ReportWire

Tag: the new york times

  • 3 Colorado restaurants make New York Times list of 50 favorites – The Cannabist

    3 Colorado restaurants make New York Times list of 50 favorites – The Cannabist

    [ad_1]

    The New York Times has released its annual list of the best restaurants in the United States, and this year, three Colorado spots took their places alongside foodie destinations in cities like Miami, New Orleans, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Nashville and, of course, New York.

    Related Articles

    Restaurants, Food and Drink |

    Read the rest of this story on TheKnow.DenverPost.com.

    [ad_2]

    The Cannabist Network

    Source link

  • The Difference Between “Vintage” And “Retro” Has Tons Of NYT Connections Players Stumped Today

    The Difference Between “Vintage” And “Retro” Has Tons Of NYT Connections Players Stumped Today

    [ad_1]

    Illustration: Kotaku / Vicky Leta

    Welcome to the weekend, puzzlers! There’s a rugged game of Connections waiting for you today. If you’re a foodie or a gamer, you’ll think you’ve got it all figured out, but then … Maybe not. Regardless, it’s a great wakeup call for your brain—much better than diving back into the wild debate about the pros and cons of the PS5 Pro. (Seven hundred bucks? That’s 12 years of NYT Games!)

    Anyway. Your daily sweet 16 words are back and ready for your best grouping efforts. The popular Connections brainbuster from The New York Times has four groups of words with a shared theme or commonality, but they’re shuffled into random order for you to figure out. Remember to take your time—many words have multiple meanings, so think twice before you click.

    Today’s words: LION, SWITCH, RETRO, BURGER, VINTAGE, SUB, PROM, SLIDER, SUPER, GRAPE, BUTTON, CALIFORNIA, REGION, KNOB, PRO, and WINERY

    [ad_2]

    Austin Williams

    Source link

  • How to turn your old iPhone into an AI phone (and skip the upgrade)

    How to turn your old iPhone into an AI phone (and skip the upgrade)

    [ad_1]

    The latest iPhones, unveiled by Apple at a marketing event Monday, look virtually identical to last year’s models. But Apple hopes that what’s underneath — new software that brings what it describes as artificial intelligence to the new phones — will persuade people to upgrade.

    Apple Intelligence, the company’s new suite of AI services, automates tasks including generating images, rewriting emails and summarizing web articles. Only the iPhone 16s unveiled Monday or last year’s iPhone 15 Pro can run the new software because older models are too slow to handle those tasks, according to the company. The faster iPhone 16 devices start at $800 and will arrive in stores later this month.

    But what if I told you there was another way to get the same perks?

    Long before Apple introduced Apple Intelligence at a software conference in June, many apps for automatically producing text and images had been widely available. Relying on a technology known as generative AI, which predicts what words and images belong together to write a catchy poem or generate a realistic-looking image of a cat on a windowsill, for instance, these types of services have been trendy for the last two years.

    Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    By downloading a handful of apps, iPhone owners can get similar benefits and hold on to their older devices longer. After I tested dozens of generative AI apps in the last year, here are my recommendations.

    Summarizing text

    One of Apple Intelligence’s most anticipated features is its ability to take large blocks of text and distill the main points into a few sentences. This capability could be useful for summarizing a lengthy web article or lecture notes.

    But there’s already a popular tool for summarizing web articles: Arc Search, a free browser developed by a startup. To test it, I loaded an 8,000-word feature from ProPublica about a chemist who blew the whistle on the manufacturer 3M. When I pinched the screen, the app generated a one-sentence overview of what the article was about, followed by three bullet points summing up the highlights. While the bullet points glossed over important details you would have gotten from reading the full article, I found the summary accurate.

    For summarizing notes, the free web app Humata AI has become popular among academic researchers and lawyers. By visiting Humata.ai on a web browser, you can upload a document such as a PDF, and from there, you can type requests in a window to ask a chatbot to summarize the most important points. In response, the chatbot will show a digital copy of the PDF and highlight relevant portions of the text.

    Writing tools

    Apple Intelligence also includes tools to rewrite text — to make an email sound more professional, for instance. Lots of free apps can handle this task proficiently.

    The best known include the ChatGPT chatbot from OpenAI, along with rivals like Gemini from Google and Bing AI from Microsoft — all apps that can be downloaded in the App Store. Just paste text into the app and ask the chatbot to rewrite it in a different tone by typing, for instance, “Make this email sound more personable for a client I’ve known for many years.”

    For help with writing, I prefer a lesser-known tool, Wordtune, from the startup AI21 Labs. Its interface, accessible on wordtune.com, is designed like a word processor for composing and editing text. You can type in a paragraph and click on buttons to expand, shorten or rewrite sentences to sound more casual or formal; the app will show a list of rewritten sentences to choose from.

    Image generation

    Another of Apple Intelligence’s hyped features is its ability to generate fun images, such as an emoji of yourself eating pizza, to send to friends.

    Many options for generating images exist, including a tool that most iPhone users are likely to already have: Meta AI, Meta’s free chatbot that is included inside Instagram, WhatsApp and its other apps. In the search bar at the top of Instagram, you can ask the chatbot to conjure images by typing “/imagine” followed by a description.

