maker Mondelez, Allianz, Audi, General Mills, GM, United Airlines and Pfizer have paused their ads on the platform, leading to a major cash crunch for the company. More are expected to follow. 

    In his live-stream, Musk asserted that hate speech has declined on the platform since he took over and asked advertisers to be patient, warning them that the company would do “plenty of dumb things” in coming weeks. 

    “If we do not do bold moves, how will we make great improvements? We have to be adventuresome here and then I think we will make really big leaps,” he said.

    For now, Twitter relies exclusively on advertising for revenue. Musks’ goal is to reduce that amount to half, while bringing more money in from subscriptions. In the Thursday email, Musk told employees the “priority over the past 10 days” was to develop and launch Twitter’s $8 monthly subscription service, which includes a blue check mark next to the name of paid members — the mark had previously only been given to verified accounts.

    The project has had a rocky rollout, as newly bought fake accounts this week have tried to impersonate high-profile figures such as basketball star LeBron James and the drug company Eli Lilly.

    In a second email to employees, Musk said the “absolute top priority” over the coming days is to suspend “bots/trolls/spam” exploiting the verified accounts system.

    On Friday, the rollout of the new subscription service, Twitter Blue, a flood of fake accounts had been frozen by the company, according to tech reporter Zoe Schiffer.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rainn Wilson announces name change to raise climate change awareness | CNN

    Rainn Wilson announces name change to raise climate change awareness | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Rainn Wilson has “changed” his name and is inviting others to do the same.

    “The Office” actor debuted “Rainnfall Heat Wave Rising Sea Levels Wilson” on social media Thursday as a way to raise awareness about the climate control crisis.

    “As a cheap little stunt to help save planet Earth, I’ve changed my name on Twitter, Instagram and even on my fancy writing paper,” he said in a video he shared on his verified social media accounts.

    In the Twitter thread that included the video, Wilson added that he was unable to change his name on Twitter “… because Elon,” referencing guidelines implemented on the platform by new owner Elon Musk.

    Wilson encouraged his followers to visit environmental advocacy group Arctic Basecamp’s “Arctic Name Changer” to get their own names to be used on their social media profiles in the hopes of capturing the attention of the world leaders assembling in Egypt for the COP27 international climate change conference.

    “And if enough of us do this, then maybe @cop27_egypt will be where our world leaders sit up and notice Arctic risks and introduce a solution,” he tweeted. “Make Arctic Name Changer a Game Changer!”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Musk’s Twitter may have already violated its latest FTC consent order, legal experts say | CNN Business

    Musk’s Twitter may have already violated its latest FTC consent order, legal experts say | CNN Business

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Just two weeks into Elon Musk’s ownership of Twitter, the company may have already violated its consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission, legal experts said.

    If proven, a violation could ultimately lead to significant personal liability for Musk, escalating the risks he faces as he stumbles through a morass of business and content moderation headaches, most of which have been self-inflicted.

    The potential violation stems from a reporting obligation Twitter must fulfill whenever the company experiences a change in structure, including mergers and sales.

    Under Twitter’s latest FTC consent order, which was implemented this year, Twitter must submit a sworn compliance notice to the regulator within 14 days of any such change. The compliance notice is intended both to advise the FTC of major changes at the company as well as a commitment that it will continue to comply with the order, according to David Vladeck, a former senior FTC official and a law professor at Georgetown University.

    Musk’s Twitter deal closed on Thursday, Oct. 27, prompting some legal experts to question Thursday whether Twitter had made the proper filings in light of the company’s mass layoffs and an exodus of senior executives. Among those resigning were its chief privacy officer and chief information security officer, who would be expected to be involved in the company’s compliance reporting.

    “Godspeed to the poor b***ards dealing with that,” tweeted Riana Pfefferkorn, a research scholar at the Stanford Internet Observatory.

    The FTC declined to comment on whether Twitter has submitted any compliance notices since Musk took over the company. Twitter, which laid off a substantial amount of its public relations team, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Alex Spiro, Musk’s attorney, told CNN on Thursday that “we are in a continuing dialogue with the FTC and will work closely with the agency to ensure we are in compliance.”

