ReportWire

Tag: Thom Tillis

  • Sen. Tillis pushes again for answers on Charlotte Border Patrol operation

    [ad_1]

    In a letter sent this week, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis pushed for more information about U.S. Border Patrol agents’ operation in Charlotte last year.

    “The operation resulted in the apprehension of several criminal illegal aliens with extensive criminal records, an outcome I applaud,” Tillis wrote to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. “At the same time, multiple public reports allege that U.S. citizens were detained, subject to force, and experienced damage to personal property.”

    The longtime Republican senator, set to retire at the end of his term, has been increasingly critical of Noem since masked federal agents shot and killed two American citizens in Minnesota last month.

    Tillis’ letter referenced an incident in which agents busted an American citizen’s window in Charlotte, and another in which a different citizen in Cary was arrested at his workplace before agents dumped him and his belongings in the woods.

    Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) speaks during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson on March 21, 2022 in Washington.
    Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) speaks during the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Associate Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson on March 21, 2022 in Washington. Jasper Colt USA TODAY

    “If these accounts are inaccurate, North Carolinians would welcome that clarification,” the senator wrote. “If they are accurate, then they represent a breakdown in safeguards that demands corrective action. Either way, the absence of clear, encounter-level data has made objective evaluation difficult and unnecessarily eroded public confidence.”

    For months, The Charlotte Observer has asked DHS for a full list of people arrested in the operation. DHS has not provided that information. The Department of Homeland Security has not released the names and information of most people arrested or taken by federal police in Charlotte, making it unknown to the public if they had criminal records or not.

    Tillis asked for Noem to produce information as well, including the total number of people arrested in Operation Charlotte’s Web and the total number of times agents used force on American citizens.

    Noem will testify before the Senate’s judiciary committee on March 3.

    Ryan Oehrli covers criminal justice in the Charlotte region for The Charlotte Observer. His work is produced with financial support from the nonprofit The Just Trust. The Observer maintains full editorial control of its journalism.

    This story was originally published February 4, 2026 at 3:34 PM.

    Ryan Oehrli

    The Charlotte Observer

    Ryan Oehrli writes about criminal justice for The Charlotte Observer. His reporting has delved into police misconduct, jail and prison deaths, the state’s pardon system and more. He was also part of a team of Pulitzer finalists who covered Hurricane Helene. A North Carolina native, he grew up in Beaufort County.

    [ad_2]

    Ryan Oehrli

    Source link

  • Tillis joins US senators telling Trump that Putin is a ‘ruthless murderer’

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump reaches out to shake hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after arriving at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson in Alaska in August.

    President Donald Trump reaches out to shake hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after arriving at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson in Alaska in August.

    AFP via Getty Images

    Three people have emerged as central players in peace talks between Ukraine and Russia: U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    But Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from Huntersville, is one of nine in a group of bipartisan senators also trying to be heard. Their message to Trump is simple: Don’t trust Putin.

    As families across the United States gathered for the holidays, Tillis and his eight colleagues focused on a four-year-old child in Ukraine who was killed in a Russian drone strike with six other people.

    Putin escalated his war against Ukraine last week with a barrage of drone strikes and long-range missiles, causing those deaths, at least 39 injuries, widespread power outages and destruction across the region.

    Zelensky had agreed to a Christmas ceasefire.

    Putin refused.

    President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky leave a press conference following their meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club this week.
    President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky leave a press conference following their meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club this week. Joe Raedle Getty Images

    Tillis was among nine senators — three Republicans, five Democrats and one independent — concerned enough about Russia’s escalated attacks that they stopped what they were doing and penned a letter to President Trump on Christmas.

    “Today’s decision by Putin to launch attacks rather than hold fire is a sobering reminder for us all: Putin is a ruthless murderer who has no interest in peace and cannot be trusted,” the senators wrote to Trump.

    The letter and the attack came after Trump administration officials drafted a 20-point peace plan between Russia and Ukraine and are helping the two countries negotiate the terms.

    Can there be peace?

    Potential for peace between the two countries be eroding after Russia’s latest attack and Moscow’s allegations that Ukraine led a counterstrike on Putin’s residence in Russia, something Zelensky vehemently denies calling it “typical Russian lies.”

