ReportWire

Tag: Trial

  • Rob Reiner’s son Nick set to appear in court on 2 counts of murder in killing of his parents

    [ad_1]

    Rob Reiner’s son Nick Reiner is expected to make his first court appearance Wednesday on two counts of first-degree murder in the killing of his parents.Nick Reiner, 32, was charged Tuesday with killing the 78-year-old actor and director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced at a news conference with LA Police Chief Jim McDonnell.“Their loss is beyond tragic and we will commit ourselves to bringing their murderer to justice,” Hochman said.Along with the two counts of first-degree murder, prosecutors added special circumstances of multiple murders and a special allegation that the defendant used a dangerous weapon, a knife. The additions could mean a greater sentence.Hochman said his office has not yet decided whether to seek the death penalty in the case.“This case is heartbreaking and deeply personal, not only for the Reiner family and their loved ones but for our entire city,” McDonnell said.The announcement came two days after the couple was found dead from apparent stab wounds in their home in the upscale Brentwood neighborhood on the west side of Los Angeles. Nick Reiner did not resist when he was arrested hours later in the Exposition Park area near the University of Southern California, about 14 miles (22.5 kilometers) from the crime scene, police said.Rob Reiner was the Emmy-winning star of the sitcom “All in the Family” who went on to direct films including “When Harry Met Sally…” and “The Princess Bride.” He was an outspoken liberal activist for decades. Michele Singer Reiner was a photographer, movie producer and advocate for LGBTQ+ rights. They had been married for 36 years.Several of those closest to them, including actors Billy Crystal, Albert Brooks, Martin Short and Larry David, released a statement mourning and celebrating the couple on Tuesday night.“They were a special force together — dynamic, unselfish and inspiring,” the statement said. “We were their friends, and we will miss them forever.”Nick Reiner had been scheduled to make an initial court appearance earlier Tuesday, but his attorney Alan Jackson said he was not brought from the jail to the courthouse for medical reasons and the appearance was postponed.At Wednesday’s hearing, Reiner may enter a plea, a judge may schedule an arraignment for later or the same issue that prevented him from coming to court Tuesday could cause further postponement. He is being held without bail.Jackson is a high-profile defense attorney and former LA County prosecutor who represented Harvey Weinstein at his Los Angeles trial and Karen Read at her intensely followed trials in Massachusetts. He was a central figure in the HBO documentary on the Read case.On the other side will be Deputy District Attorney Habib Balian, whose recent cases included the Menendez brothers’ attempt at resentencing and the trial of Robert Durst.Authorities haven’t said anything about a motive for the killings and would give few details when asked at the news conference.

    Rob Reiner’s son Nick Reiner is expected to make his first court appearance Wednesday on two counts of first-degree murder in the killing of his parents.

    Nick Reiner, 32, was charged Tuesday with killing the 78-year-old actor and director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman announced at a news conference with LA Police Chief Jim McDonnell.

    “Their loss is beyond tragic and we will commit ourselves to bringing their murderer to justice,” Hochman said.

    Along with the two counts of first-degree murder, prosecutors added special circumstances of multiple murders and a special allegation that the defendant used a dangerous weapon, a knife. The additions could mean a greater sentence.

    Hochman said his office has not yet decided whether to seek the death penalty in the case.

    “This case is heartbreaking and deeply personal, not only for the Reiner family and their loved ones but for our entire city,” McDonnell said.

    The announcement came two days after the couple was found dead from apparent stab wounds in their home in the upscale Brentwood neighborhood on the west side of Los Angeles. Nick Reiner did not resist when he was arrested hours later in the Exposition Park area near the University of Southern California, about 14 miles (22.5 kilometers) from the crime scene, police said.

    Rob Reiner was the Emmy-winning star of the sitcom “All in the Family” who went on to direct films including “When Harry Met Sally…” and “The Princess Bride.” He was an outspoken liberal activist for decades. Michele Singer Reiner was a photographer, movie producer and advocate for LGBTQ+ rights. They had been married for 36 years.

    Several of those closest to them, including actors Billy Crystal, Albert Brooks, Martin Short and Larry David, released a statement mourning and celebrating the couple on Tuesday night.

    “They were a special force together — dynamic, unselfish and inspiring,” the statement said. “We were their friends, and we will miss them forever.”

    Nick Reiner had been scheduled to make an initial court appearance earlier Tuesday, but his attorney Alan Jackson said he was not brought from the jail to the courthouse for medical reasons and the appearance was postponed.

    At Wednesday’s hearing, Reiner may enter a plea, a judge may schedule an arraignment for later or the same issue that prevented him from coming to court Tuesday could cause further postponement. He is being held without bail.

    Jackson is a high-profile defense attorney and former LA County prosecutor who represented Harvey Weinstein at his Los Angeles trial and Karen Read at her intensely followed trials in Massachusetts. He was a central figure in the HBO documentary on the Read case.

    On the other side will be Deputy District Attorney Habib Balian, whose recent cases included the Menendez brothers’ attempt at resentencing and the trial of Robert Durst.

    Authorities haven’t said anything about a motive for the killings and would give few details when asked at the news conference.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trial date set for wounded police officer

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — Now that a wounded North Andover police officer has a 2026 trial date, her defense team is turning its attention to the culture of the North Andover Police Department and what transpired before the shooting nearly five months ago.

    A jury trial has been set for Feb. 9 in Essex County Superior Court following a trial assignment conference on Tuesday for Kelsey Fitzsimmons, 29, who was shot by a responding officer and colleague in her North Andover home after being served with an abuse prevention order filed by her then-fiance, North Andover firefighter Justin Aylaian.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 7246D 2 492C86 @7 2DD2F=E 3J >62?D @7 2 52?86C@FD H62A@? DE6>>:?8 7C@> E96 D9@@E:?8 :?D:56 96C 9@>6 yF?6 b_]k^Am

    kAm!@=:46 2==6865 u:EKD:>>@?D 2:>65 2 8F? 2E @?6 @7 E96 @77:46CD[ H9:49 =65 E@ 96C 36:?8 D9@E 😕 E96 496DE] u:EKD:>>@?D 92D 4=2:>65 D96 ?6G6C 2:>65 96C 7:C62C> 2E 2?@E96C A6CD@?[ 3FE H2D D9@E 3642FD6 @7 2 72:=65 DF:4:56 2EE6>AE 2D 96C :?72?E D@? H2D 36:?8 E2<6? 7C@> 96C]k^Am

    kAm%96 EC:2= 😀 D4965F=65 E@ 36 962C5 3J yF586 z2E9=66? |4r2CE9J}6J>2?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 4@FCE 5@4<6E]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 92D 366? 96=5 H:E9@FE 32:= D:?46 $6AE] “ 27E6C |4r2CE9J}6J>2? C6G@<65 96C E6C>D @7 C6=62D6] u:EKD:>>@?D C6>2:?D 2E E96 (6DE6C? |2DD249FD6EED #68:@?2= (@>6?’D r@CC64E:@?2= r6?E6C 😕 r9:4@A66]k^Am

    kAmpE E96 4@?76C6?46 %F6D52J[ yF586 %9@>2D sC649D=6C 42==65 E96 42D6 D6C:@FD 3FE ?@E 4@>A=:42E65 2D 96 6?4@FC2865 E96 2EE@C?6JD E@ 2CC:G6 2E 2 EC:2= 52E6 2?5 7@C E96 EC:2= E@ 36 AC:@C:E:K65 5F6 E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ 56E2:?>6?E] pE 36DE[ 96 D2:5[ D96 4@F=5 36 @? C6DEC:4E:G6 4@?5:E:@?D 29625 @7 E96 EC:2= A6?5:?8 E96 $FAC6>6 yF5:4:2= r@FCE’D 7F== A2?6= 564:D:@? @? 96C C646?E 2AA62= E@ 36 C6=62D65 7C@> ;2:=]k^Am

    kAmw6C 5676?D6 E62>’D >@E:@? 7@C DA64:7:4 5:D4@G6CJ 7:=65 uC:52J H2D 5632E65 😕 4@FCE]k^Am

    kAmu:=:?8D 3J u:EKD:>>@?D’ =2HJ6CD %:>@E9J qC25= 2?5 |2CE92 r@2<=6J :?4=F56 6G:56?46 C6BF6DED C6=2E65 E@ E96 }@CE9 p?5@G6C !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ :ED DE2E:@?’D DFCG6:==2?46 7@@E286[ 5@4F>6?ED E92E D9@H @77:46C >:D4@?5F4E[ :7 @77:46CD 2C6 @? 2 ”qC25J =:DE” 2?5 DA64:7:4 EC2:?:?8 7@C @77:46CD @G6C E96 =2DE D6G6C2= J62CD]k^Am

    kAmqC25= D2:5 @? yF?6 b_[ A@=:46 @77:46CD H6C6 G:6H65 @? E96:C A9@?6D E6IE:?8 2E E96 D9@@E:?8 D46?6 2?5 9:D E62> H2?ED E96 >6DD286D]k^Am

