ReportWire

Tag: tim walz

  • Michigan voters discuss VP debate, Vance and Walz’s performances and 2024 race

    Michigan voters discuss VP debate, Vance and Walz’s performances and 2024 race

    [ad_1]

    Michigan voters discuss VP debate, Vance and Walz’s performances and 2024 race – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    CBS News National Correspondent Jericka Duncan sat down with voters in Grand Rapids Michigan to watch the Vice Presidential Debate. Listen to their reactions to the debate.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Battleground states: Key areas to watch in the 2024 election

    Battleground states: Key areas to watch in the 2024 election

    [ad_1]

    Election Day is right around the corner. With national polls pointing toward a tight race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, all eyes are on a handful of swing states. However, the swing state roster has changed since the 2020 presidential election. So, what are the key states to watch come Election Day? Swing states are typically defined as areas that have similar levels of support for each political party’s candidate that can have a key role in the outcome of the presidential race.Seven states in two regions of the U.S. could have a major impact on the outcome of the 2024 election. The ‘Blue Wall’ statesThe so-called “Blue Wall” states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania are on the list of swing states. Trump won all three states in 2016, but President Joe Biden gained them back in 2020. Wisconsin is specifically seen as one of the most competitive states, as President Joe Biden had previously won by fewer than 21,000 votes in the 2020 election.The Sun Belt statesThe Sun Belt states of Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina have also made it onto the list. This is due to a combination of an increase of Latino, Asian American and young Black voting demographics in the region. But North Carolina and Georgia could still be wild cards, as North Carolina has historically leaned Republican. Most notably missing from the list of swing states is the industrial midwest: Ohio and Iowa have recently leaned more Republican. According to an analysis by NPR, the change is due to the shift toward the GOP among white voters without college degrees. Prior to the Trump era, Ohio and Iowa were considered competitive for decades.Both presidential candidates have intensified their campaigns in key swing states in the past few months.As voters cast their ballots, watching these regions will be key to determining the electoral college winner in 2024.

    Election Day is right around the corner. With national polls pointing toward a tight race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, all eyes are on a handful of swing states.

    However, the swing state roster has changed since the 2020 presidential election.

    So, what are the key states to watch come Election Day?

    Swing states are typically defined as areas that have similar levels of support for each political party’s candidate that can have a key role in the outcome of the presidential race.

    Seven states in two regions of the U.S. could have a major impact on the outcome of the 2024 election.

    The ‘Blue Wall’ states

    The so-called “Blue Wall” states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania are on the list of swing states.

    Trump won all three states in 2016, but President Joe Biden gained them back in 2020.

    Wisconsin is specifically seen as one of the most competitive states, as President Joe Biden had previously won by fewer than 21,000 votes in the 2020 election.

    The Sun Belt states

    The Sun Belt states of Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina have also made it onto the list.

    This is due to a combination of an increase of Latino, Asian American and young Black voting demographics in the region.

    But North Carolina and Georgia could still be wild cards, as North Carolina has historically leaned Republican.

    Most notably missing from the list of swing states is the industrial midwest: Ohio and Iowa have recently leaned more Republican.

    According to an analysis by NPR, the change is due to the shift toward the GOP among white voters without college degrees. Prior to the Trump era, Ohio and Iowa were considered competitive for decades.

    Both presidential candidates have intensified their campaigns in key swing states in the past few months.

    As voters cast their ballots, watching these regions will be key to determining the electoral college winner in 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. Walz authorizes Minnesota National Guard to aid in Hurricane Helene relief efforts

    Gov. Walz authorizes Minnesota National Guard to aid in Hurricane Helene relief efforts

    [ad_1]

    ST. PAUL, Minn. — Members of the Minnesota National Guard will be heading to North Carolina to provide emergency aid in disaster areas following Hurricane Helene

    On Wednesday, Gov. Tim Walz signed an emergency executive order authorizing the deployment. 

    “Those recovering from the devastation of Hurricane Helene are not alone,” Walz said. “Minnesota will be there to support the region however we can. As communities rebuild, I am grateful for the dedication of Minnesota’s first responders in answering the call to travel east to help impacted areas.”

    According to the Minnesota National Guard, its St. Cloud-based Company — 2-211 General Support Aviation Battalion — is sending two CH-47 “Chinook” cargo helicopters, which will “transport commodities and personnel throughout disaster areas.”

    Eleven soldiers are being activated to support the mission. 

    “The Minnesota National Guard is ready to assist the state of North Carolina and help support people and communities impacted by Hurricane Helene,” Maj. Gen. Shawn Manke, Minnesota National Guard adjutant general, said. “We take pride in being able to answer the call when another state requests support.”

    The soldiers are expected to arrive Friday and will provide support for at least a week, depending on the need. 

    In addition to the Minnesota National Guard, the St. Louis County mobile command post is heading to North Carolina to help with relief efforts, according to the governor’s office. The Minnesota State Patrol and Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office both have coordinated teams ready to help with law enforcement support and are awaiting assignment through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact. The Minnesota State Fire Marshal is also working with local fire departments in sending crews and equipment to disaster areas as needed. 

    Minnesota electric workers are also traveling to disaster areas to help restore power in areas impacted by Helene. 

    The executive order went into effect Wednesday and will remain in effect until Nov. 1 or until National Guard services are no longer needed. 

    Storm Helene Causes Massive Flooding Across Swath Of Western North Carolina
    A person inspects the Biltmore Village with bicycle in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene on September 28, 2024 in Asheville, North Carolina. Hurricane Helene made landfall Thursday night in Florida’s Big Bend with winds up to 140 mph.

    Getty Images


    The hurricane made landfall in Florida last Thursday and devastated areas across nearly 400 miles of the southeastern United States, particularly in North Carolina.

    President Biden traveled to the Carolinas on Wednesday for an aerial tour of the widespread damage caused by Hurricane Helene, as well as a briefing on the ground on recovery efforts. Vice President Kamala Harris is in Georgia receiving updates on the emergency response to the storm’s devastation there.

    Mr. Biden said that he approved a request from North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper for the federal government to cover “100 percent” of all debris removal and emergency protective measure costs for six months. 

    [ad_2]

    Cole Premo

    Source link

  • Marijuana Industry Seeks Positive Signs From Candidates

    Marijuana Industry Seeks Positive Signs From Candidates

    [ad_1]

    The cannabis has been suffering for the last two years…but do the presidential candidates really care?

    The last two years has been brutal for the cannabis industry. Consumer use continues to climb, but the cost of doing business is outpacing the profit. Filled with mainly mom and pop small business owners, it has become tougher and tougher as more and more people consume.  But does either political parties care and what are they actually going to do?  The marijuana industry seeks positive signs from candidates, and more than just statements, they want sound policy.

    RELATED: Diddy’s Failed Cannabis Investment Saves Industry A Scandal

    Legal states have reaped the benefits of making the plant safely available.  ncreased tax revenue, a decreased in youth use, and a variable options for medical marijuana patients from addictive opioids.  But the businesses themselves are battling high taxes, no tax benefits, increase in crime and a massive federal restrictions. Even with a growing customer base, hope is dwindling the government will act. And both parties have not been helpful.

    Photo by Darren Halstead via Unsplash

    Vice President Harris expressed support for legalizing marijuana, speaking publicly about where she stands for the first time she became the Democratic nominee.

    “I just think we have come to a point where we have to understand that we need to legalize it and stop criminalizing this behavior,” Harris said during a nearly hourlong interview on the sports and culture podcast “All the Smoke” released Monday.

    But what does it mean? Biden promised to help in 2020. The seasoned policy maker waited to the last moment to make the move, and then didn’t push the gas petal. While 2024 looked like a turning point year, nothing will happen. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) postponed their rescheduling announcement to December, after the election and a potential change in priorities, legalization actions, and executive orders.

    Walz, as governor of Minnesota, saw the introduction of legal marijuana and how the state’s citizen’s embraced it in large numbers. But recently he shared he believed it should be a “states rights” issue but he still wants to Democrats to win Congress to help SAFE Banking.

    RELATED: Boomer And Gen Z Consume Marijuana For Similar Reasons

    The GOP Presidential candidate has given a nod to the industry, but under his previous term, nothing happened. Party leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have made it clear they want a regression of marijuana legality. The Senate GOP blocked the SAFER BANKING ACT 7 times. And the chaos over the ousting of Kevin McCarthy as speaker ruined the last big chance before camping started.

    It seems all the states want the revenue, but no political leader wants to support the growth of the industry. The industry is just hoping something will hold candidates to their promises.

    [ad_2]

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • Vance, Walz hit campaign trail after VP debate

    Vance, Walz hit campaign trail after VP debate

    [ad_1]

    Vance, Walz hit campaign trail after VP debate – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    One day after they faced off in the vice presidential debate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz were back on the campaign trail Wednesday. A new CBS News poll found that viewers saw the debate as a pretty even matchup. Robert Costa has the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Republican Insiders Were Thrilled By J.D. Vance’s Debate

    Republican Insiders Were Thrilled By J.D. Vance’s Debate

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Matt Rourke/AP Photo

    After Donald Trump’s ill-fated debate against Kamala Harris where vigorously defended his crowd sizes and lied about Haitians in Springfield, Ohio eating pets, the bar was relatively low for J.D. Vance during Tuesday’s debate with Tim Walz. However, he not only exceeded it but surpassed it among Republican operatives I spoke with. One in Vance’s orbit texted a GIF of a baseball player hitting a home run when asked for an assessment of the debate shortly after it ended.

    Other operatives from across the party kvelled about the Ohio senator’s performance, which they thought seemed particularly outstanding when compared to an at times stumbling performance from his Democratic rival, the Minnesota governor. Some couldn’t help but spent the aftermath of the debate glued to their social media feeds and CNN, reveling in what they perceived as Democratic bedwetting

    Another Republican in Vance world said simply “We killed it.” The one moment Democrats celebrated during the debate was Vance’s refusal to answer a question about whether Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. Republicans brushed that off. “They will make it all about Jan 6. But that doesn’t move the needle.”