    I typed “/imagine me eating steak.” Meta AI then loaded a tool to take photos of my face from multiple angles. It produced an obviously fake rendering of me salivating over a large, rare steak inside a restaurant.

    Other similar tools for typing prompts to generate images include Adobe Firefly, found on firefly.adobe.com, and ChatGPT.

    Photo editing

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times News Service Syndicate

    Source link

  • Why Legos have been washing up on U.K. shores for decades

    Why Legos have been washing up on U.K. shores for decades

    [ad_1]

    Why Legos have been washing up on U.K. shores for decades – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Throughout history, there have been several notable spills — oil in the ocean, molasses in Boston, and the New York Times reminds us Tuesday of the legacy of the Great Lego Spill of 1997.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tech bosses preach patience as they spend and spend on AI – The Cannabist

    Tech bosses preach patience as they spend and spend on AI – The Cannabist

    [ad_1]

    SEATTLE — Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s CEO, started 2023 by declaring it the “year of efficiency.” Like several of its big tech peers, Meta cut jobs and mothballed expansion plans.

    Then came AI.

    Zuckerberg started this year saying his company would spend more than $30 billion on new tech infrastructure in 2024. In April, he raised that to $35 billion. On Wednesday, he increased it to at least $37 billion. And he said Meta would spend even more next year.

    Read the rest of this story on TheKnow.DenverPost.com.

    [ad_2]

    The Cannabist Network

    Source link

  • Why is the global supply chain so fragile and how can it be fixed?

    Why is the global supply chain so fragile and how can it be fixed?

    [ad_1]

    Why is the global supply chain so fragile and how can it be fixed? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The COVID-19 pandemic dislodged the global supply chain, but the vulnerabilities in the system had already been building up for decades. A new book titled “How the World Ran Out of Everything” examines how the health crisis exposed the fragility of a system that was always at risk of collapse. Author Peter Goodman joins to discuss.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fact check: Trump’s false courthouse claims about his trial

    Fact check: Trump’s false courthouse claims about his trial

    [ad_1]

    Washington (CNN) — Former President Donald Trump delivered a barrage of false claims to media cameras this week as he entered and exited the Manhattan courtroom where he is on trial on charges of falsifying business records in relation to a hush money scheme during the 2016 presidential election.

    Here’s a fact check of four of the claims he made about the trial. (For this particular article, we’ll leave aside the false claims he made in the courthouse about a variety of other subjects.)

    Courthouse security

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Dale and CNN

    Source link

  • Some Other Critics Didn’t Love Taylor Swift’s New Album Either – Here’s Why! – Perez Hilton

    Some Other Critics Didn’t Love Taylor Swift’s New Album Either – Here’s Why! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Over the past few days we’ve seen some of the ugliest side effects of fans’ devotion to Taylor SwiftPaste magazine literally kept its music critic’s name secret because they were afraid of the danger the poor person might be in for trashing her new album. They didn’t think The Tortured Poets Department was good, now they have to be protected like a juror from Trump’s scary followers? That’s awful.

    The truth is, not everyone is always going to agree on art — and that’s OK! In fact, plenty of reviewers weren’t just gushing about TTPD. Several gave it mixed or even mixed-negative reviews overall.

    Related: Taylor Shouts Out The Most Positive Reviews

    We thought maybe in light of the theoretical response to that one harsh review, we’d take a look at some of the others to prove that point. So what did some critics take issue with? Let’s take a look:

    NME

    NME gave the album 3 out of 5 stars, calling it “a rare misstep” for Tay. Ouch, right?

    Reviewer Laura Molloy calls TTPD “a knottier, if inferior, sequel to Midnights” which is “mostly devoid of any noticeable stylistic shift or evolution.” She writes:

    “It mostly descends into a monochromatic palette, existing in the same Jack Antonoff-branded synth pop as Midnights, yet struggling to capture any of its brightness.”

    Molloy makes a point of praising Taylor’s lyrics generally before says this album bucks the trend and “delivers some of her most cringe-inducing lines yet.” She calls out the title track’s already infamous:

    “You smoked then ate seven bars of chocolate / We declared Charlie Puth should be a bigger artist / I scratch your head, you fall asleep / Like a tattooed golden retriever.”

    She didn’t even like what Taylor was doing with But Daddy I Love Him, singling out the lines:

    “These people only raise you to cage you… God save the most judgemental creeps/Who say they want what’s best for me”

    We imagine those are plenty of fans’ favorites on the whole damn album! Like we said, people are going to disagree on art! As it ever was. And again, that’s OK!

    Pitchfork

    Pitchfork is always hard to please, so 6.6 out of 10 may feel like condemning Taylor as mediocre — but it’s not shocking either. Writer Olivia Horn blames the “burden of expectation” — speculating Tay went ham to fill the “widening gap between Taylor Swift the artist and Taylor Swift the phenomenon” with “a firehose of material.”

    Horn’s evaluation seems to be that Taylor wasn’t precious enough and should have adhered to that old writing rule, kill your darlings. She says TTPD is “conspicuously wanting for an editor”:

    “She piles the metaphors on thick, throws stuff at the wall even after something has stuck, picks up the things that didn’t stick and uses them anyway.”