    kAmqC25= 25565 E92E 96 36=:6G6D E96C6 H6C6 2=D@ E6IE >6DD286D 6I492?865 36EH66? pJ=2:2? 2?5 E96 @77:46CD H9@ D6CG65 E96 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56C =625:?8 FA E@ E96 @77:46CD’ 2CC:G2= 2E E96 9@FD6] qC25= C6BF6DE65 E9@D6 >6DD286D 36 AC@5F465 2D H6==]k^Am

    kAmx? E96 DA64:7:4 5:D4@G6CJ >@E:@?[ E96 C6BF6DE 42==D 7@C 2== E6IE[ A9@?6[ ?@E6D 2?5 6>2:= 4@?G6CD2E:@?D @G6C E96 =2DE EH@ J62CD 36EH66? pJ=2:2? 2?5 E9@D6 @77:46CD]k^Am

    kAmqC25= C6>:?565 sC6D9D=6C 96 925 >256 2 >@E:@? @? pF8] ae[ 7@==@H:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D’ 2CC2:8?>6?E 😕 $FA6C:@C r@FCE[ E@ >2<6 2?J G:56@ 7@@E286 7C@> E96 DE2E:@? @? yF?6 b_ 2G2:=23=6] qC25= D2:5 u:EKD:>>@?D H2D 2E E96 DE2E:@? E92E 52J[ H:E9 96C 323J[ AC:@C E@ E96 D9@@E:?8 7@C 96C r!# C646CE:7:42E:@?]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D’ E62> C6BF6DE65 ?@E @?=J E96 G:56@ 7@@E286[ 3FE 2=D@ E96 ?2>6D 2?5 4@?E24E :?7@C>2E:@? @7 2?J @77:46C H9@ 6:E96C :?E6C24E65 @C D2H 96C 5FC:?8 E92E DA64:7:4 E:>6]k^Am

    kAm~? $6AE] `g[ qC25= D2:5 DE2E6 AC@D64FE@C y2>6D vF3:E@D6 E@=5 9:> E96 DE2E:@? G:56@ H2D @?=J 2G2:=23=6 324< E@ yF=J d]k^Am

    kAmq2D65 @? >2E9[ qC25= D2:5 E96 yF?6 b_ G:56@ D9@F=5 92G6 366? 2G2:=23=6 H96? 7:CDE C6BF6DE65 😕 pF8FDE[ 32D65 @? yF=J G:56@D DE:== 36:?8 D2G65 😕 $6AE6>36C] w6 DEC6DD65 E96 :>A@CE2?46 E@ 96C 5676?D6 E92E E96J 92G6 E96 G:56@]k^Am

    kAmvF3:E@D6 @3;64E65 E@ qC25=’D >@E:@? 7@C E96 G:56@ %F6D52J[ D2J:?8 96’D 4@?7:56?E E96 G:56@ ?@ =@?86C 6I:DED] xE 😀 F?4=62C 9@H @7E6? E96 56A2CE>6?E E2A6D @G6C :ED DFCG6:==2?46 G:56@D]k^Am

    kAmw6C E62> 2=D@ H2?ED E@ =@@< 2E E96 !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E’D EC2:?:?8 C6=2E65 E@ FD6 @7 7@C46[ 5@>6DE:4 42==D[ >6?E2= 962=E9 42==D[ D6CG:46 @7 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56CD 2?5 E2<:?8 4FDE@5J @7 49:=5C6?[ 2?5 H92E :ED A@=:4:6D 2?5 AC@465FC6D 2C6 C6=2E65 E@ E9@D6 EJA6D @7 42==D] qC25= 2?5 r@2<=6J 2=D@ H2?E 2 =:DE @7 EC2:?:?8 @776C65 @C 4@?5F4E65 3J E96 56A2CE>6?E 2?5 :7 E96 C6DA@?5:?8 @77:46CD 2EE6?565 2?J 5FC:?8 E96 =2DE D6G6? J62CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 DA64:7:4 5:D4@G6CJ >@E:@? 2=D@ 42==D 7@C E96 EC2:?:?8 C64@C5D @7 E96 E9C66 @77:46CD H9@ H6?E E@ 96C 9@FD6 H:E9 E96 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56Ci {E] $62? s2=6J[ @77:46CD %:>@E9J w@FDE@? 2?5 !2EC:4< }@@?2?] xE 2=D@ C6BF6DED 2== 5:D4:A=:?2CJ 2?5 EC2:?:?8 C64@C5D 7C@> E96 }@CE9 p?5@G6C 2?5 {2HC6?46 A@=:46 56A2CE>6?ED 7@C }@@?2?[ E96 @77:46C H9@ D9@E u:EKD:>>@?D 😕 E96 496DE]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D’ 4@>A=6E6 A6CD@??6= 7:=6 H:E9 2?J 5@4F>6?ED C67=64E:?8 4@>A=2:?ED @C 56>2?5D 7@C C6=:67 >256 3J 96C 282:?DE E96 56A2CE>6?E @C 😕 C6=2E:@? E@ 96C 6>A=@J>6?E 😀 :?4=F565 😕 96C 5676?D6’D C6BF6DE 7C@> E96 DE2E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6BF6DED 2=D@ =@@< 7@C A9@?6 C64@C5D 7C@> H:E?6DD @77:46CD[ :?4=F5:?8 r9:67 r92C=6D vC2J[ C6=2E65 E@ E96 D9@@E:?8 2?5 9@H C6DA@?5:?8 @77:46CD E@ u:EKD:>>@?D’ 9@>6 @? yF?6 b_ H6C6 5:D4:A=:?65 5F6 E@ E96 :?4:56?E]k^Am

    kAmp 5:D4@G6CJ >@E:@? 962C:?8 😀 D4965F=65 7@C s64] `h 😕 tDD6I r@F?EJ $FA6C:@C r@FCE 29625 @7 E96 EC:2=]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Angelina Berube | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Semaglutide fails to slow progression of Alzheimer’s in highly anticipated trials, Novo Nordisk says

    [ad_1]

    An oral version of semaglutide, the active ingredient in blockbuster drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, failed to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease in closely watched trials, Novo Nordisk said Monday.In two Phase 3 trials of more than 3,800 adults receiving standard care for Alzheimer’s, the company evaluated whether an older pill form of semaglutide worked better than a placebo. The drug was shown to be safe and led to improvements in Alzheimer’s-related biomarkers, the company said, but the treatment did not delay disease progression.Novo had long treated Alzheimer’s as a long-shot bet for the popular GLP-1 drugs. Use of these drugs for diabetes and weight loss has exploded in recent years, and they have shown benefits for a wide range of additional health conditions, such as protecting the heart and kidneys, reducing sleep apnea and potentially helping with addiction.Smaller trials and animal studies had suggested GLP-1s might help slow cognitive decline or reduce neuro-inflammation but larger trials like Novo’s were needed to confirm whether patients saw actual benefits.”Based on the significant unmet need in Alzheimer’s disease as well as a number of indicative data points, we felt we had a responsibility to explore semaglutide’s potential, despite a low likelihood of success,” said Martin Holst Lange, chief scientific officer and executive vice president of Research and Development at Novo Nordisk said in a statement on Monday that thanked trial participants.A one-year extension of the trials will be discontinued, Novo said. Results from the trials have not yet been peer-reviewed or published but will be presented at upcoming scientific conferences.Novo has been facing increased competition in the weight loss market and recently announced lowered prices for some cash-paying patients using Ozempic and Wegovy. Novo shares fell Monday after the Alzheimer’s trial announcement.

    An oral version of semaglutide, the active ingredient in blockbuster drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, failed to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease in closely watched trials, Novo Nordisk said Monday.

    In two Phase 3 trials of more than 3,800 adults receiving standard care for Alzheimer’s, the company evaluated whether an older pill form of semaglutide worked better than a placebo. The drug was shown to be safe and led to improvements in Alzheimer’s-related biomarkers, the company said, but the treatment did not delay disease progression.

    Novo had long treated Alzheimer’s as a long-shot bet for the popular GLP-1 drugs. Use of these drugs for diabetes and weight loss has exploded in recent years, and they have shown benefits for a wide range of additional health conditions, such as protecting the heart and kidneys, reducing sleep apnea and potentially helping with addiction.

    Smaller trials and animal studies had suggested GLP-1s might help slow cognitive decline or reduce neuro-inflammation but larger trials like Novo’s were needed to confirm whether patients saw actual benefits.

    “Based on the significant unmet need in Alzheimer’s disease as well as a number of indicative data points, we felt we had a responsibility to explore semaglutide’s potential, despite a low likelihood of success,” said Martin Holst Lange, chief scientific officer and executive vice president of Research and Development at Novo Nordisk said in a statement on Monday that thanked trial participants.