    Walz was surprisingly underwhelming on the debate stage—-particularly his rambling answer when asked about his repeated statements that he had been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre in 1989. Walz initially described himself as a “knucklehead” before eventually conceding that he misspoke at times.

    One establishment Republican hoped Vance’s performance would boost Trump among wavering voters.  “I do think there are people who aren’t psyched about Trump’s performance or the idea of voting for him who will like what they saw tonight,” they said. After all, Vance’s rollout as Trump’s running mate had been notoriously bumpy as he was forced to defend a series of inflammatory comments that he had made on right wing podcasts over the years including one in 2021 when he complained about the influence of “childless cat ladies” running the country.

    The Ohio senator’s image hasn’t notably softened since then as he has adopted the traditional role of running mate as an attack dog. However, on Tuesday, he was the one that pulled his punches—-at least compared to Trump who was repeatedly deriding Walz as “Tampon Tim” on social media. Instead, he came across as “exceptionally competent and conspicuously congenial,” in the words of the establishment Republican, especially compared to the public perception of him prior to the debate when he was viewed less favorably than any other candidate on a national ticket.

    There is uncertainty though whether any of this mattered. It is a vice presidential debate and voters don’t vote for the number two on the ticket. Traditionally, vice presidential debates have almost no impact on the presidential election. After all, the most memorable moment in any vice presidential debate was Lloyd Bentsen’s withering putdown of Dan Quayle in 1988 where he mocked Quayle’s comparison of himself to John F. Kennedy.  “I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy,” said Bentsen. The moment has gone down in history but Bentsen, and his running mate, Michael Dukakis, lost the election by a hefty margin.”

    As one senior Capitol Hill Republican pointed out “One can debate without any proof as to whether or not the needle moved tonight. What is clear is that this was a best case scenario for Trump and a worst case scenario for Harris.”

    [ad_2]

    Ben Jacobs

    Source link

  • Denver7 Investigates fact-checks statements made during Walz-Vance vice presidential debate

    Denver7 Investigates fact-checks statements made during Walz-Vance vice presidential debate

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — Tuesday’s vice presidential debate between Ohio Senator JD Vance (R) and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) covered a wide variety of topics, from the developments in the Middle East to immigration to healthcare.

    Denver7 Investigates fact-checked each candidate on a variety of statements.


    Immigration

    Roughly 15 minutes into the debate, Vance was asked if he would support separating parents from their children at the border. He went on to say that families are already separated, noting that the Department of Homeland Security has effectively “lost” 320,000 children.

    In August, the Department of Homeland Security released a report revealing that over the past five years, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) has lost track of unaccompanied minors, mainly those who fail to show up for immigration court. That report states nearly 300,000 children are unaccounted for.

    Fact check: True

    On the topic of the U.S. border, Vance referred to Vice President Kamala Harris as the “border czar.” While that is an unofficial title Republicans like to use in reference to Harris after she was tasked with studying root causes of migration from countries in Central America, the person mostly responsible for the border is Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

    Fact check: False

    Walz-Vance debate: Denver7 Investigates fact-checks claims about immigration

    Abortion 

    One item on top of mind for so many voters is abortion. During the debate, Walz said that the maternal mortality rate is skyrocketing in Texas, outpacing many other countries in the world. According to the Gender Equity Policy Institute, the rate of maternal mortality cases rose in Texas by 56% from 2019 to 2022. That’s compared to just 11% nationwide during the same time period.

    Fact check: True

    Walz also brought up Project 2025, claiming the plan would make it more difficult to to get contraceptives and limit access to fertility treatment.

    Neither Trump nor Vance have openly supported Project 2025, despite links to the authors of the plan. In addition, the project does not call for the restriction of birth control pills, and the website PolitiFact did not find any mention of fertilization in the plan.

    Fact check: Mostly False

    Walz-Vance debate: Denver7 Investigates fact-checks claims about abortion

    Trump tax returns

    Former President Donald Trump’s tax returns have been a point of contention for years — something Walz made sure to bring up during the debate. The Minnesota governor claimed Trump has not paid federal income taxes in 15 years.

    In Dec. 2022, the House Ways and Means Committee released documents related to Trump’s tax returns, showing he filed federal income tax returns from 2015 to 2020 and paid federal income taxes in four of those years.

    Fact Check: False

    Affordable Care Act

    Vance brought up Trump and his role with the Affordable Care Act, claiming the former president helped save a program that was on the verge of collapse. However, during Trump’s time in office, ACA enrollment declined by more than 2 million people, and the number of uninsured grew by roughly 2.3 million.

    According to PolitiFact, the Trump administration cut millions of dollars in enrollment aid and asked the Supreme Court to overturn the law.

    Fact Check: False


    investigates-banner.png

    Denver7

    Got a tip? Send it to the Denver7 Investigates team

    Use the form below to send us a comment or story idea you’d like the Denver7 Investigates team to check out. You can also email investigates@Denver7.com or call our newsroom at 303-832-0200.

    [ad_2]

    Natalie Chuck

    Source link

  • San Francisco voters gather in Mission District to watch vice presidential debate

    San Francisco voters gather in Mission District to watch vice presidential debate

    [ad_1]

    Hundreds of people gathered in San Francisco’s Mission District to watch the vice presidential debate.

    It was a left-leaning and lively crowd but many said they were pleasantly surprised by the substantive debate both candidates brought to the stage.

    Janet Covey came with a few of her friends and sat near the front. She told KPIX she lives in San Francisco but grew up in a Republican family.

    She said she was a little nervous for Democrats coming into the debate but by the time it ended she felt pretty good about how things went.

    “My initial reaction is JD Vance is very slick, but I think he’s forgotten who he’s running with. I think that the reason they kept saying they aligned on a lot of policies is because that really is what he thinks, but it’s not the person he’s running with,” said Covey.

    Several moments sparked reaction from Covey and the rest of the audience but nothing quite like the heated back and forth between Vance and Walz over immigration.

    “JD Vance tried to make it seem like the Vice President, who currently is Kamala Harris, runs the entire country. I think that’s what he was trying to point out. I wonder if he thinks that’s what his job is going to be if he actually does that because that’s what he made it seem like,” said Covey.

    While most people in the room were not fans of Senator Vance, many said they were happy to see a debate where, for the most part, the candidates followed the rules and were respectful to each other.

    “It was very impressive. That part was much better and Vance disassociated from Trump. The reality is he was able to be agreeable on a lot of these policies because it wasn’t really Trump’s position,” said Cathy Courtney, a watch party attendee.

     Covey said she’s not too sure how much, if any, this debate will do to move the needle on the election.

    She believes most voters are already firmly set in their decision.

    “I don’t think it’s really going — I think it’s really a whatever side you’re on you’re going to lean towards that person,” said Covey.

    [ad_2]

    Kelsi Thorud

    Source link

  • A look at false and misleading claims during the vice presidential debate

    A look at false and misleading claims during the vice presidential debate

    [ad_1]

    The Associated Press

    The vice presidential candidates, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance, on Tuesday engaged in a fast-moving, largely civil debate on a wide range of issues. Here’s a look at some false and misleading claims from the debate.

    ___

    Iran has not received $100 billion in unfrozen assets under the Biden-Harris administration

    VANCE: “Iran, which launched this attack, has received over $100 billion in unfrozen assets thanks to the Kamala Harris administration. What do they use that money for? They use it to buy weapons that they’re now launching against our allies.”

    THE FACTS: The Biden administration agreed last year to unfreeze $6 billion in Iranian assets as part of a deal to free five U.S. citizens being held by Iran. But administration officials say not a dollar of that has yet been given to Iran. It was part of a deal negotiated by the Obama administration, before Biden and Harris took office, that could have allowed Iran to access frozen assets in exchange for accepting limits on its nuclear program.

    In 2016, Iran said it had received access to more than $100 billion worth of frozen overseas assets following the implementation of a landmark nuclear deal with world powers. The money had been held in banks in China, India, Japan, South Korea and Turkey since international sanctions were tightened in 2012 over Tehran’s nuclear program. Then-Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew told Congress that only about $50 billion of the frozen assets would actually be accessible by Iran.

    Walz overstates the cost of insulin before cap

    WALZ: “They were charging $800 before this law went into effect.”

    THE FACTS: Walz overstated how much Americans were paying for insulin before a new law capped prices at $35 per month for millions of older Americans on Medicare. A December 2022 study found that people who were on Medicare or enrolled in private insurance paid $452 yearly on average before the new law took effect.

    Vance links unaffordable housing to immigrants who have come into the country illegally

    VANCE: “You’ve got housing that is totally unaffordable because we brought in millions of illegal immigrants to compete with Americans for scarce homes.”

    THE FACTS: Most economists blame a long-term decline in the housing supply for the steady increase in home prices. The number of new homes under construction plunged from an annual pace of 1.4 million in April 2006 to barely above 400,000 in August 2011, and didn’t recover to 2006 levels until 2021.

    Vance said at least one prominent economic analysis from the Federal Reserve supports his claims that immigrants are pushing up housing costs, but he didn’t provide details. He was likely citing a May 2024 blog post by Neel Kashkari, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Kashkari says immigration’s long-run effect on inflation is “unclear,” but immigrants need a place to live and their arrival has overlapped with higher prices.

    There might be upward pressure on home prices in some markets because of immigrants arriving, but most economists say the issue is a lack of supply of homes on the market. Homebuilders say they need the immigrants to build the homes. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said at a September news conference that high mortgage rates mean people aren’t listing their homes for sale and there has not been enough supply.

    Walz wrongly claims Project 2025 creates pregnancy registry

    WALZ: “Their Project 2025 is going to have a registry of pregnancies.”

