ReportWire

Tag: Trial

  • Hernandez Govan found not guilty in ambush killing of rapper Young Dolph

    [ad_1]

    A man on trial for organizing the ambush killing of rapper Young Dolph at a Memphis bakery in 2021 has been found not guilty.

    A Memphis jury deliberated about three hours before finding Hernandez Govan, 45, not guilty of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. He rejected an offer from the state last month to settle with a guilty plea, CBS News affiliate WREG reported. 

    On Thursday, Govan hugged his lawyer and thanked Shelby County Judge Jennifer Mitchell after she told him he was free to go.

    Govan was not accused of shooting Young Dolph, but prosecutors claimed he directed the two people who did. The jury was not convinced, however, despite a man’s testimony that Govan hired him to “do the hits” and was going to take $10,000 as his cut.

    Govan’s lawyer questioned the quality of the police investigation and the validity of cellphone communications between Govan and the men who shot Dolph, arguing that nothing in the communications directly incriminated Govan or tied him to the killings.

    Young Dolph performs at The Parking Lot Concert in Atlanta on Aug. 23, 2020.

    Paul R. Giunta/Invision/AP, File


    Young Dolph, whose legal name is Adolph Thornton Jr., was a rapper, independent label owner and producer who grew up in Memphis and was admired in the city for his charitable works.

    On the day of the 2021 ambush, the 36-year-old was in his hometown to hand out Thanksgiving turkeys to families when his visit to his favorite cookie shop turned into an attack that shocked the entertainment world.

    Authorities said two men exited a white Mercedes-Benz and began shooting at the rapper at the bakery. He died after being shot about 20 times, according to a medical examiner’s report.

    Four years earlier, Young Dolph suffered critical injuries in a 2017 attack, when three men approached and shot him over “beef,” according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Earlier that same year, he had been involved in a separate shooting where at least 100 bullets were fired at his SUV.

    Testifying against Govan was Cornelius Smith Jr., who has admitted to being one of the two shooters who ambushed Young Dolph. Smith previously was the main witness against Justin Johnson, who was convicted of first-degree murder in 2024 after Smith named him as the second shooter.

    Smith faces charges for murder and conspiracy to commit murder for his alleged role in Young Dolph’s death. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges and does not currently have a trial date set. Johnson was originally sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole following his 2024 conviction, plus an additional 35 years for two additional convictions from his trial.

    Memphis prosecutors have portrayed Young Dolph’s killing as part of an effort by Anthony “Big Jook” Mims to get revenge on Young Dolph for diss tracks aimed at Big Jook and the record label he helped run for his brother, rapper Yo Gotti. Smith has testified that Big Jook put out a $100,000 hit on Young Dolph as well as smaller bounties on all the artists at Young Dolph’s record label, Paper Route Empire.

    At Johnson’s earlier trial, a prosecutor told jurors Cocaine Muzik Group (now known as Collective Music Group), a rival record label founded by Yo Gotti, wanted Young Dolph to work for them, but he turned them down.

    Big Jook was shot and killed outside a restaurant in January 2024.

    Smith testified Monday that “I didn’t know anything about Paper Route having no hits,” before Govan told him about them. He said Govan hired him to “do the hits,” including giving Smith guns for the killing, and was going to take $10,000 as his cut. Govan was also the person who told him and Johnson that Young Dolph would be in Memphis for the Thanksgiving turkey giveaway, so “that’s our opportunity,” Smith said.

    Prosecutors introduced as evidence dozens of cellphone communications between Johnson, Smith, Govan and Big Jook ahead of the shooting.

    Meanwhile, Govan’s defense attorney, Manny Arora, tried to paint Smith as an unreliable witness who would say anything to try to get a lighter sentence.

    Arora pointed to previous testimony where Smith recalled a chance encounter with Big Jook. At the time, Smith implied that Big Jook was the person who hired him. After Smith was arrested, his attorney called Big Jook’s attorney and received somewhere between $38,000 and $50,000 in cash. Smith said on Monday that he did not know who had supplied the money.

    Smith also testified that he previously heard that Govan might be working with the FBI. Arora asked why Smith would take a job from Govan if that were the case. Smith said Govan was “innocent until proven guilty.”

    Govan did not testify in his defense.

    Smith is charged with murder and conspiracy to commit murder but has pleaded not guilty and does not yet have a trial date.

    Johnson was sentenced last September to life in prison with the possibility of parole. He was later sentenced for two other convictions from the trial: conspiracy to commit murder and being a felon in possession of a gun.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors say Daniel Penny didn’t intend to kill Jordan Neely, blame reckless actions for death

    Prosecutors say Daniel Penny didn’t intend to kill Jordan Neely, blame reckless actions for death

    [ad_1]

    Prosecutors say Daniel Penny didn’t intend to kill Jordan Neely, blame reckless actions for death – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Opening statements began in Daniel Penny’s trial for Jordan Neely’s chokehold death during a 2023 New York City subway incident. Prosecutors allege Penny’s reckless actions led to Neely’s death. Penny’s defense may offer other potential reasons for Penny’s death. CBS News New York’s Christina Fan reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Delphi, Indiana, murder trial continues with testimony of search for missing girls

    Delphi, Indiana, murder trial continues with testimony of search for missing girls

    [ad_1]

    Delphi, Indiana, murder trial continues with testimony of search for missing girls


    Delphi, Indiana, murder trial continues with testimony of search for missing girls

    01:56

    The trial of the man accused of murdering two girls in Delphi, Indiana, continued for its second day on Saturday with testimony from a former local police chief and two people who searched for Abby Williams and Libby German in 2017.

    Saturday’s testimony dug deeper into the initial reports that the two teenage girls were missing and the immediate response to try to find them.

    Richard Allen, the pharmacy technician accused of killing the girls, stands charged with murder.

    In 2017, the girls went for a hike and never returned. Their bodies were found the next day.

    Allen was arrested and charged in 2022.

    Two members of the search party for the girls testified.

    Jake Johns remembered someone seeing footprints down the hill to the riverbank. A description that fits the prosecutor’s theory that the person who killed forced them to walk down the hill to the side of the creek.

    Later, the same witness saw what ended up being German’s tie-dye shirt floating in the water.

    Pat Brown, another witness, told the jury he was the one who found the girls’ bodies. He remembered calling out “We found ’em!” and added “I thought they were mannequins.” He voice cracked as he testified.

    During Friday’s opening statements, the jury heard the girls’ cause of death: someone had cut their throats.

    Prosecutors said German was found without clothes the day after she and Williams were reported missing. Williams was wearing her friend’s clothes.

    Allen maintained he is innocent.

    The trial will pick up again on Monday. The judge told jurors that they can expect proceedings to be quite lengthy.

    The jury will likely hear from law enforcement as they got to the scene and started their investigation.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trial of Bryan Kohberger, suspect in University of Idaho murders, delayed until August 2025

    Trial of Bryan Kohberger, suspect in University of Idaho murders, delayed until August 2025

    [ad_1]

    The trial of Bryan Kohberger, who has been charged with killing four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been set. 

    The trial will begin on Aug. 11, 2025, and continue through Nov. 7, 2025, according to a scheduling order issued by the state of Idaho. It had been scheduled to start in June 2025.

    Other hearing dates will be held before the start of the trial. On Nov. 7, 2024, there will be a hearing addressing motions challenging the death penalty as a possible sentence, if Kohberger is convicted. Prosecutors have previously said they plan to ask for the death penalty if Kohberger is found guilty. 

