ReportWire

Tag: Tiger Global

  • India’s Urban Company soars 58% above IPO price in year’s most subscribed offering | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Urban Company, India’s largest home services platform, stormed onto the public markets on Wednesday, opening 58% above its issue price after delivering the country’s most subscribed IPO of the year.

    The Gurugram-based startup, which connects users to at-home services ranging from beauty treatments to appliance repair, debuted on the Mumbai-based National Stock Exchange at ₹162.25 per share (approximately $1.84), up from its IPO issue price of ₹103. The offering, which opened last week, was subscribed over 100 times, meaning investors placed orders for 100 times more shares than were available, signaling robust demand from both institutional and retail investors.

    Urban Company’s public listing has also served as a partial exit opportunity for its early backers, with Accel reaping the largest gains, followed by Elevation Capital and Tiger Global. Accel, which invested at an average cost of ₹3.61 per share, is sitting on potential profits of nearly 45x, while Elevation, with an entry price of ₹5.39 per share, stands to make around 30x and Tiger Global is looking at comparatively modest gains, reportedly around 1.3 times its cost basis.

    One of the key reasons behind Urban Company’s success over the past decade has been its ability to organize traditionally unorganized household services in India — including cleaning, plumbing, electrical work, massage, and beauty treatments. By digitizing these offerings through its app, the company has created an on-demand platform in a market that lacked standardization. In that sense, Urban Company enjoys a near monopoly, remaining the largest organized player in this space.

    Before kicking off the $217 million public offering, Urban Company raised $97 million from anchor investors, including Goldman Sachs, Dragoneer Investment Group, Norges Bank, GIC, Nomura Amundi Funds, Steadview Capital, Prosus, and WhiteOak. Domestic mutual funds including SBI Mutual Fund, ICICI Prudential, Nippon, and UTI also participated in the pre-IPO secondary round.

    Founded in November 2014 as UrbanClap by Abhiraj Singh Bhal, Varun Khaitan, and Raghav Chandra, Urban Company operates in 59 cities across four countries, including India, the UAE, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia — with India remaining its largest market so far. The company plans to enter more than 200 cities by the end of fiscal year 2030 to expand the reach of its household services.

    Urban Company aims to utilize the net proceeds primarily for technology development and cloud infrastructure, along with lease payments for office spaces and marketing initiatives.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    [ad_2]

    Jagmeet Singh

    Source link

  • Iconiq raises $5.15B toward seventh flagship fund | TechCrunch

    Iconiq raises $5.15B toward seventh flagship fund | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Iconiq Capital has raised $5.15 billion across two funds associated with the seventh growth fund family, according to SEC filings.

    The firm, which launched in 2011 as a private office managing capital of some of the most prominent and wealthiest people in tech, including Mark Zuckerburg and Jack Dorsey, originally targeted $5.75 billion, according to meeting information from New Mexico State Investment Council, the Wall Street Journal reported in March 2022. It is unclear if the firm is still raising capital toward its goal.

    Iconiq didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

    The fund size is a substantial increase from Iconiq’s fund VI target of $3.75 billion. 

    Iconiq’s latest fund haul is impressive, given that many other large growth investors failed to reach their targets by a long shot. Most notably, Tiger Global closed its latest venture capital fund at $2.2 billion, the firm’s smallest fund since 2014, Bloomberg reported. Tiger initially planned to raise $6 billion, less than half its predecessor vehicle of $12.7 billion the firm closed in March 2022. 

    The two giant funds aren’t in exactly the same position. Tiger Global was widely criticized for investing capital too quickly at exuberant prices during the 2020 and 2021 tech boom (though it always pushed back on the idea that it was overpaying). And, unlike Tiger Global, which has been actively selling secondary stakes to realize liquidity, Iconiq has been shopping for secondary positions, according to two sources.

    Iconiq’s substantive fundraise likely means that its backers are relatively pleased with the firm’s investment strategy. 

