ReportWire

Tag: The Amazing Spider-Man

  • Best Superhero Movies on Netflix (January 2026)

    [ad_1]

    There was a time when most blockbuster movies and popular television series found their way onto Netflix. Yet as the market for streaming grew, the amount of superhero movies on the service decreased. However, Netflix still hosts some of the best superhero movies ever made.

    What are the best Superhero movies on Netflix as of January 2026?

    Today, Netflix is more frequently associated with superhero streaming series than movies. They produced a number of mature series based on the world of Marvel Comics, like Daredevil. They also stream most of the Arrowverse shows based on DC Comics, thanks to a long-running licensing deal with The CW. Despite that, and most of these properties slowly making their way to Disney+ and HBO Max, there are still some fine superhero movies to be found on Netflix.

    Hellboy (2004)

    In 1944, a group of Nazi sorcerers led by the infamous Rasputin tried to summon several demons into their service. Thanks to the efforts of an Allied strike force and scholar Trevor “Broom” Bruttenholm, they failed. However, an infant demon was discovered in the aftermath. Broom adopted this Hellboy as his own son, and trained him to become a force for good.

    Six decades later, Broom and Hellboy are employed by the Bureau of Paranormal Research and Defense. With their aid, the BPRD have become humanity’s first line of defense against various monsters and magicians. Unfortunately, Rasputin’s allies have resurrected him, and they are determined to finish what they have started.

    There have been four films to date based upon Dark Horse Comics‘ superhero Hellboy and two cinematic reboots. Despite this, many feel that the first effort remains the best. This is largely due to the efforts of Oscar-winning filmmaker Guillermo del Toro, who scripted and directed the film. It is also thanks to Ron Perlman‘s masterful performance as the noble demon. It is also notable as the only Hellboy film adaptation to date to merit a sequel.

    The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

    Peter Parker is a brilliant but socially awkward teenager with dreams of becoming a scientist. This leads him to seek out a former colleague of his father, Dr. Curt Connors, who is studying cross-species genetics. A lab accident leads to Peter being bitten by a genetically-altered spider and becoming something new… The Amazing Spider-Man.

    When Connors is similarly transformed into a monstrous lizard man, Spider-Man must step up to save the city. This is made more difficult thanks to the efforts of NYPD Captain George Stacy, who thinks Spider-Man is more menace than superhero. This, in turn, endangers Peter’s romance with classmate Gwen Stacy, who just happens to be Captain Stacy’s daughter.

    Marc Webb faced a serious challenge following after Sam Raimi in developing a new Spider-Man film franchise. It is debatable how well he succeeded. However, The Amazing Spider-Man does have a devout fandom for several reasons.

    Many fans prefer Andrew Garfield‘s more wise-cracking take on Peter Parker than the more brooding variant played by Tobey Maguire. Another selling point for the movie is Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy and her chemistry with Andrew Garfield. Such is her popularity that many hope she may still find her way into the MCU as Spider-Gwen.

    Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018)

    Miles Morales was a smart student, struggling to fit in and live up to the standards of his NYPD officer father. Chance leads to his being bitten by a radioactive spider and gaining powers similar to those of the city’s greatest hero, Spider-Man. It also leads to Miles being entrusted with the only way to stop New York’s worst crime-boss from traveling between dimensions and wrecking reality after Spider-Man dies.

    In over his head and untrained in his new powers, Miles doesn’t think it is in him to be a hero. Fate intervenes again, giving him an unlikely teacher in the form of another Peter Parker from another world. Unfortunately, this Spider-Man is not the superhero he once was. However, with more and more Spiders showing up, Peter will have to remember what comes with great power. And Miles will learn that anyone can wear the mask.

    Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse was a revelation upon its release. Beyond being a blockbuster success, it was a critical smash. Even those critics who normally turn up their noses at superhero movies praised the film for its innovative concept and revolutionary animation. It ultimately earned 52 industry awards, including the Oscar, Golden Globe, and BAFTA for Best Animated Feature Film.

    Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem (2023)

    There have been many incarnations of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Despite this, their story did not differ much from film to film, or cartoon to cartoon. That changed with the 2023 animated superhero movie Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem.

    The film opens with the standard origin of four baby turtles and a rat being mutated into humanoid creatures by mutagenic ooze. However, this group of turtle boys hide themselves from the world because of their foster father Splinter’s fear of humanity. Not because of some need to maintain a superhero secret identity. Despite this, his sons long to be a part of the world above their home in the sewer.

    The existence of the Ninja Turtles is uncovered by aspiring teen journalist April O’Neil, after they recover her stolen moped. This leads to a partnership, as the TMNT help April investigate a series of crimes tied to the sinister TCRI. It also leads to the discovery of another found family of mutants, pressured into a life of crime by their charismatic leader, Superfly.

    Mutant Mayhem was notable for being one of the few times the Ninja Turtles actually seemed to act like real teenagers. It was also marked by a unique visual aesthetic, and for how well it merged ideas taken from a wide scope of earlier adaptations. The end result was a reboot that won over a new generation of fans while satisfying the old guard.

    KPop Demon Hunters (2025)

    Long ago, demons preyed on humanity. Hither came three young women, warrior poets who mixed song and sorcery to fight the demons. They created the Honmoon; a mystic barrier that limited the power of demons on Earth. Through the centuries that followed, three women in a generation would be chosen as the new guardians of the Honmoon. Today, those guardians are Huntrix – a K-pop idol group consisting of rebellious Mira, innocent Zoey, and confident Rumi.

    Huntrix are challenged in popularity by a demon-backed idol group called the Saja Boys. This leads to a battle of the bands for the souls of the world. However, Rumi has a secret; a half-demon heritage that threatens to break up the band and her friendships with Zoey and Mira.

    Some may question the inclusion of KPop Demon Hunters on a list of superhero movies. Certainly it is more heavily influenced by Korean culture and mythology than traditional comic book heroics. Yet at its core, the movie is a magical girl story, with summoned weapons, colorful costumes, and secret identities. That makes it a superhero movie by most metrics, in terms of story if nothing else.

    How we picked the best Superhero Movies on Netflix in 2026

    As noted earlier, there is little in the way of superhero movies on Netflix in 2026. However, there were still enough titles to make narrowing the list down to a top-five difficult. To that end, these movies were assessed based upon their influence, awards won, and success in establishing an on-going franchise.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Morrison

    Source link

  • Every Emma Stone Movie, Ranked

    [ad_1]

    Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photos: Disney, Lionsgate Films, Searchlight Pictures

    This list was originally published on September 20, 2017. Emma Stone’s latest movie, Bugonia, hit theaters on October 24, 2025.