    THE FACTS: That’s not true. The conservative initiative calls for the collection of “accurate and reliable statistical data about abortion, abortion survivors, and abortion-related maternal deaths,” but not a record of every pregnancy that occurs.

    More specifically, Project 2025 proposes that the Department of Health and Human Services require all states to report detailed information about abortions that are performed within their borders, including the total number of abortions, the age and state of residence of the mother, the gestational age of the fetus, the reason for the abortion and the method used to perform the abortion. It suggests that this data be separated into categories such as spontaneous miscarriages, intentional abortions, stillbirths and other medical treatments that result in the death of the fetus, like chemotherapy.

    Vance overstates immigration numbers

    VANCE: “We’ve got 20, 25 million illegal aliens who are here in the country.”

    THE FACTS: That figure is highly inflated. U.S. Customs and Border Protection reports more than 10 million arrests for illegal crossings from Mexico from January 2021 through September 2024.

    That’s arrests, not people. Under pandemic-era asylum restrictions, many people crossed more than once until they succeeded because there were no legal consequences for getting turned back to Mexico. So the number of people is lower than the number of arrests.

    According to the Department of Homeland Security’s latest available estimate, there were approximately 11 million people living illegally in the U.S. as of January 2022, 79% of whom entered prior to January 2010.

    Vance distorts Minnesota abortion law

    VANCE: “It says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to provide lifesaving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.”

    [ad_2]

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • At V.P debate, J.D. Vance and Tim Walz scapegoat immigrants, ‘corporate speculators’ for high housing costs

    At V.P debate, J.D. Vance and Tim Walz scapegoat immigrants, ‘corporate speculators’ for high housing costs

    [ad_1]

    Both candidates at tonight’s vice-presidential debate agreed that housing costs are too high. And both Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz had their favorite scapegoats to blame the problem on.

    For Vance, it was immigrants.

    “You’ve got housing that is totally unaffordable because we brought in millions of illegal immigrants to compete with Americans for scarce homes,” said the Republican vice-presidential nominee.

    Instead of “blaming migrants for everything on housing, we could talk a little bit about Wall Street speculators buying up housing and making them less affordable,” responded the Democrat.

    Neither candidate’s answer is particularly surprising. Vance has blamed immigrants for raising housing costs throughout the campaign. The GOP party platform claims that deportations will help bring housing costs down.

    Meanwhile, the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, has repeatedly blamed “corporate landlords” and “Wall Street” for rising rents and home prices. As a solution, she has endorsed capping rents at properties owned by larger corporate investors and using antitrust law to stop landlords from using rent-recommendation software. Walz was merely aping his running mate’s rhetoric.

    Vance, to be sure, has also repeatedly blamed institutional investors for raising Americans’ housing costs.

    There’s a straightforward logic to both candidate’s claims. Increased demand for housing, whether from immigrants or corporate investors, would be expected to increase prices.

    But increased demand should also be expected to increase supply, bringing prices back down.

    Corporate investors and immigrants also play an important, direct role in increasing housing supply. Investors supply capital to build new homes. Immigrants supply labor for the same.

    At least one study has found that the labor shortages caused by immigration restrictions do more to raise the cost of housing than they do to lower it through reduced demand.

    Higher demand fails to translate into supply when the government restricts homebuilding through regulations that limit where and how much housing developers can build.

    California and New Jersey have the same percentage of foreign-born residents. California also has a lot more regulatory restrictions on home building than New Jersey. The median home price in New Jersey is 30 percent cheaper as a result.

    Vance cited a Federal Reserve study showing that immigration increased housing costs, promising to share the paper later on social media. (The campaign has thus far shared remarks, not studies, from Fed officials, to the effect that immigration has increased demand for housing, which duh.)

    Contra Walz, one study has found that restrictions on investor-owned rental housing raised rents and raised the incomes of residents in select neighborhoods by excluding lower-income renters. Studies on the effects of rent-recommendation software have found mixed effects on housing costs. In tight markets, such software raises rents. When supply is loose, it lowers them.

    As always, the ability of builders to add new supply is what sets the price in the long term. Both candidates gestured at this in their own way, although Walz was more explicit about the relationship.

    “We cut some of the red tape,” he said, referencing Minneapolis’ experience of liberalizing zoning laws and seeing housing costs fall. Walz’s pro-supply remarks were nevertheless sandwiched between calls for spending more on affordable housing and down-payment assistance.

    On the supply side of the equation, Vance referenced Trump’s plan to open up federal lands for more development, saying the feds own lands “that aren’t being used for anything. They’re not being used for national parks. They’re not being used and it could be places where we build a lot of housing. And I do think that we should be opening up building in this country.”

    In some Western states, the federal government is the largest landowner and its undeveloped lands act as a de facto urban growth boundary. Vance is right that opening up those lands for development would add supply and lower prices.

    Unfortunately, his support for residential development on currently federal-owned land was immediately succeeded by a call to kick out the illegal immigrants who are competing for homes.

    So there you have it. Both candidates recognized the role that home building and home supply plays in reducing housing costs. But both were also keen to single out scapegoats—immigrants for Vance, Wall Street for Walz—for increasing demand and prices.

    Walz acknowledged tonight that there’s not a lot the federal government can do to reduce locally set land use regulations. He’s right. But the federal government does have a lot of other levers they can pull to make housing costs worse, from immigration restrictions to nationwide rent control.

    And both candidates indicated that they’d pull those levers.

    [ad_2]

    Christian Britschgi

    Source link

  • JD Vance Won the Debate—If You Ignore the Facts

    JD Vance Won the Debate—If You Ignore the Facts

    [ad_1]

    The thing about vice-presidential debates is that you typically only remember them when someone really screws up. There was Dan Quayle comparing himself to John F. Kennedy, which set Lloyd Bentsen up for an all-time zinger. More recently, there was Sarah Palin being, well, Sarah Palin. These blunders persist in the political memory because the running mates in question failed at what is usually their main requirement in these undercard bouts: to reflect well on the judgment of the nominee.

    But, of course, there’s nothing about this race you’d call usual. On one side, you have Donald Trump—not just a convicted criminal and aspiring authoritarian who already tried to overthrow democracy but an increasingly-unhinged 78-year-old, whose running mate stands to inherit his movement, at least in theory. On the other side is Vice President Kamala Harris, who ascended to the top of the ticket only two and a half months ago, and is now trying to preserve the Democratic enthusiasm that had waned under Joe Biden while convincing the handful of swing voters who will decide the election that her campaign is about more than good vibes.

    Will JD Vance and Tim Walz’s Tuesday night’s debate performances help their respective candidates’ causes?

    Vance was more articulate than his boss—a low bar to clear—and made an effort to sound more like a traditional politician than an alt-right 4chan thread. He toned down the outrageous rhetoric, disguised the most unpalatable and destructive MAGA policies in several layers of euphemism, and seemed comfortable on stage. He articulated Trump’s case with the skill—and passion—of a debate club kid who was eager for the limelight. Walz, by contrast, appeared nervous and uncomfortable in the debate format, and struggled at times, even though he had the stronger argument on a range of issues—particularly on the “fickle leadership” of Trump, as he put it in the first question of the night, about the escalating hostilities in the Middle East. But neither candidate likely did much to change the dynamic of this race.

    It should’ve. Vance was a more agile debater than Walz, but his performance was fundamentally dishonest: He misled viewers about his own record, he completely lied about Trump’s, and tried to soften the sharp edges of the MAGA agenda. “I was wrong about Donald Trump,” he said at one point, explaining how he went from describing the former president as “America’s Hitler” to working for the guy. (At one point, he even claimed Trump “salvaged” Obamacare—the health care plan Trump explicitly sought to destroy.) Walz had his own stumbles; his explanation as to why he said he was in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests when he apparently was not, for instance, was maddeningly wanting. “I’m a knucklehead at times,” the Minnesota governor said. But the facts, as it pertained to policy, tended to be on Walz’s side—which is perhaps why Vance, in a rare moment of visible frustration in Tuesday’s debate, pushed back on moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan when confronted with the reality that most of the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio he demonized are in the country legally.

    “The rules were you weren’t going to fact-check,” Vance objected.

    Obfuscations aside, the ugliness of Vance’s politics showed through, particularly on immigration—where he may not have encouraged memes about Haitian migrants eating cats, as he does when he’s not on primetime television, but nevertheless cast incoming Americans as an existential threat to those already here: “The people that I’m most worried about in Springfield,” Vance said, “are the American citizens who have had their lives destroyed by Kamala Harris’s open border.”

    It was, by comparison, a more substantive debate than the last—in no small part because Donald Trump was not at one of the podiums. It included a question about climate change, which the last debate infuriatingly did not. Walz noted, correctly, that Trump has called global warming a “hoax,” and even suggested he could profit from it. Vance deflected, saying that he and Trump supported “clean air and clean water,” but didn’t want to get into the “weird science” of climate change. It also featured a matter-of-fact question about democracy: While Mike Pence, Trump’s former vice president, respected the democratic process and certified the 2020 election results, Vance has indicated he would not. What has he to say about that? “We should fight about those issues, debate those issues, peacefully in the public square—and that’s all I’ve said, and that’s all that Donald Trump has said,” Vance claimed. (That’s not all Trump said!) “Joe Biden became the president,” Vance acknowledged, before accusing Harris of supporting “censorship”—the true “threat to democracy.”

    Trump “peacefully gave over power on January the 20th, as we have done for over 250 years in this country,” Vance said.

    That’s not remotely true. Walz may not have made that case with the eloquence of Jack Kennedy. But it’ll at least stand up to the fact-check.

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • 2024 VP debate: Fact-checking JD Vance and Tim Walz

    2024 VP debate: Fact-checking JD Vance and Tim Walz

    [ad_1]

    Ohio Republican Sen. JD Vance and Minnesota Democratic Gov. Tim Walz met in an Oct. 1 vice presidential debate hosted by CBS News that was cordial and heavy on policy discussion — a striking change from the Sept. 10 debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump that often devolved into personal attacks.

