ReportWire

Tag: Trump administration

  • Trump threatens to punish countries with tariffs if they don’t back U.S. controlling Greenland

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump suggested Friday that he may punish countries with tariffs if they don’t back the U.S. controlling Greenland, a message that came as a bipartisan Congressional delegation sought to lower tensions in the Danish capital.

    Trump for months has insisted that the U.S. should control Greenland, a semiautonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark, and said earlier this week that anything less than the Arctic island being in U.S. hands would be “unacceptable.”

    During an unrelated event at the White House about rural health care, he recounted Friday how he had threatened European allies with tariffs on pharmaceuticals.

    “I may do that for Greenland too,” Trump said. “I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security. So I may do that,” he said.

    He had not previously mentioned using tariffs to try to force the issue.

    Earlier this week, the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland met in Washington this week with U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

    That encounter didn’t resolve the deep differences, but did produce an agreement to set up a working group — on whose purpose Denmark and the White House then offered sharply diverging public views.

    European leaders have insisted that is only for Denmark and Greenland to decide on matters concerning the territory, and Denmark said this week that it was increasing its military presence in Greenland in cooperation with allies.

    A relationship that ‘we need to nurture’

    In Copenhagen, a group of senators and members of the House of Representatives met Friday with Danish and Greenlandic lawmakers, and with leaders including Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen.

    Delegation leader Sen. Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, thanked the group’s hosts for “225 years of being a good and trusted ally and partner” and said that “we had a strong and robust dialog about how we extend that into the future.”

    Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said after meeting lawmakers that the visit reflected a strong relationship over decades and “it is one that we need to nurture.” She told reporters that “Greenland needs to be viewed as our ally, not as an asset, and I think that’s what you’re hearing with this delegation.”

    A bipartisan delegation of U.S. lawmakers met the leaders of Denmark and Greenland in Copenhagen Friday to reassure them of congressional support, despite President Trump’s threats to seize the Arctic island.

    The tone contrasted with that emanating from the White House. Trump has sought to justify his calls for a U.S. takeover by repeatedly claiming that China and Russia have their own designs on Greenland, which holds vast untapped reserves of critical minerals. The White House hasn’t ruled out taking the territory by force.

    “We have heard so many lies, to be honest and so much exaggeration on the threats towards Greenland,” said Aaja Chemnitz, a Greenlandic politician and member of the Danish parliament who took part in Friday’s meetings. “And mostly, I would say the threats that we’re seeing right now is from the U.S. side.”

    Murkowski emphasized the role of Congress in spending and in conveying messages from constituents.

    “I think it is important to underscore that when you ask the American people whether or not they think it is a good idea for the United States to acquire Greenland, the vast majority, some 75%, will say, we do not think that that is a good idea,” she said.

    Along with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, Murkowski has introduced bipartisan legislation that would prohibit the use of U.S. Defense or State department funds to annex or take control of Greenland or the sovereign territory of any NATO member state without that ally’s consent or authorization from the North Atlantic Council.

    Because it straddles the Arctic Circle among the United States, Russia and Europe, Greenland is a geopolitical prize that the U.S. and others have eyed for more than 150 years. It’s even more valuable as the Arctic opens up more to shipping and trade.

    Inuit council criticizes White House statements

    The dispute is looming large in the lives of Greenlanders. Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, said on Tuesday that “if we have to choose between the United States and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark. We choose NATO. We choose the Kingdom of Denmark. We choose the EU.””

    The chair of the Nuuk, Greenland-based Inuit Circumpolar Council, which represents around 180,000 Inuit from Alaska, Canada, Greenland, and Russia’s Chukotka region on international issues, said persistent statements from the White House that the U.S. must own Greenland offer “a clear picture of how the US administration views the people of Greenland, how the U.S. administration views Indigenous peoples, and peoples that are few in numbers.”

    Sara Olsvig told The Associated Press in Nuuk that the issue is “how one of the biggest powers in the world views other peoples that are less powerful than them. And that really is concerning.”

    Indigenous Inuit in Greenland do not want to be colonized again, she said.

    ___

    Superville reported from Washington. Emma Burrows in Nuuk, Greenland and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Niemann and Darlene Superville | The Associated Press

    Source link

  • What’s next for Maryland man awaiting a decision on whether he can stay in the US – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March of last year, will learn next month whether the federal government might re-detain him.

    Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March of last year, will learn next month whether the federal government might re-detain him.

    Maryland federal Judge Paula Xinis says she will rule by Feb. 12 whether the removal order granted a year ago was a final one. If she determines it was, the government could take him back into custody.

    In the meantime, Abrego Garcia, 30, is spending time with his American wife, Jennifer, and other family members in Maryland. He was released from an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility just before Christmas, according to his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg.

    “For him the homecoming was incredibly emotional,” said Sandoval-Moshenberg. “This is a person who spent nearly all of 2025 in a jail or detention center.”

    Abrego Garcia immigrated illegally from El Salvador to the United States as a teenager, and had since been living and working in Maryland.

    He was first detained in March 2025 and then mistakenly deported to El Salvador, despite an order mandating that he not be sent there for safety reasons.

    The government then returned him in June, only to subsequently take him back into custody and charge him with human trafficking in Tennessee. Abrego Garcia denies those charges; a trial for those charges was delayed pending the resolution of his deportation status.

    The Donald Trump administration has named a number of places Abrego Garcia could be deported, including several nations in Africa. His preference would be to be deported to Costa Rica, where he would not be in fear of being re-deported to El Salvador.

    Costa Rica has already agreed to grant Abrego Garcia legal refugee status.

    “It’s been the U.S. government that’s keeping him in this country,” said Sandoval-Moshenberg. “Our argument isn’t that he can’t be deported; our argument is that he must be deported. But he must be deported to Costa Rica because that’s the country that’s offered him safety.”

    The Trump administration has insisted, without proof, that Abrego Garcia is a violent gang member. He has said he has never been a member of MS-13 or any other criminal gang.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Alan Etter

    Source link

  • Contributor: This time the U.S. isn’t hiding why it’s toppling a Latin American nation

    [ad_1]

    In the aftermath of the U.S. military strike that seized Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on Jan. 3, the Trump administration has emphasized its desire for unfettered access to Venezuela’s oil more than conventional foreign policy objectives, such as combating drug trafficking or bolstering democracy and regional stability.

    During his first news conference after the operation, President Trump claimed oil companies would play an important role and that the oil revenue would help fund any further intervention in Venezuela.

    Soon after, “Fox & Friends” hosts asked Trump about this prediction.

    We have the greatest oil companies in the world,” Trump replied, “the biggest, the greatest, and we’re gonna be very much involved in it.”

    As a historian of U.S.-Latin American relations, I’m not surprised that oil or any other commodity is playing a role in U.S. policy toward the region. What has taken me aback, though, is the Trump administration’s openness about how much oil is driving its policies toward Venezuela.

    As I’ve detailed recently, U.S. military intervention in Latin America has largely been covert. And when the U.S. orchestrated the coup that ousted Guatemala’s democratically elected president in 1954, the U.S. covered up the role that economic considerations played in that operation.

    By the early 1950s, Guatemala had become a top source for the bananas Americans consumed, as it remains today.

    The United Fruit Company, based in Boston, owned more than 550,000 acres of Guatemalan land, largely thanks to its deals with previous dictatorships. These holdings required the intense labor of impoverished farmworkers who were often forced from their traditional lands. Their pay was rarely stable, and they faced periodic layoffs and wage cuts.

    The international corporation networked with dictators and local officials in Central America, many Caribbean islands and parts of South America to acquire immense estates for railroads and banana plantations.

    The locals called it the pulpo — “octopus” in Spanish — because the company seemingly had a hand in shaping the region’s politics, economies and everyday life. The Colombian government brutally crushed a 1928 strike by United Fruit workers, killing hundreds of people.

    The company’s seemingly unlimited clout in the countries where it operated gave rise to the stereotype of Central American nations as “banana republics.”

    In Guatemala, a country historically marked by extreme inequality, a broad coalition formed in 1944 to overthrow its repressive dictatorship in a popular uprising. Inspired by the anti-fascist ideals of World War II, the coalition sought to make the nation more democratic and its economy more fair.

    After decades of repression, the nation democratically elected Juan José Arévalo and then Jacobo Árbenz, under whom, in 1952, Guatemala implemented a land reform program that gave landless farmworkers their own undeveloped plots. Guatemala’s government asserted that these policies would build a more equitable society for Guatemala’s impoverished, Indigenous majority.

    United Fruit denounced Guatemala’s reforms as the result of a global conspiracy. It alleged that most of Guatemala’s unions were controlled by Mexican and Soviet communists and painted the land reform as a ploy to destroy capitalism.

