ReportWire

Tag: the trump organization

  • Trump Could Lose Control Of Trump Tower After Fraud Ruling

    Trump Could Lose Control Of Trump Tower After Fraud Ruling

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump could be at risk of losing control of his New York business properties, including Trump Tower, after a judge found that the former president and his company liable for fraud. What do you think?

    “It should be returned to whomever he stole it from.”

    Emery Dawson, Unemployed

    “I hope it passes to a more honest Manhattan real estate developer.”

    Megan Starner, Smoke Alarm Inspector

    “He can still put his name in giant golden letters on a sensible townhome.”

    Salvador Ocampo, Paternity Delegator

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump and his company

    Donald Trump and his company

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump and his company “repeatedly” violated state fraud law, a New York judge ruled Tuesday.

    The ruling came in response to a request by New York Attorney General Letitia James seeking judgment on one of the claims in her $250 million civil lawsuit, which is scheduled to go to trial on Oct. 2. Judge Arthur Engoron agreed in his ruling with James’ office that it is beyond dispute that Trump and his company provided banks with financial statements that misrepresented his wealth by as much as $3.6 billion.

    “The documents here clearly contain fraudulent valuations that defendants used in business,” Engoron wrote in his ruling, in which he ordered the defendants’ New York business certificates canceled. He ordered that within 10 days, they must recommend potential independent receivers to manage the dissolution of the canceled LLCs.

    James’ office sued Trump, his sons Donald Jr. and Eric, and the Trump Organization in September 2022, claiming they committed extensive fraud over more than a decade while seeking loans from banks. In addition to $250 million, her office is seeking several sanctions that would severely hamper the company’s ability to do business in New York.

    Both sides sought summary judgments from Engoron. James’ office asked for the ruling delivered Tuesday, saying it would streamline the trial if Engoron found certain facts were beyond dispute: that Trump and the company issued false business records and false financial statements.

    The Trumps’ legal team asked Engoron to toss the case. They argued many of the loans in question occurred too long ago to be considered as part of this case.

    Engoron also ruled on that motion Tuesday, rejecting it. 

    The upcoming trial will now focus on other allegations in the lawsuit related to falsification of business records, issuing false financial statements, insurance fraud and conspiracy.

    The Trumps and their company have denied wrongdoing and accused James, a Democrat, of pursuing them for political reasons.

    In a statement Tuesday evening, Alina Habba, legal spokesperson for Trump’s Save America PAC, called the judge’s ruling “fundamentally flawed at every level” and said they would “immediately appeal.”

    “It is important to remember that the Trump Organization is an American success story,” the statement said. “The fact that this Court summarily found that there is no question of fact, finding in part that Mar-a-Lago is worth approximately $20 million and issue a decision of this magnitude is an affront to our legal system.”

    The judge found as fact that Trump and the company overstated the valuations of many properties by hundreds of millions of dollars. He cited the Palm Beach Assessor valuation of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club at between $18 million and $28 million for each year between 2011 and 2021 — the values for which he paid local property taxes. During those years, Trump valued the property at between $328 million and $714 million on his annual statements of financial conditions.

    Exterior of Mar-A-Lago, Trump's estate in Palm Beach, Florida
    Mar-A-Lago, former President Donald Trump’s private club in Palm Beach, Florida.

    Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    During arguments Friday related to the motions, a lawyer for James’ office said Trump signed off on so-called statements of financial condition portraying many properties he and his company owned as worth hundreds of millions more than the valuations of appraisers they had hired.

    Trump attorney Christopher Kise said in response that the valuations reflected “Mr. Trump’s investment genius.” He pointed to Trump National Doral Miami golf club, which was purchased out of bankruptcy for about $150 million in 2012. Kise said it’s worth “well more than $1 billion” now.

    “What Doral demonstrates is that President Trump is a master at finding value where others see nothing,” Kise said.

    Engoron gave some indication he didn’t buy Kise’s argument during that hearing. Engoron peppered Kise with questions, frequently interrupting him, and at one point raising his voice as he banged his fist on the bench.

    “You cannot make false statements and use them in business — that’s what this statute prohibits,” he said.

    Engoron also ruled Tuesday on a separate motion by the New York attorney general seeking sanctions against Trump’s legal team for repeatedly making arguments Engoron and other courts had already rejected. James’ office asked the judge to impose a fine of $20,000.

    Engoron ruled in the attorney general’s favor but upped the amount, fining five attorneys $7,500 each, for a total of $37,500.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump and company liable for fraud in New York lawsuit, judge rules

    Trump and company liable for fraud in New York lawsuit, judge rules

    [ad_1]

    A judge on Tuesday ruled that Donald Trump and his company are liable for fraud by misstating the true values of multiple real estate properties for years and thus grossly overstating the former president’s net worth by billions of dollars.

    Judge Arthur Engoron in his bombshell decision also canceled the New York business certificates of Trump, the Trump Organization, and the other defendants, including two of his sons, in a lawsuit by the state Attorney General’s Office.

    The judge said he would appoint an independent receiver to manage the dissolution of the corporate entities whose business certificates he canceled.

    It is not clear whether Engoron’s decision means the Trump Organization and related entities will have to completely cease doing business in New York, or whether the companies can be legally reconstituted later.

    A spokeswoman for Attorney General Letitia James declined to comment on that question.

    But Trump’s lawyer Chris Kise, who called the decision “outrageous,” said it “seeks to nationalize one of the most successful corporate empires in the United States and seize control of private property all while acknowledging there is zero evidence of any default, breach, late payment or any complaint of harm.”

    “While the full impact of the decision remains unclear, what is clear is that President Trump and his family will seek all available appellate remedies to rectify this miscarriage of justice,” Kise said.

    Engoron’s ruling, which also dismissed Trump’s request to dismiss the case, did not settle six other claims in dispute in the case whose defendants included him, the company and his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as well as former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg, company executive Jeff McConney.

    Those issues remaining claims will be addressed at a nonjury trial due to begin Monday.

    James is seeking $250 million in damages in the case and wants Trump and his two adult sons barred from doing business in the state.

    Engoron, in granting partial summary judgment to James on the fraud claim, found that Trump made false and misleading valuations for multiple real estate assets in statements to insurers and banks for years as he sought more favorable terms on insurance coverage and loans.

    Because of those misstatements, Trump also inflated his true net worth in annual financial statements by billions of dollars, according to the decision.

    “In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote.

    “That is a fantasy world, not the real world.”

    Engoron also ordered sanctions of $7,500 for five attorneys who represented the Trump defendants for making frivolous and previously rejected arguments in court filings. Kise is among those fined by the judge.

    “Today, a judge ruled in our favor and found that Donald Trump and the Trump Organization engaged in years of financial fraud,” James wrote in a post on the X social media site.

    “We look forward to presenting the rest of our case at trial,” James added.

    Trump, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, separately faces a total of 91 felony charges in four criminal cases. Two of those cases relate to efforts to reverse his re-election defeat in 2020. Another case involves his retention of classified government documents at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, a property that is mentioned in Engoron’s ruling Tuesday.

    In the fourth criminal case, Trump is charged with falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.

    He has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.

    Engoron in his ruling wrote that James’ office in its civil fraud suit “has prevailed on liability on its first cause of action … as against all defendants.”

