[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Projection has long been Donald Trump’s superpower. Since the start of his presidential run in 2015, the former president has relentlessly attacked the mainstream media, often calling it the “Lamestream Media” or quite simply “Fake News.” I always assumed this name-calling was part and parcel of Trump’s autocratic playbook, but after watching the first few days of Trump’s trial, it’s grown increasingly clear that this rhetoric is actually less applicable to the media and more applicable to himself.
Right now, in a Manhattan courtroom, we are hearing the stories of how Trump worked hand in hand with David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, to turn the trashy tabloid magazine into a propaganda machine. Trump’s first and (very likely only) preelection criminal trial focuses on how Trump and his friend, Pecker, killed stories about Trump’s alleged affairs by using cash payments to buy the silence of Trump’s alleged paramours—a practice called “catch and kill.” In essence, stories were purchased so they’d never run.
If there is anything “lame” or “fake” about the news media, it’s practices like these, which no editor or reporter of good standing would ever consider using, or that political figures would expect, as MSNBC host and White House veteran Jen Psaki pointed out this week. “Feels crazy this may need to be said,” noted Psaki, but “campaign and White House comms staff do not work with media to pay off potential sources of bad stories…ever.”
Yet, catch and kill was just one part of the Enquirer’s skullduggery: Pecker also produced outlandish news stories about Trump’s political opponents, like Ted Cruz (“Ted Cruz’s Father—Caught With JFK Assassin”), Ben Carson (“Bungling Surgeon Ben Carson Left Sponge in Patient’s Brain”), and Marco Rubio (“‘Family Man’ Marco Rubio’s Love Child Stunner!”). Later, after Trump won the primary, the magazine turned its attention to his 2016 general competitor, Hillary Clinton, by putting her on the magazine’s cover and filling it with negative headlines that painted her as everything from “corrupt” to “racist” at least 15 times in the five-month run-up to November, according to the Guardian. Headlines like these saturated the checkout aisles in grocery stores, delis, and big-box retailers, serving as mini billboards that gave an impression that candidates committed similar ethical lapses—a tactic Steve Bannon proudly coined as “flood[ing] the zone with shit.”
It was throughout this period that the magazine essentially became “the ground zero of fake news,” Lachlan Cartwright, who at the time served as the executive editor, would go on to say. In other words, the fake news media did exist, but it was populated by lie-laden stories that were cooked up by characters like Michael Cohen—and not, say, The New York Times or The Washington Post. As Pecker himself explained in court, “Michael Cohen would call me and say, ‘We would like for you to write a negative article on…let’s say, for the sake of argument, Ted Cruz…”
It’s worth reiterating once more that Pecker and Trump’s alliance—which the former called “an agreement among friends”—is something that absolutely no journalist with any ethical integrity would agree to. And therein lies the barefaced hypocrisy of the former president, who, for example, accused the media of an anti-Trump “conspiracy” during COVID; of unfavorably altering photos of then first lady Melania Trump ahead of the 2020 election; and of aiding Clinton with biased coverage (despite the media’s notorious role in blowing the nothing burger of her “emails” way out of proportion). As the adage goes, when it comes to Republicans, every accusation is a confession.
Trump wasn’t the only “FOP” or “Friend of Pecker” who got the special Enquirer catch-and-kill treatment. In court Pecker also testified about killing unfavorable stories for Arnold Schwarzenegger and Ari Emanuel, about the Hollywood agent’s brother, Rahm Emanuel, and his client, Mark Wahlberg. (Representatives for Ari Emanuel and Wahlberg could not be reached for comment by the Times, while a representative for Rahm Emanual declined to comment.)
This is all to say that Trump was given the same back-scratching, image-padding privileges of showbiz, as though he were a movie star and not a presidential candidate whose policies would have a direct impact on millions of Americans. The privileges were, as the Times reports, simply part of Pecker’s “standard operating procedure,” which he just about owned up to.
[ad_2]
Molly Jong-Fast
Source link

[ad_1]
NEW YORK – The Manhattan DA’s office wants a new trial for Harvey Weinstein in September.
The trial is expected to begin sometime after Labor Day.
The move comes after Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction was overturned by an appeals court last week.
In February, his attorneys argued to the New York Court of Appeals that he did not get a fair trial. In a 4-3 decision last week, the court overturned Weinstein’s 23-year sentence saying “the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts.”
