ReportWire

Tag: Tom Ramsey

  • EPA Mandates Cleanup Plan for San Jacinto River Cancer Cluster Site But Watchdogs Aren’t Relaxing

    [ad_1]

    Jackie Medcalf grew up in Atascocita playing on the banks of the San Jacinto River. By the time she moved to East Harris County’s Highlands community in 2003, she and several of her neighbors were suffering from health conditions they attributed to toxic waste pits in the river.

    So it was a long time coming when the Environmental Protection Agency approved last week a much-anticipated cleanup plan for the San Jacinto River Toxic Waste Pits Superfund Site, imposing 40 new conditions on “responsible parties” International Paper Company and McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corp., mandating that any changes to the plan must be approved by the EPA.

    The site near Interstate 10 is so contaminated that it was designated a “superfund” hazardous waste disposal site, meaning it has severe soil and water contamination and contains hazardous chemicals like dioxins and sulfuric acid.

    The EPA has not yet established a timeline for cleanup or penalties if the plan isn’t followed. The companies have been under a court mandate to produce a final cleanup plan, called a “Final (100 percent) Remedial Design,” since 2018. Spokespersons for International Paper and McGinnes did not respond to requests for comment.

    Medcalf, who created the nonprofit Texas Health and Environmental Alliance in 2015, said she and other advocates will continue their watchdog roles to ensure the  work gets done.

    “It’s a huge milestone and a huge moment for our community, but in some ways I feel like our work is just getting started,” she said. “The EPA has all of the regulatory tools and all of the legal tools at its disposal to ensure that this site keeps moving forward. We will — with our regulatory expertise and legal expertise and with the power of all the people who stand with us — make sure that we continue pushing for this to move forward. Continuing in that watchdog role is critical.”

    Medcalf and her family moved away from the river in 2013, but she’d already been diagnosed with endometriosis and symptoms related to the early stages of cervical cancer. It’s difficult to prove that a toxic waste site caused cancer, but she said she believes she was exposed to contaminants. Her father has multiple myeloma, which is one of the cancers closely associated with dioxin exposure.

    “I have no idea what my health would be like if I’d stayed,” she said. “I don’t think I would have been able to have my children. I don’t think I would be OK if I still lived over there.”

    Residents in the area have abnormally high rates of leukemia, lymphoma, bronchitis, and cancer, Medcalf added. Precinct 3 Harris County Commissioner Tom Ramsey said earlier this year that the superfund site near Interstate 10 is in the “worst place possible,” where young people occasionally ignore the signs and go swimming.

    The area is booming with several master-planned communities and about 330,000 people.

    “When the floods happen, the pit is going to end up in Galveston Bay,” Ramsey said at a Commissioners Court meeting in April. “We know who did it. Waste Management and International Paper, they are the responsible parties. I refer to them as the irresponsible parties. They have the money to [clean it up] I know they do because they sponsor golf tournaments and all kinds of things.”

    Ramsey also plans to keep a close eye on the EPA and the responsible companies to ensure they clean up the site as mandated by law. The commissioner has a long history with contaminated water in Harris County and says he committed to cleaning up toxic sites when he was elected in 2021.

    The commissioner recently recalled that, while studying environmental engineering at Texas A&M in 1972, he and other Aggie students were tasked with evaluating water conditions in the Houston Ship Channel. They were told not to light a cigarette within 100 yards of the ship channel because “they were afraid of spontaneous combustion,” Ramsey said during an April commissioners court meeting.

    “Essentially, the Houston ship channel in 1972 was a dead body of water,” Ramsey said. “The City of Houston was dumping raw sewage from its plants. That’s all been cleaned up since then. Essentially, we can go to that same spot today, and we can go fishing. The oxygen levels are great, but I’d recommend you not eat the fish.”
    Unfortunately, the commissioner added, the same success story cannot be told for the San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site. The area has been in peril for more than a decade, with the two companies delaying a cleanup process while cancer clusters and toxic waste plague the neighborhood.

    In the April Commissioners Court meeting — about five months before the EPA took action on the San Jacinto waste pits — Ramsey introduced a resolution “on the topic that bothers me the most in my precinct.”

    “The resolution essentially says everyone deserves clean rivers, creeks, and air to breathe,” he said at the time. “It’s our duty to ensure the safety of our community for future generations. This starts with the state accurately reporting the heartbreaking reality of what people are facing in East Harris County, with cancer clusters emerging and areas affected by environmental factors relating to the San Jacinto River Waste Pits.”