    Vance and Walz acknowledged occasional agreement with each other on policy points and respectfully addressed one another throughout the debate. But they also blamed each other’s running mates for problems facing the U.S., including immigration and inflation.

    The moderators, “CBS Evening News” anchor Norah O’Donnell and “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan, had said they planned to encourage candidates to fact-check each other, but sometimes clarified after candidates’ answers. 

    They also pinned down the candidates when they evaded answers, with Brennan pressing Walz to say he misspoke in the past about being in China’s Tiananmen Square during the deadly 1989 protests. Brennan also pushed Vance for specifics on Trump’s mass deportation plan and whether he would separate parents from children, but didn’t get a specific answer.

    During the debate, Walz misspoke during a discussion about school shootings. He described changing his position on an assault weapons ban after the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut that killed 26 people, including 20 children.

    “I sat in that office with those Sandy Hook parents. I’ve become friends with school shooters,” Walz mistakenly said. The gaffe prompted derision on social media, including from Trump, who mocked Walz on Truth Social.

    The candidates sparred on numerous topics, including immigration, school shootings, reproductive rights and the economy. We fact-checked several of their statements.

    PolitiFact fact-checks statements of people in power, regardless of political party. We’ve rated claims with a variety of Truth-O-Meter ratings from the Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump, and the Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris. This is how we choose claims to check.

    Immigration

    Vance: “We have 320,000 children that the Department of Homeland Security has effectively lost. Some of them have been sex trafficked.”

    Mostly False.

    This is not what a federal oversight report said. The claim refers to a federal oversight report about unaccompanied minors — children who came to the U.S. without a parent or legal guardian. The report covered fiscal years 2019 through 2023, which includes part of Trump’s presidency.

    The report mentioned 32,000 children who failed to appear for their immigration court hearings and 291,000 children whom Immigration and Customs Enforcement had not served a “Notice to Appear.” 

    A Notice to Appear is a charging document authorities issue and file in immigration court to start removal proceedings. The report said that by not issuing these notices to the children, Immigration and Customs Enforcement limits its chances of verifying their safety after the federal government releases them.

    The report led Republican lawmakers and conservative news outlets to say that Immigration and Customs Enforcement “lost” the children or that they are “missing.” But the report did not make that claim.

    The report said the children are at risk of trafficking, but it didn’t present a number.

    Vance: “So there’s an application called the CBP One app, where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status.”

    Mostly False.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection launched the CBP One phone app in 2020, when Trump was president. Biden expanded its use. As of January 2023, people can use the app while in Mexico to make appointments with immigration officials for processing at official ports of entry.

    The app is a scheduling tool, not an application for asylum or parole; a lengthy process follows. Vance is wrong to characterize the people making the appointments as “illegal” migrants, because the people using the app haven’t crossed into the U.S. illegally.

    At ports of entry, immigration officials can give people humanitarian parole, for up to two years, allowing them to live and work in the U.S. as they apply for asylum. Under U.S. immigration law, people can apply for asylum, but they must be physically in the country. From January 2023 to August 2024, 813,000 people have scheduled appointments on the app, the Department of Homeland Security said.

    Humanitarian parole is an official permission to temporarily live in the U.S., but it is not a lawful status. To stay in the U.S. after protections expire, or eventually gain citizenship, people must secure legal status through other avenues, such as asylum, marriage or employment.

    Abortion

    Walz: “Their Project 2025 is gonna have a registry of pregnancies.”

    False

    Project 2025 recommends that states submit more detailed abortion reporting to the federal government. It calls for more information about how and when abortions took place, as well as other statistics for miscarriages and stillbirths.

    The manual does not mention, nor call for, a new federal agency tasked with registering pregnant women.

    Vance: “As I read the Minnesota law that (Walz) signed into law … it says that a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to provide lifesaving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.”

    False.

    Experts said cases in which a baby is born following an attempted abortion are rare. Less than 1% of abortions nationwide occur in the third trimester. And infanticide, the crime of killing a child within a year of its birth, is illegal in all U.S. states.

    In May 2023, Walz, as Minnesota governor, signed legislation updating a state law for “infants who are born alive.” It said babies are “fully recognized” as human people and therefore, protected under state law. The change did not alter regulations that already require doctors to provide patients with appropriate care.

    Previously, state law said, “All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.” The law was updated to instead say medical personnel must “care for the infant who is born alive.”

    When there are fetal anomalies that make it likely the fetus will die before or soon after birth, some parents decide to terminate the pregnancy by inducing childbirth so that they can hold their dying baby, Democratic Minnesota state Sen. Erin Maye Quade told PolitiFact in September.

    This update to the law means infants who are “born alive” receive appropriate medical care dependent on the pregnancy’s circumstances, Maye Quade said.

    Iran 

    Vance: “Iran, which launched this attack (on Israel), has received over $100 billion and unfrozen assets, thanks to the Kamala Harris administration.”

    False. 

    Under President Barack Obama, Iran did take possession of $100 billion in unfrozen assets after the signing of the Iran nuclear deal, which Trump later overturned. But Harris was not involved in the Obama administration.

    Something that occurred on Biden and Harris’ watch was a hostage-release agreement with Iran that was supposed to free $6 billion in frozen Iranian assets. There is no evidence that any of the $6 billion reached Iran.

    In August 2023, the U.S. announced an agreement with Iran to secure freedom for five U.S. citizens who’d been detained in the country in exchange for allowing Iran to access $6 billion of its own funds that had been frozen in South Korean banks.

    The money consisted of Iranian oil revenue frozen since 2019, when Trump banned Iranian oil exports and sanctioned its banking sector. It was not U.S. taxpayer money. In April 2024, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said that those funds had been frozen after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel and had not reached Iran.

    Walz: “When Iranian missiles did fall near U.S. troops and they received traumatic brain injuries, Donald Trump wrote it off as ‘headaches.’”

    True.

    Walz was referring to a Jan. 8, 2020, Iran attack on U.S. soldiers in Iraq. More than 100 soldiers were diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries, according to the Pentagon.

    Trump has repeatedly called the injuries “headaches.”

    In 2020, Trump said he had “heard that they had headaches” and added it “is not very serious.” Trump repeated this claim in an Oct. 1 press conference in Wisconsin.

    After Iran attacked Israel Oct. 1, Trump responded to a question about whether he should have been stronger on Iran after the 2020 attack that injured U.S. troops. He said: “What does injured mean? You mean because they had a headache because the bombs never hit the fort?”

    Walz in China

    Walz said he ‘misspoke’ about being in Hong Kong during 1989 Tiananmen Square protests

    Walz once described being in Hong Kong during the May 1989 pro-democracy protests in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square that turned deadly that June. But contemporaneous news reports contradict that timeline. The CBS News debate moderators asked Walz to explain this discrepancy, and Walz said he “misspoke.”

    In the next sentence, he said: “So, I will just, that’s what I’ve said. So, I was in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protests, went in.”

    Minnesota Public Radio News and APM Reports found a 1989 Nebraska newspaper report that said Walz planned to leave for China in August of that year, months after the Tiananmen Square protests.

    Walz’s first trip to China in 1989 was to teach English and U.S. history for a year at a high school. He and his wife, Gwen, both high school teachers, led school trips to China in the 1990s and early 2000s. Walz said in 2016 that he had visited China about 30 times, but a Harris-Walz campaign spokesperson clarified in September that Walz has been to the country “closer to 15 times,” according to Minnesota Public Radio News and APM Reports.

    Economy

    Vance: “What (Harris has) actually done instead is drive the cost of food higher by 25%, drive the cost of housing higher by about 60%.”

    Half True.

    Grocery prices have risen by 22% since Biden and Harris took office. Housing prices, according to the Case-Shiller home price index, have risen 38%.

    Economists have told PolitiFact that the main factors driving the peak inflation in 2022 were postpandemic supply chain backups and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Biden’s pandemic relief bill, the American Rescue Plan Act, exacerbated this inflation, economists say, but it did not cause it.

    This also leaves out the simultaneous increase in wages, which have outpaced prices since the start of the pandemic. Wages have also outpaced prices for the past one-year and two-year periods.

    Fentanyl and opioids

    Vance: “Kamala Harris let in fentanyl into our communities at record levels.”

    Mostly False.

    Illicit fentanyl seizures have been rising for years and reached record highs under Biden’s administration. In fiscal year 2015, for example, U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized 70 pounds of fentanyl. As of August 2024, agents have seized more than 19,000 pounds of fentanyl in fiscal year 2024, which ended in September.

    But these are fentanyl seizures — not the amount of the narcotic being “let” into the United States.  

    Vance made this claim while criticizing Harris’ immigration policies. But fentanyl enters the U.S. through the southern border mainly at official ports of entry, and it’s mostly smuggled in by U.S. citizens, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Most illicit fentanyl in the U.S. comes from Mexico made with chemicals from Chinese labs.

    Drug policy experts have said that the illicit fentanyl crisis began years before Biden’s administration and that Biden’s border policies are not to blame for overdose deaths. 

    Experts have also said Congress plays a role in reducing illicit fentanyl. Congressional funding for more vehicle scanners would help law enforcement seize more of the fentanyl that comes into the U.S. Harris has called for increased enforcement against illicit fentanyl use.

    Walz: “And the good news on this is, is the last 12 months saw the largest decrease in opioid deaths in our nation’s history.”

    Mostly True.

    Overdose deaths involving opioids decreased from an estimated 84,181 in 2022 to 81,083 in 2023, based on the most recent provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This decrease, which took place in the second half of 2023, followed a 67% increase in opioid-related deaths between 2017 and 2023.