    United Fruit sought to enlist the U.S. government in its fight against the elected government’s policies. While its executives did complain that Guatemala’s reforms hurt its financial investments and labor costs, they also cast any interference in its operations as part of a broader communist plot.

    It did this through an advertising campaign in the U.S. and by taking advantage of the anti-communist paranoia that prevailed at the time.

    United Fruit executives began to meet with officials in the Truman administration as early as 1945. Despite the support of sympathetic ambassadors, the U.S. government apparently wouldn’t intervene directly in Guatemala’s affairs.

    The company turned to Congress.

    It hired well connected lobbyists to portray Guatemala’s policies as part of a communist plot to destroy capitalism and the United States. In February 1949, multiple members of Congress denounced Guatemala’s labor reforms as communist.

    Sen. Claude Pepper called the labor code “obviously intentionally discriminatory against this American company” and “a machine gun aimed at the head of this American company.”

    Two days later, Rep. John McCormack echoed that statement, using the exact same words to denounce the reforms.

    Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., Sen. Lister Hill and Rep. Mike Mansfield also went on the record, reciting the talking points outlined in United Fruit memos.

    No lawmaker said a word about bananas.

    Seventy-seven years later, we may see many echoes of past interventions, but now the U.S. government has dropped the veil: In his appearance after the strike that seized Maduro this month, Trump said “oil” 21 times.

    Aaron Coy Moulton is an associate professor of Latin American history at Stephen F. Austin State University in Texas and the author of “Caribbean Blood Pacts: Guatemala and the Cold War Struggle for Freedom.” This article was produced in collaboration with the Conversation.

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Coy Moulton

    Source link

  • What is the Insurrection Act and how could Trump use it to stop protesters in Minneapolis?

    [ad_1]


    What is the Insurrection Act and how could Trump use it to stop protesters in Minneapolis? – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    President Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis to stop protesters with military force. “The Daily Report” explores what this would allow the president to do, and CBS News’ Jessica Levinson has more legal analysis.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • ‘It feels like an invasion’: Minnesotans stunned as federal agents flood their state

    [ad_1]

    MINNEAPOLIS — The federal agents arrived weeks ago. But since the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good, their numbers have swelled — and people here say the weight of it all is inescapable. Agents are flooding the sidewalks of their neighborhoods, honks and whistles sound when they are near and, occasionally, the smell of chemical agents wafts by.

    The scale, the sustained intensity and the aggression demonstrated by law enforcement deployed here appears to be greater than immigration enforcement operations that took place in other blue cities like Chicago, Los Angeles and Charlotte, North Carolina, all of which are larger than Minneapolis in land mass and population.

    The officers are in unmarked cars idling on neighborhood streets. They are going door to door, residents said. They are seen inside of stores and in retail parking lots, including at the Target in Richfield, south of Minneapolis, the day after Good was killed.

    Videos from residents are proliferating on social media of violent arrests, including a woman dragged from her car. Some videos provided to NBC News by activists show agents smashing car windows or spraying chemicals point blank into the faces of residents.

    “It feels like an invasion,” said a woman who asked not to be named out of fear of retaliation. She was protesting at the Whipple federal detention facility at 7 a.m. on a frigid, 12-degree morning. The woman, a restaurant owner, said she closed her business temporarily because she was trying to protect her employees who were immigrants. “It feels very much like a Nazi Germany situation to me. It needs to stop, and people need to know what’s going on.”

    Neighbors who live near the street where Renee Good was killed say the community has had no time to recover. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images)

    The focus of Operation Metro Surge, as the Trump administration has branded this latest immigration effort, appears to have broadened beyond mass deportations and has included confrontations with anti-ICE protesters. The shooting of Good and the scope of the deployment has heightened the tense mood in a nation already bitterly divided over immigration issues and the Trump administration’s tactics. Interviews with neighbors, community leaders and organized protesters reveal a sense of being under invasion.

    On Wednesday night, a man was shot in the leg after DHS said he attacked an agent with a snow shovel aor broom handle. “Fearing for his life and safety as he was being ambushed by three individuals, the officer fired defensive shots to defend his life,” the department said.

    Mayor Jacob Frey said at a news conference after Wednesday’s shooting that the city was being put in an “impossible situation.”

    MINNEAPOLIS, UNITED STATES - JANUARY 13: Federal Agents arrest a woman after smashing her car windows for allegedly blocking the street during an Immigration Enforcement Operation in Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, U.S., January 13, 2026. (Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Federal officers have smashed car windows and arrested people they said were obstructing enforcement operations. (Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - JANUARY 11: Border Patrol agents take a man into custody on January 11, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Trump administration has sent an estimated 2,000 federal immigration agents into the area in a push to arrest undocumented immigrants. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    Immigration officers have been flooding neighborhoods, knocking on doors in pursuit of non-U.S. citizens. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    “We are trying to find a way forward to keep people safe, to protect our neighbors, to protect order,” Frey said, while also warning protesters against “taking the bait.” He added that the city has 600 police officers compared to the 3,000 federal immigration agents present. Of that number, more than 2,000 are ICE officers and agents, hundreds are Border Patrol agents and others are from Justice Department agencies, federal law enforcement officials told NBC News.

    A group of area residents visiting Good’s memorial site on Tuesday described masked immigration officers wearing camouflage going door to door, saying they were looking for non-U.S. citizens. They, and others interviewed, described it taking place around Lake Street, Uptown and the Powderhorn neighborhoods.

    Those actions reflect what Vice President J.D. Vance said agents would be doing.

    “I think we’re going to see those deportation numbers ramp up as we get more and more people online, working for ICE, going door-to-door and making sure that if you’re an illegal alien, you’ve got to get out of this country and if you want to come back, apply through the proper channels,” Vance said on Fox News last week. He had also suggested earlier that the ICE officer who shot Good would have “absolute immunity.”

    Good’s killing has shaken a Midwestern city already carrying deep wounds from the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020. In the days since Good’s fateful encounter with an armed ICE officer, there was no letup by law enforcement. In interviews, neighbors who live near the street where the 37-year-old mother and U.S. citizen was killed say the community has had no time to recover.

    Federal agents detain a protester near the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 9, 2026. A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed an American woman on the streets of Minneapolis January 7, leading to huge protests and outrage from local leaders who rejected White House claims she was a domestic terrorist. The woman, identified in local media as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, was hit at point blank range as she apparently tried to drive away from agents who were crowding around her car, which they said was blocking their way. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images)

    Federal officers regularly detain protesters outside the Whipple Federal Building. (Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP via Getty Images)

    One resident who spoke with NBC News described their own arrest hours after Good was killed, providing video evidence of the encounter. They said they were monitoring an immigration operation when agents said their vehicle was in the way. They believed the agents had space to go around their car, which was seen in the video as being positioned horizontally on the street.

    The video showed agents breaking the windows of the person’s car, before reaching in to pepper spray both the passenger and the driver. The person, who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation, said they were punched in the face after pulling down an agent’s mask who was dragging them out of the vehicle.

    “I was just so angry. I said: ‘Show yourself, coward!’” they said.

    The person said that after being thrown to the ground and arrested, they were taken to an ICE facility at the Whipple Building, which they described as bursting at the seams with more than 20 people crammed into each cell that, in this person’s experience, could reasonably feel too crowded with five people.

    Federal law enforcement agents confront anti-ICE protesters during a demonstration outside the Bishop Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 15, 2026. Hundreds more federal agents were heading to Minneapolis, the US homeland security chief said on January 11, brushing aside demands by the Midwestern city's Democratic leaders to leave after an immigration officer fatally shot a woman protester. In multiple TV interviews, US Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem defended the actions of the officer who shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, whose death has sparked renewed protests nationwide against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

    The Whipple Building, which holds an ICE facility, has been the site of daily protests. (Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images)

    The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment about their account.

    In the days that have followed, intensive arrest operations have continued close to the Good memorial site, with one taking place just a block and a half and another three blocks away. Confrontations between law enforcement and protesters are playing out almost in real time, with both sides revved up.

    In one video, an officer reaches out of his passenger’s side window to shoot a stream of red chemicals point-blank into a woman’s face as she stands in front of his car while he tries to drive away.

    Where federal officers are present, there are usually also protesters, activists and residents blowing whistles, honking their horns — and invariably filming.

    Those videos are then quickly disseminated from Minneapolis across the internet, showing agents asking drivers at an electric vehicle station whether they are citizens or dragging a screaming woman out of her car.

    As the videos inflame divisions online, the pushback has intensified on the ground.

    Drive along a neighborhood street and one can hear the honking break out in traffic, warning that immigration agents are nearby. At busy intersections, like near Karmel Mall, where a diverse mix of residents walk and shop, community members can at times be seen posted up, warning whistles slung around their necks.

    MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA - JANUARY 13:  An observer is detained by ICE agents after they arrested two people from a residence on January 13, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Trump administration has deployed over 2,400 Department of Homeland Security agents to the state of Minnesota in a push to apprehend undocumented immigrants. (Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

    The Trump administration said it would target for arrest anyone interfering with immigration enforcement. (Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

    Mark, another resident of the Bryant Central neighborhood, the diverse area of the city where some of the operations are playing out, said he felt as if the swarms of fatigue-laden officers he was seeing across his city was punishment for not voting for the president.

    He visited the site of Good’s memorial for four consecutive days, he said, for a simple reason.

    “This is wrong,” Mark said. He asked that his last name not be used because of fear of retaliation. “I truly feel Minnesota is being targeted because of who we voted for.”

    Mark, who is African American, was inside his car when he saw an ICE operation taking place nearby. He heard loud noises, he said, and tried turning around to return to his home and check on his family.

    He described immigration officers surrounding his car and accusing him of trying to obstruct their operation. They took his phone, he said. Mark then explained to them he was simply trying to walk to his home. After keeping his phone for about 15 minutes, they returned it, he said.

    “The City of Minneapolis again demands that ICE leave the city and state immediately,” the city posted on X Wednesday night. “We stand by our immigrant and refugee communities — know that you have our full support.”

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Thursday that President Trump is weighing whether to invoke the Insurrection Act over protests in Minnesota. “If anything doesn’t change with Governor Walz, I don’t anticipate that the streets will get any safer or more peaceful.”

    Matt Lavietes and Joy Y. Wang contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Natasha Korecki | NBC News

    Source link

  • Pentagon to send additional forces to the Middle East as Iran tensions rise

    [ad_1]

    Iran signaled it would not move ahead with executing protesters and reopened its airspace Thursday, as President Donald Trump left it unclear whether he would take military action over the regime’s deadly crackdown.

    The Pentagon is preparing to send additional U.S. forces and assets to the Middle East, a U.S. official told NBC News on Wednesday.

    This includes a carrier strike group, additional aircraft and land-based air defense systems, the official said. The additional forces are to bolster the military’s assets in the region as tensions remain high and the president considers military action in Iran, the official said. The forces are also to ensure the military is prepared if Iran lashes out at American assets or U.S. allies in the region, according to the official.

    The equipment and thousands of additional forces will arrive in the coming days and weeks, the official said.

    The United States began evacuating key personnel from its largest military base in the Middle East on Wednesday as the prospect of an American strike loomed, and activists said the death toll in Iran had passed 2,500.

    But speaking by phone to NBC News on Thursday, Trump said “we saved a lot of lives yesterday,” an apparent reference to his claim that the Iranian regime has stopped killing protesters and halted some planned executions, which he had previously warned could trigger a U.S. military response.

    Trump did not say whether he has decided to take action on Iran, responding: “I’m not going to tell you that.”

    FILE — Fires are lit as protesters rally Jan. 8 in Tehran. (Photo by Getty Images)

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a daily news briefing Thursday that “the president understands 800 executions that were scheduled and supposed to take place yesterday were halted,” though she did not detail the source for the figure.

    She said Trump had made it clear to Iran that “if the killing continues, there will be grave consequences,” adding that “all options remain on the table.”

    Iran’s judiciary said Thursday that a man feared to be facing the first execution would not face the death penalty.

    Erfan Soltani, 26, was expected to be the first protester to face execution, according to the State Department and human rights groups.

    Iran’s judiciary said that he had not been sentenced to capital punishment. Soltani’s charge of “colluding against the country’s internal security and propaganda activities against the regime” did not carry the death penalty but he remained behind bars, state media reported.

    The Norway-based Hengaw Organization for Human Rights said his execution had been “postponed,” citing information from Soltani’s relatives. Amnesty International said the same, citing a source.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also appeared to step back from official calls for rapid justice by telling Fox News that there would not be “any hanging today or tomorrow or whatever.” He said, “I’m confident about that. There is no plan for hanging at all.”

    But Iran’s defense minister, Brig. Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh, told state media Thursday that Iran would use all its capabilities to “suppress armed savage terrorists.”

    Earlier in the day, Trump said in the Oval Office, “It’s stopped. It’s stopping, and there’s no plan for executions.”

    Discussing the response from security forces, Trump said that “people were shooting at them with guns, and they were shooting back.” He added: “And you know, it’s one of those things.”

    Trump is ready to follow through on his repeated promises to protesters that the U.S. would intervene militarily to support them, but has told his advisers he would want any action to deliver a swift and decisive blow to the regime, according to a U.S. official, two people familiar with the discussions and a person close to the White House.

    They have so far not been able to give him that guarantee, the sources said.

    With the world watching for potential signs of U.S. action, Iran closed its airspace for nearly five hours overnight into Thursday, issuing a “NOTAM” — or “notice to all airmen” — that all flights were banned except ones to and from Tehran that had been given special permission.

    During that time, FlightRadar24 and other tracking websites showed no planes over the country, which lies along key East-West aviation routes. That notice was valid for around two hours and nearly five hours, later some planes were seeing making their way toward Tehran, FlightRadar24 showed.

    Iran closed its airspace during its 12-day aerial conflict with Israel in June.

    Despite the resumed air traffic and calmer rhetoric, the country is still reeling from the crackdown on the unrest that rocked the Islamic Republic, according to activists and analysts.

    The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency said Wednesday that it had confirmed more than 2,600 deaths — including 150 security personnel — and more than 18,000 arrests in protests that were sparked by skyrocketing inflation and the crash of the Iranian rial against the U.S. dollar.

    Protests kicked off in the capital, Tehran, but had spread to 187 cities around the country, according to HRANA.

    The advocacy group says it relies on supporters in Iran cross-checking information and that its data goes through “multiple internal checks.” HRANA attributed a dramatic rise in its death toll this week to Iranians’ ability to make their first calls to the outside world in days since an internet and phone blackout. Authorities have not released an official death toll.

    There have been harsh crackdowns on protests in the past but the level of violence in recent days indicated security forces had “waged their deadliest crackdown yet,” Amnesty International said in a report Wednesday.

    The ruling clergy has not indicated that it will back off the ongoing crackdown to maintain the Islamic Republic, analysts say.

    “Whatever political legitimacy it had is long gone,” Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, told NBC News in a text message response to questions. “It still has a repressive capacity and dwindling base of support, but its long twilight keeps getting darker.”


    Marin Scott, Colin Sheeley, Gordon Lubold, Courtney Kube and Mosheh Gains contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Babak Dehghanpisheh, Alexander Smith and Kristen Welker | NBC News

    Source link

  • ACLU of Minnesota to file class action suit for constitutional rights violations by federal agents

    [ad_1]


    The American Civil Liberties Union is filing a new class action lawsuit against the federal government on behalf of three Minnesotans – two Somali men and one Latino man – “whose constitutional rights were violated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and other federal agents,” the ACLU of Minnesota announced Thursday morning.

    The announcement comes just hours after President Trump threatened to use the Insurrection Act to send U.S. troops into Minnesota to “put an end” to protests. There are currently 3,000 federal agents in Minnesota amid Operation Metro Surge, in which officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security say has so far yielded 2,500 arrests since it began last month.

    On Wednesday night, an ICE officer shot a Venezuelan migrant in the leg in north Minneapolis, leading to violent clashes between protesters, federal law enforcement and Minneapolis police. The shooting occurred exactly one week after 37-year-old Renee Good was fatally shot by ICE officer Jonathan Ross in south Minneapolis.

    Federal government officials tell CBS News the migrant and two others allegedly attacked the officer with a snow shovel and a broom handle as the officer tried to make an arrest.

    Within an hour before the shooting, Gov. Tim Walz gave a rare primetime address to Minnesotans where he urged Mr. Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to “end this occupation.” He also called on Minnesotans to protest peacefully and record ICE activity to aid in future prosecutions.

    This story will be updated.

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Swanson

    Source link

  • The Earth keeps getting hotter, and Americans’ trust in science is on a down trend

    [ad_1]

    As global officials confirm that 2025 was Earth’s third-hottest year on record, a new poll shows Americans are sharply divided over the role of science in the United States.

    A report published Thursday by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center found that a majority of Americans want the U.S. to be a world leader in science, but Republicans and Democrats disagree on whether it is.

    About two-thirds of Democrats, 65%, fear the U.S. is losing ground to other countries when it comes to scientific achievement — a 28-point increase since 2023, the poll found. Republicans have moved in the opposite direction, with far fewer saying the U.S. is losing ground than in the past, 32%, a 12-point decrease in that same time frame.

