ReportWire

Tag: textabovecentergridwidth

  • Kathryn Bigelow’s Gripping Netflix Thriller Hits Because It’s So Realistic

    [ad_1]

    Beyond the costume and production design, many of the film’s most astounding details are true. Yes, there is an individual who follows the president around at all times with a briefcase full of nuclear retaliation options. Yes, the US’s main line of defensive anti-ballistic missiles only have a 50% success rate in tests. Yes, there really is a highly classified, self-sufficient underground city built for nuclear fallout at the Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania.

    Karbler, who had a small acting role in the film as Stratcom’s chief of staff, was very focused on the language in the film; he encouraged Bigelow to add a line about “dual phenomenology,” the requirement that both satellite and radar must confirm the existence of a missile before the US can launch a retaliatory strike. “That’s very important to get that little phrase in there, because that’s an important part of determining that truly is a missile coming in,” he says.

    Bigelow’s movie focuses most on the human element—how normal people, even the most highly trained, might react to a catastrophic event. “We make sure our processes are done correctly. We make sure our reporting, our communications, procedures, weapons, employment, is [all] done correctly. It’s very sterile, but very process-oriented,” says Karbler. “This movie brings in the human element in spades.”

    Watching this story from the vantage point of 2025, the unsettling fact Oppenheim pointed out is especially striking: The president of the US has final decision-making power in a theoretical retaliation effort. Elba’s president in the film is well-meaning, and the decision weighs heavily on him. Oppenheim—who began writing the script before Donald Trump took office for his second term—says that, in many ways, the movie presents a best-case scenario. “If everyone in authority is responsible, smart, prepared, and well-intentioned—even in that scenario, this is the outcome,” says Oppenheim. “We’ll leave it to everyone to contemplate how bad things could be, or are, if the folks in those chairs are not smart, prepared experts, and well intended.”

    [ad_2]

    Rebecca Ford

    Source link

  • Queen Camilla Paid Homage to Queen Elizabeth For Historic Meeting With Pope Leo XIV

    [ad_1]

    Another sovereign was on Queen Camilla’s mind the day she met Pope Leo XIV. Joined by King Charles III, Camilla used Vatican dress code to shift the spotlight away from Prince Andrew’s current headline-making misdeeds and invoke another member of the royal family: the late Queen Elizabeth.

    This was no mere audience or regular state visit: the king and head of the Church of England prayed together with a Catholic pontiff for the first time in 500 years. And Camilla dressed for the occasion. She opted to forgo a tiara like the one Queen Elizabeth donned when she met John XXIII on solemn occasions in 1961 or John Paul II in 1980. Instead, Camilla sported a mantilla—a more all-encompassing black veil encircled in a crown of matching leaves designed by Philip Treacy, the celebrated milliner discovered by Isabella Blow. Treacy often lends his services to the sovereign, but also works with other celebrated figures like Grace Jones. The creation is very similar in concept to the Jess Collett x Alexander McQueen signature silver leaf tiara sported by Princess Catherine on Charles’s coronation day, another subtle nod to the past.

    Queen Elizabeth II with Prince Philip at the Vatican in 1961.

    Fox Photos/Getty Images

    Queen Elizabeth II with Prince Philip at the Vatican in 1980.

    Queen Elizabeth II with Prince Philip at the Vatican in 1980.

    Anwar Hussein/Getty Images

    Queen Camilla’s stylishly-framed face looked like a 16th-century portrait—a contemporary Catherine of Aragon. Which is slightly ironic, since relations between the Church of England and the Church of Rome broke down with the schism of 1534 when Henry VIII repudiated Catherine and married Anne Boleyn. Perhaps this sartorial reference was also a studied diplomatic move—a nod toward the concord that Charles, who has called himself a “defender of all faiths,” hopes to achieve.

    In addition to the veil, Vatican protocol for occasions such as this calls for an all-black, simple dress code with no visible marks or flashy jewelry. Camilla wore a no-frills dress designed by Fiona Clare, adorning the frock with a special brooch that once belonged to Elizabeth II. It was a Georgian-era cross called the “raspberry seed,” a nod to the rubies embedded within it. The accessory took on a whole new meaning when Queen Camilla and King Charles met—and prayed with—Pope Leo XIV.

    Originally published in Vanity Fair Italia

    [ad_2]

    Giorgia Olivieri

    Source link

  • November 2025 U.S. Credits

    [ad_1]

    Vanity Fair’s November 2025 issue, featuring Charli xcx

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s YouTube-Insurrection Settlement Will Fund Golden White House Ballroom

    [ad_1]

    Over the summer, the Trump administration announced that it would construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom at the White House, which press secretary Karoline Leavitt described to reporters as a “much-needed and exquisite addition.” Not surprisingly, a rendering looks very Versailles-esque and includes an unrestrained use of the color gold; though the room was initially expected to have a seating capacity for 650 people, Trump later said it would hold 900.) In a statement that she may or may not have been contractually obligated to release, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told the public: “President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail.” Following the announcement, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer wondered aloud. “Where’d this money come from? Did Congress appropriate it? I don’t think so. It’s almost like DOGE was never about waste.” In September, CBS reported that a collection of individual and corporate donors—including Google, Booz Allen Hamilton, Lockheed Martin, and Palantir—had pledged to donate nearly $200 million for construction costs.

    Last month, when a reporter asked how he was “holding up” in the wake of the death of Charlie Kirk, Trump responded, “I think very good,” before quickly shifting focus to the ballroom. “And by the way,” he said, “right there, you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they’ve been trying to get, as you know, for about 150 years. And it’s gonna be a beauty. It’ll be an absolutely magnificent structure.”

    *Will Jimmy Kimmel file a similar lawsuit over his show having been temporarily suspended following comments by Trump’s FCC chair about doing things “the easy way or the hard way”? Stay tuned!

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Tory Burch, Art Garfunkel, Michael Eisner, and More May Be Forced Out of Their NYC Homes

    [ad_1]

    Howard Lutnick has not earned many fans in the eight months since becoming Donald Trump’s commerce secretary, a turn of events that probably has something to do with his embrace of deeply unpopular tariffs, his declaration that said tariffs are “worth it” even if they cause a recession, and his bold claim that only a “fraudster” would complain about missing a Social Security check. But according to new reports, the billionaire former trader and ex-chairman of a real estate firm also recently earned a number of enemies a lot closer to home, i.e. his neighbors at The Pierre, some of whom are pissed about a possible deal to sell the building and potentially evict the residents in the process—which they’ve blamed squarely on the Trump appointee.

    A source told Page Six that at a “star-studded” and “contentious” board meeting last week, fashion designer Tory Burch “lost her usual cool and reserved demeanor” when discussing the prospect of The Pierre—which is both a hotel and a residence—being sold, with part of the funding being provided by the Saudi Khashoggi family, according to The New York Times. It’s a potential transaction that has been negotiated under the guidance of Lutnick’s former real estate firm, which could result in Burch and other homeowners being forced to move out. “Tory, polite at first, raised her voice and was clearly angry about the ‘fast’-moving deal that would displace her from the apartment where she has lived for about two decades,” a source told Page Six. Said another insider, “Tory got progressively madder…. There were dozens of shareholders in the private meeting room, with others joining in by Zoom.” Tina Beriro, another resident of the building, reportedly told the board in an email, “I am an 84-year-old widow with no family and have just redone my apartment at great expense…. To find new accommodations and go through the trauma, exhaustion, and money involved in a move would seriously affect my health, well-being, and finances.” Other residents of the building include former Disney chief Michael Eisner, musician Art Garfunkel, and media mogul Shari Redstone. While Lutnick purchased the biggest unit in the building—a 12,000-square-foot triplex penthouse—in 2017, he apparently has yet to move in.