    The U.S. had an estimated 107,543 drug overdose deaths in 2023 — a 3% decrease from the 111,029 deaths estimated in 2022. This is the first annual decrease in overall drug overdose deaths since 2018. Nevertheless, the opioid death toll remains much higher than just a few years ago, according to KFF. It’s too soon to predict whether the downward trend will continue.

    Walz’s son as shooting witness

    Walz: “Look, I got a, I got a 17-year-old and he witnessed a shooting at a community center playing volleyball.”  

    The Walz campaign told PolitiFact that Walz’s son, Gus Walz, witnessed a January 2023 shooting outside St. Paul’s Oxford Community Center, which houses the Jimmy Lee Recreation Center. The campaign spokesperson said Gus Walz witnessed the shooting but wasn’t involved in the altercation that preceded it.

    Exavir Dwayne Binford Jr., a 26-year-old recreation center employee, got into an argument with a 16-year-old boy that “mushroomed into a fight outside the center that ended with the worker shooting the boy in the head and fleeing,” Minnesota’s public radio station MPR News reported.  

    In February, Binford was sentenced to 10 years and five months in prison, MPR News reported

    MPR News reported that children were present during the shooting, and details reported from the criminal complaint support that was the case. 

    During a Sept. 12 campaign stop in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Walz mentioned this shooting:  “My own son was in a location where someone was shot in the head,” he said. “Too many of us have this.” 

    Health care

    Vance: “Donald Trump could have destroyed the (Affordable Care Act). Instead, he worked in a bipartisan way to ensure that Americans had access to affordable care.”

    False.

    As president, Trump worked to undermine and repeal the Affordable Care Act. He cut millions of dollars in federal funding for ACA outreach and navigators who help people sign up for health coverage. He enabled the sale of short-term health plans that don’t comply with the ACA consumer protections and allowed them to be sold for longer durations, which siphoned people away from the health law’s marketplaces.

    Trump’s administration also backed state Medicaid waivers that imposed first-ever work requirements, reducing enrollment. He also ended insurance company subsidies that helped offset costs for low-income enrollees, he backed an unsuccessful repeal of the landmark 2010 health law and he backed the demise of a penalty imposed for failing to purchase health insurance.

    Affordable Care Act enrollment declined by more than 2 million people during Trump’s presidency, and the number of uninsured Americans rose by 2.3 million, including 726,000 children, from 2016 to 2019, the U.S. Census Bureau reported; that includes three years of Trump’s presidency.

    Climate

    Walz: “Sen. Vance has said that there’s a climate problem in the past. Donald Trump called it (climate change) a hoax and then joked that these things would make more beachfront property to be able to invest in.”

    True.

    In a 2020 speech at Ohio State University, Vance said, “We have a climate problem in our society.” But Vance has grown more dubious of climate change in recent years. In 2022, he told the American Leadership Forum, “I’m skeptical of the idea that climate change is caused purely by man. … (The climate has) been changing, as others pointed out, it’s been changing for millennia.”

    Also that year, Vance said he had “become persuaded that climate change is certainly happening,” but that “some of the alarmism is a little overstated.”

    Trump tweeted that climate change is a “hoax” in 2012, though he made efforts in 2016 to describe that remark as a “joke.” But in 2014 and 2015 Trump repeatedly called climate change a “hoax” in speeches, tweets and media appearances. He also made similar “hoax” comments in 2022.

    In an August 2024 interview with X owner Elon Musk, Trump said, “The biggest threat is not global warming, where the ocean is going to rise one-eighth of an inch over the next 400 years … and you’ll have more oceanfront property.” (The claim about sea level rise is vastly understated and Pants on Fire!)

    Energy

    Walz: “We are producing more natural gas and more oil at any time than we ever have.”

    True.

    U.S. natural gas production has reached new highs during Joe Biden’s presidency, as has U.S. crude oil production, U.S. Energy Information Administration data shows.

    Taxes

    Walz: “Donald Trump hasn’t paid any federal tax in the last 15 years. The last year as president.” 

    Mostly False.

    Trump paid no federal income tax some years, including his last year as president, but not every year in the last 15 years — and we don’t know what he’s paid since 2020 because his tax returns have not been made public.

    In September 2020, The New York Times reported that it obtained copies of Trump’s tax returns. They showed that Trump paid $641,000 in 2015, $750 in federal income taxes in both 2016 and 2017, and, as of that 2020 report, “no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years.”

    In 2022, the House Ways and Means Committee released Trump’s tax returns from 2015 to 2020. According to those returns, Trump reported paying $999,456 in taxes in 2018, $133,445 in taxes in 2019 and $0 in taxes in 2020, ABC News reported

    Walz: Trump “gave the tax cuts that predominantly went to the top class. What happened there was an $8 trillion increase in the national debt, the largest ever.”

    Mostly True.

    Saying which income class earned a greater share of the tax cuts varies depending on the year studied. 

    A 2017 analysis of the Republican tax law by the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center said that by 2027, the tax bill would deliver 82.8% of its benefits to the top 1% of  income earners.

    The distribution of the benefits before 2027 also skewed toward wealthier Americans, but by a lower percentage. For instance, in 2018, the bill was projected to deliver 20.5% of the benefits to the top 1%, the center’s analysis showed. And as late as 2025, 25.3% of the benefits would flow to the top 1%.

    Looking at the increase in federal debt on a president’s watch, Trump currently ranks first for debt accumulated in a single term, at $7.8 trillion. However, Biden is projected to pass Trump’s total by the time he leaves office in January 2025.

    Using a different method — counting how much future debt a president’s actions created — Trump’s policies are projected to accumulate roughly double the amount of future debt as Biden’s.

    January 6, 2021

    Vance: Donald Trump “peacefully gave over power on January the 20th as we have done for 250 years in this country.”

    Mostly False.

    Trump left the White House on Jan. 20, 2021, and another president was sworn in that day. But Vance’s statement ignores Trump’s words and actions that led up to the violent Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. 

    In December 2020, Trump repeatedly encouraged his supporters to fight the election results and gather at the Capitol. On Jan. 6, 2021, Trump used his “Save America” rally to repeat inaccurate claims that he won the election. He continually urged the crowd to “fight” before inviting them to march to the Capitol.

    “Our country has had enough,” Trump said. “We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about. To use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the steal.” 

    The crowd later chanted: “Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump!”

    At the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, supporters mobbed the building and assaulted law enforcement officers. The riot injured about 150 federal and local police officers and caused more than $1 million in damages to the Capitol. More than 1,500 defendants have been charged.

    PolitiFact Executive Director Aaron Sharockman, Chief Correspondent Louis Jacobson, Senior Correspondent Amy Sherman, Staff Writers Grace Abels, Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu, Maria Briceño, Jeff Cercone, Madison Czopek, Marta Campabadal Graus, Samantha Putterman, Sara Swann, Loreben Tuquero, Maria Ramirez Uribe, Researcher Caryn Baird, KFF Health News Senior Editor Stephanie Stapleton and KFF Health News Senior Correspondent Stephanie Armour contributed to this story. 

    Our debate fact-checks rely on both new and previously reported work. We link to past work whenever possible. In some cases, a fact-check rating may be different tonight than in past versions. In those cases, either details of what the candidate said, or how the candidate said it, differed enough that we evaluated it anew. 

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • It Sure Sounds Like Trump Thinks JD Vance Is Going to Lose the Debate to Tim Walz

    It Sure Sounds Like Trump Thinks JD Vance Is Going to Lose the Debate to Tim Walz

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump has preemptively declared that Tuesday night’s VP debate will be “rigged” against JD Vance, a baseless claim that he has made before every debate during this election cycle. Which doesn’t say much about his confidence in his running mate!

    In a Fox Nation interview that was, for some reason, conducted by former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, the ex-president said that he would personally “love to have two or three more debates” against Kamala Harris but “they’re so rigged and so stacked. You’ll see it tomorrow with JD. It’ll be stacked.”

    X content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    There is, of course, no evidence whatsoever that any of the debates that Trump has participated in have been rigged against him, nor any evidence that tonight’s proceedings will be “stacked” against Vance. Rather, Trump has made these claims about previous debates because he’s incapable of admitting when he’s lost. Following his debate last month versus Harris, the former president whined about being fact-checked by the moderators and declared “everybody at ABC” should be fired. He also absurdly floated the idea that Harris received the debate questions ahead of time (which ABC News denied) and that her earrings were actually listening devices, saying, “I hear she got the questions, and I also heard she had something in the ear.”

    At the same time, Trump also embarrassingly claimed he “won” the event, when he quite obviously did not. That probably had something to do with the fact that he spent the debate bragging about his relationship with right-wing authoritarians; refused to admit he lost the election; claimed—for not the first time—that Democrats think it’s okay to “execute” babies; rambled incoherently about “transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison”; and now famously declared, of Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio: “They’re eating the dogs…they’re eating the cats.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Vice-Presidential Debate Between Tim Walz and J.D. Vance: All the Details

    Vice-Presidential Debate Between Tim Walz and J.D. Vance: All the Details

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

    Donald Trump and Kamala Harris may not debate again before Election Day, but their running mates certainly will. On Tuesday night, CBS News will host the one and only vice-presidential debate between Senator J.D. Vance and Governor Tim Walz, and things are bound to get heated — if not weird — between the two Midwesterners. It might even be the first time in American history that two vice-presidential candidates debate the pros and cons of pet cats. Here’s what to know.

    When is the debate?

    The vice-presidential debate will begin at 9 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 1, live from the CBS Broadcast Center in Manhattan. It’s expected to last 90 minutes with two four-minute commercial breaks.

    Where can I watch the debate on TV?

    It will be broadcast on CBS, as well as simulcast on numerous other networks, including PBS, NBC, CNN, C-SPAN, Fox News, MSNBC, and more.

    How can I stream the debate online?

    The debate will be live-streamed on CBS News’ YouTube channel, CBS News 24/7, Paramount+, C-SPAN, and multiple other sites.

