ReportWire

Tag: Tesla

  • Elon Musk’s Battle with Swedish Unions Is Now Impacting Tesla’s Charging Stations

    Elon Musk’s Battle with Swedish Unions Is Now Impacting Tesla’s Charging Stations

    [ad_1]

    For the past several months, Tesla has been locked in a battle of wills with the labor unions of Sweden. The company’s refusal to ratify a collective bargaining agreement with a small number of workers associated with the Swedish union IF Metall has led to boycotts by other regional unions, turning what should have been a quickly resolved dispute into an ongoing disaster for the electric car company.

    This week, yet another humiliation was visited upon the firm: An additional labor union has decided to take action against the car manufacturer, and this time the end result could be the stifling of Tesla charging stations throughout the country. The Swedish Union for Service and Communications Employees, or Seko, published a statement Wednesday, announcing it would be initiating a “sympathy” action against Tesla over its anti-union policies:

    “IF Metall’s fight is also our fight. By refusing to comply with the rules of the game here in Sweden, Tesla is trying to gain a competitive advantage by giving the workers worse wages and conditions than they would have with a collective agreement. It is of course completely unacceptable. The fight that IF Metall is now taking is important for the entire Swedish collective agreement model. That is why we have chosen to issue another sympathy notice and increase the pressure on Tesla.”

    The impact here could be bad for Tesla, as Seko, which does important electrical work throughout the country, has promised to halt all “planning, preparation, new connections, network expansion, service, maintenance and repairs regarding all of the car brand Tesla’s charging stations in Sweden.” Elektrek has noted that the move could stop the launch of all new Tesla Superchargers within the country.

    Over the past several months, unions throughout Sweden and other parts of Europe have banded together to protect Scandinavia’s labor model from Tesla’s attempted disruption. So-called “sympathy” actions or strikes are a method by which unions not directly connected to a particular conflict can express their support and put pressure on an offending company. As a result, Tesla’s headquarters in Sweden have been subjected to a number of actions. Dock workers, electricians, postal workers, and even garbage collectors have all abandoned the company’s offices, causing serious issues for the company.

    Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has made it clear that he doesn’t like unions—which doesn’t make him particularly unique, as far as the billionaire-class goes. That said, Musk’s anti-union stance is particularly pronounced, even among his peers. He has repeatedly expressed his disdain for collective bargaining and, during one particularly inspired bout of rhetorical bullshit, said of organized labor: “I just don’t like anything which creates kind of a lords and peasants sort of thing”—which is an amazing statement coming from a guy whose cumulative wealth rivals that of any feudal lord in history.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • Tesla Chicken & Pizza Loses Trademark Dispute to Musk’s EV Co | Entrepreneur

    Tesla Chicken & Pizza Loses Trademark Dispute to Musk’s EV Co | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    This article originally appeared on Business Insider.

    A chicken shop owner in Northern England has lost a lengthy legal dispute with Elon Musk‘s Tesla.

    Amanj Ali’s takeaway in Bury, Greater Manchester, called Tesla Chicken & Pizza, was at the center of a trademark dispute with the EV company.

    Last November, Ali was ordered to pay £4,000, or $5,053, to Tesla after the UK’s Intellectual Property Office eventually sided with the auto giant.

    Ali had registered the trademark for the takeaway in May 2022, citing the inventor Nikola Tesla as his inspiration for the name, the BBC reported.

    When asked about the unusual inspiration, he told the outlet: “He was a kind of intelligent guy… in my young age, I was… reading about him, looking at his pictures.”

    While Tesla did not originally object to the trademark, Ali was notified in November 2021 that the auto company had requested international protection for trademarks in the U.K. food and drink category, documents released by the IPO showed.

    Ali opposed the request, fearing the company would try to invalidate his trademark for the takeaway. Almost a year later, Tesla did just that, claiming Ali’s trademark would take unfair advantage of the EV company’s established reputation.

    Representatives for Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, made outside normal working hours.

    After another year of back-and-forth arguments, Ali eventually lost the case.

    He told the BBC he would have appealed the decision but had already spent around £8,000 in legal fees and was struggling with the stress of the dispute. Ali added that the fight with Tesla had affected his sleeping and working habits.

    “Imagine, I’m just a small businessman running one chicken shop, and there is a big company coming which is owned by the richest man in the world,” he told the outlet.

    This is not the first time small businesses have tried to do battle with big-tech companies over trademark issues.

    In October last year, Meta’s Threads ran into issues with a small UK software company called Threads Software Limited. Its lawyers told Meta to stop using the Threads name in the UK as it owned the British trademark.

    The company claimed Meta made four offers to purchase the “threads.app” domain, which it declined.

    [ad_2]

    Beatrice Nolan

    Source link

  • Stellantis CEO says Chinese EVs are ‘possibly the biggest risk’ facing his carmaker and Elon Musk’s Tesla

    Stellantis CEO says Chinese EVs are ‘possibly the biggest risk’ facing his carmaker and Elon Musk’s Tesla

    [ad_1]

    One major problem for automakers as they transition to electric vehicles is that traditional cars still generally cost less. That matters to everyday car shoppers trying to make ends meet.

    In China, however, EVs are actually more affordable than gas guzzlers. And increasingly, Chinese EVs are being exported to markets around the world and sold for prices that are tough to match.

    That has leaders of automakers outside China worried. This week, Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares likened China’s automotive emergence to the arrival of Japanese carmakers in the U.S. in the 1970s, followed by South Korean rivals three decades later.

    Now it’s China’s turn to make its mark, he suggested, and that poses a threat to existing carmakers like Stellantis, whose brands include Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep, Ram, and Maserati.

    “The Chinese offensive is possibly the biggest risk that companies like Tesla and ourselves are facing right now,’’ Tavares said. “We have to work very, very hard to make sure that we bring out consumers better offerings than the Chinese.”

    The most-feared Chinese carmaker is probably BYD—backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway—which recently topped Tesla in global EV sales. 

    “No one can match BYD on price. Period,” Michael Dunne, CEO of Asia-focused car consultancy Dunne Insights, recently told the Financial Times. “Boardrooms in America, Europe, Korea, and Japan are in a state of shock.”

    BYD keeps its costs low in part because it owns the entire supply chain of its EV batteries, from the raw materials to the finished battery packs. The battery accounts for roughly 40% of a new electric vehicle’s price.

    Taking on Chinese EVs

    Chinese EVs are not flooding American roads today thanks to protectionist measures—a 25% tariff on Chinese-made cars on top of a regular 2.5% one on imported cars. But American lawmakers fear that Chinese carmakers will use factories in Mexico to avoid such tariffs, taking advantage of the North American free trade agreement.

    “So do we want that the Chinese carmakers take a significant share of the U.S. market in the next 20 years, or the next 10 years? I don’t know. That is the question,” Tavares said. “So how do we prevent that from happening beyond all the protectionist decisions, which are out of my reach? Well, by making our consumers happy.”

    Tavares said that while Stellantis will launch 18 new EVs this year, eight in North America, the “job is not done” until prices for EVs match those of traditional cars. 

    In Europe—where carmakers are less protected from Chinese competition—Stellantis is taking orders for the new electric Citroen e-C3. It’s priced to take on budget models from Chinese rivals like Great Wall Motor. The e-C3 sells for 23,000 euros ($25,100) and has a range of 320 kilometers (199 miles). It will hit showrooms in the second quarter. An entry-level version slated for 2025 will sell for 19,990 euros.

