ReportWire

Tag: Texas

  • Supreme Court extends block on Texas law that would allow police to arrest migrants

    Supreme Court extends block on Texas law that would allow police to arrest migrants

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court on Monday indefinitely extended its block on a Texas law that would give police broad powers to arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the U.S. while the legal battle it sparked over immigration authority plays out.Related video above: Migrants camp on Texas bridge in freezing temperaturesThe one-page order signed by Justice Samuel Alito did not set a deadline, instead extending the stay “pending further order.”Opponents have called the law, known as Senate Bill 4, the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since an Arizona law more than a decade ago, portions of which were struck down by the Supreme Court.The Texas Attorney General has said the state’s law mirrored federal law and “was adopted to address the ongoing crisis at the southern border, which hurts Texans more than anyone else.”The Biden administration sued to strike down the measure, arguing it would usurp core federal authority on immigration, hurt international relations and create chaos in administering immigration law. Civil rights groups have argued the law could lead to civil rights violations and racial profiling.A federal judge in Texas struck down the law in late February, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals quickly stayed that ruling, leading the federal government to appeal to the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court in 2012 struck down key parts of an Arizona law that would have allowed police to arrest people for federal immigration violations, often referred to by opponents as the “show me your papers” bill. The divided high court found then that the impasse in Washington over immigration reform did not justify state intrusion.The battle over the Texas immigration law is one of multiple legal disputes between Texas officials and the Biden administration over how far the state can go to patrol the Texas-Mexico border and prevent illegal border crossings.Several Republican governors have backed Gov. Greg Abbott’s efforts, saying the federal government is not doing enough to enforce existing immigration laws.The case is unfolding as record numbers of asylum seekers arrive in the United States and immigration emerges as a central issue in the 2024 election.

    The Supreme Court on Monday indefinitely extended its block on a Texas law that would give police broad powers to arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the U.S. while the legal battle it sparked over immigration authority plays out.

    Related video above: Migrants camp on Texas bridge in freezing temperatures

    The one-page order signed by Justice Samuel Alito did not set a deadline, instead extending the stay “pending further order.”

    Opponents have called the law, known as Senate Bill 4, the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since an Arizona law more than a decade ago, portions of which were struck down by the Supreme Court.

    The Texas Attorney General has said the state’s law mirrored federal law and “was adopted to address the ongoing crisis at the southern border, which hurts Texans more than anyone else.”

    The Biden administration sued to strike down the measure, arguing it would usurp core federal authority on immigration, hurt international relations and create chaos in administering immigration law. Civil rights groups have argued the law could lead to civil rights violations and racial profiling.

    A federal judge in Texas struck down the law in late February, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals quickly stayed that ruling, leading the federal government to appeal to the Supreme Court.

    The Supreme Court in 2012 struck down key parts of an Arizona law that would have allowed police to arrest people for federal immigration violations, often referred to by opponents as the “show me your papers” bill. The divided high court found then that the impasse in Washington over immigration reform did not justify state intrusion.

    The battle over the Texas immigration law is one of multiple legal disputes between Texas officials and the Biden administration over how far the state can go to patrol the Texas-Mexico border and prevent illegal border crossings.

    Several Republican governors have backed Gov. Greg Abbott’s efforts, saying the federal government is not doing enough to enforce existing immigration laws.

    The case is unfolding as record numbers of asylum seekers arrive in the United States and immigration emerges as a central issue in the 2024 election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Colder air grips the country after a warm start to March

    Colder air grips the country after a warm start to March

    [ad_1]

    It’s been a mild start to March across the Eastern U.S., but colder air has moved in and we will see more cooldowns and temperatures swings in the upcoming week.


    What You Need To Know

    • Temperatures have been above normal so far this March east of the Rockies
    • Colder air is moving in behind a cold front
    • An active pattern will bring more precipitation and cold opportunities this month

    A cold front pushing across the country has dropped high temperatures up to 10 to 20 degrees below normal for parts of the Midwest and Ohio Valley on Monday.

    Further south, sub-freezing temperatures in the forecast for tonight have led to Freeze Warnings being issued across the Deep South, stretching from Texas to North Carolina.

    Colder air and below normal temperatures follow the cold front to Florida and the Deep South on Tuesday as temperatures rebound quickly across the Central U.S.

    An active storm pattern will keep temperature swings in the forecast across the country through the week, with more cold blasts and wintry weather opportunities in the Great Lakes and Northeast through midweek and again this weekend.

    March so far

    Most places east of the Rockies are running warm this month. Average temperatures are well above normal through March 17, with areas across the Midwest, Ohio Valley and Northeast feeling a top-10 warmest March on record so far.

    (Iowa Environmental Mesonet)

    Meanwhile, the western U.S. has been running cool with below normal temperatures. With the exception of the Northeast and Florida, it is probable that the rest of the U.S. will close out the month with temperatures around or below normal. 

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Spectrum News Weather Staff

    Source link

  • U.S. to investigate Texas fatal crash that may have involved automated system

    U.S. to investigate Texas fatal crash that may have involved automated system

    [ad_1]

    DETROIT (AP) — The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating a fatal crash in San Antonio, Texas, involving a Ford electric vehicle that may have been using a partially automated driving system.


    What You Need To Know

    • The agency said in a statement Friday that a team of investigators from its Office of Highway Safety will travel to Texas and work with police on the Feb. 24 crash on Interstate 10
    • The NTSB said that preliminary information shows a Ford Mustang Mach-E SUV equipped with the company’s partially automated driving system collided with the rear of a Honda CR-V that was stopped in one of the highway lanes
    • Television station KSAT reported that the Mach-E driver told police the Honda was stopped in the middle lane with no lights on before the crash around 9:50 p.m. The 56-year-old driver of the CR-V was killed
    • Ford’s Blue Cruise system allows drivers to take their hands off the steering wheel while it handles steering, braking and acceleration on highways. The company says the system isn’t fully autonomous, and it monitors drivers to make sure they pay attention to the road

    The agency said in a statement Friday that a team of investigators from its Office of Highway Safety will travel to Texas and work with police on the Feb. 24 crash on Interstate 10.

    The NTSB said that preliminary information shows a Ford Mustang Mach-E SUV equipped with the company’s partially automated driving system collided with the rear of a Honda CR-V that was stopped in one of the highway lanes.

    Television station KSAT reported that the Mach-E driver told police the Honda was stopped in the middle lane with no lights on before the crash around 9:50 p.m. The 56-year-old driver of the CR-V was killed.

    “NTSB is investigating this fatal crash due to its continued interest in advanced driver assistance systems and how vehicle operators interact with these technologies,” the agency statement said.

    Ford’s Blue Cruise system allows drivers to take their hands off the steering wheel while it handles steering, braking and acceleration on highways. The company says the system isn’t fully autonomous, and it monitors drivers to make sure they pay attention to the road. It operates on 97% of controlled access highways in the U.S. and Canada, Ford says.

    There are no fully autonomous vehicles for sale to the public in the U.S.

    The NTSB said investigators will travel to San Antonio to examine wreckage, collect information about the crash scene and investigate the events leading up to the collision. A preliminary report is expected within 30 days.

    In a statement, Ford said it is researching the crash and the facts are not yet clear. The company expressed sympathy to those involved and said it reported the crash to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Both NHTSA and the NTSB have investigated multiple previous crashes involving partially automated driving systems, most involving Tesla’s Autopilot. In past investigations, the NTSB has examined how the partially automated system functioned.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • SpaceX successfully launches Starship but loses spacecraft while in orbit

    SpaceX successfully launches Starship but loses spacecraft while in orbit

    [ad_1]

    NATIONWIDE — SpaceX was able to successfully launch Starship on Thursday morning and while the spacecraft itself was in space for the first time, it was lost while orbiting the planet. Its exact fate is currently unknown after the company stated it was not sending out a signal.         


    What You Need To Know

    • A number of accomplishments were made, stated SpaceX
    • It was the longest Starship test so far; about 51 minutes
    • The launch happened at the company’s Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas
    • Scroll down to learn more about the Starship

    The liftoff happened at 9:25 a.m. ET with a mixture of cheers from the Starship team heard over SpaceX’s live feed and the roar of the Starship’s Raptor engines.

    The launch took place at SpaceX’s Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas.

    Collectively known as Starship, the first-stage rocket’s 33 Raptor engines, fueled with thousands of tons of sub-cooled liquid oxygen and liquid methane, lit up as it went into the sky.

    The new hot stage separation worked as designed, just like during the second launch attempt in November 2023. While it worked last time, it resulted in the rocket being destroyed. (Please see below for more.)

    The first-stage Super Heavy rocket had a hard-water landing in the Gulf of Mexico, confirmed SpaceX. The damage to it is unknown.

    The Starship spacecraft was doing various tests while in orbit, including the opening and closing of the payload door, affectionately known as the “Pez door”.

    At one point, the Starship was traveling 40 miles (65 kilometers) above the round Earth and moving at 15,973 mph (25,707 kmh).

    The plan was for Starship to have a water landing in the Indian Ocean. However, about 51 minutes after liftoff, SpaceX announced on its live feed, “We are making the call now that we have lost ship 28.”

    The ship’s signal back down to the team was lost and SpaceX confirmed that it would take a “little bit of time” to find out what exactly happened to the ship.

