ReportWire

Tag: The White House

  • Suspect identified as 2 National Guard members remain in critical condition after targeted shooting near White House

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — The Department of Homeland Security has identified the suspect involved in the Wednesday shooting of two National Guard members, who remain in critical condition.

    The suspect is Rahmanullah Lakamal, who came to the US from Afghanistan in 2021, DHS said in a statement late Wednesday. Officials said earlier the suspect is in custody.

    Multiple law enforcement officials briefed on the matter told CNN the shooter’s initial identification matches a man from Washington state who applied for asylum in 2024, which was granted by the Trump administration earlier this year.

    The two guard members had been performing “high visibility patrols” near the White House before the suspect appeared, “raised his arm with a firearm and discharged at the National Guard,” said Jeffery Carroll, the executive assistant chief of the Metropolitan Police Department, during a news conference earlier Wednesday.

    Bowser and FBI Director Kash Patel said during the news conference the two guard members are in critical condition.

    DC Mayor Muriel Bowser described the attack as a “targeted shooting” in a post on X and said the two guard members shot were part of the West Virginia National Guard.

    “To the American public and the world, please send your prayers to those brave warriors who are in critical condition and their families,” Patel said during the news conference.

    Carroll added during the presser “there is no indication” that there is another suspect, adding that the suspect in custody was taken to an area hospital.

    The shooting took place near Farragut Square — a tourist-heavy area located near a busy transit center and the White House.

    A source familiar with the investigation told CNN earlier Wednesday that law enforcement officials are not tracking any other victims of the shooting beyond the two National Guard officers and the suspect.

    Three law enforcement sources told CNN that the suspect approached the guardsmen and appeared to target them, firing first at one of the guardsmen who was mere feet away.

    One source said the suspect then fired at the other guardsman, who tried to get behind a bus stop shelter. The source added that the suspect is not cooperating with investigators and had no identification on him at the time of his arrest.

    What we know about the shooting

    Video from the nearby Metro station showed the shooting as it happened, law enforcement officials told CNN.

    The gunman approached three National Guard members who appeared to not see him until he began shooting, striking one guard member and then another, the officials said.

    The gunman then stood over the first victim and appeared to try to fire another round. That’s when the third guard member returned fire at the alleged shooter, the sources said.

    A woman who was near the scene of the shooting told CNN she heard gunshots and then saw a “bunch of people” administering CPR to people who were on the ground.

    Two law enforcement sources said earlier Wednesday the suspect was detained and transported away from the scene on a stretcher.

    Authorities ran the fingerprints of the man in custody and that’s how they got the initial name, one law enforcement official told CNN.

    Investigators recovered a handgun believed to have been used in the attack on the National Guard members and are working to determine when and how the suspect obtained it, law enforcement officials told CNN.

    US law restricts firearms sales to people who aren’t citizens or legal permanent residents and it’s unclear whether the alleged gunman could have legally bought the handgun, the officials said.

    Prior to the Wednesday news conference, there were conflicting reports about the condition of the guardsman after West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey posted on social media — and later corrected — that the guardsmen were believed to be dead.

    Earlier in the day, DC Metropolitan Police said on X that the scene is secure and one suspect is in custody. They advised people to avoid the area.

    Joint Task Force — DC, the National Guard office responsible for organizing the Guard mission to Washington, DC, confirmed in a statement Wednesday afternoon that “several” of its members “were involved in a shooting near the Farragut West Metro Station,” adding that it is working with DC police and other “law enforcement agencies.”

    A police car blocks a street in Washington, DC, following a shooting on November 26. Credit: Joe Merkel / CNN via CNN Newsource

    Trump addresses nation and calls for re-examining Afghan immigrants

    President Donald Trump identified the suspect as an Afghan national in a video from Mar-a-Lago posted late Wednesday and blamed the Biden administration for allowing him into the country.

    “I can report tonight that based on the best available information, the Department of Homeland Security is confident that the suspect in custody is a foreigner who entered our country from Afghanistan — a hell hole on earth,” Trump said in the video, adding that the suspect “was flown in by the Biden administration in September 2021.”

    “We’re not going to put up with these kind of assaults on law and order by people who shouldn’t even be in our country,” Trump added. “We must now reexamine every single alien who’s entered our country from Afghanistan under Biden and we must take all necessary measures to ensure the removal of any alien from any country who does not belong here or add benefit to our country.”

    Following Trump’s remarks, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a post on X that the processing of all immigration cases related to Afghan immigrants “is stopped indefinitely pending further review of security and vetting protocols.”

    The Trump administration was already in the process of re-interviewing Afghan migrants admitted to the US during the previous administration, CNN reported earlier this week. Trump officials have repeatedly argued that the previous administration didn’t sufficiently vet the people who entered the US.

    In his video, Trump also reiterated his request to deploy 500 more National Guardsmen to Washington, DC, in response to the shooting, which was shared by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth earlier in the day.

    Shortly after the shooting, Trump weighed in on Truth Social, saying, “The animal that shot the two National Guardsmen … is also severely wounded, but regardless, will pay a very steep price.”

    Vice President JD Vance, during remarks at an event in Fort Campbell, Kentucky, called for prayers for the national guardsmen, who he said were in critical condition at the time.

    The shooting is “a somber reminder that soldiers whether they’re active duty, reserve or National Guard are soldiers are the sword and the shield of the United States of America,” Vance added.

    National Guard troops in nation’s capital since August

    National Guard troops from multiple states have been in Washington, DC, for months as part of President Donald Trump’s anti-crime crackdown in the nation’s capital, which has since expanded to other cities across the country.

    Trump mobilized the National Guard in August and the troops were authorized to conduct law enforcement activities.

    CNN reported last month that National Guard troops will remain mobilized in the city at least through February.

    However, last week a federal judge halted the mobilization of the National Guard in Washington, DC, ruling that Trump and the Defense Department illegally deployed the troops.

    In her ruling, the judge said there were “more than 2,000 National Guard troops” every day in the city.

    The judge did not immediately order the National Guard to leave the city, allowing the Trump administration some time to file an appeal, which it did Tuesday.

    The administration earlier Wednesday asked a federal appeals court for an emergency stay of the judge’s order to remove the National Guard from Washington, DC.

    This story and headline have been updated with additional details.

    CNN’s John Miller contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Zachary Cohen, Kaanita Iyer, Holmes Lybrand, Gabe Cohen, Evan Perez and CNN

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Dream Palace of Puffery

    [ad_1]

    The President then interrupted him. “Did you ever think I was going to be called the peacemaker?”

    Glenn replied, “Actually, I did.”

    His question, when he got around to it, was about Alyssa Farah, a former aide in Trump’s first-term White House who is now a co-host of the popular ABC daytime talk show “The View” and a vocal critic of Trump’s. According to Glenn, Farah had promised to wear a Make America Great Again hat on TV if he actually managed to secure the release of Israeli hostages being held in Gaza, but she had not yet done so. After explaining all this to the President, his query to Trump was just two words: “Your response?”

