ReportWire

Tag: TikTok

  • Before you follow that Instagram trend, READ THIS! – ReverbNation Blog

    Before you follow that Instagram trend, READ THIS! – ReverbNation Blog

    Not all viral attention is good attention.

    You can attract actual fans by showcasing your music in a way that’s visually-optimized for social.

    Or you can chase trends on Reels & TikTok that hurt your music’s reach in the long-run.

    How exactly do social trends hurt musicians, you ask? Well…

    Here’s one cautionary tale about a friend of mine who had a video go viral — all for nothing:

    Social platforms have shifted from being follower-focused to recommendation-focused.

    It used to be the norm that people who followed you were at least somewhat likely to SEE your posts. If they dug what they saw, they’d stick around and probably see your next post.

    Facebook began shifting away from that dependable reach long ago. But the interaction between a creator and their community took a more drastic turn with short-form platforms such as TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.

    I’m sure you’re well aware of this change, both as a creator and a user. “The algorithm” is now recommending a constant barrage of curated content, sourced from all the creators on the platform. This has made it more difficult for creators to reach their own following.

    As Patreon’s founder Jack Conte said in a recent post:

    The impact on creators, in many cases, has been catastrophic. Reaching your fans and building real community on the internet has never been harder.

    You might think then, given this difficulty in engaging your community on social, that TRENDS would be the one way to actually reach people — since the trending concept already has proven viral energy, and you’re removing the specificity of your own music from the equation.

    But the opposite is true: You need to lean even harder into what makes you unique — both on social and in your music. Every post should emphasize something important, fun, or moving about your artistry.

    In other words, you can’t just be random entertainment in search of views and likes.

    As I mentioned in the video above, “success” on social can be counterproductive for your music if what’s going viral isn’t directly tied to your music or musical persona. Here’s why:

      The reason the content works might not be the reason you want people to return.

      You’re a musician. You want someone to love your music and come back for the music. If you make them laugh instead, or stir up some outrage, or do a crazy stunt (assuming those things have no obvious connection to your music), viewers don’t know who you are.

      They’re responding to what you did in the video, nothing else. It’s unconnected to you.

      Your social efforts should be about building the right community. Actual fans. So if you have a knack for humor, satire, or stunts, incorporate those elements into content that is, in some way, ABOUT your music.

      2. Unfocused engagement “confuses” the algorithm

      I don’t mean the algorithm is actually confused.

      In fact, if your trend post is gaining traction, the algorithm knows exactly what it needs to know: Your post is great for some quick laughs, outrage, or wows. And it’ll show your post to people who want those things.

      But that may also make it HARDER for the RIGHT people to find you, today and in the future.

      3. You grow an audience of unqualified leads

      If you pay to advertise on any of these social platforms, the wrong kinds of attention can dilute your data, creating more work for you and driving up marketing costs.

      A social post succeeding for the wrong reasons may increase the size of the audience you’re advertising to while simultaneously decreasing the percentage likelihood that any of the viewers will click the button, care about your call-to-action, or end up purchasing/converting.

      Costs up. Morale down.

      4. It’s not what you’re meant to do!

        I saved the most important thing for last.

        Did you learn to write songs in order to be a content-creator or widget-maker, helping to keep random users glued to an app for another 15 seconds?

        No, the platforms should work for you — not the other way around.

        And the viewers don’t need trends from you, because they’re already struggling to keep up with the endless supply of trends in their feed every day.

        What they need is YOU. And you need your audience to need you.

        You have something to offer, something to say, some unique experience, perspective, or sound. Find it, and convey THAT with such focus on social that viewers instantly sense what makes you you.

        That’s what true fans will come back for.

        Should you NEVER do a trend?

        Never say never.

        If you can employ a trend to tell part of your story, great! But those posts should be the exception, and they should always relate to your creative life.

        Why do so many musicians feel the pressure to hop on social-video trends though? As discussed above, trends can seem like a growth-hack. Again, for all the wrong reasons.

        But there’s something else: Because artists wear both hats, we can easily confuse the creator experience with the user experience. When, in fact, those should be VERY different things.

        Here’s what I mean:

        Conclusion

        Have you struggled with this as an artist? I think it’s pretty common.

        And there is always gonna be some new trend tempting us to stray off the path.

        Hopefully this article gives you a little more confidence to walk the road you’re meant to be on as an artist and person, even if that means your social following and engagement metrics grow more slowly than they might otherwise.

        Tortoise and the hare. Quality over quantity. True fans over mere viewers.

    Chris Robley

    Source link

  • Possible TikTok ban leaves some small businesses concerned for their survival

    Possible TikTok ban leaves some small businesses concerned for their survival

    With the clock ticking on TikTok in the U.S., millions of users, including small business owners, are scrambling to figure out what to do.

    One of them is Brandon Hurst, who says TikTok has changed his life through his plant delivery business.

    “It allows me to go live, share who I am, but it also makes it easy for people to buy,” Hurst said. 

    Since he started selling plants on TikTok last year, Hurst, better known as “Brandon the Plant Guy,” says he has tripled his business.

    “In the last year we’ve been able to sell 57,000 (plants),” Hurst said.

    His company is one of seven million small businesses on TikTok, the social media platform alleges. TikTok also claims it supports more than 224,000 American jobs.

    “I have friends and family members that work for me and help package plants and orders,” Hurst said. “So this goes beyond just me now. This is a team of eight other people that would lose their jobs.”

    The TikTok ban was signed into law Wednesday by President Biden as part of a $95 billion foreign aid package. Under the new law, ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese-based owner, has nine to 12 months to sell the platform to an American owner, or TikTok faces being banned in the U.S.

    A ban would force scores of entrepreneurs to look for a new home. Meanwhile, TikTok plans to file a lawsuit over the ban in federal court.

    “One of the reasons that TikTok has become so popular among small businesses is because it has an ability, unlike any other platform, to send products flying off the physical and virtual shelves,” Jasmine Enberg, an analyst for the data firm eMarketer, told CBS News.

    Enberg believes Meta would be “one of the biggest beneficiaries” of a TikTok ban.

    “Instagram Reels is the most natural fit,” to replace TikTok, Enberg said. “It isn’t exactly the same. You can replicate the technology, but you can’t replicate the culture.”

    So where would Hurst pivot his social media business in the event of a TikTok ban.

    “I’m on Instagram, I’ve been doing business on other platforms,” Hurst said. “…There’s just not that many places you can live sell. So I haven’t thought about it yet, to be honest. I’m not sure…what we would do.”

    Source link

  • Crazy Plane Lady Has Branded Herself ‘Anti-Woke.’ What a Shocker!

    Crazy Plane Lady Has Branded Herself ‘Anti-Woke.’ What a Shocker!

    You can take the crazy lady off the plane, but clearly you cannot make her go quietly. Known menace Tiffany Gomas is the Dallas woman who went viral last year after being caught on video in hysterics on a commercial plane, seemingly hallucinating and announcing to passengers that one of their fellow flyers onboard was “not real.”…

    Vanessa Quilantan

    Source link

  • U.S. Bans TikTok

    U.S. Bans TikTok

    President Biden signed a bill into law banning TikTok nationwide unless the Chinese company that owns it, ByteDance, sells its stake in the app within a year. What do you think?

    “And with that, Chinese influence over our economy comes to an end.”

    Rowena Marriott, Topiary Clipper

    “But I haven’t finished radicalizing!”

    Lochlan Robin, Tanning Bed Technician

    “Now the youth will return to the true center of taste and style: Paris, France.”

    Asma Harding, Weight Estimator

    Source link

  • TikTok could soon be sold. Here’s how much it’s worth and who could buy it.

    TikTok could soon be sold. Here’s how much it’s worth and who could buy it.

    Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi discusses what’s next for TikTok


    Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi discusses what’s next for TikTok

    05:37

    TikTok could be under new ownership at this time next year, after President Joe Biden on Wednesday signed a bill that gives the social media company about 12 months to either divest from its Chinese owner or face a U.S. ban. 

