ReportWire

Tag: Trial

  • Breaking down Trump’s free speech claims in Georgia election case

    Breaking down Trump’s free speech claims in Georgia election case

    [ad_1]

    Breaking down Trump’s free speech claims in Georgia election case – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A judge in the Georgia 2020 election case heard arguments Thursday over whether former President Donald Trump’s First Amendment rights shield him from prosecution. CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman joins “America Decides” with key takeaways.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trial brings shadowy world of Koreatown’s ‘doumi’ to light: Party girls, karaoke, extortion

    Trial brings shadowy world of Koreatown’s ‘doumi’ to light: Party girls, karaoke, extortion

    [ad_1]

    The drivers would circle Koreatown, piloting a van filled with party girls. The so-called doumi — decked out in bikini tops, short skirts and tight dresses — were looking to get hired at one of the many karaoke bars that fill the neighborhood.

    Doumi drivers, named for the hostesses they transport, could make $40 an hour for each passenger hired to party with karaoke customers. And each month, drivers would pay a portion of their profits to Daekun Cho, a well-known figure in Koreatown.

    Authorities arrested Cho last year, and he’s since been charged with 55 counts of extortion, one count of attempted extortion and another of carjacking.

    In a federal trial that unfolded in downtown L.A. this month, prosecutors painted Cho, 39, as a gangster who for years extorted monthly protection fees from karaoke bar owners and doumi drivers, many of whom were in the country illegally and did not speak English fluently.

    He carried out acts of violence on those who did not pay or who violated his rules, they said in court, including beating one driver with a baseball bat and shooting a doumi in the neck. Prosecutors displayed photos from Cho’s Instagram account and images of his tattoos to identify him as a member of the Grape Street Crips, a predominantly Black gang based in Watts’ Jordan Downs housing project.

    By the end of the five-day trial, jurors would walk away with a better understanding of Koreatown’s underbelly and be left to determine Cho’s role in it.

    “He wanted everyone in Koreatown to know about his power and that he had to be paid or else,” Asst. U.S. Atty. Jena MacCabe told the jury at the trial’s start.

    But defense attorneys argued that drivers and karaoke bar owners paid Cho to be part of an “association,” akin to a union member paying dues, and that in return he kept new clubs and drivers from horning in on their businesses. They said there was no definitive proof Cho was behind the baseball bat beating or the shooting.

    “He tried to bring some order into this otherwise chaotic, gray market economy,” Karen Sosa, who represented Cho, said in her opening statement. “Everybody in this case was paying to play.”

    Joo Hun Lee testified during the trial that he first met Cho — known in the neighborhood as “DK” — when Lee planned to start a company called Plus driving doumi around Koreatown.

    “I was told if you want to start this kind of work, you will have to get permission from an individual called DK,” Lee said through a Korean interpreter. He testified that Cho told him he was “a Korean gangster member.”

    When Lee started Plus with a business partner, Yun Soo Shin, around 2019, they began paying Cho $100 each month, through cash or at times on Venmo, Lee testified. If he and his partner didn’t pay, he said, “we were not able to work.”

    Drivers would pay a starting fee of around $1,500 and then a monthly association fee, according to court testimony.

    On any given night, Lee testified, he and Shin would transport 10 to 15 women — whom they recruited through Craigslist — to different karaoke bars in the neighborhood. Sometimes they drove from 8:30 p.m. until 6 a.m. The drivers waited to see if the doumi were hired. If they were not, the drivers didn’t get paid.

    “These girls would go inside the clubs, and they’d be paraded in front of middle-aged businessman … and these middle aged businessmen would decide whether to hire any particular girl based upon her looks, correct?” Cho’s attorney, Mark Werksman, asked.

    “Yes,” Lee responded.

    Werksman referenced the rules Lee and Shin set for the women they hired. Among them: no sex with customers and no drugs. Each woman was expected to work at least four nights a week.

    One rule, displayed in court, instructed doumi not to lie to clients and drivers about money, stating that they only charged $120 plus tips for the first two hours and $60 plus tips for every additional hour.

    Cho also set rules, witnesses testified. If he told drivers not to go to a certain karaoke bar and they went, they would be penalized. The same went for karaoke bar owners who called drivers who Cho told them were banned.

    The first penalty was $200. The next, $400, according to texts sent by Cho that were presented in court.

    “If u violate our rule one more time,” one text to a driver read, “U gonna see the real demon.”