    A day later, Glenn was back in front of Trump, at a press conference featuring the President and the director of the F.B.I., Kash Patel. The event’s news, among other things, was Trump complaining that law-enforcement agencies should investigate and prosecute more of his political enemies and confirming that he had secretly ordered the C.I.A. to carry out operations inside Venezuela. Glenn, however, wanted to make a point about one of Trump’s longtime preoccupations—what the President calls the “rigged election” of 2020. “By the way, you won Georgia three times,” Glenn shouted over other reporters trying to ask questions. Ed O’Keefe, of CBS News, standing in front of Glenn, could be seen shaking his head with what appeared to be exasperation. It was the last part of the exchange that really stood out, though. In response to Glenn, Trump said, “Yeah, I agree. Do you agree with me?” After Glenn replied, “I do,” the President quickly jumped back in: “And he’s the media! He’s the media!”

    I can think of no more perfect encapsulation of why the Trump Administration has done what it has to eviscerate the century-old tradition of independent reporting from the White House. In his second term, it was no longer enough to call the real news fake; now it’s the fake news that gets to displace actual journalists in order to playact the real thing. And when Trump wants validation, whether for his false claims of election fraud or some other lie, he can now claim “the media” gave it to him. How long can it be until there are only Brian Glenns in that room?

    You might think that the Kremlinization of the White House press pool doesn’t really matter at a moment when there are so many other Trump-generated crises in the country. Or that it is simply self-serving of journalists to complain about their own perks being taken away. Or that the President has no obligation, legal or otherwise, to answer questions from anyone. All of which are fair points.

    But the reason to pay attention to what’s happening with the coverage of the Presidency is that Trump cares about it perhaps more than anything else. There has never been a more media-obsessed President, nor one for whom the regard of others, even if it is suck-uppery in the crudest form, matters so much. He is known to spend hours a day consuming cable-news reports about himself. There is no detail of his public portrayal that does not concern him. In a lengthy social-media post this week, he berated Time for a cover about his Middle East diplomacy which was so complimentary it was headlined “His Triumph.” Trump’s beef was with the accompanying photo of himself, which he deemed “the Worst of All Time.” The point being: there is no pleasing a leader whose need for affirmation is so bottomless.

    The template for Trump’s second term so far has been to remake the White House as a place increasingly devoid of constraints or criticism. Gone are the first-term advisers such as John Kelly or Jim Mattis who saw themselves as checks on Trump’s tendency to go rogue. Only yes-men and flatterers need apply, and more and more they seem to be competing with one another to come up with the most over-the-top compliments possible for the boss. Last weekend, during a rally in Tel Aviv to celebrate the Trump-brokered deal to release the Israeli hostages, Trump’s Middle East negotiator, Steve Witkoff, proclaimed him “the greatest President in American history.” It doesn’t take much imagination to think what talk like that from his advisers does to a man with Trump’s ego. Those questions from reporters may soon be the last thing left tethering the President to at least some form of reality.

    This is why it’s not hard to anticipate where all this is going. Trump, it appears, is building a dream palace of endless puffery for himself, a gilded safe space where there will be no more tough questions, no more pesky reporters or impertinent demands for information that he does not want to give. And imagine how very powerful the President, who already believes the Constitution gives him the power “to do whatever I want,” will feel then. The Pentagon’s move to effectively ban journalism from its halls this week was not an outlier—it was a preview. ♦

    [ad_2]

    Susan B. Glasser

    Source link

  • Over $19 billion liquidated in worst crypto crash since COVID

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump’s latest tariff on Chinese goods has triggered the worst sell-off in crypto history. The White House announced a sweeping 100% tariff on all Chinese goods, in retaliation for Beijing’s new export controls on rare earth minerals.
    The tariffs are set to take effect on Nov. 1 or sooner.

    The announcement sent crypto markets into a massive freefall. At one point, Coinglass data showed that more than $19.2 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated, marking the largest single-day wipeout ever for crypto.

    As per Kraken, Bitcoin (BTC) plunged more than 10%, briefly dipping below $110,000 before clawing back to $112,000.

    Major altcoins were hit even harder — Ethereum (ETH) fell nearly 15%, XRP lost close to 14%, and Solana (SOL) dropped over 16%.

    At the time of reporting, the total crypto market capitalization stood at roughly $3.85 trillion, down more than 9% in just hours.

    Related: Trump and Melania Memecoins Spark a Crypto Gold Rush and Security Fears

    The intense sell-off also overwhelmed major trading platforms as traders rushed to exit positions. Binance, the world’s largest exchange, confirmed system strain and temporary outages as the sell-off accelerated.

    Later in the evening, Binance reported that all services had been restored and are “progressively returning to normal.”

    Meanwhile, Coinbase, the largest U.S.-based exchange, also reported “latency and degraded performance.” Its support team posted that a fix was implemented, assuring users that funds remain safe.

    This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Oct 11, 2025, where it first appeared in the MARKETS section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Government shutdown layoffs? How many federal workers could be affected in Tennessee?

    [ad_1]

    The first government shutdown in six and a half years is quickly approaching, and the White House is encouraging federal agencies to reflect during the pause.

    In the past, when a government shutdown has occurred, nonessential federal workers have been temporarily furloughed, and essential workers have stayed on the job without pay while Congress resolves funding disputes and then votes to pay the workers back retroactively.

    Here’s what we could see from a government shutdown in 2025.

    What is the deadline to avoid a government shutdown?

    This potential shutdown is quite different, as it comes during an administration that has actively been reducing the federal workforce since it began nine months ago. Government funding lapses at midnight on Sept. 30, and the president canceled meetings with House and Senate minority leaders as recently as Sept. 23.

    How likely is a government shutdown in 2025?

    The memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OPM) said agencies should “use this opportunity to consider” reductions in the workforce for programs that are discretionary, have another source of funding or that are “not consistent with the President’s priorities.”

    Earlier in September, members of Congress failed to advance any short-term funding extensions before a holiday break. Now, there are fewer than five days before the end of the month, and subsequently the end of the funding budget.

    The main issues are about healthcare. Democrats say they will not agree to fund the government unless Republicans deal with rising healthcare costs. This includes reversing the recent cuts to Medicaid and extending the subsidies for Obamacare premiums.

    Democrats proposed a temporary funding bill that would have restored money for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. It also aimed to stop the White House from withholding funds that Congress had approved. However, this bill did not pass in the Senate.

    How many federal employees are there in Tennessee?

    According to the OPM’s latest data, as of Sept. 2024, there were 32,574 federal employees across all agencies in Tennessee, about 1.5% of all federal employees in the United States.

    The largest agency in the state is the Department of Veterans Affairs, which has 13,632 employees. The next largest agency in the state is the Department of the Army with 2,902 employees. In the state of Tennessee, there are six bases and installations in all three major regions.

    It is difficult to ascertain the precise count of federal employees because the Trump administration undertook efforts to cut federal jobs and impose a funding freeze through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). As a result, many employees faced firings, layoffs, and accepted early resignations.

    Many of the people fired were still on provisionary status, and some of Trump’s attempts at workforce reduction have been blocked or reversed by lower courts.

    However, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration lost more than 880 probationary employees. Approximately 900 NASA employees accepted Trump’s offer of deferred resignation. In March, a Veterans Affairs memo announced plans to reduce the workforce by more than 80,000 workers.

    What agencies are essential during a government shutdown?

    Essential services include the U.S. Postal Service, Medicare and Social Security services, and air traffic control. It should be noted that, despite these industries being essential, their employees will not be paid while the government continues its shutdown.

