ReportWire

Tag: The

  • Castaways Hasn’t Been Forgotten as the North Avenue Beach’s Icon Preps to Reopen

    Castaways Hasn’t Been Forgotten as the North Avenue Beach’s Icon Preps to Reopen

    [ad_1]

    Chicago’s famed boat-shaped restaurant and bar on North Avenue Beach will reopen on Memorial Day Weekend for the first time since 2022. Castaways Beach Club, an unmistakable symbol of summer along Lake Michigan, is returning after a $3 million renovation and new menu items.

    After spending last summer in stasis, the beachside staple (formerly called Castaways Bar & Grill) is poised to unveil its freshly revamped two-floor, 22,000-square-foot space with dining decks, bar sections, patio areas, and cabanas with bottle service available for rental and private events, according to a rep.

    The renovation increased Castaways’ footprint to 22,000 square feet.
    Castaways Beach Club

    Castaways 2.0 will aim for a more polished approach than its previous sandy sports bar vibe. Workers have replaced its distressed paint with a more contemporary ocean blue and cream color scheme to evoke the breezy style of beach clubs in Miami or the Mediterranean, Stefani Restaurant Group managing partner Anthony Stefani tells the Sun-Times.

    Castaways has added a tented structure on the north end of the venue that on weekends will become a 21-and-older section aptly dubbed the North End Club that will also host live music and DJ sets. To capitalize on the location’s sweeping views of the Chicago skyline, the team has installed a new bar section for happy hours and corporate events on the south end of the second floor.

    The family-friendly upstairs restaurant also saw upgrades like new tile, paint, and furniture, and will reopen with a new, as-yet-unreleased food menu of “global beach fare” and cocktails for lunch and dinner, per a rep. Downstairs, two walk-up concession windows will channel sticky summer nostalgia. One will sling street food favorites like burgers, tacos, and wraps; the other, run by local mini-chain JoJo’s Shake Bar, will sell ice cream, according to Crain’s.

    Castaways hasn’t missed many summers in its more than two-decade-long tenure under Stefani Restaurant Group, which contracts the space from the Chicago Park District. The group, founded by prolific Chicago restaurateur (and Anthony Stefani’s father) Phil Stefani, operates 10 Chicago area restaurants including Bar Cargo pizzeria in River North, Tuscany Taylor in Little Italy, and Stefani Prime steakhouse in Lincolnwood. Phil Stefani is due for a busy season, as he’s also on the cusp of relaunching downtown stalwart Tavern on Rush around the corner from its original home in Gold Coast.

    Castaways Beach Club, 1603 Lake Shore Drive, Scheduled to open Memorial Day weekend (Friday, May 24 through Monday, May 27).

    1600 N Lake Shore Dr, , IL 60614

    [ad_2]

    Naomi Waxman

    Source link

  • K.Dot’s “Euphoria,” Acho’s Book, and Reproductive Justice With Nourbese Flint

    K.Dot’s “Euphoria,” Acho’s Book, and Reproductive Justice With Nourbese Flint

    [ad_1]

    Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay discuss the drop of Kendrick Lamar’s “Euphoria” and the evolution of Drake throughout the years (15:03), before reacting to Emmanuel Acho’s latest project, Uncomfortable Conversations With a Jew (49:17). Nourbese Flint then joins them to talk about how the political landscape is impacting Black women in America (1:09:15).

    Hosts: Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay
    Guest: Nourbese Flint
    Producer: Ashleigh Smith

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher

    [ad_2]

    Van Lathan

    Source link

  • April Comics Check-In

    April Comics Check-In

    [ad_1]

    Jomi and Steve are joined by producer Kerm to discuss some of their favorite comics from the month of April! Along the way, the guys discuss Ultimate Spider-Man, Deadpool, and Rat City.

    Hosts: Jomi Adeniran and Steve Ahlman
    Producer: Jonathan Kermah
    Additional Production Support: Arjuna Ramgopal

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts

    [ad_2]

    Jomi Adeniran

    Source link

  • ‘Baby Reindeer’ Review

    ‘Baby Reindeer’ Review

    [ad_1]

    Charles Holmes and Jodi Walker debate the merits of Netflix’s newest hit, Baby Reindeer, in which a struggling comedian is made to deal with both a female stalker and his own dark past. They examine just how the show subverted viewer expectations, the way it leaned into (and away from) the true crime angle, and its brave portrayal of trauma.

    Hosts: Charles Holmes and Jodi Walker
    Producer: Devon Baroldi

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Charles Holmes

    Source link

  • Ryan Gosling Isn’t Just Ken

    Ryan Gosling Isn’t Just Ken

    [ad_1]

    These days, when Hollywood needs an A-lister to play a stuntman, it’s never a bad idea to follow a simple rule: Get the Gosling.

    The trend began in 2011 with the neo-noir thriller Drive, in which Ryan Gosling played a man known simply as the Driver: a stuntman by day and getaway driver by night. Armed with a scorpion bomber jacket that is both impossibly cool and nigh impossible to pull off, a brooding Gosling followed the film’s lead by letting the action do most of the talking. Then, in 2013’s The Place Beyond the Pines, Gosling starred as Luke, a drifter who makes a living doing motorcycle stunts for a traveling carnival before learning he has a son with his former lover. Once again, Gosling inhabits a laconic loner who yearns for more in his life, even if he doesn’t always have the words to express it. (There’s also plenty of real-life significance tied to the movie: It’s where Gosling met his partner, Eva Mendes.)

    While it’s been over a decade since Gosling last portrayed a stunt performer, he’s back in the saddle this weekend with The Fall Guy, the action comedy hailing from stuntman-turned-director David Leitch. With several large-scale action sequences anchored by practical effects, including one scene that broke a Guinness World Record for the most cannon rolls performed in a car, The Fall Guy is a love letter to one of Hollywood’s most underappreciated art forms. (Somehow, it’s still deprived of its own Oscars category.) As for Gosling, who plays aging stuntman Colt Seavers (side note: incredible name) as he chases down the missing star of a major studio movie, The Fall Guy is a noticeable departure from his previous roles within this niche profession. Colt is a charming daredevil, the kind of dude who flashes a smile and a thumbs-up before hurling himself in the direction of a helicopter. On the basis of one-liners alone, Colt has more to say than Drive’s Driver.

    That these stuntmen fall on opposite ends of the spectrum is also reflective of Gosling’s journey as an actor. After a circuitous route to stardom, Gosling has blossomed into one of Hollywood’s most intriguing leading men—someone who’s just as comfortable playing the life of the party as he is inhabiting the quiet weirdo lurking in the corner. And much like his intrepid hero in The Fall Guy, all signs indicate that Gosling is taking his career to thrilling new heights.