    There are other, more substantive regulatory obligations that have come into question, too. They include requirements that Twitter produce written privacy assessments of any new “product, service or practice” — or when Twitter updates those things — that could affect user data or put it at risk.

    The dizzying pace of product changes at Twitter since Musk’s takeover, combined with the company’s greatly reduced headcount, have raised doubts about whether Twitter is following the rules it agreed to — or if it even can.

    “The chaos there is something the FTC is going to be worried about,” said Vladeck, “because there were serious deficiencies which led to the consent order in the first place, and the FTC is going to want to make sure they’re doing what they’re supposed to do.”

    Internal concerns about Twitter’s compliance obligations were reflected in a Slack message viewed by CNN earlier this week, in which an employee warned colleagues that Musk could try to put responsibility for certifying FTC compliance onto individual engineers at the company.

    “This will put a huge amount of personal, professional and legal risk onto engineers,” the employee wrote, adding that the new risks created by Musk could be “extremely detrimental to Twitter’s longevity as a platform.”

    Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University, urged Twitter employees to seek professional legal counsel “before signing anything or making any statement to regulators.”

    “This is a bus you do NOT want to be thrown under,” Blaze tweeted.

    FTC consent orders carry the force of law and any violations, if proven, could involve significant penalties including fines, restrictions on how Twitter can run its business and even potential sanctions on individual executives.

    The company’s latest consent agreement was announced this spring after FTC allegations that Twitter misused user account security information, such as phone numbers and email addresses, for advertising purposes. The resulting consent order expanded on a 2011 consent agreement Twitter signed with the FTC committing the company to maintaining a robust cybersecurity program.

    This summer, Twitter’s former head of security, Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, claimed Twitter was not meeting those obligations in an explosive whistleblower disclosure first reported by CNN and The Washington Post. (Twitter has previously pushed back on Zatko’s allegations, saying that security and privacy have “long been top company-wide priorities.”)

    Those claims, which predate Musk’s ownership, may already have put Twitter on the hook for billions of dollars in potential FTC fines, legal experts have said.

    Now, the latest claims of Twitter’s violations could mean even more money is at stake, as well as possible individual liability for Musk himself. Any alleged violations would first have to be proven, and the FTC would need to decide whether to enforce, said Vladeck. But under those circumstances, he said, “I think it’s likely Musk would be named” in a future consent order. “After all, he has made clear that he and he alone is making key decisions.”

    The FTC has increasingly signaled it could seek to hold individual executives personally accountable if they’re found to have been responsible for a company’s violations, naming them in future orders and imposing binding requirements on their future conduct, even if they leave the company. (Last month, the FTC showed its willingness to follow through, imposing sanctions on the CEO of alcohol delivery service Drizly.)

    Foreshadowing such a move, FTC Chair Lina Khan told US lawmakers that Twitter’s former CEO Parag Agrawal could “absolutely” be held personally liable in connection with Zatko’s allegations, if they are proven accurate. The FTC has not confirmed whether it is investigating Zatko’s allegations, but on Thursday, it issued a rare statement saying the agency is watching the current situation closely. As news about the executive departures unfolded, the agency said it is “tracking recent developments at Twitter with deep concern.”

    “No CEO or company is above the law, and companies must follow our consent decrees,” the FTC said. “Our revised consent order gives us new tools to ensure compliance, and we are prepared to use them.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Eli Lilly Stock Plummets After Verified Twitter Account’s False Claims

    Eli Lilly Stock Plummets After Verified Twitter Account’s False Claims

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s disastrous back-and-forth rollout of Twitter Blue has caused a multitude of communication problems between users and trolls, with fake news and information inadvertently going viral after users quickly see blue checkmarks and assume what they are reading is from a legitimate source.


    Getty Images

    Though much of the banter has been in good jest, one company is feeling the very real implications of the viral spreading of misinformation.

    Eli Lilly and Company’s stock plummeted on Thursday after an account posing to be the pharmaceutical company claimed that insulin would now be free in the United States.

    Screenshot via Twitter

    Eli Lilly was down just over 4% in a 24-hour period by Friday afternoon and 20 points in early trading on Friday morning.