    Emma Stone has said her idol, and role model, as an actress is Diane Keaton, and it makes total sense: Now that you’re thinking about it, it’s hard not to connect them, right? Like Keaton, Stone is instantly likable, dazzlingly funny — you can make an argument she’s a comedienne first and foremost — and relatable while never losing that star wattage. In the span of a decade, she went from making her debut (in Superbad) to being a beloved Hollywood fixture and an Oscar winner to boot. But also like Keaton, it’s not difficult to imagine her expanding on this, pushing herself while never losing that inherent affability. She’s one of us while being the best of us … which is an excellent definition of a movie star. It’s going to be extremely fun updating this list as the years go forward — after all, look where Keaton went. Who’s to say Stone can’t go just as far … or further?

    This week, she returns to theaters with Bugonia, in which she once again teams up with Greek filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos, continuing one of modern movies’ most rewarding partnerships. In the film, she flexes both her comedic and dramatic muscles, proving as always how good she is in either mode. But don’t forget that she’s also a producer on Bugonia: Although we’re ranking her finest performances, it’s important to point out how pivotal she’s been in championing other directors’ work as well. (Not for nothing, but two of 2024’s signature movies, A Real Pain and I Saw the TV Glow, were shepherded by her company, Fruit Tree.) Stone swears she has no interest in directing, but it’s hard not to imagine that one day she’ll get the itch to try that, too. Also like Keaton, she’s a creative force who seems capable of just about anything.

    Here are her 24 roles, ranked. We omitted bit parts — though we love her in Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping — and voice roles (although she’s awfully fun in The Croods). And we didn’t include The Curse since that’s television. But no matter how you choose to measure it, she’s had a pretty great career already.

    Year: 2008
    Director: Peter Cattaneo
    Run time: 1h 42m

    It’s insane to think there was a time in human existence that Bradley Cooper, Josh Gad, Christine Applegate, Jane Lynch, Jason Sudeikis, Will Arnett, Fred Armisen, Aziz Ansari, Demetri Martin, Keir Gilchrist, and Emma Stone all played supporting characters in a movie that starred Rainn Wilson, but, hey, 2008 was quite a year. Stone has a thankless, off-brand role as a moping member of a teenage rock band who drafts a former drummer in a Metallica-esque band (Wilson) to fill in so they can play their school prom. This thing is junky — and it’s not Wilson’s fault he has to do so much heavy lifting, in his underwear no less — and Stone escapes dignity intact, barely, from the wreckage.

    Year: 2014
    Director: Woody Allen
    Run time: 1h 37m

    Stone spent two years trying out the role of Woody Allen’s modern muse, not unlike Scarlett Johansson the decade before, but her stint didn’t come with any Match Point–style breakthrough: The two movies she made with Allen were among the director’s most formulaic work. She struggles particularly here as a “mystic” who performs illusions and inspires a cynical fellow magician (Colin Firth), briefly, to suspend his disbelief. Certain actors benefit from Allen’s hands-off approach, but Stone might not be one of them. She looks lost and flailing most of the time, forced to carry way too much of the narrative and the film’s attempts at charm. Stone isn’t necessarily to blame — Magic in the Moonlight is a minor trifle, even for late-career Allen — but this just isn’t a great fit.

    Year: 2013
    Director: Ruben Fleischer
    Run time: 1h 53m

    If you don’t remember Gangster Squad, it’s the other nostalgic, old-school-Hollywood-themed movie in which Stone plays an aspiring actress who moves to Los Angeles to become famous and falls in love with Ryan Gosling. Of her three collaborations with Gosling, this one is easily the worst. A limp attempt at recapturing the snarl and sex appeal of a bygone era’s gangster pictures, the film mostly feels like an excuse for big names to play dress up in fedoras. Stone isn’t terrible as Grace, the girlfriend of an infamous crime boss (Sean Penn) who starts to have feelings for the cop (Gosling) who’s helping to bring him down. But despite the timeless nature of her appeal in most roles — you get the sense that she could have been a star in any era — she doesn’t quite convince as a noir-ish love interest.

    Year: 2011
    Director: Will Gluck
    Run time: 1h 49m

    Stone only really has one scene here, but it’s a silly, fun one: She gets to break up with Justin Timberlake and then leave the movie all together. It’s worth noting that her male counterpart, the guy breaking up with Mila Kunis, is Andy Samberg. Stone is clearly here as comic relief, and it’s telling that the movie (ostensibly a comedy) trusts her to carry that responsibility on her own. Stone and Samberg would have the opportunity to reconnect a few years later with her cameo in Popstar, and even though that part is too slight to make this list, it’s even funnier. (“Turn up the beef!”)

    Year: 2015
    Director: Woody Allen
    Run time: 1h 35m

    The better of Stone’s two Woody Allen films, Irrational Man finds her playing a bright, impressionable college student who’s smitten with her brilliant, morose philosophy professor (Joaquin Phoenix), who starts developing feelings for her, too. If Magic in the Moonlight was Stone’s chance at a frothy Allen period comedy, Irrational Man is more Crimes and Misdemeanors, analyzing morality, guilt, and the absence of God in the midst of a murder plot. Stone’s role is crucial — she comes to understand just how troubled and dangerous her teacher is, and must take action — but the actress doesn’t bring enough gravitas to this drama. Her effervescence gets reduced to blandness in Allen’s movies, which ultimately feels more like his issue than hers.

    Year: 2015
    Director: Cameron Crowe
    Run time: 1h 45m

    Photo: Neal Preston/Columbia

    Our mild defense of Stone’s notorious casting as Allison Ng, an Air Force captain whose father is half-Hawaiian and half-Chinese, is that part of the joke of the character is that she loves bragging about her ethnically diverse background — even though she looks like, well, Emma Stone. But that joke, like many in Aloha, isn’t particularly good, and it also doesn’t help that Stone plays Allison with a little too much earnest adorableness, never establishing much of a rapport with Bradley Cooper’s spiritually adrift military contractor. (That’s a problem, considering they’re supposed to fall in love.) Stone has since apologized for her part in the whitewashed casting, satirizing herself during a 2015 SNL skit in which she auditions for Star Wars based on her ability to play Asian characters. It’s a sign of how flawed Aloha is that its best moment comes when Stone dances with Bill Murray to Hall and Oates’ “I Can’t Go for That (No Can Do).” She’d show off more dance moves in a better movie a year later.

    Year: 2009
    Directors: Michele Mulroney and Kieran Mulroney
    Run time: 1h 50m

    A rambling, moody, mostly dull middle-aged-white-guy-in-crisis movie about a blocked writer (Jeff Daniels) with an imaginary superhero friend (Ryan Reynolds), Paper Man only comes to life when Stone is onscreen as a teenage girl who befriends this sad-sack after losing her twin sister. Daniels is morose and whiny and Reynolds is hammy and over-the-top, which allows Stone to steal the movie, giving it its only modicum of zest and soul. She’s too good to be the fantasy of some old white guys, and soon, she wouldn’t have to be.