    Iconiq has realized several dozen exits from its portfolio in recent years, including the IPOs of Snowflake, Airbnb, GitLab and Hashicorp, according to PitchBook data. In 2023, Iconiq invested $1.1 billion into 22 companies, it says, and its portfolio includes startups like Drata, Canva, Ramp, ServiceTitan, Writer and Pigment.

    The firm’s fund VII-B has raised $3.06 billion from 219 investors, while fund VII-B closed on $1.26 billion from 462 backers, according to regulatory filings.

    Iconiq seventh vehicles will invest in 20 to 25 tech companies, according to the Buyouts Insider report based on the March 2022 meeting of New Mexico Investment Council.

    [ad_2]

    Marina Temkin

    Source link

  • ShareChat’s valuation drops below $2 billion in new funding | TechCrunch

    ShareChat’s valuation drops below $2 billion in new funding | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Social media startup ShareChat’s valuation has cratered below $2 billion from nearly $5 billion following a new funding round, a source familiar with the situation told TechCrunch, marking a steep decline for the nine-year-old Indian startup that boasts over 400 million users in the South Asian market.

    The Bengaluru-based startup, which operates a popular social network supporting a dozen Indian languages as well as a short-form video app, announced on Monday that it had raised $49 million in a convertible round. It did not disclose the valuation at which the funds were raised but strongly denied that its new valuation was below $2 billion, asserting there was “no valuation” attached to the round.

    Existing investors including Lightspeed, Temasek, Alkeon Capital, Moore Strategic Ventures and HarbourVest have invested in the new round, the startup said. Their debt will convert to equity at a valuation below $2 billion in the next round, according to a source with direct knowledge of the terms. The source requested anonymity to speak candidly. TechCrunch reported in December that ShareChat was facing a steep valuation cut.

    ShareChat also counts Google, X, Snap, Tiger Global and Tencent among its backers. It has raised about $1.3 billion to date. ShareChat was valued at $4.9 billion in a funding round it raised in mid-2022.

    The markdown comes despite ShareChat experiencing a remarkably positive year, aggressively cutting expenses while managing to double its revenue. “When the market turned, we had to temper [acquisitions and creator payments] and move towards more profitable growth,” Ankush Sachdeva, ShareChat’s co-founder and chief executive, told TechCrunch in an interview.

    ShareChat has not spent money acquiring users in the past year, with Sachdeva crediting improvements to the startup’s content recommendation engine for driving user retention and engagement. The company has also invested heavily in AI talent, particularly for senior roles in its London-based team. ShareChat also unveiled that it has doubled the ESOP grant for each employee in the firm as part of a special bonus grant.

    It has also been able to pare down its single-largest expense, the cost to serve content, he said. “When you fetch content on one of our apps, we do a lot of computation to find the 10 best content. To serve and consume that, there is another delivery cost. Optimizing this has helped us lower our burn,” he said.

    ShareChat has reduced its monthly cash burn by 90% over the past two years while doubling revenue, attracting large FMCG firms and gaming companies as advertisers.

    The startup also remains committed to the short-video market in India, despite strong competition from YouTube and Instagram following the country’s ban on TikTok in 2020.

    “In terms of traffic, ours is lower than those of Instagram and YouTube, but we are the largest in terms of a standalone app,” said Sachdeva. He believes ShareChat’s unique focus on live-streaming as a destination for entertainment and creator-user connections will differentiate it from American rivals. The startup acquired local rival MX TakaTak in a deal valued over $700 million in 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Manish Singh

    Source link

  • Way Unveils $100M Valuation Upon Close Of $20M Series A Led By Tiger Global

    Way Unveils $100M Valuation Upon Close Of $20M Series A Led By Tiger Global

    [ad_1]

    Two-year old start-up Way will announce later today the close of their Series A round totaling $20 million with a valuation of $100 million. Tiger Global led the round with several other participants including MSD Capital, the Michael Dell–founded private investment firm which has a strong presence in the real estate technology landscape. In the two years since Way’s start, the company has seen 20% month-over-month growth across dozens of brands such as Fairmont Hotels, Starwood Capital Group, Host Hotels and the short-term rental company Graduate Hotels.

