ReportWire

Tag: tom cotton

  • Republicans reject complaint about Tulsi Gabbard as Democrats question time it took to see it

    [ad_1]

    The Republican leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees have rejected a top-secret complaint from an anonymous government insider alleging that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard withheld classified information for political reasons.The responses this week from Sen. Tom Cotton and Rep. Rick Crawford mean the complaint is unlikely to proceed further, though Democratic lawmakers who also have seen the document said they continue to question why it took Gabbard’s office eight months to refer the complaint to Congress as required by law.Gabbard’s office has rejected any allegations of wrongdoing as well as criticism of the timeframe for the referral, saying the complaint included so many classified details that it necessitated an extensive legal and security review. Select lawmakers were able to view the complaint this week.Cotton wrote Thursday on X that he agreed with an earlier inspector general’s conclusion that the complaint did not appear to be credible. He said he believes the complaint was prompted by political opposition to Gabbard and the Trump administration.“To be frank, it seems like just another effort by the president’s critics in and out of government to undermine policies that they don’t like,” wrote the Arkansas Republican, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee.When asked about the complaint, Cotton’s office referred to his social media post.Crawford, the House Intelligence Committee chairman, also of Arkansas, said he believes the complaint was an attempt to smear Gabbard’s reputation.Democrats are pushing for explanations about why it took Gabbard’s office months to refer the complaint to the required members of Congress. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the law requires such a report to be sent within 21 days.“The law is clear,” Warner said Thursday at the Capitol. “I think it was an effort to try to bury this whistleblower complaint.”Warner said he also still has questions about the details of the complaint, noting that it was heavily redacted.The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, said in a written statement that he will keep looking into the matter.In a memo sent to lawmakers this week, the intelligence community’s inspector general said the complaint also accused Gabbard’s office of general counsel of failing to report a potential crime to the Department of Justice. The memo, which contains redactions, does not offer further details of either allegation.Last June, then-inspector general Tamara Johnson found that the claim Gabbard distributed classified information along political lines did not appear to be credible, according to the current watchdog, Christopher Fox. Johnson was “unable to assess the apparent credibility” of the accusation about the general counsel’s office, Fox wrote in the memo.Fox said he would have deemed the complaint non-urgent, unlike the previous inspector general, but respected the decision of his predecessor and therefore sent it to lawmakers.Copies of the top-secret complaint were hand-delivered this week to the “Gang of Eight” — a group comprised of the House and Senate leaders from both parties as well as the four top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committees.Andrew Bakaj, the attorney for the person who made the complaint, has said that while he cannot discuss the details of the report or the identity of its author, there is no justification for keeping it from Congress since last spring.A former CIA officer and now the chief legal counsel at Whistleblower Aid, Bakaj said he has heard significant redactions were made to the complaint before it was given to members of Congress.“Given the extensive redactions we understand exist, even in the version provided to the Gang of Eight, it seems unlikely anyone could reasonably and in a non-partisan manner reach the conclusions issued by Sen. Cotton,” Bakaj wrote in a statement to The Associated Press.Gabbard coordinates the work of the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies. She has recently drawn attention for another matter — appearing on site last week when the FBI served a search warrant on election offices in Georgia that are central to Trump’s disproven claims about fraud in the 2020 election.

    The Republican leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees have rejected a top-secret complaint from an anonymous government insider alleging that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard withheld classified information for political reasons.

    The responses this week from Sen. Tom Cotton and Rep. Rick Crawford mean the complaint is unlikely to proceed further, though Democratic lawmakers who also have seen the document said they continue to question why it took Gabbard’s office eight months to refer the complaint to Congress as required by law.

    Gabbard’s office has rejected any allegations of wrongdoing as well as criticism of the timeframe for the referral, saying the complaint included so many classified details that it necessitated an extensive legal and security review. Select lawmakers were able to view the complaint this week.

    Cotton wrote Thursday on X that he agreed with an earlier inspector general’s conclusion that the complaint did not appear to be credible. He said he believes the complaint was prompted by political opposition to Gabbard and the Trump administration.

    “To be frank, it seems like just another effort by the president’s critics in and out of government to undermine policies that they don’t like,” wrote the Arkansas Republican, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    When asked about the complaint, Cotton’s office referred to his social media post.

    Crawford, the House Intelligence Committee chairman, also of Arkansas, said he believes the complaint was an attempt to smear Gabbard’s reputation.

    Democrats are pushing for explanations about why it took Gabbard’s office months to refer the complaint to the required members of Congress. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the law requires such a report to be sent within 21 days.

    “The law is clear,” Warner said Thursday at the Capitol. “I think it was an effort to try to bury this whistleblower complaint.”

