ReportWire

Tag: the sports section

  • The Man Who Made Sports Uniforms As Exciting As the Games

    The Man Who Made Sports Uniforms As Exciting As the Games

    [ad_1]

    Paul Lukas with Kevin Garnett, sort of.
    Photo: Courtesy of Paul Lukas

    Two years ago, the Mets unveiled a ten-foot-tall statue of Tom Seaver near the main entrance of Citi Field. It depicted the team icon in a classic Seaver pose: mid-pitch, with his back knee so low to the ground it’s about to scrape the dirt. The statue was a hit with fans, who had been clamoring for a permanent tribute to the greatest of Mets pitchers, and the ceremony was a rare feel-good moment for the benighted franchise and its newish owner.

    But not everyone was entirely satisfied. A few weeks later, acting on a reader tip, journalist Paul Lukas published a story pointing out a tiny flaw on the statue: The “4” on Bronze Tom Seaver’s jersey did not include a stub extending off the right side of the numeral, as it does in Block Standard, the only font the Mets have ever used on their pinstriped home uniform. The mistake, as minute as it was, played into the narrative of Mets haplessness, and the story got some traction in the mainstream press. It culminated with Chris Christie opining that Lukas should “get a life” during an appearance on WFAN.

    For anyone not familiar with Lukas and his life’s work, this might have seemed like an exercise in extreme nitpickery. But for readers of his Uni Watch column, which debuted in 1999 and will publish its final edition on Sunday, it was a valedictory achievement. Among this obsessive crowd, the story of a missing stub on a statue’s numeral qualified as a major scoop.

    In launching his column, Lukas all but invented a new beat in sports journalism, one focused entirely on player uniforms, logos, and other related bits of design — what he calls “athletics aesthetics.” His work through the years has taken many forms: critical assessments of new uniform sets, essays on trends, field trips to uni-notable places, and interviews with equipment managers, Nike designers, and the occasional sports-uniform-adjacent figure. He has launched investigations into which Yankee wore the most pinstripes on his jersey or why Bill Buckner was wearing the wristband of a different cursed franchise when he made his infamous error in the 1986 World Series. Did you know that late Orioles manager Earl Weaver had a pocket for his cigarettes sewn into his jersey? Uni Watch readers do.

    “People who discovered Uni Watch, they tended to engage with it a lot, very emphatically,” says Lukas. “I heard over and over again people saying, ‘I’m so glad I encountered your work. I thought I was the only one.’ That’s a nice and gratifying thing to hear, that people feel that sense of community. They think they’re the only weirdo out there, but it turns out there’s a whole bunch of weirdos.”

    Before he began the column, Lukas would often find himself commenting on little details of the uniforms he saw on TV, like teammates with sleeves of different lengths — hardly the bread and butter of televised sports coverage. His girlfriend at the time suggested he could use an outlet for these thoughts. Lukas had written extensively on consumer culture in a zine called Beer Frame and other publications (including New York), and he’d also done some writing for design magazines. He liked the idea of writing about uniforms, but he didn’t want to create a design column about sports; rather, he wanted to write a sports column about design.

    Lukas sold the Village Voice on his idea, and his first column ran on May 26, 1999, with a look at that season’s uniform changes in Major League Baseball. When the Voice shut down its quirky sports section in 2003, Uni Watch moved briefly to Slate before finding a home at ESPN in 2004, where it grew to prominence as part of the off-kilter “Page 2” section, which made Bill Simmons a star and published Hunter S. Thompson in his final years. In 2006, Lukas founded his own website to supplement his ESPN columns; he’d take his writing there full-time after being laid off in 2019 by both ESPN and Sports Illustrated. In recent years, his uniform-writing empire grew to include a subscription newsletter.

    The more Lukas wrote, the clearer it became that there was an audience for the rather niche content he was putting out. Sports fans could always read about how their teams played, but the ones who also cared about how they looked had nowhere to go until Uni Watch came along.

    Jerry Seinfeld famously joked that sports fans are ultimately just rooting for laundry. He meant it as commentary on how athletes are perpetually switching teams, but a lot of people genuinely do care about the laundry itself. A uniform can be a through-line bridging generations of players. It can set the tone for a franchise, whether it’s looking to convey tradition, or fun, or minimalistic cool. (A bad design, meanwhile, can be a point of shame for a team’s supporters.) And to design-minded sports fans, uniforms exist at the nexus of their interests.