    Shin testified that he and Lee stopped paying in early 2021, after Cho raised prices. Within months, Shin testified, Cho and another man confronted him outside McQueen Karaoke on Western Avenue, dragged him out of his car and beat him with aluminum baseball bats, breaking his arm.

    The other assailant then stole the Honda Odyssey that Shin had rented to drop off two doumi that night.

    Shin said Cho was wearing a mask with a skeleton on it during the attack, but that he was able to identify him by the top half of his face and his voice. Prosecutors displayed a photo Cho posted on Instagram after the attack wearing what appeared to be the same mask.

    The partners closed their business soon after, and Lee left the state.

    Another witness, who said he works at Concert Karaoke, testified that he had to pay Cho $600 each month because “he threatened that if we don’t pay, we’ll lose business and he’ll do something to us.” After he stopped paying, he told the jury that Cho threatened him that he better not see him in the neighborhood.

    The witness said he stopped going to Koreatown.

    Prosecutors played surveillance footage depicting a shooting outside a karaoke bar on July 15, 2022, which they said was carried out by Cho. Police body camera footage showed a doumi who had been shot in the neck saying, “Help, help. Please, help.”

    Sang Heun Shin, another doumi driver, testified that he had paid Cho every month for four years before deciding to stop. Then, one night in January 2023, Cho punched him in the face and threatened to kill him, he said. Sang Heun Shin began working with investigators and agreed to wear a wire the next time he made a payment.

    Cho changed the meeting location three times, asking at one point, “U called cops?” before finally telling the driver to give the cash to an intermediary, according to text messages displayed in court.

    During the trial, Werksman and Sosa sought to cast doubt on the credibility of the witnesses, painting them as having motive to lie. They highlighted their immigration status and referenced their potential to obtain U Visas, which give immigrant victims of certain crimes the chance to live and work legally in the U.S. if they cooperate with authorities.

    In his closing argument, Werksman called the witness testimony “muddled,” “evasive” and “incomplete.” Werksman referred to the drivers and Cho as “bros.”

    “These drivers formed an association to bring a modicum of order to the jungle,” Werksman said.

    Werksman added that the payments to Cho were a “pittance.”

    “Was that a protection racket or was it a voluntary, if at times slightly chafing and unwelcome, association of street rats who needed to band together to achieve their common goal of exploiting hard-working, sexy young women who earned a few hundred dollars of cash every night abasing themselves for the pleasure of karaoke bar patrons?” Werksman said.

    Assistant U.S. Atty. Kevin Butler said the 56 counts tied to an extortion payment are “just a fraction of the real amount of extortion that [Cho] was responsible for.”

    “Cho was a predator. He preyed and stalked and hunted — as he called it — his victims: people in Koreatown who he thought either could not or would not go to police,” Butler said during his closing argument. “He gave each one of them an impossible, false choice: Pay him or get banned. Pay him or face the consequence. Pay him or flee the state. Pay him or get ripped out of your car and beaten with aluminum baseball bats. Pay him or get shot in the neck.”

    On Tuesday morning, the jury came back with its verdict: Guilty on all counts.

    [ad_2]

    Brittny Mejia

    Source link

  • 3/25: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    3/25: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    3/25: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on the federal raids of homes owned by Sean “Diddy” Combs, Donald Trump’s reduced bond in his New York civil fraud trial, and what to know about ISIS-K after the attack in Moscow.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3/25: CBS Evening News

    3/25: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    3/25: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Trump fraud trial bond reduced to $175 million; Man honored for stopping mass shooting

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump fraud trial bond reduced to $175 million

    Trump fraud trial bond reduced to $175 million

    [ad_1]

    Trump fraud trial bond reduced to $175 million – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Former President Trump’s bond in his New York fraud trial has been reduced to $175 million, down from nearly half a billion dollars. Trump’s “hush money” trial, meanwhile, is set to begin April 15. Robert Costa reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Republican voters express support for Trump despite legal cases

    Republican voters express support for Trump despite legal cases

    [ad_1]

    Republican voters express support for Trump despite legal cases – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Many Republican voters in key battleground states are standing behind former President Donald Trump amid his mounting legal troubles. With the “hush money” trial set to start April 15, the presumptive GOP nominee will spend a lot of time in the courtroom ahead of November. CBS News’ Major Garrett, Fin Gómez and Katrina Kaufman join with more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3/24: CBS Weekend News

    3/24: CBS Weekend News

    [ad_1]

    3/24: CBS Weekend News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Deadline for Trump’s bond approaching; Man turns Easter egg order mishap into charity opportunity

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.K. high court rules Australian computer scientist is not bitcoin founder

    U.K. high court rules Australian computer scientist is not bitcoin founder

    [ad_1]

    Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? A ruling from Britain’s high court Thursday has at least narrowed down who Satoshi is not. 