    The judge added that if liability for fraud is established under New York law, that statute allows the attorney general to obtain an order enjoining defendants from continuing to do business or “any fraudulent or illegal acts.”

    Even after Engoron appointed an independent financial monitor for the Trump Organization last year, “defendants have continued to disseminate false and misleading information while conducting business,” the judge wrote.

    “This ongoing flouting of this Court’s prior order, combined with the persistent nature of the false [statements of financial condition] year after year, have demonstrated the necessity of canceling the [defendants’ business] certificates … as the statute provides,” the judge wrote.

    Engoron’s 35-page ruling details how Trump fraudulently valued his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, once by more than 2,000%, Trump Park Avenue and 40 Wall Street in New York City, his Seven Springs property in Westchester County, New York, and his golf course in Aberdeen, Scotland.

    “Time and time again, the Court is not comparing one appraisal to another; it is comparing an independent professional appraisal to a pie-in-the-sky dream of concocted potential,” Engoron wrote.

    After noting that Trump submitted statements falsely claiming that the Trump Tower apartment in which he resided for decades was nearly three times its actual size, and was worth a whopping $327 million, the judge wrote, “a discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud.”

    “The documents here clearly contain fraudulent valuations that defendants used in business,” Engoron wrote.

    “Defendants respond that: the documents do not say what they say; that there is no such thing as ‘objective’ value; and that, essentially, the Court should not believe its own lying eyes,” the judge noted.

    Kise, the Trump attorney, said Engoron’s “outrageous decision is completely disconnected from the facts and governing law.’

    “The Court ignored fully the Appellate Division mandate and basic legal, accounting and business principles,” Kise said. “Without even conducting a trial, the Court substituted its own judgment for that of nationally recognized experts from the NYU Stern School of Business and beyond.  More importantly, the Court disregarded the viewpoint of those actually involved in the loan transactions who testified there was nothing misleading, there was no fraud, and the transactions were all highly profitable.”

    Another Trump attorney, Alina Habba, in a statement said, “It’s important to remember that the Trump Organization is an American success story and the fact that a judge without trial would say there is no question of fact and issue a decision like this in summary judgement is concerning.”

    Habba who was among the attorneys sanctioned by Engoron.

    Trump responded to Engoron’s ruling by reposting a statement on social media attacking James and the judge, while doubling down on his claims of having a much higher net worth than what was displayed on the financial statements at the center of the fraud case.

    “It is very unfair, and I call for help from the highest Courts in New York State, or the Federal System, to intercede,” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social site.

    In a tweet Tuesday, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump Organization with Donald Trump Jr., wrote, “In an attempt to destroy my father and kick him out of New York, a Judge just ruled that Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach Florida, is only worth approximate ‘$18 Million dollars’ “

    “Mar-a-Lago is speculated to be worth [well] over a billion dollars making it arguably the most valuable residential property in the country. It is all so corrupt and coordinated,” Eric wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump overstated net worth by up to $2.2 billion, New York attorney general says

    Trump overstated net worth by up to $2.2 billion, New York attorney general says

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump overstated his net worth by between $812 million and $2.2 billion each year between 2011 and 2021, the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James claims in a filing made public Wednesday.

    The allegations were raised in an Aug. 4 filing seeking a partial summary judgment in the office’s 2022 lawsuit accusing members of the Trump family and Trump Organization executives of orchestrating an extensive, fraudulent scheme related to valuations of property and Trump’s personal financial statements. 

    James’ office is seeking $250 million and sanctions that would halt the company’s operations in the state and drastically impair the ability of Trump, Eric Trump or Donald Trump Jr. to do business in New York.

    The case is scheduled for trial in October, but James’ office is asking a judge to first rule against the Trumps in one facet of the case, certain allegations related to fraud. If granted, other claims, including allegations related to falsification of records and issuing false financial statements, would still be considered at trial.

    “No trial is required for the court to determine that defendants presented grossly and materially inflated asset values…repeatedly in business transactions to defraud banks and insurers,” Andrew Amer, an attorney for James’ office wrote in the filing.

    A summary judgment motion argues that certain material facts are not in dispute, and as a result, the judge is already in a position to make a decision based on them — avoiding the need to raise them at trial.

    A spokesperson for Donald Trump’s legal team did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

    Trump’s lawyers argued in separate filing Wednesday that the case should be dismissed. They said Trump received many of the loans at the heart of the allegations too long ago under the state’s statute of limitations.

    James’ office argues in its filing that in order to rule in its favor, the judge must find that Trump’s statements of financial condition were “false or misleading” from 2011 through 2021 — the years for which the state is suing — and that the statements were used “in the conduct of business transactions.”

    “The answer to both questions is a resounding ‘yes’ based on the mountain of undisputed evidence,” the attorney general’s office said in its filing.

    This latest filing comes just as Trump’s legal problems are mounting. On Aug. 24, Trump surrendered to authorities in Fulton County, Georgia, where he and 18 others are accused of racketeering in a criminal case related to their alleged efforts to overturn the results of the state’s 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost. He is expected to enter a not guilty plea in that case, and denies wrongdoing.


    How will Trump balance campaign duties with busy legal schedule?

    09:04

    Trump is also charged in three other criminal cases. In Manhattan, he entered a not guilty plea in April to 34 counts of falsification of business records. And he entered not guilty pleas this summer to charges in a pair of federal cases in which he’s accused of 40 felony counts related to “willful retention” of national security information after leaving the White House, and four felony counts related to his alleged effort to thwart the peaceful transfer of power after losing to President Joe Biden in 2020.

    Trump maintains his innocence and has accused prosecutors from every office pursuing him of doing so out of political animus.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Charges Suggest Trump Asked Mar-A-Lago Employee To Tape Over Security Footage With Rerun Of ‘Hong Kong Phooey’

    New Charges Suggest Trump Asked Mar-A-Lago Employee To Tape Over Security Footage With Rerun Of ‘Hong Kong Phooey’

    [ad_1]

    MIAMI—According to sources familiar with the case, new charges filed Thursday in the federal indictment against Donald Trump suggested that the former president instructed a Mar-a-Lago employee to tape over security footage with a rerun of Hong Kong Phooey. “Despite being more than aware that doing so would obstruct an ongoing federal investigation, Trump ordered property manager Carlos De Oliveira to erase Mar-A-Lago security footage and replace it with the antics of the crime-fighting dog Penrod ‘Penry’ Pooch,” said sources, who confirmed that all surveillance footage pertaining to the classified documents case had been replaced by episodes of the Hanna-Barbera cartoon. “This was crucial evidence, and now all investigators have is episode six, where Phooey saves a candy factory and foils Professor Presto’s malevolent plan. He can argue it’s his favorite show and he’s allowed to tape it any way he likes, but we’ll just have to see how that holds up in court.” At press time, sources confirmed that the Justice Department was also investigating Trump for holding onto classified episodes of Hong Kong Phooey that were never supposed to leave the White House.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michael Cohen settles lawsuit against Trump Organization

    Michael Cohen settles lawsuit against Trump Organization

    [ad_1]

    Days before it was set to go to trial, a lawsuit filed by former Trump attorney Michael Cohen against his former employer, the Trump Organization, has been settled.

