ReportWire

Tag: Tufts University

  • Gunman sought after opening fire outside Medford pizza shop near Tufts University

    Gunman sought after opening fire outside Medford pizza shop near Tufts University

    [ad_1]

    Investigators are searching for a man who fired a gun early Friday morning outside a pizza shop in Medford, Massachusetts.

    Surveillance video captured the terrifying incident playing out around 1 a.m. outside Pizza Days, just down the street from Tufts University.

    The footage shows a large group of people in the parking lot, with one drawing a gun from his waistband and firing it. The crowd quickly fled.

    Two police cruisers were parked in the lot at the time. An officer can be seen pulling out a gun, but the gunman got away.

    Police did not find any victims, and it is not believed anyone was hit.

    Officers recovered a firearm and several shell casings. They reported hearing about eight gunshots.

    Tufts officials say to their knowledge, no students were involved.

    Police are trying to track down the gunman.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Rosenfield

    Source link

  • Pro-Palestinian Tufts student group demonstrates on Oct. 7 despite suspension

    Pro-Palestinian Tufts student group demonstrates on Oct. 7 despite suspension

    [ad_1]

    Tufts University suspended its chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine last week, but the group nevertheless held a demonstration on campus Monday, the one-year anniversary of Hamas’ attack on Israel.

    The Students for Justice in Palestine chapter was ordered to halt all activity on Wednesday. The university pointed to multiple policy violations in their decision, including an Instagram post that depicted assault rifles, called on others to join a student intifada and escalate for Gaza on Oct. 7.

    Less than a week after getting suspended, the group held a demonstration on with about 50 people on the academic quad, then walked into the Science and Engineering Complex and held a sit-in in a cafe, according to a statement from the school Tuesday, which noted that the action will factor into the review of SJP members and leadership. Read the school’s updated statement, which notes that the administration’s approach has included “urging students to treat each other with compassion,” below.

    “Tufts has proven its only allegiance is to its own endowment,” a Tufts SJP spokesperson said in a statement. “Its refusal to condemn the genocide and disclose and divest from Israeli apartheid, along with its punishment of Palestinian and Jewish student protestors proves it is willing to put Zionist donors above basic morality.”

    People are remembering those killed, injured and taken hostage in Israel on Oct. 7, as well as the tens of thousands who died in the violence that followed.

    A university spokesperson pointed to an SJP-organized demonstration on Sept. 12, where members marched through an academic building and blocked the entrance to another. The SJP failed to meet requirements from previous disciplinary actions related to demonstrations last spring, according to the spokesperson, resulting in their suspension.

    “The suspension will remain in effect until the case is fully resolved. During this time, SJP must halt all activities, events, and meetings,” the statement reads. “Any attempt to continue operating during this suspension will result in serious disciplinary consequences for both the organization and its leaders.”

    Tufts is the third local college to come down on pro-Palestinian student groups, according to the Anti-Defamation League East Vice President Peggy Shukur.

    “I wish I could say that things are better, calmer, but really they’re not,” Shukur said. “We saw a disturbing amount of activity yesterday, on a day that our community viewed as a really sacred day of remembrance for those who were slaughtered in that terrorist attack.”

    Last spring, MIT suspended their SJP equivalent, the Coalition against Apartheid. Brandeis University banned their SJP chapter last November — something a student government representative said has shaken their trust in the administration.

    Seven people arrested during a protest at Brandeis University faced a judge Monday.

    “Students knew completely that they would be met with the full wrath and power of the administration,” Brandeis senior Allison Weiner said. “My advice to Tufts students would be that this is kind of just the beginning… to work tirelessly to continue the work that they’ve been doing — that should not stop — but definitely be very thoughtful about their next moves.”

    Read the Tufts representative’s full statement here:

    Despite our efforts emphasizing community values and urging students to treat each other with compassion, a small group of about 50 protesters chose to use the day to heighten tensions by walking out of class and protesting on the academic quad. To be clear, this was not an approved event. It did not require registration, nor would registration have been granted. Students for Justice in Palestine has been placed on an interim suspension while a conduct process takes place to address recent allegations of violations. Among other restrictions, this requires the group to stop or cancel all organization related activities, events, and meetings until a final resolution to the complaint is reached. That SJP organized, advertised, and took credit for the protest will be important factors as the conduct process continues for the group and its leadership.

    Following the protest on the academic quad, a subset of about 20 protesters entered the Science and Engineering Complex and held a sit-in in the area around the Kindlevan café in violation of university policies. Throughout the afternoon, we took a series of escalated steps to get them to vacate the premises. We were prepared to take further steps, including issuing no-trespass orders which could potentially be followed by arrest, when the students left just before 6pm. As is our practice, we will hold accountable anyone found to have violated university policy and the student code of conduct during yesterday’s protest.

    [ad_2]

    Mary Markos

    Source link

  • 12 Tufts Lacrosse Players All Get Rare, Life-Threatening Injury After 45-Minute Workout

    12 Tufts Lacrosse Players All Get Rare, Life-Threatening Injury After 45-Minute Workout

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON (AP) — A dozen Tufts University men’s lacrosse players have been diagnosed with a rare muscle injury after participating in a voluntary, supervised 45-minute workout that the team conducted, a university spokesperson said Friday.

    Five of the players who have been diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis remained hospitalized Friday, according to Patrick Collins director of media relations for the school.

    The Tufts University campus in Medford, Massachusetts in 2020.

    David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

    The workout on Monday was led by a graduate of the university who had completed Navy SEAL training.

    Rhabdomyolysis is a rare muscle injury where a person’s muscles break down, according to the Cleveland Clinic. It’s a life-threatening condition that can happen after an injury or excessive exercise without rest.

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    Both the number of confirmed cases and the number of those hospitalized could change, Collins said.

    “Our thoughts are with the players and their families, and we are hoping for their quick return to good health under the care of local medical experts,” Collins said in a written statement.

    “Meanwhile, we are closely monitoring the condition of the rest of the team and have postponed all team practice activities until each team member has been evaluated and medically cleared to return to participation,” he added.

    Given the seriousness of the the injuries, the school is appointing an external, independent investigator to conduct a thorough review as quickly as possible, with a goal of taking any steps needed to support the safety of the school’s student athletes, he said.

    The university is still learning about the circumstances that led to the injuries, he said, and cannot provide additional details until the investigation is complete.

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Multiple Tufts men’s lacrosse players still hospitalized following workout

    Multiple Tufts men’s lacrosse players still hospitalized following workout

    [ad_1]

    Five Tufts University men’s lacrosse players remain hospitalized following a recent workout led by a graduate of a Navy SEAL training program, according to a spokesman for the school.

    Around 50 members of the Tufts men’s lacrosse team participated in this voluntary workout session on Monday.

    12 teammates ended up with Rhabdomyolysis, a potentially serious condition where damaged muscles release proteins and electrolytes into the blood, which can lead to kidney damage and potential death.

    Students at Tufts were shocked that members of this champion lacrosse team were sickened like this.

    Members of Tufts’ lacrosse team are in the hospital after a workout session hosted by a graduate of a Navy SEAL program.

    “I was honestly impressed with their strength to be able to push themselves that much.” said Tufts student Cooper Kolehmainen.

    Practices have now been postponed until each team member has been medically cleared.

    “I just hope that they get well soon and get back on the field because that’s what we want to see them doing, thats what they love doing.” added grad student Prosper Abuanor.

    Tufts has now brought in an outside investigation to do a thorough review of the situation.

    Tufts University, located in Medford and Somerville, has about 6,700 undergraduate students. The men’s lacrosse team won its fourth NCAA title in May, defeating RIT.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Fortin

    Source link

  • Fighting Viruses that Cause Cancer

    Fighting Viruses that Cause Cancer

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Contrary to how it may seem, most viruses do not want to kill their hosts. “They want to hang out as long as possible, make more viruses, and infect as many other hosts as they can,” says Karl Munger, the Dorothy Todd Bishop Research Professor and chair of developmental, molecular and chemical biology at Tufts University School of Medicine. Unfortunately, that nasty proclivity of viruses to multiply and infect has some unintended consequences.

    In the battle between host and invader, cells produce responses to stop viruses from growing, and viruses try and commandeer the cells’ defense mechanisms and get them to replicate regardless. “There’s a fight between host and virus; because it needs to multiply, it tries to convince a non-dividing cell to divide,” Munger says, “which is one of the hallmarks of cancer.”

    Munger has been studying the connections between viruses and cancer for more than 30 years, starting with his Ph.D. at the University of Zurich, and including stints at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Harvard University, before coming to Tufts in 2014. By conservative estimates, viruses are responsible for 15 percent of cancers. “It’s probably double that if you look at cancers in which viral infections have contributed,” says Munger, who focuses his work on human papillomavirus (HPV), the most common sexually transmitted infection. He joined Tufts with the intent of creating a nucleus for basic research into viruses and cancer, a relatively under-recognized and underfunded area of cancer research.