    As The New York Times reported earlier this month, in 2023, Lutnick urged The Pierre’s board of directors to hire a new management company for the building, which its residents considered to be “falling apart.” The board retained his then real estate firm,* Newmark Group. According to the Times, after “months of discussions” some members of The Pierre’s “transactions” committee determined the current management company, Taj Hotels, was unwilling to put enough money into the property to address the issues, and Newmark and the board began to explore a sale. They are now in the “final stages of negotiations” to sell for approximately $2 billion, with the Khashoggis expected to “provide at least some of the funding for the purchase,” and the Dorchester Collection, owned by the sultanate of Brunei, managing the building following a renovation. Residents could be required to move out.

    According to the Times, through the summer of 2024, Newmark earned nearly $100,000 in monthly consulting fees; industry experts told the outlet the company could collect tens of millions on the possible $2 billion sale. While 50% of residents are said to be opposed to the plan, if two thirds of the residents’ shares are ultimately cast in favor of the deal, it will go through. Per the Times, as Lutnick owns the largest unit in the building, and the 129,000 shares that come with it, he holds both the most voting power and stands to make the most money on the sale when the proceeds are divided.

    *Lutnick stepped down from Newmark (and his other firm, Cantor Fitzgerald) after being confirmed as commerce secretary. Several months later, he sold his stock in Newmark (according to the Times, his family members “retain stakes there”). A spokesperson for the Commerce Department told the Times that Lutnick has not been involved in the potential sale for many months, and that he is unaware of the specifics of the most recent offer.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • October 2025 U.S. Credits

    [ad_1]

    © 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Vanity Fair may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Looming Shutdown Is a Test for the Democrats’ Resolve

    [ad_1]

    On Friday morning, the House passed a stopgap measure to keep the government’s lights on through November 21, in a mostly party-line vote. But it failed in the Senate later in the afternoon as Democrats stood against it, setting the stage for a shutdown at the end of the month.

    “Our Republican colleagues seem to think Americans are happy with the direction of this country,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Friday. “They’re voting like they think the status quo is good enough, even though they’ve heard from so many of their constituents the fear of hospitals closing, of health care being diminished, of premiums going way up.”

    Schumer, of course, blinked during his first standoff with this Republican majority six months ago, arguing that a shutdown would do more harm than good—and angering fellow Democrats, who lamented that he had relinquished the little leverage he had. Not so this time: “The situation is much different,” Schumer told reporters on Tuesday.

    In March, he had worried that Donald Trump and Elon Musk would use a shutdown not only as a political attack line against Democrats, but that they would exploit it to consolidate even more power. But Trump’s power grab is only accelerating, and the MAGA right has gone from accusing Democrats of obstruction to all but casting them as terrorists in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder on a college campus in Utah last week—an event the administration is using to justify a crackdown on “the left.”

    It’s an extraordinarily dangerous moment in the country—and both progressives who opposed Schumer’s capitulation in March and more moderate figures like Ezra Klein are now warning that partnering with Republicans to keep the government open would be to effectively collaborate with a president that is using government “to hound his enemies, to line his pockets, and to entrench his own power.”

    “Democrats, morally speaking, should not fund a government that Trump is turning into a tool of personal enrichment and power,” Klein wrote earlier this month. “Joining Republicans to fund this government is worse than failing at opposition. It’s complicity.”

    The opposition party played hardball Friday. But where things go from here remains to be seen. Democrats, in their own funding bill, have planted their flag on health care, demanding Obamacare subsidies be extended and Medicaid cuts in Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” be reversed. “It’s the Republican shutdown,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on the floor of the lower chamber Friday. “We’re fighting for the health care of the American people.”

    But Republicans have given little indication they’ll budge from a “clean” continuing resolution. And it’s unclear what negotiations will look like going forward, with lawmakers back on recess next week for Rosh Hashanah and GOP leadership reportedly considering extending the break through the end of the month to put pressure on Democrats, who don’t seem to have an obvious path out of a shutdown: “I think what we’re trying to do is avoid things getting worse,” as Democratic congressman Jared Huffman put it to Politico this week. “I don’t think victory is in anyone’s hopes and dreams in this moment.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • “The Kind of Event I Was Warning About”: Charlie Kirk and Our Era of Political Violence

    [ad_1]

    In June, after the assassination of a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota, Robert Pape, a leading expert on political violence as the director of the Chicago Project on Security & Threats at the University of Chicago, warned in a New York Times op-ed that “we may be on the brink of an extremely violent era in American politics.” The killing of Charlie Kirk, on a college campus in Utah on Wednesday, was “tragic but predictable,” Pape tells VF. “This is exactly the kind of event I was warning about.”

    Pape is one of the most prominent voices warning about the dangerous climate in the country over the last several years. “We are on a dark road as a country,” he says.

    Kirk, a prominent right-wing activist and key ally of Donald Trump, had just begun a speaking engagement before a large outdoor crowd at Utah Valley University and was answering a question about gun violence when he was shot in the neck. Trump announced his death soon after. “All who knew him and loved him are united in shock and horror,” the president said from the Oval Office later Wednesday. “He’s a martyr for truth and freedom…This is a dark moment for America.” Kirk, who had a wife and two young children, was 31.

    Kirk is one of several victims of assassination in recent months: Melissa Hortman, the Democratic Speaker of Minnesota’s House of Representatives, and her husband were killed in June; one of her colleagues, Minnesota state senator John Hoffman, and his wife were allegedly shot by the same perpetrator but survived. In the last few years, there have also been attacks directed at Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro, a potential Democratic candidate for president; House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi; and, of course, Trump himself.

    The assassination attempt on Trump last year in Pennsylvania was initially said to have softened him. But the president has remained a bellicose figure in American politics, including in his address on Kirk’s death, during which he lamented “demonizing those with whom you disagree”—and in the same breath blamed the media and the “radical left,” his catch-all for those with whom he disagrees. “I think that the political rhetoric about opponents being the enemy from within—that concept has taken on a life of its own,” says Matt Dallek, a political historian at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

    “The United States has been experiencing a period of political violence unlike anything we’ve experienced since the 1960s and early ’70s,” Dallek says. “The violence is not apart from the politics and culture of the past decade; it’s actually endemic to it. It’s central to it.”

    Political leaders of both parties condemned the Kirk killing. Trump and a number of elected GOP officials, as well as Republican members of the media, remembered the influential conservative activist. Former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden each expressed their condolences to Kirk’s family and opposition to political violence, as did other elected Democrats—including California governor Gavin Newsom, who hosted Kirk on his podcast earlier this year. “Charlie Kirk’s murder is sick and reprehensible, and our thoughts are with his family, children, and loved ones,” Newsom wrote. “Honest disagreement makes us stronger; violence only drives us further apart and corrodes the values at the heart of this nation.”