    A one-year extension of the trials will be discontinued, Novo said. Results from the trials have not yet been peer-reviewed or published but will be presented at upcoming scientific conferences.

    Novo has been facing increased competition in the weight loss market and recently announced lowered prices for some cash-paying patients using Ozempic and Wegovy. Novo shares fell Monday after the Alzheimer’s trial announcement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lyndon Wiggins found guilty again in 2019 kidnapping, killing of Minneapolis realtor Monique Baugh

    [ad_1]

    Lyndon Wiggins was found guilty Monday of the 2019 kidnapping and killing of Minneapolis realtor Monique Baugh after a weekslong retrial. 

    Wiggins, 40, was found guilty of aiding and abetting first-degree premeditated murder, aiding and abetting first-degree premeditated attempted murder, aiding and abetting kidnapping and aiding and abetting first-degree murder while committing kidnapping. 

    He was originally convicted June 2022, and sentenced to life in prison. However, his conviction was reversed by the Minnesota Supreme Court, who said the trial judge gave the jury erroneous legal instructions.

    Wiggins’ retrial began on Oct. 6 and the jury was handed the case on Friday.

    “Monique Baugh’s family has waited nearly six years for the cases against all defendants to conclude,” said Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. “Mr. Wiggins played a primary role in Monique’s death, and he is being held accountable. My thoughts are with Monique’s family, and I want to express my gratitude to the jury for their service and to our trial team for securing this conviction.”

    According to court documents, Wiggins’ codefendant Elsa Segura set up a fake home showing in Maple Grove, Minnesota, that led to Baugh’s death. Baugh arrived at the home on New Year’s Eve and was abducted by two men and put in the back of a U-Haul. Later that afternoon, the men drove the U-Haul up to Baugh’s boyfriend’s home, and a masked gunman entered the home and shot him with a .45 caliber pistol.

    Baugh was shot three times and would later die from her injuries. Her boyfriend said he didn’t know who would have shot him, but named Wiggins as someone who wanted to harm him.

    Monique Baugh (Credit: Monique Baugh via Facebook)

    Segura’s original conviction was also overturned, but she was sentenced to 20 years in prison after she pleaded guilty to kidnapping in 2024. The two other men, Cedric Berry and Berry Davis, were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for their role in Baugh’s killing.

    According to Moriarty’s office, Wiggins will be sentenced on Nov. 13 to life in prison without the possibility of parole. 

    [ad_2]

    WCCO Staff

    Source link

  • Judge again blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Portland

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday barred President Trump’s administration from deploying the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, until at least Friday, saying she “found no credible evidence” that protests in the city grew out of control before the president federalized the troops earlier this fall.

    The city and state sued in September to block the deployment.

    It’s the latest development in weeks of legal back-and-forth in Portland, Chicago and other U.S. cities as the Trump administration has moved to federalize and deploy the National Guard in city streets to quell protests.

    The ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut, an appointee of Mr. Trump, followed a three-day trial in which both sides argued over whether protests at the city’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building met the conditions for using the military domestically under federal law.

    In a 16-page filing late Sunday, Immergut said she would issue a final order on Friday due to the voluminous evidence presented at trial, including more than 750 exhibits.

    The purpose of the deployment, according to the Trump administration, is to protect federal personnel and property where protests are occurring or likely to occur. Legal experts said that a higher appellate court order that remains in effect would have barred troops from being deployed anyway.

    Law enforcement officers watch from a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility on Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2025, in Portland, Oregon.

    Jenny Kane / AP


    Immergut wrote that most violence appeared to be between protesters and counter-protesters and found no evidence of “significant damage” to the immigration facility at the center of the protests.

    “Based on the trial testimony, this Court finds no credible evidence that during the approximately two months before the President’s federalization order, protests grew out of control or involved more than isolated and sporadic instances of violent conduct that resulted in no serious injuries to federal personnel,” she wrote.

    The complex case comes as Democratic cities targeted by Mr. Trump for military involvement — including Chicago, which has filed a separate lawsuit on the issue — seek to push back. They argue the president has not satisfied the legal threshold for deploying troops and that doing so would violate states’ sovereignty. The administration argues that it needs the troops because it has been unable to enforce the law with regular forces — one of the conditions set by Congress for calling up troops.

    Immergut issued two orders in early October that blocked the deployment of the troops leading up to the trial. She previously found that Mr. Trump had failed to show that he met the legal requirements for mobilizing the National Guard. She described his assessment of Portland, which Mr. Trump has called “war-ravaged” with “fires all over the place,” as “simply untethered to the facts.”

    One of Immergut’s orders was paused Oct. 20 by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But late Tuesday, the appeals court vacated that decision and said it would rehear the matter before an 11-judge panel. Until the larger panel rehears the case, the appeals court’s initial order from early October — under which the National Guard is federalized but not deployed — remains in effect.

    During the Portland trial, witnesses including local police and federal officials were questioned about the law enforcement response to the nightly protests at the city’s ICE building. The demonstrations peaked in June, when Portland police declared one a riot. The demonstrations typically drew a couple dozen people in the weeks leading up to Mr. Trump’s National Guard announcement.

    Oregon Protester Detained

    Federal agents detain someone during a protest held outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Portland, Oregon, Saturday, Oct. 18, 2025.

    Dave Killen / AP


    The Trump administration said it has had to shuffle federal agents from elsewhere around the country to respond to the Portland protests, which it has characterized as a “rebellion” or “danger of rebellion” — another one of the conditions for calling up troops under federal law.

    Federal officials working in the region testified about staffing shortages and requests for more personnel that have yet to be fulfilled. Among them was an official with the Federal Protective Service, the agency within the Department of Homeland Security that provides security at federal buildings, whom the judge allowed to be sworn in as a witness under his initials, R.C., due to safety concerns.

    R.C., who said he would be one of the most knowledgeable people in DHS about security at Portland’s ICE building, testified that a troop deployment would alleviate the strain on staff. When cross-examined, however, he said he did not request troops and that he was not consulted on the matter. He also said he was “surprised” to learn about the deployment and that he did not agree with statements about Portland burning down.

    Attorneys for Portland and Oregon said city police have been able to respond to the protests. After the police department declared a riot on June 14, it changed its strategy to direct officers to intervene when person and property crime occurs, and crowd numbers have largely diminished since the end of that month, police officials testified.

    Another Federal Protective Service official whom the judge also allowed to testify under his initials said protesters have at times been violent, damaged the facility and acted aggressively toward officers working at the building.

    The ICE building closed for three weeks over the summer due to property damage, according to court documents and testimony. The regional field office director for ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations, Cammilla Wamsley, said her employees worked from another building during that period. The plaintiffs argued that was evidence that they were able to continue their work functions.

    Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General Scott Kennedy said that “without minimizing or condoning offensive expressions” or certain instances of criminal conduct, “none of these incidents suggest … that there’s a rebellion or an inability to execute the laws.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Magic mushrooms for postpartum depression treatment? Florida researchers running trials

    [ad_1]

    Researchers at the University of South Florida are conducting clinical trials to explore the potential of psilocybin, a compound found in magic mushrooms, as a treatment for postpartum depression and other mental health disorders.Tracey Tee, founder and CEO of Moms on Mushrooms, said, “We’ve greatly misjudged and mis-prioritized the mental health of mothers in general and we’ve gotten a lot of it wrong.”Her group educates women about magic mushrooms and psilocybin, focusing on how they can help mothers dealing with trauma or depression. Tee emphasized the potential of microdosing and magic mushrooms as an emerging solution, although she acknowledged it may not be suitable for everyone. “Studying it for postpartum in particular is like a no-brainer for me,” she said.Health researchers at the University of South Florida are investigating whether psilocybin can help treat major depressive disorders, postpartum depression, and other conditions.Dr. Ryan Wagoner, who was involved with the research, said, “What we are eventually trying to move towards are these medications that can be Food and Drug Administration-approved just like any medication you might take.” Wagoner said if psilocybin’s medical properties are proven to outweigh its risks, it could be reclassified and approved as a medication. “If you can show that the substance does have a medical property that’s valuable to it and outweighs any sorts of risks, suddenly we can move what schedule it’s on and get it approved to be a medication just like anything else,” Wagoner said.Researchers say psilocybin works by targeting serotonin receptors in the brain, enhancing sensory input and potentially disrupting neural networks involved in depression. They are exploring the use of smaller doses to activate serotonin receptors without causing unwanted side effects. “What if we use a smaller dose. What if we use a dose that activates the serotonin receptor but doesn’t cause as much of those side effects that we’re not looking for,” Wagoner said.Tee believes the stigma around magic mushrooms should be replaced with a view of them as a medical treatment. “The idea is that you’re not high and that it’s mimicking and still working in the brain and body in the same way that a large dose journey does, that’s like transformative effects, but we are doing it in smaller amounts over time incrementally so that you are able to go about your day,” she said. She added that psilocybin should be paired with other treatments. “It really needs to be paired with something because it’s not a passive magic pill in the same way an antidepressant is; you really want to work with the medicine,” Tee said.The National Institutes of Health reports that approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder have treatment-resistant depression. A Johns Hopkins study found that two doses of psilocybin produced rapid and large reductions in depressive symptoms. “You actually have to put into practice, and so that is why we do clinical trials to first detect if there are side effects we weren’t expecting,” Wagoner said. They are investigating whether psilocybin offers benefits beyond existing medications.”Is this something real that’s going on in the brain that’s different or better than some of the medications we already have on the market,” Wagoner said.Tee expressed optimism about the role of psychedelics in mental health treatment, saying, “I think there’s a really beautiful place for psychedelics to slide in and support a lot of people without a lot of damage we’re seeing being caused by other modalities.”Magic mushrooms remain illegal in Florida, classified as a Schedule 1 controlled substance at both the state and federal levels. Possession of psilocybin mushrooms is a felony, with significant fines, probation, and potential prison time. Florida has also banned mushroom spores, despite them not containing psilocybin. Wagoner said clinical trials will continue, with more data and research being collected to potentially achieve FDA approval in the future.

