ReportWire

Tag: Trial

  • Trial begins for mother of Oxford school gunman

    Trial begins for mother of Oxford school gunman

    [ad_1]

    Trial begins for mother of Oxford school gunman – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Opening statements got underway Thursday in the trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the teen gunman who opened fire at Michigan’s Oxford High School in 2021, killing four students. Crumbley and her husband are both charged with involuntary manslaughter, accused by prosecutors of purchasing for their son the gun used in the shooting, as well as ignoring warning signs of mental health issues. Elaine Quijano has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump testifies in E. Jean Carroll defamation trial

    Trump testifies in E. Jean Carroll defamation trial

    [ad_1]

    Trump testifies in E. Jean Carroll defamation trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Former President Donald Trump took the witness stand Thursday for about four minutes in the defamation trial brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. Trump has already been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation of Carroll in a previous trial. This trial is to determine what damages Carroll should be awarded. Errol Barnett has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google to pay $700 million to U.S. states for stifling competition against Android app store

    Google to pay $700 million to U.S. states for stifling competition against Android app store

    [ad_1]

    Google has agreed to pay $700 million and make several other concessions to settle allegations that it had been stifling competition against its Android app store — the same issue that went to trial in another case that could result in even bigger changes.

    Although Google struck the deal with state attorneys general in September, the settlement’s terms weren’t revealed until late Monday in documents filed in San Francisco federal court. The disclosure came a week after a federal court jury rebuked Google for deploying anticompetitive tactics in its Play Store for Android apps.

    The settlement with the states includes $630 million to compensate U.S. consumers funneled into a payment processing system that state attorneys general alleged drove up the prices for digital transactions within apps downloaded from the Play Store. That store caters to the Android software that powers most of the world’s smartphones.

    Like Apple does in its iPhone app store, Google collects commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on in-app purchases — fees that state attorneys general contended drove prices higher than they would have been had there been an open market for payment processing. Those commissions generated billions of dollars in profit annually for Google, according to evidence presented in the recent trial focused on its Play Store.

    Consumers eligible for a piece of the $630 million compensation fund are supposed to be automatically notified about various options for how they can receive their cut of the money.

    Another $70 million of the pre-trial settlement will cover the penalties and other costs that Google is being forced to pay to the states.

    Google also agreed to make other changes designed to make it even easier for consumers to download and install Android apps from other outlets besides its Play Store for the next five years. It will refrain from issuing as many security warnings, or “scare screens,” when alternative choices are being used.


    What the Google antitrust ruling could mean for the company, Android users

    03:45

    More payment choices

    The makers of Android apps will also gain more flexibility to offer alternative payment choices to consumers instead of having transactions automatically processed through the Play Store and its commission system. Apps will also be able to promote lower prices available to consumers who choose an alternate to the Play Store’s payment processing.

    Washington D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb hailed the settlement as a victory for the tens of millions of people in the U.S. that rely on Android phones to help manage their lives. “For far too long, Google’s anticompetitive practices in the distribution of apps deprived Android users of choices and forced them to pay artificially elevated prices,” Schwalb said.

    Wilson White, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, framed the deal as a positive for the company, despite the money and concessions it entails. The settlement “builds on Android’s choice and flexibility, maintains strong security protections, and retains Google’s ability to compete with other (software) makers, and invest in the Android ecosystem for users and developers,” White wrote in a blog post.

    Although the state attorneys general hailed the settlement as a huge win for consumers, it didn’t go far enough for Epic Games, which spearheaded the attack on Google’s app store practices with an antitrust lawsuit filed in August 2020.

    Epic undeterred by Apple ruling

    Epic, the maker of the popular Fortnite video game, rebuffed the settlement in September and instead chose to take its case to trial, even though it had already lost on most of its key claims in a similar trial targeting Apple and its iPhone app store in 2021.

    The Apple trial, though, was decided by a federal judge instead of the jury that vindicated Epic with a unanimous verdict that Google had built anticompetitive barriers around the Play Store. Google has vowed to appeal the verdict.