    But the sober statements competed online with the belligerence of figures like Elon Musk, who wrote on his social media platform that Democrats were the “party of murder,” and Steve Bannon, who suggested that the country was now at “war.” The condemnations were also threatened to be drowned out by the graphic video itself, which was nearly unavoidable in the social media scroll on Wednesday. “I think it’s destabilizing,” Dallek says. “It’s not the kind of thing that one would expect from a stable, healthy democratic polity.”

    And Pape warns that it could portend even more darkness to come. “This needs to be taken seriously, because otherwise you could end up having this snowball, even in the near term,” Pape says. “It will not fade away on its own.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Lutz

    Source link

  • Trump Allies: Actually, the Epstein Drawing Is Proof Trump Is Innocent

    [ad_1]

    Remember, back in July, when The Wall Street Journal reported that Donald Trump had celebrated one of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s birthdays with a drawing of a naked woman, and a reference to a “wonderful secret” the two men allegedly shared? And the response from the president and his allies was to claim the story was “complete and utter bullshit”? And that Trump doesn’t “draw pictures”? And that the letter did not, in fact, exist? In light of the fact that the House Oversight Committee was able to obtain the letter in question from Epstein’s estate, and that Democrats on the committee went ahead and posted an image of it Monday, you might think the president and MAGA world would be singing a slightly different tune right about now. But, surprise! They are not only continuing to insist that the drawing is in no way damaging for Trump, but that it actually proves he’s innocent.

    Yes, in an incredible display of whatever is German for “You could show us evidence that this guy is the direct descendant of Satan and we’d still defend him,” allies of the president have spent the last 24 hours arguing that the letter, which appears to bear Trump’s signature, exonerates him. “Does the below from the WSJ look like this actual signature from the President? I don’t think so at all. Fake,” right-wing activist Charlie Kirk wrote on X. “Is this really the best they could do? Trump has the most famous signature in the world. Time to sue them into the oblivion,” chimed in podcaster Benny Johnson. (In fact, Trump has already sued WSJ publisher Dow Jones and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, among others. A Dow Jones spokeswoman said in a statement Monday, “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.”) “The latest piece published by the Wall Street Journal PROVES this entire ‘Birthday Card’ story is false,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declared on social media. “As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it. President Trump’s legal team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation.” Another White House official, Taylor Budowich, added to the “it’s not his signature” chorus and said that Murdoch’s media empire would need to “open that checkbook” in response to the president’s ongoing lawsuit. Vice President JD Vance cried “fake scandal.” Eric Trump went on TV and said, “I can tell you my father does not sketch out cartoon drawings.”

    Unfortunately for Eric, his father’s drawings have literally been sold at auction, and Trump has spoken publicly about his artistic process. As for the claims that the signature on the Epstein birthday card is not Trump’s, analysis by the Wall Street Journal suggests the signature in question looks remarkably like one Trump used at the time:

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • What’s Going On With the Lisa Cook–Donald Trump–Federal Reserve Drama?

    [ad_1]

    The head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency took to CNBC on Thursday morning to defend Donald Trump’s firing of Dr. Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve board of governors. During a contentious interview, Bill Pulte—the Trump appointee who publicly accused Cook last month of committing mortgage fraud and has claimed to have invented “Twitter philanthropy”—insisted Cook’s firing was not politically motivated, refused to divulge his “sources and methods,” and told cohost Andrew Ross Sorkin, “I don’t need you to help me explain things, Andrew.”

    But let’s explain how we got here. Throughout his first term and for most of his second, Trump has been extremely angry with the Federal Reserve, whose policymakers he apparently thinks know less about being good stewards of the economy than he does, a man whose companies have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy six times. Often, that anger has resulted in Trump publicly lashing out at Fed chair Jerome Powell, whom the president has called, among other things, “low IQ,” “a stubborn mule,” “a very stupid person,” and “a knucklehead.” But in late August, the president turned his ire on Cook, whom he accused of committing mortgage fraud and fired via Truth Social, a move he would undoubtedly like to follow up by replacing Cook with someone inclined to give him what he wants, i.e., lower interest rates. Cook has denied the fraud allegations and sued the president, saying he lacks the cause to get rid of her. Where do things stand? What does it mean for the economy? Who is this Bill Pulte guy? Your burning questions, answered.

    What has Trump accused Cook of doing?

    In a letter posted to his Truth Social account on August 25, Trump accused Cook of committing mortgage fraud, specifically claiming that she indicated on 2021 mortgage documents that both her home in Michigan and her house in Georgia would be her primary residence. He wrote that he was removing her from her position “effective immediately” and added, “The American people must be able to have full confidence in the honesty of the members entrusted with setting policy and overseeing the Federal Reserve. In light of your deceitful and potentially criminal conduct in a financial matter, they cannot and I do not have such confidence in your integrity.” On Thursday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump’s Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation into the allegations against Cook.

    How has Cook responded?

    Cook has denied the accusations, with her attorneys declaring in a court filing that she “did not ever commit mortgage fraud.” Cook’s lawyers—who have sued the president on her behalf—also told a judge that even if she had done the things Trump has accused her of, they would not rise to the level at which he could fire her for cause, particularly in light of the Fed’s status as an independent organization. “Setting aside the fact that Governor Cook did not ever commit mortgage fraud, any such pre-office offense plainly would not have been ‘so infamous a nature, as to render the offender unfit to execute any public franchise,’” they wrote. Cook’s team has argued that her firing was politically motivated and tied to Trump’s anger at the Fed for not lowering interest rates this year; they’ve also claimed her due process rights were violated when she was not given an opportunity to respond to the allegations prior to being fired. Cook’s attorney Abbe Lowell—whose previous clients have included Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump—has said Trump’s “reflex to bully is flawed and his demands lack any proper process, basis, or legal authority.” In response to the news of the DOJ probe, Lowell told the Journal, “The questions over how Governor Cook described her properties from time to time…are not fraud, but it takes nothing for this DOJ to undertake a new politicized investigation, and they appear to have just done it again.”

    Who is Bill Pulte?

    Pulte is the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and Trump’s most prominent soldier in the crusade against Cook. On August 20, he posted a letter on X in which he claimed Cook “falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud.” The same day, Trump demanded via Truth Social that Cook resign; five days after that, he fired her. Pulte has similarly accused Trump foes Adam Schiff and Letitia James of committing mortgage fraud. (According to NBC News, Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed a “special attorney” to investigate the Democrats; Both Schiff and James have denied the allegations.)

    During his interview with CNBC on September 4, Pulte refused to offer any details re: where he obtained the “tip” that led him to accuse Cook of fraud, telling the hosts, “I’m not going to explain our sources and methods, where we get tips from, who are whistleblowers.” When CNBC’s Sorkin told Pulte that Cook’s targeting could be considered “political weaponization,” and said that if “the tip came from inside the administration, or came from even inside your agency, with somebody who works for you…then that creates the perception issue,” Pulte angrily responded, “I don’t need you to help me explain things, Andrew.” Asked if he was also looking into reports that Republican Texas attorney general Ken Paxton has listed three properties as his primary residence, Pulte said, “If things are made public then, and/or if we decide to make them public, then I will talk about it.”