    For some viewers, their first exposure to Gosling was the ’90s revival of Disney’s Mickey Mouse Club, a variety series in which the young actor shared the stage with the likes of Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, and Justin Timberlake. Gosling followed his stint with the Mouse House by landing the title role on the Fox Kids series Young Hercules, which was canceled after its lone, 50-episode (!) season. At this point, Gosling was ready to become a legitimate dramatic actor, but he didn’t find the transition easy. “It’s very hard coming from kids’ television to break the stigma,” Gosling told The New York Times in 2011, explaining how his agents dropped him for wanting to pursue more serious film roles. “All you have is a VHS tape of you humping stuff on The Mickey Mouse Club and wearing fake tanner and fighting imaginary sphinxes.”

    Of course, Gosling’s big-screen breakout did arrive with 2004’s The Notebook, which supplanted Titanic as the movie that touched the hearts of hopeless romantics around the world. (Gosling and costar Rachel McAdams’s acceptance of the MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, in which they re-created their characters’ magical smooch, was the best kind of pandering.) You can envision a scenario in which Gosling capitalized on his heartthrob status in the immediate aftermath—leaning into all those “Hey Girl” memes—but instead, the actor seemed to actively distance himself from it. How else can one explain Lars and the Real Girl, the quirky dramedy where Gosling plays a socially awkward dude who develops a romantic relationship with a sex doll? (It’s more heartwarming than it sounds, though it’s certainly not what you expect from the star of The Notebook.)

    But the road that’s led Gosling to his current standing as an A-lister was first paved by two disparate roles in 2011: the aforementioned Drive and Crazy, Stupid, Love. Whereas Drive saw Gosling embody a taciturn antihero, Crazy, Stupid, Love required the actor to play a quick-witted womanizer falling in love for the first time. Setting aside the undeniably electric chemistry between Gosling and costar Emma Stone—something they would rekindle in Gangster Squad and, most famously, La La Land—it’s Gosling’s comedic chops that feel like the movie’s biggest revelation. The chaotic third-act reveal that brings the ensemble together is as hilarious as you remember.

    Just as crucially, these movies were critical and commercial hits, proving that beyond The Notebook, Gosling could be a box office draw. And as a performer, Gosling showed he was capable of navigating two extremes: emotionally wounded lone wolves who use their words sparingly and protagonists in knockabout comedies who never take themselves too seriously. Gosling got plenty more reps with the former, though it wasn’t always smooth sailing: The actor reunited with Drive director Nicolas Winding Refn for 2013’s Only God Forgives, which is best remembered for being booed at Cannes. (Fellow Refn-heads, however, will agree that Only God Forgives kicks plenty of ass when appreciated on its own, self-indulgent terms.) But it’s also within this space that Gosling has delivered some of his most resonant work in big-budget cinema.

    Playing the protagonist in the legacy sequel to a sci-fi classic would be a tall order for anyone, but Gosling was more than up to the task in Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049. As the replicant known as K, who hunts down his own kind, Gosling infuses the character with a similar ambiguity to Harrison Ford’s protagonist in the original Blade Runner—only this time, it’s not a question of whether or not K is human, but how much he’ll divert from his programming. It’s a performance that fits right into Gosling’s wheelhouse—the glimpses of real emotion simmering underneath the surface carry so much weight—and makes him a worthy on-screen partner to Ford, who has long made a living out of inhabiting gruff heroes. (It was also apparent from the Blade Runner 2049 press tour that Gosling and Ford share the same dry sense of humor.)

    Gosling’s greatest performance to date channeled the same frequency, with one crucial difference: It was in service of playing a historical figure. In Damien Chazelle’s First Man, we follow Neil Armstrong (Gosling) from his early days as a NASA test pilot to becoming the first person to step foot on the moon. The film’s depiction of the moon landing is a stunning achievement in its own right, but what makes First Man one of the best blockbusters of the past decade is how it digs into the psychology of someone willing to put their life on the line. For Armstrong, who lost his young daughter to a brain tumor, the risk of perishing in space is better than staying at home to talk about your feelings, making him the perfect (and somewhat literal) embodiment of the Silent Generation. Again, Gosling is at his best when those emotions slip through the cracks—most powerfully when Armstrong drops his daughter’s bracelet into the Little West crater after taking one giant leap for mankind. Even if Gosling’s work in First Man didn’t get the attention of Oscar voters, make no mistake: He’s got the right stuff.

    But even as Gosling continues to excel at portraying emotionally inhibited men (or androids), audiences have enthusiastically responded to the actor’s embrace of his funnier side. Shane Black’s 2016 comedy The Nice Guys didn’t light up the box office, but it’s endured as the rare non-franchise film that has folks clamoring for a sequel. It’s easy to see why. Following dopey private investigator Holland March (Gosling) as he teams up with low-level enforcer Jackson Healy (Russell Crowe) to investigate a porn star’s disappearance in ’70s Los Angeles, The Nice Guys doesn’t just feel like a throwback to the buddy-cop movies of yesteryear: It can hold its own against any of them. A big part of that comes down to the dynamic between Gosling and Crowe, who make for entertaining foils, especially when Healy is tossing March around like a rag doll. (Sadly, Gosling has recently squashed hopes for a sequel.)

    But while The Nice Guys has more than earned its reputation as a cult favorite, its cultural impact is a drop in the bucket compared to Barbie’s. Alongside Oppenheimer, Barbie was the moviegoing event of 2023: a delectable, witty, and occasionally profound dramedy that touched on everything from feminism to existentialism to the patriarchy. And yet, it’s hard to deny that the film’s MVP was the himbo living in Barbie’s shadow. As the Ken whose occupation is, simply, “beach,” Gosling is a scene-stealing delight, fawning over Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) before his unrequited love devolves into a ridiculous caricature of toxic masculinity. (Shout-out to the Mojo Dojo Casa House.) Gosling’s unbridled Kenergy was so infectious that he didn’t just earn an Oscar nomination: He blew the roof off the ceremony performing “I’m Just Ken.”

    When an actor is having this much fun, who can blame audiences for wanting more of the same? Thankfully, The Fall Guy lets Gosling not only continue to flex his comedy chops amid explosive action sequences, but also play a genuinely charming romantic lead opposite Emily Blunt. (This is the Barbenheimer crossover nobody saw coming.) At this point in his career, it’s clear that Gosling has a lot of pitches in his acting repertoire, whether he’s pulling off slapstick comedy, brooding over inner turmoil, or ranting about the incomparable power of jazz. If moviegoers would rather see Gosling channel some of that Kenergy for the foreseeable future, so be it—just so long as we remember that he’s always been more than just Ken.

