ReportWire

Tag: Tony Hale

  • Tony Hale Worried He’d Be Replaced in ‘Toy Story 4’ by a “Huge Star”

    [ad_1]

    Tony Hale admits he didn’t know he actually made it in the final cut of Toy Story 4 until the film’s trailer was released.

    The actor who voices Forky in the 2019 animated pic recently told People magazine that he worried he might have been replaced by a “huge star” in the movie, despite reading for the role.

    “It wasn’t until I heard my voice on the Toy Story 4 trailer that I actually thought I was still in it. It wasn’t until then,” Hale said. “The whole time I was like, ‘They’re going to cut me. They’re going to replace me with some huge star.’”

    The Veep star actually had a notable role in the Oscar-winning movie, as Toy Story 4 follows his new toy, a talking spork called Forky, who joins Woody (Tom Hanks) and the gang on a road trip alongside old and new friends, as they learn how big the world can be for a toy.

    “When you were playing in a world of Forky from Toy Story, it means just the power of simplicity. That’s why children’s books are so popular. I mean, sometimes adults gravitate to children’s books because of the simplicity,” Hale said of the character. “What I loved is [Forky] was the first toy that was made by a kid. So talk about simplicity. I mean, it was like a spork and some pipe cleaner arms, some popsicle feet.”

    He added, “He just had this kind of wide-eyed simplicity and newness to him that was just so beautiful.”

    As for the upcoming Toy Story 5, which is set to hit theaters on June 19, 2026, the Arrested Development alum briefly teased that the theme centers on toys vs. technology.

    “They give you pieces of the script, and so I saw glimpses, but the glimpses I saw are pretty cool,” Hale said. “I don’t want to lose the surprise. I want to be completely surprised with Toy Story 5.”

    [ad_2]

    Carly Thomas

    Source link

  • Woman of the Hour and Saoirse Ronan on The Graham Norton Show: Two Key Moments in “The Culture” Right Now That Tell a Larger Story

    Woman of the Hour and Saoirse Ronan on The Graham Norton Show: Two Key Moments in “The Culture” Right Now That Tell a Larger Story

    [ad_1]

    In a now viral moment on The Graham Norton Show that, to Saoirse Ronan, came as a complete surprise, the actress casually “quips” (while being totally serious) that a woman is always thinking about what she might be able to wield as a weapon for impromptu self-defense purposes. The remark came during a “har-har-har” discussion among actors Denzel Washington, Paul Mescal (these two on the promotional circuit together thanks to Gladiator II) and Eddie Redmayne, with Washington confirming his combat training by Navy SEALs during the filming of The Equalizer. Norton then questioned, “[So] you can kill something with anything?” Washington responded with an emphatic affirmation, with Redmayne then weighing in, “I find some of the techniques though that you learn, like some of the things Paul taught us, is how you can use, um, how you can use your phone if someone’s attacking you—the butt of your phone.” And it’s here that he pantomimes the gesture, about to continue to say more until Mescal foolishly interrupts, “Who’s actually gonna think about that though? If someone attacked me, I’m not gonna go, ‘Phone.’”

    Amid the yuk-yuks between the men, Ronan tries to interject, but the laughter is still too raucous, settling down long enough for Redmayne to agree, “That’s a very good point.” Well done, chap, for saying something totally ignorant. Ronan then takes the chance, before the conversation shifts again, to say, “That’s what girls have to think about all the time.” A nervous hush falls over the men, with Mescal and Redmayne quickly agreeing, as though suddenly realizing that this whole exchange could be a PR nightmare (and it kind of is). Ronan then delivers the coup de grñce by asking the audience, “Am I right, ladies?” The audience returns a loud cheer of approval. Norton is then very quick to change the topic, not even addressing what Ronan said, lest the episode become “too political.”

    Of course, everything is always political, and that’s a reality that has become even harder to ignore in these increasingly divided times. That Ronan made this comment on the heels of the release of Anna Kendrick’s directorial debut, Woman of the Hour (a movie loosely based on “The Dating Game killer”), says that fear of men is very much on women’s minds. More than ever, perhaps. Or at least more than ever in the twenty-first century. That Woman of the Hour looks to a story from the twentieth, specifically 1978 (and jumping around in time to other years in the seventies), is extremely telling of how not so far we’ve come with regard to the way women are treated by men. To be blunt, like objects designed solely for men’s pleasure and mind games—whether women want to participate in that or not. One such victim in the fictionalized account of Rodney Alcala’s serial killing spree throughout the seventies is Sheryl Bradshaw (played by Anna Kendrick and based on Cheryl Bradshaw—not sure what the point of one letter change was to “Sheryl” for the character, but anyway
).