    Warner said he also still has questions about the details of the complaint, noting that it was heavily redacted.

    The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, said in a written statement that he will keep looking into the matter.

    In a memo sent to lawmakers this week, the intelligence community’s inspector general said the complaint also accused Gabbard’s office of general counsel of failing to report a potential crime to the Department of Justice. The memo, which contains redactions, does not offer further details of either allegation.

    Last June, then-inspector general Tamara Johnson found that the claim Gabbard distributed classified information along political lines did not appear to be credible, according to the current watchdog, Christopher Fox. Johnson was “unable to assess the apparent credibility” of the accusation about the general counsel’s office, Fox wrote in the memo.

    Fox said he would have deemed the complaint non-urgent, unlike the previous inspector general, but respected the decision of his predecessor and therefore sent it to lawmakers.

    Copies of the top-secret complaint were hand-delivered this week to the “Gang of Eight” — a group comprised of the House and Senate leaders from both parties as well as the four top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committees.

    Andrew Bakaj, the attorney for the person who made the complaint, has said that while he cannot discuss the details of the report or the identity of its author, there is no justification for keeping it from Congress since last spring.

    A former CIA officer and now the chief legal counsel at Whistleblower Aid, Bakaj said he has heard significant redactions were made to the complaint before it was given to members of Congress.

    “Given the extensive redactions we understand exist, even in the version provided to the Gang of Eight, it seems unlikely anyone could reasonably and in a non-partisan manner reach the conclusions issued by Sen. Cotton,” Bakaj wrote in a statement to The Associated Press.

    Gabbard coordinates the work of the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies. She has recently drawn attention for another matter — appearing on site last week when the FBI served a search warrant on election offices in Georgia that are central to Trump’s disproven claims about fraud in the 2020 election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says Intel CEO has an ‘amazing story’ days after calling for his resignation

    [ad_1]

    Less than a week after demanding his resignation, President Donald Trump is now calling the career of Intel’s CEO an “amazing story.”

    Shares of Intel, which slid last week after CEO Lip-Bu Tan came under fire from the U.S. president, bounced higher before the opening bell Tuesday.

    The attack from Trump came after Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan’s investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army. Cotton asked Intel if Tan had divested from the companies to eliminate any potential conflict of interest.

    Trump said on the Truth Social platform Thursday that, “The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!”

    Tan was named Intel CEO in March and it is unclear if he has divested his interests in the chip companies.

    Tan said in a message to employees that there was misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems and said that he’d “always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.”

    After a Monday meeting with Tan at the White House, Trump backed off his demand that Tan resign without hesitation.

    “I met with Mr. Lip-Bu Tan, of Intel, along with Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

    Shares of Intel gained 3.5% Tuesday

    The economic and political rivalry between the U.S. and China are increasingly focused on computer chips, AI and other digital technologies that are expected to shape future economies and military conflicts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — ABC’s “This Week” — Former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.; Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, R-Ark.

    ___

    NBC’s “Meet the Press” — Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Raphael Warnock, D-Ga.; Gov. Doug Burgum, R-N.D.

    ___

    CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Nikki Haley, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations; Gov. Roy Cooper, D-N.C.; Reps. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, and Jim Himes, D-Conn.

    ___

    CNN’s “State of the Union” — Sens. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

    ___

    “Fox News Sunday” — Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Chris Murphy, D-Conn.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s Potential VP List Now Includes Tom Cotton, the Guy Who’s Called for Vigilante Justice on Protesters and Ripping People’s Skin Off: Report

    Trump’s Potential VP List Now Includes Tom Cotton, the Guy Who’s Called for Vigilante Justice on Protesters and Ripping People’s Skin Off: Report

    [ad_1]

    Do we believe that Trump likes that Cotton went to Harvard? Sure, as the fake anti-elitist Trump is, that makes sense. But it’s probably the other stuff that’s pushing the senator to the top of the list.

    Donald Trump forgets that New Yorkers despise him

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Another Trump ally lays the groundwork to claim the 2024 election was stolen

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    They said “tossing paper towels at hurricane victims” couldn’t be beat…

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    Elsewhere!

    Trump’s Pattern of Sowing Election Doubt Intensifies in 2024

    NYTRead More

    Elon Musk Ramps Up Anti-Biden Posts on X

    NYTRead More

    How Florida’s abortion law is affecting East Coast abortion clinics

    The Washington PostRead More

    Clarence Thomas Muses on Revisiting School Segregation

    Vanity FairRead More

    Trump suggests Nikki Haley will be on his team “in some form” after vote pledge

    The Washington PostRead More

    The Democratic War Room Against RFK Jr.