    Avoiding a ‘race to the bottom’

    Both models will be sold at a profit, Tavares noted. Last month, he warned about the perils of getting drawn into a damaging price war.

    “If you go and cut pricing disregarding the reality of your costs, you will have a bloodbath. I am trying to avoid a race to the bottom,” he said. “I know a company that has brutally cut pricing and their profitability has brutally collapsed.”

    He didn’t elaborate on which company he was referring to, but his comments came shortly after Tesla cut prices on its Model Y across Europe and both its Model Y and Model 3 in China.

    Read more: Ford CEO, who’s been worrying about China’s EV dominance for years, says ‘the world has changed’ and he’d work with rivals on a cheaper battery

    Tesla, in a call with investors last month, warned of “notably lower” sales growth this year after a disappointing fourth quarter. CEO Elon Musk said his EV maker is “between two major growth waves.” Hoping to better compete against both Chinese rivals and cheaper gas-powered cars, Tesla plans to start producing an entry-level EV starting at $25,000 next year.

    Musk, too, is warily watching BYD and other Chinese carmakers. 

    “If there are no trade barriers established,” he told investors last month, “they will pretty much demolish most other car companies in the world. They’re extremely good.”

    Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: February 18, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: February 18, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Shopify struggles

    Canada’s second-largest company (or third, depending on the day) had a relatively strong earnings day on Tuesday, but the company’s share price took a beating based mostly on decreased earnings expectations going forward.

    Shopify earnings highlights

    Shopify is listed on both the Toronto and New York Stock exchanges, and it announces earnings in U.S. dollars.

    • Shopify (SHOP/TSX): Earnings per share of $0.34 (versus $0.31 predicted), and revenues of $2.14 (versus $2.08 predicted).

    Shares of Canada’s tech darling were down over 13% on Tuesday, but even with the massive pullback, the share price is still up 14% year to date (YTD).

    Shopify’s CFO Jeff Hoffmeister reported the good news that more products were sold on the Shopify platform than ever before. The fourth quarter included the all-important holiday shopping activity, and Hoffmeister announced that Shopify has moved $75.1 billion-worth of merchandise. That was a 23% increase on last year’s numbers. Net earnings came in at $657 million, compared to a loss of $623 million during the fourth quarter in 2022.

    President Harley Finkelstein said Shopify handled the orders for 61 million customers worldwide on the Black Friday weekend. 

    “Our platform handled a staggering 967,000 requests per second, which is the same as 58 million requests per minute, nearly 80% higher than our peak traffic just two years ago.”

    —Harley Finkelstein

    So, where’s the struggle? Growth is not the same as profitability. With Shopify stating its free cash flow is going to be substantially lower than previously indicated, investors were quick to pounce on the bad news.

    Finkelstein tried his best to put a positive spin on future growth opportunities.

     “There are opportunities for us to go beyond Europe. Of course, we’ve talked about Latin America and the Asia-Pacific in the past, but we definitely see a lot of opportunity there[…] I mean, we’ve captured less than 1% of market share in global retail sales, even as our product and geographies have expanded.”

    There’s no question Shopify’s been an incredibly innovative company, and it is all the more noteworthy for keeping its home base in Canada, despite many tech companies moving shop. It’s very likely the company will be consistently profitable, but trying to forecast the “when” and the “how much” of that long-term profitability is a very difficult endeavour. In this age of higher-for-longer interest rates, investors appear to be demanding durable profits sooner rather than later, and consequently, shareholders will have to buckle up for a bit of a volatile rollercoaster.

    Can Shopify keep up the growth momentum while controlling costs? Investors are betting on it. But Tuesday’s dip would indicate that it’s not at all certain about those bets.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • SpaceX moves incorporation to Texas, as Elon Musk continues to blast Delaware

    SpaceX moves incorporation to Texas, as Elon Musk continues to blast Delaware

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX has transferred its incorporation from Delaware to Texas, the CEO and co-founder posted on X. 

    The move comes just weeks after a Delaware judge struck down Musk’s $55.8 billion pay package as CEO of Tesla, prompting the billionaire to lash out against the state on social media, urging other companies to depart Delaware as well. 

    “SpaceX has moved its state of incorporation from Delaware to Texas!” Musk wrote in a post on Tuesday, adding, “If your company is still incorporated in Delaware, I recommend moving to another state as soon as possible.” 

    At the root of Musk’s ire is a lawsuit filed by a Tesla shareholder, Richard Tornetta, in 2018, accusing Musk and Tesla’s board of directors of breaching their fiduciary duties to the company and its stockholders when they signed off on a multibillion-dollar pay plan agreement allegedly resulting in the unjust enrichment of Musk. 

    After failed attempts by Tesla to dismiss the lawsuit, Musk testified in November that he had no involvement in setting the terms of the payout. In January, however, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen McCormick struck down the record pay package, ruling that the negotiation process was “flawed” and the price “unfair.” 

    “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware,” Musk posted on X following the ruling, later adding, “I recommend incorporating in Nevada or Texas if you prefer shareholders to decide matters.”

    Betting on Texas

    SpaceX is Musk’s second business to be reincorporated from Delaware to a new state since the January ruling. Neuralink, Musk’s brain implant company, moved its legal corporate home from Delaware to Nevada earlier this month.

    The switch came after Musk posted on X that he would “move immediately” to have Tesla shareholders hold a vote on transferring the company’s corporate listing from Delaware to Texas, based on “unequivocal” public support.

    Considered one of the most corporation-friendly states in terms of its laws, Delaware is the “leading domicile for U.S. and international corporations,” with more than a million businesses incorporated there, according to the state’s website

    “Delaware built its preferred state of incorporation business by being friendly to company management, not shareholders,” Erik Gordon, a business and law professor at the University of Michigan, told CBS News earlier this month.

    While Musk seems confident that Texas would provide a far more welcoming legal home for Tesla if he were to reincorporate his electric car company there, that might not necessarily be the case, according to one legal expert. 

    “The last thing Texas is going to want is a reputation that their corporate law is a game where billionaires always win, because then investors aren’t going to trust it,” University of Nevada law professor Benjamin Edwards told the Economic Times in a recent article.

    Tesla shares rose 5% on Tuesday.

    — The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon’s Surging Stock Could Soon Make Jeff Bezos The World’s Richest Man Again

    Amazon’s Surging Stock Could Soon Make Jeff Bezos The World’s Richest Man Again

    [ad_1]

    Jeff Bezos arrives at the Dolce&Gabbana Party during the Milan Menswear Fall/Winter 2024-2025 on January 13, 2024 in Milan, Italy. Jacopo Raule/Getty Images

    Jeff Bezos could be making a play for the title of the world’s richest person after losing it to Elon Musk in 2021. Amazon (AMZN) disclosed earlier this month (Feb. 2) that the e-commerce billionaire will sell up to 50 million company shares over the next year, which could potentially boost his net worth to over $200 billion. 

    Bezos already sold 12 million Amazon shares worth about $2 billion on Feb. 7 and Feb. 8, according to a company filing to the SEC on Feb.9. All 50 million shares would be worth over $8 billion, depending on Amazon shares’ market price.