    “Studying how viruses contribute to cancer is an opportunity to distinguish Tufts as a center of excellence in cancer research,” says Munger, who is also interim vice dean for research at the School of Medicine.

    That focus plays to the Tufts’ strengths. Brian Schaffhausen, professor emeritus of developmental, molecular and chemical biology, has made seminal discoveries about the growth and suppression of tumors by focusing on murine polyomavirus. John Coffin, American Cancer Society Research Professor and Distinguished Professor in Molecular Biology and Microbiology, has long studied the connections between cancer and retroviruses such as HIV. Katya Heldwein, American Cancer Society, Massachusetts Division, Professor of Molecular Biology, examines how herpesviruses get in and out of cells—and how they might be stopped. Recently, Tufts hired two new researchers: Rui Guo, assistant professor of molecular biology and microbiology, who focuses on Epstein-Barr virus (EPV) and joined the university last July; and Aaron Mendez, assistant professor of molecular biology and microbiology, who is a specialist on Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and joined Tufts in January.

    Munger, who is also affiliated with the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, learned the power of collaboration early in his career. As a postdoctoral researcher at the NIH, he focused on two proteins, known as E6 and E7, that are expressed in cervical cancer associated with HPV. At that time, researchers didn’t know whether they were drivers of cancer or mere innocent bystanders. In helping to solve that question, Munger was inspired by an annual meeting of researchers working on a specific tumor suppressor protein held in a farmhouse in Western Massachusetts, organized by leaders in the field, including the late David Livingston, M65, who was physician-in-chief at Dana-Farber Cancer Research Institute.

    “I learned that even though competition drives scientific progress, research should not be a blood sport, and in general it is more productive to solve problems with help from your friends,” Munger wrote in Viruses and Cancer: An Accidental Journey, an account of his research published in PLOS Pathogens in 2016.

    Munger and his colleagues determined those tiny viral proteins did in fact cause cancer by subverting the cells’ usual signaling pathways to create uncontrolled division. “There are around 400 different kinds of HPV, and only a very small number of them are cancer-causing,” Munger says. His lab is now looking at ways to target these viral proteins.

    Targeting HIV

    A class of viruses known as retroviruses, including HIV, infects the body by implanting themselves directly into the chromosomes inside the cell nucleus, joining their DNA to that of the host’s. Years ago, people thought HIV couldn’t cause cancer, explains John Coffin, since HIV usually kills the cells that it infects.

    Coffin’s lab has long been studying how retroviruses cause cancer, first in animals, and more recently with HIV in human cells. When genetic material gets integrated into the wrong gene, it can cause rampant cell division leading to cancer. “Researchers have identified hundreds of genes like this, where a gene involved in cellular growth is supposed to be turned on and off, but instead it’s turned on all the time,” says Coffin, who has spent decades studying HIV and other retroviruses. “Then the cell goes out of control and divides all the time, which is basically what cancer is.”

    That’s important, he says, since this process often starts before an individual knows they are infected. HIV patients are also particularly susceptible to side effects of cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which can stress already weakened immune systems.

    Coffin has shown that HIV can cause cancerous changes when integrating into a specific area of the cell’s DNA called the STAT3 gene. Identifying the specific cell and viral genes that can cause cancer can help scientists find a targeted treatment to prevent it. “If you can find a small molecule that turns off the expression of the virus, you can kill the cancer even long after it has started.”

    These therapies are becoming even more important for HIV patients, who can now live much longer than they used to due to new antiretroviral treatments that can extend life. “Prior to the 1990s, patients were dying at a much younger age, and didn’t have a chance to develop these problems,” says Jose Caro, an attending physician at Tufts Medical Center and the Dr. Jane Murphy Gaughan Professor and assistant professor of medicine at the School of Medicine. In the late 1990s, physicians noticed many more HIV patients developing anal cancer, which is associated with HPV. While female patients are often screened for cervical cancer, he says, precursors to anal cancer were often left undetected until it was much farther along.

    “Because HIV has an effect on the immune system, it is more likely that somebody would acquire another virus—or if they previously acquired the virus, that it would progress and replicate,” says Caro. While 80% of sexually active people acquire HPV, it may persist in tissues of HIV patients longer than it does in others, he says—and the longer it persists, the higher likelihood of causing cancer.

    Anal cancer, he adds, is a very difficult cancer to treat, especially in HIV patients with weakened immune systems. “Chemo and radiation come with their set of difficulties and side effects, at the same time, there are also the emotional and psychological side effects of having a genital cancer that can affect someone’s sex life,” Caro says. Lately, there has been hope for the condition, with a landmark study last year that identified a precursor to anal cancer that can help doctors catch it early.

    Battling Herpes

    Another class of viruses that can cause cancer are herpesviruses—however, not the oral or genital herpes that usually come to mind. “There are nine different types of herpesviruses that infect humans, and only two cause cancer,” says Katya Heldwein. Those are EBV, better known for causing infectious mononucleosis or “mono,” and KSHV, which can cause a rare cancer affecting bone and soft tissue. Heldwein’s research focuses on how these viruses get inside and out of these cells.

    “If they can’t get inside the cell, then the cell doesn’t get infected,” she says. Just as importantly, once viral material is inside the nucleus, “they still have to assemble all of the viral components, so the complete viral particle comes out to infect more cells. If you understand how this happens, you can identify weak points and target them.”

    Heldwein says viruses—including HIV and influenza—fuse with the cell membrane by using a single protein to unlock the membrane and spill its contents inside. Herpesviruses, however, distribute that unlocking function across three or four different proteins, Heldwein says.

    “Instead of one person using a key, it’s like one person picks up the key, another sticks it in the lock, another turns it, and another pushes open the door.” It’s a mystery why these viruses have evolved such a complicated method, she says, but it makes it much more difficult to target them with a vaccine. “You could raise antibodies against one protein, but in isolation, it might not look to the immune system the same way it does to its friends,” she says. She and other biologists are just beginning to understand how all these parts work together.

    While Heldwein doesn’t focus specifically on the connection between herpesviruses and cancers, she is thrilled about the recruitment of Guo and Mendez to the School of Medicine, who work on cancer and EBV and KSHV, respectively.

    Guo’s research focuses on how EBV transforms normal human cells into cancerous ones, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. “Some 95 percent of people have this virus, but in most people, their immune system can suppress it, pushing it into the direction of latency,” he says. In addition to mononucleosis, EBV can also cause certain types of cancer, such as Burkitt’s lymphoma, which hides within white blood cells and can cause abnormalities within those cells that lead to cancer development.

    As a postdoctoral researcher at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Guo was interested in discovering how EBV manages such metabolic processes, performing genetic screens to see whether those genetic chances can be stopped. He and colleagues focused on how the virus uses certain nutrients, including a particular amino acid called methionine. In a paper published last year, they showed that in mice infected with Burkitt’s lymphoma, a diet low in methionine changed the makeup of tumor cells, causing EBV to become visible to the immune system—and therefore potentially subject to attack.

    “Just by changing the diet, we could see the EBV gene got repressed in those mice, and the tumor stopped growing within two weeks,” Guo says. While treatment in humans is still a way off, the findings provide hope that a similar strategy could be followed as an alternative to more invasive chemo and radiation therapies, perhaps combined with T-cells that can target tumor cells in the blood.

    While all these researchers are pursuing different viruses, exploring different pathways towards intervention, there are enough commonalities in their approach to make collaboration fruitful, says Munger. Each is examining the mechanism in which these viruses manipulate the body’s genetic processes and cause cells to become cancerous—and each is searching for a way to stop that malfunction with treatments that could potentially be a less invasive alternative to current cancer treatments.

    While such research can be slow, and frustrating at times, the payoff could be huge, says Munger, who is often reminded of something his mentor Livingston, who passed away in 2021, used to say: “Even if you have bad days where your grants get rejected and your research doesn’t work, a cancer patient never has a good day.” That idea has always stuck with Munger and continues to motivate him to create a powerful center of excellence devoted to viruses and cancer. “There are a lot of commonalities between what these viruses do and the pathways they target,” he says. “This is definitely something we can examine together.”



    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Powassan Virus: What to Know about this Rare Tick-Borne Disease

    Powassan Virus: What to Know about this Rare Tick-Borne Disease

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — On paper, Powassan virus sounds like your basic nightmare. A tick-borne infection with no vaccine and no cure, it kills 1 in 10 people who get it and causes long-term neurological problems in half of reported cases. For decades, Powassan virus disease had affected only about one person a year in the U.S.—most likely because it was typically transmitted to humans by a tick that rarely bites people. But cases are slowly rising, especially in New England and the Great Lakes region, and human Powassan virus infections have now been diagnosed in the U.S., Canada, and Russia. 