    Is Cook the first person Trump has fired via social media?

    Of course not. Others have included former secretary of state Rex Tillerson, and more than a thousand federal employees appointed by Joe Biden.

    What does it mean for the Fed if Trump is able to remove Cook from her post?

    It wouldn’t be great! “This is a kill shot at Fed independence,” Brookings Institution senior fellow Aaron Klein told Bloomberg. “Trump is saying the Fed is going to do what he wants it to do, by hook or by crook.” A letter signed by hundreds of economists condemns Cook’s firing and the “unproven accusations” against her, declaring they “threaten…the fundamental principle of central bank independence and undermine…trust in one of America’s most important institutions. That trust is a cornerstone of the system that has fueled America’s economic vitality over the decades.”

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Tilda Swinton, Noomi Rapace, Kate Moss, and a Constellation of Other Stars Gather in Venice to Celebrate Tom Ford’s Newest Fragrance

    [ad_1]

    Tilda Swinton took a break from her Venice Film Festival duties Friday (she’s there in support of Marianne Faithfull tribute Broken English) to celebrate a different star turn: Her role as the face of Tom Ford Black Orchid Reserve, a new fragrance that combines the scent of the original Black Orchid with the midnight-blooming Ghost Orchid.

    Swinton stars in the brand’s campaign for the scent, which was conceived by the maison’s creative director, Haider Ackermann, and shot by photography team Inez and Vinood.

    To celebrate the launch of the perfume and campaign, the maison held an intimate dinner at the Palazzo Contarini Polignac. In addition to Ackermann and Swinton, guests included Inez van Lamsweerde, Vinoodh Matadin, Farida Khelfa, Tish Weinstock, Kate Moss, Paris Jackson, Indya Moore, Saskia de Brauw, Noomi Rapace, Tom Guinness, Jordan Barrett, Malick Bodian, Chuck Junior Achikè, Kai-Isaiah Jamal, and many others.

    The brand cites Tilda Swinton’s elegance, intellect, and innovative vision as the reason behind the pairing, saying her powerful and intense soul reflects the new fragrance. Swinton has won an Academy Award, a BAFTA, and the Venice Film Festival’s Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement over the course of her career, defying convention all the while.

    The inspiration for Black Orchid Reserve is the Phantom Orchid, a floral treasure that prefers dark, hidden spaces. From the synergy of the Ghost Orchid and Black Orchid accords emerges an intriguingly luxurious manifestation of the pure essence of orchid.

    “It is a profound honor for me to be part of the story of the legendary Tom Ford Black Orchid fragrance,” Swinton said. “Transformation, crossing boundaries and celebrating extraordinary virtues have always attracted me; Black Orchid Reserve represents exactly this enchantment.”

    [ad_2]

    Laura Scafati

    Source link

  • Riley Keough Dons A Stunning Cartier Necklace For The Venice Film Festival Red Carpet

    [ad_1]

    Riley Keough stole the show on the second day of the Venice Film Festival in a sparkling Cartier necklace, in which precious sapphires are juxtaposed with the luster of yellow and rose gold. The granddaughter of Elvis Presley chose the Cartier creation to embellish the Chloé look she wore to the premiere of Noah Baumbach’s Jay Kelly, a film in which she plays the eldest daughter of the main character (who is played by George Clooney).

    “It’s really exciting to embody Cartier elegance on the red carpet,” Riley Keough told Vanity Fair. “This was my first time at the Venice Film Festival, and I felt really lucky to be able to wear such an important piece of jewelry. The Festival itself is very elegant, and the necklace reflects that idea perfectly.”

    The Cafayate Necklace, as worn by Riley Keough at the Venice Film Festival.

    Mondadori Portfolio/Getty Images

    A staggering 1460 hours were required to make the masterpiece, which is known as The Cafayate Necklace. The simple yet extravagant piece of jewelry belongs to the storied jewelry house’s En Équilibre collection, in which precision is achieved not by the search for excess but by the subtle balance between symmetry and asymmetry.

    Riley Keough at the Venice Film Festival bedecked by Cartier's Cafayate Necklace.

    Riley Keough at the Venice Film Festival, bedecked by Cartier’s Cafayate Necklace.

    Stephane Cardinale – Corbis/Getty Images

    Two iridescent opals—5.64 and 4.59 carats respectively—give off shades of red, orange and yellow, evoked by the color of the precious sapphires that surround them. “It was the lines of the necklace that enchanted me, along with the shape of the gemstones. Opal is one of my favorite gems ever,” Keough revealed.

    Riley Keough at the Venice Film Festival.

    Riley Keough at the Venice Film Festival.

    Mondadori Portfolio/Getty Images

    Yellow and rose gold distinguish the jewel chain, in which 51 precious gems are set: so-called “umba” sapphires, named after their unique place of origin, Tanzania’s Umba Valley. Each sapphire has been specially cut to the shape of a half-moon, a cut that enhances its yellow, orange and pink hues, blending beautifully with the colors radiated by the central opals.

    [ad_2]

    Federica Caiazzo

    Source link

  • September 2025 U.S. Credits

    [ad_1]

    Cover

    Styles similar to Jennifer Aniston’s Valentino gown from Valentino boutiques nationwide; Bulgari High Jewelry ring from Bulgari stores nationwide, or call 800-BULGARI; styled by Paul Cavaco.

    Her hair styled with LolaVie; Chris McMillan for soloartists.com. On her face, Chanel; Angela Levin for soloartists.com. On her nails, Manucurist; Sarah Chue for Star Touch Agency.

    Set design by Marla Weinhoff for 11th House Agency. Produced on location by Lauren Beyda and Cat Farber for Portfolio One.

    Page 24: Table of Contents

    Zoey Deutch’s Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello dress from Saint Laurent, 3 East 57th Street, NYC, or call 212-980-2970, or go to ysl.com; for Falke tights, go to falke.com; for Swarovski earrings beginning September 1, go to swarovski.com.

    Page 37: Vanities: Chase Infiniti

    Chase Infiniti’s Simone Rocha clothing from Simone Rocha, 71 Wooster Street, NYC, or go to shop-us.simonerocha.com. Jimmy Choo boots from selected Jimmy Choo stores, or call 866-524-6687, or go to jimmychoo.com; Jake Sammis for A-Frame Agency.

    Her hair styled with Kérastase Paris; Coree Moreno for A-Frame Agency. On her face, Chanel; Amber Dreadon for A-Frame Agency.

    Produced on location by Michael Lai for Preiss Creative.

    Page 40: Vanities: Opening Act: “Heir Apparent”

    Chase Infiniti’s Prada dress from selected Prada boutiques, or go to prada.com; for Pandora earrings, go to pandora.com; Jake Sammis for A-Frame Agency.

    Her hair styled with Kérastase Paris; Coree Moreno for A-Frame Agency. On her face, Chanel; Amber Dreadon for A-Frame Agency.

    Produced on location by Michael Lai for Preiss Creative.

    Page 41: Vanities: The Gallery: “In Rouge”

    Prada Tumulte bag from selected Prada boutiques, or go to prada.com.

    Page 44: Vanities: The Gallery: “Abstract Away”

    Cartier Privé Tank à Guichets in 18-karat yellow gold from selected Cartier boutiques by appointment, or call 800-CARTIER, or go to cartier.com.