    The divide mirrors “other partisan differences in attitudes around science we have been tracking for years,” the Pew report says. “In particular, partisan differences in trust in scientists and the value of science for society are far wider than they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. Republicans have become less confident in scientists and less likely to say science has had a mostly positive effect on society, while Democratic views are largely unchanged.”

    The report notes that the Trump administration has reshaped federal science policy, including eliminating research grants, cutting science and health workforces, and shifting priorities away from climate change research. Last month, the administration dismantled one of the world’s leading climate and weather research institutions, the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.

    About 90% of Democrats say they have at least a fair amount of confidence in scientists, but only 65% of Republicans said the same, according to the poll, which surveyed 5,111 U.S. adults in October. The gap in confidence between both parties on this point has been broadly similar in every survey since 2021.

    Experts said the findings are not particularly surprising.

    “It’s part of a larger trend toward the politicization of science,” said Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at Berkeley Earth, citing issues such as vaccines and climate change. He said concerns about “falling behind” may be warranted as “the U.S. is very much doubling down on being a ‘petro state’ — exporting our oil and gas — whereas other parts of the world, particularly China, are doubling down on exporting clean energy technologies like wind, solar and batteries.”

    The report lands as the world continues to head in the wrong direction when it comes to global warming.

    On Wednesday, eight international groups released data confirming that 2025 was Earth’s third-hottest year on record — nearly tied with 2023 and just behind 2024, the warmest year on record. The groups include the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA, the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service, the Japan Meteorological Agency and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology.

    The past 11 years have been the 11 warmest on record, according to Copernicus.

    Last year’s global average temperature was about 2.65 degrees above pre-industrial levels, the baseline against which global warming is measured. That means it was just shy of the 2.7 degree limit (1.5 degrees Celsius) established under the 2015 Paris climate agreement, an internationally recognized tipping point for the worst effects of climate change.

    “The news is not encouraging, and the urgency of climate action has never been more important,” Mauro Facchini, head of Earth observation at the European Commission’s Directorate General for Defense Industry and Space, told reporters this week.

    Yet Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris agreement on his first day back in office, a move he also made during his first term as president. This month, he also withdrew the U.S. from 66 other international organizations and treaties, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, from which the Paris agreement stems.

    The world is now on track to breach the Paris agreement’s limit for long-term global warming before the end of the decade — several years earlier than predicted, according to Hausfather, who also helped produce Berkeley Earth’s global temperature report that was released this week. He said it is likely that 2026 will fall “somewhere between the second and fourth warmest” years on record.

    “The new data is the latest unequivocal evidence that our climate is in crisis,” said Carlos Martinez, a senior climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists. But “the Trump administration is not simply refusing to face the reality of climate change we are experiencing, it is actively lying about science and undermining our nation’s federal scientific resources.”

    Last year wasn’t only warm globally. The contiguous U.S. experienced the fourth-warmest year in its 131-year record, according to NOAA’s assessment. Utah and Nevada recorded their warmest years on record at 4.3 degrees and 3.7 degrees above their 20th century averages, respectively. California tied for its fourth-warmest year on record.

    NOAA previously tracked weather and climate disasters where damages exceed $1 billion, but the Trump administration shut down that database last year. The administration also fired hundreds of scientists working to prepare the congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment and removed the website that housed previous assessments.

    Officials with multiple international groups this week stressed that global cooperation is key as warmer temperatures worldwide worsen the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heat waves, wildfires and floods.

    “Collaborative and scientifically rigorous global data collection is more important than ever before because we need to ensure that Earth information is authoritative, accessible and actionable for all,” said Celeste Saulo, secretary-general of the World Meteorological Organization.

    “Data and observations are essential to our efforts to confront climate change and air quality challenges, and these challenges don’t know borders,” said Florian Pappenberger, director-general of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. However, he noted that NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs has committed to not deleting any data, “which is a welcome thing.”

    “Data don’t lie,” Pappenberger said. “All we need to do is measure them.”

    [ad_2]

    Hayley Smith

    Source link

  • Minnesota Gov. Walz tells Trump, Noem to

    [ad_1]

    In a rare primetime address Wednesday evening, Gov. Tim Walz gave a six-minute-long address to Minnesotans where he called on President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to “end this occupation.”

    Walz’s address came hours after Noem’s department announced Operation Metro Surge has led to 2,500 arrests in Minnesota since it began last month.

    “What’s happening in Minnesota right now defies belief,” Walz said. “News reports simply don’t do justice to the level of chaos and disruption and trauma the federal government is raining down upon our communities.”

    On Tuesday, Homeland Security officials told CBS News there are now 800 U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents in the Minneapolis area. That’s in addition to 2,000 other ICE and federal agents already in the state in what officials call the “largest DHS operation in history.”

    “Donald Trump intends for it to get worse. This week, he went online to promise that quote, ‘the day of retribution and reckoning is coming,’” Walz said in his addresss. “That’s a direct threat against the people of this state who dared to vote against him three times and who continue to stand up for freedom with courage and empathy and profound grace.”

    The governor went on to urge Minnesotans to “protest loudly, urgently, but also peacefully.” He also called on residents to “peacefully film ICE agents.”

    “If you see these ICE agents in your neighborhood, take out that phone and hit record,” Walz said. “Help us create a database of the atrocities against Minnesotans, not just to establish a record for posterity, but to bank evidence for future prosecution.”

    Walz also expressed pride for his fellow Minnesotans, calling the state “an island of decency in a country being driven towards cruelty.”

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz

    WCCO


    “We will remain an island of decency, of justice, of community, of peace, and tonight I come before you simply to ask, don’t let anyone take that away from us,” he said.

    Walz gives a constitutionally-required annual address before the Legislature, known as the “State of the State.” But other statewide addresses that the governor has planned happen infrequently. 

    His staff notes that he addressed residents during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder.

    Lawyers representing the state of Minnesota, along with the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, were in court Wednesday morning in the hopes of getting federal Judge Kate Menendez to issue a temporary restraining order to pause ICE activities in Minnesota

    Menendez said she would not issue that restraining order until after the federal government filed its response and the state made additional filings.

    The hearing is part of a larger federal lawsuit by the state and cities attempting to get the federal government to halt all law enforcement operations in Minnesota.

    Below is the full transcript of Walz’s address. Watch the full video here.


    What’s happening in Minnesota right now defies belief. News reports simply don’t do justice to the level of chaos and disruption and trauma the federal government is raining down upon our communities.

    Two-thousand to 3,000 armed agents of the federal government have been deployed to Minnesota. Armed, masked, undertrained ICE agents are going door to door, ordering people to point out where their neighbors of color live.

    They’re pulling over people indiscriminately, including U.S. citizens, and demanding to see their papers. And at grocery stores, at bus stops, even at our schools they’re breaking windows, dragging pregnant women down the street, just plain grabbing Minnesotans and shoving them into unmarked vans, kidnapping innocent people with no warning and no due process.

    Let’s be very, very clear: this long ago stopped being a matter of immigration enforcement. Instead, it’s a campaign of organized brutality against the people of Minnesota by our own federal government.

    Last week, that campaign claimed the life of Renee Nicole Good. We’ve all watched the video. We’ve all seen what happened, and yet instead of conducting an impartial investigation so we can hold accountable the officer responsible for Renee’s death, the Trump administration is devoting the full power of the federal government to finding an excuse to attack the victim and her family.

    Just yesterday, six federal prosecutors, including the longtime career prosecutor leading the charge to investigate and eliminate fraud in our state’s programs, quit their jobs rather than go along with this assault on the United States Constitution.

    But as bad as it’s been, Donald Trump intends for it to get worse. This week, he went online to promise that quote, the day of retribution and reckoning is coming.

    That’s a direct threat against the people of this state who dared to vote against him three times and who continue to stand up for freedom with courage and empathy and profound grace.

    All across Minnesota people are stepping up to help their neighbors who are being unjustly and unlawfully targeted. They’re distributing care packages and walking kids to school and raising their voices in peaceful protest, even though doing so has made many of our fellow Minnesotans targets for violent retribution.

    Folks, I know it’s scary, and I know it’s absurd that we all have to defend law and order, justice and humanity while also caring for our families and trying to do our jobs.

    So tonight, let me say once again to Donald Trump and Kristi Noem: End this occupation. You’ve done enough.

    Let me say four critical things to the people of Minnesota, four things I want you to hear as you watch the news and look out for your neighbors:

    First, Donald Trump wants this chaos. He wants confusion, and yes, he wants more violence on our streets. We cannot give him what he wants. 

    We can, we must protest loudly, urgently, but also peacefully. Indeed, as hard as we will fight in the courts and at the ballot box, we cannot and will not let violence prevail.