In a dissent, one judge wrote the decision was “endangering decades of progress in this incredibly complex and nuanced area of law” regarding sex crimes.
Weinstein remains behind bars because he was convicted of rape in Los Angeles in 2022, and sentenced to 16 years. He’s currently at Bellevue for Medical Care.
His attorneys say they plan to appeal the California case.
Six women testified in Weinstein’s trail, even though he was facing charges related to three.
He was found guilty four years ago of forcibly performing a sex act on one woman and rape in the third degree for an attack on another woman. He was acquitted on charges of predatory sex assault and first degree rape.
The ruling shocked and disappointed women who celebrated historic gains during the era of #MeToo, a movement that ushered in a wave of sexual misconduct claims in Hollywood and beyond.
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg was not the district attorney during Weinstein’s previous trial. He says he’ll retry the case.
“Having conversations with survivors, centering their well-being, and pursuing justice,” Bragg said Wednesday.
Weinstein, 72, was noticeably thinner and paler when he appeared in court Wednesday in a wheelchair. He smiled and greeted everyone he knew in the first row behind the defense table when he entered the courtroom. He did not speak in court.
Jessica Mann, one of the women who testified, was also there. Prosecutors told the judge she was present to show she was not backing down, and that Weinstein “may have power and privilege, but she has the truth.”
Attorney Gloria Allred represents Mimi Haley, who was not present at Wednesday’s appearance. Allred says Haley’s not decided whether she’ll testify again.
“The vacating of the conviction was re-traumatizing to her, and that it will be even more traumatic to testify once again,” Allred said.
Weinstein attorney Arthur Aidala spoke about his client’s life behind bars.
“Harvey Weinstein was used to drinking champagne and eating caviar and now he’s at the commissary paying for potato chips and M&Ms,” Aidala said. “Mentally, he’s fine. He’s sharp as a tack. But physically, he’s been breaking down for years.”
“Obviously there’s a new sense of energy about him,” Aidala added.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Prosecutors said Monday they will not retry an Arizona rancher whose trial in the fatal shooting of a Mexican man on his property ended last week with a deadlocked jury.
The jurors in the trial of George Alan Kelly were unable to reach a unanimous decision on a verdict after more than two days of deliberation. Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink declared a mistrial on April 22.
After the mistrial, the Santa Cruz County Attorney’s Office had the option to retry Kelly — or to drop the case.
“Because of the unique circumstances and challenges surrounding this case, the Santa Cruz County Attorney’s Office has decided not to seek a retrial,” Deputy County Attorney Kimberly Hunley told Fink Monday.
Fink agreed to dismiss the case. He said a hearing would be scheduled later to determine if it would be dismissed with prejudice, which would mean it couldn’t be brought back to court.
Kelly’s defense attorney Brenna Larkin told the judge that she would file a request for the case to be dismissed with prejudice.
“We’re hoping we get the dismissal with prejudice, we’ll see how we go,” Larkin said Monday, according to CBS affiliate KOLD-TV. “I’m glad it’s over. We got the right result. I would have preferred a not guilty verdict and then this would be gone forever and then they would never have to worry about this.”
When a reporter from the Tucson TV station KGUN asked for Kelly’s reaction outside the courthouse, he said he felt “relief.”
“The nightmare’s over,” Kelly added, saying that the victim’s family “has my sincere sympathy.”
Kelly was trailed by protesters demonstrating on behalf of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, who was fatally shot on Jan. 30, 2023.
“Gabriel was a human being,” said one sign carried by protesters.
“Someone walking 100 yards away is not a threat,” read another, which called for a retrial.
“It’s not an issue for me about punishing Mr. Kelly. It’s about looking at the victim as a human being because at the trial really what happened was the man who was killed was put on trial,” said protestor Trayce Peterson, according to KOLD.
The 75-year-old Kelly had been on trial for nearly a month in Nogales, a city on the border with Mexico. The rancher had been charged with second-degree murder in the killing outside Nogales, Arizona.
Cuen-Buitimea had lived just south of the border in Nogales, Mexico. He was in a group of men that Kelly encountered that day on his cattle ranch. His two adult daughters, along with Mexican consular officials, met with prosecutors last week to learn about the implications of a mistrial.