    Researchers at the University of South Florida are conducting clinical trials to explore the potential of psilocybin, a compound found in magic mushrooms, as a treatment for postpartum depression and other mental health disorders.

    Tracey Tee, founder and CEO of Moms on Mushrooms, said, “We’ve greatly misjudged and mis-prioritized the mental health of mothers in general and we’ve gotten a lot of it wrong.”

    Her group educates women about magic mushrooms and psilocybin, focusing on how they can help mothers dealing with trauma or depression. Tee emphasized the potential of microdosing and magic mushrooms as an emerging solution, although she acknowledged it may not be suitable for everyone.

    “Studying it for postpartum in particular is like a no-brainer for me,” she said.

    Health researchers at the University of South Florida are investigating whether psilocybin can help treat major depressive disorders, postpartum depression, and other conditions.

    Dr. Ryan Wagoner, who was involved with the research, said, “What we are eventually trying to move towards are these medications that can be Food and Drug Administration-approved just like any medication you might take.”

    Wagoner said if psilocybin’s medical properties are proven to outweigh its risks, it could be reclassified and approved as a medication.

    “If you can show that the substance does have a medical property that’s valuable to it and outweighs any sorts of risks, suddenly we can move what schedule it’s on and get it approved to be a medication just like anything else,” Wagoner said.

    Researchers say psilocybin works by targeting serotonin receptors in the brain, enhancing sensory input and potentially disrupting neural networks involved in depression.

    They are exploring the use of smaller doses to activate serotonin receptors without causing unwanted side effects.

    “What if we use a smaller dose. What if we use a dose that activates the serotonin receptor but doesn’t cause as much of those side effects that we’re not looking for,” Wagoner said.

    Tee believes the stigma around magic mushrooms should be replaced with a view of them as a medical treatment.

    “The idea is that you’re not high and that it’s mimicking and still working in the brain and body in the same way that a large dose journey does, that’s like transformative effects, but we are doing it in smaller amounts over time incrementally so that you are able to go about your day,” she said.

    She added that psilocybin should be paired with other treatments.

    “It really needs to be paired with something because it’s not a passive magic pill in the same way an antidepressant is; you really want to work with the medicine,” Tee said.

    The National Institutes of Health reports that approximately 30% of patients with major depressive disorder have treatment-resistant depression.

    A Johns Hopkins study found that two doses of psilocybin produced rapid and large reductions in depressive symptoms.

    “You actually have to put into practice, and so that is why we do clinical trials to first detect if there are side effects we weren’t expecting,” Wagoner said.

    They are investigating whether psilocybin offers benefits beyond existing medications.

    “Is this something real that’s going on in the brain that’s different or better than some of the medications we already have on the market,” Wagoner said.

    Tee expressed optimism about the role of psychedelics in mental health treatment, saying, “I think there’s a really beautiful place for psychedelics to slide in and support a lot of people without a lot of damage we’re seeing being caused by other modalities.”

    Magic mushrooms remain illegal in Florida, classified as a Schedule 1 controlled substance at both the state and federal levels.

    Possession of psilocybin mushrooms is a felony, with significant fines, probation, and potential prison time.

    Florida has also banned mushroom spores, despite them not containing psilocybin.

    Wagoner said clinical trials will continue, with more data and research being collected to potentially achieve FDA approval in the future.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Piano teacher to children of Hollywood stars fled country as jury decided sex abuse case

    [ad_1]

    When jurors returned to a West L.A. courtroom to deliver their verdict in a child sex abuse case earlier this month, one key person was missing: the defendant.

    John Kaleel — a veteran piano teacher who has given lessons to the families of several Hollywood power players — faced allegations that he sexually abused one of his students in 2013.

    Kaleel, 69, pleaded no contest in 2016 to committing a lewd act with a teenage student, but later fought to have the plea overturned after realizing the felony conviction would be grounds for deportation to his native Australia. L.A. County prosecutors then retried him and, while the case was pending, he was released on his own recognizance.

    On Oct. 8 — the same day jurors in the Airport Courthouse found him guilty of five counts of sexual abuse — Kaleel slipped out of the country, according to a statement from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and court records.

    The Sheriff’s Department did not say where they believed Kaleel had fled to. Court records show prosecutors filed an application to seek an “Extradition/Fugitive Hardcopy Warrant,” but it contained no details about how he absconded and a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office declined to answer questions.

    Kaleel’s attorney, Kate Hardie, said she last saw her client when she drove him home from court on Oct. 7, the day before the verdict was handed down, and has had no contact with him since. Kaleel has been a lawful permanent resident of the U.S. since the 1980s, according to Hardie. Attempts by The Times to contact Kaleel were unsuccessful.

    A spokeswoman for the district attorney’s office declined to discuss what steps it would take to get Kaleel back in custody in Los Angeles. Hardie said her client faces at least a decade in state prison at sentencing.

    Hardie accused the district attorney’s office of carrying out a “vindictive prosecution” against Kaleel, who had already served a year in jail and spent time in a federal immigration detention center after his original plea deal.

    Kaleel taught private lessons for more than a quarter-century in L.A., and his clients included “Hollywood industry professionals and students who have pursued successful music careers,” according to his website. The web page boasted testimonials from the creators of critically acclaimed television series, including “Mad Men” and “Orange Is the New Black,” who praised his work with their children.

    Emmy-award winning animation director Genndy Tartakovsky, who created several famous cartoons, including “Dexter’s Laboratory” and “Samurai Jack,” also referred to Kaleel as a “gift,” according to the website.

    “I have never seen my three children become more inspired or enthusiastic for anything as much as they did for your piano classes,” Tartakovsky said, according to an earlier version of Kaleel’s business website.

    The testimonials disappeared from the website on Monday, after The Times began contacting representatives for those quoted.

    Spokespersons for Jenji Kohan, who created “Orange Is the New Black,” and Matthew Weiner, the writer behind “Mad Men,” both denied giving Kaleel any endorsements or the permission to post any comment on his website. A representative for Tartakovsky declined to comment. Court records show Tartakovsky’s wife and one of his children, a former student of Kaleel’s, testified on the teacher’s behalf at trial.

    “Mr. Kaleel has always maintained his innocence and that he took his initial plea bargain on the advice of counsel to avoid a harsher sentence should he lose at trial,” Hardie said. “He later learned of the immigration consequences when he was placed in an immigration custody facility for 8 [or] 9 months and faced removal proceedings.”

    Hardie argued her client was the victim of a “trial tax,” which references prosecutors often seeking to punish defendants more severely when they don’t take a plea. Hardie also said Sheriff’s Department detectives interviewed many of Kaleel’s students “and found no other student who complained of Kaleel being inappropriate.”

    The alleged victim in the case first contacted the Sheriff’s Department in 2015. The boy said he was 15 when Kaleel acted inappropriately by asking “to take measurements of [the victim’s] body parts, including his penis,” according to court records.

    Two years later, Kaleel convinced the boy that they should masturbate together while on a FaceTime call because that’s “what friends do,” records show. In September 2013, prosecutors alleged, Kaleel invited the boy over and they smoked marijuana together before having oral sex.

    A friend of the victim also testified at trial that Kaleel attempted to engage in sexual conduct with him, but that count was not charged, according to court records. Hardie said her client had no physical contact with that boy.

    After Kaleel struck a plea deal, he was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and served with a deportation order. He successfully challenged his removal at the Board of Immigration Appeals in 2019, according to his former immigration attorney, Mfon Anthony Ikon.

    Ikon said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security then abandoned its attempts to deport Kaleel.

    Representatives for ICE and DHS did not respond to a request for comment.

    In 2022, Kaleel convinced a judge to overturn his plea to the initial sex crimes charge on the grounds that he didn’t fully understand the impact it might have on his immigration status, records show.

