ReportWire

Tag: Toll

  • Commuters share opinions on the MTA’s proposed fare increases in 1st of 3 public hearings

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (WABC) — If the MTA gets its way and moves forward with its plan to raise fares, New Yorkers will fork over $3 to ride the MTA’s buses and trains, beginning in 2026.

    The proposed increase would also make it more expensive to reach the MTA’s weekly fare cap, which makes rides free after the first 12 trips in a week. The cap would rise from $34 to $36.

    Increases on the LIRR and Metro-North will average 4.4% to 8%. And even tolls on the major crossings will go up roughly 7.5%.

    Suburban riders, many of whom take commuter trains and the subways, will take the biggest hit. From Hicksville, a monthly ticket will cost roughly $300 and a one-way fare will top $15. It won’t be much better from White Plains where the monthly will top $270 with a one-way fare of nearly $14.

    Drivers on the Verrazano and the MTA’s East River crossings will be hit, too, with E-ZPass tolls hitting roughly $7.50 and $12 without E-ZPass.

    Many of the MTA’s long-standing discounts are being phased out, along with the MetroCard, in favor of the agency’s tap-and-go fare readers.

    Stoking the outrage is congestion pricing, where 80% of the tolls collected from that are supposed to go to the MTA.It’s a new revenue source projected to pump $12 billion into subways and busses, and another $1.5 billion to the LIRR and Metro North, and yet, the MTA is about to ask riders for more.

    “We have to make the budgets balance, that’s why these small incremental increases every year are so important,” said MTA CEO Janno Lieber. “Rider satisfaction level is way up.”

    The entire proposal is expected to be voted on by the MTA Board after three public hearings, the first of which took place on Tuesday night at the NYPD Transit Bureau at 130 Livingston Street in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, where New Yorkers made their voices heard.

    “Us standing here, passionate, deep. Our lives are on the line,” said one commuter who attended the hearing. “So, think about that in the sentence you’re making with the power you have absorbed from us as we’re out here struggling.”

    “Working class New Yorkers are caught in an affordability crisis,” said commuter Christian Joseph. “Food, rent, childcare and many other things. Basic necessities we need in the city. Transportation being one of them.”

    Eyewitness News also spoke with commuters ahead of the Tuesday’s hearing to get their takes on the proposed increases.

    “Too much money. The average person can’t afford what the fare is now, jumping the turnstiles, so that’s definitely too much,” one woman told Eyewitness News. “Weekend service is horrible … the homelessness on the train, the worrying about crime, yeah, no good.”

    “I don’t think that the fare should be raised any higher. I mean, people are struggling, you know, they’re trying to make ends meet, and now they’re talking about raising the fare again. It seems like they just raised the fare,” another commuter reacted. “Enough is enough.”

    If the proposal is approved, the increases would take effect in January.

    The MTA has consistently raised fares every other year, by roughly 4%, since 2009. An exception happened in 2021 when Gov. Kathy Hochul froze fares after the pandemic eroded ridership.

    Local politicians have also weighed in on the MTA’s proposed fare hikes.

    Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for reelection, said previously that he didn’t support the fare increases.

    “We have continued to fight for the cost of living in the city, I believe now is not the time to do an increase in fare hikes,” Adams said. “Some people would say, ‘Well, it’s just a slight increase.’ Every dollar matters when you are struggling.”

    Democratic mayoral nominee and frontrunner Zohran Mamdani has gone even further in proposing free bus rides for New Yorkers.

    Beyond city limits, Rockland County Executive Ed Day is calling for the MTA to immediately withdraw its proposed Metro-North fare increases for West of Hudson commuters, calling them “wholly unjustifiable.”

    “Our residents already face a value gap exceeding $40 million every year — paying far more into the system than they receive — while enduring inadequate, infrequent rail service and chronic underinvestment,” Day said.

    For those who can’t attend the remaining meetings in person, the MTA says the public can submit comments online, or via mail, or by calling (646) 252-6777 from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily.

    Want to participate in person or remotely? The two remaining meeting times are as follows:

    Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
    Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

    ———-

    * Get Eyewitness News Delivered

    * More Manhattan news

    * Send us a news tip

    * Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

    * Follow us on YouTube


    Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

    Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

    Copyright © 2025 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WABC

    Source link

  • Golden Gate Bridge toll could climb to more than $12 under new proposal

    Golden Gate Bridge toll could climb to more than $12 under new proposal

    [ad_1]

    Motorists driving south across the famed Golden Gate Bridge could have to shell out more than $12 a trip under a new proposal from the transit agency responsible for tolls.