    In 1997, Sam Telford III, a professor in the Department of Infectious Disease and Global Health at Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, found a genetically distinct strain of Powassan virus in deer ticks—the bloodsuckers notorious for spreading Lyme disease. He initially worried about its implications for Powassan virus in humans, as he found the virus in 1 out of every 100 deer ticks he sampled. But at the time, there were no reports of people with swelling in the brain—or encephalitis, a key symptom of Powassan—in places where deer ticks were common. He and his fellow researchers surmised that people just didn’t come down with Powassan virus disease from the strain carried by deer ticks.

    “It turned out we were wrong,” he said.

    In 2008, an elderly immunocompromised woman died from the deer-tick-carried subtype of Powassan virus. Since then, the number of cases has been slowly increasing each year. In 2022, 44 cases of Powassan virus were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and seven of those people died. So far this year, 29 cases have been reported. Massachusetts has been a particular hot spot. The state Department of Public Health has reported 16 cases in the last decade.

    Telford said he suspects that there has been some sort of natural selection for a variant of Powassan virus that’s more easily transmitted by deer ticks to people and causes severe disease. Such is likely the case regarding the recent emergence of babesiosis—a rare and sometimes fatal tick-borne disease that attacks human red blood cells—in the northeastern U.S. “Babesiosis used to be a coastal disease,” explained Telford, who is also part of the Tufts Lyme Disease Initiative. “Now it’s all over the place, from New Jersey to Maine.”

    Since 2017, Telford has conducted research under a grant from the National Institutes of Health to try to explain the epidemiological paradox of why they’ve found so much of the virus present in ticks but relatively few cases in humans. The objective is to determine whether some strains are less likely to cause disease. “This seems to be the case, but more work is needed,” he said.

    Symptoms and Transmission

    Whereas a deer tick needs to attach itself to a human host for 36–48 hours to spread Lyme disease, it may only need to be attached for 15 minutes or so to transmit Powassan virus.

    “Powassan is different from other diseases spread by ticks because it lives in the salivary glands of the tick,” said Telford. “That means it doesn’t take much time for the virus to exit the tick’s mouth and transmit to a person. Lyme and other tick-borne diseases are caused by viruses that live in ticks’ guts.”

    Powassan virus cannot be transmitted between people via coughing or close contact like the flu. Clinical symptoms begin with a high fever and vomiting and progress to neurologic signs such as headache, weakness, confusion, seizures, memory loss, and encephalitis. Half of those who survive have persisting neurological problems such as memory issues and even paralysis.

    “It’s scary what this virus can do to people,” said Telford. “If they survive, some patients will have severe neurological damage for the rest of their life.”

    If you’re experiencing any of the initial, flu-like symptoms and you may have recently been bitten by a tick, it’s a good idea to see a doctor. A blood test or spinal fluid test can diagnose Powassan virus. There are no medications that can prevent or treat Powassan, and since it’s a virus, antibiotics (which treat bacterial illnesses) won’t help.

    All that said, it is extraordinarily unlikely for a person to encounter a tick carrying Powassan virus. There are 3,000 to 5,000 cases of Lyme disease reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health each year, but the greatest number of Powassan cases ever reported to the agency was seven in 2015.

    Telford issued a word of caution for parents and dog owners, in particular. In 2021, he published this case report about two infants in Connecticut who contracted Powassan virus after being bitten by a deer tick that entered their home on the clothing of a parent who had been outside. In one case, the parent was hunting in the woods, and in the other case, the parent had been walking the family’s dog. Thankfully, both patients survived, but the cases demonstrate the importance of preventative measures.

    “One way to avoid bringing home ticks on your clothes is to spray your clothing, shoes, and gear with insecticides that contain 0.5% permethrin,” he said. “It’s not tick-ageddon. People should continue to enjoy the outdoors. Just protect yourself against tick bites.”

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Tufts President Sunil Kumar Aims to Spread the Light Beyond the Hill

    Tufts President Sunil Kumar Aims to Spread the Light Beyond the Hill

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: By Angela Nelson, Tufts Now

    Newswise — Under overcast skies that stood no chance of clouding the celebratory tone of the day, hundreds of faculty, staff, students, alumni, neighbors, and academic leaders gathered today on the Medford/Somerville campus to witness the inauguration of Sunil Kumar as the 14th president of Tufts University. He succeeds Anthony P. Monaco, who served as president for 12 years.

    Delegates from more than 85 academic institutions and learned societies around the world attended Kumar’s inauguration ceremony on the residential quad. The ceremony was the culmination of a week’s worth of activities, including an academic symposium on One Health and a Community Day for friends and neighbors.

    “Having never been inaugurated before, I didn’t know what to expect. Now I know—it is like being the groom in a traditional Indian wedding. You are important, but most of it isn’t about you at all,” Kumar, who is the first person of color to lead Tufts, told the crowd. “It’s about everybody else at the wedding.”

    That demonstration of humility was just one way Kumar shifted the spotlight from himself to the broader Tufts community throughout Inauguration Week.

    He spoke about the many people he has met over the past few months on the Medford/Somerville campus, the Boston health sciences campus, and the Grafton campus of Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine. He asked them, “What makes Tufts tick?” The common sentiment was that Tufts is a truly special place. He hypothesized that was because Tufts is a unique mix, offering a tight-knit, student-centered, liberal arts experience while carrying out world-class research.

    The theme for the Inauguration was “lighting the way,” and Kumar spoke about a bright future for Tufts and its 12,650 students, gesturing to the need for the light on the hill to extend its reach—and impact—as far beyond the university’s campuses as possible. He shared five broad themes that are of particular importance for the path forward: educating responsible leaders for tomorrow, providing transformative experiences, expanding our research footprint, broadening our definition of what it means to be a student, and giving back to the community and society.

    “Today, it is more important than ever to ensure that all students—from all backgrounds—can afford a Tufts education, and that we provide them with pathways towards social mobility and future success long after graduation,” he said.

    President Kumar’s predecessors, at center, Anthony P. Monaco (2011-2023) and Lawrence Bacow (2001-2011), enjoyed the ceremony. Photo: Alonso Nichols

    During the ceremony, Kumar was presented with three symbolic items: the university’s charter, the keys to Ballou Hall, and the presidential medallion. Along with the academic mace and the president’s regalia, which bears the school’s brown and blue colors, these items make up the Objects of Office. They are reminders not only of Tufts’ history of educating students for nearly 170 years, but of the important role that each new president plays in guiding the institution forward.

    To that end, Kumar said he is strongly committed to furthering the university’s mission of being a student-centered research university that is dedicated to the creation and application of knowledge, and to providing transformative experiences for students and faculty in an inclusive and collaborative environment. Kumar, who is also a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the School of Engineering, said he envisions Tufts as a place where creative scholars generate bold ideas, innovate in the face of complex challenges, and distinguish themselves as active citizens of the world.

    The procession included members of the Board of Trustees, delegates from other institutes of higher learning, and Tufts faculty members, including Bree Aldridge, professor of molecular biology and microbiology at the School of Medicine, who served as presenter for the ceremony and was a member of the search committee to select President Kumar.

    Distinguished speakers from Kumar’s previous appointments addressed the crowd at the inauguration. Ronald J. Daniels, president of Johns Hopkins University, represented the institution at which Kumar served as provost and senior vice president for academic affairs prior to coming to Tufts. Daniels compared Kumar’s “noble attributes” to those of Tufts’ beloved elephant mascot, Jumbo.

    “You have a capacity to conjure literary, historical, and philosophical references. You have an ability to speak powerfully to your intelligence and memory, a proclivity for collaboration and cooperation, and a seemingly endless score of patience and optimism. All classic characteristics of elephants,” he said.

    As part of the ceremony, greetings from constituent groups were offered by Jette Steen Knudsen, president of the University Faculty Senate and a professor of policy and international business at the Fletcher School; Arielle Galinsky, A24, on behalf of the undergraduate students; Zana Hunt, D24, on behalf of the graduate and professional students; and Vikki Garth, president of the Tufts University Alumni Association.

    Born and raised in India, Kumar earned a bachelor’s degree in engineering from Mangalore University in 1990, a master’s degree in computer science and automation from the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore in 1992, and a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in 1996.

     

    https://now.tufts.edu/2023/10/06/president-sunil-kumar-aims-spread-light-beyond-hill

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Tufts Welcomes the Undergraduate Class of 2027

    Tufts Welcomes the Undergraduate Class of 2027

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: By Laura Ferguson, Tufts Now

    Newswise — President Sunil Kumar welcomed members of the Class of 2027 to Tufts on August 30, encouraging them to take full advantage of the “immense freedom” that comes with being a college student—starting with being open to new ideas and experiences.

    “Every now and then, when someone asks you why you are doing something, your answer should be ‘Why not?’ . . . As you’ll come to learn, one of the great advantages of being a college student is the immense freedom you are afforded,” he said. “I urge you to take full advantage of this freedom. It will never be easier to explore a new discipline or to discover new ways of viewing the world than in the next four years.”