    But the trial’s outcome nevertheless raises the specter of Google potentially being ordered to pay even more money as punishment for its past practices and making even more dramatic changes to its lucrative Android app ecosystem.

    Those changes will be determined next year by U.S. District Judge James Donato, who presided over the Epic Games trial. Donato also still must approve Google’s Play Store settlement with the states.

    Google faces an even bigger legal threat in another antitrust case targeting its dominant search engine that serves as the centerpiece of a digital ad empire that generates more than $200 billion in sales annually. Closing arguments in a trial pitting Google against the Justice Department are scheduled for early May before a federal judge in Washington D.C.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 12/14: CBS Evening News

    12/14: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    12/14: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Multiple terror suspects, some linked to Hamas, arrested in Europe; Snowball Express honors hundreds of families of fallen veterans

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jonathan Majors assault trial begins with opening statements

    Jonathan Majors assault trial begins with opening statements

    [ad_1]

    Jonathan Majors assault trial begins with opening statements – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Opening statements began on Monday in the criminal trial of actor Jonathan Majors, who is accused of assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Grace Jabbari. CBS News’ Jericka Duncan reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pushin’ Positivity? Young Thug’s Lawyer Breaks Down The Rapper’s Name & Shares The Meaning Of ‘Slime’ On Day Two Of YSL RICO Trial

    Pushin’ Positivity? Young Thug’s Lawyer Breaks Down The Rapper’s Name & Shares The Meaning Of ‘Slime’ On Day Two Of YSL RICO Trial

    [ad_1]

    More alleged details about Young Thug and his YSL conglomerate are coming to light on day two of the record label’s RICO trial. As The Shade Room previously reported, the rapper and 27 others were arrested in Georgia in May 2022.

    Most defendants have severed from the case or taken plea deals, as Young Thug and five others maintain their innocence against racketeering and conspiracy charges.

    RELATED: Here We Go! Young Thug’s YSL RICO Trial Kicks Off With Day One Of Opening Statements

    Young Thug’s Stage Name Is Explained On Day 2 Of The YSL RICO Trial

    As The Shade Room previously reported, day one of opening statements in the YSL trial began on Monday, November 27.

    The day primarily consisted of Georgia district attorney Adriane Love’s allegation that Young Thug is the “head” of YSL. Furthermore, the state contends that the group, disguised as a music label called Young Stoner Life Records, is actually an “Atlanta-based street gang” responsible for murder, drug, and firearm violations.

    “YSL operated as a pack,” Love reportedly told the courtroom Monday. “…For 10 years and counting, the group calling itself Young Slime Life dominated the Cleveland Avenue community of Fulton County. They created a crater … that sucked in the youth, innocence and even the lives of some of its youngest members.”

    Day one’s proceeding was even plagued with the talk of a mistrial. However, the proceeding has pressed on into day two with Young Thug’s defense attorney, Brian Steel, sharing his opening statements.

    According to legal reporter Meghann Cuniff, Steel began by explaining to the courtroom that Young Thug was “born into an environment, a community, a society that was filled with oppression, despair, hopelessness and helplessness.”

    From there, Steel reportedly explained the meaning of “Thug” in Young Thug’s stage name as “Truly Humbled Under God.”

    “If he could ever make it as a musical artist and help his family, himself and his many others out of this endless cycle of hopelessness, he would be truly humbled under God. That’s what thug means,” Steel explained in footage captured and shared on X, formerly known as Twitter, by Cuniff.

    Young Thug’s Lawyer Explains The Meaning Behind “Slime” As Lil Wayne’s Name Enters The Trial

    According to journalist Bryson “Boom” Paul, Steel went on to establish Young Thug’s idolization of Lil Wayne as a teenager.

    From there, Steel reportedly referenced a now-deleted video of Young Thug taunting Lil Wayne around the time that the latter rapper’s tour bus was riddled with bullets in 2015, per REVOLT.

    According to MTV, around that time, Lil Wayne had instructed fans to “stop listening” to Young Thug’s music.

    Steel likened the rappers’ “battle” to NFL rivalries in his statements.

