[ad_1]
A year after a law that effectively banned TikTok from the U.S. went into effect, China and the U.S. have signed off on a deal, according to a White House official. Kelly O’Grady explains.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A year after a law that effectively banned TikTok from the U.S. went into effect, China and the U.S. have signed off on a deal, according to a White House official. Kelly O’Grady explains.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A woman went to her local bank with her husband, only for bank clerks to make rude remarks about her in front of him.
According to Zoe Goulet (@zogoulet), “all three of the clerks” questioned her husband’s decision to put her name on his bank account. They reportedly told her husband that “she could take all of [his] money and run with it.”
Goulet responded by restating that she was his wife and that it was their money, not just his. Since then, many viewers have shared their perspectives, urging the couple to reconsider their bank due to what they described as the teller’s blatant sexism.
The TikToker’s video garnered more than 817,000 views as of Thursday.
Based on Goulet’s video, it seems that the tellers shamed her for wanting to be on her husband’s bank account. It was a joint decision by the couple, something they emphasized in the comments. Ultimately, the remarks were unnecessary in the context of the situation.
But bank tellers did have some information and insight to offer Goulet and her husband.
“As a banker myself, I wouldn’t word it like that,” one viewer said. “We do make sure the other person is aware that the person being added has 100% access. I have seen many times [where] someone [is] being added and they break up/ divorce. [Then, the] money is gone. [I’m] not saying that’s you… but we have seen it.”
It is true that when a couple has a joint bank account, both parties can make withdrawals and deposits. That means if one person were to take thousands of dollars out of a shared savings account, they technically could do so.
It is a common enough issue that there are hundreds of articles discussing the topic. Legal Clarity states that a financial institution is not responsible “at any time” for one person withdrawing all of the funds from a legally shared account.
From this perspective, it could make more sense why the clerks were warning Goulet’s husband about the potential risks of the situation as a way of preventing further issues down the line.
“Tellers are trained to ask questions and be kind of nosey to prevent fraud, they most likely just needed to confirm with [the] husband that is what he really wanted,” added another commenter. “You’d be surprised how many people don’t know what a joint account is/equal access for both parties.”
Bank tellers may have more “audacity,” at least according to some recent interactions that others on the internet have had.
For instance, one woman went to a Chase Bank to get some documents notarized. The tellers proceeded to allegedly make fun of her height until she was near tears.
For many viewers, they also had trouble with bank tellers outright refusing to help them create joint bank accounts.
One commenter shared, “Omg! We did the same thing & the clerk (a woman) was like ‘are you sure you don’t want to keep a private account for yourself just incase’ and I was like “ummmm no I’m good.”
The Goulet family found the comments rude and incendiary, especially considering that the tellers could have asked standard questions to determine whether Goulet’s husband was making the financial decision with the correct intentions. The questions, however, felt more like jokes than genuine concerns.
“I would’ve immediately asked to take all our money and investments out and went to a different bank. Tellers should be professional regardless of the situation,” said one commenter.
Surprisingly, though, some commenters agreed with the bank tellers, saying that it was Goulet’s husband’s money, not hers.
“No, it’s not our money. It’s his money if it’s his labor to produce the money it’s his money. Yeah, I would never put my spouse on my banking account,” added one viewer. Goulet’s husband, Macgregor Goulet, responded, saying, “She’s gonna carry OUR baby for 9 months then push out OUR baby in labor… way harder than any labor I’ve done. It’s her money just as much as it is mine.”
Ultimately, other people’s relationships and marriages are different. Some couples are more comfortable putting a spouse on their personal banking accounts or having one unified account. It can be a practical option for couples who share children or other living expenses and want to simplify their finances. For others, it can be a harder decision to make.
@zogoulet Like it’s OUR money. We are ONE!!
The Mary Sue reached out to the Goulet family via email for comment.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Rachel Thomas
Source link
[ad_1]
Washington — A year after a law that effectively banned TikTok from the U.S. went into effect, China and the U.S. have signed off on a deal, according to a White House official.
The bipartisan law, passed in 2024, required that TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, sever ties with the social media platform’s American operations or lose access to U.S. app stores and web-hosting services.
The law, which was unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court, made it unlawful for app stores to offer updates or new downloads after Jan. 19, 2025. But President Trump has issued executive orders every few months directing the Justice Department not to penalize the tech companies who host TikTok on their platforms.
CBS News previously reported that TikTok’s U.S. operations will be held by a consortium of firms including Oracle and Silver Lake. (Oracle was cofounded by Larry Ellison, whose son David Ellison is the chairman and CEO of Paramount Skydance, which is the parent company of CBS News. The Ellison family owns a controlling interest in Paramount Skydance.)
Details about the arrangement, including who controls the platform’s algorithm, have not yet been disclosed. Semafor first reported that the U.S. and China had finalized a deal. It’s unclear how the Chinese government plans to move forward. Its statements about a forced sale have been vague, though it has said that any agreement would have to comply with Chinese laws and regulations.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
A woman flew with United Airlines, only to hear what she described as the most perilous song while landing. “Hallelujah,” a classic written by Leonard Cohen and covered by thousands of artists across multiple genres, blasted through the speakers after the plane’s wheels touched the ground.
That moment struck a nerve, according to TikTok user Paige Ruder (@paigegettingpaid), who said flying already feels frightening amid recent plane crashes in the United States. She posted her experience with United Airlines in a video with over 4,000 views. That anxiety, combined with the plane playing a praise-filled song like “Hallelujah,” which is traditionally folk but sometimes bluesy, pushed Ruder toward unease rather than calm.
“About the last song I want to hear playing on a plane from the AIRLINE,” she said in her video’s comments section.
There have been a number of incidents that have made U.S. passengers cautious on domestic and international flights in recent history. In January 2025, an American Airlines flight crashed into a Black Hawk Helicopter, which resulted in 265 people dying. In February 2025, another Delta Airlines flight crash-landed at the Toronto Pearson International Airport.
There have also been a number of incidents with airliners catching fire before and during routine flights. In July 2025, the left engine of a Boeing 767-400 headed toward Atlanta caught fire. The flight crew immediately initiated an emergency landing. Later, in November 2025, A UPS cargo flight crashed, killing 15 people.
There’s also been increasingly more incidents of thermal runways on flights across all carriers. The FAA has tracked an increase in lithium battery incidents since 2021, with each year having over 70 different events involving “smoke, fire, or extreme heat.”
All of these instances have a variety of factors playing a part in flight risks or total crashes. In essence, severe mistakes on commercial and even cargo flights usually occur due to a combination of errors. But that’s not necessarily comforting when considering taking a flight in 2027.
These incidents can make flying feel riskier. But flying with an air carrier is still very safe, according to flight experts. Statistically, it is still incredibly unlikely for a fatal crash to occur. After the fatal Washington D.C crash, publications like The Independent compared fatal crashes to fatal air incidents, ultimately concluding that flying only gets safer over time. That still rings true in 2026.
It seems that United Airlines is statistically more likely to play music upon landing than to crash the airplane. At least, that’s what many United Airlines fliers may have experienced. Commenters shared that they, too, have heard “Hallelujah” while flying.
“They played it on my flight to Colorado!! The people behind me were singing out loud. I thought we were going down,” said one commenter.