    SpaceX admitted during its live feed that there was always a chance the Starship and the Super Heavy rocket would not survive their splashdowns.

    However, SpaceX considered that the third flight test made some accomplishments, some not seen before:

    • All Raptor engines lighting up
    • The second time the hot stage separation worked
    • The craft’s heat shield being intact
    • The payload doors worked
    • The first time Starship was in space
    • The longest Starship test so far

    SpaceX stated it will review the data that was collected and use that for the next Starship test.

    NASA Administrator Bill Nelson called it a “successful test flight” of the Starship on X.

    “Together, we are making great strides through Artemis to return humanity to the Moon—then look onward to Mars,” Nelson stated about NASA’s and SpaceX’s plans.

    Later after the launch test, Federal Aviation Administration stated that it will be investigating the Starship flight.

    “No public injuries or public property damage have been reported. The FAA is overseeing the SpaceX-led mishap investigation to ensure the company complies with its FAA-approved mishap investigation plan and other regulatory requirements,” the FAA stated. “The FAA will be involved in every step of the mishap investigation process and must approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions.”

    Getting off the ground

    The launch did not go off on time due to wind concerns and giving boats in the splashdown areas time to get out of the way.

    The 110-minute launch window was originally set for 8 a.m. ET, but SpaceX pushed the time back to 8:02 a.m. ET. Then SpaceX pushed it to 9:10 a.m. ET, so that boats in the splash down zones had time to move out of the area, stated SpaceX.

    On Wednesday afternoon, the California-based company announced that it would be testing its 397-foot-tall stacked Starship for a third time on Thursday from its Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas.

    SpaceX was waiting for the FAA to grant its approval for the third flight attempt. The company announced last week that it was aiming for Thursday for the launch date.

    SpaceX CEO and founder Elon Musk posted on X, stating that “Starship will make life multiplanetary.”

    About Starship

    Starship is where SpaceX’s hopes and dreams are stored. If all goes well, it will take humans back to Earth’s moon and eventually, it will go to Mars.

    It is a two-stage heavy lift launch rocket that will be a fully reusable transportation system to carry humans and cargo into space. The rocket is known as the Super Heavy and the spacecraft is called Starship, but collectively, they are known as Starship.

    Both the Super Heavy rocket, with its 33 Raptor engines fueled by thousands of tons of sub-cooled liquid oxygen and liquid methane, and the Starship are designed to be reusable.

    The Starship is planned to carry 100 crew members and cargo to Earth orbit, the moon and eventually Mars, according to the ship’s user guide.

    What to expect for the third-test flight

    For the third test, SpaceX stated it built on the two previous launches and planned to showoff a series of demonstrations.

    “The third flight test aims to build on what we’ve learned from previous flights while attempting a number of ambitious objectives, including the successful ascent burn of both stages, opening and closing Starship’s payload door, a propellant transfer demonstration during the upper stage’s coast phase, the first ever re-light of a Raptor engine while in space, and a controlled reentry of Starship. It will also fly a new trajectory, with Starship targeted to splashdown in the Indian Ocean,” SpaceX explained.

    If things had gone according to plan, this would have been Starship’s flight path.

    Starship’s flight history

    SpaceX’s first launch attempt of Starship happened on April 2023, which saw a series of failures that caused the rocket to explode.

    The FAA issued a series of requirements before the California-based company could try again, which included 63 corrective actions.

    For the second test in November 2023, SpaceX was forced to blow up Starship.

    The new stage separation, called hot stage separation, worked as designed, but it resulted in the Super Heavy rocket’s destruction.

    “Following stage separation, Super Heavy initiated its boostback burn, which sends commands to 13 of the vehicle’s 33 Raptor engines to propel the rocket toward its intended landing location. During this burn, several engines began shutting down before one engine failed energetically, quickly cascading to a rapid unscheduled disassembly of the booster,” SpaceX described.

    SpaceX believed the likely cause of the booster blowing up was a filter blockage where liquid oxygen fuel goes to the engines.

    Minutes later after the hot stage separation, SpaceX could not regain a signal to the Starship spacecraft and the company was forced to destroy it.

    “A leak in the aft section of the spacecraft that developed when the liquid oxygen vent was initiated resulted in a combustion event and subsequent fires that led to a loss of communication between the spacecraft’s flight computers. This resulted in a commanded shut down of all six engines prior to completion of the ascent burn, followed by the Autonomous Flight Safety System detecting a mission rule violation and activating the flight termination system, leading to vehicle breakup,” the company stated.

    SpaceX stated it has corrected the issues (17 corrective actions) that occurred during the second flight attempt.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Leone

    Source link

  • WATCH LIVE at 8:30 a.m.: SpaceX test launch No. 3 for Starship

    WATCH LIVE at 8:30 a.m.: SpaceX test launch No. 3 for Starship

    [ad_1]

    Starship will try to fly again Thursday morning, SpaceX says.

    The company will attempt the third launch of its super-heavy rocket at 8:30 a.m. ET from Boca Chica, Texas. News 6 will stream the attempt live when it happens.

    There will be a 110-minute launch window for the test.

    SpaceX has made two attempts to successfully launch Starship into space which ended in explosions, but SpaceX says both tests completed major milestones and led to invaluable data.

    “Each of these flight tests continue to be just that: a test. They aren’t occurring in a lab or on a test stand, but are putting flight hardware in a flight environment to maximize learning,” SpaceX officials say on the company’s website.

    During the second test in November, the rocket ignited all engines successfully and completed stage separation, but the test was not completed and the rocket was destroyed.

    The third flight attempt for Starship hopes to include several objectives, including opening and closing Starship’s payload door, re-lighting a Raptor engine while in space, and a controlled reentry for the spacecraft, which would splashdown in the Indian Ocean if successful.

    Starship is the vehicle that is expected to land astronauts on the moon as part of the Artemis program. That mission is expected to happen no earlier than September 2026.

    However, a Government Accounting Office report last year said delays in Starship’s development are hampering the launch of the Artemis III mission. The report said 2027 was a more likely scenario for launch.

    Get today’s headlines in minutes with Your Florida Daily:

    Copyright 2024 by WKMG ClickOrlando – All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Christie Zizo

    Source link

  • New rules aim to prevent

    New rules aim to prevent

    [ad_1]

    New rules aim to prevent “judge shopping” in major court cases – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The Judicial Conference of the United States, the federal agency that sets guidelines for America’s judiciary, has taken a major step to stop plaintiffs from seeking the most favorable judge for their case, a practice known as “judge shopping.” CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iditarod Fast Facts | CNN

    Iditarod Fast Facts | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Here’s a look at the Iditarod dogsled race. The event is named after the Iditarod Trail, an old mail and supply route, traveled by dogsleds from Seward and Knik to Nome, Alaska.

    March 12, 2024 – Dallas Seavey wins his sixth Iditarod, breaking the record for most wins.

    March 14, 2023 Ryan Redington wins his first Iditarod.

    The race traditionally begins on the first Saturday in March, starting in Anchorage and ending in Nome.

    The race ranges from 975 to 998 miles long, depending on whether the southern or northern route is being run. The length can also vary from year to year based on course conditions.

    The beginning of the race in Anchorage is considered a ceremonial start. The competitive part of the race usually begins the next day in Willow, but depends on weather conditions.

    There may be only one musher (person who drives the sled) per team.

    There are 12-14 dogs on each team. At least five dogs must be in harness (pulling the sled) at the finish line.

    The most commonly used sled dogs are the Samoyed, Alaskan Malamute, Siberian Husky, Alaskan Husky and Chinook. The animals get tested for strength and endurance before being selected.

    The musher must make a mandatory 24 hour stop at some point during the race.

    The route alternates every other year, one year going north through Cripple, Ruby, and Galena, the next year going south through Iditarod, Shageluk, and Anvik.

    Most Consecutive Wins Lance Mackey won four consecutive times from 2007-2010.

    Most Wins – Dallas Seavey won six times, in 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2021 and 2024. Rick Swenson won five times, in 1977, 1979, 1981, 1982 and 1991.

    Fastest winning time – Mitch Seavey finished the 2017 race in eight days, 3 hours, 40 minutes, 13 seconds.

    Winner by a [dog’s] nose Dick Mackey finished the 1978 race one second ahead of Rick Swenson. The winner is decided by the nose of the first dog across the finish line.

    First female winner Libby Riddles in 1985.

    Youngest winner Dallas Seavey, 25, in 2012.

    Oldest winner – Mitch Seavey, 57, in 2017.

    1925 – A diphtheria outbreak in Nome, Alaska, creates an emergency need for medical supplies to be delivered, and dogsledders make the journey. The current race commemorates this mission and partially follows the same route.

    1966 – Dorothy Page, President of the Wasilla-Knik Centennial Committee, decides to organize a dogsled race to celebrate Alaska’s centennial in 1967. Page and Joe Redington Sr., a local musher, work together to launch the first event.

    1967 – The first Iditarod is held, with 58 mushers competing along a 50-mile trail.

    March 1973 – After shorter races in 1967 and 1969, the first full-length race takes place. The course is approximately 1,100 miles long. The first winner is Dick Wilmarth, with a time of 20 days and 49 minutes.