    Who is moderating?

    CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell and Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan will moderate.

    Will the candidates’ mics be muted?

    The candidates’ microphones will remain on by default — but CBS says it reserves the right to turn them off if needed.

    Will the candidates’ statements be fact-checked?

    CBS says the moderators won’t be focused on live fact-checking what the candidates say, but it is embedding a QR code, the New York Times points out:

    QR code — the checkerboard-like, black-and-white box that can be scanned by a smartphone — will appear onscreen for long stretches of the CBS telecast. Viewers who scan the code will be directed to the CBS News website, where a squad of about 20 CBS journalists will post fact-checks of the candidates’ remarks in real time. The code will appear only on CBS; viewers who tune in on a different channel will not see it. 

    Will there be a studio audience?

    No. As at this year’s two presidential debates, there will be no live studio audience.

    What are the other debate rules?

    Per CBS News:

    • The topics and questions will not be provided to the candidates in advance, and only the moderators are allowed to ask questions.

    • There will be no opening statements, but each candidate will be able to give a two-minute closing statement. After winning a coin toss, Vance elected to deliver his closing statement last.

    • The candidates will be given two minutes to answer each question, one minute for rebuttals, and, potentially, one minute each for follow-ups at the moderators’ discretion.

    • The candidates will not be allowed to interact with their campaign staff during the two commercial breaks.

    • Vance and Walz will be standing at identical lecterns with Walz on the left side of the stage and Vance on the right.

    • Props and pre-written notes are forbidden. Each candidate will be given a blank notepad, a pen, and a bottle of water.

    Do vice-presidential debates matter?

    Not very much, typically, but it’s at least possible this VP debate could. Unless Harris and Trump both agree to another debate, this will be the last time the campaigns face off directly on prime-time television. It’s a very close race, so swaying even a small number of voters in a key battleground state could make a real difference. And these two particular vice-presidential candidates have each made a surprising amount of national news in recent months. If the past year in politics has taught us anything, it’s to expect the unexpected.

    Will Walz or Vance wear a secret earpiece, use AI contact lenses, or be subject to hostile stage lighting?

    It’s 2024, so there will undoubtedly be some wild conspiracy theories circulating online soon after the debate, suggesting that one of the candidates was given some unfair advantage via technical wizardry and/or partisan spycraft. It was rigged, someone always says, while pointing to some elaborate subterfuge. But please exercise healthy skepticism when encountering such theories, particularly if shared by a certain very online billionaire.

    This post has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Chas Danner

    Source link

  • What are Tim Walz’s economic policies? Here’s a look at what he’s done in Minnesota.

    What are Tim Walz’s economic policies? Here’s a look at what he’s done in Minnesota.

    [ad_1]

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz may be best known for his Midwestern roots, having grown up in Nebraska and spent years as a public school teacher and football coach in Minnesota. But voters will get a chance during his debate Tuesday with vice presidential rival Sen. JD Vance on CBS to hear more about Walz’s views on taxes and the economy, a critical issue in the November election.

    With polls pointing to a tight 2024 presidential race, the share of voters who describe the economy as good has inched up, helping lift support for the Democratic ticket of Vice President Kamala Harris and Walz. Yet almost 6 in 10 voters describe the economy as “bad,” CBS News polling shows, with the economy ranking as the most important issue among likely voters.

    Already, Walz’s approach toward economic issues is visible through his actions as governor of Minnesota, a job he’s held since 2019 and where he is now serving his second term. His policies have included enacting the largest state Child Tax Credit in the nation and enacting free school meals for the state’s K-12 students, while raising taxes on high earners in the state to help pay for those and other social programs.

    Walz’s track record with taxes

    Walz “has added to the progressivity of Minnesota’s tax code,” noted Carl Davis, research director at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), a left-leaning think tank. “Having a system like Minnesota’s, where you ask more of folks at the top, that type of progressive system makes it a whole lot easier to pay for spending on side initiatives like free school lunch.”

    The taxes and social programs that Walz signed into law in Minnesota echo some of the plans that the Harris-Walz ticket have so far rolled out, including a more generous federal Child Tax Credit and plans to increase taxes on higher earners and corporations. 

    “The parallels are pretty obvious” between Walz’s track record in Minnesota and the Harris-Walz national campaign, Davis said. 

    Minnesota’s Child Tax Credit

    A number of states enacted or expanded a Child Tax Credit following the pandemic, when the federal government boosted the national CTC to as much as $3,600 per child. That bigger benefit was credited with helping reduce child poverty to historic lows, but when that enhanced CTC expired in 2022, child poverty rates surged.

    That prompted some states, including Minnesota, to explore enacting their own CTCs, ITEP’s Davis noted. 

    Minnesota’s CTC of $1,750 per child is the most generous state child tax credit in the U.S., according to the Tax Policy Center, a tax-focused think tank. Walz touted it as “the best child tax credit in the country” and encouraged Minnesota parents to file their taxes in order to claim the benefit. 

    Vance, meanwhile, has proposed expanding the federal CTC to $5,000, but Republican lawmakers earlier this year blocked a modest expansion in the tax benefit. Vance didn’t vote on the failed Senate bill to provide a bigger CTC to low-income families, as he wasn’t present for the vote. He told “Face the Nation” in August that the vote was for “show” and destined to fail, regardless of the direction of his vote.

    The debate on Tuesday is likely to pit Walz’s ideas for how to help families afford the rising cost of living against Vance’s economic views, which aside from expanding the CTC have included criticizing Democrats as “anti-family.”

    Lowering Social Security taxes

    Walz has also sought to help Minnesota residents on the other end of the age spectrum — retirees. As part of the state’s 2023 tax bill, Walz eliminated Minnesota income taxes on Social Security benefits for three-quarters of beneficiaries. 

    Under the Minnesota law, couples with annual income of less than $100,000 and single filers earning less than $78,000 are now exempted from state taxes on their Social Security checks.

    Scrapping taxes on Social Security benefits has also been proposed by former President Donald Trump, who earlier this year vowed to eliminate federal income tax on the monthly government payments. About 40% of the nation’s 67 million Social Security recipients earn enough from their benefits to owe taxes to the IRS. 

    But there’s one major difference between the dueling proposals: Walz paid for his cuts to Social Security taxes — as well as the CTC — by raising taxes on higher-income households, according to the Tax Policy Center. Trump and Vance, meanwhile, have indicated they want to lower taxes on corporations and renew the tax cuts in the 2017 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act, which gave the most generous tax cuts to higher earners.

    Walz accomplished his tax cuts for families and seniors by limiting the amount of standard or itemized deductions that high-income filers could claim, as well as reducing a deduction for dividend income and creating a surtax on capital gains income, the Tax Policy Center notes.

    How does Minnesota’s economy compare? 

    Minnesota’s gross domestic product has expanded about 5% since 2018, when Walz was elected governor, according to the Minnesota Compass, a data site created by Wilder Research, a Minnesota-focused research group that focuses on topics such as homelessness and public health. 

    Since the height of the pandemic, when employers cut workers across the nation, Minnesota has regained its lost jobs and is now back to where it was before the health emergency, its data shows.


    How Tim Walz, JD Vance are preparing to debate

    02:56

    Minnesotans also earn more than the typical American worker, with median income in the state of $85,000 in 2023, compared with about $78,000 nationally, Minnesota Compass found. To be sure, Minnesota residents’ incomes have paced ahead of the U.S. median for at least three decades, long predating Walz’s election, the data shows.

    The state ranks highly for doing business, with one recent study from business news site CNBC ranking it No. 6 among the 50 U.S. states based on a number of criteria, including competitiveness, workforce, infrastructure, economy, quality of life and business friendliness.

    A number of businesses have recently planned expansions or investments in Minnesota, including a $5 billion expansion from the Mayo Clinic and a historic $525 million investment from Polar Semiconductor.

    The state’s relatively strong economy also helped generate enough tax revenues to provide surpluses at the start of the 2019 and 2021 budget cycles, as well as an enormous $17.6 billion budget surplus for 2023. The latter helped the state fund the ambitious social programs signed into law by Walz, which include free school meals for children

    —With reporting by the Associated Press. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CBS News says it will be up to Vance and Walz to fact-check each other in veep debate

    CBS News says it will be up to Vance and Walz to fact-check each other in veep debate

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — CBS News, hosting vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz for the general election campaign’s third debate next week, says it will be up to the politicians — not the moderators — to check the facts of their opponents.

    The 90-minute debate, scheduled for 9 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday in a Manhattan studio that once hosted the children’s program “Captain Kangaroo,” will be moderated by the outgoing “CBS Evening News” anchor Norah O’Donnell and “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan.

    Tim Walz and JD Vance meet for their first vice presidential debate:

    During ABC’s debate between presidential contenders Kamala Harris and Donald Trump earlier this month, network moderators on four occasions pointed out inaccurate statements by Trump, and none by Harris. That infuriated the former president and his supporters, who complained it was unfair.

    Last spring, CNN moderators did not question any facts presented by Trump and President Joe Biden in the debate where Biden’s poor performance eventually led to him dropping out of the race.

    On Friday, CBS said the onus will be on Vance and Walz to point out misstatements by the other, and that “the moderators will facilitate those opportunities” during rebuttal time. The network said its own misinformation unit, CBS News Confirmed, will provide real-time fact-checking during the debate on its live blog and on social media, and on the air during post-debate analysis.

    With its plans, CBS News is clearly indicating it wants to take a step back from the heat generated by calling attention to misleading statements by candidates. Some argue that offstage fact-checking is too little, too late and not seen by many people who watch the event.

    It’s not the first time

    Angie Drobnic Holan, director of the international fact-checking network at the Poynter Institute, said she has seen examples of moderators who have successfully encouraged candidates to keep their opponents honest.