    Cohen planned to call one of the former president Donald Trump’s sons as a witness in the trial. Cohen sued in 2019, saying the company owed him legal fees for his work defending Trump and himself during investigations in 2017 and 2018, and during roughly 20 meetings with the Manhattan district attorney and a grand jury before Trump was indicted in March. 

    Michael Cohen at Manhattan Civil Court
    File: July 7: Michael Cohen leaves Manhattan civil court during lunch break July 7, in Manhattan, New York.

    Barry Williams, New York Daily News via Getty Images


    A spokesperson for the Trump Organization did not return a request for comment.

    An attorney for Cohen said in court earlier this month that Donald Trump Jr., a Trump Organization executive vice president, was a relevant potential witness because the company covered his legal fees in relation to some of the same investigations for which Cohen is seeking payment.

    “We would like to introduce testimony about what Mr. Trump Jr. paid his lawyers in the exact same matters,” said the attorney, Hunter Winstead.

    Cohen entered a guilty plea in 2018 to federal campaign finance violations and tax evasion, and the company has argued his criminal conduct was in violation of any agreements it had with him.

    Cohen, now a Trump adversary who is enmeshed in a tangled web of litigation involving his former boss, is the key witness in the Manhattan criminal case. Cohen’s attorneys say he incurred more than $500,000 in legal fees related to that case, in which Cohen is a key witness against Trump.

    Trump has entered a not guilty plea in the case, which centers on a series of reimbursements paid to Cohen after the ex-lawyer arranged a “hush money” payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 presidential election. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Read the indictment against Donald Trump, details of payments to porn star, Playboy model

    Read the indictment against Donald Trump, details of payments to porn star, Playboy model

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in connection with a scheme that directed hush money payments to two women before the 2016 presidential election.

    The 16-page indictment against Trump was unsealed Tuesday as he became the first former U.S. president ever to be arraigned on criminal charges.

    “Not guilty,” Trump said from his seat to Judge Juan Merchan during the hearing in Manhattan Supreme Court.

    The indictment says those payments were part of a broader scheme to suppress claims by the women, porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal, that they had sex with Trump, in a bid to keep their stories from affecting Trump’s chances against Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

    Follow CNBC.com‘s live coverage of former President Donald Trump’s surrender and arraignment at the Manhattan criminal courthouse.

    Prosecutors also said a Trump-friendly publishing company, American Media Inc., paid $30,000 to a former Trump Tower doorman who claimed to have a story about Trump fathering a child out of wedlock.

    All three payments were part of an alleged “catch and kill” effort by Trump and others, among them then-AMI chief David Pecker, from August 2015 to December 2017 “to identify, purchase, and bury negative information about him and boost his electoral prospects,” prosecutors said.

    Read the indictment against Trump

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg at a press conference said each of the false statements in business records, which related to the payment to Daniels, were done to cover up other crimes related to the 2016 election.

    Those crimes included violations of New York state election law, and false statements to tax authorities, he said. Falsifying business records can be charged as a misdemeanor, but it also can be charged as a felony if done to cover up another crime.

    Merchan scheduled the next hearing in the case for Dec. 4. It is possible that the criminal case will not be resolved before the 2024 presidential election, where Trump is seeking the Republican nomination.

    Bragg in a statement said, “The People of the State of New York allege that Donald J. Trump repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal crimes that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.”

    “Manhattan is home to the country’s most significant business market. We cannot allow New York businesses to manipulate their records to cover up criminal conduct,” Bragg said.

    A prosecutor told the judge that the DA’s office was concerned about comments Trump has made on social media that could threaten the DA’s office and the city.

    That included one post depicting Trump wielding a bat over the head of District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

    The judge said that he was taking the harsh rhetoric by Trump about the case very seriously.

    One of Trump’s lawyers, Todd Blanche, told Merchan that Trump has spoken forcefully, but that he was within his rights to do so.

    Before the arraignment, Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., posted a photo on Trump’s Truth Social site of Merchan’s daughter, who according to a Breitbart news article worked on the election campaign of President Joe Biden.

    “Seems relevant,” the younger Trump wrote. “The BS never ends folks.”

    Hush money payments

    Daniels received $130,000 from Trump’s then-lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen at Trump’s direction, 12 days before the 2016 election. Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, says she had sex with Trump one time in 2006, several months after his wife Melania Trump gave birth to their son Barron.

    Trump later reimbursed Cohen with a series of monthly checks, 11 in total. The checks first were issued by the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, while later ones came from Trump’s bank account, prosecutors said.

    Nine of the checks were signed by Trump, and “Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement” with Cohen.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump appears in court with his lawyer Joe Tacopina for an arraignment on charges stemming from his indictment by a Manhattan grand jury following a probe into hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels, in New York City, U.S., April 4, 2023. 

    Andrew Kelly | Reuters

    McDougal received $150,000 from AMI, the publisher of The National Enquirer, the supermarket tabloid that was allied with Trump. McDougal has said she had a long-term affair with Trump that began in 2006.

    Trump denies having sex with either Daniels or McDougal.

    Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal crimes, two of which were campaign finance violations for facilitating the payments to both Daniels and McDougal.

    The grand jury indicted Trump on Thursday. The charging document had remained sealed since then.

    The grand jury began hearing testimony in the case in late January.

    News of the proceedings came as a surprise, since a former prosecutor in the district attorney’s office last year had suggested the investigation into Trump was all but dead after Bragg declined to seek an indictment against Trump in connection with allegedly false financial statements involving real estate assets.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Trump separately is under criminal investigation by the Department of Justice and a state prosecutor in Georgia for efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden.

    The DOJ also is probing Trump for retaining government records after leaving the White House and for possible obstruction of justice.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What does Donald Trump’s indictment mean for his business dealings?

    What does Donald Trump’s indictment mean for his business dealings?

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump’s indictment by a New York grand jury less than four months after the Trump Organization was convicted of 17 counts of criminal tax fraud is another cloud over the real estate firm, which legal experts said could struggle getting financing and making deals.

    Trump, perhaps more than any politician in U.S. history, famously ran on his wealth and celebrity as qualifications for the highest office in the land. While that likely burnished his company’s reputation in the heady afterglow of his 2016 victory, Trump’s role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and his deepening legal woes since leaving office risk tainting the Trump Organization’s once-gilded brand.

    Although it is Trump who faces charges, his company also played a role in the affair that triggered the investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. In 2017, Trump Organization executives reimbursed former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen for a payment he made to adult star Stormy Daniels, allegedly in return for her silence about a sexual relationship with the former president before the 2016 election.

    “They’re doomed, I think. Who would want to do business with this organization or with Trump?” said Bennett Gershman, a law professor at Pace University and a former prosecutor in the New York State Anti-Corruption Office.

    Trump Organization companies rely on financing to build resorts, hotels, golf clubs and residences. In Gershman’s view, the Trump Organization’s criminal conviction last year made the company “toxic” for many potential lenders and business partners. While the indictment of its former CEO may not directly add to those legal woes, it may further tarnish the company’s reputation.

    “The corporation is already toxic. Now, when the chief of that corporation, the head of that corporation, is under indictment, that doesn’t help the image of the corporation,” Gershman said. “It seems to me they’ve already taken this big hit, there’s already trouble, and now Trump is making it worse.”