The tone of “Hallelujah” greatly depends on which version is playing. If it is Jeff Buckley’s, expect a slightly melancholic journey off the plane. But expect a different vibe from a Jennifer Hudson or Brandi Carlile rendition, which may end up being slightly more suited to calm nerves after a slightly perilous ride.
@paigegettingpaid On both flights i took with them ? #travel #traveltiktok #fyp #flying #unitedairlines ♬ Hallelujah – Jeff Buckley
The Mary Sue reached out to United Airlines and Paige via email for comment.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Rachel Thomas
Source link
[ad_1]
If you’re a soda drinker, you probably don’t expect anything out of the ordinary after purchasing a pack of your favorite flavor. Except for this Texas-based couple who found a complete oddity in their Dr. Pepper box.
In a video with over 134,000 views, TikTok creator Spaghetti Bandit (@thunderbuttmutt) films a lone can of Big Red counter.
“So, we found a Big Red in our containers of Dr. Pepper,” she says, shifting he camera to her boyfriend holding a plastic container of the soda and back to the anomaly. “We’re about to see if there’s Big Red in there.”
Then, her boyfriend cracks open the can and pours it into a cup. Instead of the burgundy liquid, bright red flows inside, an indication that it is the beloved Texas beverage, which the man sighs in disappointment.
The content creator explains in the caption what led up to the test run: “We found a Big Red in our box of Dr Pepper from Costco and we’re curious where in production the mistake happened. I was so curious to see if there would be Big Red or Dr Pepper in the can!”
Division sparked among viewers in the comments section. Many resonated with Spaghetti Bandit’s boyfriend’s feelings of dismay.
“I felt that sound of [disappointment],” one viewer commented.
“As an avid big red drinker, I would have been so upset if I opened that and it was not big red especially if it was Dr.Pepper,” a second remarked.
“Yuck I’d be upset. big red tastes like throw up,” a third said.
However, some Big Red fans interpreted this as a win.
“Big red is goated tho. Why did they sound disappointed,” one commenter stated.
“Win! I love big red,” another concurred.
In 2008, Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. (now called ‘Keurig Dr Pepper’ after merging with Keurig Green Mountain ten years later) acquired a minority stake in Big Red Inc. According to Consumer Reports, Dr. Pepper ships and manufactures 80% of Big Red products, making it the largest distributor. In fact, both companies were born in the heart of Waco, Texas. Nevertheless, an alleged former Keurig Dr. Pepper employee offered an explanation.
“I used to work at dp and if I was repacking a 12p and I was short 1 can I would throw a random one in,” they revealed.
Since the same facilities often manufacture the beverages, a production error could have caused this regardless of intention.
@thunderbuttmutt We found a Big Red in our box of Dr Pepper from Costco and we’re curious where in production the mistake happened. I was so curious to see if there would be Big Red or Dr Pepper in the can!
The Mary Sue reached out to Spaghetti Bandit via TikTok comment and direct message as well as Keurig Dr Pepper via press email.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Melody Heald
Source link
[ad_1]
Tipping has been a divisive topic among American consumers for years now.
While there are industries where gratuity feels automatic, like restaurants, bars, and food delivery, there are other services where the expectations feel less clear.
In fact, in recent years, tipping prompts have popped up in places people never expected, including medical offices and public water fountains.
While massage therapy is a service where tipping is common, it’s not always clearly defined. Most clients expect to leave something extra if the massage was good, especially for longer sessions.
Still, there are some questions. Is there such a thing as tipping too little for a massage? And more importantly, should a customer ever be asked to tip more? One Kansas City woman says that’s exactly what happened after a 90-minute session.
TikTok creator Alyssa (@alyssaj1992) shared a storytime explaining why she crossed one massage parlor off her list permanently. Her video has garnered more than 61,700 views.
“Just got an amazing massage, 90 minutes. It was fabulous,” she says at the start of the clip. She explains that the session felt so good, she was already thinking about asking whether the business offered memberships or packages.
She says she prepaid for the massage when she arrived and was asked whether she wanted to tip before or after the session. “I’m not gonna tip you before because I don’t know what kind of service you’re going to give me,” she says. “I already spent a hundred and some dollars for just the massage itself.”
After the massage ended, Alyssa says she asked if she could tip using her card. When the employee said yes, she named an amount she felt was generous. “I told her how much, which I thought was actually a really good amount to tip her,” she says.
“She literally says, ‘Oh, um, 90,’” Alyssa recalls, referencing the length of the massage. “‘Ninety minutes is a lot of work. Would you consider more?’”
Alyssa says the comment caught her completely off guard. She explains she had been feeling relaxed and excited about possibly becoming a regular customer.
“All of me was just like, oh, I’m done,” she says. She told the employee no and immediately felt uncomfortable. “I feel super awkward, kind of embarrassed, like I just insulted you.”
She adds that the tip in question was $25. “I’ve never tipped any masseuse more than $25,” she says. “None. Zero. Zilch.” While she admits she technically could have tipped more, she chose not to after being asked directly. “That’s just you,” she says, adding that the request crossed a line for her.
Alyssa clarifies that the massage itself was excellent and that the employee wasn’t rude overall. Still, the moment stuck with her. “That last comment really did take me off,” she says. “I’m not getting a membership there. I will not go back.”
Most industry guidance suggests tipping massage therapists similarly to other spa services. General advice places gratuity between 15 and 20 percent of the service cost. For a 90-minute massage priced around $100 to $130, that range often lands between $15 and $30.
Tipping more than 20 percent is typically viewed as optional rather than expected and is usually reserved for exceptional service or last-minute accommodations. Tipping less than 15 percent can happen when the experience falls short, though clients are often encouraged to share concerns directly with the business.
Context matters. Day spas and massage franchises usually expect tips unless gratuity is included. Hotel and resort spas sometimes add service charges automatically. Medical or therapeutic massage performed in a clinical setting typically does not involve tipping at all.
In the comments, many viewers said Alyssa’s experience felt inappropriate.
“I work at a massage spa in California and for 90 minutes $25 is perfectly fine,” one person wrote. “I would say most people tip between 18 and 30.”
Another commenter reacted more bluntly: “COULD YOU CONSIDER A LITTLE MORE?!?!?! Nope. And now this tip is gone.”
@alyssaj1992 I won’t be going back there again
A hairstylist weighed in as well. “You do not need to ever be pressured to tip more,” they wrote. “If someone wants to leave a tip, it’s appreciated, but it’s never expected.”
Other users shared similar experiences. One person said a business followed them outside after they didn’t tip. Another recalled being asked to tip 25 to 35 percent during a Botox appointment performed by the owner. “I refused and never went back,” they wrote.
The Mary Sue has reached out to Alyssa via TikTok messages for more information about her experience.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Ljeonida Mulabazi
Source link
[ad_1]
New Jersey woman Katie (@llewynthecat) has gone viral after feeling short-changed over a Sephora freebie. But is her upset justified?
In the clip, which has amassed 118,100 views, she held up a bottle of Gisou hair oil to the camera—the bottle was less than half full.
“What the hell is this, Sephora?” she asked. “I just got this as part of the minis that you get if you spend $90 on Sephora right now. And this is how much I got in my thing that was already only 0.1 ounces.”
“And like, I know it was free, but come on, it’s not even halfway full,” she added. “What am I supposed to do with this? Like, the packaging isn’t even oily. And neither is anything in this bag. So, like, it’s not like it spilled. It just wasn’t ever full. Come on.”