    “We started in September 2020. Which was the worst time in history for hospitality,” said cofounder Michael Stocker. “Hotels were having 30% occupancy at best. We were going to them and saying, ‘how can we help you create a new revenue stream that will help you extract additional spend from that 30% occupancy?’ ”

    Way, which calls itself a “brand activation” platform, provides a means for hotels and other businesses to coordinate with local tourist-centric experiences directly from the hotel’s own websites. The platform’s booking and payment tool is integrated directly with each hotel and each local host has their own account and dashboard where they upload the photos, event description and availability. Hotels decide the revenue split with the local hosts and receive the contact information for each guest who has signed up, providing another potential revenue source at a later date through the ability to create more tailored marketing for their repeat customers. To date the average annual net revenue, after credit card booking fees and commissions, is approximately $40,000 across all their customers.

    The average transaction value hovers around $250 but can range from free events such as this caviar tasting class at Modernhaus to this $1,000 per person Dom Perignon New Year’s Eve celebration at The Little Nell in Aspen. The latter was one of the early adopters of the platform and Henning Rahm, General Manager, said via email, “Prior to Way, launching our activations and adventures required substantial effort and labor hours from our marketing and concierge teams. We have [since] increased their average transaction value on experiences by over 80%.”

    Stocker cites several examples of high-end experiences that generated significant revenue for a hotel on their platform, such as a “snow beach pop-up” that garnered $150,000 over a six week period and a New Year’s Eve party that reached $250,000 in ticket sales.

    However, it is not necessarily the ancillary revenue that adds the most value. “Some hotels, in particular ultra-luxury ones, care less about monetizing the experience and do this more for driving their room revenue,” said Stocker. Instead he says they’re asking: “How can we take our rates from $2,000 to $3,000 a night and make experiences a part of that?”

    Stocker defines Way as an approach that brings together the concept behind online retailer Shopify, which gives brands a way to reach their consumers directly, and the Airbnb model of hosting events as part of a short-term stay. “Nobody has really blended those two together to create a tool that would enable brands to launch their own experiences in house.”

    But he attributes the early runaway success Way has seen to the shift taking place at a grassroots level: “What it really comes down to is this broader change in consumer behavior away from physical goods and in the direction of seeking to spend our capital on experiences.”

    [ad_2]

    Amy Rose Dobson, Senior Contributor

    Source link

  • EXCLUSIVE: India’s Twitter alternative Koo now reaches 4,800 towns and cities

    EXCLUSIVE: India’s Twitter alternative Koo now reaches 4,800 towns and cities

    [ad_1]

    Serial entrepreneur Aprameya Radhakrishna, known for building ride-sharing company TaxiForSure (which was acquired by Ola for $200 million in 2015), started Koo — a language-focused microblogging platform — in early 2020. It was meant to be a homegrown, hyperlocal alternative to Twitter, and a step towards fulfilling the government’s grand ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ vision. Later that year, Koo went on to win MeitY’s Atmanirbhar App Innovation Challenge in the ‘Social’ category, and was also listed among Google Play Store’s “Everyday Essentials’ apps. 

    Within 20 months of its launch, Koo says it racked up 15 million downloads. “Our first 10 million downloads happened in about a year and a half, while the next five million users joined the platform in a quarter,” Koo Co-founder and CEO Aprameya Radhakrishna tells Business Today. “Currently, we have over 45 million downloads with 7,500 eminent accounts.”

    But what worked? How did Koo find its audience in a cluttered social media space where attention spans are diminishing by the day? Radhakrishna says Koo was the answer to India’s language diversity problem. “In a country like India, where more than 90 per cent of the population thinks and speaks in a regional language, the power of expression in one’s mother tongue is truly immense. We noticed that the majority of the conversations on existing global social media platforms were in English. The native language speakers needed an immersive experience in their mother tongue. Koo is a solution to that problem,” he explains. 

    This problem is not just India’s though. “80 per cent of the world doesn’t speak English either. They speak some native language,” he says. 