    The account, which used the handle @EliLillyandCo, had the same username and profile photo as the official Eli Lilly and Co account which uses the handle @LillyPad.

    Both had blue checkmarks, except the fake account had purchased its symbol after subscribing to Twitter Blue, making it seem legitimate to quick viewers on the site.

    Eli Lilly responded from its official account late Thursday apologizing for the mixup.

    The fake branding of the pharma company was one of many in the past 24 hours, with troll accounts impersonating companies across several industries, wreaking havoc across the site.

    The fake account has now been suspended.

    [ad_2]

    Emily Rella

    Source link

  • Elon Musk, Surprising Absolutely No One, Suspends Twitter Blue After Just 2 Days

    Elon Musk, Surprising Absolutely No One, Suspends Twitter Blue After Just 2 Days

    [ad_1]

    Less than 48 hours after its launch, Twitter Blue, Elon Musk’s pay-to-play verification system, now appears to be offline, marking the almost inevitable suspension to a service that sparked widespread concerns among users from the get-go. The $8-per-month product granted any paying subscriber a blue verification badge without asking for proof of identity.

    After being officially introduced Wednesday morning, Twitter Blue triggered a cascade of chaos and confusion on the platform. Countless “blue check” accounts impersonating celebrities, corporations, and even the pope began flooding the platform. Some white supremacists also subscribed to the service, with at least one neo-Nazi posting racist and antisemitic screeds under a verified badge. But as of Friday morning, the platform’s iOS app removed the option to sign up for Twitter Blue for most users.

    In an internal memo obtained by Platformer’s Zoë Schiffer, Twitter staff noted that it was suspending the service “to help address impersonation issues.”

     “An update on what we did tonight: hid the entry point to Twitter Blue, added the ‘official’ label for ONLY advertisers,” read a Twitter Slack message published by Schiffer. “Note: here is at least one way for users to sign up for Blue. Legacy Blue users can go to subscriptions and upgrade.” The memo did note that existing subscribers—presumably those who have not yet been suspended for racism or impersonations—“will still have access to their Blue features.”

    Earlier on Friday, Twitter announced (to the confusion of many users) that it had restored its gray “official” badge, a clunky, separate form of verification meant to differentiate some important accounts from would-be impersonators. The “official” badges had originally launched in tandem with Twitter Blue but were “killed” by Musk on Wednesday.

    The relaunch of the “official” badge appears to be a stopgap attempt at addressing the concerns of corporations and advertisers. Notable among them was Eli Lilly, a pharmaceutical company that recently condemned a fake but verified impersonator who tweeted, “We are excited to announce insulin is free now.” In response, the real company account tweeted an apology “to those who have been served a misleading message from a fake Lilly account.” While the fake Eli Lilly account was eventually suspended, other major brands, including Chiquita, Pepsi, and Tesla, faced similar debacles, forcing Twitter’s depleted trust and safety team into a game of regulatory Whac-a-Mole.

    In addition to its “official” badge, Twitter has also sought to distinguish authentic accounts by including clickable fine print under every verified badge revealing whether the user is a Twitter Blue subscriber or a notable entity in “government, news, entertainment, or another designated category.” Still, the system has caused its own host of issues; after a fake account for Senator Ed Markey popped up this week, the Massachusetts Democrat tweeted that the platform had mistakenly labeled his impersonator as a “notable government account.”

    “Last night, I was easily impersonated and the account was quickly verified,” wrote Markey. “The rapid platform changes and removal of these safeguards are dangerous and Twitter and its leadership have a responsibility to the public to ensure the platform doesn’t become a breeding ground for manipulation and deceit.”

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Caleb Ecarma

    Source link

  • Twitter brings back

    Twitter brings back

    [ad_1]

    Twitter on Friday brought back its gray “official” label to verify some accounts, just days after CEO Elon Musk scrapped it. Twitter Support said they’ve re-added the feature to “combat impersonation.” 

    Since the revamped Twitter Blue went live on Wednesday, users are now able to obtain a blue tick as long as they subscribe and pay $8 a month. On the same day of the rollout, the social media company added an official gray marker that would distinguish accounts that were verified. However, several hours into the plan, Twitter removed the gray marker and said it would be “aggressively going after impersonation and deception” in lieu of it. 