Tagging Sephora in the description, Katie added, “I know this was free but this was so disappointing.”
“Not to mention they shipped it separately from my order, which isn’t coming until tomorrow. Yes, I know this is a champagne problem, please let me complain.”
The TikToker didn’t immediately respond to The Mary Sue’s request for comment via TikTok comment.
@llewynthecat @sephora I know this was free but this was so disappointing 🙁 No to mention they shipped it separately from my order which isn’t coming until tomorrow. Yes I know this is a champagne problem, please let me complain #sephora #sample #mini #beauty #makeup ♬ i was only temporary – my head is empty
In the comments, users couldn’t believe how empty the bottle was. “That’s like 2 drops,” one wrote. That’s a pill size,” another added. “No way we’re letting companies give us half full bottles,” a third said, shocked.
And a fourth quipped, “A packet of soy sauce has more product than what’s in there.”
Meanwhile, a fifth speculated, “They give influencers more, which is disappointing since we’re actually paying for it,” while a sixth suggested, “We should boycott Sephora.”
Sephora and Gisou didn’t immediately respond to The Mary Sue’s request for comment via email.
Katie isn’t the only one to draw the short straw when it comes to certain Sephora freebies.
As part of Sephora’s Beauty Insider program, customers enrolled can collect a free birthday reward, which usually consists of a box of travel-sized products like makeup, skincare, and perfume.
However, when TikToker Hajra (@itshellohajra) opened her box of Glossier goodies, she was shocked to discover that the Glossier Cloud Paint blush only has 0.13 fl oz of product. In the background was the viral audio: “I hope you’re hungry…for nothing.”
Evidently, there seems to be a growing frustration over Sephora’s freebies—the question is, will they listen?
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Charlotte Colombo
Source link
[ad_1]
As lip filler ages, it may migrate to other areas of the face, creating an undesired look. While it’s usually fixable with a simple dissolver procedure, one Australian woman shares her scary experience as a heads-up to others.
In a video with over 18.5 million views, TikToker Gabby Goessling (@gabby.goessling) posts a clip of her taking a mirror selfie before her lip filler dissolver appointment.
On-screen text reads, “‘I’m getting my lip filler dissolved so my lips will be a bit swollen, but I’ll still come to the pub, I’ll just wear a mask.”
However, the situation takes an unexpected turn. She shares a picture of her lips, which appear swollen and purple after the procedure. In subsequent pictures, her entire lower face and eyes puff up, suggesting a severe allergic reaction.
The caption reads, “Why tf can’t anything normal happen to me?”
In a follow-up video, she confirms that she experienced an allergic reaction and an ambulance took her to the hospital. In the days after her reaction, her swelling slowly goes down and returns to normal. Her lip filler is gone, too.
Most lip fillers contain hyaluronic acid, which gives the lips a plump and moisturized look. So, aesthetic practitioners have to use hyaluronidase to break down the filler once clients decide to dissolve.
Hyaluronidase allergy is extremely rare, with only around one in 2,000 patients having a true allergy, according to Dr. Tom Pierce, a U.K.-based cosmetic doctor. A severe allergy, like the one the TikToker had, is even less common.
Those with a bee allergy may be more prone to a severe hyaluronidase reaction, according to the Cleveland Clinic. In these cases, a lip injector may use an alternative to reduce the risk of a reaction.
In the comments, viewers joke with Goessling about her puffy post-dissolver face.
“Did they dissolve it with a baseball bat?” one asks. The TikToker replies, “Hahahahahah.”
Another comments, “Did they use hornets to remove the filler or what? Girlll.”
“I thought you were using a filter for funnies but it just got realer and realer,” a commenter adds.
Others say Goessling’s experience makes them think twice about getting lip filler.
“I have been de-influenced,” a viewer remarks.
“And now I’m leaving my chopped lips alone yup this confirms it,” a second writes.
A third jokes, “Seeing this is like condoms in the 90’s. Prevention. Just don’t put that shit in your body. I hope u are ok.”
“Everytime I get the itch to do my lips Im coming here.. ive seen some bad ones but this one tops it. Oh my gosh, girl! are you okay. also thank you for scaring me on NEVER doing it,” another says.
@gabby.goessling why tf can’t anything normal happen to me ??
The Mary Sue reached out to Goessling via email and Instagram direct message for further comment. We will update the story when she replies.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Rebekah Harding
Source link
[ad_1]
A local coffee shop and one of its regulars are trading words on TikTok after the customer was allegedly kicked out for not buying anything. It’s not every day you see a small business and a customer openly beefing in 4K, and the drama is sparking a ton of discourse on all sides.
So how did we end up here? It all started with a viral video by Ja’Mya Williams, AKA Premed Williams (@unique.mw) on TikTok.
Williams tearily recounted an experience at her favorite coffee shop, Luana’s Coffee & Beer, that upset her. Her clip, uploaded on Jan. 11, earned over 20,000 views.
“Bro, I hate to be on the internet crying about some stuff, but why did I just get kicked out of my favorite coffee bar?” Williams asks the camera. “Because I didn’t make a purchase when … the bartender wanted me to make a purchase. Like, what?”
Williams begins offering context on her relationship to the shop, explaining that she is very much a regular.
“I go to Luana’s Coffee & Beer at least once a week to study, as I’m studying for the MCAT,” Williams says. “I meet up with a lot of my pre-med friends, my doctor friends, at this coffee bar. And every time we go, we always make a purchase. I always buy something.”
The night she recorded her video, Williams says she had gone into Luana’s and was trying to gear herself up to study, expressing that it’s something you have to “work up the courage” to do. While she was trying to get herself in the right headspace, the conflict began to unfold.
“I sat at the bar, and the bartender was like, ‘Can I get you anything?’” Williams recounts. And I was like, ‘No, no, thank you … I don’t need anything right now.’”
Williams says the bartender “proceeds to stare [her] down” and pressures her to make a purchase immediately.
“‘Well, I expect if you’re gonna come in here and use our Wi-Fi, use our internet, use the space, that you’re gonna make a purchase,’” Williams says, allegedly quoting the bartender. “And I was like, ‘What?’ And then I got up and left. Like, you’re not gonna talk to me that way, period.”
Williams then shows the camera her lengthy purchase history at Luana’s to illustrate just how often she’s gone and given the shop her money. She later shows a positive review she had recently left Luana’s. Williams then expresses frustration that whenever she goes in to study, she generally doesn’t order right away.
“I’ll make a purchase when I’m ready to, like I always do,” Williams says. “I always start with water, then get a little bit of coffee or get a snack. Like … it’s a coffee bar. Like, people are here studying.”
Determined to “lock in” and study as she intended, Williams goes back into the shop, takes a seat, and asks for some water. A different bartender, whom she’s seen “more often,” repeats the policy that she must make a purchase.
“‘Where is this policy posted?’” Williams asks, recounting her question to the bartender. “They’re like, ‘Oh, we just need to let everybody know.’ I’m like, ‘OK, that’s fine. I come in here all the time. I make purchases all the time.’ Then he goes, ‘Would you?’ Responded with an attitude.’
Williams says she attempted to explain the bizarre interaction with the previous bartender, to no avail. She expresses bafflement at the apparently aggressive treatment she was receiving.