    You’re angry. I’m angry. Angry is not a strong enough word, but we must remain peaceful.

    Second, you are not powerless, you are not helpless, and you are certainly not alone. All across Minnesota, people are learning about opportunities not just to resist, but to help people who are in danger.

    Thousands upon thousands of our fellow Minnesotans are going to be relying on mutual aid in the days and weeks to come, and they need our support.

    Tonight I wanna share another way you can help: witness. Help us establish a record of exactly what’s happening in our communities.

    You have an absolute right to peacefully film ICE agents as they conduct these activities, so carry your phone with you at all times, and if you see these ICE agents in your neighborhood, take out that phone and hit record.

    Help us create a database of the atrocities against Minnesotans, not just to establish a record for posterity, but to bank evidence for future prosecution.

    The third thing I want to say to you tonight is we will not have to live like this forever. Accountability is coming at the voting booth and in court. 

    We will reclaim our communities from Donald Trump. We will reestablish a sense of safety for our neighbors, and we will bring an end to this moment of chaos, confusion and trauma.

    We will find a way to move forward and we’ll do it together. And will not be alone. Every day we are working with business leaders, faith leaders, legal experts and elected officials from across this country. They’ve all seen what Donald Trump is trying to do to our state, and they know their states could be next.

    And that brings me to the fourth thing I wanna say tonight Minnesota, how incredibly proud I am of the way that you’ve risen to meet this unbearable moment. But I’m not at all surprised because this, this is who we are.

    Minnesotans believe in the rule of law, and Minnesotans believe in the dignity of all people. We’re a place where there’s room for everybody, no matter who you are or who you love or where you came from. A place where we feed our kids, we take care of our neighbors and we look out for those in the shadows of life.

    We’re an island of decency in a country being driven towards cruelty. We will remain an island of decency, of justice, of community, of peace, and tonight I come before you simply to ask, don’t let anyone take that away from us.

    Thank you. Protect each other, and may God bless the people of Minnesota.


    This story will be updated.

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Swanson

    Source link

  • Trump administration targets sanctuary jurisdictions, immigrant visas

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration announced this week a tightening of immigration policies on two fronts: by pausing immigrant visas from 75 countries and by threatening to cut federal funding for sanctuary states and cities that do not fully comply with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    President Donald Trump has once again warned that jurisdictions with sanctuary policies could face financial consequences, accusing local governments of protecting criminals rather than cooperating with federal authorities.

    “They do everything possible to protect criminals at the expense of American citizens,” Trump said.

    It marks the president’s third attempt to penalize sanctuary cities by withholding federal funds, after similar efforts were blocked by the courts in the past. Trump argues that local governments are refusing to work with immigration officials, adding that “it breeds fraud and crime and all of the other problems that come, so we’re not making any payment to anybody that supports sanctuary cities.”

    In Massachusetts, several cities, including Boston and Cambridge, have pushed back against federal immigration requests, placing the state squarely in the administration’s crosshairs.

    Boston City Councilor Enrique Pepén said local leaders are preparing for potential fallout.

    “We are prepared for anything at this point,” Pepén said. “We are preparing, budget-wise, protection-wise, just keep an eye on everything.”

    Gov. Maura Healey said she is willing to cooperate with federal authorities, but she criticized the administration’s approach.

    “If you want to put away bad guys, if you want to come into communities, work with governors, work with AGs, work with local law enforcement, to do that, you’ve always had support,” Healey said. “But that’s not what’s going on.”

    Legal experts say the administration may once again face constitutional hurdles.

    “Not the president, but the Congress that is in charge of collecting money, which is through taxation, and also spending money,” said Constitutional law attorney Joseph Malouf.

    He added that without Supreme Court intervention, the president is likely to lose any legal challenge.

    At the same time, the State Department announced it will pause immigrant visa applications for people from 75 countries, including Brazil, Cape Verde, Colombia and Haiti. The policy applies to those seeking to live permanently in the United States and does not affect short-term visas for tourists, students, or temporary workers.

    Advocates say the new rules significantly raise the bar for would-be immigrants. Marie Pereira, founder of the Haiti Immigration Project, said the justification for stricter screening has shifted.

    “First, it was national security,” Pereira said. “Now, it’s becoming a public charge.”

    Under the new directive, immigration officials will expand screenings to ensure visas are not issued to applicants who may require food, medical, or housing assistance.

    Pereira acknowledged the complexity of the issue.

    “People do come here with pre-existing conditions looking for the excellent health care provided in America, and they do create a drain, sometimes, on the system,” she said.

    There are also concerns about another potential surge in immigration enforcement in the region. The Department of Homeland Security said it will continue its presence, but declined to discuss future operations.

    The cuts to sanctuary cities and states are set to take effect on Feb. 1, while the pause on immigrant visas begins Jan. 21 and will remain in place indefinitely.

    [ad_2]

    Oscar Margain

    Source link

  • What Trump’s action in Iran could look like as regime threatens executions

    [ad_1]


    What Trump’s action in Iran could look like as regime threatens executions – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    President Trump has threatened action against Iran as the country’s regime announced potential expedited trials and hangings for detained anti-government protesters. CBS News Middle East reporter Courtney Kealy has the latest.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • ICE error meant some recruits were sent into field offices without proper training, sources say

    [ad_1]

    As Immigration and Customs Enforcement was racing to add 10,000 new officers to its force, an artificial intelligence error in how their applications were processed sent many new recruits into field offices without proper training, according to two law enforcement officials familiar with the error.

    The AI tool used by ICE was tasked with looking for potential applicants with law enforcement experience to be placed into the agency’s “LEO program” — short for law enforcement officer — for new recruits who are already law enforcement officers. It requires four weeks of online training.

    Applicants without law enforcement backgrounds are required to take an eight-week in-person course at ICE’s academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Georgia, which includes courses in immigration law and handling a gun, as well as physical fitness tests.

    “They were using AI to scan résumés and found out a bunch of the people who were LEOs weren’t LEOs,” one of the officials said.

    The officials said the AI tool sent people with the word “officer” on their résumés to the shorter four-week online training — for example, a “compliance officer” or people who said they aspired to be ICE officers.

    The majority of the new applicants were flagged as law enforcement officers, the officials said, but many had no experience in any local police or federal law enforcement force.

    Both law enforcement officials noted that ICE’s field offices provide more training beyond what is provided at the academy or in the online course before officers are sent out onto the street and that the officers singled out by the AI tool most likely received that training. The officials weren’t authorized to speak publicly and spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity.

    The Department of Homeland Security didn’t respond to a request for comment. The AI mistake was identified in mid-fall — over a month into the recruitment surge — and ICE immediately began taking steps to remedy the situation, including manual reviews of résumés of new hires, the officials said.

    “They now have to bring them back to FLETC,” said one of the officials, referring to the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.

    The AI tool was initially the mechanism used to categorize résumés, the officials said. The officials weren’t sure how many officers were improperly trained. It’s also not clear how many may have been sent out to begin immigration arrests.

    As the immigration agency surges agents into American cities, their enforcement tactics are increasingly questioned by local law enforcement, community groups and lawmakers following the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by ICE officer Jonathan Ross.

    Ross had more than 10 years of experience with ICE and wouldn’t have been subject to the AI screening for new recruits.

    The error highlights the challenge of training such a large number of new recruits as ICE continues to ramp up operations to boost deportation numbers amid pressure from the White House. ICE has also placed some new recruits into a training program before they completed the agency’s vetting process, NBC News has reported.

    In Minneapolis alone, more than 2,000 ICE officers have been sent to the area to boost arrests, and they have apprehended over 2,400 people since Nov. 29, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said. Minnesota has sued to try to remove DHS.

    ICE had a mandate to hire 10,000 new officers by the end of 2025 and offered new recruits $50,000 signing bonuses using the money Congress allocated under the One Big Beautiful Bill. One of the officials said that although ICE met the goal on paper, bringing back people who were misidentified for more training means it didn’t successfully add 10,000 ICE officers on the street in 2025.

    [ad_2]

    Julia Ainsley | NBC News

    Source link

  • Contributor: A Senate war powers resolution on Venezuela actually could curb Trump

    [ad_1]

    President Trump seemed angry after the Senate voted last Thursday to pass a war powers resolution to the next stage, where lawmakers could approve the measure and seek to curb the president’s ability to wage war in Venezuela without congressional authorization.

    Trump said that day that five Republican senators who supported bringing the measure to a vote — Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rand Paul (Ky.), Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Todd Young (Ind.) — “should never be elected to office again.”