    The federal Medicare and Medicaid health insurance programs are considered mandatory spending, meaning benefits won’t be impacted if the government shuts down. The Social Security Administration is projected to pay out $1.6 trillion to 72 million beneficiaries this year, and these payments will not be disrupted by the shutdown.

    Air travel continues during a shutdown because the Federal Aviation Administration’s air traffic control and the Transportation Security Administration are essential services. During the previous shutdown in late 2018, some TSA checkpoints were closed and travelers faced longer lines when agents didn’t report to work, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

    How many US government shutdowns have there been?

    The federal government has closed down 21 times since 1977, with each shutdown averaging about eight days. The most recent one lasted for 35 days, from December 2018 to January 2019, during Donald Trump‘s first term as president.

    Jordan Green covers trending news for The Commercial Appeal. She can be reached at jordan.green@commercialappeal.com.

    This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Government shutdown layoffs could impact these Tennessee workers

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The federal government could shut down soon. Here’s what you need to know

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — A possible federal government shutdown is only days away as congressional lawmakers remain at odds over funding the government beyond September 30.

    Although Republicans control Capitol Hill and the White House, they need at least seven Democrats in the Senate to join them to pass a spending package under the chamber’s rules. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, however, is demanding any funding bill contain an extension of the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium subsidies, along with several other items, to get his party’s support. GOP leaders want an extension of funding for seven weeks, with additional money for security for the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

    President Donald Trump does not appear interested in working out a compromise. He canceled a meeting this week with Democratic leaders and said Thursday that their demands were “totally unreasonable.”

    If the impasse is not resolved, the coming government shutdown could be unlike any other in recent memory. While no two shutdowns are exactly the same, Trump and the White House Office of Management and Budget have already signaled that they are willing to use a totally different playbook — urging agencies to downsize workers in programs whose funding has lapsed and which don’t align with Trump’s priorities.

    Trump is no stranger to government shutdowns. The most recent one occurred during his first term, starting in late December 2018 and lasting 35 days, the longest on record.

    Here’s what we know about the looming government shutdown:

    What is a government shutdown?

    Congress must provide funding for many federal departments and functions every fiscal year, which begins on October 1. If lawmakers fail to pass a spending package for the full year or extend funding for a shorter period, known as a continuing resolution, then many agencies and activities must shutter until Congress appropriates more money.

    Lawmakers have yet to pass through both chambers any of the 12 appropriations bills that make up the federal discretionary spending budget. So the coming shutdown would be considered a full shutdown.

    During prior impasses, Congress approved annual funding for certain agencies, which allowed them to continue operating while other federal departments went dark. That situation is known as a partial shutdown.

    Since 1980, there have been 14 government shutdowns, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.

    What is the shutdown deadline?

    The shutdown will begin on October 1, first thing Wednesday morning, if Congress doesn’t act before that.

    What programs and payments will stop?

    Every government shutdown differs somewhat, but typically functions that are critical to the protection of lives and property are deemed essential and remain open. Agencies file what are known as contingency plans that detail what operations will continue and how many employees will remain on the job, many of them without pay.

    However, in an unusual move, OMB this time is not posting agencies’ shutdown contingency plans on its website. Instead, the plans are hosted only on each agency’s site — making it harder to assess how the Trump administration will handle the shutdown and which activities it will deem essential. (OMB noted in a memo earlier this week that it had not yet received updated contingency plans from every agency.)

    Previous shutdowns have stalled food inspections; canceled immigration hearings; and delayed some federal lending to homebuyers and small businesses, among other impacts.

    In the most recent shutdown, students had trouble getting needed tax documents from the Internal Revenue Service to get financial aid for the spring semester, and the US Department of Agriculture warned that it could only guarantee to provide food stamp benefits through February.

    Notably, important benefit programs, such as Social Security and Medicare, will continue. Also, key services — including law enforcement and border patrol — are typically deemed essential and aren’t affected.

    Some government functions can continue – at least for a certain period of time – if they are funded through fees or other types of appropriations. For instance, when a shutdown loomed in the fall of 2023, the Internal Revenue Service said it could use some of the funding it received from the Inflation Reduction Act to keep preparing for the upcoming filing season – updating tax forms and technology systems and hiring and training staff.

    If the government shuts down next month, it’s possible that immigration, border patrol and defense activities funded through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law in July, would continue. The relevant agencies’ contingency plans should specify what functions would remain operational.

    Agencies and administrations have some amount of choice in which services they deem essential, said Molly Reynolds, interim director of the governance studies program at the Brookings Institution.

    In Trump’s first term, Reynolds noted that the administration took some measures to make the shutdown less painful, such as allowing the IRS to process tax refunds — a departure from prior shutdowns.

    But that may not be the case this year.

    “The OMB memo threatening wide-scale federal layoffs if there is a shutdown suggests that this time around, they might be looking to make the shutdown more painful,” she said.

    Will national parks stay open?

    The impact of shutdowns on the 400-plus national park sites has differed greatly in recent shutdowns.

    In 2013, an estimated 8 million recreation visits and $414 million were lost during the 16-day shutdown, according to the National Parks Conservation Association, citing National Park Service data. During the most recent shutdown in 2019, many parks remained open though no visitor services were provided. The Park Service lost $400,000 a day from missed entrance fee revenue, according to the association’s estimates. What’s more, park visitors would have typically spent $20 million on an average January day in nearby communities.

    States have also stepped in to keep some national parks open using their own funds. When a shutdown loomed in the fall of 2023, Utah said it would keep the Mighty 5 parks – Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef and Zion – open, while Arizona planned to keep the Grand Canyon operational. Colorado also said it would also keep its four national parks and other federal lands open.

    A National Park Service Ranger conducts a walking tour in Shark Valley, part of the Everglades National Park, on April 17 in Florida. Credit: Joe Raedle / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    What’s the impact on airline travel?

    Air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration officers are typically deemed essential and must remain on the job, though they are not paid. But some workers have called out sick during past shutdowns, snarling flights.

    The decision by 10 air traffic controllers to stay home in January 2019 helped end that shutdown. Their absence temporarily shut down travel at New York’s LaGuardia airport and caused delays at other major hubs, including in New Jersey, Philadelphia and Atlanta, driving Trump to agree to a temporary government funding measure.

    How about the impact on federal workers?

    Federal workers bear the brunt of government shutdowns. Some are furloughed, while others are considered essential and have to continue working. But many don’t get paid until the impasse ends.

    In March, the last time a federal government shutdown loomed before being averted, more than 1.4 million employees were deemed essential, according to Rachel Snyderman, managing director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center. About 750,000 of them would have continued to be paid since their salaries were funded through other sources.

    Another nearly 900,000 workers would have been furloughed without pay. (Snyderman noted that the estimates did not include the layoffs and departures that occurred in the early weeks of the Trump administration.)

    In 2023, the Biden administration warned that the nation’s 1.3 million active-duty military troops would not get paid, before a shutdown was averted at the last minute.

    This week, judiciary officials warned that federal courts could be affected by a shutdown within days, much sooner than in previous occurrences, because of tight budgets. While judges and Supreme Court justices would continue to be paid, many other judicial employees would not.

    Federal workers are guaranteed to receive their back pay after the impasse is resolved. However, the same is not true for federal contractors who may be furloughed or temporarily laid off by their employers during a shutdown.

    What does a shutdown do to the economy?

    Shutdowns can have real consequences for the economy since federal spending is delayed, and many federal workers pull back on their purchases while they aren’t receiving paychecks.