    Vanity FairRead More

    Florida men are taking over the GOP

    Politico • Read More

    The real stars of Cannes may be the dogs

    AP • Read More

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Senator Tom Cotton Encourages People To ‘Take Matters Into Their Own Hands’ With Protesters Blocking Traffic, Suggests Tossing Them Off Bridge

    Senator Tom Cotton Encourages People To ‘Take Matters Into Their Own Hands’ With Protesters Blocking Traffic, Suggests Tossing Them Off Bridge

    [ad_1]

    Screenshot: Senator Tom Cotton

    Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) made headlines by suggesting that Americans should “take matters into their own hands” in response to anti-Israel protests taking place across the country.

    Specifically, he was addressing a situation where pro-Palestinian protesters blocked traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.

    Cotton, in an interview with Fox News, said that if the protesters were on a bridge in his home state, things would be handled a little differently.

    The Senator channeled his inner Try That In A Small Town.

    “If something like this happened in Arkansas on a bridge there, let’s just say that there would be a lot of wet criminals that would have been tossed overboard, not by law enforcement, but by the people whose road they are blocking,” Cotton said.

    RELATED: AOC Loses Her Temper On Pro-Palestine Protesters: ‘It’s F***ed Up, Man!’

    Tom Cotton Has Some Advice On How To Deal With Protesters

    Senator Tom Cotton is right. These protesters are emboldened to shut down traffic, to harass everyday people, because there are no repercussions for their actions.

    If law enforcement isn’t going to, ya know, enforce the law, then the people are left to their own devices.

    Cotton further expounded on his thoughts in a post on the X social media platform.

    “I encourage people who get stuck behind the pro-Hamas mobs blocking traffic: take matters into your own hands to get them out of the way,” he writes.

    “It’s time to put an end to this nonsense.”

    It certainly is.

    The First Amendment allows “the right of the people peaceably to assemble.” But these protests are essentially accosting people against their will. It is harassment.

    RELATED: Video Shows Woman Dubbed the ‘Brutal Blonde’ Yoke Up Climate Protester By Her Hair, Drag Her Out of the Street Twice

    Lawbreakers Need To Fear Law Enforcement, Not The Law Abiding

    The one flaw in Tom Cotton’s plan is that the justice system in leftist cities like San Francisco is corrupt from top to bottom.

    Two famous people who took matters into their own hands by defending their own lives or the lives of others around them – Kyle Rittenhouse and Daniel Penny – have been treated like the real criminals.

    Who is going to be there for people like that if they decide to treat these protesters roughly?

    The pro-Palestinian protesters haven’t just been targeting the average American. They obviously upset Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) when they went after her outside a movie theater last month.

    A group of protesters stormed a cafeteria inside the Dirksen Senate Office Building just days ago. Some of those involved in the protest can be heard chanting that the “Senate can’t eat until Gaza eats!”

    One woman in Germany shows people how to deal with those protesters blocking bridges or highways. This past summer, the woman dubbed the “brutal blonde” dragged a climate protester out of the street by her hair. 

    When the protester came back, she dragged them away again.

    And that’s basically how you do it, folks.

    Follow Rusty on X

    FBI Opens Criminal Investigation Regarding Baltimore Bridge Collapse: Report

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • New York Times Slams GOP Senator For ‘Parroting Disinformation’ On Its Staff And Hamas

    New York Times Slams GOP Senator For ‘Parroting Disinformation’ On Its Staff And Hamas

    [ad_1]

    The New York Times sent a letter to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Friday condemning him for suggesting that its employees were involved in Hamas’ attack on Israel last month, calling him out for “parroting disinformation.”

    The message came in response to a letter that Cotton sent to Times leadership Thursday citing “reports” that the newspaper’s journalists were “embedded with Hamas, knew about the attack, and … accompanied members of Hamas as they carried out the attack.”

    The “reports” Cotton referenced are completely unverified and irresponsible to share as valid sources of information, Times counsel David McCraw said in response.

    “As I am sure you agree, the spread of disinformation and incendiary rhetoric threatens the health of our democracy. Sadly, your letter to The New York Times of November 9 exacerbates those very problems,” McCraw wrote.

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) accused The New York Times of embedding its staff with Hamas.

    Tom Williams via Getty Images

    ″[Y]ou are merely parroting disinformation harvested form the internet based on a website that has conceded it had no evidence for its claims,” the letter continued, adding: “Falsehoods circulated on the Internet are many things, but they are most certainly not ‘reports.’ They also should not be abused by a U.S. Senator to falsely accuse fellow Americans of crimes.”

    In his letter, Cotton demanded that the Times say how many members of its staff have been embedded with Hamas, when the paper became aware of their involvement with the terrorist group and how much funding the Times has given to Hamas.

