ReportWire

Tag: Transport Workers Union

  • Florida Democrats voice support for Brightline workers’ right to organize

    Florida Democrats voice support for Brightline workers’ right to organize

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    U.S. House Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz

    Florida’s entire Democratic U.S. House delegation, including local Congressmen Maxwell Frost (D-10) and Darren Soto (D-9), have voiced support for Brightline workers’ right to organize, following allegations from the Transport Workers Union of union-busting behavior by the rail company.

    “Since 1926, the Railway Labor Act has protected rail workers and their right to form a union and collective bargain — a core principle we all unequivocally support,” the U.S. House delegation of eight Congressional members, led by U.S. House Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, shared in a statement. “With the news of employees working onboard Brightline trains from Miami to Orlando seeking to organize with the Transport Workers Union (TWU), we reaffirm and publicly support the right and ability to organize with the National Mediation Board as intended under the Railway Labor Act.”

    The statement, pretty uncontroversial on its face, comes shortly after TWU president John Samuelsen sent a letter to U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg this month, urging him to direct the DOT to deny additional federal funds to Brightline and to investigate the for-profit passenger train’s “compliance with its obligations” under previously-awarded grants.

    “Faced with workers’ desires to unionize, Brightline and its president, Patrick Goddard, have deliberately chosen the path of confrontation and acrimony,” Samuelsen wrote in a letter to Buttigieg dated Sept. 19. “Although Brightline bosses are anti-worker, President Joe Biden is not.” The U.S. DOT, he continued, “must give funding priority to companies that don’t interfere with workers seeking to unionize.”

    The statement from the Congressional delegation notably does not directly reference union-busting allegations, nor condemn such behavior.

    The Transport Workers Union, representing some 155,000 workers in the transportation industry nationwide, first announced a historic organizing drive among onboard attendants for Brightline in early August. The company, which has been friendly to labor unions out west, runs a high-speed rail line in Florida, from Miami up to its new station in Orlando. The company does not have other union-represented workers in Florida.

    Shortly after the Florida workers filed cards of support for unionization with the National Mediation Board, however (as part of the standard process to request a union election in the rail industry), Brightline hired on attorneys from Littler Mendelson, a firm notorious for its “union avoidance” services, to represent them. An archived list of “do”s and “don’t”s from the firm, for instance, encourages employers to“[t]ell workers that they are free to support the union or not, as they see fit, but you hope they vote against it.” 

    Brightline president Goddard sent an email to Brightline employees last month, according to screenshots shared with Orlando Weekly, where he basically did just that. In his email, Goddard wrote that, while he can now see that some employees feel “unheard,” he’d prefer to approach such discontent “by working together, without a third party involved.”

    “There is a legal process that is currently playing out and we will keep the team updated as more information becomes available,” Goddard wrote.

    Brightline, a private company, has already been awarded billions of dollars in federal grants to construct its high-speed rail line out west — a connection from Las Vegas to Southern California — and has similarly sought out government funds for expansion plans in Florida.

    “Elected officials in Florida are sending a clear message to Brightline — stop interfering with Brightline’s onboard workers’ efforts to form a union,” wrote union president Samuelsen in a statement responding to the congressional delegation’s show of support. “Brightline must stop delaying an election so workers can join the TWU and begin collective bargaining.”

    In addition to anti-union messaging, the TWU has said that Brightline is also trying to delay a union election by claiming it does not fall under the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board, which oversees union elections in the rail and airline industries.

    Instead, Brightline has argued that a union election should take place through the National Labor Relations Board, which oversee private sector labor relations in all other industries. The union, however, has claimed this argument is meant to drag out the organizing process, thus giving Brightline (and their lawyers) more time to intimidate employees against unionization.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • Union urges U.S. Department of Transportation to deny Brightline federal funds over alleged anti-union tactics

    Union urges U.S. Department of Transportation to deny Brightline federal funds over alleged anti-union tactics

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Brightline/Twitter

    A labor union seeking to represent onboard attendants for Brightline in Florida is urging the U.S. Department of Transportation to deny the for-profit passenger train company federal funds over Brightline’s alleged anti-union tactics.