    Kumar, who took over the presidency of Tufts on July 1, shared his words of advice at the university’s matriculation ceremony. While traditionally held on the Academic Quad, the event this year was moved online due to forecasts for heavy rain.

    Kumar’s remarks were drawn from his own journey. When he landed in the United States to pursue a PhD in electrical engineering, his new hometown of Urbana, Illinois, was a far cry from the large city of Bangalore in India, where he had earned his master’s degree. “To say that I felt out of place when I arrived would be an understatement,” he said.

    “My solution to this discomfort? I grew a ponytail, bought a 20-year-old Cadillac, and developed a taste for truck stop food. Looking back, these were arguably not the wisest decisions I’ve ever made, but the point is that I immersed myself in discomfort rather than shying away from it.”

    That experience shaped his belief that “personal growth rarely comes from within your comfort zone. I firmly believe in the value of so-called mistakes and failures. They help you discover deep truths about yourself and your calling,” he told the incoming class and transfers.

    “So, when you are debating whether to take that course on a topic you’ve always been curious about, or whether to fulfil your dream of studying abroad and immersing yourself in a new language and culture, ask yourself how that decision will contribute to your overall learning and growth. And, if you’re still unsure, just ask yourself ‘Why not?’,” he said.

    “Today marks the beginning of an exciting journey, and it is a privilege for me to be part of it,” Kumar noted. “I look forward to getting to know each of you during your time here, and I can’t wait to see what you will accomplish.”

    Diverse in All Kinds of Ways

    Kumar’s remarks followed similar warm greetings from Caroline Genco, provost and senior vice president, and JT Duck, dean of admissions and enrollment management for the School of Arts and Sciences and the School of Engineering.

    “We know that this class is going to make our community’s light on the Hill shine brighter,” said Duck, who then shared some of the distinctions of the 1,742 first-year students and 73 transfer students, six of whom are enrolling as members of the Resumed Education for Adult Learners program.

    He noted that first-year students represent the most ethnically and racially diverse class ever to enroll at Tufts. They come from more than 1,100 high schools—the largest number of high schools ever represented in a single, incoming class—and include more than 300 that have not sent a student to Tufts in the past five years, if ever. 

    “This class represents our continuing commitment to expand access to a Tufts education and to expand the number of communities from which our students enroll,” he said.

    Additionally, “nearly 200 of you will be among the first generation in your families to graduate from college. I, too, was the first person in my family to graduate from college. I see you—you belong here.”

    As reported in January, the Class of 2027 grew out of the university’s most diverse applicant pool in its history. The pool included the largest number of international students, first-generation students, and students of color, as well as the largest number of transfer applicants.

    It was also Tufts’ largest applicant pool to the School of Engineering and to the School of the Museum of Fine Arts at Tufts (SMFA), and the second largest-ever applicant pool to the School of Arts and Sciences. 

    Students were selected through an “individualized and holistic review of their application by members of the Tufts admissions committee, a process that sought to understand the unique accomplishments, potential, and aspirations of each student,” said Duck.

    Overall, “kindness, empathy, compassion, and a collaborative spirit defined much of what we saw in this exceptional applicant pool,” he said.

    The Class of 2027 is the third class to enroll under Tufts’ SAT/ACT test-optional policy. The policy has been extended to the next three application cycles—for students entering in fall 2024, 2025, and 2026. Similar to each of the past three years, about 45 percent of the students enrolling at Tufts this fall applied without submitting ACT or SAT results.

    The Class of 2027 by the Numbers

    Identification and Diversity

    • Women make up 55% of the overall class and men account for 41%.
    • Students who identify as genderqueer, non-binary, or preferred not to specify a gender identity account for 4%.
    • 50% of incoming U.S. undergraduates identify as students of color.
    • 7% identify as Black or African American.
    • 11% identify as Latinx/Hispanic.
    • 20% identify as Asian American.
    • 11% identify as multiracial. 
    • 47% identify as white.
    • 3% did not specify a race or ethnicity at the time of application.
    • 40 first-year students identify with a Native or Indigenous heritage, nearly all as part of a multiracial identity. This includes 26 students who identify as American Indian or Alaska Native, including four students who are enrolled citizens of their tribe, representing three tribal nations: Cherokee, Muscogee, and Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, and 14 students who identify as Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander.

    Academic Pathways

    • 282 first-year students indicate interest in the School of Engineering; 47% of those are women.
    • 1,460 first-year students indicate interest in School of Arts and Sciences, of which 5% intend to pursue the B.F.A. at the SMFA and 6% intend to pursue the combined B.F.A. + B.A./B.S. degree.
    • 12 first-year students are enrolling in the Tufts Civic Semester, a Tisch College of Civic Life program that combines academic coursework and experiential learning with a focus on community engagement and social and environmental justice. This year the program is based in Urubamba, Peru.
    • 32 incoming students took a gap year last year.

    Global Reach

    • In total, enrolled students have citizenships from 65 countries.
    • The most represented citizenships among international students are China, South Korea, India, Turkey, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom, Brazil, and Spain.
    • At least 75 different languages are spoken in the homes of the students enrolling in the Class of 2027. The most common languages other than English are Spanish, Mandarin, French, Korean, Hindi, German, Arabic, Cantonese, Thai, Turkish. Other languages spoken at home by incoming students include Hausa, from West Africa Zo; from Burma and northeastern India; and Dholuo, from Kenya and Tanzania.
    • Students hail from­­ 49 states plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
    • Students designated as foreign nationals account for 12%. 
    • The states that sent the most students are Massachusetts, New York, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Florida, Texas, and Washington.
    • One-third of the class enrolling from the U.S. is enrolling from the South, Southwest, and West.
    • 48 students come from the university’s host communities of Medford, Somerville, Boston, and Grafton. Several students are affiliated with local nonprofits supporting access to college, including Bottom Line; Steppingstone Foundation; Breakthrough Greater Boston; and SquashBusters.

    Access to College

    • The class received more than $33 million in need-based grants from Tufts. The average grant this year was more than $53,500; 12 percent of the class are Pell Grant recipients.
    • 11% are the first generation in their families to pursue a bachelor’s degree.
    • 43 students participated in the virtual Voices of Tufts Experience hosted by undergraduate admissions last fall, a program for students interested in learning more about diversity and community at Tufts.
    • 53% attended public or public charter high schools.  
    • Transfer students represent more than 50 different colleges and universities across the country and around the world, including area community colleges such as Bunker Hill Community College, North Shore Community College, and Northern Essex Community College.
    • 125 students worked with local and national community-based organizations that support their path to college, including A Better Chance (ABC), EMERGE, Minds Matter, TEAK Fellowship, Thrive Scholars, and QuestBridge. Twenty students enrolled through the QuestBridge National College Match program.

    https://now.tufts.edu/2023/08/30/welcoming-undergraduate-class-2027

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Produce Prescription Programs Yield Positive Health Benefits for Participants, Study Finds

    Produce Prescription Programs Yield Positive Health Benefits for Participants, Study Finds

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Around the country, non-profits and local governments are testing the idea of food as medicine through “produce prescription programs”—with promising results, according to researchers from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.

    By prescribing free, healthy foods similar to how doctors prescribe medications, clinicians and policy makers hope to remove financial barriers to accessing fruits and vegetables to individuals with diet-related illness. Specifically, produce prescriptions offer vouchers, debit cards, or loyalty cards to access free or discounted produce at grocery retail and farmer’s markets and typically enroll food-insecure households. A Tufts-led pooled analysis of nine such programs found these programs were associated with positive benefits, from halving food insecurity to lowering blood pressure. The study, which is the largest known evaluation of these programs to date, was published August 29 in the American Heart Association journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.

    The researchers analyzed surveys and medical records from over 1,800 children and 2,000 adults who had been identified as low-income and at risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Study participants had been enrolled in produce prescription programs operating across 22 sites in 12 U.S. states from 2014 to 2020. Each program was operated by Wholesome Wave, a national nonprofit that works to address disparities in diet-related disease and enhance nutrition equity by making fruits and vegetables more accessible and affordable to low-income community members through systems change.

    The data showed an increase in fruit and vegetable intake (by about a serving per day among adults) as well as improved clinical biomarkers of cardiometabolic health for adults. For example, diabetic patients saw a 0.3 percentage point drop in hemoglobin A1C, an indicator for average blood sugar levels in the previous three months, and a decrease in body mass index by 0.4 kg/m2 among those with overweight or obesity. In patients with hypertension, blood pressure also dropped by 5-to-8 millimeters of mercury. The improvement for these clinical biomarkers of cardiometabolic health were greater among participants with uncontrolled diabetes, obesity, or stage 2 hypertension.  