    “To make it plain for you,” the Times responded, “the only connection The New York Times has to Hamas is that we report on the organization fearlessly and at times at great risk, bringing essential information to the public about the terrorist attacks in Israel and the ongoing conflict in Gaza.”

    Cotton has made aggressive statements in support of Israel’s counterstrikes on Gaza, where members of the Hamas militant group are based.

    “As far as I’m concerned, Israel can bounce the rubble in Gaza,” Cotton said on Fox News last month. The phrase refers to further damaging something that is already destroyed.

    After members of Hamas stormed Israel, killing an estimated 1,200 people and taking roughly 240 people hostage, Israel launched an all-out attack on Gaza, killing at least 11,000 people so far in the Palestinian territory.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    [ad_1]

    While it’s common knowledge that citizens have very little influence on elected officials, The Onion asked U.S. politicians how their constituents feel about a ceasefire in Gaza, and this is what they said.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A cease what? I’ve never heard that word in my life.”

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents routinely vote in favor of having blood on our hands.”

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Does AIPAC count as a constituent?”

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Am I a politician? Gee, that’s flattering.”

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “One more word about a ceasefire, and I’m ordering Israel to bomb south Brooklyn.”

    Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Oh, while I’m at work the nanny is the one who looks after the constituents.”

    Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents know I have been calling for a cease-ceasefire since day one.”

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Representatives are public servants. That means it’s my job to listen to what my constituents have to say, internalize it, and then do whatever I want.”

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have genuinely not thought about another human being since 1998.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “When I got elected in 2014, my campaign pitch was ‘You wanna see a dead body?’”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents…constituents… Oh, you mean the blurred shapes I sometimes see before meetups with donors?”

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Hmm… What is this ‘feel’?”

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My Illinois colleague Dick Durbin, who called for a ceasefire, obviously has different constituents than I do.”

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I don’t know. I can’t hear frequencies coming out of the mouths of people who make below $400k.”

    Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “They elected me to kill people, so that’s what I’m gonna do.”

    Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have but one constituent, and their name is Lockheed Martin.”

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I know what they want. I just think they are stupid and don’t respect them. Make sense?”

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A ceasefire is a sacred bond between one man and one woman. Anything else is a sin.”

    Former President Barack Obama

    Former President Barack Obama

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “No constituents anymore, motherfuckers! You people can’t goddamn touch me! I can say whatever the hell I want. Fuck all of you!”

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My term doesn’t expire until 2068.”

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents? Oh, do you mean money? The money says to burn it to the ground.”

    Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I assume all my constituents were also given a full ride by the Federalist Society.”

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “We often think about others so much that we forget to think about our own feelings. The question is, do I want a ceasefire?”

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Most of my constituents are guns, and they love firing. It’s the equivalent of orgasm to them.”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    [ad_1]

    With the Palestinian death toll rapidly rising and conditions in Gaza deteriorating into a humanitarian crisis amid the Israeli invasion, The Onion asked politicians why they will not endorse a ceasefire, and this is what they said.

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I haven’t gotten to experience a world war since my boyhood.”

    Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA)

    Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I lament even those momentary pauses in violence when IDF soldiers have to stop shooting to reload.”

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “A ceasefire would send the message to Palestinians that we give a shit whether they live or die.”

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I have a perfect record when it comes to ethnic cleansing, and I’m not about to tarnish that now.”

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Well-behaved missiles seldom make history.”

    Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)

    Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Last I checked, there were still some Palestinian civilians left.”

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “An open-air prison actually sounds nice. What do I look like, some kind of abolitionist?”

    Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)

    Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “That would stop the genocidal momentum the IDF has built.”

    Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Because I’m making money off this. What don’t you understand?”

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Shhh, keep your voice down. Saying that word in Texas is illegal.”

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “The people of Gaza are free to start making campaign donations whenever they please.”

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Poked myself in the eye with a kebab skewer. Now all must pay.”

    Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN)

    Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Based on the last election, I figure my presidential campaign can only be helped by the absence of a strong stance on anything.”

    Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “Ugh, just come back to bed. Can’t we go one night without getting into a screaming match?”

    Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA)

    Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “When you become a U.S. senator, they tell you that you’ll be legally castrated if you ever try to stop any wars.”

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I mean, if it were up to me, they’d be air-striking the shit out of the continental U.S. as well.”

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “That’s actually a good idea. If we can trick the Palestinians into thinking we’re not going to fire anymore, they’ll be easier to shoot!”

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would never allow the U.S. to finance the Israeli military if it wasn’t perfectly safe.”

    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I don’t want to lose my widespread appeal among moderates.”

    Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Explain Why They Will Not Endorse A Ceasefire

    “I support firing both missiles and a message of love at Palestine.”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GOP Presidential Candidates Unite Around Calls to Deport Pro-Palestine Students

    GOP Presidential Candidates Unite Around Calls to Deport Pro-Palestine Students

    [ad_1]

    Over the past week, several leading GOP presidential candidates, including former President Donald Trump, have taken the ongoing Israel-Hamas war as an opportunity to bash a tried-and-true GOP foe: American colleges and universities where students are participating in large-scale protests and rallies. Demonstrations include demands for a ceasefire, criticizing the killing of civilians in Gaza, and, most controversially, blaming Israel for Hamas’s October 7 attack. Consequently, numerous top Republicans have begun issuing calls to deport student visa holders deemed supportive of Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and others.

    The issue dominated an Iowa campaign event on Friday, where several GOP presidential candidates competed to see who could promise the harshest possible crackdown on pro-Palestine protesters at U.S. colleges and universities. “You see students demonstrating in our country in favor of Hamas,” Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said. “Remember, some of them are foreigners,” DeSantis said that, were he elected president, he would cancel the visas of pro-Palestine students.

    Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, who is currently nipping at DeSantis’s heels in the polls, raised the possibility Friday of cutting or conditioning state funding to higher education. “We have got to start connecting their government funding with how they manage hate,” she said. “Because when you do that, you are threatening someone’s life. That’s not freedom of speech.”

    Offering a similar proposal, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott said that he would revoke Pell grant funding for universities that do not sufficiently condemn terrorism. A day earlier, the presidential hopeful, who is currently polling in the low single digits, unveiled a bill that would deny federal funds to any educational institution that attempts to “authorize, facilitate, provide funding for, or otherwise support any event promoting Anti-Semitism on campus.”

    Predictably, the current GOP frontrunner is setting the tone for these comments. At a campaign stop in Iowa last Monday, Trump said that, if re-elected, he would revoke the visas of and deport “radical anti-American and antisemitic foreigners” enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities, and promised to send Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to monitor what he called “pro-jihadist demonstrations.”

    The former president also vowed to institute “strong ideological screening of all immigrants to the United States” to prevent “dangerous lunatics, haters, bigots and maniacs” from coming to the U.S. “If you want to abolish the state of Israel, you’re disqualified. If you support Hamas or the ideology behind Hamas, you’re disqualified. And if you’re a communist, Marxist, or fascist, you are disqualified,” he said.

    Most legal experts agree that these proposals would fail to pass constitutional muster. “The First Amendment protects the right to speak of all people who live in this country, whether they’re here as citizens, whether they’re here as foreign nationals, whether they’re students, whether they’re visitors,” David Cole, the national legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union and a law professor at Georgetown University, told The Washington Post on Friday. Cole added that the various GOP candidate proposals were “nonstarters.”

    Despite their dubious constitutionality, calls to punish or deport pro-Palestine protestors are also getting a hearing on Capitol Hill. On Friday, Indiana Representative Jim Banks and South Carolina Representative Jeff Duncan—two members of the House Anti-Woke Caucus—sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas demanding they deport student and foreign exchange visa-holders who have “endorsed terrorist activity.” “We’ve already had a record number of illegal immigrants from terrorist-harboring nations,” Banks said. “We need to shut down our border and then deport all non-citizen Hamas sympathizers.”

    And in the Senate, Florida Senator Marco Rubio wrote to Blinken on October 15 demanding he institute “a thorough review” of all Visa holders and applicants in “coordination with law enforcement, both federal and state/local, as well as universities.” The next day, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton urged Mayorkas to deport any foreign citizen deemed supportive of Hamas, citing language in the Immigration and Nationality Act. Cole said the latter proposal would create “a serious First Amendment problem.”

    “The proposals are not unprecedented, but the precedents are not ones we should be proud of,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Jack McCordick

    Source link

  • Tom Cotton Says Israel Can ‘Bounce The Rubble’ In Gaza Amid Humanitarian Crisis

    Tom Cotton Says Israel Can ‘Bounce The Rubble’ In Gaza Amid Humanitarian Crisis

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Tom Cotton said on Sunday that Israel can “bounce the rubble” in Gaza, as Palestinian families in the blockaded enclave struggle to survive in the face of continued bombardment and lack of basic needs.

    In an interview with Fox News, the Arkansas Republican and Senate Armed Services Committee member blamed Hamas for the thousands of Palestinians Israel has bombed to death.

    “As far as I’m concerned, Israel can bounce the rubble in Gaza,” the senator said, using a phrase that refers to destroying something that is already destroyed.

    Cotton also essentially said that bombing Palestinian women and children in Gaza is a justified counterattack, because Hamas militants killed women and children in their Oct. 7 assault in Israel. Hamas, which is based in Gaza, also took an estimated 100 hostages from the attack, many of whom are presumably women and children.