    The five-week shutdown in 2018-2019 resulted in a $3 billion loss in economic growth that would not be recovered, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate. It noted that some private sector businesses would never make up their lost income.

    Also, because the IRS reduced its compliance activities during the shutdown, CBO estimated that tax revenues would be roughly $2 billion lower — much of which would not be recouped.

    The impact stretches beyond the federal government.

    The US Travel Association wrote a letter to congressional leaders in late September urging them to avoid a shutdown, which it said would result in flight delays, longer airport security lines and canceled trips.

    “A shutdown is a wholly preventable blow to America’s travel economy — costing $1 billion every week — and affecting millions of travelers and businesses while placing unnecessary strain on an already overextended federal travel workforce,” wrote Geoff Freeman, the association’s CEO. “The consequences of inaction and immediate and severe.”

    [ad_2]

    Tami Luhby and CNN

    Source link

  • Elon Musk’s Grok is cleared for federal government use

    [ad_1]

    Despite Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s very public spats and seemingly still ongoing feud, the White House has remained committed to the former’s AI ambitions. And today, the General Services Administration (GSA) that it has reached an agreement with xAI that will allow it to buy Musk’s Grok AI models for $0.42 per organization.

    As part of the Trump administration’s OneGov procurement initiative, the deal with xAI will allow federal agencies access to the Grok 4 and Grok 4 Fast advanced reasoning models. The 18-month contract is the longest OneGov AI procurement agreement to date. xAI its Grok for Government strategy earlier in the summer, which signalled its intention to provide the government with a suite of AI products, including custom models for national security, science and healthcare purposes.

    As well as opening its models for government use, xAI is also providing dedicated engineers to speed up the implementation of its AI tools for participating agencies, and will offer an “upgrade path” for expanded features and higher rate limits. Such access is a crucial part of Trump’s , designed to position the US as the global leader in AI. And his administration doesn’t appear to have been put off by Grok’s bizarre behavior in recent months, such as its with far-right conspiracy theories regarding “white genocide” in South Africa, or its towards antisemitism.

    xAI is the latest in a line of AI companies to strike deals with the GSA. Back in August, began offering its Claude AI model to three branches of the US government for $1, following Gemini and xAI’s arch rival OpenAI joining a list of approved vendors.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Tate

    Source link

  • White House tells agencies to draft mass firing plans ahead of potential government shutdown

    [ad_1]

    White House tells agencies to draft mass firing plans ahead of potential government shutdown

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House is telling agencies to prepare for large-scale firings of federal workers if the government shuts down next week.

    In a memo released Wednesday night, the Office of Management and Budget said agencies should consider a reduction in force for federal programs whose funding would lapse next week, are not otherwise funded, and are “not consistent with the President’s priorities.” That would be a much more aggressive step than in previous shutdowns, when federal workers not deemed essential were furloughed but returned to their jobs once Congress approved government spending.

    A reduction in force would not only lay off employees but also eliminate their positions, which would trigger yet another massive upheaval in a federal workforce that has already faced major rounds of cuts this year due to efforts from the Department of Government Efficiency and elsewhere in the Trump administration.

    Once any potential government shutdown ends, agencies are asked to revise their reduction-in-force plans “as needed to retain the minimal number of employees necessary to carry out statutory functions,” according to the memo, which was first reported by Politico.

    This move from OMB significantly increases the consequences of a potential government shutdown next week and escalates pressure on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. The two leaders have kept nearly all of their Democratic lawmakers united against a clean funding bill pushed by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans that would keep the federal government operating for seven more weeks, demanding immediate improvements to health care in exchange for their votes.

    In statements issued shortly after the memo was released, the two Democrats showed no signs of budging.

    “We will not be intimidated by your threat to engage in mass firings,” Jeffries wrote in a post on X. “Get lost.”

    Jeffries called Russ Vought, the head of OMB, a “malignant political hack.”

    Schumer said in a statement that the OMB memo is an “attempt at intimidation” and predicted the “unnecessary firings will either be overturned in court or the administration will end up hiring the workers back.”

    OMB noted that it held its first planning call with other federal agencies earlier this week to plan for a shutdown. The budget office plays point in managing federal government shutdowns, particularly planning for them ahead of time. Past budget offices have also posted shutdown contingency plans — which would outline which agency workers would stay on the job during a government shutdown and which would be furloughed — on their website, but this one has not.

    The memo noted that congressional Democrats are refusing to support a clean government funding bill “due to their partisan demands,” which include an extension of enhanced health insurance subsidies set to expire at the end of the year, plus a reversal of Medicaid cuts that were included in Republicans’ big tax and spending cuts law.

    “As such, it has never been more important for the Administration to be prepared for a shutdown if the Democrats choose to pursue one,” the memo reads, which also notes that the GOP’s signature law, a major tax and border spending package, gives “ample resources to ensure that many core Trump Administration priorities will continue uninterrupted.”

    OMB noted that it had asked all agencies to submit their plans in case of a government shutdown by Aug. 1.

    “OMB has received many, but not all, of your submissions,” it added. “Please send us your updated lapse plans ASAP.”

    Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

    Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New US H-1B visa fee could disrupt Indian IT operations, says industry body

    [ad_1]

    By Haripriya Suresh

    NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Imposing a new $100,000 annual fee on H-1B visa applications could disrupt the global operations of Indian technology services companies that deploy skilled professionals to the United States, India’s IT industry body Nasscom said on Saturday.

    The White House announced the new fee on Friday, prompting some major U.S. tech firms to advise visa holders to either remain in the country or return there quickly. The new fee marks Washington’s most high-profile attempt to overhaul the country’s temporary employment visa system.

    Nasscom, representing India’s $283 billion IT and business process outsourcing industry, said the abrupt rollout of the policy would impact Indian nationals and disrupt continuity of ongoing onshore projects for the country’s technology services firms.

    The industry body said the one-day deadline for the new policy created “considerable uncertainty for businesses, professionals, and students across the world.”

    It also said the new policy could have “ripple effects” on the U.S. innovation ecosystem and on global job markets, pointing out that for companies, “additional cost will require adjustments”.

    Microsoft, JPMorgan and Amazon responded to the announcement by advising employees holding H-1B visas to remain in the United States, according to internal emails reviewed by Reuters.

    Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has launched a broad crackdown on immigration, including efforts to limit certain forms of legal immigration.

    (Writing by Sarita Chaganti Singh; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fact Check: DOCTORED Video Shows Trump Warning Left Not To Poke The Bear Commenting On Charlie Kirk’s Death — Satire

    [ad_1]

    Is this a real video of Presiden Trump saying the far right doesn’t exist and that “the left” is “poking a sleeping bear with sticks” in remarks on Charlie Kirk’s death? No, that’s not true: The viral clip contained AI generated sound that doesn’t match the original footage published by the White House and was published by an account the has the word “satire” in its bio. The authentic audio mentions neither bears nor Charlie Kirk .

    The claim appeared in a post (archived here) published on X on September 13, 2025. It opened:

    Trump warns: ‘Don’t poke the bear.’ Unreal.