    To set the stage for the rampant and systemic misogyny that Sheryl faces as an aspiring actress (which is ratcheted up from “ordinary” misogyny against “civilian” women), Woman of the Hour opens with Alcala (Daniel Zovatto) and one of his victims, Sarah (Kelley Jakle, who also appeared in the Pitch Perfect movies with Kendrick), in Wyoming, 1977. Giving viewers a snapshot of his modus operandi in terms of killing style, Alcala has lured Sarah to a remote, isolated location by insisting this is the best place (presumably for setting and lighting) to take photographs of her. As he tells her to talk about herself so she can loosen up, she tells a familiar tale of abandonment by a boyfriend, his shitty behavior best exemplified by the fact that he left her despite Sarah being pregnant with his child. As she lets the tears fall while Alcala continues snapping photos like the creep he is, she admits, “I knew he was risky, but fuck it, everyone’s risky.” The statement adds an eerie layer to the fact that she’s come to this isolated hilltop with a man she doesn’t know. A man who prides himself on “always getting the girl” via his aura of “sensitivity” (hence, wielding the artist/photographer card all the time) and saying cornball shit like, “You’re beautiful.” And then, all at once, showcasing his “Mr. Hyde” personality by going for the jugular—literally.

    The way he murders Sarah is also meant to show viewers another frequent tactic of Alcala’s, which was to strangle his victims just enough for them to lose consciousness, but not kill them entirely. Once they revived, he would continue toying with them again, providing a slow, cruel and psychologically taxing death. As he does to Sarah. This harrowing scene then leads into one of a completely different kind: Sheryl auditioning for a role in front of two male casting directors who talk to each other as though she’s not even there. When they finally remember her presence because she asks if they want her to read again, one of the casting directors (Geoff Gustafson) gets around to asking her, “What year did you graduate?” (from her Columbia acting program). It’s almost as “subtle” as just coming right out and saying, “How old are you?” A shade-throwing query on the casting man’s part, as it’s meant to indicate he thinks she looks too old. Not just for the part she’s auditioning for, but in general. This treatment of her as though she’s a piece of meat is not only in keeping with the cattle call vibes of any audition (open or closed), but the way women are regarded overall. As though to really drive home that point, the other casting director (Matty Finochio) concludes with, “And you’re okay with nudity, right?” Sheryl replies, “No, it’s just not for me.” The casting agent who asked the question then takes the opportunity to eyeball her chest and assure, “Oh, I’m sure they’re fine.”

    When she gets to her apartment building, there’s no respite from sleazy male behavior to be had there either, for she must contend with the presence of her neighbor, Terry (Pete Holmes), who she clearly dreads running into. Even so, he seems to be a constant in her life as a fellow actor that often runs lines with her. But that doesn’t mean that Sheryl wants him to be lingering all the time, which he constantly is, refusing to take the hint as he follows her into the apartment while her phone is ringing. Answering it to find that it’s her agent, Sheryl tries to motion for Terry to leave so she can talk in private, but he refuses to take the hint. Just as he refuses to see that Sheryl could simply want a friendship from him, and not anything romantic. Alas, after finding out that the only gig she’s “landed” (requiring no audition, of course) is as a contestant on The Dating Game, she goes out for a drink with Terry to drown her sorrows. Taking advantage of her vulnerable emotional state, Terry tries to make a move. Obviously, her knee-jerk reaction is to recoil, at which time Terry is the one who has the audacity to be offended and start acting weird and distant.

    Rather than make him feel worse—as though it’s Sheryl’s responsibility to make him feel any way at all—she placates by insisting she wants to stay for another drink. And then placates further still by waking up in bed next to him the following morning. While some might “blame” Sheryl for this result, any woman who has ever been put in such an awkward position knows that it can become both more awkward and even dangerous if the rejection isn’t “corrected.” What’s more, at that time in society, ensuring men’s egos were as stroked as their dicks was still a significant part of being a woman. Even post-women’s “liberation.”

    To interweave Sheryl’s existence with those of Alcala’s victims is a potent storytelling device on screenwriter Ian McDonald’s part. Not just because it helps show the depth of Alcala’s crimes (and the extent to which various cries for help to stop future harm went unnoticed or unheard), but because it gives viewers a glimpse into not only Sheryl’s quiet life of exploitation and demeanment, but also her own near brush with potential death. This feeling of her having a “sliding doors” moment in terms of whether she actually concedes to going on a “date” (a.k.a. weekend getaway in Carmel, the prize from The Dating Game) with Alcala.