    Dmitry Gorin, a former L.A. County prosecutor who has tried cases in the area for the last three decades, said it’s rare — but not unprecedented — for defendants to vanish on the eve of a verdict.

    “It’s an unusual situation,” he said. “But people’s conduct can be very unpredictable when they’re facing tremendous time in prison.”

    [ad_2]

    James Queally

    Source link

  • Louisiana man accused of participating in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack pleads not guilty

    [ad_1]

    A Louisiana man accused of participating in Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel faced a judge on Wednesday. CBS News national reporter Kati Weis has the latest.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sheriff’s office employee facing charges for unauthorized access of database

    [ad_1]

    A Lake County Sheriff’s Office employee is facing charges for accessing law enforcement databases to look into people unrelated to her work.According to a report from the sheriff’s office, 30-year-old Hannah Colon worked for the sheriff’s office in dispatch and as a clerk in the criminal investigations division.”On October first, the Lake County Sheriff’s Office received allegations that Ms. Hannah Colon was accessing various law enforcement databases that are restricted,” Deputy Stephanie Early with the sheriff’s office said.After the sheriff’s office started looking into Colon’s use of law enforcement databases, a probable cause affidavit says they questioned Colon about running two different names through the Driver and Vehicle Information Databases on three different dates. The names belonged to her husband and her husband’s ex-wife, the report says.The affidavit says in April 2023, she looked at the ex-wife’s record on things like vehicles, addresses, transaction details and driver history.According to the affidavit, she told deputies it was to access the woman’s address to apply for an order of protection against her, which she did in June 2023.The deputy pointed out she could have gotten the information from her husband.The sheriff’s office says the use is concerning.”We are only supposed to use our databases for authorized use only,” Deputy Early said. “So the fact that there are employees, that this could happen, is very concerning for us, and we make sure that this does not happen again.”Something Colon isn’t facing charges for, but the probable cause affidavit says “compounded” investigators’ suspicions, was observations from coworkers. The document says Colon had recently asked a homicide detective questions about an upcoming homicide trial while wearing new glasses that have the capability to record. It says that coworkers knew Colon was Facebook friends with the defendant in that trial, Darion McGee, who the report says is a suspect in two Lake County homicides.One appears to be the killing of Mustafa Connelly. Connelly was found shot and set on fire in a vacant lot in the Leesburg area in December 2021. McGee pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder charges in May 2023. According to court records, that trial was set to start Tuesday.The sheriff’s office couldn’t say if they believed Colon shared any information with anyone involved in the case. When asked if Colon’s questions regarding the trial were being investigated any further, Early said, “The investigation is still ongoing. She is on unpaid leave at the moment.”Colon was released on bond. WESH 2 attempted to contact Colon but did not hear back Tuesday night.

    A Lake County Sheriff’s Office employee is facing charges for accessing law enforcement databases to look into people unrelated to her work.

    According to a report from the sheriff’s office, 30-year-old Hannah Colon worked for the sheriff’s office in dispatch and as a clerk in the criminal investigations division.

    “On October first, the Lake County Sheriff’s Office received allegations that Ms. Hannah Colon was accessing various law enforcement databases that are restricted,” Deputy Stephanie Early with the sheriff’s office said.

    After the sheriff’s office started looking into Colon’s use of law enforcement databases, a probable cause affidavit says they questioned Colon about running two different names through the Driver and Vehicle Information Databases on three different dates. The names belonged to her husband and her husband’s ex-wife, the report says.

    The affidavit says in April 2023, she looked at the ex-wife’s record on things like vehicles, addresses, transaction details and driver history.

    According to the affidavit, she told deputies it was to access the woman’s address to apply for an order of protection against her, which she did in June 2023.

    The deputy pointed out she could have gotten the information from her husband.

    The sheriff’s office says the use is concerning.

    “We are only supposed to use our databases for authorized use only,” Deputy Early said. “So the fact that there are employees, that this could happen, is very concerning for us, and we make sure that this does not happen again.”

    Something Colon isn’t facing charges for, but the probable cause affidavit says “compounded” investigators’ suspicions, was observations from coworkers. The document says Colon had recently asked a homicide detective questions about an upcoming homicide trial while wearing new glasses that have the capability to record. It says that coworkers knew Colon was Facebook friends with the defendant in that trial, Darion McGee, who the report says is a suspect in two Lake County homicides.

    One appears to be the killing of Mustafa Connelly. Connelly was found shot and set on fire in a vacant lot in the Leesburg area in December 2021. McGee pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder charges in May 2023. According to court records, that trial was set to start Tuesday.

    The sheriff’s office couldn’t say if they believed Colon shared any information with anyone involved in the case. When asked if Colon’s questions regarding the trial were being investigated any further, Early said, “The investigation is still ongoing. She is on unpaid leave at the moment.”

    Colon was released on bond. WESH 2 attempted to contact Colon but did not hear back Tuesday night.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge looks to set trial for wounded North Andover officer

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — The trial of a wounded North Andover police officer could get underway as early as January, after an Essex County Superior Court judge pushes for the case to be tried sooner rather than later.

    Kelsey Fitzsimmons’ lawyer, Timothy Bradl, and state prosecutor James Gubitose agreed to a pretrial assignment conference Nov. 25 to set a trial date after a pretrial conference Tuesday with her lawyer absent from the courtroom.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm!F3=:4 :?E6C6DE 😕 E96 42D6 E:65 FA E96 4@FCE’D C6>@E6 2446DD[ 5:2=:? A9@?6 =:?6 7@C E96 AC6EC:2= 4@?76C6?46[ ;2>>:?8 E96 DJDE6> 2?5 56=2J:?8 E96 4@FCE AC@4665:?8D] %96 4@FCE @C56C65 2== 7FEFC6 4@FCE 2AA62C2?46D E@ 36 😕 A6CD@? 7@C 4@F?D6= 27E6C E96 AF3=:4’D :?E6C6DE “@G6CH96=>65” 2?5 “56DEC@J65” E96 4@FCE’D 42A24:EJ E@ 8:G6 E96 AF3=:4 @?=:?6 2446DD]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D[ ag[ @7 }@CE9 p?5@G6C H2D :?5:4E65 2?5 2CC2:8?65 😕 pF8FDE @? 2 492C86 @7 2DD2F=E 3J >62?D @7 2 52?86C@FD H62A@? DE6>>:?8 7C@> 2 D9@@E:?8 😕 96C 9@>6 yF?6 b_]k^Am

    kAm!@=:46 D2:5 D96 H2D D9@E 3J 2? @77:46C 27E6C A@:?E:?8 2 8F? 2E @?6 @7 E96 C6DA@?5:?8 @77:46CD H96? E96J H6?E E@ 96C 9@>6 E@ 56=:G6C 2 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56C 2?5 92G6 96C C6=:?BF:D9 4FDE@5J @7 96C :?72?E D@? E@ 96C E96?7:2?4é] u:EKD:>>@?D 4=2:>65 D96 H2D D9@E 3J A@=:46 H9:=6 A@:?E:?8 2 8F? 2E 96C @H? 9625 😕 2 72:=65 DF:4:56 2EE6>AE]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D 92D C6>2:?65 ;2:=65 H:E9@FE 32:= D:?46 $6AE] “ 27E6C $FA6C:@C r@FCE yF586 z2E9=66? |4r2CE9J}6J>2? C6G@<65 96C 9@FD6 2CC6DE 2?5 E6C>D @7 C6=62D6 7@==@H:?8 u:EKD:>>@?D D66<:?8 @7 C6=:67 7C@> 2=4@9@= E6DE:?8 5F6 E@ A2:?]k^Am

    kAmtDD6I $FA6C:@C r@FCE yF586 %9@>2D sC6D49=6C 2D<65 qC25= 2 D:>A=6 BF6DE:@? E@ ECJ E@ @A6? E96 7:CDE 2EE6>AE 2E E96 962C:?8]k^Am

    kAm“(9J 2C6 J@F ?@E 96C6n” sC6D49=6C D2:5 E@ qC25=[ H9@ C6>@E6=J 42==65 :?E@ E96 4@FCE 962C:?8]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D’ 42D6 H2D ?@E 962C5 F?E:= `_idd 2]>] 2D E96 C6>@E6 2446DD =:?6 5:DCFAE65 E96 `c AC@4665:?8D 7C@> DE2CE:?8 @? E:>6 2D :E H2D @G6CH96=>65 3J A6@A=6 ECJ:?8 E@ =:DE6? :?]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 42D6 92D 96=5 FA @FC A9@?6 =:?6D 4C62E:?8 25>:?:DEC2E:G6 AC@3=6>D[” sC6D49=6C D2:5] “xE 92D 56=2J65 @FC AC@4665:?8D]”k^Am