    Legal expert weighs in on Trump indictment

    03:41

    A spokesperson for the Trump Organization did not respond to a request for comment.

    Republicans in Congress have mounted a full-throated defense of the former president, deriding the indictment as a politically motivated hit job.

    “These are political figures, fighting the leading political candidate,” Trump attorney Alina Habba told WABC News Radio Thursday.  “They’re all people trying to find a reason to remove Donald Trump as the future president of this country again.”

    Of course, the subject of an indictment, like anyone charged with a crime, is presumed innocent. However, “The fact that we know, legally, it’s merely an accusation, not proof — that doesn’t matter here,” Gershman said. “An indictment is the perception of wrongdoing, and the perception of wrongdoing by the head of a corporation makes people worried.”

    According to Randy Zelin, a criminal defense lawyer and professor at Cornell Law School, said the biggest legal threat to the Trump Organization is the civil lawsuit filed in September by New York’s attorney general, who is seeking to ban the company from dong business in the state.

    That lawsuit “would really be a final nail in the coffin,” Zelin said. “People will begin, if they haven’t already, to distance themselves.” 

    New York’s case, which is scheduled to go to trial in October, accuses the Trump Organization, as well as Trump, Donald Trump, Jr., Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump, of a years-long effort to commit fraud by inflating property values.  New York Attorney General Letitia James has said the alleged fraud added “billions” to Trump’s property values. 

    The company and the Trumps have denied the allegations.


    Trump indictment comes as former president faces other major investigations

    06:35

    It’s hard to tell what financial impact, if any, its legal issues may have had on the Trump Organization. As a private company, it is not required to publicly reveal its finances, and if it runs into trouble with U.S. lenders it could tap money from overseas. 

    The Daily Beast reported that after Deutsche Bank, a longtime lender to Trump, dropped him as a client in 2021, the Trump Organization secured a loan from Axon Bank, an online-only lender. A $4 billion deal the Trump Organization made last year with Dar Al Arkan, a Saudi real estate developer, appears to be proceeding, with the developer this month opening part of the project to sales.

    And, as the New York Times reported last year, the Trump Organization may not be seeking new deals. “Rather than tackling new projects in recent years, the company has largely tended to its existing properties,” the Times said.

    With reporting by Graham Kates and Aimee Picchi.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about NY prosecutors’ probe into Trump’s role in hush money scheme | CNN Politics

    What to know about NY prosecutors’ probe into Trump’s role in hush money scheme | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Manhattan prosecutors’ invitation to Donald Trump to testify in an investigation into a hush money scheme involving adult film actress Stormy Daniels has thrust the yearslong probe into the spotlight as officials weigh whether to charge the former president.

    Prosecutors in District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office have asked Trump to appear before the grand jury investigating the matter.

    The request represents the clearest indication yet that investigators are nearing a decision on whether to take the unprecedented step of indicting a former president since potential defendants in New York are required by law to be notified and invited to appear before a grand jury weighing charges.

    Here’s what to know about the hush money investigation.

    The Manhattan DA’s investigation first began under Bragg’s predecessor, Cy Vance, when Trump was still in the White House. It relates to a $130,000 payment made by Trump’s then-personal attorney Michael Cohen to Daniels in late October 2016, days before the 2016 presidential election, to silence her from going public about an alleged affair with Trump a decade earlier. Trump has denied the affair.

    At issue in the investigation is the payment made to Daniels and the Trump Organization’s reimbursement to Cohen.

    According to court filings in Cohen’s own federal prosecution, Trump Org. executives authorized payments to him totaling $420,000 to cover his original $130,000 payment and tax liabilities and reward him with a bonus.

    The Manhattan DA’s investigation has hung over Trump since his presidency, and is just one of several probes the former president is facing as he makes his third bid for the White House.

    Hush money payments aren’t illegal. Prosecutors are weighing whether to charge Trump with falsifying the business records of the Trump Organization for how it reflected the reimbursement of the payment to Cohen, who said he advanced the money to Daniels. Falsifying business records is a misdemeanor in New York.

    Prosecutors are also weighing whether to charge Trump with falsifying business records in the first degree for falsifying a record with the intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal another crime, which in this case could be a violation of campaign finance laws. That is a Class E felony and carries a sentence of a minimum of one year and as much as four years. To prove the case, prosecutors would need to show Trump intended to commit a crime.

    The Trump Organization noted the reimbursements as a legal expense in its internal books. Trump has previously denied knowledge of the payment.

    If the district attorney’s office moves forward with charges, it would represent a rare moment in history: Trump would be the first former US president ever indicted and also the first major presidential candidate under indictment seeking office.

    The former president has said he “wouldn’t even think about leaving” the 2024 race if charged.

    A decision to bring charges would not be without risk or guarantee a conviction. Trump’s lawyers could challenge whether campaign finance laws would apply as a crime to make the case a felony, for instance.

    In a lengthy response on his Truth Social account Thursday night, Trump said in part, “I did absolutely nothing wrong, I never had an affair with Stormy Daniels.”

    Trump is meeting with his legal team this weekend to consider his options and possibly make a decision on whether to appear before the grand jury, a person familiar with the matter told CNN.

    It’s not clear when Trump would need to make a decision on the grand jury invitation extended by Bragg’s office, nor whether there’s a firm deadline.

    An attorney for Trump said Friday that any prosecution related to hush money payments to an adult film star would be “completely unprecedented” and accused the Manhattan district attorney of targeting the former president for “political reasons and personal animus.”

    Trump attorney Joe Tacopina said in a statement shared with CNN that the campaign finance laws in this case, which is related to seven-year-old allegations, are “murky” and that the underlying legal theories of a possible case are “untested.”

    “This DA and the former DA have been scouring every aspect of President Trump’s personal life and business affairs for years in search of a crime and needs to stop. This is simply not what our justice system is about,” Tacopina said.

    Cohen, Trump’s onetime fixer, played a central role in the hush money episode and is involved in the investigation.

    He has admitted to paying $130,000 to Daniels to stop her from going public about the alleged affair with Trump just before the 2016 election. He also helped arrange a $150,000 payment from the publisher of the National Enquirer to Karen McDougal to kill her story claiming a 10-month affair with Trump. Trump also denies an affair with McDougal.

    Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison after pleading guilty to eight counts, including two counts of campaign-finance violations for orchestrating or making payments during the 2016 campaign.

    Cohen met with the Manhattan district attorney’s office on Friday and is set to appear Monday as well.

    Speaking to reporters has he walked into court Friday, Cohen said he has not yet testified in front of a grand jury.

    “I have to applaud District Attorney Bragg for giving Donald the opportunity to come in and to tell his story,” he said. “Now knowing Donald as well as I do, understand that, he doesn’t tell the truth. It’s one thing to turn around and to lie on your ‘Untruth Social’ and it’s another thing to turn around and to lie before a grand jury. So I don’t suspect that he’s going to be coming.”

    For her part, Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, said in 2021 that she had not yet testified in the probe but that she would “love nothing more than” to be interviewed by prosecutors investigating the Trump Organization.

    Daniels said at the time that her attorney has been in contact with Manhattan and New York state investigators and that she has had meetings with them about other issues. She said if she were asked to talk to investigators or a grand jury she would “tell them everything I know.”