    Horn seems to feel the album is more miss than hit as a result. She mostly is unimpressed with everything that’s so familiar, especially musically — though she calls out But Daddy I Love Him as fresh and exciting and “reaching flights of fantasy unlike anything else on this album.”

    The New Yorker

    The New Yorker‘s review calls the album “too long and too familiar.” We’re sensing the pattern here.

    Writer Amanda Petrusich calls out the lyrics like NME did, also singling out the Charlie Puth line, calling it “one of the weirdest verses of Swift’s career.” She goes on to say:

    “Even the greatest poets whiff a phrase now and then, but a lot of the language on the record is either incoherent (“I was a functioning alcoholic till nobody noticed my new aesthetic”) or just generally bewildering (“Florida is one hell of a drug”).”

    Petrusich does point out lyrics she loves though, like:

    “Now I’m down bad, crying at the gym / Everything comes out teen-age petulance / F**k it if I can’t have him.”

    That was a line Molloy couldn’t get her head around, either! Like we said, it’s all subjective! Again, THAT IS OK! Honestly, it’s even great! You can’t expect something to 100% hit home with one person without getting a little bit further away from a listener with very different life experiences.

    The New York Times

    The New York Times‘ Lindsay Zoladz says some of TTPD is “a return to form” but as it goes on “Swift’s lyricism starts to feel unrestrained, imprecise and unnecessarily verbose.” She references the art form Taylor has embraced as evidence of why it doesn’t work very well — poetry. She explains:

    Sylvia Plath once called poetry ‘a tyrannical discipline,’ because the poet must ‘go so far and so fast in such a small space; you’ve got to burn away all the peripherals.’ Great poets know how to condense, or at least how to edit. The sharpest moments of The Tortured Poets Department would be even more piercing in the absence of excess, but instead the clutter lingers, while Swift holds an unlit match.”

    It seems overwhelmingly those who didn’t love the album are of a similar way of thinking — in releasing so many tracks, Taylor seemingly didn’t narrow it down to the best she was capable of. It sounds like they think we got something like the assembly cut — the unedited version of a movie with all the footage before it gets tightened up and made to work as a real piece of solid entertainment. They all feel like it’s hit and miss, maybe at too low a quotient. Like a mediocre SNL episode.

    These are all painstakingly well-considered reviews by good writers. But importantly they don’t consistently agree on what the hits and misses are. So again, there’s no need to read these reviews as attacks. Everyone is just giving you their take! So take away what you can from the reviews, let it help solidify your opinion whether in agreement or disagreement. It’s all part of the experience of a new piece of art, y’all! Enjoy!

    [Image via Taylor Swift/YouTube.]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • ‘Adversity For Sale’: Jeezy talks about his book at Cam Kirk Studios Wednesday night

    ‘Adversity For Sale’: Jeezy talks about his book at Cam Kirk Studios Wednesday night

    [ad_1]

    “Adversity for Sale: Ya Gotta Believe” was published in August 2023 and is now a New York Times bestseller. Photo by Kerri Phox/The Atlanta Voice

    Atlanta rapper Jeezy once said, “Might not be the best, just know I plan to be.” 

    Thirteen studio albums later and tens of millions of records sold, Jeezy has carved his path as an Atlanta legend and pioneer for trap music. Now, Jeezy is selling more than hits; he’s selling a book that’s a testament to ambition and hustle. His journey is now encapsulated in his memoir, “Adversity for Sale: Ya Gotta Believe,” published in August 2023.

    The memoir marks the rapper’s first book and delves deep into Jeezy’s personal struggles that helped him beat the odds and achieve the success he knows today. It offers a vulnerable side to “The Snowman” that goes beyond lyrics, inviting the audience to connect to him on a deeper level. 

    [ad_2]

    Laura Nwogu

    Source link

  • What’s behind the rise in labor productivity?

    What’s behind the rise in labor productivity?

    [ad_1]

    What’s behind the rise in labor productivity? – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Business sector productivity — the output per American worker — has grown more than 3% for three consecutive quarters, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. New York Times economics reporter Ben Casselman joins CBS News to discuss why productivity is rising and what it means for workers and consumers.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift’s Team Upset Over ‘Invasive, Untrue, And Inappropriate’ Op-Ed Speculating On Her Sexuality! – Perez Hilton

    Taylor Swift’s Team Upset Over ‘Invasive, Untrue, And Inappropriate’ Op-Ed Speculating On Her Sexuality! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Taylor Swift wants everyone to calm down with all of the speculation on her sexuality!

    Over the years, there has been a ton of talk about whether she may not be 100% straight — with many believing she had flings with Karlie Kloss and Dianna Agron in the past. Tay Tay previously denied being queer in an interview with Vogue in 2019, saying:

    “Rights are being stripped from basically everyone who isn’t a straight white cisgender male. I didn’t realize until recently that I could advocate for a community that I’m not a part of.”

    Related: Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce’s Loved Ones ‘Have Never Seen Either Of Them So Happy’

    But the speculation on her sexuality still continued. Last year, she blasted the rumors in the prologue to 1989 (Taylor’s Version), saying she surrounded herself with female pals because everyone constantly speculated about whether she dated the guys she was spotted with:

    “If I only hung out with my female friends, people couldn’t sensationalize or sexualize that — right? I would learn later on that people could and people would.”