    Meanwhile, commuters from the North Bay with FasTrak passes could see their daily toll rise to more than $11 by 2028, according to a proposal from the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District.

    The current tolls are $9.75 for invoice payments for infrequent users and $8.75 for FasTrak pass holders, according to the transit agency.

    Daily bridge crossings have fallen since the pandemic ushered in the rise of remote work and reduction of commuter travel. Traffic on the bridge is now at 85% of pre-pandemic levels with commute hours down almost 30%, according to an agency staff report.

    That has translated to a loss of up to $30 million a year, the staff report said. The transportation agency relies heavily on bridge tolls to fund its operation and says it’s facing a five-year projected shortfall of at least $220 million.

    The new proposal lays out four possible toll rate options that would steadily increase over five years. The priciest option for motorists would generate $139 million over the five-year period — still far short of the anticipated funding gap.

    “I was a little bit shaken by the fact that anything we do is only half of the shortfall,” said board member Barbara Pahre, who represents Napa County, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle. “It’s not just about tolls, it’s about cinching our belts a little bit. This might end up being the easy part.”

    The priciest option would raise tolls by 50 cents each year starting in July. Under that option, FasTrak pass holders would see their daily toll rise to $9.25 this summer and to $11.25 by 2028 while invoice drivers who pay the highest rate would owe $10.75 this summer and $12.25 by 2028.

    A public hearing has been scheduled for Feb. 22 and the board will vote in March. Any new toll approved would go into effect July 1, according to the agency.

    [ad_2]

    Ben Poston

    Source link

  • Tauranga traffic: Road-pricing idea could cost Pāpāmoa-CBD commuters $2428 a year – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Tauranga traffic: Road-pricing idea could cost Pāpāmoa-CBD commuters $2428 a year – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    A congestion-busting idea to toll many of Tauranga’s main arterial routes has been labelled “ludicrous” and “unfair” by people who could be forced to pay more to drive to the supermarket.

    Others worry it would push the cost of living higher and one business owner says it might prompt him to move.

    In one scenario of how a variable road-pricing idea being considered by Tauranga City Council might work, commuting between the CBD and Pāpāmoa in peak hours five days a week could cost more than $2400 a year.

    A council commissioner, however, says that example was “illustrative” and the council was only seeking feedback on whether it should further investigate the potential issues and benefits of the “SmartTrip” road-pricing idea.

    Advertisement

    Advertise with NZME.

    It comes as Auckland Council considers congestion charging, which Mayor Wayne Brown suggested could involve paying $5 per trip to use some of the city’s busiest motorways in rush hours

    Variable road pricing in Tauranga

    Tauranga was looking at a variable road-pricing system, with a report presented to its council suggesting a system of access and distance-based charges for using certain roads in and out of the city centre could be a potential solution to traffic congestion.

    It would have more than 100 entry and exit points, require up to 100 cameras and would first need a law change to take effect.

    Priced roads included State Highway 2 and SH29A, plus local roads such as Turret Rd.

    Advertisement

    Advertise…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • These Outdated Habits Are Taking a Toll on Your Productivity | Entrepreneur

    These Outdated Habits Are Taking a Toll on Your Productivity | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The massive shift to remote and hybrid work was seen as a revolution, but two years later, not much has really changed in how most people collaborate day-to-day. Despite having access to powerful tools like Microsoft 365, large swaths of the workforce are stuck in outdated habits, leading to inefficiencies and frustration.

    According to SWOOP Analytics’ 2023 M365 & Microsoft Teams Benchmarking Report, analyzing over 266,000 employees across 19 large organizations, the commonly held belief that the move to remote work has caused widespread “meeting overload” and burnout is a myth. Only 1% of employees have five or more meetings a day on Teams, Microsoft’s video conferencing platform. Less than 17% of people have more than two meetings daily. For the average user, less than an hour is spent in Teams meetings each day.

    I see that kind of problem frequently when helping clients transition to a return to office and hybrid work. Some of them have good excuses: One told me that, due to compliance issues around stock trading, their risk management staff forbade them from using Teams chat and they have to rely on email. But what’s your excuse?

    The real problem

    The real problem is not too many meetings but that outdated tools and habits still predominate. Email remains the primary mode of collaboration for most, with the average person spending nearly two hours a day reading and writing emails. Despite having access to innovative collaboration platforms like Teams, 76% of people using Teams don’t utilize its chat channels, and 71% don’t post in their company’s internal social network. Almost 25% of Teams users have never sent or received a chat message.