    “I just thought it was stunning that there was actually somebody writing about this with some thought,” says Todd Radom, a designer and author who created the logos for teams like the Washington Nationals and Los Angeles Angels, as well as for special events like Super Bowl XXXVIII. “He was the first to give voice to this interest, the first to give voice to this community. I think he provided the template for a lot of other people who followed.”

    Over the years, readers would grow to know Lukas’s likes (stirrups, chain-stitching) and dislikes (uniform ads, the color purple). And the comments section of his website would serve as a forum for like-minded obsessives who grew up doodling logos in their notebooks during class and never stopped paying attention to the minutiae of sports design. In Uni Watch parlance, these are the people who “Get It.” Through the years, Lukas has issued more than 3,400 membership cards to readers who’ve shelled out a few bucks for a card designed like their favorite’s team’s jersey. (Full disclosure: I’m one of them.)

    With Lukas having proved there’s a market for such commentary, others joined him on the beat. SportsLogos.net, formerly a repository of, well, sports logos, has added daily news stories. Icethetics.com provides obsessive coverage of hockey logos and uniforms. And mainstream writers routinely report on uniform news in a sports world chock full of logo changes, alternate jerseys, and flashy reveals. Indeed, Lukas is walking away from the beat during perhaps the most mainstream uniform story of his career: the disastrous rollout of Nike’s new baseball uniforms, with their tiny lettering and their sweaty, mismatched fabrics.

    “Seeing a website like ESPN covering regular uniform news was a pretty big deal,” says Chris Creamer, the founder of SportsLogos.net, who briefly co-hosted a podcast with Lukas called Unified. “You go back and you read old newspaper articles, and a team would release a new uniform and the headline would be, ‘New York Jets Announce Season Ticket Prices, Also Show Off New Uniform.’ It was buried in the story.”

    Lukas, 60, isn’t retiring from writing altogether. He still plans to cover food, travel, and minutiae-centric topics on Substack, and he’ll also maintain ownership of the Uni Watch website, which will now be managed by Phil Hecken, the current deputy editor.

    Before he shifts into his post-uniform life, the Brooklyn-based Lukas has been traveling the country to celebrate his run with readers, with parties in Baltimore, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and New Orleans, all leading up to a bash on Sunday at New York’s Bowery Electric. The hockey-themed band the Zambonis will play that farewell event — in custom Uni Watch jerseys, of course.

    “What I always say about Uni Watch is that not everybody cares about this stuff, but the people who do care about it really fucking care about it,” says Lukas. “And so I am blessed. I’m lucky to have such an engaged and passionate audience.”

    [ad_2]

    Joe DeLessio

    Source link

  • ‘Unfortunately, They Made Us Fall in Love’

    ‘Unfortunately, They Made Us Fall in Love’

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Julia Nikhinson/AP

    It was always going to be an uphill battle. After a Game 6 in which the Knicks lost 116-103 to the Pacers and the pesky heartbeat of the team, Josh Hart, suffered an abdominal injury, the Knicks had their work cut out for them. Before tipoff, ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski dropped a bomb that gave fans more reason to hope: Hart and OG Anunoby, who’d been out since Game 2, were both going to play. It seemed like it could really happen this time.

    Robert Quinn, a newish fan, says he had been a little nervous, but says, “knowing my Knicks? We got this.” But it’s looking grim: Pacers 70, Knicks 55 at the half. Victor Ng, an on-and-off follower of the team since the Patrick Ewing glory days of 1994, had bet on a very specific outcome: Knicks by four points. Now he’s saying, “I think FanDuel took my money.” But he turns philosophical all the same: “Being a fan is being on a rollercoaster. This season, they’re up and down but at least it’s ending up on a high note. So I can’t complain.” Then he adds, “if they can tie, they can win. If they’re not pulling within 8, they’re not coming back.”

    Bella, age 10, usually leans toward hockey, but she’d been pulled toward basketball by the playoff run. “They’re New York, I root for New York, I’m with New York.” She has a message: “to the Knicks, no matter what happens today, you’re an amazing team and we’re supporting you all the way.”