    For eight years, Australian computer scientist Craig Wright has claimed that he was the man behind “Satoshi Nakamoto,” the pseudonym that masked the identity of the creator of bitcoin. His claim was vehemently rejected by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance, or Copa, a nonprofit group of technology and cryptocurrency firms, who brought the case to court.

    In his ruling, Justice James Mellor said Wright did not invent bitcoin, was not the man behind Satoshi, or the author of the initial versions of the bitcoin software. Further explanation will emerge when Mellor’s written statement is published at a later date.

    “Having considered all the evidence and submissions presented to me in this trial, I’ve reached the conclusion that the evidence is overwhelming,” he said, according to a court transcript.

    Dr Craig Wright court case
    Britain’s high court Thursday ruled Craig Wright (above) did not invent bitcoin. For eight years, Australian computer scientist has claimed he was the man behind “Satoshi Nakamoto,” the pseudonym that masked the identity of the cryptocurrency’s creator. 

    Lucy North/PA Images via Getty Images


    During the trial, Copa claimed Wright had created an “elaborate false narrative” and forged documents to suggest he was Satoshi and had “terrorized” those who questioned him.

    A spokesperson for Copa said Thursday’s decision is a “win for developers, for the entire open source community, and for the truth.”

    “For over eight years, Dr. Wright and his financial backers have lied about his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto and used that lie to bully and intimidate developers in the bitcoin community,” the spokesperson added.

    Wright, who attended the start of the five-week trial, denied the allegations.

    At stake was not just bragging rights to the creation of bitcoin, the world’s most popular virtual currency, but control of the intellectual property rights.

    Wright has used his claim as bitcoin’s inventor to file litigation to drive developers away from further developing the open-source technology, the alliance claimed in their lawsuit. The ruling will clearly impact three pending lawsuits that Wright has filed based on his claim to having the intellectual property rights to bitcoin.

    The murky origins of bitcoin date to the height of the financial crisis in 2008. A paper authored by a person or group using the Nakamoto pen name explained how digital currency could be sent around the world anonymously, without banks or national currencies. Nakamoto seemed to vanish three years later.

    Speculation on the true identity swirled for years and the names of several candidates emerged when Wright first surfaced to claim the identity in 2016, only to quickly return to the shadows, saying he didn’t “have the courage” to provide more proof.

    Bitcoin, the world’s first cryptocurrency, was released in 2009 as an open-source software and is the most high-profile digital currency. As with all digital tokens, bitcoin is not tied to any bank or government. Like cash, it allows users to spend and receive money anonymously, or mostly so. It can also be converted to cash when deposited into accounts at prices set in online trading.


    Bitcoin exchange-traded funds win SEC approval: Here’s what that means

    04:38

    Supporters say it can be more trustworthy than traditional money, which can be vulnerable to the whims of those in power. Skeptics say their volatility has introduced a potential new risk to the global financial system, and fret about their potential to promote illicit activities and introduce uncertainty.

    Despite occasional big wobbles, one bitcoin is now worth over $70,000, three times what it was worth just a year ago. Demand for the bitcoin has risen sharply on so-called spot bitcoin exchange traded funds. The ETFs, which allow investors to dabble in crypto in a less riskier way than ever before, has attracted a huge influx of cash this year, experts said. 

    Thursday’s verdict is a relief to the crypto exchanges who have been rejecting the idea of Wright as Satoshi.

    “Satoshi understood the value of decentralization and built bitcoin so that it could not be controlled by a single person or entity,” said a spokesperson for Kraken, one of the biggest exchanges. “We’re pleased the court recognized the overwhelming evidence that categorically settles that Wright is not Satoshi.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3/13: CBS Evening News

    3/13: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    3/13: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    House passes bill that could lead to U.S. TikTok ban; Texas teacher donates kidney to save life of toddler she did not know

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 3/13: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    3/13: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    3/13: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on efforts in Congress to ban TikTok, a judge throwing out some charges in Trump’s Georgia case, and dangerous weather across the country including a major snowstorm in Colorado.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2/28: CBS Evening News

    2/28: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    2/28: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Supreme Court agrees to take up Trump immunity case; How 2 Florida teens exhibited real girl power

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury chosen for Emonte Morgan murder trial, accused of shooting CPD Officer Ella French in 2021

    Jury chosen for Emonte Morgan murder trial, accused of shooting CPD Officer Ella French in 2021

    [ad_1]

    CHICAGO (WLS) — To see the latest update of the trial, click here.