    TikTok is vowing to fight the new law in the courts, with CEO Shou Chou saying in a video posted to the service yesterday that “the facts and the Constitution are on our side.” He added that TikTok expects “to prevail again,” referring to Montana’s efforts to ban the app, which was blocked by a federal judge.

    That being said, TikTok is likely to attract attention from numerous suitors, given that the social media service is used by 6 in 10 Americans under the age of 30. Its algorithm offers up constantly scrolling videos pegged to users’ personal interests and habits, creating an addictive stream that keeps them glued to the app. 

    That could prove extremely valuable to a number of suitors, as long as TikTok is sold with its “golden jewel algorithm,” Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told CBS MoneyWatch.

    With the algorithm, he said, “We estimate TikTok is worth $100 billion.”

    But TikTok’s owner could strip out that proprietary piece of technology in a sale, making it much less valuable to potential buyers, Ives added.

    Here’s what to know. 

    Who owns TikTok now?

    TikTok, with more than 170 million American users, is a subsidiary of Chinese technology firm ByteDance, which is why U.S. lawmakers describe the company as “Chinese-owned.”

    But ByteDance’s structure is complicated, with the Associated Press reporting that it is based in Beijing but registered in the Cayman Islands. 

    TikTok, for its part, argues its alleged ownership by a Chinese company is a myth. In a 2023 posting on its website, the video platform says that ByteDance is 60% owned by global institutional investors, including Susquehanna International Group, Carlyle Group and General Atlantic. Another 20% is owned by ByteDance employees, while the remaining 20% is owned by its founder, Chinese entrepreneur Zhang Yiming, the company says.

    How much is TikTok worth in 2024? 

    TikTok is likely worth $100 billion, according to Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives. 

    But that valuation is based on TikTok’s algorithm, the logic written into the software that decides which videos to serve up to its users in a constant stream. Without the algorithm, the company could be sold for much less, Ives said. 

    “We believe China and ByteDance will never sell this with the golden jewel algorithm. Without the algorithm we believe TikTok is worth $30 billion to $40 billion,” he told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    Who could buy TikTok? 

    Likely suitors would be Microsoft, Oracle and Walmart, Ives said. But other companies and investors are likely to express interest, he added. 

    “Private equity will swarm after this deal as well with [former Treasury Secretary Steven] Mnuchin and others,” Ives said. 

    Mnuchin told CNBC last month that he was working on a coalition of investors to acquire TikTok, anticipating that the divest-or-ban bill would become law. “It’s a great business and I’m going to put together a group to buy TikTok,” Mnuchin told CNBC. 

    How likely is it that TikTok will be sold? 

    It’s hard to say, but Ives said he believes there’s a 75% chance TikTok will have new ownership by early 2025. 

    At the same time, TikTok has previously succeeded in blocking a ban through legal action, with a federal judge ruling late last year that Montana’s attempt to ban the service “oversteps state power and infringes on the Constitutional rights of users and businesses.”

    Source link

  • Team Biden Is Posting Through the Looming TikTok Ban

    Team Biden Is Posting Through the Looming TikTok Ban

    I mentioned this in our first newsletter, but Representative Jeff Jackson from North Carolina had to issue a full-out YouTube-style apology video after his TikTok followers figured out he voted in support of this bill. Jackson’s posted to TikTok only a handful of times since the incident.

    Biden’s relationship with the app hasn’t really seemed to change much, however, and his campaign intends to keep using the platform to reach voters throughout the election.

    “A fragmented media environment requires us to show up and meet voters where they are—and that includes online,” a Biden campaign official told NBC News on Wednesday. “TikTok is one of many places we’re making sure our content is being seen by voters.”

    It’s too early to tell exactly which way the wind is blowing as far as public sentiment is concerned, but a lot of people aren’t thrilled.

    “If [Biden] wants to earn the trust of young people back, which he has repeatedly betrayed, he needs to be open and transparent about the reasoning behind this ban,” Luke Mullen, an actor, filmmaker, and activist, told me on Wednesday. “So far he’s said nothing, which feels like a belittlement of our intelligence. Young Americans aren’t stupid.”

    Beyond a lack of transparency, some creators and activists have told me that they feel like the ban is a direct response to the activism happening on the platform.

    “Regardless of the reason for the ban, the fact that TikTok specifically, as opposed to other social media sites that misuse user data, is being targeted sends a message to young people that their speech is being censored,” Victoria Hammett, deputy executive director and programming director for Gen Z for Change, told me over the phone. “Regardless of whether or not that is the reason for the ban, that is clearly the message that Congress is sending to young people.”

    If TikTok were to disappear, many of these creators and activists could lose their platforms.

    “I’ve personally witnessed the power and increased voice young people have through specifically TikTok, and getting rid of our one place for that would be troubling to say the least,” says Mullen.

    For now? Biden’s just posting through it.

    The Chatroom

    I’m going to keep it short this week. How do you feel about this TikTok bill? Are you a creator or small business owner who is worried about reaching your fans or customers? Are you part of a campaign or political group rethinking your entire media strategy this year? Or maybe you’re a TikTok user who receives a lot of their news on the app—let me know!

    With your permission, I’d like to include some of your thoughts and stories in the newsletter next week. Leave a comment on the site, or send me an email at mail@wired.com.

    💬 Leave a comment below this article.

    WIRED Reads

    Want more? Subscribe now for unlimited access to WIRED.

    What Else We’re Reading

    🔗 As Meta flees politics, campaigns rely on new tricks to reach voters: Campaigns across the political spectrum have seen engagement on Meta-owned platforms tank over the past year. (The Washington Post)

    🔗 Oracle met with Senate aides about TikTok data storage after House ban passed: The clock is ticking for TikTok, and Oracle is already freaked out that a ban on the app could impact its business. (CNBC)

    🔗 ‘Thunder Run’: Behind Lawmakers’ Secretive Push to Pass the TikTok Bill: It may have seemed like the TikTok bill came out of nowhere, but a small group of lawmakers have been quietly crafting it for almost a year. (The New York Times)

    The Download

    It’s going to be all TikTok all the time for the next few weeks, I fear. If you’re looking for a great primer on all of the trickle-down effects this law will have, you should check out our latest Politics Lab podcast episode. I discuss it all with my editor and host of the show Leah Feiger and my colleague Vittoria Elliott!

    You can listen to the show wherever you download podcasts. Go subscribe! If the next few weeks are as chaotic as this one, you just might miss it.

    That’s it for today—thanks again for subscribing. You can get in touch with me via email, Instagram, X and Signal at makenakelly.32.

    Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • Can the First Amendment Save TikTok?

    Can the First Amendment Save TikTok?

    On Wednesday, President Joe Biden signed a law that could effectively ban TikTok if the company does not divest from ByteDance, its Chinese owner, in the next 12 months. But the law, which sped through the House and Senate, could face a significant uphill battle in US courts for potentially violating the First Amendment rights of both the company and its users.

    In a statement, a TikTok spokesperson said “this unconstitutional law is a TikTok ban, and we will challenge it in court. We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail.”

    TikTok has argued that prior attempts to ban the app ran afoul of the First Amendment. Last year, the state of Montana passed a TikTok ban that was blocked by a federal judge before it could go into effect. US District Judge Donald Molloy wrote that TikTok “had established a likelihood of irreparable harm” if the ban was enacted, both to the First Amendment rights of its users and to the ability of creators to make money.

    Some experts say that the federal government could run into some of these same traps.

    “Assuming the combination that the divestiture does not go through and the app is actually banned, that means that Americans who wish to access it cannot do so,” Nadine Farid Johnson, policy director at the Knight Institute, tells WIRED. Banning the app outright would go too far, Johnson says, and “wouldn’t be a tailored response that addresses the government’s stated concerns.”

    “In all cases, I think that where this legislation is going to fail is that it’s burdening so much more speech than is necessary,” says Jenna Leventoff, senior policy counsel at the ACLU.

    If TikTok or its creators were to sue the government for violating the First Amendment, experts believe they could make a solid argument. John Morris, a principal at the Internet Society, says that the case in Montana and a 2020 case brought by users of WeChat following a Trump administration executive order to ban the Chinese chat app provide a blueprint for how the courts may view TikTok’s legal challenge.