    She wrote a tell-all book in 2018 that described the alleged affair in graphic detail, with her then-attorney saying that the book was intended to prove her story about having sex with Trump is true.

    Bragg’s investigation has continued to move forward in recent months as it neared this latest development.

    Trump’s lawyer recently met with the district attorney’s office, one source told CNN. His legal team has been concerned with Bragg’s intentions because of recently ramped up activity at the grand jury, according to another source familiar with the matter.

    Former Trump White House aides Hope Hicks and Kellyanne Conway recently appeared before the grand jury. And CNN reported last month that Jeffrey McConney, the controller of the Trump Organization, would appear in front of the grand jury, according to people familiar with matter.

    McConney is one of the highest-ranking financial officers at the Trump Organization and has responsibility for its books and records.

    Trump’s attorneys would likely be offered a chance to persuade the DA’s team that an indictment is not warranted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michael Cohen meets with NY prosecutors looking into Trump Org. and Stormy Daniels payments | CNN Politics

    Michael Cohen meets with NY prosecutors looking into Trump Org. and Stormy Daniels payments | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]


    New York
    CNN
     — 

    Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney to ex-President Donald Trump, met Tuesday with the Manhattan district attorney’s office, the clearest sign that prosecutors are zeroing in on the Trump Organization’s involvement in hush-money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

    As he arrived at the building Cohen said he was complying with a request to meet with prosecutors.

    “Called. Asked to come in. That’s what we’re doing,” he said.

    About 90 minutes later, Cohen left with his attorney, Lanny Davis, and said, “The meeting went very well.” He added that prosecutors asked him not to disclose the substance of what was discussed but, Cohen said, “It appears that I’ll probably be meeting with them again.”

    Davis said he believed prosecutors were “serious” about the investigation.

    Cohen previously met with Manhattan prosecutors 13 times over the course of their sweeping investigation into the Trump Org. Their meeting on Tuesday is the first in more than a year.

    The focus of the DA’s investigation has returned to the $130,000 payment made to Daniels to stop her from going public about an affair with Trump just before the 2016 election, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has denied the affair.

    The district attorney’s office has also reached out to Keith Davidson, who represented Daniels in the hush money deal, in recent weeks but he has not been scheduled for an interview, a person familiar with the matter said.

    Cohen was a key player in the hush-money scheme. He facilitated the payments and was reimbursed by the Trump Org. for advancing the money to Daniels. Cohen pleaded guilty to nine federal charges, including campaign finance violations, and was sentenced to three years in prison.

    Prosecutors are also looking into potential insurance fraud after new material came to light from the New York attorney general’s civil investigation into the accuracy of the Trump Organization’s financial statements, the people said.

    On Friday, the Trump Organization was sentenced to a $1.6 million fine after it was convicted last month of a running a decade-long tax fraud scheme.

    Bragg told CNN on Friday that the sentencing represented the closing of one chapter in the office’s investigation, but they are moving onto the next phase.

    “It’ll go as long as the facts and the law require,” Bragg said when asked how much longer the yearslong investigation will continue. “But as I said today, we ended a very important chapter. So, a good part of the year was focused on this very, very consequential chapter and now we move on to the next chapter.”

    Bragg inherited an investigation focused on the accuracy of the Trump Organization’s financial statements, but he did not authorize prosecutors to move forward to seek an indictment. At the time, he said when the investigation is over he would either publicly announce charges or that the probe had closed.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Organization ordered to pay $1.6 million fine for criminal tax fraud

    Trump Organization ordered to pay $1.6 million fine for criminal tax fraud

    [ad_1]

    Trump Organization guilty in tax fraud trial


    New York jury finds Trump Organization guilty on all counts in tax fraud case

    03:25

    Two Trump Organization companies were ordered to pay a $1.6 million fine at sentencing Friday, after a jury last month unanimously found them guilty of 17 counts related to tax fraud. The fine imposed by Judge Juan Merchan was the maximum penalty allowed in the case — double the amount of the taxes avoided.

    Executives at the two companies, called the Trump Corporation and Trump Payroll Corporation, were found to have illegally reduced payroll liability through a variety of schemes, including giving executives untaxed bonuses and high-end perks worth millions. 

    The company’s longtime former chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, was sentenced Tuesday to five months in New York City’s Rikers Island jail. Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in August and testified against the company as part of a deal with prosecutors. 

    Former President Donald Trump was not charged in the case, but Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has said Trump remains under investigation. 

    At the sentencing hearing Friday, Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass said the companies’ conduct “can only be described as egregious.” And he asserted, “A number of these actions were implicitly sanctioned from the top down.”

    Defense attorney Susan Necheles reiterated that the companies will be appealing the conviction.”The D.A., as usual, or again, does not understand the tax law, and that was part of what was wrong in this case,” she said.

    Weisselberg’s three days of testimony included detailed descriptions of several methods used by the company and its executives to skate on taxes. He also said that Trump and two of his children played a role by signing checks in some of the schemes, though he denied that they authorized or conspired in the fraud. Steinglass said during the trial that the evidence and Weisselberg’s testimony showed Trump “explicitly sanctioning tax fraud.”

    Defense attorneys said Trump was unaware of the schemes playing out beneath him, while prosecutors said he signed off on them. 

    The Trump Organization’s lawyers said Trump and his company were “betrayed” by Weisselberg, saying repeatedly, “Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Steve Bannon facing same judge who presided over Trump Organization trial

    Steve Bannon facing same judge who presided over Trump Organization trial

    [ad_1]

    When Steve Bannon was indicted on fraud and money laundering charges in September, the former Trump adviser claimed he was the target of a politics-driven prosecutor.

    Bannon said the Manhattan district attorney “decided to pursue phony charges against me 60 days before the midterm election,” implying the criminal case against him was designed to sway the nation’s vote.

    Trump has made similar claims about Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg, publicly accusing him of bias for a tax fraud case against Trump’s company. But when lawyers for the Trump Organization signaled they might make a similar argument during the company’s recent trial, they were quickly shut down by the judge presiding over the case.

    “I will not allow you in any way to bring up a selective prosecution claim, or claim this is some sort of novel prosecution,” Judge Juan Merchan said on Sept. 12, limiting both sides in the Trump Organization trial to arguments focused on the law.

    That same judge is presiding over Bannon’s case, which is expected to go to trial in November 2023.

    Steve Bannon
    Former Trump White House senior adviser Stephen Bannon

    Getty Images


    Bannon was charged on Sept. 8 for his role in a group that raised millions promising to privately build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, but allegedly pocketed funds instead. Bannon had faced similar federal charges in 2020 but was pardoned by Trump during the final hours of his presidency. Presidential pardons do not apply to state charges, such as the ones filed by the Manhattan D.A.

    In the Trump Organization trial, two branches of the company were found guilty on Dec. 6 of a combined 17 counts related to criminal tax fraud. An attorney for the corporation, Susan Necheles, said the judge’s restriction against arguing political bias hampered the defense.

    She said Bannon is likely to face similar limitations.

    “These are political cases. They wouldn’t have been brought if they weren’t political cases, you know, and it’s like the elephant in the room,” Necheles said. “You’re not allowed to talk about it, but there’s a reason why this case was brought.”