    kAm“W(6X 42?’E =6E E92E 92AA6? E92E E96 DFAA@CE6CD 😕 2?J 42D6 92G6 E96 23:=:EJ E@ :?E6C76C6 H:E9 E96 4@FCE’D 23:=:EJ E@ 4@?5F4E 3FD:?6DD[” sC6D49=6C D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu:EKD:>>@?D’ DFAA@CE6CD 5@??65 AFCA=6 2?5 7:==65 @?6 D:56 @7 E96 4@FCEC@@>] $96 5:5 ?@E 2AA62C G:2 2 G:56@ @C A9@?6 42== 7@C E96 AC6EC:2= 4@?76C6?46]k^Am

    kAmsC6D49=6C ?@E65 E96C6 H2D 2 8C@FA @7 A6@A=6 😕 A6CD@? H9@ D9@H65 :?E6C6DE 😕 E96 42D6[ H9:49 96 D2:5 H2D ?@E E96 AC@3=6> 3FE C2E96C H92E H2D 92AA6?:?8 H:E9 E96 A9@?6 =:?6]k^Am

    kAmsC6D49=6C :?7@C>65 qC25= 96 ?66565 E@ 86E E@ 4@FCE %F6D52J 2?5 H@F=5 ?@E AC@4665 H:E9 E96 962C:?8 F?E:= 96 D9@H65 FA] qC25= E@=5 E96 ;F586 96 H2D F?56C E96 :>AC6DD:@? E92E E96 962C:?8 H2D 2 8C@FA A9@?6 42==]k^Am

    kAmqFE =6DD E92? a_ >:?FE6D =2E6C[ E96 ;F586 42==65 E96 42D6 282:? 2?5 DEC6DD65 9@H 6G6CJ 7FEFC6 4@FCE 962C:?8 ?66565 E@ 36 😕 A6CD@? 7@C E96 =2HJ6CD] u:EKD:>>@?D 😀 E@ 2AA62C 3J G:56@4@?76C6?46 😕 }@G6>36C]k^Am

    kAmsC6D49=6C D2:5 E96 42D6 ?665D E@ 36 EC:65 2?5 H2?E65 E@ D6E 2 EC:2= 52E6 2D 62C=J 2D ?6IE H66<[ G:6H:?8 :E 2D ?@E 2 4@>A=:42E65 42D6[ =:<6=J @?=J ?665:?8 EH@ 52JD E@ 4@>A=6E6]k^Am

    kAmw6 25565 E92E qC25= 92D AF3=:4=J DE2E65 u:EKD:>>@?D’ 5676?D6 2?5 92D 5@?6 D@ “G6CJ AF3=:4=J]” %96 ;F586 D2:5 E96C6 H2D 8@@5 C62D@? E@ ECJ E96 42D6 AC@A6C=J H:E9 E96 42D6 36:?8 DEC2:89E7@CH2C5 2?5 u:EKD:>>@?D 😕 ;2:=]k^Am

    kAmqC25= 2?5 vF3:E@D6 H6C6 2D<65 :7 E96J H6C6 C625J E@ D6E 2 EC:2= 52E6] vF3:E@D6 D2:5 :E 56A6?565 @? :7 E96 5676?D6 H:== 42== 2 A@DEA2CEF> 6IA6CE]k^Am

    kAms:D4@G6CJ H2D?’E 4@>A=6E6 ;FDE J6E 7@C E96 5676?D6 E62>[ qC25= D2:5[ 2?5 9:D E62> >2J >2<6 >@E:@?D C682C5:?8 H:E?6DD6D] w6 28C665 H:E9 E96 ;F586 E92E E96 EC:2= H@F=5 ?@E 36 =6?8E9J] w6 25565 E92E 96 5@6D ?@E E9:?< E96C6 😀 2 >6?E2= 962=E9 5676?D6 3FE E96C6 2C6 >6?E2= 962=E9 :DDF6D 😕 E96 42D6]k^Am

    kAmsC6D49=6C D2:5 :7 E96 =2HJ6CD 2C6 23=6 E@ 28C66 @? 2 EC:2= 52E6[ E96 4@FCE H@F=5 DFC6=J 244@>>@52E6 2 E:>6 😕 y2?F2CJ]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ3@5J’D :?E6C6DE 😀 E@ 86E E9:D 42D6 EC:65[” sC6D49=6C D2:5]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ DE2E6 AC@D64FE@CD 2=D@ 7:=65 EH@ ?@E:46D @7 5:D4@G6CJ] %96 :E6>D :?4=F56 E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E6 !@=:46 42D6 C6A@CE 2?5 :?E6CG:6H C6A@CE 2D H6== 2D E96 }@CE9 p?5@G6C !@=:46 2?5 u:C6 56A2CE>6?ED’ :?4:56?E C6A@CE] p?@E96C :E6> :?4=F56D 2 C67FD2= 7@C 4@?D6?E E@ D62C49 3J yFDE:? pJ=2:2?[ E96 72E96C @7 u:EKD:>>@?D’ 49:=5] w6 7:=65 E96 C6DEC2:?:?8 @C56C 282:?DE 96C[ 52E65 yF?6 b_]k^Am

    kAm}@CE9 p?5@G6C A@=:46 42==D 7C@> yF?6 h 2?5 2EE249>6?ED 7C@> E96 A@=:46 2?5 h“ 42==D 7C@> pJ=2:2? 2C6 2=D@ :?4=F565 😕 E96 5:D4@G6CJ =:DE]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Angelina Berube | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Sean

    [ad_1]

    A judge on Friday ordered Sean “Diddy” Combs to serve 50 months in prison — just over four years — for two prostitution-related charges. Combs was also given five years of supervised release and a $500,000 fine. CBS News examines the high-profile federal trial in New York, the explosive testimonies, and what led to Comb’s arrest and federal charges in the one-hour special, “Sean Diddy Combs: The Sentencing,” hosted by Jericka Duncan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Breaking down Ryan Routh’s guilty verdict in Trump assassination attempt trial

    [ad_1]



    Breaking down Ryan Routh’s guilty verdict in Trump assassination attempt trial – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    A Florida jury on Tuesday found Ryan Routh guilty on all charges in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at his Florida golf course last year. CBS News correspondent Cristian Benavides reports.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Judge cuts off Ryan Routh’s opening statement in unusual day at Trump assassination attempt trial

    [ad_1]



    Judge cuts off Ryan Routh’s opening statement in unusual day at Trump assassination attempt trial – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    The trial for the Florida man accused of attempting to assassinate then-candidate Donald Trump began on Thursday. CBS News legal reporter Katrina Kaufman has the details.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Michigan judge tosses case against 15 accused fake electors for President Trump in 2020

    [ad_1]

    A Michigan judge dismissed criminal charges Tuesday against a group of people who were accused of attempting to falsely certify President Donald Trump as the winner of the 2020 election in the battleground state, a major blow to prosecutors as similar cases in four other states have been muddied with setbacks.

    District Court Judge Kristen D. Simmons said in a court hearing that the 15 Republicans accused will not face trial. The case has dragged through the courts since Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, announced the charges over two years ago.

    Each member of the group, which included a few high-profile members of the Republican Party in Michigan, faced eight charges of forgery and conspiracy to commit election forgery. The top felony charges carried a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.

    Investigators said the group met at the Michigan GOP headquarters in December of 2020 and signed a document falsely stating they were the state’s “duly elected and qualified electors.” President Joe Biden won Michigan by nearly 155,000 votes, a result confirmed by a GOP-led state Senate investigation in 2021.

    Electors are part of the 538-member Electoral College that officially elects the president of the United States. In 48 states, electors vote for the candidate who won the popular vote. In Nebraska and Maine, elector votes are awarded based on congressional district and statewide results.

    One man accused in the Michigan case had the charges against him dropped after he agreed to cooperate with the state attorney general’s office in October 2023. The other 15 defendants pleaded not guilty and have maintained that their actions were not illegal.

    Judge Simmons took nearly a year to say whether there was sufficient evidence to bring the cases to trial following a series of lengthy preliminary hearings.

    Prosecutors in Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona have also filed criminal charges related to the fake electors scheme. None of the cases have neared the trial stage and many have been bogged down by procedural and appellate delays.

    In Nevada, the state attorney general revived a case against a group of allegedly fake electors last year, while a judge in Arizona ordered a similar case back to a grand jury in May. In Wisconsin last month, a judge declined to dismiss felony charges against three Trump allies connected to a plan to falsely cast electoral ballots for Trump even though Biden won the state in 2020.

    The Georgia prosecution is essentially on hold while Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in Atlanta, who brought the charges against President Trump and others appeals her removal from the case. Technically, Trump is still a defendant in the case, but as the sitting president, it is highly unlikely that any prosecution against him could proceed while he’s in office.

    The effort to secure fake electors was central to the federal indictment against Trump that was abandoned earlier this year shortly before Trump took office for his second term.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Google ordered to pay $425.7 million in damages for improperly tracking smartphone activity

    [ad_1]

    A federal jury has ordered Google to pay $425.7 million for improperly snooping on people’s smartphones during a nearly decade-long period of intrusions.