    Year: 2013
    Director: Various, Stone’s segment by Griffin Dunne
    Run time: 1h 30m

    This star-studded Kentucky Fried Movie homage — seriously, how did this movie get Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslet, Halle Berry, Chris Pratt, Dennis Quaid, Uma Thurman, Naomi Watts, and Richard Gere? — only has two decent segments. One is a cruel but admirably strange joke on homeschooling starring Watts and Liev Schreiber, and the other is a gonzo scene in which Stone and Kieran Culkin exchange supercharged sexual banter in a grocery store over the intercom. It’s as dumb as everything else in this movie, but both Culkin and Stone play it perfectly. Check out the way Stone says, “He was a wizard, Neil! We’re still laughing.

    Years: 2012 and 2014
    Director: Marc Webb
    Run time: 2h16m (The Amazing Spider-Man); 2h 22m (sequel)

    The Marc Webb–Andrew Garfield reboot of the Spider-Man series was pretty much dead on arrival — this might be the least-inspired comic-book sequel since Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer — but the one thing that does work is the relationship between Peter Parker and Gwen Stacy. Garfield and Stone were dating in real life during the film, and it’s telling that the movie essentially stops every time they start talking to each other: They’re incredibly charming. Unfortunately, the comic-book gods must be fed, and thus, the lousiness of the rest of the movie and the end of a franchise flirtation that, all told, Stone is probably pleased to be rid of.

    Year: 2009
    Director: Mark Waters
    Run time: 1h 40m

    Stone plays the actual ghost-girlfriend of the title — a character named Allison who visits Matthew McConaughey’s slick bachelor and shows him the error of his ways with the women in his past. She has crazy wigged-out hair and braces, but she’s also quick and goofy in a way that McConaughey isn’t: This was right before the McConaissance, back when he was still mailing in stuff like this. It’s a small part, but Stone makes it count. When the movie is looking for a final joke beat at the end, it goes back to her, the one person who consistently provided them.

    Year: 2021
    Director: Craig Gillespie
    Run time: 2h 14m

    Photo: Disney+

    A little more than ten years after killing her first starring vehicle (Easy A), Cruella demonstrates how far Stone has come. Playing the future Cruella de Vil in an origin story nobody asked for, she’s at the peak of her movie-star powers as she rocks a British accent and struts through scenes as her glammed-out alter ego, happily wrapping the film around her finger. It’s a showy performance, but because there remains something so self-effacing and charming about her, it’s never overindulgent — you’ll get a kick out of how much of a ball she’s having. Unfortunately … this is an origin story nobody asked for, and the filmmakers have given her so little to work with that she has to do all the heavy lifting herself. This may be the first time that one of her films was too small to contain her.

    Year: 2008
    Director: Fred Wolf
    Run time: 1h 38m

    One of the most underrated and endlessly rewatchable comedies of the last 15 years, The House Bunny is so stupid/funny/sweet that it’s impossible to resist. That’s especially true of Stone as Natalie, a delightfully nerdy member of a loser sorority that’s transformed by the dim-bulb beauty Shelley (Anna Faris), who’s been kicked out of the Playboy Mansion. This geek-to-chic comedy was meant to be Faris’s big breakthrough, but Stone holds her own as the nerdy straight woman to Shelley’s ditzy, kindhearted stupidity. They’re a terrifically funny pair as Stone perfected her adorkable persona just as major stardom beckoned.

    Year: 2025
    Director: Ari Aster
    Run time: 2h 25m

    Stone’s role — to the chagrin of many critics who found Ari Aster’s “pandemic western” snide, formless, and frustrating (we’re among them) — is smaller than the ads make it look. That she’s so haunting during her short screen time speaks even worse of the movie. She plays Louise, the utterly stricken wife of Joaquin Phoenix’s Sheriff Joe, a woman so damaged that her pain and loss threaten to overwhelm the often glib film every time she appears. Stone has never looked quite so broken before, and there is something so raw and upsetting about her performance that you wish it were in a movie more worthy of it.

    Year: 2007
    Director: Greg Mottola
    Run time: 1h 59m

    One of the reasons you like Jonah Hill’s Seth in this movie — even though he’s disgusting, he says horrible things about women, and he can’t even steal a keg properly — is because of the great taste he has in his idealized crush. Stone’s Jules is smarter and kinder than everyone else in the movie. She has her shit together, yet she’s just silly enough to find Seth sort of charming, in spite of herself. This was her first movie role. Who wouldn’t want to see more?

    Year: 2011
    Director: Dan Fogelman
    Run time: 1h 47m

    Photo: Warner Bros.

    If this irritatingly cutesy rom-com had focused more on Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling’s story line, we would have liked it a lot more. The rest of the film strains to be profound about how screwy love can be, but she’s a delight as Hannah, a goody-goody law-school grad who decides she’s had it with her noncommittal boyfriend and takes a chance on Jacob, a seductive womanizer who’s blessed to look like Ryan Gosling. Like several Stone roles, Crazy, Stupid, Love. allows her to start off as slightly nerdy before she gets to show off her wilder side — which, naturally, is still kinda nerdy but very endearing. Hannah may be uptight, but she’s funny as hell, and Stone’s wiseass attitude is on great display when she convinces him to take off his shirt, losing her mind after she finally checks out his abs. The highlight of the movie comes later in the same scene, when Stone and Gosling re-create Dirty Dancing’s most famous moment (with the help of a body double). It’s light on its feet, but also very sexy.

    Years: 2009 and 2019
    Director: Ruben Fleischer
    Run time: 1h 28m (Zombieland); 1h 39m (Zombieland: Double Tap)

    This is another supporting role, but she brings her no-nonsense, brash-but-so-fun persona to the next level as one of the few survivors of the zombie holocaust, foraging throughout the bombed-out landscape with Jesse Eisenberg, Abigail Breslin and Woody Harrelson. (And Bill Murray, of course.) This is a minor part, but she makes it a major one: She grabs the funky, off-kilter Zombieland and ramps it up into something soulful and warm. It was exciting to watch a star being born — while the best you can say about the ill-advised sequel is that, even though she was by then way too famous to be doing something like this, she still seemed to give it her goofy all.

    Year: 2011
    Director: Tate Taylor
    Run time: 2h 26m

    Tate Taylor’s surprise monster hit could have been cloying and white-savior-y — and at times it is — but Stone grounds it with her ability to play characters who are screw-ups and awkward and gangly but also glamorous and more capable than just about everyone else around them. Impressively, she knows when to step aside and cede to her co-stars, giving Octavia Spencer, Viola Davis, and Jessica Chastain the room they need to lead the movie … before reeling it back in to keep the movie centered. It’s a quietly impressive performance, and the mark of a true star.