    New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, initiated the letter Tillis signed. Describing Putin as a “ruthless murderer” echoes words Tillis has long used since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

    Shaheen and Tillis both created and chair the Senate’s NATO Observer Group. The bipartisan group, focused on strengthening Congress’ work with NATO, initially began in 1997 but disbanded in 2007, before Shaheen and Tillis reestablished the group in 2018.

    Republican Sens. John Barrasso, of Wyoming, and Jerry Moran, of Kansas also signed. Foreign Relations committee Chairman James Risch, a Republican from Idaho, did not, nor did most of the other Republicans on the committee.

    To do so would break from Trump, who at times has been supportive of Putin and critical of Zelensky.

    Democrat Sens. Jacky Rosen of Nevada; Chris Coons of Delaware; Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Chris Van Hollen, of Maryland; and Sen. Angus King, an independent of Maine, also signed the letter that condemned Russia’s “killing of civilians as Christians around the world celebrated the Christmas holiday.”

    “It bears repeating that President Zelenskyy agreed to a Christmas truce, but Putin declined, yet he directs soldiers to continue to commit brutal crimes of aggression on one of Christianity’s holiest days,” the senators wrote to Trump. “Even for countries at war, there is a long history of Christmas ceasefires, including notably during World War I.”

    Zelensky warned about a potential attack by Russia the week of Christmas, despite calls for a holiday ceasefire from leaders across the world, including Pope Leo XIV.

    Meeting for peace

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marks the largest European conflict since World War II.

    On Sunday, following Russia’s attack, Zelensky traveled 5,500 miles to Florida to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago to discuss the potential peace plan. Trump also spoke to Putin by phone.

    Zelensky told reporters after his meeting with Trump that he agrees with about 90% of the plan.

    But the leaders disagree on who should take control one of the world’s largest nuclear power plants. And about the fate of the Donbas region, an industrial giant in Ukraine. Zelensky would allow for that area to be demilitarized, but will not give it over to Russia. Putin wants the Donbas region to be part of his country.

    Trump told reporters in a news conference Sunday that issue remains “unresolved,” but they’re “closer than we were.”

    Zelensky left without an agreement. Trump said the deal may fall through. But if it happens, he expects it within weeks.

    Danielle Battaglia

    McClatchy DC

    Danielle Battaglia is the D.C. correspondent for The News & Observer and The Charlotte Observer, leading coverage of North Carolina’s congressional delegation and elections. She also covers the White House. Her career has spanned three North Carolina newsrooms where she has covered crime, courts and local, state and national politics. She has won two McClatchy President’s awards and numerous national and state awards for her work.

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Battaglia

    Source link

  • Former Rep. Dan Bishop under consideration for U.S. Attorney job in NC

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 25: Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC), nominee to be the next Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget, testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on February 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem briefly attended the confirmation hearing. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    Former Republican Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina, then the nominee to be the next deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Feb. 25, 2025, in Washington, DC.

    Getty Images

    Former Rep. Dan Bishop is under consideration to be U.S. attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina.

    Sen. Thom Tillis confirmed the possibility to McClatchy in an exclusive interview at the Capitol on Wednesday afternoon.

    “He’s been discussed,” Tillis said. “He’s probably in the vetting process.”

    Bishop, 61, a Republican from Waxhaw, currently serves in the Trump administration as deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget.

    Both of North Carolina’s senators spoke to McClatchy about the job in exclusive conversations Wednesday, though Sen. Ted Budd, a Republican from Davie County, said he wanted to keep his conversations with Bishop private.

    Budd said the acting U.S. attorney’s position is set to expire and “there’s a lot of talent in the pipeline for the job.”

    The Middle District of North Carolina spans Durham, Greensboro and Winston-Salem.

    Bishop, who has served in the federal government since 2019, spent three decades as a litigator.

    Bishop served from September 2019 to Jan. 3, 2025, in Congress representing a district near Charlotte. In that role, Bishop aligned himself with the far-right House Freedom Caucus, which made major moves last Congress including those leading to the removal of Speaker Kevin McCarthy from leadership.

    Budd was also a member of the Freedom Caucus before joining the Senate.