    The study also revealed improvements in fruit and vegetable intake, food security, and self-reported health status among child participants. While body mass index was not noticeably reduced in children, the researchers say these benefits reflect critical measures for their development, long-term health and well-being.

    “We were excited to see the results, which showed that participants who receive this incentive consume more fruits and vegetables, yielding clinically relevant outcomes,” says senior study author Fang Fang Zhang, a nutritional epidemiologist and Neely Family Professor at the Friedman School. “We need larger-scale implementation of these programs, which may play a role in improving care, in particular for lower-income adults with obesity, diabetes, or hypertension.”

    The records reviewed were from patients who were enrolled in the nine produce prescription programs for an average of six months, usually after being referred by their physician. Most participants received a voucher or card that could be redeemed at selected grocery stores and/or farmers’ markets. Prescriptions covered an average of $43 per household per month in adult programs, and $112 per household per month in programs for children.

    “Our findings provide important new evidence from a diverse set of programs for meaningful benefits of produce prescriptions, highlighting the need for clinical, policy, and healthcare payer and providers’ efforts to implement produce prescription programs,” says Zhang.

    “There is much we still need to learn about which programs are likely to be effective, how long they should operate, what happens to patient health outcomes when they end and more,” says first author Kurt Hager, who completed the work as a doctoral student at the Friedman School and is now an instructor at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School. “The future of Food is Medicine will likely see pilots and expansion occurring alongside ongoing evaluations that will continually improve the quality of services provided.”

    Researchers across institutions have been conducting analyses of these and similar programs, with most finding net positive benefits for patients, but differences in the extent of those gains and how the programs were implemented. Such studies can help to guide the implementation of the Biden-Harris Administration’s National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition and Health, which, among other things, calls for expanded produce prescription programs for people enrolled in Medicaid, Medicare, Veterans Affairs, and the Indian Health Service.

    “This research is a step in the right direction and in alignment with the comprehensive National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health,” says Alison Brown, a registered dietician and program director in the Prevention and Population Science Program in the Division of Cardiovascular Sciences at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, part of the National Institutes of Health. “However, more rigorous ‘food is medicine’ studies are needed to add to our scientific knowledge and inform evidence-based policies.”

    Further research will help to fill some existing information gaps. While the observed gains for participants were clinically and statistically meaningful, the new study lacked a control group, which means the benefits could be attributed to other factors. Some of the programs were also in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have impacted their efficacy, as participants were less likely to redeem their vouchers.

    Research reported in this article was supported by the Rockefeller Foundation and Kaiser Permanente, and by the National Institutes of Health’s National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute under award R01HL115189. Complete information on authors, funders, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

     

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • A Conversation with Caroline Genco, Tufts’ New Provost and Senior Vice President

    A Conversation with Caroline Genco, Tufts’ New Provost and Senior Vice President

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Caroline Genco, an established academic leader and a highly regarded immunologist with an active biomedical research program, has been named provost and senior vice president at Tufts University. As provost, she is the university’s chief academic officer.

    A professor and holder of the Arthur E. Spiller M.D. Endowed Professorship in Genetics at Tufts University School of Medicine, Genco has been the university’s provost ad interim since January 2022.

    Before her current role as interim provost, Genco served as the university’s vice provost for research for two years and, from 2015 to 2019, as chair of the Department of Immunology at the School of Medicine.

    Genco joined Tufts in 2015 from Boston University School of Medicine, where she was a professor of medicine and microbiology and research director of the Section on Infectious Diseases. At BU’s School of Engineering, she was also an affiliate faculty member in the biomedical engineering department. Prior to BU, she held academic appointments at Morehouse School of Medicine and Emory University.

    Genco’s research centers on host-pathogen interactions and the ways in which infectious agents cause inflammation and disease. One area of focus is understanding why some sexually transmitted infections are asymptomatic and others are symptomatic, as STIs disproportionally cause asymptomatic disease in women, with resulting reproductive complications.

    “I have had the opportunity to engage with Caroline closely during my transition over the past eight months,” said President Sunil Kumar. “Through those conversations, I appreciated her clear vision for the academic enterprise at Tufts and the collaborative approach with which she will achieve that vision.”

    In speaking with Tufts Now, Genco shared the impact she hopes to have through her role as provost—and why she stays closely connected to her research.

    Tufts Now: What does it mean to be Tufts’ chief academic officer?

    Caroline Genco: The provost is responsible for the academic strategy of a university. A provost’s scope can differ depending on a given university’s organizational model. At Tufts, we operate under a decentralized model. While I oversee all our schools and colleges, along with some of our cross-school programs, centers, and institutes, Tufts’ schools and colleges have independent control over their resources and programming.

    My responsibility is to guide institutional priorities that collectively advance Tufts’ mission as a student-centered, R1 university. [R1 is a classification given to certain universities with very high research activity.] Another part of my role is to work with central administrative leadership, in particular, Executive Vice President Mike Howard, to ensure that our resources support our academic priorities.

    Last but certainly not least, I work to remove barriers and create support systems so that we provide an environment for our students, faculty, and staff to succeed.

    In my interim role, in service of Tufts’ mission, I redefined the provost position and the way it operates by balancing the need for a university-wide approach to academic strategy and planning with the need to maintain each school’s uniqueness and honor their autonomy. Tufts’ schools are already strong, and by coming together across schools, our impact can be even greater.

    What did you learn from your interim period that will inform your work as provost?

    Tufts is large enough to make a significant impact on the world—but we’re not unlimited in scale. Our success lies in our ability—and our desire—to collaborate, to be greater than the sum of our parts. I’ve seen firsthand how strong the sense of community is at Tufts—it’s what allows us to pivot quickly as things change around us.

    I’ve also witnessed the competitive advantage in having faculty doing pioneering research and scholarship in disciplines ranging from the humanities to the sciences and policymaking. Our expertise, steeped in civic engagement and inclusive excellence, allows us to address complex societal challenges.

    Amid all the headlines about the issues facing higher education, what are the challenges you have to consider in leading an academic enterprise in the years ahead?

    Society is changing so fast that people need to make sure they’re prepared. And just as our learners need to respond to those changes, so does Tufts. Tufts is a nimble institution, and this key characteristic will allow us to adapt as things continue to change quickly.

    At Tufts, we innovate by listening to a range of perspectives and promoting more conversations across our community. This in turn creates opportunities to bring people together to capitalize on Tufts’ strengths and to foster creative responses to the complexities that we face.

    Tufts also has a deep commitment to civic engagement and inclusive access, and these values serve as pillars that help guide us in addressing new challenges.

    Earlier in your career, you were a fellow in an intensive, year-long training program aimed at expanding the pool of qualified women candidates for academic leadership. How do you now support a new generation of people who’ve often been underrepresented in leadership?

    During my leadership training, I had the chance to see the impact of bringing emerging women leaders from throughout the country together so they could inspire and empower one another. I’ve stayed connected to the women I met, and we continue to support each other both professionally and personally. This experience gave me a network of people whom I can trust with the problems I face and who can rely on me as well.

    And now, as provost, I can pay it forward by creating systems modeled on the experience I had, to provide individuals with the tools and resources they need for success.

    I believe deeply in the power of robust mentorship and, in partnership with my team, I am currently developing mentorship programs to support our faculty not only in their development as scholars, but also to cultivate them as institutional leaders.

    Just as I have benefited from programs and mentors that helped me to feel more like I belonged, I feel strongly in continuing to make Tufts a place where everyone feels that same sense of belonging, where they have the role models, mentors, and the confidence to push themselves outside their comfort zones into directions that benefit them and, in turn, all of us.

    Something about you that people don’t know?

    People are often surprised to know that I was the first person in my family to go to college. My parents were immigrants: my father worked in a steel plant, and my mother was a seamstress. I was able to attend a public university near my home and fell in love with the world of learning and discovery and saw the value of engaging with diverse perspectives. I feel very fortunate to have had that opportunity and to have been able to build on it to get to where I am today.

    Where do you think the biggest opportunities lie for Tufts?

    I think our embrace of lifelong learning is critical. We have terrific programs that prepare students at all phases of their professional journeys. Tufts is just the right size to be flexible in terms of what we offer to prepare learners for our ever-changing future.

    Even for students who focus on a traditional four-year college experience, we recognize their desire for more within those four years, whether it’s dual majors, more hands-on experience, or more interdisciplinary opportunities to change the way they look at—and solve—problems.

    For our research and scholarship enterprise specifically, the opportunity for us now is to promote Tufts not only nationally but globally in terms of our distinctive strengths. We have expertise in a variety of disciplines that, when combined, give us a competitive advantage.

    A critical priority for us is making certain that everyone understands the breadth of what we do here at Tufts. We are working at this locally and at the state and federal levels, and globally, to make our impact known.

    Speaking of research, why is it important to you to continue your research while you have a very full plate as provost?