    Beyond the stage where sexist “banter,” encouraged by the host, Ed (Tony Hale), an audience member, Laura (Nicolette Robinson), recognizes Alcala as the man who approached her friend on the beach, the man she was last seen with before being found dead. Starting to have a panic attack not only over seeing him again, but seeing him in this context, she flees the studio in an anxiety-ridden rush. Her boyfriend, Ken (Max Lloyd-Jones), eventually follows her out to the car see what’s wrong. When she explains that she’s very sure the man on the stage is the same man who killed her friend, all Ken does is try to assure her that it’s not. That the Establishment would never have allowed him on a stage so “legitimate.” This brushing away of her very real information and feelings is representative on a larger scale of the way that women’s so-called overreactive behavior is handled by “the men in charge.” Though, as Woman of the Hour makes apparent, the only thing they appear to be in charge of is ensuring that the patriarchy continues to hold, ergo women keep getting harmed and abused.

    The macabre sentence that reads, “A serial killer wins a dating game show” is a grim reminder that the most nefarious of men can be the most charming (see also: Ted Bundy). Wearing their mask for the public and then ripping it off behind closed doors. Even some of the more overtly chauvinistic predators (e.g., Donald Trump, Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein), for as grotesque as they are out in the open, tend to be even more so in private. As McDonald noted of coming up with the script at the time when Trump’s “grab ‘em by the pussy” audio leaked,

    “
in order for bad men to flourish, a lot of good people, quote unquote, have to look the other way in order for this behavior to sort of perpetuate itself. And that was the thing that I found really interesting about him, because on a lot of true crime websites, you will hear people sort of compare Rodney Alcala to like Ted Bundy, because they’re both well-educated. And kind of handsome, but that’s kind of the extent of it, because beyond that, they’re actually really different people. Ted Bundy was a chameleon, and he was really good at making himself look like something he wasn’t. And Rodney Alcala sort of never pretended to be anything but what he was. And so, it was everybody around him that sort of accommodated that. And that was the thing that I found really interesting about him.”

    In fact, it seemed as though the more overt (like appearing on national television) and risk-taking he was, the more he got away with. The ways in which Alcala was allowed to flourish in his crimes as a direct result of the Establishment/law enforcement ignoring not just women’s pleas, but not caring at all about the threat to women’s lives, is exactly why Ronan would, in 2024, still be able to make such a chilling comment about women needing to think about protecting themselves pretty much all the time. Because the same skeptical, do-nothing attitude persists at the top of the power food chain. To boot, there is an ironic element to the fact that The Graham Norton Show set has a 70s-esque color palette and aesthetic as Ronan sat there among the three “bachelors,” so to speak, momentarily trying to stave off some of their inherent misguidedness about what women contend with on the regular.

    So while Ronan made a “small” comment and Kendrick a “small” film, both recent moments in “the culture” are extremely germane to the lack of physical and emotional safety women still feel with regard to men. As for the length of Woman of the Hour, the somewhat clipped runtime (especially considering the subject matter) is due to a taut pace designed to create a constant sense of unease within the viewer. Particularly women who already recognize the feeling so well. Women who, like Ronan, are aware that you always need to be on your toes when you’re out in public, but most especially at night
in those dark parking lots and on the sidewalks—anywhere on the street, really.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • What to stream: ‘Warriors’ album, ‘The Dating Game’ killer, ‘NCIS: Origins’ and Travis Kelce’s games

    What to stream: ‘Warriors’ album, ‘The Dating Game’ killer, ‘NCIS: Origins’ and Travis Kelce’s games

    [ad_1]

    Travis Kelce adds game show host to his growing resume with “Are You Smarter than a Celebrity?” and Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “Warriors,” a musical concept album inspired by the 1979 cult classic film, are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

    Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Anna Kendrick stars in a movie about the time a serial killer made his way onto the television show “The Dating Game,” Nintendo fans get Super Mario Party Jamboree and “NCIS” looks back at character Leroy Jethro Gibbs in “NCIS: Origins,” a series set 25 years before the original.

    NEW MOVIES TO STREAM OCT. 14-20

    — In 1978, a serial killer made his way onto the television show “The Dating Game.” Rodney Alcala was already a murderer by the time he appeared on the show as one of three bachelors seeking a date with a woman named Cheryl Bradshaw. He even won. Had they done a background check, they might have discovered that he’d been on the FBI’s 10 most wanted fugitives list and already been imprisoned for violent crimes against an 8-year-old. In the new Netflix film “Woman of the Hour,” streaming on Friday, Oct. 18, Anna Kendrick (also making her directorial debut) stars as the woman on the show (spelled Sheryl here) and puts the attention back on the victims. “Woman of the Hour” received good reviews out of the Toronto Film Festival last year.