    It’s unclear why Bezos is selling such a large chunk of Amazon equity. He owned 988 million Amazon shares worth about $170 billion (just shy of 10 percent of the company) at the end of 2023, according to Amazon 2023 proxy statement.

    On Bloomberg’s real-time billionaires rankings, Bezos currently sits behind Musk by a thin margin of $9 billion. The Amazon founder is worth $200 billion, while the Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX CEO is worth $209 billion. Bezos was the world’s richest person from 2017 (overtaking Bill Gates) to 2021 before being dethroned by Musk. French luxury mogul Bernard Arnault, who owns the fashion and beauty conglomerate LVMH (LVMHF), also often traded places with Musk and Bezos in the top ranks. 

    The majority of Bezos’s and Musk’s wealth is tied to stock of their respective companies. The recent slump of Tesla’s share price and the sharp rise of Amazon is giving Bezos an opportunity to surpass Musk.

    Since the beginning of 2024, Tesla stock is down more than 24 percent, costing Musk about $20 billion in paper wealth. Over the same period, Amazon stock is up 15 percent, adding $23 billion under Bezos’s belt.

    Bezos stepped down as Amazon CEO in 2021 while remaining as the company’s board chairman. He has been moving about $1 billion a year to fund his space company, Blue Origin, and expanding his philanthropic efforts since then.

    Amazon’s Surging Stock Could Soon Make Jeff Bezos The World’s Richest Man Again



    [ad_2]

    Nhari Djan

    Source link

  • Notion acquires privacy-focused productivity platform Skiff | TechCrunch

    Notion acquires privacy-focused productivity platform Skiff | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    Notion launched its new calendar based on Cron last month, but its productivity suit can soon have more privacy-focused offerings. The company announced today that it has acquired Skiff, a platform that offers end-to-end encrypted file storage, docs, calendar events, and email.

    Skiff was started in 2020 by Andrew Milich and Jason Ginsberg. The company had raised $14.2 million in funding over two rounds from investors such as Sequoia Capital along with Alphabet chairman John Hennessy, former Yahoo chief executive Jerry Yang, and Eventbrite co-founders Julia and Kevin Hartz, Balaji Srinivasan, and re–Inc founder Jenny Wang.

    Skiff Mobile client

    Image Credits: Skiff

    In a conversation with co-founders posted on the Notion blog, the company’s COO Akshay Kothari said that Notion had taken note of Skiff’s work right from the start.

    “Skiff started showing up on our radar at Notion right from the beginning. I actually tried to reach out in 2020 when you were building your Docs product. We never connected then, but I kept tabs on your progress. Then a few months ago, Ivan [Notion co-foudner] and I were talking, and Skiff came up again. I downloaded all the products y’all had built, and was really impressed by the attention to detail,” Kothari said.

    While the company started out as a secure alternative to Google Docs, it also built other productivity solutions such as calendar and email.

    Skiff mentioned on its website that the company is joining Notion. On a support page, the Skiff said that the product would shut down after six months. It mentioned that the Skiff user account won’t be converted to a Notion account. Plus, users can easily export or migrate their data to other services.

    Notion’s last acquisition was the workflow management tool Flowdash in 2022. Prior to that, it acquired Cron and India-based Automate.io, which had a suite of integrations with 200 services.

    [ad_2]

    Ivan Mehta

    Source link

  • With Disney’s magic, Fortnite is poised to win the metaverse | TechCrunch

    With Disney’s magic, Fortnite is poised to win the metaverse | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    We may not be using the M word much these days, but the race to build an interconnected avatar-driven virtual world didn’t take the last year off.

    The metaverse, a tech buzzword sandwiched in between the hype eras of NFTs and AI, is still being built, regardless of what we’re calling it. And in light of news this week, one company is increasingly positioned to dominate the near future.

    Epic Games and Disney revealed Wednesday that they are designing an “entertainment universe” together full of Disney-flavored games to play and things to buy. The multiyear project will deploy Epic’s under-the-hood technology and Fortnite’s social gaming ecosystem to bring characters from Disney’s vast intellectual property vault to life. Disney invested $1.5 billion for a chunk of Epic in the deal.

    In an image promoting the project, Disney and Epic portray their work together as a series of futuristic colorful islands floating in space with highways running between them and a Magic Castle glowing in the center, a beacon of cash-printing possibility. Those highways, whether literally or symbolically, will connect with Epic’s Fortnite — a hit game that’s now evolved into a massive online social ecosystem.

    Fortnite’s evolution

    Fortnite is best-known as a third-person shooter where 100 players swarm a shrinking virtual island and fight to be the last man standing. The game is famous for its goofy maximalism and it encourages players to dress in custom “skins” which can be obtained by playing or be bought through Epic’s lucrative virtual swag shop. In Fortnite, you can, as Darth Vader, roll over your enemy in a giant hamster wheel, slingshotted through the attic of a suburban foursquare home. Your foe might be dressed as Goku from Dragon Ball Z, Ariana Grande or Meowscles, a buff shirtless cat (an Epic original).

    In its early days, Fortnite was about as ubiquitous and popular as a game can be. Streaming gameplay routinely drew hundreds of thousands of viewers on Twitch, where a cottage industry of pro Fortnite players emerged, all laser-focused on Epic’s polished battle royale. By 2020, the game already had more registered players than the population of the United States. In 2023, the game saw something of a resurgence and 100 million people logged in last November.

    Anyone who still thinks of Fortnite solely as that goofy battle royale will be surprised to learn the extent of Epic’s true ambitions.

    In recent years, Epic has steadily been expanding its marquee title into something much more akin to a platform or marketplace than a simple standalone game. Over the years, Fortnite’s psychedelic seasonal events, kaiju Travis Scott concerts and user-generated sandbox worlds all hinted at these grand plans. In December, Epic tripled down by simultaneously launching three new games within the game: Lego Fortnite, a Minecraft/Animal Crossing hybrid, Fortnite Festival, a rhythm game from the studio behind Rock Band, and Rocket Racing, a fast-paced racing title from the makers of Rocket League.

    That slate of new games was already ambitious, but this week’s surprise news that Disney is coming to Fortnite (or the other way around) is on another level entirely. The two companies already have a relationship; Disney first invested in Epic through its accelerator program in 2017 and has licensed many of its Marvel and Star Wars characters to Fortnite as skins, but the new $1.5 billion investment signals a much deeper long-term play.

    Disney needs Fortnite

    With Fortnite, Disney is in an interesting position of needing something it probably couldn’t do better itself.

    Epic Games is light years ahead of many of its peers on seamless online multiplayer gaming. Running smooth, fast simultaneous instances of detailed virtual worlds for many millions of people is both technically complex and expensive. Any Fortnite player could be forgiven for not realizing that because Epic’s core experience runs perfectly the vast majority of the time, enabling people across devices to play and chat together instantly. Fortnite looks and moves as well as it does thanks to Epic’s Unreal Engine 5, which Disney’s partner Square Enix will also use for Kingdom Hearts IV, the latest game in the hit franchise featuring Disney characters.

    In the announcement, Disney CEO Bob Iger called the Epic partnership “Disney’s biggest entry ever into the world of games.” Because whatever the two companies come up with will be interoperable with Fortnite, Disney also stands to instantly gain Fortnite’s 100 million monthly players without needing to build a player base from scratch.