    Year: 2017
    Directors: Valerie Faris, Jonathan Dayton
    Run time: 2h 2m

    Stone couldn’t have known at the time — Battle of the Sexes was shot before La La Land’s awards campaign really got rolling — but this crowd-pleasing biopic is the perfect soft landing after that Oscar-winning game changer. Here, she plays Billie Jean King, the best player in women’s tennis in the early 1970s, who decides that she and her tour mates shouldn’t be paid so much less than their male counterparts. The film is a feminist parable that can sometimes be too rah-rah — favoring sentiment over nuance — but Stone supplies the heart, showing us a woman fighting for equality but also wrestling with her sexuality, getting involved with a beautiful hairdresser (Andrea Riseborough) but keeping the relationship under wraps for fear of angering fans and promoters. In future years, Battle of the Sexes may be the movie we point to where Stone pivoted away from her more adorable roles to something a little more grown-up and weary. Her King is intelligent and cutting, but she’s also a person who seems to be looking for something just out of reach, which gives the performance real poignancy. Stone and Riseborough’s tentative romance is sensual in a relaxed way; it’s the film’s emotional centerpiece. And when King finally faces off with that showboating Bobby Riggs (Steve Carell) in the finale, Stone guides her character to an ending that’s more emotional and tempered than one might expect — even if you know how their match ended up in real life.

    Year: 2025
    Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
    Run time: 1h 58m

    Photo: Atsushi Nishijima/Focus Features

    As you’ll notice from the top rungs of our rankings, we are very high on Stone’s recent collaborations with Yorgos Lanthimos, which have found her enjoying great success while pushing herself into daring new terrain. Put it this way: We think Bugonia is the least effective of their four films, yet look where we placed it on this list. And that’s because Stone is terrific as Michelle, a callous pharmaceutical CEO who is kidnapped by two local conspiracy theorists (Jesse Plemons, Aidan Delbis) who are convinced she’s an alien with nefarious plans for the human race. Her head shaved bald for most of Bugonia’s run time, Stone captures this darkly comic thriller’s central tension, leaving audiences wondering if Michelle is an extraterrestrial or merely a one-percenter trapped in a terrifying situation. The film’s twists and turns wouldn’t be nearly as effective without Stone’s tightly controlled performance. Michelle is funny, she’s calculating, she’s scared, and she may be harboring a dark secret. Stone delights in leaving us guessing until the final, shocking reveal.

    Year: 2014
    Director: Alejandro González Iñárritu
    Run time: 2h

    Stone received her first Oscar nomination for this Best Picture winner, playing Michael Keaton’s prickly daughter Sam, who’s a recovering addict and a hell of a flirt. Birdman was a major changeup for Stone: She’d done other dramas, but she’d never seemed this dangerous. Shedding her cutie-pie image, Stone convincingly berates her character’s delusional father, and then practically steals the movie during a rooftop scene with Edward Norton’s vain leading man. In a movie that, for better and for worse, is a celebration of flashy virtuosity, Stone is a stealth missile, blowing up every scene she’s in.

    Year: 2024
    Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
    Run time: 2h 45m

    After winning her second Oscar for Poor Things, Emma Stone and Lanthimos reunited for this freewheeling, super-dark lark that consists of three short films in which Stone and other cast members play different characters in each. The second and third shorts, “R.M.F. Is Flying” and “R.M.F. Eats a Sandwich,” are the ones in which she takes center stage, and she’s predictably terrific as, respectively, a wife lost as sea who returns home (but may not be herself) and a cult member in search of a strange woman. Perhaps you’ve come to expect a certain degree of twisted weirdness from Stone when she hooks up with Lanthimos, but Kinds of Kindness proves that there’s still plenty of nuttiness for her to explore. None of her three performances in this triptych is like the others, and each is a dazzling, tightly controlled tour de force. Plus, nobody dances like her.

    Year: 2018
    Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
    Run time: 2h

    Photo: Atsushi Nishijima/Twentieth Century Fox

    As a rule, we tend not to get hung up on so-called category fraud when it comes to which actor gets positioned as the lead for Oscar consideration. That said, as great as Olivia Colman is in The Favourite, technically speaking Emma Stone’s character, the conniving Abigail, is the real main character, driving the action forward and worming her way into the Queen’s heart (and bed). The edginess that Stone brought to her role in Birdman was sharpened for this film, resulting in a darkly comic turn that’s also surprisingly touching. (As much as Abigail is using Queen Anne, she does have some sympathy for this ailing, lonely woman.) Much has been made of the fact that Yorgos Lanthimos’ spiky comedy is like an 18th-century All About Eve, which means Stone is in the Anne Baxter role, and it’s delicious watching this poisonous schemer get exactly what she wants — and still receive the comeuppance that she so richly deserves.

    Year: 2010
    Director: Will Gluck
    Run time: 1h 32m

    This teen riff on The Scarlet Letter was Stone’s first starring role, and she later admitted that the stress of making it led to many sleepless nights. You’d never know from watching the breezy, sneakily emotional Easy A, which is the epitome of Stone’s sweet-and-spiky persona. She plays Olive, a precocious, misfit 17-year-old who lies about losing her virginity, which suddenly makes her unexpectedly popular. Even when the movie’s inspiration starts to flag, Olive is such a likable, original teenager — smart but sensitive, funny but vulnerable — that she’s like a magnet pulling you into the screen.

    Year: 2023
    Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
    Run time: 2h 21m

    Stone’s second collaboration with Yorgos Lanthimos is even wilder than the first, finding her delivering a master class in physical comedy as a naïve innocent named Bella whose body was fished out of the river after she committed suicide. Now reawakened by Dr. Baxter (Willem Dafoe), a mad scientist who lives for his unholy experiments, she doesn’t know who she once was, babbling like an idiot and exuding the emotional intelligence of an infant. But Bella is a quick study, whisked away by a horny lawyer (Mark Ruffalo) in this jet-black comedy, which may be the purest expression of her irreverent, inspired goofball side. She’s a revelation in Poor Things, navigating Bella’s sexual and personal evolution over the course of the film, transforming from a naïf to a fully empowered young woman, consistently hilarious throughout. The movie lets Stone rip, proving that despite winning an Oscar, she’s not afraid to still take big swings. This one she knocks out of the park, and she got Academy Award No. 2 in the process.