    Bishop chose to forgo running for reelection in 2024 and focused on a run for state attorney general. He lost 51%-49% against former Rep. Jeff Jackson, a Democrat from Charlotte. Jackson had opted against his own reelection campaign after Republicans redrew his congressional district to make it all but impossible for Jackson to win.

    For Bishop to become U.S. attorney, Trump would need to make the nomination and then would need Senate approval, the same process he went through for his role in OMB. Tillis said with the term of the interim attorney expiring, he expects that nomination to happen soon.

    Tillis said he has not personally spoken to Trump about Bishop, but he supports the potential nomination.

    “Dan and I knew each other,” Tillis said. “We had differences on legislative priorities, but I actually think he’s a good, solid lawyer, and probably would play a good role as U.S. attorney.”

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Danielle Battaglia

    McClatchy DC

    Danielle Battaglia is the D.C. correspondent for The News & Observer and The Charlotte Observer, leading coverage of North Carolina’s congressional delegation and elections. She also covers the White House. Her career has spanned three North Carolina newsrooms where she has covered crime, courts and local, state and national politics. She has won two McClatchy President’s awards and numerous national and state awards for her work.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Battaglia

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faces congressional grilling amid CDC turmoil

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., facing pointed bipartisan questioning at a rancorous three-hour Senate committee hearing on Thursday, tried to defend his efforts to pull back COVID-19 vaccine recommendations and explain the turmoil he has created at federal health agencies.Kennedy said the fired CDC director was untrustworthy, stood by his past anti-vaccine rhetoric, and disputed reports of people saying they have had difficulty getting COVID-19 shots.A longtime leader in the anti-vaccine movement, Kennedy has made sweeping changes to agencies tasked with public health policy and scientific research by laying off thousands of workers, firing science advisers and remaking vaccine guidelines. The moves — some of which contradict assurances he made during his confirmation hearings — have rattled medical groups and officials in several Democratic-led states, which have responded with their own vaccine advice.Medical groups and several Democrats in Congress have called for Kennedy to be fired, and his exchanges with Democratic senators on the panel repeatedly devolved into shouting, from both sides.But some Republican senators also expressed unease with his changes to COVID-19 policies.The GOP senators noted that Kennedy said President Donald Trump deserved a Nobel Prize for the 2020 Operation Warp Speed initiative to quickly develop mRNA COVID-19 vaccines — and that he also had attacked the safety and continued use of those very shots.”I can’t tell where you are on Operation Warp Speed,” said Republican North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis.Tillis and others asked him why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was fired last week, less than a month into her tenure.Kennedy said she was dishonest, and that CDC leaders who left the agency last week in support of her deserved to be fired.He also criticized CDC recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic tied to lockdowns and masking policies, and claimed — wrongly — that they “failed to do anything about the disease itself.””The people at CDC who oversaw that process, who put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who will be leaving,” Kennedy said. He later said they deserved to be fired for not doing enough to control chronic disease.Democrats express hostility from the startThe Senate Finance Committee had called Kennedy to a hearing about his plans to “Make America Healthy Again,” but Democratic senators pressed Kennedy on his actions around vaccines.At the start of the hearing, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon tried to have Kennedy formally sworn in as a witness, saying the HHS secretary has a history of lying to the committee. The committee’s chair, Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho, denied the Democrat’s request, saying “the bottom line is we will let the secretary make his own case.”Wyden went on to attack Kennedy, saying he had “stacked the deck” of a vaccines advisory committee by replacing scientists with “skeptics and conspiracy theorists.”Last week, the Trump administration fired the CDC’s director — a Trump appointee who was confirmed by the Senate — less than a