[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
Source link

[ad_1]
Google has agreed to pay $700 million and make several other concessions to settle allegations that it had been stifling competition against its Android app store — the same issue that went to trial in another case that could result in even bigger changes.
Although Google struck the deal with state attorneys general in September, the settlement’s terms weren’t revealed until late Monday in documents filed in San Francisco federal court. The disclosure came a week after a federal court jury rebuked Google for deploying anticompetitive tactics in its Play Store for Android apps.
The settlement with the states includes $630 million to compensate U.S. consumers funneled into a payment processing system that state attorneys general alleged drove up the prices for digital transactions within apps downloaded from the Play Store. That store caters to the Android software that powers most of the world’s smartphones.
Like Apple does in its iPhone app store, Google collects commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on in-app purchases — fees that state attorneys general contended drove prices higher than they would have been had there been an open market for payment processing. Those commissions generated billions of dollars in profit annually for Google, according to evidence presented in the recent trial focused on its Play Store.
Consumers eligible for a piece of the $630 million compensation fund are supposed to be automatically notified about various options for how they can receive their cut of the money.
Another $70 million of the pre-trial settlement will cover the penalties and other costs that Google is being forced to pay to the states.
Google also agreed to make other changes designed to make it even easier for consumers to download and install Android apps from other outlets besides its Play Store for the next five years. It will refrain from issuing as many security warnings, or “scare screens,” when alternative choices are being used.
The makers of Android apps will also gain more flexibility to offer alternative payment choices to consumers instead of having transactions automatically processed through the Play Store and its commission system. Apps will also be able to promote lower prices available to consumers who choose an alternate to the Play Store’s payment processing.
Washington D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb hailed the settlement as a victory for the tens of millions of people in the U.S. that rely on Android phones to help manage their lives. “For far too long, Google’s anticompetitive practices in the distribution of apps deprived Android users of choices and forced them to pay artificially elevated prices,” Schwalb said.
Wilson White, Google’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, framed the deal as a positive for the company, despite the money and concessions it entails. The settlement “builds on Android’s choice and flexibility, maintains strong security protections, and retains Google’s ability to compete with other (software) makers, and invest in the Android ecosystem for users and developers,” White wrote in a blog post.
Although the state attorneys general hailed the settlement as a huge win for consumers, it didn’t go far enough for Epic Games, which spearheaded the attack on Google’s app store practices with an antitrust lawsuit filed in August 2020.
Epic, the maker of the popular Fortnite video game, rebuffed the settlement in September and instead chose to take its case to trial, even though it had already lost on most of its key claims in a similar trial targeting Apple and its iPhone app store in 2021.
The Apple trial, though, was decided by a federal judge instead of the jury that vindicated Epic with a unanimous verdict that Google had built anticompetitive barriers around the Play Store. Google has vowed to appeal the verdict.
But the trial’s outcome nevertheless raises the specter of Google potentially being ordered to pay even more money as punishment for its past practices and making even more dramatic changes to its lucrative Android app ecosystem.
Those changes will be determined next year by U.S. District Judge James Donato, who presided over the Epic Games trial. Donato also still must approve Google’s Play Store settlement with the states.
Google faces an even bigger legal threat in another antitrust case targeting its dominant search engine that serves as the centerpiece of a digital ad empire that generates more than $200 billion in sales annually. Closing arguments in a trial pitting Google against the Justice Department are scheduled for early May before a federal judge in Washington D.C.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
More alleged details about Young Thug and his YSL conglomerate are coming to light on day two of the record label’s RICO trial. As The Shade Room previously reported, the rapper and 27 others were arrested in Georgia in May 2022.
Most defendants have severed from the case or taken plea deals, as Young Thug and five others maintain their innocence against racketeering and conspiracy charges.
As The Shade Room previously reported, day one of opening statements in the YSL trial began on Monday, November 27.
The day primarily consisted of Georgia district attorney Adriane Love’s allegation that Young Thug is the “head” of YSL. Furthermore, the state contends that the group, disguised as a music label called Young Stoner Life Records, is actually an “Atlanta-based street gang” responsible for murder, drug, and firearm violations.
“YSL operated as a pack,” Love reportedly told the courtroom Monday. “…For 10 years and counting, the group calling itself Young Slime Life dominated the Cleveland Avenue community of Fulton County. They created a crater … that sucked in the youth, innocence and even the lives of some of its youngest members.”