    — If fake serial killers are more your style, “MaXXXine” starts streaming on MAX on Friday, Oct. 18. The third film in Ti West and Mia Goth’s unlikely trilogy (following “X” and “Pearl”) takes the audience to the sleazy underground of 1980s Hollywood. Goth’s Maxine Minx is an adult film star hoping for a big break in mainstream movies. She gets a shot from Elizabeth Debicki’s refined director. But she’s also running from her past and a killer terrorizing the town. It’s very stylized and a little silly and underdeveloped but it’s a fun watch with a fun, extended Lily Collins cameo.

    — And for those looking for a comedy, Josh Brolin and Peter Dinklage play brothers, and former partners in crime in a starry new movie coming to Prime Video on Thursday. Brolin is the one trying for a more normal life when Dinklage convinces him to embark on a road trip to a promised big score. “Brothers,” directed by Max Barbakow (who made the delightful time loop romantic comedy “Palm Springs”) also features Marisa Tomei, Glenn Close, Brendan Fraser and Taylour Paige in its big ensemble.

    — AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

    NEW MUSIC TO STREAM OCT. 14-20

    — On Friday, Oct. 18, Lin-Manuel Miranda — in his first full post-“Hamilton” musical — and the award-winning actor and playwright Eisa Davis will release “Warriors,” a musical concept album inspired by the 1979 cult classic film that follows a street gang as they make their way from the Bronx to their home turf of Coney Island amid an all-out blitz. There are some notable departures here, including some gender-flipping and inventive genre-melding, no doubt an extension of its all-star cast, which features everyone from Ms. Lauryn Hill and Marc Anthony to Colman Domingo, Busta Rhymes and more. Last month, the duo told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview that their version of “Warriors” is about unity and peace. But it sounds full of action.

    — AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

    NEW SHOWS TO STREAM OCT. 14-20

    — Austin Stowell plays a younger version of Mark Harmon’s “NCIS” character, Leroy Jethro Gibbs in “NCIS: Origins,” a series set 25 years before the original. We meet this Gibbs as he’s beginning his career as a naval investigator. “NCIS: Origins” debuts Monday on CBS and streams on Paramount+.

    — A new Peacock docuseries digs into the wild but true story of Elizabeth Finch, a former writer on ABC’s “Grey’s Anatomy.” Finch wrote storylines she claimed were inspired by her own life and medical history, including a battle with bone cancer. She later admitted to lying. The three-part docuseries also tells the story of Finch’s ex-wife, who was the one to expose her deceit in the first place. “Anatomy of Lies” streams Tuesday on Peacock.

    — Travis Kelce adds game show host to his growing resume. The Kansas City Chiefs tight-end hosts “Are You Smarter than a Celebrity?” beginning Wednesday on Prime Video. On the show, adult contestants answer elementary grade questions with a pool of celebrities on standby ready to help.

    — In the Apple TV+’s dramedy “Shrinking,” Jason Segel plays Jimmy, a therapist grieving the death of his wife and trying to navigate being a single parent to a teen daughter. In season one, he begins to give his patients unorthodox advice, like inviting one (Luke Tennie) to move into his home. We also saw a new kind of family blossom between Jimmy, his colleagues (Harrison Ford and Jessica Williams), and neighbor (Christa Miller). Season two of the heartwarming comedy premieres Wednesday on the streamer.

    — In season three of Netflix’s “The Lincoln Lawyer,” Mickey Haller is rocked by the murder of his former client Gloria Days (Fiona Rene), but he also agrees to defend the man accused of killing her. The story is based on No. 5 of Michael Connelly’s The Lincoln Lawyer book series called “The Gods of Guilt.” It premieres Thursday on Netflix.

    — The “Sheldon-verse” continues with “Georgie & Mandy’s First Marriage” debuting Thursday on CBS. The series stars Montana Jordan as Sheldon’s older brother George “Georgie” Cooper and his new bride Mandy, played by Emily Osment. It’s a sequel to “Young Sheldon” which wrapped last May after seven seasons. Episodes also stream on Paramount+.

    — “Hysteria!”, coming to Peacock on Friday, Oct. 18, follows members of a high school band who pretend to be in a Satanic cult for attention. Their plan falls apart when town members target the teens in a witch hunt. The series stars Julie Bowen of “Modern Family” and “Evil Dead” star Bruce Campbell.