    “Anything that happens in Gaza is the responsibility of Hamas. Hamas killed women and children in Israel last weekend,” the self-proclaimed “pro-life” senator said. “If women and children die in Gaza, it will be because Hamas is using them as human shields because they’re not currently allowing them to evacuate as Israel has asked them to do so.”

    Gaza is made up of about 2.3 million Palestinians, roughly half of which are children. The Israeli military has been launching airstrikes on Gaza ever since Hamas’ attack, razing entire neighborhoods and killing thousands of Palestinians ― including more than half a million children. The attacks of the last week are in addition to the Israeli government’s decadeslong apartheid against Palestinians, of which multiple human rights groups have sounded the alarm.

    In addition to the airstrikes, Israel has cut off Gaza’s access to food, water, medicine and electricity, leaving Palestinian families to drink dirty water, ration their food, lose internet access to the outside world, and count the days until hospitals lose power. An increasing number of journalists have also died in Gaza, making it more difficult for the public to get updated on the territory.

    Cotton claimed that Gaza is the responsibility of Hamas, despite the Israeli government having control over the enclave and who gets to go in and out. Ahead of its planned ground invasion, Israel gave Palestinians in northern Gaza mere hours to evacuate this weekend, something the U.N. has warned is “impossible” and will lead to more deaths. Palestinians in Gaza also said there is nowhere to run, as they have been trapped in what they’ve called an “open-air prison” for years.

    About half a million Palestinians whose homes have been obliterated are packing into U.N.-run schools and shelters. Since Israel declared war last weekend, it has launched airstrikes on some of those shelters.

    “If Hamas uses schools, and kindergartens, and mosques for military purposes, Israel has every right under the laws of war to strike back,” Cotton claimed, adding that it is Hamas and not Israel committing war crimes. Both the Israeli forces and Hamas militants have engaged in violence that would widely be considered war crimes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden’s pick for ambassador to Israel defends record on Iran | CNN Politics

    Biden’s pick for ambassador to Israel defends record on Iran | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    President Joe Biden’s pick for ambassador to Israel, former Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, defended his record related to the Iran nuclear deal during his confirmation hearing Wednesday and made clear that he believes the US is dealing with “an evil, malign government that funds its evil and malign activities first.”

    Lew was grilled by Republican members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, particularly over questions related to his role in lifting sanctions against Iran as part of the 2015 nuclear deal. He was also pressed on whether the Biden administration can prevent Tehran from using funds returned by the US with the lifting of additional sanctions for malign activities.

    Lew played a key role in the original Iranian nuclear deal in 2015, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fiercely opposed, saying it gives Iran a clear path to an atomic arsenal. Former President Donald Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, a move that was supported by Israel.

    Iran “is not a rational economic player” and will continue to prioritize funding its malign activities over providing humanitarian support for its own people – regardless of sanctions imposed by the US, Lew told lawmakers.

    “It’s not a pure economic question. It’s a question of who are we dealing with,” Lew told Senate lawmakers when asked if there is any way for the Biden administration to guarantee Iran will only use additional funds returned with the lifting of sanctions only for humanitarian purposes.

    “It’s not a tradeoff between guns and butter. Guns come first,” he said. “You are dealing with an evil, malign government that funds its evil and malign activities first.”

    Lew also said that the vast majority of money returned to Iran with the lifting of sanctions is used for humanitarian purposes and any misappropriated funds “won’t change the thrust of what they do.”

    “When Iran gets access to food and medicine for its people, that’s food and medicine it otherwise would not have. I can’t say that there’s no leakage,” Lew added.

    “To the extent that there’s leakage, it won’t change the thrust of what they do. Sadly, supporting terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah – that’s not very expensive. … Under maximum pressure, (Iran) still was doing their malign activities,” Lew said.

    Lew also said Wednesday he is “proud” of Biden for “taking the stand that he’s been taking” following the hospital blast in Gaza, referring to the president’s recent comments asserting he believes Israel was not behind the explosion as Hamas initially claimed.

    “I’m proud to see President Biden taking the stand that he’s been taking. And even this morning, when I heard his comments on the horrible bombing of a hospital in Gaza, you know, he was not giving into disinformation. He was shooting straight in the fog of the moment. You don’t have perfect information. And he said, from everything he sees, it was not Israel that did it.”

    Prior to Wednesday’s hearing, some Republicans were already signaling that they may slow down consideration of Lew’s nomination on the Senate floor.

    Several top GOP senators have expressed their concerns over Lew’s involvement in the Iran nuclear deal during the Obama administration, arguing that although it’s important to confirm a new ambassador as quickly as possible, given the conflict in the region, he may not be the right man for the job.