    Kohberger has been charged with four counts of murder in the fatal stabbings of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, who were killed in the early morning of Nov. 13, 2022 at a home in Moscow, Idaho. Police arrested Kohberger six weeks later at his parents’ home in Pennsylvania

    A judge entered pleas of not guilty on Kohberger’s behalf when he remained silent during his plea hearing. 

    Murder Suspect Bryan Kohberger Attends Pre-Trial Hearing In Idaho
    Bryan Kohberger arrives at a hearing on September 13, 2023 in Moscow, Idaho. 

    Ted S. Warren / Getty Images


    Kohberger was initially set to go on trial in October 2023, but his lawyer said the defense would not be ready in time. At the time, Kohberger later waived his right to a speedy trial. Kohberger’s trial was then set for June 2025. At the time, the trial was set to be held in Latah County, where the killings occurred. 

    Latah County District Judge John Judge said that he expected the trial would last three months, including two weeks of jury selection, eight weeks of the trial itself, and another two weeks for the verdict, sentencing and anything else remaining, CBS News previously reported. The new trial dates cover a similar period of time.  

    But in early September, Judge ordered that the trial be moved to a different part of Idaho, saying that he believed extensive media coverage of the case and statements by other public officials would make it impossible for Kohberger to have a fair trial. The concern was echoed by Kohberger’s lawyers

    Idaho’s Supreme Court moved the trial to Boise, Idaho, more than 300 miles from Latah County. Kohberger was booked into jail there last month. 

    Goncalves’ family has criticized the handling of the trial, saying in a statement this spring that they were frustrated by how long it has taken for the case to progress through the judicial system. 

    “This case is turning into a hamster wheel of motions, hearings, and delayed decisions,” the family said.


    The Night of the Idaho Student Murders

    42:00

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge denies motions to suppress evidence in Daniel Penny’s trial

    Judge denies motions to suppress evidence in Daniel Penny’s trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK CITY (WABC) — A judge ruled that all evidence will be permitted in the trial against Daniel Penny, the Marine veteran charged with putting Jordan Neely in a fatal chokehold on the subway last year.

    Penny returned to court for the second straight day on Friday for a pre-trial hearing.

    The purpose of the hearing was to sort out what evidence will be presented at trial — including new video of what happened after the incident.

    Judge Maxwell Wiley on Friday denied all motions to suppress evidence.

    Penny, 25, is charged with manslaughter and negligent homicide in the murder of Jordan Neely on board an F train in May of last year after the deadly chokehold was captured on cellphone video by two tourists.

    Penny’s lawyers say he acted in self-defense after Neely, who suffered from mental health issues, started displaying what some described as aggressive behavior.

    Penny’s lawyers say Neely had a psychiatric history of mental illness, didn’t take his medicine, and was known to scare passengers.

    During Thursday’s pre-trial hearing, the court heard evidence from both sides.

    The cellphone video from the incident went viral and was widely seen — but the other video evidence the jury might see in the trial could make or break the case for both the prosecution and defense.

    Prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney’s office played video of Penny being interviewed by NYPD detectives at the 5th Precinct in Chinatown.

    Throughout the video he was calm, and matter of fact, as he explained what happened. He can be heard saying, “I’m not trying to kill the guy, I’m just trying to deescalate the situation.”

    The two detectives clearly tried to get a better grasp of the incident and asked what he was thinking.

    “This guy was actually threatening. He said he wanted to go to prison forever,” Penny said in the interview.

    During the videotaped interview, Penny went over what happened several times and twice demonstrated the grip he had around Neely’s neck and explained his decision to wrap his legs around him saying, “He starts to squirm, I hold him a little tighter.”

    Prosecutors also showed several body-worn cameras from the responding officers. In the video, Penny is standing around and at one point he was asked if Neely had a gun and he responded, “I don’t know, I just put him out.”

    The Manhattan District Attorney wants the jury to see the videos to hear Penny’s initial comments, but his defense said he was being treated as a witness at the time and they wanted them out.

    The trial is scheduled to begin October 8 and jury selection starts on Oct. 21. If convicted, Penny faces up to 20 years in prison.

    ALSO READ: NYPD to maintain visible presence amid Iranian missile attack on Israel

    Raegan Medgie has the latest on the counterterrorsim unit of the NYPD protecting religious institutions as tensions escalate in the Middle East.

    ———-

    * Get Eyewitness News Delivered

    * More New York City news

    * Send us a news tip

    * Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

    * Follow us on YouTube

    Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

    Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

    Copyright © 2024 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WABC

    Source link

  • Harvey Weinstein pleads not guilty to additional sex crimes charges in New York

    Harvey Weinstein pleads not guilty to additional sex crimes charges in New York

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Harvey Weinstein appeared on Wednesday in a New York courtroom and pleaded not guilty to one count of criminal sex act in the 1st degree after he was indicted by a grand jury earlier this month.

    This is a developing story. Below is previous coverage.

    Harvey Weinstein arrived at a courtroom Wednesday in Manhattan where he is expected to be arraigned on a new indictment charging him with up to three additional sex offenses, his lawyer said.

    Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala said the jailed ex-movie mogul will appear in court in person to face his latest legal hurdle after he was excused from a hearing last week while recovering from emergency heart surgery.

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office disclosed at the Sept. 12 hearing last week that a grand jury had returned a new indictment charging Weinstein with previously uncharged offenses.

    The indictment will remain under seal until Weinstein is arraigned. Prosecutors have said that the grand jury heard evidence of up to three alleged assaults: in the mid-2000s at the Tribeca Grand Hotel, now known as the Roxy Hotel, and a Lower Manhattan residential building, and, in May 2016, at a Tribeca hotel.

    At the same time, Weinstein is awaiting retrial in his landmark #MeToo case after New York’s highest court overturned his 2020 conviction earlier this year.

    Weinstein’s retrial is scheduled to begin Nov. 12. Prosecutors have said they’ll seek to fold the new charges into the retrial, but Weinstein’s lawyers oppose that, saying it should be a separate case.

    Aidala noted last week that because the indictment remains under seal, it’s not clear whether the new charges involve some or all of the additional allegations heard by the grand jury.

    “We don’t know anything,” he said outside court last week. “We don’t know what the exact accusations are, the exact locations are, what the timing is.”

    Weinstein has long maintained that any sexual activity was consensual.

    He has been at a Manhattan hospital following emergency surgery Sept. 9 to drain fluid around his heart and lungs.

    A judge ruled last week to allow Weinstein, 72, to remain indefinitely in the prison ward at Bellevue Hospital instead of being transferred back to the infirmary ward at the city’s Rikers Island jail complex.

    In vacating Weinstein’s conviction and ordering a new trial, New York’s Court of Appeals ruled in April that the trial judge unfairly allowed testimony against him based on allegations from other women that were not part of the case.

    Once one of the most powerful people in Hollywood, Weinstein co-founded the film and television production companies Miramax and The Weinstein Company and produced films such as “Shakespeare in Love” and “The Crying Game.”

    Copyright © 2024 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • Harvey Weinstein set to be arraigned on additional sex crimes charges in New York

    Harvey Weinstein set to be arraigned on additional sex crimes charges in New York

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Harvey Weinstein is expected to be arraigned Wednesday in Manhattan on a new indictment charging him with up to three additional sex offenses, his lawyer said.

    Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala said the jailed ex-movie mogul will appear in court in person to face his latest legal hurdle after he was excused from a hearing last week while recovering from emergency heart surgery.

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office disclosed at the Sept. 12 hearing last week that a grand jury had returned a new indictment charging Weinstein with previously uncharged offenses.

    The indictment will remain under seal until Weinstein is arraigned. Prosecutors have said that the grand jury heard evidence of up to three alleged assaults: in the mid-2000s at the Tribeca Grand Hotel, now known as the Roxy Hotel, and a Lower Manhattan residential building, and, in May 2016, at a Tribeca hotel.

    At the same time, Weinstein is awaiting retrial in his landmark #MeToo case after New York’s highest court overturned his 2020 conviction earlier this year.

    Weinstein’s retrial is scheduled to begin Nov. 12. Prosecutors have said they’ll seek to fold the new charges into the retrial, but Weinstein’s lawyers oppose that, saying it should be a separate case.

    Aidala noted last week that because the indictment remains under seal, it’s not clear whether the new charges involve some or all of the additional allegations heard by the grand jury.

    “We don’t know anything,” he said outside court last week. “We don’t know what the exact accusations are, the exact locations are, what the timing is.”

    Weinstein has long maintained that any sexual activity was consensual.

    He has been at a Manhattan hospital following emergency surgery Sept. 9 to drain fluid around his heart and lungs.

    A judge ruled last week to allow Weinstein, 72, to remain indefinitely in the prison ward at Bellevue Hospital instead of being transferred back to the infirmary ward at the city’s Rikers Island jail complex.

    In vacating Weinstein’s conviction and ordering a new trial, New York’s Court of Appeals ruled in April that the trial judge unfairly allowed testimony against him based on allegations from other women that were not part of the case.

    Once one of the most powerful people in Hollywood, Weinstein co-founded the film and television production companies Miramax and The Weinstein Company and produced films such as “Shakespeare in Love” and “The Crying Game.”

    Copyright © 2024 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • Federal judge rejects Trump’s request to intervene in “hush money” case

    Federal judge rejects Trump’s request to intervene in “hush money” case

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge on Tuesday swiftly rejected former President Donald Trump’s request to intervene in his New York hush money criminal case, spurning the former president’s attempt at an end-run around the state court where he was convicted and is set to be sentenced in two weeks.

    U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein’s ruling — just hours after Trump’s lawyers asked him to weigh the move — upends the Republican presidential nominee’s plan to move the case to federal court so that he could seek to have his conviction overturned in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling.

    Hellerstein, echoing his denial of Trump’s pretrial bid to move the case, said the defense failed to meet the high burden of proof for changing jurisdiction and that Trump’s conviction for falsifying business records involved his personal life, not official actions that the Supreme Court ruled are immune from prosecution.

    In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court’s July 1 ruling affected his previous conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump’s case “were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.”

    Trump’s lawyers first asked the federal court to intervene last week, but their paperwork was kicked back because they hadn’t gotten the required clearance from Hellerstein to file it. Hours after they submitted papers Tuesday requesting Hellerstein’s permission to proceed, he issued his ruling denying it.

    Before dissecting Trump’s immunity claims, Hellerstein dispatched quickly of the defense’s oft-repeated claims that trial judge Juan M. Merchan had treated Trump unfairly — subjecting him to a gag order and refusing to delay the trial until after the Supreme Court ruled — because Merchan’s daughter is a Democratic political consultant.

    Hellerstein sidestepped a defense complaint that Trump’s state court trial had been plagued by “bias, conflicts of interest, and appearances of impropriety,” writing that he “does not have jurisdiction to hear Mr. Trump’s arguments concerning the propriety of the New York trial.”

    A Trump campaign spokesperson suggested he would seek to appeal Tuesday’s ruling. Trump and his lawyers “will continue to fight to move this Hoax into federal court where it should be put out of its misery once and for all,” spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement.

    The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted Trump’s case, declined comment. Earlier Tuesday, the office sent a letter to Merchan objecting to Trump’s effort to delay post-trial decisions in the case while he was seeking to have the U.S. District Court in Manhattan step in.

    Merchan is expected to rule soon on two key defense requests: Trump’s call for the judge to delay his Sept. 18 sentencing until after the November election, and his request that the judge overturn his conviction and dismiss the case in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

    Merchan has said he will rule Sept. 16 on Trump’s motion to overturn the verdict. His decision on delaying sentencing has been expected in the coming days.

    Trump was convicted in May of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to disrupt his 2016 presidential run. Trump has denied her claim and said he did nothing wrong. His lawyers contend the case was tainted by violations of Trump’s constitutional rights and that the verdict is vitiated by the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.

    Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years behind bars. Other potential sentences include probation or a fine.

    Trump’s lawyers contend that sentencing Trump as scheduled, just two days after Merchan’s expected immunity decision, wouldn’t give him enough time to weigh next steps, including a possible appeal, if the judge rules to uphold the verdict.

    They also argued a Sept. 18 sentencing, about seven weeks before Election Day, would be election interference. In a court filing last week, they raised the specter that Trump could be sent to jail just as early voting is getting underway.

    Prosecutors have not staked a position on whether to delay sentencing, deferring to Merchan on an “appropriate post-trial schedule.” In their letter Tuesday, they said they were open to a schedule that allows “adequate time” to adjudicate Trump’s motion to overturn the verdict while also sentencing him “without unreasonable delay.”

    Merchan last month rejected Trump’s latest request that he step aside from the case, saying Trump’s demand was a rehash “rife with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims” about his ability to remain impartial. A state appeals court recently upheld the gag order.

    “It would be highly improper for this Court to evaluate the issues of bias, unfairness or error in the state trial,” Hellerstein wrote. “Those are issues for the state appellate courts.”

    Instead, he noted, Trump can pursue a state appeal or seek review from the U.S. Supreme Court, whose immunity ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president’s unofficial actions were illegal.

    Trump’s lawyers have argued that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Family of Trader Joe’s store manager killed by LAPD receives $9.5 million settlement

    Family of Trader Joe’s store manager killed by LAPD receives $9.5 million settlement

    [ad_1]

    The city of Los Angeles will pay nearly $40 million to settle three lawsuits alleging abuses by the LAPD, including a case brought by the family of a Trader Joe’s manager accidentally killed by a police officer who was firing at a fleeing suspect.

    Melyda “Mely” Corado was fatally shot in 2018 at the Silver Lake store where she worked. Her father and brother sued the city and the officers involved in the shooting, alleging that they opened fire recklessly into the crowded store.

    The $9.5 million settlement with the Corado family, which was previously negotiated but hadn’t been disclosed, was the smallest of three payouts the City Council approved on Friday.

    The others were:

    • $17.7 million for the family of Kenneth French, a 32-year-old mentally disabled man fatally shot by an off-duty LAPD officer inside a Costco in Corona in June 2019.
    • $11.8 million for James Simpson, an elderly man who sustained a traumatic brain injury after being struck by a traffic signal pole toppled in an accident caused by an LAPD detective who ran a red light.

    The council approved all three settlements unanimously.

    In a statement released through their attorneys, Corado’s family members said they would “keep her memory alive always.”

    “Nothing will bring Mely back to us and we are forever heartbroken by her violent death caused by those who are meant to protect and serve the community,” the statement read. “We hope this settlement sends a loud message to LAPD and all law enforcement agencies across the country that officers must account for their surroundings when firing their guns.”