    My research grounds me. It’s what brought me to higher education; it’ll always be at my core. Time and again, my research team exposes me to a diversity of perspectives that broadens my horizons and demonstrates the power of collaborating to solve big problems.

    Individual meetings with my graduate students and our lab meetings also keep me in tune with some of the challenges that students are facing today. As with our faculty, it’s important in my role as provost that I hear directly what’s standing in the way of their success and what’s important to them. Understanding where people are coming from helps me create opportunities to increase their ability to succeed.

    One example of the connection between research and the collaborative work that I support in my role as provost is an international conference to be held in Boston, which I helped to organize. In addition to faculty and student researchers from around the world, we’ve engaged representatives from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Sanofi, and the World Health Organization. At the same time, we are offering panels that spotlight our thriving local biotech industry. This is an opportunity to bring to bear a more innovative approach to information-sharing than at a more traditional scientific conference.

    What’s it like to work with a president who has himself been a provost?

    Having been provost at Johns Hopkins, Sunil Kumar understands and respects what is needed to run an institution’s academic enterprise. I am thrilled that he understands the role of provost so fully. He will be both a great mentor, as well as someone who will allow me the autonomy I need while also being available for advice.

    When your service as provost is complete, how would you hope that people characterize the legacy that you’ve left?

    I hope our community feels that I was able to bring together the skills and expertise of the faculty and staff to capitalize more fully on our collective potential.

    I hope I will have been able to put systems in place and remove barriers to ensure our individual and collective success. That’s the most important thing to me: that people feel like they have the tools they need to succeed. When they are successful, then I feel like I’ve done my job.

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Study Links Poor Diet to 14 Million Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Globally

    Study Links Poor Diet to 14 Million Cases of Type 2 Diabetes Globally

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — A research model of dietary intake in 184 countries, developed by researchers at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, estimates that poor diet contributed to over 14.1 million cases of type 2 diabetes in 2018, representing over 70% of new diagnoses globally. The analysis, which looked at data from 1990 and 2018, provides valuable insight into which dietary factors are driving type 2 diabetes burden by world region. The study was published April 17 in the journal Nature Medicine.

    Of the 11 dietary factors considered, three had an outsized contribution to the rising global incidence of type 2 diabetes: Insufficient intake of whole grains, excesses of refined rice and wheat, and the overconsumption of processed meat. Factors such as drinking too much fruit juice and not eating enough non-starchy vegetables, nuts, or seeds, had less of an impact on new cases of the disease.

    “Our study suggests poor carbohydrate quality is a leading driver of diet-attributable type 2 diabetes globally, and with important variation by nation and over time,” says senior author Dariush Mozaffarian, Jean Mayer Professor of Nutrition and dean for policy at the Friedman School. “These new findings reveal critical areas for national and global focus to improve nutrition and reduce devastating burdens of diabetes.”

    Type 2 diabetes is characterized by the resistance of the body’s cells to insulin. Of the 184 countries included in the Nature Medicine study, all saw an increase in type 2 diabetes cases between 1990 and 2018, representing a growing burden on individuals, families, and healthcare systems.

    The research team based their model on information from the Global Dietary Database, along with population demographics from multiple sources, global type 2 diabetes incidence estimates, and data on how food choices impact people living with obesity and type 2 diabetes from multiple published papers.  

    The analysis revealed that poor diet is causing a larger proportion of total type 2 diabetes incidence in men versus women, in younger versus older adults, and in urban versus rural residents at the global level.

    Regionally, Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia —particularly in Poland and Russia, where diets tend to be rich in red meat, processed meat, and potatoes —had the greatest number of type 2 diabetes cases linked to diet. Incidence was also high in Latin America and the Caribbean, especially in Colombia and Mexico, which was credited to high consumption of sugary drinks, processed meat, and low intake of whole grains.

    Regions where diet had less of an impact on type 2 diabetes cases included South Asia and Sub-Sharan Africa —though the largest increases in type 2 diabetes due to poor diet between 1990 and 2018 were observed in Sub-Saharan Africa. Of the 30 most populated countries studied, India, Nigeria, and Ethiopia had the fewest case of type 2 diabetes related to unhealthy eating.

    “Left unchecked and with incidence only projected to rise, type 2 diabetes will continue to impact population health, economic productivity, health care system capacity, and drive heath inequities worldwide,” says first author Meghan O’Hearn. She conducted this research while a PhD candidate at the Friedman School and currently works as Impact Director for Food Systems for the Future, a non-profit institute and for-profit fund that enables innovative food and agriculture enterprises to measurably improve nutrition outcomes for underserved and low-income communities. “These findings can help inform nutritional priorities for clinicians, policymakers, and private sector actors as they encourage healthier dietary choices that address this global epidemic.”

    Other recent studies have estimated that 40% of type 2 diabetes cases globally are attributed to suboptimal diet, lower than the 70% reported in the Nature Medicine paper. The research team attributes this to the new information in their analysis, such as the first ever inclusion of refined grains, which was one of the top contributors to diabetes burdens; and updated data on dietary habits based on national individual-level dietary surveys, rather than agricultural estimates. The investigators also note that they presented the uncertainty of these new estimates, which can continue to be refined as new data emerges.

     

    Research reported in this article was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Complete information on authors, funders, methodology, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Are Americans Eating Enough Whole Grains? It Depends on Who You Ask

    Are Americans Eating Enough Whole Grains? It Depends on Who You Ask

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — A diet rich in whole grains, which are naturally high in fiber, is associated with lowering a person’s risk for various health problems. Overall, Americans are eating more whole-grain foods than ever before, researchers from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University report in a new study, published November 30 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. However, the increase in whole-grain intake over the past two decades could be 39.5% or 61.5%, depending on which definition of a whole-grain food is being used. In addition, Americans’ mean consumption of whole-grain foods remained far below the recommended consumption of at least three ounces each day and varied considerably by each definition.

    The researchers say there’s a clear need to standardize how consumers, researchers, and policymakers talk about whole-grain foods. The study compared overlapping definitions from five institutions: the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the American Heart Association, the American Association of Cereal Chemists International, and the Whole Grains Council. The research team applied the various definitions of a whole-grain food to the dietary intakes of over 39,700 adults captured by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2003 and 2018.

    “We found that each definition captured very different types of grain- or flour-containing foods as whole-grain foods, resulting in differences in the average consumption of whole-grain foods and the associated trends,” says lead author on the study Mengxi Du, a PhD candidate in the Nutrition Epidemiology and Data Science program at the Friedman School. As a consumer, she said she has had the experience of struggling to identify what is or isn’t a whole-grain food via the packaging labels. Recent surveys suggest nearly half of American consumers have similar challenges.

    When looking at the different categories of whole-grain foods identified by these definitions, while some similarities were identified—whole-grain bread consumption increased under all definitions—there were more differences. The government-led FDA’s definition was the strictest, categorizing the fewest foods as whole-grain foods compared to the industry-led Whole Grains Council’s, which was the most lenient but could be least healthy based on a prior study.

    One surprising finding was how the foods of different population subgroups were classified depending on the applied definition. For example, individuals who are non-Hispanic white had a higher intake of whole-grain foods compared with other racial/ethnical groups under all definitions, except for the definition proposed by the American Heart Association, under which Hispanic individuals had the highest intake. The possible reason is that the American Heart Association’s definition is more sensitive to identifying dishes such as corn-based burritos, tacos, and nachos as whole-grain foods.

    “We can’t say which is the best definition yet as we need to assess the nutrient profiles of each and how these different definitions are associated with health outcomes. Our findings, however, underscore the imperative need for a consensus on whole-grain food definition. A consistent definition across agencies is essential to further promoting whole-grain food consumption in the U.S. population,” says Fang Fang Zhang, senior author on the study and interim chair of the Division of Nutrition Epidemiology and Data Science at the Friedman School.

    Research reported in this article was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities under award number R01MD011501. Complete information on authors, funders, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • Tufts University Researchers Find Link Between Foods Scored Higher By New Nutrient Profiling System and Better Long-Term Health Outcomes

    Tufts University Researchers Find Link Between Foods Scored Higher By New Nutrient Profiling System and Better Long-Term Health Outcomes

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — The idea that what we eat directly affects our health is ancient; Hippocrates recognized this as far back as 400 B.C. But, identifying healthier foods in the supermarket aisle and on restaurant menus is increasingly challenging. Now, researchers at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts have shown that a holistic food profiling system, Food Compass, identifies better overall health and lower risk for mortality.  

    In a paper published in Nature Communications on November 22, researchers assessed whether adults who ate more foods with higher Food Compass scores had better long-term health outcomes and found that they did.