    “In that case, what appeared to be very relevant to the court was the fact that the WeChat platform was a critical platform for communications of the users of WeChat, and they really didn’t have a good alternative,” Morris says. “If you’re looking at TikTok, many of the users of TikTok also predominantly use that platform to interact with other people.”

    In both the WeChat case and the Montana case, both the companies and their users were parties to the case, meaning that both “speakers” and “listeners” were claiming that their speech had been violated.

    TikTok has found itself in the crosshairs of US regulations for several years due to concerns about surveillance by the Chinese government. In 2020, former president Donald Trump issued an executive order to ban the app, calling it a threat to the “the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.” In 2023, Democratic senator Mark Warner introduced the Restrict Act, which would allow the office of the commerce secretary to review and ban certain apps. Lawmakers have expressed concern that TikTok could be spying on its US users on behalf of the Chinese government due to a law that allows the Chinese government to compel companies, organizations, and individuals to work with the state on matters of national intelligence.

    Vittoria Elliott, Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • Why U.S. officials want to ban TikTok

    Why U.S. officials want to ban TikTok

    Washington — A law that could lead to a national ban of TikTok cleared the Senate Tuesday night in a bipartisan vote of 79-18, representing one of the most serious threats to the immensely popular social media app’s U.S. operations. 

    Some lawmakers insist they don’t want to actually ban the platform used by roughly 170 million Americans, arguing the choice lies with TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance. 

    To keep TikTok up and running in the U.S., ByteDance must sell its stake in TikTok, and it has up to a year to do so, according to the legislation, which was signed into law on Wednesday by President Biden. But the Chinese government, which would have to sign off on any sale, opposes a forced sale. Without a divestiture, the company would lose access to app stores and web-hosting providers, effectively banning it in the U.S. The timeline could be prolonged by an expected legal battle. 

    “This is not an effort to take your voice away. … This is not a ban of a service you appreciate,” Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat and the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday in a floor speech, acknowledging that many Americans are skeptical of the legislation. “At the end of the day, they’ve not seen what Congress has seen.” 

    Why does Congress want to ban TikTok? 

    Lawmakers have suspicions about the video-sharing app’s ties to China and have tried to regulate it, though prior efforts to widely restrict it have been unsuccessful. U.S. officials have repeatedly warned that TikTok threatens national security because the Chinese government could use it to spy on Americans or weaponize it to covertly influence the U.S. public by amplifying or suppressing certain content. 

    The concern is warranted, U.S. officials say, because Chinese national security laws require organizations to cooperate with intelligence gathering. FBI Director Christopher Wray told House Intelligence Committee members in March that the Chinese government could compromise Americans’ devices through the software. 

    “This app is a spy balloon in Americans’ phones” that is “used to surveil and exploit Americans’ personal information,” Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Saturday before the lower chamber passed the bill as part of a broader foreign aid package. 

    In classified briefings, lawmakers have learned “how rivers of data are being collected and shared in ways that are not well-aligned with American security interests,” Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, said Tuesday. 

    Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said last month that the Chinese government has the ability to influence “a lot of young people” who use TikTok as their main news source. 

    “That’s a national security concern,” Rubio said. 

    Warner said Tuesday that the fact that Chinese diplomats are lobbying congressional staff against the legislation, which was first reported by Politico, shows “how dearly [Chinese President] Xi Jinping is invested in this product.” 

    Senate Minority Whip John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, called the lobbying effort “a stunning confirmation of the value the Chinese government places on its ability to access Americans’ information and shape their TikTok experience.” 

    Arguments against banning TikTok 

    TikTok has denied that it’s beholden to the Chinese government and has accused lawmakers who want to restrict it of trampling on citizens’ free speech rights. TikTok has vowed to mount a legal challenge, calling the law “unconstitutional.” 

    “We’ll continue to fight, as this legislation is a clear violation of the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans on TikTok and would have devastating consequences for the 7 million small businesses that use TikTok to reach new customers, sell their products, and create new jobs. This is the beginning, not the end of this long process,” TikTok executive Michael Beckerman said in an internal company memo obtained by CBS News that was sent to TikTok staff on Saturday. 

    In a video on Wednesday, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said “the facts and the Constitution are on our side and we expect to prevail again.” He said the company has invested billions of dollars to secure user data and “keep our platform free from outside manipulation.” 

    TikTok began an initiative known as “Project Texas” in 2022 to safeguard American users’ data on servers in the U.S. and ease lawmakers’ fears. But Warner argued Tuesday that the initiative was insufficient because it would still allow TikTok’s algorithm and source code to remain in China, making them “subject to Chinese government exploitation.” 

    Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts said Tuesday on the Senate floor that TikTok poses national security risks, but the legislation amounted to “censorship” because it could deny Americans access to a platform they rely on for news, business purposes, building a community and connecting with others. 

    “We should be very clear about the likely outcome of this law,” Markey said. “It’s really just a TikTok ban. And once we properly acknowledge that this bill is a TikTok ban, we can better see its impact on free expression.” 

    Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, wrote in a recent opinion piece that the law could be a gateway to the government forcing the sale of other companies.

    “If the damage to one company weren’t enough, there is a very real danger this ham-fisted assault on TikTok may actually give the government the power to force the sale of other companies,” he wrote and predicted that  the Supreme Court will ultimately rule the law is unconstitutional. 

    Nikole Killion and Alan He contributed reporting. 

    Source link

  • US banning TikTok? Your key questions answered

    US banning TikTok? Your key questions answered

    SCHOOL STAFF. NOW, A 12 NEWS EXCLUSIVE, VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS IN WISCONSIN TALKING ABOUT THE POTENTIAL TIKTOK BAN. THE VICE PRESIDENT TALKING EXCLUSIVELY WITH 12 NEWS POLITICAL DIRECTOR MATT SMITH IN LA CROSSE AS SHE STUMPS IN THE SWING STATE. AND MATT, THE TIKTOK BILL MOVING THROUGH CONGRESS TONIGHT. YEAH, JOEY SAYS PART OF THIS MASSIVE FOREIGN AID BILL THAT PASSED THE HOUSE ON SATURDAY NOW POISED TO PASS THE SENATE THIS WEEK, INCLUDED IN IT THAT POTENTIAL BAN ON TIKTOK IF ITS CHINESE OWNER DOESN’T DIVEST VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS HERE IN LA CROSSE TODAY, HER THIRD STOP TO THE KEY SWING STATE THIS YEAR ALONE, TWO EVENTS FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT TALKING TO HEALTH CARE AND NOTABLY, ABORTION. TODAY, MORE DIRECTLY GOING AFTER FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP ON THE ISSUE. ALL THIS TONIGHT AS THE SENATE NOW PREPARING TO VOTE ON THAT MAJOR FUNDING PACKAGE FOR ISRAEL AND UKRAINE, AND THAT TIKTOK PROVISION, WE’RE SEEING MORE ACTION IN CONGRESS, THE FOREIGN AID BILL PASSING THE HOUSE, THE SENATE NEXT. I’M ASSUMING THE PRESIDENT STILL WILL SIGN IT AS AS HE’S INDICATED. YES, ABSOLUTELY. A PROVISION IN THERE INVOLVES TIKTOK AND WOULD BAN THE APP IF BYTEDANCE DOESN’T DIVEST WITHIN A YEAR. I’M CURIOUS, ARE YOU COMFORTABLE BEING THE ADMINISTRATION THAT SIGNS LEGISLATION INTO LAW THAT COULD POTENTIALLY BAN TIKTOK? WELL, LET ME BE VERY CLEAR. WE DO NOT WANT TO BAN TIKTOK, AND THAT IS NOT OUR INTENTION AT ALL. WE’RE NOT TRYING TO BAN TIKTOK. WE’RE BASICALLY SAYING WE GOT TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHO THE OWNER OF TIKTOK IS AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THAT PRESENTS IN TERMS OF NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES, WE DO NOT WANT TO BAN TIKTOK AT ALL. AND MATT UNDERSCORING THE IMPORTANCE OF WISCONSIN AS A SWING STATE, YOU MENTIONED THIS IS THE VICE PRESIDENT’S THIRD STOP IN WISCONSIN THIS YEAR ALONE, AHEAD OF NOVEMBER. YEAH, JOE, WE SAY NOTABLY HER FIRST STOP IN WESTERN WISCONSIN, FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WON THIS AREA IN 2020. HE’S OVER PERFORMING HERE IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE STATE. AND THE POLLS NOW AHEAD OF 2024, THE VICE PRESIDENT’S FOCUS ON ABORTION TODAY CRITICAL AND POINTED FOR THE CAMPAIGN DANE LOOKING AND NEEDING TO REACH DEMOCRATIC AND INDEPENDENT