    Twitter 'Official' Mark
    Here’s the platform’s account with a gray “official” label. 

    Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images


    Since then, Twitter has become a cesspool of verified accounts pretending to be celebrities like Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James, politicians like former President George W. Bush, and even large companies, including drugmaker Ely Lilly, as users test or exploit Twitter’s new system. 

    On Friday, Twitter reversed its tune and returned the gray marker to some accounts.

    Despite the update, many on Twitter still raised concerns about accounts’ authenticities. 

    Musk previously said any handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying they’re a parody account would be permanently suspended. He clarified on Thursday that those accounts would need to include “parody” in their name as well. 

    While parody accounts and impersonations have always existed on the platform, experts and users warned that putting a price on verified badges could sow confusion, misinformation and scams. 

    Meanwhile, less than a month since taking over, Musk warned Twitter employees that the company could go bankrupt if it fails to boost subscription revenue.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kathy Griffin Takes Revenge On Elon Musk With Totally Off-The-Rails Impression

    Kathy Griffin Takes Revenge On Elon Musk With Totally Off-The-Rails Impression

    [ad_1]

    One of Musk’s first acts on his supposedly free speech-oriented take on Twitter ― one where he declared comedy would be “legal” ― was to boot her for making fun of him.

    So, the comedian turned up somewhere Musk couldn’t control: “Jimmy Kimmel Live.” And she did what Musk appears to hate most.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Things Sure Don’t Seem To Be Going Well At Twitter

    Things Sure Don’t Seem To Be Going Well At Twitter

    [ad_1]

    Welcome to the new Twitter. Here, everyone can be anyone and for the low, low price of $8, the company will give you a veneer of legitimacy to back it up ― at least temporarily.

    Nearly two weeks into the company’s Elon Musk era, half of the employees have been laid off (prompting a class action lawsuit), large advertisers have paused their spending (leading to a “dire” financial situation), and Twitter’s previous system for verifying that people are who they claim to be has been deliberately demolished.

    That means anyone can now set up an account pretending to be anyone else, and pay $8 for the checkmark that used to signify the account had been verified, but now means nothing.

    That’s how “George W. Bush” on Thursday came to tweet, “I miss killing Iraqis 😞” only for “Tony Blair” to respond, “Same tbh.”

    The accounts, both fake, were eventually suspended ― but only after they gained widespread attention and more than nine hours after their initial tweets. It’s what advertisers might consider a “free-for-all hellscape.”

    Join us for a brief recap of what’s happening at Twitter:

    Playing chicken with the FTC

    Twitter’s chief privacy officer Damien Kieran, chief information security officer Lea Kissner, and chief compliance officer Marianne Fogarty all resigned this week, according to Platformer reporter Casey Newton.

    In their absence, engineers will reportedly be expected to “self-certify compliance with [Federal Trade Commission] requirements and other laws.”

    Kissner confirmed their departure on Twitter Thursday.

    The departures expose Twitter, and individual employees, to potentially billions of dollars in legal liability, stemming in particular from an agreement the company reached with the FTC in May for misusing private user data to serve ads.

    In a note obtained by The Verge, a lawyer on the company’s privacy team sounded the alarm internally and encouraged employees to seek whistleblower protection if they’re asked to do anything they’re uncomfortable with.

    “Over the last two weeks, Elon has shown that he cares only about recouping the losses he’s incurring as a result of failing to get out of his binding obligation to buy Twitter,” the letter reads, in part. “He chose to enter into that agreement! All of us are being put through this as a result of choices he made.”

    “I have heard Alex Spiro (current head of legal) say that Elon is willing to take on huge amount of risk in relation to this company and its users,” the author wrote, “because ‘Elon puts rockets into space, he’s not afraid of the FTC.’”

    Separately Thursday, Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of Trust & Safety and a leading figure in the fight against hate speech on the platform, was also said to be leaving the company.

    Twitter owner Elon Musk is seen surrounded by Twitter logos in a photo illustration.

    STR/NurPhoto via Getty Images

    Advertisers are flying the coop

    Several major ad buyers paused spending on the platform after Musk took over, citing well-founded concerns about how the “free speech absolutist” planned to moderate controversial content.