    March 12, 2016 – A man on a snowmobile hits two teams competing in the Iditarod, killing one dog and injuring several other dogs. Alaska state troopers arrest Arnold Demoski, 26, of Nulato. Later, Demoski is sentenced to six months and three days in jail and ordered to pay restitution totaling $36,697.15.

    October 6, 2017 – The Iditarod Trail Committee revises Rule 39 after a musher’s team of dogs test positive for an opioid drug called Tramadol. Before the rule is revised, the ITC determines that intent of the alleged musher could not be proven. The revised rule holds a musher liable for any positive canine drug test, unless they can prove that they are not at fault. The ITC later reveals four-time champion Dallas Seavey as the musher. Seavey denies the allegations.

    December 4, 2018 – The Iditarod Trail Committee clears Seavey of any wrongdoing and releases a statement saying, “After several meetings with Dallas Seavey, and review of all relevant information and evidence, the board does not believe that Dallas had any involvement with, or knowledge of, the events that led to the positive test in his team.”

    2021 – The 2021 ceremonial Mushers’ Banquet is canceled due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Spring training offers a warm break for teams and fans

    Spring training offers a warm break for teams and fans

    [ad_1]

    When birds migrate north in the spring, baseball players and fans migrate south to Florida and Arizona every March for spring training.

    Not only is spring training an opportunity for MLB teams to get some practice in before a long season, but for fans to escape the cold weather and enjoy some warmth, sunshine and baseball in warmer climates. 


    What You Need To Know

    • Florida and Arizona host 15 MLB teams each every year for spring training
    • Spring training games are unofficial, and gives fans a chance to see their team play in warmer climates
    • Florida and Arizona are both warm in March, but differ in precipitation and humidity

    Since the late 1800s, MLB teams have sent their players and coaches south to train and practice in a warmer climate to prepare for the season.

    Since 2018, MLB has split the league with 15 teams training in Florida and the other 15 in Arizona. The reason for those two locations is pretty straight-forward: the weather. 

    Florida Grapefruit League

    MLB spreads out most of the teams that train in Florida along the Gulf Coast, with a few teams in south Florida. Average high temperatures in south and central Florida during March hover around the upper 70s and lower 80s. 

    The Toronto Blue Jays and Minnesota Twins play in the two coldest spots as far as March temperatures go, averaging high temperatures in the lower 40s.

    Not only do the players and fans get to escape the cold, but Toronto and Minneapolis average around 8 inches of snowfall during March.

    Minnesota Twins’ spring home, Fort Myers, has an average high temperature in March almost 40 degrees warmer than Minneapolis, and hasn’t even had a low temperature below 40 degrees in March since 2013. 

    Along with the Twins, the Blue Jays, Red Sox and Tigers all get about a 35 degree temperature increase after traveling south during a typical March day.

    The Marlins actually get to travel more than 80 miles north to Jupiter from Miami, and get a break from the heat, with average temperatures about 3 degrees lower. 

    How about the rest of the list? Besides the Astros, Rays and Marlins, the temperature difference is pretty significant and worthy of a trip to Florida for Spring Break. 

    Arizona Cactus League

    In the Cactus League, all 15 teams play and train in the Phoenix metropolitan area. The average high temperature in March for the Phoenix area is a balmy 78.1 degrees.

    Since the Cactus League is more centralized with no two teams more than a 45 minute drive apart, average temperatures are all within a few degrees of each other.

    The biggest difference from the Grapefruit League? The desert offers much lower humidity and less rainfall. 

    Midwest teams from the NL and AL Central Divisions have the biggest disparity when it comes to Arizona temperatures, getting about a 30 degree increase during the month of March.

    The Colorado Rockies escape Denver’s snowiest month of the year on average to play in sunny Scottsdale. 

    Similar to the Marlins, the Arizona Diamondbacks who play in downtown Phoenix, get to travel 20 minutes into Scottdale, where the average March high temperatures is only a few degrees lower.

    Beach or Desert?

    So, if you’re a neutral fan in a cold weather state and want to take in some baseball on Spring Break, do you go to Florida or Arizona?

    Florida teams are more spread out requiring longer drives, and you’ll have to deal with more humidity and higher rain chances. The Cactus league is much more centralized, and it’s a dry heat, but besides baseball, Phoenix may have less to offer for tourist opportunities when you’re not at a game.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Reid Lybarger

    Source link

  • ‘Oppenheimer’ crowned best picture at an Academy Awards shadowed by war

    ‘Oppenheimer’ crowned best picture at an Academy Awards shadowed by war

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — “Oppenheimer,” a solemn three-hour biopic that became an unlikely billion-dollar box-office sensation, was crowned best picture at a 96th Academy Awards that doubled as a coronation for Christopher Nolan.


    What You Need To Know

    • In anointing “Oppenheimer,” the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences did something it hasn’t done for more than a decade: hand its top prize to a widely seen, big-budget studio film
    • “Oppenheimer” emerged — even over its partner in cultural phenomenon, “Barbie” — as a fittingly foreboding film for times rife with cataclysm, man-made or not
    • The most closely watched contest went to Emma Stone, who won best best actress for her performance as Bella Baxter in “Poor Things”
    • A year after “Navalny” won the same award, Mstyslav Chernov’s “20 Days in Mariupol,” a harrowing chronicle of the early days of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, won best documentary

    After passing over arguably Hollywood’s foremost big-screen auteur for years, the Oscars made up for lost time by heaping seven awards on Nolan’s blockbuster biopic, including best actor for Cillian Murphy, best supporting actor for Robert Downey Jr. and best director for Nolan.

    In anointing “Oppenheimer,” the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences did something it hasn’t done for more than a decade: hand its top prize to a widely seen, big-budget studio film. In a film industry where a cape, dinosaur or Tom Cruise has often been a requirement for such box office, “Oppenheimer” brought droves of moviegoers to theaters with a complex, fission-filled drama about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the creation of the atomic bomb.

    “For better or worse, we’re all living in Oppenheimer’s world,” said Murphy in his acceptance speech. “I’d like to dedicate this to the peacemakers.”

    As a film heavy with unease for human capacity for mass destruction, “Oppenheimer” also emerged — even over its partner in cultural phenomenon, “Barbie” — as a fittingly foreboding film for times rife with cataclysm, man-made or not.

    Sunday’s Oscars at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles unfolded against the backdrop of wars in Gaza and Ukraine, and with a potentially momentous U.S. election on the horizon. Awards for the documentary winner, “20 Days in Mariupol,” and best international film, “The Zone of Interest,” brought geopolitics into the Oscar spotlight.

    The most closely watched contest went to Emma Stone, who won best actress for her performance as Bella Baxter in “Poor Things.” In what was seen as the night’s most nail-biting category, Stone won over Lily Gladstone of “Killers of the Flower Moon.” Gladstone would have become the first Native American to win an Academy Award.

    Instead, Oscar voters couldn’t resist the full-bodied extremes of Stone’s “Poor Things” performance. The win for Stone, her second best actress Oscar following her 2017 win for “La La Land,” confirmed the 35-year-old as arguably the preeminent big-screen actress of her generation. The list of women to win best actress two or more times is illustrious, including Katharine Hepburn, Frances McDormand, Ingrid Bergman and Bette Davis.

    “Oh, boy, this is really overwhelming,” said Stone, who fought back tears and a broken dress during her speech.

    Sunday’s broadcast had razzle dazzle, including a sprawling song-and-dance rendition of the “Barbie” hit “I’m Just Ken” by Ryan Gosling, with an assist on guitar by Slash and a sea of Kens who swarmed the stage.

    But protest and politics intruded on an election-year Academy Awards. Late during the show, host Jimmy Kimmel read a critical social media post from former president Donald Trump.

    “Thank you for watching,” said Kimmel. “Isn’t it past your jail time?”

    Nolan has had many movies in the Oscar mix before, including “Inception,” “Dunkirk” and “The Dark Knight.” But his win Sunday for direction is the first Academy Award for the 53-year-old filmmaker. Addressing the crowd, Nolan noted cinema is just over a hundred years old.

    “Imagine being there 100 years into painting or theater,” said Nolan, who shared the best-picture award with Emma Thomas, his wife and producer. “We don’t know where this incredible journey is going from here. But to know that you think that I’m a meaningful part of it means the world to me.”

    Downey, nominated twice before (for “Chaplin” and “Tropic Thunder”), also notched his first Oscar, crowning the illustrious second act of his up-and-down career.

    “I’d like to thank my terrible childhood and the academy, in that order,” said Downey, the son of filmmaker Robert Downey Sr.

    “Barbie,” last year’s biggest box-office hit with more than $1.4 billion in ticket sales, ultimately won just one award: best song (sorry, Ken) for Billie Eilish and Finneas’ “What Was I Made For?” It’s their second Oscar, two years after winning for their James Bond theme, “No Time to Die.”

    Protests over Israel’s war in Gaza snarled traffic around the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles, slowing stars’ arrival on the red carpet and turning the Oscar’ attention toward the ongoing conflict. Some protesters shouted “Shame!” at those trying to reach the awards.

    Jonathan Glazer, the British filmmaker whose chilling Auschwitz drama “The Zone of Interest” won best international film, drew connections between the dehumanization depicted in his film and today.