“Y’all are a small business, and I’m here to support you, but that is not how you do it,” Williams says. “As somebody who works in customer service, that is not what you do and how you treat people … It’s the fact that I’m coming in as a Black woman sitting at the bar, trying to try to do some work like everybody else in here, and you’re trying to hold me?”
Soon after Williams posted her video, she posted a follow-up video reiterating that she felt “ganged up” on by the bartenders and that she was accused of being “disrespectful.”
In this follow-up, she emphasizes that the main “argument” being made by the baristas is that she needs to leave because she’s not a paying customer. In answer to that, Williams shares with us recorded audio of her going around and talking to other customers in the shop, multiple of whom say they haven’t made a purchase or even been asked to make one.
But the saga doesn’t end there—because Luana’s Coffee got on their TikTok account and responded.
Aaron Schofield, the owner of Luana’s Coffee & Beer, recorded a response video to Williams’ original video. The 14-minute response, posted on Jan. 12, has accumulated over 32,000 views. In the video’s caption, Schofield alleged that Williams “has had about seven of her friends [write] one-star reviews about our coffee shop.” As of the writing of this article, reviews of this nature are not visible among Luana’s Google reviews. Google has a robust system for responding to review bombing.
Schofield begins his video expressing frustration that he feels he has to make a video about this situation, but he also expresses hope that both he and Williams “could both learn from this moment.”
Schofield emphasizes that it is extremely “normal practice for somebody to have to purchase something.”
“It’s a common thing that happens at Luana’s,” Schofield says. “People will come in and they’ll set up shop, and they’ll hang out, and they don’t buy anything, and they use the Wi-Fi, they use the bathroom, and they don’t get anything. And, like, we don’t have a lot of space for that … You have to help pay for the bills. It is what it is.”
Schofield says Williams’ response to the request for purchase was “kind of aggressive” and “kind of odd,” and that Luana’s employees found the whole thing “awkward.” He says when Williams exited and then reentered the shop, asking the employees to give her water, it almost felt like a “power trip” over the employees.
“We’re talking about two employees that have to deal with this all the time,” Schofield says. “It’s frustrating. They make their money on tips, guys. That’s how … this industry lives and pays their bills. And what resulted next is another level of, like, OK, now you’re the problem.”
Schofield says the employees had to draw a line when Williams began walking around and asking other customers questions, as evidenced by her recorded audio.
“She turned around and walked, proceeded to walk up to people who are on dates, who are studying on their own, who are there with their families, and started asking the different tables, ‘When you walked in … were you told to purchase something when you walked in?’” Schofield recounts. ‘“Did you have to buy some right away?’ … She went to multiple tables and did this.”
He continues, “So then one of the employees goes up there and says, ‘Hey, I’m really sorry, you gotta go.’”
“She went home and made this TikTok … changed her Yelp review about us, changed her name, took her picture off, and then wrote an absolutely, just blunt, mean review about us,” Schofield says. “And also kind of seems like she kind of enlisted her friends to kind of guerilla market like this on TikTok with her, because now I’m getting hit up with a bunch of people saying, like, you know, just mean stuff to us, and that sucks.”
Schofield says she messaged him on his personal profile and that he apologized in response, but that she then proceeded to demand a refund for all the money she’d spent at Luana’s since October 2025.
“And that seemed a little sad, not ethical, I would say,” Schofield says. “I don’t know why we would return that money … If you had bought something that night and you and you had to leave early, I would have for sure refunded you … I told her, like, ‘It’s not possible for us to return all of the money you’ve ever spent at Luana’s … I even extended a gift card.”
Schofield expresses sadness at how things went down and says this was “a learning moment” and “a sad moment” for “both parties.”
“I want to say something to the customer from last night directly,” Schofield says as he finishes the video. He says he supports the customers and wants them to succeed, but that they “just wanna be able to make sure that we are able to pay our bills so we can do that not just for you, but for hundreds of people throughout the years.”
He continues, “And I’m not mad at you. And I hope that you maybe can see the other side of this from our perspective maybe a little bit more and just take our apology ‘cause this is an apology to you that this moment happened.”
After more personalized well-wishes for Williams and an assurance that the incident was in no way related to race (Schofield self-identifies as “Hispanic-Hawaiian”), the video ends.
And Williams responded one last time.
Williams posted another video on Jan. 13, acknowledging Schofield’s apologies but still demanding the refund for all the money she’s spent at Luana’s.
She denies recruiting friends and family to review bomb Luana’s. She says it’s illegal to deny someone water in the state of Arizona (which is untrue and a widely-believed myth), and maintains one of the bartenders “started instigating.”
In an email to The Mary Sue, Schofield said Luana’s is “pretty sad about the way that all played out.”
“We tried our hardest to reason with the customer,” Schofield wrote. “But in the end, we realized we weren’t going to be able to reach her demands. Especially after so much damage had been done to our business online. With an onslaught of negative reviews (that weren’t technically real) posted to our Google page. It didn’t make sense for us to spend anymore time trying to reason with the customer.”
Schofield said he believes “both parties needed to take a pause and understand each other that night.”
“Our bartender didn’t technically say anything wrong but she also should’ve just let it be,” Schofield wrote. “At least for a few more minutes then maybe tried again, and the customer needed to understand our bartenders are at times under a lot of stress and are just trying to make the most amount of money possible on their shifts. So when someone says they’re not ordering anything, that’s going to frustrate them. We’ve since had multiple conversations with the staff on hand that night. Reminding them to be patient and give things time to play out.”
Schofield told The Mary Sue this situation has been “very hard on [him] mentally” and that he “really just [wants] to move on from this,” as “in the last couple days people have said some very hurtful things” to him.
The Mary Sue has also reached out to Williams via email to request additional comment.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Sophia Paslidis
Source link
[ad_1]
Discussing how to split the bill is awkward enough, but when you’ve ordered significantly less, it’s even more excruciating. This was the dilemma TikTok user Flor (@sidehustleswithflor) faced when she was expected to pay an extortionate amount for a considerably light brunch.
In the viral clip, which has amassed 2.6 million views, Flor filmed herself looking bamboozled and accompanied it with on-screen text reading: “I’m at a friend’s birthday brunch and I just ordered a coffee and a croissant but the group wants to split the check evenly. It’s $118 each. I have $22 in my account.”
The clip was set to a Michael Scott TikTok sound, in which The Office character said: “Will I get over it? Hmm… No.”
Flor didn’t immediately respond to The Mary Sue’s request for comment via TikTok comment.
In the comments, users debated bill etiquette.
“Tell the waitress yours will be separate,” one said. “I’ve had this done to me once. Never again.”
“It’s her birthday, why you all need to pay?” a second asked.
“So you pay for your croissant and coffee,” a third said. “Not sure why it’s a complicated matter.”
However, there were plenty of users who argued the contrary, too.
“Don’t attend a large group event if you don’t have 100-300 to help pay,” a fourth advised. “For real just don’t go, or do it at a house or park and bring the foods.”
While a fifth added, “You shouldn’t of went with 22 bucks in your account lol.”
@sidehustleswithfl If this is you, you need to start using #twineo as a #sidehustle #splittingthebill #brunch #badfriends ♬ original sound – The office quote.s
However, it’s possible that this TikTok isn’t entirely genuine. In the video description, Flor writes: “If this is you, you need to start using#twineo as a #sidehustle.