month into her tenure. Several top CDC leaders resigned in protest, leaving the agency in turmoil.The ousted director, Susan Monarez, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday that Kennedy was trying to weaken public health protections.”I was told to preapprove the recommendations of a vaccine advisory panel newly filled with people who have publicly expressed antivaccine rhetoric,” Monarez wrote. “It is imperative that the panel’s recommendations aren’t rubber-stamped but instead are rigorously and scientifically reviewed before being accepted or rejected.”Kennedy told senators he didn’t make such an ultimatum, though he did concede that he had ordered Monarez to fire career CDC scientists. Monarez’s attorneys later responded that she stood by the op-ed and “would repeat it all under oath.”Kennedy pushed back on concerns raised by multiple Republican senators, including Tillis and Sens. John Barrasso of Wyoming and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. Both Barrasso and Cassidy are physicians.Shouting matches and hot comebacksThe health secretary had animated comebacks as Democratic senators pressed him on the effects of his words and actions.When Sen. Raphael Warnock, of Georgia, questioned Kennedy about his disparaging rhetoric about CDC employees before a deadly shooting at the agency this summer, Kennedy shot back: “Are you complicit in the assassination attempts on President Trump?”Kennedy called Sen. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico “ridiculous,” said he was “talking gibberish” and accused him of “not understanding how the world works” when Lujan asked Kennedy to pledge to share protocols of any research Kennedy was commissioning into autism and vaccines.He also engaged in a heated, loud exchanges with Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Tina Smith of Minnesota.”I didn’t even hear your question,” Kennedy replied to Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto as the Nevada Democrat repeatedly asked what the agency was doing to lower drug costs for seniors.He also told Sen. Bernie Sanders that the Vermont independent was not “making any sense.”Some senators had their own choice words.”You’re interrupting me, and sir, you’re a charlatan. That’s what you are, ” said Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat. “The history on vaccines is very clear.”As the hearing neared its end, Kennedy pulled his cellphone from his pocket and then tapped and scrolled as Wyden asked about mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion.Kennedy disputes COVID-19 dataIn May, Kennedy announced COVID-19 vaccines would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a move opposed by medical and public health groups.In June, he abruptly fired a panel of experts that had been advising the government on vaccine policy. He replaced them with a handpicked group that included several vaccine skeptics, and then shut the door to several doctors groups that had long helped form the committee’s recommendations.Kennedy has voiced distrust of research that showed the COVID-19 vaccines saved lives, and at Thursday’s hearing even cast doubt on statistics about how people died during the pandemic and on estimates about how many deaths were averted — statistics produced by the agencies he oversees.He said federal health policy would be based on gold standard science, but confessed that he wouldn’t necessarily wait for studies to be completed before taking action against, for example, potential causes of chronic illness.”We are not waiting for everything to come in. We are starting now,” he said.A number of medical groups say Kennedy can’t be counted on to make decisions based on robust medical evidence. In a statement Wednesday, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and 20 other medical and public health organizations issued a joint statement calling on him to resign.”Our country needs leadership that will promote open, honest dialogue, not disregard decades of lifesaving science, spread misinformation, reverse medical progress and decimate programs that keep us safe,” the statement said.Many of the nation’s leading public health and medical societies, including the American Medical Association, American Public Health Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have decried Kennedy’s policies and warn they will drive up rates of vaccine-preventable diseases.___Stobbe reported from New York. Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.___The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., facing pointed bipartisan questioning at a rancorous three-hour Senate committee hearing on Thursday, tried to defend his efforts to pull back COVID-19 vaccine recommendations and explain the turmoil he has created at federal health agencies.