    The trial for man accused of fatally shooting Chicago police Officer Ella French began on Monday with jury selection.

    After initially selecting a jury, selection resumed Monday afternoon, after an alternate was removed.

    Emonte Morgan and his brother Eric Morgan were charged in the 2021 murder of French.

    Prosecutors said Emonte Morgan fired the fatal shots that killed French and injured her partner, Carlos Yanez, times during a traffic stop in West Englewood in August 2021.

    RELATED: Surveillance video shows traffic stop before fatal shooting of CPD Officer Ella French; 2 charged

    His brother, Eric Morgan, was driving the car the officers had pulled over for expired tags, police said.

    When French asked Eric Morgan to hand over the car keys and get out, he did. But police say Emonte Morgan, who was sitting in the back seat, would not cooperate. Investigators said he struggled with police, and had his gun in his waistband.

    According to officials, both officers had their guns holstered when Emonte Morgan pulled out a gun and fired at both officers.

    Emonte’s grandmother Denice Morgan was present in court to defend him Monday.

    “He’s afraid; his life is at stake with this, you know. Who wouldn’t be afraid? He’s just starting out life, he’s a baby,” she said.

    As jury selection began, a judge ordered Cook County deputies to collect fliers that had been posted around the courthouse in support of the accused murderer.

    Emonte’s mother also demanded video evidence be shown in court.

    “The narrative has been painted long enough – the false narrative by police,” his mother Evaleena Flores said. “It’s time that people know the truth. I say release the body cams and let the body cams speak for themselves.”

    Last week, a judge ruled the jury will be allowed to hear and see the body camera footage.

    Emonte Morgan has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    Eric Morgan accepted a plea deal last year for a seven-year sentence.

    French was one of the officers who took a 1-month-old baby and her mother to the hospital on July 2 when the baby was shot in the head during a mass shooting in Englewood.

    SEE ALSO: 1-month-old shot in head among 7 wounded in Englewood

    Copyright © 2024 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Diane Pathieu

    Source link

  • “Hotel California” lyrics trial reveals Eagles manager cited “God Henley” in phone call

    “Hotel California” lyrics trial reveals Eagles manager cited “God Henley” in phone call

    [ad_1]

    Handwritten “Hotel California” lyrics at center of lawsuit


    Handwritten “Hotel California” lyrics at center of lawsuit

    00:42

    The Eagles’ manager once told their authorized biographer that his book wasn’t getting published because of friction from “a pampered rock star,” according to a recording played in court Thursday.

    “It’s gonna come out when God Henley says it can,” Irving Azoff said in the same years-old phone call, apparently referring to band co-founder Don Henley. “Now it’s up to God.”

    The recording emerged at the criminal trial of three collectibles experts charged with conspiring to hang onto and sell sheets of handwritten, draft lyrics to the megahit “Hotel California” and other Eagles favorites.

    The biographer, Ed Sanders, isn’t charged in the case, but he factors in it because he sold the roughly 100 pages to one of the defendants. Henley and prosecutors contend that the documents were stolen, saying Sanders obtained them from Henley’s home to research the book and was obligated to return them to the Eagles.

    Defendants Edward Kosinski, Craig Inciardi and Glenn Horowitz have pleaded not guilty.

    Hotel California Lyrics-Trial
    Former Rock & Roll Hall of Fame curator Craig Inciardi, left, memorabilia seller Edward Kosinski, center, and rare-book dealer Glenn Horowitz take their places on the defendants’ table in court on Feb. 21, 2024, in New York.

    Mary Altaffer / AP


    The never-published book is a side player in the legal case. But testimony about the book has shed light on the Eagles’ interpersonal dynamics and reputational aims around the time of the group’s 1980 breakup.

    And Thursday offered a behind-the-scenes look at music-business wheeling and dealing, and at the longtime manager whom Henley once called – affectionately – “our Satan.”

    Azoff has been the personal manager of the Eagles, one of the most successful bands in rock history, since about 1973. He’s managed many other big-name musicians, produced the classic 1982 teen comedy “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” and was CEO of Ticketmaster for a time.