    Year: 2016
    Director: Damien Chazelle
    Run time: 2h 8m

    Photo: Dale Robinette/Courtesy of Lionsgate Entertainment Inc

    Many actors win their Oscar for a role that’s not close to their finest work. Happily, that’s not the case with Emma Stone. She’s never been better than she was as Mia, a struggling young actress who’s trying to find herself just as she falls for a suave jazz pianist (Gosling, again). La La Land has been debated, dissected, mocked, and scorned, but the film’s many critics haven’t really complained about Stone. That’s because she’s perfect: Hollywood is full of starlets, but none have just the right combination of wide-eyed optimism, snarky wit, and gal-next-door sweetness that Stone brought to the performance. Which moment in this nostalgic, bittersweet musical won her the Best Actress Oscar? Was it when she and Gosling tap-dance in the Hollywood Hills, or when they swirl among the stars at the Griffith Observatory? Was it the teary speech where Mia admits that maybe she’s not talented enough to make it? All are indelible, but the answer has to be “Audition (The Fools Who Dream),” in which Mia gives the casting directors (and the audience) a four-minute primer on her hopes, fears, and upbringing. Right there, you see an actress who is finally tapping into the greatness that’s always been inside her, just dying to come out. That applies to Mia as much as it does Stone, who, with La La Land, turned her lovable, indomitable spirit into something timeless.

    Grierson & Leitch write about the movies regularly and host a podcast on film. Follow them on Twitter or visit their site.

    [ad_2]

    Will Leitch,Tim Grierson

    Source link

  • Tom Holland’s Spider-Man 4 Is Coming In 2026

    Tom Holland’s Spider-Man 4 Is Coming In 2026

    [ad_1]

    The MCU’s favorite web-crawler will return to theaters in 2026. Spider-Man 4 will debut shortly after Avengers: Doomsday that year, with star Tom Holland confirming that production will begin mid-2025.

    “Next summer we start shooting. Everything’s good to go, We’re nearly there,” Holland said in an interview on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon earlier this week. “Super exciting. I can’t wait!” Spider-Man 4, the follow up to 2021’s No Way Home, will officially release on July 24, 2026.

    That puts it just a couple months after Avengers: Doomsday, which debuts on May 1 of that year, and stars Robert Downey Jr. as the titular Fantastic Four villain, as was revealed earlier this year at San Diego Comic Con 2024. That grouping recreates the previous one-two comic book punch when Far From Home released shortly after Avengers: Endgame, capping off the multi-year, multi-movie MCU saga.

    Read More: Ranking The Spider-Man Movies From Worst To Best, Now Including Venom 3

    The sequel will be directed by Destin Daniel Cretton, who made Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, and presumably have some tie-in with the greater MCU, though it’s not clear how exactly yet. “I’ve been speaking to [Robert Downey Jr.] a lot, especially about him making his [Marvel] return, which is super exciting,” Holland said on the Rich Roll podcast earlier this month. “That was a tough secret to sit on because I have a reputation for ruining things and I strategically have done no press.”

    The young actor, who also starred in 2022’s Uncharted, an adaptation of the hit PlayStation games, said the script for Spider-Man 4 had him excited. “We have a creative and we have a pitch and a draft, which is excellent. It needs work, but the writers are doing a great job. I read it three weeks ago and it really lit a fire in me,” Holland told the Rich Roll podcast. “Zendaya and I sat down and read it together and we at times were bouncing around the living room like this is a real movie worthy of the fans’ respect.”

    2026 is still a ways off and Insomniac Games recently confirmed that its Spider-Man 2 PS5 game won’t be getting any story DLC. The hit 2023 blockbuster will, however, be coming to PC next January.

    [ad_2]

    Ethan Gach

    Source link

  • Why Did Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone Break Up? Inside That Resurfaced Rumor

    Why Did Andrew Garfield & Emma Stone Break Up? Inside That Resurfaced Rumor

    [ad_1]

    Since their split, fans have wondered why Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone broke up and where The Amazing Spider-Man co-stars are now after they ended their relationship one year after the final Spider-Man movie.

    Garfield and Stone started dating in 2011 while filming The Amazing Spider-Man, in which they played love interests Peter Parker (a.k.a. Spider-Man) and Gwen Stacy. In an interview with MTV News in 2012, Garfield recalled his “instant connection” with Stone while filming the movie. “We got on really well as people, in between [takes],” he said. “That was the fun stuff: In between, we’d just mess around, and I felt, ‘Ah, this is different.’ I wasn’t really aware what was happening in the screen test. She keeps you on your toes, and that wakes you up. That was the beginning.” Garfield told Teen Vogue at the time that he knew there was something special about Stone when he met her at her audition. “It was like I woke up when she came in… It was like diving into white-water rapids and having no desire to hang onto the side. Throughout shooting, it was wild and exciting,” he said.

    Stone and Garfield are one of three Spider-Man couples to have dated in real life. The first couple was Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, who played love interests Peter Parker/Spider-Man and Mary Jane Watson, in Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man movies. The two started dating while filming 2002’s Spider-Man but split before production started on 2004’s Spider-Man 2. Garfield and Stone were the next Spider-Man couple to have dated in real life followed by Tom Holland and Zendaya, who play Peter Parker/Spider-Man and Michelle Jones-Watson in the Marvel Cinematic Universe’ Spider-Man movies.

    In an interview with The New York Times in 2021, MCU Spider-Man producer Amy Pascal revealed that she told Holland and Zendaya, as well as Garfield and Stone not to date each other after Maguire and Dunst’s breakup in the middle of the Spider-Man movies. “I took Tom and Zendaya aside, separately, when we first cast them and gave them a lecture. Don’t go there—just don’t. Try not to,” she said.  “I gave the same advice to Andrew and Emma. It can just complicate things, you know? And they all ignored me.”

    Garfield and Stone split in 2015, a year after the release of their last Spider-Man movie together, The Amazing Spider-Man 2. So why did Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone break up? Read on for the real reason they split and where Garfield and Stone are now.

    Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone
    Image: John Shearer/Invision/AP.

    Why did Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone break up?

    Garfield and Stone split in 2015 after four years together. A source told Us Weekly in October 2015 that the couple split a “couple months ago” but remain friends. “They still have a lot of love for one another and they are on good terms with each another and remain close,” the insider said. “It just wasn’t working.”

    A source also told People at the time that there was “no drama” in Garfield and Stone’s breakup and confirmed that the two ended their relationship on good terms. “There was no drama, they’ve been apart while working. They still care about each other,” the insider said. “They still have love for one another. They are on good terms with each other and remain close.”

     Long distance could have also been the reason. Stone and Garfield’s split came four months after a source told People in April 2010 that the two were taking a break due to long distance. Garfield at the time was filming his movie Silence in Taiwan, while Stone was in Los Angeles for the Golden Globes and Oscars, where she was nominated for Best Supporting Actress for her role in Birdman. “He’s thrown himself in the project to the detriment of all else,” the insider said. But it’s too early to say the relationship is over.”

    The source continued, “Emma understands his work anxieties—it’s why she originally pulled out of Cabaret last year and only did it this year—but they’re taking a break from seeing each other. They’re both a slave to their schedules. This time last year they were privately discussing marriage.”

    The insider also explained that Stone and Garfield had decided not to split officially until the next time they saw each other. “It’s one of those situations where only Andrew and Emma quite know if they’ll pick up where they left off or they’ve separated,” the source said. “They are just separated for work. Andrew is overseas. They are both busy with their careers and have not seen each other.”