    Necheles noted that during jury selection, many potential jurors — and some who were ultimately selected to decide the case — expressed strong opinions about Trump. 

    Just before opening statements on Oct. 31, Bragg praised Merchan, saying he “runs an efficient courtroom.”

    That was apparent during early hearings in both the Trump Organization and Bannon proceedings, when Merchan made rulings designed to limit the defenses’ ability to drag the cases out.

    In the Trump Organization case, during an at-times testy pretrial hearing on Sept. 12, Merchan told Necheles and other attorneys that he was determined to start the trial on time. 

    “One of the accusations is that the defense is trying to stall, you know, it’s starting to feel that way a little bit,” Merchan said. 

    In Bannon’s case, Merchan has already rejected efforts to extend the time before trial. 

    On Oct. 4, Bannon’s attorneys asked for a year to go through four terabytes of data and documents collected by prosecutors, before filing their first motions in the case. Merchan gave them four months. He laid out a schedule, including discovery — the process by which the two sides exchange information — that would have the case ready for trial in a year. 

    And in case Bannon’s side might want to draw out discovery, there’s a cautionary note from the Trump Organization case they might want to heed: In a recently unsealed decision from October 2021, Merchan held the company in contempt for failing to comply with prosecutors’ subpoenas.

    Bannon is scheduled to appear before Merchan on Jan. 12 for a hearing on discovery. Reached by phone, his attorney John Mitchell declined to discuss the hearing, saying he did not want to violate a Sept. 19 order by the judge, broadly restricting public disclosure of information related to discovery.

    “I really am not at liberty to discuss these things. We have some rather strong protective orders in place and I’m not entirely sure what I can say,” Mitchell said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Organization Found Guilty On All Counts Of Tax Fraud

    Trump Organization Found Guilty On All Counts Of Tax Fraud

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump’s real estate company has been found guilty on all 17 charges of tax fraud and other crimes related to a 15-year-long criminal scheme to defraud tax authorities. What do you think?

    “It’ll take more than that to tarnish the Trump name.”

    Ana Patterson, Classifieds Editor

    “There’s no way the Trump Organization can run for president now.”

    Micha Burkes, Unemployed

    “We can’t let Hunter Biden get away with this.”

    Louis Graves, Jig Dancer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Organization found guilty of tax fraud

    Trump Organization found guilty of tax fraud

    [ad_1]

    Trump Organization found guilty of tax fraud – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    As one investigation into former President Donald Trump expands in Washington with a wave of subpoenas, another involving the Trump Organization reached its conclusion in New York with a guilty verdict. Scott MacFarlane has the details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Heated arguments mark Trump Organization hearings in two New York courts

    Heated arguments mark Trump Organization hearings in two New York courts

    [ad_1]

    More than a dozen lawyers representing the Trump Organization in two separate cases gathered in lower Manhattan Tuesday morning, when a pair of proceedings were scheduled in courtrooms a block apart, in matters that might decide the future of the company.

    The two cases, a civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in September, and a criminal trial stemming from charges brought by the Manhattan district attorney in 2021, stem from parallel investigations conducted against the backdrop of Trump’s presidency and the public relations offensive he continued after his 2020 defeat.

    Trump has accused both offices of conducting a “political witch hunt” while his company has suffered a series of courtroom defeats — failing to stop the probes or limit investigators’ access to both the company’s and Trump’s financial records.In Manhattan Civil Supreme Court, the New York attorney general and lawyers for the company met Tuesday, five days after a judge assigned an independent monitor to keep tabs on the company. 

    In that case, the state claims the Trump Organization, former president Donald Trump and three of his children — Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka and Eric — engaged in a yearslong widespread fraud scheme revolving around property value manipulations. The New York attorney general is seeking $250 million, an end to the company’s operations in New York and sanctions on the four Trumps.

    Alina Habba, an attorney for Trump and the company, said at the hearing that the Trumps plan to attend the civil trial next year, “All of them.” She added that Trump himself might testify in his own defense.

    The hearing, a scheduling conference, became heated soon after it began, when Judge Arthur Engoron criticized a motion to dismiss filed Monday night by Trump and the company. Engoron said the arguments fell into three groups that mirrored those he had already rejected when company attorneys tried to scuttle the Attorney General’s investigation: “Standing, or lack thereof, what I call ‘the witch hunt argument,’ failure to plead a cause of action.”

    “I think it was Yogi Berra, unless it was Casey Stengel, who said it’s ‘deja vu all over again,’” Engoron said, referring to a famous line attributed to Berra, the New York Yankees Hall of Fame catcher.

    Habba seethed openly in court, saying Engoron “has a clear bias against our client.”

    “You’re asking why my arguments are different? They’re not.” Habba said. “They filed a complaint and we have to respond.”

    After the hearing, Habba walked a block north to Manhattan Criminal Court, where she sat in the audience watching lawyers for two Trump Organization companies that are on trial on more than a dozen counts related to criminal fraud and tax evasion. Prosecutors say executives at the company, which has denied all charges, devised a variety of schemes to receive untaxed benefits and bonuses worth hundreds of thousands per year. On Monday, prosecutors rested, and defense attorneys called their first witness, an accountant named Donald Bender who worked on his firm’s Trump accounts — both personal and corporate — for four decades.

    Company attorneys have sought to pin the blame on the company’s former chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, who in August entered a guilty plea in the case. They’ve argued Weisselberg and Bender, who received immunity in exchange for grand jury testimony, should have better protected the company.

    Weisselberg previously testified that he lived in an $8,200 per month corporate apartment overlooking the Hudson River without declaring the benefit, and that his son Barry paid $1,000 per month — far below market rate — for a luxury Central Park South apartment.’

    In court on Tuesday, Trump Organization attorney Susan Necheles paced back and forth while questioning Bender on his communications with Weisselberg about Barry’s apartment. Necheles asked if Weisselberg had sought advice on the arrangement.

    Bender said he had advised against it.

    “He asked me a question and I told him in my mind it didn’t work,” Bender said.

    Necheles shot back: “And you have no record of giving that advice?”

    During two sidebars Monday, Necheles and another Trump Organization attorney argued that Bender should be declared a hostile witness, claiming he wasn’t being forthcoming in his answers. Judge Juan Merchan denied those requests.

    Trump summarized his defense team’s stance on Bender’s firm, Mazars USA, in a post on his social media platform Truth Social.

    “The highly paid accounting firm should have routinely picked these things up – we relied on them. VERY UNFAIR!” Trump wrote on Nov. 18.

    That day, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a special counsel to oversee two ongoing federal criminal investigations related to Trump, probes into the removal of documents from the White House and the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot.

    As she walked into the courtroom Tuesday, a few minutes before her confrontation with Engoron, Habba was asked if Trump’s team was prepared to fend off the cavalcade of legal challenges.

    “I think we’re doing a really good job. If you look at our track record, we’ve been winning,” Habba replied. The judge later rejected the company’s request to delay trial in the New York civil case for at least 15 months, instead scheduling it for Oct. 2, 2023.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors rest in Trump Organization criminal trial

    Prosecutors rest in Trump Organization criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    Manhattan prosecutors called their last witness Monday in the Trump Organization’s criminal trial

    During three weeks of testimony, they portrayed a company for which many of the top executives not named Trump allegedly devised a series of schemes to avoid taxes on income and luxury benefits.