    It seemed like she put the rumors to rest once again. However, the speculation hasn’t stopped since then! Even an op-ed was written speculating on her sexuality — and those close to Taylor aren’t too happy about it! Earlier this week, The New York Times published an opinion piece from Anna Marks that compiled what the writer labeled as “evidence” that allegedly proved the 34-year-old pop star has been dropping hints to fans that she is a member of the LGBTQIA+ community. Marks wrote:

    “In isolation, a single dropped hairpin is perhaps meaningless or accidental, but considered together, they’re the unfurling of a ballerina bun after a long performance. Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.”

    And now Taylor’s team is furious over the article! An insider from the singer’s camp told CNN Business on Saturday:

    “Because of her massive success, in this moment there is a Taylor-shaped hole in people’s ethics.”

    The source then noted that the op-ed would not “have been allowed to be written about Shawn Mendes or any male artist whose sexuality has been questioned by fans,” adding:

    “There seems to be no boundary some journalists won’t cross when writing about Taylor, regardless of how invasive, untrue, and inappropriate it is – all under the protective veil of an ‘opinion piece.’”

    Wow…

    Apparently, Taylor’s team is no longer holding back when it comes to calling out the rumors about her life! What are your thoughts on the report, Perezcious readers? Let us know in the comments below.

    [Image via MEGA/WENN]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • The New York Times Sues Open AI, Microsoft For Copyright Infringement

    The New York Times Sues Open AI, Microsoft For Copyright Infringement

    [ad_1]

    In what may be a landmark case, the New York Times has sued Open AI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, saying the publication’s content is being by the platform to feed automated chatbots, constituting “unlawful copying and use of The Times’s uniquely valuable works.”

    It’s the first time a major media organization has sued an AI platforms although there are a handful of pending cases brought by IP owners from Sarah Silverman to John Grisham to Getty Images.

    The suit says Open AI should be responsible for “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages” chatbot and training models that use copyrighted material from The Times should be destroyed.

    Generative AI, a surging and well-funded field led by Microsoft’s Open AI  trains chatbots on large data sets. The suit says the platform uses “The Times’s content without payment to create products that substitute for The Times and steal audiences away from it.”

    The Authors Guild, John Grisham, George R.R. Martin, Michael Connelly, Jodi Picoult and a group of other famous fiction writers filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI, claiming that their technology is infringing on their works.

    Pulitzer Prize-winner Michael Chabon and Tony-winning playwright David Henry Hwang are among another group of writers that filed a class action lawsuit against Meta in federal court for having “copied and ingested” their works to train its LLaMA AI platform.

    At issue that case is training data for AI software programs that are designed to produce convincingly natural text in response user prompts. They are trained, the suit says, “by copying massive amounts of text and extracting expressive information from it. The body of text is referred to as the training dataset,” said that suit. The Plaintiffs have copyrights for their books and written works “and never consented to their use as training materials for LLaMA” — the AI platform of Facebook parent Meta. 

    In July, Sarah Silverman and two other authors sued OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement.

    More…

    [ad_2]

    jillg366

    Source link

  • The New York Times Cooking: A recipe for success

    The New York Times Cooking: A recipe for success

    [ad_1]

    When it comes to turkey, Melissa Clark is an expert. She’s an award-winning cookbook author, and a food columnist at The New York Times. Ahead of Thanksgiving, she showed Sanneh her latest recipe: “reheated” turkey. 

    “Every year, I get so many emails, letters: ‘I have to make my turkey ahead and drive it to my daughters, my son-in-law, my cousin, my aunt,’” Clark said. “So, I brought this up in one of our meetings, and my editor said, ‘Okay, go with it.’”

    “That looks really juicy,” said Sanneh. “I’m no expert, but if you served that to me, I would’ve no idea that was reheated.”

    melissa-clark-turkey.jpg
    New York Times columnist Melissa Clark with Kelefa Sanneh. 

    CBS News


    As a kid, Clark grew up cooking with Julia Child cookbooks, splattered with food: “Oh my God, those cookbooks, they’re like, all the pages are stuck together. You can’t even open them anymore!”

    Over the years, Clark has contributed more than a thousand recipes to the paper. Of course, The New York Times isn’t primarily known for recipes. The paper, which has nearly ten million subscribers, launched the NYT Cooking app in 2014, and started charging extra for it three years later. It now lists more than 21,000 recipes, from a peanut butter and pickle sandwich, to venison medallions with blackberry sage sauce. Dozens of recipes are added each month.

    nyt-cooking-b-1280.jpg
    The New York Times Cooking app contains more than 21,000 recipes. 

    CBS News


    Emily Weinstein, who oversees cooking and food coverage at the Times, believes recipes are an important part of the paper’s business model. “There are a million people who just have Cooking, and there are millions more who have access to Cooking, because they are all-in on The New York Times bundle,” she said.

    “And at a basic price of about $5 a month, that’s pretty good business,” said Sanneh.

    “Seems that way to me!” Weinstein laughed.