    Sen. Marco Rubio, a senior Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo, “I think we should have an ambassador in every country, it has to be the right person. In the case of Mr. Lew, I have real concerns that he has misled and lied to Congress in the past, in terms of some of the financial arrangements that were made under the Obama Administration.”

    Another Republican on the panel, Sen. Pete Ricketts of Nebraska, told CNN, “We have to have his hearing, but I have some very serious concerns about him and his involvement with the Iran nuclear deal, a deal that in my opinion is giving nuclear weapons to Iran, facilitating that. So, we’ll have to see what he says in there and take it from there.”

    While Lew only needs 51 votes to be confirmed, assuming his nomination is advanced by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, any one senator can slow the process down on the Senate floor. Senate Minority Whip John Thune, the no. 2 Republican in the Senate, told CNN’s Manu Raju on Monday there is “a lot of resistance” to Lew’s nomination.

    Another top Republican in leadership, Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, told CNN on Tuesday that he believes one of his colleagues may place a hold to delay Lew’s confirmation. “I would expect so,” he said, though he would not say who he thinks would take that step.

    Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican who has attacked Lew as an “Iran sympathizer who has no business being our ambassador,” indicated on Tuesday that he may block a speedy confirmation of Lew.

    “Certainly Jack Lew will have to go through all the procedural steps that we go through for any random district judge or assistant administrator of the EPA,” he said. When asked if they would have unanimous consent to skip some of those steps, as the Senate often does, Cotton replied, “We’re not going to skip those for a soft-on-Iran ambassadorial nominee to Israel in the middle of a war with Iran’s proxies in Israel.”

    Senate Democrats have pushed back, saying that Lew is qualified and that confirming a new ambassador to Israel should be one of their highest priorities.

    Senate Foreign Relations Chair Ben Cardin told reporters on Tuesday, “He’s highly qualified, he’s the right person for the right job, but we want to be most effective as possible in helping Israel to deal with the hostages, to deal with the humanitarian needs, to deal with normalization.”

    The Maryland Democrat added, “We need a confirmed ambassador in Israel as soon as possible.”

    However, Republicans remain unconvinced. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, a member of Senate GOP leadership, said that he is also “very troubled by some of what Sen. Cotton addressed in terms of his appeasement, and, frankly, the appeasement approach of the Biden administration and the Obama administration. Iran is still the number one state sponsor of terrorism.”

    He continued, “Proxies, like Hezbollah and Hamas are determined to wipe Israel off the map. And they’ve pretty much circumvented sanctions, which were supposed to have been imposed by the Treasury Department under Jack Lew, and selling oil on the open market and relieving some of the pressure that was there to get them to stop their nuclear program.”

    Iran is the main backer of terror groups Hamas, based in Gaza, and Hezbollah, based in Southern Lebanon.

    Cotton argued that rejecting Lew will send a powerful signal.

    “I know Democrats are saying that we need to confirm Jack Lew quickly to show our support for Israel. I would say it’s the exact opposite. We need to defeat Jack Lew’s nomination to show that we have a new approach to Iran,” he said in an interview on Fox News.

    In a post on X, Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri agreed.

    “As Obama’s Treasury Secretary Jack Lew was a key figure in the disastrous Iran Nuclear Deal. Iran is the chief sponsor of Hamas. Jack Lew has no business being the US Ambassador to Israel,” Schmitt wrote.

    This story has been updated with additional information.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — ABC’s “This Week” — Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; Paul Ryan, former Republican speaker of the House.

    ——

    NBC’s “Meet the Press” — Former Vice President Mike Pence.

    ——

    CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Pence; Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., mayor-elect of Los Angeles.

    ———

    CNN’s “State of the Union” — Reps. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill.

    ———

    “Fox News Sunday” — Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and Mark Warner, D-Va.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    Guest lineups for the Sunday news shows

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — ABC’s “This Week” — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.; Gov. Chris Sununu, R-N.H.

    ——

    NBC’s “Meet the Press” — Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.; Anita Dunn, senior adviser to President Joe Biden.

    ——

    CBS’ “Face the Nation” — Dunn; Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.

    ———

    CNN’s “State of the Union” — Pelosi; Govs. Larry Hogan, R-Md., and Gretchen Whitmer, D-Mich.; Gov.-elect Josh Shapiro, D-Pa.

    ———

    “Fox News Sunday” — Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind.; Gov.-elect Wes Moore, D-Md.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Republican Sen. Tom Cotton will not run for president in 2024, source says

    Republican Sen. Tom Cotton will not run for president in 2024, source says

    [ad_1]

    Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas won’t be running for president in 2024, a source close to Cotton confirmed to CBS News on Sunday. 