    Page 50: Vanities: “Zoey Takes Her Shot”

    Styles similar to Zoey Deutch’s Valentino clothing from Valentino boutiques nationwide; for Lagos earrings, go to lagos.com; styled by Ronald Burton III.

    Her hair styled with Oway; Peter Gray for Home Agency. On her face, Love + Craft + Beauty; Francelle Daly for 2B Management. On her nails, Dashing Diva; Pika for See Management.

    Set design by Viki Rutsch for Exposure NY. Produced on location by Kaream Appleton for Very Rare Productions.

    Pages 52–53: “The Next Jen”

    Jennifer Aniston’s Gucci clothing from selected Gucci stores, or go to gucci.com; for Giuseppe Zanotti shoes, go to giuseppezanotti.com; Bulgari High Jewelry ring from Bulgari stores nationwide, or call 800-BULGARI. For model’s Loro Piana pants, go to us.loropiana.com; styled by Paul Cavaco.

    Her hair styled with LolaVie; Chris McMillan for soloartists.com. On her face, Chanel; Angela Levin for soloartists.com. On her nails, Manucurist; Sarah Chue for Star Touch Agency.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DA Says Menendez Brothers Should Be Released: He Just Recommended Resentencing

    DA Says Menendez Brothers Should Be Released: He Just Recommended Resentencing

    [ad_1]

    Los Angeles County district attorney George Gascón has announced that he is recommending that the Menendez brothers, who murdered their parents with shotguns in 1989, be resentenced. This will begin a judicial process that gives them a new chance at freedom.

    Today, at a press conference in LA, the DA said that after careful review he believes Erik and Lyle Menendez should be sentenced to life with the possibility of parole.

    “I believe they have paid their debt to society,” Gascón said. He added that people who have survived sexual assault are often done great injustice, and he introduced members of Erik and Lyle’s extended family, who were in attendance.

    He made clear that he was not excusing murder: “Even if you get abused, the right path is to call police, seek help,” he said. But he said he took into account the age of the brothers at the time of the murders, and the fact that, even without the hope of parole, they have been on “a journey of redemption and a journey of rehabilitation.” Gascón said that some in the DA’s office still believe the brothers should spend the rest of their life in prison, and may appear in court to argue against resentencing.

    If Judge William C. Ryan, who is presiding over the case, agrees with the DA’s recommendation, the brothers will appear in front of the parole board.

    Gascón is up for reelection on November 5 against Nathan Hochman, who leads him in the polls. Hochman has called the timing of Gascón’s interest in the case “incredibly suspicious.” But Michael Romano, the director of the Three Strikes Project at Stanford Law School, which works to release people serving life sentences for nonviolent crimes, says he doubts that politics have affected the DA’s decision. “I know George pretty well,” he says. “I absolutely think that he [made this announcement] because he thinks it’s the right thing to do. I mean, regardless of the new evidence, sentencing 19- and 21-year-olds to life without parole is very, very harsh and something that Gascón probably opposes across the board.”

    If Hochman wins the election, as expected, it’s unknown what his position would be, but he is running on a tough-on-crime platform, and his website criticizes Gascón for “the ‘abandonment’ of victims in favor of lenient policies toward offenders.”

    The brothers’ extended family has a right to attend a resentencing hearing under Marsy’s Law. That group could include Kitty Menendez’s older brother, Milton Andersen, who does not support their release. “Mr. Andersen firmly believes that his nephews were not molested,” his attorney, Kathy Cady, said in a statement last week. “He believes that is a fabrication and he believes that the motive was pure greed.”

    Kitty’s older sister, Joan VanderMolen, disagrees and has supported her nephews since their arrest. “As details of Lyle and Erik’s abuse came to light it became clear that their actions, while tragic, were the desperate response of two boys trying to survive the unspeakable cruelty of their father,” she said, adding, “Looking back, I see the fear and tension their father had instilled in them. They were just children—children who could have been protected but were instead brutalized in the most horrific of ways.”

    The infamous Menendez case captivated the world in the early ’90s, when the brothers’ first trial—which resulted in hung juries—was broadcast on Court TV. The prosecution argued that Erik and Lyle killed their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, for their estimated $14 million inheritance. The defense maintained that Jose molested them and that they feared for their lives. The glamorous lifestyle of the wealthy Beverly Hills family and graphic testimony became a true crime sensation, and the brothers were found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in a second trial.

    The case became top of mind again when Netflix’s hit series, Monsters: The Menendez Brothers, by showrunner Ryan Murphy, was released in September, followed by a new documentary by director Alejandro Hartmann. Gascón said in a press conference earlier this month that his office was fielding calls regarding the brothers’ release, while Erik and Lyle’s attorney, Mark Geragos, says that social media campaigns to free them were an unexpected boon: “It’s the craziest phenomenon I’ve ever seen. It happened at warp speed, mostly because of this younger, kind of more vibrant and, I would argue, evolved [generation].” Eager to keep up the momentum, the brothers’ extended family hosted a press conference last week to express their continued support of their release.

    The new evidence that Geragos sent the district attorney’s office in May of 2023 is compelling, says Romano. A letter that Erik purportedly wrote to his late cousin, Andy Cano, eight months before the murders was found in his personal effects in which Erik wrote, “It’s still happening Andy [sic] but it’s worse for me now … Every night I stay up thinking [my father] might come in.” And, in another potentially potent piece of evidence, Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, has come forward alleging that Jose drugged and raped him when he was 13 or 14.

    According to Romano, a parole board hearing may take time. “Even though they become immediately eligible, there’s a long wait list,” he says. The brothers have been behind bars for over three decades.

    This story has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Deanna Kizis

    Source link

  • Beyoncé, Donna Kelce, and Kelsea Ballerini Turned Out to Celebrate Glamour’s 2024 Women of the Year Awards

    Beyoncé, Donna Kelce, and Kelsea Ballerini Turned Out to Celebrate Glamour’s 2024 Women of the Year Awards

    [ad_1]

    Among the bright lights of Times Square, Pamela Anderson, Taraji P. Henson, and Suni Lee were among those honored at the Glamour Women of the Year awards on Tuesday, a glitzy event attended by Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Demi Lovato, and more.

    While waiting for the program to begin at the Times Square Edition Hotel’s Paradise Club, guests mingled over flutes of sparkling rosé and enjoyed R&B classics courtesy of DJ Hesta Prynn. Donna Kelce—mother of Travis and Jason—was at the bar ordering a ginger ale in a state of disbelief over being one of the annual event’s honorees. “I’m honored to be with these iconic women,” she told Vanity Fair, joking that “It’s like Where’s Waldo, and I’m Waldo.” As Real Housewives alum Bethenny Frankel took snapshots and selfies with her portable ring light, attendees were invited to take their seats at their respective black bar tables, which were adorned with snacks including chips and nuts, reminiscent of a Parisian apéro setup.

    As the evening’s program commenced, Glamour global editorial director Samantha Barry highlighted the range of women being celebrated, from athletes to entrepreneurs to activists, but the night was primarily focused on mothers. Four of the honorees were what Barry called “supermoms”: Kelce; Tina Knowles, mother of Beyoncé and Solange; Maggie Baird, mother of Billie Eilish and Finneas; and Mandy Teefey, mother of Selena Gomez. Speaking to VF, Barry shared that the idea came from looking at past Women of the Year speeches, and realizing how often people thanked their moms.

    Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images.

    Improvisational rap group Freestyle+ was on hand to serenade honorees, who included Olympian Suni Lee, actor and activist Pamela Anderson, actor Taraji P. Henson, and actor Sophia Bush, who spoke about the importance of reproductive freedom before introducing activists and honorees Hadley Duvall and Kaitlyn Joshua.

    “I’m so in awe of these women and their stories,” Bush said, adding, “any of us that have the ability to speak out in rooms like this, we have to.”

    Other presenters included singer and actor Demi Lovato, as well as actor Brooke Shields and her daughter, Rowan Francis Henchy, who also shared hosting duties on the red carpet. “It was just wonderful to see all the moms being honored and recognized,” said Shields. Henchy, a student and aspiring broadcaster, admitted to having some nerves prior to the experience, but said that looking over to her mom calmed any residual anxieties. “To be able to talk to these people in a room of courage and strength, that was the best part,” she said.

    Some awardees who could not be there, such as tennis superstar Serena Williams, actor Sydney Sweeney, and Mandy Teefey, were honored by their family via a video montage that included Venus Williams and Selena Gomez.

    The evening also included a performance by country singer Kelsea Ballerini, who performed an unreleased single and a cover of “Lean on Me.” She addressed Beyoncé, thanking her for making a country album, to which Bey mouthed, “Thank you so much.”

    Once the program wrapped up, DJ Hesta Prynn returned to the stage, urging the crowd to make special requests and queuing hits from Chappell Roan and Charli xcx, to the delight of guests who stuck around as trays of pigs in a blankets and tater tots traveled through the dancefloor.

    [ad_2]

    Fred Sahai

    Source link

  • How the Menendez Brothers’ Therapist and His Mistress Became the Murder Trial’s Circus Sideshow

    How the Menendez Brothers’ Therapist and His Mistress Became the Murder Trial’s Circus Sideshow

    [ad_1]

    As Ryan Murphy’s Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story recalls in its controversial, true-crime-camp glory, the tale of Beverly Hills brothers Lyle and Erik brutally murdering their parents, José and Mary Louise “Kitty” Menendez, in 1989 was an American horror story. It had all the elements to transfix a nation—spoiled, attractive Beverly Hills brothers who made some seriously bone-headed decisions (one wrote a screenplay about a character who kills his parents; both spent up to a combined $700,000 in the aftermath of their parents’ deaths) and allegations of sexual abuse in the country’s most elite zip code. While those pulpy issues were at the forefront of the boys’ 1993 trial, the court case also featured two witnesses whose behavior was perhaps just as confounding (though not criminal): Menendez therapist L. Jerome Oziel and his mistress, Judalon Smyth. Eventually, these two managed to temporarily steal the courtroom spotlight from Lyle and Erik. In fact, their testimony became such a circus sideshow that neither was invited back to testify during the brothers’ second trial.

    Dominick Dunne, who covered the trial for this magazine, credited Erik’s lead defense counsel Leslie Abramson for taking “what was virtually an open-and-shut case of premeditated murder in the first degree,” complete with confession from the killers, and shapeshifting it before the public’s very eyes. Oziel was the source of the case’s smoking-gun evidence: tapes of the brothers’ therapy sessions, during which they described plotting their parents’ murders (“the perfect crime,” they called it, as Oziel remembered). Abramson fought for the tapes to be excluded from trial. When she lost that battle, she announced that she would discredit the psychologist in “every way known to man and God.”

    During the trial, Abramson worked Oziel like a chew toy. She got him to admit he hadn’t told the Menendez family—who hired him after the boys were caught burglarizing two homes—that his license was on probation by the state board of psychology because of what it called an inappropriate “dual relationship”: exchanging therapy for construction work done at his house by a patient. Abramson asked about a 1990 lawsuit Smyth filed against Oziel in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging that the psychologist assaulted, raped, kidnapped, and medicated her. When Abramson asked whether Oziel settled the case for $400,000 to $500,000, he replied that his insurance company did. (Oziel had also filed a countersuit, alleging that Smyth developed a “bizarre fixation and obsession with him.”)

    At the time, the state psychology board was accusing Oziel of engaging in a sexual relationship with another woman who worked in his home as a housekeeper—and said that he improperly gave her medication and assaulted her. (Oziel denied those charges.) It was also revealed during trial that Oziel didn’t turn his Menendez session tapes into authorities. Instead, he put the tapes into a safe deposit box and, according to Smyth, tried to extort money from the brothers by saying that paying him weekly, even if they did not attend sessions, would be good for their defense if they were ever put on trial. By the end of Abramson’s days-long skewering, even she was bored, according to Robert Rand’s book The Menendez Murders. The lawyer told the judge that, during her questioning of Oziel the following day, “I’m going to be briefer than I thought. I’m frankly sort of sick of him.”

    L. Jerome Oziel testifying.

    Nick Ut/AP.

    Oziel’s testimony was so damaging to his character that, in 1993 the LA Times reported that his cushy existence—he had a 6,000-square-foot canyon home, a psychologist wife, two children, and a waiting list for his $150-per-hour sessions—is “not such a good life anymore…. For Oziel, it is his reputation that is on trial.” He faced state disciplinary hearings due to the revelations in court. In 1997, the Consumer Affairs Board of Psychology charged Oziel with “a variety of offenses,” according to a spokesperson who spoke to CNN, including sharing confidential information about his patients with Smyth; having both a business and sexual relationship with Smyth; supplying her with drugs; physically assaulting her on two occasions; and engaging in sexual misconduct with two female clients. (Oziel’s attorney denied the last charge, claiming the women were not patients.) Rather than go to court, Oziel surrendered his license “while at the same time denying he engaged in any improprieties,” according to his lawyer. “He is not practicing psychology anymore and hasn’t been for several years. It wasn’t worth the expense and interference with his life.”

    The defense’s greatest gift, during the first trial, may have been Oziel’s mistress: an attractive woman who first reached out to Oziel in the hopes of getting relationship therapy. After she realized she could not afford Oziel’s sessions, she became sexually involved with the psychologist, and dysfunctionally enmeshed in both his marriage and the Menendez case. After Oziel broke up with her, Smyth told authorities that Oziel possessed taped confessions from the Menendez brothers.

    [ad_2]

    Julie Miller

    Source link

  • Armageddon, but with Singing: Tilda Swinton and Michael Shannon Face ‘The End’

    Armageddon, but with Singing: Tilda Swinton and Michael Shannon Face ‘The End’

    [ad_1]

    There have been many reports over the years that billionaires have been quietly building survival bunkers around the world—sprawling and well-appointed hideaways where the ruling class plan to spend Armageddon. There they will remain in comfort while the rest of us go to war over resources, contend with the worsening elements, and die off. But won’t they, too, suffer in some way, haunted by who and what they left behind, daunted by a hopeless future, growing sick of one another? That is maybe the argument being made in Joshua Oppenheimer’s peculiar and intermittently affecting The End, a musical drama that, in its strange empathy, condemns the oligarchs of our world in a way that could almost be called satiric.