    And the subscribers respond, sometimes energetically. “We have this enormous fire hose of feedback in the form of our comments section,” said Weinstein. “We know right away whether or not people liked the recipe, whether they thought it worked, what changes they made to it.”

    nyt-cooking-comments.jpg
    Readers freely comment on the Times’ recipes. 

    CBS News


    Clark said, “I actually do read a lot of the notes – the bad ones, because I want to learn how to improve, how to write a recipe that’s stronger and more fool-proof; and then, the good ones, because it warms my heart. It’s so gratifying to read that, oh my God, this recipe that I put up there, it works and people loved it, and the meal was good!”

    Each recipe the Times publishes must be cooked, and re-cooked. When “Sunday Morning” visited Clark, she was working on turkeys #9 and #10 – which might explain why she is taking this Thanksgiving off.

    “This year, I’m going to someone else’s house for Thanksgiving,” Clark said.

    “And they’re making you a turkey? They must be nervous,” said Sanneh.

    “Not at all.”

    “I guarantee you that home chef right now is already stressing about this.”

    “Um, he has sent me a couple of texts about it, yeah!” Clark laughed.

         
    For more info:

           
    Story produced by Mark Hudspeth. Editor: Joseph Frandino. 


    “Sunday Morning” 2023 “Food Issue” recipe index
    Delicious menu suggestions from top chefs, cookbook authors, food writers, restaurateurs, and the editors of Food & Wine magazine. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The New York Times Cooking: A recipe for success

    The New York Times Cooking: A recipe for success

    [ad_1]

    The New York Times Cooking: A recipe for success – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    For subscribers, The New York Times’ Cooking section, and its Cooking app – with recipes by contributors like food columnist and cookbook author Melissa Clark – are as important a part of the “paper of record” as the news. And as Times editor Emily Weinstein tells correspondent Kelefa Sanneh, they’re an important part of the paper’s business model as well.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What Adam Nagourney Learned Mining the Times

    What Adam Nagourney Learned Mining the Times

    [ad_1]

    When Gay Talese’s landmark New York Times history, The Kingdom and the Power, hit shelves in 1969, the reviews were largely favorable—not least from the Times itself. The literary critic and Times daily book reviewer Christopher Lehmann-Haupt called it “beguilingly gossipy, intimately anecdotal, exhaustively and sometimes irrelevantly detailed…a grand epic that personalizes the impersonal and turns monolith to flesh.” Writing for The New York Times Book Review, the journalist and media critic Ben Bagdikian concluded: “Despite its flaws, the book creates moving scenes and personalities. Seldom has anyone been so successful in making a newspaper come alive as a human institution.”

    It’s a high bar to live up to. But veteran Times reporter Adam Nagourney hopes he has at least come close with The Times: How the Newspaper of Record Survived Scandal, Scorn, and the Transformation of Journalism, out Tuesday from Crown Publishing Group. The story picks up not long after Talese’s classic leaves off, chronicling the institution’s journalistic triumphs, shameful sagas, and various currents of change through four decades and seven executive editors. You know the convulsions I’m talking about, at least the ones from the more recent annals of Times history: the scandals surrounding Jayson Blair’s fabulism and Judith Miller’s Iraq-war reporting; the life-saving decision to build an online paywall; the much-ballyhooed innovation report that lit a fire regarding the need for digital transformation and audience development.

    Is it fair to think of Nagourney’s book as a sequel? “The only reason I would resist that at all,” he told me, “is that I don’t think I’m in the same league as Talese. But that is what I was trying to do. I pick up in about 1977; I think he ends in 1969. But very much I was trying to help people understand what makes the Times the Times, and what motivates these men and women who put out the paper.”

    Nagourney and I caught up last week ahead of The Times’s September 26 pub date. Our condensed and edited conversation is below.

    Vanity Fair: You’ve worked at the Times since 1996. Of all the convulsions you’ve witnessed—from Judy Miller and Jayson Blair and the fall of Howell Raines, to the introduction of a paywall, the innovation report, Jill Abramson’s firing, the ouster of James Bennet—which of these feels, in hindsight, like it was the most major? The most disruptive to the institution?

    Adam Nagourney: I think the confluence of Jayson Blair and Judy Miller was the most disruptive, and had the most long-term effect on the newsroom, but also on the paper’s reputation. Jayson Blair was, what, 20 years ago? Even now you still get people accusing you of making stuff up. Are you Jayson-Blairing me? And I think the Judith Miller stuff, some of her dubious reporting on Iraq—without taking away from some of her good reporting—has always sort of colored the way a lot of people view the Times.

    What made you want to write a book about the Times?

    I’ve always been someone who kind of grew up on the Times. It was always part of my life. I always wanted to work there, and without sounding like a cliche, I read Gay Talese’s book, and it really influenced me. I always thought there was a need to do another book on the Times. There were two major ones, but it’s been a long time, and I think the paper has gone through a major change, both in how it’s viewed in society and how it has succeeded and not succeeded. There was just a lot to write about. I decided this is something I wanted to do, and I spent seven years doing it.

    What advice did Talese give you?

    After I got the book contract, I said, “Can I come over and see you?” I didn’t know him beforehand. I knocked and he opened the door and he goes, “I’ve been waiting 15 years for someone to write this book.” He invited me in, opened up this phone book, told me all these people to talk to. I mean, he was just amazing.