    The benefits will also extend the other way, and Fortnite might be able to leapfrog Roblox’s own numbers, which are currently at least double its own. Disney, like Lego, will also widen Fortnite’s appeal beyond the audience that plays battle royale and Fortnite’s other shooting-centric games. Fortnite offerings in other genres could bring in players both younger and older and expand the game’s appeal to more women, who are currently enjoying the rise of cozy gaming, and to parents looking for family-friendly titles.

    Fortnite’s business model is also key for the potential success of the Disney collaboration. Games in Fortnite’s ecosystem are free to play, and the company makes its money through brand licensing partnerships and in-game purchases like skins, dances and emotes, which rotate through its virtual store on a daily basis.

    If the popularity of Fortnite character skins from Disney-owned franchises like Star Wars and Marvel is any indication, players will be eager to collect their favorites and show them off on Fortnite’s slickly-animated avatars. From Elsa and Mickey to Princess Leia and Iron Man, Disney’s vast vault of characters is a near-endless resource with limitless revenue potential for both companies.

    State of the metaverse

    Meta may have gone to the trouble of renaming itself after the metaverse, but when solving for the future, the company formerly known as Facebook got the equation backward. By focusing on VR hardware, a market the company mostly had cornered after buying Oculus in 2014 for $2 billion, Meta wound up with a solution in need of a problem — a how without a what. Apple’s new Vision Pro, while technically very impressive, may hit a similar adoption wall.

    While Meta was obsessing over building its Oculus acquisition into a mainstream consumer product, companies like Epic, Roblox, Minecraft-maker Mojang and others were developing avatar-driven virtual worlds where people loved spending time. Importantly, those worlds are widely available and hardware agnostic, meaning that a PlayStation 5 player could square off in a fight against someone on a PC or even an iPhone (Epic’s complex standoff with Apple notwithstanding).

    Horizon Worlds was Meta’s answer to those experiences — creepy legless avatars and all — but by then many millions of people were already invested in a virtual world that suits them, no headgear necessary. These social gaming worlds are all extremely sticky and people love hanging out in them, expressing themselves through virtual purchases and generally doing the whole thing sans VR.

    In light of their success, Epic, Roblox and Mojang all smartly positioned things we once thought of as games instead as platforms. Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft all host user-generated content, sometimes called UGC — a not very helpful acronym that means players can also upload their own game modes and virtual goods there for other players to try or buy. This content is very, very popular — according to Epic, 70% of Fortnite players play user-made content in addition to the core experience. Its what people think of when they talk about Roblox. For these companies, user-generated content doesn’t cost anything, keeps players coming back and can bring in low-effort revenue.

    Fortnite, Roblox, Minecraft and other avatar-based virtual worlds can co-exist, but Fortnite boasts some unique advantages. While its peers lean on their nostalgia-heavy looks, Fortnite’s high fidelity graphics and sophisticated animations (so sophisticated they’ve sparked more than one lawsuit over dance moves) are more future-proofed and brand friendly. Minecraft and Roblox are powerhouses in their own right, but the former is more of a game than an ecosystem and the latter will need to prove it can retain its young core users as they age up. Meanwhile, Epic commands a deep understanding of the ways people want to express themselves online and the technical prowess, and now partnerships, to make it possible.

    Online multiplayer games aren’t social networks in a traditional sense, but the two categories are converging, with games becoming more like social networks and social networks increasingly full of games. As the Fortnite cinematic universe expands to include Lego, Rock Band and now Disney, Epic is poised to introduce a huge swath of new players to a virtual world that’s as much about who you’re with as it is about what you’re doing — and wasn’t that the promise of the metaverse all along?

    [ad_2]

    Taylor Hatmaker

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: February 11, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: February 11, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Disney is back on track

    Even with all the iconic brands under its corporate umbrella, Disney has struggled the last few years, as its share price is down 11% since February 2019.

    Things might be looking up now that CEO-extraordinaire Bob Iger is back in the captain’s seat after “retiring” back in 2020.

    Disney earnings highlights

    All earnings and revenues for Disney, PayPal, McDonalds, and Eli Lilly below are in U.S. dollars.

    • Disney (DIS/NYSE): Earnings per share of $1.22 (versus $0.99 predicted), and revenues of $23.55 billion (versus $23.64 billion predicted). 

    Disney shares were up over 7% in extended trading on Wednesday after the earnings call. And the call highlighted the following reasons for increased profit guidance in 2024:

    • Disney will meet or surpass its goal of cutting costs by $7.5 billion this year.
    • The House of Mouse company will also invest $1.5 billion into a partnership with game software developer Epic Games.
    • Disney’s “experiences” division (think theme parks and cruises) saw a 7% increase in revenues versus last year. 

    Yet, the biggest Disney revelation this week came from its sports streaming division.

    With Amazon trying live football broadcasts this year, it appears the more traditional names in media have decided to fight back. 

    Disney (through its ESPN subsidiary), Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery announced joining forces to create a new sports streaming service. The planned platform has yet to be named, but it would feature current sports programming from ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, SECN, ACCN, ESPNEWS, TNT, TBS, TruTV, FS1, FS2, BTN, UFC, as well as the main ABC and Fox broadcasts. 

    Iger stated, “The launch of this new streaming sports service is a significant moment for Disney and ESPN, a major win for sports fans and an important step forward for the media business.”

    When you think about the possibilities of bundling a new live sports service with current Disney+, Hulu, and Max (the HBO streamer), you will have re-created a substantial amount of the old American cable bundle, plus streaming of classic movies and TV shows. Now, all we need to know is the price, and if and when it would be made available to Canadians.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • Sen. James Lankford Drops A Diss Bomb On Elon Musk

    Sen. James Lankford Drops A Diss Bomb On Elon Musk

    [ad_1]

    Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) responded to Elon Musk’s lies about the border bill by telling him to focus on the 2 million Teslas that are being recalled.

    What Did James Lankford Say About Elon Musk?

    On CNN, Jake Tapper asked Sen. Lankford, “A claim being circulated on Twitter by Elon Musk, who posted the long-term goal of the so-called border security bill, is enabling illegals to vote. It would do the total opposite of securing the border. I know Elon Musk is not an expert on illegal immigration or the border. But he has a huge megaphone. Explained what he is talking about. Is he wrong? ”

    Lankford responded, “He needs to go back to doing the 2 million Teslas currently being recalled to be able to focus on that. It is not focused on trying to get more illegals to vote. That is absurd. It is against the law for anyone that is not a citizen of the United States to be able to vote in the U.S. In any federal election. That remains so. We are not dealing with that. I’ve heard people say you are not taking on illegal voting. So I’m going to oppose the bill. Neither did HR 2  that came out of the House that so many people said was the perfect border security bill. It also did not deal with any issues of voting because the bill was seen as a border security bill not a voting issue bill. ”

    Video:

    One of the biggest changes since Elon Musk bought Twitter has been the reputational damage that Musk has done to himself and his companies with his social media posts. Musk has revealed himself to be a fool who spreads hatred, division, and misinformation in his posts.

    Sen. Lankford was the principal negotiator for Senate Republicans on the border bill. He is also just about as conservative as it gets in Congress.