    Koo’s native language proposition managed to woo some of the top venture capitalists of the world. In a little over two years, the Bengaluru-based startup has raise $64.1 million in funding from the likes of Tiger Global, Mirae Asset Management, One4 Capital, Accel, Casper, and prominent angels, including Naval Ravikant, Balaji Srinivasan, Ashneer Grover, among others. Koo’s last funding round came in February this year, and its valuation stood at $263 million in June, according to Tracxn

    Radhakrishna says, “Running a language-based micro-blog is way more complex than a single language platform in multiple ways. Koo has built tech to support billions of interactions from millions of users. It has one of the most exhaustive and deep usage of language-based technologies. Right from translations to transliteration, context extraction, categorization to recommendations and personalization. The language dimension adds many complexities, apart from the fact that a lot of the language tech, especially Indian languages, is still nascent.”

    Today, Koo enables interactions in Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Tamil, Telugu, Marathi, Kannada, Gujarati, and Punjabi, besides English. The platform allows creators to send their messages in real-time across languages while retaining the context and sentiment attached to the original text. “This enhances a user’s reach, as the message can be consumed by people across the country in a language of their choice,” says the founder.

    As a result of its deep language penetration, Koo claims to be reaching users in 4,800 towns and cities of India, with over 60 per cent of those coming from Tier 2 and Tier 3 regions. With growing mobile internet usage, more and more first-time users are now taking to social apps. However, Koo stakes a claim to several seasoned netizens as well. “The average age of users on Koo is between 23 to 35 years. These are not necessarily first-time internet users, but language users who didn’t have a platform to express themselves earlier,” Radhakrishna reveals. 

    Despite the positive indicators, Koo — like most other social media platforms of the world — continues to battle charges of hate speech and discrimiation. Its content moderation policies have come under the scanner too. The company says it follows the laws of the land. “Our structured content moderation practice complies with Indian law and leverages the expertise of both humans and machines to curb online hatred and facilitate a cleaner ecosystem. We also have a ‘Voluntary Self-Verification’ feature on the Koo app which helps to curb anonymity and the presence of nuisance creators,” the founder explains. 

    Interestingly, self verification is something Elon Musk (who’s close to completing his Twitter buyout) has been pushing for a while. In April, the Tesla CEO and Twitter board member urged the social media platform to “authenticate all real humans”, which Koo claims it has already done. Radhakrishna, in fact, tweeted to Musk, asking him to try out the app. “Your specific point on democratized verification [is] already done btw,” he wrote. 

    But what really are the pros of self-verification? Is it effective enough? 

    He elaborates, “Self-verification empowers every user on Koo with the privilege of getting recognized as a genuine voice, something which is only available for eminent voices on other social media apps. Being a ‘genuine voice’ lends greater credibility to the thoughts and opinions that are shared. Profiles have witnessed a 75 per cent spike in followers and a 30 per cent increase in profile visits within a week of having self-verified themselves, says our analysis.”

    When it comes to monetisation, however, Koo is yet to turn a corner. The platform’s annual revenues stood at $145,000 as on December 31, 2020, according to Tracxn. It reportedly incurred losses of over Rs 35 crore in FY21, and with funding drying up in 2022, operations have been crunched further. Koo also laid off nearly 5 per cent of its workforce in August. 

    “These colleagues were let go for a mix of reasons like performance issues and restructuring that made some of these roles redundant. This is a constant exercise at any company,” Radhakrishna asserts. “We are still aggressively hiring people in areas such as product, analytics, and engineering. Our current workforce has a strength of 300 employees.”

    But is there a clear path to monetisation and profitability? Without divulging much, the founder says, “Koo is looking at sustained growth that will be backed by experiments related to driving value to brands, creators and other stakeholders linked to the Koo ecosystem.”

    Also ReadKoo relies on library of 6,300 words and phrases to spot abusive content

    Also Read: Koo signs MoU with Telangana govt, to open development centre in Hyderabad

    [ad_2]

    Source link