In essence, Twinio is a mobile app that uses AI to make an AI ‘twin’ of yourself. The AI is purportedly trained on your personality, thoughts, and interests and can be used to do things on your behalf, such as answering survey questions to generate passive income.
The reason that this video is suspect is that Flor has made dozens of videos like this, in which she lays out a scenario and links it back to Twinio in the caption.
However, she doesn’t seem to disclose that these videos are possibly ads.
This could end up problematic because, according to the National Institute of Social Media, it is a legal requirement for social media users to disclose any “material connection” they have with a brand “clearly and conspicuously” in their promotional social media post.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Charlotte Colombo
Source link
[ad_1]
In another attempt to reduce our attention spans to mush, TikTok has released the PineDrama app, which offers serialized drama series that are roughly a minute per episode. As first spotted by Business Insider, the app is designed exactly like TikTok, but instead of trendy dance videos, you can scroll through and watch “micro dramas.”
For those new to the category, micro dramas are bite-sized TV shows shot in vertical video and available in minute-long episodes. Don’t expect any nominations for Best Original Screenplay with series like The Officer Fell For Me or Married to my past life’s nemesis, since they typically offer soap opera vibes with cliffhangers that keep users scrolling to the next episode. The app is designed to keep people on it with a Discover tab, a place to save favorites and the ability to react in real time alongside other viewers.
Right now, the micro dramas on PineDrama are all free to watch and don’t have any ads. It’s unclear if TikTok will introduce any costs or ads to the app, since other micro drama options like DramaBox or ReelShort have a paid structure. Late last year, TikTok also introduced a way to watch micro dramas within its own app, with a section called Minis. It’s not the first time we’re seeing shorter TV show formats, since Quibi made waves with a format of episodes that were less than 10 minutes long. However, maybe even 10 minutes was too long since the startup eventually called it quits after eight months.
[ad_2]
Jackson Chen
Source link
[ad_1]
Yoga is often treated as a women-centered activity in the U.S., especially when it comes to studio culture. Walk past most yoga classes, and you’ll usually see a room full of women, which has helped create the idea that these spaces function as a kind of quiet, shared refuge.
Of course, men practice yoga too, and plenty of them teach it professionally. Still, expectations form over time, especially when a studio’s regular crowd looks the same week after week.
For one Los Angeles woman, that expectation was shattered the moment a man rolled his mat out beside hers. What she describes next has sparked a wider debate online about gendered spaces, comfort, and whether personal discomfort crosses into exclusion.
TikTok creator Sian Renee (@aqua.babe.s) posted a short video reacting to her experience in a yoga class, which has since drawn thousands of views and plenty of divided reactions. The clip got over 4,379 views.
In the video, Renee is blunt. “I don’t hate men, but I don’t think there’s a worse feeling than going to a yoga class and having a man put his mat next to yours,” she says.
She frames the issue as one of expectation and money, rather than outright hostility. “Like I didn’t pay $30 for this yoga class for a man to sweat next to me,” she says.
Reactions in the comments section range from sarcasm to sympathy to confusion.
“What a wonderful personality you have,” one commenter wrote sarcastically.
Another viewer sided with Renee’s discomfort, saying, “I would have left and asked for a refund.”
Others offered context from their own experiences. “I attend a yoga class in New York City twice a week,” one person shared. “It’s usually me and about 10 ladies for the past 10 years. We socialize outside of our practice as well.”
Meanwhile, some commenters pushed the conversation further, questioning what the alternative should be. “So what should we do?” one user asked.
For women who strongly prefer working out without men present, options do exist, particularly in large cities like Los Angeles. While general yoga studios operate as inclusive spaces open to everyone, there are studios and classes that intentionally cater to women.
Some gyms and wellness centers offer women-only yoga sessions, often labeled clearly on their schedules. These classes typically exist alongside mixed-gender options, giving people the ability to choose the environment that best fits their comfort level without excluding others from the broader space.
@aqua.babe.s #yogasculptclass ♬ original sound – Sian Renee
In California, anti-discrimination laws generally prevent businesses from denying service based on gender. That means a standard yoga class at a public studio can’t legally bar men from attending. However, studios can design specific programs, workshops, or sessions that center on women.
In other words, discomfort doesn’t have to turn into discrimination. Choice exists, but it usually requires seeking out the right space rather than expecting a shared one to change.
We’ve reached out to Renee via TikTok and Instagram message.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Ljeonida Mulabazi
Source link
[ad_1]
TikTok has quietly released a new standalone short drama app called PineDrama in the U.S. and Brazil. The app offers access to micro dramas, which are essentially bite-sized TV shows that can be watched in a series of one-minute episodes. Think TikTok, but every single video you come across is a short episode of a fictional story.
PineDrama is available on iOS and Android. It’s free and currently ad-free, though that could change in the future.
The news was first reported by Business Insider.
You can find content through the app’s “Discover” tab, where you can sort through “All” or “Trending dramas, or through endless vertical recommendations that are tailored to your taste. PineDrama features a variety of genres, including thriller, romance, family, and more. Examples of popular shows include “Love at First Bite” and “The Officer Fell For Me.”
The app features a “Watch history” section where you can jump back into the various series you’re watching. There’s also a “Favorites” section where you can save the dramas you like the most. You can also share thoughts with other viewers in the comment section, and enter a full-screen viewing experience that gets rid of the caption and sidebar.
The move comes as TikTok launched a “TikTok Minis” section in its app late last year, where users can watch micro dramas.
With the launch of PineDrama, TikTok is taking on popular micro drama platforms like ReelShort and DramaBox. While the micro drama industry wasn’t that popular until recent years, it’s racing toward $26 billion in annual revenue by 2030, as reported by Variety.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
Short-form storytelling hasn’t always found success, even with notable backing. In 2020, DreamWorks co-founder and former Disney executive Jeffrey Katzenberg launched a short-form streaming platform called Quibi with $1.75 billion in funding. The platform offered episodes under 10 minutes featuring popular Hollywood actors, but failed to gain traction and was shut down six months later.
ReelShort and DramaBox succeeded where Quibi failed because while Quibi tried to compress Hollywood TV into shorter episodes, ReelShort and DramaBox created low-budget stories that hook viewers within the first few seconds, followed by continuous cliffhangers, all featuring non-union talent. Additionally, they target fans of soapy romance and revenge thriller stories, while Quibi tried to target everyone.
TikTok is now looking to replicate this success with PineDrama. The company already dominates the short-form social media space and is now aiming to take on another media category.
[ad_2]
Aisha Malik
Source link
[ad_1]
Spray tans aren’t cheap. Depending on where you live and which type you choose, it can run anywhere from $25 to $80 per session, something you’re expected to repeat every week or so if you want to keep the color consistent. Over time, that adds up fast.
And considering American women already spend more than $600 a year on hair, makeup, and skincare, any trick that promises to cut costs tends to get attention. That’s why the latest TikTok beauty workaround is spreading so quickly: a Harbor Freight paint sprayer, a bottle of spray tan solution, and, ideally, a helpful husband.
TikTok creator Palmkai (@palmkai) showed how the hack works in a recent video that pulled in more than 366,000 views. In it, she films the entrance of a Harbor Freight store while text on the screen reads, “POV: your husband saw the Harbor Freight spray tan hack.”