    Lankford has spent months negotiating with Senate Democrats and the White House on this substantial and historic legislation only to watch members of his own party lie about it and refuse to put the bill up for a vote in the House.

    The Senator seems frustrated, and he clearly isn’t going to take any crap from Elon Musk.

    A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

    If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

    We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.

     

    [ad_2]

    Jason Easley

    Source link

  • Elon Musk Says Tesla Workers to Sleep, Live in Texas Factory | Entrepreneur

    Elon Musk Says Tesla Workers to Sleep, Live in Texas Factory | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    This article originally appeared on Business Insider.

    Elon Musk warned Tesla workers to prepare for a challenging production ramp-up as he previewed plans to build a mass-market vehicle.

    The Tesla CEO said on the company’s Wednesday earnings call that building Tesla’s next-generation EV, set to enter production in 2025, will require Tesla workers to live and sleep on the manufacturing line at the company’s Texas factory.

    “We really need the engineers to be living on the line. This is not sort of an off-the-shelf ‘it-just-works’ type of thing,” Musk told investors.

    “That will be a challenging production ramp,” Musk said. “We’ll be sleeping on the line, practically. Not practically, we will be.”

    It wouldn’t be the first time Tesla workers have reportedly had to sleep on manufacturing lines to meet the company’s production deadlines.

    A former worker at Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California, told The Verge that employees would sleep on the factory floor after 12-hour shifts. Musk has said he slept beneath his desk while spending “three years straight” basically living in Tesla’s manufacturing facilities.

    Musk said that Tesla’s next-generation vehicle, which Reuters reported is a mass-market, affordable EV codenamedRedwood,” is set to enter production in the second half of 2025 at the company’s Texas Gigafactory — though he admitted that he is often optimistic with timing, and could not yet predict how many of the vehicles Tesla would initially produce.

    Tesla workers could face a heightened form of what Musk previously dubbed “production hell” during Tesla’s 2017 Model 3 ramp-up.

    “There’s a lot of new technology, a tremendous amount of new revolutionary manufacturing technology here,” Musk said.

    “I am confident that once it gets going, it will be head and shoulders above any other manufacturing technology that exists anywhere in the world. It’s next level,” he added.

    The billionaire has hinted for years that Tesla plans to release a cheaper EV expected to cost below $30,000.

    It comes as the company is under increasing pressure from Chinese EV manufacturers prioritizing more affordable vehicles, with the Chinese EV manufacturer BYD recently overtaking the U.S. automaker as the world’s largest producer of electric vehicles. But BYD does not yet sell its cars in the U.S.

    Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, made outside normal working hours.

    [ad_2]

    Tom Carter

    Source link

  • Viral video of Tesla driver wearing Apple Vision Pro headset raises safety concerns

    Viral video of Tesla driver wearing Apple Vision Pro headset raises safety concerns

    [ad_1]

    A viral video of a motorist seeming to let Tesla’s new Cybertruck drive itself while wearing the new Apple Vision Pro headset is sounding alarm bells at the highest levels of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

    Despite their names, Tesla’s assisted driving features — Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving — do not mean the vehicles are fully autonomous, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg said Monday on social media.

    “Reminder — all advanced driver assistance systems available today require the human driver to be in control and fully engaged in the driving task at all times,” Buttigieg posted on X (formerly Twitter).

    Buttigieg’s tweet came in reply to a video that had more than 24 million views of a Tesla driver taking his hands off the steering wheel while apparently controlling a virtual reality display of the kind used by Apple’s Vision Pro. The 23-second clip was posted on February 2, the day the pricey Vision Pro hit stores shelves in the U.S

    Apple specifically cautions against using the Vision Pro while driving in its users guide. “Never use the device while operating a moving vehicle, bicycle, heavy machinery, or in any other situations requiring attention to safety,” it states. 

    Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. 

    The electric automaker in December recalled more than 2 million vehicles across its model lineup to fix a defective system that is supposed to ensure drivers are paying attention when they use the Autopilot feature.


    Apple Vision Pro headset presale begins

    03:49

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2021 launched an investigation into Tesla over crashes that resulted in more than a dozen fatalities involving Tesla’s driver-assisted features. The agency late last year told CBS News its probe found Autopilot’s means of ensuring drivers are paying attention to be inadequate.

    Autopilot can steer, accelerate and brake automatically in its lane, but can’t drive itself. In a report filed with NHTSA, Tesla said Autopilot’s controls “may not be sufficient to prevent driver misuse.”

    The driver of the Tesla in the video told Gizmodo that he made the video with friends as a “skit” and drove the vehicle while wearing the Apple headset for 30 to 40 seconds. 



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Toyota is crushing it with hybrid vehicles as Tesla’s rough start to year hits net worth of Elon Musk, who dismissed them as a ‘phase’

    Toyota is crushing it with hybrid vehicles as Tesla’s rough start to year hits net worth of Elon Musk, who dismissed them as a ‘phase’

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk’s Tesla is off to a difficult start in 2024, and it’s probably no surprise to Akio Toyoda. The Toyota chairman has long been skeptical of electric vehicles hype, steering his company to focus more on hybrids. That’s turned out to be a smart strategy.    

    Tesla shares are down about 24% year-to-date, knocking Musk off his perch as the world’s richest man, an honor now bestowed upon French luxury tycoon Bernard Arnault.

    Investors did not react well to Tesla’s fourth-quarter earnings, when the EV maker warned that this year’s sales growth might be “notably lower” than last year’s—not reassuring when it cut prices in 2023 to prop up demand. In California, a key market, registrations of Teslas actually fell in the fourth quarter, the first time that’s happened there in more than three years. 

    Toyota, by contrast, can’t make its hybrids quickly enough, and demand for them is strong without price cuts. The Japanese giant was the world’s top-selling carmaker for the fourth year in a row in 2023, selling 11.2 million vehicles globally, a respectable 7.2% increase from the previous year.

    Tesla sold 1.8 million vehicles, in comparison, jumping an impressive 38% year over year.

    Hybrids over EVs 

    Toyoda, however, does not believe that electric vehicles will take over the world. Last month, he predicted that adoption of EVs will peak at just 30%, saying they’ll share the roads with hybrid, gas-guzzling, and hydrogen-powered cars.

    Hybrids, meanwhile, have been on a tear, not just for Toyota but for other automakers as well, including Ford and Honda. From January to November in 2023, hybrids accounted for 9.3% of new light vehicle registrations, beating EVs by 1.8 percentage points, reported Reuters, citing S&P Global Mobility data, and Toyota was the biggest seller of hybrids in the U.S., with more than a third of the those registrations.

    Edmunds wrote on its website in mid-December that the hybrid market share in the U.S. increased to 9.7% in November 2023, a 99% jump from the year prior, whereas the EV share increased just 25%. “The transition to full EVs has slowed, and hybrids are the more comfortable choice for the majority of Americans seeking electrified options right now,” it added.

    For many consumers, hybrids have the feel-good factor of burning less fuel than normal cars—friendlier on the environment and the wallet—without the range anxiety and other doubts surrounding EVs. (Hybrids maximize efficiency by alternating from gas to battery power.) It also helps that hybrids are priced much closer to traditional cars than are EVs.

    Toyota, which will report earnings on Tuesday, with analysts expecting a strong quarter, does sell EVs, but despite their rapid sales growth they make up just a sliver of its shipments.