    “Right now, we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people, whether the victims of October the 7th in Israel, or the ongoing attack on Gaza, all the victims, this dehumanization, how do we resist?”

    A year after “Navalny” won the same award, Mstyslav Chernov’s “20 Days in Mariupol,” a harrowing chronicle of the early days of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, won best documentary. The win, a first for The Associated Press and PBS’ “Frontline,” came as the war in Ukraine passed the two-year mark with no signs of abating.

    Chernov, the Ukrainian filmmaker and AP journalist whose hometown was bombed the day he learned of his Oscar nomination, spoke forcefully about Russia’s invasion.

    “This is the first Oscar in Ukrainian history, and I’m honored,” said Chernov. “Probably I will be the first director on this stage to say I wish I’d never made this film. I wish to be able to exchange this (for) Russia never attacking Ukraine.”

    In the early going, Yorgos Lanthimos’ Frankenstein-riff “Poor Things” ran away with three prizes for its sumptuous craft, including awards for production design, makeup and hairstyling and costume design. “Poor Things” fared second best to “Oppenheimer,” with a total of four awards.

    Kimmel, hosting the ABC telecast for the fourth time, opened the awards with a monologue that emphasized Hollywood as “a union town” following 2023’s actor and writer strikes, drew a standing ovation for bringing out teamsters and behind-the-scenes workers — who are now entering their own labor negotiations.

    The night’s first award was one of its most predictable: Da’Vine Joy Randolph for best supporting actress, for her performance in Alexander Payne’s “The Holdovers.” An emotional Randolph was accompanied to the stage by her “Holdovers” co-star Paul Giamatti.

    “For so long I’ve always wanted to be different,” said Randolph. “And now I realize I just need to be myself.”

    Though Randolph’s win was widely expected, an upset quickly followed. Hayao Miyazaki’s “The Boy and the Heron” won for best animated feature, a surprise over the slightly favored “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse.” Miyazaki, the 83-year-old Japanese anime master who came out of retirement to make “The Boy and the Heron,” didn’t attend the ceremony. He also didn’t attend the 2003 Oscars when his “Spirited Away” won the same award.

    Best original screenplay went to “Anatomy of a Fall,” which, like “Barbie,” was penned by a couple: director Justine Triet and Arthur Harari. “This will help me through my midlife crisis, I think,” said Triet.

    In adapted screenplay, where “Barbie” was nominated — and where some suspected Greta Gerwig would win after being overlooked for director — the Oscar went to Cord Jefferson, who wrote and directed his feature film debut “American Fiction.” He pleaded for executives to take risks on young filmmakers like himself.

    “Instead of making a $200 million movie, try making 20 $10 million movies,” said Jefferson, previously an award-winning TV writer.

    The Oscars belonged largely to theatrical-first films. Though it came into the awards with 19 nominations, Netflix was a bit player. Its lone win came for live action short: Wes Anderson’s “The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar,” based on the story by Roald Dahl.

    The win for “Oppenheimer” offered Hollywood a chance to celebrate despite swirling storm clouds in the film industry. Nolan’s film debuted last year just as actors joined screenwriters in a prolonged strike over streaming economics and artificial intelligence. The actors’ strike ended in November, but little of Hollywood’s unease subsided. Streaming has proved less lucrative for most studios not named Netflix.

    But “Barbenheimer” was the kind of unplanned phenomenon Hollywood needs more of. The two films could also give a lift to the Oscar telecast, which has historically benefitted from having big movies in contention. The Academy Awards’ largest audience ever came when James Cameron’s “Titanic” swept the 1998 Oscars.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • 3/10: CBS Weekend News

    3/10: CBS Weekend News

    [ad_1]

    3/10: CBS Weekend News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Biden critical of Israel as war continues; Skaters clean pools for free in California

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A short history of daylight saving time

    A short history of daylight saving time

    [ad_1]

    Twice a year, most of the U.S. adjusts to time moving forward in the spring and back again in the fall. But where did the crazy idea of “shifting time” come from?


    What You Need To Know

    • Daylight saving was first put to use during World War I
    • The U.S. was once in daylight saving time for over three years during World War II
    • Some want to go to daylight saving time year-round

    Benjamin Franklin gets some credit for the idea of daylight saving time, though his recommendation was a joke.

    In a letter to the editor of the “Journal of Paris,” Franklin jokingly recommended the people get out of bed earlier in the morning to minimize the use of candles and lamp oil. He never mentioned setting clocks back or forth.

    (Erica Roman)

    In 1895, George Hudson, an entomologist from New Zealand, came up with the modern concept of daylight saving time. He proposed a two-hour time shift so he could have more after-work hours of sunshine to go bug hunting in the summer.

    Hudson suggested moving clocks ahead two hours in October and then a two-hour shift back in March.

    In 1905, William Willett, a British builder, suggested moving clocks ahead 20 minutes every Sunday in April and then setting them back every Sunday in September. That’s eight time changes every year!

    First use of daylight saving time

    It was during World War I that daylight saving time was first practically used.

    In 1916, locations within the German Empire set clocks ahead one hour to use less power for lighting and to save fuel for the war effort.

    Many other countries soon followed and after the war ended, they all went back to standard time.

    Daylight saving time in the U.S.

    In the United States, daylight saving time was first used in 1918, when a bill introduced the idea of a seasonal time shift. It lasted seven months before the bill was repealed.

    During World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt re-established the idea of daylight saving time. It was called “War Time.”

    War Time began in Feb. 1942 and lasted until the end of Sept. 1945.

    In 1966, the Uniform Time Act of 1966 established the idea of regulating a yearly time change. Daylight saving time would begin the last Sunday in April and end the last Sunday in October.

    (Pexels)

    During the 1973 oil embargo, the United States Congress ordered a year-round period of daylight saving time to save energy. The period ran from Jan. 1974 to April 1975. The plan did little to save energy and lost popularity. In Oct. 1974, the U.S. switched back to standard time.

    From 1987 through 2006, daylight saving time started the first weekend in April, running through the last weekend in October.

    In 2007, the start and end of daylight saving time shifted again. That year, it began on the second Sunday in March and it ended on the first Sunday in November, which has been the case ever since.

    The future of daylight saving time

    In recent years, some have pushed to make daylight saving time last year-round. Several states have passed legislation to make this law.

    I guess “time” will tell if we see year-round daylight saving time in the future.

    (iStock)

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Chief Meteorologist Gary Stephenson

    Source link

  • School shootings prompt more states to fund digital maps for first responders

    School shootings prompt more states to fund digital maps for first responders

    [ad_1]

    When a motion detector went off overnight at Kromrey Middle School, a police dispatcher called up a digital map of the building, pinpointed the detector, clicked on a live feed from the nearest camera and relayed the intruder’s location to responding police.


    What You Need To Know

    • Spurred by mass shootings, thousands of school districts have hired companies to produce detailed digital maps that can help police, firefighters and medical professionals respond more quickly in emergencies
    • More than 20 states have enacted or proposed digital school mapping measures in the past few years, according to an Associated Press analysis aided by the bill-tracking software Plural
    • Critical Response Group, run by an Army special operations veteran, has been driving the trend. The company’s CEO, Mike Rodgers, recently told lawmakers in Maryland how he used gridded digital maps during deployments and was surprised the school where his wife taught had nothing similar. So he mapped her school, then expanded — to 12,000 schools and counting, nationwide
    • Many schools have long provided floor plans to local emergency responders. But they haven’t always been digital. As with Uvalde, some plans have lacked important details or become outdated as schools are renovated and expanded

    Within moments, they captured the culprit: a teenager, dressed in dark clothes and a ski mask but carrying no weapon.

    The map and cameras “let the dispatcher keep things from becoming super-escalated,” said the school’s security director, Jim Blodgett. “The dispatcher could see that it looked like a student … just kind of goofing around in the building.”

    Spurred by mass shootings, thousands of school districts have hired companies to produce detailed digital maps that can help police, firefighters and medical professionals respond more quickly in emergencies.

    The Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District, where the teenage trespasser entered from a roof hatch, was an early adopter in Wisconsin, which has since provided mapping grants to about 200 districts.

    More than 20 states have enacted or proposed digital school mapping measures in the past few years, according to an Associated Press analysis aided by the bill-tracking software Plural. Florida approved $14 million in grants last year. Michigan allotted $12.5 million. New Jersey allocated $12.3 million in federal pandemic relief funds to complete digital maps of every school in the state.

    Critical Response Group, run by an Army special operations veteran, has been driving the trend. The New Jersey-based company’s CEO, Mike Rodgers, recently told lawmakers in Maryland how he used gridded digital maps during deployments and was surprised the school where his wife taught had nothing similar. So he mapped her school, then expanded — to 12,000 schools and counting, nationwide.

    “When an emergency happens at a school or a place of worship, most likely it’s the first time those responders have ever gone there,” Rodgers told the AP. “They’re under a tremendous amount of stress and they’re working with people they’re not familiar with, which is exactly the same problem that the military is faced with overseas, and ultimately that’s why this technique was born.”