    The post contained a video in which Trump appeared to be saying the following:

    I really shouldnt say it, but I think Ive got to say it. The far right in our country doesnt exist....yet. The far left, the loony tune brigade, however, is quite real.. real as real gets.. as serious as cancer. Cancer not good. But people forget that Im a moderate. Charlie was a moderate as well. But the psycho left has been poking a sleeping bear with sticks, calling the bear names, stealing the bears wallet, and theyve actually begun shooting the bear. But this isnt an ordinary bear, folks. No, no, its not. This, of course, is what scholars refer to as a metaphor. So if I was a miserable lefty, who hated my dad and thought John Oliver was a real looker, Id pause here and ask myself, do I want to keep poking this bear, or do I want my face ripped off in a horrific bear accident?

    This is what the post looked like on X at the time of writing:

    Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of post at x.com/MaverickDarby

    In reality, however, Trump did not say any of the words attributed to him in the clip on social media.

    A reverse image search led to the original footage published by the White House on September 2, 2025. In that recording, Trump announced the relocation of the U.S. Space Command headquarters to Huntsville, Alabama, and answered a series of questions, but none of them were related to the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk that would happen eight days later (archived here). For the same reason, Trump couldn’t have used the past tense to describe the political leanings of the then-alive activist.

    Lead Stories additionally searched the automatically generated transcript: In the authentic recording, Trump said nothing about bears or Charlie Kirk.

    Screenshot 2025-09-14 at 5.05.05 PM.png

    Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of video by the White House on YouTube.com

    Screenshot 2025-09-14 at 5.19.06 PM.png

    Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of video by the White House on YouTube.com

    Hiya, a tool from the InVid verification plugin, showed that the audio in the version of the recording that spread on social media was created by AI:

    Screenshot 2025-09-14 at 5.31.15 PM.png

    Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of the InVid verification plugin

    Furthermore, at the very final second, the clip from X itself showed a definition of the adjective “unreal”, hinting that the video was not authentic:

    Screenshot 2025-09-14 at 5.38.16 PM.png

    Image source: Lead Stories screenshot of post at x.com/MaverickDarby

    The bio of the @MavericDarby account on X (archived here) says it creates satire:

    Mostly satire. I make videos, but the podcast is 🎷

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Many Court Cases Can Trump Lose in a Single Week?

    [ad_1]

    Is Donald Trump tired yet of all the losing? During the past week alone, federal judges across the country have rejected some of the most important and far-reaching of Trump’s initiatives—from his efforts to reshape the global economy with tariffs and mobilize the military to act as police in American cities to his refusal to spend billions of dollars in congressionally appropriated funds. The President continues to cite nonexistent emergencies to justify his executive overreach and judges continue to call him out on it, issuing stern rebukes in the tradition of Judge Beryl Howell, who, during a case this spring about the firings of civil servants, observed that “an American President is not a king—not even an ‘elected’ one.”

    I’m not sure that this week’s epic losing streak has received the attention that it deserves, no doubt in part because America had other things to worry about, such as whether Trump was actually alive, despite all the internet rumors. It speaks to the present moment that the President is not only very much still with us but has already started fund-raising off the social-media frenzy surrounding his supposed death over Labor Day weekend. (“These rumors are just another desperate attack from the failing left who can’t stand that we’re WINNING and bigly!” the e-mail pitch that arrived in my inbox on Thursday morning said.) But what does it say about the state of things that disputing rumors of his death turns out to be a welcome distraction from underlying political realities for Trump?

    In fact, the President enters the first fall of his second term in office with historically low approval ratings—the only President with worse marks at this point was Trump himself, in his first term—and a radically disruptive agenda whose fate has yet to be determined. I am well aware that this is not currently the dominant narrative about Trump 2.0, which, whether you like it or hate it, has generally been covered as a sweeping and surprisingly successful attack on pillars of the American establishment in and out of government. But, depending on how the next few months play out, it could be. And that’s the point: What’s clear from Trump’s first seven months back in power is that he has embarked on a breathtaking effort to reshape the American Presidency. What’s far from apparent yet is whether and to what extent he will succeed.

    The latest string of defeats began last Friday, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs imposing double-digit duties on key trading partners such as Canada, China, and the European Union were illegal. Over the holiday weekend, a federal district judge intervened to stop migrant children from being deported to Guatemala while some of them were already loaded on planes. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reinstated a Federal Trade Commissioner, saying that Trump did not have the power that he claimed to fire her. Also that day, another federal judge ruled that, in sending hundreds of National Guard personnel to Los Angeles amid protests of Trump’s immigration crackdown, the President had violated a nineteenth-century law prohibiting the use of troops for domestic law-enforcement purposes. On Wednesday, yet another judge, in Boston, rejected billions of dollars in cuts to research funding for Harvard University, part of a broad war on liberal academia that Trump has made an unlikely centerpiece of his second term. And late on Wednesday night, a federal judge in Washington blocked billions of dollars in Trump-ordered cuts to foreign aid, saying that he was usurping Congress’s power of the purse in refusing to spend the money. This, I should add, is an incomplete list. If nothing else, it shows the extraordinary scope and scale of the battles that Trump has chosen to pursue—suggesting not so much a strategic view of the Presidency as an everything-everywhere-all-at-once vision of unchecked Presidential power.

    Important caveats apply, of course, most notably that all these rebuffs to Trump can and may well be overturned on appeal; September’s losing streak could soon enough become next spring’s winning streak, especially with a Trumpified Supreme Court, which, in the first few months after Trump’s return, failed to check many of Trump’s initial excesses, almost certainly emboldening him to push further and faster in applying his favored constitutional theory, what one might call the “I can do anything I want to do” doctrine. Already this week, Trump has appealed the tariff ruling to the Supreme Court, asking for an expedited review in a case that will test not only the legality of his favorite economic tool but his broad assertions of emergency authority to override constitutional constraints. In the foreign-aid case, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali made clear that his word would hardly be the last on the matter, anticipating “definitive higher court guidance” given the “immense legal and practical importance” surrounding the question of whether a President can simply decide to flout Congress’s appropriations bills.

    There’s also the matter of the damage that Trump has already wrought, even if he were to ultimately lose some or even all of these cases—unspent aid that could have saved lives, families divided by harsh immigration policies, companies whose supply chains have been broken or disrupted by a single man’s peremptory demands. So let’s stipulate that winning by losing might be a fine outcome as far as Trump is concerned; when smashing stuff is the goal, the more that’s smashed, the better, whether the judges ultimately agree or not.

    [ad_2]

    Susan B. Glasser

    Source link

  • Donald Trump ‘is fine’ after shots fired during speech at rally

    Donald Trump ‘is fine’ after shots fired during speech at rally

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump breaks silence

    Former President Donald Trump released a statement on his social media platform Truth Social after being shot at during his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania earlier this evening.

    “I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania.

    “Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured.

    “It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead.

    “I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin.

    “Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

    Vice President Kamala Harris sends prayers to Donald Trump

    VP Kamala Harris has revealed she has been briefed on the shooting at former President Trump’s event in Pennsylvania.

    She has sent prayers to the former president and his family.

    Nancy Pelosi breaks silence

    Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi released a statement regarding the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump earlier this evening at his rally in Pennsylvania.

    Shooter was reportedly on a rooftop

    The reported shooter was reportedly on a rooftop adjacent to the venue, ABC reports.

    Three senior U.S. law enforcement officials also revealed to NBC News that the Trump rally shooting occurred OUTSIDE the U.S. Secret Service security perimeter of the event.