    Introduced in 2021, Food Compass provides a holistic measure of the overall nutritional value of a food, beverage, or mixed meal. It measures 9 domains of each item, such as nutrient ratios, food-based ingredients, vitamins, minerals, extent of processing, and additives. Based on scores of 10,000 commonly consumed products in the U.S., researchers recommend foods with scores of 70 or above as foods to encourage; foods with scores of 31-69 to be eaten in moderation; and anything that scores 30 or below to be consumed sparingly. For this new study, Food Compass was used to score a person’s entire diet, based on the Food Compass scores of all the foods and beverages they regularly consume.

    “A nutrient profiling system is intended to be an objective measure of how healthy a food is. If it’s achieving its purpose, then individuals who eat more foods with higher scores should have better health,” said Meghan O’Hearn, a doctoral candidate at the Friedman School and the study’s lead author.

    For this validation study, researchers used nationally representative dietary records and health data from 47,999 U.S. adults aged 20-85 who were enrolled between 1999-2018 in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Deaths were determined through linkage with the National Death Index (NDI).

    Overall, researchers found that the mean Food Compass score for the diets of the nearly 50,000 subjects was only 35.5 out of 100, well below ideal. “One of the most alarming discoveries was just how poor the national average diet is,” said O’Hearn. “This is a call for actions to improve diet quality in the United States.”

    When people’s Food Compass diet scores were assessed against health outcomes, multiple significant relationships were seen, even adjusting for other risk factors like age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, income, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and diabetes status. A higher Food Compass diet score was associated with lower blood pressure, blood sugar, blood cholesterol, body mass index, and hemoglobin A1c levels; and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cancer. A higher Food Compass diet score was also associated with lower risk of mortality: for each 10-point increase, there was a 7 percent lower risk of death from all causes.

    “When searching for healthy foods and drinks, it can be a bit of a wild west,” said Dariush Mozaffarian, Jean Mayer Professor of Nutrition and dean for policy at the Friedman School. “Our findings support the validity of Food Compass as a tool to guide consumer decisions, as well as industry reformulations and public health strategies to identify and encourage healthier foods and beverages.”

    Compared to existing nutrient profiling systems, Food Compass provides a more innovative and comprehensive assessment of nutritional quality, researchers say. For example, rather than measuring levels of dietary fats, sodium, or fiber in isolation, it takes a more nuanced and holistic view, evaluating the ratio of saturated to unsaturated fat; sodium to potassium; and carbohydrate to fiber. 

    Food Compass also boosts scores for ingredients shown to have protective effects on health, like fruits, non-starchy vegetables, beans and legumes, whole grains, nuts and seeds, seafood, yogurt, and plant oils; and lowers scores for less healthful ingredients like refined grains, red and processed meat, and ultra-processed foods and additives.

    Researchers designed Food Compass with the ever-evolving field of nutrition science in mind, and their multidisciplinary team—comprised of researchers with expertise in epidemiology, medicine, economics, and biomolecular nutrition—will continue to evaluate and adapt the tool based on the most cutting-edge nutrition research.

    “We know Food Compass is not perfect,” said Mozaffarian. “But, it provides a more comprehensive, holistic rating of a food’s nutritional value than existing systems, and these new findings support its validity by showing it predicts better health.”

    These findings are timely given the release of the new U.S. National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition and Health. One pillar of this strategy is to “empower all consumers to make and have access to healthy choices” through measures such as updating food labeling and making it easier to interpret, creating healthier food environments, and creating a healthier food supply.

    “This study further validates Food Compass as a useful tool for defining healthy foods. We hope the Food Compass algorithm—publicly available to all—can help guide front-of-pack labeling; procurement choices in workplace, hospital, and school cafeterias; incentive programs for healthier eating in healthcare and federal nutrition programs; industry reformulations; and government policies around food,” said O’Hearn.  

    Researchers plan to work on a simplified version that requires fewer nutrient inputs, as well as versions tailored to specific conditions such as diabetes and pregnancy or to other nations’ populations. The research team is also interested in adding Food Compass domains based on other aspects of foods, such as environmental sustainability, social justice, or animal welfare.

    “We look forward to continuing to find ways to improve the Food Compass system, and to get it to more users to help clear up confusion about healthier choices,” said Mozaffarian.

    Research reported in this article was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute under award number 2R01HL115189 and Vail Innovative Global Research. Complete information on authors, funders, and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper.

    The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link

  • The College-Admissions Merit Myth

    The College-Admissions Merit Myth

    [ad_1]

    Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two cases that could end America’s experiment with affirmative action in higher education. The challenges to the admissions programs at Harvard and at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill—both brought by Students for Fair Admissions, a coalition of unnamed students assembled by the conservative legal strategist Edward Blum—argue that the institutions discriminate against Asian American students, and that eliminating the use of race in admissions would fix the problem.

    Lower courts have rejected SFFA’s arguments, leaning on more than 40 years of precedent that says the use of race in admissions is permissible in narrow circumstances. “Harvard has demonstrated that no workable and available race-neutral alternatives would allow it to achieve a diverse student body while still maintaining its standards for academic excellence,” Judge Allison Burroughs wrote in her 2019 opinion. But SFFA pressed on, and now the case sits before a conservative Supreme Court that has shown a willingness to overturn well-established precedents.

    In her new book, Is Affirmative Action Fair? The Myth of Equity in College Admissions, Natasha Warikoo, a sociologist at Tufts University who has spent years examining race-conscious admissions, assesses the positions of those for and against affirmative action, and argues that we’re asking the wrong questions about how students get into college. By exalting merit, Warikoo warns, Americans have developed a skewed perception of the process—a perception that leads to challenges such as the one before the Court.

    I spoke with Warikoo about her book, the Supreme Court hearing, and how we can better understand admissions.

    This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.


    Adam Harris: You write, “When we recognize the diverse goals that universities attempt to address through college admissions, it becomes clear that admission is not a certification of individual merit, or deservingness, nor was it ever meant to be.” Can you expand on that idea? Where do we have flaws in our understanding of college admissions?

    Natasha Warikoo: In the past, it was like “We want to have a bar.” You had to have some demonstration that you could handle the work that we’re going to give you. And some of that was exclusionary. It was like “Can you pass the Latin test?” Well, most schools didn’t teach kids Latin, so it’s not that that was fair—it was “You’re going to be doing Latin; do you know Latin?”

    But now, when we’re talking about super-selective places—there are more than 200 of them, so not just the Ivies, but also not most colleges—they have so many different interests that are playing into who they’re admitting. You’ve got the sports coaches who are trying to get their recruits; you’ve got the development office that gives a list and says, “These people have done a lot for this university—make sure you take a close look at that”; there’s the humanities departments who want to make sure there are people interested in the humanities, not just in STEM; the orchestra’s bassoon player may have graduated, and now the orchestra needs a bassoon player. So, there are all these different things that are going on, and the admissions office is trying to fulfill all these different interests and needs.

    But ordinary people treat admissions as, you know, they’re lining people up from best to worst and taking the top ones, and if one of these says they’re not coming, then they take the next person. Well, that’s not how it works. They’re fulfilling organizational needs and desires. But somehow, we treat it as a prize—and whoever is most deserving gets in.

    Harris: That plays into the broader idea in America around merit, and the way that we’ve oriented our society around merit. How do merit and the idea of fairness work together to give us the wrong idea about admission systems?

    Warikoo: In all of these international surveys, when you look at respondents’ belief about whether people should be rewarded for merit over other things, Americans are much more likely to say yes than people in most other countries. A lot of modern societies believe in these ideas of meritocracy, but the United States is especially attached to the idea. We have this belief that some people are deserving—and the unspoken idea that some are undeserving. And there’s a sense of entitlement, like I did all of these things; I deserve a spot at these places.

    But we should stop treating college admissions as if everybody is on an equal playing field and that the person who is the smartest, the most hardworking, the one with the most grit, is the one getting in. Instead of arguing about how affirmative action goes against our ideas of meritocracy, we should look at what colleges are actually trying to do.

    Harris: Well, let’s talk about affirmative action. How has it been viewed since Justice Lewis Powell accepted the diversity rationale in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case in 1978?

    Warikoo: There’s a whole industry of research that develops after that decision to really try to dig into the impact of a diverse learning environment: What is the impact of having a roommate of a different race, going to a college that is diverse, being in a class with students who are a different race? And this research shows all these benefits: Groups make better decisions; students have more intellectual engagement; they improve their racial attitudes. There are even some findings that show a positive impact on civic engagement down the line. A student may not even have a diverse set of friends, but if they’re on a diverse campus, there seems to be some kind of impact.

    So, all of this research shows these positive effects, and those data have been used in subsequent court cases defending affirmative action. But in the public conversation, many people recognize that it’s also an equity issue.

    Harris: In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said the Court expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary. And that’s what a lot of opponents of affirmative action say now: It may have been justified in the past, but it’s no longer necessary—and if we need something, we might be able to find a proxy. Are there proxies for race in admissions?