    At Mustang Harry’s, a block south of the Garden, fans are straining to see the TVs through the windows. Rich Templeton, a lifelong fan, has already been to two more bars nearby, Stout and The Triple Crown, and he says this patch of sidewalk was the best vantage point he’s found. “They’re coming back,” he says. “Donte [DiVincenzo] is gonna lead them back. Donte and [Jalen] Brunson. Donte’s got a little spunk to him and he can shoot the 3 ball.” How does he see the night going if the Knicks pull out a comeback victory? “It’s not Philadelphia, so I don’t expect things to be burned or anything, but I think it’ll be a nice lively atmosphere.”

    Tom, an 18-year-old who flew in from Naples, Florida, disagrees: “If they win I think the city’s gonna burn the fuck down. Empire State Building’s going down, and Penn Station is burning to the ground. Simple as that.” He and his two friends have courtside seats, he says, arriving at halftime. They’re optimistic for a comeback but also realists. “It’s always a letdown, as Knicks fans. That’s what makes us loyal fans.”

    Back by the entrance to the Garden, a pair of vendors are hawking NEW YORK VS. EVERYBODY and JALEN MVP BRUNSON shirts. Another seller says of his prices, “If we win, this goes up.”

    Halfway through the fourth quarter, hope is fading. Fans start trickling out of the Garden onto the steps where Michael and his friend Kevin are standing. Michael says he’s walked past the arena on his commute every day for the past ten years. When we ask him whether he and Kevin are Knicks fans, Michael says, “We wish we weren’t after this game.” Kevin adds, “we overcame so much this season … just for it to end it like this.”

    Draco, a content creator and 76ers fan who watched as the Knicks eliminated his team two weeks ago, came up from Philly this morning “just to watch them lose.” He walks over to us, livestreaming from his phone, and also starts interviewing Michael and Kevin. “Y’all have so little faith in your team right now. There’s still six minutes left in the game. And y’all really leaving right now, what’s going on?” But they’re still proud. Michael says, “We grind, we grit, we work hard and I feel like at the end of the day like that’s what matters. We support them. We love them as players and as people you know, we protect them, we take care of our own.”

    Jeff Knight, a 38-year-old who’s been a fan since he was 6, tells me he’d headed for the exit after news spread inside the arena that Brunson had fractured his hand. Another fan, Adam Silvers, had been sitting in section 201, where the injury news spread as people got updates on their phones. When he got word, Silvers thought, “well, that’s the end of that.” He’d spent more than $800 on his tickets.

    Rami Evgi, a season-ticket holder for 30 years, says he knew the Knicks were going to lose from the beginning of the game. He left early because he couldn’t bear to see the ugly end. He’d flipped every other playoff ticket he had for the money, but he’d saved game 7 for himself. Even with the loss, he says, it was still the best Knicks season since 1999, when the Knicks lost to the San Antonio Spurs in the finals. This season, he says, was sweet because it was a surprise, “I didn’t even know if they would make the playoffs. If everybody was healthy, nobody could have stopped us.”

    Amber, a brand-new fan at 26, had seen them win in Philadelphia. She too is down, but she’s already relishing the memory: “They’ve done so well, honestly. A lot of the players got injured, but with the few players they have left, they did amazing. We’re sad, but honestly they did a good job.”

    Pat, 35, and Tracy, 36, are New Yorkers who paid $12,000 each for their center-court season tickets. But Tracy is, like her dad, a Celtics fan. “She is happily married to me, I believe,” Pat reassures us, and possibly himself. “She roots for the Knicks unless it’s against the Celtics.” Ever since Julius Randle got hurt in January, “it was always like, agh, the season’s probably not going to be great. But then everyone kept trying their guts out. And unfortunately, they made us fall in love. And then you know, just sucks to see someone try so fucking hard…”

    One of the first Pacers fans to leave the arena, when his team was up 17 with three minutes to go, is a lone guy in a golden-yellow team hoodie. A bunch of random Knicks fans immediately circle him, yelling “get the fuck out of here you bitch-ass” and “fuck the Pacers.” (It was more aggro posturing than actual threat.) The Pacers fan doesn’t seem to mind the taunting — his team was through, after all. A family of six dressed in Pacers jerseys, with three young children plus an infant in Mom’s arms, says they feel “amazing,” barely aware that Knicks fans are screaming at them to go home. Joe and Jack Judson, also Pacers fans, aren’t fazed by being outnumbered. Joe says, “that’s the thing about New York fans, they’re passionate.” The two spent $10,000 per ticket and Joe estimates that the trip cost about $27,000 altogether. Jack, his son, says it’s the best game he’s ever been to. He’s a rising senior at Purdue University in Indiana, and says his buddies back home are “electric.” His phone has been blowing up.