Day one’s proceeding was even plagued with the talk of a mistrial. However, the proceeding has pressed on into day two with Young Thug’s defense attorney, Brian Steel, sharing his opening statements.
According to legal reporter Meghann Cuniff, Steel began by explaining to the courtroom that Young Thug was “born into an environment, a community, a society that was filled with oppression, despair, hopelessness and helplessness.”
“Jeffery Williams was born into an environment, a community, a society that was filled with oppression, despair, hopelessness and helplessness.”
Steel skillfully used this intro about Young Thug’s background to transition into criticism of police and credibility of witnesses. pic.twitter.com/0iDMjOjfbc
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) November 28, 2023
From there, Steel reportedly explained the meaning of “Thug” in Young Thug’s stage name as “Truly Humbled Under God.”
“If he could ever make it as a musical artist and help his family, himself and his many others out of this endless cycle of hopelessness, he would be truly humbled under God. That’s what thug means,” Steel explained in footage captured and shared on X, formerly known as Twitter, by Cuniff.
According to journalist Bryson “Boom” Paul, Steel went on to establish Young Thug’s idolization of Lil Wayne as a teenager.
#YoungThugTrial: @youngthug’s attorney, Brian Steel, shares that the rapper idolized @LilTunechi and @2PAC as he discovered #hiphop at 16. #ysl #ysltrial #youngthug #rap pic.twitter.com/hyE7txs0A8
— Bryson “Boom” Paul (@brysonboompaul) November 28, 2023
From there, Steel reportedly referenced a now-deleted video of Young Thug taunting Lil Wayne around the time that the latter rapper’s tour bus was riddled with bullets in 2015, per REVOLT.
According to MTV, around that time, Lil Wayne had instructed fans to “stop listening” to Young Thug’s music.
Steel likened the rappers’ “battle” to NFL rivalries in his statements.
Steel tries to distance Thug from 2015 shooting of Lil Wayne’s bus. The video with the guns challenging Wayne was all Thug’s manager’s idea.
“You will learn that this is part of being involved in hip hop and rap. There’s all these battles going across social media. It generates… pic.twitter.com/tWN9Z11tVD
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) November 28, 2023
However, Steel’s establishment of the rappers’ alleged relationship and Young Thug’s reverence for Lil Wayne did not stop there. Journalist Jewel Wicker reports that Steel explained to the courtroom that Young Thug’s use of “Slime” stemmed from Lil Wayne.
Furthermore, Steel even took the time to explain that Young Thug’s alleged gang affiliation is misperceived.
Young thug lawyer explains that “Pushing P” stands for “Pushing Positivity” 💯😂 pic.twitter.com/HthHiCfK3a
— Shannonnn sharpes Burner (PARODY Account) (@shannonsharpeee) November 28, 2023
As previously reported by The Shade Room, Young Thug remains one of six defendants in the ongoing trial, which was halted by a ten-month jury selection.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Ural Glanville presides over the case, which now features a 12-person jury.
Furthermore, Rolling Stone reports that the jurors consist of nine women and three men. Additionally, nine of the twelve jurors are Black.
According to CNN, the trial is expected to last months and features a witness list that may spark celebrities such as Lil Wayne taking the stand.
[ad_2]
Jadriena Solomon
Source link
[ad_1]
A star neuroscientist at USC is facing allegations of misconduct after whistleblowers submitted a report to the National Institutes of Health that accused the professor of manipulating data in dozens of research papers and sounded alarms about an experimental stroke medication his company is developing.
The accusations against Berislav V. Zlokovic, professor and chair of the department of physiology and neuroscience at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, were made by a small group of independent researchers and reported in the journal Science.
The report identifies allegedly doctored images and data in 35 research papers in which Zlokovic is the sole common author. It also raised questions about findings in Phase II clinical trials of a drug called 3K3A-APC, an experimental stroke treatment sponsored by ZZ Biotech, the Houston-based company Zlokovic co-founded.
Preclinical data appeared to have been manipulated, the report authors allege. In addition, the Phase II results appear to contain errors that would skew interpretation of the data in favor of the drug.
An attorney for Zlokovic said the neuroscientist takes the accusations “extremely seriously” and was “committed to fully cooperating” with a USC inquiry into the matter. However, he said his client could not comment on the allegations while the review was pending.