    Kennedy said the fired CDC director was untrustworthy, stood by his past anti-vaccine rhetoric, and disputed reports of people saying they have had difficulty getting COVID-19 shots.

    A longtime leader in the anti-vaccine movement, Kennedy has made sweeping changes to agencies tasked with public health policy and scientific research by laying off thousands of workers, firing science advisers and remaking vaccine guidelines. The moves — some of which contradict assurances he made during his confirmation hearings — have rattled medical groups and officials in several Democratic-led states, which have responded with their own vaccine advice.

    Medical groups and several Democrats in Congress have called for Kennedy to be fired, and his exchanges with Democratic senators on the panel repeatedly devolved into shouting, from both sides.

    But some Republican senators also expressed unease with his changes to COVID-19 policies.

    The GOP senators noted that Kennedy said President Donald Trump deserved a Nobel Prize for the 2020 Operation Warp Speed initiative to quickly develop mRNA COVID-19 vaccines — and that he also had attacked the safety and continued use of those very shots.

    “I can’t tell where you are on Operation Warp Speed,” said Republican North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis.

    Tillis and others asked him why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was fired last week, less than a month into her tenure.

    Kennedy said she was dishonest, and that CDC leaders who left the agency last week in support of her deserved to be fired.

    He also criticized CDC recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic tied to lockdowns and masking policies, and claimed — wrongly — that they “failed to do anything about the disease itself.”

    “The people at CDC who oversaw that process, who put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who will be leaving,” Kennedy said. He later said they deserved to be fired for not doing enough to control chronic disease.

    Democrats express hostility from the start

    The Senate Finance Committee had called Kennedy to a hearing about his plans to “Make America Healthy Again,” but Democratic senators pressed Kennedy on his actions around vaccines.

    At the start of the hearing, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon tried to have Kennedy formally sworn in as a witness, saying the HHS secretary has a history of lying to the committee. The committee’s chair, Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho, denied the Democrat’s request, saying “the bottom line is we will let the secretary make his own case.”

    Wyden went on to attack Kennedy, saying he had “stacked the deck” of a vaccines advisory committee by replacing scientists with “skeptics and conspiracy theorists.”

    Last week, the Trump administration fired the CDC’s director — a Trump appointee who was confirmed by the Senate — less than a month into her tenure. Several top CDC leaders resigned in protest, leaving the agency in turmoil.

    The ousted director, Susan Monarez, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday that Kennedy was trying to weaken public health protections.

    “I was told to preapprove the recommendations of a vaccine advisory panel newly filled with people who have publicly expressed antivaccine rhetoric,” Monarez wrote. “It is imperative that the panel’s recommendations aren’t rubber-stamped but instead are rigorously and scientifically reviewed before being accepted or rejected.”

    Kennedy told senators he didn’t make such an ultimatum, though he did concede that he had ordered Monarez to fire career CDC scientists. Monarez’s attorneys later responded that she stood by the op-ed and “would repeat it all under oath.”

    Kennedy pushed back on concerns raised by multiple Republican senators, including Tillis and Sens. John Barrasso of Wyoming and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. Both Barrasso and Cassidy are physicians.

    Shouting matches and hot comebacks

    The health secretary had animated comebacks as Democratic senators pressed him on the effects of his words and actions.

    When Sen. Raphael Warnock, of Georgia, questioned Kennedy about his disparaging rhetoric about CDC employees before a deadly shooting at the agency this summer, Kennedy shot back: “Are you complicit in the assassination attempts on President Trump?”

    Kennedy called Sen. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico “ridiculous,” said he was “talking gibberish” and accused him of “not understanding how the world works” when Lujan asked Kennedy to pledge to share protocols of any research Kennedy was commissioning into autism and vaccines.

    He also engaged in a heated, loud exchanges with Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Tina Smith of Minnesota.

    “I didn’t even hear your question,” Kennedy replied to Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto as the Nevada Democrat repeatedly asked what the agency was doing to lower drug costs for seniors.

    He also told Sen. Bernie Sanders that the Vermont independent was not “making any sense.”

    Some senators had their own choice words.

    “You’re interrupting me, and sir, you’re a charlatan. That’s what you are, ” said Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat. “The history on vaccines is very clear.”

    As the hearing neared its end, Kennedy pulled his cellphone from his pocket and then tapped and scrolled as Wyden asked about mifepristone, a drug used for medication abortion.

    Kennedy disputes COVID-19 data

    In May, Kennedy announced COVID-19 vaccines would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a move opposed by medical and public health groups.

    In June, he abruptly fired a panel of experts that had been advising the government on vaccine policy. He replaced them with a handpicked group that included several vaccine skeptics, and then shut the door to several doctors groups that had long helped form the committee’s recommendations.

    Kennedy has voiced distrust of research that showed the COVID-19 vaccines saved lives, and at Thursday’s hearing even cast doubt on statistics about how people died during the pandemic and on estimates about how many deaths were averted — statistics produced by the agencies he oversees.

    He said federal health policy would be based on gold standard science, but confessed that he wouldn’t necessarily wait for studies to be completed before taking action against, for example, potential causes of chronic illness.

    “We are not waiting for everything to come in. We are starting now,” he said.

    A number of medical groups say Kennedy can’t be counted on to make decisions based on robust medical evidence. In a statement Wednesday, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and 20 other medical and public health organizations issued a joint statement calling on him to resign.