    Eyewitness accounts from rally shooting

    Pennsylvania State candidate David McCormick told Fox News of the chaos that erupted as at least 8-10 shots appeared to ring out while Trump was speaking.

    Video caught the moment apparent gunshots rang out at 6:11 pm on Saturday in Butler, Pennsylvania, close to Pittsburgh in the west of the battleground state.

    McCormick claimed another person in the crowd was also injured and that there was a lot of blood on the scene.

    He said that it appeared some of the alleged shots came from the left side of the president as he was facing the crowd and that a man behind him was hit.

    The candidate said others in the crowd quickly rushed around to administer first aid.

    He added that he believed it was a small caliber firearm but he could not be certain if there was just one gun or two.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Aquino

    Source link

  • Joe Biden, 81, appears to FREEZE again – before Barack Obama comes to his rescue

    Joe Biden, 81, appears to FREEZE again – before Barack Obama comes to his rescue

    [ad_1]

    PRESIDENT Joe Biden appeared to freeze on stage again before Barack Obama rushed to his rescue and ushered him away.

    The 81-year-old US President was pulled off the stage by his former boss as questions continue to swirl over his health ahead of elections.

    6

    Joe Biden could be seen grinning motionlessly for a few secondsCredit: X
    Barack Obama then tugged the US president by his sleeve to snap him out of his state

    6

    Barack Obama then tugged the US president by his sleeve to snap him out of his stateCredit: X
    The two politicians walked off the stage together as Obama patted Joe's back

    6

    The two politicians walked off the stage together as Obama patted Joe’s backCredit: X
    Joe Biden appeared at Los Angeles theatre for the Democratic Party fundraiser

    6

    Joe Biden appeared at Los Angeles theatre for the Democratic Party fundraiserCredit: Reuters

    Biden, alongside Obama, appeared at a star-studded fundraiser for the Democratic party on Saturday as he gears up for his re-election campaign.

    As they received an ovation from the crowd at Peacock Theater in Los Angeles, Biden appeared to be motionless as he blankly stared into the distance.

    Meanwhile, Obama waved and smiled at the cheering audience before gently tugging the current president by his sleeve.

    As if woken up from sleep, Biden suddenly snapped out of his state and walked off the stage, accompanied by the former US leader.

    Obama could be seen patting Sleepy Joe on the back as he whispered something in his ear before both disappeared behind the curtains.

    This is just one of the latest bizarre incidents which sparked health rumours as Americans are preparing to head to the polls.

    It comes just days after elderly Biden wandered off from global powerhouse leaders as they set to get a group photo at the G7 summit.

    The worrying footage caught Biden turning his back on fellow world leaders as he appeared static while looking in the completely wrong direction.

    He was only shepherded back towards the group, which included the UK’s Rishi Sunak, by Italian PM Giorgia Meloni.

    Earlier this week, Biden appeared to freeze again for a moment during a Juneteenth celebration at the White House.

    Doddery Biden is ‘the worst he’s ever been’ as video shows him shuffling away from leaders, say G7 insiders

    Footage shared by the RNC Research group showed Biden grinning while Vice President Kamala Harris and members of George Floyd’s family danced.

    He looked zoned out at the event – sparking further concern just months before the presidential election.

    Another viral clip showed a tired-looking Biden drinking what looked like Gatorade.

    The president then gave a rambling speech which wasn’t coherent at some points.

    Is US President in a fit state to lead world?

    By Harry Cole, political editor

    WE need to talk about Joe Biden.

    The White House has been trying to hide it for months, but here in Italy it was clear the elderly leader of the free world is not in a good way.

    The annual G7 gathering for once actually achieved more than warm words, but the unprecedented $50billion (£39billion) seizure of Russian assets to aid Ukraine will not be why Puglia ’24 will be remembered.

    “It’s the worst he’s ever been,” one seasoned diplomatic source whispered to me yesterday, and the whole world can see it now.

    Questions about the lucidity of the most powerful man in the world have been bubbling around for years, but on the eve of the US elections they have exploded.

    On the fringes of the summit, hushed discussions are taking place about Biden, 81, and his worrying lack of mental clarity.

    Another insider told me that while the President had at times shown sharpness during meetings, he also appeared to display a troubling loss of “focus” and concentration.

    But it was the moment that the Italian PM Giorgia Meloni put on a skydiving display for her fellow world leaders on the luxury Borgo Egnazia estate that the penny finally dropped . . . 

    Has the Commander in Chief gone gaga?

    This gem of olive groves on the Adriatic coast, nestled in Italy’s heel, used to be most famous for Justin Timberlake’s 2012 wedding.

    Now it could go down in history as the place where the West realised the game was up for Sleepy Joe.

    Meloni’s photo op show of unity and military prowess was quickly overshadowed when Biden decided to turn his back on the G7 group as they clapped for each parachute jumper displaying a national flag.

    He stood grinning for a few seconds before deciding to shuffle away from the powerful pack.

    After taking several small and limbering steps he began to talk to someone and offered them a thumbs-up.

    The other leaders stood watching the President with puzzled looks on their faces.

    Emmanuel MacronRishi Sunak and Giorgia Meloni stared in his direction before catching each other’s eye with a knowing glance.

    Quick-thinking Meloni then made a beeline for the President before tugging on Biden’s arm.

    By this point the President was facing in the total opposite direction, with his back to everyone else, clearly not sticking to the script.

    As if helping a confused elderly relative, Meloni gently shepherded Biden back towards the photographers, as the rest of the G7 leaders all made an obvious movement to surround the befuddled-looking Joe.

    As all fixed smiles and looked towards the cameras, Biden then decided to slowly put on his shades.

    The White House quickly went into full spin mode, attempting to say a viral video of the moment had been edited.

    But they know the truth, and have had to stop their boss walking alone, instead flanking him with aides to try to disguise his physical frailty.

    Biden’s stroppy press secretary, Andrew Bates, claimed his boss was simply congratulating a diver on the floor who was collecting his things.

    He went on to blame the “desperate” media for using “an artificially narrow frame” to make Biden look bad.

    When quizzed, Rishi Sunak tried to put on a brave face yesterday morning, repeating the line that the President was just “being very polite” in thanking the jumpers.

    The PM claimed his key ally “just went over to kind of talk to all of them individually”.

    He told me: “As far as I know, he went over to talk to some of the parachute jumpers and say thank you or hello to them.”

    But the video, from whatever angle you watch it, shows a different story.

    And people have eyes, and their own minds, to make up.

    “The day reminds us that we have a helluva lot more work to do. Let’s keep marching. Let’s keep the faith,” Biden told the crowds in one moment.

    The Democrat’s term has been plagued with gaffes and blunders.

    He has fallen up the stairs of Air Force One and has stumbled on countless occasions.

    Last year, Biden took a tumble at the Air Force Academy graduation ceremony.

    In February, Biden confused the leaders of Mexico and Egypt while delivering a rambling address to the nation after it emerged he wouldn’t face criminal charges over storing secret docs.

    Last week, Biden seemed to fumble for his seat while on stage with the Macrons and his wife, Jill, at a D-Day event – but there was no chair behind him.

    Doubts are still lingering over Biden’s competency for the second term.

    And polling suggests Biden’s re-election bid could be tricky.

    ON A KNIFE-EDGE

    Real Clear Politics polling suggests Donald Trump would win the election if it were held tomorrow.