    Twitter hasn’t actually changed its moderation or enforcement policies since the acquisition, but Musk’s own behavior has corporate America on edge and research shows racial slurs have nevertheless soared.

    “Not only are extremists celebrating Musk’s takeover of Twitter, they are seeing it as a new opportunity to post the most abusive, harassing, and racist language and imagery,” a group of advocacy organizations wrote in an open letter to Twitter advertisers last week. “This includes clear threats of violence against people with whom they disagree.”

    At an all-hands meeting Thursday he told employees he wasn’t sure how much time Twitter has to turn it around and that “bankruptcy isn’t out of the question.”

    Musk first attempted to cajole them back by accusing them of choosing “political ‘correctness’” over “freedom of speech” (a false dichotomy). When that didn’t work, he blamed “activist groups.” And when that didn’t work he suggested lawsuits might follow.

    Not helping matters, the company’s ad sales head publicly resigned soon after the acquisition closed.

    On Wednesday, the billionaire held an hour-long Q&A on Twitter Spaces seeking to allay advertisers’ fears and paint his vision for a “digital town square that’s as inclusive as possible.”

    Monthly $8 subscriptions featured heavily in his pitch, both as a means to decrease spam on the platform and to create a brand-safe environment.

    “I don’t think having hate speech next to an ad is great. Obviously,” he told advertisers. But the “propensity for someone to engage in hate speech if they’ve paid $8 and are risking the suspension of their account is going to be far, far less.”

    The pep talk didn’t seemingly result in an immediate rush of advertisers back to Twitter. Hours later, Musk sent his first email to the company, warning of a “dire” economic picture given Twitter’s heavy reliance on advertising dollars. In the same email, Musk also reversed Twitter’s work-from-anywhere policy.

    Will the real Slim Shady please stand up?

    Soon after Musk told advertisers he didn’t believe people would regularly pay $8 for a check mark they’d use to impersonate other verified accounts, a whole bunch of Twitter users proceeded to do just that.

    Verified accounts purporting to be former President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair cropped up, followed by countless other fakes of Elon Musk, LeBron James, and others.

    To the particular horror of advertisers, fake ― yet still “verified” ― brands also appeared. “Nintendo of America” shared a photo of Mario flipping people off. And the drug manufacturer “Eli Lilly” excitedly announced that “insulin is free now.”

    Twitter briefly debuted a gray “official” tag to effectively double-verify accounts, only to have Musk almost immediately kill it.

    While Musk told advertisers Twitter “will actively suspend accounts engaged in deception or trickery of any kind,” that’s easier said than done when you’ve fired half your staff and are committing those who remain to an endless game of whack-a-mole.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Twitter Lawyer Reportedly Points Employees to Whistleblower Website as Musk Appears Poised to Burn It All to the Ground

    Twitter Lawyer Reportedly Points Employees to Whistleblower Website as Musk Appears Poised to Burn It All to the Ground

    [ad_1]

    After Elon Musk made his first offer to buy Twitter in April—before subsequently trying to renege on the deal—the company’s then CEO, Parag Agrawal, held a town hall with its reportedly “shock[ed] and dismay[ed]” workforce, which was not at all enthused about the billionaire becoming their new overlord. Seven months later, amid a raft of resignations and internal calls to blow the whistle on Musk, it does not appear that the new Twitter owner has won over any hearts or minds.

    On Wednesday, three top Twitter executives—chief information security officer Lea Kissner, chief privacy officer Damien Kieran, and chief compliance officer Marianne Fogartyleft the company, one day before a major deadline to submit a compliance report to the Federal Trade Commission.

    Over Twitter, Kissner confirmed that they had left the platform. Fogarty tweeted days before their departure: “I don’t watch Game of Thrones. I certainly don’t want to play it at work.” The trio’s departures come just after half the company was laid off. They also come amid fears that Musk is rolling out new features before they can be properly vetted. (For example, Twitter Blue, which allows people to pay a monthly fee for a blue “verification” check mark, cleared the way for dozens of accounts to impersonate high-profile individuals and brands, i.e., the whole reason verification badges were initially implemented in the first place.) They also follow reported resignations earlier this month by Leslie Berland, the company’s chief marketing officer and head of people; Jean-Philippe Maheu, vice president of global client solutions; Sarah Personette, chief customer officer; and Dalana Brand, chief people and diversity officer. Jay Sullivan, the company’s head of product, is also suspected to have left the company after deleting Twitter from his bio.