    — Alicia Rancilio

    NEW VIDEO GAMES TO PLAY

    — Holiday season is almost here, and for Nintendo fans, there’s no party like a Mario Party. Super Mario Party Jamboree follows the classic formula: It’s a virtual board game in which most of the spaces lead to a multiplayer contest. Up to four people can play in-person or online, though one online mode lets up to 20 compete in a hectic “Koopathlon.” There are 22 characters, seven different boards and more than 110 minigames covering the gamut of Mario Party silliness, from races to brawls to minigolf. And there are few cooperative challenges, like a cooking game where four chefs try to slice and dice in rhythm. The festivities start Thursday on Switch.

    — Barcelona-based Nomada Studio gained plenty of fans and a handful of awards with 2018’s stylish Gris, a haunting tale in which a young girl worked through grief by solving puzzles and collecting stars. The indie developer’s Neva starts in a similarly gloomy place: A warrior named Alba sets out with a white wolf, Neva, to explore a dying world. Nomada calls it “a love song dedicated to our children, our parents and our planet,” and the arresting, painterly landscapes will look familiar to fans of Gris. The journey begins Tuesday on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Switch and PC.

    — Lou Kesten

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Comic Relief US launches new Roblox game to help children build community virtually and in real life

    Comic Relief US launches new Roblox game to help children build community virtually and in real life

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — The notion that online gaming could help players develop charitable habits seemed bold when the anti-poverty nonprofit Comic Relief US tested its own multiverse on the popular world-building app Roblox last year.

    As philanthropy wrestles with how to authentically engage new generations of digitally savvy donors, Comic Relief US CEO Alison Moore said it was “audacious” to design an experience that still maintained the “twinkle” of the organization that’s behind entertainment-driven fundraisers like Red Nose Day.

    But the launch was successful enough that Comic Relief US is expanding the game this year. Kids Relief’s second annual “Game to Change the World” campaign features a magical new Roblox world, an exclusive virtual concert and a partner in children’s television pioneer Nickelodeon.

    The goal is to instill empathy and raise money through a scavenger hunt across various realms, including SpongeBob SquarePants and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Users travel through portals to collect magical tools that will improve their surroundings. The net proceeds from in-game purchases will be donated.

    The community-building inherent in collaborative gaming is intended to subtly encourage off-screen acts of kindness.

    “It’s a little bit like me helping you, you helping me — all of us together. I love the idea of doing that in a game space,” Moore told The Associated Press. “It’s not meant to be a banner ad or a sign that says, ‘Do Good.’ It’s meant to be emblematic in the gameplay itself.”

    Nickelodeon is also promoting an instructional guide for kids to start their own local projects in real life such as backpack drives.

    Quests are delivered from wizards voiced by “Doctor Who” icon David Tennant, “Veep” star Tony Hale and “Never Have I Ever” actress Maitreyi Ramakrishnan. One wizard invites users to “embark on an enchanted journey to awaken the heart of your community.”

    The campaign will culminate in a weekend music festival on Roblox beginning Sept. 13 that features rock band Imagine Dragons, whose lead singer Dan Reynolds has focused his philanthropy on LGBTQ+ causes. Virtual acts also include Conan Gray, Poppy, d4vd and Alexander Stewart — all musical artists who got their big breaks on YouTube.

    Moore said she was “blown away” by last year’s numbers. The inaugural game has been played for over 32 billion minutes and one performance received the highest “concert thumbs up rating” ever on Roblox, according to Comic Relief US.

    Charitable donations are increasingly being made through gaming, according to business strategist Marcus Howard.

    The fit comes naturally, he said, considering that young people value experiences such as gaming over the material possessions that past generations might have bought at a charitable auction.

    “It just makes sense,” Howard said.

    But he finds that partners must overcome the negative stigma associated with online chat rooms. To its credit, Howard said, Roblox combines the creativity of popular competitor Fortnite with less “toxicity” because of its emphasis on cooperation over competition.

    Comic Relief US kept in mind the need to build a game that appeals to both children and their parents, Moore said.

    To navigate that tricky balance, the nonprofit has adopted a mindset that she credits Nickelodeon with originating: Include parents in the conversation but speak to their children.

    “Good games are good games,” Moore said. “Good games that make me feel good are good things.”

    ___

    Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and non-profits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside Out 2: Perhaps Even More Anti-San Francisco Than Inside Out Due to Entirely Excluding the City From the Narrative

    Inside Out 2: Perhaps Even More Anti-San Francisco Than Inside Out Due to Entirely Excluding the City From the Narrative

    [ad_1]

    While the first Inside Out was a patently anti-San Francisco movie, the sequel has proven to perhaps be even less generous—dare one even say, actually crueler—toward the city by choosing to ignore its presence altogether. Although San Franciscans might have thought the presentation of their city couldn’t possibly be worse in the second movie than it was in the first, it has to be said that the full-stop refusal to acknowledge its existence is probably even more insulting. Because, apparently, so “non” is San Francisco at this point that the Inside Out 2 creators and animators—based, by the way, right near San Francisco “suburb” Emeryville—could barely bother to provide a few background scenes of the milieu as Riley Andersen (Kensington Tallman) is on the way to a weekend hockey camp.