    US banning TikTok? Your key questions answered

    No, TikTok will not suddenly disappear from your phone. Nor will you go to jail if you continue using it after it is banned.After years of attempts to ban the Chinese-owned app, including by former President Donald Trump, a measure to outlaw the popular video-sharing app has won congressional approval and is on its way to President Biden for his signature. The measure gives Beijing-based parent company ByteDance nine months to sell the company, with a possible additional three months if a sale is in progress. If it doesn’t, TikTok will be banned.So what does this mean for you, a TikTok user, or perhaps the parent of a TikTok user? Here are some key questions and answers.WHEN DOES THE BAN GO INTO EFFECT?The original proposal gave ByteDance just six months to divest from its U.S. subsidiary, negotiations lengthened it to nine. Then, if the sale is already in progress, the company will get another three months to complete it.So it would be at least a year before a ban goes into effect — but with likely court challenges, this could stretch even longer, perhaps years. TikTok has seen some success with court challenges in the past, but it has never sought to prevent federal legislation from going into effect.WHAT IF I ALREADY DOWNLOADED IT?TikTok, which is used by more than 170 million Americans, most likely won’t disappear from your phone even if an eventual ban does take effect. But it would disappear from Apple and Google’s app stores, which means users won’t be able to download it. This would also mean that TikTok wouldn’t be able to send updates, security patches and bug fixes, and over time the app would likely become unusable — not to mention a security risk.BUT SURELY THERE ARE WORKAROUNDS?Teenagers are known for circumventing parental controls and bans when it comes to social media, so dodging the U.S. government’s ban is certainly not outside the realm of possibilities. For instance, users could try to mask their location using a VPN, or virtual private network, use alternative app stores or even install a foreign SIM card into their phone.But some tech savvy is required, and it’s not clear what will and won’t work. More likely, users will migrate to another platform — such as Instagram, which has a TikTok-like feature called Reels, or YouTube, which has incorporated vertical short videos in its feed to try to compete with TikTok. Often, such videos are taken directly from TikTok itself. And popular creators are likely to be found on other platforms as well, so you’ll probably be able to see the same stuff.“The TikTok bill relies heavily on the control that Apple and Google maintain over their smartphone platforms because the bill’s primary mechanism is to direct Apple and Google to stop allowing the TikTok app on their respective app stores,” said Dean Ball, a research fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. “Such a mechanism might be much less effective in the world envisioned by many advocates of antitrust and aggressive regulation against the large tech firms.”

    No, TikTok will not suddenly disappear from your phone. Nor will you go to jail if you continue using it after it is banned.

    After years of attempts to ban the Chinese-owned app, including by former President Donald Trump, a measure to outlaw the popular video-sharing app has won congressional approval and is on its way to President Biden for his signature. The measure gives Beijing-based parent company ByteDance nine months to sell the company, with a possible additional three months if a sale is in progress. If it doesn’t, TikTok will be banned.

    So what does this mean for you, a TikTok user, or perhaps the parent of a TikTok user? Here are some key questions and answers.

    WHEN DOES THE BAN GO INTO EFFECT?

    The original proposal gave ByteDance just six months to divest from its U.S. subsidiary, negotiations lengthened it to nine. Then, if the sale is already in progress, the company will get another three months to complete it.

    So it would be at least a year before a ban goes into effect — but with likely court challenges, this could stretch even longer, perhaps years. TikTok has seen some success with court challenges in the past, but it has never sought to prevent federal legislation from going into effect.

    WHAT IF I ALREADY DOWNLOADED IT?

    TikTok, which is used by more than 170 million Americans, most likely won’t disappear from your phone even if an eventual ban does take effect. But it would disappear from Apple and Google’s app stores, which means users won’t be able to download it. This would also mean that TikTok wouldn’t be able to send updates, security patches and bug fixes, and over time the app would likely become unusable — not to mention a security risk.

    BUT SURELY THERE ARE WORKAROUNDS?

    Teenagers are known for circumventing parental controls and bans when it comes to social media, so dodging the U.S. government’s ban is certainly not outside the realm of possibilities. For instance, users could try to mask their location using a VPN, or virtual private network, use alternative app stores or even install a foreign SIM card into their phone.

    But some tech savvy is required, and it’s not clear what will and won’t work. More likely, users will migrate to another platform — such as Instagram, which has a TikTok-like feature called Reels, or YouTube, which has incorporated vertical short videos in its feed to try to compete with TikTok. Often, such videos are taken directly from TikTok itself. And popular creators are likely to be found on other platforms as well, so you’ll probably be able to see the same stuff.

    “The TikTok bill relies heavily on the control that Apple and Google maintain over their smartphone platforms because the bill’s primary mechanism is to direct Apple and Google to stop allowing the TikTok app on their respective app stores,” said Dean Ball, a research fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. “Such a mechanism might be much less effective in the world envisioned by many advocates of antitrust and aggressive regulation against the large tech firms.”

    Source link

  • TikTok Divest-or-Ban Bill Passes in the Senate

    TikTok Divest-or-Ban Bill Passes in the Senate

    The U.S. Senate passed the TikTok bill on Tuesday evening in a vote of 79-18. The bill, which bans TikTok unless Bytedance sells it to a U.S. owner, flew through Congress this week as part of a broader package to provide $90 billion in foreign aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. President Joe Biden said in a statement following the Senate vote that he would sign the package as soon as Wednesday, clearing the last hurdle before the TikTok divest-or-ban bill becomes law.

    “We’ve learned in recent years that democracy is a fragile and precious thing,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on the Senate floor Tuesday. “It will not survive the threats of this century – the new threats – if we aren’t willing to do what it takes to defend it.”

    TikTok is prepared to wage a legal battle against the U.S. government over the so-called ban, Bloomberg reported on Sunday. The social media company claims the so-called TikTok ban is “a clear violation” of the First Amendment rights of TikTok’s 170 million American users. A court case of this kind is unprecedented and could go up to the Supreme Court.

    TikTok did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment.

    The “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” also known as the TikTok bill, grants the White House new privileges to crack down on apps it determines to be a national security threat. The bill gives U.S. presidents the power to label apps as “foreign adversary-controlled applications” and force them to be sold to a U.S. owner within 270 days, though Biden can extend this to 360 days (a previous version only provided 180 days). If no sale occurs, the apps will be banned from app stores and blocked by internet service providers in the United States.

    TikTok has long denied that it shares any data with the Chinese government. However, Senators received classified briefings on TikTok from national security officials in March, which reportedly revealed the app’s “shocking” spy capabilities. Senators told Axios that TikTok could be used to tap the microphone on users’ devices, and even determine what users are doing on other apps. That said, none of this evidence has been made public

    A previous version of this bill swiftly passed through the House in March but stalled in the Senate for more than a month. By tying the TikTok bill to a crucial foreign aid package, lawmakers were able to nearly ensure it would be taken up by the Senate.

    One concern tech lawyers have raised about the TikTok bill is that it could ban apps other than TikTok. The bill features vague definitions of what constitutes “foreign adversary-controlled applications,” and gives the president a near unchecked power to make such a categorization.

    As President Biden seems poised to sign the TikTok bill into law, former President Donald Trump has flipped his stance on the social media app. Trump now supports TikTok’s existence, posting on Truth Social Monday that “Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok.” Trump was the first to attempt a TikTok ban in 2020 when he signed an executive order that was later rejected by a federal court.