    The family’s lawyers called the settlement the largest pretrial payout ever in an LAPD shooting case.

    “Mely’s death was entirely preventable if the officers had followed their training and accounted for their background while firing,” said attorney Neil Gehlawat. “Officers must look at the dangers posed to bystanders when using deadly force, and the officers here failed to do that.”

    Corado was fatally shot on July 21, 2018, as two police officers pursued Gene Evin Atkins, suspected of shooting his grandmother and his girlfriend and then taking the younger woman hostage. Atkins led police on a lengthy pursuit in his grandmother’s car, during which he shot at officers, ran red lights and collided with multiple vehicles, prosecutors alleged.

    The chase ended at the Trader Joe’s on Hyperion Avenue. Atkins stopped the car and ran toward the store, which was crowded with Saturday afternoon shoppers.

    Atkins shot at the officers, who returned fire as he entered the store. One of the officer’s bullets struck Corado, killing her. Atkins was wounded in the arm, but he held shoppers and employees hostage inside the store for three hours before surrendering. His trial is pending.

    The LAPD came under harsh criticism for shooting a bystander, which then-Chief Michel Moore described as “every officer’s worst nightmare.”

    In the French case, the $17.7 million payout is roughly the same amount awarded by a federal jury in 2021 after Officer Salvador Sanchez was found to have used excessive and unreasonable force. Sanchez, who was later fired, was off-duty when he and French got into a confrontation in a line to sample sausages.

    Sanchez’s attorney claimed during the federal trial that he was knocked to the ground during the encounter and believed that French was armed. Sanchez’s rounds killed French and wounded his mother and father.

    The Police Commission found that Sanchez violated department policy. Sanchez also faced criminal manslaughter and assault charges, but the prosecution ended in a mistrial earlier this year. A call to the French family’s attorney went unreturned on Friday.

    Simpson sued the city after sustaining numerous injuries when LAPD detective Alex Pozo ran a red light in Chino while driving a city-owned vehicle in August 2020. The driver of an SUV swerved to avoid colliding with Pozo and crashed into a traffic pole, which fell on top of Simpson, 70, as he walked on the sidewalk.

    The city council voted not to approve a settlement for an LAPD sergeant who sued after being repeatedly disciplined over controversial posts on his personal Facebook and Instagram accounts. The sergeant, Joel Sydanmaa, accused the LAPD of singling him out for punishment for expressing political viewpoints they didn’t like.

    “We rejected their suggestion, and we asked them to go to trial,” Councilmember Bob Blumenfield said.

    Sydanmaa’s attorney, Caleb Mason, said he was “disappointed” that city officials apparently backtracked on what he described as a signed settlement agreement.

    “My client waited three-and-a-half years for a trial date and then he agreed to vacate that trial date two weeks before his trial, based on the word of high level city attorney officials — he trusted them,” Mason said.

    Friday’s payouts add to the more than $171 million in taxpayer money spent since 2019 to resolve legal claims accusing the LAPD of wrongful death, excessive force, negligence, discrimination and more, according to records from the L.A. City Tttorney’s office.

    That figure could grow because the city is appealing several sizable payouts, including the $4 million that a jury awarded to then-Capt. Lillian Carranza, who sued over a nude photograph that was doctored to look like her and shared with coworkers.

    [ad_2]

    Libor Jany, David Zahniser

    Source link

  • Las Vegas trial underway for ex-county official charged in reporter’s murder

    Las Vegas trial underway for ex-county official charged in reporter’s murder

    [ad_1]

    Las Vegas trial underway for ex-county official charged in reporter’s murder – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Opening statements took place Wednesday in the murder trial of Robert Telles, who is charged in the 2022 killing of Las Vegas Review-Journal reporter Jeff German. Prior to his death, German had published a series of articles alleging Telles fostered a hostile work environment while serving as an elected public administrator. Elise Preston has details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kenya cult leader on trial for deaths of more than 400 followers

    Kenya cult leader on trial for deaths of more than 400 followers

    [ad_1]

    Kenya cult leader on trial for deaths of more than 400 followers – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A trial began Monday for a Kenyan cult leader charged with manslaughter over the deaths of more than 400 of his followers. Paul Mackenzie, a self-proclaimed pastor, was arrested last April after about 440 bodies were found in the remote Shakahola Forest. Mackenzie allegedly told his followers to stop eating in order to “meet Jesus.”

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Isaac Schuman’s family, Nicolae Miu’s victims give emotional statements before sentencing in Apple River stabbings

    Isaac Schuman’s family, Nicolae Miu’s victims give emotional statements before sentencing in Apple River stabbings

    [ad_1]

    HUDSON, Wis. — Nicolae Miu was sentenced to 20 years in prison for stabbing multiple people and killing a teenager on the Apple River in July of 2022.

    The courtroom in Hudson was packed Wednesday with those who wanted to learn Miu’s fate, as well as to hear victims give their impact statements before the judge.

    Miu, 54, was found guilty in April of one count of first-degree reckless homicide, four counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety and one count of battery. Isaac Schuman, 17, was killed in the stabbings and four others were injured.  

    The sentence was a significant downward departure, as the prosecution asked for a 70-year sentence.

    Isaac Schuman’s mother: “He stole Isaac’s life”

    Alina Hernandez, Isaac Schuman’s mother, was the first to read her impact statement Wednesday morning.

    “He was a mother’s dream,” she said. “Isaac was kind, sensitive, smart, giving, helpful, talented, and harmless.”

    Isaac Schuman wasn’t supposed to be on the river that day, Alina Hernandez said. Instead he was supposed to be golfing. The teenager was about to enter his senior year of high school, and he had dreams of attending college and studying engineering. 

    He had just started his own detailing business and he loved to play the cello and piano, she added.

    “He stole Isaac’s life and he stole my life. Losing Isaac, my baby, has devastated me and shattered my heart,” Alina Hernandez said. 

    5a-vo-apple-river-stabb-wcco5vab.jpg

    The Isaac Schuman Foundation


    She ended her statement by asking the judge to sentence Miu to the fullest extent.

    Donnie Hernandez: Isaac “wanted love for everyone”

    Donnie Hernandez, Alina Herndandez’s husband, spoke next. He described the pain he felt after losing Isaac Schuman.

    “Isaac was a beautiful man who wanted love for everyone,” he said. “I will forever miss his ‘What’s up dad’ and most importantly, telling each other ‘I love you.’” 

    Donnie Hernandez also asked for Miu to receive the maximum sentence. 

    “My son died a hero, preserving life,” he said.

    Isaac Schuman’s sister describes pain of losing a sibling

    Isaac Schuman’s sister Alexis Hernandez gave her testimony after her father. Her brother, she said, was the “glue” that held the family together.

    “He had brains, and dreams, and looks. It seemed like nothing could stand in the way of his success,” she said.

    She described the grief that she now works to navigate through, and her mission of finding justice for her brother.

    “Grief is a different kind of pain,” she said. “This is a lonely feeling I would never wish on anyone.”

    She said the trauma of the last two years has impacted every part of her life.

    Schuman’s father: “Isaac was a hero”

    Scott Schuman, Isaac Schuman’s father, said he wakes up “every day with a profound sense of loss and sadness.”

    He attends a homicide support group, and despite the effort of his family and friends, he said he struggles with loneliness and finds it hard to connect with others.

    “Isaac was a hero in my eyes,” he said. “He was trying to stop the defendant from hurting anyone else on the day he was killed.”