    I talked to some of your more illustrious past and present colleagues about what I should I ask you, so if there’s anything you don’t like in this next batch of questions, don’t shoot the messenger. This first one came up most often: Considering you still work at the Times, why should readers trust your views on the place? Aren’t you restrained from being totally honest?

    That’s a totally legitimate question that I anticipated from day one. This book ends in 2016. There are a couple of reasons I do that, but a lot of it’s because I did not want to be writing about people that I work for. And I was really, really assiduous about that. There are one or two exceptions. I write about Arthur Gregg Sulzberger [the publisher] and a little bit about Carolyn Ryan [a managing editor]. But mostly I’m writing about people who I don’t work for. Pretty much everyone in this book is someone who’s from the history of the Times, not currently at the Times. Again A.G. gets more complicated because he’s still there, but I write about him in the past. I thought about quitting the paper.

    [ad_2]

    Joe Pompeo

    Source link

  • New York Times to pull the plug on its sports desk and rely on The Athletic

    New York Times to pull the plug on its sports desk and rely on The Athletic

    [ad_1]

    The New York Times will eliminate its 35-member sports desk and plans to rely on staff at The Athletic, a sports news startup the media outlet bought last year, for coverage on that topic, the paper announced Monday. 

    Two of the newspaper’s top editors — Joe Kahn and Monica Drake — announced the changes Monday in a staff email, the Times reported. CEO Meredith Kopit Levien told staffers in a separate memo that current sports staff will be reassigned to different parts of the newsroom. 

    “Many of these colleagues will continue on their new desks to produce the signature general interest journalism about sports — exploring the business, culture and power structures of sports, particularly through enterprising reporting and investigations — for which they are so well known,” Levien said in the memo.

    Levien acknowledged the decision to axe the paper’s sports desk may disappoint employees, but said “it is the right one for readers and will allow us to maximize the respective strengths of The Times’ and The Athletic’s newsrooms.”

    The company said no layoffs are planned as a result of the strategy shift, noting that newsroom managers will work with editorial staff who cover sports to find new roles.

    The Times bought The Athletic in early 2022 for $550 million, when the startup had roughly 400 journalists out of a staff of 600. The Athletic has yet to turn a profit, the Times reported. The operation lost $7.8 million in the first quarter of 2023, although subscribers have grown from 1 million in January of last year to 3 million as of March 2023, according to the paper.

    “We plan to focus even more directly on distinctive, high-impact news and enterprise journalism about how sports intersect with money, power, culture, politics and society at large,” Kahn and Drake said in their memo. “At the same time, we will scale back the newsroom’s coverage of games, players, teams and leagues.”

    With The Athletic’s reporters producing most of the sports coverage, their bylines will appear in print for the first time, the Times said.

    Unlike many local news outlets, the Times gained millions of subscribers during the presidency of Donald Trump and the COVID-19 pandemic. But it has been actively diversifying its coverage with lifestyle advice, games and recipes, to help counter a pullback from the politics-driven news traffic boom of 2020. 

    In May the Times reached a deal for a new contract with its newsroom union following more than two years of talks that included a 24-hour strike. The deal included salary increases, an agreement on hybrid work and other benefits.

    Sports writers for The New York Times have won several Pulitzer Prizes over the years, including Arthur Daley in 1956 in the column, “Sports of the Times;” Walter Wellesley (Red) Smith in 1976 for commentary and Dave Anderson in 1981 for commentary.

    — The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • “How Do We Get Every Second of Your Day?”: The New York Times Goes All In on a New Podcast App

    “How Do We Get Every Second of Your Day?”: The New York Times Goes All In on a New Podcast App

    [ad_1]

    The average New York Times reader, as the Times sees it, checks their push notifications first thing in the morning, scrolls through the internet while making coffee, then puts in their headphones to listen to something as they cook, clean, commute, or walk the dog. Stephanie Preiss,Times executive in charge of the paper’s audio business, has thought about this routine a lot. She keeps a chart of it—the day in the life of a “smart, curious person”—above her desk at home. The paper has long had the news alerts covered, and it’s all over social media and news aggregators, but “what does it look like for the Times to have embedded itself deeply into every single moment?” asked Preiss. “How do we get every second of your day?” The Times is betting on a new app, New York Times Audio, launching Wednesday, after nearly a year and a half in a private beta. 

    The app is a home for the Times’ growing audio empire, from new shows across the news and opinion sections, to Serial, which the company acquired in 2020, to its purchase of Audm, the service that turns news articles into audio, to establishing a strategic partnership with This American Life. The Times intends to maintain its audience at the top of the podcast publisher charts as well as its wide distribution and the advertising business that it runs on the backs of all of that. “But we believe that—kind of similar to what we’ve done in text journalism, if you will—we can start to move our most engaged users into our own apps and platforms,” Preiss said.  

    Courtesy of The New York Times.

    Still, it’s a weird time to get into a podcast app business. The age of “There’s an App for That” feels squarely a bygone of the aughts. And this one has debuted to the public at a precarious time for the audio industry. “Podcast Companies, Once Walking on Air, Feel the Strain of Gravity,” read a recent headline in the Times. “The dumb money is gone, the easy money has slowed down, and the smart money has seen some pullback,” podcast guru Eric Nuzum told Vanity FairNPR and Spotify both laid off staff and canceled shows. 