    These findings point to a “silent majority” of employees who collaborate little digitally and are difficult for managers to engage. While a small number of overly active users may feel burned out, this research suggests the focus should shift to helping the broader workforce improve collaboration habits.

    To maximize the benefits of tools like Microsoft 365, teams must establish common practices for using them. It’s not practical to educate every employee on the full functionality, but agreeing on a subset of features and learning together is achievable. Each M365 tool, like Outlook, Teams chat, meetings, and channels, plays a distinct role that contributes value. Integrating different modes of communication in the appropriate contexts can help reduce inefficiencies.

    For example, Teams chat is ideal for quick conversations and bonding teams together, while email may be better suited for communicating with external contacts or when formality is important. Teams channels facilitate asynchronous collaboration for projects or workstreams. Regular meetings, whether on Teams or in person, provide opportunities to engage with colleagues and align on priorities. Determining as a group when and how to use each tool most effectively can optimize productivity.

    The good news is, improving digital collaboration habits can have a big impact. SWOOP Analytics estimates that optimizing M365 use could increase workforce productivity by 4.5%. But making the most of available technology requires breaking out of old email habits and embracing new ways of working together online. With the right focus and practices in place, the promise of hybrid work can finally be fulfilled.

    Pitfalls to avoid

    A few common pitfalls to avoid:

    • Relying only on email: While email is useful in some contexts, using it as the primary means of collaboration creates information silos and slows work. Channels, chat and real-time video are better suited for active teamwork.
    • Lacking clear rules of engagement: Without guidance on how and when to use each tool, employees default to what they know, usually email. Teams must determine the role of each technology in their workflow and document their approach to provide clarity for all members.
    • Ignoring the “silent majority”: Focusing only on “squeaky wheel” employees who overuse certain tools can mask deeper issues around collaboration and morale in the broader workforce. Analytics provide insight into how all employees interact so managers can address gaps and bring more people into active digital collaboration.
    • Failing to learn together: Don’t assume everyone has expertise in new platforms. Choose a subset of functionalities for your team to start with and learn through regular use, troubleshooting together and sharing tips with colleagues. Provide ongoing opportunities for teams to explore new features together.
    • Neglecting in-person interaction: While remote work is here to stay, in-person connection remains important for relationship building and complex work. Look for opportunities to get together when possible, even if just occasionally. Make time for water cooler conversations and social interaction.

    With hybrid work here for the foreseeable future, organizations have an opportunity to reimagine how employees collaborate for greater productivity and work-life balance. But technology alone is not enough. By establishing new norms, learning through experimentation, focusing on the whole workforce, and valuing both virtual and in-person interaction, teams can thrive in this new paradigm. The future of work is promising, as long as we break from the past and commit to collaborating more effectively.

    Next steps to optimize your digital engagement

    Leaders must make collaboration a strategic priority and commit resources to help teams optimize how they work together day-to-day. Some key steps:

    • Analyze current collaboration patterns using tools like Microsoft Workplace Analytics or SWOOP Analytics. Look for gaps and opportunities across the organization and in specific teams. Share insights with managers and discuss what they reveal.
    • Provide education and training on new collaboration platforms, but focus on practical use cases and examples. Don’t try to cover all functionality at once. Start with the minimum needed for a team to work together effectively in a hybrid setting. Build from there.
    • Coach managers on bringing the “silent majority” into active collaboration. Help them figure out why certain team members aren’t engaging digitally and take steps to connect them to the group. Make collaboration a key part of performance reviews and accountability.
    • Encourage experimentation and sharing of best practices. Tell teams to try new ways of collaborating and discuss what works well. Facilitate opportunities for networking and learning across teams. Celebrate wins and stories of progress to build momentum.
    • Consider restructuring workflows and workspaces to facilitate more seamless collaboration. Shared digital spaces on platforms like Teams where people come together around projects or workstreams can help. Provide areas for hybrid teams to meet in person and work side-by-side when in the office. Rethink the open office.
    • Model the change you want to see. Leaders and executives should actively use the collaboration tools and methods they are promoting to set an example. Share your experiences learning to work in new ways. People follow what leaders do much more than what they say.

    Conclusion

    The path forward is challenging, but the potential benefits to both employee experience and productivity are enormous. By breaking old habits, embracing new technology thoughtfully, and facilitating a culture where collaboration is valued and nurtured, organizations can thrive in this new era. The future of work depends on the future of how we work together. With focus and effort, that future can be bright. Teams can overcome the obstacles of distance to build real cohesion and make progress, as long as they leave behind outdated tools like email in favor of all the platforms at their disposal. The power of hybrid work lives in a shared connection. It’s time to unlock that potential.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link