    The verdict reached Wednesday in San Francisco federal court followed a more than two-week trial in a class-action case covering about 98 million smartphones operating in the United States between July 1, 2016, through Sept. 23, 2024. That means the total damages awarded in the five-year-old case works out to about $4 per device.

    Google had denied that it was improperly tracking the online activity of people who thought they had shielded themselves with privacy controls. The company maintained its stance even though the eight-person jury concluded Google had been spying in violation of California privacy laws.

    “This decision misunderstands how our products work, and we will appeal it,” Google spokesman Jose Castaneda said Thursday. “Our privacy tools give people control over their data, and when they turn off personalization, we honor that choice.”

    The lawyers who filed the case had argued Google had used the data they collected off smartphones without users’ permission to help sell ads tailored to users’ individual interests — a strategy that resulted in the company reaping billions in additional revenue. The lawyers framed those ad sales as illegal profiteering that merited damages of more than $30 billion.

    Even though the jury came up with a far lower calculation for the damages, one of the lawyers who brought the case against Google hailed the outcome as a victory for privacy protection.

    “We hope this result sends a message to the tech industry that Americans will not sit idly by as their information is collected and monetized against their will,” said attorney John Yanchunis of law firm Morgan & Morgan.

    The San Francisco jury verdict came a day after Google avoided the U.S. Department of Justice’s attempt to break up the company in a landmark antitrust case in Washington, D.C., targeting its dominant search engine. A federal judge who had declared Google’s search engine to be an illegal monopoly ordered less radical changes, including requiring the company to share some of its search data with rivals.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Commentary: ‘What’s to prevent a national police force?’ Not this National Guard ruling

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge ruled Tuesday that President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles was illegal, which the sane and democracy-loving among us should applaud — though of course an appeal is coming.

    During the trial, though, a concerning but little-noticed exchange popped up between lawyers for the state of California and Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who was in charge of the federalized National Guard forces in L.A. It should have been an explosive, red-flag moment highlighting the pressure our military leaders are under to shake off their oath to the Constitution in favor of fealty to Trump.

    Sherman testified that he objected to National Guard involvement in a show-of-force operation in MacArthur Park, where Latino families often congregate.

    That action, Sherman said, was originally slated for Father’s Day, an especially busy time at the park. Internal documents showed it was considered it a “high-risk” operation. Sherman said he feared his troops would be pushed into confrontations with civilians if Border Patrol became overwhelmed by the crowds on that June Sunday.

    Gregory Bovino, in charge of the immigration efforts in L.A. for the Border Patrol, questioned Sherman’s “loyalty to the country,” Sherman testified, for just showing hesitation about the wisdom and legality of an order.

    It’s the pressure that “you’re not being patriotic if you don’t blow by the law and violate it and just bend the knee and and exhibit complete fealty and loyalty to Trump,” California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said Tuesday. And it’s a warning of what’s to come as Trump continues to press for military involvement in civilian law enforcement across the country.

    For the record, Sherman has served our country for decades, earning along the way the prestigious Legion of Merit, the Bronze Star and the Meritorious Service Medal among other accolades.

    The MacArthur Park operation, according to the Department of Homeland Security, was itself little more than a performative display of power “to demonstrate, through a show of presence, the capacity and freedom of maneuver of federal law enforcement within the Los Angeles,” according to agency documents presented in court. It was dubbed Operation Excalibur, in honor of the legendary sword of King Arthur that granted him divine right to rule, a point also included in court documents.

    But none of that mattered. Instead, Sherman was pushed to exhibit the kind of blind loyalty to a dear leader that you’d expect to be demanded in dictatorships like those of North Korea or Hungary. Loyalty that confuses — or transforms — a duty to the Constitution with allegiance to Trump. Military experts warn that Sherman’s experience isn’t an isolated incident.

    “There’s a chilling effect against pushing back or at least openly questioning any kind of orders,” Rachel E. VanLandingham, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, told me. She’s former active duty judge advocate in the U.S. Air Force who now teaches at Southwestern Law School and serves as a national security law expert.

    VanLandingham sees the leadership of our armed forces under pressure “to not engage in the critical thinking, which, as commanders, they are required to do, and to instead go along to get along.” She sees Sherman’s testimony as a “telling glimpse into the wearing away” of that crucial independence.

    Such a shift in allegiance would undermine any court order keeping the military out of civilian law enforcement, leaving Trump with exactly the boots on the ground power he has sought since his first term. This is not theoretical.

    Through Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Trump has purged the top ranks of the military of those who aren’t loyal to him. In February, Hegseth fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Black soldier who championed diversity in the armed forces. Hegseth has also purged the head of the Pentagon’s intelligence agency, the head of the National Security Agency, the chief of Naval Operations, multiple senior female military staff and senior military lawyers for the Army, Navy and Air Force. In August, he fired the head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency after that general gave a truthful assessment of our bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites, angering Trump.

    At the same time, the military is being pushed farther into civilian affairs, and not just as erstwhile cops. The Associated Press reported Tuesday that Hegseth ordered 600 military lawyers to serve as temporary immigration judges.

    Not to dive too deep into the convoluted immigration system, but these are civilian legal positions, another possible violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, VanLandingham points out.

    And beyond that, can a military lawyer — trained and bound to follow orders — really act as an impartial judge in proceedings where the administration’s wish to deport is clearly known?

    Goodbye due process, goodbye fair trial.

    That “looks like martial law when you have militarized … judicial proceedings,” VanLandingham said. “How can we trust they are making unbiased decisions? You can’t.”

    And even though Sherman pushed back on a full-blown military presence in MacArthur Park, that raid did happen. Federal agents marched through, about three weeks after Father’s Day, with National Guard troops remaining in their vehicles on the perimeter. It was Hegseth himself who authorized the mission.

    Sherman also said on the stand that he was told there were “exceptions” to the Posse Comitatus Act — the law being debated in the trial that prevents the military from being used as civilian law enforcement — and that the president had the power to decide what those exceptions were.

    “So your understanding is that while [some actions] are on the list of prohibited functions, you can do them under some circumstances?” Judge Charles Breyer asked.

    “That’s the legal advice I received,” Sherman answered.

    “And the president has the authority to make that decision?” Breyer asked.

    “The president has the authority,” Sherman answered.

    But does he?

    Breyer also asked during the trial, if the president’s powers to both command troops and interpret law are so boundless, “What’s to prevent a national police force?” What, in effect, could stop Trump’s Excalibur-inspired inclinations?

    For now, it’s the courts and ethical, mid-level commanders like Sherman, whose common-sense bravery and decency kept the military out of MacArthur Park.

    Men and women who understand that the oaths they have sworn are to our country, not the man who would be king.

    [ad_2]

    Anita Chabria

    Source link

  • Judge grants new trial for 3 Memphis ex-officers charged with the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols

    [ad_1]

    A judge ordered a new trial Thursday for three former Memphis police officers who were convicted of federal charges in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols, after defense lawyers argued that another judge who presided over their trial was biased in his belief that at least one of the men was in a gang.

    U.S. District Judge Sheryl H. Lipman issued the order for a new trial for Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley and Justin Smith, who were found guilty in October 2024 of obstruction of justice through witness tampering.

    The ruling marks the latest setback for prosecutors in a case that shocked the country when videos were released showing officers violently kicking and punching Nichols during a traffic stop. The officers who have been granted a new trial in the federal case were acquitted of state murder charges in May. And last year, federal prosecutors were unable to secure convictions on the most severe counts against Bean and Smith.

    Two other officers charged, Emmitt Martin and Desmond Mills Jr., pleaded guilty before the federal trial.

    Lipman took over the case in June after U.S. District Judge Mark S. Norris, who presided over the case and the trial, recused himself days before the sentencings of the five officers.

    In a statement shared by his judicial office Thursday, Norris said, “Because of the code of judicial conduct, I cannot make a statement on this matter.”

    In her order, Lipman cited a notice filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office saying Norris expressed a theory that at least one of the officers was in a gang.

    The notice discussed an incident in which Norris’ law clerk was shot during a car theft days after the trial ended. The clerk was staying at the home of another law clerk who had previously worked for Norris on the Nichols case, it said.

    The notice also said police investigators believed some juveniles committed the shooting; that Norris wanted those responsible held accountable; and that he “evidenced reasonable frustration with the police investigation.”

    Norris met with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and an FBI agent, who explained why no federal charges would be brought in the clerk’s shooting.

    Norris indicated that he believed at least one of the former officers was in a gang and that it was responsible for the shooting, the notice said. It also said the U.S. Attorney stated that Norris told those present that the clerk “had been seen by one or more of the Defendants during the trial.”

    An assistant U.S. attorney who attended the May 30 meeting also said she remembered that Norris told her he could not meet with police to give a statement because the department was “infiltrated to the top with gang members,” the notice said.

    Bean, Haley, and Smith filed motions seeking a new trial, arguing that Norris was biased and violated their rights to due process by presiding over the case.