    Lobbying and competition

    Many of the state laws and bills contain nearly identical wording championed by Rodgers’ company. They require verification by a walk-through of each campus and free compatibility with any software already used by local schools and public safety agencies. They must be overlaid with aerial imagery and gridded coordinates, “oriented true north” and “contain site-specific labeling” for rooms, doors, hallways, stairwells, utility locations, hazards, key boxes, trauma kits and automated external defibrillators.

    The standards create “a competitive, fair environment” for all vendors, Rodgers said. But when New Jersey sought a mapping contractor, the Critical Response Group had “the only product that was available in the state that answered the legislative criteria,” State Police mapping coordinator Lt. Brendan Liston said.

    The New Jersey law required “critical incident mapping data,” a phrase that Critical Response Group tried to trademark.

    Critical Response Group has hired lobbyists in more than 20 states to advocate for specific standards, according to an AP review of state lobbying records. Competitors also have engaged lobbyists to wrangle over the precise wording. In some states, lawmakers have gone with a more generic label of “school mapping data.”

    Four companies offering digital mapping among their services — Critical Response Group, Centegix, GeoComm and Navigate360 — have together spent more than $1.4 million on lobbyists in 15 states, according to an AP analysis. Their costs are unknown in some states where lobbyist payments aren’t publicly reported.

    Delaware and Virginia also chose the Critical Response Group program. Iowa has contracted with GeoComm. Other states are leaving vendor decisions to local schools.

    A response to tragedy

    U.S. Department of Justice review of the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, noted police had only “a basic map” that didn’t show windows or doors connecting classrooms as they waited to confront the gunman.

    The Texas Education Agency responded last year with new standards requiring an “accurate site layout” and door designations to be provided to 911 agencies. The Legislature reinforced this by requiring silent panic buttons and armed security officers as part of a more than $1 billion school safety initiative.

    Creating each map can cost several thousand dollars, and costs can escalate as maps are linked to other security systems, such as wearable panic buttons. But integrations also add value.

    “If it’s not integrated with a crisis response system that can be pushed electronically to the dispatch center and police, then it’s probably not going to mean anything to them in the first minutes,” said Jeremy Gulley, the school system superintendent of Jay County, Indiana, which uses a Centegix mapping and alert system.

    Because of their detailed information, digital school maps are exempt from public disclosure under legislation in some states. That’s critical to school safety, said Chuck Wilson, chair of the Partner Alliance for Safer Schools, a nonprofit coalition of education groups, law enforcement and security businesses.

    “If bad people had access to the drawings, that would be almost worse than not knowing” a school’s layout, Wilson said. He added, “We’ve got to be really, really mindful of protecting this information.”

    Maps need updating

    Many schools have long provided floor plans to local emergency responders. But they haven’t always been digital. As with Uvalde, some plans have lacked important details or become outdated as schools are renovated and expanded.

    Washington began digitally mapping every school in the state 20 years ago, after the deadly Columbine High School shooting in Colorado, and provided annual funding to the Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs to operate the map repository.

    But over time, schools quit updating the information and the maps grew stale. The state funding proved insufficient and legislators ended the program in 2021, just as more states launched similar initiatives.

    Security consultant David Corr ran the program and wishes it could have continued, but he said that for emergency responders, “wrong information is even worse than lack of information.”

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Texas approves land-swapping deal with SpaceX as company hopes to expand rocket-launch operations

    Texas approves land-swapping deal with SpaceX as company hopes to expand rocket-launch operations

    [ad_1]

    SpaceX would acquire public land in Texas to expand its rocket-launch facilities under a tentative deal that is moving forward after months of opposition from nearby residents and officials near the U.S.-Mexico border.A tentative land-swapping deal moved forward this week when the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission unanimously voted in favor of the deal to swap 43 noncontiguous acres from Boca Chica State Park with SpaceX, which would then give the state 477 acres about 10 miles south of the park near Brownsville, Texas.Related video above: SpaceX, founded in Delaware, has filed to relocate its business incorporation to Texas, according to reportsSome of the 43 contested acres are landlocked with no public access but with protected plant and animal species. Although SpaceX is proposing swapping the public land for 477 acres, it has not yet purchased that property. None of the land in the deal has beach access, but the 43 acres sit near protected federal land and lagoons that stretch along the coast.”Through this transaction we are guaranteeing the conservation of 477 acres, which would otherwise potentially be developed into condominiums or strip centers,” Jeffery D. Hildebrand, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission chairman appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott, said at the meeting’s close.The deal started in 2019 as a conversation between the state and SpaceX. But it was finally worked out in 2023, said David Yoskowitz, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s executive director. People sent over 2,300 letters to the department to voice their opinion. Although the majority, 60%, were opposed, the department recommended the state vote in favor of the deal, which had the support from the Democratic state senator for the area, the comptroller and the Texas General Land Office commissioner.Dozens of people traveled up to the Monday’s meeting in the state capital of Austin to voice their support or discontent with the plan. Cyrus Reed, the legislative and conservation director with the Lone Star chapter of the Sierra Club, was among those opposing the deal.”We think, as an alternative, if we think the 477 acres are valuable, go and buy it. We the voters of Texas have given you money to purchase valuable land,” Reed said, referring to the state’s Centennial Parks Conservation Fund. In November, voters approved the establishment of the fund, creating the largest endowment for park development in Texas history. “And remember the precedent you’re setting,” Reed said. “If you approve this deal, that means every industrialist, everyone who has an interest in expanding is going to look at this and say, ‘Where can I go find some land that I can exchange to continue to pollute and hurt other land?’ So, that’s not a net benefit for Texas.”SpaceX Starbase general manager Kathryn Lueders attended the meeting and said she has seen wildlife coexist with spacecraft in Florida when she worked as a program manager for NASA.”At the same time, it further expands on a critical refuge and allows Texans to receive a coveted property which has been sought by multiple state and federal agencies for conservation efforts for over a decade,” she said. An environmental assessment, public comment period and other consultations could mean the disposition of the property could take up to 18 months to complete, according to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s general counsel.

    SpaceX would acquire public land in Texas to expand its rocket-launch facilities under a tentative deal that is moving forward after months of opposition from nearby residents and officials near the U.S.-Mexico border.

    A tentative land-swapping deal moved forward this week when the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission unanimously voted in favor of the deal to swap 43 noncontiguous acres from Boca Chica State Park with SpaceX, which would then give the state 477 acres about 10 miles south of the park near Brownsville, Texas.

    Related video above: SpaceX, founded in Delaware, has filed to relocate its business incorporation to Texas, according to reports

    Some of the 43 contested acres are landlocked with no public access but with protected plant and animal species. Although SpaceX is proposing swapping the public land for 477 acres, it has not yet purchased that property. None of the land in the deal has beach access, but the 43 acres sit near protected federal land and lagoons that stretch along the coast.

    “Through this transaction we are guaranteeing the conservation of 477 acres, which would otherwise potentially be developed into condominiums or strip centers,” Jeffery D. Hildebrand, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission chairman appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott, said at the meeting’s close.

    The deal started in 2019 as a conversation between the state and SpaceX. But it was finally worked out in 2023, said David Yoskowitz, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s executive director.

    People sent over 2,300 letters to the department to voice their opinion. Although the majority, 60%, were opposed, the department recommended the state vote in favor of the deal, which had the support from the Democratic state senator for the area, the comptroller and the Texas General Land Office commissioner.

    Dozens of people traveled up to the Monday’s meeting in the state capital of Austin to voice their support or discontent with the plan.

    Cyrus Reed, the legislative and conservation director with the Lone Star chapter of the Sierra Club, was among those opposing the deal.

    “We think, as an alternative, if we think the 477 acres are valuable, go and buy it. We the voters of Texas have given you money to purchase valuable land,” Reed said, referring to the state’s Centennial Parks Conservation Fund.

    In November, voters approved the establishment of the fund, creating the largest endowment for park development in Texas history.

    “And remember the precedent you’re setting,” Reed said. “If you approve this deal, that means every industrialist, everyone who has an interest in expanding is going to look at this and say, ‘Where can I go find some land that I can exchange to continue to pollute and hurt other land?’ So, that’s not a net benefit for Texas.”

    SpaceX Starbase general manager Kathryn Lueders attended the meeting and said she has seen wildlife coexist with spacecraft in Florida when she worked as a program manager for NASA.

    “At the same time, it further expands on a critical refuge and allows Texans to receive a coveted property which has been sought by multiple state and federal agencies for conservation efforts for over a decade,” she said.

    An environmental assessment, public comment period and other consultations could mean the disposition of the property could take up to 18 months to complete, according to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s general counsel.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to Watch at SXSW 2024

    What to Watch at SXSW 2024

    [ad_1]

    All the cool film girlies just came back from Berlin. Specifically, they are fresh from the 74th Berlin International Film Festival, and they still smell like cigarettes to prove it. Between anecdotes about how Berghain is ruined, they’re telling me how they watched Cillian Murphy (my father, emotionally) give another masterful, award-worthy performance in the Enda Walsh adaptation of Claire Keegan’s novel Small Things Like These. This is apropos of nothing, except that I was not in Berlin, so I will have to wait alongside everyone else to see one of my favorite books on screen later this year.

    But how can I be bitter? This week, half of Los Angeles will flock to Texas for South By Southwest in Austin, and I’ll be delightfully distracted by a whole new slate of upcoming releases premiering at this year’s festival. There are so many new films to be excited about premiering at the festival — even without Cillian Murphy’s cheekbones.