    “Obviously we’re not immune to macroeconomic trends and headwinds affecting the digital media landscape broadly,” said Preiss, “but we do experience that differently.” She cites the Times’ success at the top of the charts with “a fraction of the number of shows” of competitors, and its dual advertising and subscription business. Even now, the Times is seeing “increased demand for new ad products,” Preiss said, and “historic new audience heights,” with many Times shows, including The Daily, seeing “their highest audience ever, including during the insane peaks of early COVID,” in Q1. The only way to access the app is if you subscribe to the Times in some way (either for news or in a bundle with its other features). For now, the Times is not selling the New York Times Audio app as a standalone subscription, though it is sunsetting the Audm app and folding it into the new program.

    Though not everyone is buying into this rosy picture. “I am very suspicious of the claim that the Times is seeing increased demand for new ad products on the audio side, when the evidence is clear that’s not the case,” one veteran podcast producer told me, noting that “many of their ad spots are empty, or only filled with New York Times ads.” Advertising for podcasts is dropping across the industry significantly, they said. Semafor recently pointed out that The Daily has been running without a full slate of paid ads in recent months. Preiss rejected the notion, noting that for years it has been running “consumer messaging” related to the Times’ other offerings.

    The NYT Audio app will have exclusives, including a new daily news show called The Headlines, hosted by veteran journalist Annie Correal; it’s a roughly eight-minute sister program to The Daily—though with less “handholding,” as Correal put it—spotlighting about three items, and the reporters behind them, per episode. Unsurprisingly, research has shown that shorts are consistently among the most popular content, pushing the Times to go even smaller than its breakout 20- to 25-minute morning show, which inspired copycats at outlets like Vox and The Washington Post—and which the paper has been interested in building off of for years, kicking around ideas like an afternoon show that hasn’t come to fruition. Headlines, says director of audio Paula Szuchman, “is really the first, I would say, expansion of the Daily universe.” The app will also be home to sub-10-minute stories about what to cook, read, watch, and more; a recent one featured Times Food reporter Priya Krishna sharing her secret to making perfectly cooked rice in the microwave. 

    I’ve been playing around on the app the past few days, and it does, at risk of sounding too woo-woo, feel like diving into the Times universe. On Tuesday, I hit play on the playlist curated each weekday morning and was taken from the day’s Headlines, on bank collapses and the war in Ukraine, to The Daily, where Mexico bureau chief Natalie Kitroeff was reporting from the southern border on the day Title 42 ended, to a “reporter reads,” in which publishing reporter Alexandra Alter read a piece she cowrote with Elizabeth Harris about an author who was asked by Scholastic to delete references to racism from her book, to a short by This American Life. “We hope that this will expand the universe of subscribers, but I think that we are very interested in making sure that Times subscribers have a better experience of audio, and one that is an introduction to Times journalism, than they would if they were just to start searching online for news podcasts or culture podcasts,” said Preiss. 

    At the very least, the NYT Audio app felt like a smoother experience than Apple’s much-derided podcast app. It felt, too, like a huge investment incongruous with the state of the audio industry—one perhaps only the Times is in the position to make right now. 

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Judge Dismisses Trump’s Suit Against New York Times, Orders Him To Pay Legal Fees

    Judge Dismisses Trump’s Suit Against New York Times, Orders Him To Pay Legal Fees

    [ad_1]

    A New York judge dismissed former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against The New York Times on Wednesday, saying the newspaper’s reporting on his tax returns was protected by the First Amendment.

    Trump sued the paper, three of its reporters and his niece Mary Trump in 2021 after a series of bombshell reports about his tax records. The former president demanded “no less” than $100 million at the time, accusing the journalists of taking part in an “insidious plot” to obtain the records from his niece.

    The series later won a Pulitzer Prize.

    The judge rejected the former president’s argument on Wednesday, saying the case failed “as a matter of constitutional law,” ordering Trump to pay legal fees and associated costs for the Times and its reporters.

    “Courts have long recognized that reporters are entitled to engage in legal and ordinary news-gathering activities without fear of tort liability — as these actions are at the very core of protected First Amendment activity,” New York Supreme Court Justice Robert Reed wrote in his decision.

    There was no decision about the case against Mary Trump, who has said she was the source for the Times’ reporting. Her attorneys told The Washington Post they were pleased with the ruling, adding they were “confident the court will also protect Ms. Trump’s exercise of her First Amendment rights.”

    The Times also said it was pleased with the ruling.

    “It is an important precedent reaffirming that the press is protected when it engages in routine news gathering to obtain information of vital importance to the public,” a spokesperson for the media company said Wednesday.

    Trump’s attorneys told the Times they would weigh his options and “continue to vigorously fight on his behalf.” It’s unclear if they plan to appeal the ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against The New York Times

    Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against The New York Times

    [ad_1]

    A judge in New York dismissed former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against The New York Times and three of the paper’s reporters on Wednesday over a 2018 article that alleged Trump engaged in “suspect tax schemes.” The three authors of the article — David Barstow, Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner — later won the 2019 Pulitzer Prize in explanatory reporting for the piece.