    However, Steel’s establishment of the rappers’ alleged relationship and Young Thug’s reverence for Lil Wayne did not stop there. Journalist Jewel Wicker reports that Steel explained to the courtroom that Young Thug’s use of “Slime” stemmed from Lil Wayne.

    Furthermore, Steel even took the time to explain that Young Thug’s alleged gang affiliation is misperceived.

    Here’s What We Know About The YSL RICO Trial

    As previously reported by The Shade Room, Young Thug remains one of six defendants in the ongoing trial, which was halted by a ten-month jury selection.

    Fulton County Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville presides over the case, which now features a 12-person jury.

    Furthermore, Rolling Stone reports that the jurors consist of nine women and three men. Additionally, nine of the twelve jurors are Black.

    According to CNN, the trial is expected to last months and features a witness list that may spark celebrities such as Lil Wayne taking the stand.

    [ad_2]

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • USC neuroscientist faces scrutiny following allegations of data manipulation

    USC neuroscientist faces scrutiny following allegations of data manipulation

    [ad_1]

    A star neuroscientist at USC is facing allegations of misconduct after whistleblowers submitted a report to the National Institutes of Health that accused the professor of manipulating data in dozens of research papers and sounded alarms about an experimental stroke medication his company is developing.

    The accusations against Berislav V. Zlokovic, professor and chair of the department of physiology and neuroscience at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, were made by a small group of independent researchers and reported in the journal Science.

    The report identifies allegedly doctored images and data in 35 research papers in which Zlokovic is the sole common author. It also raised questions about findings in Phase II clinical trials of a drug called 3K3A-APC, an experimental stroke treatment sponsored by ZZ Biotech, the Houston-based company Zlokovic co-founded.

    Preclinical data appeared to have been manipulated, the report authors allege. In addition, the Phase II results appear to contain errors that would skew interpretation of the data in favor of the drug.

    An attorney for Zlokovic said the neuroscientist takes the accusations “extremely seriously” and was “committed to fully cooperating” with a USC inquiry into the matter. However, he said his client could not comment on the allegations while the review was pending.

    “Professor Zlokovic would normally welcome addressing every question raised, insofar as allegations are based on information and premises Professor Zlokovic knows to be completely incorrect,” attorney Alfredo X. Jarrin wrote in an email. “And other questions address work not performed at his lab or papers where he was not the senior author or contact author and his role was limited.”

    The university also issued a statement saying it takes allegations of research integrity seriously. “Consistent with federal regulations and USC policies, the university forwards any such allegations to its Office of Research Integrity for careful review,” the university said in a statement. “Under USC policy, this review is required to be confidential. As a result, we are unable to provide any further information.”

    Last year, USC’s Keck School of Medicine received from NIH the first $4 million of a planned $30-million grant to conduct Phase III trials of the experimental stroke treatment on 1,400 people.

    Given the serious issues outlined in their report, the whistleblowers say those trials should be stopped immediately.

    “It should certainly be paused in my opinion,” said Matthew Schrag, an assistant professor of neurology at Vanderbilt and co-author of the whistleblower report. “There are red flags about the safety of that treatment.”

    He said that evidence from the USC-led phase II trial of the drug, which was published in 2018 and called RHAPSODY, raised questions of patient safety. Patients in that trial were more likely to die in the week after treatment, and more likely to be disabled 90 days later than those who were given a placebo.

    In addition, Schrag said, some patients given the placebo had to wait longer for the standard stroke treatment of the drug tPA or surgery to dissolve the blood clot.

    “The faster you’re able to intervene to either restore blood flow with the drug or restore blood flow by removing the clot, the more brain cells survive,” he said.

    He added that he did not believe the delay was intentional but that it had the effect of “skewing the results in favor of the drug.”

    Schrag previously raised questions about the integrity of other neurological research, work he said was separate from his employment at Vanderbilt.

    Scientists have questioned Zlokovic’s research anonymously for years, Schrag said. Many of these concerns were published on PubPeer, a website on which anonymous contributors can examine scientific papers and highlight potential flaws.