    Trump has leads over his rival in all seven battleground states that will decide who ends up in the White House.

    The brash tycoon leads by more than five points in North Carolina and Nevada.

    Trump’s lead is more slender in the likes of Wisconsin and Michigan – states which Biden won in 2020.

    Trump has had a polling lead for months – despite the four indictments leveled against him and being convicted of falsifying business documents.

    And, Biden’s job approval is lower than what Trump’s, Obama’s, and George W. Bush’s were at this stage of their respective presidencies.

    Biden’s approval ratings have not been above water since August 2021.

    The vast majority of Americans believe the country is heading in the wrong direction.

    Sleepy Joe was saved by his former boss from the embarrassing blunder

    6

    Sleepy Joe was saved by his former boss from the embarrassing blunderCredit: Reuters
    The fundraiser was hosted by Jimmy Kimmel and attended by Barack Obama

    6

    The fundraiser was hosted by Jimmy Kimmel and attended by Barack ObamaCredit: Reuters

    [ad_2]

    Aiya Zhussupova

    Source link

  • Moment Biden, 81, freezes AGAIN after shuffling away from G7 leaders in Italy

    Moment Biden, 81, freezes AGAIN after shuffling away from G7 leaders in Italy

    [ad_1]

    PRESIDENT Joe Biden has been caught bizarrely freezing again after awkwardly shuffling away from world leaders at a G7 meeting.

    The global powerhouses, including the UK’s Rishi Sunak, were set to get a photo before a wayward Biden tried to escape the shoot before being shepherded back by Italian PM Giorgia Meloni.

    10

    The moment Joe Biden, 81, turns his back on his fellow leaders at the recent meeting of G7 leadersCredit: X
    The president is then left looking in the completely wrong direction frozen

    10

    The president is then left looking in the completely wrong direction frozenCredit: X
    He is only shepherded back towards the group when Italian PM Giorgia Meloni ushers him back

    10

    He is only shepherded back towards the group when Italian PM Giorgia Meloni ushers him backCredit: X
    Biden returns for a group picture before slowly putting on his sunglasses

    10

    Biden returns for a group picture before slowly putting on his sunglassesCredit: X
    The bizarre video came from a meeting with G7 leaders this week

    10

    The bizarre video came from a meeting with G7 leaders this weekCredit: AP

    Awkward footage shows the president and other world leaders watching on as parachute jumpers descend from the sky with the flags of allied nations.

    But, the show of unity and military prowess is quickly overshadowed when Biden decides to turn his back on the group as they clap for the latest jumper.

    The 81-year-old stands still with a huge grin on his face for a few seconds before deciding to shuffle away from the pack.

    After taking several small, limbering steps he begins to talk to someone and offers them a thumbs up.

    The remaining heads of state all stand watching Biden with a puzzled look on their faces as Emmanuel Macron, Rishi Sunak and Giorgia Meloni stare in his direction before all looking at each other.

    Meloni then makes a dart towards the president as she speaks to Macron before tugging on Biden’s arm.

    By this point the commander-in-chief is looking completely in the opposite direction with his back to everyone else.

    Quick-thinking Meloni manages to shepherd Biden back towards the photographers as the G7 members all make a move left so they are surrounding the US leader.

    As all the leaders smile and look towards the camera, Biden decides to slowly put on his aviator sunglasses before posing for the picture.

    White House press secretary Andrew Bates claimed Biden was simply congratulating a diver on the floor who was collecting his things.

    Bates went on to blame the “desperate” media for using “an artificially narrow frame” to make Biden look bad.

    It comes as earlier this week, Biden appeared to freeze again for a moment during a Juneteenth celebration at the White House.

    US President Joe Biden sparks concerns as he appears to FREEZE during Juneteenth celebration concert at the White House

    He looked statuesque at the event – sparking further concern just months before the presidential election.

    The Democrat’s term has been plagued with gaffes and blunders.

    He has fallen up the stairs of Air Force One and has stumbled on countless occasions.

    Last year, Biden took a tumble at the Air Force Academy graduation ceremony.

    In February, Biden confused the leaders of Mexico and Egypt while delivering a rambling address to the nation after it emerged he wouldn’t face criminal charges over storing secret docs.

    Last week, Biden seemed to fumble for his seat while on stage with the Macrons and his wife, Jill, at the D-Day event.

    But, there was no chair behind Biden.

    Biden looked like he was crouching down before Jill then put her hand over her mouth.

    It looked like she was going to tell him something.

    It’s not known if she uttered anything to the president.

    Questions continue to swirl over Biden’s health and competency for office – just months before Americans go to the polls.

    And polling suggests Biden’s re-election bid could be tricky.

    Biden with Giorgia Meloni when they arrived at the G7 event

    10

    Biden with Giorgia Meloni when they arrived at the G7 eventCredit: Getty
    Biden starts to slowly shuffle away from the pack as the other leaders look on puzzled

    10

    Biden starts to slowly shuffle away from the pack as the other leaders look on puzzledCredit: X
    The Democrat looked confused when he was turned back around

    10

    The Democrat looked confused when he was turned back aroundCredit: X
    The White House says Biden was just congratulating a diver in the viral clip

    10

    The White House says Biden was just congratulating a diver in the viral clipCredit: Rex
    Biden has been accused of freezing up before during events

    10

    Biden has been accused of freezing up before during eventsCredit: Rex

    [ad_2]

    Georgie English

    Source link

  • Trump stuns US allies by warning he would ‘encourage’ Russia to attack West

    Trump stuns US allies by warning he would ‘encourage’ Russia to attack West

    [ad_1]

    DONALD Trump would “encourage” Russia to attack any Western nations that fail to pay Nato defence bills.

    The ex-US president bragged he once slapped down the leader of a “big country” who asked if America would step in if invaded by Russia.

    1

    Former US President Donald Trump has sent a warning to Western nations that fail to pay NATO defence billsCredit: Getty

    Trump, running for president again, told supporters: “I said, ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent? No I would not protect you’.

    “In fact I would encourage them to do whatever they want. You gotta pay.”

    A White House spokesman branded Saturday’s comments at a rally in South Carolina “appalling and unhinged” and a threat to global security.

    Trump, 77, has claimed too much US cash is spent protecting 30 Nato nations and accused some of failing to spend enough on defence.

    READ MORE ON DONALD TRUMP

    He has also alarmed allies by claiming to have a working relationship with Russia leader Vladimir Putin while members of his party have blocked vital weapons cash for Ukraine.

    Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg said: “Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security.

    “We expect that regardless of who wins the presidential election, the US will remain a strong and committed ally.”

    Trump’s outburst came 24 hours after Russian drones blasted an oil depot in Kharkiv, killing seven.

    Meanwhile, US warplanes blasted Houthi rebels in the latest mission to protect shipping in the Red Sea.

    Donald Trump has ‘no business being commander in chief,’ blasts Nikki Haley after jab over her husband serving overseas



    [ad_2]

    Nick Parker

    Source link

  • US House Speaker Johnson unveils a two-step stopgap bill – media

    US House Speaker Johnson unveils a two-step stopgap bill – media

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson on Saturday announced a two-step temporary funding measure aimed at averting a partial government shutdown a week from now, U.S. media reported.

    The measure employs an unorthodox structure that would provide funding for some segments of the federal government until Jan. 19 and for other agencies until Feb. 2, according to media reports. It was unlikely to win support from Democrats or the White House.