    “I’ll be interested in seeing how this works in practice,” she said. “Having said that, you’re basically off-loading one of your journalistic responsibilities onto the candidates themselves, so I don’t think that it’s ideal. It takes journalistic courage to be willing to fact-check the candidates, because the candidates are absolutely going to complain about it. I don’t think the moderators’ first goal is to avoid controversy.”

    During the ABC debate, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis corrected Trump statements on abortion, the 2020 election, crime statistics and reports that immigrants in Ohio were eating pets.

    Unlike the two presidential debates, the two sides agreed that the vice presidential candidates’ microphones will not be turned off while their opponent is speaking, increasing the chance for genuine back-and-forth exchanges and the risk that the two men will talk over each other. CBS says it reserves the right to shut off a “hot mic” when necessary. Each candidate will have two minutes for a closing statement, with Vance winning a virtual coin toss and choosing to get the last word.

    The stakes are high for CBS News

    It’s a big moment for CBS News, long mired in third place in the evening news ratings. O’Donnell just announced she was stepping down from the role. Brennan is considered a rising star.

    Like with the presidential debates, CBS is making its feed available for other networks to televise, and many are expected to take advantage of the opportunity.

    There will be no audience when Vance and Walz meet at a West Side studio that, in its past, has hosted editions of “60 Minutes,” “CBS Sunday Morning,” “Inside the NFL,” “Geraldo” and “Captain Kangaroo.”

    It’s not known whether there will be other opportunities to see Trump and Harris together on the same stage before the Nov. 5 election. Harris has accepted an invitation from CNN for another debate on Oct. 23, but Trump has rejected it. In a poll taken by Quinnipiac University and released earlier this week, likely voters said by roughly a two-to-one margin that they’d like them face off again.

    CBS’ “60 Minutes” is looking to land both Harris and Trump for back-to-back interviews that will air on Oct. 7, but neither candidate has committed to it yet.

    ___

    David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump claims Gov. Walz asked him to say they were friends to stop protesters in 2020

    Trump claims Gov. Walz asked him to say they were friends to stop protesters in 2020

    [ad_1]

    By Pat Kessler

    MINNEAPOLIS — Former President Donald Trump says Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz once asked him to say they were friends in order to stop pro-Trump protesters from attacking him.

    Trump made the claim on the popular Fox News program “Gutfeld!” He said Walz asked him for protection from MAGA protesters outside the governor’s residence during the 2020 riots.

    In Trump’s story, Walz pleaded for help and Trump saved him.

    “He called up years ago, I was in the White House, and he said, ‘My house is being surrounded by people with American flags.’ And I said, ‘Is that a good thing or a bad thing?’ He said, ‘I think they’re going to attack me.’” Trump said. “He said, ‘Can you put out a word that like I’m your friend?’ I don’t even know him, but that’s the only time I ever spoke to him. I put out a statement. ‘He’s a good man, the governor. He’s on our side.’ I didn’t know him, but I didn’t want him to get hurt.”

    Trump appears to have conflated separate events and mischaracterized crucial facts.

    There were pro-Trump protesters at the Minnesota governor’s residence in April 2020 protesting Walz’s emergency COVID lockdown orders. They were boisterous but not threatening.

    That same day, Trump stirred up protesters to march on several blue state governors to oppose lockdowns, tweeting, “Liberate Minnesota!”

    That pandemic protest had no connection whatsoever to the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis six weeks later.

    It was Trump who called Walz then, offering military assistance after Walz activated the National Guard.

    That night, Trump famously tweeted, “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

    Trump says the MAGA protest is the only time he has ever spoken with Walz, but that’s not true either. As governor, Walz spoke with Trump multiple times and says the conversations were “relatively cordial.”

    [ad_2]

    WCCO Staff

    Source link

  • More Mainstream Pressure For The Federal Government Accept Cannabis

    More Mainstream Pressure For The Federal Government Accept Cannabis

    [ad_1]

    A federal department wants more control over legal cannabis- but until it rescheduled or more, there hands are tied.

    Legal marijuana has turned out to be surprisingly popular. It has been embraced by all ages for fun, to manage anxiety, to help sleep, for pain and more. Gen Z has started a trend of moving away from alcohol and toward the healthier cannabis.  Boomers, guided by AARP, are embracing it for a variety of medical benefits and for enjoyment. But now a federal agency has come out to say the government needs to have more say in stregthen and products. The issue, until rescheduling or decriminalization, they don’t have the authority. So this is just more mainstream pressure for the federal government to accept cannabis as part of today.

    RELATED: The Most Popular Marijuana Flavors

    Both presidential candidates along with VP candidate Tim Walz have said they are for moving cannabis forward.  But have made statements of support, but no real clear action.  When asked should marijuana be legalized across the U.S. for recreational and medical use, he replied.

    “Well, I think it’s an issue for the states on some of those, and that’s the way the states have done it,” Walz, the former Minnesota’s governor and Congressman said, dodging the question.

    Photo by Darren Halstead via Unsplash

    But with more people using, especial for medical, and a state patchwork of products, strengthand dosage, it is a bit messy. States have oversight, but not the same resources as the federal movement.  Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration are for rescheduling and oversight.  Now the Center for Disease Control and Prevention are adding their voice.  They released a report about what needs to happen, but nothing can be done until the federal government has a big voice.

    “We’d like the federal government to step up to provide some leadership in this area,” said Dr. Steven Teutsch of the University of Southern California, who chaired the committee behind the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report. The CDC and the National Institutes of Health sponsored the report. A CDC spokesperson said Thursday that the agency would study the recommendations and that more money would be needed to implement them.

    RELATED: This Natural Cannabinoid Makes You Feel Happy

    Aaron Smith of the National Cannabis Industry Association said states have protected public health by replacing criminal markets with regulated businesses “that are required to test products for contaminants, practice truth in labeling, and most importantly, keep cannabis products out of the hands of minors.” Making cannabis legal nationally would improve public health through federal regulation, Smith said.

    [ad_2]

    Amy Hansen

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: A look back at some of the questionable claims made during the Democratic convention

    FACT FOCUS: A look back at some of the questionable claims made during the Democratic convention

    [ad_1]

    The Democrats’ star-studded, four-day convention drew to a close as Vice President Kamala Harris accepted the party’s nomination for president. The festivities were high on entertainment and praise for Harris and running mate Tim Walz. But while most speakers stuck to the script — and the facts — the convention was not without false information or statements that begged for additional context.

    Here’s a look at the facts around some of those claims.

    Trump’s views on an abortion ban

    VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS said Trump would “ban medication abortion and enact a nationwide abortion ban with or without Congress.”

    THE FACTS: While Trump has said in the past that he would support a national ban on abortion, he said Thursday morning on Fox & Friends: “I would never. There will not be a federal ban. This is now back in the states where it belongs.”

    In April, he said he would leave the issue up to the states in a video on his Truth Social platform.

    Days later, asked by a reporter upon arriving in Atlanta whether he would sign a national abortion ban, Trump shook his head and said “no.”

    But just a month earlier Trump suggested he’d support a national ban on abortion around 15 weeks of pregnancy. He also often brags about appointing the Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the constitutional right to an abortion.

    Trump has previously supported a federal ban on abortion at 20 weeks of pregnancy. In a letter to anti-abortion leaders during his 2016 campaign, Trump expressed his commitment to this view by vowing to sign the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

    The Republican presidential nominee advocated for the bill again in 2018, at that year’s annual March for Life festival in Washington. The bill, which included exceptions for saving the life of a pregnant woman, as well as rape or incest, was passed by the House in 2017, but failed to move forward in the Senate.

    Trump told CBS News on Monday that he would not enforce the Comstock Act to restrict the sale of abortion medication by mail. The act, originally passed in 1873, was revived in an effort to block the mailing of mifepristone, the pill used in more than half of U.S. abortions.

    Trump and Project 2025

    COLORADO REP. JASON CROW: “Donald Trump’s Project 2025 would abandon our troops, abandon our veterans, our allies and our principles.”

    THE FACTS: Many speakers at the convention have linked Trump to Project 2025. Trump has repeatedly disavowed the conservative initiative, saying on social media he hasn’t read it and doesn’t know anything about it. At a rally in Michigan, he said Project 2025 was written by people on the “severe right” and some of the things in it are “seriously extreme.” He has also denied knowing who is behind the plan.

    Project 2025 has also said it is not tied to a specific candidate or campaign. And yet, it is connected in many ways to Trump’s orbit. Some of the people involved in Project 2025 are former senior officials from the Trump administration. The project’s former director is Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under Trump.

    Trump’s campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt was featured in one of Project 2025’s videos. John McEntee, a former director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office in the Trump administration, is a senior adviser. McEntee told the conservative news site The Daily Wire earlier this year that Project 2025’s team would integrate a lot of its work with the campaign after the summer when Trump would announce his transition team.

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, penned the forward of a yet unreleased book written by Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, which created Project 2025.

    __ CROW again: “Trump plans to do Putin’s bidding by abandoning Ukraine and walking away from our NATO allies. In chapters two and three, he plans to fire our national security and military professionals and then replace them with MAGA loyalists.”

    THE FACTS: In regards to the Russia-Ukraine war, Project 2025 lays out three schools of thought about U.S. involvement, one of them being that it should not continue. However, it does not advocate for any one over the other.

    Crow’s claim that national security and military professionals will be replaced with Trump supporters does ring true. Among its recommendations are that senior CIA leaders “must commit to carrying out the President’s agenda and be willing to take calculated risks.” It also states that the National Security Council should be made up of “personnel with technical expertise and experience as well as an alignment to the President’s declared national security policy priorities.”

    Trump’s alleged comments about those captured or killed in military service

    ARIZONA SEN. MARK KELLY: “Trump thinks that Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice are suckers and losers.”

    THE FACTS: Kelly was among many DNC speakers who brought up similar claims. He was referencing allegations first reported in The Atlantic on Sept. 3, 2020, that Trump made disparaging remarks about members of the U.S. military who have been captured or killed, including referring to the American war dead at a World War I cemetery outside Paris in 2018 as “suckers” and “losers.”