    Let’s get into it.


    What is SXSW?

    I’m in for a week of acronyms: SXSW in ATX FTW – LFG!! South By Southwest (aka SXSW or SX or South By) is a film festival, music festival, and industry conference all rolled into one. Fueled by Texas BBQ and Torchy’s Tacos, creative people in the tech, film, music, education, and culture industries swarm from theater to concert hall and conference room networking (allegedly), writing pretentious reviews about the future of culture (guilty), and being menaces to the residents of Austin by causing even worse traffic jams than the city is used to— and I can’t wait.

    When is SXSW 2024?

    SXSW 2024 will be held from March 8 – 16 2024. Highly anticipated events include Rolling Stone’s Future of Music Series (my artists to watch are Flo Milli and Faye Webster), and the SXSW Music Festival (which, this year, includes The Black Keys, Bootsy Collins, and many more). Of course, the highlight is the insane 2024 SXSW movie lineup. I can’t wait to laugh, cry, and contemplate my very existence while staring up at a screen at SXSW. In the words of Nicole Kidman, “We come to this place to dream.” And this week, the dreamers are all in Austin, Texas.

    Here are the films at SXSW 2024 we’re most excited about – starring an assortment of all our favorite actors (even though Cilian won’t be making an appearance). Still, we’re excited to see new performances from faves like Ayo Edebiri, Jake Gyllenhaal, Ryan Gosling, Aaron Taylor Johnson, Jonathan Groff, Hunter Schafer, Rachel Zegler, Anne Hathaway, Nicholas Galitzine, and a whole lot more.

    SXSW 2024 Official Opening Night Selection

    Road House

    This is not Patrick Swayze’s Road House (1989) — but by the time Jake Gyllenhaal is done with you, you’ll love it as much as the original. Gyllenhaal stars as an ex-UFC fighter-turned-bouncer at a Florida Keys roadhouse, owned by Frankie (Jessica Williams). Facing threats from a criminal gang led by Brandt (Billy Magnussen), Dalton’s violent past emerges. When he is confronted by Knox (Conor McGregor), a lethal gun-for-hire, the escalating brawls and bloodshed become more dangerous than his days in the Octagon. Fans of real-life, ex-UFC fighter Conor McGregor are excited to see him in this film, even if he is the villain. Road House is coming to Prime Video on March 21st.

    SXSW 2024 Official Closing Night Selection

    ​The Idea of You

    This film is like if your mom stole your Wattpad moment. Created by two-time SXSW Audience Award Winner Michael Showalter, it’s his great return to SXSW and it’s sure to be a riot. Allegedly based on Harry Styles (and a little bit of Prince Harry, too), The Idea of You is the salacious story of a 40-year-old single mom who begins an unexpected romance with her daughter’s favorite popstar. She goes from begrudgingly chaperoning her daughter to Coachella to meeting, and falling for, 24-year-old Hayes Campbell, the lead singer of a band based on One Direction. This odd couple romance promises to be more than meets the eye. The couple is played by Red White & Royal Blue’s Nicholas Galitzine alongside Anne Hathaway so I am ready and willing to go on this ride. I’m expecting something that feels like a mix of After, A Star is Born, and How Stella Got Her Groove Back. Watch the trailer HERE. And listen to the first song from the Original Soundtrack by fictional boy band August Moon HERE.

    Other films to watch at SXSW 2024

    ​I Wish You All The Best

    I am unspeakably excited for Tommy Dorfman’s queer coming-of-age drama. Written and directed by Dorfman and starring Corey Fogelmanis, Miles Gutierrez-Riley, Alexandra Daddario, Cole Sprouse, Lena Dunham, Amy Landecker, Lexi Underwood, and more (wow!) it’s an adaptation of Mason Deaver’s novel of the same name. A queer tale of chosen family, it follows Ben DeBacker, a non-binary teen who is thrown out of their house and forced to move in with their estranged older sister, Hannah, and her husband, Thomas. Struggling with anxiety, they come out only to Hannah, Thomas, and their art teacher, Ms. Lyons, while trying to keep a low profile at their new school. Ben’s attempts to survive junior year unnoticed are thwarted when Nathan, a funny and charismatic student, decides to take Ben under his wing. With the help of Nathan, and his friends Sophie and Mel, Ben discovers themselves, and what started as a disastrous turn of events looks like it might just be a chance to start a happier new life.

    ​A Nice Indian Boy

    A Nice Indian Boy

    I’ll watch Jonathan Groff in anything — and this original odd-couple comedic drama would have taken me no convincing anyway. Self-effacing doctor Naveen Gavaskar meets Jay Kurundkar, a white man adopted by two Indian parents, when Jay takes his picture at the hospital. Despite initial skepticism on Naveen’s part, the two quickly fall in love. Naveen avoids telling his traditional family—parents Megha & Archit and sister Arundhathi—who accepted his sexuality years earlier and are close to him but increasingly don’t know much about his life. Eventually, inevitably, Jay, with no family of his own, has to meet the Gavaskars, who have never met a boyfriend of Naveen’s.

    ​The Fall Guy

    The Fall Guy

    Don’t fret, Barbie fever is over, but Ryan Gosling will be back on your screens soon enough with this comedic action blockbuster. Ryan Gosling stars as Colt, a stuntman who, after a near-career-ending accident, is drafted back into service when the star of a mega-budget movie—being directed by his ex, Jody (Emily Blunt)—goes missing. Now, this working-class hero has to solve a conspiracy and try to win back the love of his life while still doing his day job. Certified heartthrob Aaron Taylor Johnson is also in this — giving me something to look forward to as I wait patiently for his role in Kraven: The Hunter later this year. I’m sat.

    ​Omni Loop

    Omni Loop

    The more Ayo Edebiri in the zeitgeist, the better. Alongside Mary Louise Parker, Steven Maier, Eddie Cahill, and more, she stars in this existential sci-fi feature. Zoya Lowe, a 55 year old woman from Miami, FL, has been diagnosed with a black hole inside her chest and given a week to live. But what the doctors and her family don’t know is that she has already lived this week before. She’s lived it so many times, in fact, that she doesn’t even know how long it’s been. Until one day she meets Paula, a young woman studying time at a lab in the local university, and together they decide to try and solve time travel so Zoya can actually go back— back into her past, back to a time before she settled, back to when her whole future was still wide open in front of her—back so she can do it all over again, and finally be the person she always wanted to be. It’s this year’s Everything Everywhere All At Once so I have high hopes.

    The Greatest Hits

    The Greatest Hits

    Harriet (Lucy Boynton) finds art imitating life when she discovers certain songs can transport her back in time – literally. While she relives the past through romantic memories of her former boyfriend (David Corenswet), her time-traveling collides with a burgeoning new love interest in the present (Justin H. Min). As she takes her journey through the hypnotic connection between music and memory, she wonders if she can change the past. Think Yesterday, but … no, pretty much just exactly Yesterday.

    Y2K

    Y2K A24 Movie

    ​The children are our future! This A24 disaster comedy, Y2K, stars Rachel Zegler, Jaeden Martell, Julian Dennison, Lachlan Watson, Daniel Zolghadri, Mason Gooding, The Kid Laroi (yes, from that Justin Bieber song), and more as high schoolers who crash a NYE party in 1999 and end up fighting for their lives. But doesn’t all high school feel like that?

    ​I Love You Forever

    I Love You Forever

    Directed and written by Cazzie David and Elisa Kalani and starring Sofia Black-D’Elia, Ray Nicholson, Jon Rudnitsky, Cazzie David, and Raymond Cham Jr, this film portrays the sad reality of the dating landscape. It follows Mackenzie, a disillusioned 25-year old law student tired of the apps — because who isn’t. When she has a “real life meet-cute” with a charming journalist who makes her believe true love may actually exist. Ultimately, it starts to go left and Mackenzie finds herself trapped in a tumultuous and depleting cycle of emotional abuse.

    Doin It

    Doin It

    Starring internet sensation-turned-host-turned-actor Lilly Singh, Doin It is a comedy of errors about an Indian woman trying to lose her virginity. Fans of Never Have I Ever, which also starts with that premise, should flock to this film. After teenage Maya is caught in a sexually compromising position, her mom moves the family back to India so Maya can learn proper discipline. Years later, she returns to the US to find funding for her teen-focused app, and gets a job as a substitute high school teacher so she can research her target demo. But when the principal assigns her to teach sex ed, Maya —who’s still a virgin— sets out on a quest with her best friend to make up for the high school experience she lost out on. It also stars Ana Gasteyer, Sabrina Jalees, Stephanie Beatriz, Mary Holland, Utkarsh Ambudkar, and Sonia Dhillon Tully.

    ​Civil War

    Civil War

    No, not the Marvel film. Much more chilling and dystopian — especially since it’s set in a plausible, near-future. It stars Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Cailee Spaeny, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Sonoya Mizuno, and Nick Offerman taking us on an adrenaline-fueled thrill ride through a fractured America balanced on the razor’s edge, going through a civil war.