    Ramsey provided an emailed statement this week saying he will make sure the community’s health and safety come first, and that the cleanup is completed as quickly and responsibly as possible.

    “While the EPA has not yet set a final timeline or penalties for delays, my office continues to press for a clear path on this cleanup,” Ramsey said. “We are working closely with the County Attorney’s Office, partnering with community advocates like the Texas Health and Environment Alliance, writing letters to and staying engaged with state and federal partners, and keeping constituents informed every step of the way. I’d also like to thank both Trump administrations for prioritizing this site after the previous administration ignored the issue.”

    Medcalf said the San Jacinto River didn’t get on the EPA’s radar by coincidence.

    “Hurricane Harvey impacted over 70 superfund sites on the Texas coast, but the one the nation heard about was the San Jacinto River Waste Pits, and it’s because our coalition has spent over 10 years being 100 percent committed to every ounce of this,” she said.

    Medcalf and her team have studied the data, read the technical documents, and pored over lab reports, said the advocate, who has a background in environmental geology.

    “We really screamed and advocated to the Texas Department of State Health Services for many years to study our health because we felt like we were disproportionately impacted by the San Jacinto River site,” Medcalf said. “The first study was produced in 2015, and we requested an update to that study because there were new cancers that people were concerned about.”

    click to enlarge

    The San Jacinto River Toxic Waste Pits Superfund Site has been contaminated since the 1960s, according to environmental advocates.

    Screenshot

    The state health department studied a 250-square-mile area of Harris County and designated the entire region as a cancer cluster, Medcalf said.

    “We know that when the area floods, when a storm surge comes in, contaminants from the waste pits are dispersed throughout our communities,” she said.

    The river’s “southern pit” was successfully cleaned up in 2024, but the plan for a pit on the north side of the property was stalled for years by the responsible parties, according to a press release issued last week. The companies submitted multiple plans that did not meet the EPA’s requirements, the release states.

    While the dump site doesn’t look like an ideal spot for a family picnic, there are no signs advising “no swimming,” Medcalf said.

    “It truly is a matter of people being informed,” she said. “Living in that area, I learned that if something is wrong with your environment, the government is not necessarily going to send you a letter or knock on your door. I learned that the hard way, and that’s why we do what we do.”

    “It is crazy that it’s sitting there,” she added. “There’s a temporary cap on top of most of that northern pit, but it’s had repeated failures over the years and a need for repairs time and time again. It’s absolutely absurd that highly toxic contaminant material is just sitting there in the river above one of the most productive estuaries in the United States.”

    click to enlarge

    The Environmental Protection Agency ruled last week that International Paper Company and McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corp. have to clean up the San Jacinto River Toxic Waste Pits Superfund Site.

    Screenshot

    The site has been contaminated since the 1960s, and Medcalf said she’s been actively working with the EPA since 2011. The “legal wheels are turning,” she said, and EPA’s legal counsel is negotiating with the responsible parties. That process will end with a consent decree or a Unilateral Administrative Order, which would force the parties to comply or face penalties, Medcalf explained.

    “Residents have lost loved ones. Many have developed cancer and other illnesses, but they never stopped. This is a blue-collar community. They show up for work and they don’t quit until the job is done,” Medcalf said. “They stayed united during the years of delays, and the community will hold the companies accountable to follow this cleanup plan. This community isn’t going anywhere and they aren’t going to stop pushing for a full, effective cleanup.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • Harris County Flood Control District Unveils Bond Project Dashboard

    [ad_1]

    The Harris County Commissioners Court held a public hearing on its controversial budget and tax rate on Thursday, but another agenda item was top of mind for Billy Guevara, Doris Brown, and members of the disaster response advocacy group West Street Recovery: the unveiling of a dashboard to track $2.5 billion worth of flood bond projects that were approved seven years ago.

    Guevara lost six family members who tried to outrun Hurricane Harvey in 2017 and drowned in the floodwaters of Halls Bayou. Brown’s northeast Houston home flooded, the roof caved in, and FEMA rejected her application for assistance. West Street Recovery was formed shortly after Harvey to help Houstonians like Guevara and Brown.

    Hurricane Harvey devastated Houston and southeast Texas, flooding more than 100,000 structures and causing $125 billion in damage. At least 100 people died.