    Yet scientists working with Zlokovic did not complain publicly, he said, allowing the studies to continue for years and succeed at attracting tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding.

    “I think people are concerned about the potential for backlash for harm to their own careers,” Schrag said. “And so I think that motivates people to just go along.”

    In its report, the journal Science interviewed four former employees of Zlokovic’s lab who said that Zlokovic routinely pressured them to manipulate data. Two said they were told to discard notebooks with results that didn’t fit preferred conclusions he hoped to reach.

    “There were clear examples of him instructing people to manipulate data to fit the hypothesis,” one former employee told the journal.

    The severity of the data manipulation charges merits a thorough investigation of Zlokovic’s data, said Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist and scientific integrity consultant who co-wrote the whistleblower report.

    “Appropriate steps would be for USC to ask Zlokovic to give them the lab’s notebooks and data,” Bik said. “For example, for images where it appears that certain parts might have been duplicated or erased, the original images as they came off a scanner or microscope need to be compared to the published figure panels.”

    Bik is among a subset of the report’s authors who are considering filing a federal whistleblower lawsuit. Should the NIH deem that any federal grant money was used improperly, a successful suit would entitle the plaintiffs to a portion of the money the government can claw back.

    Zlokovic has received roughly $93 million in NIH funding, according to Science. A spokesperson for NIH’s Office of Extramural Research would not comment on the specifics of the case.

    “We take concerns related to research integrity very seriously, and this may include allegations of research misconduct,” the office said in a statement.

    Over the years, Zlokovic has created several biotech companies aimed at commercializing his scientific work. In 2007, he co-founded ZZ Biotech, which has been working to gain federal approval of 3K3A-APC.

    Last year, Kent Pryor, ZZ Biotech’s chief executive, called the drug “a potential game-changer.”

    “I believe, based on the positive clinical results to date, our 3K3A-APC will potentially create the first new drug class to treat ischemic stroke since 2003,” Pryor said.

    On Tuesday, Pryor declined to comment on the details in the whistleblowers’ report. “I don’t want to get into particular explanations right now because of the ongoing investigations,” he said.

    He said the Phase III clinical trial had not yet begun.

    Zlokovic is a leading researcher on the blood-brain barrier, with particular interest in its role in stroke and dementia. He received his medical degree and doctorate in physiology at the University of Belgrade and joined the faculty at USC’s Keck School of Medicine after several fellowships in London.

    A polyglot and amateur opera singer, Zlokovic left USC and spent 11 years at the University of Rochester before returning in 2011. He was appointed director of USC’s Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute the following year.

    “My role will be to enhance an already very strong neuroscience base and try to make USC the No. 1 place in the neurosciences in the country and the world,” Zlokovic said upon rejoining the USC faculty. “It’s a big goal, but I think, with what’s going on right now, it’s actually moving in that direction. I think that could be my greatest contribution.”

    [ad_2]

    Corinne Purtill, Melody Petersen

    Source link

  • Gobble gobble

    Gobble gobble

    [ad_1]

    Me and my wife’s first ever attempt at a Thanksgiving meal. We’re calling it our trial run. Never made it before together normally go to other people’s houses which we still are this is just a small thing for me and my family. Hope you all have a good day.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Man found guilty in violent attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    Man found guilty in violent attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    [ad_1]

    Man found guilty in violent attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A San Francisco jury on Thursday found David DePape guilty of federal charges in last year’s violent hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the couple’s home. DePape faces up to 50 years in prison.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kaitlin Armstrong found guilty in shooting death of pro cyclist Anna

    Kaitlin Armstrong found guilty in shooting death of pro cyclist Anna

    [ad_1]

    The woman accused in the May 2022 shooting death of rising professional cyclist Anna Moriah Wilson — known as “Mo” Wilson — has been found guilty of her murder. Jurors reached the verdict for Katilin Armstrong Thursday in court at the Blackwell-Thurman Criminal Justice Center in Austin, Texas, concluding a criminal trial that lasted just over two weeks. 