    A source also told Us Weekly at the time that Stone and Garfield’s relationship ended due to the “dark place” Garfield was in as he was filming Silence, in which Garfield plays a 17-century Jesuit and lost 40 pounds for. “He’d been in a dark place for months, getting into his role,” the insider said. “He wasn’t being the best partner.”

    Rumors that Garfield cheated on Stone resurfaced in 2024 after his Chicken Shop Date with host Amelia Dimoldenberg. A source told OK! magazine in 2015 Stone noticed that Garfield was seemingly distant and “basically called him out on his behavior and demanded to know exactly what was going on,” which is when he confessed to his alleged infidelity. “She was horrified,” the insider said.

    The insider claimed that Garfield blamed his behavior on stress at first before eventually confessing to Stone. “He felt truly terrible about it,” the source said. “He says that he met a girl in a bar, and that he would never dream of doing anything like that ever again.”

    The source continued, “She never thought that he’d be capable of this in a million years, and she’s beside herself.” After the incident, the insider claimed that Stone moved out of her and Garfield’s Los Angeles, New York, and London homes. “Emma’s getting all of her stuff together and looking for a new place in L.A.,” the insider said. “She feels betrayed and says that she can’t be with someone she doesn’t trust. She knows that they can’t be together every second of every day and doesn’t want to be constantly worried that he’ll cheat again.”

    Where are Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone now?

    So where are Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone now? In 2017, two years after her breakup from Garfield, Stone started dating Saturday Night Live director Dave McCary. They got engaged in December 2019 and married in 2020. The two welcomed their first child together, a daughter named Louise Jean McCary, in March 2021. The name was a tribute to Stone’s grandmother, Jean Louise. Jean is also Stone’s middle name. As for Garfield, news broke in November 2021 that he was dating model Alyssa Miller, who has also been linked to Spider-Man: Far From Home actor Jake Gyllenhaal.

    In an interview with IMDb in 2019, Garfield opened up about his view on love. “Yes, I do believe in love at first sight but I also believe that you would love absolutely anybody if you knew their story,” he said. “I believe that the modern notion of romantic love is seriously misguided and it creates a lot of problems in our modern world.” He continued, “I believe that we need to reevaluate this idea that we have of the nuclear family, this idea that we have of two-point-four children, this idea we have that it’s Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve. I believe it’s possible for all of us to be in love all the time with ourselves and everyone around us.”

    Garfield confirmed in an interview with Variety in 2021 that he and Stone remain friends while looking back on The Amazing Spider-Man franchise. “It was only beautiful,” he said. “I got to meet Emma [Stone] and work with her and Sally Field.” Garfield was also seen giving Stone a standing ovation when she won a Golden Globe for La La Land in 2017. “I’m her biggest fan as an artist. I’m constantly inspired by her work. I’m constantly inspired by how she handles and holds herself,” Garfield told Vanity Fair at the time. “So, for me it’s been bliss to be able to watch her success and watch her bloom into the actress she is.”

    He continued, “We care about each other so much, and that’s a given, that’s kind of this unconditional thing. There’s so much love between us and so much respect … It’s also been wonderful to have that kind of support for each other. It’s nothing but a beautiful thing.”

    Warning: Spider-Man: No Way Home spoilers ahead. There were also rumors that Stone was set to star with Garfield in 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home but she pulled out of the role due to the health crisis and her pregnancy with her daughter at the time. Spider-Man: No Way Home saw Garfield reprise his role as Peter Parker (a.k.a. Spider-Man) after a spell by Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) brought him and other characters from other Spider-Man franchises to the MCU’s Spider-Man universe. The movie also saw Garfield’s Spider-Man save MJ (Zendaya)—the love interest of Tom Holland’s Spider-Man—after MJ fell off of the Statue of Liberty. The scene was a reference to the death of Gwen Stacy (Stone) in The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which saw Garfield’s Spider-Man fail to save her after she falls in a similar way.

    The Marvel Cinematic Universe movies are available to stream on Disney Plus. Here’s how to watch them for free.

    Image: Courtesy of Marvel. Insight Editions.

    For more about Spider-Man, check out Marvel’s special edition book, Spider-Man: From Amazing to Spectacular: The Definitive Comic Art Collection, which takes readers through 50 years of Spider-Man. The deluxe art book—which includes exclusive interviews and content from the writers and illustrators that brought the Marvel superhero to life half a century ago—follows Spider-Man’s history, from his first appearance in Amazing Fantasy #15 in 1962 to how he went from being Marvel’s chronic underdog to the amazing and spectacular superhero fans know today. The book—which also includes a deep dive into Spider-Man’s superpowers, including his spider-like strength, genius mind and webslingers (not to mention his “fully loaded arsenal of quips—Spider-Man: From Amazing to Spectacular also features never-before-seen art of the friendly neighborhood superhero, and behind-the-scene details from creators like Brian Michael Bendis, Gerry Conway and Tom DeFalco, as well as others who helped bring Peter Parker to life. Spider-Man: From Amazing to Spectacular is a must-read for any Marvel superfan.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Pham

    Source link

  • Spider-Man 2 Players Discover Its Most Absurd Glitch

    Spider-Man 2 Players Discover Its Most Absurd Glitch

    [ad_1]

    Now that Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 is finally out in the wild, players are finding all of its cool moments and comic book Easter eggs. But a bunch have encountered something much more unexpected: a glitch that turns Spider-Man into a little white lump of tofu.

    It’s not technically tofu per se, but that’s certainly what some players think it looks like. The strange bug sees a small cube you might associate with early development prototyping completely replace the titular superhero’s body. Spider-Block as some are calling it (me, I’m calling him that) can still do all the amazing things the neighborhood web-crawler normally does, like web-slinging through New York and comboing bad guys skyward. The weird glitch transforms the experience from cool comic book stuff to extra-surreal fever dream.

    Social media is already full of players encountering the cube glitch:

    Despite the bug’s prevalence, no one really seems to be sure exactly what causes it. The tofu slabs just appear any time either Peter Parker or Miles Morales’ suit model fails to load. Then it’s cube time. You can fix it by going back to the suit menu and swapping to a different costume. It’s smart to do that quickly, too, since there are reports of some cubed players falling through the map after their unexpected transfigurations. Perhaps therein lies a portal to the blockverse, but your best bet is just to reload from the last checkpoint if that happens.

    Fortunately, my 40-hour experience with Spider-Man 2 was mostly bug free, though some players have reported game crashes or occasionally getting stuck on parts of the environment. A few players have even reported being unable to play the disc version of the game at all, with installations getting stuck at 36 percent. Insomniac Games hasn’t yet provided an official workaround, though the issue doesn’t seem to be too widespread. Hopefully it gets solved soon so those players can also experience the glory of Spider-Block.