The clip follows her husband inside the store as he heads straight for the tools aisle and grabs a paint sprayer. She shows the box on camera, revealing that they went with the Central Pneumatic 4 oz. Adjustable Detail Spray Gun, which currently lists for $14.99 on Harbor Freight’s website.
“A man that takes action,” she wrote on the video’s caption.
In a follow-up video, she shows how her husband fills the sprayer with tanning solution, how he applies it evenly, and promises to show the final results once the color develops.
The reason the husband, or at least a second person, keeps showing up in these videos is practical. Spraying yourself evenly, especially across your back and legs, raises the risk of streaks and patchiness. Having someone else handle the sprayer cuts down on awkward angles and missed spots.
Palmkai isn’t alone. A quick search on TikTok turns up dozens of videos from women trying the same hack, often with the same tools and methods. Many say the finish looks closer to a professional spray tan than they expected, especially given the low cost of the equipment.
That said, the trend also comes with caveats. Paint sprayers aren’t designed for cosmetic use, and spray tanning products are approved for external application only. Professional estheticians receive training to avoid sensitive areas like the face, nose, and mouth. At home, especially with an inexperienced helper, user error becomes more likely.
There’s also the issue of overspray and ventilation. A paint sprayer can disperse product more aggressively than a standard tanning mist, which means more airborne particles and more wasted solution. Some creators recommend wearing masks or setting up outside or in a garage to avoid breathing anything in.
Still, for many people watching, the potential savings outweigh the risks—especially when the alternative is paying for salon visits every ten days.
In the comments, viewers didn’t just watch—they compared notes, swapped tips, and debated whether the hack was worth trying.
“Someone bring me back for update. My man has a compressor,” one person wrote.
“My husband did too! And his first spray tan for me was SO GOOD,” another shared.
Not everyone had a flawless outcome, though. “We got the same one— I looked like a cheetah,” one commenter admitted.
Others suggested skipping the sprayer entirely. “Pro tip: You can just buy the felt hand mitts for 10 on Amazon and wipe it on every four days after a shower,” one person wrote. “This saves a ton of product and keeps it even as it fades. Makes the bottle last six months or so.”
@palmkai a man that takes action ? spray tan life hack harbor freight #spraytan #lifehack #spraytanhack #husband ♬ original sound – naddy?
The Mary Sue has reached out to Palmkai via TikTok messages and to Harbor Freight via email for comment.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Ljeonida Mulabazi
Source link
[ad_1]
Traffic to Wikipedia, the world’s largest online encyclopedia, naturally ebbs and flows with the rhythms of daily life—rising and falling with the school calendar, the news cycle or even the day of the week—making routine fluctuations unremarkable for a site that draws roughly 15 billion page views a month. But sustained declines tell a different story. Last October, the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that oversees Wikipedia, disclosed that human traffic to the site had fallen 8 percent in recent months as a growing number of users turned to A.I. search engines and chatbots for answers.
“I don’t think that we’ve seen something like this happen in the last seven to eight years or so,” Marshall Miller, senior director of product at the Wikimedia Foundation, told Observer.
Launched on Jan. 15, 2001, Wikipedia turns 25 today. This milestone comes at a pivotal point for the online encyclopedia, which is straddling a delicate line between fending off existential risks posed by A.I. and avoiding irrelevance as the technology transforms how people find and consume information.
“It’s really this question of long-term sustainability,” Lane Becker, senior director of earned revenue at the Wikimedia Foundation, told Observer. “We’d like to make it at least another 25 years—and ideally much longer.”
While it’s difficult to pinpoint Wikipedia’s recent traffic declines on any single factor, it’s evident that the drop coincides with the emergence of A.I. search features, according to Miller. Chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity often cite and link to Wikipedia, but because the information is already embedded in the A.I.-generated response, users are less likely to click through to the source, depriving the site of page views.
Yet the spread of A.I.-generated content also underscores Wikipedia’s central role in the online information ecosystem. Wikipedia’s vast archive—more than 65 million articles across over 300 languages—plays a prominent role within A.I. tools, with the site’s data scraped by nearly all large language models (LLMs). “Yes, there is a decline in traffic to our sites, but there may well be more people getting Wikipedia knowledge than ever because of how much it’s being distributed through those platforms that are upstream of us,” said Miller.
Wikipedia must find a way to stay financially and editorially viable as the internet changes. Declining page views not only mean that fewer visitors are likely to donate to the platform, threatening its main source of revenue, but also risk shrinking the community of volunteer editors who sustain it. Fewer contributors would mean slower content growth, ultimately leaving less material for LLMs to draw from.
Metrics that track volunteer participation have already begun to slip, according to Miller. While noting that “it’s hard to parse out all the different reasons that this happens,” he conceded that the Foundation has “reason to believe that declines in page views will lead to declines in volunteer activity.”
To maintain a steady pipeline of contributors, users must first become aware of the platform and understand its collaborative model. That makes proper attribution by A.I. tools essential, Miller said. Beyond simply linking to Wikipedia, surfacing metadata—such as when a page was last updated or how many editors contributed—could spur curiosity and encourage users to engage more deeply with the platform.
Tech companies are becoming aware of the value of keeping Wikipedia relevant. Over the past year, Microsoft, Mistral AI, Perplexity AI, Ecosia, Pleias and ProRata have joined Wikimedia Enterprise, a commercial product that allows corporations to pay for large-scale access and distribution of Wikipedia content. Google and Amazon have long been partners of the platform, which was launched in 2021.
The basic premise is that Wikimedia Enterprise customers can access content from Wikipedia at a higher volume and speed while helping sustain the platform’s mission. “I think there’s a growing understanding on the part of these A.I. companies about the significance of the Wikipedia dataset, both as it currently exists and also its need to exist in the future,” said Becker.
Wikipedia is hardly alone in this shift. News organizations, including CNN, the Associated Press and The New York Times, have struck licensing deals with A.I. companies to supply editorial content in exchange for payment, while infrastructure providers like Cloudflare offer tools that allow websites to charge A.I. crawlers for access. Last month, the licensing nonprofit Creative Commons announced its support of a “pay-to-crawl” approach for managing A.I. bots.
Wikipedia itself is also adapting to a younger generation of internet users. In an effort to make editing Wikipedia more appealing, the platform is working to enhance its mobile edit features, reflecting the fact that younger audiences are far more likely to engage on smartphones than desktop computers.
Younger users’ preference for social video platforms such as YouTube and TikTok has also pushed Wikipedia’s Future Audiences team—a division tasked with expanding readership—to experiment with video. The effort has already paid off, producing viral clips on topics ranging from Wikipedia’s most hotly disputed edits to the courtship dance of the black-footed albatross and Sino-Roman relations. The organization is also exploring a deeper presence on gaming platforms, another major draw for younger users.
Evolving with the times also means integrating A.I. further within the platform. Wikipedia has introduced features such as Edit Check, which offers real-time feedback on whether a proposed edit fits a page, and is developing features like Tone Check to help ensure articles adhere to a neutral point of view.
A.I.-generated content has also begun to seep onto the platform. As of August 2024, roughly 5 percent of newly created English articles on the site were produced with the help of A.I., according to a Princeton study. Seeing this as a problem, Wikipedia introduced a “speedy deletion” policy that allows editors to quickly remove content that shows clear signs of being A.I.-generated. Still, the community remains divided over whether using A.I. for tasks such as drafting articles is inherently problematic, said Miller. “There’s this active debate.”