    Smith’s lawyer said there was no “suggestion or one hint in the federal discovery process or the federal trial that any defendant or any member of the Memphis Police Department was in any way affiliated with an illegal street gang either through membership or relationship.”

    Haley’s lawyer wrote that “Judge Norris made the gang statements on at least two occasions, demonstrating that it is a firmly held belief, not an off-hand remark.”

    Lipman also unsealed several filings made before and after Norris recused himself. In one of them, federal prosecutors argued that there was no evidence that he “harbored any bias before or during trial, let alone the type of extreme bias that would warrant the extraordinary remedy of a new trial.”

    Lipman found that while a review showed Norris’ decisions throughout the trial were “sound, fair, and grounded firmly in the law,” a new trial is necessary “because the risk of bias here is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.”

    A date for the retrial has not been set. Lipman ordered lawyers to submit positions on what charges they believe need to be tried.

    Smith’s attorney, Martin Zummach, said Lipman “did the right thing.” Bean’s lawyer declined to comment, and Haley’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request. Memphis police also declined to comment.

    Bean, Haley and Smith were found guilty of trying to cover up the beating by failing to say that they or their colleagues punched and kicked Nichols and broke police department rules when they did not include complete and accurate statements about what type of force they used.

    Bean and Smith were acquitted of more serious civil rights charges, however.

    Haley was found guilty of violating Nichols’ civil rights by causing bodily injury and showing deliberate indifference to medical needs and also conspiracy to tamper with witnesses.

    Bean, Haley and Smith were acquitted in May of all state charges, including second-degree murder. Haley is in federal custody, but Bean and Smith are on limited release.

    Martin and Mills pleaded guilty in federal court last year to violating Nichols’ civil rights by causing death and conspiracy to witness tamper. They did not stand trial in federal court with their former colleagues.

    Martin and Mills also avoided a state court trial after reaching agreements to plead guilty.

    The officers were part of a crime suppression team called the Scorpion Unit that was disbanded weeks after Nichols died.

    On Jan. 7, 2023, officers yanked Nichols from his car and then pepper-sprayed and hit the 29-year-old Black man with a Taser. Nichols fled, and when the five officers, who also are Black, caught up with him, they punched, kicked and hit him with a police baton. Nichols called out for his mother during the beating, which took place steps from his home.

    He died three days later.

    Video of the beating captured by a police pole camera also showed the officers milling about, talking and laughing as Nichols struggled with his injuries.

    It prompted intense scrutiny of police in Memphis, nationwide protests and renewed calls for police reform.

    Norris is a former Republican state senator who was confirmed as a U.S. district judge in West Tennessee in October 2018 after being nominated by President Trump.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sean

    [ad_1]

    A jury convicted Sean “Diddy” Combs on prostitution-related counts, but acquitted him of the more severe charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking on Wednesday, following a 7-week trial. CBS News examines the high-profile federal trial in New York, the explosive testimonies, and what led to Comb’s arrest and federal charges in the one-hour special, “Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs: The Verdict,” hosted by Jericka Duncan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Yella Beezy’s Attorney Says Mo3 Murder-for-Hire Trial Date Set for February 2026

    [ad_1]

    Yella Beezy’s trial on murder-for-hire charges is scheduled to begin Feb. 2, 2026, his attorney, Toby Shook, said Monday. The hearing to announce the multi-platinum recording artist’s trial date was supposed to happen Monday, but the judge’s absence pushed it back to Friday…

    [ad_2]

    Bryson "Boom" Paul

    Source link

  • Board Denies Parole For Erik Menendez Despite Reduced Sentence For His Parents’ 1989 Murders – KXL

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Erik Menendez was denied parole Thursday after serving decades in prison for murdering his parents with his older brother in 1989.

    A panel of California commissioners denied Menendez parole for three years, after which he will be eligible again, in a case that continues to fascinate the public. A parole hearing for his brother Lyle Menendez, who is being held at the same prison in San Diego, is scheduled for Friday morning.

    The two commissioners determined that Menendez should not be freed after an all-day hearing during which they questioned him about why he committed the crime and violated prison rules.

    The brothers became eligible for parole after a judge reduced their sentences in May from life without parole to 50 years to life.

    The parole hearings marked the closest they’ve been to winning freedom from prison since their convictions almost 30 years ago for murdering their parents.

    The brothers were sentenced to life in prison in 1996 for fatally shooting their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989. While defense attorneys argued that the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers sought a multimillion-dollar inheritance.

    A judge reduced their sentences in May, and they became immediately eligible for parole.

    Erik Menendez made his case to two parole commissioners, offering his most detailed account in years of how he was raised, why he made the choices he did, and how he transformed in prison. He noted the hearing fell almost exactly 36 years after he killed his parents — on Aug. 20, 1989.

    “Today is August 21st. Today is the day that all of my victims learned my parents were dead. So today is the anniversary of their trauma journey,” he said, referring to his family members.

    The state corrections department chose a single reporter to watch the videoconference and share details with the rest of the press.

    Erik Menendez’s prison record
    Menendez, gray-haired and spectacled, sat in front of a computer screen wearing a blue T-shirt over a white long-sleeve shirt in a photo shared by officials.

    The panel of commissioners scrutinized every rules violation and fight on his lengthy prison record, including allegations that he worked with a prison gang, bought drugs, used cellphones and helped with a tax scam.

    He told commissioners that since he had no hope of ever getting out then, he prioritized protecting himself over following the rules. Then last fall, LA prosecutors asked a judge to resentence him and his brother — opening the door to parole.

    “In November of 2024, now the consequences mattered,” Menendez said. “Now the consequences meant I was destroying my life.”

    A particular sticking point for the commissioners was his use of cellphones.

    “What I got in terms of the phone and my connection with the outside world was far greater than the consequences of me getting caught with the phone,” Menendez said.

    The board also brought up his earliest encounters with the law, when he committed two burglaries in high school.

    “I was not raised with a moral foundation,” he said. “I was raised to lie, to cheat, to steal in the sense, an abstract way.”

    The panel asked about details like why he used a fake ID to purchase the guns he and Lyle Menendez used to kill their parents, who acted first and why they killed their mother if their father was the main abuser.

    Commissioner Robert Barton asked: “You do see that there were other choices at that point?”

    “When I look back at the person I was then and what I believed about the world and my parents, running away was inconceivable,” Menendez said. “Running away meant death.”

    His transformation behind bars
    Erik Menendez’s parole attorney, Heidi Rummel, emphasized 2013 as the turning point for her client.

    “He found his faith. He became accountable to his higher power. He found sobriety and made a promise to his mother on her birthday,” Rummel said. “Has he been perfect since 2013? No. But he has been remarkable.”

    Commissioner Rachel Stern also applauded him for starting a group to take care of older and disabled inmates.

    Since the brothers reunited, they have been “serious accountability partners” for each other. At the same time, he said he’s become better at setting boundaries with Lyle Menendez, and they tend to do different programming.

    More than a dozen of their relatives, who have advocated for the brothers’ release for months, delivered emotional statements at Thursday’s hearing via videoconference.

    “Seeing my crimes through my family’s eyes has been a huge part of my evolution and my growth,” Menendez said. “Just seeing the pain and the suffering. Understanding the magnitude of what I’ve done, the generational impact.”

    His aunt Teresita Menendez-Baralt, who is Jose Menendez’s sister, said she has fully forgiven him. She noted that she is dying from Stage 4 cancer and wishes to welcome him into her home.

    “Erik carries himself with kindness, integrity and strength that comes from patience and grace,” she said.

    One relative promised to the parole board that she would house him in Colorado, where he can spend time with his family and enjoying nature.

    The board brushed off prosecutor’s questions
    LA County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said ahead of the parole hearings that he opposes parole for the brothers because of their lack of insight, comparing them to Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom denied him parole in January 2022 because of his “deficient insight.”

    During the hearing, LA prosecutor Habib Balian asked Menendez about his and his brothers’ attempts to ask witnesses to lie in court on their behalf, and if the brothers staged the killings as a mafia hit. Commissioners largely dismissed the questions, saying they were not retrying the case.

    In closing statements, Balian questioned whether Menendez was “truly reformed” or saying what commissioners wanted to hear.

    “When one continues to diminish their responsibility for a crime and continues to make the same false excuses that they’ve made for 30-plus years, one is still that same dangerous person that they were when they shotgunned their parents,” Balian said.

    What happens next
    Lyle Menendez is set to appear over videoconference Friday for his parole hearing from the same prison in San Diego.

    The case has captured the attention of true crime enthusiasts for decades and spawned documentaries, television specials and dramatizations. The Netflix drama “ Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story ” and a documentary released in 2024 have been credited for bringing new attention to the brothers.

    Greater recognition of the brothers as victims of sexual abuse has also helped mobilize support for their release. Some supporters have flown to Los Angeles to hold rallies and attend court hearings.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link