    The carmaker has taken pains to emphasize that it is not “anti-EV” but rather lets consumers choose which type of vehicle they want and offers each king. Toyoda hinted at his philosophy a few years ago when he said, “Toyota is a department store of all sorts of powertrains. It’s not right for the department store to say, ‘This is the product you should buy.’”

    To be sure, Toyota has its problems, among them recent recalls and, last month, the suspended shipments of 10 vehicle models due to testing irregularities for engine certifications. And some industry observers fear the auto giant will be caught flat-footed if consumers switch the EVs faster than it expects. 

    But it clearly called things right with regards to hybrids, if not in the long run then certainly for now.

    In 2011, Musk laughed at the electric vehicles made by Chinese rival BYD, which recently passed Tesla in global EV sales. And in 2022, Musk dismissed hybrids as a “phase,” saying it was “time to move on” from them. 

    But many car buyers, we now know, do not feel the same way.

    Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.



    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • Tesla settles for $1.5 million after allegations of illegally disposing hazardous waste

    Tesla settles for $1.5 million after allegations of illegally disposing hazardous waste

    [ad_1]

    An environmental investigation by the San Francisco district attorney’s office that began in 2018 and spurred similar inquiries throughout the state concluded Thursday, when a San Joaquin County judge ordered Tesla to pay $1.5 million for improperly disposing of hazardous materials.

    The individual efforts turned into one combined civil environmental prosecution by 25 district attorneys from Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura and other counties into allegations that Tesla improperly disposed of used lead acid batteries, antifreeze, paint and electronic waste at its car service and energy centers throughout California.

    The electric vehicle giant was also placed on a five-year injunction, which includes training employees to properly dispose of hazardous materials. Tesla must also hire an outside contractor to audit some of its trash containers for hazardous waste.

    “While electric vehicles may benefit the environment, the manufacturing and servicing of these vehicles still generates many harmful waste streams,” San Francisco Dist. Atty. Brooke Jenkins said in a statement. “[Thursday’s] settlement against Tesla, Inc. serves to provide a cleaner environment for citizens throughout the state.”

    Tesla lawyers did not respond to a request for comment.

    In 2018, the San Francisco district attorney’s Environmental Division launched undercover inspections of trash containers at Tesla service departments. Investigators found that hazardous waste such as lubricating oils, brake cleaners, aerosols and contaminated debris were not properly disposed.

    In court documents, the plaintiffs allege that Tesla placed hazardous waste into “any trash container, dumpster, or compactor at the facilities” or improperly outsourced the materials to transfer stations and landfills not suited for hazardous waste.

    In Alameda County, inspectors found weld spatter waste, which sometimes contains copper, along with paint mix, used wipes with primer and other hazardous waste dumped into ordinary trash containers at Tesla’s Fremont factory.

    Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer and Riverside County Dist. Atty. Mike Hestrin both said in statements that their own inspections at Tesla facilities “found similar unlawful disposal.”

    Neither office responded to a Times request for elaboration on what was found and where.

    “A company that is supposedly environmentally friendly should know better than to illegally dump hazardous waste that threatens to do irreparable damage to our communities,” Spitzer said in a statement.

    Of the settlement money to be paid, $1.3 million will be split up among the 25 counties, while $200,000 pays for the cost of investigations.

    Alameda County is slated to take the largest share, $225,000. San Francisco and San Joaquin will each claim $200,000; San Diego, Orange and Riverside will get $100,000; Los Angeles, $15,000; and Santa Barbara, San Bernardino and Ventura, $10,000.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew J. Campa

    Source link

  • Making sense of the markets this week: February 4, 2024 – MoneySense

    Making sense of the markets this week: February 4, 2024 – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Facebook thrives—the rest of tech, not so much

    While all four of the tech titans that announced quarterly earnings this week managed to beat their predicted earnings and revenue targets, only Facebook announced earnings that really got investors excited.

    Big tech earnings highlights

    All numbers below are in U.S. currency.

    • Microsoft (MSFT/NASDAQ): Earnings per share of $2.93 (versus expected of $2.78) and revenues of $62.02 billion (versus $61.12 billion predicted).
    • Alphabet (GOOGL/NASDAQ): Earnings per share of $1.64 (versus expected of $1.59) and revenues of $86.31 billion (versus $85.33 billion predicted).
    • Meta (META/NASDAQ): Earnings per share of $5.33 (versus $4.96 predicted) and revenues of $40.1 billion (versus $39.18 billion predicted). 
    • Apple (AAPL/NASDAQ): Earnings per share of $2.18 (versus $2.10 predicted) and revenue of $119.58 billion (versus $117.91 billion predicted).
    Source: CNBC

    With Meta, often referred to as Facebook, announcing excellent ad revenue growth, decreased expenses, and even introducing its first-ever dividend ($0.50 a share, paid in March), it was no surprise to see share prices pop in after-hours trading on Thursday. That said, the 14% surge (on top of a 12% year-to-date gain) caps off an incredible run for Facebook that has seen the share price quadruple since November 2022. This good news comes despite the virtual reality unit at Facebook losing $4.65 billion this quarter (which is about what the entire company of Air Canada is worth as a comparison).

    When Microsoft and Alphabet released earnings on Tuesday, it was puzzling to see the solid earnings results lead to substantial drops in share prices for both companies. This price movement was likely due to sky-high expectations that led to outsized price run-ups in 2023 and the first month of 2024. 

    Considering that bigger picture is important, as Microsoft is still up over 7% year to date, and Google (despite an 8% loss on Wednesday) is up nearly 2% so far in 2024.

    Both Google and Microsoft announced that their cloud computing services were large growth vectors, and that layoffs were in the works in the name of cost-cutting and efficiency.

    Apple had similar earnings results to Google and Microsoft, as they beat their earnings projections but share prices were down 4% in after hours trading on Thursday, as several red flags were apparent in their quarterly earnings numbers. Most notably, a 13% sales decrease in China, and decreased revenue guidance for iPhones going forward. The stock is basically flat year-to-date.

    CP and Brookfield keep a steady hand on the profit tiller

    On our side of the border this week, the notable earnings calls included Brookfield Infrastructure and CP Rail.

    Canadian earnings highlights

    All figures in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated.

    • Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIP/TSX): Earnings per share came in at a loss of USD$0.20 (versus positive USD$0.11 predicted) and revenues were USD$4.97 billion (versus USD$2.03 billion predicted).
    • Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP/TSX): Earnings per share came in at $1.18 (versus $1.12 predicted) and revenues were $3.78 billion (versus $3.68 billion predicted).

    Before you get too worried about those wonky results from Brookfield, keep in mind that their reported numbers are often quite complicated to make sense out of due to their unique corporate structure and accounting practices. Given that the massive infrastructure conglomerate is often buying and selling large utilities, its quarterly numbers can look misleading. In this instance, the market took the news in stride, as BIP was up over 1% on the day.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Prevost

    Source link

  • Tesla recalls 2.2 million cars — nearly all of its vehicles sold in the U.S. — over warning light issue

    Tesla recalls 2.2 million cars — nearly all of its vehicles sold in the U.S. — over warning light issue

    [ad_1]

    Tesla is recalling almost 2.2 million vehicles — nearly all of the cars that it has sold in the U.S. — because the font size is too small on its instrument panel for its brake, park and antilock brake system warning lights. 