    Why should he get so riled up about this, to the point where he could put his own party’s control of the Senate at risk in November? Even if this resolution were to pass both houses of Congress, he could veto it and ultimately be unrestrained. He did this in 2019, when a war powers resolution mandating that the U.S. military cease its participation in the war in Yemen was passed in both the Senate and the House. Many people think that such legislation therefore can’t make a difference.

    But the president’s ire is telling. These political moves on the Hill can get results even before the resolution has a final vote, or if it is vetoed by the president.

    The Trump administration made significant concessions before the 2019 resolution was approved by Congress, in an attempt to prevent it from passing. For instance, months before it was approved, the U.S. military stopped refueling Saudi warplanes in midair. These concessions de-escalated the war and saved tens of thousands of lives.

    A war powers resolution is an act of Congress that is based on a 1973 law of the same name. That law spells out and reinforces the power that our Constitution has allocated to Congress, to decide when the U.S. military can be involved in hostilities.

    The U.S. military raid in Caracas that seized Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, is illegal according to international law, the charters of the Organization of American States and the United Nations, as well as other treaties to which the United States is a signatory. According to our own Constitution, the government violates U.S. law when it violates treaties that our government has signed.

    None of that restrained the Trump administration, which has not demonstrated much respect for the rule of law. But the White House does care about the political power of Congress. If there is an expanded war in Venezuela or anywhere else that Trump has threatened to use the military, the fact that Congress took steps to oppose it will increase the political cost to the president.

    This is likely one of the main reasons that the Trump administration has at least promised to make concessions regarding military action in Latin America — and who knows, possibly he did make some compromises compared with what had been planned.

    On Nov. 5, the day before the Senate was to vote on a war powers resolution to halt and prevent hostilities within or against Venezuela by U.S. armed forces, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and White House counsel had a private briefing with senators.

    They assured lawmakers that they were not going to have a land war or airstrikes in Venezuela. According to news reports, the White House counsel stated that they did not have a legal justification for such a war. It is clear that blocking the resolution was very important to these top officials. The day after that meeting, the war powers resolution was blocked by two votes. Two Republicans had joined the Democrats and independents in support of the resolution: Murkowski and Paul. That added up to 49 votes — not quite the needed majority.

    But on Thursday, there were three additional Republicans who voted for the new resolution, so it will proceed to a final vote.

    The war powers resolution is not just a political fight, but a matter of life and death. The blockade involved in the seizure of oil tankers is, according to experts, an unlawful use of military force. This means that the blockade would be included as a participation in hostilities that would require authorization from Congress.

    Since 2015, the United States has imposed unilateral economic sanctions that destroyed Venezuela’s economy. From 2012 to 2020, Venezuela suffered the worst peacetime depression in world history. Real (inflation-adjusted) GDP, or income, fell by 74%. Think of the economic destruction of the U.S. Great Depression, multiplied by three times. Most of this was the result of the sanctions.

    This unprecedented devastation is generally attributed to Maduro in public discussion. But U.S. sanctions deliberately cut Venezuela off from international finance, as well as blocking most of its oil sales, which accounted for more than 90% of foreign exchange (mostly dollar) earnings. This devastated the economy.

    In the first year of Trump sanctions from 2017-18, Venezuela’s deaths increased by tens of thousands of people, at a time when oil prices were increasing. Sanctions were expanded even more the following year. About a quarter of the population, more than 7 million people, emigrated after 2015 — 750,000 of them to the United States.

    We know that the deadly impact of sanctions that target the civilian population is real. Research published in July by the Lancet Global Health, by my colleagues Francisco Rodriguez, Silvio Rendon and myself, estimated the global death toll from unilateral economic sanctions, as these are, at 564,000 per year over the past decade. This is comparable to the worldwide deaths from armed conflict. A majority of the victims over the 1970-2021 period were children.

    The Trump administration has, in the last few days, been moving in the direction of lifting some sanctions to allow for oil exports, according to the president’s stated plan to “run Venezuela.” This is ironic because Venezuela has for many years wanted more investment and trade, including in oil, with the United States, and it was U.S. sanctions that prohibited it.

    Such lifting of sanctions would be a big step forward, in terms of saving lives of people who are deprived of food, medicine and other necessities in Venezuela, as a result of these sanctions and the economic destruction that they cause.

    But to create the stability that Venezuela needs to recover, we will have to take the military and economic violence out of this campaign. There are members of Congress moving toward that goal, and they need all the help that they can get, before it’s too late.

    Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research and author of “Failed: What the ‘Experts’ Got Wrong About the Global Economy.”

    [ad_2]

    Mark Weisbrot

    Source link

  • Here’s how many Somalis are in the U.S. as Trump administration ends protected status

    [ad_1]

    There are about 98,000 immigrants from Somalia living in the U.S., according to the Census Bureau’s latest 2024 estimates. About 83% are naturalized U.S. citizens.This comes as the Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it is ending temporary protected status for Somali immigrants.File video above: Temporary protection status ends for Nicaraguans and HonduransTPS offers protection from deportation and work authorization for those who are facing unsafe conditions in their home countries. Only a fraction of immigrants from Somalia in the U.S. have been granted TPS.The majority of Somali immigrants in the U.S. — about 44% — live in Minnesota. Ohio and Washington host the second-highest number of immigrants from Somalia, just over 10,000 each. President George H.W. Bush first granted TPS to Somalis in 1991 during the country’s civil war. Subsequent administrations have repeatedly renewed that status, including most recently President Joe Biden in 2024.Over the past decade, the total Somali immigrant population in the U.S. has remained about the same, although a growing number have become naturalized citizens. There are about 260,000 total people of Somali descent in the U.S. as of 2024 estimates — that’s including those born in the U.S.PHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4=

    There are about 98,000 immigrants from Somalia living in the U.S., according to the Census Bureau’s latest 2024 estimates. About 83% are naturalized U.S. citizens.

    This comes as the Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it is ending temporary protected status for Somali immigrants.

    File video above: Temporary protection status ends for Nicaraguans and Hondurans

    TPS offers protection from deportation and work authorization for those who are facing unsafe conditions in their home countries. Only a fraction of immigrants from Somalia in the U.S. have been granted TPS.

    The majority of Somali immigrants in the U.S. — about 44% — live in Minnesota.

    Ohio and Washington host the second-highest number of immigrants from Somalia, just over 10,000 each.

    President George H.W. Bush first granted TPS to Somalis in 1991 during the country’s civil war. Subsequent administrations have repeatedly renewed that status, including most recently President Joe Biden in 2024.

    Over the past decade, the total Somali immigrant population in the U.S. has remained about the same, although a growing number have become naturalized citizens.

    There are about 260,000 total people of Somali descent in the U.S. as of 2024 estimates — that’s including those born in the U.S.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At least 6 Minnesota federal prosecutors resign amid pressure to treat Renee Good killing as assault on ICE agent

    [ad_1]

    At least six career prosecutors in the Minneapolis U.S. Attorney’s office — including Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson — have resigned as the office continues to face pressure to treat the investigation of the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman by an ICE officer as an assault on a federal officer case.

    Thompson also previously served as the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota; he was appointed by President Trump in June and served in the position until October. He resigned from the attorney’s office along with Harry Jacobs, Melinda Williams, Thomas Calhoun-Lopez, Ruth Schneider and Tom Hollenhurst.

    CBS could not immediately confirm the reasons for all the resignations. The New York Times has reported that senior DOJ officials were seeking a criminal investigation into the actions of the widow and whether she had ties to “activist groups.”

    Thompson was the lead prosecutor in the Feeding Our Future case, a COVID-era $250 million scheme which targeted programs that were meant to feed schoolchildren. Since then he’s charged defendants for allegedly defrauding housing and autism service programs, claiming that fraud in Minnesota has topped $9 billion, a figure which Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has pushed back on.

    The NYT reported Tuesday that a number of people familiar with Thompson’s decision said he also objected to federal investigators refusing to cooperate with Minnesota state agencies in investigating Good’s killing. 

    Since the massive fraud scandal, Mr. Trump has lashed out at Minnesota’s large Somali-American community, as many of the Feeding Our Future defendants are of Somali descent. His administration cited the fraud scandal as impetus for deploying thousands of federal immigration agents to the Minneapolis area.

    Walz called Thompson’s resignation a “huge loss for our state.”

    “It’s also the latest sign Trump is pushing nonpartisan career professionals out of the justice department, replacing them with his sycophants,” Walz said on X.

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar said on X that “these career public servants have served our state through multiple tragedies and critical investigations. We cannot allow prosecutors to be driven by politics. The family and loved ones of Renee Good deserve justice, not political attacks.” 

    Thompson also filed charges against Vance Boelter, the man accused of killing former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, as well as shooting state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette, who survived. 