    Harris County responded by putting a multibillion-dollar bond issue before voters in 2018. The measure passed with 86 percent casting ballots in favor, and local leaders got to work submitting projects.

    But until this week, there was no way for a member of the public, or even an elected county commissioner, to get a simple snapshot on the Harris County Flood Control District website of what’s been accomplished and what’s in the pipeline.

    Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis, the only current official who was seated at the time of the bond program, has demanded that the county follow an equity framework that prioritizes flood mitigation projects in historically underserved areas that need it most.

    Commissioner Tom Ramsey has argued that Ellis’ definition of equity puts the projects in Precinct 1 at the top of the priority list, neglecting much-needed flood mitigation in other areas of the county.

    During a Commissioners Court meeting in June, Harris County Flood Control District Director Tina Petersen heard from an irate crowd, including Guevara and Brown, who said they were promised that flood mitigation projects would be initiated in their neighborhoods to prevent “another Harvey.” They voted for the bonds and supported the framework that was supposed to address “the worst first.”

    They didn’t know if the projects in their neighborhoods were funded and slated for construction or if they’d been discarded because they were found not to be feasible. Residents and commissioners accused the flood control district of not being transparent.

    “We could land a guy on the moon easier than what we’re trying to do here, in terms of how complicated we’ve made it,” Ramsey said at the June meeting. “It shouldn’t be this hard to figure out whether a project is going to be done in your neighborhood or not. I have to send a registered professional engineer with 20 years of experience to go meet for two hours to try to figure out what projects are being done, just in my precinct.”

    Many suggested a streamlined “one-stop shop” where residents and commissioners could track projects and hold officials accountable to do what they said they’d do when the bond passed.

    Petersen and her team heard the mandate, and the Harris County Flood Control District rolled out a dashboard this week that displays more than 100 projects with detailed information about the scope, benefits, completion status, and funding sources for each. Residents can type in their address for a micro view of projects near their neighborhoods.

    click to enlarge

    A dashboard unveiled this week allows residents to track projects approved in a 2018 bond.

    Screenshot

    Flood Control District Chief External Affairs Officer Emily Woodell met with the media prior to Thursday’s court meeting to review the dashboard. In addition to providing the public display of all things related to the 2018 flood bond package, Woodell said her team has been meeting every Friday morning since July with staffers from each of the four county commission precinct offices.

    “There’s been a massive amount of effort to really, literally, all come to the table with a shared understanding of the program and a shared understanding of benefits to make sure we’re moving this forward in a responsible way,” she said.

    A dashboard doesn’t fix Harris County’s infrastructure but it does provide much-needed transparency, Woodell added. Rumors abounded earlier this year that the bond program faced a massive deficit due to inflation. It’s important for the voters to see not just which projects are getting done, but how they’re being funded, she said.

    Voters approved a $2.5 billion bond but the needs assessment at that time amounted to more than $5 billion. Flood control district officials have leveraged the bond funds into an additional $2.7 billion in partnership funding, representing a 109 percent return on investment, Woodell explained. If a project doesn’t have funding or the necessary cooperation of a government entity, it’s being paused.

    Currently about 26 projects are paused, and “solid engineering estimates” show the amount needed to fund them is $400 million, Woodell said.

    “We think it’s really important and frankly this is something we’ve been wanting to spend time on for a long time,” she said of the dashboard. “What we’re focused on doing is providing the data in a lot of different ways. When you talk about $5.2 billion, you lose the sense of scale and you lose the sense of what’s going on. We’re focused on making sure that when we talk funding, we’re talking spent funds, committed funds, and then total funds so that people know where their tax dollars are going.”

    “We’re also getting into where the projects are in the overall delivery process,” she added. “How is my watershed’s funding stacking up to other people’s funding?”

    Based on any potential directives given at Thursday’s Commissioners Court meeting, which was still underway at press time, the dashboard will be updated early next week to reflect new priorities and funding allocations, Woodell said.

    A lot of work has been done since the program was initiated, but some of it — such as design work and right-of-way acquisition — isn’t immediately visible while driving through Houston neighborhoods.

    The new dashboard shows 181 approved “bond IDs,” categories such as Greens Bayou Watershed, Buffalo Bayou Watershed, and Galveston Bay Watershed. Within those bond IDs are about 400 projects. About half of those projects are finished, Woodell said.