    The president of the Transport Workers Union, representing 155,000 U.S. workers in the rail, transportation and airline industries, wrote a letter to Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Sept. 19 accusing Brightline of “abusing the public coffers and denying workers their fundamental labor rights.” Union president John Samuelsen, in his letter, also urged the DOT to investigate whether funds previously awarded to Brightline “should be clawed back due to the railroad’s non-compliance with federal law.”

    “Faced with workers’ desires to unionize, Brightline and its president, Patrick Goddard, have deliberately chosen the path of confrontation and acrimony,” Samuelsen declared.

    “Although Brightline bosses are anti-worker, President Joe Biden is not,” Samuelsen continued. “The U.S. DOT now must give funding priority to companies that don’t interfere with workers seeking to unionize.”

    A majority of the roughly 100 attendants for Brightline Florida who serve food and drinks to passengers onboard the company’s high-speed rail line filed a petition last month with the National Mediation Board, seeking to unionize with the TWU. Filing such a petition requires signed cards of support from at least 30 percent of employees, although the union says more than 50 percent have filed cards. Since then, Brighltine has retained legal counsel through the notoriously anti-union law firm Littler Mendselson, who have allegedly sought to delay workers’ vote on forming a union and are “actively pressuring” workers against unionization according to union representatives. Such behavior, the union argues, stands in clear conflict with pro-labor stances taken by the Biden administration.

    An executive order from President Joe Biden, released Sept. 4, called on federal departments, including the DOT, to specifically prioritize awarding federal funds to companies that demonstrate high labor standards such as paying competitive wages, ensuring worker safety, and demonstrating pro-union policies such as “voluntary union recognition and neutrality by the employer with respect to union organizing.”

    Brightline Florida has already received or benefited from $36 million in grants through the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements program, according to the union, while the affiliated Brightline West — a high-speed rail project that will run from Las Vegas to Southern California — has received at least $3.5 billion in federal funds. Local governments in Florida, including Brevard County, have also dedicated public funds for Brightline projects.

    In Florida, Brightline runs a high-speed passenger train from Miami up through Aventura, Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Orlando, where its higher-fare service has been especially popular. The rail system is expected to further expand to Tampa, the Treasure Coast (if local government officials can reach a deal with Brightline) and Cocoa.

    Onboard attendants for Brightline Florida are the first to seek unionization, but union president Samuelsen previously told Orlando Weekly that other Brightline employees have also reached out to the union to discuss joining. The Transport Workers Union also represents employees of other rail companies, including Amtrak, whose onboard attendants recently won a union contract delivering a 34 percent compounded wage increase over seven years, plus paid parental leave and stable healthcare costs.

    President Biden has declared himself the “most pro-union president” ever, and secured endorsements from many major labor unions — including the TWU — before he dropped his bid for re-election earlier this year. The union has since endorsed Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris, along with other major unions that include Unite Here, the Service Employees International Union and the United Auto Workers, among others.

    The union’s letter to the DOT calls for further investigation into funds Brightline has received so far. It states that while Brightline has benefited from federal funds allocated specifically for rail projects, the company is now claiming it is not a rail carrier under the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and therefore does not fall under the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board, which governs labor relations specifically in the rail and airline industries.

    Brightline’s lawyers have used this argument to dismiss the workers’ petition to unionize with the NMB, arguing such a petition should instead be filed with the National Labor Relations Board, which oversees the rest of the private sector. The union has decried this argument as a targeted delay tactic.

    “If the company sincerely believes these arguments, it should be obligated to repay the more than $36 million it has inappropriately received or benefited from out of monies reserved for use by or for RLA-covered carriers,” the letter reads.

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link

  • ‘Brightlies’: Passenger railway Brightline Florida hires union avoidance lawyers to discourage organizing workers

    ‘Brightlies’: Passenger railway Brightline Florida hires union avoidance lawyers to discourage organizing workers

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Photo via Brightline/Twitter

    Florida’s high-speed passenger train Brightline has responded to their onboard attendants’ newly announced effort to unionize by hiring lawyers from the notorious union avoidance law firm Littler Mendelson and internally communicating that they would prefer for Brightline to remain union-free. (Shocker!)