    Cotton has been calling donors and friends to inform them of his plans to not run. Politico first reported the news.

    Cotton, who was first elected to the Senate in 2014, is one of the Republican party’s rising stars. He has pushed a “tough on crime” agenda, including saying on “CBS Mornings” last week that “we need to crack down” following the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    “The answer to all of these crimes is to get tough on crime and throw the book at these criminals,” Cotton said on “CBS Mornings.”

    He added that “we should throw the book” at the assailant in the Pelosi attack. 

    GOP Senate Candidate Adam Laxalt Campaigns Across Nevada
    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) speaks at a campaign event for Nevada Republican U.S. Senate nominee Adam Laxalt on November 05, 2022 in Las Vegas, Nevada. 

    / Getty Images


    Cotton, in a safe Republican seat, is not up for reelection this year. He was reelected in 2020 with more than 66% of the vote. 

    Since then, he has traveled around the country – including making stops in Iowa and New Hampshire, the two critical early voting contests. He has nearly $8 million cash on hand from his campaign committee’s fundraising since 2017, according to Open Secrets, which could be transferred to a presidential campaign account. 

    The period after Election Day in a midterm year is crucial for presidential hopefuls, as they have to prepare for the presidential election season. But the Republican party has to contend this year with former President Donald Trump, who has been mulling announcing his intention to run as soon as Nov. 14, sources told CBS News earlier this weekend. 

    Republicans are favored to win control of the House of Representatives, with the latest CBS News Battleground Tracker showing the GOP leading in 228 seats. 

    But Trump has laid many of his hopes on the Senate, campaigning this weekend in Pennsylvania and Florida. He is set to appear in Miami on Sunday night with Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, but not Gov. Ron DeSantis. DeSantis is up for reelection on Tuesday – and is a potential rival to Trump in 2024. DeSantis held events in three Florida communities on Sunday – far from Trump. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Republican Sen. Rick Scott to campaign for Herschel Walker in Georgia this week | CNN Politics

    Republican Sen. Rick Scott to campaign for Herschel Walker in Georgia this week | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Sen. Rick Scott of Florida will travel to Georgia on Tuesday to support GOP Senate nominee Herschel Walker, whose campaign has been reeling following reports Walker asked a woman to terminate two pregnancies.

    The move by Scott highlights how critical the race in Georgia is with a 50-50 split in the US Senate. Scott is chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Senate Republican campaign arm.

    “The Democrats want to destroy this country, and they will try to destroy anyone who gets in their way. Today it’s Herschel Walker, but tomorrow it’s the American people,” Scott said in a statement sent to CNN on Saturday. “I’m proud to stand with Herschel Walker and make sure Georgians know that he will always fight to protect them from the forces trying to destroy Georgia values and Georgia’s economy, led by Raphael Warnock.”

    Warnock, a Democratic senator from Georgia, is Walker’s opponent.

    The Daily Beast reported on Friday that Walker paid for a woman’s abortion in 2009. The woman told The New York Times that Walker asked her to terminate a second pregnancy two years later, but she refused the request and their relationship ended.

    Walker, who said in May he supports a full ban on abortions, with no exceptions, has denied the earlier report from The Daily Beast, calling the allegation a “flat-out lie.”

    CNN has not independently confirmed the woman’s allegation about the abortion or that Walker urged her to terminate a second pregnancy. CNN has reached out to the Walker campaign for comment.

    Earlier Saturday, Warnock, said Walker “has trouble with the truth.”

    “It’s up to Georgia voters. It’s not up to him, it’s not up to me,” Warnock said. “We do know that my opponent has trouble with the truth. And we’ll see how all this plays out, but I am focused squarely on the health care needs of my constituents, including reproductive health care.”

    NRSC spokesperson Chris Hartline said on Saturday that the organization will “have a big presence in Georgia in the final stretch.”

    Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas will also be in Georgia to campaign for Walker on Tuesday.

    “Senator Cotton is headed to Georgia on Tuesday to campaign for Herschel Walker and help Republicans take back the Senate next month,” Cotton’s communications director, Caroline Tabler, told CNN. “He believes Herschel will be a champion for Georgia who will vote to keep violent criminals in jail, for lower gas prices, and to stop Joe Biden’s inflationary policies.”

    The Washington Post first reported on Scott and Cotton’s trip to Georgia.

    On Sunday, GOP Rep. Don Bacon, who is facing a competitive reelection in a swing district in Nebraska, told NBC he still backs Walker.

    “I sure do,” Bacon told Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press.”

    “Hershel needs to come clean and be honest,” he added. “We also know that we all make mistakes. It’s better – if this actually did happen – it’s better to say ‘I’m sorry’ and ask for forgiveness.”

    This headline and story have been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Source link