    Warikoo: The legal requirement is that when you’re using these suspect categories such as race in a policy, you have to show that there’s no other way that you could do things instead. And it’s pretty clear that there’s no good stand-in for race. We can use class, and class is important. But I don’t see these as either-or. The Georgetown law professor Sheryll Cashin has looked at zip code as a stand-in, and it’s pretty clear that such an approach is not going to have an impact on the numbers of underrepresented minority students on campus. Because, you know, the overwhelming majority of people in the United States today are white. The majority of people who are poor in this country are white. So you’re not really going to racially diversify by looking at class.

    Colleges have tried different things, such as the Texas “10 percent plan.” The research suggests that these other ideas are somewhat helpful, but the problem has been that graduation rates can go down when you’re just using a percent plan. And it’s not a stand-in for race-based affirmative action.

    We can look at the data from the states that have banned affirmative action to understand that they have not figured out a stand-in. We see declines in every state, year on year, of the number of underrepresented minorities when affirmative action gets banned.

    Harris: One of the through lines in the book is the purpose of higher education. What can colleges do better to be more honest about their goals?

    Warikoo: One is being careful about how they talk about admissions. And when you dig into their language, many schools say that they’re looking to build a class, and that everyone makes a unique contribution. But they’re still publishing acceptance rates. There are so many ways in which the language they use buys into this idea that they are a place of excellence. This is the best class ever, you’re told when you’re a freshman.

    When you have these elite colleges in which the student body comes from more resourced families than the average across 18 year-olds, it’s not just the best of the best. Your family’s resources play a role—whether you have parents who went to college, whether you grew up in certain neighborhoods or went to certain schools. Two-thirds of American adults don’t have a bachelor’s degree.

    But I keep coming back to the question of What are we trying to do here? Our spending in the U.S. on higher education is regressive. The most elite colleges accept students who are the highest achieving and most resourced. But who needs the most support? When you look at what community colleges are doing in terms of social mobility, they blow places like Harvard and Tufts out of the water. Colleges should think much more about the role they want to play in our society, and how they should align admissions to those goals.

    Harris: As I got toward the end of the book, where you talk about solutions, a couple of things really stuck out: the sort of anti-inclusive instinct that a lot of institutions have in terms of increasing their enrollment, where they don’t want to increase enrollment because that may upset alumni who attach value to the selectiveness of their institution. Or, if there were an admission lottery, families of high achievers may be frustrated. And my takeaway was: There’s really nothing the institutions may be able to do that is going to make everyone happy, so maybe they should just do what’s just.

    Warikoo: Yes. There are so many more amazing 18-year-olds in our country—deserving, hardworking, ambitious, smart, whatever superlative you want to use—than there is space for them at Harvard, at UNC, at any given school.

    But we have to stop acting like you deserve it and you don’t deserve it. It’s not about who deserves it. And that’s why I talk about a lottery system, because it implies you don’t deserve this more than anyone else—you got lucky. It already is luck: that your parents could afford to buy a house near a school that had a college counselor, or you had a tutor who could help you with your essay, or you went to a school with a crew team and you got recruited for crew—all kinds of things. It is luck. Why not call it what it is?

    [ad_2]

    Adam Harris

    Source link

  • The Softer Side of Bats

    The Softer Side of Bats

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — A group of bats is often called a colony. But did you know it’s also referred to as a cauldron? With that kind of language, it’s easy to understand how these winged mammals came to be associated with Halloween. Long portrayed in media as blood-thirsty, disease-carrying night-stalkers, real bats don’t quite live up to their notorious reputation.

    While it’s true they’re nocturnal, most bats do not drink blood or attack humans, with rare exceptions. Though they may not be cute or cuddly, bats make important contributions to the ecosystem as well as to the fields of human medicine and technology.

    Alison Robbins, V92, is assistant director for the Master’s in Conservation Medicine (MCM) program and research assistant professor in the Department of Infectious Disease and Global Health at Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University. She has been at Tufts for nearly 30 years and has been researching bats for 15 years.

    Much of her work has focused on White Nose Syndrome, a fungal disease first detected in New York in 2006 that has killed millions of northern long-eared, little brown, and tri-colored bats across the United States—with some populations declining by as much as a 95%, she says. Still, bats are the second largest group of mammals after rodents, spread on all continents except Antarctica, and found in various ecosystems from forests to deserts.   

    These days, she has shifted gears to population monitoring using a method for finding bats called acoustic monitoring. The work is part of the North American Bat Monitoring Program, or NABat, a continental-wide effort to collect data and look at population trends long term.

    “We have bat detectors that can detect bat calls via monitors we put in the environment for a long period of time,” says Robbins. “Similar to a camera trap, they are sound activated and automatically collect and record ultra-sonic audio calls that bats make while hunting insects. We download and analyze the data. Often, we can tell what species made the call, though some bats have overlapping calls.”

    She recently sat down with Tufts Now to talk about some of the many benefits to having 1,400 species of bats on our planet—even if occasionally, they still give us the creeps.

    Bats are pollinators. They drink nectar from plants and flowers and then spread the pollen as they fly from flower to flower. They’re important for seed dispersal, too. For example, fruit-eating bats in subtropical and tropical regions eat fruits and spread the seeds around in their guano, or excrement. Agave, a plant used to make tequila and grown in Mexico and Southern California, is pollinated solely by bats.

    “Many plants have co-evolved with bats,” says Robbins. “For example, they flower at night, which wouldn’t work for a nectar-seeking bird that flies during the day. Such plants also have special attractions for the bats so they can find the flowering plants. The shape of the flower fits the exact shape of the bats’ faces. This co-evolution is very complicated and millions of years old.”

    They eat so many bugs. Bats eat enough bugs to save more than $3 billion per year across all agricultural production in the United States, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. By some estimates, one little brown bat can eat up to 1,000 bugs in one hour, and nursing mothers may devour 4,000 bugs in an evening.

    “Everybody always wants to know how many mosquitoes bats eat, which I can’t exactly confirm,” says Robbins. “But I think they prefer to hunt larger-bodied insects, like moths, because the mosquito does not provide much for a meal.”

    They help humans learn about flight. “Bats are the only true flighted mammals,” says Robbins, noting that flying squirrels aren’t technically flying, they’re gliding. “Bats provide a biological mechanism for scientists to study in terms of how flight developed.”

    Bats have some impressive abilities that other flighted animals don’t have. For example, they can turn 180 degrees mid-flight with just three wing beats, according to the National Science Foundation (NSF). And their dexterous wings are designed to fold during flight, which is much different than bird wings. The NSF reports that ongoing research on bat wings may lead to better maneuverability of airplanes.

    They’re useful in biomedical research. Flight is an incredibly energetic process, and bats—like some birds—use torpor to help conserve energy. It’s a survival mechanism similar to hibernation in which some warm-blooded animals can lower their heart rates and body temperatures. Bats can survive long periods of time in torpor, which historically has allowed bats to evade virus infection, Robbins says.

    “However, this is a double-edged sword for bats because they also can harbor many viral infections, such as rabies, and not succumb to the diseases. Coronaviruses are very common in bats but may not cause any problems in infected bats, so they have mechanisms for suppressing the viruses.”

    They’re also useful for technological development. Bats use echolocation to navigate flight patterns and find prey. Echolocation works when bats emit a high-frequency sound which bounces off their environment, sending echoes back to the bat. The bat uses the echoes to determine where it is in location to objects from which the echoes came, as well as the size of the objects. Modern technology such as ship sonar and ultrasound imaging were partly inspired by bat echolocation.

    About the sucking blood thing. Only vampire bats consume blood, which they prefer to get from birds, cows, pigs, and other livestock. And they don’t suck the blood; they bite an animal and lick the wound. Found in Central and South America, vampire bats are unlikely to cause problems for most people in North America.

    How Humans Can Help Bats

    Robbins outlined a few ways that humans can be bat friendly, like, for example, when bats get into a house. “A lot of bats prefer houses for their maternal colonies or overwintering,” she says. “Bats will roost in houses where they’ll have babies, usually at the end of May and June, and the young emerge in July and August, which is when most people get random bats flying in their houses. It’s like the young teenager bats that don’t listen to their parents and go the wrong way.”

    In most U.S. states, it’s illegal to try to remove bats from your own house during the summer when the young are present, to help protect the population—and it’s not a good idea anyway, Robbins says. Call a licensed animal control officer instead.

    Not using pesticides or insecticides on yards and landscaping can help because bats eat insects that may have high levels of pesticides. Also, bats like the crevasses and cracked bark in old trees, so consider leaving them in the yard instead of chopping them down. For those folks who really love bats, Robbins suggests building a bat house on your property. Here are instructions from the National Wildlife Foundation.

    Lastly, a note of caution that bat-friendliness is in spirit only. “Do not handle a downed bat,” Robbins stresses, “because they are much more likely to have rabies than a bat that is flying around the house, which is a normal behavior.”

    [ad_2]

    Tufts University

    Source link