    [ad_2]

    Miles Surrey

    Source link

  • ‘X-Men ’97,’ the Criticism of Nostalgia, and Midnight Musings

    ‘X-Men ’97,’ the Criticism of Nostalgia, and Midnight Musings

    [ad_1]

    Another episode of X-Men ’97 is here, and the Midnight Boys are back to talk about what they liked (12:29). They also have a discussion on the ins and outs of critiquing the state of fandom today, as well as their first installment of Midnight Musings (67:25).

    Hosts: Charles Holmes, Van Lathan, Jomi Adeniran, and Steve Ahlman
    Senior Producer: Steve Ahlman
    Additional Production Support: Arjuna Ramgopal
    Social: Jomi Adeniran

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts

    [ad_2]

    Charles Holmes

    Source link

  • Star Wars: The Old Republic gets cozy with a new farming homestead

    Star Wars: The Old Republic gets cozy with a new farming homestead

    [ad_1]

    A new developer stream for Star Wars: The Old Republic showed a surprising feature on the way in Game Update 7.5. Players will be able to earn their own farmstead on the planet of Dantooine after completing a quest chain. The cozy feature will come with a Spring Abundance festival, which includes the surprisingly comfortable activities of “seed collecting, dancing, pie-baking, animal rehabilitation, and a galactic egg hunt,” according to a press release.

    Star Wars: The Old Republic has been live for 13 years, and there’s a huge archive of content for players to enjoy. Ten months ago, the MMORPG changed hands from its original developer BioWare to Broadsword, the studio behind Ultima Online and Dark Age of Camelot. While The Old Republic has faded from the spotlight, it’s still a very enjoyable game that’s worth revisiting to scratch a Star Wars itch.

    Broadsword is taking the game in an intriguing direction. Patch 7.4.1 included Date Night companion missions, which are exactly what you’d expect from the name. These missions become available if the companion has been romanced, and is available in a player’s story — some circumstances can cause your partner of choice to leave the party. Date Night missions will be released in batches, and they grant a unique title and decoration.

    Update 7.5 also includes a new main story chapter where players wrangle with a Hutt, and new single-player Ventures that are meant to provide a challenging experience. Players train up their very own Basilisk Prototype B3-S1 (or Bessie) and prepare them for combat. Eventually, Bessie joins your team as a permanent companion. The release date for Update 7.5 will be announced soon.

    [ad_2]

    Cass Marshall

    Source link

  • A CEO Firing, and the Chaos at Paramount

    A CEO Firing, and the Chaos at Paramount

    [ad_1]

    Matt is joined by Lucas Shaw to discuss the ousting of Paramount Global CEO Bob Bakish, why it happened now, and whether it affects a potential deal moving forward. They then update their predictions in the Skydance vs. Apollo deal, and wonder what would happen to Paramount Global and its new three-headed CEO triumvirate if there is no deal. Matt finishes the show with an opening weekend box office prediction for the upcoming action movie Fall Guy.

    For a 20 percent discount on Matt’s Hollywood insider newsletter, What I’m Hearing …, click here.

    Email us your thoughts!

    Host: Matt Belloni
    Guest: Lucas Shaw
    Producers: Craig Horlbeck and Jessie Lopez
    Theme Song: Devon Renaldo

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Belloni

    Source link

  • Why ‘Baby Reindeer’ Rose to the Top

    Why ‘Baby Reindeer’ Rose to the Top

    [ad_1]

    It may seem strange that as we approach the summer months, a TV show titled Baby Reindeer is one of the most watched, most talked-about shows in the country, but there’s a reason for that.

    Currently boasting a 97 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes from critics, and more than 52.8 million viewing hours, Netflix’s binge model continues to dominate the way television is made, even as the two most important parts of storytelling—media literacy and narrative nuance—find themselves facing extinction.

    At its core, Baby Reindeer delves into the complexities of power dynamics, identity, and the blurred lines between reality and fiction. In the dramatized Netflix series, which began as a stage production at Edinburgh Festival Fringe in 2019, writer/creator Richard Gadd stars as Donny, a comedian with a unique sense of humor, desperate to break into showbiz, who becomes the victim of stalking and sexual assault. The series recounts Gadd’s real-life encounter with a female stalker, exploring the psychological impact of being pursued and harassed. This intertwining of reality and fiction has allowed Gadd’s experience to intersect with larger conversations being held about those same power dynamics, consent, male sexual assault, and the myth of the “perfect victim.” These are nuanced topics rarely explored, but similarly perfected, in Michaela Coel’s Emmy-winning HBO limited series I May Destroy You.

    From the moment we meet Donny, Gadd presents him as a weirdo whose jokes never quite land. Similar to compartmentalizing trauma, Donny keeps disparate elements of his personal life (being a barman and a comedian and a man who dates trans women) separate, much like the characters of the show who become catalysts to his breakdown, and the eventual unpacking of his long-buried trauma.

    Donny, like many comedians (no offense), is enthralled with the attention of strangers, but what cements this story in a different category is that Donny’s encounters aren’t a series of things that happen to him, they are acts that he is a part of. In moments of self-reflection, Gadd’s voice-overs at the climax of several of the later episodes often remark, “I would love to tell you that’s as far as it went,” or recounting what he could have, or should have done. As the story develops, every occurrence seemingly reinforces the old adage of “no good deed goes unpunished.” Each string of events starts with an act of kindness, with each of the characters wanting to be seen for who they are, and how they present, when in their normal lives they’re used to being ignored, or othered. Yet each character—when they finally are seen—is viewed with a skewed lens and taken advantage of.

    With Martha, played by the fantastic Jessica Gunning—who is not Scottish, but whose accent work deserves an Oscar, Grammy, Tony, BAFTA, and a Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Award—a chance meeting at a bar and a free cup of tea sets into motion a series of events and a push-and-pull of power dynamics. As Donny, Gadd realizes when all of his red flags should have shot up simultaneously, but instead he becomes both predator and prey in her deranged reality and obsessive half-truths, even stating “I felt sorry for her.” It’s important to remember Martha’s claims aren’t simply fabrications plucked out of thin air—most of them are based in reality, wrapped in self-important grandiosity and topped with a lot of delusion. She is a lawyer who worked for an important politician (who she then stalked, but that’s not the point until later!), but much to her chagrin, and to the detriment of her famous variants of “sent from my iPhone” email signature, she does not in fact have an iPhone. Another half-truth is her many mentions of being too busy to stay for a drink because of her work schedule. She ends up staying for Donny’s entire shift and, despite supposedly being a girlboss rubbing elbows with high-powered clients, when asked to pay for a cup of tea or a pint, she simply replies: “Can’t afford it.”