From streamlining editing to distributing its content ever more widely, Wikipedia is betting that A.I. can ultimately be an ally rather than an adversary. If managed carefully, the technology could help accelerate the encyclopedia’s mission over the next 25 years—as long as it doesn’t bring down the encyclopedia first.
“Our whole thing is knowledge dissemination to anyone that wants it, anywhere that they want it,” said Becker. “If this is how people are going to learn things—and people are learning things and gaining value from the information that our community is able to bring forward—we absolutely want to find a way to be there and support it in ways that align with our values.”
[ad_2]
Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly
Source link
[ad_1]
Nothing humbles you quite like a $70 “effortless” top that turns into a fabric straitjacket. In a viral TikTok, a Florida woman casually strolls into Aritzia and later leaves without her dignity.
Unfortunately for her, all respectability was–quite literally– sheared off the minute she got stuck in the wardrobe. Good thing retail workers are often hailed as society’s unsung heroes. This time, they were moonlighting as EMTs. Who knew the power a pair of scissors could hold?
In a story so embarrassing she had to share, Lily (@flearepellent) has caught the attention of 3.5 million viewers in just two days. Her clip only shows her face with her hand covering her mouth, but the real story is in the text overlay: “Went into aritzia. found a shirt. tried it on. got stuck in it. and they had to CUT. ME. OUT. OF. IT.”
Short and simple, while still encapsulating all the humiliation that over a thousand viewers are commenting on. Her caption? “Lived my nightmare today.”
Two of Lily’s most asked questions in the comments section: what top was i,t and was she charged for the damage? Lily shares that it was the Element Tube Top. On Aritzia’s website, it lists the top at $110. In reply to a viewer’s comment asking whether she had to pay, Lily says, “No thank GOD.” But others haven’t been so lucky.
While it might have been humbling, Lily isn’t the first person to experience this. Some were even charged for it. In 2015, Refinery 29 reported 10 of the most “mortifying” fitting room stories they’ve received. Believe it or not, getting stuck in a clothing item showed up twice in the article. One 27-year-old got stuck while trying on a dress, which led to a three-employee rescue squad cutting along the zipper to free her. Unlike Lily, she paid for the dress.
While Aritzia has become notorious for its trendy aesthetics and high prices, another reputation precedes it. It seems indulging in fast fashion comes with a side of body shaming. The Mary Sue covered a story where a woman was trying on jeans and felt the style was a little off. Without even asking for the employee’s opinion, they comment that it’s because of her body. In the comments, viewers share that they have had similar experiences.
Another woman calls out the high prices compared to the cheap quality. She shares on the internet that she bought Aritzia’s $160 Faux Leather Pants. After leaving them folded in her closet for only a couple of months, the pants were shedding and coming apart. Her viewers also share how the same has happened with them with other faux leather items from Aritzia.
@flearepellent lived my nightmare today ? #aritzia #trending #xyzbca #genz ♬ Céline sauce – #1 ?Marilyn Thornhill fan??
Some immediately call out the absurdity of Lily’s situation. One viewer says, “In aritzia too? That place is too expensive for scenarios like this to be had.” Lily replies, “I couldn’t breathe.” A second viewer says, “In ARTIZA?? Oh yeah I would’ve crawled out the door.”
A third admits, “ur so brave for posting this i’d genuinely take this to the grave.”
Another simply says, “I’m so sorry friend omg.” Lily replies, “5 women were surrounding me in the fitting room and I was CLUTCHING THE WALL.”
Others choose to just offer solace and advice. One says, “This is why y’all need to GET YOUR SIZE & stop getting sizes to make you look slimmer or anything.”
Another shares, “I’ve had to cut two $500 dresses off people if it makes you feel better.”
One viewer offers her own personal story. “I had to be cut out of a bra from athleta.” Another says, “If it makes you feel any better, I tried on boots at Macys three years ago and it took not one but TWO employees to pull it off my calf. Almost flew backwards. One of the employees was in training… I’m sure she’ll never forget it.”
The Mary Sue reached out to Lily via TikTok direct message.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Gisselle Hernandez
Source link
[ad_1]
An Orange County woman had been visiting the same hairstylist for six years. Then, that same hairstylist let her know they would need to go their separate ways.
Baffled, Breeanna (@breeannalario) took to TikTok to ask her audience what she could have possibly done. She posted multiple videos, possibly deleting her first recounting of the story and later creating an update that generated 1.2 million views within four days of being uploaded. In her update video’s description, she wrote, “I’m spiraling at this point. Do I respond to this or do I just let it go and just move on with my life?”
Surprisingly, TikTok didn’t have an answer, other than saying she probably deserved it and that she should leave the stylist alone.
Since hairstylists often own private practices, they can technically “fire” their clients for any reason they wish.
Hairstylists may consider letting go of a client for reasons such as consistently being late to appointments, failing to properly pay for services, being overly critical of the stylist’s process, or being unable to have their needs met.
Sometimes, a hairstylist will say goodbye to a client because they simply do not feel comfortable treating the client’s hair the way the client wants it to be treated. For instance, a hairstylist who primarily offers natural highlights may not want clients who continually request bright, maintenance-heavy colors.
Often, stylists will still try to problem-solve with a client to give them what they want, but some salons do not even carry certain colors a client may request. In those cases, a stylist may refer clients with completely different expectations elsewhere. Most stylists want to maintain the professional nature of the business, after all. Most of the time, though, they are upfront before an appointment and refuse to take the client to begin with.
Hairstylists can even “fire” clients for not tipping well. So, it’s impossible to know exactly what Breeanna did. She may have given awful tips, given her stylist unreasonable requests, or even said something out of pocket. The only thing commenters seem certain about is that she was at fault for the hairstylist abandoning her in 2026.
According to some viewers, the stylist may have strayed away from Breeanna once they learned of her political affiliation.
Commenters referred to the TikToker’s supposed Republican leanings, saying that she may have voted against the stylist’s best interests.
Other viewers found this practice unprofessional, but again, it’s the stylist’s discretion to stop seeing a client, and it could have been for any number of other reasons.
“For those asking about political parties, if he fired you over that, that would be so unprofessional. As a Republican Christian, I have clients who believe totally opposite of me, and I love them as long as we’re respectful of each other’s differences. We’re still human,” one commenter said. “Are you chronically late, reschedule often, or ask for fixes a lot??”
Breeanna did not reply to this comment or to others asking questions about her behavior at the salon.
Ultimately, commenters urged Breeanna to move on from the issue and not ask her stylist why they would no longer see her. The curt message Breeanna received was professional based on the industry’s general standards. To many commenters, Breeanna wasn’t owed any follow-up or reasoning.
“As a hairstylist, I’m going to hold your hand when I say this: Don’t blame it on them,” one viewer added. “This is something you’ve done, repeatedly, that they no longer want to deal with. It’s not an easy decision to fire a client, especially in this economy, so a little self-reflection will go a long way.”
Another said, “You say ‘ok, thanks and best of luck.’ It’s really quite simple,” referring to her question about what to say to her stylist.
Breeanna did end up reaching out to her former stylist on Jan. 8. It is unclear whether she received a response. However, many people watching her TikToks theorized that the stylist would not respond.