    Trump’s reversal, which seems contradictory, is likely to curry favor with younger voters. Despite the overwhelming support in Congress, a U.S. TikTok ban is not popular with voters. Just 38% of U.S. adults say they would support a TikTok ban, according to the Pew Research Center. If Biden signs the TikTok bill, he’ll appear strong against China, but could potentially lose important swing voters.

    TikTok says this bill would “trample” free speech in America, an increasingly popular claim among social media apps. Elon Musk’s X and Trump’s Truth Social make similar First Amendment arguments for their app’s controversial content. Meanwhile, Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is going in the other direction. Facebook, Threads, and Instagram how vowed not to prioritize news on their social media sites, making duller apps in exchange for less controversy.

    TikTok has fought tooth and nail to avoid a U.S. ban under Bytedance’s ownership. The app sent push notifications to millions of American users asking them to call their local congress member. Lawmakers’ offices were flooded with phone calls later that day. TikTok and Bytedance also reportedly spent over $7 million lobbying in Congress this year to fight the potential ban. Those attempts were unsuccessful, so now TikTok is poised to take this battle to court.

    Maxwell Zeff

    Source link

  • This Is the Beginning of the End of TikTok

    This Is the Beginning of the End of TikTok

    On Tuesday, the Senate passed a massive foreign aid package that included an ultimatum for TikTok: Divest or be banned from operating within the US. The package was approved by the House of Representatives on Saturday, and President Joe Biden said that he intends to sign the bill on Wednesday.

    “Even as our social media platforms have fumbled in their response to foreign influence operations, there was never any concern that these platforms are operating at the direction of foreign adversaries,” Mark Warner, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said ahead of the vote on Tuesday. “I cannot say the same for TikTok.”

    For more than four years, Congress has threatened to ban TikTok, citing potential risks to national security. Last month, the House approved a separate divestiture bill, but the measure stalled out in the Senate after lawmakers like Senator Maria Cantwell argued that giving TikTok six months to find a new owner was too little time. The new bill extends the deadline for up to an additional six months, giving TikTok a year to sell.

    “It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign aid and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans,” TikTok said in a statement shortly after Saturday’s vote. The company did not immediately respond to the Senate’s vote on Tuesday.

    The effort to ban TikTok has become politically fraught, especially as more politicians join the platform to campaign in the 2024 election. For years, the Biden administration and campaign avoided creating their own accounts on the app, opting to build out a network of influencers to fill the void. But in February, Biden’s reelection campaign joined TikTok. In March, Biden told reporters that he would sign the bill.

    Responding to this revived divestment effort, former president Donald Trump blamed Biden for attacks against the app. “Just so everyone knows, especially the young people, Crooked Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday. “He is the one pushing it to close, and doing it to help his friends over at Facebook become richer and more dominant, and able to continue to fight, perhaps illegally, the Republican Party.”

    The Trump administration was the first to go after TikTok. In 2020, Trump signed a series of executive orders banning apps like TikTok, Alipay, and WeChat. Court challenges prevented these orders from going into place. Last year, Montana lawmakers voted to ban the app, but a federal judge blocked the law from taking effect, saying that it “likely violates the First Amendment.” After the bill passed the House on Saturday, the company’s head of public policy, Michael Beckerman, told staff in an email that if the bill were signed into law, “we will move to the courts for a legal challenge.”

    Many lawmakers have cited national security and data privacy concerns as their primary motivation for supporting the bill.

    “Congress is not acting to punish ByteDance, TikTok or any other individual company,” Democratic senator Maria Cantwell, said in a floor speech on Tuesday. “Congress is acting to prevent foreign adversaries from conducting espionage, surveillance, maligned operations, harming vulnerable Americans, our servicemen and women, and our U.S. government personnel.”

    Critics of a ban have long argued that passing a sweeping data privacy bill could satisfy most of the complaints lawmakers have over TikTok’s security, as well as those posed by US-based companies.

    “Congress could pass comprehensive consumer privacy legislation, which would, I think, take more meaningful steps toward addressing a lot of the data privacy concerns that have been raised about TikTok,” says Kate Ruane, director of the Center for Democracy and Technology’s Free Expression Project. “And I do not think that there is public evidence that is currently available to demonstrate that extreme, serious, immediate harm exists.”

    Vittoria Elliott, Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • The TikTok ban was just passed by the House. Here’s what could happen next.

    The TikTok ban was just passed by the House. Here’s what could happen next.

    TikTok users could soon find that the popular social media service is either under new ownership or, although it wouldn’t happen immediately, outright banned in the U.S.

    On Saturday, the House passed legislation that would bar TikTok from operating in the U.S. if the popular platform’s China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake within a year. The bill will next head to the Senate, where it is expected to pass, buoyed by its attachment to a larger foreign aid package for Ukraine and Israel that has gained bipartisan support. 

    TikTok has attracted unwanted scrutiny not only for the addictiveness of its constantly scrolling videos, but also due to its Chinese owner, ByteDance. That has raised concerns among lawmakers and security experts that the Chinese government could tap TikTok’s trove of personal data about millions of U.S. users. 

    Meanwhile, TikTok has asked its users to contact their lawmakers to argue against the bill’s passage, an effort that appears to have failed to sway opinions in Washington, D.C., noted Eurasia Group director Clayton Allen. 

    TikTok has sent push alerts to users of the social media platform, urging them to contact their lawmakers about a congressional bill that would require its Chinese owner ByteDance to sell it or face a U.S. ban.

    Aimee Picchi


    As recently as last week, TikTok was sending push notifications to some of its users urging them to reach out to their lawmakers, saying that the bill could “take away YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to access TikTok.”

    “It’s a low-cost exercise if you have access to the user base,” Allen told CBS MoneyWatch. “But it seems like it has backfired.”

    Some lawmakers had argued that TikTok’s ability to send bulk push notifications to its users, many of them minors, underscored the risks of the app.

    In a statement, TikTok said it is “unfortunate” that lawmakers are “using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually.”

    Here’s what to know about what could happen next to the TikTok bill. 

    When will the Senate vote on the TikTok bill?

    The Senate is expected to take up the bill as early as Tuesday, although the vote could come on Wednesday, said CBS News congressional correspondent Scott MacFarlane. 

    President Joe Biden has indicated he would sign the bill, which is primarily focused on providing foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. 

    Why does Congress want to ban TikTok? 

    Actually, lawmakers want ByteDance to sell its stake in TikTok. Barring such a deal, the legislation would, in fact, ban the social media app in the U.S.

    Lawmakers are increasingly concerned about the company’s ties in China, with fears that ByteDance or TikTok could share data about U.S. users with China’s authoritarian government. 

    “The idea that we would give the Communist Party this much of a propaganda tool, as well as the ability to scrape 170 million Americans’ personal data, it is a national security risk,” Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” on Sunday.

    What is the timeline for a possible TikTok sale or shutdown?

    If passed, the bill would give TikTok’s owner nine months to arrange a sale, with the potential for an additional three-month grace period, according to a copy of the bill released earlier this month. 

    But, Allen of Eurasia Group noted, that would put the nine-month mark in mid- to late January, which could also coincide with the U.S. presidential inauguration. If former President Donald Trump wins in November, he could very well take a different tack with TikTok, the analyst noted.

    “This might become a question for the next administration,” Allen said. “Looking at the language of the bill, I’m not sure Trump would be as bound to pursue what the Biden administration would want. He could use it as a point of leverage with China.”

    If TikTok is sold, who might buy it?

    Likely bidders include Microsoft, Oracle or private equity groups, according to Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives.

    However, Ives thinks ByteDance would be unlikely to sell TikTok with its core algorithms, the vital software that provides video recommendations to users based on their interests and viewing habits. 

    “The value of TikTok would dramatically change without the algorithms and makes the ultimate sale/divestiture of TikTok a very complex endeavor, with many potential strategic/financial bidders waiting anxiously for this process to kick off,” Ives said in a research note.

    Could other social media platforms benefit from the bill? 

    Rivals such as Meta could benefit from the bill if it becomes a law, Ives noted. 

    Wedbush estimates that roughly 60% of TikTok users would shift to Meta’s Instagram and Facebook if TikTok went dark in the U.S. Google would also benefit, he added. 