    In 1979, as the Eagles were closing out the decade that brought them superstardom, they hired Sanders to pen a biography. The writer, who also co-founded the ’60s counterculture rock band the Fugs, had authored a noted book about murderous cult leader Charles Manson.

    “Pampered rock star”

    Azoff testified Wednesday that when Sanders turned in the Eagles manuscript in the early 1980s, Henley and Eagles co-founder Glenn Frey were “very disappointed.” Azoff said he found the draft’s discussion of the Eagles’ breakup “unacceptable” and the band never authorized publication because the book “wasn’t very good.”

    “It didn’t, to me, capture the essence of the joy of the story,” Azoff added on the witness stand Thursday, elaborating about the Eagles “chasing the American dream and how important they were to establishing Southern California as a mecca of music.”

    “Somebody else might have thought it was very good,” he said, but “we didn’t think it was good for the Eagles.”

    Hotel California Lyrics Trial
    Eagles manager Irving Azoff leaves supreme court after testifying, Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2024, in New York. 

    Mary Altaffer / AP


    Then one of Kosinski’s lawyers played a recording of Azoff proclaiming he was “phenomenally, absolutely happy” with the book.

    The recording, of a call between Azoff and Sanders, was undated but apparently from the 1980s. The defense said the writer taped it.

    At other points in the call, Azoff indicated that Frey didn’t have a problem with the manuscript and that “deals are done,” but there still was an obstacle.

    “Ed, you’ve been wonderful. The book is gonna come out – it’s just that I have a pampered rock star here,” Azoff said.

    Asked on the witness stand who the “pampered rock star” was, Azoff said: “Probably all of them.”

    “You’d agree that you told Mr. Sanders that the book was going to come out when ‘God Henley’ says it can?” attorney Scott Edelman asked at another point.

    “It was either me or Satan that told him that,” Azoff quipped.

    Henley said in the Eagles’ 1998 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame induction speech that Azoff “may be Satan, but he’s our Satan.″ Asked during testimony Wednesday about the remark, Azoff shot back: “Have you ever heard of humor, sir?”

    Notwithstanding the taped phone call, Azoff said Thursday that he didn’t remember any publishing deal for the Eagles biography, and he said years of rewriting never produced a book the band was willing to approve.

    “There were a lot of changing positions, but at the end of the day, I believe it was Mr. Frey who pulled the plug,” the manager said. Frey died in 2016.

    Horowitz, Inciardi and Kosinski are accused of deceiving auction houses, and trying to fend off Henley, by crafting bogus explanations of how Sanders got the documents.

    Horowitz, a rare-book seller who has brokered deals to place major archives at institutions, bought the Eagles lyrics drafts from Sanders for $50,000 in 2005.

    Horowitz later sold them for $65,000 to Inciardi, who was then a rock Hall of Fame curator, and Kosinski, who owns a rock memorabilia auction site.

    After Kosinski’s site offered four pages of the “Hotel California” lyrics in 2012, Henley reported them stolen but ultimately bought them for $8,500. After more sheets from that song and “Life in the Fast Lane” went up for auction in 2014 and 2016, Henley refused to negotiate more buybacks and turned to authorities again, according to prosecutors and Azoff.

    Defense lawyers say Henley gave Sanders the documents. The defense argues that the writer was the rightful owner when he sold them, and so were the defendants once they bought the pages.

    Sanders hasn’t testified, and it appears unlikely he will. He hasn’t responded to a message seeking comment on the case, and emails sent to him bounced back.

    “Hotel California” lyrics and meaning

    Frey and Henley wrote the lyrics to  1976’s “Hotel California” in a Beverly Hills house rented for the purpose, since the tidy Henley’s tendency to pick up after Frey “would drive them crazy” if they worked in their own homes, Azoff testified.

    Henley did most of the writing, he added, with Frey leaning in to make suggestions such as the phrase “Life in the Fast Lane,” which became the title of a hit single.

    In 2016, “CBS Mornings” co-host Gayle King asked Henley about the meaning of “Hotel California.”

    “Well, I always say, it’s a journey from innocence to experience. It’s not really about California; it’s about America,” Henley said. “It’s about the dark underbelly of the American dream. It’s about excess, it’s about narcissism. It’s about the music business. It’s about a lot of different…. It can have a million interpretations.”

    The Grammy-winning song is still a touchstone on classic rock radio and many personal playlists. The entertainment data company Luminate counted more than 220 million streams and 136,000 radio plays of “Hotel California” in the U.S. last year.