    With Teri (Nava Mau), the first meeting is different. It isn’t by chance; Donny actively seeks her out. From the beginning, he lies to Teri—a trans woman he met on a trans dating app—telling her his name is Tony and that he’s a construction worker. Donny only agrees to meet her at a specific bar, at night, under the guise that it’s the best bar in the city—fast trickery for an unsuspecting American living abroad. Donny is preying on her vulnerability and marginalized identity. His inability to consummate a relationship with Teri is partly rooted in his shame and incapacity to understand his newfound sexual identity, which we uncover in Episode 4.

    What happens in Episode 4 could be categorized as the real turning point, shown in heartbreaking honesty when Donny meets Darrien (Tom Goodman-Hill), a successful writer of one of his favorite TV shows, who says he sees promise in Donny and agrees to help him in his career. Darrien then coerces Donny to do drugs, and then gropes and rapes him repeatedly—what’s worse, Donny acknowledges he has been raped after the first instance, yet still goes back. Gadd positions himself—er, Donny—in such a lonely state of just wanting to be seen by someone, and while Donny knows that what he’s feeling and experiencing is wrong, Darrien’s praise is what keeps him coming back. For Donny, the idea that someone believes in him and is willing to give him constructive criticism is stronger than any of the drugs he takes, or the shame that he feels.

    Later, everything comes to a head. After months of stalking and even being groped by Martha, Donny goes to the police to report Martha’s behavior—but not until six months later, and even when he does, he fails to mention Martha’s racist, transphobic, and verbally and physically abusive behavior during an event with Teri that Donny could have prevented; nor does he mention being assaulted by Darrien. In the aftermath of the series, viewers have removed the nuance from Gadd’s account and taken to searching for the identity of “Martha” and “Darrien” and others in the show, speculating on people in Gadd’s life even after he pleaded with them not to on social media.

    True crime enthusiasts, while passionate about unraveling mysteries and the fascinating, darker aspects of human nature, can ignore nuanced storytelling by fixating on sensationalism. In their quest for thrilling revelations and shocking twists, some have speculated and made accusations about people in Gadd’s life, completely missing the point of the story. The allure of a sensational headline often takes precedence over the deeper exploration of the social, psychological, and ethical dimensions of storytelling as a catharsis, and, as a result, can lead some to come away with a shallow understanding of complex issues while reinforcing simplistic stereotypes.

    Baby Reindeer became a hit because its nuanced storytelling enraptured the audience and transcended the confines of black-and-white narratives. The series existed in a gray area where complex truths and accountability intertwine. In its embrace, characters like Martha and Donny never became mere caricatures; they became mirrors reflecting complex issues, all while navigating moral ambiguity and fostering empathy and compassion.

    Meecham Whitson Meriweather is a culture writer based in Brooklyn, whose work has appeared in Granta, Vulture, New York magazine, InStyle, The Daily Beast, and his newsletter Now That I Mention It, which you should already be subscribed to!

    [ad_2]

    Meecham Whitson Meriweather

    Source link

  • ‘Love Island (U.K.)’ Season 2, Episodes 21-26

    ‘Love Island (U.K.)’ Season 2, Episodes 21-26

    [ad_1]

    ITV

    Juliet and Callie continue their ‘Love Island (U.K.)’ Season 2 marathon

    This week, Juliet and Callie continue their Love Island (U.K.) Season 2 marathon, discussing Episodes 21-26. The ladies talk about couple dynamics, favorite islanders, drama, and more!

    Hosts: Juliet Litman and Callie Curry
    Producer: Jade Whaley
    Theme Song: Devon Renaldo

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / RSS

    [ad_2]

    Juliet Litman

    Source link

  • Hall of Fame: Steve Rodgers, Captain America

    Hall of Fame: Steve Rodgers, Captain America

    [ad_1]

    This pod is with you till the end of the line! Jo and Mal are here to induct Steve Rodgers into their Hall of Fame in celebration of the fifth anniversary of Avengers: Endgame (07:45). They break down Cap’s best moments and what made this character so special throughout the years.

    Hosts: Mallory Rubin and Joanna Robinson
    Senior Producer: Steve Ahlman
    Additional Production: Arjuna Ramgopal
    Social: Jomi Adeniran

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / Pandora / Google Podcasts

    [ad_2]

    Mallory Rubin

    Source link

  • We Need to Talk About the ‘Challengers’ Threesome Scene. Just Not for the Reason You Think.

    We Need to Talk About the ‘Challengers’ Threesome Scene. Just Not for the Reason You Think.

    [ad_1]

    Challengers is a movie obsessed with making sure you understand its chronology. Throughout its 131 minutes, Luca Guadagnino’s new ténnage à trois flick deploys a barrage of scene-resetting phrases like “THIRTEEN YEARS EARLIER,” “THE NEXT DAY,” and even “MIDNIGHT,” in all-caps, pink-text title cards. (Also: “SET BREAK,” shortly after a match official explains that they’re going to take a break between sets.) I’m not sure all of this is necessary: Even as the plot volleys across two decades, most shifts are easy to track. We know that it’s the mid-aughts because there’s a Motorola Razr on Zendaya’s nightstand; we know that it’s closer to the present day because Josh O’Connor is swiping through Tinder on a cracked iPhone. This isn’t exactly Lost Highway! (Though I would love to see what title cards Luca would’ve cooked up for Lynch’s neo-noir headfuck.)

    This is, of course, a minor complaint—and I may be on an island here, considering the Letterboxd and Rotten Tomatoes love Challengers is getting. But it’s relevant to a question I’m about to ask: Does Luca think I’m an idiot and that I wouldn’t notice he snuck a song from the wrong decade into a scene set in (roughly) 2006?

    I’m specifically referring to THE scene, as in [insert “SPOILER” and “CONTENT WARNING” title cards here] the infamous threesome set piece that threatens to, uh, thrust the acronym “MMF” into the mainstream lexicon. [Another title card here: “DON’T GOOGLE MMF AT WORK.”] If you have a passing familiarity with Challengers, then you know what I’m referring to—Zendaya, O’Connor, and Mike Faist on a hotel bed, both men fawning over her, things getting hot and heavy as the two men try to show her their stroke (before playing a little doubles with themselves). The movie’s been out for less than 24 hours and it’s already one of the most talked-about scenes of the year. All of my attention should’ve been on this triples match. However, I was too busy losing my mind over one small detail: the song playing on the radio during this scene. Blood Orange’s “Uncle ACE”—ace, get it?—from his breakthrough Cupid Deluxe. A song that came out in 2013—as in six or seven years after this illicit almost-affair took place.