“Professor Zlokovic would normally welcome addressing every question raised, insofar as allegations are based on information and premises Professor Zlokovic knows to be completely incorrect,” attorney Alfredo X. Jarrin wrote in an email. “And other questions address work not performed at his lab or papers where he was not the senior author or contact author and his role was limited.”
The university also issued a statement saying it takes allegations of research integrity seriously. “Consistent with federal regulations and USC policies, the university forwards any such allegations to its Office of Research Integrity for careful review,” the university said in a statement. “Under USC policy, this review is required to be confidential. As a result, we are unable to provide any further information.”
Last year, USC’s Keck School of Medicine received from NIH the first $4 million of a planned $30-million grant to conduct Phase III trials of the experimental stroke treatment on 1,400 people.
Given the serious issues outlined in their report, the whistleblowers say those trials should be stopped immediately.
“It should certainly be paused in my opinion,” said Matthew Schrag, an assistant professor of neurology at Vanderbilt and co-author of the whistleblower report. “There are red flags about the safety of that treatment.”
He said that evidence from the USC-led phase II trial of the drug, which was published in 2018 and called RHAPSODY, raised questions of patient safety. Patients in that trial were more likely to die in the week after treatment, and more likely to be disabled 90 days later than those who were given a placebo.
In addition, Schrag said, some patients given the placebo had to wait longer for the standard stroke treatment of the drug tPA or surgery to dissolve the blood clot.
“The faster you’re able to intervene to either restore blood flow with the drug or restore blood flow by removing the clot, the more brain cells survive,” he said.
He added that he did not believe the delay was intentional but that it had the effect of “skewing the results in favor of the drug.”
Schrag previously raised questions about the integrity of other neurological research, work he said was separate from his employment at Vanderbilt.
Scientists have questioned Zlokovic’s research anonymously for years, Schrag said. Many of these concerns were published on PubPeer, a website on which anonymous contributors can examine scientific papers and highlight potential flaws.
Yet scientists working with Zlokovic did not complain publicly, he said, allowing the studies to continue for years and succeed at attracting tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding.
“I think people are concerned about the potential for backlash for harm to their own careers,” Schrag said. “And so I think that motivates people to just go along.”
In its report, the journal Science interviewed four former employees of Zlokovic’s lab who said that Zlokovic routinely pressured them to manipulate data. Two said they were told to discard notebooks with results that didn’t fit preferred conclusions he hoped to reach.
“There were clear examples of him instructing people to manipulate data to fit the hypothesis,” one former employee told the journal.
The severity of the data manipulation charges merits a thorough investigation of Zlokovic’s data, said Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist and scientific integrity consultant who co-wrote the whistleblower report.
“Appropriate steps would be for USC to ask Zlokovic to give them the lab’s notebooks and data,” Bik said. “For example, for images where it appears that certain parts might have been duplicated or erased, the original images as they came off a scanner or microscope need to be compared to the published figure panels.”
Bik is among a subset of the report’s authors who are considering filing a federal whistleblower lawsuit. Should the NIH deem that any federal grant money was used improperly, a successful suit would entitle the plaintiffs to a portion of the money the government can claw back.
Zlokovic has received roughly $93 million in NIH funding, according to Science. A spokesperson for NIH’s Office of Extramural Research would not comment on the specifics of the case.
“We take concerns related to research integrity very seriously, and this may include allegations of research misconduct,” the office said in a statement.
Over the years, Zlokovic has created several biotech companies aimed at commercializing his scientific work. In 2007, he co-founded ZZ Biotech, which has been working to gain federal approval of 3K3A-APC.
Last year, Kent Pryor, ZZ Biotech’s chief executive, called the drug “a potential game-changer.”
“I believe, based on the positive clinical results to date, our 3K3A-APC will potentially create the first new drug class to treat ischemic stroke since 2003,” Pryor said.
On Tuesday, Pryor declined to comment on the details in the whistleblowers’ report. “I don’t want to get into particular explanations right now because of the ongoing investigations,” he said.
He said the Phase III clinical trial had not yet begun.
Zlokovic is a leading researcher on the blood-brain barrier, with particular interest in its role in stroke and dementia. He received his medical degree and doctorate in physiology at the University of Belgrade and joined the faculty at USC’s Keck School of Medicine after several fellowships in London.
A polyglot and amateur opera singer, Zlokovic left USC and spent 11 years at the University of Rochester before returning in 2011. He was appointed director of USC’s Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute the following year.