    Patrick Goddard, president of Brightline, sent an internal company email to Brightline employees earlier this month, informing employees that while it is their “right” to seek union representation, he believes a “direct relationship” between the company and its employees — without a union — is “in the best interest of all of us.”

    “The fact that many Onboard Teammates have inquired about representation is their right, and it’s clear to me, that many feel unheard,” wrote Goddard, according to screenshots of the internal email, obtained by Orlando Weekly. “I believe the best way to approach these matters is by working together, without a third party involved.”

    Goddard’s use of the phrases “third party” and “direct relationship” are telling. They come directly from the union avoidance industry playbook, and from rhetoric encouraged by anti-union law firms like Littler Mendelson, which is representing Brightline as their legal counsel during the unionization process.

    This kind of language, which downplays the direct role that workers have in forming a union in their workplace, was also used by Howard Schultz, former CEO of Starbucks — another client of Littler Mendelson.

    “One hundred million people come in to Starbucks. The customer experience will be significantly challenged and less-than if a third party is integrated into our business,” then-Starbucks CEO Shultz told the New York Times during a live interview in 2022, as cafe employees at dozens of corporate-owned locations, including in Florida, were organizing to join Starbucks Workers United.

    Goddard, who helped oversee Brightline’s $2.7 billion expansion project to Orlando, worked in the hotel industry before joining Brightline. He founded and led luxury hotel management companies, and worked for hotel groups like Hilton Hotels — a multinational company that has historically spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (more likely, millions) on anti-union labor consultants (some of whom are attorneys, but not all).

    Goddard’s email to the Brightline employees earlier this month goes on to offer a brief rundown of “Frequently Asked Questions” concerning the process of forming a union, union dues, and warnings that, if onboard attendants democratically vote to unionize, contract negotiations between the union and Brightline could take years. “There will be legal limitations on Brightline’s ability to work directly with you to make changes,” he adds.

    The Transport Workers Union, the labor organization that some Brightline employees are seeking to join, emailed its own response to Brightline employees after Goddard sent his email, which they titled “Brightlies.”

    “Straight out of their high-priced attorney’s playbook, [Goddard] brought forward the argument that by forming a Union, the Onboard Workers would disrupt the ‘direct relationship’ that he so much enjoys having with all of you,” the union’s email reads. “The truth is, what you have all set out to do is exactly that: Form a Real Direct Relationship where the company will have to sit and listen to your concerns and demands.”

    Anti-union bingo card sent to Brightline employees, in response to Brightline's anti-union email to employers earlier this month (August 2024) - Transport Workers Union

    Transport Workers Union

    Anti-union bingo card sent to Brightline employees, in response to Brightline’s anti-union email to employers earlier this month (August 2024)

    The union’s email includes its own responses to Goddard’s list of frequently asked questions, which they describe as more truthful. The union, for instance, clarifies Goddard’s claims on union dues, sharing that no union member would be required or asked to pay union dues until a union contract has been successfully negotiated. The union also denies Goddard’s claim that dues would amount to $600 for each employee, annually.

    According to TWU, union dues are equal to two hours of pay per month, and under Florida’s right-to-work law, signing up to become a dues-paying union member would presumably be completely voluntary anyway. The union quips that Goddard would need to give Brightline employees a raise in order for dues to cost $600 annually, and further explained what members’ dues would support.

    “70% of the dues remain with your Local to use to run the union. 30% goes to TWU International to help further grow the union and to fight for rulemaking with agencies like the Federal Railroad Administration to improve the livelihoods of railroad workers despite rail companies fighting like hell to reduce safety and working standards,” the email reads.

    The company’s effort to frame the union as a third party is a “smokescreen,” the union argues. “YOU AND YOUR COWORKERS are the union and YOU all will directly negotiate with the company with TWU’s help!”

    click to enlarge Screenshot of an email sent by Brightline Florida to employees. - Email screenshot obtained by Orlando Weekly

    Email screenshot obtained by Orlando Weekly

    Screenshot of an email sent by Brightline Florida to employees.