    Henley is expected to testify. Defense lawyers have indicated that they plan to question how clearly he remembers his dealings with Sanders and the lyric sheets at a time when the rock star was living “life in the fast lane” himself.

    In 2016, Henley told Gayle King that the band was indeed living that lifestyle in the 1970s.

    “Yeah… Everybody was doing it. It was the ’70s,” Henley said. “It was what everybody was doing, which doesn’t make it right necessarily. And you know, looking back on it, there’s some regrets about that. We probably could have been more productive … although we were pretty productive, considering.”


    Don Felder plays “Hotel California” at the Met

    02:48

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Texas school legally punished Black student over hairstyle, judge says

    Texas school legally punished Black student over hairstyle, judge says

    [ad_1]

    A Black high school student’s monthslong punishment by his Texas school district for refusing to change his hairstyle does not violate a new state law that prohibits race-based hair discrimination, a judge ruled on Thursday.Video above: Clarified: What is the CROWN Act?Darryl George, 18, is a junior and has not been in his regular classes at his Houston-area high school since Aug. 31 because his school district, Barbers Hill, says he is violating its policy limiting the length of boys’ hair.The district filed a lawsuit arguing George’s long hair, which he wears in tied and twisted locs on top of his head, violates its dress code policy because it would fall below his shirt collar, eyebrows or earlobes when let down. The district has said other students with locs comply with the length policy.After just a few hours of testimony in Anahuac, state District Judge Chap Cain III ruled in favor of the school district, saying its ongoing discipline of George over the length of his hair is legal under the CROWN Act. For most of the school year, George has either served in-school suspension at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu or spent time at an off-site disciplinary program.Dozens of people filed into the courtroom in Anahuac, outside Houston, where George and his mother, Darresha George, told reporters they were hopeful his punishment would soon end allowing him to return to regular classes.“We’re going to get justice today,” Darresha George said. “I’m nervous but I’m happy.”Video below: Darryl George makes comment as hair discrimination trial beginsThe CROWN Act, which took effect in September, prohibits race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, locs, twists or Bantu knots.Attorneys for the school district did not present any witnesses. Attorney Sara Leon told Cain that the Barbers Hill dress code “is consistent with the CROWN Act” and that the policy “is race neutral.”Allie Booker, Darryl’s George’s attorney, presented only two witnesses: Darresha George and Democratic state Rep. Ron Reynolds, one of the co-authors of the CROWN Act.Reynolds testified that hair length was not specifically discussed when the CROWN Act was proposed but “length was inferred with the very nature of the style.”“Anyone familiar with braids, locs, twists knows it requires a certain amount of length,” Reynolds said.Pressed by Cain if there was anything in the legislation that talks specifically about length, Reynolds said no, but that it is “almost impossible for a person to comply with this (grooming) policy and wear that protective hairstyle.”After Reynolds’ testimony, both sides rested their case.George, an 18-year-old junior, has not been in his regular classroom at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu since Aug. 31. He has instead served in-school suspension and spent time in an off-site disciplinary program.In court documents, the school district maintains its policy does not violate the CROWN Act because the law does not mention or cover hair length.In a paid ad that ran in January in the Houston Chronicle, Barbers Hill Superintendent Greg Poole wrote that districts with a traditional dress code are safer and have higher academic performance, and that “being an American requires conformity.”George’s family has also filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency and a federal civil rights lawsuit against Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with the school district, alleging they failed to enforce the CROWN Act. The lawsuit is before a federal judge in Galveston.Barbers Hill’s hair policy was also challenged in a May 2020 federal lawsuit filed by two other students. Both withdrew from the high school, but one returned after a federal judge granted a temporary injunction, saying there was “a substantial likelihood” that his rights to free speech and to be free from racial discrimination would be violated if he was not allowed to return. That lawsuit is pending.

    A Black high school student’s monthslong punishment by his Texas school district for refusing to change his hairstyle does not violate a new state law that prohibits race-based hair discrimination, a judge ruled on Thursday.

    Video above: Clarified: What is the CROWN Act?

    Darryl George, 18, is a junior and has not been in his regular classes at his Houston-area high school since Aug. 31 because his school district, Barbers Hill, says he is violating its policy limiting the length of boys’ hair.

    The district filed a lawsuit arguing George’s long hair, which he wears in tied and twisted locs on top of his head, violates its dress code policy because it would fall below his shirt collar, eyebrows or earlobes when let down. The district has said other students with locs comply with the length policy.