    Armstrong, 35, had pleaded not guilty to a charge of first-degree murder in Wilson’s death. She was also charged with escape causing bodily injury, which is a felony, for allegedly trying to escape custody three weeks before the trial began. Authorities said Armstrong fled from officers as they escorted her to a doctor’s appointment on Oct. 11, but only ran for about half a block before they caught up with her. 

    She could potentially face up to 99 years in prison for the murder conviction, and up to 20 years in prison for the second charge if convicted. There was also an outstanding warrant for Armstrong’s arrest on a misdemeanor charge for theft of services when she was questioned by police after Wilson’s death.

    Wilson was found fatally shot on the floor of a friend’s bathroom on May 11, 2022, just days before she was slated to compete in a cycling race that she was also favored to win. The up-and-coming athlete was 25 at the time of her death.

    Cyclist Killed Texas
    Kaitlin Armstrong enters the courtroom during the first day of her trial. 

    Mikala Compton / AP


    Police have said that Wilson previously dated Armstrong’s boyfriend, Colin Strickland, a fellow competitive cyclist, with whom Wilson remained friends after their relationship ended. Wilson and Strickland had gone swimming at a local pool hours before she was killed, according to police. Strickland told them after the murder that he had picked up Wilson earlier in the day on May 11 for the swim, and dropped her off at the friend’s house, where Wilson was staying ahead of the race in Austin, that night at around 8:30 p.m.

    Armstrong worked as a yoga instructor and real estate agent in Austin, and also owned a business with Strickland. They lived together. During a period of separation in their on-off relationship, Strickland briefly dated Wilson.

    Prosecutors alleged that Armstrong had been using the fitness app Strava to track Wilson’s location, since Wilson used the app to manage her workouts. They told the jury during Armstrong’s trial that her car, a Jeep, had been seen near the apartment where Wilson was staying with her friend, Caitlin Cash.

    Cash testified during the first week of the trial, describing how she arrived back at her home to find Wilson covered in blood, after the cyclist had been shot in the head and chest. In addition to playing a recording of the 911 call from the night of the murder, when Cash tried to revive Wilson after finding her, prosecutors said the jury would be shown surveillance footage where Wilson could be heard screaming just before her death.

    “The last thing Mo did on this earth was scream in terror. Those screams are followed by ‘pow! pow!’” said Travis County Prosecutor Rick Jones in his opening statement at the trial. He said Armstrong shot Wilson again, for the third time, seconds after that. 

    screen-shot-2022-05-24-at-7-26-04-am.png
    Photo of Anna Moriah Wilson from Substack blog.

    Ansel Dickey/Substack


    Armstrong’s defense said there were no witnesses to the killing, nor is there video evidence placing Armstrong at the scene of Wilson’s death. She was questioned by police and let go after the murder, but a warrant was eventually issued for Armstrong’s arrest on May 19. Before the warrant, authorities said that Armstrong sold her Jeep for cash and traveled from Austin to New York City, then from Newark, New Jersey, to Costa Rica, allegedly using her sister’s passport as her own for the trip.

    Authorities said that Armstrong taught yoga while in Costa Rica and underwent plastic surgery to change her appearance, with prosecutors additionally telling the jury that Armstrong had cut her hair and changed her hair color as well. Her attorney, Geoffrey Puryear, addressed speculation about her time in Costa Rica during the trial, saying, ” “She would have no reason to know about any (arrest) warrant. You will hear Kaitlin is passionate about traveling and passionate about yoga,” CBS Texas reported.

    After almost six weeks in Costa Rica, Armstrong was arrested by officers with the U.S. Marshals Service at a hostel on Santa Teresa Beach in Provincia de Puntarenas, and returned back to the U.S. 

    Strickland also testified at Armstrong’s trial, telling the jury about how their relationship began over a dating app in 2019, and continued to date on and off for more than two years. He said Armstrong had access to his communications, the Austin American-Statesman reported, and that he had changed the name of Wilson’s contact in his phone to avoid conflict with Armstrong. He called Wilson “an immense talent” while addressing the jury.