    But the truth is that it hasn’t been proven definitively, one way or the other, whether Trump actually made these comments.

    The Republican presidential nominee said the day the Atlantic story came out that it is “totally false,” calling it “a disgraceful situation” by a “terrible magazine.”

    Speaking to reporters after he returned to Washington from a campaign rally in Pennsylvania soon after, Trump said: “I would be willing to swear on anything that I never said that about our fallen heroes. There is nobody that respects them more. No animal — nobody — what animal would say such a thing?”

    And yet, a senior Defense Department official with firsthand knowledge of the events and a senior U.S. Marine Corps officer who was told about Trump’s comments confirmed some of his remarks to The Associated Press after the Atlantic story was published, including the ones about “suckers” and “losers.”

    Walz’s accomplishments as governor

    MINNESOTA SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR, touting Tim Walz’s accomplishments as governor of the state: “Tim has delivered — paid leave, school lunches and the biggest tax cut in Minnesota history.”

    THE FACTS: Over the last two years, Walz has indeed signed legislation to create a paid family and medical leave program in Minnesota, and for free school breakfasts and lunches for all students regardless of income.

    Walz also signed what his administration and Democratic legislative leaders have touted as the largest tax cut in state history, about $3 billion worth as part of the two-year budget approved last year. It included a one-time refundable tax credit of $260 for single filers and up to $1,300 for a family with three children. It also established a child tax credit of up to $1,750 per child for lower-income families, subject to income limits. In addition, it exempted more people from state taxes on Social Security income, but left the tax in place for higher-income seniors.

    But critics take issue with his characterization of it as the biggest tax cut in state history. The Center of the American Experiment, a conservative think tank, points out that low-income Minnesotans don’t pay the state income tax, so in its view giving them tax credits amounts to income redistribution and welfare — not tax cuts.

    Republican legislators tried to hold out for permanent tax cuts for everyone, but Democrats control both chambers of the Legislature and went for targeted relief instead.

    Bill Clinton’s keeping score

    FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON on Wednesday: “Since the end of the Cold War in 1989, America has created 51 million new jobs. I swear I checked this three times. Even I couldn’t believe it. What’s the score? Democrats 50, Republicans one.”

    THE FACTS: The math shows Clinton is technically right, but the underlying story is more nuanced. There were four recessions since the end of the Cold War — each of them beginning during the Republican presidencies of George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Donald Trump. That’s the simplest explanation for the trend outlined by Clinton.

    Let’s get precise: The U.S. economy has added almost 51.6 million jobs since January 1989, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That includes a net 1.3 million jobs added under Republicans.

    It’s worth noting that this simple scoreboard is incomplete. There can be reasons for a recession that have nothing to do necessarily with the president — as market economies can have minds of their own. There can be bad policy choices in previous administrations that led to downturns happening later. And job growth generally comes from the combination of rising populations, improvements in workers’ skills and the actions of private employers. The U.S. economy is big and diverse enough that areas in the industrial Midwest struggled even as parts of the Sunbelt boomed.

    After George H.W. Bush endured a brief downturn, the economy recovered and 2.3 million jobs were added during his term. But Americans still felt the economy was poor and elected Clinton.

    Growth jumped during Clinton’s eight years as more women entered the labor force and 22.9 million jobs were added. But shortly after he left office, the tech bubble in the stock market burst and the U.S. economy entered into a brief recession. The economy shed jobs for a little over two years, then mounted a comeback only to slam headfirst into the mortgage bust and the 2008 financial crisis that produced the Great Recession and mass layoffs. Still, over eight years, George W. Bush added a little over 2.1 million jobs because the U.S. population was still growing.

    Democrat Barack Obama inherited the disastrous economy in early 2009 and endured a grindingly slow but successful recovery. The U.S. economy added 11.3 million jobs.

    Trump took the presidency and promised an unprecedented economic boom. The job market continued to build on its health during Obama’s final four years, only to get crushed by the coronavirus pandemic as shutdowns for health reasons led to unemployment. As a result, the country had 3.1 million fewer jobs when his term ended.

    President Joe Biden oversaw a recovery with additional pandemic aid and other investments that accelerated hiring, but it was accompanied by higher inflation that left much of the public feeling pessimistic about the economy. Still, his presidency — still ongoing — has added more than 15.8 million jobs.

    Whether Trump said women should be punished for having abortions

    ALEXIS MCGILL JOHNSON, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, on Wednesday: “Do we want a president who said women should be punished for having abortions?”

    THE FACTS: Asked whether he would be comfortable with states deciding to punish women who access abortions after the procedure is banned, Trump said in an April interview with Time magazine: “The states are going to say. It’s irrelevant whether I’m comfortable or not. It’s totally irrelevant, because the states are going to make those decisions.”

    Trump said outright during his 2016 campaign that women who get illegal abortions should receive “some form of punishment.” The comment came during a heated exchange with MSNBC host Chris Matthews at a town hall taping in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

    But Trump quickly did an about-face. His campaign sought within hours to take back his comment in two separate statements, ultimately saying he believes abortion providers — not their patients — should be the ones punished.

    The first statement said he believed the issue should rest with state governments, while the second entirely rejected the idea that a woman should face repercussions for undergoing an illegal abortion.

    “If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman,” Trump said in the second statement. “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb.”

    Trump faced backlash from both abortion-rights supporters and anti-abortion activists, The Associated Press reported at the time.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Melissa Goldin in New York, Josh Boak in Chicago and Steve Karnowski in Minneapolis, contributed to this report.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • FACT FOCUS: False claims follow Minnesota governor’s selection as Harris’ running mate

    FACT FOCUS: False claims follow Minnesota governor’s selection as Harris’ running mate

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris’ announcement on Tuesday that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz will be her running mate in the 2024 presidential election increased the spread of false claims about the Midwestern Democrat, some of which appeared on social media even before Harris made her pick public.

    Here’s a look at the facts.

    ___

    CLAIM: Walz said on CNN that he wants to invest in a “ladder factory” to help people scale the wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and illegally enter the U.S.

    THE FACTS: That’s false. Posts are misrepresenting a comment Walz made on an episode of CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” last week. In the full segment, the Democrat criticizes former President Donald Trump’s plan to build a wall on the southern border by joking about the hypothetical investment. He then gives multiple other examples of how to address illegal crossings into the U.S. through Mexico.

    Amid Harris’ Tuesday announcement, social media users used a clip from the segment to make it seem as though the Minnesota governor was advocating for illegal immigration.

    “He talks about this wall, I always say, ‘let me know how high it is, if it’s 25 feet then I’ll invest in a 30-foot-ladder factory,’” Walz says, referencing Trump. “That’s not how you stop this.”

    One X post that shared the clip reads: “FLASHBACK: Kamala’s VP pick, Tim Walz, says he should invest in a ‘ladder factory’ to help illegal aliens climb the border wall.”

    But Walz was not offering to help people enter the U.S. without authorization. He was actually discussing how to prevent this from happening.

    In the full segment, after making the investment quip, Walz gives alternative ideas for how to handle illegal crossings on the southern border. Arrests for such crossings reached a record high in December, but dropped to a new low for the Biden administration at the end of July following a temporary ban on asylum.

    “You stop this using electronics, you stop it using more border control agents and you stop it by having a legal system that allows for that tradition of allowing folks to come here just like my relatives did,” Walz says near the end of the segment. “To come here, be able to work and establish the American dream.”

    He also spoke in support of a bipartisan border security package intended to cut back on illegal crossings that the Senate voted down in February.

    — Associated Press writer Melissa Goldin contributed this report.

    ___

    CLAIM: Walz changed the Minnesota flag so that it resembles the Somali flag.

    THE FACTS: Minnesota did unfurl a new state flag and accompanying seal in May, but the changes were made to replace an old design that Native Americans said reminded them of painful memories of conquest and displacement. The State Emblems Redesign Commission was established during the 2023 legislative session to oversee the development of a new design.

    Changes were made to eliminate an old state seal that featured the image of a Native American riding off into the sunset while a white settler plowed his field with a rifle at the ready. The seal was a key feature of the old flag.

    The commission included public officials, design experts and members of tribal and other communities of color. Its purpose statement dictated that the designs “must accurately and respectfully reflect Minnesota’s shared history, resources, and diverse cultural communities. Symbols, emblems, or likenesses that represent only a single community or person, regardless of whether real or stylized, may not be included in a design.”

    What to know about the 2024 Election

    The public submitted more than 2,600 proposals and the commission picked one from Andrew Prekker, 25, of Luverne, as the basis for the flag.

    Prekker said Walz had nothing to do with the creation of the flag, and Somalia had nothing to do with the flag design. Minnesota is home to the largest Somali population in the U.S. and is home to U.S. Rep. Ilhan Oman, who was born in Somalia and is a member of an informal group of progressive Democratic House members known as The Squad.

    “The inspiration behind my flag were three main concepts inspired by Minnesota’s history and culture: The North Star, the Minnesota shape, and three stripes representing different facets of Minnesotan identity,” he wrote in an email.

    Prekker’s original design had the white star on the blue background with white, green and light blue stripes stretching over the rest of the flag. The flag was compared online with flags from states in Somalia that have green, white and blue stripes and a star. The stripes were dropped by the commission in the final design.

    The final version of the flag features a dark blue shape resembling Minnesota with a white, eight-pointed star on it. The right side is light blue and is meant to symbolize the state’s abundant waters that led to it being known as the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

    The Somali flag has a five-point star on a light blue background. “There is no connection to Somalia or any other country, and in complete honesty I didn’t even know Somalia existed before the whole flag debacle. Any similarities people want to see are a coincidence. It is a Minnesotan flag, and that is what I designed it for,” Prekker said.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    [ad_2]

    Source link