After all, Breeanna made three separate TikToks about the incident, although it appears she has since deleted one of the videos. The negative commentary, even if not revealing the stylist’s identity, could be a deterrent to a real response.
@breeannalario I’m spiraling at this point. Do I respond to this or do I just let it go and just move on with my life? #hairstylist #fired #drama #hair #oc ♬ original sound – breeannalario
We have reached out to Breeanna via email for comment and will update this story if she responds.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Rachel Thomas
Source link
[ad_1]
A box so big it needs its own ZIP code shows up at her front door, and now it’s a full-blown Parisian production. In a now-viral TikTok, a bride and her two friends unbox a six-foot mannequin carrying her Dior gown.
This prompts viewers to wonder less about the vows and more about how much it costs to ship haute couture across an ocean. Many are split between swooning over the luxury flex or blasting capitalism. Others not-so-quietly side-eye the reveal by commenting on her TikToks of the wedding day, whispering, “That’s it?”
Hayley Sullivan (@haylsullivanmarrero) and her unboxing have garnered a whopping 26 million views. The clip is short, only nine seconds long, but fully captures the grandiosity of the white box Hayley is opening. She, alongside two other people, lifts the cover and starts unwrapping the sheets protecting the gown. The text overlay reads: “pov your wedding dress arrives from paris in a 6ft mannequin that you can barely get into the house.” Her caption: “Wedding dress of my dreams!!!”
As challenging as getting RSVPs and booking venues might be, handling a wedding dress is a whole other conundrum on its own. Sometimes, rules are made, and others are broken. For example, the Mary Sue covered a story where a woman was desperate to get tips on how to travel to Italy with her wedding gown. The comments advised her to simply buy a seat. Others share how some airlines allow you to hang it in the closet. Hayley was lucky that her dress arrived pristine and beautifully packed, something viewers definitely noticed.
Many of Hayley’s viewers seemed to harp on one specific topic: the shipping. From wondering about the cost to even how one would get a wedding dress shipped, considering the importance of the garment. France’s UPS website has an entire section dedicated to such a question. In their carefully detailed explanation, they share how a person carefully packs their wedding dress and conducts the shipping process. Of course, the fees depend on different countries and their tax rates. For Dior specifically, though, their shipping rules are laid out quite simply.
“Dior offers up to four rapid and secure delivery options.
-Standard Shipping: Free for all orders
-Express Delivery: $25, Free for orders over $3,000
-Saturday Delivery: $35, Free for orders over $3,000.”
Without knowing Hayley’s exact wedding dress model, we can infer from the prices cited for other weddings. Dior is well-known across the celebrity world, and it frequently pops up in articles citing the expenses. The Knot includes two of its most expensive dresses: Chiara Ferragni’s dress at $420,000 and Chinese actress Angelababy’s. While the exact cost is unknown, her wedding alone cost $31 million and the Dior dress was covered in 100 roses of Chantilly lace, and a 10-foot train made of 170 feet of tulle.
First things first, the luxury of affording a Dior wedding gown has people shocked. More specifically, calling out capitalism. One viewer says, “Ohhh you RICH RICH.” While another asks, “What tax bracket is this?” A third jokes, “People are dying, Kim.”
One viewer says, “You are living the problem that I want to stress about.” Another shares, “I miss The French Revolution.”
Others crack jokes. One viewer says, “U could rent that box out as a micro studio in nyc for 500 a month just sayin.” One sarcastically comments, “I hate it when that happens.” In a similar fashion, one says, “Happened to me last week. It had to go in my backup mansion. So annoying.”
@haylsullivanmarrero Wedding dress of my dreams!!!
As usual, when the internet is offered a peek of something, they naturally want a reveal. In this case, many were dying to see the design that called for so much ceremony. In another TikTok, Hayley posts a clip of her getting ready on her wedding day with the caption, “The day I said ‘I do.””
In the clip, she stands still as three helpers suit her up in the dress. With a long train, lace bodice, and flowy skirt, Hayley’s gown is a sight. However, not many think it’s a good sight.
One viewer says, “I was expecting so much more when I seen the box. I’m glad u love it.” Another says, “Cute but so plain I thought Dior would be a lot more fancy.” A third says, “Oh that’s all?”
However, she does get many comments defending her. One viewer shares, “Ya’ll are just rude, just cause it isn’t your taste doesn’t mean her heart didn’t skip a beat when she saw this.” A second chastises, “Not y’all in this lady’s comments downplaying her DIOR wedding dress. The audacity!”
Lastly, one viewer says, “Just pure elegance and class. Every woman’s dream.”
The Mary Sue reached out to the creator via TikTok direct message.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Gisselle Hernandez
Source link
[ad_1]
Nothing says a high-flying wedding quite like getting married at plus 30,000 feet and turning fellow passengers into your witnesses.
A new TikTok video going viral depicts a marriage ceremony taking place literally in the clouds. The video begins with the flight attendant claiming that “Southwest is known as the love airline,” given the handful of other instances that the company facilitated a wedding mid-flight. “And today, love is in the air,” she quips. (Yes, I made the same joke in my opening. No, I’m not sorry.)
The couple on board, named Tina and Roger, then proceeded to walk down the airplane aisle (the dad jokes practically write themselves, huh?)
What ensues, as you can see below, is a heartwarming moment where the couple says their vows and an air hostess pronounces them husband and wife. The bride even tosses the bouquet, though given the confines, it’s more of a lob than a traditional arching throw.
As you can imagine, TikTok users had a field day with this. @jenojenojenoing said out loud what we were all thinking when watching this. “Imagine taking a nap and you wake up mid ceremony.” That must feel like the most jarring return to reality.
“‘Thank you all for being here’ as if they had another choice,” joked another user, while another echoed the same sentiment by writing: “I’ve never seen a wedding hostage situation.”
Wondrous things happen when people realize they have free will and don’t need to be bound by rules of tradition and expedience. And this, as one comment pointed out, is certainly among the “craziest uses” of that human quality so far.
But perhaps most relatable of all was theblackrabbit‘s response. “If I’m forced to attend a wedding mid flight, there BETTER be catering.” You tell ’em, brother.
While the story marks a wholesome moment for the couple and all the other accidental unsuspecting attendees, it does raise an interesting question: can you actually get married on a flight?
Simply put, airline pilots and flight attendants don’t have the authority to perform marriages. For a marriage to be legally recognized in the United States, it needs to be performed within the borders of a specific state by an ordained minister, judge, or other designated officiants.
The legal complexity, and perhaps dubiousness, increases when you factor in the flight itself. Determining which state’s laws apply when cruising at above 30,000 feet is not so easy, especially when the location is constantly changing at 500 miles per hour.
Now, if the officiant is properly ordained (and in this case, we don’t know if they are) the couple could theoretically obtain a marriage license before or after an in-flight ceremony. That treats the event as purely ceremonial, but when has legal paperwork ever stopped people from celebrating love and having a bit of fun while they’re at it?
So, there might be a legal workaround to have an official wedding ceremony in the air (especially if you fly only within the borders of a single U.S. state) but people do this for the memory and the story they’ll tell around the dinner table for the rest of their lives, not to avoid a courthouse visit.
(featured image: TikTok/@katrinabadowski)
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
[ad_2]
Jonathan Wright
Source link