    “Our country needs leadership that will promote open, honest dialogue, not disregard decades of lifesaving science, spread misinformation, reverse medical progress and decimate programs that keep us safe,” the statement said.

    Many of the nation’s leading public health and medical societies, including the American Medical Association, American Public Health Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have decried Kennedy’s policies and warn they will drive up rates of vaccine-preventable diseases.

    ___

    Stobbe reported from New York. Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

    ___

    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alina Habba slams Sens. Chuck Grassley, Thom Tillis over Senate’s blue slips

    [ad_1]

    Alina Habba is heaping more pressure on Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) to revoke the chamber’s blue slip tradition, which New Jersey’s two Democratic senators wielded to stop her from getting a floor vote for the post of U.S. attorney in the state.

    Trump had nominated Habba, whom he tapped on an interim basis in March, for the full-time appointment. But Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim used blue slips — which empower home-state senators to block U.S. attorney and District Court judge nominees — to keep her from advancing in the chamber.

    And Grassley, despite pressure from the White House, isn’t planning on curtailing that power anytime soon.

    Meanwhile, Tillis, also a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said he’d serve as a check against anyone opposed by a home-state senator even if Grassley rescinded the procedure.

    “This tradition that Senator Grassley is upholding effectively prevents anybody in a blue state from going through into Senate to then be voted on,” Habba said on “Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.” “Senator Booker and Senator Kim had absolutely every right to vote no for me for the U.S. Attorney position. But I had the right as the nominee to get if front of Senate and to be voted on, to be vetted. I never even got there.”

    But there remains little appetite in the GOP-led Senate to scrap the tradition, which Republicans have used in the past to influence judicial appointments at home with Democrats in the White House.

    Habba’s saga this year has been complicated. She was appointed acting U.S. attorney for the state, but, once the 120-day interim period expired, a panel of District Court judges declined to retain her, instead appointing Desiree Leigh Grace, her first assistant, to the interim position. Complaining about “rogue” judges, Attorney General Pam Bondi then fired Grace and Trump — who had previously nominated Habba to the post full-time — instead restored Habba’s interim status, a maneuver that was immediately challenged as invalid.

    The result: Habba is currently holding her attorney post “not lawfully,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann said last week, leaving open the possibility that any of the actions she has taken on the job since July 1 “may be declared void.” Shortly after that ruling, a District Court judge postponed the sentencing of a CEO prosecuted by Habba’s office due to her involvement.

    “The truth is it has nothing to do with the work that we’re doing, it has nothing to do with the crime that we’re stopping,” she told Bartiromo. “It has to do with trying to prevent President Trump from continuing his agenda, and it has to stop. So I would say to Senator Tillis and Senator Grassley, you are becoming part of the issue. You are becoming part of the antithesis of what we fought for four years.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    [ad_1]

    While it’s common knowledge that citizens have very little influence on elected officials, The Onion asked U.S. politicians how their constituents feel about a ceasefire in Gaza, and this is what they said.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A cease what? I’ve never heard that word in my life.”

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents routinely vote in favor of having blood on our hands.”

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Does AIPAC count as a constituent?”

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Vice President Kamala Harris

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Am I a politician? Gee, that’s flattering.”

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “One more word about a ceasefire, and I’m ordering Israel to bomb south Brooklyn.”

    Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Oh, while I’m at work the nanny is the one who looks after the constituents.”

    Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My constituents know I have been calling for a cease-ceasefire since day one.”

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Representatives are public servants. That means it’s my job to listen to what my constituents have to say, internalize it, and then do whatever I want.”

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have genuinely not thought about another human being since 1998.”

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “When I got elected in 2014, my campaign pitch was ‘You wanna see a dead body?’”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Gov. Gavin Newsom Of California

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents…constituents… Oh, you mean the blurred shapes I sometimes see before meetups with donors?”

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Hmm… What is this ‘feel’?”

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My Illinois colleague Dick Durbin, who called for a ceasefire, obviously has different constituents than I do.”

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I don’t know. I can’t hear frequencies coming out of the mouths of people who make below $400k.”

    Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “They elected me to kill people, so that’s what I’m gonna do.”

    Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I have but one constituent, and their name is Lockheed Martin.”

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Gov. Kathy Hochul Of New York

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I know what they want. I just think they are stupid and don’t respect them. Make sense?”