    And yes, for the rest of the movie after that brief scene of Riley’s parents, Mrs. Andersen (Diane Lane) and Mr. Andersen (Kyle MacLachlan), driving her to the camp with her friends, Grace (Grace Lu) and Bree (Sumayyah Nuriddin-Green), there is nary a sign of San Francisco anywhere. Unless one grasps at the straws of Riley wearing a “Bay Area Skills Camp” jersey. Although one might have anticipated more play for SF now that Riley is a teenager and is theoretically supposed to be coming into her own vis-à-vis exploring the city a little bit more independently than she used to, Inside Out 2 totally misses the opportunity to, at the very least, employ San Francisco for the task of ramping up Riley’s latest emotion to enter her puberty-fueled headspace: Anxiety.

    Of course, this being a “kids’” movie, co-screenwriters Meg LeFauve (who also co-wrote the first movie) and Dave Holstein likely didn’t want to rock the boat too much in terms of what types of “stimuli” might prompt Riley to have an anxiety flare-up. Like, say, the sight of some zombie-esque homeless people hobbling toward her at a steady clip on the sidewalk. Or overhearing her parents talk about the unaffordability of the city and how maybe they, too, should join the others who supposedly comprise what is called the “California Exodus.” Indeed, that latter threat would surely send Anxiety into overdrive, seeing as how Riley has finally gotten her bearings in her formerly new city. The last thing she would want to do now is move to Austin, Texas (where all the Californians have reportedly disappeared to).

    The total absence of any sense of place in Inside Out 2 is what marks the most noticeable change in the film’s “setup” after almost a decade has gone by. What it says probably has less to do with San Francisco and more to do with the fact that our entire existence is increasingly “lived” solely in non-places. This being the term coined by French anthropologist Marc AugĂ© in his seminal work, Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. It is in this work that AugĂ© discusses the characteristics of the average non-place (e.g., supermarkets, airports, hotel rooms, metro stations and, in this case, hockey rinks): cold, clinical, lacking in any unique identifying characteristics. In short, it is a transitional space (sort of like adolescence itself) designed to evoke no sense of belonging whatsoever due to being devoid of any personal touches—what is known as “having character.”

    When applied to the feeling—or, rather, “non-feeling”—that San Francisco evokes in Inside Out 2, it can perhaps be interpreted “poetically” in that Riley has never truly felt as though she belongs there. And now, with her only two friends abandoning her after the summer to attend a different high school, Riley is panicking all the more about her “sense of place,” about where, exactly, she’s supposed to fit in.

    While some might say that San Francisco’s absence is “nothing personal,” or that the storyline of the sequel is intended to be less about the city and more about Riley’s fresh trials and tribulations as a teenager navigating the increasingly murky waters of friendship, it cannot be overlooked that where one lives as a teenager is a large part of what forms their emotions and identity. Needless to say, Riley would be a totally different person if she had remained in Minnesota. Excluding the more urban landscape of San Francisco from this new “snapshot” of her teenhood is, thus, an odd choice. Others still would posit that because the mind itself is the milieu in which Inside Out and Inside Out 2 take place, there’s not much need to incorporate a “real” environment. Fine, keep it “minimal” then—but don’t oust a tangible setting altogether. But, again, this likely doesn’t register with or bother that many people when taking into account that the majority is, at this juncture, well-accustomed to seeing and experiencing non-places. It just comes across as particularly shade-throwing that, now, San Francisco is a “non-place,” too. Not even worth making fun of anymore, as far as Inside Out 2 is concerned.

    In the past, there would have at least been the usual mockery about how “generic” the city has become, how “corporatized.” Not just thanks to the long-ago tech infiltration, but as a result of the collective adherence to globalization itself. Everywhere is everywhere. But, in all honesty, that’s not really true of San Francisco, which still possesses its unique, indelible aspects—not least of which is its signature topography and landmarks. And, as the usual haters would waste no time in parroting, “All the homeless people!” The seemingly lone condemnation that detractors can think of to consistently lob at the Golden City (and yes, it is golden, despite what the naysayers might quip about that gold being of the “fool’s” variety). Either that or, where conservatives are concerned, it’s “too gay.” In fact, one of its other rotating nicknames is Gay Mecca. This perhaps being yet another reason that Inside Out 2 opted to shirk San Francisco altogether during Riley’s teen years. After all, what if Riley is a lesbian? San Francisco is the perfect place to unearth such a sexual revelation. But, in terms of including SF in all its (gay) glory for a teenager, Pixar seemed to be channeling Regina George insisting, “I couldn’t have a lesbian at my party. There were gonna be girls there in their bathing suits.”