    A.J. Martin, stabbed by Miu, gives impact statement

    A.J. Martin was one of the four survivors of the stabbing, who suffered the most serious wounds of those who were injured. During the trial he showed the jury his large scar, which runs from his ribs down to his waist. 

    He said he had gone to the river that day to see friends he hadn’t seen in years, and woke up in a hospital with a breathing tube in his throat.

    “My scars hurt all the time,” he said. “I can’t stretch the same, I can’t rock climb the same, I’ll never look the same.”

    He said he felt the internal scars too, and for a while didn’t feel safe to go outside the home.

    Rhyley Mattison: “I feel loneliness.”

    Rhyley Mattison was one of the victims who was seriously wounded by Miu. She also took the stand during Miu’s trial and recounted being attacked by Miu. 

    “Every conversation I have brings back to the incident,” she said. “I feel loneliness.”

    The thought of being around people, she said, filled her with dread. Since her injury, she said she struggled to gain weight, and her digestive system was permanently altered. 

    “This trauma has cast a long, dark shadow over my life,” she said.

    MIU040224
    St. Croix County District Attorney Karl Anderson places a photo of 17-year-old Isaac Schuman in front of the jury during the Nicolae Miu trial at the St. Croix County District Court in Hudson, Wis., on Monday, April 1, 2024.

    Elizabeth Flores


    Issac Schuman’s family launches scholarship foundation

    Since Isaac Schuman’s death, his family has launched a foundation in his honor, with a scholarship designed to support young people pursuing their educational goals, entrepreneurial dreams or creative ventures. They are now accepting donations for the scholarship through the Isaac Schuman Foundation. Its second annual golf tournament will be held Monday at Stillwater’s Oak Glen Golf Course. 

    [ad_2]

    Aki Nace

    Source link

  • Jurors in Sen. Bob Menendez’s bribery trial begin deliberations

    Jurors in Sen. Bob Menendez’s bribery trial begin deliberations

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The fate of Sen. Bob Menendez now lies in the hands of twelve jurors, who began deliberations Friday afternoon in the New Jersey Democrat’s bribery trial. 

    The trial, initially expected to last six weeks, has stretched into its ninth week. 

    Menendez, who has pleaded not guilty, is charged with 16 felony counts, including obstruction of justice, acting as a foreign agent, bribery, extortion and honest services wire fraud. He is accused of using his political influence to benefit two foreign governments, while helping three New Jersey businessmen in return for bribes that included stacks of cash, gold bars, mortgage payments and a Mercedes-Benz convertible. 

    Since mid-May, prosecutors have detailed a wide-ranging corruption scheme in which Menendez allegedly used his influence as the then-chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee to secretly benefit Egypt and pressure a Department of Agriculture official to protect a halal certification monopoly Egypt granted to businessman Wael Hana, who was paying the senator’s wife, Nadine Menendez

    The senator also allegedly tried to quash state and federal criminal cases related to former insurance broker Jose Uribe and real estate developer Fred Daibes. Menendez was helping Daibes land a lucrative investment deal with Qatar at the same time, according to prosecutors. 

    Prosecutors say Menendez and his wife tried to obstruct the investigation after they were initially charged by characterizing some of the alleged bribe payments as loans, which “caused” their former lawyers to make false statements to prosecutors. 

    A judge postponed Nadine Menendez’s trial until August because she’s recovering from breast cancer surgery. She has pleaded not guilty. 

    Hana and Daibes, who have also pleaded not guilty, are on trial with the senator. 

    Uribe pleaded guilty earlier this year and testified in this trial that he asked Menendez directly for his help, months after he said he handed Nadine Menendez $15,000 in cash in a restaurant parking lot for a downpayment on a $60,000 Mercedes. Uribe made her car payments until June 2022 — the same month the FBI searched the Menendezes’ home and found over $480,000 in cash and gold bars worth more than $100,000. 

    “This is a big case, but it all boils down to a classic case of corruption on a massive scale,” prosecutor Paul Monteleoni said this week during closing arguments. 

    The senator chose not to testify in his own defense. His lawyers have asserted the government is prosecuting routine legislative activity. They also have tried to pin the blame on Nadine Menendez, saying she had financial troubles that she did not disclose to her husband. 

    “There is no text, there is no email, there is no recording, there is no voicemail, there is no photo, that ever shows Senator Menendez taking a bribe in exchange for doing something. There is none,” his lawyer Adam Fee said this week, saying the government’s case is based on “painfully thin” evidence.

    Fee asked jurors to “resist the temptation to pick the salacious story about a corrupt politician, because it’s not there.” 

    Prosecutors pushed back on the defense’s assertion that the couple lived separate lives, showing jurors text messages of the couple sharing mundane details about their day with each other and the senator checking in on his wife’s location. They said Menendez was careful while committing the alleged crimes. 

    “When a sophisticated, careful person like Menendez commits a crime, he doesn’t say the quiet part out loud,” Monteleoni said. “He doesn’t negotiate the bribe payment himself. He has Nadine do that for him. He insulates himself.” 

    Ash Kalmar contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Bob Menendez’s lawyer tells jury that prosecutors failed to prove a single charge in bribery trial

    Sen. Bob Menendez’s lawyer tells jury that prosecutors failed to prove a single charge in bribery trial

    [ad_1]

    A lawyer for Sen. Bob Menendez urged jurors on Tuesday to acquit him of every charge at the New Jersey Democrat’s corruption trial, saying federal prosecutors had failed to prove a single count beyond a reasonable doubt.

    The attorney, Adam Fee, told the Manhattan federal court jury that there were too many gaps in evidence that prosecutors wanted jurors to fill in on their own to conclude crimes were committed or that Menendez accepted any bribes.

    “The absence of evidence should be held against the prosecution,” he said. “There’s zero evidence of him saying or suggesting that he was doing something for a bribe.”

    And he defended over $100,000 in gold bars and more than $480,000 in cash found in an Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, home during a June 2022 FBI search, although he acknowledged of the valuables: “It’s provocative. It’s atypical.”

    “Prosecutors have not come close to meeting their burden to show you that any of the gold or cash was given to Senator Menendez as a bribe,” Fee said.

    Criminal Trial For US Senator Bob Menendez
    Senator Robert Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, arrives at federal court in New York City on July 8, 2024.

    Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    “This is a case with a lot of inferences,” he said, suggesting there were large gaps in the evidence that was unsupported by emails, texts or other evidence.

    The longtime lawmaker faces 16 felony counts, including obstruction of justice, acting as a foreign agent, bribery, extortion and honest services wire fraud. 

    After the jury was sent home Tuesday, Fee told Judge Sidney Stein that he was about halfway through a five-hour closing that will resume Wednesday morning. His closing will be followed by arguments from two other defense lawyers before prosecutors present a rebuttal argument. The jury is likely to get the case on Thursday.

    Earlier Tuesday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni said in a closing argument that began Monday that the senator had engaged in “wildly abnormal” behavior in response to bribes, including trying to interfere in criminal cases handled by the top state and federal prosecutors in New Jersey.

    Menendez has pleaded not guilty to charges that he accepted bribes including gold and envelopes of cash from 2018 to 2022 from three New Jersey businessmen who wanted his help in their business ventures.

    His trial entered its ninth week on Monday.