    Delay tactics at a price

    The notable unionization effort first publicly kicked off earlier this month, as the Transport Workers Union — an international labor union representing more than 155,000 workers — announced that a majority of the roughly 100 onboard attendants for Brightline Florida had signed authorization cards in support of unionizing — signifying a historic organizing effort.

    The Transport Workers Union then filed those cards with the National Mediation Board — a federal government agency that oversees railroad and airline labor relations — requesting a union election for the employees.

    According to TWU, however, Brightline’s Littler Mendelson lawyers are making the argument that a union election needs to be requested through the National Labor Relations Board — which oversees private sector labor relations in other industries — not the NMD. Neither Brightline nor the two lawyers the company has retained have responded to a request for confirmation or comment.

    The union, in a separate email to Brightline employees, described this argument as a “poorly written objection” and a purposeful delay tactic based solely on the position that this union election is not under the jurisdiction of the rail industry.

    The union also claims the move will ultimately just serve to pad the pockets of Littler Mendelson, whose attorneys have been known to bill clients hundreds of dollars per hour. The firm is one of the oldest in the country that specializes in “union avoidance” and one of the largest, with dozens of locations around the world.

    Their lawyers have historically been used to help fend off organizing efforts such as the Fight for $15 campaign organized by fast food workers (a project of the Service Employees International Union, which recently rebranded as Fight for a Union) and have represented clients such as Starbucks, Apple, Amazon and Trader Joe’s that have been accused of labor law violations.

    According to TWU president John Samuelsen — who is an elected official, chosen by TWU membership — Brightline Florida employees reached out to the union within the last three months, after first having organizing talks among themselves. “The motivation is similar to every other work group that seeks to unionize: to build collective power in a workplace,” Samuelsen told Orlando Weekly earlier this month.

    Workers are dissatisfied with their pay — as many Floridians continue to struggle to afford basic living expenses — and their current benefits, and are also concerned about safety issues, according to Samuelsen.

    Headlines reporting deadly accidents between Brightline trains and vehicles emerge nearly on a weekly basis. Samuelsen told the Palm Beach Post that workers don’t feel like Brightline is taking into consideration the trauma this creates for employees.

    “As opposed to other rail operators, Brightline has an indifference to its workforce after the trauma that comes when a Brightline train runs somebody over,” he claimed.

    Brightline, a for-profit passenger train that also operates on the West Coast, has courted both the state and federal government for grants to help support their projects in Florida, which have been highly anticipated by the public. Out west, the company has received billions of dollars in federal grants for a much larger project that will run from Southern California to Las Vegas, and has developed an amicable relationship with labor unions, including the TWU.

    Brightline Florida runs a high-speed train line running from Miami to Orlando, first expanding to the Orlando area last fall. Further expansion is also in the works, as Brightline courts commuters to make up for recent quarterly losses.

    “Brightline made a strategically stupid decision in hiring a union-busting law firm, Littler Mendelson, infamous for their anti-labor tactics at Starbucks,” Samuelsen told Orlando Weekly. “Brightline — which glommed huge sums of government assistance — is now using taxpayer money to fight the democratic desire of its workers to form a union.”

    Samuelsen has shared that more Brightline employees — not just the onboard attendants, who help passengers with bags and serve food and drinks — have also approached the union, similarly interested in organizing.

    At this time, union officials have been unable to connect Orlando Weekly with rank-and-file Brightline employees they have been communicating with, citing a wish to protect the employees from employer retaliation — an issue that’s common during union drives. A similar concern was shared back in April, when airline JetBlue began (allegedly) posting anti-union flyers at airports, including Orlando International Airport.

    Statewide, just 6.1 percent of Florida’s workforce is represented by a union, according to federal data, and a new state law has further undercut unions’ presence in the public sector. Just about 26 percent of Florida’s public sector workforce had union representation as of last year, but tens of thousands of employees have seen their unions decertified, or dissolved by the state, since.

    If you’re a Brightline Florida employee with thoughts on the union drive among onboard attendants, we want to hear from you. Contact reporter McKenna Schueler at [email protected].

    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler

    Source link