    That makes the lights hard to read, increase the risk of a crash, according to a recall notice filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The font size violates federal safety standards, according the agency.

    The vehicles being recalled include:

    • 2012-2023 Model S
    • 2016-2024 Model X
    • 2017-2023 Model 3
    • 2019-2024 Model Y
    • 2024 Cybertruck vehicles

    A January 30 report posted by NHTSA noted that Tesla is not aware of any crashes, injuries or deaths linked to the incorrect warning light fonts.

    Tesla is fixing the vehicles by releasing a free, over-the-air software update. The automaker will also mail owner notification letters starting March 30. 

    Separately, the NHTSA on Thursday said it has opened a preliminary evaluation about reports of power steering problems with some Teslas. The report noted that it has identified 2,388 complaints about drivers losing steering control in some 2023 Tesla Model 3 and Y vehicles. 

    NHTSA said it has started an engineering analysis about the issue, a step taken before issuing a recall.


    Tesla recalling more than 2 million vehicles to fix a safety issue with its autopilot feature

    02:28

    Tesla has issued a series of recalls in recent weeks. The company January recalled nearly 200,000 vehicles in the U.S. because the backup camera can malfunction while the car is in reverse.

    In December, Tesla also recalled more than 2 million vehicles across four different models to fix a flaw in its Autopilot system. That followed a years-long investigation by NHTSA into a series of crashes, some deadly, related to the Autopilot technology. 

    —With reporting by the Associated Press.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest predicts waning EV sales will balloon, hitting 74 million cars annually by the end of the decade

    Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest predicts waning EV sales will balloon, hitting 74 million cars annually by the end of the decade

    [ad_1]

    Forget about anything you may have read about the waning hype around electric vehicles. According to ARK Invest founder Cathie Wood, EVs are only just starting to take off.

    In her firm’s annual “Big Ideas” report published on Wednesday, the asset manager predicts the new battery-powered cars sold last year could soar by a third every year to reach 74 million in 2030 — all of which will at least be technically capable of driving autonomously. By comparison only about 10 million EVs were delivered to customers last year. 

    “As battery costs continue to decline, EV prices should fall, potentially driving exponential growth in unit sales,” the report argues.

    At an average selling price of $20,000 each, that represents a grand total of more than $1.4 trillion in annual revenue potential for EV carmakers, who she anticipates will pocket a tenth of that as profit before interest and tax. 

    The flip side is this will all but wipe out demand for internal combustion engine cars as total global new vehicle sales only hit 100 million in 2030, barely more than what was sold in the peak year of 2017. This may cause a “death spiral for incumbent auto manufacturers”, ARK Invest warns.

    EV makers struggling to reach Tesla’s scale

    Wood is known for her love of moonshot technologies tipped to render existing ones obsolete in five to 10 years, and to better predict trends deliberately employs research analysts from specialist fields rather than from conventional Wall Street backgrounds. 

    She first earned a reputation as a star investor for her prescient bullish bets on Tesla, which Wood argues should hit $2,000 in 2027, largely because Musk will have by then solved autonomous driving, what he calls Tesla’s “ChatGPT moment”. 

    Nonetheless her firm acknowledged that many EV manufacturers are struggling to scale profitably. So far only Tesla and BYD have proven they can ramp operations fast enough to achieve the kind of cost advantages their competitors can only dream of. 

    “Many are pulling back from the market […] because the already-profitable market leaders are cutting prices aggressively,” ARK Invest wrote, citing General Motors, Volkswagen and Ford delaying some of their EV capacity expansion plans.

    Volvo Cars abandons Polestar in its hour of need

    One competitor that has struggled to scale is Sweden’s Polestar. The company should be ideally placed to benefit from the EV revolution in China and Europe, as it combines clean Scandinavian design and a premium brand positioning with a low-cost manufacturing base outsourced to partners to minimize cash burn. 

    In practice however, Polestar has been unable to scale fast enough to finance itself internally, growing vehicle sales by just 6% in 2023. 

    Now, large Polestar shareholder Volvo Cars said on Thursday it will cease any and all further funding and revealed plans to reduce its 48% stake in the company, in part through a “distribution” of stock to its own investors including its Chinese parent company, Geely.

    “Our focus is on developing Volvo Cars and concentrating our resources on our own ambitious journey,” the Swedish premium carmaker said.

    Seeking to reassure his investors all was not lost, Polestar CEO Thomas Ingenlath praised what he called the “continued cooperation with Volvo Cars” in other areas of the business, such as manufacturing. He also welcomed Geely’s interest to potentially step into the breach, before claiming talks to plug a $1.3 billion financing gap were “well advanced”.

    So given the recent gloomy news in the EV industry, why is Wood’s ARK Invest so bullish? The asset manager bases its call on a conviction that the cost for batteries will tumble 28% every time their production output (measured not in units but kilowatt hours) doubles. 

    Come 2040, ARK Invest anticipates applications for battery technology will experience their own “Cambrian explosion”—a reference to the most intense burst of rapid-fire evolution Earth has ever seen. This should enable flying taxis to transform urban landscapes by that point.

    Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Christiaan Hetzner

    Source link

  • Elon Musk can’t keep $55 billion Tesla pay package, Delaware judge rules

    Elon Musk can’t keep $55 billion Tesla pay package, Delaware judge rules

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk may not keep a Tesla pay package worth more than $55 billion, a Delaware judge ruled on Tuesday, saying that the Tesla CEO and his company failed to prove that the massive payout was fair.

    The ruling comes five years after a shareholder lawsuit accused Musk and Tesla’s board of directors of breaching their duties to the electric vehicle manufacturer, wasting corporate assets and unjustly enriching the billionaire.

    Tesla shares slid 4% in after-hours trading.

    Musk had testified in November that he didn’t attend any meetings where the plan was discussed by Tesla’s board or its compensation committee, and denied that he had a hand in setting the terms of the payout. But Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen McCormick wrote in her ruling that Musk and his attorneys failed to prove that the compensation plan was fair.

    “[T]he defendants bore the burden of proving that the compensation plan was fair, and they failed to meet their burden,” McCormick wrote in the decision, which was posted online by Bloomberg News.

    She added that Musk, Tesla and their attorneys also failed to prove that the milestones that Musk had to meet to receive the pay package were difficult to reach, and said that other parts of their defense failed to make their case.

    “The defendants maintained that the plan is an exceptional deal when compared to private equity compensation plans, but they did not explain why anyone would compare a public company’s compensation plan with a private equity compensation plan,” she added. “The defendants insisted that the plan worked in that it delivered to stockholders all that was promised, but they made no effort to prove causation.”

    After the judge released her ruling, Musk wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware.”

    —With reporting by the Associated Press.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Five Big Tech companies with combined market value of over $10 trillion to report earnings this week

    Five Big Tech companies with combined market value of over $10 trillion to report earnings this week

    [ad_1]

    Investors wondering where the S&P 500 is headed, at least for the next month or so, will want to pay attention to three key days this week.

    Between Tuesday and Thursday, five Big Tech companies with a combined market value of more than $10 trillion will report earnings: Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc., Meta Platforms Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve will issue its decision on interest rates, followed by Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference where he’s expected to discuss the outlook ahead.