    This is a developing story. Check back for details. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • At least 6 Minnesota federal prosecutors resign amid pressure to treat Renee Good killing as assault on ICE agent

    [ad_1]

    At least six career prosecutors in the Minneapolis U.S. Attorney’s office — including Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson — have resigned as the office continues to face pressure to treat the investigation of the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman by an ICE officer as an assault on a federal officer case.

    Thompson also previously served as the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota; he was appointed by President Trump in June and served in the position until October. He resigned from the attorney’s office along with Harry Jacobs, Melinda Williams, Thomas Calhoun-Lopez, Ruth Schneider and Tom Hollenhurst.

    CBS could not immediately confirm the reasons for all the resignations. The New York Times has reported that senior DOJ officials were seeking a criminal investigation into the actions of the widow and whether she had ties to “activist groups.”

    Thompson was the lead prosecutor in the Feeding Our Future case, a COVID-era $250 million scheme which targeted programs that were meant to feed schoolchildren. Since then he’s charged defendants for allegedly defrauding housing and autism service programs, claiming that fraud in Minnesota has topped $9 billion, a figure which Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has pushed back on.

    The NYT reported Tuesday that a number of people familiar with Thompson’s decision said he also objected to federal investigators refusing to cooperate with Minnesota state agencies in investigating Good’s killing. 

    Since the massive fraud scandal, Mr. Trump has lashed out at Minnesota’s large Somali-American community, as many of the Feeding Our Future defendants are of Somali descent. His administration cited the fraud scandal as impetus for deploying thousands of federal immigration agents to the Minneapolis area.

    Walz called Thompson’s resignation a “huge loss for our state.”

    “It’s also the latest sign Trump is pushing nonpartisan career professionals out of the justice department, replacing them with his sycophants,” Walz said on X.

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar said on X that “these career public servants have served our state through multiple tragedies and critical investigations. We cannot allow prosecutors to be driven by politics. The family and loved ones of Renee Good deserve justice, not political attacks.” 

    Thompson also filed charges against Vance Boelter, the man accused of killing former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, as well as shooting state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette, who survived. 

    This is a developing story. Check back for details. 

    [ad_2]

    Aki Nace

    Source link

  • Pentagon is embracing Musk’s Grok AI chatbot as it draws global outcry

    [ad_1]

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok will join Google’s generative AI engine in operating inside the Pentagon network, as part of a broader push to feed as much of the military’s data as possible into the developing technology.

    “Very soon we will have the world’s leading AI models on every unclassified and classified network throughout our department,” Hegseth said in a speech at Musk’s space flight company, SpaceX, in South Texas.

    The announcement comes just days after Grok — which is embedded into X, the social media network owned by Musk — drew global outcry and scrutiny for generating highly sexualized deepfake images of people without their consent.

    Malaysia and Indonesia have blocked Grok, while the U.K.’s independent online safety watchdog announced an investigation Monday. Grok has limited image generation and editing to paying users.

    Hegseth said Grok will go live inside the Defense Department later this month and announced that he would “make all appropriate data” from the military’s IT systems available for “AI exploitation.” He also said data from intelligence databases would be fed into AI systems.

    Hegseth’s aggressive push to embrace the still-developing technology stands in contrast to the Biden administration, which, while pushing federal agencies to come up with policies and uses for AI, was also wary of misuse. Officials said rules were needed to ensure that the technology, which could be harnessed for mass surveillance, cyberattacks or even lethal autonomous devices, was being used responsibly.

    The Biden administration enacted a framework in late 2024 that directed national security agencies to expand their use of the most advanced AI systems but prohibited certain uses, such as applications that would violate constitutionally protected civil rights or any system that would automate the deployment of nuclear weapons. It is unclear if those prohibitions are still in place under the Trump administration.

    During his speech, Hegseth spoke of the need to streamline and speed up technological innovations within the military, saying, “We need innovation to come from anywhere and evolve with speed and purpose.”

    He noted that the Pentagon possesses “combat-proven operational data from two decades of military and intelligence operations.”

    “AI is only as good as the data that it receives, and we’re going to make sure that it’s there,” Hegseth said.

    The defense secretary said he wants AI systems within the Pentagon to be responsible, though he went on to say he was shrugging off any AI models “that won’t allow you to fight wars.”

    Hegseth said his vision for military AI systems means that they operate “without ideological constraints that limit lawful military applications,” before adding that the Pentagon’s “AI will not be woke.”

    Musk developed and pitched Grok as an alternative to what he called “woke AI” interactions from rival chatbots like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT. In July, Grok also caused controversy after it appeared to make antisemitic comments that praised Adolf Hitler and shared several antisemitic posts.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to questions about the issues with Grok.

    [ad_2]

    Konstantin Toropin and David Klepper | The Associated Press

    Source link

  • AbbVie reaches deal with Trump administration on drug prices in exchange for tariff relief

    [ad_1]

    North Chicago-based AbbVie has become the latest drugmaker to reach a deal with the Trump administration on drug prices in exchange for being exempted from tariffs and future price mandates, the company announced Monday evening.

    Under the voluntary agreement, AbbVie will offer “low prices” in Medicaid, a state and federally funded health insurance program for people with low incomes and disabilities, the company said in a news release. AbbVie will also invest $100 billion in U.S.-based research, development and building, including for manufacturing, over the next decade, according to the release.

    It will also sell more medications directly to consumers through TrumpRx. TrumpRx is to be an online platform that will allow people to buy medications directly from manufacturers, according to the Associated Press.

    The deal “was enabled by the Trump administration providing exemption from tariffs and future price mandates,” AbbVie said in its news release.

    “AbbVie is following President Trump’s call to action by reaching this agreement, allowing us to collectively move beyond policies that harm American innovation,” said Robert A. Michael, chairman and CEO at AbbVie in the news release.

    AbbVie plans to offer medications including Humira, Alphagan, Synthroid and Combigan on TrumpRx.

    In recent months, the Trump administration has announced more than a dozen similar deals with drugmakers, including Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi.

    The agreements follow an executive order issued by Trump in May that sought to bring most-favored-nation pricing on medications to Americans. Most-favored-nation pricing refers to lower prices charged for the same medications in other economically-comparable countries. Throughout last year, Trump threatened to impose large tariffs on pharmaceutical companies.

    Earlier on Monday, AbbVie announced plans to expand its U.S. manufacturing by acquiring a facility in Arizona. The company also announced last year that it would construct a new $195 million facility near its headquarters in North Chicago.

    AbbVie spun off from Abbott Laboratories in 2013 and has about 29,000 employees in the U.S. The company is known for medications including Humira, which is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and other conditions, as well as the drugs Skyrizi, which treats plaque psoriasis, and Rinvoq for rheumatoid arthritis.

    [ad_2]

    Lisa Schencker

    Source link

  • Trump has a plan to make housing more affordable. Will it work?

    [ad_1]

    President Trump last week proposed two policies aimed at reducing the cost of buying a home, as soaring prices and elevated mortgage rates make homeownership increasingly unattainable for many Americans.

    Mr. Trump said he plans to ban large institutional investors from buying single-family homes, and is also directing the federal government to purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds to drive down mortgage rates for Americans.

    “It is one of my many steps in restoring Affordability,” Mr. Trump said in a Jan. 8 social media post of the proposed mortgage debt purchase.

    Buying a home has become far more expensive in recent years as home prices have surged, driven by a shortage of affordable housing and, since 2022, rising mortgage rates. But because many of those pressures lie beyond the federal government’s direct control, it’s unclear how much Mr. Trump’s proposals could ultimately lower costs, according to experts.

    America’s housing shortage

    Mr. Trump’s approach aims to tackle two core issues with the housing market — higher mortgage rates and competition for homes from institutional investors. Yet experts say these strategies will do little to address one of the housing market’s thorniest problems: a shortage of homes for sale. 

    The supply issue partly reflects years of underbuilding after the 2008 financial crisis, as well as the reluctance of homeowners who locked in ultra-low mortgage rates during the ensuing recession to relinquish their properties. 

    “There is an undersupply of housing in the U.S., and that will take time to resolve,” Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy for TD Securities, told CBS News. 

    The U.S. would need to build as many as 4 million additional homes beyond the normal pace of construction to address the housing shortage, according to Goldman Sachs.

    Janneke Ratcliffe, vice president of housing and communities at the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, told CBS News that the housing market’s supply challenges could be harder to address.  

    “Most solutions to create new housing take a long time to come to fruition,” she said. 

    For example, high land costs make it hard to add to the housing supply. One solution,  Ratcliffe said, would be to change local zoning rules so more homes can be squeezed into a given area. Yet such policies are set at the local level, not by the federal government, she noted. 