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “A ceasefire is a sacred bond between one man and one woman. Anything else is a sin.”

    Former President Barack Obama

    Former President Barack Obama

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “No constituents anymore, motherfuckers! You people can’t goddamn touch me! I can say whatever the hell I want. Fuck all of you!”

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “My term doesn’t expire until 2068.”

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Constituents? Oh, do you mean money? The money says to burn it to the ground.”

    Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “I assume all my constituents were also given a full ride by the Federalist Society.”

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ)

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “We often think about others so much that we forget to think about our own feelings. The question is, do I want a ceasefire?”

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Gov. Greg Abbott Of Texas

    Image for article titled Politicians Try To Recall How Their Constituents Feel About A Ceasefire

    “Most of my constituents are guns, and they love firing. It’s the equivalent of orgasm to them.”

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    You’ve Made It This Far…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore confirms he won’t seek another term leading the chamber

    North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore confirms he won’t seek another term leading the chamber

    [ad_1]

    RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore confirmed on Friday that his record fifth two-year term presiding over the chamber will be his last, saying legislative colleagues have known about his decision going back a year.

    Moore, a Cleveland County Republican, has served in the House since 2003 and was first elected speaker in 2015 while succeeding now-U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis at the job.

    He’s helped push a conservative fiscal and social agenda through the General Assembly with Senate leader Phil Berger and built GOP seat margins back to veto-proof majorities.

    The U.S. House majority is in play next year after an anemic showing by Republicans in the midterm elections and a surprise Supreme Court ruling that will likely bring two new safely Democratic districts.

    House Republicans in North Carolina are pitching an overhaul of public education laws in the final days of the session that would take power away from superintendents and the State Board of Education while giving parents more control.

    Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro is backing off his insistence on money for a new private-school funding program, giving Pennsylvania’s Democratic-controlled House the opening to pass a new state spending plan after a days-long stalemate.

    Republicans who control Pennsylvania’s Senate are advancing spending legislation ahead of Saturday’s start of a new fiscal year, but they lack agreement with the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.

    Moore, 52, said in an interview that he told fellow House Republican leaders in spring 2022 about his plans not to run for speaker after the 2023-24 term ends. And he said he told the current GOP membership the same thing last fall when they assembled their slate of candidates for chamber positions.

    “All of my caucus members knew — I made it clear that this is my last term as speaker,” Moore said, adding that he would serve out his term through the end of 2024. A successful run for speaker by any Republican in 2025 would be all but contingent on the GOP retaining a seat majority.

    Leading up to the 2022 elections, Moore had weighed running for a congressional seat in a potential open district west of Charlotte, but he declined. Then-U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn initially announced he wanted to run in that region. The congressional lines ultimately had to be redrawn last year and Cawthorn ran and lost in another mountain-area district.

    The General Assembly will again redraw the state’s 14 U.S. House districts later this year in time for the 2024 elections, raising the potential for Moore to run for Congress now.

    When asked Friday about his future, Moore didn’t completely reject running for his state House seat again in 2024. Some previous speakers over the past 30 years have remained rank-and-file members of the legislature.

    Still, Moore said that he would be “looking at potentially other offices or other options.”

    With his election as speaker in January, the Kings Mountain attorney made history by breaking a tie with two former speakers who had served four two-year terms: Democratic Rep. Liston Ramsey of Madison County and Rep. Jim Black of Mecklenburg County.

    Rep. Jason Saine, a Lincoln County Republican and top budget writer, said Friday that Moore had mentioned not running for speaker in 2025 on “multiple occasions” to the GOP caucus.

    Moore last month was the subject of a lawsuit by a man who alleged Moore broke up his marriage by having an affair with his wife. Moore, who is divorced, defended his actions and vehemently rejected allegations in the lawsuit. Attorneys for Moore and the husband announced last week the matter was resolved, and the husband ended the lawsuit July 5, according to a state courts website.

    Saine, who has been mentioned as one of many on a list of potential successors to Moore as speaker, said Moore’s decision was made long ago and had no connection to the legal matter.

    “No one is pushing the speaker out,” Saine said in a text message. “He’s been very open and honest that he would not seek another term as our speaker.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link