ReportWire

Tag: Total Wine &. More

  • Cannabis In Candy And Other Halloween Myths

    Debunking cannabis in candy and other Halloween myths: what parents really need to know

    Curious about the cannabis in candy and other Halloween myths? Every autumn, a familiar rumor surfaces on social media and in group texts: “Someone’s handing out weed candy to trick‑or‑treaters.” But here’s the short version: no credible evidence supports the claim. What’s actually going on is a modern twist on a long history of candy‑tampering folklore.

    RELATED: Google Could Help You Pick A Halloween Costume

    Long before cannabis entered the public conversation, concerns about Halloween treats were dominated by tales of razor blades hidden in apples, pins in chocolates, or poison in candy. Those fears are largely urban legend.

    Where did it start? By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as candy production grew industrial, some doctors and commentators began warning food adulteration was a hidden menace. The shift from small‑scale confectioners to mass manufacturing fueled distrust of what lurked inside sweets. In 1959, a California dentist, Dr. William Shyne, distributed laxative pills to trick‑or‑treaters in candy coatings—more prank than poison, but it entered the lore.

    In 1970, a New York Times op‑ed asked whether the “plump red apple” might conceal a razor blade, feeding parental fear.

    The most infamous case came in 1974, when an 8‑year‑old in Texas died after consuming a Pixy Stix laced with cyanide. But the twist is the child’s own father, Ronald Clark O’Bryan, was convicted—and later executed—for planting the poison to camouflage a murder as a “random” trick‑or‑treat crime.

    Folklorists like Joel Best have traced dozens of reports of candy tampering from 1958 to 1983; but after investigation, none could be confirmed as a stranger’s random act of harm. Many turned out to be misattributed, hoaxes, or even children themselves adding dangerous objects and calling attention to it.

    Over time, the razor‑blade apple myth became a cultural shorthand for parental anxiety. Ironically, apples were once common Halloween treats (candied or caramel apples). But the myth contributed to their decline as mass “give‑aways.”

    RELATED: Best Ways To Reduce Your Halloween Hangover

    The razor blade story is far from the only tale in the haunted folklore of Halloween sweets. Some of the persistent legends include:

    1. Needles or pins in candy bars: Occasionally reported, but often traced to local pranks or “copycats” rather than sinister strangers.
    2. Poisoned candy or drug‑laced treats: Tales of cyanide, lye, or drugs in sweets persist. But documented cases of poisoning via “random Halloween candy” are effectively non‑existent.
    3. “Blue star” lollipop tattoos or poisoned tattoos: A variant rumor claims temporary tattoos handed out include psychoactive or toxic compounds—another version in the “urban legend about drugs” canon.
    4. Mass poison scares tied to other events: For instance, after the 1982 Tylenol poisoning scandal (cyanide in over‑the‑counter pills), public fear of tainted consumables spiked—including Halloween candy warnings.

    These legends flourish because of what folklorists call availability cascade—when a vivid fear is repeated often, people assume it must be true.

    Cannabis In Candy And Other Halloween Myths

    So where did the weed candy myth come from? It’s essentially a new costume draped over an old scare. As legal cannabis markets have emerged, the idea someone might hide THC or marijuana edibles in trick‑or‑treat bags has gained traction online — yet it fails under scrutiny:

    • No documented cases. No credible report shows strangers distributing cannabis treats to kids on Halloween.
    • Cost is prohibitive. Legal THC edibles are expensive under regulation and taxation—handing out full doses to many kids isn’t cheap.
    • Strict regulation and packaging. Dispensaries are required to use child‑resistant packaging, labeling, and maintain records—anonymously distributing to random children would breach every rule.
    • Severe legal risk. Distributing THC to minors is criminal; any plausible motive is overshadowed by the consequences.
    • Counterfeit vs. real product confusion. Some rumors mix in fake or illegal edibles mimicking mainstream candy, creating fear, but they are not part of regulated cannabis commerce.

    RELATED: Perfect Drinks For These 5 Classic Horror Films

    Derived from older tampering myths and amplified by digital echo chambers, the cannabis candy scare is a modern variant—but one without substance.

    A practical Halloween safety checklist might include: supervise routes, cross at well‑lit streets, have children wait until home to open candy, discard unwrapped or suspicious items, and of course, check for choking risks or allergens.

    The myth someone is secretly giving cannabis candy to unsuspecting trick‑or‑treaters is more frightening than factual. It’s a modern reincarnation of a much older folklore of tainted treats, one built on fear, not evidence. The razor in the apple may be a chilling image, but it remains a legend, not a reality. This Halloween, the real risk is not a phantom dose of THC—but a car, a broken sidewalk, or too much sugar.