    To be clear, “Uncle ACE” is an excellent song off Dev Hynes’s excellent album, and maybe a perfect choice, vibes-wise. It’s sexy, it’s propulsive, and it, uh, climaxes with an unbelievable sax solo. It’s also vaguely nostalgic, which should work in a movie that taps into nostalgia. The problem is that this song is supposed to be diegetic—the film nerd word meaning it exists in the world of the film, which, well, “Uncle ACE” certainly did not. (In fact, not only does Challengers imagine a world in which this song existed in 2006, but it also imagines a world in which a radio station would be conducting a lengthy interview with Dev Hynes.) If you’re a music nerd on top of being a film nerd, this is the exact kind of thing that will take you out of an experience. Instead of focusing on the Y tu Tennis También shit unfolding before your eyes, you’re desperately trying to make sense of why some dork-ass tennis prodigies in 2006 would be listening to a deep cut off of Pitchfork’s 21st-best record of 2013. It is all-caps, pink-text MADDENING!

    A few weeks ago, before I had seen Challengers, a colleague of mine referred to it as “Saltburn-core.” If you’ve seen both, the descriptor fits. Even if Challengers’ threesome scene or churro-nibbling can’t come close to Saltburn’s spunk-slurping, grave-humping chaos, there’s a certain memeable soapiness to both. Both films also share an affinity for overexplaining things—I will never forgive Saltburn for the climactic montage, which gave the Usual Suspects plot-twist treatment to things that no half-awake viewer could have ever missed. (What do you mean the bad-guy liar lied about bad things?) And maybe most importantly, both Challengers and Saltburn mine the same era for nostalgia—with apparently little care for the finer details. Infamously, in Saltburn—which is also largely set in 2006 and 2007—there are a number of issues: characters playing MGMT songs a year before they could’ve known about them, karaoke versions of yet-to-be released Flo Rida hits, the family watching Superbad on DVD before the movie was even released in theaters! I know the rich have access to many things us plebes don’t, but I’m pretty sure Judd Apatow wasn’t sending the Catton family rough cuts of McLovin and friends. And it wasn’t just music and film nerds that noticed this stuff: The Saltburn anachronisms were so egregious that blogging about them became something of a cottage industry around the holidays.

    As time goes on, it’s only natural that more and more movies will start looking back on the late 2000s and early 2010s. But if I’m going to be repeatedly confronted with the notion that my best days are now fodder for nostalgia, can’t they at least nail the details? Why bother setting the story in a not-really-that-bygone era in the first place if not? And if that doesn’t matter, then are these films being placed in the mid-aughts in service of the story or because it’s easy to tap into cheap sentimentality? Why didn’t the music supervisor for either movie step in and say, “Hey, shouldn’t these kids be listening to, like, “Daft Punk Is Playing at My House” instead? (Though if I’m being real, Art Donaldson seems more like a Band of Horses guy.) It’s not like Luca and his team didn’t focus on other small details: The product placement is self-aware, but avoids veering into Talladega Nights or Wayne’s World parody territory. The specific degradations of Josh O’Connor’s character—and the way they manifest through his court attire and the empty bottles clinking around the floor of his car—are subtly brilliant. Hell, this is a movie with an intricate understanding of the geography of Westchester County! I have my gripes with a handful of things about the film—let’s never talk about the stop-motion wind kiss under the giant “Game Changer” poster—but it’s clear some level of care went into this. (Though there is one other pedantic, also diegetic thing I have to speak my truth on: At one point, Zendaya’s kid asks to watch Spider-Verse, and while I admire the restraint shown in not referencing the mononymous star’s own role in that franchise, the winking reference doesn’t break the fourth wall so much as it splits its skull against it.)

    Mistakes—or possibly just wanton flouting of chronology—like the “Uncle ACE” placement are head-scratching, but ultimately inconsequential. No one, aside from the most P4K-pilled, is going to truly care about the flattening of indie-music history. (And to be fair, during one scene, Challengers got the mid-aughts hipster catnip right with a needle drop of Spoon’s “I Turn My Camera On.”) Also, I get it: There are a trillion small things that go into making a movie, so it’s better to have some grace, especially with the man who made Call Me by Your Name. But my culture—my skinny jeans and iPod Nano and Sailor Jerry tattoos—is not a costume, so please have some respect. If you’re going to ask me to care that much about the timeline, you have to care about every part of it. That shouldn’t be hard to grasp. Maybe if I put it on a title card in all caps, they’ll understand.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Sayles

    Source link

  • Is Bravo Forcing Kyle to Out Herself? Plus ‘Summer House,’ ‘The Valley,’ and ‘Vanderpump Rules.’

    Is Bravo Forcing Kyle to Out Herself? Plus ‘Summer House,’ ‘The Valley,’ and ‘Vanderpump Rules.’

    [ad_1]

    Rachel Lindsay and Jodi Walker begin this week’s Morally Corrupt with a chat about the Bravo news of the week, then jump into Season 8, Episode 10 of Summer House (13:04). Then, Rachel and Jodi discuss Season 1, Episode 6 of The Valley (34:02) and Season 11, Episode 13 of Vanderpump Rules (49:20). Plus, Rachel guesses the zodiac sign for the problematic Bravo man of the week!

    Host: Rachel Lindsay
    Guest: Jodi Walker
    Producers: Devon Baroldi
    Theme Song: Devon Renaldo

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Lindsay

    Source link

  • Aaron Sorkin, Live From D.C.

    Aaron Sorkin, Live From D.C.

    [ad_1]

    In a special live episode, Matt and Puck colleague Peter Hamby are joined by screenwriter, playwright, and film director Aaron Sorkin to discuss the current state of Hollywood, the impact of AI on writers, politics, why he fired his agents, and much more.

    For a 20 percent discount on Matt’s Hollywood insider newsletter, What I’m Hearing …, click here.

    Email us your thoughts!

    Host: Matt Belloni
    Guests: Aaron Sorkin and Peter Hamby
    Producers: Craig Horlbeck and Jessie Lopez
    Theme Song: Devon Renaldo

    Subscribe: Spotify

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Belloni

    Source link

  • ‘Challengers’ Is Sexy, Sweaty, and Undeniable

    ‘Challengers’ Is Sexy, Sweaty, and Undeniable

    [ad_1]

    MGM

    Plus, Justin Kuritzkes joins to talk about writing the script, the power dynamics among the characters, and more!