    Menendez is on trial with two of the businessmen — Wael Hana and Fred Daibes. Hana, who prosecutors say enlisted Menendez to help him protect a monopoly on the certification of meat exported from the U.S. to Egypt, and Daibes, an influential real estate developer, have also both pleaded not guilty. A third businessman, Jose Uribe, pleaded guilty and testified that he bought a Mercedes-Benz convertible for the senator’s wife in exchange for Menendez quashing criminal investigations into his business associates. 

    Senator Menendez Trial Continues In New York City
    Wael Hana arrives for trial at Manhattan Federal Court on June 11, 2024, in New York City.

    Michael M Santiago/Getty Images / Getty Images


    Monteleoni rejected attempts by the defense to make it seem that Menendez was unaware of efforts to get cash or favors from the businessmen by his then-girlfriend, Nadine Arslanian, who became his wife in October 2020. Fee has argued that she went to great lengths to hide her financial troubles, including an inability to pay for her home, from Menendez.

    To demonstrate his point that Menendez was in charge of bribery schemes, the prosecutor pointed to testimony about a small bell the senator allegedly used to summon his wife one day when he was outside their home with Uribe and wanted her to bring him paper.

    The bell “showed you he was the one in charge,” Monteleoni said, “not a puppet having his strings pulled by someone he summons with a bell.”

    Nadine Menendez also is charged in the case, but her trial has been postponed while she recovers from breast cancer surgery.

    Menendez has resisted calls, even by some prominent Democrats, that he resign, though he did relinquish his powerful post as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee after the charges were unveiled last fall.

    Several weeks ago, Menendez filed to run for reelection this year as an independent.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alec Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter trial begins with jury selection

    Alec Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter trial begins with jury selection

    [ad_1]

    Alec Baldwin’s trial in the shooting of a cinematographer begins Tuesday with the selection of jurors who will be tasked with deciding whether the actor is guilty of involuntary manslaughter.Getting chosen to serve in a trial of such a major star accused of such a major crime would be unusual even in Los Angeles or Baldwin’s hometown of New York. But it will be essentially an unheard-of experience for those who are picked as jurors in Santa Fe, New Mexico, though in recent years the state has increasingly become a hub of Hollywood production.Baldwin and his wife Hilaria arrived at the courthouse Tuesday with their youngest child, Ilaria Catalina Irena Baldwin. The couple have seven children, ranging in ages from 1 to 10.Baldwin, 66, could get up to 18 months in prison if jurors unanimously decide to convict him. The jurors are tasked with deciding whether Baldwin committed the felony when, during a rehearsal in October 2021, a revolver went off while he was pointing it at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza. They were on the set of the Western film “Rust,” at Bonanza Creek Ranch some 18 miles from where the trial is being held.Baldwin has said the gun fired accidentally after he followed instructions to point it toward Hutchins, who was behind the camera. Unaware that the gun contained a live round, Baldwin said he pulled back the hammer — not the trigger — and it fired.The star of “30 Rock” and “The Hunt for Red October” made his first appearance in the courtroom on Monday, when Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer, in a significant victory for the defense, ruled at a pretrial hearing that Baldwin’s role as a co-producer on “Rust” isn’t relevant to the trial.On Tuesday, 79 people will be questioned and narrowed down. “It’s a process where both sides get to ask really specific questions of jurors,” John Day, a legal expert with sister station KOAT, said.He added, questions will come after some extensive research by both the prosecution and the defense.”Like, looked up their social media posts to see if they’ve said anything about this trial, or about guns in general, or Alec Baldwin in particular,” Day said.Candidates will also be grouped up in a 50-minute selection to ensure a faster process. Something that differed from Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s trial. Twelve jurors and four alternates were selected in her case.”They were feeling pretty strongly that she had one job, and she didn’t do it,” Day said. “Her job was to make sure that there was no live ammunition on the set and that the guns didn’t have anything that was going to hurt someone.”That means finding the perfect juror will be key in a limited amount of time. “The ultimate juror is someone who can say, ‘I might know about the case, but I don’t have an opinion,’” Day said.However, certain ideas may be favored.For the prosecutions, the team will be looking closely at gun safety.”You’re going to want people on the jury who are familiar with gun safety issues, right?” Day said. “Who knows about gun safety, and who is going to be skeptical of somebody pointing a gun at someone without knowing what’s in it.”As for the defense, attorneys will closely look at movie set protocols.”You’re going to want people who would agree that a film is not like real life,” he said. “That if you’re an actor on a film set and someone hands you a gun and says it’s safe, there’s no reason to think otherwise.”But each side can only reject a certain number of potential jurors. “People that can kick off or they can say, ‘we’re not going to take that person for this reason,’” Day said. “It’s a process of narrowing down a large pool into a much smaller pool of jurors and alternates.”Jury selection will begin Tuesday morning at the Santa Fe County Courthouse. Opening statements are expected Wednesday.The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Alec Baldwin’s trial in the shooting of a cinematographer begins Tuesday with the selection of jurors who will be tasked with deciding whether the actor is guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

    Getting chosen to serve in a trial of such a major star accused of such a major crime would be unusual even in Los Angeles or Baldwin’s hometown of New York. But it will be essentially an unheard-of experience for those who are picked as jurors in Santa Fe, New Mexico, though in recent years the state has increasingly become a hub of Hollywood production.

    Baldwin and his wife Hilaria arrived at the courthouse Tuesday with their youngest child, Ilaria Catalina Irena Baldwin. The couple have seven children, ranging in ages from 1 to 10.

    Baldwin, 66, could get up to 18 months in prison if jurors unanimously decide to convict him. The jurors are tasked with deciding whether Baldwin committed the felony when, during a rehearsal in October 2021, a revolver went off while he was pointing it at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza. They were on the set of the Western film “Rust,” at Bonanza Creek Ranch some 18 miles from where the trial is being held.

    Baldwin has said the gun fired accidentally after he followed instructions to point it toward Hutchins, who was behind the camera. Unaware that the gun contained a live round, Baldwin said he pulled back the hammer — not the trigger — and it fired.

    The star of “30 Rock” and “The Hunt for Red October” made his first appearance in the courtroom on Monday, when Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer, in a significant victory for the defense, ruled at a pretrial hearing that Baldwin’s role as a co-producer on “Rust” isn’t relevant to the trial.

    On Tuesday, 79 people will be questioned and narrowed down.

    “It’s a process where both sides get to ask really specific questions of jurors,” John Day, a legal expert with sister station KOAT, said.

    He added, questions will come after some extensive research by both the prosecution and the defense.

    “Like, [they may have] looked up their social media posts to see if they’ve said anything about this trial, or about guns in general, or Alec Baldwin in particular,” Day said.

    Candidates will also be grouped up in a 50-minute selection to ensure a faster process.

    Something that differed from Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s trial. Twelve jurors and four alternates were selected in her case.

    “They were feeling pretty strongly that she had one job, and she didn’t do it,” Day said. “Her job was to make sure that there was no live ammunition on the set and that the guns didn’t have anything that was going to hurt someone.”

    That means finding the perfect juror will be key in a limited amount of time.

    “The ultimate juror is someone who can say, ‘I might know about the case, but I don’t have an opinion,’” Day said.

    However, certain ideas may be favored.

    For the prosecutions, the team will be looking closely at gun safety.

    “You’re going to want people on the jury who are familiar with gun safety issues, right?” Day said. “Who knows about gun safety, and who is going to be skeptical of somebody pointing a gun at someone without knowing what’s in it.”

    As for the defense, attorneys will closely look at movie set protocols.