    [ad_2]

    Ethan Gach

    Source link

  • Is Peter Parker More Buff In Spider-Man 2? A Kotaku Investigation

    Is Peter Parker More Buff In Spider-Man 2? A Kotaku Investigation

    [ad_1]

    Spider-Man 2, the highly anticipated sequel to Insomniac Games’ blockbuster 2018 action-adventure game, is out today, October 20. And though there’s plenty to be said about the impossibly fast fast-travel, the fantastic opening scene, and the story thus far, there’s one thing that I can’t get off my mind: Peter Parker’s muscles.

    When I played through Spider-Man 2’s opening scene, which frequently has Peter and Miles Morales fighting side-by-side, I noticed that the former seemed more beefed up than in the original game. And I’m not alone: The replies in my post on X (formerly Twitter) wondering if Peter got on that protein grind are full of people remarking on his physique.

    The term “caked up” is being thrown around, and not just when he’s in that skin-tight suit. Even when he’s not wearing the Spider-Man costume, Peter boasts a neck so thick he looks like a WWE wrestler. There’s certainly at least the illusion of a buffed-up Peter, but is this just the result of the sequel being a PS5-only release, and therefore able to make the most of the current-gen consoles graphical rendering power?

    Or perhaps Insomniac, knowing that there are more tag-team fights in the sequel, decided to make Peter a bit thicker so you could better delineate between him and Miles mid-battle. Maybe Peter, despite struggling to keep a job, clean his recently deceased Aunt’s house, and otherwise live a well-balanced life, decided to up his creatine intake and start meal-prepping some ground turkey and rice.

    Read More: Spider-Man 2 Dev Hints Insomniac Is Open To A Venom Spin-Off

    But speculation without proof is irresponsible, especially for a journalist. So I tried to prove that Peter Parker is more muscular in Spider-Man 2 than he is in the original game. I’m an amateur weight-lifter myself, and I can recognize when a lat spread looks decidedly more spread-y than previous versions. But that’s not enough—I asked other journalists who are experts in the field (“a real twink to twunk moment IMO,” said io9’s James Whitbrook, who noticed Peter’s neck and chest definition the most). I texted an ex who once chided me for not mixing creatine into my diet. I pored over a video comparing the visuals from the first and second games, lingering far too long on his gluteal fold. That last one helped me see the differences in Peter’s base costume (color changes, adjustments to patterns, etc.) as well as the slight changes to his body, which could be the result of him aging, spending more time as Spider-Man rather than Peter, or a new workout regimen.

    Screenshot: Nick930 / Insomniac / Sony / Kotaku

    Here’s what I noticed. His neck is definitely thicker, which could be the result of an increase in weighted shrugs (both dumbbell and Kirk) and/or weighted neck extensions. His lat spread, or latissimus dorsi (which covers the width of your middle and lower back), is definitely larger and more defined, likely the result of lat pull downs and/or pull-ups.

    Side-by-side shots of Peter Parker's lower half in Spider-Man 1 and Spider-Man 2.

    Peter Parker’s cupcake in Spider-Man 1 and his actual cake in Spider-Man 2.
    Screenshot: Nick930 / Insomniac / Sony / Kotaku

    Most importantly, his butt and hamstrings are more defined and juicy, which could be thanks to Romanian deadlifts, sumo squats, and/or glute bridges. The fact that he’s a superhero likely contributes to him having a far easier time gaining and toning muscle than your average person—though you will definitely see some results if you start mixing the aforementioned workouts into your daily routine. You’re welcome.

    I reached out to Insomniac Games for comment regarding Peter’s physique, but did not receive a response in time for publication. Despite this, I can say with some confidence that Spider-Man 2’s Peter Parker is a bit more of a beefcake than he was in the previous game. Case closed. I’ll await my Pulitzer.

    [ad_2]

    Alyssa Mercante

    Source link

  • Spider-Man 2 Has One Hell Of An Opening

    Spider-Man 2 Has One Hell Of An Opening

    [ad_1]

    Spider-Man 2 doesn’t waste any time showing you all of the ways it’s bigger and better than the first two games. The result is one of the best video game openings ever.

    If you plan on playing Spider-Man 2 and haven’t finished the first half-hour yet, you should go do that first.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    Spider-Man 2 stars Peter Parker and Miles Morales, so naturally the first mission features both of them working together like a well-oiled superhero machine. Miles is a high school student and Peter is teaching his class. When dust starts coming in the windows and an emergency breaks out downtown, the two bounce out of the building and strip down to their uniforms as the game’s hip-hop theme (“Swing” by Atlanta-based duo EarthGang) plays.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    The opening cleverly makes use of Spider-Man 2’s bigger New York City map, which adds t Queens and Brooklyn on the other side of the East River. The first thing Peter and Miles do is web-swing across the Brooklyn Bridge to get to Manhattan’s Financial District where another villain is once again on the loose. It’s immediately clear just how much more expansive the game looks and feels, with glistening skyscrapers in full view across the shimmering water.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    The villain in question is none other than Sandman, probably my least favorite entry in the Spider-Man rogues gallery. His shoehorned inclusion in 2007’s chaotic Spider-Man 3 did little to help that. But there’s no origin story here, just Flint Marko transformed into a 40-story-tall sand monster rampaging through the Financial District. He’s massive, but not so massive the Spider-Men can’t web his eyes shut and punch him in the face. It’s absurd but immensely gratifying.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    The initial slugfest is just the start. The fight also takes Peter and Miles inside a nearby building, battling armies of mini-Sandmen while they run through the halls saving civilians and scrambling to get to the water tank on the rooftop as everything around them breaks apart. It’s an incredibly elegant sequence of real-time action and quick-time cutscenes that’s visually stunning and feels seamlessly stitched together.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    This intro alone, topped off with a final boss fight sequence that looks better than most Marvel movies, would be enough to make it one of the best setpieces ever in a first-party PlayStation game. But then there’s something Insomniac does just because it can: fling Miles halfway across Midtown and back again in a 20 second shot that never cuts.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    The entire encounter feels like some of the best tricks from Uncharted and God of War blended into Insomniac’s unique spin on cinematic comic book choreography. It even uses the action-packed chain of events to introduce the web wings, Spider-Man 2‘s best new trick which lets Peter and Miles glide through the air like Batman.

    Gif: Insomniac Games / Sony / Kotaku

    The opening scene takes less than 20 minutes and succeeds at both reminding players how to play a Spider-Man game and proving why Spider-Man 2 is more than just more Spider-Man. Some games start with drawn-out conversations or extended cutscenes. Others have you rigidly go through a tutorial bogged down in explanations and button prompts. Spider-Man 2 is like getting dropped into a rocket that’s just started counting down to lift off. More games should do that.