    Sean and Amanda gather to discuss the 2024 film perfectly situated at the center of their respective tastes: Challengers. They discuss the thrilling trio of actors at its center, underrated director Luca Guadagnino, its pulsing score, and its thrilling ending (1:00). Then, Sean interviews Justin Kuritzkes, the writer of the movie, about writing this script on spec, the balance of power dynamics among the characters, why he chose to set it in the world of tennis, and more (1:35:00).

    Hosts: Sean Fennessey and Amanda Dobbins
    Guest: Justin Kuritzkes
    Senior Producer: Bobby Wagner

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / RSS

    [ad_2]

    Sean Fennessey

    Source link

  • How Taylor Swift Writes About Being Taylor Swift

    How Taylor Swift Writes About Being Taylor Swift

    [ad_1]

    Long before anyone heard a note, Taylor Swift’s new album caused controversy among the grammarians.

    The fuss was about the title, The Tortured Poets Department, and its conspicuously absent apostrophe. Should “poets” not have been possessive? If it had been, was the singular or plural more appropriate? Was this a mistake? Or by design? English teachers, grammar hobbyists, and the standards editor of The New York Times weighed in. There is, they said, no intrinsically correct answer—just one that differs based on the album title’s intended meaning. The Tortured Poet’s Department, for example, would imply a department belonging to a singular tortured poet, and perhaps her place of work or where one could go to find her. The Tortured Poets’ Department would suggest a similar situation, just with all the tortured poets. In omitting the apostrophe altogether, it’s the authors themselves who go under the microscope in The Tortured Poets Department—though perhaps the singular would have been most appropriate.

    Few pop stars make their authorial voices as central to their work as Taylor Swift. She broke out in country music, a genre in which storytelling is fundamental. She writes her own songs, which are personal and, increasingly, meta-textual, in the sense that she has begun to tell stories about fame and its inherent self-mythologizing. In the best parts of The Tortured Poets Department, Swift advances this work, writing about herself not just as Taylor Swift the person but as Taylor Swift the performance. “This town is fake, but you’re the real thing,” coos an industry insider to a young Swift in “Clara Bow,” the closing track of the double album’s first half. But the Swift who wrote the song knows that “the real thing” is itself a sham when the job is telling tales. The Tortured Poets Department is full of its own stories—of goodbyes and getaways and ghosting—but its central character is Taylor Swift—author. And it’s consumed by whether or not she is a reliable narrator.

    What does it mean to write your own life? On “How Did It End,” Swift processes a breakup through the need to explain it—to worried friends and eager gossipers alike—and sees the story become theirs before she’s even figured out the true answer for herself. “Come one, come all, it’s happening again,” she sings, announcing her own heartbreak. In the first verse, Swift’s use of “we” as she explores what went wrong seems to include just herself and her former partner. But by the second, the circle extends to friends, then cousins, then people around town. By the end, they’ve all drawn their conclusions—despite the fact that Swift herself is still asking the titular question.

    Perhaps less subtly, “I Can Do It With a Broken Heart” underscores that what we see from Swift is often an illusion. “Lights, camera, bitch, smile—even if you want to die,” she sings, over poppy production that evokes the closing numbers of her blockbuster Eras Tour. This song is a statement about an emotionally turbulent period in her life, sure, and you feel for her, but it’s also about what it means to be a performer and a professional—and a good one. “Try and come for my job,” Swift says, tossed off, at the end of the track. If you read the separation of the personal and professional selves on the song as healthy, it’s really a song about competence. Swift is practically begging her audience to understand that she is vocationally required to put on a show.

    If some stories on The Tortured Poets Department are merely delusive, others are outright dangerous. On “The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived,” the most eviscerating track of the album (and possibly of Swift’s career), she wonders if an ex who love bombed, then ghosted, her, was a secret assassin or an author writing a tell-all—with both possibilities presented as equally vicious. On “The Bolter,” having “the best stories” means having the scar tissue from a collection of bygone relationships. It’s a far cheerier song than “The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived,” but it still suggests that a collection of tales to share over brunch is not much of a consolation prize.

    The song “The Albatross,” an ethereal, if somewhat dozy, tune from the 2 a.m. release, draws a particularly poetic—and meta-textual—connection. In it, Swift references the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” in which a sailor on a boat caught off course shoots an albatross that was flying overhead. The ship’s crew comes to view the bird as a curse, and forces the mariner to wear its corpse around his neck as a reminder of his bad deed.

    It’s an epic poem—626 lines long. In its time, it was criticized both for its wordiness and its inscrutability. Some scholars have argued it has no singular moral; others have said it has no moral at all.

    In Tortured Poets, Swift likewise asks a lot of her audience. The album begs a close read and rewards fourth, fifth, sixth, and 16th listens. Many songs have third verses, unusual for pop tune packaging. The double album runs over an Easter egg–packed two hours. Swift has more than enough fans who want to do this homework—and who feel rewarded by the excavation—to set streaming record after record. But for those outside her core fan base who don’t, it does become somewhat illegible. In the relatively lukewarm critical reception to the album, a main critique is its lack of concision. (Even as someone who enjoys the record, I tend to prefer its clear and declarative moments over its most intricate—I’ll take a line like “I hope it’s shitty in the Black Dog,” for instance, over the slant rhymes of “Fresh Out the Slammer.”) An album about the author’s own writing suggests some required reading to even make sense of the premise.

    The second half of the double album ends with “The Manuscript,” a piano ballad that reads a lot like the story of Swift recording the 10-minute version of “All Too Well,” and turning that story into a short film, which she did in 2021. One could read TTPD as a whole as a reference to Swift’s need to write to move past events in her life, but “The Manuscript” is the only song on the record that tells that story.

    And the years passed
    Like scenes of a show
    The Professor said to write what you know
    Lookin’ backwards
    Might be the only way to move forward

    The song ends with Swift shedding herself of the entire ordeal. “Now and then I reread the manuscript,” she sings. “But the story isn’t mine anymore.” Ending on that sentiment feels intentional. It’s possible to overthink these things—I’m reminded of a story the musician and author Michelle Zauner has told about meeting Swift at a Grammys after-party in 2023 and asking her a carefully-constructed question about parallels between her song “invisible string” and Ernest Hemingway’s writing.

    “OK, English major!” Swift said, then walked away.