The Mexican Consulate in Nogales, Arizona, said it would release a statement later.
Prosecutors had said Kelly recklessly fired nine shots from an AK-47 rifle toward a group of men on his cattle ranch, including Cuen-Buitimea, about 100 yards away. Kelly has said he fired warning shots in the air, but argued he didn’t shoot directly at anyone.
The trial coincided with a presidential election year that has drawn widespread interest in border security. During it, court officials took jurors to Kelly’s ranch as well as a section of the U.S.-Mexico border.
Earlier, Kelly had rejected an agreement with prosecutors that would have reduced the charge to one count of negligent homicide if he pleaded guilty.
Kelly was also accused of aggravated assault of another person in the group of about eight people.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Bryan and David start the show by remembering Howie Schwab, who died over the weekend. They reflect on his legacy as a producer, researcher, and the final boss on Stump the Schwab (1:00). Then they discuss the Donald Trump trial, at which cameras were barred from the courtroom and Trump struggled to stay awake (9:41). Afterward, they get into upcoming bids for NBA rights (15:56). They then talk about the Summer Olympics, how much of it they’ll watch, and who will be featured (27:43). Later, during the Notebook Dump, they bring up the afterlife of the alt-weeklies (36:35).
Plus, the Overworked Twitter Joke of the Week and David Shoemaker Guesses the Strained-Pun Headline.
Hosts: Bryan Curtis and David Shoemaker
Producer: Brian H. Waters
Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / RSS
[ad_2]
Bryan Curtis
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
When the car sped past him in a Long Beach parking lot, former school safety officer Eddie Gonzalez was either a dedicated public servant in fear he would be run over by a fleeing suspect — or a killer who made a wild and reckless decision to shoot into the back of a car full of youths who disobeyed him.
Those were the lines prosecutors and a defense attorney drew Thursday afternoon as opening arguments began in the guard’s murder trial in the September 2021 killing of 18-year-old Manuela “Mona” Rodriguez, who was shot dead near Millikan High School when Gonzalez fired two bullets into a vehicle she was riding in.
The shooting sparked outrage and protests. School officials quickly moved to fire Gonzalez, 54, and then-Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia called for him to be prosecuted. Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón obliged, filing murder charges a month later.
“The only reason he fired his gun, the only reason Mona lost her life, was because three people disobeyed him,” L.A. County Deputy Dist. Atty. Kristopher Gay said Thursday, emphasizing that Gonzalez was in “no danger” when he opened fire that day.
Gonzalez was responding to a report of a fight between Rodriguez and a 15-year-old girl on Palo Verde Avenue near Millikan High School. Rodriguez was traveling with her boyfriend, Rafael Chowdhury, and his teenage brother when they spotted the other girl, who’d recently gotten into a fight with one of Rodriguez’s friends.
Chowdhury previously told police that he and Rodriguez were looking to buy shoes for their 5-month-old daughter and happened upon the girl on the day of the brawl. At Gonzalez’s 2022 preliminary hearing, however, a police officer testified that the group had gone out searching to assault her.
Oscar and Omar Rodriguez hold a photo of their slain sister, Mona, and her mother at a news conference in 2023.
(Jay L. Clendenin / Los Angeles Times)
“This wasn’t a fight,” defense attorney Michael Schwartz said Thursday, painting Rodriguez as a dangerous felony suspect whom Gonzalez had to stop. “This was a planned beat-down.”
Gonzalez threatened to pepper-spray both girls if they didn’t stop fighting. Rodriguez and her group went back to their car, but not before she made a threat against the 15-year-old’s family, according to preliminary hearing testimony. Gonzalez followed and ordered her to stop.
As the car drove off, Gonzalez shouted and opened fire. Rodriguez, who was in the vehicle’s passenger seat, was struck in the head, police said. Chowdhury and his brother were not hit. Gonzalez previously told Long Beach police investigators he was aiming at the driver but missed and struck Rodriguez.
Rodriguez suffered severe brain damage and was taken off life support a week later. Last year, the Long Beach Unified School District settled a wrongful death suit filed by her family for $13 million.
Gonzalez has claimed he acted in self-defense because the car could have struck him. But Gay argued Thursday that “the defendant responded to youthful disobedience with deadly force.”