    Perhaps most worrisome—if Musk were the type of person to worry about such things, take constructive criticism, etc.—was the note reportedly posted to Slack by an attorney for the company’s privacy team warning of the grave legal risks Musk is taking. The missive pointed employees to the company’s ethics hotline, a number to get in touch with the FTC, and a website where they can obtain whistleblower protection. Touching on everything from Musk’s return-to-office policy to the excessive hastiness of his new product launches, it reads:

    Twitter is a remote-first workplace, and has operated as such for years. It is a fundamental change to our employment contracts to require a 40hr a week in-office requirement. I do not, personally, believe that Twitter employees have an obligation to return to office. Certainly not on no notice (if at all).

    Over the last two weeks. Elon has shown that he cares only about recouping the losses he’s incurring as a result of failing to get out of his binding obligation to buy Twitter. He chose to enter into that agreement! All of us are being put through this as a result of the choices he made.

    Elon has shown that his only priority with Twitter users is how to monetize them. I do not believe he cares about the human rights activists. the dissidents, our users in un-monetizable regions, and all the other users who have made Twitter the global town square you have all spent so long building, and we all love.

    I have heard Alex Spiro (current head of Legal) say that Elon is willing to take on a huge amount of risk in relation to this company and its users, because “Elon puts rockets into space, he’s not afraid of the FTC.”

    Also, given that the FTC can (and will!) fine Twitter BILLIONS of dollars pursuant to the FTC Consent Order, extremely detrimental to Twitter’s longevity as a platform. Our users deserve so much better than this.

    Please also note the FTC’s number is: 1-877-FTC-HELP. You may also remember that Mudge reached out to httos://whistlebloweraid.org.

    Mudge presumably refers to Peiter Zatko, who was hired by Twitter in 2020 to lead security and later became a whistleblower, telling Congress: “Twitter leadership is misleading the public, lawmakers, regulators and even its own board of directors. The company’s cybersecurity failures make it vulnerable to exploitation, causing real harm to real people.” Spiro did not immediately return a request for comment from Vanity Fair.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Verified Twitter accounts impersonating LeBron James, George W. Bush and others send out fake tweets

    Verified Twitter accounts impersonating LeBron James, George W. Bush and others send out fake tweets

    [ad_1]

    Several Twitter users have already begun exploiting the revamped Twitter Blue by receiving the blue check mark and pretending to be celebrities and politicians. Twitter Blue, which now costs $8 a month, is stirring confusion about which of the platforms’ accounts are real.

    A verified Twitter account that had Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James’ name and a current profile photo of his family requested a trade, thanked Lakers fans and suggested he was going back to Cleveland. At a quick glance, the tweet looked real, but the handle was @KINGJamez, not the authentic @KingJames one. The tweet was deleted, and the account appears to have lost its verified status.

    Another Twitter user pretended to be New York Yankees pitcher Aroldis Chapman and announced he was signing an extension with the team. That account was suspended and the tweet was deleted. 

    Two accounts that claimed to belong to former President George W. Bush and former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair exchanged tweets about how they “miss killing Iraqis.” Another impersonated ESPN reporter Adam Shefter and in a tweet claimed Las Vegas Raiders coach Josh McDaniels had been fired. All three accounts were suspended. 

    CBS News reached out to Twitter for a statement. 

    Twitter CEO Elon Musk, who took over late last month, said any handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying they’re a parody account would be permanently suspended. While parody accounts and impersonations have always existed on the platform, experts and users warned that putting a price on verified badges could sow confusion, misinformation and scams. 

    Previously, as a way to distinguish some accounts, Musk rolled out a gray “official” check mark next to some accounts to indicate the social media company had verified their authenticity. However, within hours of the experiment, he scrapped the plan. 