    Maybe it’s not that deep. Or maybe Swift had had two cosmos and didn’t feel like chatting. But it’s also possible that history’s most personal pop star actually does want some veil of mystery between Taylor Swift and Taylor Swift. She has shared quite a lot over the years, and it’s possible to read TTPD as a reflection on what it means to have written your entire life into art and commerce. Sometimes, Swift seems to find that the answer is catharsis. But more often, it sounds like the real person is no match for the storybook version. The pen can heal, she seems to say. But it can also be the instrument of torture itself.

    [ad_2]

    Nora Princiotti

    Source link

  • Where to Sip a Refreshing Margarita in Chicago

    Where to Sip a Refreshing Margarita in Chicago

    [ad_1]

    The Fulton Market sister spot to a breezy, agave-obsessed cocktail bar in Logan Square, Estereo FM is a playful, sun-drenched retreat from the bustle of Downtown Chicago. Its menu is packed with tequila and mezcal, and margarita fans can try icy options like Frozen #1 (salted mango, Tromba tequila, lime), Frozen #2 (blackberry, lime, Convite mezcal), or a swirl of both flavors.

    [ad_2]

    Samantha Nelson

    Source link

  • Why Conor Oberst Learned the Conor Oberst Songbook All Over Again

    Why Conor Oberst Learned the Conor Oberst Songbook All Over Again

    [ad_1]

    On Thursday, Conor Oberst will complete his latest attempt to shake up the routines that develop when you’ve been making music for over 30 years. Every week throughout March and April, the prolific, Omaha-born songwriter assembled a new band, spent four days rehearsing with them, and then performed a distinct, career-spanning show with a set list filled with his lesser-known songs. Billed as “Conor Oberst and Friends,” the run was split into two locations: The first four installments happened at the Teragram Ballroom in Los Angeles, while the following New York appearances took place at the Bowery Ballroom.

    Oberst estimates he’s written about 500 songs in his lifetime, and at these eight shows, he’s played over 100 of them, plus a smattering of covers by the likes of the Replacements and Daniel Johnston. He’s had to relearn tracks he’s released both under his own name and as Bright Eyes, his pseudonymous solo endeavor that developed into a group with Mike Mogis and Nate Walcott. Some of his albums got more love than others (lots of I’m Wide Awake, It’s Morning and his self-titled, full-length album from 2008; not so much Cassadaga or anything from Desaparecidos, unfortunately). Each assembled band had its own musical director and its own flavor, from the turn-of-the-millennium New York cool of Nick Zinner of Yeah Yeah Yeahs, to the rootsy approach of James Felice of the Felice Brothers, to the ramshackle, early Saddle Creek vibes of Maria Taylor of Azure Ray—all of which correlate to a sonic element of Oberst’s music.

    Oberst has been a key influence on younger artists including Hurray for the Riff Raff, Waxahatchee, and Phoebe Bridgers, his Better Oblivion Community Center partner who joined him for three songs at the third Los Angeles date. In turn, those artists’ fans have started discovering Oberst’s music, and these residencies were their first chance to see him attempt some of these rarer songs live.

    Just before the last Conor Oberst and Friends show, The Ringer spoke to him about how the whole thing came together and how he feels now that it’s almost done. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

    Why did you decide to do this now?

    This guy Eric [Dimenstein], who’s been my booking agent for like 20 years, we’ve on and off talked about the idea, but the timing was never right. There’s always a record or something else to do. So, yeah, it kind of worked out timing-wise. And New York and L.A. are the most obvious spots, but they’re also two places where I have lived in my life and have a lot of friends, so there’s a lot of musicians and people to draw from, as far as the bands.

    Why did this idea intrigue you in the first place?

    It was honestly just trying something new. Sometimes when you go on tour, it’s great and you get really close with the people you’re with, but after a while, it becomes routine, unfortunately. I’m not really in a jam band, so you end up doing similar sets. You might change a couple songs a night, but for the most part, once you get the show up and running, that’s the show and that’s what you present in every town you go to. It seemed fun to just change that dynamic, where it’s just once a week, but every week I don’t really know what’s going to happen. That’s exciting because I’ve been doing this a long time. And then it’s just a chance to revisit a lot of past material and random songs I haven’t played in a long time.

    Each week, one of the people in the band acted as the musical director and helped pick the songs and organize the band. Even with Bright Eyes, besides Mike and Nate, we always had different people on tour with us, so I’m used to playing with a lot of different people, but I’m not used to doing it so consecutively and quickly. It’s the closest I feel like I’ve had to a real job for a long time. Because it’s rehearse Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, play the show Thursday, and then Friday and Saturday are my days off. But even those days, I have to try and listen to the next week’s songs and remember stuff.

    Are the bands practicing together beforehand without you, or is it really that week when you all start playing together for the first time?

    Maybe some of them were practicing on their own, but no, not really. Another thing was, I didn’t want any songs to repeat in New York or L.A. The ones we played in L.A., we could play in New York, but that was the rule: For the city, don’t repeat any songs. That’s a lot of songs. Once I figured out who was going to be the band leader for all the weeks, we had to get square with the set list because some people wanted to do the same song.

    Some negotiating had to happen.

    Yeah, exactly. But I’m a natural-born diplomat, so it’s fine.

    Were there songs that they would pitch that you were particularly excited about revisiting?

    Nick Zinner from Yeah Yeah Yeahs was last week. We made the Digital Ash [in a Digital Urn] record, and he was in the band for that tour. So I knew we were going to do a bunch of those songs, or I assumed that would be the case. He picked this song “True Blue,” which I wrote for my nephew when he was, like, 4 years old. It’s just the weirdest song for Nick to pick. He’s like a vampire, so I just think he’s going to pick the darkest ones, but he picked this. It just made me laugh. I was like, “You really want to do that one?” So there was stuff like that along the way that was surprising.

    Were there songs that you had never played live that came up?

    I don’t know about that, but there’s definitely ones where it had been years [since I had revisited them]. There were some covers that were brand new to me. I’m pretty sure I played all the songs of mine at some point in my life, but like I said, I’ve been doing this a long time, and I don’t have the greatest memory.

    Were there any songs where you were like, “I’m not doing that one?”

    I really shied away from the ones that I’ve played so much, like “First Day of My Life” and “Lua.” Those didn’t feel as exciting. I guess we did play “First Day” on Maria’s week. [Editor’s note: He also played “Lua” that night as a duet with Phoebe Bridgers.] I was definitely leaning a little bit away from the ones that we’ve done in the last couple years.