    ​Birdeater

    Birdeater

    A bride-to-be is invited to join her own fiancé’s bachelor party on a remote property in the Australian outback. But as the festivities spiral into beer-soaked chaos, uncomfortable details about their relationship are exposed, and the celebration soon becomes a feral nightmare. I’m imagining part Saltburn and part Get Out from this feature debut.

    Babes

    Babes

    After becoming pregnant from a one-night stand, Eden leans on her married best friend and mother of two, Dawn, to guide her through gestation and beyond. Starring lana Glazer, Michelle Buteau, John Carroll Lynch, and Hasan Minhaj, this comedy about friendship and motherhood is sure to be both belly-busting and heartwarming

    ​Musica

    Musica

    Based on writer, director and star Rudy Mancuso, Música is a coming-of-age love story that follows an aspiring creator with synesthesia, who must come to terms with an uncertain future, while navigating the pressures of love, family and his Brazilian culture. Alongside Mancuso are Camila Mendes, Francesca Reale, Maria Mancuso, and J.B. Smoove.

    ​Freaknik: The Wildest Party Never Told

    Freaknik: The Wildest Party Never Told

    If anyone else has heard about Freaknik endlessly without hearing about Freaknik, your time has come. This documentary feature is a celebratory exploration of the boisterous times of Freaknik, the iconic Atlanta street party that drew hundreds of thousands of people in the 80s and 90s, helping put Atlanta on the map culturally. At its height, Freaknik was a traffic-stopping, city-shuttering, juggernaut that has since become a cult classic. This documentary will, too.

    ​The Black Sea

    The Black Sea

    Immersive and inspired by Derrick B. Harden’s travels to Bulgaria, The Black Sea details the transformative journey of a man who finds unexpected connections in a small coastal Eastern European town even as he finds himself to be the only black person around.

    ​Pet Shop Days

    Pet Shop Days

    I love a very serious thriller with a whimsical title. Starring Jack Irv, Darío Yazeb Bernal, Willem Dafoe, Peter Sarsgaard, and more, you know this one’s going to be good. In an act of desperation, impulsive black sheep Alejandro flees his home in Mexico. On the run from his unforgiving father, Alejandro finds himself in New York City where he meets Jack, a college age pet store employee with similar parental baggage. Together the two enter a whirlwind romance sending them down the rabbit hole of drugs and depravity in Manhattan’s underworld.

    ​Toll

    Toll

    This Brazilian feature is definitely going to chill me to my core, I’m calling it now. Suellen, a Brazilian toll booth attendant and mother, falls in with a gang of thieves in an attempt to keep her family afloat. In doing so, she realizes she can use her job to raise some extra money illegally for a so-called noble cause: to send her son to an expensive gay conversion workshop led by a renowned foreign priest.

    ​My Dead Friend Zoe

    My Dead Friend Zoe

    My Dead Friend Zoe follows the journey of Merit, a U.S. Army Afghanistan veteran who is at odds with her family thanks to the presence of Zoe, her dead best friend from the Army. Despite the persistence of her VA group counselor, the tough love of her mother and the levity of an unexpected love interest, Merit’s cozy-dysfunctional friendship with Zoe keeps the duo insulated from the world. That is until Merit’s estranged grandfather—holed up at the family’s ancestral lake house—begins to lose his way and is in need of the one thing he refuses… help. It stars Sonequa Martin-Green, Natalie Morales, Ed Harris, Morgan Freeman, Utkarsh Ambudkar, and Gloria Reuben.

    A House Is Not a Disco

    A House Is Not a Disco

    Directed by Brian J. Smith, this documentary shows a year-in-the-life in the world’s most iconic “homo-normative” community: Fire Island Pines. Situated fifty miles from New York City, this storied queer beach town finds itself in the midst of a renaissance as a new generation of Millennial homeowners reimagine The Pines for a new, more inclusive era. Filmed like a Wiseman movie on magic mushrooms, a large cast of unforgettable eccentrics, activists, drifters, and first-timers reflect on the legacy of The Pines while preparing their beloved village for the biggest challenge it has faced since the AIDS crisis: rising seas caused by climate change.

    Brandy Hellville & the Cult of Fast Fashion

    Brandy Hellville & the Cult of Fast Fashion

    My eighth-grade self, experiencing all the stages of grief in the Brandy Melville changing room, is ready for this expose. It examines how Brandy Melville developed a cult-like following despite its controversial “one size fits all” tagline. Hiding behind its shiny Instagram façade is a shockingly toxic world, a reflection of the global fast fashion industry. Fast fashion isn’t all glitz and glamor – it’s a business that sacrifices humanity and pollutes the planet for the sake of profit.

    [ad_2]

    LKC

    Source link

  • Harris County primary election results for March 5, 2024

    Harris County primary election results for March 5, 2024

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON – Voters in Harris County had cast their ballot in the primary elections on March 5, 2024.

    Residents will select their preferred candidates for various local offices, as well as to weigh in on the Presidential primary. From county commissioners to district judges, the primary elections will determine the nominees who will vie for these positions in the general election.

    In Harris County, the Democratic primary has 119 races, and the Republican primary has 122. But the races you see on your ballot will depend on two things – where you’re registered, and which party you choose to vote in.

    In Texas, voters are allowed to participate in the primary and runoff elections of only one party, or alternatively, they can choose to engage in the convention of a third party.

    The polls opened at 7 a.m. and closed at 7 p.m. on Election Day.

    Click here to see the full list of Texas counties that have vote centers.

    Track national, statewide and local vote totals in the dropdown menu below:

    Decision 2024: Harris County primary elections

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Ed Gonzalez *(D)

    78,33869%

    Dana M. Wolfe (D)

    16,67215%

    Vergil Rochelle Ratliff (D)

    13,19812%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Annette Ramirez (D)

    44,99141%

    Danielle Keys Bess (D)

    18,52117%

    Desiree Broadnax (D)

    17,74416%

    Claude Cummings III (D)

    10,3359%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Christian D. Menefee *(D)

    78,62673%

    Umeka “UA” Lewis (D)

    29,16627%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Gilberto “Gil” Reyna (D)

    5,88523%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Jerry Garcia *(D)

    4,45877%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Sherman Eagleton *(D)

    8,06683%

    John Jay “JP” Portillo (D)

    1,67217%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Jerome Moore (D)

    10,35646%

    Jerry Rodriguez (D)

    6,39128%

    Don Quang Dinh (D)

    3,36215%

    William Gorman (D)

    2,34110%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Silvia Tervino *(D)

    2,83476%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    James “Smokie” Phillips (D)

    11,46264%

    Michael Coleman (D)

    3,52420%

    Gary R. Hicks Sr.(D)

    2,80916%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Jo Ann Delgado *(D)

    3,92571%

    Oscar Salazar Jr.(D)

    1,57129%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    James Lombardino (R)

    24,48372%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Ashley Mayes Guice (D)

    70,21767%

    Juan J. Aguirre (D)

    34,72733%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Fransheneka “Fran” Watson (D)

    56,69254%

    Troy M. Moore (D)

    27,04126%

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Richard Cantu *(D)

    66,12463%

    Josh Wallenstein (D)

    38,07437%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    John Fitzgerald McGee *(D)

    27,14862%

    Richard Bonton (D)

    16,38738%

    *Incumbent

    32.3% of Precincts Reporting

    (176 / 545)

    Primary Election Races that Matter

    Visit the Decision 2024 page of Click2houston.com for complete election results and news.

    Copyright 2024 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No evidence Texas fires set to attack US food supply

    No evidence Texas fires set to attack US food supply

    [ad_1]

    Wildfires in the Texas Panhandle — including the Smokehouse Creek fire, the largest in state history — have burned more than 1.3 million acres of land in late February and early March, killing thousands of livestock animals.

    At least two people have been killed, along with thousands of cows and other animals, according to news reports. That has led some social media users to tie the fires to a long-running, baseless conspiracy theory that the nation’s food supply is under attack.

    “Texas fire deliberate attack on our food supply?” read sticker text on a March 4 Instagram video.

    The video shows a clip from the “American Journal” podcast, which is part of InfoWars, a website known for sharing misinformation and conspiracy theories. Host Harrison Smith said the recent wildfires are apparently “just another weird coincidence that happens to align perfectly with everything that the psychopathic, depopulationist, World Economic Forum globalist technocratic scumbags want.” (The World Economic Forum is a frequent conspiracy theory target.)

    A caption on the Instagram post agreed, saying, “Working on a video going through every food supply incident the last two years. Sure, accidents do happen occasionally, but this is most definitely deliberate.”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The notion that the fire may be a deliberate attack on the U.S. food supply plays into conspiracy theories that have spread for more than two years that globalists are intentionally attacking farms and food production facilities in the U.S. to starve people.

    PolitiFact has debunked such claims on several occasions, most recently a claim that falsely alleged 12 million chickens died in a Texas egg farm fire that was set on purpose. That fire was a “noncriminal accident,” authorities there said, and the number of chickens that died was far fewer than 12 million, the egg farm’s CEO said.

    (Instagram screenshot)

    Although the cause of the Texas wildfires has yet to be officially determined, there’s been no evidence presented by state authorities that shows they were set intentionally. 

    “Texas A&M Forest Service law enforcement investigators are working in coordination with local law enforcement, and the cause of these fires is under investigation at this time,” Erin O’Connor, a spokesperson for the agency, said in a March 5 email to PolitiFact.