    Source link

  • The EU opens an investigation into TikTok Lite, citing addiction concerns

    The EU opens an investigation into TikTok Lite, citing addiction concerns

    The European Union (EU) into TikTok and has accused the platform of running afoul of the region’s Digital Services Act (DSA), . The probe involves the addictive nature of TikTok Lite, which is a smaller version of the app that takes up less memory on a smartphone and was built to perform over slower internet connections.

    TikTok Lite launched earlier this month in France and Spain and includes a design aspect that allows users to earn points by watching and liking videos. These points can be exchanged for stuff like Amazon vouchers and TikTok’s proprietary digital currency, which is typically used to tip creators. The EU’s Commission has expressed concern that this type of “task and reward” design language could impact the mental health of young users by “stimulating addictive behavior.”

    The Commission hasn’t yet confirmed any breaches of the DSA, but has suggested that it might impose temporary measures to force parent company ByteDance to suspend TikTok Lite in the EU while it continues the investigation. The company has until April 24 to argue against these potential measures, so the app’s still available for EU residents. However, ByteDance failed to provide the EU with a risk assessment document regarding TikTok Lite after being asked last week.

    This failure to comply with the DSA could open the company up to steep penalties of up to one percent of its total annual income and periodic penalties of up to five percent of daily income. The Commission hasn’t indicated if it plans on issuing these fines as the investigation continues.

    “We suspect TikTok Lite could be as toxic and addictive as” light cigarettes, Thierry Breton, the commissioner for the EU Internal Market, wrote in a press release announcing the probe. “We will spare no effort to protect our children.”

    ByteDance has yet to respond to the investigation and the potential of TikTok Lite being banned in the EU. This latest inquiry follows a more comprehensive probe . That wide-ranging investigation focuses on addictive algorithms, age verification issues, default privacy settings and ad transparency.

    February’s probe is ongoing, but ByteDance was already forced to make concessions to allow TikTok to operate in the EU. The company had to give users the choice to the For You Page and instituted new harmful content reporting options. It also suspended personalized ads for EU users aged 13 to 17.

    As for America, the keeps inching closer to reality. The US House of Representatives tucked a revised version of the bill into this weekend’s foreign aid package. Under this new proposed legislation, ByteDance would have one year to sell off TikTok before it would be banned from app stores. It’s now heading to the Senate and will likely be voted on this week. However, it remains to be seen if the Senate will even keep the stuff about TikTok in the foreign aid package. President Biden has previously said if Congress passes it.

    Lawrence Bonk

    Source link

  • 4/21: Face the Nation

    4/21: Face the Nation

    4/21: Face the Nation – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    This week on “Face the Nation,” Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia talks what the timeline for a possible TikTok sale or ban could look like. Plus, House Appropriations Committee chair Rep. Tom Cole on the foreign aid legislation that passed the House on Saturday.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    Source link

  • House votes in favor of bill that could ban TikTok, sending it onward to Senate

    House votes in favor of bill that could ban TikTok, sending it onward to Senate

    The US House of Representatives passed a bill on Saturday that could either see TikTok banned in the country or force its sale. A revised version of the bill, which previously passed the House in March but later stalled in Senate, was roped in with a foreign aid package this time around, likely meaning it will now be treated as a higher priority item. The bill originally gave TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, six months to sell the app if it’s passed into law or TikTok would be banned from US app stores. Under the revised version, ByteDance would have up to a year to divest.

    The bill passed with a vote of 360-58 in the House, according to AP. It’ll now move on to the Senate, which could vote on it in just a matter of days. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said today that the Senate is working to reach an agreement on when the next vote will be for the foreign aid package that the TikTok bill is attached to, but it is expected to happen this coming Tuesday. President Joe Biden has previously said he would support the bill if Congress passes it.

    The bill paints TikTok as a national security threat due to its ties to China. There are roughly 170 million US users on the app, at least according to TikTok, and ByteDance isn’t expected to let them go without a fight. In a statement posted on X earlier this week, the TikTok Policy account said such a law would “trample the free speech rights” of these users, “devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually.” Critics of the bill have also argued that banning TikTok would do little in the way of actually protecting Americans’ data.

    Cheyenne MacDonald

    Source link

  • The Houses Passes a TikTok Ban Bill That’s on the Fast Track

    The Houses Passes a TikTok Ban Bill That’s on the Fast Track

    A TikTok ban is back on the table after the House approved a new bill on Saturday addressing the issues that stalled it out in the Senate.

    The bill would allow the Biden administration to ban TikTok nationwide if it doesn’t divest from its China-based owner, Bytedance, within a year. It’s different from a similar bill passed in the House last month and gives TikTok an additional six months to find a US buyer. The previous bill stalled out in the Senate after Senate Commerce Committee Chair Maria Cantwell raised several issues, including the short timeline for divestiture.

    It passed easily, in a 360-58 vote.

    “This app is a spy balloon on Americans’ phones,” said representative Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, in his introduction of the bill on the House floor Saturday. “It is a modern-day Trojan horse … used to surveil and exploit America’s personal information.”

    The TikTok backlash had bipartisan support. “National security experts are sounding the alarm, warning that our foreign adversaries are using every tool at their disposal, including apps like TikTok, to amass troves of sensitive data on all Americans,” said representative Frank Pallone, a New Jersey Democrat. “This bill takes decisive action to mitigate our adversaries’ ability to collect Americans’ data and use it against us.”

    Digital liberties groups have pushed back against a TikTok ban over First Amendment concerns, and because they believe that getting rid of TikTok fails to address the underlying issue of pervasive data collection. “The only solution to this pervasive ecosystem is prohibiting the collection of our data in the first place,” wrote the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group, in a post last month. “Ultimately, foreign adversaries will still be able to obtain our data from social media companies unless those companies are forbidden from collecting, retaining, and selling it, full stop.”

    Even X owner Elon Musk spoke out against the ban. “In my opinion, TikTok should not be banned in the USA, even though such a ban may benefit the X platform,” he posted Friday. “Doing so would be contrary to freedom of speech and expression. It is not what America stands for.”

    Regardless, divestment or a ban now seems almost certain. This new measure had been tacked on to a multi-billion dollar foreign aid package directed at Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. After Iran’s retaliatory attack against Israel last week, this aid has been fast-tracked, which would make it more difficult for the Senate to avoid passing it.

    Cantwell has endorsed this latest package, saying in a Wednesday statement, “I’m very happy that Speaker Johnson and House leaders incorporated my recommendation to extend the Byte Dance divestment period from six months to a year. As I’ve said, extending the divestment period is necessary to ensure there is enough time for a new buyer to get a deal done. I support this updated legislation.”

    For several years, Congress has tried and failed to force a TikTok sale. Republicans and Democrats have feared that the app poses a risk to US national security, providing the Chinese government troves of American user data. But Congress has provided little evidence to support these claims, and TikTok and its supporters argue that banning the app would violate freedom of speech rights.

    Makena Kelly

    Source link

  • House passes legislation that could ban TikTok in the US

    House passes legislation that could ban TikTok in the US

    The House passed legislation Saturday that would ban TikTok in the United States if the popular social media platform’s China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake within a year, but don’t expect the app to go away anytime soon.

    The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a larger foreign aid package, a priority for President Joe Biden with broad congressional support for Ukraine and Israel, fast-tracked the ban after an earlier version had stalled in the Senate. A standalone bill with a six-month selling deadline passed the House in March by an overwhelming bipartisan vote as both Democrats and Republicans voiced national security concerns about the app’s owner, the Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.

    The modified measure, passed by a 360-58 vote, now goes to the Senate after negotiations that produced a compromise.

    Even if the legislation becomes law, though, the company would have up to a year to find a buyer and would likely try to challenge the law in court, arguing it would deprive the app’s millions of users of their First Amendment rights. Court challenges could significantly delay the timeline set out by Congress or block the law from going into effect.