    Some of these songs are over 20 years old. When you revisit a song like that, do you still relate to the person who wrote it?

    To be honest, sometimes not really at all. But I do have memories connected with them. There’s this song that we’ve actually played quite a bit over the years called “Falling Out of Love at This Volume,” which is on the very first Bright Eyes record, and I was literally 15 years old when I wrote it. So yeah, I’m not at all the same person, but I do connect it with the memories of that time in my life. It’s not like doing a cover song. There’s an aspect of it I can relate to, but it’s a very distant memory. What I was feeling when I wrote it or whatever, that’s long gone.

    I’ve been a journalist for a while, and sometimes I’ll read articles I wrote when I was just starting, and I’m like, “What was that guy thinking?” And sometimes I’m like, “Oh yeah, that’s pretty smart, kid. Good job.”

    Right. This is actually weirdly connected to this whole thing in a way, which is Bright Eyes did this whole set of EPs that were companion pieces for all the records. I don’t know why I put myself through these fucking challenges, but we rerecorded a bunch of our old songs in new ways. I was very particular about which ones I wanted to sing, and they were the ones obviously that I still felt held up and that I felt some connection to, emotionally or mentally. You want that to be there or else it can feel like you’re just doing karaoke or something.

    Why do you put yourself through these complicated challenges?

    It’s like when people get older and they want to stave off early-onset dementia so they do a lot of crossword puzzles or something. I do shit like this, try to keep what brain cells I have left active.

    Have the shows felt different between L.A. and New York?

    New York, this has been really a real trip down memory lane because I lived in the East Village. I paid rent in New York for like 13 years, although I was on tour a lot of that time and in Omaha and stuff. I had probably five different apartments over the years, but they were all in the East Village. And now I got this apartment sublet thing for the month, so I’m really deep in. Obviously, some things have changed, but there’s ghosts everywhere. I can walk from the apartment to the practice space to the Bowery [Ballroom]. I don’t know if I’ve even gotten in a car here at all. It’s a trip because I have things I had forgotten about.

    I still live in L.A., and there we were just rehearsing at my house. So that was very comfortable and cool, but it was a little closer to my actual current life.

    As far as crowds and stuff, I don’t know, I don’t think they’re that different. All the crowds have been super gracious and nice and excited. We’ve made a point of not letting people know ahead of time what was up each week. Of course there are some diehards that are trying to go to every show, but a lot of people, they just pick the show and that’s what they got. I hope they had a good time though. I’m sure there’s some people that are like, “Aww, I wish I would’ve gone to that week.” But that’s the nature of the experiment.

    For these shows, are you reinterpreting songs in a different way than how you recorded them?

    Not really vastly reinterpreting, but we’ve extended a lot of parts. Like Miwi [La Lupa]’s week, we had a four-piece horn section, so there were parts that we extended to make room for that. Nick’s week, Lee Ranaldo [of Sonic Youth] was in the band, so you’ve got to make some time for him to solo and stuff. And then Nate Walcott’s week, which was the second week in L.A., was with Jeff Parker, the guitar player. It was all jazz musicians. I would say that week was the furthest from the way I would normally perform a song.

    How do you feel about playing live these days?

    You and me and everyone that follows music knows that it’s much harder to make a living off of record sales, so playing live is part of the job in that sense. I don’t have kids, but the guys in my band have kids and bills. It’s like, you got to keep making money. That’s the unromantic part about it, but there is truth to that. But I still like playing live. Honestly, I feel like when you’re on tour, you’re getting paid for all the bullshit you have to do, like check into the hotels and go to the airport and get on the bus and find food and do this and whatever. Actually being onstage performing music, for the most part, not always, that’s the best part of the day. Unless the show is total trash.

    Has this experience made you more or less excited to go on tour?

    It’s been so interesting and different, just because that stuff I’m talking about is gone. I don’t have to get on a bus or a plane or a hotel, but I have to rehearse all the time. The only thing I’ve been stressing on is just my voice holding up. People think, Well, it’s once a week; that should be easy. But the truth is, if you’re on tour, you’re singing maybe two hours a day. I’m singing eight hours a day for four days in a row [at rehearsals] and then doing the show. So I’ve been trying to be careful. I barely smoked cigarettes for these past couple months. I’m trying my best. Lots of tea, lots of Throat Coat, lots of Halls, whatever, all the tricks. From a physical standpoint, that’s the biggest difference. But on the other hand, you don’t have all the stress of travel. You’re in the same city and with your friends, so it’s great.

    Would you ever do this again?

    I don’t know. I guess it depends how long I live. Maybe it’ll sound fun in five years or something. One of our guitar techs and good friends, even when we’re having a shitty day, he’s like, “Beats sweeping the floor.” I’m like, “That’s true.” It has been a lot of work. I knew it was going to be a lot, but it’s been more than I thought it would be. I would have to be very rejuvenated to want to do this thing again.

    Eric Ducker is a writer and editor in Los Angeles.

    [ad_2]

    Eric Ducker

    Source link

  • ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer, ‘Shogun’ Finale, and ‘X-Men ’97’

    ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer, ‘Shogun’ Finale, and ‘X-Men ’97’

    [ad_1]

    Marvel Studios

    The Midnight Boys also chat about the festivities from Van’s birthday party

    The Midnight Boys are back to give you another jam-packed episode. First, they take a look at the latest Deadpool & Wolverine trailer (11:45). Then, they talk about the beautiful finale of Shogun (26:33) as well as the latest episode of X-Men ’97 (67:06). All before finally talking about some of the goings-on that happened at Van’s birthday party (82:03).

    Hosts: Charles Holmes, Van Lathan, Jomi Adeniran, and Steve Ahlman
    Senior Producer: Steve Ahlman
    Additional Production Support: Arjuna Ramgopal
    Social: Jomi Adeniran

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts

    [ad_2]

    Charles Holmes

    Source link

  • Hall of Fame: Tony Stark, Iron Man

    Hall of Fame: Tony Stark, Iron Man

    [ad_1]

    We have a plan: Attack! As Avengers: Endgame turns five, Mal and Jo induct Tony Stark into the House of R Hall of Fame. They look back at Tony’s most iconic moments, from his signature snark to his harrowing showdowns, and celebrate his lasting impact on the MCU.

    Hosts: Mallory Rubin and Joanna Robinson
    Senior Producer: Steve Ahlman
    Additional Production: Arjuna Ramgopal
    Social: Jomi Adeniran

    Subscribe: Spotify / Apple Podcasts / Stitcher / Pandora / Google Podcasts

    [ad_2]

    Mallory Rubin

    Source link