    New York Supreme Court Justice Robert Reed dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against the paper and its journalists, and held him financially responsible for their attorneys fees and additional costs incurred as well, writing in his opinion that Mr. Trump’s claims “fail as a matter of constitutional law.”

    “Courts have long recognized that reporters are entitled to engage in legal and ordinary newsgathering activities without fear of tort liability — as these actions are at the very core of protected First Amendment activity,” continued Reed.

    Donald Trump suspect tax schemes
    A special report in the October 7, 2018 edition of The New York Times investigates suspect tax schemes used by Donald Trump and his father, Fred Trump, to avoid paying taxes.

    Robert Alexander / Getty Images


    Trump initially filed the suit against The Times, the three reporters and his niece, Mary Trump, in late 2021, alleging that the paper engaged in an “insidious plot” to illegally obtain copies of his confidential tax documents through Mary Trump, and subsequently exploit them. Trump’s attorneys alleged that in providing the paper with Trump’s 20-year-old tax documents, his niece had been in violation of a 1999 court ruling involving the will of Fred C. Trump, the former president’s father, reported The New York Times.

    Reed asserted that Mary Trump “owned the files she disclosed to The Times, and thus there was nothing wrongful” about the paper and its reporters requesting the documents from her for journalistic use.

    While Reed has tossed out the claims against The Times, Barstow, Craig and Buettner, the claims against Mary Trump have yet to be ruled upon. It is not immediately clear when a decision will be made.  

    “The New York Times is pleased with the judge’s decision today,” a spokesperson for the paper said in a statement provided to CBS News. “It is an important precedent reaffirming that the press is protected when it engages in routine newsgathering to obtain information of vital importance to the public.” 

    Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, said in a statement: “All journalists must be held accountable when they commit civil wrongs. The New York Times is no different and its reporters went well beyond the conventional news gathering techniques permitted by the First Amendment. In light of the Court’s decision, we will weigh our client’s options and continue to vigorously fight on his behalf.” She did not specify if they would appeal.

    This is not the first time Trump has been unsuccessful in suing The New York Times. In 2020, the former president filed a libel lawsuit against the paper, claiming it inaccurately reported “as fact a conspiracy with Russia” in a 2019 opinion piece. The suit was dismissed in 2021.

    –Graham Kates contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bernard Kalb, former CBS News journalist, dies at age 100

    Bernard Kalb, former CBS News journalist, dies at age 100

    [ad_1]

    Bernard Kalb, veteran correspondent and former CBS News journalist, died Sunday, his daughter confirmed to CBS News. He was 100.

    A statement from Kalb’s family called him the “ultimate reporter” who had “boundless curiosity and an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.” 

    Bernard Kalb in CBS Newsroom, 1972
    Bernard Kalb in CBS Newsroom. Image dated June 15, 1972.

    CBS News Archive / Getty Images


    “Above all, he was a person of impeccable integrity who embraced peoples and cultures all over the world and loved his family deeply,” the statement continued. “We have lost a journalistic giant. We will miss him enormously.”

    Kalb’s younger brother, Marvin Kalb, another former CBS News reporter, told The Washington Post that Kalb died at his home in the Washington suburbs following complications from a fall.

    Over the course of his journalistic career, which spanned over six decades, Kalb worked at CBS News from 1962 to 1980, and accompanied former President Richard Nixon to China during his historic trip in 1972. Kalb was also responsible for the opening CBS News’ Hong Kong bureau in 1972, was a Washington anchorman on “CBS Morning News” and was well-regarded for his reporting on Southeast Asian affairs.

    Portrait Of The Kalb Brothers In The CBS Newsroom
    Portrait of American journalists and brothers Bernard Kalb (left) and Marvin Kalb as they pose before a wall of electronic equipment, November 5, 1969.

    CBS News Archive / Getty Images


    Kalb also co-authored two books with his brother — one a biography on Henry Kissinger, and another a novel about the fall of Saigon.

    In addition to his prolific news career, Kalb is also known for a short employment stint at the U.S. State Department. In the announcement of his new role at the State Department in 1984, the New York Times called him “a widely traveled foreign correspondent,” who covered the office for eight years — through five secretaries of state — before being named as their spokesman. 

    “This is the first time that a journalist who covered the State Department has been named as its spokesman,” the Times wrote.

    Kalb resigned publicly in 1986, after a misinformation campaign following U.S. airstrikes that had hit Moammar Gadhafi’s compound earlier in the year. The Washington Post exposed the campaign, reporting that the U.S. had leaked false information to reporters, which Kalb knew nothing about, according to The Associated Press.

    State dept spokeman Bernard Kalb in 1986
    State dept. spokeman Bernard Kalb RE: Haiti elections in 1986.

    Cynthia Johnson / Getty Images


    “I am concerned about the impact of any such program on the credibility of the United States,” Kalb said, adding, “Anything that hurts America’s credibility, hurts America.” 

    He later returned to journalism, becoming the first host of CNN’s “Reliable Sources” in 1992.

    He is survived by his wife, Phyllis, and his four daughters, Tanah, Marina, Claudia, and Sarinah, according to The Associated Press.

    [ad_2]

    Source link