    Whatever the reason (or “non-reason”) for choosing to give San Francisco absolutely no play apart from tacking on three arbitrary exteriors (including, of course, the Golden Gate Bridge) during the credits, it seems that the opinion of the town is so low at the moment that Pixar favored largely disavowing its presence entirely. And, as Oscar Wilde said, “There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.” Thus, San Francisco’s (non-)representation in Inside Out 2 is what makes the movie even harsher toward the city than Inside Out.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Inside Out 2: When You Grow Up, Your Heart Dies

    Inside Out 2: When You Grow Up, Your Heart Dies

    [ad_1]

    The world was a vastly different place nine years ago, when the first Inside Out was released. Though, at the time, it might have felt like a world that was dangerous and unsafe for children to grow up and develop in, the truth is, they were probably better off doing so in 2015 than they would be in 2024 (good luck to the sociopaths that have to do that now). And so, yes, 2024 feels like the “perfect” moment to introduce a “new” emotion to Inside Out 2: Anxiety! Of course, even though nearly a decade has passed since last we saw Riley Andersen (voiced by Kaitlyn Dias in the original, and presently, Kensington Tallman), she’s still only just now turning thirteen. Better known to most parents (and teachers
or anyone else subjected to the horrors of interacting with a teenager) as: the Scary Age.

    Incidentally, “Terror” doesn’t appear as a more nuanced emotion than “Fear” in the complex range of new ones that are rolled out with a brand-new console that gets installed by the “mind workers” the night before Riley “hits puberty.” A previously uncharted era during which, suddenly, the limited range of five primary emotions—Joy (Amy Poehler), Sadness (Phyllis Smith), Fear (Tony Hale), Disgust (Liza Lapira) and Anger (Lewis Black)—are hardly sufficient enough to convey all the confusing, disordered feelings Riley is having at any given moment now that she’s thirteen. Enter Anxiety (Maya Hawke), the key emotion freshly presented into the fray that best encapsulates all those crippling, inexplicable sentiments that go hand-in-hand with an increasing fixation on social status. Granted, Anxiety isn’t alone in terms of being part of a new burst of emotions that only get introduced once a person enters teenhood. Especially when that person is a girl.

    Thus, she is joined by Ennui (Adùle Exarchopoulos), Embarrassment (Paul Walter Hauser) and Envy (Ayo Edebiri). For a brief instant, even a new emotion called Nostalgia (June Squibb) pops out, stylized as an old lady with glasses. But Anxiety tell her she’s much too early to be there, and she’s promptly sent away from headquarters. Unfortunately, Joy has to admit that Anxiety does seem, in contrast, to be right on time—to know much more about Riley’s new set of concerns and worries than Joy does. And yet, that doesn’t stop Joy from fretting over the fact that Anxiety is negatively impacting the meticulously crafted “Sense of Self” that Riley currently has
thanks to some clever manipulations from Joy via filing memories with unpleasant associations to the back of her mind. Which is for Riley’s “own good,” of course. In fact, all Joy wants is for Riley to think and feel that she’s that wonderful thing: a good person.

    Alas, as someone becomes a teenager, all sense of “goodness” tends to go out the window if it means interfering with how that adolescent wants to be perceived. And, no matter how much time goes by or what changes occur in technology, how a teen always wants to be perceived is: cool. Accepted. Well-liked. Best of all, popular. For while Gen Z might think such concerns went the way of the dodo after millennial teenhood, it’s still very much alive and well on an even worse scale thanks to social media and its impact on self-esteem. Riley is a victim of her own intense desire to feel embraced by an older group of girls once she learns that her best friends, Grace (Grace Lu) and Bree (Sumayyah Nuriddin-Green), are going to be attending a different high school when the summer is over.

    And so, instead of seeing the hockey camp they’re invited to attend (and as the only junior highers, to boot) as an opportunity for a last hurrah together, Riley, under Anxiety’s so-called guidance, takes it as a chance to gain the favor of a popular star player named Val Ortiz (Lilimar). And, when Val actually seems to take a liking to Riley despite how awkward and socially inept she is (in the 00s, Riley is the girl who would have been freely referred to as a “spaz”), the latter can’t help but jump at the chance to “rebrand” in order to better fit in with Val and her older crew of friends.