“My role will be to enhance an already very strong neuroscience base and try to make USC the No. 1 place in the neurosciences in the country and the world,” Zlokovic said upon rejoining the USC faculty. “It’s a big goal, but I think, with what’s going on right now, it’s actually moving in that direction. I think that could be my greatest contribution.”
[ad_2]
Corinne Purtill, Melody Petersen
Source link


[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
The woman accused in the May 2022 shooting death of rising professional cyclist Anna Moriah Wilson — known as “Mo” Wilson — has been found guilty of her murder. Jurors reached the verdict for Katilin Armstrong Thursday in court at the Blackwell-Thurman Criminal Justice Center in Austin, Texas, concluding a criminal trial that lasted just over two weeks.
Armstrong, 35, had pleaded not guilty to a charge of first-degree murder in Wilson’s death. She was also charged with escape causing bodily injury, which is a felony, for allegedly trying to escape custody three weeks before the trial began. Authorities said Armstrong fled from officers as they escorted her to a doctor’s appointment on Oct. 11, but only ran for about half a block before they caught up with her.
She could potentially face up to 99 years in prison for the murder conviction, and up to 20 years in prison for the second charge if convicted. There was also an outstanding warrant for Armstrong’s arrest on a misdemeanor charge for theft of services when she was questioned by police after Wilson’s death.
Wilson was found fatally shot on the floor of a friend’s bathroom on May 11, 2022, just days before she was slated to compete in a cycling race that she was also favored to win. The up-and-coming athlete was 25 at the time of her death.
Mikala Compton / AP
Police have said that Wilson previously dated Armstrong’s boyfriend, Colin Strickland, a fellow competitive cyclist, with whom Wilson remained friends after their relationship ended. Wilson and Strickland had gone swimming at a local pool hours before she was killed, according to police. Strickland told them after the murder that he had picked up Wilson earlier in the day on May 11 for the swim, and dropped her off at the friend’s house, where Wilson was staying ahead of the race in Austin, that night at around 8:30 p.m.
Armstrong worked as a yoga instructor and real estate agent in Austin, and also owned a business with Strickland. They lived together. During a period of separation in their on-off relationship, Strickland briefly dated Wilson.
Prosecutors alleged that Armstrong had been using the fitness app Strava to track Wilson’s location, since Wilson used the app to manage her workouts. They told the jury during Armstrong’s trial that her car, a Jeep, had been seen near the apartment where Wilson was staying with her friend, Caitlin Cash.
Cash testified during the first week of the trial, describing how she arrived back at her home to find Wilson covered in blood, after the cyclist had been shot in the head and chest. In addition to playing a recording of the 911 call from the night of the murder, when Cash tried to revive Wilson after finding her, prosecutors said the jury would be shown surveillance footage where Wilson could be heard screaming just before her death.
“The last thing Mo did on this earth was scream in terror. Those screams are followed by ‘pow! pow!’” said Travis County Prosecutor Rick Jones in his opening statement at the trial. He said Armstrong shot Wilson again, for the third time, seconds after that.
Ansel Dickey/Substack
Armstrong’s defense said there were no witnesses to the killing, nor is there video evidence placing Armstrong at the scene of Wilson’s death. She was questioned by police and let go after the murder, but a warrant was eventually issued for Armstrong’s arrest on May 19. Before the warrant, authorities said that Armstrong sold her Jeep for cash and traveled from Austin to New York City, then from Newark, New Jersey, to Costa Rica, allegedly using her sister’s passport as her own for the trip.
Authorities said that Armstrong taught yoga while in Costa Rica and underwent plastic surgery to change her appearance, with prosecutors additionally telling the jury that Armstrong had cut her hair and changed her hair color as well. Her attorney, Geoffrey Puryear, addressed speculation about her time in Costa Rica during the trial, saying, ” “She would have no reason to know about any (arrest) warrant. You will hear Kaitlin is passionate about traveling and passionate about yoga,” CBS Texas reported.
After almost six weeks in Costa Rica, Armstrong was arrested by officers with the U.S. Marshals Service at a hostel on Santa Teresa Beach in Provincia de Puntarenas, and returned back to the U.S.
Strickland also testified at Armstrong’s trial, telling the jury about how their relationship began over a dating app in 2019, and continued to date on and off for more than two years. He said Armstrong had access to his communications, the Austin American-Statesman reported, and that he had changed the name of Wilson’s contact in his phone to avoid conflict with Armstrong. He called Wilson “an immense talent” while addressing the jury.