    According to Twitter, only accounts subscribed to Twitter Blue on iOS on or after Wednesday are eligible for the blue checkmark moving forward. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Twitter’s cybersecurity chief quits amid company turmoil | CNN Business

    Twitter’s cybersecurity chief quits amid company turmoil | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    Washington
    CNN Business
     — 

    Twitter’s chief information security officer announced their resignation on Thursday, vacating one of the company’s most critical roles just as scrutiny is mounting over Twitter’s future and the erratic decisions of its new owner, Elon Musk.

    In a tweet, Lea Kissner, the former CISO, said they were looking forward to figuring out their next steps.

    “I’ve made the hard decision to leave Twitter,” Kissner tweeted. “I’ve had the opportunity to work with amazing people and I’m so proud of the privacy, security, and IT teams and the work we’ve done.”

    Kissner didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did they publicly offer their reasons for leaving Twitter.

    Their resignation was the latest example of the internal turmoil that has rocked Twitter following mass layoffs at the company.

    Kissner’s departure reportedly coincided with the resignations of multiple other top Twitter leaders Wednesday evening over fears about the company’s legal exposure before the Federal Trade Commission, according to an internal Slack message viewed by CNN. The independent journalist Casey Newton and The Verge first reported the resignations.

    In the Slack message, a Twitter employee wrote that Musk’s sole priority is “recouping the losses he’s incurring as a result of failing to get out of his binding obligation to buy Twitter.”

    From Linkedin

    The employee’s post also claimed Musk’s focus on monetizing the platform could jeopardize vulnerable users including human rights activists and political dissidents.

    It could even put Twitter’s own employees in legal jeopardy, the message suggested, after the employee claimed Musk was unconcerned about Twitter’s potential liability before the FTC.

    The employee claimed to have overheard Alex Spiro, Musk’s attorney and, according to the message, Twitter’s new head of legal, saying “Elon puts rockets into space, he’s not afraid of the FTC.”

    Spiro did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, a spokesperson for the FTC said it is “tracking recent developments at Twitter with deep concern.”

    “No CEO or company is above the law, and companies must follow our consent decrees,” the spokesperson said. “Our revised consent order gives us new tools to ensure compliance, and we are prepared to use them.”

    Twitter has twice settled with that agency over user privacy violations, and faces whistleblower allegations from its former head of security, Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, that the company under former CEO Parag Agrawal had violated its FTC obligations a third time. If proven true, Zatko’s allegations could result in billions of dollars in fines and personal liability for Agrawal.

    The message outlined plans at Twitter to devolve FTC compliance responsibilities to the individual workers remaining at the company.

    “This will put huge amount of personal, professional and legal risk onto engineers,” the message warned, according to The Verge. “I anticipate that all of you will de [sic] pressured by management into pushing out changes that will likely lead to major incidents.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk cites “difficult times ahead” in abruptly scrapping Twitter’s work-from-home policy

    Elon Musk cites “difficult times ahead” in abruptly scrapping Twitter’s work-from-home policy

    [ad_1]

    New Twitter owner, Elon Musk, sent his first email to employees late Wednesday to alert them of the social media company’s new rules: Working from home will no longer be permitted, with staffers expected to be in the office at least 40 hours a week.

    Musk — who titled his email “difficult times ahead” — also said he wanted to prepare employees for challenges amid a “dire” economic outlook, which he said will especially impact an advertising-dependent business like Twitter, according to the companywide email, which was viewed by CBS MoneyWatch. 

    “The road ahead is arduous and will require intense work to succeed,” Musk wrote. “We are also changing Twitter policy such that remote work is no longer allowed, unless you have a specific exception.”

    He added, “Starting tomorrow (Thursday), everyone is required to be in the office for a minimum of 40 hours per week.”

    Musk’s new workplace policy reverses a shift that Twitter’s management made early in the pandemic to allow employees to work from anywhere — a move that was emulated by many other companies as they sought to make their employees’ lives easier amid the health crisis. 

    The new policy risks alienating Twitter workers, especially after more than two years of having a flexible workplace approach, experts say.  

    “Business owners across the country are hanging on for dear life hoping their employees will want to come back into the office,” Kathleen Quinn Votaw, a talent recruitment and retention expert, said in an email. “Nope. That’s not going to happen. We’re never going back to the way we were.”