    Horrified at the way Riley is ignoring the carefully crafted “Sense of Self” Joy worked so hard to create, she can’t understand that Anxiety is part of a larger phenomenon that comes with growing up (particularly in a world that, increasingly, prides itself on desensitizing youths): kindness and empathy being stamped out, your heart dying. This being the very accurate and eloquent phrase Allison Reynolds (Ally Sheedy) from The Breakfast Club wields when she laments, “When you grow up, your heart dies.” An aphorism delivered in reply to Andrew Clark’s (Emilio Estevez) question of whether or not they would become like their parents (that is to say, assholes). Allison also insists, “It’s unavoidable. Just happens.” For Riley, she might not be becoming like her wholesome, largely checked-out parents, per se, but she is becoming more impervious to the notion of “morality.” Of whether or not what’s “good” is necessarily good for her.

    Anxiety only serves to fan those flames of sociopathy, prompting Riley to do whatever it takes to achieve “her” goals (though, all along, one has to ask: are they really “hers” or merely what she thinks should be hers due to societal and peer pressures?). In this case, getting onto the Firehawks team as a freshman so that she can have a secured group of friends in her teammates, including Val. When the other girls tell Riley that Coach Roberts (Yvette Nicole Brown) always holds a scrimmage on the last day of camp and it’s what ended up getting Val on the team as a freshman, Anxiety sends Riley into peak panic mode about doing well enough the next day so that the coach puts her on the team for next year. Of course, Val tells her that all she has to do is stop stressing and “be herself.”

    In response to that notion, Envy asks Anxiety a fair (and slightly philosophical) question: “How do we be ourself if our ‘self’ isn’t ready yet?” Anxiety, ever the “problem-solver,” reacts by putting more anxiety-ridden memories into the Sense of Self bank that will supposedly propel Riley to act in a way that secures the best possible future. Naturally, what Anxiety doesn’t understand is that Riley won’t be securing much of anything if she’s a tightly-wound ball of panic that can barely function because of all her crippling worries. Nonetheless, Anxiety can’t be bothered with considering how she’s actually hurting Riley, remarking to Envy, “I wish we knew what Coach thought about us.” It’s then that, while Riley is just trying to fucking sleep that Anxiety plants the idea in her head to sneak into the coach’s office and look at the notebook where she writes down all of her “hot takes” about the players. Thus, Riley commits yet another act that goes against what Joy would call her true Sense of Self (even if it was manipulated by Joy): breaking and entering. Oh, an obtaining information that’s supposed to be “confidential” by any means necessary.

    As Anxiety has turned Riley into someone she isn’t—someone whose core Sense of Self repeats, “I’m not good enough”—Joy and her “follower emotions” finally make it to the back of Riley’s mind, where the Sense of Self Joy had originally created was exiled by Anxiety. Initially relieved to have recovered the trophy-looking structure, Joy can’t help but take notice of the literal mountain of bad memories she’s stockpiled back here, in a place that suppresses what Riley’s true self might actually be. And when she calls upon Sadness to launch them back to headquarters through the pipe Joy built to jettison those bad memories there in the first place, Anxiety manages to destroy the pipe so that Joy and co. are stuck there. Needless to say, this smacks of the same pickle Joy was in during the first Inside Out, when she got booted into the Memory Dump—a location of the mind where any memories that get deposited there are doomed to fade out for good. Feeling hopeless and defeated, she can no longer even fake a plucky attitude to the other emotions, telling them, “I don’t know how to stop Anxiety. Maybe we can’t. Maybe this is what happens when you grow up. You feel less Joy.” In other words, “When you grow up, your heart dies.”

    This is exactly why so many memes about Riley as an adult have come about in the wake of Inside Out 2. For example, Depression as an emotion stamping out all the other ones. Or alcohol being used to briefly chase the emotion of Euphoria before it quickly disappears. And yes, it’s obviously true that there’s no place for Joy in the adult mind. Her presence becoming nothing but one of those faded memories in the Memory Dump (this is perhaps why that incident in Inside Out was nothing more than foreshadowing for Joy’s inevitable disappearance during Riley’s adulthood).

    And yet, none of the adults involved in the making of Inside Out 2—and certainly none of the adults who control the system in place—would ever stop and think that perhaps there’s something very, very wrong with how it’s simply accepted that to grow up is to experience the death of Joy. The loss of “heart” a.k.a. any sense of humanity. And all in the name of getting “ahead.” As Anxiety phrased it, “It’s not about who Riley is, it’s about who she needs to be.” But why does anyone “need” to become an asshole in this life? To adhere to the subjugating “tenets” of capitalism, duh.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link