    The company lobbied hard against the legislation, pushing the app’s 170 million U.S. users — many of whom are young — to call Congress and voice opposition. But the ferocity of the pushback angered lawmakers on Capitol Hill, where there is broad concern about Chinese threats to the U.S. and where few members use the platform themselves.

    cbsn-fusion-congress-to-fast-track-tiktok-ban-bill-thumbnail.jpg
    TikTok.

    CBS News


    “We will not stop fighting and advocating for you,” TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said in a video that was posted on the platform last month and directed toward the app’s users. “We will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform that we have built with you.”

    The bill’s quick path through Congress is extraordinary because it targets one company and because Congress has taken a hands-off approach to tech regulation for decades. Lawmakers have failed to act despite efforts to protect children online, safeguard users’ privacy and make companies more liable for content posted on their platforms, among other measures.

    The TikTok ban reflects widespread concerns from lawmakers about China.

    Members of both parties, along with intelligence officials, have worried that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over American user data or direct the company to suppress or boost TikTok content favorable to its interests. TikTok has denied assertions that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government and has said it has not shared U.S. user data with Chinese authorities.

    The U.S. government has not publicly provided evidence that shows TikTok shared U.S. user data with the Chinese government or tinkered with the company’s popular algorithm, which influences what Americans see.

    The company has good reason to think a legal challenge could be successful, having seen some success in previous legal fights over its operations in the U.S.. In November, a federal judge blocked a Montana law that would ban TikTok use across the state after the company and five content creators who use the platform sued.


    Congress to fast-track TikTok ban bill

    04:46

    In 2020, federal courts blocked an executive order issued by then-President Donald Trump to ban TikTok after the company sued on the grounds that the order violated free speech and due process rights. His administration brokered a deal that would have had U.S. corporations Oracle and Walmart take a large stake in TikTok. The sale never went through for a number of reasons; one was China, which imposed stricter export controls on its technology providers.

    Dozens of states and the federal government have put in place TikTok bans on government devices. Texas’ ban was challenged last year by The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which argued in a lawsuit that the policy was impeding academic freedom because it extended to public universities. In December, a federal judge ruled in favor of the state.

    Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have backed the app. “Congress cannot take away the rights of over 170 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves, engage in political advocacy, and access information from around the world,” said Jenna Leventoff, a lawyer for the group.

    Since mid-March, TikTok has spent $5 million on TV ads opposing the legislation, according to AdImpact, an advertising tracking firm. The ads have included a range of content creators, including a nun, extolling the positive impacts of the platform on their lives and arguing a ban would trample on the First Amendment. The company has also encouraged its users to contact Congress, and some lawmakers have received profanity-laced calls.

    “It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually,” said Alex Haurek, a spokesman for the company.

    Nadya Okamoto, a content creator who has roughly 4 million followers on TikTok, said she has been having conversations with other creators who are experiencing “so much anger and anxiety” about the bill and how it’s going to impact their lives. The 26-year-old, whose company “August” sells menstrual products and is known for her advocacy around destigmatizing menstrual periods, makes most of her income from TikTok.

    “This is going to have real repercussions,” she said.

    Source link

  • TikTok is in the hot seat once again in Washington

    TikTok is in the hot seat once again in Washington

    TikTok is again facing an imminent threat from Congress.On Wednesday, House Republicans added a hot-button bill that could lead to a nationwide TikTok ban to a wide-ranging foreign aid package intended to help Israel and Ukraine.House Speaker Mike Johnson aims to hold a vote on the aid package as early as Saturday. If approved, it could fast-track what has become the most serious risk to TikTok’s US business since former President Donald Trump first proposed a ban of the popular app in 2020.An earlier version of the TikTok bill sailed through the House in March, but it has become bogged down in the Senate. By including it in the aid package, House Republicans hope to force the Senate to a quick vote on a measure supporters say is necessary to protect Americans’ personal data from the Chinese government.Opponents, including TikTok and a range of civil society groups, have argued the bill risks violating TikTok users’ First Amendment rights.In pressuring Senate colleagues to approve the TikTok bill alongside military equipment for Ukraine, House Republicans are angling to avoid the lengthy regular process that could delay a Senate vote on the app, which has 175 million U.S. users. President Joe Biden has said he would sign the House TikTok bill if it reaches his desk.The latest version of the TikTok bill contains some updates. For example, it sets out a nine-month timeframe for the app’s Chinese parent, ByteDance, to sell the social media company. If it misses the deadline, TikTok would be banned from U.S. app stores.That proposed time limit is longer than the roughly six months proposed in previous legislation. The new bill would also give the president the option to extend the deadline by another 90 days if he determines there’s been progress toward a sale.The changes appear aimed at addressing concerns by some senators that the original six-month deadline was too short. Whether the revisions are enough to gain Senate approval, however, remains unclear, as some leading senators have signaled desires for a slower approach to a TikTok bill.One key senator who was doubtful of the initial House TikTok bill appeared satisfied.”I’m very happy that Speaker Johnson and House leaders incorporated my recommendation to extend the ByteDance divestment period from six months to a year,” said Washington Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, in a statement. “As I’ve said, extending the divestment period is necessary to ensure there is enough time for a new buyer to get a deal done. I support this updated legislation.”For years, U.S. policymakers have expressed fears that TikTok’s links to China through its parent company could allow the Chinese government unauthorized access to TikTok’s US user data. That information could potentially help the Chinese government identify intelligence targets or facilitate disinformation campaigns, they have said. Some other countries such as India have already banned TikTok.TikTok has pushed back strongly against those claims, saying there is no evidence the Chinese government has accessed U.S. user data to date and that the company has taken steps to insulate Americans’ personal information. That includes Project Texas, an initiative that involved moving TikTok’s U.S. user data onto servers controlled and overseen by Oracle, the US technology giant.Some policy experts say a more comprehensive way to deal with TikTok’s potential national security risks would be for Congress to pass a national privacy law that regulates how all businesses and organizations can handle Americans’ personal information.This month, Cantwell and her Republican counterpart in the House, Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, unveiled a proposal that could do just that, breaking a yearslong deadlock over key issues including the scope and reach of a unified, national data privacy standard.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

    TikTok is again facing an imminent threat from Congress.

    On Wednesday, House Republicans added a hot-button bill that could lead to a nationwide TikTok ban to a wide-ranging foreign aid package intended to help Israel and Ukraine.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson aims to hold a vote on the aid package as early as Saturday. If approved, it could fast-track what has become the most serious risk to TikTok’s US business since former President Donald Trump first proposed a ban of the popular app in 2020.

    An earlier version of the TikTok bill sailed through the House in March, but it has become bogged down in the Senate. By including it in the aid package, House Republicans hope to force the Senate to a quick vote on a measure supporters say is necessary to protect Americans’ personal data from the Chinese government.

    Opponents, including TikTok and a range of civil society groups, have argued the bill risks violating TikTok users’ First Amendment rights.

    In pressuring Senate colleagues to approve the TikTok bill alongside military equipment for Ukraine, House Republicans are angling to avoid the lengthy regular process that could delay a Senate vote on the app, which has 175 million U.S. users. President Joe Biden has said he would sign the House TikTok bill if it reaches his desk.

    The latest version of the TikTok bill contains some updates. For example, it sets out a nine-month timeframe for the app’s Chinese parent, ByteDance, to sell the social media company. If it misses the deadline, TikTok would be banned from U.S. app stores.

    That proposed time limit is longer than the roughly six months proposed in previous legislation. The new bill would also give the president the option to extend the deadline by another 90 days if he determines there’s been progress toward a sale.

    The changes appear aimed at addressing concerns by some senators that the original six-month deadline was too short. Whether the revisions are enough to gain Senate approval, however, remains unclear, as some leading senators have signaled desires for a slower approach to a TikTok bill.

    One key senator who was doubtful of the initial House TikTok bill appeared satisfied.

    “I’m very happy that Speaker Johnson and House leaders incorporated my recommendation to extend the ByteDance divestment period from six months to a year,” said Washington Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, in a statement. “As I’ve said, extending the divestment period is necessary to ensure there is enough time for a new buyer to get a deal done. I support this updated legislation.”