    Michael Shannon plays a former oil baron who has fled environmental catastrophe and taken his family and a few attendants to a facility built deep inside a cavernous salt mine. Their living quarters are lovely and ornate, filled with priceless art and elegant furniture. He and his wife, played by Tilda Swinton, are devoted to the raising of their twentysomething son, a naive and childlike man played by George MacKay. He was born in the bunker and only knows of the outside world in theory—he’s about as home-schooled as any kid could be.

    The family and their doctor (Lennie James), butler (Tim McInnerny), and friend/nanny (Bronagh Gallagher) live in a kind of rigorous harmony, going about their chores and safety drills with little mention of what ruin lives above them, nor of the sorry fact that theirs is an inevitably fading ecosystem, too. But they do sing about it, remarking on how surreal it is that MacKay’s character is most likely the end of the line. The film’s musical interludes—spare, lilting compositions by Joshua Schmidt and Marius de Vries—mostly function as poetic internal monologue, representative of the turmoil of feeling lying under all the tightly managed order.

    But disorder does eventually arrive, as it tends to do. A stranger, played by Moses Ingram, somehow finds her way down to the cave, barely having survived the ravages of the land above. The bunker dwellers are wary at first—they reference a past incident in which the butler was shot by invaders; it’s why the father insists that his son practice with firearms—and seem poised to expel this untrustworthy outsider. Then again, she is young and a woman, and thus maybe there could be a lineage-extending benefit to keeping her around. MacKay’s interest certainly seems piqued.

    The matter of sex and procreation is not stated plainly in the film, but we feel its heavy implication. Some primal part of us sees that outcome as the only right one; life must carry on. But Oppenheimer also allows room for questioning that instinct. What point would there be in bringing another doomed child into this place? It may in fact be nothing but a cruelty. Perhaps this one rich family’s vanity—the notion that they, over all others, must endure—is the vanity of a whole planet, rapacious with personal need at the cost of everything.

    Oppenheimer’s film is firmly an environmentalist one, a soft-spoken excoriation of industries and their leaders who hasten the destruction of our climate. We consumers are at fault, too, though those of us without the resources to build underground arks will feel the consequences sooner. The End perhaps most pities the blameless children: those like MacKay’s character, who are taught all the wrong things, and those like Ingram’s, who can do nothing but struggle and scramble to stay breathing through no fault of her own.

    The stranger has her own guilt, though. As do most of the characters in this long and elusive film. Perhaps that is Oppenheimer’s ultimate message: you can flee the havoc, but something will always chase after you. There is no true escape from humanity’s reckless failings. Oppenheimer’s documentary The Act of Killing had Indonesian mass murderers confront their misdeeds through re-enactment; maybe The End is meant to be a precautionary tale for any billionaires who happen to be watching it: your selfishness will not save you.

    That said, it is difficult to affix any distinct meaning on the film. Captivating as it often is, it is also ponderous and withholding. Patience is tried as The End slowly, solemnly glides across two and a half hours. Loud, bonk-over-the-head Issues Movies are not necessarily preferable—it’s fascinating to encounter such elliptical art about a big, pertinent topic. But The End’s difficult construction risks alienating viewers from its worthy concerns.

    What remains engaging throughout are the carefully textured performances—MacKay’s study of repressed energy and Ingram’s mix of wariness and gratitude are particular highlights—and the film’s myriad aesthetic graces. While probably not made on a huge budget, The End looks like it cost a zillion dollars. The landscape of the film is richly realized, captured in chillingly elegant chiaroscuro by cinematographer Mikhail Krichman. Humanity’s final residence is a lovely one, and all the more frightening and contemptible for it.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Lawson

    Source link

  • Assistant to Matthew Perry Has Been Unfairly Scapegoated, Harvey Weinstein’s Former Staffer Says

    Assistant to Matthew Perry Has Been Unfairly Scapegoated, Harvey Weinstein’s Former Staffer Says

    [ad_1]

    When Matthew Perry’s personal assistant, Kenneth Iwamasa, was arrested earlier this month, the explanation provided by officials seemed iron-clad. After all, it was he who gave Perry multiple shots of ketamine the day he died of what medical examiners say was an overdose of the drug. But Rowena Chiu, who worked as an assistant to convicted sexual assailant Harvey Weinstein, says it’s not that simple.

    According to a statement from the US Attorney’s Office, Central District of California, Perry’s 59-year-old, live-in assistant has “admitted to repeatedly injecting Perry with ketamine without medical training, including performing multiple injections on Perry on October 28, 2023 – the day Perry died” at age 54. According to a plea agreement Iwamasa made with prosecutors, Perry had instructed him to secure illicit doses of the powerful anesthetic in late September. By early October, Iwamasa was allegedly injecting the actor with the drug on a regular basis.

    On the day of his death, Matthew Perry—who for years had been open about his struggle with substance use disorder—requested three shots of ketamine throughout the day. “Shoot me up with a big one,” Iwamasa said Perry told him before his last dose, then asked him to prepare the hot tub for use. A few hours later, Iwamasa discovered Perry unresponsive in that same hot tub. Perry’s autopsy report lists an overdose of ketamine as the primary cause of his death, and drowning as the secondary cause.

    In a guest essay for the New York Times, Chiu argues that a toxic and problematic system is at least partially to blame for the situation that led to Iwamasa’s arrest. The personal assistant to Weinstein for two months in 1998, she publicly accused the former mogul of attempted rape nearly 20 years later. While in her professional role, she says, she got “firsthand insight into the toxic dynamic that can develop while assisting a celebrity or understand the inherent power imbalance that can arise,” even beyond her interactions with the notoriously problematic Weinstein.

    “An assistant to a celebrity can be expected to do whatever is asked of them, regardless of ethics or legality,” Chiu makes clear. “These requests can range from telling white lies (to, say, an irate spouse wanting to know where your boss is) to procuring illicit indulgences (such as drugs).” In her experience, the alleged actions that led to multiple charges against Iwamasa were all in a day’s work.

    And worse, she writes, he might have been led to believe that he would be shielded from any repercussions. “As a personal assistant, if you’re ever asked to do anything ethically dubious, you’re immediately reassured, as I was: Oh, don’t worry, you’ll never get into trouble,” after all, she writes, people powerful enough to hire a crew of assistants also have a legal team to step in in the assistant’s behalf.

    That supposed safety net went away for Iwamasa when Perry died, Chiu argues, as “Mr. Perry (and his deep pockets) are no longer around to protect the assistant. Without that patronage, the legal system has come for him.”

    Chiu isn’t the only person who says that Iwamasa should not be held to the same standard as, say, the doctors who allegedly provided the deadly drug. Iwamasa is “the least culpable in my opinion,” former federal prosecutor and president of West Coast Trial Lawyers Neama Rahmani tells People regarding his arrest. “I think he’s in the business of being an assistant … if your boss is a drug addict and you want to keep your job, maybe you might do it for that reason.”

    Brian Daniel, who recently spoke to The Cut about his experience as an assistant to “ultrawealthy clients,” offers this general insight into how hard it is for assistants to set boundaries with their employers. “You get sucked in, and the water becomes very muddy. A lot of these people are lonely. They’re in their megamansion all alone with you, and then they’ve had a couple lines, and then they’re telling you all their problems, and you become like a psychiatrist. It’s tricky.”