    Let’s protect kids with real caution, not ghost stories.

    Amy Hansen

    Source link

  • Hemp Is Being Helped By GOP Senator

    Hemp is being helped by GOP Senator Rand Paul, boldly tying government funding to hemp’s survival

    In a surprising twist of Senate strategy, hemp is being helped by GOP Senator. Randy Paul has positioned himself as the unlikely champion of hemp — threatening to keep the federal government shutdown alive unless protections for the industry are secured. With the Republican Party controlling the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, this move shows how intra-party battlegrounds can shape policy and put unexpected players into the spotlight.

    RELATED: Immersive Events Redefine Millennial Nights

    With Republicans holding the presidency oand congress, the GOP nominally holds the power to end the shutdown. But power isn’t the same as unity. While GOP leaders are pushing to fund the government, the details of what gets included in the continuing resolution remain hotly contested. Sen. Paul has effectively leveraged that dynamic by tying the fate of government-funding legislation to the fate of hemp policy.

    Paul warned that unless the hemp industry’s interests — particularly around hemp-derived THC products — are expressly protected, he may withhold his support for bringing the government back online. According to industry coverage, he’s told leadership that “we can do this the easy way or the hard way. The easy way is I give my consent, and the hard way is I don’t.” The result: a fresh sense that even with unified Republican control, the party must manage internal dissent if it hopes to reopen the government.

    Back in 2018, the Hemp Farming Act of 2018 (part of the larger Farm Bill) removed hemp — defined as cannabis sativa with less than 0.3 % THC — from Schedule I drug status, opening the door for industrial uses and new product development. Since then, the hemp industry has evolved far beyond fiber and seed. Now, hemp-derived cannabinoid products — including gummies, beverages, extracts and even low-dose THC items — have flooded the market, gaining significant consumer traction.

    One of the key sticking points in Washington is the proposed language in appropriations bills that would redefine “hemp” by eliminating any “quantifiable amount” of THC or THC-adjacent cannabinoids. The industry argues that such a definition would effectively bury the current hemp-derived products sector. Paul, fending for his state’s hemp farmers, said a tighter definition would “devastate” Kentucky’s hemp economy.

    RELATED: The Connection Between Country Music And Cannabis

    It’s not just niche farms anymore. Hemp-derived products are moving into mainstream retail channels and becoming a consumer trend. For instance, Total Wine & More now features hemp-derived THC beverages and other innovative hemp products on shelves, marking a signifier of how widely accepted the category has become. Retail articles highlight that “mainstream retailers like … Total Wine … are joining the THC Beverage Retail Revolution, signaling that hemp-derived cannabis drinks have officially entered the mainstream.” The combination of broad availability and elevated consumer demand helps explain why Paul is motivated to keep fighting for protections — this isn’t a fringe industry anymore.

    Paul’s core demand: don’t let the appropriations process or continuing resolution sneak in language that guts hemp-derived products by redefining hemp in a way that would ban many existing products. Instead, he proposes that Congress delay sweeping changes, conduct studies, and give the industry breathing room. Marijuana Moment+1
    For the hemp industry — and for retailers — the stakes are high. A ban on “any quantifiable THC” could force many products off shelves, disrupt supply chains, jeopardize investments and cost farmers and businesses tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Photo by traffic_analyzer/Getty Images

    For younger and middle-aged consumers, this isn’t just about farmers and policy wonks. Hemp-derived products tie into wellness trends (CBD, functional beverages), alternative consumables (micro-dose THC drinks), and retail culture (finding such items in familiar stores). The mainstream move of hemp means suddenly your local beverage aisle or specialty store might carry hemp-derived options alongside other lifestyle products.
    So when Paul threatens to use a shutdown as leverage, it’s more than politics — it’s about whether your next casual drink could be a hemp-derived beverage, or whether those products could vanish or shift dramatically in how they’re regulated.

    As the shutdown drags on and GOP leadership wrestles internal divisions, Paul’s blockade of hemp-related changes creates a scenario where even a party with full control doesn’t necessarily have full command of the agenda. If he holds out, the shutdown could persist until either leadership makes a deal on hemp — or until Paul relents.
    For hemp brands, retailers and consumers, the message is: Washington is watching. The definition of hemp, the regulation of THC-adjacent products and the channels of mainstream retail are all in flux. Millennials who have embraced hemp as lifestyle, beverage or wellness category should keep their eye on Capitol Hill — because their everyday options might hinge on how this fight resolves.

    In the land of majority rule, one senator is reminding his party control doesn’t equal consensus — and the hemp industry just became the rope he’s pulling on.

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link