    For years, U.S. policymakers have expressed fears that TikTok’s links to China through its parent company could allow the Chinese government unauthorized access to TikTok’s US user data. That information could potentially help the Chinese government identify intelligence targets or facilitate disinformation campaigns, they have said. Some other countries such as India have already banned TikTok.

    TikTok has pushed back strongly against those claims, saying there is no evidence the Chinese government has accessed U.S. user data to date and that the company has taken steps to insulate Americans’ personal information. That includes Project Texas, an initiative that involved moving TikTok’s U.S. user data onto servers controlled and overseen by Oracle, the US technology giant.

    Some policy experts say a more comprehensive way to deal with TikTok’s potential national security risks would be for Congress to pass a national privacy law that regulates how all businesses and organizations can handle Americans’ personal information.

    This month, Cantwell and her Republican counterpart in the House, Washington Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, unveiled a proposal that could do just that, breaking a yearslong deadlock over key issues including the scope and reach of a unified, national data privacy standard.

    The-CNN-Wire
    ™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

    Source link

  • If they ban TikTok, is Apple next?

    If they ban TikTok, is Apple next?

    The censors who abound in Congress will likely vote to ban TikTok or force a change in ownership. It will likely soon be law. I think the Supreme Court will ultimately rule it unconstitutional, because it would violate the First Amendment rights of over 100 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves.

    In addition, I believe the Court will rule that the forced sale violates the Fifth Amendment. Under the Constitution, the government cannot take your property without accusing and convicting you of a crime—in short, without due process. Since Americans are part of TikTok’s ownership, they will eventually get their day in court.

    The Court could also conclude that naming and forcing the sale of a specific company amounts to a bill of attainder, legislation that targets a single entity.

    These are three significant constitutional arguments against Congress’ forced sale/ban legislation. In fact, three different federal courts have already invalidated legislative and executive attempts to ban TikTok.

    If the damage to one company weren’t enough, there is a very real danger this ham-fisted assault on TikTok may actually give the government the power to force the sale of other companies.

    Take, for example, Apple. As The New York Times reported in 2021, “In response to a 2017 Chinese law, Apple agreed to move its Chinese customers’ data to China and onto computers owned and run by a Chinese state-owned company.”

    Sound familiar? The legislators who want to censor and/or ban TikTok point to this same law to argue that TikTok could (someday) be commanded to turn over American users’ data to the Chinese government.

    Note that more careful speakers don’t allege that this has happened, but rather that it might. The banners of TikTok don’t want to be troubled by anything inconvenient like proving in a court of law that this is occurring. No, the allegation is enough for them to believe they have the right to force the sale of or ban TikTok.

    But back to Apple. It’s not theoretical that it might turn over data to the Chinese Communist government. It already has (albeit, Chinese users’ information). Nevertheless, it could be argued that Apple, by their actions, could fall under the TikTok ban language that forces the sale of an entity: under the influence of a foreign adversary.

    (Now, of course, I think such legislation is absurdly wrong and would never want it applied to Apple, but I worry the language is vague enough to apply to many entities.)

    As The New York Times explains: “Chinese government workers physically control and operate the data center. Apple agreed to store the digital keys that unlock its Chinese customers’ information in those data centers. And Apple abandoned the encryption technology it uses in other data centers after China wouldn’t allow it.”

    This sounds exactly like what the TikTok censors describe in their bill, except so far as we know, only Americans who live in China might be affected by Apple’s adherence to China’s law. TikTok actually has spent a billion dollars agreeing to house all American data with Oracle in Texas.

    Are there other companies that might be affected by the TikTok ban? Commentary by Kash Patel in The Washington Times argues that Temu, an online marketplace operated by a Chinese company, is even worse than TikTok and should be banned. He makes the argument that Temu, in contrast with TikTok, “does not employ any data security personnel in the United States.”

    And what of the global publishing enterprise Springer Nature? It has admitted that it censors its scientific articles at the request of the Chinese Communist government. Will the TikTok bill force its sale as well?

    Before Congress rushes to begin banning and punishing every international company that does business in China, perhaps they should pause, take a breath, and ponder the ramifications of rapid, legislative isolationism with regard to China.

    The impulse to populism is giving birth to the abandonment of international trade. I fear, in the hysteria of the moment, that ending trade between China and the U.S. will not only cost American consumers dearly but ultimately lead to more tension and perhaps even war.

    No one in Congress has more strongly condemned the historical famines and genocides of Communist China. I wrote a book, The Case Against Socialism, describing the horrors and inevitability of state-sponsored violence in the pursuit of complete socialism. I just recently wrote another book called Deception, condemning Communist China for covering up the Wuhan lab origins of COVID-19.

    And yet, even with those searing critiques, I believe the isolationism of the China hysterics is a mistake and will not end well if Congress insists on going down this path.

    Rand Paul

    Source link

  • The biggest myth about TikTok for musicians – ReverbNation Blog

    The biggest myth about TikTok for musicians – ReverbNation Blog

    Many major-label artists understand the power of TikTok as a music-marketing tool. In fact, some major acts even sought creative workarounds to get tracks back onto TikTok after their music was removed.

    In contrast, countless independent musicians seem to have the opposite problem. Their music IS easily available on TikTok, but there’s something else holding them back.

    What’s preventing those artists from reaching new fans on TikTok? Is it skill issues? Lack of gear? Ideas that don’t translate into viral videos? Probably not, actually! Most of us know how to frame a shot, hold a smartphone, and capture something that belongs on social.

    No, what holds so many musicians back is something (thankfully) that’s easy to solve. We just need to STOP believing the most damaging myth about TikTok.

    What’s that big, bad myth?

    It’s that TikTok prohibitively skews towards a particular age or demographic. That it isn’t for YOUR age-group, your interest-group, your country or region, etc.

    Have you ever heard yourself say some version of:

    “It’s only for kids.”

    “It’s only for dance trends.”

    “It’s only for comedy.”

    “It’s only for pop music.”

    If so, you’ve helped fuel this myth.

    In short: You believe that TikTok isn’t for you.

    The truth about TikTok for musicians

    It’s not a myth, of course, that TikTok skews young. That part is true.

    But here’s the thing: When you have a billion or more users on a platform that is designed to get the right content in front of the right audience, what does it matter if 60% of them are age 24 or younger? That still means you can reach 400million people who are OLDER than 24.

    And you can run similar math for almost any demographic consideration. You CAN find your people on TikTok. Which is why you might hear the phrase “corner of TikTok.” As in, there are millions of users in a certain “corner” of the platform, interacting with niche content that still gains massive reach due to the overall size of TikTok’s userbase.

    In other words,…

    No music is too niche

    No song is too strange. No artist is too old. No creator is too ANYTHING!

    As long as the content is good.

    Accordion hip-hop? Of course.

    Sad indie-folk covers of dance songs? Indeed.

    Electronic pop that only uses Casio keyboards? Yep.

    Ancient Corsican acappella? Why not.

    Humor and critique? Plenty of it.

    Encouragement and wisdom? Absolutely.

    Geography lessons via heavy metal? Hell yes.

    Sea Shanties? Timeless.

    Whether you’re 18 or 98, your music can reach, move, and change people. Not if you don’t get it in front of them though. And today, TikTok is arguably the most effective tool for music discovery. Which is why Taylor Swift’s music is back on the platform after UMG removed its catalog from TikTok.

    So if you want to reach people, you probably SHOULD be active on a vertical video platform. If it isn’t TikTok, you should have a strategy for Reels or Shorts instead.

    Why do we believe the myth that TikTok isn’t for us?

    It’s convenient. Because if we believe that myth, we don’t have to try.

    We don’t have to risk failing or being ignored. And I get it: It can be scary to put ourselves out there. Especially in a newer format (close-up, social, video) that differs dramatically from other settings where we might naturally thrive (on stage, in the studio, etc.)

    But if we attach ourselves too closely to some critique of modern music consumption trends — “oh, TikTok is only for kids and stupid dance videos” — what we’re really doing is blocking our own ability to use those same exact tools to reach people who will fall in love with our music.

    And isn’t that the point of everything we’re doing?

    Distribute your music to TikTok today!

    Chris Robley

    Source link