    Two Trump Organization companies and former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg were charged with more than a dozen counts related to fraud and tax evasion. No member of the Trump family has been charged in the case. Weisselberg previously entered a guilty plea in the case and agreed to testify for the prosecution. During more than three days of testimony, he described receiving annual bonuses in which he was called an independent contractor, and deducting the value of luxury benefits from his income. 

    Weisselberg said both practices were designed to lower his and the company’s tax burdens.

    Defense attorneys rejected that portrayal, saying Weisselberg deceived the company and betrayed the trust of the Trump family.

    Trump Legal Troubles
    Donald Bender, left, a former accountant for Donald Trump, arrives at Manhattan criminal court, Monday, Nov. 21, 2022, in New York. 

    Michael Sisak / AP


    “Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg,” said a defense attorney during opening statements. Another Trump executive called by prosecutors, controller Jeffrey McConney, said he relied on Weisselberg and an outside accountant, Donald Bender, for tax-related decisions.

    Prosecutors had previously indicated they might call Bender, a partner at the accounting firm Mazars USA who worked on the Trump account for four decades, but ultimately chose not to.

    Instead, Bender was the first witness called by defense attorneys Monday afternoon.

    Bender and his team prepared tax filings for the company, as well as members of the Trump and Weisselberg families for years, until Mazars abruptly ended the relationship with the Trumps in February.

    The firm cited a separate civil investigation by the New York attorney general in recanting a decade’s worth of financial statements prepared for the company and Donald Trump, saying they “should no longer be relied upon.”

    The Trump Organization said in a statement to CBS News at the time that it was “disappointed that Mazars has chosen to part ways,” but former President Donald Trump has since taken a more accusatory stance. 

    “The highly paid accounting firm should have routinely picked these things up – we relied on them. VERY UNFAIR!” Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social on Nov. 18.

    Bender said at the start of his appearance Monday that he received immunity for testimony he gave to a New York State grand jury investigating the Trump Organization. 

    The company denies all charges. Weisselberg is expected to be sentenced to five months in jail, according to the terms of his plea agreement, which were outlined in court. His next hearing is Nov. 28.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trumps had role in fraud scheme, Allen Weisselberg testifies at company’s trial

    Trumps had role in fraud scheme, Allen Weisselberg testifies at company’s trial

    [ad_1]

    Former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg testified in court Thursday, describing how Donald Trump and two of his children allegedly participated in a scheme to defraud tax authorities.

    Weisselberg said Donald Trump, or at times Eric Trump or Donald Trump Jr., signed checks to pay up to $100,000 for private school tuition for Weisselberg’s grandchildren. Weisselberg said he then instructed the company’s controller to deduct the $100,000 from his salary, allowing him to report a smaller income. Copies of some of the checks signed by the Trumps have been shown in court. 

    Weisselberg said the first time Trump signed a tuition check, Weisselberg told him, “Don’t forget, I’m going to pay you back for this.” The payback, he said, was the salary reduction.

    Two Trump Organization entities and Weisselberg are accused of more than a dozen counts of fraud and tax evasion. Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in August, admitting to charges filed by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office accusing him of receiving more than $1.7 million in untaxed compensation.

    Weisselberg, who is still on the Trump Organization’s payroll, has over the first two days of testimony described a litany of benefits he and several other executives received for which he said their salaries were similarly reduced to avoid paying taxes.

    He said for himself and several other executives, the salary reductions were then mitigated by hefty bonus checks paid to the executives as if they were independent contractors for Trump Organization entities.

    “Donald Trump always wanted to sign the bonus checks” before he became president in 2017, Weisselberg said.

    That practice ceased during the next two years after an internal review led to changes at the company, he said.

    “We were going through a company-wide cleanup process, making sure that since Mr. Trump was now president, everything was being done properly,” Weisselberg said.

    Courtroom s
    Former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg testifies at the company’s trial on fraud charges in New York.

    Jane Rosenberg


    Weisselberg said the funds delivered as independent contractor payments were used to set up Keogh retirement plans, tax-deferred pension accounts designed for people who are self-employed.

    Defense attorneys for the Trump Organization have said the company did nothing wrong, and laid the scheme squarely at Weisselberg’s feet, saying he hid the salary reductions and independent contractor payments from the Trumps. 

    Trump Organization attorney Alan Futerfas asked Weisselberg Thursday, “What human being did you scheme with?”

    Weisselberg replied, “Jeff McConney,” referring to the company’s controller, who previously testified during the trial. McConney was granted immunity in exchange for grand jury testimony in the case, and blamed Weisselberg for the scheme.

    Futerfas continued with questions seeking to differentiate the Trumps from the executives who worked beneath them.

    “Did you conspire with any member of the Trump family?” Futerfas asked.

    “No,” Weisselberg replied.

    “Did you scheme with Jeff McConney?” Futerfas asked.

    “Yes,” Weisselberg replied.

    “Did you scheme with any member of the Trump family?” Futerfas asked.

    “No,” Weisselberg replied.

    Later, Futerfas asked, “Aside from family members, you were among the most trusted people they knew. Is that correct?”

    “Correct,” Weisselberg replied.

    Soon after, Futerfas asked, “Are you embarrassed about what you did?”

    Choking up, Weisselberg replied, “More than you can imagine.”

    Earlier Thursday, Weisselberg said under questioning by a prosecutor that other executives at the company were active participants in, and beneficiaries of, similar salary and bonus arrangements.

    Weisselberg described arranging for his son Barry’s family to live in a newly-renovated apartment on New York’s tony Central Park South. He said the location was convenient for Barry Weisselberg’s job as manager of an ice rink and carousel run by the Trump Organization in Central Park. Allen Weisselberg said his son paid $500 out of pocket and $500 from his salary per month to rent the apartment, which he described as a “below market” rate.

    At the time, Allen Weisselberg and his wife lived in an $8,200 per month company-owned apartment under a lease agreement signed by Donald Trump himself.

    Allen Weisselberg said he provided his son’s tax paperwork for preparation to the outside accountant who was in charge of the entire Trump Organization’s annual tax account. Allen Weisselberg said his son’s reported salary at the time “was probably lower than it should have been.”

    Peter Stambleck, an attorney for Barry Weisselberg, declined to comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Trump Org. CFO testifies he didn’t pay taxes on $1.76 million in personal expenses | CNN Politics

    Former Trump Org. CFO testifies he didn’t pay taxes on $1.76 million in personal expenses | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg testified Tuesday that he knew he should have paid taxes on hundreds of thousands of dollars in benefits he received annually, including a company-paid Manhattan apartment that he said former President Donald Trump suggested he move into.

    Weisselberg testified for about 90 minutes during the criminal trial of the Trump Organization in Manhattan, calmly walking the jury through the growth of the company from 50 employees when he started there in 1986 into an umbrella organization that includes 500 entities.

    Under questioning by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger, Weisselberg answered “yes” as the prosecutor went through each of personal expenses he received from the Trump Org. – and that the company didn’t pay taxes on them from 2005 through 2017.

    One of those untaxed benefits Weisselberg received was a more than $7,000 per month 1200 square foot luxury apartment overlooking the Hudson River in Manhattan.