    Twitter didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

    Musk’s 120-hour workweeks

    The Tesla CEO is known for his own extreme work ethic, which, depending on your view is either heroic or a sign of unhealthy workaholism. Musk told the New York Times in 2018 that he spent the entire 24 hours of his 47th birthday at a Tesla factory and had been working 120-hour weeks. “All night — no friends, nothing,” he told the publication.

    Musk has had a turbulent start to his ownership of Twitter, which has included an advertiser revolt over concerns about the social media service’s oversight of content under his leadership and his decision to fire 3,700 employees, or roughly half its workforce. 

    Meanwhile, Musk’s fortune has plummeted by $100 billion this year as Tesla’s stock price slumps amid the Twitter turmoil. He’s also struggled to navigate a plan to charge $8 a month for Twitter’s blue check marks, which has been derided by some Twitter users. 

    In his Wednesday email, Musk warned that the company needs to generate subscription revenue amid the advertising slowdown. 

    “Without significant subscription revenue, there is a good chance Twitter will not survive the upcoming economic downturn,” he wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Musk Reportedly Bans Remote Work At Twitter And Warns Of ‘Difficult Times’ In Internal Email

    Musk Reportedly Bans Remote Work At Twitter And Warns Of ‘Difficult Times’ In Internal Email

    [ad_1]

    Topline

    Twitter’s new CEO and owner Elon Musk scrapped the company’s remote work policy and ordered all employees to return to the office in his first email to staffers since taking over the company, Bloomberg reported, marking further impact to the firm’s workforce after nearly half of its staff was laid off last week.

    Key Facts

    According to Bloomberg, Musk’s first email sent to staffers late on Wednesday night warned of “difficult times ahead” for the company, adding that there was no way to “sugarcoat the message.”

    Musk also ended Twitter’s lenient remote work policy that has been in place since the start of the pandemic and allowed employees to work from anywhere, corroborating earlier reports.

    In his email, Twitter’s new CEO reportedly said the policy change will go into effect immediately and employees are expected to be in the office “at least 40 hours per week.”

    Any exemptions to the remote work policy change will have to be personally approved by Musk himself, the report added.

    As advertisers flee Twitter over content moderation concerns, Musk wants $8 per month subscriptions from the new Twitter Blue to make up half of Twitter’s total revenue—a far cry from the current situation where 90% of the company’s revenue comes from ads.

    Forbes has reached out to Twitter for comment.

    Key Background

    Musk’s first official email to Twitter employees comes days after the company laid off nearly half of its workforce, gutting several important teams in the process. The entire layoff process was so chaotic that the company had to eventually ask some of the laid-off workers to come back to the company. People who were asked to come back included those who were reportedly fired “by mistake” and others whose skillset the new management did not anticipate would be necessary to help build some of the new features being demanded by Musk. Twitter was also hit with a class action lawsuit last week accusing the company of violating federal and state labor laws by failing to give the laid-off workers adequate notice. Apart from canceling remote work, Musk previously also scrapped Twitter’s “days of rest” policy which was a company-wide extra off day every month that went into effect during the pandemic.

    Tangent

    Musk has been vocal about his distaste for remote work several times this year. In June, the Tesla CEO scrapped remote work at the electric car company and ordered its executive staff to work a minimum “40 hours a week” a week from office or leave. When asked on Twitter about people wanting to work remotely, Musk responded, “they should pretend to work somewhere else.” In his email to Tesla workers Musk reportedly added: “The office must be where your actual colleagues are located, not some remote pseudo office. If you don’t show up, we will assume you have resigned.” Speaking at an event in May, Musk criticized American workers, stating: “People are trying to avoid going to work at all.” The billionaire’s dig at U.S. workers came after he praised Tesla’s factory workers in China, who he said were willing to work as late as 3 a.m. or not even leave the factory if needed.

    Further Reading

    Musk’s First Email to Twitter Staff Ends Remote Work (Bloomberg)

    Twitter Reportedly Asks Fired Workers To Return—Here’s What To Know About The Aftermath Of Its Mass Layoffs (Forbes)

    [ad_2]

    Siladitya Ray, Forbes Staff

    Source link