    “You’re going to want people who would agree that a film is not like real life,” he said. “That if you’re an actor on a film set and someone hands you a gun and says it’s safe, there’s no reason to think otherwise.”

    But each side can only reject a certain number of potential jurors.

    “People that [the teams] can kick off or [that] they can say, ‘we’re not going to take that person for this reason,’” Day said. “It’s a process of narrowing down a large pool into a much smaller pool of jurors and alternates.”

    Jury selection will begin Tuesday morning at the Santa Fe County Courthouse. Opening statements are expected Wednesday.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hawk Tuah Girl, ‘Clipped’ Finale, and the Karen Read Trial

    Hawk Tuah Girl, ‘Clipped’ Finale, and the Karen Read Trial

    [ad_1]

    Jodi and Chelsea are going all over the worldwide web this week, starting with updates on TikTok’s favorite courtroom drama, the Karen Read trial (5:50), before finally being ready to talk about the international implications of Hawk Tuah Girl (16:20). Then, Jodi tells Chelsea what she’s looking forward to this year, like the potential of Gladiator II and Wicked: Part One becoming 2024’s Barbenheimer (32:24), and a very Josh Hartnett summer (39:24). Finally, they talk about the last two episodes of Clipped, the portrayal of the notorious “silly rabbit” interview, and how the finale left them feeling (46:15), before sharing their personal obsessions of the week (1:0 0:15).

    Hosts: Jodi Walker and Chelsea Stark-Jones
    Producer: Sasha Ashall

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher

    [ad_2]

    Jodi Walker

    Source link

  • Bob Menendez’s defense rests without New Jersey senator testifying in bribery trial

    Bob Menendez’s defense rests without New Jersey senator testifying in bribery trial

    [ad_1]

    Defense rests in bribery trial of New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez


    Defense rests in bribery trial of New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez

    00:51

    Washington — Attorneys for Sen. Bob Menendez concluded calling witnesses on Wednesday, opting not to have the New Jersey Democrat take the stand in his own defense as he fights allegations that he traded political favors for gold bars and cash. 

    While leaving court, Menendez said it did not make “any sense” for him to testify. “From my perspective, the government has failed to prove every aspect of its case,” he said. 

    A handful of witnesses testified on his behalf, compared to the 30 witnesses called by the prosecution during the trial, which has so far spanned eight weeks.

    Menendez’s defense attorneys called his sister and the sister of his wife, Nadine Menendez, to testify on Monday as they sought to show it was not unusual for the couple to keep gold and large amounts of cash in their home. 

    When federal investigators executed a search warrant at Menendez’s home in June 2022, they found more than $480,000 in cash stashed in envelopes, coats, shoes and bags, as well as 13 gold bars worth more than $100,000. 

    Menendez, who has pleaded not guilty, is charged with bribery, extortion, wire fraud, obstruction of justice and acting as a foreign agent for Egypt. Nadine Menendez has also pleaded not guilty. Her trial was postponed until August as she recovers from breast cancer surgery. 

    The senator’s older sister, Caridad Gonzalez, told jurors that their parents and aunt had a practice of storing cash at home after their family fled persecution in Cuba in 1951, before Menendez was born. She called the habit “a Cuban thing.” 

    “Daddy always said don’t trust the banks,” Gonzalez said. “If you trust the banks, you never know what can happen, so you must always have money at home.” 

    Criminal Trial For US Senator Bob Menendez
    Senator Robert Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, exits federal court in New York on June 10, 2024.

    Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    She recalled finding a stash of cash in a shoebox in Menendez’s home in the 1980s. 

    But prosecutors undercut one of the points made by Gonzalez after she testified that she asked her brother to help a neighbor with an immigration issue. Prosecutors showed text messages between the senator and his sister that suggest he did not give that issue the same treatment that prosecutors say the businessmen who bribed the couple got. 

    The businessmen, Wael Hana and Fred Daibes, are on trial with the senator. They have also pleaded not guilty. 

    When they asked Menendez for help, he allegedly pressured a U.S. Department of Agriculture official to protect Hana’s halal certification monopoly and interfered in a criminal case in New Jersey involving Daibes, according to prosecutors. 

    Russell Richardson, a forensic accountant, testified that Menendez withdrew about $400 in cash almost every few weeks from 2008 to 2022, totaling more than $150,000. 

    The testimony was meant to bolster Menendez’s explanation that he withdrew thousands of dollars in cash from his bank account over decades because of his family’s experience in Cuba. 

    Richardson testified during cross-examination that he did not find any record of Menendez withdrawing $10,000 in cash at one time. Some of the cash seized from Menendez’s home was found in bundles of $10,000, and Daibes’ fingerprints were found on some of the envelopes containing the cash. 

    Part of Menendez’s defense strategy has been to pin the blame on his wife, claiming the senator was unaware of his wife’s financial challenges and her dealings with the businessmen accused of bribing them. 

    Nadine Menendez’s younger sister, Katia Tabourian, testified that her sister and the senator broke up in late 2018 because her sister’s ex-boyfriend “was creating a lot of chaos in her relationship with the senator.” Menendez’s lawyers say the couple could not have plotted together during the pause in their relationship. 

    Tabourian confirmed that her sister locked her bedroom closet, which Menendez’s lawyers said he did not have a key to. Investigators found gold bars and cash in the closet during the 2022 search. Tabourian said it was common for her family to give cash, gold and jewelry as gifts. 

    Jurors are expected to have the case by the end of next week, following testimony from Hana’s witnesses and closing arguments. Daibes’ legal team rested Wednesday without presenting a defense. 

    —Ash Kalmar and Christine Sloan contributed reporting. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling and Trump’s 2024 campaign

    Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling and Trump’s 2024 campaign

    [ad_1]

    Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling and Trump’s 2024 campaign – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Advisers on former President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign believe the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity will help his efforts for a second term at the White House and make another trial unlikely before Election Day. CBS News’ political director Fin Gomez reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge to weigh request to dismiss Alec Baldwin shooting case for damage to evidence during testing

    Judge to weigh request to dismiss Alec Baldwin shooting case for damage to evidence during testing

    [ad_1]