    One homeowner whose property was destroyed in the fires has sued Xcel Energy, one of its subsidiaries and a contractor, alleging that a fallen utility pole that wasn’t properly maintained started the Smokehouse Creek fire.

    David Anderson, a Texas A&M agricultural economics professor, said the fires aren’t part of a plot to hurt the U.S. food supply.

    “Fires happen out on the Great Plains in the spring, especially when it rains the prior fall, causing a lot of grass to grow,” Anderson said. “In winter, the grass freezes and dries down, creating a fuel load for a fire to burn.”

    Combined with high winds that move through the Plains in the spring, he said, “you get wildfires.”

    Whatever the Texas wildfires’ cause, experts we spoke with said they didn’t expect to see a big effect on the nation’s food supply or consumers.

    “These fires will have no effect on the nation’s food supply. They will have no effect on beef prices to consumers,” Anderson said.

    A large percentage of Texas cattle are in the Panhandle, but most of those are confined in feedlots and dairies, Anderson said.

    “No feedlots or dairies have been hit by these fires. The cattle that have been impacted are beef cows out on ranches grazing rangelands,” said Anderson, noting that’s a “small percentage” of beef cows in the state.

    Darren Hudson, a Texas Tech University agricultural and applied economics professor, said any loss of cattle will have some effect on beef prices as the U.S. cattle inventory is at its lowest level since the 1950s.

    “I do not think the impact will be enough to ‘damage’ the U.S. food supply,” Hudson said. 

    Hudson pointed to cattle prices that have remained flat since the fires started. That shows “the market is not anticipating much impact at this time,” he said.

    Matt Stockton, a University of Nebraska-Lincoln agricultural economics professor, said there is certainly “economic devastation for those in Texas who have lost their cattle.” 

    Speculation about how a disaster like this may affect the industry and consumers is often overstated, he said.

    “Of course it will have an effect, but the industry is large and has ways to compensate,” Stockton said.

    Stockton said the affected area is relatively minor in terms of the whole industry, and other meat products, such as poultry and pork, could be increased quickly if needed.

    Our ruling

    An Instagram post claimed the Texas wildfires were set intentionally to damage the nation’s food supply.

    The fires’ cause remains under investigation, but authorities have not tied them to foul play. A homeowner sued a utility company, alleging that a downed power line started the Smokehouse Creek fire. 

    Meanwhile, the fires may devastate the ranchers they affect, but they’ll have little impact on the nation’s food supply or consumer prices, agricultural economics experts said. We rate the claim False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Directed energy weapons didn’t start Texas wildfires

    Directed energy weapons didn’t start Texas wildfires

    [ad_1]

    After wildfires broke out in Texas, the largest in the state’s history, a familiar conspiracy theory began circulating online: Social media users are claiming the blaze was set intentionally using “directed energy weapons.”

    A March 3 Instagram post shared side-by-side videos of a purported “directed energy weapon” attack and the Texas wildfires. The video on the left showed what appeared to be a flash of lightning with a green laser beaming down behind a house at night. The video on the right showed a Texas landscape covered in smoke and fire.

    The video’s text says, “Could these two events be related?”

    (Screengrab from Instagram)

    Other Instagram posts also shared the green laser video and suggested it was related to the Texas wildfires.

    One post’s caption read, “If this is actual footage … we’re looking at yet ANOTHER intentionally set fire courtesy of DEWS (directed energy weapons) and our lovely (government).”

    Some X posts shared a clip of President Joe Biden discussing the Texas wildfires and claimed he said directed energy weapons were involved. We previously fact-checked social media posts that took this clip of Biden out of context. The president was discussing the need for buildings to be up to code to better withstand wildfires.

    These posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    In the week since fires broke out across the Texas Panhandle, more than 1 million acres of land have burned, and at least two people have been killed. The fires have also killed thousands of livestock animals, scorched fields of crops and destroyed hundreds of buildings.

    Directed energy weapons are real and fire concentrated electromagnetic energy at light speed. Such weapons include high-energy lasers, high-power microwaves and radio frequency devices. The United States and other countries are researching using directed-energy weapons for military purposes, but there is no evidence they were used to ignite the Texas wildfires.

    Authorities are still investigating how the Smokehouse Creek fire, which still burns, started. A Texas homeowner sued a utility company, blaming a downed power line, but officials have not determined a link. Hot weather, dry land and high winds have fueled the fire’s spread.

    The green laser beam video predates these Texas fires. Reverse-image searches using Google Images found this video was shared online as early as Dec. 31, 2023. The account that appears to have first shared it is known for videos that claim to show paranormal or extraterrestrial activity.

    Last year, social media users also claimed that directed energy weapons ignited fires that devastated Maui, Hawaii. There have been similar claims about fires in Canada and Russia. But all these claims are unfounded.

    We rate the claim that the Texas wildfires were started by directed energy weapons False.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker endorses Nikki Haley for president at Stockyards rally

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker endorses Nikki Haley for president at Stockyards rally

    [ad_1]

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker called Nikki Haley an inspiring candidate with a vision for the future.

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker called Nikki Haley an inspiring candidate with a vision for the future.

    hmantas@star-telegram.com

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker bucked the trend of most prominent Texas politicians by endorsing former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley for president.

    Parker introduced Haley at a packed rally Monday at Tannehill’s Tavern in the Stockyards. She called the former South Carolina governor’s message a hopeful vision for the future.

    “Each of you are here because you’re voting for someone, not against the status quo,” Parker said. She called Haley inspirational, adding that Haley inspires people to be better together.

    Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn and several North Texas congressional representatives support former President Donald Trump.

    However, prominent Fort Worth Republicans including Parker, former Mayor Betsy Price, and former Fort Worth city council member Steve Murrin have all shown support for Haley.

    Price, who spoke to the Star-Telegram before introducing Haley at a February event in Dallas, said Haley is more of a public servant than a politician.

    “I’m just really not sure we need somebody that’s got all that baggage,” Price said.

    Haley’s visit to Fort Worth comes on the eve of Super Tuesday, where 15 states, including Texas, will hold primary elections.

    Haley trails Trump by a tally of 244 delegates to 43. They each need 1,215 delegates to win the nomination.

    She’s also behind Trump in the latest University of Houston poll, with 80% supporting Trump and 19% supporting Haley.

    Still, people at Monday’s rally said they are supporting Haley for her ability to bring people together. Several blamed Trump for divisions in the Republican party and argued that Haley would stand a better chance of beating President Joe Biden in the general election in November.

    Cathy Hartman, 66, said she supported Trump in 2016 at a time when the country needed his style of what she called raw truth.

    “I think it’s kind of falling on deaf ears now. It’s not sexy anymore,” Hartman said.

    Patrice Lucas, a retired nurse from Fort Worth, was more blunt in her assessment of Trump.

    “I don’t want someone who is old and facing jail time, and it would be nice if someone could speak in complete sentences,” Lucas said.

    She also said she’s tired of the toxic political culture embodied by Trump, who often focuses on bashing his political opponents rather than talking about policy to make the country better.

    Haley picked up on that point in her stump speech, referencing the way Trump lashed out at her after she secured 43% of the vote in the New Hampshire Republican primary.

    “All he’s doing is talking about himself, and the thing is, this isn’t about him. This is about the American people,” Haley said, drawing booming applause from the roughly 1,000 people gathered Monday.

    Haley’s speech was interrupted at least a dozen times by protesters calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s war against Hamas. While the crowd chanted her name to drown out the protesters, Haley urged her supporters to be civil.

    “My husband and his military brothers and sisters sacrifice every day for their right to be able to (protest),” she said.

    Haley ended her speech with a call to normalcy. Biden calling his opponents fascists and Trump calling his opponents vermin is not normal, Haley said.

    She noted that many young Americans can’t afford to buy a house and believe their children will be worse off.

    “If you join this movement, if you make your voices heard, I promise you our best days are yet to come,” she said.

    Related stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Harrison Mantas has covered the city of Fort Worth’s government, agencies and people since September 2021. He likes to live tweet city hall meetings, and help his fellow Fort Worthians figure out what’s going on.

    [ad_2]

    Harrison Mantas

    Source link

  • Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Texas Law That Allows Police To Arrest Migrants – KXL

    Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Texas Law That Allows Police To Arrest Migrants – KXL

    [ad_1]

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas’ plan to arrest migrants who enter the U.S. illegally is headed to the Supreme Court in a legal showdown over the federal government’s authority over immigration.

    The high court on Monday blocked Texas’ immigration law from going into effect until March 13.

    It asked the state to respond by March 11.

    The law was set to take effect Saturday.

    The court’s decision came just hours after the Justice Department asked it to intervene. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed the law in December.

    For months, he’s unveiled a series of escalating measures on the border that have tested the boundaries of how far a state can go keep migrants from entering the country.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • 3/3/2024: Operation Lone Star; 97 Books; Artemis

    3/3/2024: Operation Lone Star; 97 Books; Artemis

    [ad_1]

    3/3/2024: Operation Lone Star; 97 Books; Artemis – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    First, a report on barricades and battles on the Texas border. Then, a look at why Beaufort banned five books from school libraries. And, a report on the challenges NASA faces going back to the moon.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link