As his first witness took the stand late Thursday, Gay displayed cellphone video that captured the shooting. A woman’s screams could be heard as the video displayed Gonzalez letting off his two-shot burst. Several of Rodriguez’s relatives could be seen turning away in the gallery, and one woman teared up.
Schwartz told jurors that although Rodriguez’s death may have been a tragedy, it was “not a crime.”
The veteran defense attorney — who has made a career of defending police officers from prosecution in excessive force cases — noted the car’s tires were turned toward his client.
“He was right by that car as it peeled into his path,” Schwartz said.
Many large police departments, including the LAPD, no longer allow officers to shoot at moving vehicles unless the occupants pose a threat beyond the vehicle itself.
Whereas Gay described the fight between the girls as a schoolyard dust-up, Schwartz painted it as a planned attack. When Gonzalez opened fire, his attorney said, he was trying to stop dangerous felony suspects who had participated in a premeditated assault.
Schwartz said he plans to call three witnesses who will testify that Gonzalez was in the path of the vehicle when he shot. Gay’s first witness, a high school student who filmed the shooting, said Gonzalez fired his second shot while he was behind the car.
The trial is expected to last roughly one week.
In a series of letters sent to the court asking for a reduction of Gonzalez’s bail at an earlier phase of the trial, his relatives described him as a dedicated, hardworking family man who worked as a cable repairman for decades before pursuing his dream to be a law enforcement officer.
“On Sept. 27, 2021 — my Dad went to work, as he has done for decades, to provide for his family,” wrote his daughter, Jasmine. “He is not a malicious or vengeful person and I hope that through this trial you and a jury of his peers can see that is the obvious case.”
Gonzalez was a reserve Orange County sheriff’s deputy from 2015 to 2018, according to the letters, and relatives claimed he was once named “reserve deputy of the year.” A spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Gonzalez’s law enforcement career had taken a downward turn in the years before the shooting as he bounced between jobs. He worked for the Los Alamitos Police Department from January to April 2019, according to city officials who declined to provide details about his departure.
A few months later, he joined the Sierra Madre Police Department in September 2019, but again left after less than a year on the job, according to a police spokeswoman, who said the city “chose to separate from Officer Gonzalez” but would not elaborate.
Police officer disciplinary records are largely shielded from public view under California law, unless the officer has used deadly force or been accused of sexual misconduct or dishonesty on duty.
[ad_2]
James Queally
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
HUDSON, Wis. — Day two of the trial for the deadly stabbing on the Apple River in Wisconsin gets underway Tuesday morning.
Nicolae Miu is accused of killing a teen and injuring four others in July of 2022.
The prosecution is trying to prove that Miu was the aggressor. They expect to call more than 40 witnesses to the stand.
The defense is arguing Miu stabbed the five people in self-defense.
The trial is scheduled to resume at 8 a.m. Tuesday. WCCO will have live coverage, which you can watch via CBS News Minnesota, Pluto TV or the CBS News app on your phone or connected TV.
Among the first witnesses was Ryan Nelson, the best friend of Isaac Schuman, one of the five people stabbed and the only person who died from his injuries.
Nelson said he was positive that Miu started the fight when he hit one of the victims.
WCCO
During an intense cross-examination, defense attorneys were quick to challenge Nelson’s memory of events.
The prosecution also showed two cellphone video clips, less than four minutes in total, detailing much of what happened that day on the Apple River.
In the first video, which is just nine seconds long, someone is heard saying Miu was “looking for little girls.” The defense was quick to note there were not little girls near him in the video.
In another three-and-a-half minute clip, Miu can be seen running towards the group of tubers and underlying audio can be heard indicating Miu was asked more than 20 times by the groups to go away.
Then the physical confrontation begins, with pushing and shoving and, ultimately, the stabbings.
Legal expert Joe Tamburino, who’s not affiliated with the case, said now it’s up to both sides to call witnesses that will help give these clips context.
“What they’re also going to point out is what led up to parts of the video,” Tamburino said. “You see at the beginning when the video is played, all we see is Mr. Miu basically running toward these young men and we don’t know why, and that’s where witness testimony will be very important so it can explain, where did he come from? Why was he coming near the young men? What was he saying, what was he doing? All of that’s not on the video.”
[ad_2]
Pauleen Le
Source link

[ad_1]
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
[ad_2]