In other testimonies, two of Amrstrong’s former friends took the stand. One of them, Nicole Mertz, knew Armstrong through the cycling community and said she considered her to be one of her closest friends, CBS affiliate KEYE-TV reported. Mertz recalled once being at an Austin restaurant called The Meteor with Armstrong, where Armstrong had said she was upset because Wilson had come to town and was visiting Strickland, according to the station.
Mertz also said Armstrong became “visibly angry” seeing Wilson enter the restaurant, and, when Mertz asked what Armstrong would do if Strickland started dating someone else, Mertz testified that her former friend responded, “I would kill her,” reported KEYE-TV.
– Allison Gualtieri contributed reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Ivanka Trump is expected to provide testimony in her father’s fraud trial on Wednesday.
New York Attorney General James is suing former President Donald Trump for $250 million, accusing him of inflating his net worth by billions of dollars to obtain benefits such as better bank loans and reduced tax bills between 2011 and 2021. Trump maintains his innocence in the case, accusing prosecutors of targeting him for political purposes. The lawsuit is civil, not criminal, meaning he will not face jail time.
James compelled testimony from Trump’s three eldest children in the business fraud lawsuit. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump are listed as defendants in the civil suit and testified last week. The former president provided testimony on Monday.
Ivanka Trump, who left the Trump Organization in 2017 for a role in the White House, will testify on Wednesday. Unlike her brothers, she is not a defendant in the civil suit and was dropped from it earlier this year due to a statute of limitations.
She previously served as the executive vice president for development and acquisitions at the Trump Organization. James’ office has argued that while she is not a defendant, she still played a key role in negotiating and financing Trump Organization properties.
She served as a “primary contact” for Deutsche Bank, the company’s largest lender, for three loans that are at the center of the case, according to the attorney general’s office.
Newsweek reached out to Ivanka Trump‘s attorney for comment via email.
The projects Ivanka Trump worked on at the Trump Organization included securing a lease and loan for a Washington hotel, loans for Trump’s Doral golf resort in South Florida, and a Trump-owned hotel and condo skyscraper in Chicago, the Associated Press reported.
Federal prosecutors have argued her finances remained intertwined with the Trump Organization even after her 2017 departure.
“She does not seem to be averse to her involvement in the family business when it comes to owning and collecting proceeds from the OPO sale, the Trump Organization purchasing insurance for her and her companies, managing her household staff and credit card bills, renting her apartment or even paying her legal fees in this action,” James wrote in a court filing last month.
She reported $2.6 million in income from Trump entities in 2021 federal disclosures, the AP reported.
Ivanka Trump tried, but failed, to fight a subpoena compelling her testimony in the business fraud trial, arguing that her testimony would cause “undue hardship” if it were to be held during a school week. A New York court rejected her request.
She is expected to be the last member of the Trump family to testify and will follow the testimony of her father. The former president’s behavior during the trial drew a rebuke from Judge Arthur Engoron, who ordered his attorneys to “control him” following a series of tangents.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
At the beginning of Robert De Niro’s civil trial this week, the actor’s testimony attracted attention for its volume and bluster. He’s in court over two lawsuits, one claiming that he was an irascible boss who discriminated against his former employee Graham Chase Robinson based on her gender, and the other, filed by his company Canal Productions, alleging that Robinson diverted company time and resources to her own ends. In his defense, De Niro shouted on Monday, “This is all nonsense!”
It was this sort of remark, Robinson testified on Thursday, that came to characterize her time working for De Niro. When asked by her lawyer how often he lashed out at her, the AP reported, Robinson replied, “He yelled at me two days ago.”
Continuing her testimony on Friday, Robinson elaborated on her experiences with De Niro. After becoming his assistant in 2008, she went on to work as Canal’s vice president of finance and production. She testified that these jobs entailed being on call 24/7 and 365 days a year, according to Variety. By the time she left her role in late 2018, she said that he had twice called her a “bitch.”
It was “very difficult to have him call me that,” Robinson said, and “it was very demeaning [and] incredibly hurtful to hear that from your boss.”
Earlier this week, De Niro exclaimed “You got me!” after admitting that he asked Robinson to scratch his back on two occasions when he couldn’t reach an itch. On the stand, Robinson took offense to the tenor of these “creepy” and “disgusting” requests. “I like the way you do it,” she remembered him saying.