                   

    [ad_2]

    Ethan Gach

    Source link

  • Anime Fans Are Laughing At MJ’s Botched ‘Akira’ Slide In Spider-Man 2

    Anime Fans Are Laughing At MJ’s Botched ‘Akira’ Slide In Spider-Man 2

    [ad_1]

    A new Spider-Man 2 launch trailer debuted just ahead of its October 20 release, and it’s got a brief clip that has anime fans going wild. The trailer, which shows off villains like Sandman, Mr. Negative, and Venom, also has what looks to be an attempt at an iconic move from the beloved 1998 anime film, Akira. Unfortunately, fans aren’t thrilled at Spider-Man 2’s tribute to the anime film—they’re laughing.

    Akira is a touchstone in the animation community and beyond for its accomplished storytelling and stunning hand-drawn animation. The most memorable moment from the two-hour film is what fans call the “Akira Slide:” a two-second clip where protagonist Kaneda skids his 200-hp motorcycle on the highway. The anime move is so iconic that it’s been replicated in numerous anime, cartoons, video games, and live-action films like Jordan Peele’s Nope. Regardless, any media that has the Akira slide tends to get cool points on the internet— that is unless you’re Spider-Man 2.

    PlayStation / Insomniac Games

    Read More: Spider-Man 2: The Kotaku Review

    In a brief scene from the Spider-Man 2 launch trailer, Mary Jane Watson does her own version of the Akira slide (around the 54-second mark) but things don’t go according to plan. Namely, she falls off her motorcycle before it reaches a complete stop. To her credit, we don’t know the context for why MJ biffed the Akira slide. Maybe she was being chased by one of the many goons Spider-Man is always dealing with and slid out of desperation rather than in an attempt to look cool. Regardless, lack of context hasn’t stopped less-than-charitable anime fans on Twitter and Reddit from dubbing MJ as the first fictional character to botch the Akira slide.

    “Nah MJ fucking up the Akira slide gotta be the top 5 craziest fumble of all time,” Twitch streamer GamesCage wrote on Twitter.

    “I actually found this funny bcs you don’t see people actually failed doing the ‘Akira Slide’,” ADC_Vr said.

    “Mj busting her ass doing the Akira bike slide is some of the funniest shit I didn’t know I needed to see lmfaooo,” Anim0nk wrote.

    “Yoshida-sama has been slighted by this homage through the scarlet woman,” fudgedhobnobs wrote on the r/Spiderman Reddit.

    “She almost did it perfectly, guess not everyone can Akira slide,” Monkey_King291 replied in the same Reddit thread.

    Read More: The Akira Motorcycle Skid: A Celebration

    While some fans are trouncing MJ’s vehicular oopsie as developer Insomniac Games “not [understanding] the assignment” others offered the Marvel heroine an out by reminding fans that they don’t have the context for the clip and that the Akira slide is difficult to replicate in a real-world setting.

    “No one can land it, the Akira slide is literally impossible on pavement unless it’s icy or your tires are greased up,” Red_Naxela_ wrote.

    It’s unclear what set up the Akira motorcycle scene but perhaps we’ll learn more about it through an MJ-centric story mission.

    Spider-Man 2 will release on October 20 exclusively on the PlayStation 5.

    Pre-order Marvel’s Spider-Man 2: Amazon | Best Buy | GameStop

    .

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link

  • Spider-Verse Fans Have Compelling Evidence That Gwen Is Trans

    Spider-Verse Fans Have Compelling Evidence That Gwen Is Trans

    [ad_1]

    Just in time for Pride, Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse moviegoers think the summer box-office phenomenon offers some pretty compelling evidence that one of its heroes, Gwen Stacy, is trans.

    While the film never explicitly raises the issue of whether or not Gwen Stacy is trans over the course of its two-hour and twenty-minute runtime, some Spider-Verse viewers feel that her character arc, which includes a painful coming-out of sorts to her father, functions as a trans allegory. And the visual motifs that the film employs during this pivotal scene only serve to drive home that interpretation.

    Throughout the film, the watercolors lending their hues to the background of Gwen’s universe shift to match the emotions she’s feeling. It lends her whole world a similar look to that of Robbi Rodriguez’s cover art for her 2015 comic book, Radioactive Spider-Gwen.

    However, during a pivotal scene where Gwen reveals to her father, Captain George Stacy, that she’s Spider-Woman, the entire backdrop of the Stacy household is awash in white, blue, and pink watercolors: the same colors that make up the trans pride flag. The tri-color art direction during Gwen’s anguished confession about an aspect of her identity she fears her father won’t accept underscore a conflict that resonated with many trans viewers.

    “I truly thought the ‘Gwen is trans’ stuff in ATSV was just Twitter doing its usual thing but no it’s AGGRESSIVELY loud about it,” Twitter user Blankzilla wrote. “Being draped in the trans colors while giving a speech about having to hide half of yourself from the people you love is as subtle as a brick.”

    “Thinking about Trans Gwen Stacy and her entire plot being about centered around her father’s struggle to believe her and accept her identity,” tori_af said.

    “Mfs be like ‘gwen stacy isn’t trans’ and then they have a four minute sequence in the movie where she’s just the trans flag colors,” Moshy_Maybe wrote.

    Aside from Gwen’s confessional with her father feeling akin to a trans person coming out to their family for the first time, eagle-eyed Spider-Verse viewers also spotted a bunch of items scattered about her house as evidence supporting their ongoing fan theory. For example, one Twitter user pointed out that Gwen has a trans pride pin on her jacket and a “Protect Trans Kids” sticker on her wall, and her dad has a trans pride flag on his police uniform.

    Kotaku reached out to director Kemp Thompson and producers Phil Lord and Chris Miller for comment.

    Sony Pictures Animation

    Gwen Stacy’s visual motif is like a ‘mood ring’

    Spider-Verse fan theories about Gwen Stacy being trans might not be entirely off the mark. In an interview with Cinema Blend, Gwen Stacy actress Hailee Steinfeld revealed that Spider-Verse director Kemp Thompson and producers Phil Lord and Chris Miller described the watercolors of Gwen’s world as “like a mood ring.”

    “It will visually change as her circumstances change, and the emotions she feels we will feel in the audience on screen,” Steinfield told Cinema Blend, adding, “I’m biased, but Gwen’s world is pretty beautiful.”

    If the filmmakers had the wherewithal to drop a visual hint that Miles altered his fate from becoming Prowler back in Into The Spider-Verse, who’s to say they didn’t also deliberately drop the most obvious artistic clue that Gwen is trans in Across The Spider-Verse?

    Whether or not Gwen is trans, Twitter user RawbertBeef perfectly encapsulates what Spider-Gwen means to the trans community by saying, “even if the movies never outright confirm it…if she can make somebody feel represented, who are you to tell them they’re wrong?”

       

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link