    That challenge to say “no” to a powerful boss might not matter, says Mark Chutkow, another former federal prosecutor. Iwamasa—who faces up to 15 years in prison—“was actually injecting this drug into Matthew Perry, so that makes him the most closely tied to what eventually happened.”

    Chiu appears to worry that Chutkow is right. “I’m not surprised that Mr. Iwamasa pleaded guilty,” she writes.

    “The assistant, who is usually invisible, is suddenly center stage, the last place he or she is equipped to be. Along with invisible, the assistant can also be penniless, powerless and a vulnerable target. It’s far too easy to turn the butler into the scapegoat.”

    [ad_2]

    Eve Batey

    Source link

  • 22 Undersung TV Gems to Binge Right This Second

    22 Undersung TV Gems to Binge Right This Second

    [ad_1]

    More gems on BritBox (which is quietly one of the best streamers, if you ignore its comically basic interface): Murder Is Easy, Inspector Morse, MI-5, Miss Marple, The Fall, Cracker, Being Human, Chewing Gum, Life on Mars and the sequel Ashes to Ashes, The Buccaneers (the 1995 miniseries, so good), Vera, Sherlock, Three Little Birds, The Night Manager, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Brideshead Revisited (still slaps), Blackadder, Absolutely Fabulous, 26 seasons of Doctor Who, and the Up documentary series.

    Men of a Certain Age (Max)

    © TNT/Everett Collection.

    It’s still impossible to believe that Andre Braugher is gone. But there’s no better demonstration of his versatility than this program, which, admittedly, does not have the sexiest premise: How do three men adjust to the indignities and ambiguous rewards of middle age? The thing is, when the writing and the ensemble are this good, and when the leads are played by Scott Bakula, Ray Romano, and Braugher, the answers to that question are often amusing and rewardingly complicated. A spin through both seasons will likely make you miss Braugher even more, but it’s worth it.

    A selection of Max gems: Pennyworth, Somebody Somewhere, Warrior, South Side, Banshee, Starstruck, Gomorrah, The No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency, Adventure Time, Sweet Tooth, Enlightened, Station Eleven, The Plot Against America, Peacemaker, My Brilliant Friend, David Makes Man, Jett, Sort Of, Harley Quinn, Angels in America, Epitafios, Insecure, Our Flag Means Death (RIP sob), Veneno, Flight of the Conchords, Miss Sherlock, Gotham, Regular Show, How to With John Wilson, Mosaic, Betty, Rome, I May Destroy You, Gentleman Jack, In Treatment, Togetherness, Deadwood, A Black Lady Sketch Show.

    Miss Scarlet and the Duke (PBS)

    Image may contain Clothing Coat Person Accessories Bag Handbag Glove Adult Formal Wear Tie Purse and Hat

    © PBS/Everett Collection.

    [ad_2]

    Maureen Ryan

    Source link

  • TCA Awards 2024: See All the Winners

    TCA Awards 2024: See All the Winners

    [ad_1]

    It’s been five years since the Television Critics Association announced the winners of its annual TCA Awards in person: the pandemic meant the 2020 and 2021 events were virtual, and the WGA and SAG strikes last year meant the 2023 awards were announced in a press release. But in 2024, the event was back for its 40th year, with a ceremony held on Friday July 12 at the Langham Huntington in Pasadena.

    Nominees for this year’s TCA Awards had been announced nearly a month ago, on June 10. Hopes were high for contenders such as The Bear (which garnered four nominations) and Ripley (a quintuple nominee). But both went home empty-handed.

    Instead, it was Shōgun‘s night. The 250-strong group of TV critics named the limited FX series its Program of the Year, and also awarded it with the Outstanding Achievement in Drama and Outstanding New Program honors. Actor Anna Sawai, who played Lady Mariko on the show, won the TCA’s (all gender-inclusive) Individual Achievement in Drama trophy, as well.

    Meanwhile, Netflix’s Baby Reindeer took home the Outstanding Achievement in Movies, Miniseries or Specials award, while HBO’s Hacks took top honors in the comedy category. Star Jean Smart also came out on top, scoring the Individual Achievement in Comedy award.

    Despite the controversy swirling around it, Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV won the top slot in the Outstanding Achievement in News and Information category, and John Mulaney beat out industry veterans including John Oliver and Jimmy Kimmel to win the Outstanding Achievement in Variety, Talk or Sketch crown for Everybody’s in LA.

    Finally, the critics awarded The Traitors with its top Reality honors, Doctor Who won in the Family Programming category, and Bluey was tops in Children’s Programming. A full list of nominees and winners is below.

    Program of the Year

    WINNER: Shōgun
    Baby Reindeer
    The Bear
    Hacks
    Reservation Dogs
    Ripley

    Outstanding Achievement in Comedy

    WINNER: Hacks
    Abbott Elementary
    The Bear
    Girls5eva
    Reservation Dogs
    We Are Lady Parts

    Outstanding Achievement in Drama

    WINNER: Shōgun
    Baby Reindeer
    Fallout
    Ripley
    True Detective: Night Country

    Outstanding Achievement in Movies, Miniseries or Specials

    WINNER: Baby Reindeer
    The Fall of the House of Usher
    Fargo
    Fellow Travelers
    Ripley
    The Sympathizer

    Outstanding New Program

    WINNER: Shōgun
    Baby Reindeer
    Fallout
    Mr. & Mrs. Smith
    Ripley
    X-Men ’97

    Individual Achievement in Drama

    WINNER: Anna Sawai, Shōgun
    Jodie Foster, True Detective: Night Country
    Richard Gadd, Baby Reindeer
    Hiroyuki Sanada, Shōgun
    Andrew Scott, Ripley
    Juno Temple, Fargo

    Individual Achievement in Comedy

    WINNER: Jean Smart, Hacks
    Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
    Ayo Edebiri, The Bear
    Renée Elise Goldsberry, Girls5eva
    Devery Jacobs, Reservation Dogs
    Jeremy Allen White, The Bear

    Outstanding Achievement in News and Information

    WINNER: Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV
    America Outdoors with Baratunde Thurston
    Frontline
    The Jinx: Part Two
    Queens
    Telemarketers

    Outstanding Achievement in Variety, Talk or Sketch

    WINNER: John Mulaney Presents: Everybody’s in LA
    The Daily Show
    Jimmy Kimmel Live!
    Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
    Late Night with Seth Meyers
    Saturday Night Live

    Outstanding Achievement in Reality

    WINNER: The Traitors
    The Amazing Race
    Conan O’Brien Must Go
    Jerrod Carmichael Reality Show
    Top Chef
    We’re Here
    Welcome to Wrexham

    Outstanding Achievement in Family Programming

    WINNER: Doctor Who
    Heartstopper
    My Adventures with Superman
    Percy Jackson and the Olympians
    Renegade Nell
    X-Men ’97

    Outstanding Achievement in Children’s Programming

    WINNER: Bluey
    Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood
    Frog and Toad
    Pokémon Concierge
    Sesame Street
    Snoopy Presents: Welcome Home, Franklin

    [ad_2]

    Eve Batey

    Source link