    Why lower mortgage rates aren’t a panacea

    Because Mr. Trump’s policies address the demand side of the equation, they could inadvertently drive up home prices, Goldberg said. For instance, a decline in mortgage rates could draw more buyers into the market, pushing home prices higher and exacerbating the supply problem. 

    “If consumers are able to afford more homes because monthly payments are lower, home prices tend to rise more quickly,” the analyst told CBS News. “So simply lowering the cost of buying a home through the mortgage channel isn’t sufficient to fix the problem in the long run.”

    Meanwhile, Mr. Trump’s plan to ban big investors, such as Invitation Homes and financial giant Blackstone, from hoovering up single-family homes might have only a limited effect on the market, according to Goldberg. The reason: investors that own at least 100 properties account for only roughly 1% of the total single-family housing stock in the U.S., according to the American Enterprise Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. 

    “That’s a relatively small impact,” Goldberg said.

    Mr. Trump also hasn’t said whether institutional investors would be required to sell the homes they currently own, he pointed out. If those firms are not forced to put those properties on the market, a ban is unlikely to significantly expand the supply of homes, Goldberg said. 

    Still, Mr. Trump’s policies could make a small difference, some housing market experts said.

    “Mortgages will be a little cheaper, and housing will be a little more affordable,” Carl Weinberg, chief economist and managing director of High Frequency Economics, told CBS News, adding that banning institutional investors from scooping up homes could “bring prices down a little.”

    Ben Ayres, a senior economist at Nationwide Financial, estimated that the government buying $200 billion in mortgage securities could reduce home loan rates by up to 0.35 percentage points, which could “spur more spending activity.” 

    The upshot: Meaningful progress will require tackling the shortage of available homes, economists agreed. Unless that issue is addressed, the housing affordability crunch will persist, said Edward Pinto, senior fellow and co-director of the AEI Housing Center at the nonpartisan American Enterprise Institute.

    “We need to either activate the existing supply that is underutilized, or take steps to allow the building of new homes,” Pinto said. “We need to come up with supply-side solutions that take effect quickly.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A breakable regime

    [ad_1]

    Iran’s death toll: Hundreds of protesters have been killed in Iran, as the government tries to crack down on what look like some of the country’s largest protests since 1979.

    “The Center for Human Rights in Iran, based in New York, said it had received eyewitness accounts and credible reports that hundreds of protesters have been killed since the government shut down access to the internet Thursday night,” reports The Washington Post. “The Human Rights Activists News Agency, also based in the United States, said 490 protesters have been killed since the protests began.” The regime has attempted internet and cell service blackouts to try to suppress the spread of information, but the West has still managed to see videos of full body bags spread out, on hospital grounds, substantiating reports of a significant (yet still unknown) death toll.

    The protests started over economic grievances, but they have snowballed into more generalized anger with the repressive regime. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has threatened to insert the U.S. into the conflict. “Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned Sunday against such strikes,” reports the Post. “If the country were attacked, he said, it could target the United States, Israel and international shipping lanes.”

    “Iran’s 12-day war with Israel and the U.S. last June broke the regime’s carefully nurtured image of invincibility, many ordinary Iranians say,” reports The Wall Street Journal. “Israeli strikes across Iran destroyed much of its military leadership, and the follow-on U.S. bombing campaign struck a heavy blow against Iran’s nuclear program. It was a humiliation for a regime that had invested so much of the country’s national wealth into a proxy network that was designed to deter exactly this sort of assault on the homeland.”

    A regime that once looked unbreakable has cracks forming everywhere.

    Iran is not merely a theocracy, Tahmineh Dehbozorgi points outs on X: “It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises.”

    Wealth tax barely understood by normies: “California helped make them among the richest people in the world. Now they’re fleeing because California wants a little something back,” writes Lorraine Ali in an unintentionally hilarious Los Angeles Times article about a proposed “billionaire tax.”

    “The proposed California Billionaire Tax Act has plutocrats saying they are considering deserting the Golden State for fear they’ll have to pay a one-time, 5% tax, on top of the other taxes they barely pay in comparison to the rest of us,” continues Ali. “Think of it as the Dust Bowl migration in reverse, with The Monied headed East to grow their fortunes.” Those who’ve already left the state “include In-n-Out Burger owner and heiress Lynsi Snyder, PayPal co-founder and conservative donor Peter Thiel, Venture Capitalist David Sacks, co-founder of Craft Ventures, and Google co-founder Larry Page, who recently purchased $173 million worth of waterfront property in Miami’s Coconut Grove. Thank goodness he landed on his feet in these tough times.”

    About that last one: Ali doesn’t seem to understand the mechanics of how the tax would be applied. But the affected people sure do.

    “Larry [Page] and Sergey [Brin] can’t stay in California since the wealth tax as written would confiscate 50% of their Alphabet shares,” writes Y Combinator CEO Gary Tan on X. “Each own ~3% of Alphabet’s stock, worth about $120 billion each at today’s ~$4 trillion market cap. But because their shares have 10x voting power, the…billionaire tax would treat them as owning 30% of Alphabet (3% × 10 = 30%). That means each founder’s taxable wealth would be $1.2 trillion. A 5% wealth tax on $1.2 trillion = $60 billion tax bill, each. That’s 50% of their actual Alphabet holdings—wiped out by a ‘5%’ tax.”

    Consider the way the law is written: “For any interests that confer voting or other direct control rights, the percentage of the business entity owned by the taxpayer shall be presumed to be not less than the taxpayer’s percentage of the overall voting or other direct control rights.” This is probably to ensure rich people can’t use complex share structures to make it seem like they have lower ownership (and thus a lower tax burden).

    This law is being pitches as a means of making up for the $100 billion state budget shortfall, including $19 billion in federal cuts to Medi-Cal, $7 billion to $9 billion in state cuts to the same program, and possible cuts to the state’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. And the line that keeps being repeated—that these billionaires couldn’t have done it without the state of California, or without being in their specific location—is kind of a strange one. Sure, Silicon Valley agglomeration effects are great, but it’s not like they were bilking the state in some way.

    “Billionaires have built their extraordinary fortunes with the help of California resources and were the largest beneficiaries of the federal legislation that contributed to the current state budget crisis,” write the drafters of the law. “It therefore is both necessary and equitable to ask those who have benefitted most from California’s resources to contribute proportionately to support health care, education, and nutrition in California through a one-time 5% tax on billionaire wealth.”


    Scenes from New York: “The group Palestinian Assembly for Liberation organized a rally outside Young Israel of Kew Gardens Hills yeshiva in protest of an event promoting real estate investments in Jerusalem,” reports CBS. “Protesters gathered on the sidewalk behind barricades across the street from the yeshiva at the corner of 150th Street and 70th Road, some carrying Palestinian flags. In at least one video posted to social media, the demonstrators appear to be chanting, ‘We support Hamas here.’…’Showing support for terrorist organizations outside of the synagogue is a horrific act,’ said Scott Richman, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League New York and New Jersey.”


    QUICK HITS

    • “The U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, over the central bank’s renovation of its Washington headquarters and whether Mr. Powell lied to Congress about the scope of the project, according to officials briefed on the situation,” reports The New York Times.
    • “Venezuela’s current political moment is a paradox of tutelage: a partial rupture with authoritarian rule that has not translated into democratic control,” writes Juan Miguel Matheus in the Journal of Democracy. “The removal of Nicolás Maduro marks the end of a long and suffocating autocratic cycle centered on a single ruler. Yet, the way in which that rupture has occurred—through external intervention and in coordination with remnants of the old regime—has produced a political landscape that is at once post-Maduro and still undemocratic. Liberation has begun, but it remains partial, contested, and insufficient to restore Venezuelan self-government….Venezuela’s present moment does not fit the model of democratic transition made familiar by the third wave. It is neither a negotiated pact between authoritarian incumbents and democratic challengers, nor a clean electoral alternation, nor a revolutionary rupture. It is instead a unique conjuncture produced by the intersection of extreme autocratic entrenchment, external intervention, institutional collapse, and the displacement—rather than the empowerment—of democratic initiative. What Venezuela is experiencing is not a postliberation order, but a partial liberation. Maduro has been removed, but the regime has not been defeated.”
    • “I went sober to prioritize my health,” writes Dean Stattmann for GQ. “But then slowly but surely I realized the best parts of life were passing me by.” (This is why I’m long booze.)
    • “Nearly 16,000 nurses at three major hospitals in New York City are expected to strike amid a severe flu season, the last group of New York Nurses Association practitioners who have not settled their contracts,” reports Bloomberg. “A strike would come three years after a similar labor dispute ended in a historic contract. Operations at hospitals including Mount Sinai Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian in Manhattan as well as Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx are expected to be affected.”
    • Pivot to manufacturing isn’t going so well:

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link