    After just a few hours of testimony in Anahuac, state District Judge Chap Cain III ruled in favor of the school district, saying its ongoing discipline of George over the length of his hair is legal under the CROWN Act. For most of the school year, George has either served in-school suspension at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu or spent time at an off-site disciplinary program.

    Dozens of people filed into the courtroom in Anahuac, outside Houston, where George and his mother, Darresha George, told reporters they were hopeful his punishment would soon end allowing him to return to regular classes.

    “We’re going to get justice today,” Darresha George said. “I’m nervous but I’m happy.”

    Video below: Darryl George makes comment as hair discrimination trial begins

    The CROWN Act, which took effect in September, prohibits race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, locs, twists or Bantu knots.

    Attorneys for the school district did not present any witnesses. Attorney Sara Leon told Cain that the Barbers Hill dress code “is consistent with the CROWN Act” and that the policy “is race neutral.”

    Allie Booker, Darryl’s George’s attorney, presented only two witnesses: Darresha George and Democratic state Rep. Ron Reynolds, one of the co-authors of the CROWN Act.

    Reynolds testified that hair length was not specifically discussed when the CROWN Act was proposed but “length was inferred with the very nature of the style.”

    “Anyone familiar with braids, locs, twists knows it requires a certain amount of length,” Reynolds said.

    Pressed by Cain if there was anything in the legislation that talks specifically about length, Reynolds said no, but that it is “almost impossible for a person to comply with this (grooming) policy and wear that protective hairstyle.”

    After Reynolds’ testimony, both sides rested their case.

    George, an 18-year-old junior, has not been in his regular classroom at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu since Aug. 31. He has instead served in-school suspension and spent time in an off-site disciplinary program.

    In court documents, the school district maintains its policy does not violate the CROWN Act because the law does not mention or cover hair length.

    In a paid ad that ran in January in the Houston Chronicle, Barbers Hill Superintendent Greg Poole wrote that districts with a traditional dress code are safer and have higher academic performance, and that “being an American requires conformity.”

    George’s family has also filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency and a federal civil rights lawsuit against Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with the school district, alleging they failed to enforce the CROWN Act. The lawsuit is before a federal judge in Galveston.

    Barbers Hill’s hair policy was also challenged in a May 2020 federal lawsuit filed by two other students. Both withdrew from the high school, but one returned after a federal judge granted a temporary injunction, saying there was “a substantial likelihood” that his rights to free speech and to be free from racial discrimination would be violated if he was not allowed to return. That lawsuit is pending.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump $354 million fraud verdict includes New York business ban for 3 years. Here’s what to know.

    Trump $354 million fraud verdict includes New York business ban for 3 years. Here’s what to know.

    [ad_1]

    A judge’s ruling on Friday in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial deals a severe blow to the former president, who is now barred from running the New York-based company that for decades has served as the hub of his global business empire. 

    In a 92-page decision, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron barred Trump from serving as an officer or director of any corporation or other legal entity in the state for three years, while his sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., were banned for two years, according to the ruling. 

    Trump and The Trump Organization were also ordered to pay penalties of $354 million in what is one of the stiffest corporate sanctions in New York history. The total jumps to $453.5 million when pre-judgment interest is factored in. 

    Engoron ruled last fall that Trump and his company, the Trump Organization, “repeatedly” violated state fraud law by systemically misrepresenting the value of some of his properties and his overall net worth. That enabled his business to obtain loan rates and other financial terms that they otherwise wouldn’t have received, New York Attorney General Letitia James had claimed in filing suit against Trump.


    Breaking down the Trump New York civil fraud case decision

    10:32

    More specifically, James’ allegations included falsifying business records, issuing false financial statements and insurance fraud. James’ office claimed that Trump’s misrepresentations led to the company collecting $370 million in “ill-gotten gains.”

    Friday’s ruling also appoints Judge Barbara Jones to continue in her role as an independent monitor of Trump’s businesses for at least three years. It orders the addition of an independent director of compliance at the Trump Organization, with Engoron ruling that this person will be responsible for “ensuring good financial and accounting practices.”

    “[T]he more evidence there is of defendants’ ongoing propensity to engage in fraud, the more need there is for the Court to impose stricter injunctive relief,” Engoron wrote in his verdict. “This is not defendants’ first rodeo.”