    After the final buzzer — Pacers 130, Knicks 109 — a swarm of mostly young men gather at the top of the escalators to Penn Station at 33rd street. United in their loss, they start chanting “Fuck Trae Young,” a player who is not on the Indiana Pacers nor is even in the playoffs. The animosity is still fresh from when Young’s Atlanta Hawks beat the Knicks in the first round in 2021.

    Silvers is optimistic: “This is probably year one for this core. They probably got three or four years in them. They got a lot of draft picks and a lot of capital. So they can go out and get a pretty big name. And Randle will be healthy and he gives the Knicks 25 and 10 easily every night.” Knight thinks the Knicks should part ways with Randle in the offseason, “based on how the Knicks played without him. Brunson took his game to a different level once Randle was out.” Silvers thinks “maybe they get someone like a Kevin Durant if he thinks MSG is cool enough now.”  Evgi thinks they need “another good guy, not Kevin Durant or Devin Booker, but a surprise, like Hartenstein. Just a good player.”

    Cops are patrolling the area, dispersing the crowds and drawing them down from lampposts. A fan jokes to his friend, “Knicks in 8,” suggesting that this was still their year. The crowd shifts to “fuck Tyrese,” the Pacers star, then “fuck Embiid,” the 76ers star. Anything is worthy of comment — including the entire sport of hockey, as they shift over to yelling “let’s go Rangers.” An altercation with a Knicks fan prompts an officer to shove him back, and several other cops step in to push the crowd away and firmly suggest that they all go home. The last chant before the police disperse them is “fuck the Celtics.” The city does not burn. The price of the T-shirts drops from $20 to $10.

    [ad_2]

    Liz Boyd,Britina Cheng

    Source link

  • This Is Where Our Game Began

    This Is Where Our Game Began

    [ad_1]

    Opening day, April 10, 1915, at Washington Park, on Third Avenue between 1st and 3rd Streets in Park Slope, Brooklyn. The Brooklyn Tip-Tops (seen in white uniforms) won but finished the season in seventh place out of eight teams.
    Photo: Library of Congress, Bain Collection

    It was always a city game, baseball.

    For all the efforts to slap a pastoral gloss on the sport, for all the attempts to make it about little boys playing in a cow pasture, only someone unfamiliar with the isolation of American farm life could truly believe that baseball came of age in the country.

    What we think of as baseball today is really an urban game.  More precisely, it is “the New York game.”  That’s what modern baseball was first called, and where it was first played.  New York is where its rules were perfected, and where we first kept score.  New York was where the curveball was devised, and the bunt, and the stolen base, and where the home run came into its own.  New York was where admission was first charged to see a game, and where the very first all-star game was played, and the first “world championship.”

    It was in New York, too, where the game’s color line was finally broken, and the reserve clause was made law, and where a players’ league was conceived, and died, and where the first, modern free agent was signed. It was here that the sport’s — or any sport’s — first true superstar emerged, and where the first true baseball stadiums were built. Where sportswriting came into its own, where the first great radio broadcasters plied their trade, and where the first game was televised. It was in New York that the only perfect game in World Series history was pitched, where an expansion team won a World Series for the first time, where 14 World Series were played exclusively within the city limits—and where the World Series was fixed by gamblers.

    Baseball is a game that grew up inextricably linked to the pace, and the customs, and the demands of New York.  It was shaped by the challenges and the possibilities the city had to offer, by its inventiveness and its ambitions, its grandiosity and its corruption.  For the last two centuries, the game’s trajectory has followed the city’s many rises and declines, its booms and its busts, its follies and its tragedies.