The trial is expected to last another week.
[ad_2]
Dan Adler
Source link

[ad_1]
Sam Bankman-Fried, who founded the FTX cryptocurrency exchange, on Thursday was convicted of seven fraud and conspiracy charges carrying a maximum sentence of 110 years in prison.
During the monthlong trial, Bankman-Fried gave testimony in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that stretched over three days. At one point during his time on the stand, the 31-year-old disgraced mogul testified that he believed his crypto company would fail.
“I thought there was maybe a 20 percent chance of success,” Bankman-Fried testified.
He also said he knew “basically nothing” about cryptocurrency before founding FTX in 2019.
Nevertheless, Bankman-Fried had pleaded not guilty to all seven counts of fraud and conspiracy. Prosecutors argued that he and others involved in FTX’s operations defrauded customers out of as much as $10 billion to cover losses and pay back loans owed by sister fund Alameda Research.
The testimony of Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend and one-time chief executive officer of Alameda, garnered much media attention. She told the court that Bankman-Fried instructed her to steal billions of dollars from customers to cover losses and debt owed by the sister fund.
Bankman-Fried was accused of bullying Ellison during her testimony by scoffing and shaking his head.
At one time, FTX was seen as a tech success story. The company enjoyed a high profile with commercials featuring stars like football legend Tom Brady and comedian Larry David. However, the company collapsed in November 2022, and Bankman-Fried was arrested the following month in the Bahamas before being extradited to the United States.
“His crimes caught up to him. His crimes have been exposed,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon told the jury on Thursday, according to the Associated Press, which also reported that U.S. Attorney Damian Williams told the media after the verdict that Bankman-Fried “perpetrated one of the biggest financial frauds in American history, a multibillion dollar scheme designed to make him the king of crypto.”
“But here’s the thing: The cryptocurrency industry might be new. The players like Sam Bankman-Fried might be new. This kind of fraud, this kind of corruption is as old as time and we have no patience for it,” he added.
Bankman-Fried’s attorney said in a statement that while they respect the jury’s decision, they were “very disappointed with the result.”
Newsweek reached out to Bankman-Fried’s attorney via email for further comment Thursday night.
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan set a sentencing date of March 28, and Bankman-Fried is expected to appeal.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Robert De Niro’s ongoing civil trial has been filled with a series of colorful one-liners. “You got me!” he exploded, after admitting that he had twice asked his former employee Graham Chase Robinson to scratch his back when he had an itch he couldn’t reach. In his testimony this week, he described Robinson’s accusations of harassment and gender discrimination as “all nonsense,” but acknowledged that he may have asked her to have a late-night martini delivered to him from Nobu.
On Thursday, De Niro’s girlfriend Tiffany Chen joined the fray. While on the stand, according to the Independent, she discussed a text she sent to a then employee of Canal Productions, De Niro’s company where Robinson worked as vice president of finance and production after rising from her role as his assistant beginning in 2008.
“The whole situation has become very Single White Female,” Chen wrote. She was discussing how Robinson had gone into the couple’s home and allegedly unplugged all of her electronics.
In the courtroom, Chen elaborated on what she meant by this reference to the 1992 erotic thriller: a woman who is “obsessive, crazy, and dangerous.”
Robinson, Chen testified, dreamt of dating De Niro herself. “I believed she lived her whole life as a fantasy,” Chen said.
The trial, which began on Monday and is expected to last two weeks, addresses two lawsuits that Robinson and De Niro filed against each other. In 2019, De Niro accused Robinson of using company resources for personal purposes, including the use of over $125,000 in frequent flyer miles and a Netflix account that the suit alleged she repeatedly accessed during work hours. In short order, Robinson responded with a suit of her own, claiming that De Niro subjected her to repeated sexist remarks and “gratuitous physical contact.”
In Chen’s view, the dispute was romantic in origin. She testified that Robinson had an “imaginary intimacy” with De Niro and that Chen urged him to get rid of her. Robinson, she said amid a stream of angry remarks, was “obsessive, psychotic and dangerous.”
In other texts displayed in court, Chen described Robinson to De Niro as a “straight up Nasty B****” and wrote “her possessive manner over the house makes me very uncomfortable.”
When asked if she had written these messages, Chen was just as direct. “Yeah,” she testified. “I wrote it.”
[ad_2]
Dan Adler
Source link