    In other testimonies, two of Amrstrong’s former friends took the stand. One of them, Nicole Mertz, knew Armstrong through the cycling community and said she considered her to be one of her closest friends, CBS affiliate KEYE-TV reported. Mertz recalled once being at an Austin restaurant called The Meteor with Armstrong, where Armstrong had said she was upset because Wilson had come to town and was visiting Strickland, according to the station. 

    Mertz also said Armstrong became “visibly angry” seeing Wilson enter the restaurant, and, when Mertz asked what Armstrong would do if Strickland started dating someone else, Mertz testified that her former friend responded, “I would kill her,” reported KEYE-TV.

    – Allison Gualtieri contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 11/8: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    11/8: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    11/8: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on the third Republican presidential debate, testimony from Ivanka Trump in the New York civil fraud trial, and why Congress has not yet passed legislation to keep children safe online.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ivanka Trump testifies in civil fraud trial

    Ivanka Trump testifies in civil fraud trial

    [ad_1]

    Ivanka Trump testifies in civil fraud trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Ivanka Trump, daughter of former President Donald Trump, testified as a witness Wednesday in the $250 million New York civil trial in which the Trump Organization, her father and family members are accused of fraud. She testified that she had no knowledge of her father’s financial statements. Scott MacFarlane has details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What was Ivanka Trump’s job in Trump Organization? Her role explained

    What was Ivanka Trump’s job in Trump Organization? Her role explained

    [ad_1]

    Ivanka Trump is expected to provide testimony in her father’s fraud trial on Wednesday.

    New York Attorney General James is suing former President Donald Trump for $250 million, accusing him of inflating his net worth by billions of dollars to obtain benefits such as better bank loans and reduced tax bills between 2011 and 2021. Trump maintains his innocence in the case, accusing prosecutors of targeting him for political purposes. The lawsuit is civil, not criminal, meaning he will not face jail time.

    James compelled testimony from Trump’s three eldest children in the business fraud lawsuit. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump are listed as defendants in the civil suit and testified last week. The former president provided testimony on Monday.

    Ivanka Trump, who left the Trump Organization in 2017 for a role in the White House, will testify on Wednesday. Unlike her brothers, she is not a defendant in the civil suit and was dropped from it earlier this year due to a statute of limitations.

    Ivanka Trump attends a Department of Justice event in Washington, D.C., on August 4, 2020. Trump is set to testify in the Trump Organization’s business fraud trial on November 8, 2023.
    Drew Angerer/Getty Images

    She previously served as the executive vice president for development and acquisitions at the Trump Organization. James’ office has argued that while she is not a defendant, she still played a key role in negotiating and financing Trump Organization properties.

    She served as a “primary contact” for Deutsche Bank, the company’s largest lender, for three loans that are at the center of the case, according to the attorney general’s office.

    Newsweek reached out to Ivanka Trump‘s attorney for comment via email.

    The projects Ivanka Trump worked on at the Trump Organization included securing a lease and loan for a Washington hotel, loans for Trump’s Doral golf resort in South Florida, and a Trump-owned hotel and condo skyscraper in Chicago, the Associated Press reported.

    Federal prosecutors have argued her finances remained intertwined with the Trump Organization even after her 2017 departure.

    “She does not seem to be averse to her involvement in the family business when it comes to owning and collecting proceeds from the OPO sale, the Trump Organization purchasing insurance for her and her companies, managing her household staff and credit card bills, renting her apartment or even paying her legal fees in this action,” James wrote in a court filing last month.

    She reported $2.6 million in income from Trump entities in 2021 federal disclosures, the AP reported.

    Ivanka Trump tried, but failed, to fight a subpoena compelling her testimony in the business fraud trial, arguing that her testimony would cause “undue hardship” if it were to be held during a school week. A New York court rejected her request.

    She is expected to be the last member of the Trump family to testify and will follow the testimony of her father. The former president’s behavior during the trial drew a rebuke from Judge Arthur Engoron, who ordered his attorneys to “control him” following a series of tangents.