    It is not the intention here to enter into the eternal debate over exactly when and where the very first contest involving a bat and a ball took place. Claimants range from Prague to Pittsfield, and just about every burg in between. As David Block notes in Baseball Before We Knew It, ancient hieroglyphics depict Egyptians with bats playing at something called seker-hemat, around 2500 B.C. Berbers in the 1930s were observed playing ta kurt om el mahag, or “the ball of the pilgrim’s mother” — a game one historian theorized was brought to North Africa in the fifth century A.D. by the Vandals, who were credited in turn with inventing the ancient, Northern European game of “longball.” Medieval Normans played grande théque, while their French cousins played la balle empoisonée, the Germans had schlagball, and the Finns played pesapällo.

    Countless other bat-and-ball games evolved under any number of different rules and different names in England. There was hand-in and hand-out, and wicket and cricket, and rounders. There was prisoner’s base, or just “base”; there was tip-cat and one-old-cat; there was feeder, and squares, and northern spell; there was stool-ball, and stobball or stow-ball, and trap ball, and tut-ball; and there was goal ball, barn ball, sting ball, soak ball, stick ball, and burn ball; and round-ball and town ball, and finally — baseball (or base-ball, or base ball).

    The whole welter of English and continental games followed the colonists over to America. On Christmas Day, 1621, Governor William Bradford of Plymouth Colony was enraged to find some of his fellow Pilgrims, “frolicking in ye street, at play openly; some at pitching ye barr, some at stoole ball and shuch-like sport.” At Valley Forge, George Washington was recorded as having taken part in a game of “wicket,” while Lewis and Clark tried to teach a form of “base” to the Nez Perce, and small boys wrote later of watching a grown Abe Lincoln join in their games of town ball: “… how long were his strides, and how his coat-tails stuck out behind, and how we tried to hit him with the ball, as he ran the bases. He entered into the spirit of play as completely as any of us, and we invariably hailed his coming with delight.”

    The first true superstar sports celebrity: Babe Ruth of the New York Yankees.
    Photo: Library of Congress

    The one thing that is clear is that Abner Doubleday had nothing to do with it.  This was widely acknowledged even at the time the myth was first propagated, by a Special Base Ball Commission, handpicked by Albert Spalding in 1905.  Spalding, one of the game’s earliest stars turned team-owner-and-sporting-goods-magnate, was eager to refute the thesis of his friend, Henry Cartwright, that baseball had evolved from the English girls’ game of rounders.  Certain that such antecedents would not serve for the pastime of a young, proud nation just emerging on the world stage, Spalding’s commission seized instead upon the weakest reed imaginable.  This was a letter sent by an aged Western crank named Abner Graves, who would murder his wife in a fit of senile paranoia a few years later.  Graves swore that he had seen Doubleday lay out the whole game one afternoon in 1839 along the banks of the Glimmerglass, in Cooperstown, New York, and that was good enough for the chairman of Spalding’s commission, A.G. Mills.

    Abner Doubleday was the Forrest Gump of the 19th century, a soldier, mystic, and bibliophile with an uncanny ability for being on hand when anything of interest was going on. The first shot of the Civil War, a Confederate cannon blast at Fort Sumter, “penetrated the masonry and burst very near my head,” he later recalled, and in turn he “aimed the first gun on our side in reply to the attack.” He would rise to the rank of major general, sustain two serious wounds, hold the Union line on the first day of Gettysburg, and take the train back to Pennsylvania with President Lincoln, when the president gave his Gettysburg Address. Doubleday read Sanskrit, corresponded with Ralph Waldo Emerson, commanded an all-Black regiment of troops, attended séances at the White House with Mary Todd Lincoln, obtained the first charter for San Francisco’s cable cars, and served as president of Madame Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society … but he did not invent baseball.

    Nobody really thought he did, even on Spalding’s commission. A.G. Mills had been friends with Doubleday for 20 years, including a period when Mills was president of the National League. A fellow Civil War officer, Mills had arranged Doubleday’s funeral and his burial at Arlington Cemetery. Yet for as long and as well as he knew him, Mills admitted, he never heard his friend so much as mention baseball. In a brief autobiographical sketch, Doubleday himself wrote that, “In my outdoor sports, I was addicted to” — drumroll, please — “topographical work …”

    Just why anyone took Graves’s claim seriously in the first place is something of a mystery. One of the game’s greatest historians, John Thorn, speculates that this may have come about thanks to feuding factions of Theosophists, who for a time included Spalding. If true, it’s hilarious. Theosophy was an early mix of new age religion, occultism, and spiritualism. It’s as if a group of feuding Scientologists hatched a plot to have L. Ron Hubbard replace Dr. Naismith as the inventor of basketball.