    The Republican-controlled House and Democratic-led Senate have until Friday to enact temporary funding legislation, commonly known as a continuing resolution, to keep federal agencies open after current funding expires.

    Stopgap measures, known as continuing resolutions or “CRs,” have been used up to now to fund the entire government over a single period of time. The unorthodox two-step structure adopted by Johnson reflected demands from Republican hardliners who have opposed more straightforward measures in the past.

    Before Saturday’s announcement, some Republican lawmakers had expressed concern that a complex CR could make it harder to reach agreement with Democrats and increase the risk of a shutdown.

    (Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by David Gregorio and Daniel Wallis)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ​Eric Lander Left the White House Under a Cloud. Now He’s Back at Work, and Not Everyone’s Happy.

    ​Eric Lander Left the White House Under a Cloud. Now He’s Back at Work, and Not Everyone’s Happy.

    [ad_1]

    Eric Lander, who resigned as President Biden’s science adviser after a White House investigation found that he had bullied and demeaned subordinates, is headed back to the Broad Institute — and some inside the prestigious research center say it hasn’t done enough to respond to their concerns that such behavior could repeat itself.

    Lander had been on a two-year leave from the institute in Cambridge, Mass., where he was the founding director for more than a decade, to head the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. The cabinet member stepped down in February 2022 after the investigation, first reported by Politico, found “credible evidence” that he was “bullying” his general counsel, a woman, and of multiple other women complaining that he “spoke to them in a demeaning or abrasive way” in front of colleagues.

    Lander’s future at the institute, which is independently operated but formally affiliated with MIT and Harvard, was an open question until Friday morning, when the research center’s director announced by email that, starting in February, Lander will be returning as a core institute member, once again in charge of his lab there, and in the title of founding director emeritus. He will also resume his tenured faculty positions at MIT and Harvard Medical School, where he is a professor of biology and systems biology, respectively.

    “At Broad, we have high expectations for all Broadies to foster an inclusive culture of respect, regardless of role, stature, or identity,” wrote Todd Golub, the institute’s director. “Eric also deeply values this culture and is committed to upholding it.”

    But inside the institute, the news was met with surprise and alarm from dozens of researchers and other staffers. Some had previously speculated that Lander’s return was imminent after he was photographed in December at a ceremony for an award that bears his name. Yet at a town hall that month, Jesse Souweine, the chief operating officer, had told Broad employees that Lander’s leave would last “through January 2023, so any question about his return is being handled with the board. So I don’t have any new news to report,” according to video obtained by The Chronicle. When The Chronicle asked in mid-December when the board of directors would make a decision, a Broad spokesperson said there was no timeframe.

    In a Slack forum viewable to all employees on Friday, Broad employees expressed frustration that the decision had seemingly been made without staff input, according to screenshots obtained by The Chronicle. And they noted that Golub’s message had not mentioned information they felt relevant — for instance, whether the institute had conducted its own investigation into Lander’s behavior, whether or what Lander had learned from his experience in the White House, whether his behavior will be monitored upon his return to a leadership role, or whether measures would be taken to safeguard members of his lab.

    “With Eric Lander’s return to the Broad now official, does anyone else feel like it’s weird how much his resignation from the WH has been skimmed over?” one staffer asked the Slack channel. “The messaging here seems very vague. I’m curious also about how this decision was made — who was consulted, and whose voices were listened to?” Forty people responded with an arrow emoji pointing to the statement, and three people responded with the exploding-head emoji.

    Another staffer noted that Golub’s message referenced “often tough discussions about academic culture here and across the nation” following Lander’s departure from the White House. In response, the Broad staffer wrote: “I’m so glad that such discussions took place. I must have somehow missed them. Are the results of these discussions documented somewhere, so that I can inform myself? Thank you!”

    One staffer said that they and a colleague had spoken with leaders this month and “expressed concerns about transparency around this decision, that the Broad community deserves a platform to talk about their concerns, and that leadership should communicate how Eric has reflected on his behavior at the White House and what accountability mechanisms exist to make sure no toxic behavior is brought to the Broad.”

    “Good to hear that nothing came of the concerns you raised!” another replied.

    “The fact that public scrutiny was glossed over by the institution,” wrote another, “could discourage people from speaking up if they were to find themselves in a sticky situation again.”

    Karen Zusi-Tran, a spokeswoman for the institute, said by email: “We are committed to being an open and inclusive workplace, one where everyone regardless of seniority can do and support great science in a respectful, productive environment. All Broad employees and affiliates have an obligation to follow our policies and to maintain proper standards of conduct at all times.” She did not answer questions about how the decision about Lander had been made or whether Lander’s behavior would be specifically monitored.

    She also said the institute had not identified “any formal complaints in any available records related to Dr. Lander from his time at Broad.”

    Zusi-Tran said the institute encourages employees to speak up about behavioral concerns and takes all of them seriously. “We reiterate [internal reporting] methods, as well as the importance of reporting concerns, regularly with managers and individuals within the institution and on our website,” she said.

    In 2004, Lander became the founding director of the Broad Institute, which was started with a gift from the philanthropists Eli and Edythe Broad, and he oversaw the Cambridge research center’s rise to an internationally renowned biomedical and genomic research center with nearly 3,000 employees and affiliated personnel. It has produced, for instance, some of the earliest discoveries about the gene-editing technology CRISPR. Lander himself — a geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician — was a principal leader of the Human Genome Project, the international collaboration that mapped the human genome from 1990 to 2003. But even prior to joining the Biden administration, his career was also marked with controversy, including aggressive moves against scientific rivals.

    Last year, shortly after he had resigned from the White House, The Boston Globe interviewed three former employees of his, who said that he was a demanding boss but that they did not feel that his behavior rose to the level of what he had been recently accused of. “In fact, all three said they admired his passion and brilliance and enjoyed working with him,” the Globe reporters wrote. “And they didn’t feel he was harder on women than men, unlike the allegations that led to his resignation.” At the time, Lander apologized and wrote: “I have sought to push myself and my colleagues to reach our shared goals — including at times challenging and criticizing. But it is clear that things I said, and the way I said them, crossed the line at times into being disrespectful and demeaning, to both men and women.”

    On Friday morning, ahead of the public announcement of Lander’s return, the Globe ran an opinion piece with the headline “Eric Lander is getting uncanceled.” It suggested the scientist had been unfairly pilloried for the complaints of “a vocal few” that did not hold up to closer examination.

    The article drew on interviews with more than 20 of Lander’s colleagues at the Broad Institute and elsewhere, including “10 prominent female scientists who have known him for a collective total of nearly 200 work-years” and said they “categorically repudiate the accusations that he’s sexist.”

    But on Slack, staffers at the Broad were unimpressed. As one wrote: “Much of that opinion piece seems to rest on people saying ‘I never saw him to be abusive so he couldn’t be abusive.’ If you understand abuse dynamics, you know that statement is not true.”

    In an interview, a female graduate student who requested anonymity for fear of retribution told The Chronicle: “This sets a precedent that will discourage other people from coming forward with concerns about Eric’s behavior specifically and more broadly, behavior by senior leadership that is perceived as bullying or sexist, given the lack of follow-through and accountability in Eric’s case.”

    Lander did not immediately return a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Stephanie M. Lee

    Source link