    “One of the things that we’ve gotten away from, just to be totally honest with you, is that this really was in response to Harvey,” she said. “It was seven years ago but it feels like it was yesterday. The damage was countywide. I think one of the things that’s been lost in this is just how much work has been done already and the benefits that are on the ground right now. We know that tens of thousands of people are safer.”

    click to enlarge

    Each of the 2018 bond projects has its own page on the dashboard that details the construction timeline and associated costs.

    Screenshot

    One of the big wins for the bond program, according to Woodell, was the construction of more than 16,000 acre-feet of stormwater detention.

    “That’s like if you took Minute Maid Park and stacked it 1,000 feet with stormwater,” she said. “It’s an amazing amount of capacity we’ve been able to add across the county. We’ve also constructed miles and miles of channel conveyance improvements. What that looks like is making sure our channels can actually move water and they have more capacity.”

    As new commissioners were elected and Petersen was appointed executive director in 2022, the bond program remained “highly conceptual,” Woodell said.

    “There were not a lot of hard projects included in the bond program,” she said. “There was a ton of engineering and analysis that was needed to be able to refine those concepts and actually build projects. The back-of-the-napkin things had to be turned into things that could be built, and there’s a lot of work that goes into that.”

    A prioritization framework was adopted by Commissioners Court in 2019 and later updated by the Harris County Community Flood Resilience Task Force in 2022.

    click to enlarge

    Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis surveys damage after Hurricane Harvey.

    Photo by Brandon Dudley

    The flood control district, which reports to Commissioners Court, has followed the framework throughout the process, according to Petersen and Woodell, but Commissioner Ellis said this week he intends to hold them accountable to ensure vulnerable neighborhoods are being prioritized.

    Ellis said he was pleased with the action taken in June to secure $262.5 million for urgent needs, including $118 million for Greens Bayou.

    “I will continue to push for full implementation of the flood equity framework; no cuts to feasible projects in underserved areas; transparent reporting on project status, funding, and timelines; and deployment of all remaining flood bond funds according to equity principles,” Ellis said in an email. “We cannot back off. Equity isn’t a slogan. It’s a promise.”

    Some projects have been paused or eliminated from the to-do list because they were found to be “unfeasible,” Woodell said, meaning there is no engineering solution to move a project forward or a partner hasn’t come to the table. The dollars earmarked to those projects will be shifted to other efforts, Woodell said.

    Partnerships with private funders have proved lucrative, however, although the partners get to pick the projects they want to fund and their priorities may not line up with residents who voted for the bond.

    “The thing that will slow an infrastructure project down the fastest is uncertainty, whether it’s uncertainty about funding or scope,” Woodell said. “As we’ve refined the program over time, we’ve gotten more and more clarity.”

    click to enlarge

    Doris Brown asks for transparency and accountability at a September 18 meeting of Harris County Commissioners Court.

    Screenshot

    Public comment was held prior to the dashboard unveiling at Thursday’s Commissioners Court meeting, and while it was clear that several residents had already viewed the one-stop shop, many weren’t satisfied that it addressed their concerns about prioritizing projects in Harris County’s historically underserved neighborhoods.

    Community activist Shirley Ronquillo said she volunteered on the Flood Resilience Task Force from 2022 to 2024, but project prioritization based on equity wasn’t discussed.

    “I am here on behalf of communities that have been historically neglected and left to flood time and time again,” she said. “I applied for the task force under the illusion that the community could work alongside Harris County Flood Control and serve as an adviser to equitable flood mitigation solutions. However, my free time, after work, time away from my aging parents, was spent listening to county departments rather than serving as an adviser on projects.”

    Doris Brown, the northeast Houston resident whose home flooded during Harvey, also addressed equity.

    “Equity means that we must assist people in communities so that everyone ends up with an equal opportunity to thrive,” she said. “It means that communities that have been neglected, if not outright discriminated against, should get investment. All communities deserve to be protected from flooding.”

    “For too long, flood control decisions were made on basic cost-benefit analysis that valued a million-dollar home as more important than six $150,000 homes,” she added. “The prioritization matrix that flood control was instructed to use in 2019 and 2022 was supposed to address this, but time and time again, we have seen that flood control does not. It is a betrayal of trust that flood control decided that some projects didn’t need to be passed through the matrix.”