    A New Mexico judge plans to rule Friday on a request to dismiss the sole charge against Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer over concerns the FBI damaged the firearm during forensic testing before defense attorneys could examine it.Defense attorneys for Alec Baldwin have asked Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer to scuttle the case against Baldwin ahead of what would be a high-profile trial starting in July.Baldwin’s legal team has requested that, if the trial moves forward, the judge should at least prohibit presentation of an analysis of the gun using replacement parts by a firearms expert for the prosecution. They say investigators may have destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence while testing whether the gun might accidentally discharge without a pull of the trigger.During a film-set rehearsal on Oct. 21, 2021, Baldwin was pointing the gun at Halyna Hutchins when it went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza, who survived.Baldwin has pleaded not guilty to an involuntary manslaughter charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison.Sheriff’s investigators initially sent the revolver to the FBI for routine testing, but when an FBI analyst heard Baldwin say in an ABC interview that he never pulled the trigger, the agency told local authorities they could conduct an accidental discharge test, though it might damage the gun.The FBI was told by a team of investigators to go ahead, and tested the revolver by striking it from several angles with a rawhide mallet. One of those strikes fractured the gun’s firing and safety mechanisms.“They understood that this was potentially exculpatory evidence and they destroyed it anyway,” Baldwin lawyer John Bash said during a virtual court hearing Monday. “It’s outrageous and it requires dismissal.”Prosecutors said it was “unfortunate” the gun broke, but it wasn’t destroyed and the parts are still available. They say Baldwin’s attorneys still have the ability to defend their client and question the evidence against him.Baldwin’s lawyers say authorities went ahead with destructive testing of the gun without bothering to disassemble it and photograph the parts first, thus eliminating their most critical evidence in the case. Noting damage to the top notch on the revolver’s hammer, they urged the judge to prohibit a jury from viewing an analysis of the reconstructed gun.Several hours of testimony about the gun and forensic testing during online hearings provided a dress rehearsal for the possible trial against Baldwin. Attorneys for Baldwin gave long and probing cross-examinations of the lead detective, an FBI forensic firearm investigator and the prosecution’s independent gun expert, Lucien Haag.Special prosecutor Erlinda Ocampo Johnson told the court Monday that the defense has plenty of gun evidence to work with at the trial.She added that all available evidence, from witness testimony to video footage of Baldwin firing the revolver, showed the gun was in good working order on the day of the shooting and that police had no reason to believe its internal workings could provide exonerating evidence.Prosecutors plan to present evidence that they say shows the firearm “could not have fired absent a pull of the trigger” and was working properly before the shooting.Armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was convicted in March of involuntary manslaughter for her role in the shooting and was sentenced to 1.5 years in prison.Since the 2021 shooting, the filming of “Rust” resumed but moved to Montana under an agreement with Hutchins’ husband, Matthew Hutchins, which made him an executive producer. The completed movie has not yet been released for public viewing.

    A New Mexico judge plans to rule Friday on a request to dismiss the sole charge against Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer over concerns the FBI damaged the firearm during forensic testing before defense attorneys could examine it.

    Defense attorneys for Alec Baldwin have asked Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer to scuttle the case against Baldwin ahead of what would be a high-profile trial starting in July.

    Baldwin’s legal team has requested that, if the trial moves forward, the judge should at least prohibit presentation of an analysis of the gun using replacement parts by a firearms expert for the prosecution. They say investigators may have destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence while testing whether the gun might accidentally discharge without a pull of the trigger.

    During a film-set rehearsal on Oct. 21, 2021, Baldwin was pointing the gun at Halyna Hutchins when it went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza, who survived.

    Baldwin has pleaded not guilty to an involuntary manslaughter charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison.

    Sheriff’s investigators initially sent the revolver to the FBI for routine testing, but when an FBI analyst heard Baldwin say in an ABC interview that he never pulled the trigger, the agency told local authorities they could conduct an accidental discharge test, though it might damage the gun.

    The FBI was told by a team of investigators to go ahead, and tested the revolver by striking it from several angles with a rawhide mallet. One of those strikes fractured the gun’s firing and safety mechanisms.

    “They understood that this was potentially exculpatory evidence and they destroyed it anyway,” Baldwin lawyer John Bash said during a virtual court hearing Monday. “It’s outrageous and it requires dismissal.”

    Prosecutors said it was “unfortunate” the gun broke, but it wasn’t destroyed and the parts are still available. They say Baldwin’s attorneys still have the ability to defend their client and question the evidence against him.

    Baldwin’s lawyers say authorities went ahead with destructive testing of the gun without bothering to disassemble it and photograph the parts first, thus eliminating their most critical evidence in the case. Noting damage to the top notch on the revolver’s hammer, they urged the judge to prohibit a jury from viewing an analysis of the reconstructed gun.

    Several hours of testimony about the gun and forensic testing during online hearings provided a dress rehearsal for the possible trial against Baldwin. Attorneys for Baldwin gave long and probing cross-examinations of the lead detective, an FBI forensic firearm investigator and the prosecution’s independent gun expert, Lucien Haag.

    Special prosecutor Erlinda Ocampo Johnson told the court Monday that the defense has plenty of gun evidence to work with at the trial.

    She added that all available evidence, from witness testimony to video footage of Baldwin firing the revolver, showed the gun was in good working order on the day of the shooting and that police had no reason to believe its internal workings could provide exonerating evidence.

    Prosecutors plan to present evidence that they say shows the firearm “could not have fired absent a pull of the trigger” and was working properly before the shooting.

    Armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was convicted in March of involuntary manslaughter for her role in the shooting and was sentenced to 1.5 years in prison.

    Since the 2021 shooting, the filming of “Rust” resumed but moved to Montana under an agreement with Hutchins’ husband, Matthew Hutchins, which made him an executive producer. The completed movie has not yet been released for public viewing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • David DePape convicted of five state charges in hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    David DePape convicted of five state charges in hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband

    [ad_1]

    David DePape, the conspiracy theorist who attacked Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, with a hammer and plotted to interrogate the former House speaker on video, was convicted Friday of state charges related to the assault.

    A jury found DePape guilty of five felony counts in state court, according to several news outlets. The charges resulted from an attack that investigators described as the beginning of a planned “rampage” to go after high-profile targets, including actor Tom Hanks and Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    He was convicted of imprisonment, residential burglary, threatening a family member of a public official, attempting to sway a witness and aggravated kidnapping. The verdict comes seven months after he was found guilty of federal charges in the attack.

    DePape’s social media accounts, and interviews with friends and former co-workers, detail how he began to descend into baseless right-wing conspiracy theories. He wrote blog posts about several discredited conspiracy theories, including those popularly known as “Pizzagate” and “QAnon,” which posited large sexual abuse rings run by Hollywood and Democratic Party figures.

    San Francisco Assistant Dist. Atty. Phoebe Maffei argued during the trial that DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi because of her role as House speaker at the time, making her second in line for the presidency, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. She was not home during the break-in.

    “We haven’t seen anybody make a plan to break into the home of one of our national leaders, hold hostage and nearly kill that person’s spouse,” Maffei told jurors, according to the Chronicle. “Thankfully this is unusual. But it’s what happened.”

    In November, DePape was convicted in federal court of attempting to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and assaulting her husband. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison.

    Attorneys with the San Francisco public defender’s office, which represented DePape, successfully sought to have several charges against him dismissed in the state case, arguing that they were similar to those he had been convicted of in federal court.

    In response, San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Harry Dorfman tossed out the counts of attempted murder, elder abuse and assault with a deadly weapon. Defense attorneys argued that the state’s double jeopardy law prohibits defendants from being tried more than once on the same crime.

    In his closing arguments, Public Defender Adam Lipson argued that his client might be guilty of false imprisonment, residential burglary and attempting to sway a witness. But, he told jurors, DePape should not be convicted of aggravated kidnapping and threatening a family member of a public official, the Chronicle reported.

    Lipson reportedly argued that DePape’s threats were not specific to Pelosi’s role as House speaker, but rather to find and reach other targets.

    Conspiracy theories continued to play a role as the state trial came to a close this week.

    On Tuesday, Dorfman barred DePape’s former partner from the courtroom and second floor of the building, the Associated Press reported. The decision came after Gypsy Taub, a nudism activist, handed out fliers outside the courtroom with links to her website, which promotes a series of conspiracy theories.

    The day Dorfman kicked her out of the second floor, the address for Taub’s website was spotted on a wall and on a toilet paper dispenser in a women’s bathroom at the courthouse.

    Dorfman accused Taub of “trying to corruptly influence one or more jury members” and instructed bailiffs to escort her out.

    [ad_2]

    Salvador Hernandez

    Source link