    The former CFO said Trump offered him the apartment in 2005 to cut his daily commute to Long Island where he lived at the time. Weisselberg sat down with Trump, who Weisselberg said asked him if he would consider moving into the city. Trump said, according to Weisselberg, it would “help you, help the company” and Weisselberg could work longer hours.

    Weisselberg said after speaking with his wife, they agreed to move in and Trump authorized the expense.

    He also said he expensed his utilities, phone, car leases and garage saying it was “part and parcel” with the apartment.

    Either Weisselberg or Trump would sign the rent checks for his apartment. In total, he received as much as $200,000 in untaxed compensation in a year from all those benefits, according to his testimony.

    Weisselberg testified had he asked for a raise the company would have had to pay him double – as much as $400,000, to cover the taxes.

    In all, Weisselberg said he didn’t pay taxes on approximately $1.76 million in personal expenses from 2005 through 2017.

    He acknowledged that he knowingly unreported his income on his tax forms to get the fringe benefits tax free, and he hid that information from the accountants at Mazars, he said, because he thought they would refuse to sign his tax returns had they known about it.

    Trump Organization Controller Jeff McConney knew the practice was illegal when he generated the false W-2 and 1099 tax forms on Weisselberg’s behalf, according to Weisselberg.

    McConney previously claimed on the stand that he didn’t think all of the expenses were handled improperly until an internal review years later.

    Weisselberg on Tuesday also acknowledged that he was stripped of the chief financial officer title after he was arrested and charged with 15 counts of tax fraud and grand larceny. Weisselberg, whose voice dropped to a whisper when discussing his crimes, said he continued to do most of the same work after he was indicted. That changed in October, several months after he pleaded guilty and agreed to testify, when Weisselberg said he began working from home and his contact with Eric Trump, who runs the company on a day-to-day basis, “stopped.”

    Weisselberg said he is on paid leave and still expects to receive a $500,000 bonus in January in addition to his $640,000 salary.

    The day Weisselberg finalized a plea deal with prosecutors in August, his son threw a birthday party for him at Trump Tower. Weisselberg attempted to downplay it, saying he regretted it, and that “it was a small cake.”

    Weisselberg is expected to continue on the stand Thursday morning.

    Two Trump Organization entities are charged with nine counts of tax fraud, grand larceny and falsifying business records in what prosecutors allege was a 15-year scheme to defraud tax authorities by failing to report and pay taxes on compensation provided to employees. The former president is not a defendant in the case and is not expected to be implicated in any wrongdoing.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge agrees to appoint monitor for Trump Organization assets, restricts financial transfers without approval

    Judge agrees to appoint monitor for Trump Organization assets, restricts financial transfers without approval

    [ad_1]

    A state judge Thursday granted a request by the New York attorney general for an order prohibiting the Trump Organization from transferring any substantial assets, unless pre-approved by the court, and appointing an independent monitor to oversee communications regarding financial matters while a state lawsuit against the company moves forward.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office was seeking a preliminary injunction, alleging in a court filing that the company “appears to be taking steps to restructure its business to avoid” liability and payment of any damages in a massive lawsuit filed by her office in September. The suit alleges a widespread effort to manipulate property valuations by former President Donald Trump and his eponymous company. It seeks $250 million and an end to the company’s operations in the state.

    The day the lawsuit was filed, the company incorporated a new entity with the state, called Trump Organization II LLC. The entity was registered days before in Delaware. James’ office claimed that was possible proof the company planned to move its assets.


    How is New York attorney general’s lawsuit against Trump different from investigations?

    03:02

    Trump filed a lawsuit against James and her office Wednesday night in a Florida state court. The suit claims James, a Democrat, is pursuing Trump, a Republican, for political gain, and claims her office  lacks authority to demand documents related to Trump’s revocable trust, through which he owns the company. He claims James’ demand for trust documents violates his “right to privacy and property” and his rights in the trust. 

    A similar federal suit filed in the Northern District of New York in December 2021 was dismissed in May. The judge in the case said there was little proof James’ office was motivated by political animus, and “no evidence” subpoenas in the attorney general’s investigation had “been conducted in such a way as to constitute harassment.”

    A spokesperson for the New York attorney general called Trump’s new lawsuit “baseless.”

    The New York attorney general’s lawsuit is seeking $250 million and punishments including the revocation of the Trump Organization’s business certificate, effectively barring it from doing business in New York. It also seeks to permanently prohibit Trump and three of his children, Ivanka, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., from serving as officer or director of any business in New York, including their family’s company.

    Attorneys for Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump did not immediately reply to a request for comment, nor did attorneys for Trump and the company.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s company conducted internal tax review after he became president, executive says

    Trump’s company conducted internal tax review after he became president, executive says

    [ad_1]

    A longtime Trump attorney oversaw an internal investigation of the Trump Organization’s tax practices in 2017 and 2018, leading the company “to do some things differently,” an executive testified Tuesday.

    The revelation came amid the second day of sworn testimony by Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney, who was the first witness called by the government in the company’s New York criminal fraud trial.

    McConney said the investigation was led by Sheri Dillon, an attorney most known for a January 2017 press conference held by then-President-elect Donald Trump in which she and Trump displayed stacks of papers they said were related to his companies’ taxes.

    Donald Trump holds a news conference in 2017
    Piles of papers and files are displayed as President-elect Donald Trump gives a press conference on January 11, 2017 in New York. 

    DON EMMERT/AFP/Getty Images


    The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in 2021 charged former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg and the company, through two corporate entities — the Trump Corporation and Trump Payroll Corporation — with more than a dozen criminal counts related to allegations that certain executives were provided with untaxed “indirect employee compensation.” Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in the case in August. The company maintains its innocence of all charges. 

    Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Susan Hoffinger said during her opening statements Monday that company executives had been evading taxes for years, “but the evidence will show that when Donald Trump was elected president at the end of 2016, these companies finally had to clean up these fraudulent tax practices.”

    McConney said Tuesday that Dillon — a tax attorney at the law firm Morgan Lewis who worked for more than a decade on matters related to the Trump Organization — was brought in after Trump left the company in 2017 to assume the presidency.

    “Ms. Dillon conducted an investigation of the tax practices of the Trump Organization entities,” McConney said.  

    He said the investigation resulted in a memo, completed in either late 2017 or early 2018.

    “I was instructed to do some things differently,” McConney said. 

    Dillon did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

    As McConney began to describe the memo, attorneys for the Trump Organization objected, citing attorney-client privilege, and the judge called a sidebar. Discussion of the memo was then limited.

    Prosecutors claim company executives used a variety of methods to “hide” luxury benefits from tax authorities dating back to at least 2005.

    Attorneys for the company said Monday in their opening statements that it was Weisselberg alone who was hiding that he wasn’t paying taxes on benefits.

    Weisselberg is expected to be called as a witness during the trial. Weisselberg entered a guilty plea in the case in August, and agreed to testify as part of his plea arrangement. He will be sentenced after the trial, which is expected to last up to six weeks.

    McConney testified Monday that his personal attorney is paid for by the Trump Organization, and that he met with the company’s criminal defense attorneys on Sunday, among other occasions. 

    A request by prosecutors to treat him as a hostile witness was rejected by Judge Juan Merchan.

    [ad_2]

    Source link