    The stakes couldn’t be much higher, with the S&P 500 Index pushing deeper into record territory on bets that central bankers are poised to began easing monetary policies and tech behemoths like Microsoft getting more valuable by the day.

    “Tech disproportionately moved the market last year and big tech continues to have the biggest earnings power, so the results will be crucial for the markets,” said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Independent Advisor Alliance.

    After a shaky start to the year, the S&P 500 is rising again and on pace for a third monthly advance that’s added more than 18% since late October, when the index hit a near-term low before Fed officials started signaling that rate hikes were over. 

    The rally is again being led by megacaps including Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon.com, Nvidia and Meta Platforms, which were responsible for a majority of the index’s 24% gain last year as investors became captivated by the possibilities of artificial intelligence services. The so-called Magnificent Seven, which also includes Tesla Inc., just hit a record 29% of the S&P 500 despite a slump in shares of the electric-vehicle maker that’s erased more than $200 billion in market value just this month.

    AI Booming

    Microsoft and Alphabet will kick off earnings on Tuesday after markets close. The two companies are among the best positioned to benefit from the AI boom after investing heavily in the field for years. Microsoft has been adding the features to its suite of software products, and investors are betting that AI will soon start boosting profit and sales growth.

    On Wednesday, the focus shifts to the end of the Fed’s January meeting, where it’s expected to hold interest rates steady for a fourth-consecutive meeting. Traders will be primarily focused on what Powell and other policymakers have to say about the timing of easing. Recent data showing inflation continuing to recede and resilient US economic growth suggest central bankers won’t be in a hurry to cut interest rates.

    Apple is the biggest draw on Thursday, when Amazon and Facebook-owner Meta Platforms also report in the afternoon. The iPhone maker has been dogged by concerns about revenue growth and is expected to report its first sales expansion in four quarters.

    Read more: Apple veteran instrumental to iPhone development leaves for electric-vehicle maker Rivian: ‘Now is the time for me to move on’

    With most of the megacaps in record territory, there are concerns that investors are over exposed to just a handful of stocks, which could open the door for some pain if quarterly results underwhelm.

    The Magnificent Seven stocks were again named the most crowded trade in a Bank of America survey of fund managers, according to a research note published by the bank last week.

    No Protection

    Still, traders aren’t rushing to scoop up hedges against declines, according to options market data.

    A gauge of projected price swings in Apple in the next three months is hovering near the lowest level in six years. Traders expect a 3.3% move in the stock in either direction a day after the results, which would be among the narrowest post-earnings swings in two years.

    Projected three-month volatility in Meta Platforms, which more than quadrupled since its November 2022 nadir, is at the lowest in two years. The cost of protection against a 10% decline in Microsoft in the next month is hovering near the lowest level since August relative to the cost of options that profit from a similar rally.

    Tesla demonstrated the risks last week after missing fourth-quarter earnings estimates and warning that its sales growth would be “notably lower” in 2024. The stock tumbled 12% the following day, its biggest drop in a year.

    Microsoft recently overtook Apple as the world’s most valuable company with a market value above $3 trillion. The rally has made the stock even more expensive, at 33 times profits projected over the next 12 months compared with an average of 24 times over the past decade.

    To Jason Benowitz, senior portfolio manager at CI Roosevelt, there’s no doubt the megacap trade is crowded. But that doesn’t mean the stocks can’t continue to rally with economic growth slowing and easing financial conditions.

    “There’s a good reason for the crowded trade,” he said. “The environment is good for them.”

    Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.

    [ad_2]

    Jeran Wittenstein, Elena Popina, Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Forget Tesla: Consider These 2 Millionaire-Maker Stocks to Buy Instead

    Forget Tesla: Consider These 2 Millionaire-Maker Stocks to Buy Instead

    [ad_1]

    Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has been one of the best-performing stocks on the market over the last decade as it proved that electric vehicles (EVs) can be a viable business, and even a highly profitable one. However, recently, Tesla stock has been looking surprisingly mortal. The stock trades down by roughly half from its peak in 2021, and its fourth-quarter earnings report shows why the stock has faded.

    Tesla’s revenue growth continues to slow and profits are falling, and that pattern continued in Q4. Automotive revenue rose 1% year over year to $21.6 billion, and overall revenue was up just 3% to $25.2 billion. These metrics reflect the impact of lower prices as the company looks to stay competitive, gain market share, and overcome headwinds from higher interest rates.

    As a result of lower prices, operating income fell 47% year over year to $2.06 billion, and adjusted earnings per share fell 40% to $0.71. Tesla missed estimates on the top and bottom lines, and it also forecast slower production growth in 2024.

    Seemingly, Tesla is less of a millionaire-maker stock than it was two years ago. What’s an ambitious investor to do with this news? If you’re looking for growth stocks that can help make you a millionaire, keep reading.

    A Tesla Model 3 driving down a wintry road.

    Image source: Tesla.

    Nvidia has powerful tailwinds pushing it higher

    Tesla and every other artificial intelligence (AI) stock can’t make their technology without the help of one company, and that’s Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA).

    Nvidia stock soared over the last year as its chips are in extraordinarily high demand from companies like OpenAI, Oracle, Meta Platforms, and Tesla, among others. Nvidia, which invented the graphics processing unit (GPU), has a significant head start over its rivals. AI systems like OpenAi’s ChatGPT and autonomous vehicle systems like Tesla’s full self-driving rely on massive training models that use the kind of chips and accelerators Nvidia makes.

    That strong demand should help power Nvidia stock higher this year as it’s coming off a third quarter in which revenue tripled year over year and its generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) profit rose by 12x.

    As profits have soared, the company’s valuation has come down, and it appears to be set for another strong year in 2024 as cloud infrastructure companies and others are still rapidly building out their AI infrastructure. This should favor Nvidia.

    General Motors is more profitable than Tesla

    Tesla made its name in electric vehicles, but there are signs of slowing demand for EVs that could spell trouble for Tesla and its peers. It also creates an opening for traditional automakers like General Motors (NYSE: GM) whose stocks got hammered as investors chased EV stocks and abandoned legacy automakers.

    As a result, GM stock now trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of just 5. GM may not offer the same growth potential that Tesla does, but the company has a growing EV and autonomous vehicle (AV) business in Cruise, whose rollout has taken a pause after San Francisco regulators suspended operations.

    GM remains more profitable than Tesla and is reporting solid growth with a 14% increase in vehicles sold to 2.6 million. That’s a strong growth clip for a mature business and from a stock priced for no growth. Notably, that’s also significantly faster than Tesla’s Q4 revenue growth.

    GM’s low valuation also gives the company a greater opportunity to return cash to shareholders. In fact, the company announced a $10 billion accelerated share repurchase program in November and raised its dividend by 33% to $0.12 a share.

    Considering the growth in its legacy car business and its investments in electric vehicles and autonomy, GM should be able to bridge the gap with EVs and AVs when the time comes. If GM delivers another strong earnings report, the stock could soar.

    Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now?

    Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:

    The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

    Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than tripled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

    See the 10 stocks

     

    *Stock Advisor returns as of January 22, 2024

     

    Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has positions in Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms, Nvidia, Oracle, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and recommends the following options: long January 2025 $25 calls on General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Forget Tesla: Consider These 2 Millionaire-Maker Stocks to Buy Instead was originally published by The Motley Fool

    [ad_2]

    Source link