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link

  • In Lina Hidalgo’s World, Early Childhood Programs Are Still the No. 1 Priority

    [ad_1]

    Harris County is days away from adopting its $2.7 billion budget, sinking in debt, and grappling over how to prioritize flood control projects, but County Judge Lina Hidalgo can’t stop talking about an early childhood program she tried — and failed — to fund through a tax increase earlier this year.

    The Democratic judge has been at odds for months with Commissioners Lesley Briones and Adrian Garcia, members of her own political party, as well as Republican Commissioner Tom Ramsey. At the heart of most of the arguments is money.

    Briones and Garcia, who are both up for re-election in 2026, were noticeably absent from Hidalgo’s State of the County address last Friday. The event, sponsored by Greater Houston Partnership, was billed as an opportunity to hear from the judge on infrastructure, storm resilience, and economic mobility. Hidalgo, however, spent more than half of her allotted 40 minutes directing guests at the Marriott Marquis to a PowerPoint presentation on early childhood education.

    The judge is clearly still salty about a thwarted attempt on August 7 to let voters decide on a one-penny tax for the kids’ education program funded by American Rescue Plan Act dollars that expire next year.

    Commissioners Ramsey, Briones and Garcia — referred to by Hidalgo as the “GOP three” — not only rejected the judge’s plea to continue funding the program but denounced her effort to involve children to sway votes, saying her behavior was inappropriate. Ramsey proposed a censure of the judge, which was supported by Briones and Garcia.

    “We need to get better leadership,” Ramsey said at the time. “We don’t have time for this.”

    click to enlarge

    When Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, center, delivered her State of the County address last week, Rodney Ellis was the only commissioner who attended.

    Photo by April Towery

    Commissioners Court is scheduled to adopt its budget and tax rate on September 18.

    Since the August discussion on the childhood education program, the Harris County Commissioners Court has moved on to other budget debates, primarily centered on how to combat a $200 million deficit and how to compete with law enforcement pay at the Houston Police Department.

    Well, most of the Commissioners Court has moved on.

    “To get politicians to agree on something like putting [money] into early childhood education is harder than getting toddlers to agree on bedtime,” Hidalgo said at last week’s State of the County.

    The judge touched briefly on public safety, noting that she and Commissioner Ellis proposed $100 million in raises for county law enforcement, a measure that passed and is included in the proposed budget.

    But Hidalgo and Ellis voted against doubling the salaries of Harris County’s eight constables, who have asked for pay hikes to $290,000 per year, which amounts to more than the annual salary for Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and just slightly less than that of Houston Police Chief Noe Diaz. That measure passed 3-2 and is also included in the proposed budget slated for adoption next week.

    Briones and Garcia have indicated they support “pay parity” and are concerned about losing law enforcement officers to the Houston Police Department. A recently approved $1 billion Houston police contract includes a 36.5 percent raise for officers spread across five years.

    It was clear at last week’s event that Hidalgo wanted to avoid the rift among county officials and instead talk about the childhood education program, as she asked the audience to support her in ensuring that the matter is on the ballot in 2026.

    “You all understand that our workforce depends on what we do right now for those kids who are going to grow up and be in the future workforce,” she said. “You are the movers and shakers who are going to be able to spread the word about what we’re trying to do. Also, a lot of you have been able to get to where you are while raising children, so you know how hard it is.”

    The penny tax Hidalgo proposed would have cost the average Harris County homeowner roughly $24 more a year in taxes, and it would have provided educational opportunities for about 25,000 families, she said.

    “I may not be a mom, and I’m certainly not a teacher, but I do understand the importance of early childhood education, and I don’t think you have to be a parent or a teacher or somebody who works with kids in order to do so,” she said.

    The judge outlined data showing that the program is successful and voters would have supported it, according to a poll.

    “Early childhood education is popular because everyone understands how important it is,” she said. “What this shows you, in my mind, is a bipartisan reticence at the politician level to support early childhood education, when, at the community level, there is huge support for it. This disconnect between politics and the needs of the community does not stick with one party or the other.”

    “These kids are going to lose access to the programs,” she added. “It’s really important that we put this on the ballot in November of 2026. There is no excuse not to do it.”

    Following Hidalgo’s presentation, the judge dodged a question from Greater Houston Partnership president and CEO Steve Kean about whether she’ll seek re-election to a third term.

    “I’m afraid I’m not going to be able to break news on that here today, but it’s coming very, very, very, very soon,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    April Towery

    Source link