    Donald Jr. and Eric Trump fined millions in civil fraud case

    16:58

    It’s possible Trump could appoint a trusted adviser to run his business during the three-year ban, noted John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School and an expert on corporate governance and white collar crime. 

    “I doubt that he can appoint someone else without the court’s approval, but one candidate that he will think of is Ivanka, his daughter, who is not a defendant,” Coffee told CBS MoneyWatch. “When Martha Stewart was barred from serving as a director of her own business, which like Trump had her name on it, she appointed her daughter as CEO for three years.”

    Ivanka Trump, once an executive at The Trump Organization, was originally named as a defendant in the fraud suit, but an appellate court later dismissed allegations against her due to the state’s statute of limitations.

    Trump: “unAmerican judgment against me”

    In a statement, Trump, who is expected to appeal, decried the verdict, calling it “unAmerican” and “a Complete and Total SHAM.”

    “There were No Victims, No Damages, No Complaints,” Trump said in his statement. “Only satisfied Banks and Insurance Companies (which made a ton of money), GREAT Financial Statements, that didn’t even include the most valuable Asset – The TRUMP Brand.”

    The decision comes just weeks after a federal jury ruled that Trump must pay $83.3 million in damages for defamatory statements he made denying that he sexually assaulted the writer E. Jean Carroll. Trump is also facing numerous additional legal cases

    “These bills are really racking up for Trump,” said CBS News legal analyst Katrina Kaufman shortly before the verdict was announced. James “asked for a lifetime ban on Trump in New York’s real estate industry, which is huge for him. This is where he started as a businessman.”

    Trump could see the damages reduced on appeal, Columbia’s Coffee said. But to appeal, Trump would have to post a bond covering the $354 million in penalties, he added.

    “That will be costly,” Coffee said. “Some banks will post the bond for him, for a hefty fee, but they will want security that they can liquidate easily, and that may require some sale of some of his assets.”


    Breaking down Trump’s legal battles after being ordered to pay $83 million to E. Jean Carroll

    04:58

    Trump and his legal team had long expected a defeat, with the former president decrying the case as “rigged” and a “sham” and his lawyers laying the groundwork for an appeal before the judgment was even issued. 

    In 2023, Engoron found that Trump and his company overstated the valuations of many properties by hundreds of millions. The judge cited the Palm Beach, Florida, real estate assessor’s valuation of his Mar-a-Lago club at as low as $18 million — an amount on which Trump paid local property taxes. At the same time, Trump valued the property at as much as $714 million on his annual statements of financial conditions.

    Separately, Trump also faces charges in four criminal proceedings. The first trial, which centers on a payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016, is scheduled to begin in Manhattan on March 25. He has pleaded not guilty in all four cases. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • David Becker says former President Trump’s case is different “because he withheld” documents

    David Becker says former President Trump’s case is different “because he withheld” documents

    [ad_1]

    David Becker says former President Trump’s case is different “because he withheld” documents – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    David Becker, CBS News election law contributor, tells “Face the Nation” that the behavior outlined by President Biden in special counsel Robert Hur’s report is being handled differently than how former President Donald Trump’s allegedly handling of classified documents “mainly because he withheld those documents.”

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2/6: CBS Evening News

    2/6: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    2/6: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Michigan school shooter’s mother guilty of involuntary manslaughter; Behind the scenes of some upcoming Super Bowl ads

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2/6: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    2/6: Prime Time with John Dickerson

    [ad_1]

    2/6: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    John Dickerson reports on an appeals court rejecting Donald Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, deadly weather in California, and what to know about the Chiefs-49ers matchup if you’re heading to a Super Bowl party.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jury deliberations underway in Jennifer Crumbley trial

    Jury deliberations underway in Jennifer Crumbley trial

    [ad_1]

    Jury deliberations underway in Jennifer Crumbley trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The fate of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, is now in the hands of a Michigan jury. Crumbley is charged with involuntary manslaughter. She is the first parent of a school shooter to go to trial on criminal charges for her child’s actions. Her husband, James Crumbley, is also charged with involuntary manslaughter and is set to go to trial in March. CBS News’ Elaine Quijano has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge rejects Alex Murdaugh’s request for new trial

    Judge rejects Alex Murdaugh’s request for new trial

    [ad_1]

    Judge rejects Alex Murdaugh’s request for new trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A judge has rejected convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh’s request for a new trial. Murdaugh and his lawyers alleged a court clerk improperly influenced the jury when he was convicted of killing his wife and one of his sons. Nikki Battiste has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link