    John Montgomery Ward, who started the Players’ League to compete with the National and American Leagues in 1890. It didn’t last.
    Photo: Library of Congress

    Confronted by reporters years later, Mills fumfahed that his commission had only concluded “that the first baseball diamond was laid out in Cooperstown.”  This was also untrue, but Mills revealed another reason for his commission’s determined gullibility.  That is, the need to move the national game out of the clutches of the dirty, immigrant city:

    “I submit to you gentlemen, that if our search had been for a typical American village, a village that could best stand as a counterpart of all villages where baseball might have been originated and developed — Cooperstown would best fit the bill.”

    And so it would. Though of all the great stars, and the makers of the game that the charming National Baseball Hall of Fame would admit, they would not include … Abner Doubleday.

    By the 1950s, an alternative foundation myth had been set in place, one revolving around how, one fine day in 1846, the New York Knickerbockers Base Ball Club took the steam ferry over to the Elysian Fields, a pleasure park just across the Hudson from Manhattan in Hoboken, to play the mysterious “New York Base Ball Club” in the very first game of “real” baseball — and got plastered, 23-1. I never understood this one even when I first read about it as an 8-year-old boy. If the Knickerbockers invented the damned game, how did they manage to lose the first one so badly?

    The truth, of course, is that they weren’t the first.  The Knickerbockers were just one of at least six early baseball clubs that by 1846 had already existed for years in Manhattan and Brooklyn.  Their chief contribution, as Thorn puts it, was as “consolidators rather than innovators,” combining and formalizing rules that others were already playing by.  “The Knickerbocker Rules” became “the New York Game,” and by the Civil War it had pretty much wiped out every other form of bat-and-ball game in the country.

    Photo: Penguin Random House

    Baseball became “America’s game,” as Walt Whitman called it, with “the snap, go, fling of the American atmosphere …” For Mark Twain it was, “The very symbol, the outward and visible expression of the drive and push and rush and struggle of the raging tearing, booming 19th century.”

    But more than America’s game, baseball was New York’s game. It held its own in a town where the other leading spectator sports were rat-baiting, bare-knuckle boxing, and firefighting (The city’s volunteer fire companies used to brawl with each other for the honor of putting out the town’s incessant conflagrations.). The sport came of age in a city that often seemed hell-bent on its own destruction. A city where not just firefighters fought with each other, but rival police departments did, too, and on the steps of City Hall. Where commuter steamboats raced and exploded in the Hudson, and teamsters whipped and cursed each other as they raced their wagons in the streets. A city prone to riot and mayhem at the drop of a rumor, an island ringed by tanneries, slaughterhouses, knacker’s yards and rendering plants, bucket shops and block-and-fall joints.

    Baseball was played anywhere the space could be found, on empty lots and in the streets, on what had just yesterday had been garbage dumps, pig styes, mud flats, and even river bottoms. It was played not just by gentlemen in pleasure gardens, but by men of every background and description. By Black men and white, Hispanic and Irish — of all classes and professions. There were teams composed solely of shipbuilders, firefighters, actors, postal clerks, bank clerks, ferrymen, newspaper reporters and printers’ devils, government bureaucrats, and ministers. There were the Manhattans, a club made up of policemen; and the Phantoms, who were bartenders, and the Pocahontas Club, who were all milkmen. There were the Metropolitans, who were schoolteachers, and the Columbia club of Orange, New Jersey, who were hatters, and the Aesculapeans of Brooklyn, who consisted entirely of eye doctors.

    Almost from the start, too, the game drew gamblers and touts, ward heelers and con artists, adoring groupies, and loutish “bugs” or “kranks,” as the fans were then known. It was a tough game played in a tough town, and right away, many New Yorkers, especially money men and fixers, politicos and promoters, saw the main chance in it just as they did in everything else. They, too, would contribute much to making the game what it became, the first major team sport in the world.

    From The New York Game: Baseball and the Rise of a New City, by Kevin Baker. Reprinted by permission of Alfred A. Knopf, an imprint of the Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC. Copyright © 2024 by Kevin Baker.

    [ad_2]

    Kevin Baker

    Source link